August 21 – 27, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… Kristen Brown should get your vote … Greensite… on Cowell Water Quality backstory… Steinbruner… bad legislation, water, water, water, County Fair… Hayes… back next month … Patton… A Book I Do Not Plan To Read … Matlock… …empty venues for empty heads…sunsetting red hats…quoth the albatross, meow… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… James Veitch… Quotes on… “Boomers”

...

PACIFIC AVENUE & COOPER STREET. That would now be Cinema 9 , Palace Art & Office Supply and Peet’s Coffee + Tea on the left. Pacific Wave is on the right where it says County Bank. Any and all car experts should respond asap and tell us what year this was taken…please???

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: August 21, 2024

KRISTIN BROWN FOR SECOND DISTRICT COUNTY SUPERVISOR. First, Barry Scott connected with me then I heard from Aidan Hosler. Both familiar and very active community members. They both wrote the following report. And I’m repeating their opening  paragraph just in case you haven’t become familiar with Kristin.

“Kristen Brown won the endorsements of Santa Cruz for Bernie, PV Dems, and the Democratic Women’s Club as well as Supervisors Cummings and Hernandez. Add to these Kristen’s endorsements by several unions, the Lieutenant Governor, California Transportation Commissioner Carl Guardino, and Rod Diridon, Sr.”

Beware, Greenway has found their pick for Supervisor, District 2, in Kim DeSerpa.

Greenway founder Bud Colligan, Greenway spokesman Jack Brown, and Trail Now director Brian Peoples have all endorsed Kim DeSerpa’s candidacy against progressive Kristen Brown. We can expect Kim to join Manu in efforts to erase our rail transit options and serve the wealthy in other ways if elected.

There’s more going on here than transportation and the Rail Trail.  Short-term rental owners and agents have come to her support, much to the chagrin of housing advocates.  And Kim seems to support excluding the public from coastal access:

Kim has earned the endorsements and support of key culprits in the infamous Beach Drive Blockade that extinguished public access to a beautiful public right of way at Rio Del Mar Beach.

The California Coastal Commission issued the largest-ever fines to the HOA and two owners last year for their refusal to restore access.

Two six-foot-high chain-link fences were built last February without the required Coastal and County building permits but the wealthy out-of-county owners don’t feel obliged to follow rules like the rest of us.

Kim DeSerpa’s website lists an endorsement of Gaurav Singh, one of the owners who received the record-setting fine.

Jim Vadaugna held fundraisers in his Beach Drive patio for Manu Koenig and Kim DeSerpa. (see flyers below)

Kim’s campaign contributions list five apparent Vaudagna family members, all living over the hill and each contributing a maximum of $550 to her campaign.

(this Netfile link appears to not work right)

Like Greenway’s Manu Koenig, Kim is endorsed by the Coastal Property Owners Association; Candidates who have committed to supporting “the rights of coastal property owners”, which apparently means shutting out the public from our walkways.   CPOA Endorsements

Manu and any new allies like DeSerpa will continue to work against rail and trail.  I just witnessed 2 more ugly bike accidents that could have been prevented if Manu had stopped blocking progress on segment 8.  DeSerpa will allow him greater opportunity to work against the will of the public and, frankly, public safety.

Please support Kristen Brown for District Two Supervisor, no matter where you live!
The Board of Supervisors directs policy that impacts ALL of us in all five districts, so we need to pay attention and support those who will support us.

Kristen won the endorsements of Santa Cruz for Bernie, PV Dems, and the Democratic Women’s Club as well as Supervisors Cummings and Hernandez.

Add to these Kristen’s endorsements by several unions, the Lieutenant Governor, California Transportation Commissioner Carl Guardino, and Rod Diridon, Sr.

votekristenbrown.com 

Aidan Hosler,
Sustainable transportation advocate and business owner
Santa Cruz

LADY IN THE LAKE. Apple series (5.9IMDB). *** Natalie Portman (who is now 43 years old) plays a Jewish author in the 1960’s Baltimore. There’s some black politics thrown in and the plot gets lost after some extreme editing. The entire plot is reversed and not as well thought out as they figured. Don’t give up anything important to watch this.

EXIT PLAN. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE). **** An insurance investigator checks in to a very special hotel in Denmark exclusively inhabited for patients who make their own plans on dying. Then he too realizes that he’s dying from a tumor. It’s an excellently told and deep and depressing story about assisted suicide. Full of time and personality shifts you’ll be transported into moments thinking about your own demise. Watch it when you’re in a good mood only.

MIDNIGHT RUN. (1988 RELEASE) (NETFLIX MOVIE) (7.5 IMDB). *** An absolutely brilliant comedy plus crime plot that will have you rolling on the floor with pathos and delight, see it again even if you remember the best scenes. It stars Robert De Niro as the cop and the ever subtle Charles Grodin as the robber being escorted across country by De Niro. The laughs are both outrageous and subtle and the rest of the cast looks like outcasts from The Sopranos.

VANISHED INTO THE NIGHT. Netflix movie (5.2 IMDB) ** An Italian family’s two children are kidnapped and a huge ransom is demanded. The acting is poor, the plot is questionable and only Santa Cruz small boat owners will stay awake to solve the twists and inadequacies.

LAND OF BAD. Netflix movie (6.6 IMDB) *** An unexplained battle that happens in South Africa and the Philippines within our own armed services, namely the air forces versus the infantry! It’s high tech adapting to traditional military systems. It’s probably all very true but the presentation is slow and boring.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Prime series. **** (7.8 IMDB) An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it. I’ve repeated this review because too many folks forgot the title.

GOYO. Netflix series. (6.5 IMDB)  *** Hard to believe and follow this tearful drama from Buenos Aires. It’s about a museum guide who has Asperger’s. We get to look at his sex life, how he loses control, and his new love of the beautiful woman guide that changes everything.

A MAN IN FULL. Netflix series (6.5 IMDB) ***  Jeff Daniels at his very best acting (not so much) costars with Diane Lane in this drama centering on his real estate empire and all the complex issues we find in real estate everywhere. Lucy Liu plays a big part in it too as we watch his partial control over himself and his holdings mostly disappear inside banks, attorneys, and drawn out office scenes.

ROALD DAHL’S ESIO TROT. Prime movie. (6.9 IMDB) * The top name cast has Dustin Hoffman and his chasing of Judi Dench while Richard Cordery leads us on this boring, predictable, comedy. It’s another back balcony upstairs/ downstairs over used plot. Hoffman is very disappointing when you start thinking back to his classic and serious films, he’s 87 years old now.

THE ASUNTA CASE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) *** Another Spanish movie based on a true story about a local couple whose adopted Chinese daughter is found murdered. Even the police are suspected of the crime. Mistakes are made, the story stays tight, worth watching.

GANGS OF GALICIA. Netflix series (6.3 IMDB) *** A Spanish murder adventure about a woman whose father gets murdered, so she goes inside some drug cartels to find out and get revenge on whodunit!! Great seaside- water footage. With boats and police everywhere.

SUNNY. Apple series (7.3 IMDB) ** A Japanese comedy starring Rashida Jones who loses her husband and has a robot replace him. There’s way too much mugging, drinking, and undirected reactions to make this worth watching…avoid it

DESPERATE LIES. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB) *** Juliana Paes takes the lead in this Brazilian re-take after re-take about childbirth. It appears that she got drunk, went to bed with two guys and got pregnant from both of them….and had twins! Complex, barely believable, only a bit humorous, but you will stay focused.

...

August 19, 2024

THE STORY BEHIND PUBLIC RELATIONS: COWELL BEACH WATER QUALITY

Inspiration for a BrattonOnline topic just didn’t materialize over the weekend. There is no shortage of national and international issues but I’m no expert and some of my views aren’t popular. For example, the Russian attack on Ukraine was anything but unprovoked but the propaganda has been successful and venturing into that topic I’ve found is not productive. Local issues are a different matter.

Chatting on Facetime with my son and grandchild I asked for some suggestions. Calliope, who is seven suggested I write something kind. “It’s not nice to laugh at someone because of who they are”, she volunteered. You can’t argue with that. I asked her if someone is being hurtful or untruthful is it ok to tell them to stop doing that? She agreed that is ok. Since the main purpose in my writing these pieces is to dig up the truth on local issues and sift out the public relations veneer, I offer the following and hope Calliope will approve.

Cowell Beach Off the Beach Bummer List

As many know, for over a decade, Cowell Beach topped the list of the ten most polluted beaches in California. The then Mayor, David Terrazas, formed a sizable working group of city and county staff and non-profits to tackle the problem. I represented the Sierra Club on the group. The task was to find the source or sources of pollution and eradicate them. Water samples are collected weekly at three spots on Cowell Beach, along with many other shoreline testing sites in the county. Cowell’s pollution was unique in that it occurred during the summer months rather than the more typical winter rainy months and is largely confined to a near shore area on the westside of the Wharf. I admit to experiencing frustration as the monthly meetings turned into years and the aim seemed more about changing which testing is done rather than isolating and removing the sources of pollution. As a year-round swimmer at Cowell’s, I was more than a little self-interested. Plus, the area of pollution was mostly populated by children playing in the shallow water.

Shoreline seaweed and marine mammals had been excluded as possible sources due to a prior study from a Stanford researcher. That, and nearby sewer laterals had been fixed, plus the city stated Neary Lagoon wasn’t a source. I hypothesized that one source may be canine, given that there is a beach around the corner, It’s Beach, that has become a de facto dog beach with the currents flowing west to east towards Cowell’s. Plus, as you see from the recent photo above, plenty of people ignore the posted No Dogs sign at Cowell’s, chasing off the migratory shorebirds that come to rest and feed. Canines as a possible contributing factor seemed plausible. DNA source testing of water samples is used in the lab. to pinpoint whether the source of a high indication of bacteria is from human, bird, canine, or marine mammal. Bovine can be sourced but cows did not seem likely.

One group member’s cell phone had a dog barking ringtone which should have been a tip-off that my suggestion for canine source testing would be ignored, as indeed it was, repeatedly. Sometimes accompanied by a snigger. After a couple of years of monthly meetings that to me seemed repetitive and going nowhere, one member showed a photo of a pigeon under the Wharf with a bird poop dropping on the wet sand. So, a plan took off. No source testing was done but expensive stainless-steel meshing was installed under the Wharf for 200 feet at a cost of $50,000, to prevent the pigeons roosting. In 2017, for the first time in a decade, Cowell’s was not top of the Beach Bummer list but was #3. It still received an F grade for the summer months. The following year, 2018, Cowells was #8. Better than #1 but still a long way from acceptable. The bird netting was helping but the other sources remained a mystery.

Then, despite the city’s claim that the outfall from Neary Lagoon, seen in the photo above, was not a contributing factor, major steps were taken by the city to address this drainage. Sliding gates were deployed at Neary Lagoon to control the flow of bacteria-laden water from the storm drain outlet onto Cowell Beach during the summer months. A steel gate was installed at the Neary outfall pipe to divert high-bacteria water to the City’s Wastewater Treatment Facility where it is treated and disinfected before being discharged into the ocean. And subsequently, Cowell Beach disappeared from the Beach Bummer list and success was declared.

Despite these other measures, birds still take the major rap. This year’s City’s press release of 8/1/24 as well as last year’s press release has the following entry near the top:

A major breakthrough came in 2017 when the source of the pollution — primarily birds roosting on and near the Wharf — was identified and managed.

The other measures are lower down near the end of the press release. And all the news outlets dutifully follow the city’s lead in centering the birds as the major cause of the pollution. Maybe not a huge issue but it is not accurate. A lot of public monies can be squandered when spin replaces accuracy. As for the days when the water at Cowell’s still tests high for pollution, although not cumulatively high enough to rate a spot on the Beach Bummer list, I have suggested that two samples be taken during such times, with one sample subject to source testing for human, canine, and bird. So far that suggestion has been ignored. Science is about testing hypotheses. Politics is too often about cherry picking and spinning the results. Improving water quality should be the former, not the latter and that is the kindest thing I can say.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

A BAD PIECE OF LEGISLATION
In the wake of Soquel Creek Water District imposing steady rate and fee increases, making water unaffordable for some, the legislature is poised to pass a horrible law, AB 2257, that would take away any ability of ratepayers to legally challenge utility rate increases as invalid. Assemblymember Lori Wilson is the author.

Consider this:
“This bill would prohibit, if a local agency complies with specified procedures, a person or entity from bringing a judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with the constitutional provisions for any new, increased, or extended fee or assessment, as defined, unless that person or entity has timely submitted to the local agency a written objection to that fee or assessment that specifies the grounds for alleging noncompliance, as specified.”

AB 2257: Local government: property-related water and sewer fees and assessments: remedies. | Digital Democracy

The question is, what is “timely”?

A)That all written objections must be submitted within the written objection period set by the local agency pursuant to paragraph (4) and that a failure to timely object in writing bars any right to challenge that fee or assessment through a legal proceeding.
That means that at a time when most customers have no idea that a rate increase is in the works, they must provide written objection and explain why the proposed rates are to be challenged. If that is not done, all possibility of challenging rate increases is barred.

This amended bill is scheduled for a third reading.  Contact local Assemblymembers and ask them to vote NO on AB 2257.

Assemblymember Robert Rivas
Assemblymember Gail Pellerin
Assemblymember Dawn Addis

A GOOD GRASSROOTS MEASURE ON THE BALLOT TO CHALLENGE UNREASONABLE WATER RATES
Consider the current grassroots citizen petition Measure U on this November 5 ballot that was compelled by San Lorenzo Valley Water District customers fed up with unreasonable fixed rate increases that cannot be addressed with conservation.

A Yes on grassroots Measure U is your support for an equitable rate structure. Limiting fixed
charges will help make water affordable for those who use the least and spreads a Fair Share balance across all users.

The sharply rising Service Charge and proliferation of additional fixed charges has unfairly
shifted the primary cost burden onto low water users. Fixed charges have roughly doubled since 2021.

At the same time, the District lowered the price of water for most customers, foolishly
giving up over a million dollars a year while creating a rate structure that is upside-down,
where lower water users now subsidize higher water users. The purpose of Measure U is to
tilt the balance back to being more based on actual water usage and less about fixed
charges you must pay before using a drop of water.

Measure U is a grassroots answer to Unfair rates, and for an equitable rate structure.
Please vote Yes on Measure U.

Visit slvh2o.org
Measure U, argument for

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVES $50 MILLION BOND FOR RENTAL HOUSING IN LIVE OAK
Reliant – Seaside, LP, a California limited partnership (the “Borrower”) a
partnership of which Reliant Group (the “Developer”) or a related person to the Developer is the
general partner, has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”)
adopt a plan of financing providing for the issuance of exempt facility bonds for a qualified
residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
“Code”) in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such
exempt facility bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed
$50,000,000 in aggregate principal amount (the “Bonds”), to finance or refinance the acquisition,
rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of a multifamily rental housing project located at 1380
30th Avenue, Santa Cruz, California (the “Project”)
See item #9.

NEW DENSE HOUSING ZONES WILL NO LONGER REQUIRE PUBLIC NOTICE OR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Board of Supervisors met Tuesday and approved a new ‘Ministerial Combining Zone” that includes ___ parcels in Aptos and Live Oak that would allow developers to build whatever they want without having to hold public hearings or conduct any environmental review, as long as there are 20% of the units deeded as affordable to low-income residents.
See Item # 10.

About half of these would require approval by the Coastal Commission for a development permit because they are in the Coastal Zone (ocean side of highway One.)

A Planning Commission public hearing was held on June 12, 2024. During this meeting
the Commission requested modifications to the Resolution and Ordinance to include the
following:

  1. Reference to a minimum of 20% affordable housing in the Resolution with a “preference for at least 25% affordable housing”; and
  2. That the County notify the property owner at time of rezoning; and
  3. That notification of all property owners and residents be increased from the staff proposal of 100 feet to 300 feet of a parcel when subject to an application for development.

Staff has addressed the Planning Commission’s modifications as follows:
 Staff has removed any reference to the percentage of affordable units required.  The preference to increase the affordability requirement of ministerial projects from 20% to 25% is a larger project that would take time to study and understand the impacts of. Staff finds that this can be an “encouragement” to developers of future projects, but is infeasible to implement into the Ordinance at this time.

The current County Code requires notification to the property owner when a property is
rezoned. When Staff proposes a property specific rezoning, the property owner will be
noticed.

Staff has modified the Ordinance to include the increase in noticing distance into the
Ordinance. If an application is proposed within the Ministerial Combining District,
property owners and residents within 300 feet will be notified.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In November 2023, the County certified an addendum to the EIR prepared for the
Sustainability Update to address any environmental impacts of the 2023 Housing
Element and its programs under CEQA. No new significant impacts were identified
beyond those previously addressed in the EIR. Therefore, no additional CEQA analysis
is required for this Ordinance.
 The Addendum may be reviewed online here

ISN’T THIS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
Why would Supervisor McPherson try to push his authority to rezone ag land out of production in order to so obviously streamline direct benefit Central Coast Community Power (3CE)?
County Supervisor Bruce  McPherson really pushed to get approval of four large parcels to be rezoned for large battery energy storage sites  with a new overlay zoning district and Ordinance to return to the Board on September 24.  Planning Staff said they knew nothing of these parcels and requested six months to do environmental analysis inherent to large battery storage.  McPherson said NO, and insisted it return to the Board on or before the second meeting in October.

“You really want to get this done before you leave office, don’t you?”  I could not help but say the obvious from the audience.  There were no images or drawings of what these sites would look like, or analysis of hazards inherent (think about the recent fires at the Moss Landing battery facility).

Supervisor McPherson and  CAO Palacio are both Board members of the 3CE Community Power governance board.
[Governing Boards – Central Coast Community Energy]

Isn’t it a conflict of interest for them to be using their authority to shove approval to rezone parcels for battery power storage that will directly benefit 3CE? Watch the video presentation and discussion of Item #11 at the August 13 Board meeting and see what you think. (click on item #11 to go directly to that part of the Board meeting).

YET ANOTHER TAX PREYING ON YOUR CONCERN ABOUT WILDFIRES
This November 5 ballot includes Measure Q, “The Clean Water and Wildfire” measure to forever collect $87/parcel countywide.  The County Fire Chiefs Association filed Argument Against this measure for good reason.
Measure Q, Argument Against

Government (and now non-profits) have sold tax increases to the public by promising better fire protection.  Measure G in 2018 was so egregious it prompted investigation by the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury.  Grand Jury Measure G Report

Measure B promised the same: B – County TOT Favor 622
This was the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) increase approved in June, 2022.

Santa Cruz City Measure E also pounced on concerns for clean beaches and waterways:
Clean River, Beaches and Ocean Fund

How can voters be assured the money raked in by the County of Santa Cruz with Measure Q on the November 5 ballot will do anything close to what proponents claim it will?  Who would decide how that anticipated $7.3 million every year forever would get spent?  The “citizen oversight” would be the same hand-picked Advisory Committee, appointed by County Supervisors and one from each of the four incorporated cities.

Make no mistake…this is yet another money grab to benefit the County’s coffers while also allowing large non-profits to belly up to the trough.

Read the 16-page documentation carefully, know that the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, Sempervirens and Peninsula Open Space paid big money for signature gatherers to get this “citizen’s initiative” Parcel Tax on the ballot and allowed to pass with 50% + 1 rather than 2/3.

Word has it that a former County Supervisor has used influence to shove this along to benefit his former analyst, who now heads up the County Department that stands to win bloated salaries and more staff if Measure Q passes.

Just vote NO on Measure Q.

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT GETS NEW WELL PAID FOR BY STATE TAXPAYERS
As part of a large State Dept. of Water Resources (DWR) grant, Soquel Creek Water District is constructing a brand new well on Cunnison Lane in Soquel.

The new well will have an estimated depth of 500 to 600 feet. Based on groundwater modeling and analyses, this new well could extract an average of 400 acre-feet per year (afy) and serve to redistribute groundwater pumping away from the coast.

The raw water will be piped to the nearby Tannery Well, which has had many problems with production over the past year.

In reading the August 20, 2024 Soquel Creek Water District Board Operations and Maintenance report, I see that the other well that would be used as the actual treatment facility site for the Cunnison Well raw water will be the Tannery Well.

Consent Item 4.5

Operations staff are collaborating with Engineering and Black & Veatch to provide input during the 30% design phase of the Cunnison Well Construction and Tannery Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
project.

• On 1/13/2023, the Tannery well failed after running for 2.5 hours at an average flow rate of 800
gallons per minute (GPM). Operations staff determined that the motor needed replacement.
Maggiora Bros. Drilling, after evaluating the motor (rebuilt in 2019), recommended a new
replacement. The new motor was installed on 3/2/2023, but initial tests revealed a reduced flow
of 660 GPM. After adjustments, the flow improved to 700 GPM, though the issue remained
unresolved, resulting in a 100 GPM loss from Tannery WTP production.

Following consultation with Montgomery and Associates, the District hired Maggiora Bros. to
pull the well equipment for inspection and video analysis. The inspection revealed no clear cause
for the reduced flow. Subsequently, the District contracted the company PumpMan under an
existing pumping services blanket agreement to inspect the pump and provide a report. The
inspection indicated that while the pump was in adequate condition, the lateral adjustment might
have been too high. The column pipe, though intact, requires replacement, and the video showed
the well itself is in good health but in need of preventative maintenance

(see pages 63-64)

I found the EIR Addendum, approved by the Board last December, to accommodate the Cunnison Well treatment facility changes

There is a good map on page 15 showing where the Tannery Well is located and where the raw water pipeline will go.

Page 23 describes the construction at the Tannery Well:

The Tannery Well site would not include drilling construction activities because there would be no new well installations. The modified project would only expand the existing treatment facility to include treatment capacity originally proposed to occur at the Cunnison Lane site in the WMP, and construct an underground pipeline that would run from the Cunnison Lane site to the Tannery Well site.

There is a discussion of noise impacts, and a map on page 25 of noise monitoring stations during the construction phase.

What is not discussed is the chemical hazard associated with the chlorine treatment facility at the Tannery Well.  What form will the chlorine being used for treatment be?

If you are concerned about this, please contact Soquel Creek Water District Board <bod@soquelcreekwater.org>  Maybe they will respond.

Below is the construction site with protective noise mitigation.

The well drilling requires large volumes of water for construction and flushing.  The District is using a nearby hydrant for that supply.  I wonder if there will be “Baker Tanks” set up for dechlorination before the chemically-reactive water is injected into the groundwater?   And does Fish and Wildlife know about the impending well flushing that will get dumped into the stormwater drain and creek leading to Noble Creek? Hmmm….

THE GULAG  NEXT TO THE MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND WILLOWBROOK PARK IS GONE
Maybe it was because you and others contacted Soquel Creek Water District about how unsightly the chainlink fence with barbed wire enclosure was that they were compelled to make it less offensive.    Although the PureWater Soquel Project Willowbrook Injection Well no longer looks like a gulag, the purpose of injecting treated sewage water into the pristine groundwater drinking water supply is still offensive.

Here is how that injection well site looks now….

but below is what the gulag used to look like, next to the Montessori School and  Willowbrook Park.

And below is what another injection well at Twin Lakes Baptist Church looks like, still nicer consideration than what the Montessori School was afforded:

APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT MOVES ALONG WITH PLANS TO ELIMINATE PUBLIC PARKING
Last week marked a five-year anniversary of the Hihn Apple Barn conversion opening as New Leaf Market in the Aptos Village.  Although some store spaces are still vacant, the next phase of construction to make more is marching along, with plans to eliminate public parking on Aptos Creek Road.

Parking is nearly non-existent for people who want to ride bikes or walk into the Forest of Nisene Marks State Park, with the extremely narrow Aptos Village Way closed to public parking and construction crew vehicles gobbling up much of what remains.

A BEAUTIFUL BOX OF ART IN APTOS VILLAGE
Even though the Aptos Village Project is  hideous, a recent piece of “Outside the Box” artwork on a utility box near Aptos Creek Road and Soquel Drive is lovely.  The artist did not sign their work…maybe you know who they are?

It is beautiful.

APPLY TO SERVE ON THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FAIR BOARD
The Santa Cruz County Fair Board has a few vacancies and in fact, has not always been able to gather a quorum recently to conduct business.

The Board needs three people, maybe four, to assure a quorum  and conduct the Fair’s business. The seats are appointed by the Governor.

Apply here.

If you want to help keep the Santa Cruz County Fair and Fairgrounds the gem in the Community that it is, both for private events and County emergency evacuation sheltering, please consider applying.  Things have calmed down a bit since former CEO Dave Kegebein got fired due to a scathing Performance Audit by the State, but the Board really needs people who care about the Community and are willing to ask questions of the new CEO.

Maybe that is you or someone you know.

By the way, the Santa Cruz County Fair is coming up!  September 11-15.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  READ YOUR BALLOT INFORMATION CAREFULLY AND THINK ABOUT THOSE OF FIXED INCOMES WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE ONSLAUGHT OF PROPOSED TAXES.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE BY JUST DOING ONE THING THIS WEEK.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Grey will be back in September!

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#227 / A Book I Do Not Plan To Read

The image above is taken from the Berkeley Journalism website. It depicts Michelle Goldberg, a columnist for The New York Times. Goldberg’s “What I Cover” statement on The Times‘ website indicates that she focuses her writing on “politics and culture from a left-leaning, feminist point of view.” In early August, Goldberg did a book review in The Times that was titled as follows: “JD Vance Just Blurbed a Book Arguing That Progressives Are Subhuman.”

As someone who identifies as a “progressive,” I was naturally interested, and I read Goldberg’s column.

The book Goldberg reviewed is titled, Unhumans, at least that is the title that Goldberg used in her  column. The full title of the book is significantly longer, as follows: Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions (and How to Crush Them). Goldberg is correct that vice presidential candidate JD Vance did recommend the book, although Goldberg charitably suggests in her column that Vance may well have “recommended Unhumans without actually reading it, a practice that’s not unheard-of in book publishing.”

Goldberg’s hypothesis that Vance may have endorsed Unhumans without having read it is charitable, in one sense (stand by to learn more about the book), but it is not very flattering in another. A political candidate who would make an endorsement and recommendation without having any real knowledge of what he is talking about is not someone whom I’d like to put a heartbeat away from the presidency, and as Goldberg quite properly says, “unless and until he credibly distances himself from it, we should take [Vance] at his word that he shares the book’s analysis. After all, some of the language in Unhumans resembles his own rhetoric.”

As far as I know, Vance has taken no action to “distance himself” from Unhumans, or to repudiate his book jacket recommendation. Thus, let us accept the fact that Vance actually agrees with what Unhumans says.

Let me tell you what Unhumans says, as outlined by Goldberg – first noting, before listing the claims made in the book, that the author of the book, Jack Posobiec, is “best known for promoting the conspiracy theory that Democrarts ran a satanic child abuse ring beneath a popular Washington Pizzeria.”

Goldberg identifies the following claims made in Unhumans:

  • “Leftists” don’t deserve the status of human beings.
  • “Leftists” are “waging a shadow war against all that is good and decent which will end in apocalyptic slaughter if they are not stopped.”
  • “Leftists” are “opposed to humanity itself, [and] “place themselves outside of the category completely in an entirely new misery-driven subdivision, the ‘unhuman.'”
  • “Progressivism” is “just the latest incarnation of an ancient evil dating back to the late Roman Republic and continuing through the French Revolution and Communism today.”
  • “Democracy has never worked to protect innocents from the ‘unhumans.'”
  • Francisco Franco, who overthrew the democratic Second Spanish Republic in the country’s 1930s civil war, is a “great man of history,” properly compared to George Washington, and Franco was correct about good governmental policy when he said that “we do not believe in government through the voting booth.”

Thanks to Michelle Goldberg, I can delete Unhumans from my “must read” list. That’s a book I do not plan to read.

And what about the Trump-Vance presidential ticket? Well, Michelle Goldberg certainly gives me another reason to be sure to vote on November 5th, and to vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, not the Trump-Vance ticket. I do not want to help elect a vice presidential candidate who has endorsed views like the ones listed above, and I don’t want to vote for a presidential candidate who has done the same – which former president Trump actually has done, though I doubt has read any books about that (or about much else, either)!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

SWIFTIES TO THE RESCUE? SCRAWLING POLI-SCI 101 IN THE DEAD OF NIGHT, VASELINE COVERED CRAZY

Presidential candidate Donald Trump will soon have to drop his popularity indicator of rally crowd size if he starts paying attention…hoping that your are not, of course! He is denying the reports of his audience starting to trickle away at his Wilkes-Barre, PA rally, which took place to begin with in a venue that started off with rows and rows of empty seats with unclaimed ‘Trump-Vance’ campaign signs. In spite of photographic- and video-proof, The Donald shot back, “We had to turn away lots of people yesterday…but Comrade Kamala Harris’ Social Media Operation showed empty seats, long before the Rally started, early in the afternoon when, in actuality, we had to turn away 11,500 people!” Perhaps he meant 11,780 people since that number has such meaning for him, particularly in his effort to overturn the Georgia state election in 2020…and we can be assured that staff was outside with hand-counter clickers to back him up with an accurate count of those sent packing. Ramblin’ on, Trump added, “She should have never been Vice President, and had to stage a COUP of Joe Biden, with her America-hating friends, Barrack Hussein Obama, Crazy Nancy Pelosi, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, and the rest. Comrade Kamala is a STONE COLD LOSER, and she will FAIL and, if she doesn’t, our Country will cease to exist as we know it, turning into a Communist, Crime Ridden Garbage Dump. November 5th will be the Most Important Date in the History of the U.S.A. It’s as simple as that!”

The bearer of bad tidings, USA Today reporter, Zac Anderson, who was in attendance, writes that as Trump’s ‘speech’ hit the one-hour mark, people were headed for the exits, though the former president directed his critical remarks toward Harris, later posting that his opponent, “…is a LIAR, and shouldn’t even be allowed to run for Office!” Former Republican Jeff Timmer flagged the post about empty seats, writing, “Looks like someone woke up on the gibbering, barking, panicked side of the bed today.” Ron Filipkowski, a former prosecutor, commenting on the high number of posts the subject spawned, said, “Panicked Trump completely melts down. He’s coming apart.” Republicans Against Trump highlighted his desperation, after discovering he had posted ‘Swifties for Trump’ using AI-generated photos of supposed Taylor Swift fans displaying the slogan on t-shirts…below which Trump wrote, “I accept.” Conservative Army Iraq War Veteran Peter Heinlein laughingly posted, “LOL…I mean…this is uniquely pathetic, even for Trump.” Another Trump post features another AI-generated photo of Kamala Harris posing before a communism-themed rally, prompting former Republican lawmaker Chris Vance to post, “I guarantee you this moron couldn’t write a coherent PoliSci 101 answer to the question, ‘What is communism?'”

The Palmer Report’s Robert Harrington writes that he is gratified by the current political polls, acknowledging that polls can be erroneous, so he derives greater comfort from crowd size, coupled with its enthusiasm…for him, a metric that is more telling than the theoretical. Harrington admits that Trump would agree with him…in theory. He is buoyed by the fact that Harris and Walz filled the 20,000 seat arena in Phoenix, while Trump on the same day, only filled half of the 7,000 seats in a Montana arena. Trump’s Phoenix rally the previous week, same venue, was much smaller…with photo evidence for proof. Desperate MAGA posters claim, it’s ‘reported’ the Harris-Walz rally was attended by vetted, paid actors, the majority being flown in to the closed-to-the-public venue. Harrington counters with his charge that, “It is being reported by the voices in your head…an obvious lie…have to be loony to believe it…you would have to be a Republican, but I repeat myself.” “Besides,” he maintains, “…bribing 20,000 people to a rally is something a sane person would never consider. It would immediately leak. How do we know this? Trump has tried it many times…and it always leaked.” Bocha Blue writes on Palmer“Something is happening. He has matriculated at the University of Psychotic Criminals. Witness the anger, the wild lies, the FUTILITY in every letter he writes. Something is different. Here’s what is it…the madness has claimed him…from dawn to dusk…no longer confined to a few mad scrawls in the dead of night.”

Recent comments reported by Jack Dunn of Variety, from the ‘Variety, Rolling Stone Truth Seekers Summit’ as seen on Paramount+, a panel discussion with Yamiche Alcindor of NBC NewsKaty Tur of MSNBCCNN anchor Abby PhillipPBS News Hour co-anchor Geoff BennettCBS Mornings co-host Tony Dokoupil for the Politics in the Zeitgeist, and moderator Ramin Setoodeh of Variety, emphasized that transparency in the journalistic process is more important than it’s ever been. Alcindor remarked that “truth is fact,” a simple definition to which not everyone subscribes. She recalled, as a PBS reporter, she was hit with tear gas outside St. John’s Episcopal Church as protesters were cleared to allow then-President Trump to pose in front of the church directory sign holding up a Bible.  Her report of the incident on PBS was promptly labelled a lie by the government, then a couple of days later it was admitted that people were gassed…“not exactly tear gas.” Bennett responded, “People often assume bias on the part of us as journalists because they don’t fully understand how we do the work we do, and to the degree that we are able to be more transparent about how we do that news gathering and how we pull it together, is good. It’s good for the work we do and it’s good for our democracy.”

Tur says Trump has remained the biggest story in political reporting since he ran in 2016, and although he is unpredictable, he is “self-aware” and operates on “gut reaction” regarding how he communicates with his supporters. “He has an instinct of how to behave in front of a camera and in front of a crowd. That’s why you saw him raise his fist after he was almost assassinated. I was one of the first people that covered him, so it was often just me and him at rallies. I was the only reporter he knew. So he would come up to me, and call me a lot. He is very magnetic, he’s very charming. And when he doesn’t think he can charm you any longer, he’ll get very angry, and that’s when he starts to attack,” Tur notes. She continued, “My discomfort here is, we interview him and we don’t get a lot out of it. It’s not as if we are covering all the crazy things he says. The headline is, ‘Donald Trump Gives Long, Meandering Speech, Agrees to Debate Kamala Harris.’ That puts Vaseline over the crazy of what he’s saying. This is a guy who tried to stay in office because he wanted to…he tried to do it in 2016 when he thought he was going to lose, and he is starting to do it again.”

Dace Potas of USA Today writes that Trump “erred greatly in selecting JD Vance as his running mate,” displaying his overconfidence in facing Joe Biden and leading him toward prioritizing the MAGA legacy. Everything shifted when Biden dropped out, endorsing Harris, making the Vance misstep painfully clear. The election changed, leaving The Donald with his Ohio Albatross, blowing up his confidence and that of his Republican base and their willingness to follow along. Trump has jeopardized the election and his own legacy, handing the Democrats the momentum on a silver platter, yet in his cockiness he remains his own worst enemy. Potas says as of July 15, Trump had an implied 66.2% chance of winning in November, but since that time his chances have dropped by over 20 percentage points, with his opponent having to do almost nothing…the biggest factor benefitting Democrats is that Trump is electoral poison. His narcissism may cost the GOP once again, in his choice of Vance, and by taking over the RNC as a family organization, assigning the party platform to himself…further sowing divisions rather than building bridges of cooperation. Potas concludes, “In reality, the best thing for Democrats is GOP incompetence and Trump’s own ego. This has been true the whole time.”

From digital media company, The Dispatch“Kamala Harris is hardly even bothering to campaign in the conventional way against Donald Trump. And why should she? Joe Biden beat Trump in 2020 without running a real campaign against him, either. Trump’s three big problems as a candidate are precisely the same qualities that mitigated the worst of what might have been a much worse Trump presidency the last time around: He is lazy, he is stupid, and he is childish.” Terming this description as analysis, rather than name-calling, and being the most relevant traits of The Donald, we should be accept this on its face value! The Dispatch believes “…laziness is most hurtful for Trump, unable to get his mouth and his brain in gear, as he speaks in half-understood generalities…dishonest ones at that! His stupidity is wrapped up in his laziness. Anyone who has heard Trump speak or read his unedited writing knows he is not an especially intelligent man. But his native stupidity is compounded by his ignorance, which is to say, by the fact that he is too lazy to do his homework and acquire the kind of grasp of the issues that would make him a more effective candidate. But he won’t do his homework, and he may not have the raw brainpower to simply file away enough mental notecards to get the job done. There is a reason he wanders all over the place in his speeches…it isn’t only arrogance and self-centeredness…he’s dumber than nine chickens. That’s why he was an incompetent real estate investor even though he was a successful reality-television grotesque. He isn’t the first dumb person to find success in the celebrity business, where stupidity seems to be an asset. All of this is made worse by his childishness when he goes into rooms full of possible donors and supporters and bores them to death with tales of how the 2020 election was stolen, or his blubbering about the unfairness of Biden and Harris trading places to make him suffer. His penchant for using demeaning nicknames as a substitute for political argument might be thought of as an aspect of his laziness or his stupidity, but it is, at heart, part of his childishness…he doesn’t need to run a conventional campaign because he is a very special little boy. I am not quite sure that I believe the maxim that ‘character is destiny.’ Stupidity, on the other hand…”

JD Vance continues to get his derogatory comments about Trump’s 2016 candidacy thrown at him, but as The Lincoln Project says, “Trump’s found his anti-Pence who will do or say anything to be next in line…there’s no zealot like a convert.” And, ClimatePower.us reminds us the Ohio senator has pulled in $340K in donations from Big Oil since 2019 for his vote to dismantle EPA protections…member in good standing of Club GriftPeople for the American Way describes Vance as a former never-Trumper who fully embraces the most extreme MAGA policies, as an election denier, a supporter of Project 2025 – Trump’s lapdog for this proposal, and an advocate of the white nationalist’s racist ‘great replacement theory.’ Vance joins the chorus in describing immigration as an ‘invasion’ that will replace ‘real’ – make that read, ‘white Christian’ – AmericansSteve Schmidt blames the ‘stupidity’ of Chuck Schumer in not funding the $5M needed for Democrat Tim Ryan’s Senate campaign, allowing Mitch McConnell to put the GOP’s $40M to get Vance his ticket to the Senate seat. He says it’s only history now and we can point a finger at Donald Trump, Jr. for his pushing JD into the VP candidate slot for his daddy. Both Don Jr. and brother, Eric, must have glossed over a 2021 Vance quote that hits squarely upon dear ol’ dad; Vance said, “One of the great tricks that I think the sexual revolution pulled on the American populace, was convincing people in ‘unhappy,’ or ‘even violent’ marriages that getting divorced would ‘make people happier in the long term.'” He also criticized people who “shift spouses like they change their underwear.” Oopsie!

Anti-woman Vance’s spiel about “miserable, childless cat ladies with no direct stake in America’s future,” has gained him few fans, yet he continues to double down with this attack, against Democrats in particular. His stance is not enhancing his favorability ratings which range from -5 points overall, to -16 points in his stomping grounds of OhioWisconsinMichiganIllinois, and Indiana…the region that knows him best like him even less than the remainder of the country. Where’s Sarah Palin, or Dan Quayle, when you need them!? Satirist Andy Borowitz writes, “In a move that infuriated her Republican opponents, Kamala Harris announced that her economic plan would include a $10,000 tax credit for households with cats. “For too long, Americans with cats have shouldered an unfair burden,” said Harris, who revealed that a household with multiple cats would receive $10,000 per cat. Shortly after her announcement, Sen. JD Vance alleged, “Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, and their far-left cronies are plotting to turn America into a giant litter box.” “Mark my words,” Vance said. “If the Democrats are elected, millions of cats will come swarming over the border to give birth to anchor kittens.”

Vance seems unwilling to face reality when pressed about the GOP’s sluggish poll numbers. “Consistently, what you’ve seen in 2016 and 2020 is that the media uses fake polls to drive down Republican turnout and to create dissension and conflict with Republican voters,” he claims. Sounds reasonable and valid, huh? Forward!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Boomers

“Boomers are idiots. We went from Sex, Drugs, & Rock ‘n Roll to Fox News.”
~Mark Cuban

“The baby boomers are getting older, and will stay older for longer. And they will run right into the dementia firing range. How will a society cope? Especially a society that can’t so readily rely on those stable family relationships that traditionally provided the backbone of care?”
~Terry Pratchett

“Every generation trash-talks younger generations. Baby boomers labeled Generation X a group of tattooed slackers and materialists; Generation Xers have branded millennials as iPhone-addicted brats.”
~Neil Blumenthal

“We have been so successful in the past century at the art of living longer and staying alive that we have forgotten how to die. Too often we learn the hard way. As soon as the baby boomers pass pensionable age, their lesson will be harsher still.”
~Terry Pratchett

“Baby boomers don’t go out as much, they aren’t interacting with each other and they would rather stay home and watch TV. That’s the audience for a guy like me, unless I’m doing ‘Bad Santa.'”
~Billy Bob Thornton

...

James Veitch is one of my favorite British comedians. This short clip should show you why.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 14 – 20, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… keeping up with the mailings… Greensite… on Tourism Trumps Rape and Domestic Violence Prevention in the City of Santa Cruz… Steinbruner… back soon!…Hayes… Both sides are wrong… Patton… MAGA On The March… Matlock… a joyful campaign…holding up the fort…a turn to orange?…call Elon or AAA?… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… Live at Daryl’s House Quotes on… “Hawaii”

...

“HELP” opens at the Del Mar August 11, 1965. This was almost exactly one year before their final concert at the Candlestick. Has there ever been such fan support for any group, any music in history?

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: August 14, 2024

SOME THOUGHTS… BrattonOnline readers… I think it’s not just important but necessary that all our readers/subscribers see and pay attention to a lot of the mass mailings that are flooding our “windows” and boxes. This arrived to me late last week. Give it your best attention…

Dear Friend of The Nation, and BrattonOnline…  it’s Jane Fonda. I’m reaching out about a vital training series I’m hosting with Greenpeace USA Votes. But first, let’s talk about what’s at stake:

Donald Trump’s “Drill, baby, drill” agenda and the alarming Project 2025 plan pose significant threats to our environment. Project 2025 is a comprehensive strategy developed by Trump’s allies to dismantle climate regulations and promote fossil fuel expansion, effectively reversing decades of environmental progress.

I am ready to do whatever it takes to make sure the pro-climate majority is victorious at the ballot box this year. That’s why I’m teaming up with Greenpeace USA Votes, Sunrise PAC, Working Families Party, and amazing political leaders including Stacey Abrams to launch the Build, Lead, Win: Climate Action Training 2024!

Starting August 15th, we’ll gather every Thursday for five weeks to dive into strategies for mobilizing our communities, turning out voters, and securing big climate wins this November.

Each session will feature insights from top movement leaders, organizing experts, and special guests. We’ll cover everything from building community power to mastering persuasion techniques. I’m thrilled to reveal our exciting lineup of speakers. You’re going to love them.

What: Build, Lead, Win: Climate Action Training 2024
When: Starting August 15th, every Thursday for five weeks
Who: Hosted by Greenpeace USA Votes, Sunrise PAC & Working Families Party featuring Jane Fonda, Stacey Abrams, Aru Shiney-Ajay, Ella Barrett, Marshall Ganz, and more!
Where: On Zoom

This election is our last, best chance for climate action. If we don’t out-organize and out-mobilize the pro-fossil fuel machine, our future is at risk.

In 2020, we achieved record-breaking voter turnout in what many called the first true climate election in the U.S. This year, we need to build on that momentum and emerge victorious for the people and the planet.

This is your chance to be part of a dynamic network of changemakers. Whether you’re a new voter or a seasoned activist like me, this training series will provide the tools and inspiration to make a real impact.

SIGN UP

See you there!
Jane Fonda

LADY IN THE LAKE. Apple series (5.9IMDB). *** Natalie Portman (who is now 43 years old) plays a Jewish author in the 1960’s Baltimore. There’s some black politics thrown in and the plot gets lost after some extreme editing. The entire plot is reversed and not as well thought out as they figured. Don’t give up anything important to watch this.

EXIT PLAN. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE). **** An insurance investigator checks in to a very special hotel in Denmark exclusively inhabited for patients who make their own plans on dying. Then he too realizes that he’s dying from a tumor. It’s an excellently told and deep and depressing story about assisted suicide. Full of time and personality shifts you’ll be transported into moments thinking about your own demise. Watch it when you’re in a good mood only.

MIDNIGHT RUN. (1988 RELEASE) (NETFLIX MOVIE) (7.5 IMDB). *** An absolutely brilliant comedy plus crime plot that will have you rolling on the floor with pathos and delight, see it again even if you remember the best scenes. It stars Robert De Niro as the cop and the ever subtle Charles Grodin as the robber being escorted across country by De Niro. The laughs are both outrageous and subtle and the rest of the cast looks like outcasts from The Sopranos.

VANISHED INTO THE NIGHT. Netflix movie (5.2 IMDB) ** An Italian family’s two children are kidnapped and a huge ransom is demanded. The acting is poor, the plot is questionable and only Santa Cruz small boat owners will stay awake to solve the twists and inadequacies.

LAND OF BAD. Netflix movie (6.6 IMDB) *** An unexplained battle that happens in South Africa and the Philippines within our own armed services, namely the air forces versus the infantry! It’s high tech adapting to traditional military systems. It’s probably all very true but the presentation is slow and boring.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Prime series. **** (7.8 IMDB) An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it. I’ve repeated this review because too many folks forgot the title.

GOYO. Netflix series. (6.5 IMDB)  *** Hard to believe and follow this tearful drama from Buenos Aires. It’s about a museum guide who has Asperger’s. We get to look at his sex life, how he loses control, and his new love of the beautiful woman guide that changes everything.

A MAN IN FULL. Netflix series (6.5 IMDB) ***  Jeff Daniels at his very best acting (not so much) costars with Diane Lane in this drama centering on his real estate empire and all the complex issues we find in real estate everywhere. Lucy Liu plays a big part in it too as we watch his partial control over himself and his holdings mostly disappear inside banks, attorneys, and drawn out office scenes.

ROALD DAHL’S ESIO TROT. Prime movie. (6.9 IMDB) * The top name cast has Dustin Hoffman and his chasing of Judi Dench while Richard Cordery leads us on this boring, predictable, comedy. It’s another back balcony upstairs/ downstairs over used plot. Hoffman is very disappointing when you start thinking back to his classic and serious films, he’s 87 years old now.

THE ASUNTA CASE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) *** Another Spanish movie based on a true story about a local couple whose adopted Chinese daughter is found murdered. Even the police are suspected of the crime. Mistakes are made, the story stays tight, worth watching.

GANGS OF GALICIA. Netflix series (6.3 IMDB) *** A Spanish murder adventure about a woman whose father gets murdered, so she goes inside some drug cartels to find out and get revenge on whodunit!! Great seaside- water footage. With boats and police everywhere.

SUNNY. Apple series (7.3 IMDB) ** A Japanese comedy starring Rashida Jones who loses her husband and has a robot replace him. There’s way too much mugging, drinking, and undirected reactions to make this worth watching…avoid it

DESPERATE LIES. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB) *** Juliana Paes takes the lead in this Brazilian re-take after re-take about childbirth. It appears that she got drunk, went to bed with two guys and got pregnant from both of them….and had twins! Complex, barely believable, only a bit humorous, but you will stay focused.

FANCY DANCE. Apple movie. (6.6 IMDB) ** Executive directed by Forrest Whitaker and starring Michael Rowe. It’s all about Native Americans and their family structure and personal issues. It’s both sensitive and amateurish and lacks a forceful direction.

