January 15 – 21, 2025

Highlights this week:

Greensite… on Downtown Plan Extension DEIR… Steinbruner… off this week … Hayes… Cattle Grazing on Public Lands … Patton… Artificial Sweetener … Matlock… calling a bluff…51 and counting…neither more nor less… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… A glacier guide’s story Quotes on… “Inauguration”

...

FISHING ON THE SAN LORENZO. December 8, 1940. This was on the opening of Steelhead Season (remember steelhead?). It’s at Murray Street on East Cliff Drive

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

Dateline: January 15, 2025

STILL BURNING. The unimaginable reality of 25 people killed, 82,000 still evacuated, 90,000 under threat of evacuation, and 45 acres burned is hard to wrap your head around. In the Palisades and Eaton fires alone, some 12,000 structures have been destroyed, and containment is at 22% and 55% respectively. Firefighters and first responders are working tirelessly, as are volunteers, community members, and total strangers. It will be a long time before there is such a thing as “life as usual” in Los Angeles. I was thinking just the other day about what the long-term and wide-spread effects of all this are going to be. It’s not just the people that owned and lived in those houses and ran those businesses, it’s the entire human ecology around them that is disrupted. Imagine being a real estate agent in LA now… or a landscaper, or a handyman, or a sanitation worker. I saw an article stating that close to 30,000 students were affected by these fires. It’s just incomprehensible.

HELPING LA. While they are in need of donations of all sorts (people have lost ev-e-ry-thing after all), following the impulse to load up the car and drive down there is not that great of an idea. In fact, when there are disasters, well meaning “civilians” are often a hindrance as opposed to the help they want to be. If you feel moved to give to SoCal (and you should, if you can), please coordinate with some form of already ongoing relief effort. Here’s an article on KQED on How to Help People Affected by the LA Fires, containing links and useful information. Here’s something I learned that I did not know – if you have a GoFundMe that specifies that the money will be used for relief (like house repairs, funeral expenses, etc) from a natural disaster, then you can not receive funds from FEMA for that same disaster. That’s a good thing to know! Also, be leery of fundraising scammers. Sadly, these “digital looters” pop up around natural disasters.

...

STAR WARS: SKELETON CREW. Disney+ series (7.2 IMDb) *** It’s refreshing when a big franchise realizes they’ve created a universe big enough to tell other stories (look at Star Trek Lower Decks – a successful animated comedy entrenched deeply in the Star Trek Universe), and that’s what Skeleton Crew does for Star Wars. A quartet of children, chafing at the bureaucratic cloister of their homeworld, stumble on a crashed spaceship and find themselves launched into the rough and tumble Star Wars Universe. Using a rough “Treasure Island” plotline, there’s space piracy aplenty: Jude Law’s character is referred to as Cap’n Silvo (nod to Long John Silver from Treasure Island) and the ship’s yarr-voiced droid is SM-33 (Smee was Captain Hook’s first mate in Peter Pan). Good for adults and children (though not TOO young – plenty of life-taking and intense scenes). ~Sarge

NIGHTBITCH. Hulu movie (5.6 IMDb) *** This film is ideal for husbands and fathers, capturing the mix of profound and bullshit (and profound again) moments in a woman’s journey from being a successful artist to new motherhood. What begins as a seemingly supernatural plot evolves into a raw, magical realist exploration of the chaos and sacrifice of motherhood and identity. It’s a subjective, visceral experience, navigating the emotional and (literal) physical mess of this transformative stage. ~Sarge

SMALL THINGS LIKE THESE. PrimeTV. (6.9 IMDb) *** A quietly ponderous Christmas tale set in a small town in Ireland in 1985 (swear to god it feels more like the 1940s…). Cillian Murphy plays a loving father and quietly likable coal delivery man, who comes into conflict with the steely “kind” Mother Superior (Emily Watson) of the local school and “Magdelene Laundry” for fallen girls. A bit of a slow walk, and as heartening as it could be, given the Laundries wouldn’t be eliminated till the mid 1990s. Excellent performances all around, particularlly given how little dialogue there was. ~Sarge

EMILIA PÉREZ. Netflix. (6.8 IMDb) ***- A musical for those who don’t like musicals. Emilia Pérez is a spectacular film with a compelling story. A ruthless drug cartel leader, Juan “Manitas” Del Monte (played by Karla Sofía Gascón), seeks the help of attorney Rita Mora Castro (played by Zoe Saldaña, who just won a golden globe) to undergo gender affirmation surgery and begin a new life as Emilia Pérez. However, things go awry when she invites her unsuspecting former wife Jessi (played by Selena Gomez) and her children to live with her. The musical numbers are strong and short. ~Jennifer

A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. In theaters. (7.8 IMDb) ****I don’t know what I can say about this movie that you haven’t heard from your friends or read about in social media or reviews. It’s one of best movies I’ve seen in a long, long time – and I’m not a fan of biopics, especially musical biopics, but this one is so well done! Although the director, James Mangold, did ‘Walk the Line’, the Johnny Cash movie with Joaquin Phoenix, and that was great too. Timothée Chalamet captures our vision of a young Dylan to a T. He’s an incredibly soulful actor, and Ed Norton as Pete Seeger is uncanny. They edited the songs down from their original versions, but they did in such a way that they never feel like they’re being yanked out from under you; it just makes you want to go and listen to the originals. My 25 year old son loved it too. Run, don’t walk, and believe all the hype because it’s true. ~Hillary

BABYGIRL. In theaters. (6.6 IMDb) ** “Babygirl” aka “Nicole’s mid-to-late life crisis” feels false in so many ways, including, if not especially, the sound of her orgasms. A lot of reviews have focused on the exchange of power, particularly female empowerment because the traditional male-female age gap is turned on its head. I found the deeper message to be that no matter how successful a woman becomes, what she truly craves is to be objectified and bossed around by a man. Have 50 years of feminism and a powerful #metoo movement taken us nowhere? Kink part aside, her young buck gets abusive in other ways and she’s just there ready to forgive and forget and go another round. In real life she would have ended up alone with nothing in a studio apartment going to Sex Addicts Anonymous meetings. Besides being distracted by facial tweaks and procedures, I couldn’t help wondering what compelled Nicole to do this movie in the first place other than to show off her toned 57 year-old body while she can. Which begs the old adage, just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. ~Hillary

THE LAST NIGHT AT TREMORE BEACH. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB). *** An extra dramatic and moody plus scary drama about a composer/ pianist. It centers on his composing plus memories of his deceased wife. It’s all in Ireland at a beach house/cabin. It deals with fate, his predictions coming true. You’ll be mesmerized, don’t miss it.

BLITZ. Apple movie. (6.4 IMDB). **** This is much more of a saga of a young half black boy and what he has to deal with after he and his mom are separated. Apple pushes the Blitzkrieg attack on London by Hitler at the start of World War II. The prejudice, bigotry, and inhumanity are much more the main thrusts of the plot.

LA MAISON. Apple series. - (6.0IMDB). All about two of the top French fashion houses and their internal and external pressures to be number one in the world of fashion. It’s foolish, pointless, not funny, nor meaningful…do not watch, no matter what or who says so.

THE SECRET OF THE RIVER. Netflix series. *** (8.2 IMDB). Frida Cruz and Mario Guzman are two Oaxaca born boys who accidentally watch the accidental death by drowning of a neighbor.  As they become older they grow closer and try to determine whether or not they are gay. 20 years later they reunite and deal with the ongoing issues. Definitely worth watching.

...

January 13, 2025

Downtown Plan Extension Draft (and bogus) Environmental Impact Report

The long-awaited draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Downtown Plan Extension has been released. The deadline for you to submit comments is February 21.

This proposed extension of the downtown area is the most massive development ever in the city of Santa Cruz. It swallows up an existing small neighborhood, displacing its residents. It encompasses Front Street where the current Warriors Arena is located, Center and Cedar Sts. and extends to the first roundabout for a total of twenty-nine acres. The Plan includes the addition of 1,600 to 1,800 new housing units and 60,000 square feet of new commercial space. A new arena for the Santa Cruz Warriors is a key feature.

When this plan was first publicly floated by the city Planning Department it had new building heights as high as twenty stories. For comparison, the above photo of the new building currently under construction on Front St. is seven stories. While city council attempted to cap building heights in this Downtown Plan Extension at twelve stories, we now know that there can be no height limit imposed on new construction that takes advantage of the State Density Bonus. And what savvy investor in the lucrative Santa Cruz real-estate market wouldn’t take advantage of this state-imposed power grab of local control?

