Bratton… Rail and trail … Greensite… on the Downtown Expansion Plan… Steinbruner… Adverse Camping, Why RTC Should NOT Consider Lightrail … Hayes… on Fire (no, not literally)… Patton… A Few More Words About Billionaires… Matlock… Vigilantes, Inc….whistleblowers, sharks and batteries…Georgia on my mind… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… the difference between WWII and Vietnam vets… Quotes on… “Grandparents”…
|
Dateline: June 26, 2024
FRIENDS OF THE RAIL AND TRAIL APPEAL. FRT has been working for years trying to bring common sense to our seemingly infinite transportation issues. Due to our natural (and unnatural ) environment/geography we need some very creative and unusual solutions to our transportation. FRT sent this logical and realistic appeal to their followers. I’m linking to it here…hoping the rest of our community will respond accordingly.
June – ACTION ALERT
Dear Bruce and readers of BrattonOnline.com,
Summer weather is here and I know we’re all starting to enjoy all the extra traffic! The increased traffic, which is only expected to get worse every year, is the perfect reminder of why alternative modes of transportation are so important. Not only is boosting our public transportation system vital for the 30% of County residents who can’t drive, adding rail to the mix is the only North-South option that will allow us to get to the beach without sitting in any traffic at all. We all agree we need it, so now is the perfect time to start designing!
Let’s Get Started Designing the Rail Service We Want to See!
Over the next four weeks, the Santa Cruz Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) is taking public comment on the first draft of rail vehicles, alignments, and possible stops. This preliminary look has been simplified to the point of providing almost no detail at all, however, it’s at this point when we can have the biggest impact on the design principles we want to see in this project. To that end, we’ve spent the time reading best practices in rail service design so you wouldn’t have to.
[Read the full newsletter here]
INHERITANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1IMDB) This is a comedy and you need to remember that intention. A TV host dies and for some plot reason the family is invited to his mansion to experience the reading his will. He hosted a game show and they throw in some gay humor, some inside tv programing errors and it’s only worth 2 thumbs.
DEFENDING JACOB. Apple TV series. (7.8IMDB) Chris Jacobs loses the screen and our attention every time his co-star Michelle Dockery appears…she has inherited and mastered all screen stealing techniques. He’s a much liked and capable assistant District attorney. All of a sudden his son’s best student buddy is murdered and the son is faced with maybe being guilty. It’s a long take on family loyalty, and on what’s fair, the privileges the DA’s son enjoys…and the movie is excellent…don’t miss it.
HITLER AND THE NAZIS. NETFLIX SERIES (7.5 IMDB) We’ll never the total truth behind World War II but this documentary fills in many blank spots. 6 years of war, 60 million lives lost, Nuremberg trials, Hitler and his love for some of Wagner’s operas, Goering, anti-British, mentioning the Messiah…it’s all in this well done documentary. We should memorize the lessons we need to learn.
WONDER. Netflix movie. (7.9 IMDB) When you have Owen Wilson, Julia Roberts and Mandy Patinkin as leads in a sentimental movie about a 10 year old boy born with a disfigured face after 27 surgeries you have a terrible chance at making a watchable movie….and this isn’t watchable.
PRESUMED INNOCENT. Apple series. (7.5 IMDB) Jake Gyllenhaal does his usual excellent job this time as a Chicago attorney. It’s almost all courtroom scenes plus murder of a pregnant woman, and why was she killed? Legalese takes first place plus some very tense moments….go for it.
THE IRON CLAW. HBO MAX movie. (7.6IMDB) It’s hard to imagine that they’d make a movie about the phoniness of tag team wrestling and expect it to contain anything resembling a believable plot. Zac Efron heads this semi true story of the wrestling Von Erich family. They managed to involve the Christian church in it but to little or no avail. Bad acting, flaky plot, and it’s half billed as a documentary, do not watch.
RAISING VOICES. Netflix Series. (7.2 IMDB) It’s just a bit dated because they have a relatively normal family who have built and operate a marijuana farm in their basement. There’s also lots of alcohol and party times happening. Another sub plot is a momentary focus on whether or not some of the characters are lesbians. There is no reason for this topic and no reason to see this movie either.
HIT MAN. Netflix movie. (7.3 IMDB) It’s listed as a comedy and Glen Powell plays the lead as an undercover cop who takes on many jobs as a killer informant but fools everyone involved. The plot is amazingly confusing and full of posing and bad acting. The New York Times gave Powell big publicity and promotion last Sunday, pay no attention to it. They got it wrong, or are secretly managing Powell’s career.
ERIC. Netflix series (7.01IMDB). Now we get to see/hear Benedict Cumberbatch do an American accent. He’s part of the 1980’s New York City startup of PBS’s Sesame Street in its most innovative Jim Hensen period. It’s partly funny, but it’s about the father son relationship that Cumberbatch has with his son. They hit on the race issue, plus the gay life, and even the homeless scene. It has a corny ending but it’s still worth watching.