YOUR HONOR. Netflix series (7.6 IMDB). *** Bryan Cranston along with Hope Davis and especially Rosie Perez lead this New Orleans saga. The son of a crime boss is killed and it’s the judge’s son who gets the blame. Well worth watching.

HOUSE OF THE DRAGON. HBO series. *** I re-watched much of this series prequel to Game of Thrones just to check on how relevant and applicable it may still be. It definitely has lost the magic and charm, probably due to our increasing and improving the world. Game of Thrones was back in 2011 and had an amazing 72 episodes. House of The Dragon begins 17 decades before Game Of Thrones.

...

Tourism Trumps Rape and Domestic Violence Prevention in the City of Santa Cruz

The banner depicted above used to be a familiar sight in the city of Santa Cruz. Placed on light poles along major city streets during April for National Rape Awareness Month and October for National Domestic Violence Month, its purpose was to raise the visibility of crimes kept hush hush and hidden. The project was initiated in 2005 by the city’s Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women (CPVAW). It was approved by the city and by the Parks and Recreation Department that handled city street banner displays. Somewhere around 2016 the project was terminated, the banners disappeared, apparently stuffed somewhere in the basement under City Hall.

Fast forward to 2024. One member of the Commission is on record enquiring about the banners’ whereabouts and the possibilities for reviving the project. City staff said they would make enquiries. At the CPVAW meeting on August 7, 2024, staff shared the results of their research.  Control of city street banners has moved from the Parks and Recreation Department to the Economic Development and Housing Department. Word from that Department is that banners for tourism and business promotion are the only ones allowed. When a commissioner tentatively asked if perhaps staff could go back to that department and ask again, nicely, the response from staff was “I have reached the limit of my authority.” The conversation then switched to maybe having a banner outside the Civic Auditorium.

The CPVAW agenda also included item #5 on its response to the Civil Grand Jury report: “City of Santa Cruz: Preventing Rape and Domestic Violence: Where’s the Priority?” While City Councils and Board of Supervisors are required to respond to Civil Grand Jury reports that involve their jurisdictions, Commissions and Departments are invited to respond.

For each of the Grand Jury Findings there is a choice of Agree, Partially Agree or Disagree. For the latter two, an explanation is required.  For each of the Recommendations sent to the Commission there is a choice of Has Been Implemented, Has Not Yet Been Implemented but Will Be in The Future, Requires Further Analysis or Will Not Be Implemented. The Commission was invited to respond to four Findings and three Recommendations.

The Agenda Report Summary sheet for this agenda item stated that “After input from the City Manager’s office, City Attorney and Santa Cruz Police Department, staff has prepared responses for review.” For the four Findings, staff checked Disagree. For the three Recommendations staff checked Will Not Be Implemented for two and Requires Further Analysis for one.

The agenda packet for this agenda item did not include the full Grand Jury report, only its Findings and Recommendations. After the meeting I wrote asking that the full report be made available to commissioners so they can evaluate city staff response. I was told commissioners had received the full report in June. It was, however, not available in the agenda packet for the public.

The Commission voted to form an ad hoc committee to review staff response to the Grand Jury Report. Their input for consideration by the whole Commission will be on the September CPVAW agenda. Meanwhile the number of SCPD reported rapes in the city has reached thirty- two so far this year, one less than was reported for the entirety of 2023. The current failure to track rapes by strangers and inform the community with alerts if the assailant is still at large, as was the practice in the past, was considered by the Grand Jury to leave the community less safe. City staff does not agree with that Finding. We will see what CPVAW thinks. What do you think? Only public opinion can enforce Grand Jury recommendations.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

Becky will be back soon!

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Both Sides Are Wrong

A lot about voting for candidates seems driven by who we don’t want, rather than who we do want. One of the debates on the national level is around how democratic our government is and whether decisions are made that benefit more people rather than only a (richer) few. I want to take that focus to the local level with environmental matters.

Leading Local Environmental Challenges

I want to emphasize the most pressing matters concerning the environment at the local level. If you disagree, I’d like to hear from you. Any sane person would start with climate change; dealing with that global phenomenon is arguably best addressed at a state and, better still, national/international policy level. Locally, climate change can be addressed by reducing automobile emissions, increasingly relying on sustainable electricity generation, improving energy efficiency of homes and businesses, and increasing use of more locally produced goods, including food. Although linked to the prior, species conservation would be the next biggest local issue on my list; avoiding impacts on any rare species, stewardship/restoration of habitat, and improving habitat connectivity are the main means towards success here. The last of the big issues I want to highlight is environmental education: people need to understand what we need to do to address climate change and species conservation – that’s the way towards an informed citizenry, which is crucial to supporting the policies and the people that will make a better future.

Local Political Choices for Environmental Benefit

Reflecting on the three key areas listed above, think about who in elected office at the local level is leading, and in which areas. If you are like me, you will quickly realize that no elected official is leading on these issues, which are key to life on Earth. Instead, local governmental officials spend most of their time moving forward issues that do not relate to the aforementioned priorities or are even detrimental to the environment. As with the situation nationally, the agenda that local officials consider is largely determined by a very few people with related financial interests, and likewise, the benefits of elected officials’ decisions are generally directed at the very few. When one side of the political spectrum accuses the other of ‘fascism,’ or a politician suggests that they will be dictatorial, I wonder who in their right mind thinks that those traits are more likely to be applied by one party more than the other. What is your reaction to the people who accuse relatively ‘liberal’ local governmental officials of being dictatorial or fascist?

Project Examples

There are good examples of local initiatives exhibiting traits that subvert democracy. For instance, the development of Arana Gulch’s paved trail system, where the City was able to do exactly what it had decided was right decades before. In that case, there was significant public involvement, even opposing factions that collaborated to propose viable alternatives…and still the City decided to construct what you see now – ignoring long term costs that taxpayers are still beholden to. The City’s plan was extremely destructive to sensitive habitat and endangered species. In a similarly autocratic process, the City’s sale of the Pelton Street property out from under the Homeless Garden Project (HGP) and its half-heartedly apologetic and extremely novice plan to relocate the HGP to a lead-contaminated site at the Pogonip greenbelt is another such example. At the County level, we see no enforcement of protections for endangered species in wetlands, streams, and rivers, despite repeated calls to action. The County’s Rail Trail process is the current project that fails to instill faith in democracy: despite deep public engagement, there has been zero transparency about implementation of the environmental protection measures promised to the public. For example, see the paucity of information on the North Coast Rail Trail at this link: how hard would it be for more detailed updates, including plans to mitigate ($8 million worth!) or otherwise protect the many rare species affected by the project?

Process Examples

County Supervisors regularly ignore requests for species protections by appointed public advisors with the County’s Fish and Wildlife Advisory Commission including most recently requesting assistance from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that would have provided increased protection of sensitive critters across thousands of acres of public land on the North Coast. Elected officials’ active engagement with appointed advisory bodies are one hallmark of a more viable democracy, a great way to expand and broaden democratic decision making. The City of Santa Cruz likewise has a differently ill-used advisory committee named the Parks and Recreation Commission. That City Commission oversees many rare species on the City’s greenbelt but most of the individuals Council members have chosen to appoint to the Commission have no interest in, or knowledge about, species protections. Moreover, the City Council never asks that Commission to assist with strategies to conserve its greenbelt lands and the associated sensitive species.

Polarity

If these issues were part of the national presidential race, here are the two sides you’d hear:

  • Additional environmental protections are unnecessary, we have the most beautiful water, such wonderful air; we don’t need more regulations! The other party is trying to take away your liberty.
  • Don’t let the other party win, they will destroy the environment!

In the first case, you will note the very familiar anti-regulation fervor, which is increasingly being acted upon to the detriment of values that the vast majority of US citizens hold. In the second case, you will note the utter lack of commitment to policies that make a difference for the priorities I listed above concerning climate change, species conservation, and environmental education. These are choices about the speed and methods of destruction of nature, not whether it should occur.

Doesn’t it seem like these contrasting statements are repeated locally?

Answers

How do we improve the democratic process for environmental issues facing our local governments? For projects affecting the environment, public officials should learn from other areas where public process is taken seriously: a little research and they will find a wealth of highly rated examples of ways to improve community involvement for better outcomes. With regard to climate change, local governments need to report regularly to the public on how they are succeeding. The website on the County’s 2022 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan has no updates or reports on how the County is addressing the number one threat to our local environment. With regard to species conservation, County Supervisors should have better respect for the Fish and Wildlife Advisory Commission, which should be more heavily involved with advancing the species conservation principles of the 2024 County General Plan/Local Coastal Plan. And, insofar as environmental education goes, local governments could easily and affordably partner with nonprofits to increase environmental education for staff, schools, and citizens to foster pro-environmental behaviors that make a difference for local conservation. Of course, all of this would be more likely to happen if locals voted for candidates that professed to believe in the priorities listed above. But alas, people seem to vote for the most business-friendly candidates who coincidentally view environmental conservation as anathema to the economy. Why?

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#226 / MAGA On The March

Click the link I am providing to find out about “MAGA’s Plan to Take Over America.” Oops! Whether you will actually be able to access this discussion may well depend on whether or not you subscribe to The New York Times. It’s just another one of those “paywall” things!

The link I have provided in the paragraph above references a column by Jennifer Szalai. In essence, Szalai’s column is a book review, and the book being reviewed is Finish What We Started, by the journalist Isaac Arnsdorf.

Arnsdorf documents what MAGA (the movement) has been doing since January 6, 2021. There is, it seems, an actual “plan” to take over the government, and it’s all based on a “bottoms up” approach. Here is one of Arnsdorf’s observations:

Bannon’s extravagant bluffing — “We’re two-thirds of the nation!” he bragged at CPAC — can’t hide the fact that MAGA extremism is still terribly unpopular. An NBC News poll last year put the share of Americans with a favorable view of the MAGA movement at a meager 24 percent. But consolidating power whenever possible can allow the faithful to “feel some wins,” Arnsdorf writes. Bannon, by constantly telling his listeners that they’re the culmination of democracy instead of its death knell, is feeding them a useful and invigorating delusion. The precinct strategy has become another way of energizing the base.

And the base turns out to have infinite patience for the nitty-gritty of local politics, as long as the ultimate goal is not governance but domination. “Now they understand how important the rules are,” a merry Bannon tells Arnsdorf. “We’re having a civics lesson here. We’re exploding, and the reason we’re exploding? We’re really getting into the granular, and people can’t get enough of it.”

My suggestion, if you don’t want to wait around to see if MAGA will be successful in its march towards “domination,” is to get engaged in local government yourself – right where you are living right now.

I am extolling the benefits of such local political involvements NOT, let me say, as a good way to take over the nation, but as a way to prevent the nation from being taken over by someone else, including that magnificent MAGA bunch.

The “genius” of self-government in the United States is the ability of ordinary men and women, at the local, state, and ultimately national level, to establish a “representative” government that actually does “represent” the people, and works to achieve what the people want. When and where “self-government” is strong, no group, striving for national “domination” will ever be able to succeed. Read On Revolution by Hannah Arendt, if you want to have this all fleshed out in political theory.

Tyranny is stymied, Arendt tells us, when there are lots of independent “powers,” locally based, that cannot be cowed or compelled into the kind of totalitarian government that she watched emerge in Germany prior to World War II.

So, let’s not watch MAGA march by, on its way to “domination.” Let’s just take over our government ourselves, starting at the local level, and working our way up.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

FIRED UP, ON OFFENSE AGAINST FELONIOUS BUNK, STOLEN FIRE

Kamala Harris’s choice for her VP running mate, 60 year-old Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, has turned him into a household word for most who were never aware of his existence. The former six-term congressman has made his presence known quickly and can be credited with slapping the term ‘weird‘ onto the GOP’s presidential and vice-presidential nominees, much to their consternation. The Donald doesn’t care for name calling if someone else does it…especially towards him! In his term as governor, Walz is credited with securing free school lunches, free college tuition for students in low-income families, enacting 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave, and enacting an impressive children’s tax credit. As a hunter and gun owner, the NRA awarded him an A-rating for a time, but that was speedily downgraded to an F-rating when he dared to call for more stringent gun control measures. A former football coach, he says he is “fired up and back on offense” and is ready to bring some joy to their campaign to turn around the doom and gloom politics of the MAGA Monsters as exhibited by the scowling, angry Donald Trump and his cat-woman hating sidekick.

CNN’s Van Jones believes the GOP is breathing a sigh of relief with Walz’s candidacy, relieved that Harris passed up on selection of Shapiro or Kelly, referring to their estimate of Walz’s middle-of-the-road leanings; yet they are attempting to portray him as a left-winger who will burn the country down. Jones sees satisfaction in MAGAland at facing Walz, which he says is a disquieting early indicator, but “this is the most unpredictable race that you’ve seen, I think in the past 50 years…it’s just nuts, yeah.” Convicted felon Trump issued a statement criticizing Walz, saying, “Embracing policies to allow convicted felons to vote, Walz is obsessed with spreading California’s dangerously liberal agenda far and wide.” So, citizens in both Minnesota and California won’t necessarily be seeing him taking up residency in their states post-election…ya think? A New Republic staff writer comments, “Need to get the campaign’s position, but it sure seems like they think Florida should strip Donald Trump’s voting rights!” Walz’s 2023 legislation restored voting rights to over 55,000 formerly incarcerated citizens in his state…and thank-you, Felon Don for the reminder of one of the prime issues the Democrats are pushing in this campaign. Crying-on-My-Pillow election denier, Mike Lindell, chimed in with his complaints against Walz, saying, “He made horrible decisions with the China virus…we had to sit out in snowbanks to eat.” He claims his company was prepared to provide masks for congregations during the pandemic before Walz “shut down our Christian churches.” And the clincher for Walz’s sinfulness against Lindell, the My-Pillow CEO complains, “And I was gonna run for governor of Minnesota after the 2020 election, but Walz feared that and he put out a hit job on me throughout the state, sent postcards out everywhere.” Ok, that’s it, Mikey! Your fifteen minutes were up long ago…back to your pillow fort!

Satirist Andy Borowitz writes, “Responding to Vice President Harris’ choice of Tim Walz as her running mate on Tuesday, Donald J. Trump claimed that the Minnesota governor ‘was never white before. ‘I saw him on television many, many times, and, quite frankly, he was never white. Then, he suddenly became white.’ Hinting that ‘there’s something going on, and his last minute decision to become white should be looked into.'” Film critic and journalist, Peter Travers, reviewed Walz with, “Coach Walz sells well from left to right! Nobody will believe this guy is anything but their neighbor…America will love Coach Walz. He’s authentic, jocular, everybody’s favorite uncle, and affable, engaging, a rural ex-teacher with ‘dad energy’ – and he can land a punch, too! Give him four mesh trucker hats, way up!” As The Lincoln Project says, “So, if you’re keeping score at home, that’s a prosecutor and a solidly moderate Governor, versus a convicted felon and a bonafide weirdo who no one likes.” Taking up Walz’s call for “going on offense,” Trump will “make even more mistakes in his backpedaling, whether it’s forgetting to supersize his meal at McDonald’s or making the worst VP pick in recent memory (oops!), it all adds up. Being inside the head of Donald Trump is how we win this election.”

Several postings on X zero in on the impressions Walz is making with voters:  “I just know Tim Walz could teach me how to drive a stick shift without making me cry once.”

“My real concern with Governor Tim Walz is that he seems like the kinda guy if you leave your car unlocked in the summer, he’s going to leave you 6 zucchinis on your front seat.” “Tim Walz is definitely bringing green bean casserole to the DNC convention.” “Walz has the vibes of a man who makes short, helpful videos on how to fix garbage disposals in his spare time.” “Tim Walz would immediately stick out his palm if he heard the Chex Mix bag open in the back seat of the car on a vacation trip.” “Guaranteed 1000% that Tim Walz says, ‘What’s the damage?’ when the waiter hands him the check.” “Tim Walz seems like the kind of guy who has a favorite ladder in his garage. Moreover, he’d let you borrow it.” “Tim Walz would take his family to Disney World and have a Dole Whip for breakfast everyday.” “Tim Walz is the dad an entire generation wish they had instead of the one they lost to Fox News.” “JD Vance will disintegrate when Walz hits him with a ‘son, lemme tell you something about life.'” “If you want to signal midwestern ‘dad solidarity’ with Tim Walz, open your garage door just half way for absolutely no reason.”

Andy Borowitz has picked up on the ‘Dad-can-do-it-all’ theme regarding Walz, writing, “Turning up the heat on his Republican counterpart, on Thursday Gov. Tim Walz challenged Sen. JD Vance to change a tire. ‘I’ve driven in the dead of night outside Duluth when it’s twenty below and the wind chill coming off Lake Superior makes it feel like thirty,’ Walz told supporters in North Carolina. ‘All of a sudden, holy hell, you get a blowout,’ he continued. ‘What would you do, JD? Call Elon and ask him to send you a new car? I can’t wait for you to show me what you learned about changing a tire at Yale,’ Walz declared. ‘Any time, any place, any tire.'” Petition both parties to arrange for a debate at a convenient Firestone or Big O outlet! We need to witness this!

So the Orange Felon is angry. Angry that Joe Biden skipped out on him after it had burned into his brain for over three years that Joe was to be his adversary. The only happy moments in his life are when he gets into his performance art of name-calling, or making others unhappy alongside him…a trace of a smile perhaps, a smirk with certainty. With Kamala’s campaign showing its strength, especially with drawing huge crowds, Trump is beside himself, attacking Fox News for rashly reporting the truth of her success. He’s mad at everyone, even attacking Kellyanne Conway to slap at critic George Conway, though she remains loyal, so far. Lately, he’s been quiet about sharks, sinking electric boats, and windmills, but he must think his new story of crash landing in a helicopter with California’s Willie Brown who dished on Kamala Harris during their ride is a winner. Hannibal Lecter probably feasted on his brain cells containing the other subjects, so the MAGA faithful have to suffer with this new falsehood in his pity-party rally diatribes. Willie says he was never on a helicopter with Trump, and former governor Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom recalled their shared ride to a destructive forest fire site was uneventful.

To be fair, The Donald wasn’t lying completely about a scary helicopter ride according to Nate Holden, a former LA city councilman and state senator. Holden says, “I guess we all look alike…Willie is the short Black guy in San Francisco…I’m the tall Black guy in LA.” Sometime in the 90s, Trump was planning to develop a site of a historic LA hotel, which was approved by Holden. Five passengers, including Holden, Trump, Trump’s brother Robert, attorney Harvey Freedman, and Trump’s executive VP of construction and development boarded a helicopter to take a quick tour of the new Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City. Instrumentation was lost during the flight, with the aircraft shaking violently, necessitating an emergency landing at a Teterboro airport…and you guessed it…Trump later enjoyed joking about Holden “turning White.” Holden says it was actually Trump who turned white, and incidentally, Kamala Harris was never mentioned, and that Trump has now “mixed it up, or he made it up.” Trump threatened to sue The New York Times for disputing his story, claiming he has the flight record to substantiate his lie, but so far…nada, with only crickets from his campaign. And as Steve Schmidt suggests, “Perhaps Donald was never orange after all?”

Handlers of the former president are perturbed as his rallies become more chaotic, with him flailing, unable to stay on subject while bouncing around with his on-the-fly stories, or his repetitive lies and fantasies. The assassination attempt has thrown him off-balance, with Harris’s sudden surge in the polls and her ability to attract large crowds which should be flocking to him as a mark of his popularity. The old byword to just “let Trump be Trump” has fallen with a thud, but his keepers have no influence, knowing he will never change. He has taken to calling Harris a “bitch” in private…actually a milder version of his name-calling, and his staff now fears he has alienated Miriam Adelson, calling her and the super PAC Preserve America to which she has donated heavily, “RINOS” – Republican in name only – according to The New York Times. To cope with Trump’s stubbornness, his advisers are focussing “not on the need for him to change but on the need to adapt his message to win,” a source admitted to Axios. It’s difficult to even see this happening! After all the strutting he displayed at the RNC, his smugness and contentment transmitting to the faces of those in attendance that victory was just 100 days away, only to have his fire stolen a few days later, by a WOMAN!

SHE has also stolen his big crowds, filling stadiums, as he continues to bore his decreasing number of followers out of their gourds. As he plunges in popularity, voters tiring of his same-old-same-old act, he has to be questioning his choice of a weird running mate – privately, of course – and as Bocha Blue writes on the Palmer Report“He picked a moron, and she picked America’s dad.” Harris has something to say, Trump does not, which is why, after the ugly Mar-a-Lago press conference, Blue calls the GOP candidate, Donald Dump. Non-stop exaggerations and lies…the gathered reporters could hardly keep up with his rapid-fire diatribes and the praises he heaped upon himself. Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster, believes “Trump has issues on his side, but that his ‘persona’ is to blame for his drop in the polls.” As he told CNN, Trump could be more successful if he sticks to the issues, but Harris’s attributes are pointing her toward success because people like her better. Luntz continues, saying, “If he’s watching this interview right now, his head is exploding – and that’s part of the problem. He has lost touch with the people that he needs, and she is in perfect touch. And the reason is the Donald Trump persona.”  As a source told Axios“He has to convince himself to leave the other garbage behind.” Enough with “The Silence of the Lambs” cannibalism jokes, Donald Dump!

Comedian Chelsea Handler is adding her jibes to those criticizing VP candidate JD Vance, particularly after his notorious “childless cat ladies” comment. She posted on X“Listen up, you Wingnut Elegy! This country is still controlled by men in systems that were set up by men that are carefully crafted to continue to benefit men. So, to put it in women-hating terms that you’ll understand, you’re being hysterical.” She continues, “There’s no correlation between childless people and the presidency,” noting that President George Washington had two stepchildren, as does Kamala Harris, who has none of her own. Further, she points out that no president in the history of the US has ever been a mother, all being men. Dinging nominee Donald Trump, she writes, “But maybe if she had five kids with three different men, and a scandalous affair with a porn star, and was a convicted felon, that would be more palatable to Republican men.” Not letting up on JD, she rants on, “You sad, Diet Mountain Dew-drinking, couch humping, dolphin-porn aficionado…all of us childless cat and dog ladies are gonna go from childless and crushing it, to childless and crushing YOU in November. And before you tell me the couch story is untrue, spare me. I grew up in New Jersey in the 80s where everyone had a couch in their basement, and I know a couch [abuser] when I see one.” A skit on “The Daily Show” last year, with Handler celebrating not having children, drew criticism from former Fox News luminary, Tucker Carlson. After his head exploded, she responded, “Are you really upset about how much freedom I have, or are you upset that you haven’t been able to take it away from me yet?” Ah yes…and to that we can add, “Nothing says family like three marriages, lusting after your daughter, cheating on your pregnant wife, and burying the woman you divorced on a golf course.”

If you support Trump, we won’t judge you for your choice of political parties. We will judge you for your lack of morals, ethics and humanity. So will others. So will history.

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Hawaii

“Hawaii is paradise born of fire”
~Rand McNally

“I believe Hawaii is the most precious jewel in the world”
~Don Ho

“Hawaii is not a state of mind, but a state of grace”
~Paul Theroux

“For me, the magic of Hawaii comes from the stillness, the sea, the stars”
~Joanne Harris

“Coming to Hawaii is like going from black and white to color”
~John Richard Stephens

...

Daryl Hall has this AMAZING series of “Live at Daryl’s House” episodes, where he hosts a plethora of famous musicians, and they play with a whole band in his livingroom. Here is one fabulous clip, but there are so many more. Watch them all!!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 31 – Aug 13, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… project 2025 … Greensite… Greensite on Grand Jury Recommendations to City Council… Steinbruner… Thank you Sandy Brown, Bond measures, and Aptos… Hayes… Humans are animals, and sharing your house with plants… Patton…Hillbilly Allergy … Matlock… 9-1-1 for wipeout of a whiteout…unfair dropout…babysitter washout…conversion…fraud…flying ketchup…and nine mooches…. Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… Dead and Company at the Sphere Quotes on… “Jerry Garcia”

...

TOM SCRIBNER October 28 1964, Davenport CA. Here’s a photo of Tom doing what he loved the most, editing and creating the Redwood Ripsaw Review. The Review was a hard hitting opinion generated “newspaper” . Known mostly as the subject of the Musical Saw player in front of the Bookshop Santa Cruz which was placed there in 1978. Tom was a staunch member of the Industrial Workers of the World (The Wobblies). He fought for labor and labor unions all his life. The Musical Saw was barely a hobby for him. He did play on Pacific Avenue when he lived in the St. George Hotel…but he never “busked” (played for money). He died in 1982.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: July 31, 2024

PROJECT 2025 AND WHY CONGRESS SHOULD REJECT IT. For some hazy tricky reason we’ve never been given a clear and straight explanation about Project 2025. Here’s what James Carville sent out to many of us last week.

Project 2025 is a dangerous blueprint for dismantling our democratic institutions and imposing MAGA extremism on America. Developed by key figures from Trump’s administration and his closest allies, Project 2025 threatens our rights, freedoms, and the foundations of our democracy.

It seeks to end reproductive freedom by banning vital medications and limiting access to contraception. Our education system faces an existential threat with plans to abolish the Department of Education, jeopardizing millions of students’ futures.

The initiative doesn’t stop there. It aims to politicize our civil service by replacing career officials with MAGA loyalists, corrupting the impartiality of our government. Environmental protections would be gutted, with climate change initiatives dismantled in favor of increased fossil fuel production.

Perhaps most alarmingly, Project 2025 advocates for an unprecedented concentration of power in the executive branch, undermining the crucial checks and balances that safeguard our democracy. It even seeks to roll back civil rights protections by eliminating terms like “sexual orientation” and “gender equality” from federal laws.

This is not just another policy proposal — it’s a comprehensive attack on American democracy, backed by Trump’s network and MAGA extremists.

We can stop this dangerous initiative and preserve the America we believe in.

Send a message to your senators and representative now demanding they publicly disavow Project 2025 and commit to protecting our democratic institutions.

VANISHED INTO THE NIGHT. Netflix movie (5.2 IMDB) ** An Italian family’s two children are kidnapped and a huge ransom is demanded. The acting is poor, the plot is questionable and only Santa Cruz small boat owners will stay awake to solve the twists and inadequacies.

LAND OF BAD. Netflix movie (6.6 IMDB) *** An unexplained battle that happens in South Africa and the Philippines within our own armed services, namely the air forces versus the infantry! It’s high tech adapting to traditional military systems. It’s probably all very true but the presentation is slow and boring.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Prime series. **** (7.8 IMDB) An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it. I’ve repeated this review because too many folks forgot the title.

GOYO. Netflix series. (6.5 IMDB)  *** Hard to believe and follow this tearful drama from Buenos Aires. It’s about a museum guide who has Asperger’s. We get to look at his sex life, how he loses control, and his new love of the beautiful woman guide that changes everything.

A MAN IN FULL. Netflix series (6.5 IMDB) ***  Jeff Daniels at his very best acting (not so much) costars with Diane Lane in this drama centering on his real estate empire and all the complex issues we find in real estate everywhere. Lucy Liu plays a big part in it too as we watch his partial control over himself and his holdings mostly disappear inside banks, attorneys, and drawn out office scenes.

ROALD DAHL’S ESIO TROT. Prime movie. (6.9 IMDB) * The top name cast has Dustin Hoffman and his chasing of Judi Dench while Richard Cordery leads us on this boring, predictable, comedy. It’s another back balcony upstairs/ downstairs over used plot. Hoffman is very disappointing when you start thinking back to his classic and serious films, he’s 87 years old now.

THE ASUNTA CASE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) *** Another Spanish movie based on a true story about a local couple whose adopted Chinese daughter is found murdered. Even the police are suspected of the crime. Mistakes are made, the story stays tight, worth watching.

GANGS OF GALICIA. Netflix series (6.3 IMDB) *** A Spanish murder adventure about a woman whose father gets murdered, so she goes inside some drug cartels to find out and get revenge on whodunit!! Great seaside- water footage. With boats and police everywhere.

SUNNY. Apple series (7.3 IMDB) ** A Japanese comedy starring Rashida Jones who loses her husband and has a robot replace him. There’s way too much mugging, drinking, and undirected reactions to make this worth watching…avoid it

DESPERATE LIES. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB) *** Juliana Paes takes the lead in this Brazilian re-take after re-take about childbirth. It appears that she got drunk, went to bed with two guys and got pregnant from both of them….and had twins! Complex, barely believable, only a bit humorous, but you will stay focused.

FANCY DANCE. Apple movie. (6.6 IMDB) ** Executive directed by Forrest Whitaker and starring Michael Rowe. It’s all about Native Americans and their family structure and personal issues. It’s both sensitive and amateurish and lacks a forceful direction.

YOUR HONOR. Netflix series (7.6 IMDB). *** Bryan Cranston along with Hope Davis and especially Rosie Perez lead this New Orleans saga. The son of a crime boss is killed and it’s the judge’s son who gets the blame. Well worth watching.

HOUSE OF THE DRAGON. HBO series. *** I re-watched much of this series prequel to Game of Thrones just to check on how relevant and applicable it may still be. It definitely has lost the magic and charm, probably due to our increasing and improving the world. Game of Thrones was back in 2011 and had an amazing 72 episodes. House of The Dragon begins 17 decades before Game Of Thrones.

A BODY THAT WORKS. Netflix series. (7.7 IMDB) *** It starts slow as we watch a scared and un-pregnant 37 year old woman decide to get a surrogate woman to carry her baby. There’s much realistic action and re-actions between the two “pregnant” couples.

NIGHTMARES AND DAY DREAMS. Netflix series.(6.6 IMDB) *** A collection of 7 episodes starting in Jakarta with a baby falling from a balcony, some concepts of torture, and then… switches to a bread factory !! All seven chapters are like that and they hang together neatly, but full of blood and guts.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Series. (7.8 IMDB) **** An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it.

...
Dateline July 29, 2024

Holding Local Government Accountable

“Does government waste, inefficiency, or lack of responsiveness concern you?” So goes the introduction to the Santa Cruz Grand Jury website, encouraging community members to get involved.

After an intense year of work, I and the other grand jurors from the 2023-24 year are hoping that the effort will lead to needed functional changes in local government. As I wrote earlier, press coverage is crucial to getting the word out. Interestingly, so far it has been the print media, the Sentinel and the Good Times that have stepped up to the plate and covered at least some of the reports. The online publications, Lookout and Santa Cruz Local have been disappointingly missing in action despite requests for coverage to the former.

All the Grand Jury reports address important issues and I hope you have read at least some of them. Given that I usually write on Santa Cruz City matters, I’ve here selected recommendations from the two reports that investigated issues under the purview of the Santa Cruz City Council. The law requires that the City Council respond to the recommendations by the due date. Grand Juries can only recommend adoption; they cannot require it. If the council refuses to adopt a recommendation, only the public can achieve compliance through political pressure.

The recommendations listed below were carefully developed from intensive investigations. Each recommendation is linked to a Finding (F1 etc.) Each Finding is based on factual evidence. For facts to be considered evidence they must be corroborated from multiple sources. Nothing is left to opinion or only one source. All must pass scrutiny from county counsel and the presiding judge. I encourage you to consider the recommendations carefully and be actively involved when they are on the City Council agenda, likely late August, or early September.

Housing For Whom? An Investigation of Inclusionary Housing in the City of Santa Cruz

Recommendations:

R1. The Grand Jury recommends that the Santa Cruz City Council state exactly which HCD (Housing and Community Development) Income Levels are covered by the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and Resolutions and make that information public by December 31, 2024. (F1)

R2. The Grand Jury recommends that the Santa Cruz City Council develop an ongoing system to track, document and verify within 30 days of occupancy whether a unit is occupied by an income-verified local resident or local worker as required by the Ordinance, specifying which category the renter fulfills, and have such a system in place by January 31, 2025. (F2)

R3. The Grand Jury recommends that the Santa Cruz City Council document the percentage of the City’s Inclusionary and 100% Affordable Housing units that are rented to UCSC students, making that data public by February 28, 2025, with annual updates. (F3)

The required City Council response is due by September 19, 2024

City Of Santa Cruz: Preventing Rape and Domestic Violence
Where’s The Priority?

Recommendations:

R1. The Grand Jury recommends that the City Council fund a dedicated staff person for the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women (CPVAW) with skills commensurate to the need for program and resource development, community outreach and visibility, data research and report writing and have such position advertised by December 31, 2024. (F5, F3)

R2. The Grand Jury recommends that the City Council reevaluate the legal ability of CPVAW commissioners to access redacted police reports of rape as described in this investigation and present the results of that research by December 31, 2024. (F6)

R3. The Grand Jury recommends that the City Council begin evaluating options with the Santa Cruz City School District to reinstate the in-person self-defense program for middle and high school students of all genders by January 31, 2025. (F4)

R4. The Grand Jury recommends that the SCPD (Santa Cruz Police Department) update its website to include the detailed metrics on Rape Incidents submitted to NIBRS (National Incident Based Reporting System) and CIBRS (CA IBRS), ensuring all data entries are accurate and available at each meeting of the CPVAW, and have this in place by January 31, 2025. (F8, F9)

R5. The Grand Jury recommends that the SCPD reinstate community alerts for incidents of stranger rape, with case-by-case updates, by December 31, 2024. (F7)

R6. The Grand Jury recommends that the Commission and the SCPD submit comprehensive annual reports as called for in Ordinance 81-29, using the 2005-07 reports as a model, with the 2024 Annual Report placed on the Commission’s agenda by December 31, 2024, and future reports submitted on a consistent, annual basis. (F1)

R7. The Grand Jury recommends that the 2023 Report be amended to remove the national entry on stranger rape, replacing it with accurate data for the City of Santa Cruz by December 31, 2024. (F2)

R8. The Grand Jury recommends that the CPVAW update the status of the Safe Place Network and the Bar Coasters program. If the programs are to be discontinued, a public CPVAW meeting is advised for that decision. If the programs are to be continued, the date of January 31, 2025, is recommended for the full reinstatement of these programs. (F3)

R9. The Grand Jury recommends that Focus Area 5, Public Safety of the 2023-28 Five Year Strategic Plan include an entry prioritizing the prevention of rape and domestic violence, as mandated by Ordinance 81-29, and published by February 28, 2025. (F10)

R10. The Grand Jury recommends that the City Manager increase the visibility of the CPVAW programs and events by publishing relevant information, at least quarterly, in the City Manager’s Weekly Update and that the first article be published by December 31, 2024. (F11)

The required City Council response is due by September 25, 2024

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

THANK YOU, SANDY BROWN
Last Wednesday’s “Can Santa Cruz Manage It’s Housing Destiny?” event that featured Senator Scott Weiner, Supervisor Manu Koenig and City Councilmember Sandy Brown had a full house at the Hotel Paradox.   Despite quite a few YIMBY-clad tee shirt wearers, judging by the roars of applause when Sandy Brown challenged Senator Weiner’s claim that Santa Cruz can fix the outrageous housing affordability problem  by just building more and more under State mandate, there was a large majority attending who are concerned about losing local discretion and the character of our Communities.

“We always hear ‘it won’t pencil out’ to build more inclusionary affordable housing.  Well, what rate of return are these developers requiring?  I dug and dug, and determined it’s 20%-25%!”  said Councilmember Brown.  Wow.  And I thought that the CPUC’s guaranteed return of 11% for utility companies was high.

Later in the evening, Mr. Sibley Simon, CEO of Workbench, which is submitting the 16 story ClockTower Project, and the controversial Food Bin Project on Mission Street in Santa Cruz, confirmed that Ms. Brown had correctly reported the profit margin number.  He had alot to say, barely taking a breath to allow Moderator Chris Neely from LookOut to interject a question or two.  Mr. Simon admitted he did not know much about the Clocktower Project.   I wondered why Mr. Simon was the only developer asked to be interviewed for the entire second hour?

Hopefully, this event recording will be available soon.

OVER TEN LOCAL BOND MEASURES AND COUNTING ON OUR NOVEMBER BALLOT
Take a look at the ten bond and tax measures that have been filed so far, with another three more likely:
VotesCount, Local Measures

It is shocking, and so far in my research, none will allow exemptions for seniors, disabled or Veterans on fixed incomes being stretched thinly these days.

Why this mad rush for money grabs in so many arenas?

I think I figured it out, by reading the Scotts Valley Fire District Resolution for their $24.5 Million Bond measure.

It’s because of Assembly Constitutional Amendment ACA 1 /ACA 10 on the November 5 ballot, which if passed, will allow any other bond or tax measures also on the ballot for special districts, cities or counties to be approved with a 55% threshold, rather than a 2/3.

Isn’t that amazing?

ACA 10 would amend ACA 1 to limit its application to general obligation bonds, amending the State Constitution to afford special districts, cities, and counties, the same 55 percent vote threshold allowed for approving school district bonds. It would affirmatively apply its provisions to any local bond measures submitted at the same election as ACA 1 or at a later election held after the effective date of ACA 1, subject to certain requirements.

ACA 10 would remove from ACA 1 a new 55 percent voter approval threshold for special taxes for the purposes of funding the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or replacement of public infrastructure, foreclosing the possibility that public agencies would be able to utilize that provision following voter approval at the November election. The State Constitution currently requires two-thirds voter-approval for both special taxes and general obligation bonds placed on the ballot by special districts, cities, and counties.
ACA 10 Strikes 55% Special Tax Threshold from ACA 1 on November Ballot

WHAT MATTERS TO YOU IN SCHOOL DISTRICT LEADERSHIP?
Take this LookOut survey and share it with others.  This information will help craft LookOut interviews and forums with school board candidates and bond measures. Share your priorities for your local school board – Santa Cruz Local

BIG MONEY SUPPORTING THE LAND TRUST’S $87/PARCEL BAD TAX
The Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, posing as a “citizen”, spent big bucks to have paid signature gatherers standing out on the sidewalks to get the necessary number of qualified signatures to get this bad tax on the November ballot.  This information is now public, thanks to the political committee raking in nearly half a million $$ to shove this bad tax along having to file a Form 460 with the Secretary of State.

Isn’t it interesting that Friends of Santa Cruz County Parks had $10,000 just lying around to donate to the Land Trust’s sneaky special parcel tax coming your way on the November ballot?  What about the $25,000 donation from Patricia Quillen, wife of Reed Hastings, the CEO of NetFlix? Netflix Chief Reed Hastings’ Wife, Patricia Quillin, Was a Quiet Force in the 2020 Election in California

This is a really bad tax, promising to fund so many types of projects, but laying out no clear path to ensure the money will actually accomplish anything of benefit, other than filling the pockets of the County treasury and non-profits , like the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, who will benefit.  The “Advisory Committee” filled by those appointed by County and City officials would decide how the anticipated $7.3 Million annually collected would get spent, after the County government grabs the top 6%.  There would be strong input by the non-profits who have collected nearly half a million $ to get this bad tax on the ballot, but it is unknown who would hold any of them accountable.

Pay attention!

THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION OPPOSES THIS “CLEAN WATER, BEACHES AND WILDFIRE” PARCEL TAX.

Why?

 Your Santa Cruz County Fire Chiefs’ Association does not support this Measure because it would not directly contribute to wildfire risk reduction nor directly fund all local fire agencies who are responsible for wildfire risk reduction.

*Past promises on two local sales tax increases were supposed to fund fire protection, but ZERO dollars have gone to fund local fire agencies or projects that would reduce fire risk, confirmed by the County Grand Jury in 2022.

Read more here why the Santa Cruz “Water and Wildfire Protection Act” (for short) is a bad tax that the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, Peninsula Open Space and Sempervirens is somehow being allowed to be called a “voter initiative” and thereby be approved with a 50% + 1 approval threshold rather than a 2/3 majority with no exemptions for seniors, disabled or Veterans.

Isn’t this deceptive???

POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IN COUNTY FIRE DEPT. GOVERNANCE AND TRANSPARENCY ARE MUCH-NEEDED
The Santa Cruz County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) will finally review the long-overdue AP Triton Consultant report on the effectiveness of the fire agencies in the County when they meet next Wednesday, August 7 at 9am.

The problems with Santa Cruz County Fire Dept., supposedly governed by the Board of Supervisors, has poor financial transparency and the Board really doesn’t care, allowing CALFIRE to run the show with no accountability.

If you live in the rural areas of Santa Cruz County, chances are you are in County Fire Dept. area, funded by County Service Area (CSA) 48 property tax assessments, and includes well-trained Volunteers.  It was many of these such Volunteers who stayed behind and saved many homes in the 2020 CZU Fire…and subsequently terminated as Volunteers by CalFire.

LAFCO Agenda item 6b is sure to spark lively discussion, and hopefully lead to a much-needed governance change for improved accountability and representation.

Please share this information with others who live in the rural areas.

WHAT THE COUNTY PLANS FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
On July 31, the County’s Commission on the Environment held a public forum with speakers from the County Water Resources Dept. and Public Works to unveil the Climate Adaptation and Action Plan (CAAP).  It was well-attended, with good presentations.

The public was not allowed to comment until near the end, given only three minutes to comment on nearly two hours of information-rich presentations.   Some  folks (including me) left before that opportunity in order to attend the forum next door at the Hotel Paradox about housing mandates and saving the shred of local discretionary control remaining.

Here is a link to the video recording of the CAAP presentations (many thanks to Planner Mr. David Carlson)

Note the excellent information and suggestions the public did present at about minute 1:37:00.

One of the projects described is the Soquel Drive Buffered Bike Lane Project from State Park Drive in Aptos to Dominican Hospital.  Most of the on-street parking in that stretch will disappear to create protected Class 2 and Class 4 bike lanes.  That means there will be striping and, in about half of the distance, reflective vertical posts to separate the bike lane from the vehicle lanes, narrowing the traffic lanes for “calming”.  Well, let’s hope that works.

Soquel Drive and State Park Drive construction of new Buffered Bike Lanes.

There will be an in-depth presentation on water issues, which includes the update of the County Well Ordinance, on Wednesday, August 7 at 4pm at the County Water Advisory Commission hybrid meeting (701 Ocean Street County Bldg. in the Redwood Conference Room).

The next such public forum will be September 25. The Commission on the Environment will discuss different aspects of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan at each of their upcoming meetings. The presentations will be grouped by the County Departments responsible for implementing the various Objectives in the CAAP. While this meeting will include presentations from CDI Recycling and Solid Waste staff and the Water Resources Manager, the next meeting in September in Watsonville is scheduled to have a presentation from OR3 staff covering the CAAP Objectives they are responsible for implementing.

GET READY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SECOND HIGHWAY PEDESTRIAN/BIKE OVERPASS
Last week, the construction supports for the Chanticleer Overpass were removed, repackaged, and likely will get moved to the location near State Park Drive in Aptos for the Mar Vista Overpass planned there.  Crews are already mowing down lots of trees to make way for this portion of the Segment 11 RTC/County/CalTrans Project.

Here is the view from Mar Vista Drive at McGregor Drive in Seacliff.  The cones on the corner are part of the Mar Vista Overpass landing zone.  This is one of two areas where the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) declared eminent domaine against the affected Homeowners’ Associations.   You can see the equipment in the background…mowing down trees.

A few years ago, a Community group of local residents was asked to provide input on this Overpass project.  Everyone clearly said this was not the best location, but that moving the proposed Overpass closer to Mar Vista Elementary School and Cabrillo College area would be superior.  The RTC ignored the group’s recommendation, citing environmental concerns.  Hmmm….

HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?
After the Santa Cruz County Fair Board meeting a couple of weeks ago when the Board approved spending $55,000 to study why there was a dirt slide adjacent to the main parking lot in 2023 rains, I drove out to take a look.  As far as I could tell, it seemed the dirt and debris slid because of saturation of unengineered fill.  It was just a pile of dirt and debris that the former CEO allowed to get dumped there, hoping to widen the parking lot a bit, but it failed.

Now, the same thing is happening on the opposite side of the parking lot, but this time there seems to be some unwritten agreement between the new CEO Zeke Fraser and Granite Construction to dump a mountain of soil (origin and cleanliness unknown) at the edge of the parking lot and next to the creek.  It was shocking to see the devastation in this riparian area to make room for the clandestine parking lot expansion work that, according to reliable sources, Granite has been doing at night for the past six weeks.

What is not readily visible in the picture above is the devastating tree removal and soil adjacent to the creek that leads to College Lake in Watsonville, but you can get a sense of it below.

CEO Fraser had made no mention of it in his public report to the Board during the meeting.  When I queried him about what I saw, he said he “forgot” to mention it to the Board, but “It’s just some extra dirt to use for the Monster Truck show at the Fair, and other places afterward.”  He stated “it’s from College Lake project, and good dirt.”  He wasn’t sure why there were portable light towers at the site, or sections of new 12″ plastic drain pipe stored there, but assured me he would check into it.

Hmmm….

Upon questioning the agency doing the project at College Lake, it was confirmed that Granite is not a contractor on that project, and did not haul soil from the College Lake project, and that no contractor associated with the College Lake project transported soil to the Fairgrounds.

Hmmm….

Upon questioning a few nearby residents, I learned that Granite Construction has been hauling truckloads of soil at night to the Fairgrounds parking lot for at least six weeks.  The soil is likely from the Highway 152 and Holohan Road improvement project.

The enforcement staff at California Fish & Wildlife, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board now know about this mysterious project that CEO Fraser “forgot” to inform the Board was happening.

Shouldn’t Granite Construction officials have known better?

The Fairgrounds is owned by the State, as the the 14th District Agricultural Association. This casts a dark cloud on the State’s staff, who should and likely does know better.

The question is: Is the soil now towering over the creek that leads to College Lake contaminated (there is a gas station at the Holohan intersection)?  Will it also fail in the future when it becomes saturated by heavy winter rains, and compel the Fair Board then to allocate big money to fix?  What about the creek?

Hmmm….

This is just opposite the site of the new South County Park at 181 Whiting Road, where County staff has boasted there could be a connection to the Fairgrounds for emergencies.

Hmmm……

Please write Senator Laird and ask for investigation and enforcement actions

STROLLING IN APTOS VILLAGE…WATCH OUT!
What about pedestrian safety in Aptos Village?  Neither the County nor Swenson really cared about studying that when this disgusting project was approved in 2012 with only a Negative Declaration for environmental impacts.  But now that  phase 2 of the ghetto is getting built, local residents are more than a little concerned about pedestrian safety. The Seacliff Improvement Association received a grant for conducting outreach surveys and public education on pedestrian safety improvements in the area.

On Sunday, August 11, meet at 10am on the astroturf “Village Green” at Aptos Village Way and  Parade Street.  There will be appearances by elected officials for some grand photo ops.  Maybe there will be some helpful ideas…such as the taxpayer-funded lane restrictions painted on Soquel Drive last week by County crews.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS TO VOTE “NO” ON THE LAND TRUST’S BAD TAX.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Humans are Animals!

I paced back and forth in front of the glass double doors at the DMV office in Capitola, hoping to get someone’s attention. I hoped that one of the DMV employees would come out to speak to me about making special compensation to allow me inside the building. Prior to my arrival, a DMV employee had placed an official-looking sign on the inside of the door, facing out. It read: “No animals allowed inside.” I saw other humans inside, and no one was coming out to help, so I entered the building and mentioned the confusing sign to the person at the front desk. They replied something like “hah” in passing as they directed me to the correct line, further inside the lobby.  The sign has faded, but it is still on the door, many years later.