The Plan area sits smack dab in the middle of tourist traffic heading to and from the Boardwalk, Wharf, and beach area and the lower westside neighborhood traffic heading to and from downtown and the Eastside. Given that knowledge, a valid DEIR would carefully study the congestion impact on current traffic from the expected additional traffic of renters in the new 1,600 housing units, plus their guests plus their deliveries, plus the traffic to and from the 60,000 square feet of new commercial, plus the traffic to and from the new Warriors Arena/Entertainment Center. Such a study would predictably have concluded significant impacts and mitigations could have been proposed. I can think of a few.

However, there is no such study in this DEIR under Transportation Section 14. The DEIR concludes there is no significant impact from traffic and therefore no Mitigation Measures required.

How do the consultants manage to arrive at this absurd conclusion? Partly by deciding to study only VMT or Vehicle Miles Traveled and omit Congestion from the study. This limited focus is allowed under CEQA however additional study of congestion is allowed if a particular project warrants it. If ever there was a project that cried out for a study of congestion rather than VMT, this is it. The city should have required such a study. Input into the Scoping meeting for the project from members of the public specifically asked that such a study be done. Ignored. So, the fact that the three miles between Laurel St. and your home on the lower westside, or to the Wharf or to the beach which now takes fifteen minutes will take up to an hour or longer once this project is built is a non-issue for the city and its CEQA consultants.  Before the project and after the project are the same three miles, including for ambulances and other emergency vehicles. No significant issue found.

The other avenue the consultants use to arrive at a no significant issue conclusion is via misleading information. Under Analytical Method 14.4.2, page 14-7 they describe the “Construction of a new arena with a slightly higher capacity than currently exists” to assess its impacts. The existing arena is 35,000 square feet with a seating capacity of 2,500. The new arena is proposed to be 180,000 square feet with a seating capacity up to 4,000 with anticipated year-round events. That difference is not a “slightly higher capacity.” Describing it as such signals that this is a DEIR designed to achieve the result the city wants, not designed to objectively study the environmental impacts of this mammoth transformative project.

I have read only the Transportation section. Further reading may reveal other sections similarly manipulated. Our city government has a history of producing environmental documents that violate the law (Wharf Master Plan) or not preparing environmental documents when they are required (Save Our Big Trees.)

If this EIR process follows that pattern, if public comments are further invalidated and if not corrected by a city council vote, the only recourse the public has is to file a lawsuit. Then the city will blame you for holding up the Warriors games and delaying the provision of more housing.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

Becky’s taking this week off, but she’ll be back!

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS, HOLDING OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY DOING JUST ONE THING.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
Cattle Grazing on Public Lands

Last week’s negotiated settlement at Point Reyes National Seashore is the latest example of how controversy over cattle grazing on public land gets resolved. The polarity is typical. On one ‘side’ are ranchers, their families and workers, and the broad community that supports family farms, local agriculture, and organic or nowadays regenerative agriculture. On the other ‘side’ are environmentalists, pro-species, pro-clean water, pro-wildlife, and anti-livestock where there’s profit on public lands. The battle at Point Reyes is just one in this war across the U.S. West, and it has been going on for decades. At least at Point Reyes, the two sides don’t neatly align in the expected ways between the two mainstream political parties. Why did it get so bad at Point Reyes that legal action and tens of millions of dollars were needed to settle the issues? Could this kind of thing occur on public lands closer to the Monterey Bay? Let’s look closer to see.

The Vast Gulf

Conflicts with recreation, water quality concerns, and impacts on native plant and wildlife species are the issues most commonly raised when there are concerns about cattle grazing on public land. And, there is good science to support the value of carefully planned cattle grazing to reduce wildfire impacts while promoting native plant and wildlife conservation. In addition to these types of issues, there are pro- and anti- cattle advocates out there, on one hand in support of agriculture or cute critters for children to adore; and, on the other hand, wanting only native animals on the land or against meat eating, methane producing, and otherwise cruel corporate cattle corporations.

Radical Center

There are many of us who are experiencing the beauty of collaboration between livestock managers and conservationists: we are achieving more emergent success than anyone thought possible 30 years ago. Chief among these collaborative networks’ concerns has been development and sprawl…greed that replaces private ranches with housing tracks and shopping malls. In California, we also have shared concerns about the vitality of ranching economics, water provision, wildlife conservation, and catastrophic wildfire. Each of these issues has seen progress because a respectful, trusting network keeps showing up and working together. It takes everyone who has an interest in land management to create innovative solutions: ranchers, conservationists, researchers, land managers, regulatory agencies, community members, resource advisors and consultants, and planners. But, each of these groups has unique interests, different languages, different cultures. We get past these differences by gathering together and learning from one another in well planned, moderated dialogues. The Quivira Coalition is the first group I know to start these discussions, and many followed. The Central Coast Rangeland Coalition (CCRC) is working on this stuff locally, and is celebrating its 20th Anniversary in 2025. I copy here the pledge from the Quivira Coalitions website (link above), a pledge that mirrors the work of other groups like the CCRC:

“We pledge our efforts to form the ‘Radical Center’ where:

  • The ranching community accepts and aspires to a progressively higher standard of environmental performance;
  • The environmental community resolves to work constructively with the people who occupy and use the lands it would protect;
  • The personnel of federal and state land management agencies focus not on the defense of procedure but on the production of tangible results;
  • The research community strives to make their work more relevant to broader constituencies;
  • The land grant colleges return to their original charters, conducting and disseminating information in ways that benefit local landscapes and the communities that depend on them;
  • The consumer buys food that strengthens the bond between their own health and the health of the land;
  • The public recognizes and rewards those who maintain and improve the health of all land; and
  • All participants learn better how to share both authority and responsibility.”

Who is Showing Up, Who is Not

Where do you see cows on public land; how is it working; how do you know? There are cattle grazing on Midpeninsula Open Space, Santa Clara Open Space, State Parks (Pacheco State Park), BLM (Ft. Ord, Cotoni Coast Dairies), POST, and on City of Santa Cruz (Moore Creek, Arana Gulch). Of these, MidPen, POST, and Santa Clara regularly show up to work with the CCRC. I believe that these are the organizations that are most apt to succeed and least likely to end up in the terrible situations that Point Reyes has been experiencing. Why do some show up and not others? I suggest that the third bullet is as important as the next-to-last. It takes the oversight agency’s interest in results as well as the public’s engagement to nudge public land managers to the table.

My Experience at Point Reyes

I am an unabashed native plant conservationist, have researched and visited coastal prairie habitat at Point Reyes for many years, and I have NOT been impressed. Two of the science papers that got me started on my doctoral research were from Point Reyes. One told the story of a rare wildflower that was protected to death when cattle grazing was removed from its wetland habitat. The other illustrated how another rare wildflower thrived because of an appropriate cattle grazing regime. I consequently surveyed across fencelines at Point Reyes and found native annual wildflowers to be more diverse and abundant on the cattle grazed side of the fence, as opposed to the side where grazing had been excluded. In fact, I found the very rare San Francisco Owl’s clover in abundance in the areas with, and not so much without, cattle grazing. I have subsequently made many returns to Point Reyes to learn about what is going on. During one field trip, I found out that the cattle ranchers and park managers had only the most rudimentary ability to discuss a topic that had long been a priority, common interest: the encroachment of brush onto coastal prairies. During another excursion to explore the health of the very endangered Point Reyes Horkelia, park employees indicated that not only did they not have any data to share about the health of this species, but also that I was not permitted to monitor the species without extensive paperwork, even in areas open and easily accessible to the public (see bullet point above, re: defense of procedure vs. production of results). Nevertheless, I found that the cattle grazing regime had hammered nearly to obliteration this rare species whereas adjoining cattle excluded areas still had a few individuals which were on the verge of being obliterated by weeds, especially iceplant, a species that is relatively easy to eradicate in such instances where it is a local threat to an endangered species. I’m sure that the cattle rancher had no idea about rare species and I’m sure that the Park employees had never considered talking to the rancher about its conservation. In my experience, such communication is essential to improved success.

Where From Here?

Reflecting on my experience at Point Reyes, I am unsurprised about the recent outcome, but I am undeterred to keep helping the Central Coast Rangeland Coalition avoid such unproductive mayhem wherever possible. I challenge the Bureau of Land Management, State Parks, the City of Santa Cruz, and all other land stewardship entities to take the above pledge, joining constructive dialogues that demonstrate success at taking care of our lands. And, I challenge everyone else who is reading this to take the portion of the pledge that applies to you. I especially challenge the “Conservation Architects” (you know who you are)…including those who think highly of the concept of a “Great Park” designed to encompass most of the Santa Cruz Mountains…to now doubly consider what kind of baby-sitting federal agencies need to achieve conservation success. Together, we can make a difference. But, we need the principles of Radical Center-based collaboration (as articulated above) to take root in all places before we will see the harvests we so desperately need.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Monday, January 13, 2025

On November 9, 2024, The New York Times published a “Letter To The Editor” from Julia Lee. You can read her letter, below. Lee was reacting to an article that documented how one teenager’s involvement with an “artificial” companion took him to suicide.