ATLAS. Netflix movie (5.6 IMDB) Just about another future earth after some kind of huge attack. This one stars (loosely) Jennifer Lopez and she’s terrible in this Hollywood 28 years after some horrible attack flop. Plenty of bots working with humans which seems to be nearly impossible. It’s even truer after you watch Dune part 2. Don’t bother.
MAESTRO IN BLUE. Netflix series (8.2 IMDB) A curious film made during the covid mask era in Greece. It’s about a music festival on an island, the handsome guy in charge of the festival, and all these gay guys who don’t seem to be happy while being gay. Then too there’s a sort of sub plot involving a 18 year old girl and a 40 plus guy. I couldn’t buy any of it.
DUNE. PART 2. Max movie (8.6 IMDB) (4 thumbs) An absolute genius of a special effects extravaganza. You’ll need to see (or read) the plot from Frank Herbert’s book to remember /learn all the names and plot twists involved in part 2. It’s about intergalactic spices and who owns them. Timothee Chalamet is the lead and Javier Bardem plays a serious role too along with Christopher Walken, Zendaya, Josh Brolin and thousands of digital look a likes. It’s the best use of advanced screen effects I’ve ever seen. The scope, the plot, the movie itself is the biggest ever. Don’t miss it and go to a theater to see it on the biggest screen possible.
A SIMPLE FAVOR. Netflix movie (6.8 IMDB) It’s billed as a drama/comedy and doesn’t qualify as either one. Anna Hendrick is the lead and she is simply just not funny OR believable. Rupert Friend and Henry Golding are in it too, but shouldn’t have been. A child goes missing and finding her son takes most of this movie, and your patience.
BRIDGERTON. Netflix series. (7.4 IMDB) The very definition of a British costume drama. But this is no Downtown Abbey and contains only stereotypes of high court characters. Julie Andrews is in it, if you wait long enough. It’s interesting and possible that there really were that many races represented in the British courts at that time or is it the film makers attempt to stage racial balance?
June 24, 2024
Downtown Expansion: Plan or Pipe dream?
The map area outlined in red is the 29-acre site of the new “proposed” extension to downtown. “Proposed” is italicized since it appears that this is a done deal. According to the mayor at the joint meeting of city council and planning commission on June 18th, only the project’s “operationalization” or implementation is up for discussion and decision. Most city projects, and this is probably the largest city project in living memory, wait for the circulation of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) before council approval. The draft EIR for this project is still being developed.
The driver for the project is the push for a new Warriors arena to avoid the G team (G for Gatorade) leaving Santa Cruz for better facilities. The extra push is the state requirement for the city to demonstrate where it will be able to accommodate 3700 new housing units under the next seven-year Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) cycle. The last seven- year cycle required 700 units at various income levels, all of which the city reached or surpassed, being one of only six percent of CA cities to do so. There are 1600 mixed use (housing and retail) units proposed for this newly designated Downtown Plan Extension project. Can an area under 30 acres, gridlocked with summer tourist traffic, with no provision for parking (state law), housing fifty percent of the city’s required RHNA numbers, successfully be transformed as described below in the 6/18/24 Agenda Report?
A new urban destination with distinct urban character and a major events venue of regional importance could make this project the center of a highly successful economic development endeavor, bringing residents and visitors from throughout the region into the downtown and helping them navigate between key points of interest at the beach, river levee, and Downtown.
I am skeptical for several reasons. Some are:
- One of the long-time expressed desires by city planners is to connect downtown with the beach area. It is the first and primary rationale for this project in the Agenda Report. It is never accompanied by data. I suggest city planners grab a beach towel, pop on a swimsuit, walk along Main Beach or the Boardwalk and chat with folks. Doing so will quickly reveal that visitors who come to Santa Cruz to go to the beach, with stocked coolers and children’s beach toys are a different demographic with different interests from those who visit downtown, window shop, go to a movie, stop for a coffee, or try on a new outfit.
- With no parking in this new urban, regional destination area, where are visitors going to park? Two commissioners stressed that concern. In their slide show, planning staff had a pie graph of what the (local) public sees in this area as Roadway Priority: 226 chose vehicles while 829 chose pedestrians and bicycles. What exactly is the implication in that for regional visitors? For planning?
- Recent city environmental reports fudge the issue of traffic under exemptions or changes in CEQA law. The traffic study for the future Calypso project on Center St. studied only weekday traffic despite gridlock being on summer weekends. Can we expect the same approach in this EIR process? The project area is smack in the middle of the route taken by the lower west side to access downtown or across town to the eastside, not to mention beach hill residents. Impact and mitigations will need serious assessment.
- Why is current tourist traffic bound for the Boardwalk and beach area required to navigate two roundabouts (this project will add a third), merge with Wharf traffic and local traffic to enter Beach St. to access the only entrance to the Boardwalk parking lot? A Second Street back entrance to the Boardwalk parking lot would make sense. In the ongoing negotiations with the Seaside Company, that option deserves a discussion. It could be a mitigation for the obvious traffic nightmare this project will create.