Do Words Matter?

I’m one of those people who think that it matters what words you use, and that suggesting humans are not animals contributes to the destruction of nature. I learned that there are four kingdoms of life: plants, animals, protists, fungi, and monera. So, if humans aren’t animals, what are we? What if the DMV sign read “No Admittance of Non-Human Animals?” Is that so hard to understand? Some establishments avoid this issue by using the term ‘pets’ – “No Pets Inside.” This doesn’t help much as the word “pet” is defined as any domesticated or tamed animal kept for pleasure, not utility. I suggest that humans are as domesticated as any animals and we hang out with people for pleasure, not utility. The word ‘kept,’ though, gives one pause: ‘kept’ as in rather than ‘kicked out,’ ‘let go,’ or ‘allowed to roam with impunity?’ What is this ‘kept’ word all about? Could it mean marriage? (or is that for utility?)

In sum, I think we should use the terms ‘human animal’ and ‘non-human animal’ if we are distinguishing the two. And, let’s also think a bit more about ‘pets.’

Non-Human Companions

If by the term ‘pet,’ we mean non-human companion, I can safely suggest that pets are an important gateway to providing an introduction of human animals to their animal nature. Consider the pet dog, which we can teach to understand hundreds of English words. As we learn to be good dog companions, and vice versa, we experience the gap between the species narrow. We learn to be compassionate with our pets and they seem compassionate to us.  We assign them ‘rights.’

How much dog language do you know? What would it take to learn? Do you doubt that they have their own language?

Are Humans Animals, And Are They Natural?

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

~

Sharing your Home with Plants

“Houseplants,” what a term! The term is well known but could just as well be ‘indoor plant pets’ or ‘my photosynthetic family inside,’ or ‘living beautification props.’ You can’t read the term “houseplants” too literally, though some plants do actually provide human housing: we call those ‘timber,’ they fall, and then they ‘lumber’ their way into your wall. Nay, ‘houseplants’ is a term for living organisms in the plant kingdom that are purposefully grown in containers inside buildings. People have various reasons for choosing to grow houseplants; I want to encourage you to try it if you haven’t, or deepen your relationship with houseplants if you already have them.

Reliable Restaurant Review: Houseplants

The very best restaurants I’ve eaten at had lovingly cared for houseplants. Restaurant plants should be clean, well-watered, and vigorously growing. I can’t blame a restauranteur who avoids growing plants -their business is already a lot to manage! But, for those who are able to grow healthy houseplants and create tasty meals – that’s a place I want to keep going back to! Restaurants with plastic plants make me wonder about the ingredients in the food. If a chef can put up with plastic plants, what will they substitute in place of good ingredients on the menu? Restaurants with badly cared for plants are even worse. When I see plants with layers and layers of dust and pests, even plastic plants that are incredibly dusty, in restaurants, the food is inevitably terrible. Luckily, restaurant houseplants are normally displayed in the front window, so you don’t have to enter to use this tip.

Green Thumb Myth

There is no such thing as a green thumb, so beware of using that phrase as a way of getting out of growing houseplants. The myth goes that there is some innate ability to care for plants, that some people have and others do not. When claiming not to have ‘a green thumb’ as an excuse for not growing houseplants, you might as well say “I’m not interested in houseplants,” though that might seem a bit rude in conversation. Alternatively, you might say “houseplants are not my cup of tea.” Growing houseplants is like any other skill you have learned: put a little effort into reading, asking friends, and experimentation, and you will find that, you, too, can grow plants in containers indoors. Why would anyone with such disinterest in houseplants be motivated to change? Many reasons.

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

~

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Wednesday, July 31, 2024

#213 / Hillbilly Allergy

The image above comes from an article about J.D. Vance (who was born James Donald Bowman). Vance is the author of Hillbilly Elegy and he is currently running for Vice President on a ticket with D.J. Trump. The article from which I obtained the picture ran in Boston Review on July 22, 2024, and is titled, “Liberals Are to Blame for the Rise of J. D. Vance.”

Anyone who regularly reads my blog postings is likely to remember that I have mentioned Vance before, and not very favorably. The title I am using for my blog posting today reflects the fact that I do have something like an allergic reaction to Vance and to Vance’s book.

While Hillbilly Elegy has some worthwhile things about it, I find it rather off-putting for the exact reason that the Boston Review mentions, in the sentence I have emphasized, below:

J. D. Vance’s selection as Donald Trump’s running mate has unnerved many Democrats. He is closely tied to the architects of Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation plan to purge large swathes of the civil service. He is friendly with Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk, and Alex Jones, and he warns darkly about falling birthrates and rising immigration. All of this strikes many as remarkable given that Vance began his political career as the darling of the liberal establishment with his 2016 book Hillbilly Elegy, widely praised as offering the definitive explanation of the appeal of Donald Trump to the white working class. In reality, Vance was a prominent Never Trumper in 2016, telling his former roommate that Donald Trump was “America’s Hitler” and publicly declaring he would vote for a third party.

Vance’s political transformation—if it is indeed even much of a transformation at all—from liberal darling to reactionary proto-fascist is easy to dismiss as simply a case of unchecked political ambition and thirst for power. The bigger story is what the fact that liberals’ favorite conservative in 2016 has now aligned himself with the hard right tells us about the deeper pathologies of U.S. politics—above all, the liberal dream of finding a “responsible conservative” to spar with that would render American democracy stable and safe from partisan extremes (emphasis added).

Good “politics,” I believe, does not come from an “unchecked political ambition and thirst for power.” One way to distinguish between what are called “liberal” views and what are called “conservative” views is to focus on the question whether we should think of our politics, and our nation, and our personal position in the world, from an “individualistic” perspective, or whether we should believe, as both Joyce Vance and I never tire of proclaiming, that “we are in this together.”

By the way, though it’s probably quite obvious, J.D. Vance and Joyce Vance are NOT related.

I find myself somewhat “allergic” to Vance because he is someone who always – or at least almost always – puts himself first. A self-centered belief that progress is achieved as an individual project, as opposed to being achieved by a succesful and collaborative social effort, is pretty much the way I distinguish political “conservatives” from political “liberals.” While not totally “immune,” of course, from the temptations of individualism, so-called “liberals” tend to be less susceptible than so-called “conservatives” to the “I alone can do it” syndrome.

Our recently reconfigured presidential race is really about our “future.” Do we like the Kamala Harris future, emphasizing openness and tolerance, and the need to work together, or are we going to be convinced by the claim that “I alone can fix it,” this being the repeated assertion of Donald J. Trump. Trump, by the way, and despite his recent disclaimers, would apparently seek to implement this approach to government by implementing a “Project 2025,” one main feature of which is to eliminate civil service protections for current federal employees, making the main qualification for virtually all federal employees their personal allegience to the “Great Leader.”

The Trump/Vance ticket is proclaiming the “individualistic” ideal. Harris says we’re in it together. “Liberal” that I am, I am rooting for Kamala!

Here is Harris’ picture, just to balance out the picture at the top of my blog posting today. Consider it to be an anti-allergenic antidote:

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

STUPIDS IN FERTILITY WRECK, 2025 SMOKESCREEN, MEOW, MEOW, MEOW

“Hello, 9-1-1, there’s a black woman running for President of the United States!” That seems to be the panicked message being disseminated by the MAGA/GOP for the past couple of weeks after Kamala Harris dive-bombed the election scene and began to overtake The Donald and his cat-aclysmic, fake Sancho Panza in the polls, a former lead that seemed to have a bright future for them in facing President Joe Biden’s windmills. Trump continues to self-destruct as evidenced by his out-of-control, wild appearance on stage before the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago. Down-ballot GOP candidates looked on in disbelief as he sabotaged their standings among the electorate, but they only have themselves to blame…they created this Orange Monstrosity! And of course, they, along with his handlers can’t attempt to stop him simply because they are afraid of the reactions, and they see the futility of such a course of action in the end. With no level-headed Mike Pence-type as second banana, they’ll have to go forward with a woman-hating, cat-hating, dishonest charlatan who is too crazy to neutralize Trump’s irrationality. Republican operatives are in a complete panic because Trump can’t stop his grifting…donations to the RNC are paying his legal bills instead of keeping his campaign afloat or benefitting other races. In President Biden’s campaign exit speech, he said, “We are a great nation because we are a good people.” Earlier that day, Trump said, “We are a stupid country that’s led by stupid people.” Whose side are you on?

Bocha Blue, on The Palmer Report, writes, “I want to see a wipeout. It’s not enough, friends and readers, to merely beat them. I want to see a wipeout. I want to clean their clocks and wipe the floor with them. I want to see our margin of victory so large, so amazing, that they won’t know what hit them. We have a few things on our side that will make this wish a reality. Republicans work less hard than we do. Oh, they try. But they ALWAYS seem to get sidetracked by their own weirdness, by outrage at the latest food or drink they must boycott, and by infighting that has torn them apart for years. They have anger but no way do they have our PASSION, our determination…yes, we need to have a wipeout. We want a wipeout. They want a whiteout. A whiteout blanketing America, insolent white Christian MEN, a whiteout so vast, so completely glowingly white that it wipes out all the other colors of the rainbow…like Black, Brown, and Gold.”

We can make Trump’s run for the presidency analogous to a dog running to the door when the doorbell rings…it’s never for them.

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

~

SNAKE BITTEN, A RUBBER STAMP, ROTTEN TOMATOES, YES WE ARE!

Watch out for flying ketchup bottles at Mar-a-Lago! Seems like at least a year since the events of few weeks ago began…first with the attempt on Donald Trump’s life, followed by the RNC convention where 39-year-old JD Vance became the second banana on the GOP presidential ticket, only to be capped by President Biden’s decision to abandon his attempt to be elected for a second term. Enter VP Kamala Harris in dramatic fashion, tossing her hat into the race for the nation’s top spot, and quickly gaining support of the Democrats who responded with carloads of cash donations. A bewildered Trump called ‘foul‘ since his backers had spent wads of campaign funds to battle Biden in what seemed like a sure path to victory. MAGA is trying to block Harris’s entry by insisting her delegate count doesn’t belong to her, but to the President, as well as the campaign’s $91M money stash, even though she is listed as a part of the Democratic team vying for reelection. And besides, Trump wants compensation for all the time and money spent for his lying and name-calling against Biden…calling it “fraud!” Trump has been out-trumped in his quest to find someone to solidify his base of White working-class voters!

Many in the GOP had second thoughts about the selection of JD Vance on the ticket, and now with Kamala’s show of strength, the dissatisfaction is growing, though Trump will not acknowledge that he has an albatross around his neck…as Roy Cohn told him, “never admit that you’re wrong!” Extremist psychopath Vance has become mired in trying to explain his way out of multiple flubs from past social media posts and TV appearances, Harris changing her characterization of him as a DJT rubber-stamp to describing him as a “hypocrite” and a “major liability.” Counting on her VP running mate to focus on that narrative during the campaign, she is saying, “The message is not just that Vance is ‘weird,’ it’s that the Ohio senator shouldn’t be a heartbeat away from the presidency, and that Trump picking him raises more questions about the top of the ticket.” Picking up on the previous criticisms of Biden by MAGA, she intends to highlight Trump’s 78 years of age to raise the alarm on a Vance presidency…a deflection of GOP targeting her supposed lack of experience. As Harris’s campaign co-chair, Mitch Landrieu, told CNN“We have a Black woman, we have a White guy, and nobody asked the White guy about his job qualifications.”

As Walter Einenkel writes on Daily Kos“Vance’s RNC speech was so boring that the enthusiasm from the crowd, who was clearly desperate for something to cheer, came when they started chanting for themselves. Vance says, ‘You guys are a great crowd,’ with the crowd answering back, ‘Yes we are! Yes we are! Yes we are!'” The speech pushed Trump into golden slumbers, but women have since perked up since the surfacing of his old interview with Tucker Carlson, when he called childless women “miserable ‘cat-ladies’ with no direct stake” in America’s future. In 2016’s run for the presidency, Trump’s inner circle included MelaniaIvankaHope Hicks and Kellyanne Conway, all instrumental in his selecting of Mike Pence as his VP, but this time around, females were benched…even Melania only brought her smile and a few friendly waves for the gathered at the RNC confab. With The Don letting only men be pivotal in the selection process which resulted in Vance, he is stuck unless, or until, JD offers to jump ship. No doubt the estrogen will continue to roil the campaign if Vance continues with his advocacy of no abortions, elimination of no-fault divorce, and no leaving an unhappy/abusive marriage. A Harris VP selection will certainly have women’s input on her final choice.

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

~

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Jerry Garcia

“Deadheads are kinda like people who like licorice. Not everybody likes licorice, but people who like licorice, REALLY like licorice!”

“I’d rather have my immortality while I’m alive. I don’t care if it lasts beyond me at all. I’d just as soon it didn’t.”

“[commenting on environmental issues] Somebody’s got to do something, and it’s a damned shame that it has to be us!”

“Magic is what we do, music is how we do it.”

“Drug use is kind of a dead-end street. It’s one of those places you turn with your problems, and pretty soon all your problems just become that one problem. Then it’s just you and the drugs.”

...

This is the show I was at in Las Vegas this past weekend. Set 2 is available on YouTube as well. At least right now…

This was one of the most amazing concert experiences I’ve ever had! We had seats in the center, and closer than where the video is shot from, but I don’t think the Sphere has a bad seat…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 24 – 30, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… some truthdig… Greensite… will be back next week… Steinbruner… is out this week… Hayes… perennial grasses and healthy soil… Patton…They … Matlock… …inexorable decision by the donkey in the room…a hat is tossed…a new day… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you …June Lockhart in 1970… Quotes on… “Election”

...

EARLIEST PHOTO OF DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ. This was taken around 1859. It’s of course what we now call Pacific, Front, and Mission streets with that Jamba Juice, US Post office and stuff there now. Back then it was Willow, Front and Main Streets.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: July 24, 2024

Friends, this week I’m passing on this story which was originally published in the Grist weekly newsletter.

After weeks of intense media speculation and sustained pressure from Democratic lawmakers, major donors and senior advisors, President Joe Biden has announced that he is bowing out of the presidential race. He is the first sitting president to step aside so close to Election Day. “I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and focus entirely on fulfilling my duties as president for the remainder of my term,” Biden said in a letter on Sunday.

He endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, to take his place. “Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year,” he said in another statement. Not long after, Harris announced via the Biden campaign that she intends to run for president. “I am honored to have the president’s endorsement and my intention is to earn and win this nomination,” she said.

During his term, Biden managed to shepherd a surprising number of major policies into law with a razor-thin Democratic majority in the Senate. His crowning achievement is signing the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA — the biggest climate spending law in U.S. history, with the potential to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions up to 42 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. In announcing his withdrawal, Biden called it “the most significant climate legislation in the history of the world.”

Former president Donald Trump has vowed to undo many of the policies Biden accomplished if he becomes president.

Despite his legislative successes, the 81-year-old Democrat couldn’t weather widespread blowback following a debate performance in June in which he appeared frail and struck many in his party as ill-equipped to lead the country for another four years. He will leave office with a portion of his proposed climate agenda unpassed and the United States still projected to miss his administration’s goal of reducing emissions at least 50 percent by 2030.

Former president Donald Trump has vowed to undo many of the policies Biden accomplished if he becomes president, including parts of the IRA. And scores of his key advisors and former members of his presidential administration contributed to a blueprint that advocates for scrapping the vast majority of the nation’s climate and environmental protections. Whichever Democrat runs against Trump has a weighty mandate: protect America’s already-tenuous climate and environmental legacy from Republican attacks.

With Biden’s endorsement, Harris, a former U.S. senator from California, is the favored Democratic nominee, but that doesn’t mean she will automatically get the nomination. There are fewer than 30 days until the Democratic National Convention on Aug. 19. The thousands of Democratic delegates who already cast their votes for Biden will either decide on a nominee before the convention, or hold an open convention to find their new candidate — something that hasn’t been done since 1968.

As vice president, Harris argued for the allocation of $20 billion for the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, aimed at aiding disadvantaged communities facing climate impacts, and frequently promoted the IRA at events, touting the bill’s investments in clean energy jobs, including installation of energy-efficient lighting and replacing gas furnaces with electric heat pumps. She was also the highest-ranking U.S. official to attend the international climate talks at COP28 in Dubai last year, where she announced a U.S. commitment to double energy efficiency and triple renewable energy capacity by 2030. At that same conference, Harris announced a $3 billion commitment to the Green Climate Fund to help developing nations adapt to climate challenges, although Politico reported that the sum was “subject to the availability of funds,” according to the Treasury Department.

“Vice President Harris has been integral to the Biden administration’s most important climate accomplishments and has a long track record as an impactful climate champion,” Evergreen Action, the climate-oriented political group, said in a statement.

Harris caught some flak for using a potentially overstated “$1 trillion over 10 years” figure to describe the Biden administration’s climate investments. She got that sum from adding up all of the administration’s major investments over the past four years, some of which are only vaguely connected to climate change.

“Vice President Harris has been integral to the Biden administration’s most important climate accomplishments and has a long track record as an impactful climate champion.”

As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris proposed a $10 trillion climate plan to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 on the campaign trail, including 100-percent carbon-neutral electricity by 2030. Under the plan, 50 percent of new vehicles sold would be zero-emission by 2030; and 100 percent of cars by 2035. But that proposal, like similarly ambitious climate change proposals released by other Democrats during that election cycle, was nothing more than a campaign wishlist. A better indicator of what her plans for climate change as president would look like — better, even, than her record as vice president, as much of her agenda was set by the Biden administration — could be buried in her record as San Francisco’s district attorney from 2004 to 2011 and as California attorney general from 2011 to 2017.

As district attorney, Harris created an environmental justice unit to address environmental crimes affecting San Francisco’s poorest residents and prosecuted several companies, including U-Haul, for violation of hazardous waste laws. Harris later touted her environmental justice unit as the first such unit in the country. An investigation found the unit only filed a handful of lawsuits, though, and none of them were against the city’s major industrial polluters.

As attorney general, Harris secured an $86 million settlement from Volkswagen for rigging its vehicles with emissions-cheating software and investigated ExxonMobil over its climate change disclosures. She also filed a civil lawsuit against Phillips 66 and ConocoPhillips for environmental violations at gas stations, which eventually resulted in a $11.5 million settlement. And she conducted a criminal investigation of an oil company over a 2015 spill in Santa Barbara. The company was found guilty and convicted on nine criminal charges.

“We must do more,” Harris said late last year at the climate summit in Dubai. “Our action collectively, or worse, our inaction will impact billions of people for decades to come.”

Clayton Aldern contributed writing and reporting to this article.

Your support matters…

Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.

You can help level the playing field. Become a member.

Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what’s really happening- without compromise. [support truthdig]

GOYO. Netflix series. (6.5 IMDB)  *** Hard to believe and follow this tearful drama from Buenos Aires. It’s about a museum guide who has Asperger’s. We get to look at his sex life, how he loses control, and his new love of the beautiful woman guide that changes everything.

A MAN IN FULL. Netflix series (6.5 IMDB) ***  Jeff Daniels at his very best acting (not so much) costars with Diane Lane in this drama centering on his real estate empire and all the complex issues we find in real estate everywhere. Lucy Liu plays a big part in it too as we watch his partial control over himself and his holdings mostly disappear inside banks, attorneys, and drawn out office scenes.

ROALD DAHL’S ESIO TROT. Prime movie. (6.9 IMDB) * The top name cast has Dustin Hoffman and his chasing of Judi Dench while Richard Cordery leads us on this boring, predictable, comedy. It’s another back balcony upstairs/ downstairs over used plot. Hoffman is very disappointing when you start thinking back to his classic and serious films, he’s 87 years old now.

THE ASUNTA CASE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) *** Another Spanish movie based on a true story about a local couple whose adopted Chinese daughter is found murdered. Even the police are suspected of the crime. Mistakes are made, the story stays tight, worth watching.

GANGS OF GALICIA. Netflix series (6.3 IMDB) *** A Spanish murder adventure about a woman whose father gets murdered, so she goes inside some drug cartels to find out and get revenge on whodunit!! Great seaside- water footage. With boats and police everywhere.

SUNNY. Apple series (7.3 IMDB) ** A Japanese comedy starring Rashida Jones who loses her husband and has a robot replace him. There’s way too much mugging, drinking, and undirected reactions to make this worth watching…avoid it

DESPERATE LIES. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB) *** Juliana Paes takes the lead in this Brazilian re-take after re-take about childbirth. It appears that she got drunk, went to bed with two guys and got pregnant from both of them….and had twins! Complex, barely believable, only a bit humorous, but you will stay focused.

FANCY DANCE. Apple movie. (6.6 IMDB) ** Executive directed by Forrest Whitaker and starring Michael Rowe. It’s all about Native Americans and their family structure and personal issues. It’s both sensitive and amateurish and lacks a forceful direction.

YOUR HONOR. Netflix series (7.6 IMDB). *** Bryan Cranston along with Hope Davis and especially Rosie Perez lead this New Orleans saga. The son of a crime boss is killed and it’s the judge’s son who gets the blame. Well worth watching.

HOUSE OF THE DRAGON. HBO series. *** I re-watched much of this series prequel to Game of Thrones just to check on how relevant and applicable it may still be. It definitely has lost the magic and charm, probably due to our increasing and improving the world. Game of Thrones was back in 2011 and had an amazing 72 episodes. House of The Dragon begins 17 decades before Game Of Thrones.

A BODY THAT WORKS. Netflix series. (7.7 IMDB) *** It starts slow as we watch a scared and un-pregnant 37 year old woman decide to get a surrogate woman to carry her baby. There’s much realistic action and re-actions between the two “pregnant” couples.

NIGHTMARES AND DAY DREAMS. Netflix series.(6.6 IMDB) *** A collection of 7 episodes starting in Jakarta with a baby falling from a balcony, some concepts of torture, and then… switches to a bread factory !! All seven chapters are like that and they hang together neatly, but full of blood and guts.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Series. (7.8 IMDB) **** An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it.

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB). *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT. Prime movie. (7.0 IMDB) **** All about competition rowing at the college level. The University of Washington ended up sending their rowing team to the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Hollywood star/ actor George Clooney directed this sentimental and touching near documentary…and it shows. Exciting, scenes from the existing class system and how these poor children pulled together.

INHERITANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1IMDB) ** This is a comedy and you need to remember that intention. A TV host dies and for some plot reason the family is invited to his mansion to experience the reading his will. He hosted a game show and they throw in some gay humor, some inside tv programing errors and it’s only worth 2 thumbs.

...

Gillian will be back next week!

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

Becky will be back soon!

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Perennial Grasses and Healthy Soil
Isn’t it amazing how marketing pitches can formulate the foundations for societal dialogues? Somehow, forest management gets ridiculed with the phrase ‘raking the forest,’ aiding the politics of defunding the US Forest Service at a time when we really do need widespread restoration of prescribed fire…not raking, but effectively the same thing. And ‘forgiving student debt’ gets bandied about, helping to steer conversations/media away from the more difficult subjects of: better funding/better outcomes of public education; training young adults about contractual obligations and financial planning, and; regulating financial institutions to make student loans more affordable. I’m sure each area of human dialogue has its ‘short hand’ statements that one sector uses to manipulate others. The one I’m faced with currently is the jingo ‘healthy perennial grasses make for healthy soil.’ Let’s take a closer look at that phrase.

Bunchgrass Paradigm
Long ago, a preeminent ecologist traveled to California and ‘discovered’ something that formulated the basis of myriad dialogues continuing through today. Frederic Clements described ‘natural succession’ where nature transforms itself from one habitat to the next in a logical and predictable order. You may recall the diagram that still sticks with me where a pond becomes a marsh becomes a bog becomes a meadow becomes shrubland, culminating in the ‘climax’ community…a forest. In examining California’s grasslands, Dr. Clements found a patch of ‘pristine’ grassland, one of the few that had escaped the plow, along a railroad right of way. That ‘pristine’ grassland was dominated by a perennial bunchgrass, purple needlegrass: this, he said, was how all California’s grasslands should look. Many people still believe this. What about the hundreds of species of wildflowers, such as those cited by John Muir as creating carpets across the Central Valley, and those which provided food for indigenous peoples for generations? Those holding dear to the ‘bunchgrass paradigm’ will say those species grew only in between the bunchgrasses where weeds now proliferate.

Perennialization Bandwagon
As the bunchgrass paradigm has been perpetuating, another popular movement has been building, a desire to transform agriculture from annual plants into perennial plants with little to no tilling, which purportedly ‘destroys’ soil health. Despite being disproven as effective over and over again, farmers are still attempting to grow lettuce, carrots, broccoli, etc, on ground without tilling. Meanwhile, rangeland managers are repeating a similarly disproven hypothesis that all California grasslands would be better off if ‘restored’ to perennial grasses. Buoyed by science papers that suggest the importance of cattle grazing to help establish/maintain perennial grasses, livestock managers have found good use of this message to gain credibility and increase their land base.

The “Perennial Grasses Have Bigger Roots” Myth
Add the two previously described popular myths together and you encounter another emergent, oft-repeated myth: perennial grasses restore soil health because they have larger masses of roots (in comparison with annual grasses). Central to this popular misconception are comparison photos from the Midwest showing profiles of annual wheat versus perennial wheat including both above and below-ground portions of the plants.  The idea being promulgated is that larger root systems add more organic matter to the soil, break up soil compaction, and allow for better water infiltration. Most recently, proponents of this myth point out that the increased below ground organic matter of the larger rooted perennials means that more carbon is being sequestered, helping to address climate change.

California’s Grasslands: Not Naturally Perennial
California is mostly a Mediterranean state with a long history of ecological disturbance: grazing, fire, drought, inundation, etc. That ecological situation does not naturally produce widespread perennial grass dominated prairies. Even where there are perennial grasses present in a given area of prairie, they are rarely naturally ubiquitous: species seem specific to soils, steepness of slopes, wetness, nutrients, and so on. There are many more annual species than perennial, and many more wildflowers than grasses. Some of the most emblematic grasslands in California are naturally annual plant dominated, such as the wildflower-display rich Carizzo Plains, the rolling hills over the Altamont Pass, and the flower-filled savannahs of the southern, low-elevation Sierra Nevada. On the other hand, large swaths of the former wetlands of the Great Valley were probably once dominated in wide swaths by perennial rushes, sedges, and tall native, rhizomatous (not bunch) grasses.

Myths of the Perennial Life Form
Let’s examine the “Perennial Grasses Have Bigger Roots” myth for a moment. The most widespread native perennial grass in California is pine bluegrass, a diminutive grass that often has leaves a mere inch or two high and a flower stalk reaching a foot or so into the air. This species likes it hot, dry, and shady, growing in interior oak savannahs. With the first rains, it turns green, later sends up flower heads, and then dries by late spring. There is no reality in which this species has longer roots, or a bigger root system, than the often 4′ tall European oatgrass. Around here, that European oatgrass is more comparable to the perennial California brome grass. This brome, in some soils, alongside European oats similarly continues growing, flowering, and seeding well into summer. In wet areas, a common native perennial grass is meadow barley. Meadow barley is relatively small and short-lived, and goes dormant very early in the season, when it is replaced by the proliferate annual Italian ryegrass, which is larger by far. Most people surveying for perennial bunchgrasses have overlooked meadow barley altogether as it disappears so early in the season.

Yes, there are smaller annual grasses and larger perennial grasses, but my point is that the generality that ‘perennial grasses have bigger roots’ is untrue and not that useful as a generality.

Regenerative Ranching: Regenerating What?
Although the definition of ‘regenerative ranching’ is elusive, it seems most proponents are gravitating towards suggesting that they are ‘restoring healthy soil.’ The idea here is that soil has been in some way degraded and must be returned to its primeval state. Often, the soil degradation concern is ‘compaction.’ To restore soil health, proponents rely heavily on the myths described above overlaid with management hypotheses that using livestock can mimic evolutionary disturbance regimes last encountered with the Pleistocene megafauna, 10,000 years ago. Regenerative ranchers really believe that such approaches work and are full of anecdotes about what they’ve witnessed, though changes in soil health are notoriously slow and always soils-specific.

Compared to What?
I’m pleased that there is a conversation about how to best manage California’s prairies, but concerned about bandwagons, slogans, and misinformation. Humans are really, really good at pairwise comparisons, but their attraction to such must be tempered. Perennial vs. annual grasses: nonsensical! Livestock grazed vs. ungrazed: not helpful! We can try really hard or spend a lot of money trying to ‘restore’ soil health, but what are we restoring it to? There is the possibility for a great collaboration in this conversation. The USDA NRCS has a long-running research project that fits nicely: their ‘ecological site description’ project would do well to help define which sites are best compared with one another, based on soil types. When having these conversations, we would do well to have great respect for the state of the science, referencing a rich literature and how it does, or doesn’t pertain. And, in our pairwise comparison analysis, let’s always try to compare what we are doing, regenerative or otherwise, with someone else’s approach: what is working better, and why? We must always make these conversations very site-specific…variability across sites is the rule.

Meanwhile, beware of definition-less terms without a systematic third party certification program: ‘natural,’ ‘grassfed,’ or ‘regenerative’ labels hope to entice you to pay more, have higher respect, adhere to brand loyalty, or just plain ‘believe’ you are doing the right thing by supporting such verbiage. With this and other jingo-based bandwagons, let’s get a tad more critical so that we support what is worth supporting with greater clarity on WHY.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#199 / They

Pictured above is Raymond Oliver Dreher, Jr. (born February 14, 1967), known as Rod Dreher. Dreher is an American expatriate writer and editor living in Hungary. He was a columnist with The American Conservative for twelve years, ending in March 2023, and he remains an editor-at-large there. He is also author of several books, including How Dante Can Save Your LifeThe Benedict Option, and Live Not by Lies.

The above information is coming to you by way of Wikipedia. Dreher’s blog, should you wish to consult it, can be found by clicking this link. I have mentioned Dreher before (and actually more than once). I first became aware of him by way of New Yorker profile.

Below is a rather long extract from Dreher’s blog posting published on July 15, 2024. In that blog posting, Dreher reacts to the attack on former president Trump that occurred during a July 14, 2024, rally in Butler, Pennsylvania:

Whatever the motivation of the failed assassin, this was a monumental failure on behalf of the Secret Service. How the hell does a gunman climb onto that roof and crawl into place, with multiple people in the crowd screaming, “He’s got a gun!” and trying to warn police, and squeeze off shots at Donald Trump?! There were snipers already in place for just such a possibility. Why were there no Secret Service agents on that roof to begin with? It’s an obvious platform for an assassin, were one to be present. The conspiracy theorists are already going wild on this point, and understandably so. I say “understandably” not to endorse a conspiracy theory, but to say this Secret Service failure gives natural rise to such speculation.
My thoughts as I was falling asleep on the first night, on the fact political and culture war fact pattern emerging:

  • They wouldn’t leave Evangelical Christian Jack Philips alone to bake his cakes and run his business.
  • They won’t let parents know if their children are transing themselves in school.
  • They won’t let parents remove pornographic books from school libraries.
  • They teach little children and teenage minors to hate everything normal — their families, their own bodies, even their very identity.
  • They told us that the President of the United States was a Russian Manchurian (Siberian?) candidate, and crippled his administration with these lies.
  • They told us Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation, though they knew it was not.
  • They lied to us about Covid and its origins.
  • They told us that we couldn’t have even a semblance of a normal life because of Covid … unless we were going out onto the streets to protest racism, or burn the cities down to honor George Floyd.
  • “Mostly peaceful” riots.
  • They have turned professional journalism into propaganda.
  • For example, they ignored obvious signs of Joe Biden’s mental and physical decline into decrepitude, until he choked on live TV — and are now shocked, shocked that the White House deceived them.
  • They tried to ruin as a bigot a high school kid who wore a MAGA hat on the Mall, and was set upon by a provocative left-wing activist.
  • They have conspired to destroy institutions essential to running society by keeping out the accomplished and the meritorious, for the sake of letting in those who are incapable of doing the work, but who possess the favored demographic profile.
  • They have divided America and made us fear and loathe each other on racial lines.
  • They have demonized white people — especially white males.
  • They have destroyed statues and attempted to rewrite American history to reflect ideological convictions.
  • They have led near-pogroms against Jews on elite American campuses.
  • They secretly pressured, from senior government levels, a policymaking medical organization to abandon scientific considerations in order to eliminate lower limits on sexually and psychologically mutilating children.
  • They passed laws in some states allowing the government to seize minor children from their uncooperative parents, for the sake of sexually and psychologically mutilating them.
  • They are destroying women’s sports, and making women everywhere more vulnerable to mentally unwell men who think they are women.
  • They gaslit us into war in Iraq, and now they’ve gaslit us into an ongoing, unwinnable war against Russia, risking World War III for no plausible national interest.
  • They are wrecking the military with DEI, such that fewer normal men want to serve.
  • They have frightened millions of Americans into silence over fear of cancellation.
  • They have left the back door into the US wide open for migrants, including Hezbollah fighters, likely Chinese agents, and others.
  • They shipped America’s manufacturing base overseas, and blame Americans for being unhappy with their economic prospects.
  • They deregulated Wall Street, and when it blew up in 2008, managed to avoid punishing anyone for it.
  • They failed in Iraq and Afghanistan, but no senior military commander lost his job for it, even though the 2014 Afghanistan Papers report revealed that the Pentagon didn’t know what it was doing, and didn’t care.
  • All those American soldiers, physically and psychologically maimed by the invasion of Iraq on false pretenses, and by the stupidity of trying to build a liberal democracy in Afghanistan — swept under the rug.
  • In a country where you have to show ID to buy beer, this week they tried to defeat a law that would require people to show ID proving their are citizens in order to vote.
  • They declared that Americans who dissent from all this are on the “far right” and might be “domestic terrorists” — while mollycoddling Antifa and violent leftists.
  • They put Trump through a show trial in Manhattan on flimsy charges, to make him easier to remove as a rival to Joe Biden.
  • AND NOW … they have tried to assassinate Trump.

Who is “they”? The Ruling Class. The people in power — including some Republicans; it wasn’t Democrats who led the invasions, nor only the Clinton Democrats who bent over for Wall Street). I’m talking about the people who benefit from the system as it is.

It’s a nice gesture for Dreher to suggest that maybe some “Republicans” are implicated in all the insults he lists – all those outrages that “They” have perpetuated upon the American people. It is true, for instance, that the shooter who apparently just grazed Trump’s ear, was a registered Republican, but it is pretty clear who Dreher thinks the bad guys are – who “They” are – as you read through Dreher’s list.

In August of last year, when I referenced Dreher, the title of my blog posting read: “Songs of Resentment.” If you want to track it down, you’ll find a link to an actual song, too! Given this recent “They” listing, it looks like Dreher thinks that there are a lot of new verses that might be added to the tune!

I keep saying this, but it seems to me that what I am saying continues to be relevant. In the United States of America, WE (“we, the people”) are “The Ruling Class.” At least we can be, and we should be, and we have the right to be! There is no “They” who are ultimately responsible for oppressing and distressing us. In our “self-government system,” our remedy for the outrages that we can see everywhere is to organize politically, and then to use whatever political successes we have to advance the agenda we think is best. I have had some people tell me that this “model” sounds good, but that it just doesn’t work in our current economic situation. Not in “real life.” Well, if it truly doesn’t work, then we need to do something about that, don’t we? Unless, that is, we are willing to stipulate that we are the powerless pawns of those with the big bucks, which is pretty much the theme of that “Song of Resentment” I linked above.

I’m not buying into a declaration of powerlessness, and I hope no one else is, either, because what we “think” determines what we “do,” and what we “do” determines what happens.

While we are trying to work out a good strategy, allow me to give my opinion: Making up lists of all the horrible things that “They” have done to us (finding more verses for those “Songs of Resentment” that we so often love to sing to ourselves) is exactly the opposite of a successful strategy.

Frankly, that kind of thinking is what sends people to the rooftops with automatic weapons!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

NEVER MIND, WORKING CLASS NAPALM, ATTACK DOGS ON THE LOOSE

Last Sunday marked a dramatic change for American politics in one of the most unusual presidential races in our history with Joe Biden stepping aside from his Democratic presidential campaign. After weeks of back-stage whispers and hand-wringing by party stalwarts, the growing cacophony in support of this conclusive act caused the president to acquiesce after discussions with associates and family, ending his bold promise to charge on against Trump and the MAGA horde. His embarrassing ‘debate’ with Trump was not the first indication that trouble lay ahead, but it was the final straw for a majority, and his follow-up interviews with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos and CBS’s Lester Holt did nothing to restore any confidence in his ability to carry on with the race as concern about his age and mental acuity only increased alarm.

Despite eroding poll numbers, Biden was undaunted, even in the face of the now-steady stream of calls for him to step aside to allow a stronger candidate to save democracy from the MAGA-controlled GOP which threatens to overhaul the government and negate the Constitution and our body of laws. His withdrawal basically reshapes the campaign for both parties, and may invigorate the Democrats who have faced waning support from apathetic voters, especially the big-money donors. Over the past months a disinterested electorate has rolled their eyes at a possible repeat of the Trump-Biden race of 2020, so a fresh new face could put some spice into the race, spurring the undecideds, as well as those who had decided to sit this one out to start paying attention. Democratic donors and operatives have been discussing possible replacements for some time now; and while several names have come to the fore with the dawning of a new day, VP Harris seems to have leapt to the top with her declaration of candidacy, donors coming out of the woodwork to fund her campaign. The only other person who has said Biden’s delegates are her target is Marianne Williamson, author, spiritual adviser to Oprah, and perennial political candidate who has never received more than 5% of the vote in any state primary she has entered. Senator Joe Manchin had hinted that he was considering re-registering as a Democrat in order to throw his hat in the ring, but Monday morning brought him to his senses and he discounted the notion.

CNN’s Trump-Biden ‘debate’ was damaging to Biden not only for his faltering showing, but it allowed the former president to retreat, holding back without revealing the real Donald Trump…fewer lies and name-calling than in his usual performance. Some members of Congress thought that Biden had been slow to reach out to his party’s leaders, and to those lawmakers in difficult races, with some charging his staff with shielding him from those calling for his withdrawal. A recent meeting of the House Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, allowed members to vent about The Boss and his staff, referring to the situation as “the elephant in the room,” some calling it “the donkey in the room.” Last week, as Biden fell victim to his third bout with COVID-19Democratic strategist Van Jones remarked, “Wednesday was a terrible day for Democrats,” as he contrasted the Trump assassination attempt the previous Saturday, adding, “If you pull back and look at this thing, strength versus weakness, a bullet couldn’t stop Trump. A virus just stopped Biden. The Democrats are coming apart. The Republicans are coming together.” After his diagnosis, Biden headed for Delaware for self-isolation, and presumably the critical meetings that resulted in his letter on X for a graceful withdrawal from the race, which Obama adviser, David Axelrod, had termed “inexorable.”

Biden announced his support for VP Kamala Harris, giving her a clear edge to replace him, also saying that selecting her as his 2020 running mate was the best decision he has made. One advantage she has is that she was a member of that winning ticket, and has several months of campaigning under her belt already. She has been a prominent figure in the administration’s push for abortion access, and is likely the candidate who would be able to access the president’s campaign war chest of donations for a solid start to a candidacy. Conventional wisdom says an open DNC convention is unlikely at this late date, but should that happen it could well be a disaster of infighting and chaos which will defeat the party in the end. Ryan Grim, on a Substack post says, “If Kamala Harris wants the nomination, and wants it to be worth anything, she has to at least show that she fought for it and won it cleanly. It just so happens Democrats are scheduled to meet to nominate a presidential candidate in Chicago next month. That process could help to resolve the legitimacy crisis by at least offering an attempt at something like a participatory democratic process.” Quickly tossing her hat into the ring, Harris issued a statement saying, “I am honored to have the President’s endorsement and my intention is to earn and win this nomination.”

Republicans, anticipating this turn of events, have their attacks against Harris in a row, labeling her the “border czar” for her work on addressing the root causes of migration from Central America, and of course, she will be connected to the issues they have raised that are plaguing the Biden administration. Trump’s attack dogs were in the fray after Biden’s endorsement, blasting that, “Kamala Harris is just as much a joke as Biden is. Harris will be even WORSE for the people of our Nation than Joe Biden.” As satirist Andy Borowitz reports, the Trump campaign is “Calling it ‘the most crooked conspiracy in American history,’ as Trump and other Republicans accused Democrats of plotting to nominate a winning presidential candidate. ‘I’ve seen the Democrats do some pretty evil things, but I never thought they’d choose a nominee with a chance of winning,’ Trump said. ‘This should never be allowed to happen in our country.’ ‘What we are witnessing is no more and no less than a shameless scheme to mount a successful election campaign,’ House Speaker Mike Johnson charged. ‘As God is my witness, this will not stand.’ Senator J.D. Vance attacked the Democrats’ ‘blatant use of strategy’ and warned of more sinister machinations to come. ‘In a matter of days, be prepared for them to announce that they’ve chosen a qualified and appealing VP candidate,’ Vance said. ‘We Republicans would never do that.”” We can expect culture-war excesses over a Harris nomination from the MAGAs. A Californian? Too liberal! A former prosecutor? Too conservative! Too female! Too Black! The last two charges will not be said aloud…but count on dogwhistles thunderous enough to disintegrate the case holding the Constitution.

When the RNC closed its convention, party officials were beaming at the future they believed was spread out before them, expectations high! A party united, a candidate leading in the polls, opponents disorganized and a Democratic incumbent dropping like a rock in the polls. Donald Trump with victory in his eyes, had started solidifying plans for the post-election transition period, his 2024 election being a given in his cockiness. Then came the slap in the face, as Biden abandoned his candidacy, provoking fear in the MAGA ranks, as their anti-Biden offensive fell apart, while Democrats transitioned from despair to prudent optimism that they were finally on-track. One important factor is the contrast of youth versus old should VP Harris be the chosen one to face Trump…it’s no longer a race between two old, unpopular candidates…The Donald is now the oldest presidential nominee in US history! A South Carolina state representative said in a CNN interview, “The man is 80-years-old and so the question is, can he serve another four years? I’m not sure he can.” Tit-for-tat retribution! Anti-Trump Republican George Conway chimed in with, “Seriously, how do you convince people you’re going to make America great again with some old guy who slurs his words and rambles incoherently after his jail ti- …um, I mean bedtime??” And perhaps the most delicious comment came from E. Jean Carroll who said, “Suddenly, he is looking really old.” Former Trump advisor and MAGA extremist, Stephen Miller, enraged in his Fox News interview, accused Democrats of undemocratic actions, calling Kamala Harris a weak choice, and “napalm for the working class.” Miller whined that the GOP had spent tens of millions of dollars running against Biden, only to have the Dems pull the rug out from under them with a “never mind.”

Trump primary challenger, Nikki Haley, predicted in January, “The first party to retire its 80-year-old candidate is going to be the party that wins the election.” In her campaign, she had called Trump “unhinged” and “not qualified,” drawing an impressive number of followers, but her appearance at the RNC convention giving the former president her “strong endorsement” revealed her true colors. A small PAC of disaffected Haley supporters, committed to preventing Trump’s return to the Oval Office, has endorsed Kamala Harris for president, changing their organization’s name too ‘Haley Voters for Harris.’ The group’s director, Craig Snyder, calls Harris a “tough former prosecutor and the best candidate to defeat Donald Trump in November.”

Ezra Klein writes in The New York Times“It was a convention that picked Abraham Lincoln over William Seward. It was a convention that chose F.D.R. over Al Smith. I’ve been reading Ed Achorn’s book ‘The Lincoln Miracle: Inside the Republican Convention That Changed History.’ My favorite line in it comes from Senator Charles Sumner, who sends a welcome note to the delegates, ‘whose duty it will be to organize victory.’ Whose duty it will be to organize victory – I love that. That’s what a convention is supposed to do. It’s what a political party is supposed to do: organize victory. Because victory doesn’t just happen. It has to be organized.” Tom Nichols wrote in The Atlantic Daily“Every voter who cares about democracy but has claimed to be paralyzed by the two old men in the race will now have no excuses for indecision. The Democrats have made clear that they intend to field a stable, experienced candidate. The Republicans, a cult of personality in the grip of fevered delusions, will field Trump. Tonight, Americans have the clarity they demanded.”

Independent presidential candidate, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., had to get his licks in, saying, “the contest for the White House is now a two-man-race’” and that only he can defeat Donald Trump. At his press conference he praised Biden for his service to the country while blaming Democratic leaders for concealing the president’s “mental decline.” “If the Democrats do what I suspect they’re going to do, which is to anoint Kamala Harris, a vice president who is monumentally unpopular within her own party…they’re doing it because it’s the easiest way to hold onto the money,” he added. He also said he would consider accepting the Democratic nomination if it were offered to him. Count on your telephone ringer to be deathly silent, junior!

As reported on HuffPost by Lee Moran, former Trump White House aide, Sebastian Gorka made racist comments about VP Harris before Biden pulled the plug on his candidacy, as talk arose regarding her possible succession to the slot. Gorka called the first female, Black and Asian American VP, a “DEI hire” and “colored,” reflecting a racist right-wing spin on efforts to boost diversity, equity and inclusion…which they have made into racist diatribe with the “DEI” term. Actor and comedian, D.L. Hughley, on CNN called Gorka’s comment a product of “mediocre white men,” as he defended Harris in her past achievements, her professionalism and ability to run the country, which makes her suitably qualified in the event of Biden’s inability to complete his term now or in the future. Hughley believes, “America has been more damaged by GCI than DEI…greedy, corrupt, incompetent white men who have caused more damage to the USA than diversity, equity, and inclusion. So what men do, what mediocre white men do, is blame things. They have no excuse for their failures. Trump did to get a second term because he so mishandled COVID that he was fired by the American people.”

Hughley says, “I find the whole tone of this insulting…for a couple of reasons. I watched a man get convicted of 34 felonies. I watched a man get adjudicated for sexual battery. I watched a man who got convicted of fraud and never have I heard from the media in general about his qualifications to be president.” Trump, as might be expected, took to his Truth Social platform to launch more conspiracy theories and propel insults at the president. “It’s not over! Tomorrow Joe Biden’s going to wake up and forget that he dropped out of the race!” Said the man who is still facing questions regarding his own mental fitness! He went on, accusing Biden of faking his COVID illness, and saying, “He is a threat to democracy. Who is running our Country right now? It’s not Crooked Joe, he has no idea where he is. If he can’t run for office, he can’t run our Country!!!” Yada-yada-yada…

Stephen Colbert, on a recent show said, “Donald Trump’s brain is broke, and we got more proof of that when he tried to shame Joe Biden into taking a cognitive test.” A video clip was shown of Trump bragging…again!…about passing a cognitive test of his own, muffing the name of the doctor who administered the test by calling him “Ronny Johnson” instead of his correct name, Ronny Jackson. Launching into his Trump-voice impression of the former president, Colbert said, “Doc Ronny Johnson, he gave me the test, then I went home to my beautiful wife, Malaria, and my two hideous sons, Urkel and Carl’s Jr.” The Late Show host then reminded us of the comments from a Republican lawmaker, who said a meeting with the former president was “rambling…like talking to your drunk uncle at the family reunion,” and a business leader who complained that a meet-up with Trump was “meandering…he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.”