“Artificial” relationships are, by definition, not “real.” Online “sweeties” are fake!

Can we find a way to renew our commitment to the “real world”?

We need to do that!

I keep putting it this way, “Find Some Friends“!

Real ones, that is. Artificial sweeteners are bad for our health!

oooOOOooo

To the Editor:

Kevin Roose highlights the danger of A.I. companions worsening isolation by replacing human relationships with artificial ones. I agree that while these apps may offer entertainment and support, they also risk deepening loneliness by diminishing one’s ability to engage in real social interactions.

As a high school student, I have friends who rely on Character.AI to help them cope with loneliness. The tragic case of Sewell Setzer III shows how these platforms can draw teens away from real-life connections and proper mental health resources.

To better understand the risks, I visited the website Sewell had been associated with, only to find that on the topic of mental health, I saw no warnings or links to professional assistance.

Alarmingly, the A.I. is presented as an expert and even claims to be human, deceiving users with humanlike traits such as sarcasm and humor. We need stricter safety measures to prevent harm, especially to younger users.

Julia Lee
Fairfax, Va.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
PANA-MAGA CANAL, HOUSE OF DELUSIONS, FUNNY/NOT FUNNY THREE RINGER

Nations ’round the globe are perking up their collective ears with Trump’s spouting off about his territorial expansion wishes, prompting Seth Meyers on his The Late Night show to throw in a few comments regarding Greenland, which Trump has been eyeing since his first term. Meyers goaded Trump with, “I’d like to say something to Donald Trump about his threat to take Greenland by military force that might take some of our viewers by surprise — DO IT!” Continuing his encouragement to Trump, he said, “Go get Greenland, you coward…don’t show me your face ever again…I’m calling your bluff. Stop making these crazy promises. Do it. I want it. Go get it.” In a taunting tone, Meyers added, “Why won’t you get it? You afraid of Denmark, bro? You starting to remember they got those big-ass dogs,” as he showed a picture of a tough-looking Great Dane. Meyers joked that Trump will “keep downgrading” his threats to “smaller and smaller countries,” predicting that “Russia’s going to do whatever it wants while he threatens Peru with, ‘We’re coming. We’re going to get Macchu Picchu back where it belongs.'” To Trump’s suggestion that NHL legend Wayne Gretzky should be Canada’s new Prime Minister, Meyers argued, “I think Trump picked Gretzky because that’s the only Canadian he knows,” suggesting that Trump probably wants the Prime Minister to Ireland be the Lucky Charms mascot. Many readers were delighted when The New York Post ran a front page cartoon of Trump using a pointer on a world map with a renamed Greenland as ‘Our Land,’ Canada as ’51st State,’ the Gulf of Mexico as ‘Gulf of America,’ and the Panama Canal as ‘Pana-MAGA Canal.’

What started as the MAGA-in-Chief’s calamitously ignorant, and incredibly exorbitant 25% tariff threats to our allies has degraded into his hazardous expansionist dreams. Canada was quick to defy his bullying over a new tax policy proposal. Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau immediately became a target for Trump who called him “Governor Trudeau” with a suggestion that Canada become the US’s 51st state. Trudeau had been under tremendous pressure to resign, and after deputy prime minister Freeland resigned under protest, and with concerns over Trump’s tariff increases threat, the calls for him to step down became too overwhelming for him to ignore, so he made his announcement to resign. Immediately, Trump launched into posts on Truth Social, proclaiming what a great nation could result from a US/Canada merger, with no tariffs, reduced taxes, and security from Russian and Chinese threats. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene proclaimed Donald Trump as ‘Canada’s liberator,’ accusing Trudeau of “tyrannical COVID abuse, destroying free speech, and being Zelenskyii’s biggest cheerleader. Trudeau RESIGNS!”

Elizabeth May, a Green Party member of Canada’s Parliament, recently held a news conference where she voiced a hard “NO…thanks, but no thanks,” to Trump’s proposal for Canadian statehood, citing his “monumental ignorance” of Canadian politics and the five different parties in their “sovereign nation,” which, by the way, has no need for “braggarts, bullies, or dictators.” “No one runs for Prime Minister in Canada!” she emphasized, referring to Trump’s Wayne Gretzky plug, and suggesting he borrow one of his grandchildren’s school books to brush up on his history. She proposed that perhaps CaliforniaOregon and Washington might care to join their provinces where they have universal health care, safe streets, gun laws, and where women have health rights which are going by the wayside in the US…and that perhaps a Province of Vermont could be included? Also, no ‘Go Fund Me’ posts needed to rescue patients denied medical care by greedy insurance companies! May emphasized that the two countries, who have been good friends and allies, should continue to be trading partners, not combatants, since Canadian goods are a bargain for the US, based on the current exchange rates of their respective dollars, and that perhaps Trump might even prefer they join the EU! May goes on to say that if The Don’s 51st state proposal was a joke, it failed miserably, and that Trump is not acting as a president-elect should conduct himself with his disrespectful comments, and that she, for one, will not throw Mexico under his bus!

Trump has also used his threat to impose 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico unless that country stops migrants and drugs from crossing into the US, suggesting that they are not currently cooperating to do so…a total lie particularly aimed at US voters. Mexico’s President Sheinbaum responded sharply with her claim that American gun trafficking to her country is fueling crime and violence among gangs who smuggle drugs into US markets. She noted, “Tragically, it is in our country that lives are lost to the violence resulting from meeting the drug demands in yours.” Sheinbaum suggests that the two nations’ interrelated national challenges underscore the need for cross-border cooperation rather than Trump’s insults and confrontational attitude. She uses US statistics to make her point that border crossings are down, since Mexico is acting to prevent travel across their own southern border, thwarting migrants who want to head to the US…hardly an “invasion” as Trump is claiming. As reported in both The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, the Mexican government security operations shuttle migrants back to the south and away from our border in what they call ‘El Carrousel.’ Experts see President Biden’s efforts at cracking down on illegal crossings as succeeding greater than any past efforts, all without tariffs.

However, Trump and his MAGA gang are ignoring the success, pretending nothing is being accomplished, while scamming behind the smokescreen of denial, a swindle that is focused on tariffs. Arianna Huffington wrote back in 2000 in her book ‘How to Overthrow the Government,’ “Our political landscape is so littered with duplicity and deceit, we’ve actually come to expect our leaders to lie. What once would have shocked us now barely registers. We’ve become inured to wrongdoing. So politicians mangle the truth — call it ‘spin’ — and the public lets it slide, too numb to care…it’s because, even though we don’t like it, we don’t consider it really damaging. Spinning sounds cute, almost constructive…something that should engender indulgent smiles rather than outrage.” Huffington said it should be termed ‘propaganda’ where the propagandist succeeds by claiming to be nothing more than the humble mouthpiece of ‘the people.’ The more the public is duped, the more its deceivers can claim to express the public’s will which only brings forth an orgy of euphemisms. “Humpty Dumpty would have been right a home,” Huffington declares, “when he told Alice, ‘When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”

Greg Sargent writes in The New Republic“All this paves the way for larger deceptions later. Bank on it: The moment Trump takes office, the lower apprehension numbers will magically become real metrics. Fox News will start trumpeting them and he’ll start claiming the border has achieved pacification due to his strength. Indeed, Trump very well may credit his current threat of tariffs with ‘forcing’ Mexico to make the lower numbers of border crossings a reality.” During a recent conversation between Trump and Sheinbaum, she explained to him Mexico’s strategy to address the migration phenomenon, observing human rights, while not closing the border but instead building bridges between government and people. But we find Trump crowing that she agreed to close the border, taking credit for something in which he hasn’t even been a participant. No need to let a troublesome thing like ‘reality’ get in the way of building a house of delusions, eh?

Brad Reed writes in Raw Story that some MAGAs are eager to start launching military operations inside Mexico to take out drug cartel leaders, though experts believe it would do little to stop the supply of drugs coming into the US. Mexico has found this approach to be a failure, which only started an explosion of violence within the cartel, so killing off capos within the gangs is not new, only a failed strategy. One military veteran declared the strategy as being, “Iraq all over again. We’re not fighting an army. We’re fighting poverty. Let’s fight desperation. Let’s fight hopelessness. That sounds a whole lot like what we did in Afghanistan for 20 years unsuccessfully.”