- The current Local Coastal Program, LCP for south of Laurel requires that new housing be for families, meaning more than one-bedroom. Will the LCP be changed to designate small, single-person units to be the new norm for this area?
- What will be the impact of this new urban entertainment, retail center on current downtown businesses and the Civic Center? The Santa Cruz Symphony director seemed enthusiastic about leaving the Civic for the new Arena. In the Civic I’ve watched basketball games, Lipizzaner stallions, Derby Girls, Santa Cruz Symphonies, Bob Dylan, Jesse Jackson and much more. And yes, there is funding already allocated to erect railings on the bleachers, a long overdue safety feature. Are we never satisfied with what we already have? Doesn’t a quickly warming climate require a modicum of restraint?
The city is accepting comments on this Plan up to July 10. These are separate from comments on the draft EIR which is expected to be released late summer. You can submit comments to principal planner Sarah Neuse at sneuse@santacruzca.gov and view documents here.
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
LOW IMPACT CAMPING THAT IS NOT
Last Tuesday, the Board of Supervisor chambers was overflowing with local fire professionals and many people who live in the rural areas, worried about Supervisor Zach Friend’s push to allow private campgrounds throughout the high-fire risk areas.
Zayante Fire Chief Maxwell said the Fire Chief’s Association did not support it. (see minute 4:40)
County Fire Marshal Walters said he had not seen the proposed changes to be able to review them (see minute 5:07)
The Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) stated camping and campfires are not compatible with wildland areas such as Cotoni-Coast National Monument in Davenport, and that top fire fighting experts within the BLM (“Hot Shots”) recommended against camping and are leading a project to create 100′ of defensible space encircling Davenport.
Supervisor Zach Friend opened the public hearing by stating he had talked with local fire officials in the hallway, and they were okay with the changes that addressed their concerns. However, neither of the fire professionals had seen his proposals until he discussed them in his presentation.
He said he would support limiting the number of permits to 150, and later said he wanted County staff (not the land owners seeking campground permits) to conduct CEQA analysis to determine impacts on those areas. He questioned the wisdom of prohibiting such campgrounds in high and very high fire risk areas when he claimed some areas of La Selva Beach’s San Andreas Road are considered high fire risk.
After some members of the public, including a retired fire captain, reported they had contacted the State Insurance Commissioner’s office about the proposed Ordinance and that those officials were shocked such action could be considered because of potential fire risks and inherent insurance non-renewal for adjacent properties, Supervisor Friend claimed he had contacted Insurance Commissioner Lara’s office and “unlike what people have said, the staff had no issue with the Ordinance.” Really?
Why is he pushing this so hard?
Supervisor Friend’s frantic push to have County staff conduct an expensive CEQA study on the Ordinance and potential campground areas was obscene. Supervisor Koenig pointed out that the County cannot afford to fix the roads, so he could not support asking staff to do an expensive environmental report.
Supervisor Friend would not give up, and insisted a CEQA review, with the topics that he alone defined, would provide the County with information necessary to enact an Ordinance that would be better than what SB 620 might provide, if approved.
Thank goodness, the Board did not acquiesce. After nearly three hours of public testimony and discussion, they voted to wait until after August 31 to see if SB 620 is approved, and take action from there regarding any County-funded CEQA analysis.
Because I have studied CEQA law informally, I know that any CEQA analysis of a project must be noticed to the public and allow for open public comment regarding “Scoping” of what the study should include. When I asked County Counsel Jason Heath about this and the fact that Supervisor Friend seemed to want to define the scoping of the proposed Low Impact Camping Ordinance, Mr. Heath refused to comment.
Here is the law:
Public disclosure and informed decision-making are priorities under CEQA. CEQA mandates two periods during the EIR process when public and agency comments on the impacts of a proposed project are solicited: 1) during the scoping comment period, and 2) for a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), during the public review period.
In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15082[a], 15103, 15375), the County must circulate a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Proposed Project.
So just how many of these HipCamp sites are already operating, unpermitted, near you??? Take a look.
Hipcamp
Many show campfires. Some allow dogs to be off leash. Who knows if there is a way to call 911 if there is a fire or medical emergency? Could responders find the sites if called? How loud are the generators providing power? Is there water on site for fire suppression? How do the off-leash dogs affect wildlife?
Hmmmm…..
Read about HipCamp’s CEO here: Hipcamp Founder and CEO Alyssa Ravasio featured in Outside Business Journal’s list of 20 Most Influential People in Outdoor Industry
CONTACT STATE REPRESENTATIVES TO URGE OPPOSITION TO SB 620
The crowd who filled the Board chambers and largely opposed the idea should now turn their energy to the State representatives. I called State Senator Mike McGuire’s office to ask why he would author such a bill as SB 620? I was referred to and left a message for his policy analyst, Chris Nielson. No reply yet.