The Late Night host, Seth Meyers gave President Biden credit for allowing Melania Trump to attend the RNC convention undisturbed after passing new protections for undocumented immigrants, which shields about 500,000 immigrants from deportation. Meyers said, “It’s the first time a US president has done something nice for Melania.” So, the mystery of the missing Melania ended when she made an appearance in the final hours of the RNC gathering, only 45 minutes late. Her apathy showed as she appeared onstage with The Donald after his record-breaking snoozer of a speech, when she quickly turned aside as he tried to kiss her. Maybe there is something to satirist Andy Borowitz’s post that she was lured to the convention by a promise that her husband was ready to sign the divorce papers?

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Election

“The people who cast the votes don’t decide an election, the people who count the votes do.”
~Joseph Stalin

“People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election.”
~Otto von Bismarck

“~A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.”
James Freeman Clarke

“It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 – except Goldwater in ’64 – the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted.”
~Ann Coulter

“The United States brags about its political system, but the President says one thing during the election, something else when he takes office, something else at midterm and something else when he leaves.”
~Deng Xiaoping

“Win or lose, we go shopping after the election.”
~Imelda Marcos

...

Staying in the 70s, here’s an interesting clip. When looking into it, I found that June Lockhart is still around, and in fact turned 99 in June of this year. She is one of the last surviving actors from the Golden Age of Hollywood. As recently as 2021, she voiced Alpha Control in one episode of the rebooted Lost in Space on Netflix.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 17 – 23, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… Calm and level heads… Greensite… on Civil Grand Jury Investigative Reports… Steinbruner… road safety in Aptos… Hayes… Gish Gallop… Patton… AOC: Veteran Political Operator… Matlock… RNC coronation…black and gray flights of fancy…a call for calm… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… conversation pits and other 70s decor… Quotes on… “Debate”

...

DREAM INN SITE 1960. In the lower right you can just see the Municipal Wharf and the Ideal Fish Restaurant. The large dark spot in the center is where the Dream Inn was built. You can also see the original Sisters Hospital right where Bay Street comes in on the left.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: July 17, 2024

URGING CALM AND LEVEL HEADS. I’ve known Becky O’Malley for decades. She’s the editor of the Berkeley Gazette. Here is a recent opening editorial of hers. Do take note.

Earth to Dems: Keep Calm and Carry On

Becky O’Malley
Monday July 01, 2024 – 02:56:00 PM

On my kitchen wall there’s a poster with a slogan from World War II Britain: “Keep Calm and Carry On.” In the wake of the recent presidential debate (also known as The Debacle), pundit wannabes could use a sign like that. They fell all over each other pronouncing President Biden down for the count.

The worst offender was the New York Times Editorial Board, which should be charged with journalistic malfeasance. Almost before the MSNBC talking heads had finished their OMGs over Biden’s poorish performance on Thursday night, the NYT Board was out of the gate on the Internet (“digital edition”) calling for his scalp, a cry they repeated in print in the Sunday Opinion section:

“As it stands, the president is engaged in a reckless gamble. There are Democratic leaders better equipped to present clear, compelling and energetic alternatives to a second Trump presidency. “

And there were plenty more top-tier newsies and editorial writers who announced the same hasty conclusion.

Why?

Granted, the president was somewhat hoarse, and he obviously struggled not to revert to his childhood stutter. And yes, he seemed a bit fuzzy, with trouble choosing words and finishing sentences.

Why was he sounding like that? Watching at home I made an immediate diagnosis before he’d spoken the equivalent of three grafs: he had a cold, of course.

But colds don’t make you fuzzy, do they?

No, but as an experienced home medicator (daughter,spouse,parent, grandparent) I can tell you that a vast array of OTC (over the counter) cold remedies do. I’ve learned from personal experience not to take any of the stuff Big Pharma would like you to buy at CVS or Walgreens before doing anything moderately complicated, like driving … or participating in a debate.

I’m not a doctor, or at least just a J.D, not an M.D. That’s why I was gratified to learn that a trio of Yale professors, including two genuine M.Ds, agreed with my diagnosis. Their conclusion appeared on Saturday on the MedPage Today site::

“The most probable explanation for this transient period of cognitive impairment in an older person with a cold is a side effect of cold medications. If this is so, the handwringing should cease, and we should use the debate as a reminder of how common such reactions are rather than an indication that the president is chronically debilitated.”

Unfortunately, it seems that President Biden’s handlers, including his lovely wife perhaps, didn’t realize this. If the man had a bad cold, he should have been advised to announce that he’d lost his voice and offer to set another date.

Now, after the damage has occurred, here’s the advice of the Yale doctors:

“We need to know if President Biden took cold medications before the debate. His doctors should assess the role they may have played. How the American people assess the debate hinges on the answer. It would be tragic to magnify the meaning of an ill-timed adverse drug effect — and potentially have it change the course of history.”

But following such sober advice is no fun for the commentariat. Sunday’s NYT Opinion is loaded with what Jamelle Bouie, interviewed there, called “hyperventilating panic”. His own comments are the exception; he catalogs the “fatal downsides to Biden leaving the race” which seem to have escaped the notice of his NYTO colleagues.

The Board members in particular don’t seem to be aware of how hard it would be for Democrats to mount a real campaign for a new candidate at this stage. They claimed, remember, that

“There are Democratic leaders better equipped to present clear, compelling and energetic alternatives to a second Trump presidency. “

Really? Who?

Liberals, traditionally Nervous Nellies always looking for alternatives, need to be constantly reminded that you can’t beat someone with no one, and the devil you know is usually the safer choice. An assortment of governors with little name recognition outside their own states would be risky even two years out, and we’re down to single digit numbers of months now. Senators are needed right where they are. Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom have negatives well known to Californians.

The Times Editorial Board, like similar boards of other well-funded prestige papers, is populated by and large by people who have no real-life political experience. They tend to overestimate the influence of “independent” or “undecided” voters. From an early job as a campaign manager I know that people who describe themselves thus actually seldom vote. “Infrequent” registered voters on the rolls have probably moved away. Of the probable voters, a very small percentage will be changing their minds because of this debate.

As NYT and its competitors become more and more digital, man-bites-dog excitement becomes more and more desired as clickbait. Follow-up to the debate conspicuously lacked factchecking of Trump’s 90 straight minutes of lies—where’s the news in that? He performed as expected.

As my daughter pointed out to me, it’s a lot easier to deliver a smooth presentation if you don’t worry about facts, which is why some viewers claimed Trump “won”. He radiated confidence, not letting truth cramp his style.

The best analysis I’ve seen of how this first debate will or won’t, should or shouldn’t, affect the November election came from MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, someone who had a real political job working in the Senate before he became an opinion journalist.

You can see it in the window on the right. His opening monologue is only about twenty minutes long and well worth the time.

Just as I’m ready to post this, the Supreme Court has given us all very good reasons to stop squabbling and get on with it. If we can’t bar the door in November, we’ll find out what real trouble looks like.

THE ASUNTA CASE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) *** Another Spanish movie based on a true story about a local couple whose adopted Chinese daughter is found murdered. Even the police are suspected of the crime. Mistakes are made, the story stays tight, worth watching.

GANGS OF GALICIA. Netflix series (6.3 IMDB) *** A Spanish murder adventure about a woman whose father gets murdered, so she goes inside some drug cartels to find out and get revenge on whodunit!! Great seaside- water footage. With boats and police everywhere.

SUNNY. Apple series (7.3 IMDB) ** A Japanese comedy starring Rashida Jones who loses her husband and has a robot replace him. There’s way too much mugging, drinking, and undirected reactions to make this worth watching…avoid it

DESPERATE LIES. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB) *** Juliana Paes takes the lead in this Brazilian re-take after re-take about childbirth. It appears that she got drunk, went to bed with two guys and got pregnant from both of them….and had twins! Complex, barely believable, only a bit humorous, but you will stay focused.

FANCY DANCE. Apple movie. (6.6 IMDB) ** Executive directed by Forrest Whitaker and starring Michael Rowe. It’s all about Native Americans and their family structure and personal issues. It’s both sensitive and amateurish and lacks a forceful direction.

YOUR HONOR. Netflix series (7.6 IMDB). *** Bryan Cranston along with Hope Davis and especially Rosie Perez lead this New Orleans saga. The son of a crime boss is killed and it’s the judge’s son who gets the blame. Well worth watching.

HOUSE OF THE DRAGON. HBO series. *** I re-watched much of this series prequel to Game of Thrones just to check on how relevant and applicable it may still be. It definitely has lost the magic and charm, probably due to our increasing and improving the world. Game of Thrones was back in 2011 and had an amazing 72 episodes. House of The Dragon begins 17 decades before Game Of Thrones.

A BODY THAT WORKS. Netflix series. (7.7 IMDB) *** It starts slow as we watch a scared and un-pregnant 37 year old woman decide to get a surrogate woman to carry her baby. There’s much realistic action and re-actions between the two “pregnant” couples.

NIGHTMARES AND DAY DREAMS. Netflix series.(6.6 IMDB) *** A collection of 7 episodes starting in Jakarta with a baby falling from a balcony, some concepts of torture, and then… switches to a bread factory !! All seven chapters are like that and they hang together neatly, but full of blood and guts.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Series. (7.8 IMDB) **** An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it.

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB). *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT. Prime movie. (7.0 IMDB) **** All about competition rowing at the college level. The University of Washington ended up sending their rowing team to the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Hollywood star/ actor George Clooney directed this sentimental and touching near documentary…and it shows. Exciting, scenes from the existing class system and how these poor children pulled together.

INHERITANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1IMDB) ** This is a comedy and you need to remember that intention. A TV host dies and for some plot reason the family is invited to his mansion to experience the reading his will. He hosted a game show and they throw in some gay humor, some inside tv programing errors and it’s only worth 2 thumbs.

DEFENDING JACOB. Apple TV series. (7.8IMDB) *** Chris Jacobs loses the screen and our attention every time his co-star Michelle Dockery appears…she has inherited and mastered all screen stealing techniques.  He’s a much liked and capable assistant District attorney. All of a sudden his son’s best student buddy is murdered and the son is faced with maybe being guilty. It’s a long take on family loyalty, and on what’s fair, the privileges the DA’s son enjoys…and the movie is excellent…don’t miss it.

HITLER AND THE NAZIS. NETFLIX SERIES (7.5 IMDB) **** We’ll never the total truth behind World War II but this documentary fills in many blank spots. 6 years of war, 60 million lives lost, Nuremberg trials, Hitler and his love for some of Wagner’s operas, Goering, anti-British, mentioning the Messiah…it’s all in this well done documentary. We should memorize the lessons we need to learn.

WONDER. Netflix movie. (7.9 IMDB) * When you have Owen Wilson, Julia Roberts and Mandy Patinkin as leads in a sentimental movie about a 10 year old boy born with a disfigured face after 27 surgeries you have a terrible chance at making a watchable movie….and this isn’t watchable.

...

July 15, 2024

Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury

As my Tae Kwon Do teacher used to say: “Don’t start with dragon’s head and end with snake’s tail.” That old caution to avoid a weak ending applies to the lack of press coverage for most of the investigative reports from the 2023-24 Santa Cruz Civil Grand Jury. Grand Jury reports rely on press coverage to alert the community and so far, after the initial two reports, press coverage has been sparse. By the time you are reading this there may be more coverage, but so far, the lack of press interest in most of the reports listed above is of concern.*

I have just completed a year as a Civil Grand juror, one of nineteen selected to be part of a historical institution that oversees and investigates the workings of local government to ensure its efficiency and transparency: civil issues as distinct from criminal. The term is a year, and all applicants for this volunteer position are advised that the time commitment is considerable, an average of twenty hours a week. Beware of averages! From July until December the time commitment was fine. From January until June I largely disappeared from Bratton Online and other activities as the work increased and deadlines loomed. Overall, it was one of the most challenging, rewarding, intense years of my life.

By all accounts, Santa Cruz folks have more than a few gripes about their locally elected city and county representatives on a wide range of issues. One avenue for investigating such complaints is via the Civil Grand Jury, the form for which is on the Civil Grand Jury website. Some complaints don’t qualify as legitimate, such as parking tickets, neighborhood disputes or criminal issues. And not all issues investigated flow from submitted complaints. Some are suggested by jurors themselves. These are subject to a formal proposal and Grand Jury vote. All issues accepted are investigated over many months, subject to multiple-source factual evidence, exhaustive group editing and final acceptance from the Presiding Judge. Each of the reports from the above list above went through that process.

Despite a Grand Jury committee tasked with press releases to all media and follow-up, the lack of press coverage, the snake’s tail, after so much work, is very discouraging. The Civil Grand Jury can only recommend that local governments follow its recommendations. It cannot require that they do so. It relies on public pressure to hold the government accountable to the recommendations, and the public relies on the press to keep it informed about issues investigated. Without the latter, the former is unaware, and the hard investigative work of the Civil Grand Jury is for naught.

Had I not been involved in this effort I may have gone along with some in the community who think that Grand Jury reports are a joke. Without good press coverage and an involved public that may well be true. I now see the Civil Grand Jury as a unique democratic process to potentially hold government accountable. That is, if the issues are well-covered in the press, the public takes notice and follows through with political action.

I urge you to read the reports listed above and detailed here.

At least choose one that interests you. The government agencies have ninety days to respond to the report recommendations which puts most at mid-September. Whether they check “don’t agree” with no required explanation is largely dependent on whether they think the public is paying attention. Well, are you?

*Since submitting this piece for publication the Sentinel has covered the Grand Jury report on Preventing Rape and Domestic Violence (7/16/24). Hopefully more media outlets will follow their lead.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

SIGN UP NOW FOR PANEL DISCUSSION ABOUT DENSE HOUSING MANDATES
If you have not yet done so, sign up now to attend this free panel discussion July 31 that will feature State Senator Scott Wiener, who has shoved through much of the legislation removing local discretion in land use projects and seeks to weaken the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for developments.

This housing forum will discuss how communities in Downtown Santa Cruz, Live Oak/Soquel and throughout the county can maintain their identities amid state-driven development like the Food Bin and “Clock Tower” projects. We’ll explore the impacts of increasing housing on Santa Cruz’s character and consider the roles of state and local governments in housing policies.

This forum will feature California State Senator Scott Wiener, Santa Cruz County First District Supervisor Manu Koenig, Santa Cruz City Councilmember Sandy Brown, and Sibley Simon of Workbench. It will be moderated by Lookout’s Politics and Policy Correspondent, Christopher Neely.
get tickets here
 
While the County is planning alot of dense development in Supervisor Koenig’s Live Oak District, the largest and most significant development planned is in the Second District, with the 13-acre parcel at 2600 Mar Vista earmarked for nearly 300 new units, and about 40 units at the Seascape Golf Course parking lot.  Where is Supervisor Zach Friend?  Likely off to his next higher rung of the political ladder.
 
COUNTY’S EVENING PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS CLIMATE ACTION PLANS
On the very same evening as the event above, the County’s Commission on the Environment and the Office of Response, Recovery and Resilience (OR3) will hold a rare evening meeting for the public in the County Government Building at 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, in the 5th Floor Board of Supervisor chambers.  The meeting is scheduled for 5pm-7pm, which makes it possible to at least hear the first hour before hiking next door to the Hotel Paradox
 
Santa Cruz County to host climate action adaptation meetings [Santa Cruz Sentinel]

“According to a release from the county, discussion topics will include carbon-emission reduction strategies, natural resource protection efforts and climate change hazard mitigation.

“This is an opportunity for the community to learn more detail about the County’s updated Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and track the progress the County is making on reaching our greenhouse gas emission reduction goals,” said Kris Damhorst, chair of the County’s Commission on the Environment, which is hosting the meetings.”
 
PROTECTING THE LUNGS OF THE EARTH IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
Why does the County only offer protection for large trees within the Coastal Zone?

Last week, the County Fish & Wildlife Advisory Commission discussed how best to get the attention of the County Board of Supervisors with a recommendation to expand the County’s Significant Tree Protection Ordinance to areas outside that area of the County’s unincorporated boundaries.
 
The last letter the Commission sent to the Board on July 11, 2019,asking for reasonable changes received no action.

Purportedly, Supervisor Bruce McPherson responded that the letter (two pages) was too long and the requested change would threaten logging operations.
 
Currently, there is no such protection for large trees in the unincorporated areas that fall outside of the Coastal Zone. Take a look at this map to see what that means: California Coastal Commission

Note that boundary, developed by the Coastal Protection Act in 1977, pretty much follows Highway One until the western boundary of the City of Santa Cruz, when the line swerves about a mile inland.

What is considered a “Significant Tree”?

“Significant tree,” for the purposes of this chapter, shall include any tree, sprout clump, or group of trees, as follows:

(A)    Within the urban services line or rural services line, any tree which is equal to or greater than 20 inches d.b.h. (approximately five feet in circumference); any sprout clump of five or more stems each of which is greater than 12 inches d.b.h. (approximately three feet in circumference); or any group consisting of five or more trees on one parcel, each of which is greater than 12 inches d.b.h. (approximately three feet in circumference).

(B)    Outside the urban services line or rural services line, where visible from a scenic road, any beach, or within a designated scenic resource area, any tree which is equal to or greater than 40 inches d.b.h. (approximately 10 feet in circumference); any sprout clump of five or more stems, each of which is greater than 20 inches d.b.h. (approximately five feet in circumference); or, any group consisting of 10 or more trees on one parcel, each greater than 20 inches d.b.h. (approximately five feet in circumference).

Santa Cruz County Code: SIGNIFICANT TREES PROTECTION
 
 
Why did the County only include protection for significant trees within the Coastal Zone?  Likely it was due to the timber harvesting regulations in place and regulated by the California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection at the time.  That thought was supported by recent testimony by CalFire Chief Rich Sampson to the Commission.
 
 
The Board of Supervisors has considered violations against PG&E for excessive large tree removal and the Califonria Coastal Commission Enforcement Officer, Mr. Patrick Veesart, sent notice to PG&E regarding this (Violation V-3-20-0089)on November 20, 2020.  CALFIRE also sent notice of violation on November 18, 2020 regarding excessive removals within the CZU Fire burn areas and lack of maintained service roads.
 
Here is the template for your Supervisor’s e-mail contact: <FirstName.Lastname@santacruzcountyca.gov> 
You can contact all Supervisors at Board of Supervisors: <boardofsupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov>
or call 831-454-2200.

Please contact your County Supervisor and urge him to support the County’s Fish & Wildlife Commission proposal to change the Significant Tree Protection Ordinance to include all areas of the unincorporated lands.
 
You may be interested to learn that the State requires each county to have a Fish &Wildlife Advisory Commission.  The Santa Cruz County group is very well-informed and sends thoughtful letters with recommendations to the Board of Supervisors.  
 
It would be nice if the Supervisors were to pay attention.

Here is another excellent letter the County Fish & Wildlife Advisory Commission sent to the Board of Supervisors, this one about the damaging impacts of homeless encampments in riparian areas.
 
CAPITOLA BRANCH LIBRARY WILL SOON BE CLOSED ON SUNDAYS
August 4 will be the final Sunday that the Capitola Branch Library will be open during the afternoon.  The only library in the County that will be open on Sunday  afternoon will be the Downtown Branch.  According to the librarian, “there just isn’t enough funding to pay staff to keep the (Capitola) branch open.”
 
What a sad state of affairs.  This means patrons will have to travel to downtown Santa Cruz to do research and homework studies.  Where did all the Measure S tax money go??
 
OUR TAX DOLLARS WILL HELP SWENSON 
You and I will pay to help Swenson’s  grand entry to the Aptos Village Project reduce traffic hazards, using precious little funding available for road maintenance and traffic engineering.
 
Public Works staff confirmed the County will pay to paint traffic separation on eastbound Soquel Drive in Aptos Village to reduce the existing left turn queue lane for Trout Gulch Road by about 50% in order to create a dedicated queue lane for Swenson’s Parade Street.  The markings, shown below, will get official painting within the next couple of weeks.  Once installed, a County Public Works Traffic Engineer will sit at the site to observe the effectiveness of the markings.  (kerching, kerching…)
 
Based on that Engineer’s observations, the County may install plastic bollard post separators to make sure that motorists wanting to turn left onto Trout Gulch Road do not use the queue lane for Swenson’s Parade Street entrance.

I think a safer mitigation would be to make Parade Street one-way with exit-only.  This would eliminate the problem of traffic backing up on Soquel Drive and could even allow for a Metro stop on Parade Street that would promote better transit use to and from the heart of the Village and events at Aptos Village Park nearby. 
 
I also feel that the County should require Swenson to paint “NO LEFT TURN”  on Parade Street  exit at the Soquel Drive intersection.  The small “Right Turn Only” sign currently on Parade Street is too far back from the actual intersection, and motorists approaching the busy intersection likely do not see it.  Painting on the pavement would be more visible to motorists, and Swenson should be required to pay for the safety mitigation of their intersection.

 
Please ask Supervisor Zach Friend and County Public Works Director Matt Machado for a town hall meeting with Aptos constituents to discuss this matter, and protest that the County is using precious funding for road safety to paint the demarcation on Soquel Drive to accommodate Swenson’s Parade Street entrance to the Project and a Traffic Engineer to visit the site for observation of effectiveness. Matt Machado<matt.machado@santacruzcountyca.gov>  and Supervisor Zach Friend<zach.friend@santacruzcountyca.gov>
 

Here are the preliminary markings now in the left turn queue lane for Trout Gulch Road motorists.  Traffic there is often congested during school commute times…reducing the length of the queue lane will make it worse.

IT WORKS!
If you visit Nisene Marks State Park, you know that there is limited cell phone service within that gigantic forest.  However, at the Steel Bridge near the entry, there is a pay phone that is available and now back in service!  In 2020, a runner had to knock on the door of a nearby resident at 6am to report the wildland fire nearby because the payphone did not work.
 
Be advised that all calls to 9-1-1 do not require coins being deposited.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND VOICE YOUR THOUGHTS.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Gish Gallop
Has it always been so common, or is it just more apparent because it has become so prevalent in mainstream politics? The Gish Gallop is a method of debate where one streams together so many unsubstantiated points that it becomes difficult to track, and rebut, them all. Perhaps the easy swipe of social media or the increased speed of emerging news have helped to wire us to be more receptive to the full-steam-ahead BS argument technique. Here, I try my hand at making a speech using the Gish Gallop technique with a collection of commonly held nature fallacies:

A Gish’ing Example
Nature is dangerous! For instance, all sorts of snakes and spiders are venomous, and people die from their bites all the time. You have to be especially careful of mountain lions, which are increasingly attacking people across California. If environmentalists have their way, there will also be wolves roaming everywhere across the Western USA- once established, they will become habituated to eating livestock and they’ll be coming after people, too. Just outside your door trying to get into your trash are very dangerous rabid opossums. You don’t even have to go outside for nature to get you. There are spiders hiding in your house, and an average of six a year drop into sleeping people’s mouths. I heard just the other day about another venomous snake crawling out of someone’s toilet. Some crazies want to blame so many things like this on global warming, which is just hype from crackpots trying to control our lives. They claim burning fossil fuels is going to kill us all, but that’s not true! Change happens, for God’s sake, there have always been natural disasters and there always will be, just get used to it, you snowflakes!

Does that kind of diatribe sound familiar? It should, and its not just coming from the political right – watch out for it coming from just about any political direction, in just about any social situation. You can tell a real Gish Gallop addict by picking out just one of their tidbits and trying to follow up with a more involved conversation. If they are a galloping gish o’phile, they’ll be unable to stick to that topic and will hit you with another round of Gish Gallop before you can yell ‘stop!’ I don’t know if its just my circles of company, but I venture to guess that 1 out of 10 of my conversations encounter something amounting to Gish Gallop.

Toilet Snakes
Let’s take a look at just one of the parts of the above parade d’ BS: toilet snakes. Mention the phrase ‘toilet snake’ during a party, and it may well take root in conversation with anecdotes just as lunatic, or even substantiating evidence of this profoundly unlikely scenario. Was it Voltaire that said absurdities beget atrocities? One step leads to the next. Who are we to deny the frequency of toilet snakes, anyway? I’m sure it has happened once or twice! It may even be getting more frequent with global warming, invasive species, collapsing and outdated infrastructure, and the loss of skilled labor attracted to public works jobs. See? How familiar is that? That’s how it goes…

Turning This Around: The Antidote
How good are you at stemming the tide of verbal diarrhea? How do we collectively alter this rotten social habit? It is time to infuse more meaningful dialogue into the world. I am particularly advocating for better dialogues about nature and hoping that we carry with us enough fascinating stories that we can knit deeper and deeper oral traditions into a regionally-oriented social fabric. As we do that, I encourage us to use science as our guide, so that we have a method of building out truth, of going deeper and deeper into nature, and to add those discoveries into our stories.

The Fate of Snakes
My essay ‘Snakes on the Monterey Bay’ is one of the most popular reads on my website. I suspect that there are widespread positive sentiments about native snake species. But there are also widespread popular beliefs, well supported in social circles, that snakes are all very dangerous. Snake phobia, even nature phobia, is far too common. I well recall a time when I was working with a farm labor crew to machete poison hemlock, an invasive species that had taken over much of Younger Lagoon Reserve that I was stewarding for the University. One of the crew spotted a garter snake: quickly three were chasing it and proudly hacked it to pieces in moments before I could stop them. They seemed astounded that I was angry at their actions. I’m sure that they still think that I was acting insanely to be defending SNAKES! Why? Many people believe snakes are dangerous, and this is one of the many subjects that we can work on to improve human-nature relations.

Might you find out a bit about one of our native snakes and start a conversation about it with your friends? Such conversations could change the world for the better.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#195 / AOC: “Veteran Political Operator”

Just after I published my May 4, 2024, blog posting that reflected on the political accomplishments of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, popularly known as “AOC,” The New York Times ran an opinion piece by Gaby Del Valle, which addressed the same topic.

In the hardcopy version, Del Valle’s column was published under the following headline: “Meet Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Veteran Political Operator,” a title that I didn’t much like, to tell you the truth. Online, the column is more simply presented: “The Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez You Don’t Know.” Del Valle’s thoughts on AOC appeared in the Sunday, May 5, 2024, edition of The Times.

My point, in my earlier blog posting, was that Ocasio-Cortez got elected in her Congressional District, and stirred such positive feelings across the country, because she did what all our elected officials are supposed to do. She “represented” the people who elected her, and that is, in fact, what our elected officials are supposed to do. They are supposed to be “representatives.”

What Del Valle celebrates in her article is, really, the same thing I was trying to highlight, though the headline that called Ocasio-Cortez a “Veteran Political Operator” could have been misleading, and that is why it struck me as “wrong,” somehow. AOC has been a breath of fresh air in our politics because she has made her focus not going along with “leadership,” or advancing a partisan agenda, the kind of activities associated with those “veteran political operators” we generally love to hate, but by actually trying to do what the people she represents want her to do. Del Valle is suggesting that Ocasio-Cortez is, actually, helping to change our national politics, since we have, in many ways, actually lost sight of how “representative” self-government is supposed to work.

I encourage those reading this blog posting to click this link, to see if The New York Times’ paywall will let you read the entirety of Del Valle’s column. If you’re blocked, though, here are the concluding paragraphs, which give you a pretty good idea of what Del Valle has to say:

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez [is] the Democratic Party’s most charismatic politician since Barack Obama and its most ardent populist since Bernie Sanders. Crucially, she can offer voters something more substantial than a hollow rebuke of Trumpism. Last month, when the journalist Mehdi Hasan asked her how she’d respond to “a young progressive or Arab American who says to you, ‘I just can’t vote for Biden again after what he’s enabled in Gaza,’” Ms. Ocasio-Cortez said a vote for Mr. Biden didn’t necessarily mean an endorsement of all his policies. “Even in places of stark disagreement, I would rather be organizing under the conditions of Biden as an opponent on an issue than Trump,” she said. It was a shrewd political maneuver, designed to distance herself from Democrats who support Israel unconditionally, while meeting voters — some of whom have lost family members in Gaza — where they are. She was, in effect, acknowledging their pain and attempting to channel their righteous anger into a political movement.

There are, of course, limits to this strategy. Some on the left see Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s endorsement of Mr. Biden as a betrayal of progressive values, particularly in the wake of the climbing death toll in Gaza. The moderate Republicans who turned out for Mr. Biden in 2020 might shrink from a Democratic Party led by someone they consider an outspoken progressive. But for every moderate or leftist voter lost with a strategy like Ms. Ocasio-Cortez’s, the Democratic Party may be able to win someone new — from the pool of disillusioned Americans who feel shut out of the political process….

If she ever runs for higher office, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez might be able to galvanize voters of color who, despite leaning left, do not regularly show up at the polls. She could contrast her commitment to issues that matter to a large number of voters, like raising the minimum wage and protecting reproductive rights, with Republicans’ endless culture wars. And she could frame herself as one of the few Democrats who opposed unconditionally spending billions on an unpopular war while Americans struggled to afford groceries and gas.

She could take the message that catapulted her into Congress — as a tireless champion of the underclass — to the national level. In some ways, she already has. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez hit the picket line with striking United Auto Workers members in Missouri and requested a hearing on the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, nearly a year before Mr. Biden visited the community. These are constituencies the Democratic Party has been losing, perhaps because they’ve written them off as Republican voters, if they bother to vote at all. But in the same way Ms. Ocasio-Cortez isn’t afraid to collaborate with conservatives when it helps her policy agenda, she has shown up for people whom other Democrats have abandoned — and voters may remember that when they cast a ballot in 2028 (emphasis added).

There are several ways for our politics to go bad, undermining genuine representative government. Here, perhaps, is a top three list – three ways that our representative government can end up failing us: (1) Elected representatives can start using their positions for personal advantage, meaning, almost certainly, that they will tailor their advocacy, and their votes, to what wealthy special interests want, instead of focusing on what the people who elected them want; (2) Elected representatives can also become mere cogs in a “partisan” machine, again insuring that monied interests count more for them than the people who elected them; (3) Finally, elected representatives can stop trying to “make a deal,” and to find workable compromises that a majority of elected representatives might be able to agree to, but seek to eliminate the opposition, as opposed to achieving their policy goals by finding policies and programs that can appeal across the multitude of differences within our society.

“Representing” the people who put you in office, and for whom you act, is how elected officials make our system of representative government work. When it’s not working, then claims by aspiring “dictators,” who claim that “I, alone, can fix it,” become more credible.

AOC is clearly one of those elected officials who is trying to make the system work the way it’s supposed to. The fact that I initially bridled at the headline calling her a “veteran political operator” is a testimony, as I think about it, that there aren’t nearly enough elected officials taking her approach. In fact, AOC is just the kind of “veteran political operator” we need in government!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

A GATHERING OF FASCISTS, AS LUCK WOULD HAVE IT, BRINGING DOWN THE HORSE

It’s a mystery at this writing, how the RNC’s Milwaukee nominating convention is going, and most of all, how it ended up. So, how did the electrifying coronation go? And did the gathering of fascists (so named by Steve Schmidt) celebrate their new martyr with the veneration that a cult leader who disdains them…cares nothing for a single one of them…truly deserves? We have to remember Trump’s Las Vegas rally where people were falling like flies from the heat, when he said, “Because I don’t want everyone going on me, we need every voter. I don’t care about you, I just want your vote. I don’t care.” Straight from the MAGA Master’s mouth! Schmidt writes, “The Republican Party retains a name, but it has lost its identity because it has become unmoored from Americanism. It rejects the US Constitution, the peaceful transfer of power, election results, pluralism, women’s rights and separation of church and state. Trump is running on a platform of retribution and revenge with the claim that an American president is a Caesar.”

Would-be assassin, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, turned the presidential election sweepstakes on its head, by disrupting the Trump rally in Butler, PA with his AR-style semi-automatic rifle, clipping the former president’s ear, killing one attendee and wounding two others, before he was dispatched by a Secret Service sniper. A Bethel Park High School classmate disclosed that the shooter failed to make the junior varsity rifle team, and “was asked not to come back” because he was such a poor shot. Curiously, he was looked upon as a political conservative. However, this is a perfect opportunity for Trump to resurrect his fulmination, “They’re not after me. They’re after you. And I just happen to be standing in their way,” and we might expect to hear more of the same paranoid martyrdom from 2016, “I am your voice. Today, I add I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those of you who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution.” Trump promised to carry out his plans for attendance at the RNC convention, suggesting that he would edit his scheduled anti-Biden speech by calling for more unity in our nation’s politics. So, was it a complete change of heart, a conversion on the road to Damascus, and assigning Project 2025 to the scrap heap? Ha!

HBO’s Real Time host, Bill Maher posted, “I unequivocally denounce the shooting. Not funny. Not for me. I don’t want to say the election is over, but MAGA nation finally has its full martyr. They loved it when he went to jail…the mug shot…nailed it! And he reacted to the shooting like he rehearsed it…one take! It doesn’t matter who the Democrats put up now…so much damage to the Left now. I’ll be in Milwaukee tomorrow…to go to the strip clubs! But I’m glad Trump’s okay. I gotta say this: he’s he luckiest ______ that ever walked the face of the Earth. Always lucky, lucky, lucky!” The bartender at Mar-a-Lago looked up to see a distraught-looking Trump plop himself onto a barstool, ordering a Scotch. The bartender says, “Whoa, Mr. Trump…that’s not like you! What’s eating you?” He replies, “I thought I’d sneak out and take a short drive to get away from all the activity, and on the way home my car died. I had no idea what to do, so I raised the hood like everybody else does. A horse popped his head over the roadside fence and told me how to fix it! And here I am!” The bartender says, “Wow, was it a black horse?” Puzzled, Trump answers, “Well, yes it was…?” The bartender tells him, “You are a lucky man! There’s a gray horse in that field that doesn’t know crap about engines!”

In the aftermath of the shooting, both parties signaled they would back off from campaigning, a sort of grace period…but how long will/did that last? Tim Stanley of The Telegraph says descriptors of Trump will transcend from “admirable” to “awesome…like Moby Dick or the Terminator, a force of nature…who can doubt he will win?” Stanley says, “In the United States, every assassination attempt is a tragedy but every near-miss is a triumph – because Americans are schooled in what could’ve been…Lincoln, Kennedy, King. This time, the target got right back up. Trump punched the air, he yelled ‘Fight,’ and the crowd chanted ‘USA! USA!’ Remember: Rocky lost in the first movie, he didn’t win until the second. And in the fourth he single-handedly brought down the Soviet Union.” A post on X-FKT presents a dilemma: Should Americans be traumatized by the happenings at the Trump rally, or should Americans just pretend it was another elementary school shooting  and get over it…asking for a nation tired of double standards!

USA Today’s columnist Rex Huppke posted on X-FKT (X-Formerly Known as Twitter – aren’t you tired of seeing this silly clarification in every news story mentioning X?) that after the news of the shooting broke, a chaotic churn of social media, the birthing of lies, conspiracies and speculation arose that has become our new normal. “The event was sickening, we didn’t need to wait on specific details to know that…a crackle of gunfire, seeing the presumptive GOP presidential nominee rushed offstage with blood on his face? It’s unthinkable. It’s not how America is supposed to work. Speculation blasted out on social media from random knuckleheads, pundits, lawmakers who decided in the moment they knew exactly what happened. Facts rendered meaningless. Opinions and hot takes elevated to levels that were once the sole realm of actual, reputable news. It was this person’s fault…it was that person’s fault…you’re to blame…they’re to blame. Trending topics took off with claims of everything from an assassination attempt to a staged event. Unfettered garbage. Cynical manipulations. Sick, twisted imaginings and attempts at humor…worthless chatter that once had no way to enter the mainstream were blasted out to a country where, quite literally, everybody has to have a damn opinion in order to grasp at some form of social status. What is wrong with us? How have we let the drip of conspiracy theories and lies that are part of any society become a fire hose? I look forward to every detail of this horrific shooting coming out so we can move forward together and do what Americans should be doing: Make things better.”

Ryan Grim of dropsitenews on Substack posts, “One quick thought on the political ramifications: My first instinct was that the assassination attempt would seal the election for Trump, particularly given the imagery it produced. But others have noted that it may also feed into the fear the public has that another Trump term means a return to nonstop political chaos. There’s no reason for us to guess, though, as we’ll have polling in a few days that answers the question.” Polls in ‘a few days’ may not be entirely accurate since presidential candidate’s usually get a boost immediately following a convention, so ‘calm down‘ may be the cautionary phrase needed here.

Steve Schmidt writes on The Warning“Violence begets violence begets violence, and on and on it goes. Donald Trump is a man who has long courted, celebrated, incited and threatened violence. He has now become a victim of the malice and insanity that he has spread more singularly, directly and indiscriminately than any living American. Donald Trump has built his political career on grievance, imaginary persecutions and indomitable toughness in the face of his enemies. Much of MAGA is a community of the disaffected and aggrieved who have been conditioned to believe Trump is being attacked by a hideous elite who is similarly attacking them. Last night, Trump became mythological to those people. The attempted assassination of Donald Trump was every bit as much an attack on American democracy as was the disgrace of the January 6 insurrection. It deserves absolute condemnation and our utter contempt.” Schmidt sees no silver lining for our future, believing, “A period of chaos has begun in America, and unfortunately, it will get worse through the election and beyond. This is a moment during which Trump could choose to back down and refuse to pour gasoline on the fire. He will not make that choice. He will inflame the situation. ‘Fight, fight, fight!’ will become his anthem. The one thing that nobody gets to say about this situation is that they are surprised by it.”

We were greeted last Monday with news that Trump the Lucky had his classified documents case dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida…although not a surprising turn of events, it was still shocking to hear the announcement, nonetheless! Without a doubt, the decision will be appealed, and the case assigned to another judge, with no chance of it being heard in the courtroom before the presidential election. With a Trump election victory, this case, along with the other Federal charges will be scattered to the Four Winds, never to see the light of day! So, Mr. Lucky rode into the RNC convention on a black field horse, and exited atop a black, fire-breathing steed with hooves of steel. The only thing easier to buy than a gun in America is a US senator or judge…is it future president Cannon, or Supreme Court justice Cannon? Ms. Lucky has hit the jackpot!

And how did this element work itself out? Retired, former Fox News media mogul, 93-year-old Rupert Murdoch was actively seeking an active role in the selection of Trump’s running mate but was not looking forward to kissing the former president’s ass, reports Kipp Jones on Mediaite. Murdoch was said to be pressuring people within Trump’s inner circle, expressing his wish to see North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum in the VP slot, since he loathes JD Vance. So serious was Rupert, that he called Trump and his staff several times a day, sending surrogates to do his campaigning, or dispatching reporters from The New York Post to Mar-a-Lago to smear Vance. Even News Corp execs met with the former president to make the case for Burgum, though the original pitch was for ‘anyone but JD.’ Marco Rubio was acceptable originally but Murdoch’s focus narrowed. It is speculated that because Rupert had always viewed Trump as subservient to him, and since he doesn’t look forward to another four years of kissing up to him by having him on Fox News, a VP Burgum could be the face of the administration as they groom him for a presidential run. Thus ending Trumpism? Nah…not a chance! All the while, Trump had a great time with his reality show lead-up to the “You’re HIRED!”  finale…sorry, Little Marco!

Ruth Ben-Ghiat posts on Lucid@Substack“Afraid to talk about Trump right now? You can continue to talk about the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025, and the ghastly outcomes of a Republican return to the White House. The collective popular and media focus on Project 2025 has led many Americans to wake up to the dangers that will befall us if Trump is re-elected. Focus on policies, not personalities. That’s always a good rule.”

Regardless of all the recent chain of events, Steve Schmidt warns us that Trump is an American fascist, raising money from the assassination attempt, with his MAGA faithful competing in “an Olympics of demagoguery blaming President Biden for the crime.” The Biden campaign has paused “all outbound communications, working to pull down television ads as quickly as possible” in the wake of the attempt…probably for the best since they are ineffective, a waste of money, says Schmidt, and a pathetic decision a that. A former Republican who had senior roles in two presidential campaigns, serving in the White House before joining the Lincoln Project to help elect Biden, he says his life was never threatened until Trump came on the political scene. He’s had suspicious packages mailed to his home, was accused of pedophilia, the purpose of which was to trigger an unhinged person to confront him, all thanks to MAGA. Steve say, “Violence has always ridden in the shadows of our republic, accompanying our progress towards justice every step of the way. Trump has incited violence, he celebrated thuggery in the 2020 presidential debate, he has killed with words, following his January 6 speech. He has openly pondered the killing of his fellow Americans. The choice in the election is perfectly clear because what Trump stands for is perfectly clear. National suicide is on the ballot…talking about this isn’t just honest, but reality-based. History didn’t stop on Saturday night [in Butler, PA]. It kept moving forward.” And all we have to do for verification of this statement is review the speeches given at the RNC, from Tucker Carlson to Marjorie Taylor Greene. Trump must be defeated…we must become the lucky ones!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Debate

“It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it.”
~Joseph Joubert

“For good ideas and true innovation, you need human interaction, conflict, argument, debate.”
~Margaret Heffernan

“A good leader can engage in a debate frankly and thoroughly, knowing that at the end he and the other side must be closer, and thus emerge stronger. You don’t have that idea when you are arrogant, superficial, and uninformed.”
~Nelson Mandela

“Those who cannot understand how to put their thoughts on ice should not enter into the heat of debate.”
~Friedrich Nietzsche

“Freedom is hammered out on the anvil of discussion, dissent, and debate.”
~Hubert H. Humphrey

“What we have to do… is to find a way to celebrate our diversity and debate our differences without fracturing our communities.”
~Hillary Clinton

...

Home decorating trends of the seventies… some of these make me shudder, but damn do I ever think we should bring conversation pits back!! Though it is rare that you see a livingroom large enough for one nowadays… Also, how were the seventies 50-ish years ago?!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 10 – 16, 20124

Highlights this week:

Bratton… senior and/or disabled? RTC needs you!… Greensite… Greensite on Housing and Students… Steinbruner… housing, fire districts, and grand jury reports … Hayes… loss … Patton… Teach Your Children To Love America… Matlock… declaration of war mandate…American Revolution redux…Confederates arise… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… Slim Gaillard… Quotes on… “Board Games”

...

PACIFIC AVENUE AND COOPER STREETS February 15, 1950. This was part of Jimmy Roosevelt’s campaign stop for California Governor!! That’s the famed Cooper House on the right and our original Santa Cruz County Bank on the left (now Laili’s restaurant and Pacific Wave)

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: July 10, 2024

RTC LOOKING FOR SENIORS AND DISABLED PEOPLE. There are so many seniors in Santa Cruz and so many reading this ….I want to pass it onward…

RTC is seeking members for Elderly and Disabled Transportation Advisory Committee (EDTAC). Does this describe you? Are you a Santa Cruz County resident and any of the following:

  • Senior (60+)
  • Living with a disability
  • Transit rider (60+)
  • Paratransit rider
  • or represent services for senior and disabled individuals

Get involved! Join the Elderly and Disabled Transportation Advisory Committee. As a member of the committee, you will:

  • Speak up about the transportation needs of seniors and disabled individuals.
  • Support transportation services to help seniors and disabled individuals to be independent, involved, and connected.
  • Guide and review planning, policy, and funding for transportation programs.

For information on membership positions, view the membership application here, or contact the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission at info@sccrtc.org

Let us know how you do, if you’re accepted!

FANCY DANCE. Apple movie. (6.6 IMDB) ** Executive directed by Forrest Whitaker and starring Michael Rowe. It’s all about Native Americans and their family structure and personal issues. It’s both sensitive and amateurish and lacks a forceful direction.

YOUR HONOR. Netflix series (7.6 IMDB). *** Bryan Cranston along with Hope Davis and especially Rosie Perez lead this New Orleans saga. The son of a crime boss is killed and it’s the judge’s son who gets the blame. Well worth watching.

HOUSE OF THE DRAGON. HBO series. *** I re-watched much of this series prequel to Game of Thrones just to check on how relevant and applicable it may still be. It definitely has lost the magic and charm, probably due to our increasing and improving the world. Game of Thrones was back in 2011 and had an amazing 72 episodes. House of The Dragon begins 17 decades before Game Of Thrones.

A BODY THAT WORKS. Netflix series. (7.7 IMDB) *** It starts slow as we watch a scared and un-pregnant 37 year old woman decide to get a surrogate woman to carry her baby. There’s much realistic action and re-actions between the two “pregnant” couples.

NIGHTMARES AND DAY DREAMS. Netflix series.(6.6 IMDB) *** A collection of 7 episodes starting in Jakarta with a baby falling from a balcony, some concepts of torture, and then… switches to a bread factory !! All seven chapters are like that and they hang together neatly, but full of blood and guts.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Series. (7.8 IMDB) **** An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it.

Reminder…repeating this one in case you haven’t seen it yet!!!

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB). *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT. Prime movie. (7.0 IMDB) **** All about competition rowing at the college level. The University of Washington ended up sending their rowing team to the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Hollywood star/ actor George Clooney directed this sentimental and touching near documentary…and it shows. Exciting, scenes from the existing class system and how these poor children pulled together.

INHERITANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1IMDB) ** This is a comedy and you need to remember that intention. A TV host dies and for some plot reason the family is invited to his mansion to experience the reading his will. He hosted a game show and they throw in some gay humor, some inside tv programing errors and it’s only worth 2 thumbs.

DEFENDING JACOB. Apple TV series. (7.8IMDB) *** Chris Jacobs loses the screen and our attention every time his co-star Michelle Dockery appears…she has inherited and mastered all screen stealing techniques.  He’s a much liked and capable assistant District attorney. All of a sudden his son’s best student buddy is murdered and the son is faced with maybe being guilty. It’s a long take on family loyalty, and on what’s fair, the privileges the DA’s son enjoys…and the movie is excellent…don’t miss it.

HITLER AND THE NAZIS. NETFLIX SERIES (7.5 IMDB) **** We’ll never the total truth behind World War II but this documentary fills in many blank spots. 6 years of war, 60 million lives lost, Nuremberg trials, Hitler and his love for some of Wagner’s operas, Goering, anti-British, mentioning the Messiah…it’s all in this well done documentary. We should memorize the lessons we need to learn.

WONDER. Netflix movie. (7.9 IMDB) * When you have Owen Wilson, Julia Roberts and Mandy Patinkin as leads in a sentimental movie about a 10 year old boy born with a disfigured face after 27 surgeries you have a terrible chance at making a watchable movie….and this isn’t watchable.

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB) *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE IRON CLAW. HBO MAX movie. (7.6IMDB) * It’s hard to imagine that they’d make a movie about the phoniness of tag team wrestling and expect it to contain anything resembling a believable plot. Zac Efron heads this semi true story of the wrestling Von Erich family. They managed to involve the Christian church in it but to little or no avail. Bad acting, flaky plot, and it’s half billed as a documentary, do not watch.

RAISING VOICES. Netflix Series. (7.2 IMDB) ** It’s just a bit dated because they have a relatively normal family who have built and operate a marijuana farm in their basement. There’s also lots of alcohol and party times happening. Another sub plot is a momentary focus on whether or not some of the characters are lesbians. There is no reason for this topic and no reason to see this movie either.  

...

July 8, 2024

Choosing Sides

The photo is from the Food Bin appeal hearing before the city Planning Commission in May. Those in the audience with signs opposing the neighbors’ appeals of the project are from UCSC Student Housing Coalition and Santa Cruz YIMBY.