During his 1976 campaign for US Senator from CaliforniaSamuel Hayakawa said of the proposed transfer of the Panama Canal from the US to Panama“We should keep the Panama Canal. After all, we stole it fair and square.” It should be noted that a few years later, Senator Hayakawa helped win approval for the transfer; but now we find that president-elect Trump is railing for a reversal of the ownership. Trump feels the Canal authority is charging “exorbitant prices and rates of passage” on US naval and merchant ships, demanding that fees either be lowered, or give it back to this country. The US is the canal’s biggest customer and Trump’s fear is that the passage is in danger of falling under China’s control as the second-biggest customer. Failing to get much attention is the outstanding tax evasion case against Trump, Trump Panama Hotel Management LLC, and Trump International Hotels who are accused of not paying the required 12.5% tax rate to the Panamanian government. The lawsuit alleges the companies kept the money, “intentionally evading taxes” and leaving the new owner liable for millions. According to Malcolm Ferguson in The New Republic, a tax audit of the hotels submitted as evidence found massive inconsistencies in the case still pending in New York District Court. In 2018, Panamanian officials stepped in, stripping the Trump name from the Trump Ocean Club International Hotel and Tower.

Co-president-elect Musk, donning his own global expansionist/interference cloak, is asking whether the US should “liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government” as he launched into a series of X posts to call for the release of a jailed right-wing activist, and the imprisonment of a junior minister of the Labour government. The Tesla head-honcho is calling for the jailing of Jess Phillips, a member of Prime Minister Starmer’s cabinet, calling her a “rape genocide apologist” over her handling of investigations into organized gangs accused of systematic rape of young women. The Labour government says it is focused on enacting recommendations of a 2022 study, which were not implemented by the previous Conservative government, as Starmer rebukes Musk for grandstanding, taking advantage of an “utterly sickening issue” for his own advantage: “Those who are spreading lies and misinformation as far and wide as possible are not interested in victims, they’re interested in themselves.” A propagandist — neither more nor less?

Musk has spoken out for Islamophobic fascist activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who goes by his pseudonym, Tommy Robinson. Robinson, a member of the fascist British National Party was convicted of mortgage fraud and assault for stalking a female journalist at her residence, and is now serving 18 months in prison for repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee. Musk disagrees with his incarceration, but MAGA-lover Nigel Farage of Britain’s right-wing Reform Party can’t abide Robinson. Farage’s outspokenness spurred Musk to call for his ouster as Reform Party leader. A few weeks ago, Musk meddled in German politics, endorsing the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party, to which Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre in an interview said he finds it “worrying that a man with enormous access to social media and large financial resources is so directly involved in the internal affairs of other countries.” So, it’s destined to be a complete Barnum & Bailey three-ringer — who’s next?

Dr. Jo posts on Quora that despite Trump’s appointment of a lot of real clowns to his cabinet, creating the most dangerous circus in the history of the world, it’s not a circus…not even close. To wit: appearance and apparent clumsiness hide the fact that real circus clowns are capable and competent; circus acts are carefully scripted; circuses have rules and mechanisms for safety. Trump has initiated a reality show, with supporters who have yet to cope with his narcissism, as he sees the whole of reality as reality TV, himself being the hero, consequently, many of his selections are sycophantic Fox News presenters. But, however self-indulgent, it’s not totally a reality show which can be arbitrary and bizarre, with many people behind the scenes to capture and edit any bad things before damage control is needed. In Trump 2.0, we find that the safety nets are absent, wild animals are free to roam, emergency exits are blocked, fire hazards are acute…equipment wasn’t checked because nobody cares, appointees/performers are hardly competent…existing just for show — the competent ones have left or are about to leave, or will be fired by Musk, and no script…which is done daily upon the whims of Trump.

Dr. Jo concludes, however, that the reality show is funny…or will be funny when the “legion of spiteful, vindictive” Trumpers in the crowd realize what is really happening. Sooner, rather than later, almost everyone who voted for Trumpy McTrumpface will be quite surprised. They are currently sharing in the reality-impaired delusion…until they get a drubbing. Repeatedly, the US will be managed into the ground, just like Twitter X, until there is nothing left of value, except that anything of value will be in the pockets of Trump and his gang. Time to grab your peanuts, popcorn and cotton candy and watch from afar, preferably from a parallel universe, because it ain’t gonna be pretty.

TV host Stephen Colbert on The Late Show last week, reported that President Biden was in California“doing what presidents should do: pledging federal disaster support to a stricken state.” At a press conference, Biden also announced that he was officially the first sitting president to become a great-grandfather, as is eldest granddaughter gave birth to a baby boy. “And with under two weeks left, there’s still time for Joe to set more old-man presidential records,” Colbert suggested, such as “most Malt-o-Meals consumed at 4 a.m., most rubber bands collected in an old cigar box, first president ever to fall asleep at a picnic and be carried away by ants.” As Nietzsche asked, “Is not life a hundred times too short for us to bore ourselves?”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Inauguration

“Nothing valuable can be lost by taking time. If there be an object to hurry any of you in hot haste to a step which you would never take deliberately, that object will be frustrated by taking time; but no good object can be frustrated by it.”
~Abraham Lincoln

“Much has been given us, and much will rightfully be expected from us. We have duties to others and duties to ourselves; and we can shirk neither.”
~Theodore Roosevelt

“Old truths have been relearned; untruths have been unlearned. We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics.”
~Franklin Delano Roosevelt

“Only by helping the least fortunate of its members to help themselves can the human family achieve the decent, satisfying life that is the right of all people.”
~Harry S. Truman

“Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.”
John F. Kennedy

...

The Moth has some fascinating stories…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.
Email: webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
...

Deep Cover

January 8 – 14, 2025

Highlights this week:

Greensite… on the Wharf Reopening… Steinbruner… Sewage sludge, desal, or brackish water conversion… Hayes… What’s in the air… Patton… A Force For World Peace… Matlock… certification…banana republicanism…hilarity…gravitas… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… Pseudoscience Support… Quotes on… “Wildfires”

...

COOPER AND FRONT STREETS.This was taken after 1866 when the Hall of Records went down. It was also before 1882 when the Octagon was built and became our Hall of Records. Note the City Jail, now MAH, isn’t up yet and the Red Ball hasn’t arrived. Watch this space.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

Dateline: January 8, 2025

SOCAL BURNING. Los Angeles is in flames, and there will not be any containment until the winds die down. There are five fires, and entire neighborhoods have been obliterated. “Only” five deaths have been reported so far, but obviously that number could go up. Evacuation orders are in place for thousands of people, and the chaos is just unimaginable. My heart goes out to all the people – and wildlife – affected by these fires. If you feel moved to help, the American Red Cross is the organization that Jamie Lee Curtis recommends. She was just on the Tonight Show where she mentioned this as she was talking about her neighborhood burning.

As for us here in Santa Cruz County… if you have a house, do you have a defensible perimeter around it? Have you cut back trees, trimmed bushes, made sure your house isn’t surrounded by piles of burnable materials? If the answer is no, then you might want to think about that. That, and packing a bug-out bag to have on hand. It can happen so quickly.

MOVIE REVIEWERS. Please join me in welcoming our intrepid trio of movie reviewers: Hillary Bratton, Jennifer Bratton, and Jeffery (Sarge) Sargent! It seems fitting to me that we need three people to attempt to fill Bruce’s shoes, and I absolutely love that both his daughters have graciously agreed to take part. The first reviews are coming right up!

...