I also called the office of co-author Assemblyman Damon Connelly and spoke with his analyst, Michael, who defended the legislation (“campers would not pose any more fire risk than the people who live in those areas do.”) and downplayed Assemblyman Connelly’s involvement (“He doesn’t represent Santa Cruz County, and is only a co-author.). I reminded him that this legislation would affect the entire State, if approved.
When I asked who it was that had contacted Assemblyman Connelly and caused him to co-author SB 620, Michael said “Hip Camp and the Nature Conservancy”.
Hmmm…..
I called the Nature Conservancy office in San Francisco. Their office knew nothing of SB 620, and were concerned.
Both Senator McGuire and Assemblyman Connelly represent the Santa Rosa area, a region still recovering from devastating wildland fires.
Please call your local state elected representatives and relay your concerns about the Low Impact Camping (LICA) legislation SB 620 that has many in this County, including fire professionals, shaking their heads in alarm and disbelief.
- Senator Mike McGuire: 916-651-4170 after 10:30am
- Assemblyman Damon Connelly: 916-319-2012
- Senator John Laird: Contact
- Assemblywoman Gail Pellerin: Contact | Official Website – Assemblymember Gail Pellerin Representing the 28th California Assembly District
- Assemblywoman Dawn Addis: Contact | Official Website – Assemblymember Dawn Addis Representing the 30th California Assembly District
LAND TRUST BALLOT IS JUST ANOTHER MONEY GRAB
Beware the impending forever Special Parcel Tax coming to your ballot this November. Funded by the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, paid signature gatherers were able to get the required number of signatures to qualify this “citizen initiative” for the ballot that will collect $87 on parcels countywide, except timber and ag lands, and win approval with only 50% +1 majority, not the usual 2/3 approval required.
There would be no senior exemptions
All administration of the anticipated $7 million would be allocated by an Advisory Committee, composed of appointed representatives from each of the five County Supervisorial Districts and four cities, and supposedly be subject to the Brown Act open meeting requirements. Hmmm…
Who are the top funders in this expensive campaign? Take a look here:
Santa Cruz County for Water and Wildfire Protection
The County would get alot of money just to administer this. Think about it, and ask yourself if you trust these politicians at 701 Ocean Street who have repeatedly lied to voters regarding Measure G in 2018 and Measure K in March of this year. Zero $ for fire protection from Measure G. Zero $ for road repairs from Measure K.
RTC PLAN TO INCLUDE LIGHT RAIL HARMS WATSONVILLE COMMERCE AND SHOULD BE WITHDRAWN
Last week, I attended the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Open House for the Zero Emission Passenger Report public input. There was one in Watsonville and a second in Live Oak. I chose to go to the Watsonville event and was really glad I did.
Because it was not well-attended, it was possible to hear the RTC staff stationed around the room answering peoples’ questions. The maps showed the plan for where the rail stops would be located and there was information about three different kinds of passenger trains under consideration.
I was a bit shocked to see plans for a tunnel under Highway One near Cabrillo to connect the Cabrillo College Station on McGregor Drive to Cabrillo College Drive, near Twin Lakes Baptist Church. I was also surprised to see that the proposed Aptos Village station is where the Aptos Street BBQ and other businesses are located.
Fortunately, I learned there would be a formal presentation of the project to the Watsonville City Council the following night. I was really glad I went to that because I learned from Watsonville City Councilwoman Ari Parker that if the RTC chooses the lightrail passenger mode, it will really harm Watsonville’s commerce by removing freight rail connectivity to the main rail lines in Pajaro.
Because the existing rail bridge over the Pajaro River will be demolished and rebuilt to accommodate the impending levee repair project that will raise the height of the levee and require tracks on Walker Street and the new train bridge to be higher by as much as 10′.
Ms. Parker wanted to know if the RTC staff was aware of the problem with the lightrail not being compatible with freight rail traffic? Yes, the RTC is aware of that. Ms. Parker then wanted to know if the residents in the northern end of the County were being made aware of that, and the serious adverse implications that would pose for Watsonville? Staff was not sure.
My question is this: Why is the RTC even considering lightrail as an option, knowing if it were selected, supposedly “by the people” via input in these Open Houses and other meetings, Watsonville commerce will be trashed???
CHANTICLEER OVERPASS PROGRESSING
This week, crews added the decorative whale motifs to the fencing on the Chanticleer Pedestrian and Bicycle Overpass on Highway One.
Recently Soquel Creek Water District Board approved adding tens of thousands of dollars for an upgrade to the Overpass fencing. Maybe they want toilets and taps and ???? put on the fence sections adjacent to the PureWater Soquel Project wastewater treatment plant?
AND THE APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT GHETTO CONTINUES
Last week, I noticed painted markings on eastbound Soquel Drive in the Aptos Village area of Parade Street. This area has become problematic for motorists wanting to make a left turn onto Trout Gulch Road because the same turn lane gets used midway for Parade Street left turns into the Aptos Village Project.