A recent Sentinel op-ed (July 7) with the heading, “Don’t Blame Students for the Housing Crisis in Santa Cruz” was written by the founder of UCSC Housing Coalition and a graduating student. The op-ed bemoans the verbal attacks against students by some in the community who blame students for the “housing, water and environmental woes.” The writer urges us to see that we all have a shared responsibility to change how we live and not scapegoat each other. I worked with students at UCSC for thirty years, enjoyed them immensely and still count many as friends. The impact on the city from UCSC students is not an individual issue and should not be directed at students per se. If there is an impact, and the data shows there is, fingers should be pointed at the UC System. However, the op-ed writer keeps it all personal and individual. He fails to acknowledge that continued UCSC growth is a systemic and real problem, exacerbating rental housing costs, impacting students as well as long-time local renters, contributing to the displacement of local working families.

The facts speak for themselves. When I started working at UCSC, the student population was six thousand. Forty years later the student population is close to twenty thousand with a plan by UCSC to add a further eight thousand. One constant across time is that fifty percent of students seeks off campus rental housing. Fifty percent of six thousand is far less than fifty percent of twenty thousand, let alone twenty- eight thousand. Half the population growth of the city of Santa Cruz in the last forty years is due to student growth. That each student may be a delightful person who recycles and volunteers at a Food Bank is irrelevant. When it comes to rental housing costs, numbers matter.

It used to be that student housing activists opposed continued UCSC growth. They recognized that growth in numbers without associated resources and infrastructure has a negative impact on students as well as the broader community. Faculty and staff (including me) joined students in protests, pointing out overcrowded classrooms, inability to get into needed classes, overcrowded dorms, loss of public space, environmental impacts, and rising rents, all emanating from growth. Since that time, such problems have not disappeared. That’s why the proposed three thousand new units of housing for the campus westside is not earmarked to accommodate increased student numbers but is catch-up for existing overcrowding.

Current student housing activists, at least those in the Student Housing Coalition are uncritically pro-growth, both in student numbers and for city housing development. I attended one of their on-campus meetings in May. It was advertised on the city’s webpage. Also in attendance were leaders in Santa Cruz YIMBY as well as a new hire from the county who critiqued CEQA. One of the take-aways from the meeting suggested by the chair was that more members of the Student Housing Coalition should attend city hearings with signs showing support for whatever development project is under review, which they did, in the above photo. Other than insensitivity to neighbors’ valid concerns at having a tall new development loom over their single-family homes, their tactic seemed to irk a couple of Planning Commissioners who suggested the students might also put pressure on the UCSC administration to build more on-campus housing.

At the campus meeting, amidst the enthusiasm for more housing development off campus I suggested that if the campus continues to grow, any growth in off campus housing would cancel out any rent relief from increased supply. Only a cap on further growth can change that equation. My comment was met with an admonition that all students are entitled to get a UCSC education. This position is echoed in the op-ed where the writer, the founder of the Student Housing Coalition concludes by writing that he “refuses to gatekeep others from the same opportunity I had.” Commendable, but they don’t all have to come to UCSC. There are ten UC campuses, including UC Merced which has a relatively small enrollment of eight thousand students. The UC system proudly claims that students can get the same world-class education at every UC campus. At the campus housing meeting, after a question was posed by the chair: “for how many of you was UCSC notyour first choice?” over ninety percent raised their hands. So, it’s not necessarily for the love of Santa Cruz that such students decide to come to UCSC.

Expect to see members of the Student Housing Coalition along with YIMBY –and maybe that is the coalition– at all the public hearings on future large-scale housing developments in the city. They repeat the same jargon, have no time for quaint notions of “Santa Cruz character”, ignore any impacted neighborhood concerns and are well-organized. When the not-yet-built Calypso project on Center Street was appealed by a neighborhood group based on the inadequate beach-bound traffic study (the city studied only weekdays for Front and Center streets which are gridlocked on summer weekends) the Student Housing Coalition generated over 100 form emails to city council opposing the appeal. Each email said the same thing. It was obvious they hadn’t read the appeal nor cared about traffic impacts on neighborhoods. Expect more of this student/developer aligned presence for every new project coming down the pike, including the mammoth South of Laurel Downtown Extension project.

Such students should not be surprised at increased hostility from locals. Increasing enrollment at UCSC raises rental housing costs. It is a systemic problem, and students are not to blame for the impacts. However, if students align with developers and organize opposition to legitimate community concerns regarding over-development, they have strategically shifted position and should expect to shoulder blame.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

CAN SANTA CRUZ INFLUENCE ITS HOUSING DESTINY?
Don’t miss this free opportunity to hear what Senator Scott Weiner has to say about Santa Cruz City’s blossoming dense high-rises. Sign up for this July 31 event at that Hotel Paradox.

THE MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY INCREASED 10% WHILE POPULATION DECLINED
Think about this for a moment.  “Affordable” housing is for people who make less than 80% of these numbers.  I guess when one lives in the most-expensive place to live in the nation, the median incomes should be commensurate, right?  Nope.
DATAUSA: Santa Cruz

$105,491 in 2022
$132,800 in 2023

Housing Authority: Santa Cruz Income Limits [pdf]
 
So, really…does it make sense to pile on more and more property taxes and increasing sales tax??? That is exactly what we will see on the November 5 ballot coming our way.

CENTRAL FIRE DISTRICT BOARD APPROVES $221 MILLION BOND MEASURE FOR NOVEMBER BALLOT
There were a number of people in the audience as the Central Fire District Board (only three of the five were present) deliberated and ultimately approved placing a 30-year Bond measure on the ballot to borrow $221,000 for a “Project List” of capital improvements…new stations for Capitola, Soquel and La Selva Beach.

This will mean an average of $29 per $100,000 assessed property value, raising an anticipated $11,600,000 annually.  The debt interest rate could be up to 12% annually.  Ouch.

One resident asked about whether there would be exemptions for senior citizens?  No answer.

The consultant assured the Board it will likely pass, thanks to a concurrent Proposition 5 on the ballot that is a California Constitutional amendment allowing a 55% approval threshold for such property tax assessments, rather than 2/3.

This is not good news for those property owners on fixed incomes who are barely hanging on, in the face of inflation.

SCOTTS VALLEY FIRE BOARD APPROVES BOND MEASURE ON THE BALLOT
I very much appreciated Director Hurst and President Parker insisting that the bond ballot measure this November should be honest with voters and state that the need is to replace the seismically-unsafe fire station on Erba Lane, and not shroud that with word salad the consultant’s survey showed would be good buzz words to help the measure pass.  You know, “wildfire resilience” and “improve 911 response”…

To the Board’s credit, they actually requested Fire Chief Correira to change the wording in the 75-word ballot measure to include “seismic upgrade”…although it is buried in the middle of the measure’s verbiage.

Voters in the Scotts Valley Fire District will be asked to approve a 30-year General Obligation Bond for $24,5 Million, and expect to pay $19 per $100,000 of their assessed property value, with the average tax of $160-$189/year, and is expected to raise $1,900,000 annually.

The Board will hold a public hearing on this Bond measure August 14 at 6pm in the Scotts Valley City Council Chambers. (see page 23-24 and 31)

NO MORE MEASURE T FOR BRANCIFORTE FIRE PROPERTY OWNERS, BUT THEIR FIRE STATION WILL NO LONGER BE INSURED
Last Wednesday, the Scotts Valley Fire District Board agreed to terminate assessing the tax on properties that are in the former Branciforte Fire District area, but are now consolidated with Scotts Valley Fire District.  The people had approved Measure T in 2016 to assess themselves in order to fund their fire station maintenance and to purchase apparatus.

When Scotts Valley officially took ownership of the station and contents last December, the station closed, much to the dismay of the Branciforte residents.

At the reasonable request of the Branciforte Advisory Committee, Scotts Valley Fire Chief Mark Correira recommended that the Board terminate Measure T assessments, since the District had migrated the funds into the General Fund for the Scotts Valley Fire District use.

You can read the Resolution on page 21, showing that the Board does want to do what is right.

However, it was very alarming to hear the Board approve the Chief’s later recommendation that the former Branciforte Fire Station NO LONGER BE INSURED because it was too expensive.  “If something happens to the station, the local residents would be asked to pay for repair or replacement, because it would benefit them more than other areas of the District.” said the Chief.

At the request of the public present, he will research whether that also removes liability insurance coverage.  Will the District be able to hold public gatherings there or staff the station in disasters?  Stay tuned.

THE ACCIDENTS HAVE BEGUN AT INTERSECTION OF PUREWATER SOQUEL PROJECT AND CHANTICLEER PED OVERCROSSING
Last Tuesday afternoon, a motorist making a turn from Soquel Avenue Frontage Road at Chanticleer ran into the back of the Varni Electrical contractor dump truck parked in front of the PureWater Soquel Sewage Water Treatment Plant.  Wow.  When I happened to arrive soon after, there was traffic control.  The flagman was adamant that the orange cones on the roadway had not been there earlier when the accident happened.

The crew was installing an electrical box at the intersection of Chanticleer and Soquel Avenue Frontage Road when a motorist allegedly drove into the back of the dump truck parked in the street.  Luckily, no one was hurt, according to the workman.

Here is the view from the Chanticleer Avenue sidewalk, adjacent to the County Sheriff Center (known by the large white “golf ball” weather radar equipment on the roof).  Will Soquel Creek Water District have their CH2M Hill Engineer contractors running the sewage water treatment plant (aka PureWater Soquel Project) also set up such elaborate traffic control when large trucks of hazardous chemicals need to access the driveway at the intersection?  Hmmm…..

Imagine what this unprotected hazardous intersection will be like once the bicyclists (some of which will be electric) come zooming down the Chanticleer Pedestrian and Bicyclist Overcrossing onto Soquel Avenue Frontage Road, and large chemical supply trucks are entering and exiting the PureWater Soquel plant?

If you are worried about this, please contact Santa Cruz County Public Works Director Matt Machado <matt.machado@santacruzcountyca.gov> and First District County Supervisor Manu Koeng <manu.koenig@santacruzcountyca.gov> and the Santa Cruz County RTC  info@sccrtc.org  Attn. Ms. Grace Blakeslee (pedestrian traffic) and Mr. Tommy Travers (bicycle traffic)

It seems a traffic light of some sort will be imperative for everyone’s safety.   But the question is: Who will pay for it?

END OF PUBLIC COMMENT IS NEAR FOR ZERO EMISSION PASSENGER RAIL
Next week is the deadline for you to submit comment on the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) project to further study which mode of passenger rail might be implemented when construction on the railway begins in 2031.

I hope you will consider asking the RTC to dump the idea of lightrail because it would bring significant economic harm to the Watsonville commercial businesses who depend on freight rail.  The RTC does mention that lightrail is NOT compatible with freight rail, but makes no explanation as to why that matters to Watsonville.

Take a look at the video recording of the June 25, 2024 Watsonville City Council meeting where RTC staff presented the Zero Emission Passenger Rail project (minute 1:05:00) and Councilwoman Ari Parker adamantly rejecting lightrail and why (minute 1:30:00-1:44:00)

Submit your comments here: 

Milestone Two Virtual Open House
Community members are invited to attend the ongoing virtual open house to learn about proposed rail transit vehicle types and the initial conceptual alignment and share their input.

Available at zeprt.com from June 6 through July 18, 2024.

READ THESE EXCELLENT REPORTS!
After months of diligent work, the 2023-2024 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury has just released nine great investigative reports.  Take a look and share your favorites with friends and neighbors.

[2023-2024 Grand Jury Reports and Responses]

Write a letter to the editor and voice your thoughts on a report you feel is especially meaningful and that will hopefully improve local government process:

GRAND JURY REPORT: CZU FIRE STILL BURNS
Here is another excellent Santa Cruz County Grand Jury investigative report, bluntly finding that things have not gone well for the 2020 CZU Fire Survivors, and the County Board of Supervisors must hold the Planning Dept. and CALFIRE accountable.

Although there is a finding that communication between CALFIRE and local fire districts was poor and lead to unnecessary loss of homes and loss of a life, there is no recommendation that the County Board of Supervisors require an After Action analysis with fire agencies involved, especially the Santa Cruz County Fire Dept. volunteers who CALFIRE instructed to stand down. Those who refused to do so saved neighborhood homes, yet were later terminated by CALFIRE.

In partial nod to the problem, there is hope in this Recommendation, if CALFIRE will cooperate:

R4. The Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury further recommends that the Board of Supervisors work with CAL FIRE to develop clear collaboration between local firefighting agencies and CAL FIRE. The community at large should then be advised as to this line of command. This should be done by December 31, 2024

“It is good to remember that we too often get lost in numbers. Numbers don’t completely hide the human cost from view, but sometimes make it more difficult to see and feel. As Grand Jurors, we saw it and felt it all the more deeply as we re-lived every experience, every delay, and every difficulty with every victim we interviewed. That being said, this report is respectfully submitted as a story of both success and failure in which two seemingly contradictory concepts exist side by side. This report is offered to reconcile those concepts and to inform and guide our community.”

Findings

  • F1. The inability of local fire departments to coordinate (communicate) with CALFIRE during their initial response to the CZU Fire caused many fire victims to unnecessarily lose their homes and possibly contributed to the loss of a life.
  • F2. The Long-term Recovery Group which assisted CZU fire and other disaster victims with case management and food and housing support serves as a model for the future.
  • F3. Because many CZU fire victims were unaware of LTRG disaster services, fire victims, to their detriment, did not make use of the services and/or available financial assistance.
  • F4. The failure of County agencies to have an effective disaster response plan in place prior to the CZU Fire caused many fire victims to incur unnecessary expense in the rebuilding process.
  • F5. The failure of CDI and Environmental Health to provide timely guidance with respect to applying for and obtaining required permits after the CZU Fire caused many fire victims to expend unnecessary time and expense in the rebuild permitting process.
  • F6. The failure of the County Environmental Health department to fully inform CZU fire victims about new state septic system regulations (LAMP) resulted in many fire victims abandoning their plans to rebuild after realizing how high the cost of meeting the new standards would be.

Grand Jury 2024-06 CZU Report

HONORING PROMISES?
Another great County Grand Jury Report just released evaluates whether the local government agencies that were the subject of investigations in previous years actually did what their representatives said they would do to improve.

Take a look and contact the agencies to urge them to improve their public service.

WHAT DO YOU THINK COULD BE IMPROVED IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT?
The County Civil Grand Jury is in place for the purpose of investigating issues in local government and special districts (school, fire, water, hospital, etc) to lend positive recommendations for improvements in accountability and transparency.  Many of the issues brought to the Grand Jury’s attention come from citizens like you who care about the Community and want to make it better from the top down.

Do you have an issue you think should be examined and investigated by the County Civil Grand Jury?  Please submit your ideas here.

While the Grand Jury has no enforcement authority, their investigations and excellent reports do make a difference in local accountability and transparency.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  READ ONE GRAND JURY REPORT.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Loss

The sadness of loss is almost too much to remain engaged as a lover of Nature. The love comes easily and despite our collective desire to protect Her, we somehow keep acquiescing to destruction. Why? Either by quick violent death or by slow strangling loss, somehow humans are capable of the most atrocious acts against Nature. These things are not happening only in some distant rainforest or coral reef…these things cannot be relegated to some guiltless past by unknown villains…they have been happening right here, are occurring right now around the Monterey Bay.

Sudden Violent Nature Destruction

I’ve been living near Santa Cruz since 1986, and during that time there have been some horrific atrocities to Nature. And they still are occurring.

Even as I weep to see the destruction of the East Meadow at UCSC, I clearly recall the moments of the tearing of bulldozers into other precious ground. The actions themselves are bad enough, but the sadness deepens as I hear the violence supported by the sentiment of members of my community. Rationalizations. Deep convictions and justifications. How can so many have become so separated from the Great Nurturer, our Mother Nature? I know the answer, but it doesn’t make it easier: greed.

UCSC. Arana Gulch. Santa’s Village. Terrace Point. Castle Rock. Glenwood. Millenium High. Large areas of Fort Ord. Armstrong Ranch. Santa Cruz Gardens. Seascape. These are just a few of the places that have been violently, suddenly and permanently transformed by bulldozers, development, pavement, and buildings since I arrived in Santa Cruz.

None of these ‘projects’ ‘needed’ to happen. All have been completely rationalized by society at large. Many have profited, and many more will feel the losses for generations. Few now feel a more direct, deep sense of loss from the destruction of those places; most did not come to know them well enough to love them deeply. Fewer still have the broader and deeper connection with Nature to feel pain upon witnessing her passing and the forlornness that comes from respect of what was there before. No one can acutely feel these things and still survive. We must “move on.”

A Slower Strangling

War or slasher movies attract human attention far more than long term torture. We eventually forget Guantanamo, refugee camps, those haunted and plagued by the trauma of war, famine, or injustice: we “move on.” Such is the case with our treatment of the lands around us. We now know that even ‘protected’ lands need careful tending, that the whole Earth needs our active care, but we are failing that responsibility everywhere. And so, our neglect means Nature is (maybe not so slowly) dying. We have put Her in a cell and neglected food and water. She cannot be so separated from us, and her dying is already causing our suffering. And although everyone hears Her rattling her cage, we “move on.”

Nature’s Slow Death Around Us

We daily witness the actions driving climate change, but it is harder to see the actions driving the torture and neglect of Nature around us. Everyone reading this can glimpse those actions in the rhetoric about Nature tourism around the Monterey Bay…mostly about mountain biking, but also about the many ‘natural’ attractions our region has ‘to offer.’ Nature tourism is one of the top ten threats to biodiversity globally. Around the Monterey Bay, there are only the grossest, ham-fisted approaches by conservation lands managers to stem the impacts of natural areas visitors. We are loving our conservation lands to death. Literally watch your step as you hike trails eroding into ditches, soil spoiling surrounding streams, trails draining the water from the land. Trash. Weeds and pathogens proliferating along trails and roads through natural areas. Wildlife fleeing frequent visitation with no where left to go. Invasive plants, pathogens, and introduced animals permanently altering Nature, spurring native species loss. Nature tourism is good for business! And, as to the cost that comes from that profit…most people have already “moved on.”

Moving On

As a society, we are “moving on,” and I and others who care are swept up in the flow. The tears we shed for the losses we see are quickly diluted in the river of profit that drives our downstream movement. We feel we must hide our Great Sadness so that the shreds of hope we retain in the resilience of Nature might inspire others to come to her aid. The future is uncertain.

To calm the panic and loose the sadness, we turn to Nature and go for a walk…quietly, respectfully, slowly, and in awe.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#185 / Teach Your Children To Love America

Peggy Noonan, formerly a speechwriter for President Ronald Reagan, is now a columnist for The Wall Street Journal. Noonan is advising her readers to, “Teach Your Children to Love America.”

Noonan’s advisory was published in May. Today, the day before our national birthday celebration, seems like a good day to mention it. On the face of it, this advice might seem either “wrong,” or certainly dangerous. To the degree that this advice can be held to mean that children should be told to do whatever the national government says, or (even worse) whatever “the President” says, it is clearly a dangerous prescription. This is ever more true, these days, as we face the possibility that our next president will be preaching “dictatorship” as the model to which we should aspire.

When a presidential candidate touts “dictatorship,” even for a day, what that candidate is actually saying is, “do what I say, what I require, and don’t give me any backtalk.” If you are being told to “love your country,” and I am the elected head of the government, doesn’t this mean that you should get in line, right now, and do what I tell you to do?

Well, I am pretty sure that Noonan doesn’t want to send that message. But let’s be clear. This “Love Your Country” message might be easily misunderstood. We need to be aware of this danger.

Tomorrow, on the Fourth of July, let’s remember what this country is really all about. What this country is really all about is “self-government.” That’s what the Declaration of Independence proclaims, and that’s the reason to “love America.” It may be – think about it – that this “love of country,” when properly understood, may be the very best and strongest way to innoculate ourselves against those would-be dictators, who claim that, “I alone can fix it.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

HERITAGE FOUNDATION’S PATRIMONY, A BLOODLESS 2025 COUP?

We are hearing, and learning, much more about Project 2025, also misleadingly called ‘Mandate for Leadership,’ as the presidential sweepstakes progresses. This ‘Mandate’ is a collection of conservative and right-wing policy proposals from the Heritage Foundation, written to reshape the US federal government and consolidate executive power for the Republican winner of the 2024 election, and to bring to fruition all those items not accomplished by the first Trump administration. Ruth Ben-Ghiat of Substack says, “They got a slow start, so their codeword is ‘day one,’ forming the basis for the potential Trump term number two.” Ben-Ghiat, authoritarianism expert and history professor at New York University who authored ‘Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present,’ comments, “Already politically-vetted people are in place to immediately implement the plans if Trump wins the election,” though the former president has claimed to have no knowledge of the project’s purpose nor who, or what, is behind the handbook! Mass deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants is one facet in the 970-page guide with Ben-Ghiat warning, “One thing that’s very important for people to realize is that undocumented immigrants won’t be the only ones who end up being targeted. It’s always more people. They use one group to have the justification to build the repressive infrastructure like the transit camps, whatever they are going to do; but be assured, and this is the history of authoritarianism, many groups of people will be targeted to be in that.”

MSNBC anchor, Joy Reid, launched into Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation, after an interview on ‘Real America’s Voice,’ a right-wing fringe network, after he said, “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the Left allows it to be.” So, to avoid violence Americans should simply accept his group’s ‘Mandate.’ Reid called him a “coward,” contending that he won’t do anything violent since he’ll be in the country club after golfing, as the violent and armed people such as the Proud Boys-types will be doing the dirty work. She asserts, “So that man is a coward, and he likes to talk a lot of crap, but it is still a threat. And I took it as a declaration of war against the rest of us.” Reid’s guest, Sherrilyn Ifill, a law professor and former president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, remarked, “The gloves are off. They are no longer afraid to say what their true intentions are. They don’t get the American Revolution. They are the Confederacy, bent on destroying this country.”

Progressives were astonished that the authoritarian conspirators were so bold in publishing their ‘Mandate’ to destroy the government, a plan so malevolent it seems they might wish to hide it; yet, there it is on a website open to all, fascist flag a’flying. But MAGA adherents have never been terribly secretive about their agendas, Trump being candidate number one when he calls for “retribution” against opponents, or promises “pardons” for J6 rioters, or calls anyone who objects to his strategies “vermin” who should be eliminated…or deported. This tactic works because most Americans aren’t paying attention, never learning that such heinous things are being advocated…except for the ‘base’ who will get their hackles raised, and some progressives who will absolutely panic. The panic-stricken then get called out for being a pack of liberal crazies prone to exaggeration. Amanda Marcotte, senior political writer at Salon, likens it to “a guy who pinches a woman’s butt in a bar, and when she protests, laughs and insists she’s just a crazy lady making it all up.” Marcotte continues, “We say this about the strategy with the Supreme Court’s recent presidential ‘immunity’ decision…it’s factually correct that it gives Trump a license to kill, but anyone who speaks this fact is accused of “Trump Derangement Syndrome” and “madness” by the Republicans.”

Marcotte believes the MAGA strategy is successful because less politically engaged Americans assume that both parties engage in hyperbole, with the low information individuals being quick to believe false accusations that liberals are “deranged” upon hearing their accusations of Trump’s dictatorial plans. The Heritage Foundation revealed Project 2025 in assuming normal voters would never learn of it, and those few who heard would dismiss fears as “overheated nonsense”  – if it’s so evil, why would they disclose it? Recently, on the Black Entertainment Television awards show, host Taraji P. Henson managed to speak out against Project 2025, when she said, “The Project 2025 plan is not a game. Look it up! I’m talking to all the mad people that don’t want to vote. You’re going to be mad about a lot of things if you don’t vote.” From there it went viral, being picked up by other celebrities, spurring the MAGA squads into action with their gaslighting efforts against those who are starting to see that the ‘Mandate’ may not be hysterical progressives theatrics, but a valid threat. MAGA’s fake leftists are busy sowing confusion online by saying Project 2025 is a Biden undertaking, but the Biden campaign has begun to raise awareness on its site with bullet points to highlight the dangers in the right’s efforts. Marcotte says the initiative’s name sounds like something out of a dystopian sci-fi novel, as does the Trump team’s “Agenda 47,” which it uses in-house, and is only a light-weight version of the same fascistic game plan. These scary-sounding names may thrill the sadistic MAGA base, but liberals react with fear and caution, and the tide may be turning as Trump’s schemes come to the fore. Marcotte believes Trump can’t win without a large percentage of voters backing him under the false belief that he’s “not so bad,” and that as they discover his intentions, a second term will spur second thoughts. Good bumper sticker: Second Term? Second Thoughts!

Heritage Foundation’s President Kevin Roberts may wish for a bloodless second American Revolution, but North Carolina’s lieutenant governor, Mark Robinson, now running for governor, had a different take as he recently told the congregation at Lake Church in White Lake, North Carolina“Some folks need killing! It’s time for somebody to say it. It’s not a matter of vengeance. It’s not a matter of being mean or spiteful. It’s a matter of necessity!” Of course, the authority in pronouncing judgement rests on Mark Robinson and the MAGA base…being kind and benevolent, naturally!

Last came Anarchy: he rode
On a white horse, splashed with blood;
He was pale even to his lips, 
Like Death in the Apocalypse. 
And he wore a kingly crown;
And in his grasp a sceptre shone;
On his brow this mark I saw –

‘I AM GOD, AND KING, AND LAW!’

Percy Bysshe Shelley, The Masque of Anarchy
(Thanks to Asha Rangappa/The Freedom Academy)

California’s Representative Jared Huffman is leading a group of congressional Democrats in a task force aimed toward examining, preempting and counteracting the Heritage Foundation’s dystopian plot to undermine our democracy, which plainly states its intent to abolish our checks and balances, to chip away at church-state separation, and impose far-right agendas infringing on basic liberties in violation of public will. Huffman warns, “This is an unprecedented embrace of extremism, fascism, and religious nationalism, orchestrated by the radical right and its dark money backers. We need a coordinated strategy to save America and stop this coup before it’s too late. Donald Trump and those behind Project 2025 are ready to turn America into a theocratic regime if they get the chance – and we are going to be ready to stop them.” Two prominent lawmakers involved are Representatives Jamie Raskin and Pramila Jayapal, who are ready to stand against the MAGA agenda, to never see the light of day. Right-wing groups backing Project 2025 have received tens of millions of dollars in funding from dark money networks led by Leonard Leo, co-chair of the Federalist Society, and billionaire oil tycoon Charles Koch. Despite his claim of lacking awareness of the plot, Trump has openly embraced its objectives, vowing to gut climate regulations in exchange for Big Oil donations, and launching the “largest domestic deportation operation in American history, and threatening to weaponize federal agencies against his opponents, while deploying the US military against protestors.” Undoubtedly, the new 4th of July will be J6 from here on out.

Trump would begin his second term by purging nonpartisan civil service workers who prevented some of his most glaring excesses in his first term, replacing them with unqualified toadies. Project Sovereignty 2025 is taking names of “anti-American bad actors burrowed into the administrative state” by trawling through backgrounds, social media posts, and statements from high-ranking civil servants as they prepare for the massacre of reclassifications, reassignments or outright firing, with the immediate goal of sowing fear and menacing federal employees. “Flooding the zone with conservative personnel,” is on tap according to Kevin Roberts, in a fashion that they weren’t prepared to do in 2017, this time with their lists at the ready, the ducks in a row! That list would affect around 50,000 federal workers, though former Trump director of the OMBRussell Vought, has plans to cut up to 68% of staff, from senior attorneys down to admin staff all over the country who had nothing to do with policy-making. According to Robert ReichInequality Media Civic Action is preparing to launch videos across every major social media platform to sound the alarm, because the mainstream media has yet to begin the clarion call for action. Even Fox News is hiding from its viewers the GOP assaults on IVF and contraception as described in Project 2025, because these policies are highly unpopular among the electorate, even as Trump and his base have begun to downplay their previous opposition to reproductive freedom…which only muddles the picture for both progressives and supporters of the Trump candidacy. The Fox News pattern of glossing over, or ignoring, coverage of the topic, contrasts with the Christian right’s moral panic, revealing of how anxious the GOP is about American voters discovering their extreme agenda. Republicans know the vast majority of the population take contraception and IVF for granted, as a normal and morally accepted practice (82%), second only to birth control (90%). As Sarah Posner of MSNBC says, “By now it is clear that the GOP’s 2024 strategy depends on evasions and prevarications about the right’s ambitions to restrict reproductive freedom. Any claims that Project 2025 envisions a Republican program for Americans’ ‘self governance’ is yet another rhetorical bait and switch in this cynical campaign of misdirection.”

Andy Borowitz satirically reports, “In a lawsuit filed on Monday, millions of Americans asked the US Supreme Court to grant them immunity from Donald J. Trump. The lawsuit argues that the Constitution was intended to protect the people from Trump, unlike the Court’s recent actions, which have protected Trump from the Constitution. ‘The Constitution was designed to shield the people from domestic tyranny and foreign threats,’ the filing reads. ‘Trump represents both.’ In a separate filing, the American people asked for protection from violent insurrections enabled by Supreme Court justices’ wives.”

Interesting post on The Nation’s website: “We’re not Leninists here at The Nation – we’re apostles of small-d democracy. But right now it is impossible to deny the salience of the Russian revolutionary’s observation that ‘there are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.’ This has clearly been one of those weeks. Just as some of us thought it might be safe to come out from under the covers where we’d been hiding from reality, the Supreme Court dropped a decision on presidential immunity that – while not wholly unexpected – will have both immediate and long-term effects every bit as bad as we had been dreading. Real progress requires clarity of vision as well as energy and direction. So to those still mired in self-delusion, whether by Joe Biden’s mental acuity or the benevolence of our Supreme Court, I offer Marx’s challenge: ‘Who are you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?’…Chico, not Karl.”

Ascension Catholic Church in Chesterfield, Missouri had to issue an apology for running an ad in its bulletin, which read, “We are calling all young men back to Church to form a militia dedicated to protecting the Holy Eucharist, our congregation, our clergy, and the church grounds.” The proposed name for the militia, ‘The Legion of the Sancta Lana Council,’ was to be made up of young men between the ages of 18-29, to be trained in strict physical fitness standards, classroom study, and instructions in military operations. A QR code was printed for scanning for those who have experience in military, fitness instruction, Latin, business or medicine, which brought up the application for membership with ties to the Ascension parish. The application said that the church “has been chosen as the testing ground for the militia and, if successful, we hope to establish platoons at parishes around the world.” According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the church has retracted the announcement, apologizing for the “error and the anguish it has caused,” clarifying that the activity does not have its support, nor is it tied to the parish, and that the ad was “sort of a mistake…it slipped through the cracks of the review process, being inappropriate and unhelpful,” since no threats have been made against the community. They are everywhere!

And, THEY are certainly in Louisiana, as proven by Governor Jeff Landry’s signing of an educational bill requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in every classroom, while also removing requirements for vaccinations…tailor-made action for a truckload of lawsuits. The package as signed will give more money to private schools, weaken teacher standards, and eliminate preferred pronouns, while giving more power over school curricula to a new state board which will determine what, and how, teachers can teach. Landry said, “If you want to respect the rule of law, you’ve got to start from the original lawgiver, which was Moses. And I can’t wait to be sued.” Four civil liberties organizations immediately obliged his call. No state funds will be used to display the Big Ten on posters or plaques, as they will rely on churches to voluntarily provide the goods. It is not out of the question to think that the current Supreme Court will find a way to make the Louisiana law acceptable…and perhaps the law of the land? Mark Sumner posts on Daily Kos“Regarding claims about the ‘original lawgiver,’ someone might want to inform Landry about Hammurabi or Ur-Nammu. Not only do these expansive lists of laws predate any version of the Ten Commandments, but those ancient vengeance- and retribution-based legal systems would likely appeal to Republicans. Of course, the intention of putting the Ten Commandments in every classroom from kindergarten through college doesn’t have anything to do with education. And it’s certainly not about respecting the rule of law.”

As Rudy Giuliani continues in his devolution from the treading water stage into the slime in an amoeba state, we can find comfort in that he is finally gainfully employed! Sure, having been unsuccessful in his courtroom experiences, filing a declaration of bankruptcy, and being barred from practicing law in New York are hardly résumé highlights; but, now this announcement from MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell on Steve Bannon’s WarRoom show, “Speaking of Rudy Giuliani…we hired him over at FrankSpeech.com. He’s on my network now. He follows Steve Bannon, Lou Dobbs and then myself.” Lindell told Newsweek that he hired Giuliani after his suspension from WABC for lying on his daily show about the 2020 election, so now he’s host of a daily podcast. The free fall from mayor of New York City to podcaster will gain him no respite from his creditors who are hot on his trail, as he spouts his election lies from the pillow fort of co-conspirator Lindell.

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Board Games

“Lose your first 50 games as quickly as possible.”
~Go proverb

“If you’re not prepared to lose every friend you have over a board game, you’re not playing hard enough.”
~Anon.

“The worst thing a kid can say about homework is that it is too hard. The worst thing a kid can say about a game is it’s too easy.”
~Henry Jenkins

“It just a fun game, until someone starts to win and then everyone else begins to cheat!”
– Andrew James Pritchard

“You can tell that Monopoly is an old game because there’s a luxury tax and rich people can go to jail.”
~unknown

...

Here’s a comment from Bruce about this clip: “I had the honor of hearing Slim Gaillard in person play the Oakland Song that I co-wrote!!! (available on iTunes)”


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 3 – 9, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… SCOTUS oversight… Greensite… on 2020 North Pacific Avenue… Steinbruner… non-renewals even affect the fire department … Hayes… burning the landscape… Patton… Sometimes Lucky, Sometimes Not… Matlock… Presidential immunity, delay-delay-delay, big win for big wind… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… Stockholm Syndrome origin… Quotes on… “Stockholm Syndrome”

...

MGM Star Van Johnson on the Graham Hill Road set for the film “The Romance Of Rosy Ridge”. The young women are Santa Cruz High School winners in the ticket selling contest for Miss Santa Cruz County of 1947. They are (L to R) Bunty Braun Pettibone, Joanne Nielsen, “unknown” and Julene Brogden. This film also starred Janet Leigh in her very first screen role, Marshall Thompson and comedian Guy Kibbee.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: July 3, 2024
SCOTUS REFORM Today I am reproducing this message I received from Our Revolution:

Bruce, and readers of BrattonOnline.com….

the right-wing Supreme Court just ruled that Donald Trump and other presidents have immunity from prosecution for almost anything. It could let Trump off the hook for his role in January 6 and efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. If you’re ready to take action, add your name to punish SCOTUS justices for corruption and set term limits for Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito!

Justice Sotomayor said that the ruling by the six right-wing justices means, “The president is now a king above the law.” She also listed off all of the things the ruling allows the president to do, as long as it’s an “official act” as president. What’s included? Ordering the military to kill political opponents.

The corrupt conservatives on the Supreme Court are protecting Donald Trump and destroying democracy. Clarence Thomas’ wife was involved in January 6 and Samuel Alito had a Stop the Steal flag flying over his house. Clear conflicts of interest and they still ruled on this case.

Congress can’t just stand by and do nothing. Instead it must pass a Supreme Court Ethics Act to hold Thomas and Alito accountable for corruption. Congress must also pass term limits for Supreme Court justices. If we had term limits, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts would be OFF the Court. As Sotomayor wrote in response to this scary ruling, “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.” It’s time for serious SCOTUS oversight in Congress.

Add your name: End the corrupt right-wing reign on the Supreme Court. Congress must hold justices accountable for corruption and pass term limits for justices! It’s time to get Thomas, Alito, and Roberts off the Court.

A democracy doesn’t give its elected leaders the right to do anything they want!

The right-wing justices on the Supreme Court have now given Trump immunity, overturned Roe v. Wade, and destroyed corporate accountability and oversight (like in last week’s Chevron ruling).

SCOTUS can’t escape accountability for their disastrous rulings. That’s why Congress must take action immediately.

Add your name: Hold the right-wing, corrupt conservatives on SCOTUS accountable. Send Thomas, Alito, and Roberts to find new jobs with term limits!

When we organize, we win.

Our Revolution and BrattonOnline.com

NIGHTMARES AND DAY DREAMS. Netflix series.(6.6 IMDB) *** A collection of 7 episodes starting in Jakarta with a baby falling from a balcony, some concepts of torture, and then… switches to a bread factory !! All seven chapters are like that and they hang together neatly, but full of blood and guts.

ROCCO SCHIAVONE: ICE COLD MURDERS. Series. (7.8 IMDB) **** An absolutely engrossing, tightly knit movie about an Italian (Aosta is the city in Italy) detective whose wife is either murdered or maybe was suicidal. He’s quirky, smokes pot, and heads up a great cast in an excellent series. Go for it.

Reminder…repeating this one in case you haven’t seen it yet!!!

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB). *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT. Prime movie. (7.0 IMDB) **** All about competition rowing at the college level. The University of Washington ended up sending their rowing team to the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Hollywood star/ actor George Clooney directed this sentimental and touching near documentary…and it shows. Exciting, scenes from the existing class system and how these poor children pulled together.

INHERITANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1IMDB) ** This is a comedy and you need to remember that intention. A TV host dies and for some plot reason the family is invited to his mansion to experience the reading his will. He hosted a game show and they throw in some gay humor, some inside tv programing errors and it’s only worth 2 thumbs.

DEFENDING JACOB. Apple TV series. (7.8IMDB) *** Chris Jacobs loses the screen and our attention every time his co-star Michelle Dockery appears…she has inherited and mastered all screen stealing techniques.  He’s a much liked and capable assistant District attorney. All of a sudden his son’s best student buddy is murdered and the son is faced with maybe being guilty. It’s a long take on family loyalty, and on what’s fair, the privileges the DA’s son enjoys…and the movie is excellent…don’t miss it.

HITLER AND THE NAZIS. NETFLIX SERIES (7.5 IMDB) **** We’ll never the total truth behind World War II but this documentary fills in many blank spots. 6 years of war, 60 million lives lost, Nuremberg trials, Hitler and his love for some of Wagner’s operas, Goering, anti-British, mentioning the Messiah…it’s all in this well done documentary. We should memorize the lessons we need to learn.

WONDER. Netflix movie. (7.9 IMDB) * When you have Owen Wilson, Julia Roberts and Mandy Patinkin as leads in a sentimental movie about a 10 year old boy born with a disfigured face after 27 surgeries you have a terrible chance at making a watchable movie….and this isn’t watchable.

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB) *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE IRON CLAW. HBO MAX movie. (7.6IMDB) * It’s hard to imagine that they’d make a movie about the phoniness of tag team wrestling and expect it to contain anything resembling a believable plot. Zac Efron heads this semi true story of the wrestling Von Erich family. They managed to involve the Christian church in it but to little or no avail. Bad acting, flaky plot, and it’s half billed as a documentary, do not watch.

RAISING VOICES. Netflix Series. (7.2 IMDB) ** It’s just a bit dated because they have a relatively normal family who have built and operate a marijuana farm in their basement. There’s also lots of alcohol and party times happening. Another sub plot is a momentary focus on whether or not some of the characters are lesbians. There is no reason for this topic and no reason to see this movie either.  

HIT MAN. Netflix movie. (7.3 IMDB) ** It’s listed as a comedy and Glen Powell plays the lead as an undercover cop who takes on many jobs as a killer informant but fools everyone involved. The plot is amazingly confusing and full of posing and bad acting. The New York Times gave Powell big publicity and promotion last Sunday, pay no attention to it. They got it wrong, or are secretly managing Powell’s career.     

ERIC. Netflix series (7.01IMDB). *** Now we get to see/hear Benedict Cumberbatch do an American accent. He’s part of the 1980’s New York City startup of PBS’s Sesame Street in its most innovative Jim Hensen period. It’s partly funny, but it’s about the father son relationship that Cumberbatch has with his son. They hit on the race issue, plus the gay life, and even the homeless scene. It has a corny ending but it’s still worth watching.

ATLAS. Netflix movie (5.6 IMDB)  * Just about another future earth after some kind of huge attack. This one stars (loosely) Jennifer Lopez and she’s terrible in this Hollywood 28 years after some horrible attack flop. Plenty of bots working with humans which seems to be nearly impossible. It’s even truer after you watch Dune part 2. Don’t bother.

MAESTRO IN BLUENetflix series (8.2 IMDB) A curious film made during the covid mask era in Greece. It’s about a music festival on an island, the handsome guy in charge of the festival, and all these gay guys who don’t seem to be happy while being gay. Then too there’s a sort of sub plot involving a 18 year old girl and a 40 plus guy. I couldn’t buy any of it.

...

July 1, 2024

“I’m At a Loss For Words” Contractor Lee Brokaw

Photo from City Planning Website

Along with others, I zoomed into the June 5th and June 26th online city meetings regarding the proposed project for 2020 North Pacific Avenue. Two versions of the project are being presented by the developer: one at eight stories and one at sixteen. Both are in the pre-application stage, meaning neither has been formally presented to the city Planning Department. The developer, Workbench has six months to complete that process.

It’s hard to fathom the motivation for presenting such provocative renditions of the project at this early stage. While a sixteen-story building is a jaw-dropping departure from anything yet built in the city of Santa Cruz (the Dream Inn is ten stories), the original city proposal for the tallest building heights in the south of Laurel area, also known as Downtown Extension, was a head-reeling twenty stories, since scaled down to a hopeful twelve. Is the taller Clocktower project real or is it a ploy to have the community eventually breathe a sigh of relief and accept eight stories with a “well, it could have been worse” attitude? Or is it developer confidence under a changed reality? Armed with a plethora of new state laws that leave little local planning control, and cheered on by recently-established-in-town pro-development groups such as YIMBY and UCSC Housing Coalition, the developers can afford to watch the little people squirm.

Meanwhile I’ve been trying to understand how a sixteen-story building, which is around 180 feet tall can be proposed for an area of Downtown zoned for a maximum height of 35 feet. I know State density bonuses can double that height but that gets us to 70 feet not 180. In pursuit of an answer, I asked that question in the Q&A on June 5th. The response from Workbench was:

 What State law basically says is that the City can’t restrict the height of a building in such a way that a project can’t fit all of the units allowed by state law. So, the height limit is set by the number of units allowed on the site. State law allows for a “waiver” of height limits that prevent the project from including all of the units allowed.

I pondered, if the height is based on the number of units allowed on any given site, what determines the number of units at this site? A different Santa Cruz project from Workbench (on their website) is a six-story building with 305 units. How does the 260 units clocktower building get to climb to sixteen-story with forty five less units? I asked this question of the senior city planner for the project. He referenced the following from the City’s Municipal Code.

  1.    For the purposes of calculating the number of density bonus units in areas where a maximum density range is not provided in the zone district or general plan, an implicit residential density shall be calculated based on a project put forward by the applicant that meets all applicable development standards. Objective development standards such as setbacks, floor area ratio, and height limitations, while not defining the maximum density range per se, can be utilized to determine the implicit residential density allowed. In this approach, a project defines the applicable residential density for itself based on meeting applicable development standards. SC Municipal Code 24.16.255 (6) My emphasis added.

I’ve read this many times. It seems the project itself determines the number of units, which can be doubled under the current state density bonus. So long as the project meets development standards, it cannot be denied. However, development standards are subject to waivers, so in the end, it seems the developer can define whatever they want, including sixteen stories. Or, as the YIMBY participant enthused, why stop at sixteen, why not twenty?

Why not indeed? Well, perhaps a strong sense of place and deeply held affection for the character of Santa Cruz? Workbench’s response to a request to keep the current Spanish Colonial design characteristic of Santa Cruz was dismissed with a “we like modern.” So much for community input.

It’s worth noting that the density bonus is a carrot to encourage developers to build. It does not result in more than the required “affordable” units at the bonus height compared to the pre-bonus height. The City’s Inclusionary rate is 20%. This rate is applied to the “base” height, the height before any density bonus kicks in to double or triple the height. That’s why the Inclusionary rate for a density bonus project in toto is usually well-below the required 20%. When a zoom caller tried twice to clarify this point, staff response was, “that’s a pretty detailed question” and did not answer it. It’s an important point. Community buy-in rests on the assumption that all this extra height is at least giving us more affordable housing. It isn’t. In fact, it’s making the situation worse by raising Area Median Incomes. Affordability levels are based on Area Median Incomes. The higher the AMI, the less affordable the Inclusionary rental housing.

The city zooms seem planned to cherry-pick responses as the project picks up steam. That, plus changing the content to say whatever is needed. The entry about Latinos preferring four stories was entered as “Latino voices support taller buildings”.  That has since been corrected after complaints. The comment that this project will raise rents overall was entered as “rents will be too high to support students.” The comment that such dense projects will make single-family homes even more expensive was entered as “SF (sic) will become more desirable/more expensive.” With all due respect to the person who had to type answers, a job I could never manage, all entries should be checked with the tape for accuracy. Otherwise, they go forward as fact, influencing the decision-makers.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

EVEN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS SUFFERING NON-RENEWAL
Many in Santa Cruz County are receiving notice of non-renewal from insurance agents…even Central Fire Department!

Background:
In April 2024, Central Fire received notice from VFIS Insurance Services that Central Fire
District would not be renewed when the policy expires on 7/1/2024. This cancellation
included excess insurance up to $10 million.

Here is Central Fire Chief Jason Nee’s explanation:

“The insurance story is long and complicated, but here is a very brief summary.
 
The past two winters have done significant damage to the Soquel and Live Oak fire stations.  Further, we lost a fire apparatus in the winter of 2022 to the storm surge.  We also had other claims for non-storm related incidents, some of which were outside of our control, some of which were a function of our old, outdated facilities and cramming new, larger equipment into the old/small facilities.  Other incidents were a lack of attention to detail.
The sum of these incidents triggered our insurance company to drop us.  Our 10-year history of claims is excellent.  Our two-year history, not so much.
 
So, we were forced into the insurance market at the same time the insurance companies are forced to recoup recent losses and preempt forecasted future losses.  We basically hit the market during the perfect storm.  Our options have been scarce, but we are fortunate to have an opportunity to have insurance.  Insurance agencies are not in the business of protecting government agencies…. we are in the same position as many California residents, though for different reasons.  Unfortunately, this increase in cost will have some effect on our ability to pay for other response related future purchases.

Have a safe holiday weekend.

Jason”
 

Residents withing the Central Fire Protection District will see a bond measure on their ballots this November to support infrastructure upgrades.

WHAT IS THE LATEST NEWS ABOUT CABRILLO COLLEGE ON-CAMPUS HOUSING PROJECT?
Do you want to learn about the current status of the 604-bed five-story dormitory planned to be built at the edge of the athletic fields and next to the Highway?  Listen in online Friday, July 12 at 2pm to Santa Cruz Voice online radio when Cabrillo Collenge President Matt Wetstein is a Guest for discussion of the topic on “Community Matters”: santacruzvoice.com/

Many wonder if placing housing next to the busy Highway  is a good idea for the students’ health?  Will the 1999 EIR be updated to include traffic and water impacts?