SMALL THINGS LIKE THESE. PrimeTV. (6.9 IMDb) *** A quietly ponderous Christmas tale set in a small town in Ireland in 1985 (swear to god it feels more like the 1940s…). Cillian Murphy plays a loving father and quietly likable coal delivery man, who comes into conflict with the steely “kind” Mother Superior (Emily Watson) of the local school and “Magdelene Laundry” for fallen girls. A bit of a slow walk, and as heartening as it could be, given the Laundries wouldn’t be eliminated till the mid 1990s. Excellent performances all around, particularlly given how little dialogue there was. ~Sarge

EMILIA PÉREZ. Netflix. (6.8 IMDb) ***- A musical for those who don’t like musicals. Emilia Pérez is a spectacular film with a compelling story. A ruthless drug cartel leader, Juan “Manitas” Del Monte (played by Karla Sofía Gascón), seeks the help of attorney Rita Mora Castro (played by Zoe Saldaña, who just won a golden globe) to undergo gender affirmation surgery and begin a new life as Emilia Pérez. However, things go awry when she invites her unsuspecting former wife Jessi (played by Selena Gomez) and her children to live with her. The musical numbers are strong and short. ~Jennifer

A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. In theaters. (7.8 IMDb) ****I don’t know what I can say about this movie that you haven’t heard from your friends or read about in social media or reviews. It’s one of best movies I’ve seen in a long, long time – and I’m not a fan of biopics, especially musical biopics, but this one is so well done! Although the director, James Mangold, did ‘Walk the Line’, the Johnny Cash movie with Joaquin Phoenix, and that was great too. Timothée Chalamet captures our vision of a young Dylan to a T. He’s an incredibly soulful actor, and Ed Norton as Pete Seeger is uncanny. They edited the songs down from their original versions, but they did in such a way that they never feel like they’re being yanked out from under you; it just makes you want to go and listen to the originals. My 25 year old son loved it too. Run, don’t walk, and believe all the hype because it’s true. ~Hillary

BABYGIRL. In theaters. (6.6 IMDb) ** “Babygirl” aka “Nicole’s mid-to-late life crisis” feels false in so many ways, including, if not especially, the sound of her orgasms. A lot of reviews have focused on the exchange of power, particularly female empowerment because the traditional male-female age gap is turned on its head. I found the deeper message to be that no matter how successful a woman becomes, what she truly craves is to be objectified and bossed around by a man. Have 50 years of feminism and a powerful #metoo movement taken us nowhere? Kink part aside, her young buck gets abusive in other ways and she’s just there ready to forgive and forget and go another round. In real life she would have ended up alone with nothing in a studio apartment going to Sex Addicts Anonymous meetings. Besides being distracted by facial tweaks and procedures, I couldn’t help wondering what compelled Nicole to do this movie in the first place other than to show off her toned 57 year-old body while she can. Which begs the old adage, just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. ~Hillary

THE LAST NIGHT AT TREMORE BEACH. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB). *** An extra dramatic and moody plus scary drama about a composer/ pianist. It centers on his composing plus memories of his deceased wife. It’s all in Ireland at a beach house/cabin. It deals with fate, his predictions coming true. You’ll be mesmerized, don’t miss it.

BLITZ. Apple movie. (6.4 IMDB). **** This is much more of a saga of a young half black boy and what he has to deal with after he and his mom are separated. Apple pushes the Blitzkrieg attack on London by Hitler at the start of World War II. The prejudice, bigotry, and inhumanity are much more the main thrusts of the plot.

LA MAISON. Apple series. - (6.0IMDB). All about two of the top French fashion houses and their internal and external pressures to be number one in the world of fashion. It’s foolish, pointless, not funny, nor meaningful…do not watch, no matter what or who says so.

THE SECRET OF THE RIVER. Netflix series. *** (8.2 IMDB). Frida Cruz and Mario Guzman are two Oaxaca born boys who accidentally watch the accidental death by drowning of a neighbor.  As they become older they grow closer and try to determine whether or not they are gay. 20 years later they reunite and deal with the ongoing issues. Definitely worth watching.

MARTHA. Netflix movie (7.2 IMDB). This is an amazing, even shocking. interestingly created documentary centering on the world’s most successful businesswoman Martha Stewart. Marrying into wealth, she parlayed her love and her acumen into becoming one of the most influential world citizens. Open, honest, even charming, she made one or two stock investment mistakes. Her failure, plus prison time, involves Justin Bieber  and it’s hard to believe, but you will when you watch this portrait. Inspirational.

...

Monday January 6, 2025

Wharf Reopening

The reopening of the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf on Saturday January 4th was good news for all, especially the workers. The sea lions’ barking competed with the dignitaries’ speeches which were short and positive in tone. There was no finger-pointing or scapegoating from those who spoke. That would come later.

Santa Cruz City Council member Scott Newsome, whose district includes the Wharf, spoke of “the character of a community that is revealed in times of crisis.”

He was referring to the positives. I’m experiencing the negatives. Both are part of the character of the community. The negatives are whipped up by scapegoating and social media. I was disappointed to see the Sentinel give a mouthpiece following the ceremony to Council member Renee Golder to further the finger pointing. Her statement in Sunday’s Sentinel that “the unfortunate impact of the litigation we were in was that it stopped some of the funding and some of the construction from happening that absolutely needed to happen” is just plain false. The lawsuit did not stop any funding. Maybe the city decided to not apply for funding to replace the pilings at the Wharf end but that is a different matter. Nor did the lawsuit stop “construction that needed to happen.” The only construction at the end of the Wharf that needed to happen was the replacement of the damaged pilings identified in 2014.  For some members of the community, these false accusations are as a red flag to a bull. They get stirred up and aggressive.

Social media is a platform for anyone who has a strong opinion based on limited, skewed or no facts. Their postings come with sarcasm, nastiness and sometimes threats. Don’t Morph the Wharf! is getting many hurled our way.

Perhaps the lowest was from someone who is impersonating the group, and particularly me, on X. He’s posted some nasty stuff, looking like it is coming from me. People re-post it, and it takes on a life of its own, amplified. Social media make dead fish seem almost quaint.

On the topic of misinformation, many people saw the CBS News Bay Area interview with the retired Wharf Supervisor who opined that the collapse of the end of the Wharf would never have happened had they been able to proceed with a 2013 Plan to strengthen the shear of the Wharf with an eastern and western walkway. He said they had a Plan plus funding ready to go in 2013 but were stopped by a CEQA lawsuit. No mention of the damaged pilings at the end of the Wharf. Nor that those walkways are a long way from the Wharf end.

Where to begin? First, there was no Plan in 2013. The Wharf Master Plan wasn’t on paper until 2014. Then, even with no lawsuit, any large project must go through proper environmental review and public hearings which can take years. It was six years before the Plan finally made it to City Council in 2020 prior to any legal challenge. There was no funding associated with the Plan.

Besides hyperbole, there’s factual inaccuracies. I met with the retired Wharf Supervisor early on, probably around 2016, bringing to his attention the concerns of many community members about the changes and additions proposed for the Wharf in the Wharf Master Plan. We had a pleasant discussion in his office where he showed me many historical photos and shared his vast experience of the Wharf. Towards the end of our conversation, I brought up the subject of the western walkway. He shared that it was an idea from a staff member of the Coastal Commission, that its inclusion was about increased public access and it could probably be removed from the Plan. I left feeling somewhat hopeful. The labelling of the western walkway as “essential” for Wharf stability came much later, after members of the public found problems with its inclusion.

Finally, it bears repeating that the context for the end of the Wharf’s collapse includes the city’s failure to replace documented damaged pilings requiring replacement since 2014. As for the work being done during the collapse, a legitimate question is, what was the quality of pile replacement work being done by the consulting engineering firm? Not pointing fingers; just asking an appropriate question.

A noticeable absence on the dais at the Wharf Reopening ceremony was the current Wharf supervisor. If there is to be an investigation, as surely there must be, maybe the city will ask the Wharf crew for their observations and conclusions. That would be far more productive than scapegoating community groups and regurgitating false narratives.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS MANAGER RESIGNS
Some in the know feel that Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds CEO Zeke Fraser was likely instructed by the State to resign “for health reasons”.  Apparently, other problematic CEO’s in the California Fair industry have also left quickly “for health reasons”, having received advice letters from the State.  The problems that came about under CEO Fraser’s watch were largely, in my opinion, due to his willingness to let those in charge of the Fairgrounds Foundation (Jeannie Kegebein) and Ag History Project (Dave Kegebein, former CEO who was fired after a State Audit), and a debacle involving Granite Construction dumping a mountain of soil  next to a creek from Highway One expansion.  The idea was to expand the parking lot, but went awry when State officials became aware of the unpermitted and unauthorized project.  CEO Fraser presented three different versions of the contract he supposedly had with Granite, yet claimed publicly he was unaware of what Granite was doing.  Hmmm….
 
The Press Release states that last year’s Fair was the most profitable ever.  I wonder how that can be known when CEO Fraser never publicly presented any financial accounting of the Fair to the Board or the Public?
 
Pajaronian: The Fairgrounds CEO resigns

Stay tuned to see who comes in the revolving door at the fairgrounds.  Purportedly, legal teams from the California Dept. of Food & Ag (DCFA) hand the Fair Board of Directors a short list of who they feel can step in as Interim CEO.  Do you know someone who would do a good job managing this gem that is critical for emergency sheltering as well as a great venue for events, and a County Fair that brings everyone together?  If so, please contact Michael Flores <michael.flores@cdfa.ca.gov>
 
DEVELOPERS LOBBYING TO PREVENT STRICTER REGULATIONS ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEALS FUNDED BY MUNICIPAL BONDS
Last year’s Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Report “Housing for Whom?” brought forth some shocking investigative information about the lack of Santa Cruz City’s tracking around affordable housing occupancy that was largely ignored by the City Council:

The City Municipal Code requires that local residents and workers in the City of Santa
Cruz who meet income eligibility requirements are given preference (priority) for
Inclusionary Housing. But is this happening?