County staff let me know “The striping is all we are implementing. There will be no physical barriers in the roadway. This is being done out of our Traffic Engineering Section to balance the needs of all the movements on Soquel Dr. We will continue to monitor the area.”
What a mess. When the County has no money to fix potholes, there is somehow money to add features to further help Swenson.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.
Becky
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Fire
The advent of human control of fire was a pivotal moment in the development of our species. Human use of fire has been changing in some ways and remains steady in others. Recently, it seems that the use of fire is becoming more and more remote for more and more people. Is that good or bad? Join me for a few moments to examine the state of human relationship with fire.
In the millennia of humans” past and on into our present, we have used fire for heating, cooking, pest control, trash disposal, transportation, and war as well as for the creation of food and fiber. I intend to revise this essay and welcome suggestions about other major uses for fire. Fire is a powerful tool.
Fire for Heating
Consider the evolution of using fire for heating: from the first flame to the storage of heat in stone, masonry fireplaces and chimneys, metal wood stoves, furnaces and, most recently, forced air central heating. Do I understand correctly that conversion of wood to fire for heat, even with super-efficient, clean burning woodstoves, is no longer legal for new construction in Santa Cruz County? Soon, even mountain folk will lose their expertise and familiarity with keeping their homes warm using locally produced fuel, easily produced as a land management byproduct making for improved wildfire safety.
Cooking Fires
My host gently wiggles and pushes three-foot branches, 3″ in diameter into the fire to renew the steady heat beneath a tortilla-cooking comal. Smoke rushes out through the roof. Mayan peoples in Belize showed me this indoor cooking method, which is similar to that which many tropical and subtropical cultures have relied for generations. Elsewhere, grills over charcoal, “spits” turning above flames, and wood-fired ovens are other methods for fire-cooking food. Cast iron wood-fired cook stoves are antiques. I haven’t seen one used for a decade.
Have we entered a new era for cooking with fire? Can anyone confirm the rumor that gas stoves are no longer permitted with new construction? I understand that there are concerns about indoor air pollution as well as thoughts that such methods will unduly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
One of the last cooking fires in our region is employed by those ‘roughing it” using portable gas-fired stoves, some of which have become ultra-lightweight and highly efficient. I would be remiss not to also mention wood-fired appropriate technology cooking units, fed by surprisingly small handfuls of branches to prepare family meals. These have been targeted to developing countries with increasing shortages of fuel wood.
Pest Control
A member of Sonoma’s Kashia Pomo tribe recently spoke to a group I was with about the importance of burning the understory of oaks for pest control. He pointed out insect holes in an empty acorn shell and noted that his ancestors would have burned the understory of oak forests to reduce this damage and improve the acorn crop. I”ve heard similar things about pine nut pest management.
How many other pests might have been once controlled by different uses of fire?
Food Production
Precluding the use of fire for pests, fire has been, and is still being, used for other aspects of food production. Tribal peoples use fire to increase productivity of seed crops. Burning releases nutrients trapped in dead vegetation into the soil, increasing plant growth. Native ryegrass and brome grass stands that are burned produce more, heavier seeds. Burning meadows increases the amount of clover and other wildflowers which serve as either salad greens or seed crops.
The principle of fire releasing nutrients for the next crop also applies to rice farmers in California. Burning rice fields was once a more common method of returning nutrients from “crop residue” to the soil. Some farmers have turned to selling rice straw or flooding fields so that waterfowl help break down crop residue.
Other fire-prepared food crops include morels, beef, and grasshoppers. Morels are especially numerous after fire-spurred nutrient release. Ranchers have long used fire to reduce the cover of unpalatable shrubs and increase herbaceous forage to benefit livestock production. Perhaps fire is still used to round up grasshoppers that are subsequently roasted and coated in chili powder and salt for a tasty, crunchy, protein-rich snack.
Fire-Grown Fiber
I haven’t encountered anyone burning for fiber production, but have a few ideas. Burning to reduce shrub invasion into grasslands would make those areas more productive for sheep, and, hence, wool (fiber) production.
Native peoples have burned various plants in various ways to increase fiber production. Around our region, hazel, willow, and iris burned in the right way would make it possible to harvest more and better fiber for cordage and basketry.
Trash Disposal
Travel in rural areas of the Americas and you’ll no doubt encounter the distinct smell of incinerating trash. Especially unctuous is the dioxin-tainted odor of burning plastic. I know of a certain gentleman who very recently was regularly burning 50 gallon oil drums of trash including plastic baby diapers, polluting an otherwise pristine area of Big Sur. I wonder how common the practice is at this moment in the USA?
Fire for Wildfire Fuel Reduction
Carefully planned pile burns or broadcast burns are increasingly being used to dispose of vegetation that would have otherwise been a fire hazard. I’ve written more about these practices in this and this essay.