EIR:  Cabrillo College Master Plan Draft EIR, Oct 1999

Statement of Findings

ASSEMBLYWOMAN GAIL PELLERIN WILL DISCUSS STATEWIDE ISSUES
On Friday, July 12, at 3pm, State Assemblywoman Gail Pellerin will be the Guest for the second hour of “Community Matters” on Santa Cruz Voice.com online radio program.  She will fill us in with her thoughts on the State Budget, fire insurance issues, the Low Impact Camping legislation (SB 620) and other topics of her choosing.  Listen online!

Santa Cruz Voice – Listen and Be Heard

WRONGFUL TERMINATION LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
I happened to discover that the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds former Manager, Dave Kegebein, and the Fairgrounds Foundation, currently run by Jeannie Kegebein, is being sued for wrongful termination by two former long-time employees.  Here is the Santa Cruz County Superior Court case number: 24CV01524

It is shocking to read the mistreatment the employees endured under not only Kegebein, but also the two Interim Managers brought in by the State officials, and ultimately resulted in alleged wrongful termination.  These two long-time employees just knew too much about the many problems behind the scenes and in my opinion, were viewed as a threat to the status-quo.

You may remember that in October, 2022, officials from the California Dept. of Food & Ag Fairs and Expositions visited the Fair Board meeting and demanded the Board terminate then-Manager Dave Kegebein because of multiple findings made in a State Performance Audit of the State-owned facility.

The Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds, known as the 14th District Agricultural Association (DAA) is not the only state-owned fairgrounds getting audits resulting in Manager/CEO termination.  Recently, following a Performance Audit and findings, the State officials dismissed the Board of Directors of the Tri-County Fair (18th DAA) in Bishop, and then took action to terminate the CEO.  The same CEO was also managing the Ventura County Fair,  and promptly resigned from that job.

Many of the same problems found in the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds Performance Audit in 2022 were also found in the 18th DAA Performance Audit.

Here is the 2022 14th DAA Performance Audit (included in the October Board Agenda Packet, available on the website)

Take a look at the current Santa Cruz County Fair Board agenda…recently rescheduled to July 23 because the Manager failed to provide the required 10-day notice of the July 2 meeting, and was out of compliance with the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act. 

Are things going better at the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds?  It is troubling that former CEO Dave Kegebein, terminated by the Board, is now the Executive Director of the Ag History Project on the premises, and the Fairgrounds Foundation (run byJeannie Kegebein) seems to be running the fairgrounds with the new CEO Zeke Fraser complacent.

The recent Performance Audit of the 18th DAA is attached at the end of this report.

I think it is good that the State officials are holding local fairgrounds management accountable when the Board of Directors affiliated don’t.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  LISTEN IN ON SANTA CRUZ VOICE.COM AND ASK QUESTIONS.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Burning the Landscape, On Purpose

“Prescribed fire” is one way of saying it, another is “broadcast burn”; these terms mean to burn a patch of vegetation. These terms contrast with the phrase “cultural burn,” which is when indigenous people use fire for a thousand different reasons, only some of which are broadly understood. This essay continues from the last one in examining humans’ purposeful use of fire. Here, I will focus on the use of prescribed fire in the Monterey Bay area during the last 30 years.

Personal Experience with Fire – Twin Gates UCSC

My experience with prescribed fire started when I was steward of the UCSC Campus Reserve, from 1992-1997. Any responsible conservation lands manager in California has to consider fire, either because they need to think about the interface with human infrastructure or because of the role fire can play in managing for species. At that moment, people weren’t vocal about the potential for vegetation and fuels spreading from conservation lands and burning up human infrastructure and destroying lives. However, staff with the UCSC Grounds Department from time-to-time mentioned the rationale behind one of the fire roads being named “Fuel Break Road,” and harkened to a prior era when people bulldozed chaparral and burned the piles to reduce wildland fuels on upper campus. Being a manzanita-phyle, I was happy that no one was pushing for that practice, but I started talking to folks about burning upper campus grasslands as a restoration experiment.

CAL FIRE was interested in doing a training burn, and so we were able to move forward with a prescribed fire program. I worked with students to collect data on the meadow composition (data apparently now misplaced in the UCSC Campus Reserve Office), and CAL FIRE did the environmental review and plan for the burn. We would focus on the ocean side of Twin Gates, between Empire Grade and what is Wilder Ranch State Park now. At CAL FIRE’s request, I drove up there frequently to collect humidity, wind speed, and air temperature so that the prescribed burn team could better plan their approach. When the time was right, crews arrived and created bare soil ‘hand lines’ around the perimeter of the meadow. Then a firing crew used drip torches to set strips of the meadow on fire, closely monitored by folks dragging fire hoses to dowse the flames if they got out of hand. Soon, the whole meadow was black with the last wisps of smoke drifting from smoldering spots.

Bad Fire in the Meadow

I loved that meadow before the fire, and thought I was helping it become more healthy: I was wrong. That fire forever changed a beautifully diverse native meadow into a much weedier shadow of its former self. In particular, where once there were big patches of lush native tufted hairgrass, non-native rattlesnake grass and other European annual grasses proliferated. I recall that the diverse native bulb assemblage declined, and the uncommon false yellow lupine patch shrank.

In retrospect, and with observation of other such experiments, I hypothesize that there was simply too much build up of dead vegetation, so the fire cooked out vulnerable native plants. There were plenty of non-native plant species waiting for an opportunity to invade. And, there was a bad drought following the burn, which probably contributed to the problems.

Others’ Fires

Since that time, there have been many more prescribed fires in the area. State Parks staff have regularly burned more of the meadows between Twin Gates and the ocean in Wilder Ranch State Park as well as the meadows on the ocean side of the highway, north of Año Nuevo and patches of Andrew Molera State Park. That same State Parks team has also burned chaparral at Henry Cowell and Wilder Ranch as well as forest at Big Basin. The prescribed fires at Big Basin State Park are particularly interesting as they preceded the  2020 CZU Lightning Complex Fire, which has become popularly understood to be devastating to the redwood forest at that  Park.

Prescribed Fire: Helping Old Growth Survive Wildfire?

State Parks staff had long burned portions of Big Basin’s old growth redwood forest for ecological restoration, and to make it more resilient to wildfire: how has that worked out? Luckily, a peer-reviewed scientific paper based on data collected just before the 2020 CZU Lightning Complex Fire is available to help inform the situation. The paper illustrates that prescribed fires at Big Basin worked as designed to reduce fuel loading and to improve forest structure to make the old growth redwood forest more resilient to wildfire. Using the locations where those data were collected should help inform how the areas actually performed in the face of the wildfire. I hope someone examines that.

Prescribed Fire’s Anecdotal Forest Success

Just before the 2020 CZU fire, Save the Redwoods League burned a patch of the San Vicente Redwoods property, in Bonny Doon…just up the hill from Santa Cruz. The prescribed fire location coincided with an area where trees survived the wildfire, which killed thousands of trees nearby. It is one of the few places where one can see mature Douglas fir trees in the midst of the intense fire scar. As with anything green in the vicinity, wildlife flocked there in the fire’s aftermath. Folks say that the prescribed burn at that location even prevented the wildfire from spreading to adjacent homes.

Plumes of Smoke on the Bay

As the fire ignited, personnel huddled behind fire engines to protect themselves from unexploded bombs and bullets. The Army at Fort Ord has used prescribed fire to clear off the vegetation so that they can clean up ‘unexploded ordinance.’ As a military base, the oak woodlands, grasslands, and chaparral had long been subject to accidental fire, but these flames have been planned. The first few fires they set on purpose were a disaster for Salinas: citizens downwind choked on the smoke and complained. Better planning ensued and the Army even paid people to stay in hotels away from the smoke if they needed to. I haven’t seen any reports on the impacts of the burning on the many rare species and habitats that call Fort Ord home, and wildfire hasn’t raged through the area to test the effects of prescribed fire on wildfire intensity or rate of spread.

Fire’s Accelerating Influence

As human-induced climate change increases the intensity and frequency of wildfire in California, officials are demanding increased pace and scale of prescribed burning. The State of California has a target of using prescribed fire on 500,000 acres a year; it has been a good year when we’ve burned 10% of that thus far. Ironically, it is getting harder to find a good time to do prescribed burns as the changing climate creates either too much moisture or too windy/hot conditions. But, the main issue at hand is human opposition. Communities don’t feel safe around prescribed fire. Only when people feel safe in their homes will prescribed fire proliferate across the landscape. To that end, people need to learn better how to keep their homes safe from wildfire – it all starts there. Also, people need to be afforded the opportunity to experience prescribed fire firsthand. When they see how carefully those fires are planned and controlled, they might feel safer.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#184 / Sometimes Lucky, Sometimes Not

That is Margaret Chase Smith, pictured. She was formerly a United States Senator representing the State of Maine. The image was captured from a column by Lance Morrow, which appeared in yesterday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. The title of Morrow’s column, “Margaret Chase Smith for President,” was a piece of wishful thinking, since Smith died in 1995.

Morrow’s column commented on the current presidential race – and on past presidential races, too – and among other things, Morrow said this:

Sometimes things turn out all right and the country gets lucky. Sometimes not. Some say that America elects the president it deserves. It’s shaming to thnk of what the country must have done to deserve this year’s choice.

The disheartening presidential debate held on Thursday, June 27th clearly prompted Morrow’s column, and generated the observation just quoted. As anyone reading this blog posting probably knows, our current president, Joe Biden, performed abysmally in the debate, leading to many suggestions that he withdraw as the Democratic Party candidate, or that the Party find some way to replace him. The other candidate, former president Donald Trump, lied, dodged questions, and acted with savage meanspiritedness. That debate really was disheartening, and as Bob Dylan might say, “the wheel’s still in spin.” It’s not clear what may happen now.

I know that one friend of mine has suggested that Biden may well have been drugged by some infiltrator into his “Green Room,” just prior to the debate. Comparing Biden’s performance in the debate to the speech he made just one day later, touching on all the same themes, makes it easy to see where this hypothesis comes from. You can click right here for a video of the entire debate, and you can click right here to see Biden’s speech at his North Carolina political rally, held on the very next day. The differences are startling, and the “he must have been drugged” idea is an explanation that could, actually, “explain” what happened in the debate. In the debate, Biden seemed “out of it,” to be charitable. There was a different presentation one day later.

My point in this blog posting is not to endorse such speculation, or to take a hard and fast position on what should happen in this year’s presidential race – and particularly about who the Democratic Party candidate should be. I do want to be clear that I think that it is imperative that the people of the United States not elect Donald J. Trump to the presidency in November of this year. That would be a huge mistake and a setback, but if Trump were elected, that’s not the “end” of democracy, or of self-government in the United States. Trump’s election would just mean exceedingly hard times ahead in almost every part of our national life.

My point is this: The idea that a presidential “debate” is a good way to decide who to vote for, an idea more or less implicit in Morrow’s column – reinforces the erroneous thought that, really, the only thing that truly matters is who the president is.

This is just totally wrong. If anyone thinks (or “assumes” may be a better word) that the entire future fate of the United States of America depends on which person is president, please pick up a copy of the Constitution, and read a little American history, and understand how our government is actually intended to work. The president plays an important role in our system of self-government, but it is an “administrative” role. It is the president’s job to “see that the laws are faithfully executed.” That is, in fact, pretty much “it.” Making sure that the laws are faithfully executed is really the president”s main assignment, and this means that the future fate of the Republic is, emphatically, not dependent on who the president is.

The president is not supposed to be deciding what the rules are, what our goals are, what the budget  is, whether women have a right to make their own decisions on the issue of abortion, or whether or not the United States of America goes to war. Just to name a couple of high-profile questions.

All the most important policy questions, including questions of war and peace, are supposed to be made by our elected representatives, “in Congress assembled.”

The key word is “representative.” If you have a legal representative, a lawyer, who doesn’t advocate for the positions you want your lawyer to advance, or who is otherwise ineffective, you replace that lawyer. You should do the same with your elected representatives in the United States Congress. Impossible? Hardly! Easy? No.

When the world is getting fit to be fried, when the threats of nuclear war are sounding more like real threats, instead of bluster and hype, and when income inequality has reached such massive proportions that the word “oligarchy” doesn’t do justice to the economic status of the billionaires and the corporations that are currently controlling everything, it is obvious that things have gone, and are continuing to go, seriously wrong.

In such a situation, it is absolutely a mistake to think that what will happen in the future will depend either solely, or primarily, on who gets elected president. That is Mr. Trump’s erroneous claim, of course (his statement that “I alone can fix it“), but it’s not true. WE have to fix it, and that means everyone.

“Something is happening here.” We are coming to a decision point. Who gets elected president is one important question.

But the more important question is what the people of the United States of America are going to do, regardless of who gets elected. It’s “shameful,” to use Morrow’s word, that we would so denigrate our own power and ability as to think that who the president is has become the only really important question.

Sometimes, we’re lucky in who our president is. Sometimes, not so lucky.

What’s important isn’t a question of “luck.” It’s whether we are willing to pledge “our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor” to insisting that a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” will not perish from this earth.

BY the people is the most important part of that phrase from the Gettysburg Address. That means you. That means me. That means us.

It’s time to reallocate our time, and to reestablish self-government in the United States. Whoever the Democratic Party candidate turns out to be. Whoever wins in November.

Our role is not to sit in the rally stands and cheer the performers onstage. Our role is not to go home and seek to divert ourselves from a spectacle we can’t stand to watch.

Our role is to run our governments, from local, to state, to national.

And we’d better get to work on that, right now!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

TANGERINE IMPERIALISTS, DECISION FOR THE AGES (OR AGED?), FLAGS FLY FOR REVENGE

Well, well…it looks as though His MAGAness was right about his innocence all along, and that he has the right to be a criminal, borne out by the US Supreme Court decision released last Monday. Does the new Imperial Presidency, supported by the new Imperial High Court apply to President Biden as well, or does he have to abide by the law as we ordinary citizens must do? The Court could have, and should have, decided on this case in December (only agreeing to take the case in late February)…or at least shortly after that acceptance, as the courts demonstrated in 16 days when the Nixon/Watergate tapes scandal erupted. This very court ruled that Trump’s name should remain on the Colorado primary ballot in less than a month! Constitutional law professor emeritus at Harvard UniversityLaurence Tribe, accused the Court of dragging its feet, saying, “It’s obvious that the Court has DELIBERATELY delayed everything. It could easily have issued a ruling much sooner.” Special Counsel Jack Smith brought the four-count indictment against Trump almost a year ago, accusing the former president of conspiring to derail the 2020 Biden victory by preventing Congress from verifying the totals from the state Electors.

In DecemberUS District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the charges on ground of absolute presidential immunity in his argument that any actions taken while in office protects him from prosecution, and that the House of Representatives must impeach, and the Senate must convict a former president before criminal prosecution is initiated. Trump’s claim was rejected by the DC Circuit Court in February, with Chutkan delaying the scheduled March 2024 trial date until the Trump argument wended its way through the court system. Trump asked the Supremes to weigh in and offer their “thoughtful consideration.” We now see that the ‘consideration’ wasn’t very ‘thoughtful’ as they delayed release of a decision for four months, waiting until the last day of the court session to rule on a decision that was, in reality, probably decided six months ago by the majority of six MAGA-leaning judges. James Sample, a Hofstra University constitutional law professor believes there was “no legal necessity” for the High Court to accept this case in the first place, pointing to Trump’s “dangerous” arguments. Sample argues, “When you compare the Supreme Court’s handling of similarly urgent presidential matters in the past, including Watergate…, and certainly Bush v Gore, the delay that has occurred here is intentional, and it is destructive of our democratic process. The DC Circuit’s decision was correct on the merits, the Supreme Court has effectively interfered in the political process for no reason whatsoever other than for the purpose of interfering.”

Clair Wofford, poli sci professor at the College of Charleston, said it’s “certainly fair” to criticize the court for not taking up the case sooner, adding, “If you wanted, there are lots of people you could hold responsible for how long this is taking.” She references Attorney General Merrick Garland, who waited until November 2022 to appoint Special Counsel Jack Smith, and the FBI’s hesitancy of a year before investigating the J6 riot. “If you want something to be reasonable and rational and thoughtful and ordered, it doesn’t happen quickly,” Wofford stated. So, in it’s tardy ruling last week, The Supremes ruled that our Tangerine Darth PaidHer can be tried for any of his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss that were not in an official presidential capacity…too late for a trial to be completed before election day. Both Wofford and Tribe agree that Jack Smith can rewrite the indictment against Trump to include things that Trump’s lawyers admit were private, narrowing the case to the fake elector scheme. Tribe says, “No one doubts that that’s outside the president’s powers, that he supported the filing of false allegations of election fraud, that he signed verifications in court filings knowing that they were false.” He adds that Smith could proceed with trial 88 days from the decision, time to which Trump and his defense team are entitled for trial prep. Smith’s narrowing the case might allow for a trial before the election, but it wouldn’t include all the crimes committed leading up to and including January 6, the only advantage being that Trump could be partially exposed for his criminality to voters. One hitch might be that AG Garland will determine that with the election being eminent, he will not authorize holding a trial, a decision that Tribe warns against since a winning candidate Trump will appoint a compliant attorney general who will simply waive all charges.

Writing for the 6-3 court majority, Chief Justice John Roberts says, “The parties before us do not dispute that a former President can be subject to criminal prosecution for unofficial acts committed while in office. They also agree that some of the conduct described in the indictment includes actions taken by Trump in his unofficial capacity.” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that the majority’s decision “makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law.” She argues that the Supremes gave the former president “all the immunity he asked for and more. With fear for our democracy, I dissent.” The Chief Justice downplayed the dissenters, saying, “As for the dissents, they strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today – they conclude that immunity extends to official discussions between the President and his Attorney General , and then remand to the lower courts to determine ‘in the first instance’ whether and to what extent Trump’s remaining alleged conduct is entitled to immunity.” Of the six conservative justices, half were appointed by Trump, and he was quick to jump on Truth Social, calling the ruling “A BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY.”

Roberts agrees that presidents are not above the law, but says, “…under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts. That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office.” Former Justice Department attorney, David Becker, called the Supreme’s decision “deeply disturbing” and “really striking” for what it would allow a president to do in office and remain unchallenged criminally, such as immunity from interactions with an attorney general who might endeavor to change election results or kill a political opponent. “The way I read this opinion is it could be a road map for (presidents) seeking to stay in power. It could put into question whether or not future peaceful transfers of power occur.” Robert Mintz of McCarter & English, said the decision created more heat than light, and, “Rather than finding either a clear immunity or no immunity for alleged criminal conduct, this new standard will unquestionably lead to protracted hearings and further appeals as the lower courts have to now grapple with the question of which allegations in the indictment constitute official acts.”

Presidential criminal immunity is something the framers of our Constitution didn’t consider, nor could they have conceived of such a clause for inclusion, after having rejected the toxic rule of a royal sovereign. But now it seems we must crown King Donald. Previous courts had ruled that presidents are immune from civil lawsuits for official actions taken while president though not from lawsuits tied to their behavior, but after the three judges of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals discounted the Trump claim of absolute immunity, the Supreme Court felt a need to step in to examine whether or not there are barriers to any criminal charges against a president. Though it had to make a ruling on the Trump appeal, rather than make a decision for the ages, it mutilated any rationale that a responsible court could have accomplished by cherry-picking to satisfy the MAGA swamp. Indeed, Justice Neil Gorsuch said as they took up the case, “We’re writing a rule for the ages,” with Justice Kavanaugh joining in that the justices should be focused on how their decision would affect future presidents…the “here and now of this case,” as he said. Sorry guys, but you missed the mark by a bunch since you no longer share OUR values, but those of MAGA! Guaranteed to have smiles on their faces are justice’s wives, the flag-flying Martha Ann Alito, and ‘Ginni-Stop-the-Steal’ Thomas, who undoubtedly pillow-talked and conspired with their respective spouses in their decisions.

Clarence Thomas questions whether Jack Smith is a legitimate prosecutor, by saying, “If this unprecedented prosecution is to proceed, it must be conducted by someone duly authorized to do so by the American people. The lower courts should thus answer these essential questions concerning the Special Counsel’s appointment before proceeding.” Instigating another Supreme Court decision, eh Clarence? And since the justices left it to the lower courts to decide what constitutes an official act versus an unofficial act, this must be seen as a tactical victory for The Donald, since it fits right in with his strategy of delay-delay-delay, as he attempts to exhaust prosecutors and the courts with his tactics. As Steve Schmidt tells us in The Warning“Scumbaggery is his rocket fuel, and all you need is anger, rage, and stupidity if you want to advance politically and advance Trump’s scumbaggery!” It’s now easy to conclude that the Court’s ruling have validated Trump’s ideas of “retribution” against his enemies should he return to the Oval Office, especially against Joe Biden and the Democrats who he charges with attempting to sidetrack his candidacy in acts of political persecution…for which he has no proof…because “I said so!”

Political revenge may need to be meted out, as Trump said to Dr. Phil“Well, revenge does take time, I will say that, and sometimes revenge can be justified, Phil, I have to be honest. Sometimes it can.” He continues to bring up possible retribution in his interviews, or at his campaign rallies. Trump’s White House attorney, Ty Cobb, says, “I think there should be concern. From a 30,000-foot view, what I see is Trump angrier now than he was before he was convicted.” In an interview on Fox, Trump told Sean Hannity that critics were wrong in saying that he will use his possible return to the White House for revenge, but the next minute found him to be laying out the opportunities. “Look, when this election is over, based on what they’ve done, I would have every right to go after them. And it’s easy because it’s Joe Biden, and you see all the criminality, all the money that’s going into the family and him, all of his money from China, from Russia, from Ukraine.” Both Hannity and Dr. Phil tried to dissuade him from speaking of retribution, that it serves no purpose and will not help the country, but on Newsmax, Trump went so far as to mention the possibility of imprisonment for his political opposites if he has the opportunity, also suggesting that the public would reach a “breaking point” if he is sentenced to jail time or house arrest at his July 11 sentencing. In 2020, Trump criticized his attorney general, William Barr, for not arresting Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton for their “illegal activity” tied to Robert Mueller and the Russia investigation, as he continues to claim this is being done on behalf of his base. “I know a lot of Republicans who want retribution. They want to do that. We’re going to see what happens.”

Ty Cobb once said that he believes the nation’s institutions would hold the line if Trump attempted to delve into what would clearly be political revenge, nevertheless fraught with peril. After the Supreme Court ruling, his opinion today would be interesting to hear, since he felt that the checks and balances would resist these attempts, and that it would be difficult finding people to carry out his demands. Raise your hand if you think Ty should take another look! For instance, revenge-seeking Trump supporters had their hackles raised when a federal judge ordered former Trump adviser Steve Bannon to prison after the Supreme Court turned down a hearing on his appeal to delay his four-month term. True to form, Bannon in his anger issued his own threats. “Don’t pray for me. Pray for my enemies. They’re the ones who need it,” he barked. In defense of Bannon, Trump posted on Truth Social that members of the J6 Committee should be indicted, writing, “INDICT THE UNSELECT J6 COMMITTEE FOR ILLEGALLY DELETING AND DESTROYING ALL OF THEIR ‘FINDING!’” Caution is advised after Trump shared a post…“Haul Out the Guillotine!”

The political world is still roiled by President Biden’s poor showing at the so-called CNN ‘debate’ last week, with Democrats far and wide making their views known about the candidate’s future. Polls are in flux for whatever that may be worth, but it seems that the rank-and-file are still on board with continuance, and a family confab over the weekend seems to suggest support for his staying the course. Historian Allan Lichtman of American University, who has correctly predicted the results of nine of the last ten presidential elections, argues that replacing Biden on the ticket would cost his party the 2024 election. Post-debate concerns of Biden’s age and ability don’t seem to sway Lichtman, who says, “It’s a huge mistake. They’re not doctors. They don’t know whether Biden is physically capable of carrying out a second term or not. This is foolhardy nonsense.” Lichtman uses a series of 13 historical factors or “keys” in his election predictions, missing only the race in 2020, out of the last fifty years. His system includes four factors based on politics, seven on performance, and two on candidate personality, making it imperative that the incumbent party maintain at least seven out of the thirteen to retain the White House. The state of the economy and the presence of third-party candidates factor into his determination, but debate performance is not a determinate of election outcome…pointing to Ronald Reagan who captured 49 states in spite of poor debate performance and age considerations. Lichtman considers Biden’s age and mental acuity are “fundamentally different” than his metrics as a president. “Debate performances can be overcome, yet at the first sign of adversity the spineless Democrats want to throw him under the bus, their own incumbent president. My goodness!” However, it must be pointed out that he has not made his final prediction for November’s contest.

Final thoughts, with thanks to the Scots and LuckovichTrump has all the wit, charm, and intelligence of a rectal thermometer. Something the Scots would call a “cockwomble”…a person, usually male of course, prone to making outrageously stupid statements and/or exhibiting inappropriate behavior while generally having a very high opinion of their own wisdom and importance. And recapping a Mike Luckovich cartoon with Trump sitting across from a fortune teller and her crystal ball, she says, “In your future, I see corruption, vengeance, dictatorship, internment, deportation…” A pleased Trump interrupts with, “So far, so good…”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Stockholm Syndrome”

“I mean, they call it Stockholm Syndrome and post traumatic stress disorder. And, you know, I had no free will. I had virtually no free will until I was separated from them for about two weeks.”
~Patty Hearst

Stop it. Do not feel safe with him. The Stockholm Syndrome is not your friend.
~J.R. Ward

“I’ve always been intrigued by Stockholm Syndrome. Reminds me of my childhood.”
~Jonathan Ames

“Authors who moan with praise for their editors always seem to reek slightly of the Stockholm syndrome.”
~Christopher Hitchens

“Women, who are the prime victims of religion, and perhaps in some, stockholm syndrome effect, often form the most fervent advocates of the very thing that degrades them. I believe that in the end, it will be women who will turn this around. This should be the final stage of feminism. For a feminist to still believe in god is like a freed slave still living on the plantation.”
~Matthew Chapman

...

This is a documentary that shows where the term “Stockholm Syndrome” came from. Growing up in Sweden, I remember, albeit vaguely, when this happened. I find it interesting to get details about things I thought I knew, but decades later realize that maybe I didn’t, really.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

June 26 – July 2, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… Rail and trail … Greensite… on the Downtown Expansion Plan… Steinbruner… Adverse Camping, Why RTC Should NOT Consider Lightrail … Hayes… on Fire (no, not literally)… Patton… A Few More Words About Billionaires… Matlock… Vigilantes, Inc….whistleblowers, sharks and batteries…Georgia on my mind… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… the difference between WWII and Vietnam vets… Quotes on… “Grandparents”…

...

HOLY CROSS CHURCH AND SANCTUARY.. Circa 1889. Margaret Koch’s book says the Church on the left was dedicated in 1858 and was used until the brick sanctuary on the right was built in 1889.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: June 26, 2024

FRIENDS OF THE RAIL AND TRAIL APPEAL. FRT has been working for years trying to bring common sense to our seemingly infinite transportation issues. Due to our natural (and unnatural ) environment/geography we need some very creative and unusual solutions to our transportation. FRT sent this logical and realistic appeal to their followers. I’m linking to it here…hoping the rest of our community will respond accordingly.

June – ACTION ALERT

Dear Bruce and readers of BrattonOnline.com,

Summer weather is here and I know we’re all starting to enjoy all the extra traffic! The increased traffic, which is only expected to get worse every year, is the perfect reminder of why alternative modes of transportation are so important. Not only is boosting our public transportation system vital for the 30% of County residents who can’t drive, adding rail to the mix is the only North-South option that will allow us to get to the beach without sitting in any traffic at all. We all agree we need it, so now is the perfect time to start designing!

Let’s Get Started Designing the Rail Service We Want to See!

Over the next four weeks, the Santa Cruz Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) is taking public comment on the first draft of rail vehicles, alignments, and possible stops. This preliminary look has been simplified to the point of providing almost no detail at all, however, it’s at this point when we can have the biggest impact on the design principles we want to see in this project. To that end, we’ve spent the time reading best practices in rail service design so you wouldn’t have to.

[Read the full newsletter here]

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT. Prime movie. (7.0 IMDB) **** All about competition rowing at the college level. The University of Washington ended up sending their rowing team to the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Hollywood star/ actor George Clooney directed this sentimental and touching near documentary…and it shows. Exciting, scenes from the existing class system and how these poor children pulled together.

INHERITANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1IMDB) ** This is a comedy and you need to remember that intention. A TV host dies and for some plot reason the family is invited to his mansion to experience the reading his will. He hosted a game show and they throw in some gay humor, some inside tv programing errors and it’s only worth 2 thumbs.

DEFENDING JACOB. Apple TV series. (7.8IMDB) *** Chris Jacobs loses the screen and our attention every time his co-star Michelle Dockery appears…she has inherited and mastered all screen stealing techniques.  He’s a much liked and capable assistant District attorney. All of a sudden his son’s best student buddy is murdered and the son is faced with maybe being guilty. It’s a long take on family loyalty, and on what’s fair, the privileges the DA’s son enjoys…and the movie is excellent…don’t miss it.

HITLER AND THE NAZIS. NETFLIX SERIES (7.5 IMDB) **** We’ll never the total truth behind World War II but this documentary fills in many blank spots. 6 years of war, 60 million lives lost, Nuremberg trials, Hitler and his love for some of Wagner’s operas, Goering, anti-British, mentioning the Messiah…it’s all in this well done documentary. We should memorize the lessons we need to learn.

 WONDER. Netflix movie. (7.9 IMDB) * When you have Owen Wilson, Julia Roberts and Mandy Patinkin as leads in a sentimental movie about a 10 year old boy born with a disfigured face after 27 surgeries you have a terrible chance at making a watchable movie….and this isn’t watchable.

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB) *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE IRON CLAW. HBO MAX movie. (7.6IMDB) * It’s hard to imagine that they’d make a movie about the phoniness of tag team wrestling and expect it to contain anything resembling a believable plot. Zac Efron heads this semi true story of the wrestling Von Erich family. They managed to involve the Christian church in it but to little or no avail. Bad acting, flaky plot, and it’s half billed as a documentary, do not watch.

RAISING VOICES. Netflix Series. (7.2 IMDB) ** It’s just a bit dated because they have a relatively normal family who have built and operate a marijuana farm in their basement. There’s also lots of alcohol and party times happening. Another sub plot is a momentary focus on whether or not some of the characters are lesbians. There is no reason for this topic and no reason to see this movie either.  

HIT MAN. Netflix movie. (7.3 IMDB) ** It’s listed as a comedy and Glen Powell plays the lead as an undercover cop who takes on many jobs as a killer informant but fools everyone involved. The plot is amazingly confusing and full of posing and bad acting. The New York Times gave Powell big publicity and promotion last Sunday, pay no attention to it. They got it wrong, or are secretly managing Powell’s career.     

ERIC. Netflix series (7.01IMDB). *** Now we get to see/hear Benedict Cumberbatch do an American accent. He’s part of the 1980’s New York City startup of PBS’s Sesame Street in its most innovative Jim Hensen period. It’s partly funny, but it’s about the father son relationship that Cumberbatch has with his son. They hit on the race issue, plus the gay life, and even the homeless scene. It has a corny ending but it’s still worth watching.

ATLAS. Netflix movie (5.6 IMDB)  * Just about another future earth after some kind of huge attack. This one stars (loosely) Jennifer Lopez and she’s terrible in this Hollywood 28 years after some horrible attack flop. Plenty of bots working with humans which seems to be nearly impossible. It’s even truer after you watch Dune part 2. Don’t bother.

MAESTRO IN BLUENetflix series (8.2 IMDB) A curious film made during the covid mask era in Greece. It’s about a music festival on an island, the handsome guy in charge of the festival, and all these gay guys who don’t seem to be happy while being gay. Then too there’s a sort of sub plot involving a 18 year old girl and a 40 plus guy. I couldn’t buy any of it.

DUNE. PART 2. Max movie (8.6 IMDB) (4 thumbs)  **** An absolute genius of a special effects extravaganza. You’ll need to see (or read) the plot from Frank Herbert’s book to remember /learn all the names and plot twists involved in part 2. It’s about intergalactic spices and who owns them. Timothee Chalamet is the lead and Javier Bardem plays a serious role too along with Christopher Walken, Zendaya, Josh Brolin and thousands of digital look a likes. It’s the best use of advanced screen effects I’ve ever seen. The scope, the plot, the movie itself is the biggest ever. Don’t miss it and go to a theater to see it on the biggest screen possible.

A SIMPLE FAVOR. Netflix movie (6.8 IMDB)  * It’s billed as a drama/comedy and doesn’t qualify as either one. Anna Hendrick is the lead and she is simply just not funny OR believable. Rupert Friend and Henry Golding are in it too, but shouldn’t have been. A child goes missing and finding her son takes most of this movie, and your patience.

BRIDGERTON. Netflix series. (7.4 IMDB) ** The very definition of a British costume drama. But this is no Downtown Abbey and contains only stereotypes of high court characters. Julie Andrews is in it, if you wait long enough. It’s interesting and possible that there really were that many races represented in the British courts at that time or is it the film makers attempt to stage racial balance?

...

June 24, 2024

Downtown Expansion: Plan or Pipe dream?

The map area outlined in red is the 29-acre site of the new “proposed” extension to downtown. “Proposed” is italicized since it appears that this is a done deal. According to the mayor at the joint meeting of city council and planning commission on June 18th, only the project’s “operationalization” or implementation is up for discussion and decision. Most city projects, and this is probably the largest city project in living memory, wait for the circulation of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) before council approval. The draft EIR for this project is still being developed.

The driver for the project is the push for a new Warriors arena to avoid the G team (G for Gatorade) leaving Santa Cruz for better facilities. The extra push is the state requirement for the city to demonstrate where it will be able to accommodate 3700 new housing units under the next seven-year Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) cycle. The last seven- year cycle required 700 units at various income levels, all of which the city reached or surpassed, being one of only six percent of CA cities to do so. There are 1600 mixed use (housing and retail) units proposed for this newly designated Downtown Plan Extension project. Can an area under 30 acres, gridlocked with summer tourist traffic, with no provision for parking (state law), housing fifty percent of the city’s required RHNA numbers, successfully be transformed as described below in the 6/18/24 Agenda Report?

A new urban destination with distinct urban character and a major events venue of regional importance could make this project the center of a highly successful economic development endeavor, bringing residents and visitors from throughout the region into the downtown and helping them navigate between key points of interest at the beach, river levee, and Downtown.

I am skeptical for several reasons. Some are:

  • One of the long-time expressed desires by city planners is to connect downtown with the beach area. It is the first and primary rationale for this project in the Agenda Report. It is never accompanied by data. I suggest city planners grab a beach towel, pop on a swimsuit, walk along Main Beach or the Boardwalk and chat with folks. Doing so will quickly reveal that visitors who come to Santa Cruz to go to the beach, with stocked coolers and children’s beach toys are a different demographic with different interests from those who visit downtown, window shop, go to a movie, stop for a coffee, or try on a new outfit.
  • With no parking in this new urban, regional destination area, where are visitors going to park? Two commissioners stressed that concern. In their slide show, planning staff had a pie graph of what the (local) public sees in this area as Roadway Priority: 226 chose vehicles while 829 chose pedestrians and bicycles. What exactly is the implication in that for regional visitors? For planning?
  • Recent city environmental reports fudge the issue of traffic under exemptions or changes in CEQA law. The traffic study for the future Calypso project on Center St. studied only weekday traffic despite gridlock being on summer weekends. Can we expect the same approach in this EIR process? The project area is smack in the middle of the route taken by the lower west side to access downtown or across town to the eastside, not to mention beach hill residents. Impact and mitigations will need serious assessment.
  • Why is current tourist traffic bound for the Boardwalk and beach area required to navigate two roundabouts (this project will add a third), merge with Wharf traffic and local traffic to enter Beach St. to access the only entrance to the Boardwalk parking lot? A Second Street back entrance to the Boardwalk parking lot would make sense. In the ongoing negotiations with the Seaside Company, that option deserves a discussion. It could be a mitigation for the obvious traffic nightmare this project will create.
  • The current Local Coastal Program, LCP for south of Laurel requires that new housing be for families, meaning more than one-bedroom. Will the LCP be changed to designate small, single-person units to be the new norm for this area?
  • What will be the impact of this new urban entertainment, retail center on current downtown businesses and the Civic Center? The Santa Cruz Symphony director seemed enthusiastic about leaving the Civic for the new Arena. In the Civic I’ve watched basketball games, Lipizzaner stallions, Derby Girls, Santa Cruz Symphonies, Bob Dylan, Jesse Jackson and much more. And yes, there is funding already allocated to erect railings on the bleachers, a long overdue safety feature. Are we never satisfied with what we already have? Doesn’t a quickly warming climate require a modicum of restraint?

The city is accepting comments on this Plan up to July 10. These are separate from comments on the draft EIR which is expected to be released late summer. You can submit comments to principal planner Sarah Neuse at sneuse@santacruzca.gov and view documents here.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

LOW IMPACT CAMPING THAT IS NOT
Last Tuesday, the Board of Supervisor chambers was overflowing with local fire professionals and many people who live in the rural areas, worried about Supervisor Zach Friend’s push to allow private campgrounds throughout the high-fire risk areas.

[June 25 meeting, video]

Zayante Fire Chief Maxwell said the Fire Chief’s Association did not support it.  (see minute 4:40)
County Fire Marshal Walters said he had not seen the proposed changes to be able to review them (see minute 5:07)
The Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) stated camping and campfires are not compatible with wildland areas such as Cotoni-Coast National Monument in Davenport, and that top fire fighting experts within the BLM (“Hot Shots”) recommended against camping and are leading a project to create 100′ of defensible space encircling Davenport.

 Supervisor Zach Friend opened the public hearing by stating he had talked with local fire officials in the hallway, and they were okay with the changes that addressed their concerns.  However, neither of the fire professionals had seen his proposals until he discussed them in his presentation.

He said he would support limiting the number of permits to 150, and later said he wanted County staff (not the land owners seeking campground permits) to conduct CEQA analysis to determine impacts on those areas.  He questioned the wisdom of prohibiting such campgrounds in high and very high fire risk areas when he claimed some areas of La Selva Beach’s San Andreas Road are considered high fire risk.

After some members of the public, including a retired fire captain, reported they had contacted the State Insurance Commissioner’s office about the proposed Ordinance and that those officials were shocked such action could be considered because of potential fire risks and inherent insurance non-renewal for adjacent properties, Supervisor Friend claimed he had contacted Insurance Commissioner Lara’s office and “unlike what people have said, the staff had no issue with the Ordinance.”  Really?

Why is he pushing this so hard?

Supervisor Friend’s frantic push to have County staff conduct an expensive CEQA study on the Ordinance and potential campground areas was obscene.  Supervisor Koenig pointed out that the County cannot afford to fix the roads, so he could not support asking staff to do an expensive environmental report.

Supervisor Friend would not give up, and insisted a CEQA review, with the topics that he alone defined, would provide the County with information necessary to enact an Ordinance that would be better than  what SB 620 might provide, if approved.

Thank goodness, the Board did not acquiesce.  After nearly three hours of public testimony and discussion, they voted to wait until after August 31 to see if SB 620 is approved, and take action from there regarding any County-funded CEQA analysis.

Because I have studied CEQA law informally, I know that any CEQA analysis of a project must be noticed to the public and allow for open public comment regarding “Scoping” of what the study should include.  When I asked County Counsel Jason Heath about this and the fact that Supervisor Friend seemed to want to define the scoping of the proposed Low Impact Camping Ordinance, Mr. Heath refused to comment.

Here is the law:

Public disclosure and informed decision-making are priorities under CEQA. CEQA mandates two periods during the EIR process when public and agency comments on the impacts of a proposed project are solicited: 1) during the scoping comment period, and 2) for a  Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), during the public review period.

In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15082[a], 15103, 15375), the County must circulate a Notice  of Preparation (NOP) for the Proposed Project.

So just how many of these HipCamp sites are already operating, unpermitted, near you???  Take a look.
Hipcamp

Many show campfires.  Some allow dogs to be off leash.  Who knows if there is a way to call 911 if there is a fire or medical emergency?  Could responders find the sites if called?  How loud are the generators providing power?  Is there water on site for fire suppression?  How do the off-leash dogs affect wildlife?
Hmmmm…..

Read about HipCamp’s CEO here: Hipcamp Founder and CEO Alyssa Ravasio featured in Outside Business Journal’s list of 20 Most Influential People in Outdoor Industry

CONTACT STATE REPRESENTATIVES TO URGE OPPOSITION TO SB 620
The crowd who filled the Board chambers and largely opposed the idea should now turn their energy to the State representatives.  I called State Senator Mike McGuire’s office to ask why he would author such a bill as SB 620?  I was referred to and left a message for his policy analyst, Chris Nielson.  No reply yet.

I also called the office of co-author Assemblyman Damon Connelly and spoke with his analyst, Michael, who defended the legislation (“campers would not pose any more fire risk than the people who live in those areas do.”)  and downplayed Assemblyman Connelly’s involvement (“He doesn’t represent Santa Cruz County, and is only a co-author.).  I reminded him that this legislation would affect the entire State, if approved.

When I asked who it was that had contacted Assemblyman Connelly and caused him to co-author SB 620, Michael said “Hip Camp and the Nature Conservancy”.

Hmmm…..

I called the Nature Conservancy office in San Francisco.  Their office knew nothing of SB 620, and were concerned.

Both Senator McGuire and Assemblyman Connelly represent the Santa Rosa area, a region still recovering from devastating wildland fires.

Please call your local state elected representatives and relay your concerns about the Low Impact Camping (LICA) legislation SB 620 that has many in this County, including fire professionals, shaking their heads in alarm and disbelief.

LAND TRUST BALLOT IS JUST ANOTHER MONEY GRAB
Beware the impending forever Special Parcel Tax coming to your ballot this November.  Funded by the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, paid signature gatherers were able to get the required number of signatures to qualify this “citizen initiative” for the ballot that will collect $87 on parcels countywide, except timber and ag lands, and win approval with only 50% +1 majority, not the usual 2/3 approval required.

There would be no senior exemptions

All administration of the anticipated $7 million would be allocated by an Advisory Committee, composed of appointed representatives from each of the five County Supervisorial Districts and four cities, and supposedly be subject to the Brown Act open meeting requirements.  Hmmm…

Who are the top funders in this expensive campaign? Take a look here:
Santa Cruz County for Water and Wildfire Protection

and here.

The County would get alot of money just to administer this.  Think about it, and ask yourself if you trust these politicians at 701 Ocean Street who have repeatedly lied to voters regarding Measure G in 2018 and Measure K in March of this year.  Zero $ for fire protection from Measure G.  Zero $ for road repairs from Measure K.

RTC PLAN TO INCLUDE LIGHT RAIL HARMS WATSONVILLE COMMERCE AND SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN
Last week, I attended the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Open House for the Zero Emission Passenger Report public input.  There was one in Watsonville and a second in Live Oak.  I chose to go to the Watsonville event and was really glad I did.

Because it was not well-attended, it was possible to hear the RTC staff stationed around the room answering peoples’ questions.  The maps showed the plan for where the rail stops would be located and there was information about three different kinds of passenger trains under consideration.

I was a bit shocked to see plans for a tunnel under Highway One near Cabrillo to connect the Cabrillo College Station on McGregor Drive to Cabrillo College Drive, near Twin Lakes Baptist Church.  I was also surprised to see that the proposed Aptos Village station is where the Aptos Street BBQ and other businesses are located.

Fortunately, I learned there would be a formal presentation of the project to the Watsonville City Council the following night.  I was really glad I went to that because I learned from Watsonville City Councilwoman Ari Parker that if the RTC chooses the lightrail passenger mode, it will really harm Watsonville’s commerce by removing freight rail connectivity to the main rail lines in Pajaro.

Because the existing rail bridge over the Pajaro River will be demolished and rebuilt to accommodate the impending levee repair project that will raise the height of the levee and require tracks on Walker Street and the new train bridge to be higher by as much as  10′.

Ms. Parker wanted to know if the RTC staff was aware of the problem with the lightrail not being compatible with freight rail traffic?  Yes, the RTC is aware of that.  Ms. Parker then wanted to know if the residents in the northern end of the County were being made aware of that, and the serious adverse implications that would pose for Watsonville?  Staff was not sure.

My question is this: Why is the RTC even considering lightrail as an option, knowing if it were selected, supposedly “by the people” via input in these Open Houses and other meetings, Watsonville commerce will be trashed???

Please write the RTC and ask that the lightrail option be removed from consideration, out of respect for Watsonville’s economy and commerce.

CHANTICLEER OVERPASS PROGRESSING
This week, crews added the decorative whale motifs to the fencing on the Chanticleer Pedestrian and Bicycle Overpass on Highway One.

Recently Soquel Creek Water District Board approved adding tens of thousands of dollars for an upgrade to the Overpass fencing.  Maybe they want toilets and taps and ???? put on the fence sections adjacent to the PureWater Soquel Project wastewater treatment plant?

AND THE APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT GHETTO CONTINUES
Last week, I noticed painted markings on eastbound Soquel Drive in the Aptos Village area of Parade Street.  This area has become problematic for motorists wanting to make a left turn onto Trout Gulch Road because the same turn lane gets used midway for Parade Street left turns into the Aptos Village Project.

County staff let me know “The striping is all we are implementing. There will be no physical barriers in the roadway. This is being done out of our Traffic Engineering Section to balance the needs of all the movements on Soquel Dr. We will continue to monitor the area.”  

What a mess.  When the County has no money to fix potholes, there is somehow money to add features to further help Swenson.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Fire

The advent of human control of fire was a pivotal moment in the development of our species. Human use of fire has been changing in some ways and remains steady in others. Recently, it seems that the use of fire is becoming more and more remote for more and more people. Is that good or bad? Join me for a few moments to examine the state of human relationship with fire.

In the millennia of humans” past and on into our present, we have used fire for heating, cooking, pest control, trash disposal, transportation, and war as well as for the creation of food and fiber. I intend to revise this essay and welcome suggestions about other major uses for fire. Fire is a powerful tool.

Fire for Heating

Consider the evolution of using fire for heating: from the first flame to the storage of heat in stone, masonry fireplaces and chimneys, metal wood stoves, furnaces and, most recently, forced air central heating. Do I understand correctly that conversion of wood to fire for heat, even with super-efficient, clean burning woodstoves, is no longer legal for new construction in Santa Cruz County? Soon, even mountain folk will lose their expertise and familiarity with keeping their homes warm using locally produced fuel, easily produced as a land management byproduct making for improved wildfire safety.

Cooking Fires

My host gently wiggles and pushes three-foot branches, 3″ in diameter into the fire to renew the steady heat beneath a tortilla-cooking comal. Smoke rushes out through the roof. Mayan peoples in Belize showed me this indoor cooking method, which is similar to that which many tropical and subtropical cultures have relied for generations. Elsewhere, grills over charcoal, “spits” turning above flames, and wood-fired ovens are other methods for fire-cooking food. Cast iron wood-fired cook stoves are antiques. I haven’t seen one used for a decade.

Have we entered a new era for cooking with fire? Can anyone confirm the rumor that gas stoves are no longer permitted with new construction? I understand that there are concerns about indoor air pollution as well as thoughts that such methods will unduly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.