The Grand Jury investigation determined that the City keeps no records, does no
tracking, gathers no data, and has no evidence to determine if preference is being given
to local residents and local workers when renting Inclusionary Housing units.

The City has conflicting and contradictory policies on whether Inclusionary Housing
applies to low, very low and extremely low income earners only, or whether moderate
income earners are also eligible. The City cannot state what percentage of the City’s
affordable housing is occupied by income-verified UCSC students.

Grand Jury Housing Report

I wonder if the County has the  same problem with data tracking regarding whether developers and non-profits who build and manage affordable housing projects for the County, thereby reaping the benefit of ZERO property tax payments on government-owned developments, are charging tenants a reduced rent reflecting this savings?
 
Apparently, this is a big problem in California, according to an investigation.
The report was published December 31, 2024, and revealed large sums of money developers spent to lobby legislators to stop laws that would tighten regulations about what “affordable” rents really can mean, and require developers and non-profits managing the units to potentially pay property taxes if the rents did not reflect the financial benefit of no property taxes paid to the municipalities.
 
Take a look at this excerpt:

Developers making millions from ‘affordable housing’ program lobbied California lawmakers to shut down regulation

“But the rents the developers charge also don’t abide by the same strict regulations as federally subsidized affordable housing. About half of the units at the 13 Northern California essential housing properties charge higher rents than comparable nearby market-rate buildings, the Bay Area News Group previously reported.

Meanwhile, for the 3,401 units across those properties, developers have collected $25 million in upfront fees and stand to make millions more in interest payments over the 30- to 40-year lifetime of the bonds. Another $48 million in fees has gone to the bankers and law firms that issue the bonds. Meanwhile, cities forfeit an annual $21 million in property taxes to support the program, though each city is meant to recoup property taxes lost at the end of the bond’s term, as the agency gives them an option to purchase or sell the property.

In 2022, the legislature proposed regulating these deals to ensure the rent discounts would be commensurate with the tax benefits the program received. Working with the California Housing Partnership, Assemblyman Chris Ward, a San Diego Democrat, introduced a bill, AB 1850, to establish stricter affordability standards and cap developers’ fees on the essential housing deals — what he hoped would prevent “abuse” by some for-profit players that “snookered” cities into giving up property taxes without delivering on middle-income housing promised.

Waterford and Catalyst hired top lobbyists to fight the bill — Catalyst Housing spent $186,565 to hire lobbyists at Actum, and Waterford spent $135,000 to hire lobbyists at Axiom Advisors, including Jason Kinney, a friend of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who attended an infamous 2020 dinner party at the French Laundry with the governor despite pandemic-era restrictions.

As AB 1850 went to the Senate Governance and Finance Committee for a second hearing, two votes were in play: Majority Leader Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Sen. Anna Caballero, D-Merced, the committee’s chair. With Hertzberg not voting, Caballero cast the deciding vote that killed the bill.
 
Four months later, Caballero’s reelection campaign received $4,000 from a group that had never donated to her before: Waterford. In March 2023, they donated another $4,000.

But there are limits to that influence. In 2023, for example, essential housing came under a new threat when a county tax assessor in Southern California argued that moderate-income housing didn’t qualify for a property tax exemption and used an obscure provision of tax law to start billing Waterford, as well as some tenants, for taxes. Waterford fought back, saying that neither the company nor its tenants should foot the bill. If Waterford is forced to pay taxes, the company said, it will eat at the company’s profits to the point where the projects would be unfeasible.
 

Assemblyman Josh Lowenthal, a Democrat from Waterford’s home district in Long Beach who has received $50,000 from Waterford’s founders and their partners in campaign donations, introduced AB 2506, a bill to stop county assessors from charging tenants these taxes. A spokesperson for Lowenthal said in a statement that Waterford “was one of many stakeholders involved in discussions on this program,” among housing advocacy groups, tenants and county assessors.

Lowenthal later pulled the bill after it stalled in a committee where staff were highly critical of the precedent it would set.”

Please ask your County Supervisor about how Santa Cruz County tracks the rents of affordable housing projects here, and what tax breaks the agencies managing them receive:
Affordable Housing Project Tracker — Housing Santa Cruz County
 
I wonder how much money each Supervisor received from developers and housing non-profits during the last election?

Contact your Supervisor
 
WHEN WILL COUNTY UPDATE SUPERVISOR WEBSITE?
I hope the Board of Supervisor website is updated soon.  As of this writing, the website still shows the former Board member’s smiling faces and contact information.  Board of Supervisors  However, according to a social media post below by the new 5th District Supervisor, Monica Martinez, she and 2nd District Supervisor Kim DeSerpa were sworn in December 23, 2024. If that is true, I wonder why Supervisor Zach Friend and Bruce McPherson presided over the SPECIAL BOARD MEETING on December 27 to declare a state of emergency regarding storm damage?

“Yesterday was an unforgettable day as I was sworn in by Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, alongside Supervisor Kim DeSerpa of District 2. Having my children by my side reminded me why this work matters so much—for their future and for every family in our community.

It’s an incredible honor to serve as your 5th District Supervisor, and I’m filled with gratitude for the trust you’ve placed in me. I’m ready to get to work, listen, and lead with compassion and determination. Together, we will make a difference.”  Monica Martinez  12/24/2024

AUDITOR URGES BETTER ACCOUNTABILITY
Two years ago, the State Auditor determined that the State’s Housing & Community Development (HCD) had used questionable data and methods to calculate the new round of the State’s housing mandates, known as Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).

RHNA Audit Background Paper
 
Now, the State Auditor is finding other departments have serious weaknesses in their methods and financial reports as well.

[California State Auditor urges departments to tighten accounting controls]
 
Ask your elected representatives to follow up on this and require better financial accountability and transparency.

Contact:

 
WHY NOT USE BRACKISH DESAL INSTEAD OF SEWAGE WATER?
The City of Antioch will soon begin operations at a brackish desalination plant that will produce 5,500 AcreFeet of drinking water for the residents.   Couldn’t the same sort of project be used in areas of the County using brackish wells near the Bay, or even near the mouth of the San Lorenzo River where summer water tables rise so high that brackish water flows out of streetlight electrical boxes?  [Antioch brackish desalination plant set to begin operations]

Take a look at what Antioch is doing:
 
Antioch Brackish Water Desalination Project
Brackish Water Desalination Facility Project
 
Wouldn’t it make sense to use brackish water, rather than sewage water, as a supplemental water source?  I think so, in addition to increasing surface water runoff.  While both require energy-intensive reverse-osmosis, using treated sewage water adds a high-level dependency on hazardous chemicals and the unknown long-term health impacts on vulnerable segments of the population because not all contaminants can be removed completely. Who knows what the cumulative impacts of injecting nitrate, chloride, DEET, Ibuprofen, sucralose and a host of other chemicals that are known to persist in these treated waters. 
 
Soquel Creek Water District’s PureWater Soquel is set to start injecting treated sewage water into the MidCounty area aquifer in April.  Write the Board with your thoughts:
Soquel Creek Water District Board of Directors <bod@soquelcreekwater.org> and copy the Clerk of the Board, Emma Western <emmaw@soquelcreekwater.org>.
 
In Monterey County, two such similar projects have been proposed.   Deep Water Desal and CalAm’s Brackish Well Project in Marina.  Regulations and litigation have stalled both, Deep Water Desal has been stalled by changes in ocean water intake permitting, and may be either studying methods to eliminate harm, or examining subsurface intake, but the project still seems active:

[DeepWater Desal General Information]
[Deepwater Desal has long been out of the public eye, but expect that to change in 2018.]
  
CalAm Water wants to build a new brackish well desalination in Marina but has met with resistance from the City of Marina.
 
Purportedly, Sand City has had a brackish desal plant since 2010, the first of such in California:

Sand City Coastal desalination plant

Sand City Coastal Desalination Plant in Monterey County was the first full-scale brackish seawater desalination facility in the state of California.  It became operational in May 2010 and can produce 268,000 gallons/day (300 acre-feet/year)

Status of desalination plants in California
 
The plant supplies more than enough water for the needs of the City:
Sand City Desalination

Current General Manager of Soquel Creek Water District, Ms. Melanie Mow-Schumacher, actually worked at Deep Water Desal for a short time before returning to the golden halls of the District. I wonder why?
 
SEWAGE SLUDGE CONTAMINATES FARMLAND WITH CARCINOGENIC PFAS
Where does the City take it?  The Central Valley?  According to many reports now emerging, farmland where sewage sludge has been applied as a fertilizer are now contaminated with the “forever carcinogen” PFAS. and the farms must now idle, due to contamination.
 
Forever chemicals tainting food supply, destroying American farmers

New York Times article (paywall)

I forwarded this information to the County Water Advisory Commission.  One Commissioner who has shown great interest replied with a recommendation to watch the movie Dark Waters; a 2019 American legal thriller film, directed by Todd Haynes and written by Mario Correa and Matthew Michael Carnahan. The story dramatizes Robert Bilott’s case against the chemical manufacturing corporation DuPont after they contaminated a town with unregulated chemicals.”

2,700 ACRE RANCH GIFTED TO UC REGENTS FOR UCSC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION
Since 2013, the UC Regents have been considering a gift of the 2,700-acre Strathearn Ranch in San Benito County.  The transfer finally happened last November, complete with an endowment fund of $7-$10 million for operational costs and improvement. 

UC Santa Cruz announces a new 2,400-acre UC Reserve after Regents approval
 
“Consisting of 2,700 acres of real property located at Tres Pinos, San Benito County, California, Strathearn Ranch is a bequest under the Lee Von Hasseln Living Trust (the “Living Trust”) that requires the Regents to establish the Strathearn Ranch Reserve as a separate reserve under the UCNRS within 12 months after the donor’s death, which occurred in January 2024.”

DESIGNATION OF THE STRATHEARN RANCH RESERVE (SAN BENITO COUNTY) INTO THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM
 
The UC Regents  Study Committee had anticipated annual operational costs could be $550,000 annually. (see page 9)
 
I wonder what the UCSC researchers and students will study, and how the students in K-12 will be folded into the educational experience?

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS, HOLDING OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY DOING JUST ONE THING.

Cheers,
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
What’s In the Air?

Have you heard the question “What’s in the water?” I’ve encountered that question recently posed in the context of a situation when odd, inexplicable things had been happening at an organization. Then, new, seemingly fresh and rational personnel are hired, but those people quickly seem just as odd and inexplicable, less fresh and innovative and then things just stay the same kind of weird. How can that possibly happen?! And we exclaim, “What’s in the water?” It’s as if people are being medicated through their drinking water into a kind of sub-par state of being. “They drank the Kool-Aid” is another way of saying that same thing, I guess, except less innocuously referencing a terrible tragedy in South America some time ago. Judging by the amount of filtered water, bottled water, and such that people purchase, it does seem as if we are very, very concerned about what is in our water. What about the air? What’s in our air?

The Direction of the Wind
In my daily routine, each time I walk outside I try to pay attention to the wind. Which way is the wind headed? I feel the breeze on my skin or watch the swaying of the grass and trees. I tilt my body until I face straight into it, to know best the precise direction. Ialso ask how is the wind blowing right where I am versus farther away? Sometimes the wind is gentle close but raging nearby, on higher ground, where trees ‘talk’ and sway.

The directions of the wind can be predictable, but it is becoming less so. Winds around the Monterey Bay are often from the north or northwest, mainly cool breezes. Winter storms especially sweep in with gales from the northwest. Bomb cyclones come from that way. Atmospheric rivers tilt the direction more from the west. Especially cold storms come more from the north. Once the breeze starts coming from those other two ways, things get weird.

The downslope, Santa Ana winds of southern California (aka devil winds) make things really weird to our south. Those winds are from the east and can be very strong; fires rage, people freak out. Luckily, that phenomenon doesn’t happen here, but we do get occasional winds from the east. I swear I can smell the desert on those winds, the smell of creosote bush. Those breezes are warm and dry just like the winds from the south. I can very well recall the stormy winds from the south: those brought us the CZU Lightning Complex Fire as well as a couple other tattered hurricane remnants that created havoc across the state. When winds come from the south or east, beware of fire and keep your eye out for the odd human behavior associated with Santa Ana winds in southern California. We might also be concerned about the better-documented situation where those breezes carry the spores of fungi that cause Valley Fever, an air quality concern…borne on the wind as they say.

Air Quality
Once you recognize the direction from which the wind blows, the next question becomes what is that air carrying? When the wind blows ‘just right’ (from the northeast), we get a nasty soup of smog hanging out to sea, blown out of the Golden Gate and then generally downcoast where you get to appreciate that the Bay keeps us a bit sheltered and inland from those toxic breezes. Northeast winds are rare, but that smog carries lots of ugly chemistry. There’s stuff you don’t want to breathe for its toxicity, but there is also lots of fertilizer from car exhaust. Catalytic converters do a good job of turning exhaust into readily available nitrogen compounds that are fertilizing the landscape. Healthy? Nay. Fertilizer makes habitats more weedy, weeds grow bigger and make a bigger wildfire danger when they dry. The tall weeds outcompete native wildflowers. Fires carried by those weeds are devastating California’s deserts, endangering things like Joshua trees. The Golden Gate (NE wind) is one of our passages for nitrogen-laced air pollution, the other is the Pajaro Valley, belching out smog pushed by the more northerly breezes passing down through the southern end of the Silicon Valley.

Those ‘Fresh’ Westerlies
If you are like me, you feel lucky to have that great expanse of clean ocean air to keep us breathing well. Think again. We are seeing more and more pollution from China reaching our shores. Those giant cargo containers full of ‘stuff’ isn’t the only thing coming from the east. Coal fired power plants are making a yuckola mess of chemicals that are polluting California’s air. But, let’s not rest all of the blame on human’s insatiable appetite for stuff in the present. Some of the toxic air particles are from greed of the deep past: gold mining. Mercury was used in processing gold in California. That mercury flowed downstream and into the ocean; it is now being carried back to land in fog and rain, concentrating up the food chain and poisoning mountain lions in the Santa Cruz Mountains.

Famous Air Quote

“We have some incredibly talented people that know environment and what we’re doing probably better than any people on Earth.

From day one, my administration has made it a top priority to ensure that America has among the very cleanest air and cleanest water on the planet.  We want the cleanest air.  We want crystal-clean water, and that’s what we’re doing and that’s what we’re working on so hard.”

I’m guessing you know the source of this quote by now. If not, you can probably guess from the recognizable style. We hope that President Trump, like all politicians, recognizes how much the vast majority of citizens value clean air, so that there is ample motivation to do something about it. If politicians don’t act on these things, we all suffer. Unfortunately, few journalists hold any politician accountable to their clean air record: after all, it is anti-business to do so, and the news needs money.

Our Work
Vote. Get an air purifier for your house. Buy less. Go outside and think about the breeze…the direction of the wind…the strength of the wind…and what is carried on those breezes.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Saturday, January 4, 2025

Paul Krugman, pictured above, won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2008. He writes for The New York Times, and and on October 19, 2024, Krugman’s “Opinion” column in The Times was titled, “Trump’s Radical Tariff Proposal Could Wreck Our Economy.”

Click right here for the column (understanding that you may be stymied by a paywall imposed by The Times). I, personally, think that this column is very much worth reading. It is a relatively short and pretty understandable explanation of tariffs, and explains how they work (or don’t work, I guess you’d have to say).

I want especially to highlight the following point, which isn’t really about the “economic” impact of tariffs, but speaks to another aspect of what lowering trade barriers can mean:

Some of Roosevelt’s officials, especially Cordell Hull, his long-serving secretary of state believed that closer trading ties between nations were a force for world peace.

We are “in this together” not only on a national basis, but on a global basis, as well. “Beating” other countries, economically – putting national economic self-interest as a top priority – is contraindicated.

“World Peace” ought to be on our New Year’s Resolutions List, so I am urging you to think about the point that Krugman is making!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
ACCOUNTABILITY, SECRET SATURDAY, A FRENCH AMBASSADOR

Well, it had to happen…Donald Trump’s election victory was certified by a joint meeting of Congress presided over by his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, a thirty minute tragedy that was only delayed for a couple of minutes by unhappy Blue Staters trying to crash the proceedings by breaking down the doors…naaahhh, that didn’t happen! But the peacefulness and decorum of the process was in stark contrast to that of the “normal day in DC” of 2020, as now described by MAGAs of course. Those charged with crimes during the storming of the Capitol are in Trump’s sights to avoid accountability with his pardons…as many as 1500 may avoid charges, slates wiped clean from the ugliness of that day. As Representative Jamie Raskin, a former member of the House Select Committee said, “This is an asymmetry we’ve been pointing out from the beginning that there has been relative accountability up until this point for the people who smashed the police officers over the head with Confederate battle flags or speared them with Trump flags or stormed the Capitol and so on — vis a vis the masterminds behind the whole process.”

Trump’s indictments for his role in seeking to block the peaceful transfer of power in Georgia have hit a snag, and Special Prosecutor Smith’s request to dismiss the J6 case without prejudice, leaves the door open for possible refilings in the future, but admittedly, the likelihood fades with the passage of time. Representative Zoe Lofgren, another House Select Committee member, adds, “Trump won the election…it is pretty pathetic that the officers who defended our lives are so disrespected and that the criminal who egged them on is now going back into the White House. You know, he has vowed to pardon the criminals who attacked the Capitol. People died. I always make a point of calling some of the officers who were injured on the sixth so they know it’s not the whole world that has forgotten their sacrifice.” Federal prosecutor Mary McCord, former acting head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division warns, “There’s no question that some of the defendants are currently still very empowered, and you have to imagine that they’re not going to be nearly as deterred from engaging in behavior that violates the law — particularly something that Trump may want them to do — in the future.” Former federal prosecutor in the US attorney’s office in DCRizwan Qureshi, declared, “I think the bedrock of a true democracy is a peaceful transition of power. That’s why those who engaged in actual violent conduct on that date need to be held accountable…because accountability and respect for rule of law are necessary to deterring violence and preserving our democracy that I think we take for granted every day.”

The rule of law was dealt a poke in the eye with a secretive Saturday night party at Mar-a-Lago, reportedly celebrating efforts to overturn the 2020 election…no publicity, no press invitations, just attended by the likes of John EastmanMichael FlynnJeffrey ClarkRudy Giuliani, and Peter Navarro as they watched a documentary film about Eastman. Attorney Eastman was delegated to pressure Vice President Pence not to certify the results of the presidential vote of 2020, to the praise of Trump’s introductory remarks on Saturday. “I’m a big fan of John Eastman. Y’know, he was right. He happened to be right. That’s why they changed the law and nobody wants to talk about that. They said he’s not allowed to do it, he’s not allowed to do it, and they convinced him he’s not allowed to do it, our vice president, then right after the election they changed the law so he can’t do it.” Hosts of MSNBC Weekend, in discussing it on Sunday, prompted Michael Steele to ask, “What was the sense in this room, what was the purpose of this gathering, is it just an in-your-face-moment or just a tale of things to come?” Vaughn Hilyard’s take is that it was clear from Trump’s guest list that it was no coincidence about the purpose. Symone Sanders Townsend tersely responded, “Let’s just put a finer point on it, this is sickening! This is sickening, I am sick. Navarro, Clark, the people that went to the Capitol to take up arms against the US government, because the president at the time lied to them, that’s what happened. Those are not patriots. What Donald Trump did last night is a disgrace to the country and Constitution, and the fact that they didn’t tell anybody about it lets you know that they knew what they were doing was untoward, and they wanted to do it anyway.”

Steve Schmidt writes on The Warning that many have called for President Biden to issue preemptive pardons for the likely targets included in Trump’s promised retributions in his abuse of presidential powers. Schmidt is against such action, calling the Constitution and our own dignity as our protectors. Accepting a pardon means admitting a crime, and the necessity of opposing Donald Trump is not a crime. It is necessary, and will continue to be necessary, he maintains. Opposition to Donald Trump doesn’t need explanation or justification, so fight against criminalization of matters of conscience under a regime that doesn’t tolerate criticism or dissent. The fear that Trumpers have instilled throughout America “isn’t just unseemly…it is disconcerting, pathetic at some level and cynical at another,” Schmidt says. The premise that Biden should issue preemptive pardons is “among the worst ideas ever floated. It is a gateway to banana republicanism through a side door.”

Andy Borowitz writes in The Borowitz Report“In a series of scathing Truth Social posts on Tuesday, Donald J Trump lambasted President Biden for issuing a pardon without being paid for it. ‘Pardoning someone for free was an incredibly selfish act,’ Trump wrote. ‘This will lower the market value of every future pardon I give. The framers of the Constitution gave the president pardon power for one reason: to make money,’ Trump continued. ‘I have too much respect for the Constitution to pardon people for free.’ In perhaps the strongest denunciation of Biden’s actions, he added, ‘Any decent father would have made Hunter ambassador to France.'”

In response to Trump’s promise of pardons, bootlicking Republicans are sucking up to him in a time-honored and traditional way: by being cowards. And, all those Senators and Representatives who hunkered down for safety on January 6, 2021, are all lined up to show him they can roll over for him. Senator Lindsey Graham said, “We’ll see what he does. I mean it’s been four or five years (since J6). The ones that hurt cops, they’d be in a different category for me, but we’ll leave that up to him.” Trump’s charge that the House Select Committee destroyed evidence that would have exonerated him, and fantasizing Liz Cheney before a firing squad, all seem to be fine with the GOP. The detailed events in the 850-page report from the committee were terrifying, illuminating and damning, and most voters oppose Trump’s plan to pardon insurrectionists, but what most voters want has never been the Republican Party’s bag, writes Walter Einenkel on Daily Kos.

Author Charles Pierce, in discussing presidents of his lifetime, says they were not perfect men, but for the most part, “they approached the job, and they took to the podium, with all the gravitas they could muster as appropriate for the job. They tried, at least, to reach for something in the presidency that was beyond their grasp as ordinary human beings. They were not all ennobled by the attempt, but they tried nonetheless.” Looking at our current prospect, he moans, “And comes now this hopeless, vicious buffoon, and the audience of equally hopeless and vicious buffoons who laughed and cheered when he made sport of a woman whose lasting memory of the trauma she suffered is the laughter of the perpetrators. Now he comes, a man swathed in scandal, with no interest beyond what he can put in his pocket and what he can put over on a universe of suckers, and he does something like this while occupying an office that we gave him, and while endowed with a public trust that he dishonors every day he wakes up in the White House. The scion of a multigenerational criminal enterprise, the parameters of which we are only now beginning to comprehend. A vessel for all the worst elements of the American condition. And a cheap, soulless bully besides…Watch how a republic dies in the empty eyes of an empty man who feels nothing but his own imaginary greatness, and who cannot find in himself the decency simply to shut up even when it is in his best interest to do so…Watch him behind the seal of the President of the United States. Isn’t he a funny man? Isn’t what happened to that lady hilarious? Watch the assembled morons cheer. This is the only story now.”

As if to echo Pierce’s words, the president-elect will be attending an interfaith prayer service in DC the day before he is inaugurated — his wealthiest supporters are invited if they write a big enough check. This news is reported by Religion News Service, which gathered the information from Trump’s inaugural committee which has a list of different tiers of ‘benefits‘ for the various donor contribution amounts. On January 18, donors can get tickets to a ‘Make America Great Again Rally,’ a cabinet reception and a dinner with VP-elect Vance, to be followed the next day with the “pay-to-pray” event, so dubbed by RNS reporter Jack Jenkins.

Humorist Dave Barry had the perfect summation of the 2024 election season in his 2024 yearly wrap:  But what made 2024 truly special, in terms of sustained idiocy, was that it was an election year. This meant that day after day, month after month, the average American voter was subjected to a relentless gushing spew of campaign messaging created by political professionals who—no matter what side they’re on—all share one unshakeable core belief, which is that the average American voter has the intellectual capacity of a potted fern. It was a brutal, depressing slog, and it felt as though it would never end. In fact it may still be going on in California, a state that apparently tabulates its ballots on a defective Etch-a-Sketch.”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Wildfires

“I’d rather fight 100 structure fires than a wildfire. With a structure fire you know where your flames are, but in the woods it can move anywhere; it can come right up behind you.”
~Tom Watson

“My father was a wildfire. Really. Nobody could save him from anything. His family turned away from him, and he broke up with his first wife. It just happened to be that when he was going to get back up on his feet, my mother was there.”
~John Carter Cash

“No matter the natural disaster I’ve covered, whether it’s a wildfire or flood, I always come back with a much greater perspective.”
~Ginger Zee

“Due to climate change, wildfires are growing in size, frequency, and intensity, and wildfire seasons are becoming longer.”
~Mikie Sherrill

“It is known that wildfires behave unpredictably – this is fundamental – but it is my experience that humans in the presence of wildfire are also likely to behave in aberrant and unpredictable ways.”
~Michael Leunig

...

Wired does this whole series of different professions doing “tech support”, answering questions from people on the internet. This one is really good, it’s called Pseudoscience Support.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.
Email: webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
...

Subconscious Comics
Deep Cover