Riding the Fire
Internal combustion engines burning fossil fuels, releasing ancient carbon, and powering vehicles is a leading cause of global warming in our nation. Not long ago, the hungry burning work of steam engines propelled society ‘forward,” destroying forests for fuel, leading to California’s hardwood crisis in the late 1800’s. Quieter, fireless electric engines are a revolution at hand, but there’s a sound like distant thunder propelling people in much different ways.
War Fire
Sanctions aside, war is mainly a fiery affair. Bombs, bullets, flame throwers, and napalm are the fire-based war weapons of modern soldiers. No doubt too many of us have been exposed to media portrayals of more ancient warfare involving flaming projectiles meant to kill or destroy property. The most ‘modern” of fiery death, atomic warfare, is too close at hand with entirely different types of flames.
Could war really be over if we wanted it enough? Let’s quell those violent flames starting by putting out those types of fires closer to home.
Fire – For Better or For Worse
Next time you light a candle, if you even do that anymore, take a moment to reflect on the use of good fire or bad fire. As humans become more distant from their roots, more unfamiliar with tools that we have long used to steward our world, it seems we need to make a greater effort to raise future generations to be comfortable using fire in the best of ways. We must also learn to turn aside from the power of less productive flames, as tempting as that power might be. Burn brightly! Burn well.
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
#171 / A Few More Words About Billionaires
It wasn’t too long ago that I commented on the number of billionaires among us. In a blog post at the end of last year, I said there were 735.
Since then, I have been advised by an email bulletin from Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen, that there are actually 806 billionaires in the United States, although Weissman properly notes, in a comment highlighted by an asterisk, that “the exact number of billionaires at any given moment fluctuates with gains and losses in the stock market and other financial metrics.”
At any rate, having raised the topic of the “billionaires among us,” I thought it was a good idea to pass on the additional information I have now received from Public Citizen. This group is urging its supporters – and others, including you – to “tell Congress that the American people need our elected officials to fight back against worsening economic inequality.”
Specifically, Public Citizen is urging all of us to “tell Members of Congress to pass the Ultra Millionaire Tax Act of 2024.”
If you click this link right here, I believe that Public Citizen will provide you with an opportunity to sign a petition to that effect.
In the meantime, as you decide whether you would like to sign on, or not, here is that additional information from Public Citizen that I didn’t have when I published my earlier blog post:
- There are approximately 806 billionaires in the United States.
- That’s roughly 1 billionaire for every 417,265 non-billionaires.
- The average net worth of an American billionaire today is over $7 billion.
- The combined fortunes of all of this country’s billionaires add up to a staggering 5.8 trillion dollars.
- Here’s what that looks like numerically: $5,800,000,000,000.00.
- As Americans for Tax Fairness report, that is double what it was at the end of 2017, not even seven years ago.
- For comparison, the combined wealth of the entire bottom half of our society — some 65 million households — is $3.7 trillion.
- In other words, America’s 806 billionaires collectively have $2.1 trillion more than the entire bottom half of the country, and — because our tax system is so biased in their favor — these billionaires have numerous ways to avoid paying anything close to their fair share.
- A bill in Congress — “The Ultra Millionaire Tax Act of 2024” — would start to bring some sanity to our nation’s disgraceful and unequal tax regime, by imposing an additional — though actually still quite modest — tax on those whose net worth exceeds $50 million.
- “The Ultra Millionaire Tax Act of 2024” would also give the IRS much-needed additional resources to keep after the wealthiest taxpayers (or tax cheats, as the case may be).
- Sponsors of this critical new legislation include Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and Representatives Pramila Jayapal, Brendan Boyle, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
To give you a hint of what I think, I signed the petition!
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
KKK ON THE RISE, BILLIONAIRES AND 2000 MULES, A FINALE?
Greg Palast, author, freelance journalist (often featured in The Guardian), and film maker who has produced several presentations for the BBC, is in the process of making a film entitled “Vigilantes, Inc.” in which he exposes the scam of ‘volunteer vigilantes” who have operations in several states to disrupt the vote by purging Black voters. He is endeavoring to hunt down what he calls the “Klan-Lite” operatives who are initiating these challenges to the voting rolls in a return to the KKK of the 1940s…this time backed by financing of billionaires as they continue the assault on the Voting Rights Act. Palast began his investigation in 2018 after Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brian Kemp (now governor after defeating Stacey Abrams in that race), had purged about a half-million voters, with Palast getting access to the whole list. Hiring a private contractor to verify names and addresses, he probed each name, finding that over 150,000 had legitimately moved away from Georgia, while over 340,000 had not moved, and surprise, surprise…most were Black voters.
Election Day 2018 found the Palast Investigative team, with film crew, in Atlanta where they met up with a Black woman outside her usual polling place (for fifty elections), and who had been denied a ballot because she had been purged from the rolls. She was interviewed, then invited the crew to her house, where it was discovered she was a cousin of Martin Luther King, Jr. Brian Kemp won the election by 54,723 votes, having overdone his purging by several thousand votes…oh well. Within the two years leading up to the 2020 presidential election, Kemp’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger (Palast emphasizes pronunciation as RaffensPurger), purged another 309,000 voters, bringing Palast back into the fray with his investigative contractor, along with the Georgia ACLU Black Voters Matter Fund, and the Georgia NAACP. Their efforts restored about half onto the rolls, allowing Joe Biden to win the state by…repeat after me…”11,780 votes” which Trump unsuccessfully attempted to move into his column.
Not surprising that the purges are ongoing in Georgia, but the trend is picking up adherents across the nation as the “vigilantes” step up their efforts in at least 20 states. Palast found that in the 2020 election-leadup analysis that Black voters in Wisconsin, particularly those voters in Milwaukee, had been purged, along with students in Madison being incorrectly added to the list. The Palast Investigative Fund, and Black Voters Matter, filed their findings with a bipartisan elections commission which stopped the purges…resulting in a Biden victory. The vigilante “challenges” skirt the legalities in Red States under the guise of “whistleblower challenges,” undertaken by citizens who suspect that an individual who they think is casting a vote illegally might be called out. For instance, Georgia’s SB202 allows “unlimited” challenges to voters by those not in government. While individual states are prohibited from purging voters by “list maintenance” within 90 days of an election, a citizen vigilante can present their voter purge lists even on election day, leaving no time for re-registration and casting a vote for those purged.
“In 2022, 149,000 voters were challenged in Georgia, not by the government, but by vigilante vote fraud hunters using specious data. Unfortunately, there have been two federal court rulings this far that have allowed this to continue, so it’s now spreading to other states,” comments Palast. He goes on to say that a Marjorie Taylor Greene associate named Pam Reardon, challenged 32,000 voters, heavily focused on Black people and college students, by using a list compiled by the group True The Vote. This group is known as the producer of the movie “2000 Mules” which falsely claimed millions of votes were “stuffed” into drop boxes by Black people across the nation. Hardly surprising that the movie premiered at Mar-a-Lago for Comrade Cheetolino! The conservative media company behind the movie and a companion book, Salem Media Group, Inc., recently issued an apology and announced it was removing the film and the book from its platform, halting distribution. ‘2000 Mules” has been widely debunked by law enforcement and the media, and an individual featured in the film who had been investigated by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation was cleared of any wrongdoing. This individual had sued Salem Media for the way he was portrayed and for the violent threats to his family, which resulted in an undisclosed “significant” settlement.
Palast identified vigilante Alton Russell, chair of the Ft. Benning area GOP, who challenged over 4,000 voters, including a “substantial number of Black soldiers.” Russell views himself as a bonafide vigilante in his Doc Holliday style clothing with a six-shooter on his hip. Palast’s Investigative Fund, along with NAACP and ACLU assistance, found not one single voter challenged by vigilantes Reardon and Russell were fraudulent, as they only stopped Reardon’s purge. On the other hand, Russell’s challenges were sustained, with the 4,000+ voters purged. Palast cautions, “Georgia’s brand of voter vigilantism has now legally spread to Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. They”re now mass challenging literally hundreds of thousands of voters, and True The Vote has put out a call to get 100,000 volunteers to submit these challenges. They”re probably the most effective vote suppression organization since the Ku Klux Klan,” further noting, “Georgia and Texas are not Red states…if people were allowed to vote they”d be Blue states.”
The film, “Vigilantes Inc.” takes its name from the 1946 incorporation of the Georgia Klan, when they registered that name in their endeavor to specifically eliminate every Black citizen from the voter rolls, and now we have them back…so, if you want your next president to be elected by the Klan, stay home on election day! Interested in the film? You can get screen credits (alongside Martin Sheen’s) for a donation of $100 or more, which will also get you a signed DVD of the film upon its completion. If interested in simply being a film backer, any donation is welcome at Greg Palast Investigative Fund.
A couple of Sundays ago, Donald Trump visited the 180 Church, a Black congregation near Detroit, for what he called “a roundtable” and as we might have predicted, his mouth opened with a lie, by saying, “it’s an honor to be here. it’s a very important area for us. We”ve done more for…and I say this proudly…the Black population than any president since Abraham Lincoln. President Biden has done nothing for Blacks.” He claimed that he had lowered Black unemployment, but failed to say that Biden has exceeded his so-called record. Political science professor David Dixon at Howard University has lauded the Biden-Harris administration for the energy they have put toward Black constituents, and that record seems to be borne out by the nomination of 25 Black judges to the federal court system, notably, the appointment of the first Black female on the Supreme Court. Government professor Steven Taylor at American University is of the opinion that the full picture of Biden’s efforts is contrasted against a Congress, especially Trump Republicans, that votes against any proposal that might improve the lives of Black people. Contrast that with Trump himself who has the gall to stand before a Black congregation to puff out his chest about his supposed efforts.
We might also have correctly suspected this appearance would be a total scam, and after seeing all the blue-eyed, white faces peering from the pews, it was evident the MAGA gang had filled the church with a crowd who had never set foot in a Black church prior to this, and would not do it again unless called upon by their Cinnamon Jesus. After the phony roundtable had ended, Trump was back at it, criticizing Black majority cities…Milwaukee is “horrible,” echoing his past disparagements of “crime-infested hellholes” in Atlanta and Baltimore, and Detroit being declared “crooked as hell,” when he told his minions to “guard the vote.” Shirley Kennedy writes on The Palmer Report, “These words about and characterizations of predominately Black cities shows where Trump’s head is when it comes to Blacks. Yet, he wants the Black vote. Any Black people who vote for Trump are bigger fools than his regular supporters.”
Leo Daniel’s Trumpvirus post on Quora writes about election commissioner, Chris Jackson’s evidence alleging that the Trump Gang has been paying people to show up at his ‘rallies,” which has “sparked significant debate and scrutiny, adding another layer to the already contentious legacy of the former president. The allegations shed light on potential tactics used during his campaign events, raising questions about the authenticity of support garnered by Trump during his time in office.” As reported on Raw Story, Jackson is looking into a June 9 event, when individuals were incentivized with money to attend a gathering, though evidence of who made payments is cloudy, raising ethical implications. “In a democratic society, it is essential that citizens attend political rallies and events of their own volition, driven by their beliefs and values rather than monetary incentives. When attendees are paid, it blurs the line between genuine grassroots support and artificial manipulation of public perception,” writes Daniel. He continues, “It raises concerns about transparency and honesty of campaigns. Voters have the right to make informed decisions based on genuine interactions with candidates and their policies…it undermines the democratic process and erodes trust in the political system.” The Trump contingent has denied this scheme in question, which was in Las Vegas, but there remains much speculation and debate, which furthers the deepening divisions and distrust among voters.
MSNB’s Nicolle Wallace, who calls herself a “self-loathing former Republican,” charges Fox News of depriving its audience of the full picture of Idol Trump, as the network has chosen to cut away from several of the GOP candidate’s rally speeches when he starts going off the deep end. The Las Vegas rally is a prime example when the teleprompter conked out, with Trump then threatening the event contractors before going into his now-infamous ‘shark-vs.-electric boat” scenario. A former GOP strategist, Stuart Stevens, suggests to Wallace that Fox “can try not to show this and hide it, but it’s a long time to election day and a lot of people are going to start paying attention that aren”t paying attention now,” highlighting the differences between Donald and Joe. Stevens says, “I think Trump is like a guy walking around with a paper bag full of water. it’s probably not going to leak that much, but when it goes, it’s going to be hell to pay to get it back. That’s where he’s headed.” Rachel Maddow told Wallace the president is now “really, really, frequently incoherent. And when he’s not incoherent, he’s speaking in terms that are pornographically violent when he’s trying to rile up his audience.” Maddow believes his speeches would be shocking to a lot of the public, if people could stand to listen to him for longer that they do, if only news organizations could responsibly broadcast more of what he says. Because of the lies and threats he’s pushing, it might be considered irresponsible to do so, however. On the shark/electric boat story, Rachel says Trump will now double down as he always does, and his troops will fall into formation, eyes agog, salivating tongues hanging, and heads nodding. “it’s as hilarious as it is scary,” she adds.
In his dehumanizing characterizations of immigrants, Trump has now suggested that they could be pitted together in fights for our entertainment…as he told Christian conservatives on Saturday. He claims he proposed to his friend Dana White, president of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, that a competition of his fighting league champs against immigrants might solve the immigration problem. Hardly non-violent, eh? Satirist Andy Borowitz reports that, “in a rare public statement on Monday, Melania Trump said her husband has exhibited ‘alarming mental decline” since she last saw him three years ago. Mrs. Trump said that she happened to see him on television recently ranting about sharks and boats and was struck by how much he had deteriorated over the past three years. ‘He was incoherent before, but now he be worst,” she said. Shortly after Mrs. Trump released her statement, her husband vehemently disputed it. ‘I don”t know what Mercedes is talking about…I may be 78, but I have the mind of a two-year old.””
The Palmer Report’s Bocha Blue says, “This will not end well. At this point, Donald Trump’s brain is a ‘sopranos’ episode. it’s episode after episode, leaving us transfixed, at the edge of our seats, waiting to see how it all plays out. As the episodes become more and more bizarre each day, leading up to the denouement, they become darker and more ominous, leading us gently into the finale where…………”
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
“Grandparents”
“There are no words to describe the happiness in holding your baby’s baby.”
~Unknown
“Grandfathers are just antique little boys.”
~Unknown
“A child needs a grandparent, anybody’s grandparent, to grow a little more securely into an unfamiliar world.”
~Charles and Ann Morse
“The best parents get promoted to grandparents.”
~Unknown
“The reason grandchildren and grandparents get along so well is that they have a common enemy.”
~Sam Levenson
I think this is a very important distinction that has not been paid enough attention to. |
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com