One of the last cooking fires in our region is employed by those ‘roughing it” using portable gas-fired stoves, some of which have become ultra-lightweight and highly efficient. I would be remiss not to also mention wood-fired appropriate technology cooking units, fed by surprisingly small handfuls of branches to prepare family meals. These have been targeted to developing countries with increasing shortages of fuel wood.

Pest Control

A member of Sonoma’s Kashia Pomo tribe recently spoke to a group I was with about the importance of burning the understory of oaks for pest control. He pointed out insect holes in an empty acorn shell and noted that his ancestors would have burned the understory of oak forests to reduce this damage and improve the acorn crop. I”ve heard similar things about pine nut pest management.

How many other pests might have been once controlled by different uses of fire?

Food Production

Precluding the use of fire for pests, fire has been, and is still being, used for other aspects of food production. Tribal peoples use fire to increase productivity of seed crops. Burning releases nutrients trapped in dead vegetation into the soil, increasing plant growth. Native ryegrass and brome grass stands that are burned produce more, heavier seeds. Burning meadows increases the amount of clover and other wildflowers which serve as either salad greens or seed crops.

The principle of fire releasing nutrients for the next crop also applies to rice farmers in California. Burning rice fields was once a more common method of returning nutrients from “crop residue” to the soil. Some farmers have turned to selling rice straw or flooding fields so that waterfowl help break down crop residue.

Other fire-prepared food crops include morels, beef, and grasshoppers. Morels are especially numerous after fire-spurred nutrient release. Ranchers have long used fire to reduce the cover of unpalatable shrubs and increase herbaceous forage to benefit livestock production. Perhaps fire is still used to round up grasshoppers that are subsequently roasted and coated in chili powder and salt for a tasty, crunchy, protein-rich snack.

Fire-Grown Fiber

I haven’t encountered anyone burning for fiber production, but have a few ideas. Burning to reduce shrub invasion into grasslands would make those areas more productive for sheep, and, hence, wool (fiber) production.

Native peoples have burned various plants in various ways to increase fiber production. Around our region, hazel, willow, and iris burned in the right way would make it possible to harvest more and better fiber for cordage and basketry.

Trash Disposal

Travel in rural areas of the Americas and you’ll no doubt encounter the distinct smell of incinerating trash. Especially unctuous is the dioxin-tainted odor of burning plastic. I know of a certain gentleman who very recently was regularly burning 50 gallon oil drums of trash including plastic baby diapers, polluting an otherwise pristine area of Big Sur. I wonder how common the practice is at this moment in the USA?

Fire for Wildfire Fuel Reduction

Carefully planned pile burns or broadcast burns are increasingly being used to dispose of vegetation that would have otherwise been a fire hazard. I’ve written more about these practices in this and this essay.

Riding the Fire

Internal combustion engines burning fossil fuels, releasing ancient carbon, and powering vehicles is a leading cause of global warming in our nation. Not long ago, the hungry burning work of steam engines propelled society ‘forward,” destroying forests for fuel, leading to California’s hardwood crisis in the late 1800’s. Quieter, fireless electric engines are a revolution at hand, but there’s a sound like distant thunder propelling people in much different ways.

War Fire

Sanctions aside, war is mainly a fiery affair. Bombs, bullets, flame throwers, and napalm are the fire-based war weapons of modern soldiers. No doubt too many of us have been exposed to media portrayals of more ancient warfare involving flaming projectiles meant to kill or destroy property. The most ‘modern” of fiery death, atomic warfare, is too close at hand with entirely different types of flames.

Could war really be over if we wanted it enough? Let’s quell those violent flames starting by putting out those types of fires closer to home.

Fire – For Better or For Worse

Next time you light a candle, if you even do that anymore, take a moment to reflect on the use of good fire or bad fire. As humans become more distant from their roots, more unfamiliar with tools that we have long used to steward our world, it seems we need to make a greater effort to raise future generations to be comfortable using fire in the best of ways. We must also learn to turn aside from the power of less productive flames, as tempting as that power might be. Burn brightly! Burn well.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#171 / A Few More Words About Billionaires

It wasn’t too long ago that I commented on the number of billionaires among us. In a blog post at the end of last year, I said there were 735.

Since then, I have been advised by an email bulletin from Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen, that there are actually 806 billionaires in the United States, although Weissman properly notes, in a comment highlighted by an asterisk, that “the exact number of billionaires at any given moment fluctuates with gains and losses in the stock market and other financial metrics.”

At any rate, having raised the topic of the “billionaires among us,” I thought it was a good idea to pass on the additional information I have now received from Public Citizen. This group is urging its supporters – and others, including you – to “tell Congress that the American people need our elected officials to fight back against worsening economic inequality.”

Specifically, Public Citizen is urging all of us to “tell Members of Congress to pass the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act of 2024.”

If you click this link right here, I believe that Public Citizen will provide you with an opportunity to sign a petition to that effect.

In the meantime, as you decide whether you would like to sign on, or not, here is that additional information from Public Citizen that I didn’t have when I published my earlier blog post:

  • There are approximately 806 billionaires in the United States.
  • That’s roughly 1 billionaire for every 417,265 non-billionaires.
  • The average net worth of an American billionaire today is over $7 billion.
  • The combined fortunes of all of this country’s billionaires add up to a staggering 5.8 trillion dollars.
  • Here’s what that looks like numerically: $5,800,000,000,000.00.
  • As Americans for Tax Fairness report, that is double what it was at the end of 2017, not even seven years ago.
  • For comparison, the combined wealth of the entire bottom half of our society — some 65 million households — is $3.7 trillion.
  • In other words, America’s 806 billionaires collectively have $2.1 trillion more than the entire bottom half of the country, and — because our tax system is so biased in their favor — these billionaires have numerous ways to avoid paying anything close to their fair share.
  • A bill in Congress — “The Ultra Millionaire Tax Act of 2024” — would start to bring some sanity to our nation’s disgraceful and unequal tax regime, by imposing an additional — though actually still quite modest — tax on those whose net worth exceeds $50 million.
  • “The Ultra Millionaire Tax Act of 2024” would also give the IRS much-needed additional resources to keep after the wealthiest taxpayers (or tax cheats, as the case may be).
  • Sponsors of this critical new legislation include Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and Representatives Pramila Jayapal, Brendan Boyle, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

To give you a hint of what I think, I signed the petition!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

KKK ON THE RISE, BILLIONAIRES AND 2000 MULES, A FINALE?

Greg Palast, author, freelance journalist (often featured in The Guardian), and film maker who has produced several presentations for the BBC, is in the process of making a film entitled “Vigilantes, Inc.” in which he exposes the scam of ‘volunteer vigilantes” who have operations in several states to disrupt the vote by purging Black voters. He is endeavoring to hunt down what he calls the “Klan-Lite” operatives who are initiating these challenges to the voting rolls in a return to the KKK of the 1940s…this time backed by financing of billionaires as they continue the assault on the Voting Rights Act. Palast began his investigation in 2018 after Georgia’s Secretary of StateBrian Kemp (now governor after defeating Stacey Abrams in that race), had purged about a half-million voters, with Palast getting access to the whole list. Hiring a private contractor to verify names and addresses, he probed each name, finding that over 150,000 had legitimately moved away from Georgia, while over 340,000 had not moved, and surprise, surprise…most were Black voters.

Election Day 2018 found the Palast Investigative team, with film crew, in Atlanta where they met up with a Black woman outside her usual polling place (for fifty elections), and who had been denied a ballot because she had been purged from the rolls. She was interviewed, then invited the crew to her house, where it was discovered she was a cousin of Martin Luther King, JrBrian Kemp won the election by 54,723 votes, having overdone his purging by several thousand votes…oh well. Within the two years leading up to the 2020 presidential election, Kemp’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger (Palast emphasizes pronunciation as RaffensPurger), purged another 309,000 voters, bringing Palast back into the fray with his investigative contractor, along with the Georgia ACLU Black Voters Matter Fund, and the Georgia NAACP. Their efforts restored about half onto the rolls, allowing Joe Biden to win the state by…repeat after me…”11,780 votes” which Trump unsuccessfully attempted to move into his column.

Not surprising that the purges are ongoing in Georgia, but the trend is picking up adherents across the nation as the “vigilantes” step up their efforts in at least 20 states. Palast found that in the 2020 election-leadup analysis that Black voters in Wisconsin, particularly those voters in Milwaukee, had been purged, along with students in Madison being incorrectly added to the list. The Palast Investigative Fund, and Black Voters Matter, filed their findings with a bipartisan elections commission which stopped the purges…resulting in a Biden victory. The vigilante “challenges” skirt the legalities in Red States under the guise of “whistleblower challenges,” undertaken by citizens who suspect that an individual who they think is casting a vote illegally might be called out. For instance, Georgia’s SB202 allows “unlimited” challenges to voters by those not in government. While individual states are prohibited from purging voters by “list maintenance” within 90 days of an election, a citizen vigilante can present their voter purge lists even on election day, leaving no time for re-registration and casting a vote for those purged.

“In 2022, 149,000 voters were challenged in Georgia, not by the government, but by vigilante vote fraud hunters using specious data. Unfortunately, there have been two federal court rulings this far that have allowed this to continue, so it’s now spreading to other states,” comments Palast. He goes on to say that a Marjorie Taylor Greene associate named Pam Reardon, challenged 32,000 voters, heavily focused on Black people and college students, by using a list compiled by the group True The Vote. This group is known as the producer of the movie “2000 Mules” which falsely claimed millions of votes were “stuffed” into drop boxes by Black people across the nation. Hardly surprising that the movie premiered at Mar-a-Lago for Comrade Cheetolino! The conservative media company behind the movie and a companion book, Salem Media Group, Inc., recently issued an apology and announced it was removing the film and the book from its platform, halting distribution. ‘2000 Mules” has been widely debunked by law enforcement and the media, and an individual featured in the film who had been investigated by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation was cleared of any wrongdoing. This individual had sued Salem Media for the way he was portrayed and for the violent threats to his family, which resulted in an undisclosed “significant” settlement.

Palast identified vigilante Alton Russell, chair of the Ft. Benning area GOP, who challenged over 4,000 voters, including a “substantial number of Black soldiers.” Russell views himself as a bonafide vigilante in his Doc Holliday style clothing with a six-shooter on his hip. Palast’s Investigative Fund, along with NAACP and ACLU assistance, found not one single voter challenged by vigilantes Reardon and Russell were fraudulent, as they only stopped Reardon’s purge. On the other hand, Russell’s challenges were sustained, with the 4,000+ voters purged. Palast cautions, “Georgia’s brand of voter vigilantism has now legally spread to Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. They”re now mass challenging literally hundreds of thousands of voters, and True The Vote has put out a call to get 100,000 volunteers to submit these challenges. They”re probably the most effective vote suppression organization since the Ku Klux Klan,” further noting, “Georgia and Texas are not Red states…if people were allowed to vote they”d be Blue states.”

The film, “Vigilantes Inc.” takes its name from the 1946 incorporation of the Georgia Klan, when they registered that name in their endeavor to specifically eliminate every Black citizen from the voter rolls, and now we have them back…so, if you want your next president to be elected by the Klan, stay home on election day! Interested in the film? You can get screen credits (alongside Martin Sheen’s) for a donation of $100 or more, which will also get you a signed DVD of the film upon its completion. If interested in simply being a film backer, any donation is welcome at Greg Palast Investigative Fund.

A couple of Sundays ago, Donald Trump visited the 180 Church, a Black congregation near Detroit, for what he called “a roundtable” and as we might have predicted, his mouth opened with a lie, by saying, “it’s an honor to be here. it’s a very important area for us. We”ve done more for…and I say this proudly…the Black population than any president since Abraham Lincoln. President Biden has done nothing for Blacks.” He claimed that he had lowered Black unemployment, but failed to say that Biden has exceeded his so-called record. Political science professor David Dixon at Howard University has lauded the Biden-Harris administration for the energy they have put toward Black constituents, and that record seems to be borne out by the nomination of 25 Black judges to the federal court system, notably, the appointment of the first Black female on the Supreme Court. Government professor Steven Taylor at American University is of the opinion that the full picture of Biden’s efforts is contrasted against a Congress, especially Trump Republicans, that votes against any proposal that might improve the lives of Black people. Contrast that with Trump himself who has the gall to stand before a Black congregation to puff out his chest about his supposed efforts.

We might also have correctly suspected this appearance would be a total scam, and after seeing all the blue-eyed, white faces peering from the pews, it was evident the MAGA gang had filled the church with a crowd who had never set foot in a Black church prior to this, and would not do it again unless called upon by their Cinnamon Jesus. After the phony roundtable had ended, Trump was back at it, criticizing Black majority cities…Milwaukee is “horrible,” echoing his past disparagements of “crime-infested hellholes” in Atlanta and Baltimore, and Detroit being declared “crooked as hell,” when he told his minions to “guard the vote.” Shirley Kennedy writes on The Palmer Report“These words about and characterizations of predominately Black cities shows where Trump’s head is when it comes to Blacks. Yet, he wants the Black vote. Any Black people who vote for Trump are bigger fools than his regular supporters.”

Leo Daniel’s Trumpvirus post on Quora writes about election commissioner, Chris Jackson’s evidence alleging that the Trump Gang has been paying people to show up at his ‘rallies,” which has “sparked significant debate and scrutiny, adding another layer to the already contentious legacy of the former president. The allegations shed light on potential tactics used during his campaign events, raising questions about the authenticity of support garnered by Trump during his time in office.” As reported on Raw Story, Jackson is looking into a June 9 event, when individuals were incentivized with money to attend a gathering, though evidence of who made payments is cloudy, raising ethical implications. “In a democratic society, it is essential that citizens attend political rallies and events of their own volition, driven by their beliefs and values rather than monetary incentives. When attendees are paid, it blurs the line between genuine grassroots support and artificial manipulation of public perception,” writes Daniel. He continues, “It raises concerns about transparency and honesty of campaigns. Voters have the right to make informed decisions based on genuine interactions with candidates and their policies…it undermines the democratic process and erodes trust in the political system.” The Trump contingent has denied this scheme in question, which was in Las Vegas, but there remains much speculation and debate, which furthers the deepening divisions and distrust among voters.

MSNB’s Nicolle Wallace, who calls herself a “self-loathing former Republican,” charges Fox News of depriving its audience of the full picture of Idol Trump, as the network has chosen to cut away from several of the GOP candidate’s rally speeches when he starts going off the deep end. The Las Vegas rally is a prime example when the teleprompter conked out, with Trump then threatening the event contractors before going into his now-infamous ‘shark-vs.-electric boat” scenario. A former GOP strategist, Stuart Stevens, suggests to Wallace that Fox “can try not to show this and hide it, but it’s a long time to election day and a lot of people are going to start paying attention that aren”t paying attention now,” highlighting the differences between Donald and Joe. Stevens says, “I think Trump is like a guy walking around with a paper bag full of water. it’s probably not going to leak that much, but when it goes, it’s going to be hell to pay to get it back. That’s where he’s headed.” Rachel Maddow told Wallace the president is now “really, really, frequently incoherent. And when he’s not incoherent, he’s speaking in terms that are pornographically violent when he’s trying to rile up his audience.” Maddow believes his speeches would be shocking to a lot of the public, if people could stand to listen to him for longer that they do, if only news organizations could responsibly broadcast more of what he says. Because of the lies and threats he’s pushing, it might be considered irresponsible to do so, however. On the shark/electric boat story, Rachel says Trump will now double down as he always does, and his troops will fall into formation, eyes agog, salivating tongues hanging, and heads nodding. “it’s as hilarious as it is scary,” she adds.

In his dehumanizing characterizations of immigrants, Trump has now suggested that they could be pitted together in fights for our entertainment…as he told Christian conservatives on Saturday. He claims he proposed to his friend Dana White, president of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, that a competition of his fighting league champs against immigrants might solve the immigration problem. Hardly non-violent, eh? Satirist Andy Borowitz reports that, “in a rare public statement on Monday, Melania Trump said her husband has exhibited ‘alarming mental decline” since she last saw him three years ago. Mrs. Trump said that she happened to see him on television recently ranting about sharks and boats and was struck by how much he had deteriorated over the past three years. ‘He was incoherent before, but now he be worst,” she said. Shortly after Mrs. Trump released her statement, her husband vehemently disputed it. ‘I don”t know what Mercedes is talking about…I may be 78, but I have the mind of a two-year old.””

The Palmer Report’s Bocha Blue says, “This will not end well. At this point, Donald Trump’s brain is a ‘sopranos’ episode. it’s episode after episode, leaving us transfixed, at the edge of our seats, waiting to see how it all plays out. As the episodes become more and more bizarre each day, leading up to the denouement, they become darker and more ominous, leading us gently into the finale where…………”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Grandparents”

“There are no words to describe the happiness in holding your baby’s baby.”
~Unknown

“Grandfathers are just antique little boys.”
~Unknown

“A child needs a grandparent, anybody’s grandparent, to grow a little more securely into an unfamiliar world.”
~Charles and Ann Morse

“The best parents get promoted to grandparents.”
~Unknown

“The reason grandchildren and grandparents get along so well is that they have a common enemy.”
~Sam Levenson

...

I think this is a very important distinction that has not been paid enough attention to.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

June 19 – 25, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… Check out LandWatch; last chance for Maui timeshare… Greensite… on Losing the East Meadow: A Big Unnecessary Mistake… Steinbruner… Private campgrounds in rural fire-risk areas… Hayes… back next week… Patton… China’s housing woes… Matlock… Thomas hits the jackpot…Fauci faces Flaxen Klaxon…78 candles & a file, please… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… Donald Sutherland, R.I.P. Quotes on… “Donald Sutherland”

...

SANTA CRUZ POST OFFICE. July 1, 1911. As the writing on the photo says, “looking Southwest”. You can see many of the still standing structures along Front Street and over on Pacific Avenue. It was the Plaza Land Office there where Jamba Juice is now located.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: June 19, 2024

LANDWATCH FUND-RAISES I got this email, and am sharing it with all of you here.

Your Financial Contributions Allow LandWatch’s Success

Dear Bruce and readers of BrattonOnline….

We pause briefly to evaluate our progress halfway through 2024. We ask ourselves two questions: What have we accomplished between January and June? Where do we need to direct our energy in the next six months?

We have been laser focused on housing elements for the County and cities in Monterey County. This one document, updated every five years, sets the tone for so many important policies, including preservation of open space, transportation, environmental justice, and climate goals.

If housing elements don’t align with actual local housing needs and priorities, sustainability goals, and infrastructure, then our future will be much more challenging.

Over the last six months we’ve submitted dozens of letters to local jurisdictions, sometimes more than once, to promote:

  • Creating the type of housing that local workers and families need and can actually afford;
  • Ensuring city-centered projects rather than sprawl, which converts our natural lands and agricultural fields; and
  • Reducing greenhouse gas emissions across many sectors.

Knowing that you have our back and that you trust us with these important forward-thinking decisions, allows us to continue this critical work. If the future of our region is important to you, I hope you’ll consider a generous gift that supports our involvement locally and regionally in planning for our community and future together.

Donate Now

Everytime we ask for your help submitting comments or testifying, you show up. It not only means a lot, but it also proves to decision makers that residents care.

Today, I’m hoping you can make a financial contribution to LandWatch to help ensure we have a seat at the table and that our recommendations are not just considered, but actually adopted.

There are many options when giving to LandWatch, including a one-time gift, monthly giving, retirement contributions, and legacy gifts—to name a few.

I will keep you apprised of when and where you can participate in upcoming planning efforts. Until then, your tax deductible gifts will help us engage directly with local governments to create a more sustainable region that improves our individual and collective quality of life.

[end of email]

GOING TO MAUI? Daughter Jennifer Bratton, award-winning former Santa Cruzan, has one available date on her time share on Maui. If you want a good deal on a vacation stay July 13-20 at the Westin Nanea Ocean Villas in Kaanipali, check this listing out! It’s a great resort with beautiful lagoon style pools!

THE WESTIN NANEA OCEAN VILLAS

Check-in: Sat, Jul 13, 2024
Check-out: Sat, Jul 20, 2024

Click for all the details, these are a really good deal! You can ask questions or book right from the website.

HITLER AND THE NAZIS. NETFLIX SERIES (7.5 IMDB) **** We’ll never the total truth behind World War II but this documentary fills in many blank spots. 6 years of war, 60 million lives lost, Nuremberg trials, Hitler and his love for some of Wagner’s operas, Goering, anti-British, mentioning the Messiah…it’s all in this well done documentary. We should memorize the lessons we need to learn.

 WONDER. Netflix movie. (7.9 IMDB) * When you have Owen Wilson, Julia Roberts and Mandy Patinkin as leads in a sentimental movie about a 10 year old boy born with a disfigured face after 27 surgeries you have a terrible chance at making a watchable movie….and this isn’t watchable.

PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB) *** Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.

THE IRON CLAW. HBO MAX movie. (7.6IMDB) * It’s hard to imagine that they’d make a movie about the phoniness of tag team wrestling and expect it to contain anything resembling a believable plot. Zac Efron heads this semi true story of the wrestling Von Erich family. They managed to involve the Christian church in it but to little or no avail. Bad acting, flaky plot, and it’s half billed as a documentary, do not watch.

RAISING VOICES. Netflix Series. (7.2 IMDB) ** It’s just a bit dated because they have a relatively normal family who have built and operate a marijuana farm in their basement. There’s also lots of alcohol and party times happening. Another sub plot is a momentary focus on whether or not some of the characters are lesbians. There is no reason for this topic and no reason to see this movie either.  

HIT MAN. Netflix movie. (7.3 IMDB) ** It’s listed as a comedy and Glen Powell plays the lead as an undercover cop who takes on many jobs as a killer informant but fools everyone involved. The plot is amazingly confusing and full of posing and bad acting. The New York Times gave Powell big publicity and promotion last Sunday, pay no attention to it. They got it wrong, or are secretly managing Powell’s career.     

ERIC. Netflix series (7.01IMDB). *** Now we get to see/hear Benedict Cumberbatch do an American accent. He’s part of the 1980’s New York City startup of PBS’s Sesame Street in its most innovative Jim Hensen period. It’s partly funny, but it’s about the father son relationship that Cumberbatch has with his son. They hit on the race issue, plus the gay life, and even the homeless scene. It has a corny ending but it’s still worth watching.

ATLAS. Netflix movie (5.6 IMDB)  * Just about another future earth after some kind of huge attack. This one stars (loosely) Jennifer Lopez and she’s terrible in this Hollywood 28 years after some horrible attack flop. Plenty of bots working with humans which seems to be nearly impossible. It’s even truer after you watch Dune part 2. Don’t bother.

MAESTRO IN BLUENetflix series (8.2 IMDB) A curious film made during the covid mask era in Greece. It’s about a music festival on an island, the handsome guy in charge of the festival, and all these gay guys who don’t seem to be happy while being gay. Then too there’s a sort of sub plot involving a 18 year old girl and a 40 plus guy. I couldn’t buy any of it.

DUNE. PART 2. Max movie (8.6 IMDB) (4 thumbs)  **** An absolute genius of a special effects extravaganza. You’ll need to see (or read) the plot from Frank Herbert’s book to remember /learn all the names and plot twists involved in part 2. It’s about intergalactic spices and who owns them. Timothee Chalamet is the lead and Javier Bardem plays a serious role too along with Christopher Walken, Zendaya, Josh Brolin and thousands of digital look a likes. It’s the best use of advanced screen effects I’ve ever seen. The scope, the plot, the movie itself is the biggest ever. Don’t miss it and go to a theater to see it on the biggest screen possible.

A SIMPLE FAVOR. Netflix movie (6.8 IMDB)  * It’s billed as a drama/comedy and doesn’t qualify as either one. Anna Hendrick is the lead and she is simply just not funny OR believable. Rupert Friend and Henry Golding are in it too, but shouldn’t have been. A child goes missing and finding her son takes most of this movie, and your patience.

BRIDGERTON. Netflix series. (7.4 IMDB) ** The very definition of a British costume drama. But this is no Downtown Abbey and contains only stereotypes of high court characters. Julie Andrews is in it, if you wait long enough. It’s interesting and possible that there really were that many races represented in the British courts at that time or is it the film makers attempt to stage racial balance?

BETTER THAN USNetflix series. (7.3 IMDB) *** This is a Russian attempt at a science fiction/ robot/ sex / half serious comment on where high tech will be taking us in the near future. A “female” robot vanishes and the search and her relationships are the crux of the plot. Interesting but not necessary.

DARK MATTER. Apple series (7.4 IMDB) *** Yes indeed, another space bending, time warping 9 episode distraction. This one stars Joel Edgerton and Jennifer Connelly. There’s a robbery he gets beat up then he gets reborn backwards 14 months and 10 days in his life. He made and remakes mistakes and so do many other characters in their new growth decisions, but it’s not all that bad. Go for it.

A NEARLY NORMAL FAMILY. Netflix series. (6.4 IMDB) A beautiful 19 year old daughter gets raped by a 40 year old guy. Turns out he’s not such a bad guy except that he gets murdered and she gets accused. Her parents and many friends and you too, will defend her. The ending is a surprise. It’s enticing, engrossing, and it has just a few gaps in the telling of the plot but watch it at your earliest convenience.

...

Losing the East Meadow: A Big Unnecessary Mistake

In 1978, when we moved into one of the Family Student Housing apartments at UCSC I exclaimed, “I bet this is the fanciest place I’ll ever live in!” That turned out to be true. The two-bedroom apartments were spiffy, very well-designed for student families with young children. Clustered around multiple, fenced grassy common areas, each circle of apartments provided an ideal setting for toddlers to play safely and socialize outdoors. That was then, this is now.

Current residents of Family Student Housing (FSH) complain of persistent mold, leaks, and rust. If you look closely at bottom left, you can see sandbags against the sliding glass doors. They are there presumably to stop water leaking inside. Much of the wooden fencing and decking is visibly rotten. In a mere forty-five years, neglect by the UCSC administration has created a blight, a housing complex now described as “beyond its useful life.”

In 1978, the rent for one of these apartments was $110 a month. When word spread that the administration planned to raise the rent by $45 a month, we organized a rent strike. Going door to door we secured support from over ninety percent of residents who agreed to participate in the rent strike. We placed one month’s rent from each household in a bank account. Then we drew up a petition stating that we were withholding our rent until the proposed rent increase was dropped. Our rationale was that UCSC is equivalent to a factory town: they control Teaching Assistant (TA) salaries as well as FSH rents. If they want to raise the latter, they should raise the former. We requested a meeting with then Chancellor Sinsheimer, and with toddlers in tow, a small group of us explained our case to him in his office. He was sympathetic to the logic. The rent increase was dropped. Even more significant, FSH was removed from the state-required formula that future student housing building costs are amortized across all current students. Such formula means that any future UCSC growth will inexorably raise current on-campus rents to pay for loans for new building costs. And by extension, campus growth and ever-increasing on-campus rents drive up off-campus rents as landlords follow the money.

The current residents of FSH pay $1900 a month, almost twenty times what we paid for the same apartments, although then in excellent condition. I don’t know for sure, but I doubt TA salaries have risen twenty-fold over the same period. UCSC has given a $2500 stipend for FSH families. It appears from student comments to the press that rent increases have eaten up much of it. UCSC is currently proposing a further $65 a month rent increase for FSH. The residents have drawn up a petition signed by 400 people, not all of them FSH residents, protesting the increase. As of writing I do not know the outcome of their petition. The administration has stated that rent increases are to pay for, among other things, “repairs and maintenance.” It seems that little if any of that money went for repairs and maintenance of FSH over the years. Such neglect and waste should be an embarrassment for a world-renowned university that proudly features a Sustainability Office.

A FSH rent increase pales beside the plan to bulldoze the current FSH apartments and build a new complex at the base of the East Meadow. Instead of the current 199 apartments and child-care center, the new complex will have only 120 apartments and child-care center. Rents for the new complex are expected to be $2,400 a month. This plan, in the works since 2017, drew serious opposition from many UCSC academics, alumni, and donors via the East Meadow Action Committee. It was highly unpopular within the larger community. In a Sentinel Guest Commentary on March 6, 2024, those deeply involved in this effort laid bare the history of UCSC’s decision to relocate FSH to the East Meadow.

The big picture includes the Student Housing West project, at the site of current FSH. This project for three thousand new bed spaces sounds like a giant step forward in building student housing on campus. However, according to UCSC, it is bedspace for current students who have piled into dorms meant for half the number of students. It is catch-up for years of increased enrollment and too little building of on-campus housing. (Remember that any new campus housing raises rents for all current students.) As plans were proceeding for Student Housing West, a protected species was found onsite. It appears the UCSC administration had a choice. Wait six months and negotiate with US Fish and Wildlife Service over mitigation for the protected species. Or draw up a hasty new plan that included an increase in the height of Student Housing West and the relocation of FSH to the East Meadow. They chose the latter.

Such choice was unfortunate and unnecessary. Surely the stable of UCSC lawyers know that If mitigations cannot reduce an impact to a less than significant degree, the applicant can submit a Statement of Overriding Consideration under CEQA law? Had UCSC proceeded with its original plan, there would have been no lawsuits and at worst a six- month delay, not a six- year delay.

Many, including the UCSC Student Housing Coalition as quoted in the press, blame the lawsuits for holding up the building of much-needed student housing. Lawsuits are an easy target to deflect blame. Such finger pointers might think about campus growth and the inevitable rent increase connection. Or the campus history of superb environmental design. Or the beauty of scanning Monterey Bay over the unspoiled East Meadow. Once that’s gone, it’s gone forever. Rents, however, will keep rising with each new housing project.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

SANTA CRUZ JUDGE RULES UCSC LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS INADEQUATE
I happened to find a Santa Cruz County Superior Court tentative ruling this week, stating that the judge granted legal challenge of the UCSC plan for housing on Campus.

It was a consolidation of three related cases brought against the Regents by HABITAT AND WATERSHED CARETAKERS (“HAWC”) et al, CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, and COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ.

Amazingly, the Court’s tentative ruling opined that the Regents violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Education Code §67504, as follows:

  1. The analysis of the 2021 LRDP’s wildfire impacts with respect to evacuation is inadequate;
  2. The analysis of the LRDP’s consistency with regional land use policies is inadequate;
  3. The EIR’s mitigation measure for the LRDP’s impacts to wildfire with respect to evacuation routes is ineffective;
  4. The EIR failed to adequately respond to the City’s proposed mitigation measure for the significant impacts to the City’s tight housing market, by an ongoing contribution from the University; and failed to demonstrate that this proposed mitigation measure is infeasible;
  5. The FEIR failed to adequately respond to Comment 07-25.

One of the parties, likely the attorney for the Regents, apparently contested the ruling and presented additional argument on June 13 to Judge Timothy Schmal.  He accepted documents and argument of both sides, and has taken the matter into submission for further consideration.  He has 90 days to issue a final decision.

You can keep an eye on this by logging into the Court’s case search system and researching Cases 21CV02683, 22CV00373 and 22CV00383

PRIVATE CAMPGROUNDS IN OUR RURAL FIRE-RISK AREAS?
If you live in the rural area, pay attention to the proposed Low Impact Camping Ordinance (LICA) and plan to attend next Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor meeting on June 25 at 1:30pm or submit comment earlier.

Why would the County want to allow private campgrounds in the high fire-risk areas of our communities?  The Planning Commission twice rejected the notion, but this Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors will discuss approval.

Why does Supervisor Zach Friend support this?

I think it’s because the camps would pay Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT), which would bolster the County’s need to raise money needed for debt service and to support the never-ending services handed out.

The Ordinance would allow any landowner with parcels five acres or more to establish campgrounds for up to 36 people at a time, with no water on site, no required communication connectivity to allow calling emergency responders if needed, and no required on-site supervision by the landowner.

A recent letter to the editor by Ms. Nancy Kille, a resident of Bonny Doon, pointed out that:

“I live at the end of the road in a residential area of Bonny Doon. A third of my community was lost in the CZU fires. Most people have not yet been able to rebuild. One requirement that must met before rebuilding is the installation of a 10,000-gallon water tank with fire hookups. The fire marshal asked for this to be part of the LICA ordinance but it was deemed “too restrictive” so water will not be required on LICA sites.
Various fire officials have asked that areas of extreme and high fire danger be excluded from becoming private campgrounds. We were told that would make about half of our county ineligible for LICA campsites so that will not be part of the ordinance. Slightly more than half of all wildfires are started by campfires. If our insurance is being canceled in these areas because of fire danger, why would camping in them be encouraged?”

Guest Commentary | Why Santa Cruz County should not support low impact camping on private land

Below is an alert from Chairman Justin Cummings’s Newsletter:

Many of you have been following the Low-Impact Camping Area (LICA) ordinance draft as it worked its way through the Planning Commission – a body that twice recommended the Board deny the ordinance. Now it comes before the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, June 25 at 1:30 PM. While staff has made small adjustments, the ordinance will still streamline the development of rural, private campgrounds in the unincorporated areas by providing a ministerial permitting process.

There will be no required CEQA analysis nor public hearings for these projects. Staff has added in an ‘environmental clearance’ procedure which is a ministerial, abbreviated map review that could lead to further analysis. But this process would be inadequate to fully examine the foreseeable impacts of the total project in terms of potential wildfire risk and its effects on sensitive habitats.

After speaking with fire professionals, seasoned volunteers and law enforcement, I continue to question the feasibility of enforcing the ordinance due to the costs associated with it and the staffing it will require – a factor that has yet to be explored. Additionally, the roadways in rural parts of District 3, including private roads leading to eligible parcels, can be inaccessible for public safety vehicles. Since the ordinance does not require an on-site manager at these campgrounds, there is a lack of accountability built into the ordinance that is problematic.

For these and other reasons, I will be seeking clarification and information from staff. I invite you to please express your views on this important matter by sending letters to the Board, by calling in during the hearing, or by joining us in-person on Tuesday June 25th at 1:30 pm at the County Building, in Board Chambers at 701 Ocean Street, Room 525.  The agenda report for this item will be available on the County website this Thursday June 20th in the afternoon. 

Email:
BoardOfSupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov 

The County is jumping in on this State mandate not yet signed by the Governor as legislation Senate Bill 620:

SB 620, as amended, McGuire. Low-impact camping areas. 
Existing law, the Special Occupancy Parks Act, establishes requirements for the construction, maintenance, occupancy, use, and design of special occupancy parks. Existing law defines “special occupancy park” to mean a recreational vehicle park, temporary recreational vehicle park, incidental camping area, or tent camp. This bill would specify that, for purposes of that act, a special occupancy park does not include a low-impact camping area. The bill would define a “low-impact camping area” to mean any area of private property that provides for the transient occupancy rental of a temporary sleeping accommodation, as defined, for recreational purposes that is not a commercial lodging facility and meets specified requirements. The bill would require the county in which the low-impact camping area is located to enforce some of those requirements, relating to waste disposal and quiet hours, as specified. 

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Please weigh in on this local matter at the Board of Supervisor meeting Tuesday, June 25 at 1:30pm.

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT COLLECTING FEES FOR A SERVICE NOT PROVIDED
The Soquel Creek Water District raised rates significantly to help pay for the PureWater Soquel Project benefits they insist will be provided to the MidCounty Groundwater Basin when the Project becomes operational.

It is not legal to charge customers for a service that is not provided.  The District staff knows this because of the successful legal challenge against them by ratepayer Jon Cole.

Yet, here they are again, admittedly charging customers for a service not rendered.
Staff admitted it last Tuesday in Item #7.2:

The revisions to the District’s Reserve Policy include the addition of this Major Maintenance Account under a Pure Water Soquel Repair and Replacement Reserve.
 
In addition, the District began collecting revenue in April 2024 to support, in part, operation of the Pure Water Soquel facilities. Since the District’s revenue collection fluctuates between higher revenue in summer month and lower revenue in winter months, it is financially prudent to begin setting aside that portion of rate revenue, as identified in the 2024 Water Rate Study performed by Raftelis, that is for Pure Water Soquel operations and basin sustainability. This will ensure that when PWS operations commence the District has adequate cash flow to pay the service fees associated with the OMAR contract, including establishment of the Major Maintenance Account, as well as other expenses associated with PWS. For this reason a Temporary Operating Reserve for Pure Water Soquel has also been added to the revised Reserve Policy

https://www.(PAGE 178 of agenda packet)

This Project has been delayed, and the bills are coming due.  The Board voted to allow the General Manager Ron Duncan to negotiate a new revolving loan agreement to be $30 million instead of $75 million, and not have to immediately repay $16.8 million borrowed on the line of credit.  The State grant money will not be fully released until the Project is completed, and it may take six months to one year for that reimbursement.

The June 4 District Final Budget revealed the anticipated annual operating costs for the Project will be $6.9 million.

What a financially foolish thing this Board has done.

WHEN WILL THE LIVE OAK LIBRARY ANNEX OPEN??
Recent Board of Supervisor consent agenda materials hinted that the Live Oak Library Annex may be supervised by Parks Dept. staff (if they have time).  I wrote to the Santa Cruz County Public Library Director and asked when the facility would be open?

Here is Interim Director Eric Howard’s response:

Thank you for your inquiry. The study rooms are part of the Annex and they can be accessed now. The Annex isn’t a branch and so it’s operations and services will differ – but the space will be accessible during the hours of operations for the entire Center. We intend to introduce limited library services beginning in August. As we get closer to that time we will be able to provide more information on the services being offered, including when staff will be available.  Librarians have already reserved some of the spaces for programming and those programs will be advertised in the coming weeks.
Kind regards,
Eric Howard, Interim Library Director

There are no books at this library, and no librarians there, yet Measure S Library funds built it.  How can we hold our elected officials accountable for this lie?  Please read the 2021-2022 County Grand Jury Report on this misuse of Measure S funding and contact your County Supervisor…or the Grand Jury again and think twice about approving any local tax measures coming on the November ballot: Measure S Report

NEW REPORTS OUT BY THE COUNTY GRAND JURY
The County Grand Jury has released more reports. Please take time to read through them and contact appropriate agencies required to respond with your thoughts: 2023-2024 Grand Jury Reports and Responses

LEGAL OPINION EXPECTED REGARDING YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE ON TAX ISSUES
At the time of this writing, a decision by the State Supreme Court is expected to be issued June 20, 2024 as to whether you and I will be allowed to vote this November on a tax initiative that has qualified for the ballot.  In unprecedented action, the Legislature has sued the Secretary of State to block our ability to vote.

Please watch for this, and contact the Governor with your thoughts.

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. WEBER (HILTACHK)
Case: S281977, Supreme Court of California

Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2024-06-18
Event Description: Notice of forthcoming opinion posted

Notes: To be filed Thursday, June 20, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.


For more information on this case, go here

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A BOARD OF SUPERVISOR MEETING IF YOU CAN.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers and Happy Summer Solstice!
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Grey is off camping in remote Big Sur this week, we will see him next week!

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#167 / China’s Housing Woes (And Ours)


An under-construction housing complex by Chinese property developer Poly Group in Dongguan, in China’s southern Guangdong Province, in 2022

An interesting article in the June 6, 2024, edition of The New York Times (“Guess Who’s Angry?“) made me aware that housing market issues in Ch1na are not, perhaps, all that different from housing market issues in my own hometown.

Here is an excerpt from the article I am talking about (with emphasis added):

For much of the past decade, China’s efforts to curb speculation on real estate grew broader and more extensive.

Shanghai declared that anyone who got a divorce would be subject to restrictions on apartment buying for three years, to counter couples who were splitting up just so they could buy second homes as investments. In Chengdu, in western China, only local residents who paid social welfare taxes and drew a winning ticket in a lottery could buy a new place. In the city of Tangshan, in the country’s northeast, anyone buying a home had to hold the property for at least three and a half years.

Those restrictions, along with limitations in other regions, have been lifted as China tries to revive a severe property downturn. Since last year, more than 25 Chinese cities have eliminated all restrictions on real estate purchases, as many local governments scrapped rules that prevented developers from cutting prices.

Last month, the central government went further. It lowered down-payment requirements and relaxed mortgage rules, and urged local governments to buy unsold homes and convert them into public housing.

But some of China’s efforts to stimulate home buying have upset one of the country’s most vocal constituencies: existing homeowners.

Many Chinese homeowners, who pinched and saved to buy apartments that serve as a main household investment, are now worried that the relaxing of restrictions will depress prices for their properties. The new policies have given rise to a dose of NIMBY-ism, short for “not in my backyard,” in a country ruled by the Communist Party.

The government must thread a needle as it tries to address the collapse of an industry that accounts for a quarter of the Chinese economy. While discontent over the economy could shake social stability, so could a backlash by homeowners, many of whom are holding on to hope that their properties will build wealth for future generations.

Many of the restrictions were lifted by the same policymakers who had introduced the rules only a few years earlier to adhere to the decree by China’s leader, Xi Jinping, that “houses are for living, not for speculation.”

It was more or less news to me that the “real estate boom” in China, which I did know about, has been supported by “investors” who have been buying up housing not, simply, to provide a home for themselves and their family, but as an “investment” that would pay off as housing prices increased.

In other words, despite the admonition that “houses are for living, not for speculation,” and despite the fact that China is supposed to be “communist,” not “capitalist,” those who were buying housing were, in fact, “speculating.” Recent government efforts to make housing more available are making some people “angry.” Who? Well, the homeowner/speculators who are afraid that actually making housing available to those who need shelter (and thus encouraging a pricing policy that will allow more people to buy) will depress housing prices, and thus undermine their strategy to use ever-increasing housing prices as a way to make money.

The situations in China and the United States are different, but a common thread is the idea – advanced by some, at least – that residential real estate should be an “investment,” as opposed to providing simple shelter for those who need housing.

In Santa Cruz County – and the City has a similar program, originally patterned after the County’s – some housing price increases are limited. The County’s “Measure J” inclusionary housing program (one of the first in California), allowed average and below average income people to buy housing at a price that they could afford. BUT… unlike what apparently happened in China, that housing was sold with a price restriction, so that when a Measure J inclusionary unit is resold, the price can go up only to reflect inflation and any additional investments made by the homeowner. The idea is that the purchaser of a Measure J inclusionary unit, when it is originally sold, will buy the unit at a price that is “affordable” to a person with an average or below average income. When resold, that housing unit will also go to someone who is at the same income level as the person who originally bought the home. Housing that is “affordable” when first sold will remain “affordable.” Buying up truly affordable, price-restricted housing, will not be the kind of investment that will make you a lot of money.

Clearly, the idea here is exactly the one articulated by Xi Jinping: “Houses are for living, not for speculation.” Alas, speculators abound – in both countries, it appears. We know they abound in the United States! The Times‘ article points out that they abound in China, too.

Housing is a basic and fundamental human need. When housing is converted into a speculative good, with people buying housing not becuase they need a home, but in order to profit from an anticipated price runup, then the “Golden Rule of Economics” comes into play. You may remember that I have talked about this “Golden Rule” before:

Those Who Have The Gold Make The Rules

In my hometown, developers of a proposed new development adjacent to the Town Clock are telling everyone that all we need to do to provide “affordable” housing is just to build more housing, period (they’re the builders, of course). They say that the increased “supply” of housing will cause the “price” to come down, thus making “affordable” housing more generally available.

Don’t you believe it! That certainly doesn’t work in Santa Cruz, California. People from all over the world (including China, by the way) are going to be bidding for every new housing unit built in our local community. Unless there is a price restriction on the new housing units produced, those with the “Gold” will get the goods. Please be aware that this will not include any average or below average working people who support community services. You know, the teachers, the store clerks, the guys who do landscaping, or who take care of customers in their local gym. Painters, waitresses, and house cleaners need not even think of applying!

Finding ways to take the “speculation” out of housing prices can solve our affordable housing crisis. In fact, it’s the only way to do it. More sixteen or eighteen-story buildings on downtown streets will just put more “gold” into the pockets of the developer/speculators who tout their deep commitment to the community and to “affordable” housing.

Santa Cruz residents should  check out the pictures below. This proposed development, called “Clock Tower Plaza,” is the latest effort to deliver wealth to the property owners and developers, at the expense of everyone else. They won’t provide parking. They won’t restrict prices (except for a small number of units). And they will sell or rent their units to those who can pay the most. That won’t be most of us! There will only be a very few price-restricted units available. The developers will make out just fine, while the rest of us can have the privilege of watching our community disappear:

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

TUCKER SPUTTERS, AS THE CROW FLIES, GREENE DENIED

Just in case you were eagerly awaiting the release of the much-heralded biography of Tucker CarlsonBryan Tyler Cohen has disappointment for you on his odactionnews website…the publication has been shelved…at least until Tuck-Tuck regains some notoriety. As Cohen writes, “A biography about alt-right fanboy and testicle-tanning enthusiast Tucker Carlson has been cancelled by a major publishing house, apparently because Carlson’s star power has waned since his unceremonious ouster from FoxNews last year. Politico’s Michael Shaffer attributed the book deal’s demise to Carlson’s diminished cultural relevance, writing that ‘the cancellation stems at least in part from the belief that Carlson, once the biggest name on cable, no longer has the kind of cultural footprint to warrant a pricey, complicated book by a top-shelf writer.’ For the record, we would argue Carlson never had the kind of cultural footprint to warrant a complicated book of any kind; he simply had hold of one of Rupert Murdoch’s very loud and very well-funded megaphones.” Dominion Voting Systems seems to have a larger megaphone…to the tune of $787M worth! Make better choices next time, Tuck.

Bad news on another front, for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his ‘son,’ Mark Martin, who he claims to have raised from the age of six, comes word that they have evidently had a falling out, with no contact ‘in a long time.’ Mark is actually the grandson of Thomas’s sister, and was the beneficiary of donated gifts of tuition to two private schools, courtesy of the Clarence Thomas sugar-daddy, Harlan Crow. Martin, who is now 32, is awaiting trial in South Carolina on drugs and weapons charges, saying in a Business Insider interview that despite his reaching out to Clarence and Ginni several times over the years, he has been ignored and is unsure whether they are aware of his current plight…nor is he sure they would even care. He has said he was unaware of Crow’s footing the bill for his education, but that he “believed his intentions to be pure.” No word on whether or not he was a participant in any of the vacations enjoyed by the Thomas duo bestowed upon them by Mr. Crow. After ProPublica revealed that Thomas had benefited from the Crow largesse several times, he finally owned up to two trips which had been excluded in his filings, subsequently amending his 2019 financial disclosure; but then investigators questioning Crow himself offered him a deal, whereupon he spilled the beans about three more unreported private jet trips. Are there more dominoes about to fall? A statement from Crow’s office says Senators had been given information covering the past seven years, with the committee agreeing “to end its probe with respect to Mr. Crow. Despite his serious and continued concerns about the legality and necessity of the inquiry, Mr. Crow engaged in good faith with the Committee.” Crickets from Justice Thomas regarding his frequent use of Crow’s Canadian Bombardier Global 5000 business jet which can cost over $10,000 per flight hour if chartered from a private company.

The senate committee also authorized a subpoena for conservative legal activist Leonard Leo, who joined Thomas and Crow on one trip, but is better known as a luxury fishing trip buddy for Justice Samuel Alito. Leo is defying the subpoena. The clamor that arose from the questionable ethics of Thomas and Alito led to the Court adopting a historical-first code of conduct, which as might be expected, has no teeth and no enforcement mechanism. Last week the Senate Democrats attempted to pass a bill to tighten the Court-adopted ethics rules and create a process for investigating complaints of possible misconduct, but Senator Lindsey Graham called it “unconstitutional overreach” as he led a group of GOP Senators to block it.

Justice Thomas, in acknowledging the two free vacations reported by ProPublica, said he “inadvertently omitted” the gifts on his financial disclosure forms. And though many legal experts have described his unreported trips as violations, Thomas’s attorney maintains that free flights don’t have to be reported. Somewhere in his reasoning, Thomas, who claims to be a Constitutional originalist with ability to parse definite meanings from the ambiguous language of that founding document, loses the thread when it comes to his personal lifestyle. Those definitive words he spoke last year become contradictory in newer situations as he becomes an advocate of evolving explanations toward a forgetful audience. After ProPublica started revealing the beneficence of Crow toward him, Thomas issued his ‘disclosure’ that these were “family trips with dearest friends,” further explaining advice sought from colleagues that, “this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the Court, was not reportable. I have endeavored to follow that counsel throughout my tenure.” So, intentional exclusions, eh? But with the newly filed amendment, he says his information had been “inadvertently omitted” earlier? So which is it, Justice Thomas? The trickster is at work here…amended filings list only “food and lodging” – how did he get to Bali? Must have been a private jet or a luxury cruiser of some sort?  The listing on the disclosure as a “reimbursement” instead of a ‘gift’ enables Thomas to hide the dollar value of his Bali vacation just as was the case with other gifts. It is estimated that Mr. T has accumulated between $2m and $4 in gifts since 2004, to which Steven Lubet of The Daily Beast writes, “As a justice of the Supreme Court, Thomas must regularly interpret complex statutes, and determine the validity of laws based on his theory of ‘history and tradition,’ often with the life, fortune, or freedom of people at stake. If nothing else, it is a task that demands consistency, candor, and completeness. Although I seldom agree with Thomas’s jurisprudence, I can still appreciate the clarity of his written opinions. When it comes to his financial disclosures, however, it is all commission, contradiction, and obfuscation. Which raises the question: How gullible does he think we are?”

Still plying her wiles on our gullibility is Georgia’s Flaxen KlaxonMarjorie Taylor Greene. However, her tactics were stalled by fellow House members, both Republicans and Democrats, after her recent attempt to remove Mike Johnson as House Speaker when she could barely gather just a handful of backers. This led her to begin pointing fingers at both political parties as a “uniparty” even though there is not much unity to see…except where they want her to clam up and disappear. Charlie Sykes commented on MSNBC that one doesn’t even have to like Speaker Johnson to enjoy this moment, where Greene is “basically reaching her expiration date.” Only after the former president posted that her action “will negatively affect everything,” did she back off, not daring to lose favor with her orange idol, though she was only following his example using a big mouth and a hate-filled heart. Amanda Marcotte of Salon identifies “she” as the operative word in MTG’s case…the Christian right-controlled GOP sees women as support staff, not leaders. She was beloved when she paid little attention to legislative work and spent all her time spewing invective to rally MAGAts…being a cheerleader. But then she jumped into the huddle and started trying to call plays, so a line was drawn, characterized by the boos and heckling from the House floor. As Marcotte says, “The GOP turned on her because, simply put, she got too big for her britches. Or, in more old-fashioned terms, she wanted to wear the britches, while they wanted her to stay in skirts. Greene is emblematic of the empty-headed fascism Trump has brought to life in American politics. Greene has painted a target on her back. Her relevance just took a big blow she may never recover from.”

But, never one to take a hint, Greene faced off with Dr. Anthony Fauci last week during a House hearing where he was questioned, fending off criticism that he harbors secrets regarding COVID-19 and is responsible for governmental policies during his tenure…“crimes against humanity.” Greene refused to address him by his title of ‘doctor’ until she was admonished by the chair, though she continued with her snippy rudeness. Jimmy Fallon of The Tonight Show mocked her actions as a “strong stance,” saying her come-on line was, “If you’re a real doctor, how come you’re not walking toward me with a straitjacket?” Fallon also noted that Pepsi had been surpassed by Dr. Pepper as the second top soda brand in the USA, just behind Coke. He imagines Greene’s response as a rant about ‘Mr. Pepper’ not being “a real doctor.” As the Red Queen said to Alice“you have to run as fast as you can to stay in the same place.” Run, Marge, run!

Marjorie seems to fall into the category described by Aaron Blake of The Washington Post where he says that those who will be deciding the 2024 election this year are not “generally the ones who will be on the fence and making crucial calls late in the campaign.” He apologizes for this summation, which is not to be a reflection on those who read campaign politics newsletters and the like, because the decisive voters are going to be those who have little to no idea what those who have been paying attention are even talking about. He discusses a poll from Yahoo News and YouGov where people were asked a series of basic questions about current politics, with only about half of our citizens agreeing Trump had been indicted for the subjects of his three remaining indictments. Sadly, 16 to 21 percent said affirmatively that Trump had not been indicted for these things…which he in fact has been indicted for. With some skepticism, he thinks some Republicans answered the questions wrong to skew the polling numbers. Blake attributes the range of answers simply to lack of paying attention, or a media diet on outlets that also don’t pay attention, with those least familiar with the indictments being FoxNews viewers and who don’t watch other cable news. Referencing those who purposely answered questions incorrectly, a protest of sorts might be at work if they feel indictments were unjustified…how could a ‘witch hunt’ be an indictment anyway? Lack of engagement is emphasized by the 1 in 5 polled who claimed not to know details of the Trump Manhattan Court verdict, either saying the former president was ‘not guilty’ or the trial was still in process…with 2 out of every 5 registered voters under the age of 30! Yikes…not a good omen!

Marquette University Law School poll finds that a majority of independents indicate that they have heard only “a little” or “nothing at all” regarding Trump’s purloined classified documents indictment. Last month, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found that only 1 in 5 voters knew that Trump said purported voter fraud in the 2020 election “allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.” Based on claims by Trump and his MAGAts, some voters believe our economy is in recession, and think we have a 50-year high in unemployment. It is concerning that we may not see big shifts approaching the upcoming election, even with voters becoming more attentive.

Notably, one who hasn’t been paying attention is Donald J. Trump who still hasn’t figured out how our government works…in particular the House of Representatives. After his conviction on 34 felony fraud counts in the New York case, he immediately contacted House Speaker Johnson  asking him to overturn the verdict, which in turn prompted Seth Meyers of ‘Late Night‘ to explain the Trumpian view of our three branches. “He treats them like his three adult kids. The executive branch is Ivanka, she can do whatever she wants; the judicial branch is Don Jr., his right-hand man who does his bidding; and, Congress is Eric,” Seth interprets, adding, “Send him a birthday card, even though Trump has probably tried to have him killed. Eric knew it wasn’t intentional that he got pushed into the quicksand.” Meyers rags on the MAGA fold for spouting conspiracy theories about Joe Biden, while ignoring “the real one right in front of them.”

Trump returned to the location of his four-year crime spree in DC last week, meeting with House Republicans, and was about as coherent as any of his verbal-incontinency rally speeches might be. One source described him as “rambling, like talking to your drunk uncle at the family reunion,” as he tried his repetitive bit at humor in describing Hannibal Lecter as a nice guy who had a friend over for dinner. Most of those in attendance had great praise for the gathering saying he had brought “great unity.”…perhaps, with the exception of Representative Chip Roy who spent part of his time watching golf on his iPad as the Orange One rambled on. Trump was serenaded with a round of ‘Happy Birthday’ as he exited, in celebration of his 78th birthday event to follow at a Mar-a-Lago the next day.

Keith Olbermann, formerly of MSNBC and ESPN, jumped on the reporting of the Associated Press for its coverage of Trump’s return to DC, saying on Xwitter“Fire everybody for describing the visit as ‘triumphant.'” His article was headlined, “Cheers, cake and a fist-bump from GOP as Trump returns to Capitol Hill in a first since Jan. 6 riot,” going on to say, “I am surprised to find the AP is still in business today after it published this wanton, biased, compromised, prostituted, unsurvivable pile of Trump-sucking propaganda yesterday.” Yeah, but what do you really think, Keith? Referring to Adolf Hitler’s propaganda minister, he adds, “Goebbels would have been embarrassed.” The AP did not immediately respond to his commentary, but the Trump campaign was quick to attack, with a post saying, “Joe Biden and his supporters  showing they are anti-press and in favor of punishing anyone who does not parrot their propaganda.”

Jimmy Fallon of the ‘Tonight Show‘ cracked, “Down at Mar-a-Lago, they’re planning a big party with candy ankle monitors and a bouncy jail house. Apparently, when the chef at Mar-a-Lago asked what kind of cake he wanted, Trump said, ‘The kind with the file baked into it.'”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Donald Sutherland”

“It’s the things we love most that destroy us.”
~Donald Sutherland

“We don’t have that much time left to do it. I’m 80. I wanted to be Walter Huston to his John Huston. I wanted him to direct me, not in The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, but something. We’ll see. We can’t predict anything.”
~Donald Sutherland, on working with Kiefer

“I have never planned anything. I have been doing this job for over 50 years. I have been paid to work with some wonderful people and it has been a huge gift, to me.”
~Donald Sutherland

“When the camera starts to roll, there is something of death about it.”
~Donald Sutherland

“If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the pearly gates? Oh, you know something? I’m so far away from believing that it exists, and the only thing I know are jokes about it.”`
~Donald Sutherland

“Fundamentally, people are suckers for the truth.”
~Donald Sutherland

...

Donald Sutherland passed away, and he will be missed. Check out this interview by Anderson Cooper.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

June 12 – 18, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… No faults with Fauci … Greensite… Back soon!… Steinbruner… High-rises increasing, County’s SB9 Ordinance, and more… Hayes… Natural reserves and Ecological reserves… Patton… Taking Some Advice From Ben… Matlock… RNC’s blooper, Melania’s plight, Bannon going away, and praying for dollars… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you…Moldy watercolor painting restoration… Quotes on….”Pride”

...

EARTHQUAKES?? HOW ABOUT FIRES???? This is Pacific Avenue and Cooper Street on April 14, 1894 and because the water happened to be turned off that day, the fire consumed almost the entire block between Pacific and Front Street. That funny little “hut” on the right was the bank vault.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: June 12

NO FAULTS WITH FAUCI. 3.14 ACTION FUND sent this press release last week.

It’s been a while since we’ve seen reports on Fauci, and the indignities, insults and even threats he dealt with as he worked so long and hard to save us from the real and faked results from the covid threat. We owe him plenty.

314 Action Fund is the only national organization working to train, recruit, support, and elect Democrats with STEM and medical backgrounds to office at all levels of government.

Last week, Republicans set up a sham hearing to grill and mock Dr. Anthony Fauci (who retired two years ago from public service).

Marjorie Taylor Greene called for his prosecution and arrest – a sentiment shared by other Republicans like Rand Paul, James Comer, Lauren Boebert, and Ron DeSantis. This comes as conservative media outlets have spent thousands of hours blaming Dr. Fauci for the failed policies of Trump and GOP Governors during Covid-19.

Amid all of these unfair attacks we wanted to highlight the work of Dr. Anthony Fauci below to set the record straight!

DR. FAUCI FAVORABILITY POLL: Do you hold a favorable opinion of Dr. Anthony Fauci? Click here to answer the poll.

We appreciate your input,

314 Action

THE IRON CLAW. HBO MAX movie. (7.6IMDB) * It’s hard to imagine that they’d make a movie about the phoniness of tag team wrestling and expect it to contain anything resembling a believable plot. Zac Efron heads this semi true story of the wrestling Von Erich family. They managed to involve the Christian church in it but to little or no avail. Bad acting, flaky plot, and it’s half billed as a documentary, do not watch.

RAISING VOICES. Netflix Series. (7.2 IMDB) ** It’s just a bit dated because they have a relatively normal family who have built and operate a marijuana farm in their basement. There’s also lots of alcohol and party times happening. Another sub plot is a momentary focus on whether or not some of the characters are lesbians. There is no reason for this topic and no reason to see this movie either.  

HIT MAN. Netflix movie. (7.3 IMDB) ** It’s listed as a comedy and Glen Powell plays the lead as an undercover cop who takes on many jobs as a killer informant but fools everyone involved. The plot is amazingly confusing and full of posing and bad acting. The New York Times gave Powell big publicity and promotion last Sunday, pay no attention to it. They got it wrong, or are secretly managing Powell’s career.     

ERIC. Netflix series (7.01IMDB). *** Now we get to see/hear Benedict Cumberbatch do an American accent. He’s part of the 1980’s New York City startup of PBS’s Sesame Street in its most innovative Jim Hensen period. It’s partly funny, but it’s about the father son relationship that Cumberbatch has with his son. They hit on the race issue, plus the gay life, and even the homeless scene. It has a corny ending but it’s still worth watching.

ATLAS. Netflix movie (5.6 IMDB)  * Just about another future earth after some kind of huge attack. This one stars (loosely) Jennifer Lopez and she’s terrible in this Hollywood 28 years after some horrible attack flop. Plenty of bots working with humans which seems to be nearly impossible. It’s even truer after you watch Dune part 2. Don’t bother.

MAESTRO IN BLUENetflix series (8.2 IMDB) A curious film made during the covid mask era in Greece. It’s about a music festival on an island, the handsome guy in charge of the festival, and all these gay guys who don’t seem to be happy while being gay. Then too there’s a sort of sub plot involving a 18 year old girl and a 40 plus guy. I couldn’t buy any of it.

DUNE. PART 2. Max movie (8.6 IMDB) (4 thumbs)  **** An absolute genius of a special effects extravaganza. You’ll need to see (or read) the plot from Frank Herbert’s book to remember /learn all the names and plot twists involved in part 2. It’s about intergalactic spices and who owns them. Timothee Chalamet is the lead and Javier Bardem plays a serious role too along with Christopher Walken, Zendaya, Josh Brolin and thousands of digital look a likes. It’s the best use of advanced screen effects I’ve ever seen. The scope, the plot, the movie itself is the biggest ever. Don’t miss it and go to a theater to see it on the biggest screen possible.

A SIMPLE FAVOR. Netflix movie (6.8 IMDB)  * It’s billed as a drama/comedy and doesn’t qualify as either one. Anna Hendrick is the lead and she is simply just not funny OR believable. Rupert Friend and Henry Golding are in it too, but shouldn’t have been. A child goes missing and finding her son takes most of this movie, and your patience.

BRIDGERTON. Netflix series. (7.4 IMDB) ** The very definition of a British costume drama. But this is no Downtown Abbey and contains only stereotypes of high court characters. Julie Andrews is in it, if you wait long enough. It’s interesting and possible that there really were that many races represented in the British courts at that time or is it the film makers attempt to stage racial balance?

BETTER THAN USNetflix series. (7.3 IMDB) *** This is a Russian attempt at a science fiction/ robot/ sex / half serious comment on where high tech will be taking us in the near future. A “female” robot vanishes and the search and her relationships are the crux of the plot. Interesting but not necessary.

DARK MATTER. Apple series (7.4 IMDB) *** Yes indeed, another space bending, time warping 9 episode distraction. This one stars Joel Edgerton and Jennifer Connelly. There’s a robbery he gets beat up then he gets reborn backwards 14 months and 10 days in his life. He made and remakes mistakes and so do many other characters in their new growth decisions, but it’s not all that bad. Go for it.

A NEARLY NORMAL FAMILY. Netflix series. (6.4 IMDB) A beautiful 19 year old daughter gets raped by a 40 year old guy. Turns out he’s not such a bad guy except that he gets murdered and she gets accused. Her parents and many friends and you too, will defend her. The ending is a surprise. It’s enticing, engrossing, and it has just a few gaps in the telling of the plot but watch it at your earliest convenience.

THE HIJACKING OF FLIGHT 601. Netflix Series (6.7 IMDB) This is a thriller from Columbia and it’ll keep you attached for all 6 episodes. It’s based about 80% on the true story of that high jacking of a passenger plane in the 1970’s. It’s full of government officials, much airline hostess’s activity and genuine well developed suspense. They manage to portray a lot of politics and the evils of huge sums of money and be sure to allow yourselves enough time to watch all 6 of the series because you’ll care which side wins.

REPTILE. Netflix movie. (6.8 IMDB) *** Benicio Del Toro is near perfect as the detective who works full time and near silent investigating the murder (cruel stabbing) of a housewife. Real Estate plays a background setting as Justin Timberlake and Alicia Silverstone do only halfhearted acting in their fill in parts.

MIDSUMMER NIGHT. Netflix series. (6.7 IMDB) *** Set in Norway this celebrates Midsummer Night which is the longest night of the year. (news to me!) It’s contemporary and they use their cell phones a lot. Lots of sex involved here and some of it is surprising because it’s between and older male and a young babe. You’ll probably up thinking about your own morals and their validity. Go for it.

...

Gillian will be back with more soon!

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

A 16 STORY BUILDING ON NORTH PACIFIC AVENUE?
Applications for  super-tall buildings in the City of Santa Cruz are springing up right and left.  On March 4, the day before voters went to the polls to decide whether Measure M would let people vote on building heights in the City, Workbench developers submitted a pre-application under SB 330 for a large project at North Pacific that includes two versions…an eight-story building and a 16-story building.  Under SB 330, the City cannot require the project to implement any new building codes made after the date the pre-application is deemed complete.

Sit down before you take a look at what this could look like…

“One of the projects includes an eight-story mixed-use development encompassing approximately 120,932 square feet, including 174 residential apartment units, 8,184 square feet of commercial tenant space, and 29,884 square feet of on-site parking.  A conceptual rendering is shown below.  The other project includes a sixteen-story mixed-use development encompassing approximately 279,480 square feet, including 260 residential apartment units, 11,126 square feet of commercial tenant space, and 29,884 square feet of onsite parking.

Both projects include a merger of two adjacent lots (2020 N. Pacific Ave. and 113/115 Knight St.) and demolition of the existing commercial buildings and would require the use of Density Bonuses.”

SB 330, the Housing Accountability Act, is in effect until January 1, 2025.

It prohibits a local agency from disapproving any housing development project for very low, low, or moderate-income residents or an emergency shelter or conditioning approval in a manner that renders “infeasible” unless the local agency makes specified written findings based on a preponderance of the evidence in the record.

What is a preponderance of evidence?  That is often determined by the court.  SB 330 requires a court to impose a fine on a local agency under certain circumstances and requires that the fine be at least $10,000 per housing unit in the development project on the date the application was deemed complete.  This could happen if the local agency attempts to reduce the density as a condition of project approval after the pre-application is deemed compliant with SB 330

This bill, until January 1, 2025, would specify that an application is deemed complete for these purposes if a preliminary application was submitted

MAYBE FOUR NEW HOUSING UNITS IN YOUR BACKYARD WITH ONLY A FOUR FOOT SETBACK?
The State is mandating quick, dense development under SB 9, and requires Counties and Cities to approve them ministerially, without any public hearings.  It allows lot splits so that instead of one single family home, there could be up to four 800-1200 SF homes, with zero to one parking place included.

 Santa Cruz County is moving quickly to adopt  new Senate Bill 9 Ordinance to comply, but at what cost to our Communities and the environment?  This new Ordinance would be effective in all Urban Census areas of the County, not confined to the Urban Services Line, and includes broad areas of the San Lorenzo Valley, Corralitos, Soquel, La Selva Beach and Seascape.  Take a look at the map on page 24…I think you will be amazed.

This week, County planning staff presented a Zoom webinar to take public comments and questions about what is proposed.   People asked about  inadequate definitions of “coastal bluff” and questioned why the County is moving forward on adopting this now when the relative state mandate could soon change with passage of SB 450, causing the County to again amend the Coastal Development Plan of the General Plan.

“This bill would remove the authorization for a local agency to deny a proposed housing development if the building official makes a written finding that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the physical environment. The bill would require the local agency to consider and approve or deny the proposed housing development application within 60 days from the date the local agency receives the completed application, and would deem the application approved after that time. The bill would require a permitting agency, if it denies an application, to provide a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant.”   [Bill Text: CA SB450]

Some wanted to know if the City of Redondo Beach, etal vs. Rob Bonta, in which the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled SB 9 is unconstitutional relating to charter cities and counties, could apply to Santa Cruz County?

Superior Court Ruling: Charter Cities Not Subject to SB 9

The planners dismissed any effect this landmark case would have here, because Santa Cruz County is not a Home Rule, aka charter, county.  What they did not mention, even when I commented that I would like the County to pursue becoming a charter county to retain local land use control, is that it is possible to amend a County’s organization and become a charter county.

This new proposed Ordinance will be soon coming before the County Planning Commission, and then the Board of Supervisors.  Read this proposal carefully and weigh-in now because it could literally change densities in your Community, affecting evacuation route safety, biological communities and traffic where you live…not to mention the general quality of life.

PRISONERS AND STAFF AT ROUNTREE DETENTION CENTER SHOULD HAVE BOTTLED WATER
Would you want to drink water with elevated carcinogen levels known to exist?  I wouldn’t, and I don’t think it is humane to force prisoners at the Rountree Detention Center in Watsonville to drink such water.

The County Water Advisory Commission, after hearing a presentation by the Director of County General Services, Mr. Michael Beaton, describing the carcinogenic hexavalent chromium and PFAS elevated contamination levels present in the well water serving the prisoners and staff at Rountree, sent a letter to the Board of Supervisors, recommending bottled water be provided until the proposed treatment plant is operational.

At budget hearings last week, I reminded the Board of this Commission recommendation during the Sheriff Dept. budget consideration.  Sheriff Hart seemed annoyed, stating that he got a letter saying the well water was fine.  Imagine my surprise when Mr. Beaton quickly stepped up to the podium and said “the water at Rountree is safe to drink.”  The Board approved the budget without any request for contamination level reports or bottled water for the staff and prisoners at Rountree.

Therefore, it is curious that the State is awarding the County a $800,000 grant to treat the water at Rountree, as is shown in the Consent Agenda item #32 for the June 4 Regular Meeting.

A SMOOTH PATH THROUGH PARADISE OR A HELL OF A ROAD
Why are the roads in Santa Cruz County in such bad shape and what can be done to improve the problem? The 2023-2024 County Grand Jury Reports are now beginning to become public, and include an investigation and findings regarding the poor state of the roads here.

I am somewhat disappointed that the investigation focuses mostly on needing more money, and does not mention the County Supervisor big lie to voters in 2018 that money from Measure G’s new half-cent sales tax would be used to fix roads.

There needs to be more focus on mismanagement of existing funds, and the fact that the County Public Works no longer does much preventive maintenance, such as oil and screen to seal badly-cracked pavement to preserve it from further degradation.  This is included, in part, in the findings:

The County of Santa Cruz has failed to perform resurfacing maintenance on many of the smaller unincorporated local roads, resulting in higher failure rates and at least a 10 times increased maintenance cost when and if those roads are resurfaced.

The County prioritizes preventive maintenance of roads in fair to good condition over road repair and reconstruction due to limited discretionary funds. As a result, many residents in local road areas will have to contend with very poor/failed roads into the foreseeable future

Measure K funds go directly into the General Fund and road maintenance funding expenditures are only recommended. This may allow the funding to go to other needs.

Recommendation:
The Grand Jury recommends that the DPW complete a public report by December 31, 2024 which shows the prioritization of culvert and drainage ditch maintenance in order to help prevent road washouts that are more costly to repair.

Maybe it would be better to replace old culverts with sturdy metal bridge crossings, such as what I recently saw in Washington state, and that reminded me of a reasonable and quick repair of a culvert failure on Nelson Road in Scotts Valley, which used an old railroad flatcar placed upon concrete abutments.

GOOD NEWS, THANKS TO THE SANTA CRUZ SIERRA CLUB EFFORTS!
Thanks to the persistent efforts of the Santa Cruz Sierra Club group and members of the Santa Cruz Bird Club, the protected migratory Cliff Swallows on the Laurel Street Bridge will be spared from Soquel Creek Water District’s  disruptive construction crews working there until the birds have completed their nesting season under the Bridge.

On May 20, Ms. Melanie Mow-Schumacher, the District’s Assistant General Manager, finally responded to Mr. Guth’s letters imploring the PureWater Soquel Project pipeline attachment work on the Bridge be postponed during the summer to protect the federally-protected migratory Cliff Swallow nesting activity.  Last year, the District paid no heed and the number of bird mud nests under the Bridge plummeted.

Good work, Sierra Club and Santa Cruz Bird Club stewards!  Thank heavens, Soquel Creek Water District finally paid attention…

Sent via email:
May 20, 2024
Michael Guth, Executive Committee Chair

Sierra Club, Santa Cruz County Group of the Ventana Chapter
PO Box 604
Santa Cruz, CA 95061

Subject: Laurel Street Bridge/Pure Water Soquel Conveyance Project

Dear Mr. Guth,
Thank you for your letter dated May 8, 2024. We appreciate Sierra Club’s recent observations regarding the
presence of cliff swallow nesting under the Laurel Street Bridge. This is consistent with our biologist’s
observations.

Work associated with the pipeline and architectural cover on the bridge have not been conducted since April
24, 2024. Further, this work on the bridge will not commence until after the nesting season (anticipated
through August 31, 2024).

On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your interest.
Sincerely,
Melanie Mow Schumacher, PE
Assistant General Manager/ Pure Water Soquel Program Director

IS IT SAFE TO WALK IN APTOS VILLAGE?
Many thanks to my friend, Al, for sending this survey to help determine what can be done to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety in Aptos Village.  Take this survey and provide your suggestions for making it safer to walk and bicycle in Aptos Village.

This project is a disaster for pedestrians and cyclists.  The County disregarded the RTC Bicycle Committee early recommendation to put bike lanes on Aptos Village Way to link Aptos Creek Road and Trout Gulch Road, and instead allowed an extremely narrow roadway with the on-street parking numbers included to meet the parking requirement for the development.

Recently, I learned that the existing parking on Aptos Creek Road will soon disappear as the Phase 2 Aptos Village Project development gets built.

And where is that active recreation area that was a Condition of Approval for Swenson’s greenlight to destroy Aptos Village?  It’s the steep hillside…for which County Parks has absolutely no idea what to do.

Well, take this pedestrian survey and let the Seacliff Improvement Association know your thoughts.  It is open until July 15, 2024.

FIRE DEFENSIBLE SPACE SAVED THIS HOME IN SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS
Deputy Fire Marshal Tony Akin at Central Fire Protection District sent this video to encourage all living in the wildland-urban interface to pay attention and create fire defensible space now.
Our landlines may not be safe with this decision.

Is your Community a FireWise Community yet?  There are 55+ so far in Santa Cruz County.  Learn how to work together with your neighbors to become certified, and earn reductions in your insurance rates.

AT&T MAY HAVE ABILITY TO DITCH COPPER LANDLINES ANYWAY?
Many thanks to Nina Beety in Monterey County for this thoughtul analysis of the recent CPUC ruling on the AT&T application to drop copper landline  telephone service:

“The proposed ruling in fact explicitly mentions this does not in any way preclude AT&T from phasing out copper and, for example, replacing it with fiber (“POTS over fiber”). That fulfills their obligation to offer regulated phone service to anyone. Two separate things. AT&T is required to provide phone service in its service area, but that is not required to be over copper and the CPUC clarified that to avoid any possible confusion.

If you mean copper landlines specifically, from a regulatory/legal perspective, not much, unfortunately. Neither the FCC nor the PUC has any mandates that they provide phone service over copper. In fact, they have acted to remove such mandates and requirements regarding copper retirement and transitions.

AT&T could provide “POTS over fiber” service, but has not done this to the same extent that Verizon has, which has done this aggressively in most metropolitan areas in its service territory the Northeast. It’s possible that AT&T doesn’t have plans to move copper customers to fiber unless it can get rid of its regulated service obligations altogether, in which case they have unnecessarily correlated the two, to the benefit of consumers.”

Please read the proposed decision.

Our landlines may not be safe with this decision.

POSITIVE THINKING REALLY MATTERS
It is easy to get discouraged by the events of the world, state and local government, but I encourage you all to keep a positive outlook, and keep participating in the wave of citizen-led efforts that will make a difference, and to fight for the things that matter to you most in your life.

A recent Merriam-Webster ‘Word of the Day” was a good one…

Meliorism
Meliorism refers to the belief that the world tends to improve and that humans can aid its betterment.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPECT ANSWERS.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.

Cheers,
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Protecting Our Most Precious Spots

The most highly protected terrestrial areas around California’s Monterey Bay are designated as “Natural Preserves” by the California Department of Parks and Recreation and as “Ecological Reserves” by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Let’s explore where those places are, and how the State’s premier land management agencies are directed to protect areas with these designations.

CDFW Ecological Reserves

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) manages 1.1 million acres of land in California. Unfortunately, CDFW does not publish summary statistics about how many of those acres are designated as Ecological Reserves, which have the highest protection of any state-owned public lands, as reflected in the following regulatory language:

“….ecological reserves are maintained for the primary purpose of …..protection of rare, threatened, or endangered native plants, wildlife, aquatic organisms, and specialized terrestrial or aquatic habitat types. Visitor uses are dependent upon the provisions of applicable laws and upon a determination by the commission that opening an area to such visitor use is compatible with the purposes of the property.” (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 630 Additional Visitor Use Regulations on Department Lands Designated as Ecological Reserves).

Note the stress on maintaining these properties for species and habitat conservation, first and foremost. And note that it takes a vote by the California Fish and Game Commission to allow any visitors to use those properties. Any such vote must be supported by an analysis of the impacts of such visitation on the species and/or habitats that the Ecological Reserve was designated to protect.

Local Ecological Reserves

The two CDFW Ecological Reserves that people regularly visit around the Monterey Bay are the Elkhorn Slough Ecological Reserve and the Bonny Doon Ecological Reserve. The two other CDFW Ecological Reserves do not allow public access without special permission: Quail Hollow and Watsonville Slough.

The Elkhorn Slough regularly has many visitors. The Fish and Game Commission appears to have at some point voted to approve visitor use at that property. However, a Commission-approved Elkhorn Ecological Reserve Management Plan outlining how visitor use is compatible with the conservation purposes of the property is not readily available. So, unfortunately, I can’t tell you what ‘conservation purposes’ were designated when the property was afforded such a high level of protection.

The other CDFW Ecological Reserve that the public visits is much more definitely legally off limits despite CDFW’s allowance for visitor use. In contravention to the regulation cited above, CDFW has allowed public use despite the Fish and Game Commission never having approved a management plan analyzing the compatibility of visitor use and protection of the Bonny Doon Ecological Reserve. And there is no publicly available documentation about what ‘conservation purposes’ were designated when the property was designated as an Ecological Reserve.

State Parks Natural Preserves

The California Department of Parks and Recreation manages 1.6 million acres of land. As with CDFW, Parks does not publish how many acres are designated as Natural Preserves. Natural Preserves have the highest protection of any State Parks managed lands, as reflected in the following policy language:

“… natural preserves will be established to give full protection to environmental and ecological integrity, from the standpoints of watershed influences, scenic and visual unity, cultural values, and other appropriate environmental factors.

Developments in natural preserves are limited to trails and interpretive facilities required to make possible the visual and sensory enjoyment of the resources by visitors. Vehicle access and parking are not appropriate; visitor centers, restrooms, structures, and facilities other than signs shall be placed outside natural preserves.

Bicycles are allowed only on paved roads in…Natural Preserves.”

Note the language, as with CDFW, stressing the primary importance of these State Parks areas for ecological conservation, and how Parks adds to this designation watershed processes and areas of cultural significance.

Local Natural Preserves

There are 5 Monterey Bay spots with State Parks Natural Preserve designation: Wilder Beach Natural Preserve (small, Wilder Ranch State Park); San Lorenzo Headwaters Natural Preserve (1800 acres, Castle Rock State Park); Theodore Hoover Natural Preserve (23 acres, Big Basin State Park); Año Nuevo Coast Natural Preserve (925 acres, Año Nuevo State Park), and; Point Lobos State Natural Preserve (550 acres). A large portion of the Año Nuevo Coast Natural Preserve has restricted public access and there is no public access allowed at Wilder Beach. The other spots allow public access, but, as noted in the above policies, no one is allowed to leave trails in areas with this designation, and bicycles are not permitted except on paved roads.

One Natural Preserve is missing from State Park’s list: the one that was to be designated for the coastal prairies in upper Wilder Ranch. During the process of approving use of that part of the park, Parks was discussing designation of vast areas of the diverse grasslands as a Natural Preserve. However, it turned out that Parks never updated the Wilder Ranch General Plan and so didn’t pursue such a designation, possibly due to opposition from mountain bikers.

How Are They Doing?

Many people reading this will be familiar with at least some of the areas listed above, places afforded the highest levels of conservation protection. For each spot, ask yourself: how are the managers doing? Do those areas seem to be better managed for conservation than other places? In the case of Wilder Beach, are snowy plovers nesting there…do people get away with trespassing there? In the case of the Bonny Doon Ecological Reserve, is visitor use truly compatible with protecting the many species and habitats, which includes the most endangered ecosystem in North America? How can we tell these stories and help the managers elevate these very special places to give them the protection they deserve?

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#158 / Taking Some Advice From Ben

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that “AI Employees Hesitate to Speak Up.” I am linking the article, by Alyssa Lukpat, to a statement of the headline as that headline appeared in the hard copy edition of the paper. You will get a slightly different headline (but the same article) if you click that link and are then able to penetrate what is likely to be a paywall, protecting The Journal’s intellectual property rights.

The basic story is as follows: A number of leading AI researchers believe that the companies developing AI (including OpenAI) are not taking enough steps to make sure that this new technology doesn’t become what the researchers believe might be an existential danger. These researchers are frustrated because the companies they are working for are constraining their ability to speak out, by employing “non-disclosure” and “non-disparagement” provisions in their employment contracts. Considering what’s at stake, this limit on free discussion carries a huge risk, according to these researchers.

Here’s a key quote from the article: “Some AI researchers believe the technology could grow out of control and become as dangerous as pandemics and nuclear war.” A number of these researchers, including Geoffrey Hinton (whom I have mentioned before), have recently authored a letter, laying out their concerns.

One statement in the article particularly caught my attention, and that statement has stimulated my comment here: “OpenAI said in response to the letter … that it agrees there should be government regulation.”

Well, this seems fine, and a step in the right direction – at least theoretically. Our government is supposed to “represent” the public, and the public interest, and so when the government “regulates” private and corproate activities, that should be something that benefits the public, and that would help protect the public from the kind of dangers that the AI researchers are worried about.

However….. it has surely not escaped your attention that “our” government has become largely subservient to the interests of the very same corporations whom the concerned researchers are saying need to be regulated.

I feel very certain – I am just positive – that this fact has not escaped your attention.

So, what to do? Aren’t we just kind of stuck? What can be done about this situation? Giant corporations are working at full speed to develop a technology that many of those most informed believe could end up being as bad as pandemics and nuclear war, and essentially lead to the end of human life on Earth. These corporations are also attempting to suppress any real understanding of the dangers, and our government, which should be helping to protect the public, is actually controlled by those very same giant corporations.

As I have just said, “What to do?” If my description of our situation is accurate, one might well think that the statement by OpenAI, that it supports “government regulation,” is an artful effort to avoid any significant impediment to what it is doing and wants to do, and that the company hopes will make it boatloads of money.

I think there is a clue about what to do in the word “our.” Theoretically, “our” government is working for the public. In fact, it is working for the giant corporations and the extremely rich. You may remember a relatively recent blog posting of mine, titled, “Signature Lines.” That blog posting considered the following question, and then made the observation I am displaying below:

“Why do the rich have so much power?”

“The rich have so much power because the rest of us don’t use our own.”

“Our” government is only theoretically “ours.” Many, many more of us need to become deeply engaged in the political activities that ultimately create the world in which we most immediately live.

Time allocation! That’s what I am talking about.

Getting organized! That’s what I am talking about.

If we spend more time watching Netflix and playing computer games than we do engaging in the immensely interesting and productive job of making “our” government actually work for and represent all of us, it is no surprise that “our” government isn’t actually “ours,” at all.

People can beat money. But only with their time!

Time is money,” remember that one? I know you do! To employ a style popularized by Bob Dylan, as I reference that “Time is money” quotation: “Ben Franklin said that.”

That Ben Franklin guy was pretty smart. So, let’s put that lesson to work! We will never have “self-government” if we are not directly, and significantly, involved in government ourselves.

I can testify. I know it works!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

HO, HO, HO CHI MINH, APOLOGIZING TO MIERS, PRISON BE BEST

Wow!…that was a close one for the GOP! The RNC website ran an ad for the upcoming convention to be held in Milwaukee, WI on July 15…only problem being that the imagery featured Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam. Maybe they meant to use a Hanoi image, or even one of PyongyangKim Jong Il would probably welcome Trump and his minions since they developed such a cozy relationship during The Don’s presidency…they “fell in love” according to the record…and who can forget the “love letters” kept by Don, interspersed with classified documents, as he fled to Mar-a-Lago in 2021? After the press pointed it out, the RNC website was quickly changed to the proper host city, but Jimmy Fallon on ‘The Tonight Show’ had to have his chance to run a spoof ad, using his Trumpy voiceover, saying, “From the Capitol building to the White House, we’ll celebrate the wall on our southern border,” as imagery of the Taj Mahal, a White Castle Restaurant, and the Great Wall of China crossed the screen. The Boston Globe ran a screenshot of the RNC’s error, gleaning 598,000 views and 3,700 Likes. The Wisconsin Democratic Party posted on Xwitter an edited shot of a t-shirt reading, “I attended 2024 RNC convention in Milwaukee, WI, USA,” with the location Xed out and replaced with “Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.” Dems chairperson, Ben Wikler, posted, “It appears that Trump’s RNC is unfamiliar with the location of Milwaukee, WI.”  Upon correcting the imagery on the ad, the RNC claims the photo came from a web developer who is no longer on the payroll. Wondering if Trump is refusing them payment for their efforts?

The former president is expected to be nominated at the convention four days after his sentencing in the hush money/falsified business records case…guilty on 34 felony counts…add ’em up! RNC chair Michael Whatley says the convention is planning for the possibility of Trump sitting in jail during this Grand Old Party party, and as he told Newsmax’s ‘Wake Up America,’ “I’m actually going to Milwaukee, and we’re going to have a series of conversations.” One would certainly hope so! And wake up that fly on the wall who can relay the details!

Jimmy Fallon feels that Melania Trump is not doing “fine” as husband Don stated after his New York guilty verdict. Fallon said, “Trump indicates Melania is doing fine, but that this hush money trial has been hard on her, and you know Melania is boiling because whenever your spouse says, ‘I’m fine,’ they’re most definitely not fine,” adding, “If you want to show her your support, send her a message on any of the five dating apps she just joined. The big question now is whether Trump will get jail time or house arrest. If he’s sentenced to jail, Melania will be inside the courtroom chanting ‘four more years!’ Trump will be sentenced on July 11, and his lawyers told him, ‘You should get your affairs in order,’ to which he replied, ‘That’s what got me in trouble in the first place!'” In a similar vein, Andy Borowitz writes, “Writing an impassioned letter to Judge Juan Merchan, Melania Trump argued that sentencing her husband to house arrest would mean cruel and unusual punishment for her,’ arguing further, ‘…that confining her husband to any place where she resides would be a clear violation ‘not only of the US Constitution, but of the Geneva Conventions. Your honor, you can prevent a humanitarian crisis. The human I speak of is me.'” Andy ends by writing, “Suggesting an appropriate sentence for her felonious husband, Mrs. Trump wrote, ‘Prison be best.'”

In a recent conversation with the toadies of ‘Fox and Friends,’ Trump was asked, “What’s your relationship with God like, and how do you pray?” His reply from left field (right field?) was, “OK, so I think it is good. I do very well with the evangelicals. I love the evangelicals. And I have more people saying they pray for me – I can’t even believe it. They are so committed, and they are so believing. They say, ‘Sir, you’re going to be OK. I pray for you every night.’ I mean, everybody, almost – I can’t say everybody, but almost everybody that sees me, they say it.” MSNBC host, Joe Scarborough, had to laugh uproariously, afterwards saying, “Just go to church…once! It’s beyond parody…sad!” Joe’s co-host, Willie Geist, says Trump should carry around a few printouts of Bible passages to recite for the ‘right‘ occasion. But although Trump missed the point of the question, or avoided it deliberately, he is doing something right in courting the religious right, by calling out his multiple prosecutions as persecutions. The New York Times reports that he now finishes some rallies with a devout closing…“The great silent majority is rising like never before and under our leadership. We will pray to God for our strength and for our liberty. We will pray for God, and we will pray with God. We are one movement, one people, one family, and one glorious nation under God.” Let us pray that his Teleprompter doesn’t start waffling.

Stuart and Dickinson, in Rolling Stone magazine, write of Justice Samuel Alito speaking at the Supreme Court Historical Society, of the ideological battle of the left facing off with the right, concerned about the hardship of existing “peacefully” in the face of “fundamental” differences that “can’t be compromised.” In a discussion he agreed that it is necessary to fight to “return our country to a place of godliness,” with the final resolution being that, “One side or the other is going to win.” The duo writes that Alito’s comments make no attempt to present himself as neutral, but as a partisan, as a “member of a hard-right judicial faction that’s empowered to make life-altering decisions for every American.” Interviewed by documentary film maker, Lauren Windsor, posing as a religious conservative, Alito says “there are fundamentals that can’t be compromised…so, it’s not like you’re going to split the difference.” Interviewing Chief Justice John RobertsWindsor found that he differs with the opinion that the nation is polarized, believing that the Court is experiencing nothing new historically. He argues that it isn’t the Court’s obligation to get the country onto a more “moral path,” believing it’s for the people we elect to office…not lawyers. Roberts disagrees that the high court should be “guiding us in that path” toward being a “Christian nation,” mentioning his “Jewish and Muslim friends,” adding, “It’s not our job to do that. It’s our job to decide the cases as best we can.” Windsor is putting together a documentary entitled ‘Gonzo for Democracy,’ dealing with the Trumpism phenomena of election denial and religious extremism. In the words of Don Pardo“Watch for it next time…if there is a next time!”

Elie Mystal in a recent piece in The Nation, writes that she owes an apology to Harriet Miers who was first nominated to the Supreme Court by George W. Bush, with Samuel Alito as a second choice. She describes Miers as a Bush crony and sycophant, who was criticized by everyone as a partisan hack who would be in step with all that Bush and the GOP wanted done. Coming from Texas to be deputy chief of staff, before being White House counsel, she was one of Bush’s closest friends, a born-again evangelical, and a good friend of Condoleeza Rice. Mystal says that “Miers was nominated because she spent most of her public career…in service to Bush. And she treated Bush, the bumbling oaf and war criminal, with a saccharine level of sycophancy.” Her nontraditional experience didn’t meet up with the GOP’s idea of a Supreme Court Justice, particularly the more conservative bloc who felt she was unreliable as a vote against abortion, offering no proof that she would reject court precedents. Republicans wanted a candidate who was willing to reject precedent and produce the right-white outcomes, instead of one who would uphold the law. Enter the Federalist Society and Samuel Alito. In Mystal’s view, the world has been worse every day since, though she doesn’t necessarily think Miers would have been a good choice. She writes that Alito is the most partisan justice on the high court…Clarence Thomas is only the most corrupt, Neil Gorsuch is the most dangerous to society’s functioning, and Brett Kavanaugh the most attempted-rapey. FoxNews has picked Alito to fashion their talking points into national laws…and to fly his flags high. Mystal’s argument that the GOP rejection of Miers was “the precise moment the party was lost to MAGA, laying the groundwork for the antidemocratic authoritarianism now in our foreground…cultism came to the Supreme Court before it arrived anywhere else in government. I’ve learned that you’re always better off going with the person who loves what you hate, instead of the person who hates what you love. The former might create something you find appalling, but the latter will only destroy that which you find most precious.”

Rob BostonSenior Advisor at Americans United for Separation of Church and State, calls the placement of a statue of the Reverend Billy Graham by the state of North Carolina an undeserved honor. Though it does replace the removed statue of a former White Supremacist governor, he thinks it is a misguided decision. He feels Graham was uniquely positioned to bring Americans together during a painful, divisive time, but lacked the courage or vision to do so, despite his popularity and fame as an evangelist for his particular form of fundamentalist Christianity. His antisemitic comments and crusading against LGBTQ+ equality evoked the pain caused by unjust social norms, yet he “was unwilling to break with the White status quo,” writes Anthea Butler, author of ‘White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America.’ “He bemoans racism as a sin, yet offered only small, cosmetic adjustments to change the ethos…characteristic waffling.”

Trumper Steve Bannon is finally going to prison for contempt of Congress…for four months. Not long enough in the eyes of many, but long enough for him to miss the remainder of the 2024 election cycle, putting a serious damper on his ability to carry out whatever election antics he was hoping for, says Bocha Blue and Bill Palmer of The Palmer Report. One thing he won’t be able to do is line his pockets from his podcast crowd, being locked away without his mic and camera. Blue says, “So Bannon would have been smarter to just serve his four month sentence back when he was convicted and get it over with. It’s the latest reminder that Bannon is very much the opposite of smart. He’s a guy who digs himself a hole, then labels himself savvy for crawling out of it, and somehow gets the media (on both sides) to portray him as a political genius. But the larger point here is that this is just the beginning for Bannon. He’s also set to go on criminal trial in New York for his ‘build the wall’ scam…Bannon is likely to be convicted in his NY trial. It’s centered on the kinds of serious felonies that come with multi-year prison sentences…In other words Bannon is now on track to go from Federal prison, to criminal trial, to state prison…if Trump were somehow to win in November, he wouldn’t be able pardon Bannon on state charges. He’s seventy years old and seemingly in poor health, so he may never get out.”

Andy Borowitz, on his The Borowitz Report, writes, “Panic gripped the nation’s prison guards on Thursday as they reacted to the prospect of body-searching Steve Bannon. The thought of interacting with the naked Bannon had many in the guard community rethinking their careers, insiders confirmed. ‘I’ve been living in fear of this day,’ Frank Klugian, a veteran correctional officer, said. ‘I knew it was bad news the minute I heard Mrs. Alito was flying her flag upside down again.’ Harland Dorrinson, the warden of the penitentiary that will be receiving Bannon, said that ‘every protection’ will be provided those carrying out the procedure, including, obviously, hazmat suits.” Who will get Trump’s prayers in this instance?

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Pride”

“It is revolutionary for any trans person to choose to be seen and visible in a world that tells us we should not exist.”
~Laverne Cox

“Do not allow people to dim your shine because they are blinded. Tell them to put on some sunglasses, because we were born this way.”
~Lady Gaga

“There will not be a magic day when we wake up and it’s now okay to express ourselves publicly. We make that day by doing things publicly until it’s simply the way things are.”
~Tammy Baldwin

“Darling, I want my gay rights now.”
~Marsha P. Johnson

“Of course, attitudes change, but only because brave people like Ellen [DeGeneres] jump into the fire to make them change. And if I hadn’t seen her on TV, I would have thought, ‘I could never be on TV. They don’t let LGBT people on TV.’ And more than that, I would have gone on thinking that I was an alien and that I maybe didn’t even have a right to be here.”
~Kate McKinnon

...

Check out this restoration of a moldy watercolor painting! It’s unbelievable what can be accomplished with some patience…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment