|
|
BrattonOnline: Bruce Bratton ran weekly opinion columns in various papers, and eventually online, for 49 years. His contributors of additional content are continuing his legacy. Read articles from Gillian Greensite, Grey Hayes, Becky Steinbruner, Gary Patton, and Dale Matlock, as well as comics by Tim Eagan, all put together by the Webmistress since 2003!
May 27 – June 9, 2026
Highlights this week:
Greensite… done campaigning, back soon… Steinbruner… Speak up to save the landline… Bratton on KSCO… Hayes… Right Versus Left… Patton… Same Fate As The Dinosaurs?… Matlock… …festival of corruption… lies… bigotry… divisiveness… / … lawfare… weaponization… slushies… bitter regret… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… figureskating… Quotes on… “Summer”
DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ. Circa 1875. Those are the horsecar tracks going right down the middle of a very wide Pacific Avenue. The publicly owned horsecars would take folks
down to the beach…of course that idea had to be stopped – by some other city council I’ll bet.
Yes, that’s a fire on the left and I can’t find an exact date or location when it happened.
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com
|
|
|
If you want to pitch in to
keep this work of passion going,
we are ever so grateful!

|
Dateline: June 4, 2026
PORTLAND IS JUST LOVELY. I knew this before, of course, but I just had the most magical weekend in Portland. It was so fun! We saw the Stars on Ice show, went to the Portland Saturday Market, the Japanese Garden, Hale Pele Tiki Bar, and Hopscotch. The latter is an interactive art space that was just phenomenally fun! Throughout, all we had to do to move between places and back to our hotel was tap our phone or credit card, and step on the lightrail. I had forgotten how nice it is to have public transportation that works!
Not that I want to move out of this area (I *really* don’t!!!), but if I absolutely had to, Portland would be high on my list.
Hope your summer is starting out right!
~Webmistress
GOOD GIRL’S GUIDE TO MURDER. Netflix. Series. (6.8 IMDb) 
Think Nancy Drew meets True Detective. Five years after the apparent murder of a popular high school student, aspiring journalist Pip Fitz-Amobi decides the case doesn’t add up. What begins as a school project quickly turns into a deeper investigation, uncovering secrets, lies, and long-buried resentments in a town convinced the mystery was solved years ago.
The show’s biggest strength is Pip herself (Emma Myers – Jenna Ortega’s bouncy rainbow werewolf roommate on “Wednesday”): smart, determined, and believable as an amateur sleuth. While it never gets as dark as True Detective, it avoids feeling like a watered-down teen mystery, delivering genuine suspense, credible twists, and enough suspects to keep you guessing. Based on the novel by Holly Jackson, it’s a fast, engaging binge that captures the appeal of a classic detective story while giving it a modern true-crime sensibility.
~Sarge

GOOD OMENS 3. PrimeTV. Movie. (8 IMDb)
In 1990, fantasy legend Terry Pratchett and young comic fantasy mavin Neil Gaiman collaborated on a novel built around the question, “What if the Antichrist got switched at birth?” and Good Omens was born.
In 2024, the third season of Amazon’s adaptation of the late Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s Good Omens was put on hold after multiple allegations of sexual assault against Gaiman surfaced in the news.
The Amazon version of Good Omens thrived on the brilliant chemistry between David Tennant and Michael Sheen as Crowley, a demon, and Aziraphale, an angel, who have spent millennia on Earth in what increasingly resembles a Cold War marriage. Faced with the impending Apocalypse, both come to the conclusion that maybe it might be altogether better … NOT doing that.
Featuring a host of charming side stories that all somehow linked together, plus a simmering relationship between the two leads, the first season felt like a delightful Douglas Adams pastiche. Since season one adapted the novel itself, the second season came as a complete surprise. Crafted entirely by Gaiman, it leaned harder into the Crowley/Aziraphale relationship, along with a gloriously naked and amnesiac Jon Hamm as the angel Gabriel. A great deal happens, and it all ends on a heartbreaking cliffhanger.
Then came season 3 … NOT!
As allegations against Gaiman mounted, stretching from the mid-80s into relatively recent years, comics, films, and television projects tied to him began getting canceled or shelved, including Good Omens 3. Fortunately, Gaiman stepped away from the production, allowing fans to get a third season … sort of. Cut down to a single feature-length finale, it still manages to wrap up a surprising number of story threads, and may even produce a few sniffles.
Gaiman’s problematic history aside, worth a watch.
~Sarge
PANTHEON. Netflix. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
What if the threat isn’t AI? What if it’s UI: uploaded intelligence. Human brains destructively scanned, living only in the cloud. “Pantheon” explores this idea as exquisite, real science fiction. Not cheesy animated sci-fi melodrama, but a genuine exploration of love, grief, immortality, endless simulations, conspiracies, global politics, and so much more.
The animation is restrained, there to serve the story rather than distract from it. The characters are rich, not cardboard cutouts, whether good or bad. No supervillains. No Mary Sues.
It’s a dense story, so if science fiction concepts tend to lose you, this may not be for you. But if they don’t, this absolutely deserves a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS – TALES FROM ’85. Netflix. Series. (5 IMDb)
Stranger Things exits stage left…then pops back out for one more bow.
Set between seasons 2 and 3, this animated take brings back the core crew without sanding things down for kids. It’s not anime or cheap knockoff – dipping their pens in the Spiderverse/Arcane inkwell, with a creative, stylized look. It’s also more focused than the later live-action seasons, trimming most of the adults and zeroing in on the kids. Best of all, Will Byers actually gets to be a character instead of a punching bag, helped by the addition of Niki, an Amazonian punk rocker who connects with him over their shared outsider status. The recast voices are a little jarring at first, but you should settle in. Rough reviews aside, it’s worth a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb)
Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.
They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb)
This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) 
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?
Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge
SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.
Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |

Gillian will be on the radio show, Bratton on KSCO, on Friday. She’ll be back to writing soon.
|
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.
|

SPEAK UP TO SAVE LANDLINES FOR RELIABLE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION
The CPUC rulemaking proceeding is R.24-06-012. The proceeding documents are here. At the top of the page is a tab “Public Comments”. The public comments page has a button Add a Comment. Very important: contact state representatives including Sen. John Laird, and the Board of Supervisors to support landlines.
Many thanks to Ms. Nina Beety for posting the information below on her new website, “Monterey Bay Matters”
Critical Deadlines
- June 2, 12:00pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
- June 11, 3:30pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
- June 15 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-120 and 26-121
- June 22 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-123 and 26-125
AT&T petitions to discontinue landline and Lifeline – 26-121, 26-120, 26-125, 26-123
AT&T filed the following petitions to the FCC to eliminate landlines and Lifeline in areas of California including in the Monterey Bay region. These petitions will be automatically granted if there is no opposition.
Deadlines for filing comments/opposition: June 15 and 22, 2026
WC Docket No. 26-121 AT&T application to discontinue residential (due 6/15)
WC Docket No. 26-120 AT&T application to discontinue business (due 6/15)
WC Docket No. 26-123 AT&T petition for forbearance from ETC including Lifeline (due 6/22)
26-125 AT&T petition for preemption and declaratory ruling (due 6/22)
Because the FCC streamlined the process to allow carriers to discontinue landline service as part of a “technology transition”, these requests are automatically granted in most cases. Filing oppositions is the only way to protest AT&T discontinuance plans; it stops the FCC from automatically granting the applications. If they receive opposition, the FCC will remove AT&T’s application from “streamlining” and perform a review.
These applications contain the notice mailed 5/20 to customers.
Filing Oppositions or Comments is not difficult. To submit them to the FCC, you can prepare a letter and upload it (ECFS Standard Filing) or type/paste a comment into ECFS Express Filing. Note on your document which docket you are commenting on.
Instructions for the longer Standard Filing form:
Proceeding: Start typing the docket number such as 26-125 and the docket title will pop up . Click on the title and it will fill in the line.
Fill in starred lines.
Type of Filing: Click on the box and choose Comment or Opposition (I’ve requested clarification from the FCC)
Address of: Click on box and choose whichever is correct
Fill out remaining red starred items.
Upload your document(s).
Click in yellow box.
Click blue Continue to Review Screen and submit from there.
FINANCIAL HELP FOR WATSONVILLE HOSPITAL AND MOVING FORWARD
The Watsonville Hospital just got a big financial boost from Senator Laird’s bill to provide $25 million to struggling hospitals. According to a recent presentation to Santa Cruz County LAFCO by Hospital CEO Stephen Gray, Watsonville Hospital was one of four applicants chosen to receive grant funding. Eleven hospitals applied.
Of the $25 million available, Watsonville Hospital received $10.6 Million. One condition of the grant is that the Hospital must continue functioning under current leadership, and cannot be sold or handed over to another provider to run it. This will require a delicate balance of ownership vs. control if the Hospital continues to pursue a public partnership with another larger care provider, as is the current plan, according to Gray.
Laird bill will help Watsonville Community Hospital | The Pajaronian | Watsonville, CA
CEO Gray also responded to public query at the LAFCO meeting regarding the thousands of parcels erroneously charged or not charged at all for the Measure N parcel tax to support the Pajaro Valley Health Care District (PVHCD) funding of the Hospital. He said County financial staff had attended a PVHCD Board meeting and apologized for the significant mistake, assuring the Board it had been corrected. In my opinion, the boundaries of the District need to be examined. They were hastily-drawn to help provide emergency funding to keep the Hospital from closing. I would be happy to pay to keep this good hospital open but my rural Aptos area was not included within the boundaries, even though urban Aptos and Rio del Mar are. Our family has always, at the advice of our doctor, sought emergency medical help at Watsonville Hospital because there is a much lower incidence of drug-resistant Staph infection or MURSA.
CEO Gray mentioned in the LAFCO presentation that last year’s cyber attack had cost the Hospital alot of money, and required dipping into the eight days-worth of cash reserves available and banking on the patience of suppliers to extend payment deadlines. Luckily, insurance did re-imburse those expenses and revenue losses, but it took awhile.
CEO Gray has announced his resignation, effective next month. He has led the transition well from a for=profit owner near bankruptcy to a publicly-owned hospital serving the local community.
Who will fill his shoes? I predict it will be Santa Cruz County Deputy CEO Marcus Pimentel….just a hunch. He is on the Board, and is passionate about saving the Hospital. Stay tuned. Marcus Pimentel
SUTTER CANCER CENTER PROJECT PROPOSED FOR SKYVIEW DRIVE-IN THEATER SPACE
Maybe you have been wondering about the fate of the former Skyview Drive-In Theater? A few months ago, Sutter Health, via Swift Consulting, filed a pre-application with the County Planning Dept. for a single-story Cancer Center that would occupy about half of the parcel. Future plans for the other half include potential residential units and expanded medical clinics.
Major Project Applications, Santa Cruz County
I wonder about the traffic study? Stay tuned.
It is too bad the Flea Market got closed down in 2021.
ASK THE SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR ABOUT THE TWO 5-6 STORY BUILDINGS PLANNED FOR APTOS
No public meetings are scheduled for this colossal project in Aptos, near State Park Drive, but you can ask Second District Supervisor Kimberly DeSerpa about it at her June 22 Constituent meeting (5-6:30pm) at the Aptos Library. According to her recent newsletter, the development will now include two 5 or 6-story apartment buildings and nearly 200 three-story townhomes, for a total of about 400 residential units.
Wow.
Will there be an environmental impact review? Not likely.
“Village on the Green” at 2600 Mar Vista Drive (adjacent to the pedestrian bridge under construction over Highway One) could be another Swenson Builder project:
Village on the Green, Development Review Group Application 251471
On November 20, 2025, an application was submitted for a Development Review Group (DRG), a pre-application for the review of a housing development proposal on the site of the former Aptos Par 3 golf course. County staff from several County departments and other public agencies will review this proposal to develop 197 “for sale” 3-bedroom townhomes (each with attached 2-car garage) and a 7-story apartment structure with 215 affordable units and 274 parking spaces on the 13.85-acre site, with the intent to determine the extent of further information needed to process the application, as well as assess the project for compliance with all County ordinances. Relevant comments, corrections, and conditions will be provided to the applicant to be incorporated into proposed project, prior to the formal application.
Major Project Applications, Santa Cruz County
BRATTON ON KSCO RADIO EVERY FRIDAY AT 6PM
You can now listen to a variety of topics discussed by revolving hosts from Bratton Online contributors, every Friday, 6pm-7pm on KSCO Radio, AM 1080 or streaming ksco.com/listen
Grey Hayes hosted a program recently, and last week’s program featured Thomas Leavitt discussing local history and place names, and the importance of preserving historic and cultural resources.
This Friday, June 12 will feature Gillian Greensite discussing her recent campaign for Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz.
Listen in!
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |

Right Versus Left
One of the most important lessons I have received, which has allowed me to better understand politics, is the fundamental difference between the Right and Left. The Left believes people are born basically as good beings and the Right believes people are born as bad beings. From there, the Left believes in nurturing the goodness and the Right believes in correcting the badness. So, a Left-leaning person gives people the tools to do good. And, a Right-leaning person forces people into doing what they think is right. Nurturing at one end of the spectrum and violence at the other. It is amazing to watch the world through this lens.
Doing the Best They Can
Some of the most regular phrases I hear from my left-leaning community are “they’re doing the best they can,” or, “I’m doing my best.” Normally, these phrases are offered for situations where things aren’t going well. For instance, when I have criticized State Parks for fraudulent behavior and misshapen alliances with the recreational industry, left-leaning people have responded ‘they’re doing their best, they just need more funding.’ Or, when people have made mistakes that have led to breaking expensive things by doing procedures completely wrong, these left leaning people have said to me “I tried!” In the first case, how do we know that State Parks has hired the right people? Perhaps the unqualified staff ARE doing the best they can, but then why did they get hired in the first place? And, in the second case, why did the person even try to do something that they didn’t understand enough not to break? Is left-leaning ‘belief’ getting in the way of a better world?
They Protect What They Appreciate
Another way that these left-leaning attitudes crop up is with protection of Nature. Billions of dollars are spent on nature documentaries, museums, zoos, and public access trails into conservation areas with the idea that these activities are crucial to biodiversity protection. “People won’t support protection for something they don’t understand” is the frequent logical support given for these activities. I ask those with this belief how it is working out, really. Why do we have near zero politicians who support conservation with so many people so well impacted by documentaries, zoos, and trail experiences?
Left Leaning Politicians
It seems to me that the faulty logic systems I have just described are propped up by a hierarchical system that maintains power because of such shallow dialogues. If State agencies that protect the environment are seen as ‘doing the best they can,’ then politicians are off the hook. If mediocre education about the environment passes for engagement in conservation, then there is no threat to the politicians and their business partners and funders. Politicians dam the environment with faint praise constantly. “Let’s recognize so-and-so for their leadership in preserving Cotoni Coast Dairies” is one trope when in fact the property faces severe and increasing threats, as is normal after a land is ‘preserved.’
Meanwhile, on the Right
As the left-leaning politicians gently slip the poison pill to their constituents, the right-leaning politicians just bludgeon them. “Face reality,” they say, “humans are going to destroy the environment, so let’s get rich doing it right now!” If you disagree with this statement, you are attacked, threatened, tortured, and/or killed.
Equivalence?
The right-leaning people are destroying the environment Right Now and the left-leaning people are doing it A Little Slower and much more subtly, a little more blindly, and perhaps not as efficiently. This is not to say that the two are equivalent: the speed of the destruction is meaningful. Perhaps the slower change allows more people to realize the losses in Nature or the connection between loss of biodiversity and their own decline of standard of living. Perhaps the slower pace of destruction allows us to realize that protection of Nature is not a left- vs. right- political issue…it is an issue that transcends politics.
Accountability and Victims
I recently attended a right-leaning gathering where everyone detailed just how victimized they were by the government, environmentalists, and by their neighbors. I was there to help find solutions, but it was impossible to keep the conversation focused on that when there were so many victim stories to tell. The politician in the group led credibility to the victim stories. Law enforcement in the group steadfastly upheld the standard, conservative “law and order” narrative while also clearly communicating how legal codes had victimized his community. Solutions, no. Vitriol, plenty.
Conflict Aversion
I have seen left-leaning communities succumb to conflict aversion, stunting their ability to create positive change. If everyone is doing their best, who am I to bring up any conflict? Thank this lefty proclivity for a wealth of under-performing environmental regulations. In one state or another, the State Wildlife Agency personnel were asked why they didn’t regulate dams for healthy fish populations, as they were charged by state statute? They responded that if they were to prosecute that statute, politicians might revoke that statute. This is called ‘slippage,’ and it is evident in many arenas, especially, locally: the California Coastal Act, Santa Cruz County ordinances protecting rivers/streams or other threatened ecosystems, and the Porter-Cologne and US Clean Water Acts. A newspaper may one day publish this story:
Poisoned Waters
We contacted Assemblyperson Martin’s office to find out why water quality in the Elkhorn Slough has consistently been ranked the worst in the nation for decades. Office staff responded “Our Community deserves safe recreational access to the Slough while supporting the vital agricultural industry surrounding it. And so, we have been in many meetings to advance incremental policy improvements. By the end of the next fiscal year, I’m sure we will have something to propose. Meanwhile, we urge our constituents to remain engaged by following us on @plickitupoo.assemblypoo.gov”
Conservation Heroes
Demonstrating his ongoing concern for conservation, Senator Smith introduced a bill to support wage growth for facilities management employees of California State Parks. “Our Parks employees do their best every day to maintain 2,200 miles of recreational trails Statewide. They are working hard to provide access to every Californian. They deserve more recognition.” Union representatives for Facilities Management Employees expect to sign the raise agreement in the next few days.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |

Tuesday, June 2, 2026
If you have been following the news, you probably know that SpaceX will soon promote an Initial Public Offering (IPO) – a sale of its stock to the public. This stock offering will possibly end up making Elon Musk (pictured) the world’s first trillionaire. As the BBC tells us, in the article I have linked in the first line of this blog posting, “SpaceX makes rockets, offers a satellite internet service called Starlink, and also owns Musk’s controversial artificial intelligence (AI) firm xAI. The initial public offering (IPO) on the US stock market is set to be the largest in Wall Street history and could start next month under the ticker symbol SPCX.”
Naturally, the BBC is not alone in covering this news. The Saturday-Sunday, May 23-24, 2026, edition of The Wall Street Journal had a couple of articles on the SpaceX IPO. SpaceX’s Ambitions Are Intergalactic. Its Business Is Selling You Internet.” Corrie Driebusch’s article appeared under this headline: “SpaceX Is Aiming for Civilization on Mars. Its IPO Couldn’t Be More Old School.” Both of these are worth reading, and I think that clicking on the links will get you to them. Here is an excerpt from Cohen’s column that caught my attention (emphasis added):
SpaceX consists of three segments: space, AI and connectivity, which is primarily driven by Starlink. Last year, the Starlink division was responsible for $11 billion of revenue, which amounted to more than 60% of the company’s total sales. It was the most valuable part of the business—and the only profitable one. And for years, it has been absolutely essential to the success of SpaceX. As it turns out, even companies that defy the laws of gravity are bound by the laws of economics.
The mysterious finances of Musk’s company were detailed this week in SpaceX’s IPO filing, which is far more bonkers than financial paperwork has any right to be.
The highlights include the company describing itself as “the most ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engine on (and off) Earth,” claiming a total addressable market of $29 trillion, revealing that Musk’s pay package is tied to “the establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at least one million inhabitants” and declaring: “We do not want humans to have the same fate as dinosaurs.”
Now, when I say that the report above “caught my attention,” I am somewhat understating my reaction. First, Musk, apparently, thinks that it’s actually going to be possible to transport a “human colony” to Mars – a “colony” with “at least one million inhabitants.” Remember how much time, effort, and money it took to put a couple of guys on the Moon? A million on Mars? Wow! That’s a truly different thing, indeed.
But check out the last line I have quoted. Musk doesn’t “want humans to have the same fate as dinosaurs.” We do remember what happened to the dinosaurs, right? They all died, as conditions on Earth changed to make the planet incapable of supporting their life, going forward.
So…. it looks like Musk believes that this is what’s going to happen in the relatively near term (within Musk’s lifetime) with respect to human beings. Humans are either going to die out here on Earth, or they are going to have to migrate to Mars, to avoid extinction. As a personal note, Mars does not seem very hospitable, or a nice place to live, at least to me (witness the photo below).
My suggestion? Let’s forget about putting our money into a company that is betting against the continued ability of human beings to live on Planet Earth, and start investing our money on keeping Earth habitable. Wouldn’t it make more sense to use our financial resources to fight off global warming, and to bring peace to the world (eliminating the possibility of a global nuclear war), instead of betting on some whacked-out potential trillionaire’s dream that he, and a million or so pals, can all scoot off to Mars, avoiding the extinction of human life on this planet?
Check out the pictorial comparison below. Don’t you agree that sticking with Earth is the better bet?
Earth

Mars
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |

250 FOR 250, THE GOAT, BLOWN HONOR, TIP OFF TO TIP OVER
Katherine Stewart, author of ‘The Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous Rise of Religious Nationalism’, and ‘Money, Lies and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy’, has written an interesting take on Trump’s plans for the country’s 250th birthday celebration. “In another world with a better government in power, Americans might well have looked forward to an authentic celebration of the remarkable achievements of the American Revolution. In this world, under the Trump administration and the Republican rubber-stamp chorus in Congress, we are being asked to settle for a festival of corruption, lies, bigotry and divisiveness,” she begins.
The Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving, billed as “part of the broader Freedom 250 initiative,” was held on May 17 on the National Mall, with a relatively sparse gathering to see and hear Christian nationalist “faith leaders, public servants, music, prayer, and testimony to honor God’s hand in America’s story.” Hosted by a private foundation in partnership with the White House, it brought together those dedicated to replacing American democracy with a supposedly Christian autocracy. Speaker Paula White-Cain, senior faith adviser to Trump, said the event was “about the history and the foundations of our nation, which was built on Christian values, on the Bible. This is really truly rededicating the country to God,” she remarked. Stewart’s observation is that Freedom 250 was fundamentally about rededicating the country to outright corruption, flying in the face of America’s Founders who attempted to avoid the kind of extractive and imperial system of government seen in the British Empire, as the program “diverted tens of millions in taxpayer funds to a nakedly sectarian and partisan festival,” going further by inviting corporate and foreign donors to contribute.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the president also proposes offering 250 pardons to celebrate the 250th — a real triumph for the rule of law! Any predictions on who might be a recipient in Trump’s pay-for-play freedom pardon scam? “But there’s a higher order of corruption at work here, not unlike that practiced by the remaining ‘clean’ ‘conservative’ justices on the Supreme Court — not the ones who won’t accept free camper buses, school tuition, and luxury holidays from their conservative patrons. This is where officers of the United States, even while paying lip service to the Constitution, flout their responsibilities and instead pervert our democratic system for power and aggrandizement. When a political leader directs government to reward a particular band of extremist supporters and disenfranchise the rest of the population, that is corruption, not democracy,” insists Stewart.
Stewart remarks, “On this semiquincentennial, one might have hoped for some expressions of unity. America’s Founders, after all, prized unity almost too much. That is why they made so many compromises in their quest to create a United States of America. But Freedom 250, like everything Trumpian, is about dividing America, not uniting it. It’s there to tell us that there are ‘good’ Americans and ‘bad’ Americans. The good ones are Bible-believing Christians. The bad ones include media that reported accurately on the fiasco of the Iran war, for example; anyone who criticizes Dear Leader; and, of course, those who fail to adhere to the nation’s supported founding faith.” The Founders understood that the surest way to divide the new nation would be to introduce a national religion into a country that was even then incredibly diverse in its mingling of faith traditions — some things they may have erred on, but on this point they were absolutely correct. Thomas Jefferson famously and correctly celebrated the First Amendment as a means of erecting ‘a wall of separation between church and state’. Now Trump’s plan is to ‘celebrate’ the Founders’ achievement by demolishing that wall.
By rejecting the aristocratic pretensions of the Old World, the Founders felt it to be vital to give the new democracy a certain kind of dignity, making a determined effort to prove that a government of the people could also rise to worthy levels of cultural achievement. So what is Trump giving us? The Ultimate Fighting Championship to entertain us with the spectacle of bare-knuckled men punching one another in the face within the unsightly arena that we now see rising on the White House lawn! Stewart concludes, “We can be sure that the Trump administration and its MAGA supporters will deride critics of Freedom 250 as somehow anti-American. We should not let them get away with it. We should oppose this kind of squalid, divisive festival of grift, not because we despise America but because we continue to support the ideals upon which the nation was founded. Maybe the most American thing we can do in this sad and degenerate moment in history is to find a way to celebrate American principles of equality, pluralism, and justice — independent of this partisan rally, which the present malefactors in government are using to destroy democracy itself.”
Discovered is President Trump’s purchase of $15,000 to $50,000 worth of TKO Group Holdings as he began his promotion of the UFC birthday event on the lawn outside the People’s House. The Daily Dose of Democracy group says they are willing to give him a pass on this one if he will put his money where his mouth is and hop into the ring with the fighters. The company will see its star rise with all the free publicity spouted by the president. Jordan Libowitz of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington says, “Grifting has always been an issue in Donald Trump’s presidency, but now the mask is off. Using the White House to promote a company whose stock you bought while promoting it is one of the worst conflicts of interest you could imagine. The agenda of this administration seems to start and stop with how to make Donald Trump richer.”
Since Trump’s announcement last summer about hosting the UFC Championship at the White House, he hasn’t shut his mouth about it, even inviting UFC fighters to the Oval Office to show off the AI-generated images of the octagon arena. “We’re going to have 4,000 seats in front of the door of the White House. The hardest ticket I’ve ever had, too. This will be the greatest show on earth,” bragged the president. The spectacle is touted as part of the nation’s 250th birthday, but the arena will be completed for scheduled use on June 14 — coincidentally, the President’s 80th birthday. Attorney Norm Eisen calls the brutal event an “extravagant waste of money and government time, serving not only to distract from the real work of the government but now may result in a pecuniary benefit to the president. That is a far uglier White House spectacle than anything that the UFC will exhibit.”
UFC chief executive Dana White, a Trump supporter, claims the UFC 250 event will not be an inherently political event. “You can make anything political if you want to,” he says, confident that the fight will “positively deliver” for the president and his group. But some in the mixed martial arts and pro fighting world are less than enthusiastic about the prospect of the event — onetime ally of the president, podcaster Joe Rogan not holding back. In his estimation the idea of outside fighting is problematic, and there is no weather contingency plan, especially since Washington, DC can reach temps of 100 degrees by June. Rogan would prefer an inside, air-conditioned venue, calling Trump’s extravaganza a “gimmick” and a “security nightmare“.
John Byrne of Raw America posts that as the country turns 250, Trump wanted to have “a concert worthy of an emperor. What he is getting instead is a punchline.” Or a punch in the face. His plan was to have a star-studded musical extravaganza on the National Mall running from late June into July, but a steady stream of artists who were previously announced are now giving notice that they no longer showing up, claiming they were misled regarding the partisan nature of the Freedom 250 concerts — entitled Great American State Fair. It looks as thought the hangers-on are Milli Vanilli, and Vanilla Ice, who said, “I don’t even vote, so I don’t even care.” Byrne says, “There’s something almost perfect about all of it. A president who governs through spectacle planned a spectacle, and the actual artists of the country looked at the invitation and said ‘no’. The founders built a republic, not a monarchy, specifically so that no one man’s birthday became a national obligation.”
In his attempt to recover from the musical snubs, Trump announced that he plans to hold a political rally to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary, posting, “I understand Artists are getting ‘the yips’ having to do with their performance, so I am thinking about bringing the Number One Attraction anywhere in the World, the man who gets much larger audiences than Elvis in his prime, and he does so without a guitar, the man who loves our Country more than anyone else, the man who some say is the Greatest President in History (THE GOAT!), DONALD J. TRUMP, to take the place of these highly paid, Third Rate ‘Artists,’ and give a major speech, rallying the Country forward like I have done ever since being President!”
Robert Reich posted on Substack, “Beware of Trump’s 250th Rally on the Mall — he’s given up on the ‘talent’ except for You Know Who.” Reich says that Trump often confuses himself with America, and America with himself; so not surprisingly, his plan for celebrating the nation’s 250th anniversary is looking more and more like a celebration of Trump. In addition, Trump’s face will be engraved on a new $250 bill; it will be etched onto both sides of a celebratory gold coin; it’s already on passports issued this year. His signature is on dollar bills. If you still fail to get the point, his visage will soon be draped over all federal buildings. Reich finds it difficult to read the president’s THE GOAT! post without laughing, but it’s no joke as his malignant narcissism ramps up even higher than its usual galactic level.
In a follow up post on Truth Social, Trump writes, “I am ordering my Representatives to look at the feasibility of doing an AMERICA IS BACK Rally on Wednesday, Washington, DC, same time, same location. Only Great Patriots invited — It will be a Wild and Beautiful Celebration of America!” Reich reminds us that the ‘Great Patriots’ and ‘will be wild’ phrasing harkens back to Trump’s encouraging his rioters preceding the January 6, 2021 insurrection. We shouldn’t expect another attack on the Capitol — just attacks toward immigrants, Muslims, Democrats, trans people, RINOs, judges and anyone ‘woke,’ as Trump stars in his own hate rally.
Reich explains that our 250th anniversary events, commemorating America’s founders’ refusal to be bound by a tyrant, were supposed to be planned by a nonpartisan, nonprofit group created by Congress in 2016, called ‘America250.’ The bipartisan congressional caucus made up of over 350 members, with honorary co-chairs George W Bush, Laura Bush, Barack Obama, and Michelle Obama, plus ex-officio members to include present and former government officials, have had no hand in planning the anniversary events with the circumvention by Trump/MAGA and their ‘Freedom250‘ committee. This renegade group is bankrolling events to promote Trump and his political agenda which lists its ‘core theme‘ of boosting Trump’s supposed ‘achievements.’ And as might be expected the group is designed to make money for Trump, with his personal business trademarking the term ‘Trump 250,’ along with a logo similar to that of the ‘America250’ logo.
In fact, several trademark applications in connection with the upcoming celebration feature Trump’s name as the centerpiece for use on bumper stickers, tote bags, drink ware, clothing, and golf balls, with Trump’s online store already selling sweatshirts, golf balls, and a blanket. Mimicking the ballroom project’s pay-to-play scam, people and companies with financial interests affected by the administration are encouraged to make tax-deductible donations to gain access to, and seek favors from, the president. Those corporations paying between $500,000 and $10 million become “sponsors” and those giving $1 million or more will be invited to a “private Freedom 250 thank-you reception” hosted by you-know-who. Major donors contributing $2.5 million or more will qualify for a speaking role at the Fourth of July celebration in Washington, so we can expect to hear leaders of Lockheed Martin, ExxonMobil, Oracle, Palantir, Mastercard, and United Airlines — so far. Stay tuned.
Count yourself in as a contributor to Trump and his ‘Freedom 250‘ extravaganza, because in last year’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill‘ was a Congressional allocation of $150 million for observances of the nation’s birthday. The Interior Department chose to dole out $100 million to the Trump organization, with only $25 million going to the official nonpartisan ‘America250‘ group. Stay tuned on disclosure of expenses in this siphoning of taxpayer funding — only if you stay attuned until 2027! Reich says, “This is exactly what Trump did to the Kennedy Center, the Smithsonian Institution, the National Capital Planning Commission, and every other semi-public body Congress established for the common good. This is the way authoritarianism substitutes for democracy — slowly and incrementally, until the whole system suddenly tips over.”
Elliot Kirschner writing on Substack’s Through the Fog, asks if anyone really feels like celebrating America’s 250th, even though it’s only a month away? He imagines what could be taking place if only we had a unifying president, with participation by American musical giants, to inspire a soaring sense of pride, and a belief that despite all our differences and the dark chapters in our history, that we are part of an ambitious experiment in multi-racial, multi-ethnic democracy. He says that America loves a good party, but that notion is now a “casualty of our troubled times — another opportunity for good feeling and unity lost to the boorish squatter in our nation’s capital as he tracks mud of corruption, vindictiveness, and divisive autocracy across our national fabric.” Instead of proceeding with this fiasco, he suggests we give ourselves a raincheck until this nightmare is over, waiting a few years to find a way to celebrate our democracy. “Then, we can have the biggest party ever, bringing together artists and teachers, immigrants and veterans, scientists and musicians, people from every corner of this sprawling and complicated country. A party about the best of America. A party that is joyful instead of angry. Inclusive instead of exclusionary. A party to which everyone is invited,” concludes Kirschner. “Well, almost everyone.”
Satirist Andy Borowitz writes, “In a last ditch attempt to salvage his ‘US Freedom 250’ concert, Donald J. Trump announced Monday that the only remaining musical act will be Secretary of State Marco Rubio playing a kazoo…According to sources, Rubio is taking his new assignment extremely seriously, spending hours practicing the kazoo in the Situation Room. In an official statement, Rubio declared, ‘I am honored to blow anything President Trump asks me to.'”
[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]
MARCO, PAYDAY FOR POOPERS, MARCO, FRAUD BUFFET, MARCO
The ensnared federal government ‘agreed’ to drop the tax claims against President Donald Trump last week according to a settlement document that also resolves Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns, along with a public apology from the agency. The agreement reads that the US is “forever barred and precluded” from examining or prosecuting Trump, his sons and the Trump organization’s current tax issues, simply a one-page document posted to the Department of Justice website. An adjunct to this agreement allowed the administration to create a nearly $1.8 billion fund to compensate allies of the president who believe they have been unjustly investigated and prosecuted, which brought howls from the Democrats and government watchdog groups as “corrupt” and unconstitutional. Formally called the “Anti-Weaponization Fund“, it provides an avenue for those “wrongly targeted” for political purposes — particularly by the Biden administration’s Justice Department — to apply for payouts, which acting Attorney General Todd Blanche terms a “a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.” The 1600 rioters who were charged, then fined or imprisoned, could see a payday of about a million bucks each!
The Late Show host, Stephen Colbert, during his last week on his canceled CBS show, had some thoughts on the newly-created “slush fund,” and how “one group of lucky slushies could be the people prosecuted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot.” “We may be canceled, but apparently The Late Show has outlived the Constitution of the United States, because yesterday, without any congressional or court approval, completely unilaterally, Donald Trump gave himself a $1.8 billion taxpayer-fueled slush fund,” said the comedian to begin his show. Colbert noted that in January, Trump and Sons filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, alleging that the bureau willfully failed to safeguard his tax information from unauthorized disclosure by a former IRS contractor during the president’s first term. The judge involved in the case was “highly skeptical” of its validity, prompting Trump and Sons to drop the suit in exchange for establishment of the “slush fund” by Todd Blanche.
[ click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse) ]
A doubting Colbert explained, “That means people who stormed the capitol, rubbed their poop on the walls, assaulted police officers, and tried to hang VP Mike Pence could be getting this cash. But they won’t because Trump’s going to steal it all.” Colbert says his “educated guess” is that Trump could steal from the fund since the money would be managed by a five-person commission appointed by the attorney general, with Trump empowered with the right to remove any commission member at will. “So, I’d like to congratulate the inaugural commission for the Donald Trump Slush Fund, Marco Rubio, Marco Rubio, Marco Rubio, Marco Rubio, and Marco Rubio,” he quipped. Colbert continued, “It could get more corrupt, because most egregiously, the guidelines announced by the acting attorney general stipulate once the funds are deposited into the designated account, the US has no liability whatsoever for the protection or safeguarding of those funds, regardless of bank failure, fraudulent transfers, or any other fraud or misuse of the funds. This settlement is just some piece of paper they printed out saying that Trump can do anything he wants with a bunch of your money.” Colbert called the guidelines for the shakedown tree “an all-you-can-fraud buffet.”
Ruth Ben-Ghiat writes on Lucid on Substack, “The critical point for me, as a historian of coups and Fascist revolutions, is that the payouts are not just to reward past actions. They should instead be seen as retainers for the foot soldiers and elite backers of future violent actions. The pardons also had this double function: tying people to Trump by making their legal problems go away, and freeing them up to serve the movement and the leader.” Ben-Ghiat says such retainers are common in organized crime and autocratic corruption around the world, and she agrees with former national security operative Steven Cash, that the “settlement” resembles the kind of state-funded loyalty network or private militia support system often seen under rising authoritarian regimes overseas. Furthermore, while the US armed forces is to all appearances doing Trump’s bidding, and ICE is developing in the direction of being a state-funded revolutionary guards operation, there is nothing like having a private militia that is loyal to you personally. With this slush fund, Trump signals to violent extremists that their service to him has not ended. In 2021, Ben-Ghiat wrote, “America could evolve into a national brand of electoral autocracy in which election subversion is backed up by grassroots violence.” She cautions that the 2026 midterms could present an opportunity for this militia-in-the-making to serve their leader again.
According to former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance, Donald Trump just signaled that he is trying to get away with something big, causing her to raise alarms over what she is calling a “pardon on steroids” — the one-page Justice Department settlement that shields Trump, his family, and his business from any federal prosecution or civil action for crimes “presently known or unknown.” Vance says that the most pressing question is what, exactly, is Trump trying to bury? “The optics of this are so bad that it’s hard to believe Trump would expose himself to their consequences unless he really needed this deal. The protection it offers must be essential in some way we are as of yet unaware,” she writes in her Civil Discourse newsletter. The Supreme Court’s 2024 immunity ruling already shields the president from prosecution for official acts, but Vance notes that personal business dealings, tax matters, and private transactions fall outside that umbrella, and those are exactly the areas the new settlement wipes clean. Legal scholars have long argued a president cannot pardon himself, but Vance sees this as a Trump workaround. “There is no hint of what consequence Trump may be trying to avoid. Here, Trump seems to have found a way around that limitation, obtaining a pardon equivalent and then some, for himself and for his family,” she concludes.
Thom Hartmann asks in his The Hartmann Report, “Why doesn’t anybody mention that Trump himself is the biggest recipient of his ‘settlement’ slush fund?” Hartmann mentions The New York Times article entitled ‘With Trump’s Deal, a Possible $100 million I.R.S. Penalty Melts Away,’ disclosing that in 2010, Trump was busted for claiming a deduction for his failing Chicago tower twice, a crime, and that the I.R.S. has been attempting to collect around $100 million (plus interest) ever since. Now, as Hartmann says, “This new ‘Thug Fund’ will eliminate all claims against him, his kids and his ‘affiliated entities’ and businesses, for all past, present, and future times. So he gets to keep the $100 million+, while the media ignores it — except for the one mention in the Times. Where is the outrage? Can you imagine what would happen if Obama had tried to give himself $100 million out of our Treasury?” Oh, just “reparations” says Republican Representative Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania — a term which lends credence to the perception that Trump’s fund is just a Trojan horse to funnel “reparations” to white criminals — to include Trump?
The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, Representative Jamie Raskin, introduced a bill to bar the Justice Department’s “Anti-Weaponization Fund” to be used for payouts to those who claim to have faced weaponization at the hands of the government — entitled the “No Taxpayer-Funded 5 Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2026.” The act would bar the use of any federal funds to back the settlement and would also create new restrictions on payouts generally, including barring anyone convicted of rioting at the Capitol on January 6 from receiving funds. “Trump is trying to commandeer nearly $1.8 billion in taxpayer funds to bankroll a slush fund for January 6 cop-beaters and aggrieved MAGA foot soldiers,” Raskin said. “This massive abuse of public money also has glaring constitutional defects: only Congress has the power to appropriate federal dollars, and we didn’t appropriate a cent for the J6 millionaire trust fund.” Therefore, Raskin has introduced his legislation “to shut down this highway robbery and restore basic guardrails on how taxpayer dollars are spent.”
“Congress must reassert the power of the purse and stop this brazen looting of taxpayer funds before this ‘pilot program’ for massive partisan corruption becomes the permanent operating system of our government,” Raskin added. While the bill would specifically block the new ‘slush fund,’ it would also generally bar future settlements tied to cases related to the January 6, 2021 riot or disputes over the 2016 presidential election, while blocking the president, vice president, and cabinet members from receiving money in any litigation over those matters. Several GOP members may line up with Raskin in support of his bill. All this to soothe the exceptionally fragile ego of a malignant narcissist who simply cannot accept that he got smoked in the 2020 election?
The New York Times‘ editorial board also jumped into the fray with a scathing opinion column blasting the Justice Department’s establishment of the fund, warning it could be used to “reward loyalists willing to defy the law and commit violence on behalf of the president.” The board wrote, “The fund manages to combine three of Mr. Trump’s most alarming behaviors. One, it is an obvious form of corruption, coming from a president who has used his office to enrich himself, his family and his allies. Two, the fund continues his pattern of using the Justice Department as an enforcer to punish his perceived opponents and protect his friends and allies. Three, the fund is the latest attempt to rewrite history about the 2020 election and the January 6, 2021 attack on Congress.” The op-ed added, “It is worth pausing to put the fund into the larger context of Mr. Trump’s political project: He is destroying pillars of American democracy to empower himself.”
It should be noted that the administration has already paid out $1.25 million to Michael Flynn despite his guilty plea to lying to FBI agents, and nearly $5 million to the family of slain J6 rioter Ashli Babbitt, and the Times’ editorial board flagged a detail that suggested how the president intended to use the taxpayer money. “The fund’s timeline is the giveaway of how Trump plans to use it,” wrote the board. “The Justice Department said the fund would stop processing claims on December 15, 2028, weeks before the president is to leave office, ensuring the money is distributed while he still holds the power to fire anyone who objects. The window is precisely the window of Mr. Trump’s authority.” The Trump administration has already fired federal agents who investigated Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss, and the board wrote that acting AG Todd Blanche signaled the fund would be used to turn law enforcement into a weapon against the president’s enemies, while the fund would be used to encourage lawlessness on the president’s behalf. “This all seems to be an obvious abuse of power by the Department of Justice, by the president. He negotiated essentially with himself. You’re his appointee [Blanche], the IRS are his appointees, he’s the plaintiff,” charged Senator Jack Reed, who later called Blanche “the president’s consigliere.”
The Times‘ op-ed concludes, “It sends a message that he will use his power not only to shield people who break the law from accountability but also to shower benefits on them. Just as punishment is a deterrent, rewards are an incentive. Americans should be clear-eyed about what the president is doing. He is taking their money and showering it on criminals.” Notably, the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 as a result of the Civil War, says in Section 4: “[N]either the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.” Seems pretty straightforward since those who stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of a presidential election engaged in exactly the kind of insurrection for which it was written.
Two of the Capitol police officers who attempted to fend off the rioters on J6 filed a lawsuit that seeks to block Trump’s ‘slushie fund’ to bankroll those who tried to stab and beat officers with flagpoles, smash windows, try to kill members of Congress, and call for VP Pence’s lynching. The two don’t see the logic that conveys anything done in the name of Trump isn’t just legal but should be rewarded, no matter how vile it may be…imagine! US Capitol police officer Harry Dunn defended Nancy Pelosi’s office, and Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges defended an outer doorway, nearly being crushed to death by the hordes, caught between metal doors while being beaten with his own baton. The lawsuit says, “In the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century, President Donald J Trump has created a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded slush fund to finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name. The fund’s mere existence sends a clear and chilling message: those who enact violence in President Trump’s name will not just avoid punishment, they will be rewarded with riches. That message, by itself, substantially increases the already sizable risk of vigilante violence Dunn and Hodges face on a near-daily basis. And it encourages those who are harassing Dunn and Hodges, and sending them death threats, to up the ante.”
Trump’s reply to reporters who asked about rioters receiving slush money, defended the action, saying, “They’ve been weaponized. They’ve been in some cases imprisoned wrongly. They paid legal fees that didn’t have. They’ve gone bankrupt. Their lives have been destroyed. And they turned out to be right.” Expatriate Robert Harrington wrote on The Palmer Report, “Many Republicans in Congress agree with Trump about this outrageous crap, either by saying so out loud or by their silence. These Republican dybbuks in Congress can get away with making these stupid assertions because American is filled to the rafters with morons willing to accommodate Trump’s b.s. And they vote. Trump is a black hole of greed and hate. Nothing escapes that black hole, not even light. Trump is the enemy of the people, and those who don’t realise it now will realise it later, with bitter regret.”
In an hour-long contentious meeting behind closed doors, acting AG Todd Blanche sparred with Republican senators over the ‘anti-weaponization’ fund, which led to Majority Leader John Thune’s cancellation of voting on the reconciliation bill to fund ICE, and cancelling a meeting with the White House, sending everyone home for a weeklong Memorial Day recess. “We will pick up where we left off,” Thune explained to reporters amid the impasse. “It makes everything harder than it should be. It would have been nice if they had consulted Senators. They need help with this issue, because we have a lot of members who are concerned obviously about the timing but also about the substance.” Senator Lisa Murkowski compared the weaponization fund to “a bomb” dropped by the White House, and a senior Senate GOP aide termed the decision “a delay of the administration’s making.” The House GOP followed suit, cancelling a Friday vote on the immigration package.
Several people who were granted anonymity described the meeting as “not going well for the administration” and that Blanche was not persuasive amid the grilling by dozens of GOP senators. Senator Mitch McConnell, who had previously been tight-lipped regarding the settlement fund, issued a scathing statement: “So the nation’s top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally wrong — take your pick.” The Daily Dose of Democracy blog says, “Senate Republicans have had enough of Trump’s b.s., and they are NOT happy.” Thune’s cancellation of meetings and the week’s recess, means the Trump-imposed deadline of June 1 to fund ICE will not occur, a symbolic rebuke of the president. A Senate aide texted to Punchbowl’s Andrew Desiderio, “Our majority is melting down before our very eyes.” While this may be the case, DDoD is of the opinion that “these spineless cowards will eventually cave and give Trump what he wants, but there are some bumpy waters ahead for Trump and his agenda.”
The Trump White House is a kleptocratic organ, pure and simple — one that increasingly resembles authoritarian regimes around the world. “This new slush fund is no different than what we see in other kleptocracies,” says Casey Michel, a contributor to The New Republic and author of the forthcoming book, ‘United States of Oligarchy’. “It’s a ruling figure creating a new pot of wealth that they can use for whatever they want — in this case, paying off a bunch of insurrectionists who Trump can now transform into his own personal paramilitary, without any oversight or checks whatsoever. It’s something we’ve never seen in US history — but is perfectly familiar to those who study autocracy around the world.”
Sasha Abramsky writes in The Nation, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore,” parroting newscaster Howard Beale in the 1976 movie ‘Network‘, and being tempted to open her window to scream out into the ether as she reaches her breaking point. She calls the Trump administration “the quintessence of public corruption” as it “regards the nation’s treasury as a personal piggy bank.” She says that Howard Beale found absolute clarity of vision in his frenzied madness, and would have added our authoritarian government to his list of the heinous woes confronting society. So, are we ready to join Beale and Abramsky at an open window before Trump and his pilferers show up at Fort Knox? All together now…1…2…3…
[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com.
|

Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Dateline: June 3, 2026
Did you know that we have a local school that is over 125 years old, founded in 1899?!? That caught my attention when I was flipping through the book recently, and I decided to check to see if, 40 years later, the school was still functioning, and yes, indeed, it is: “Today the school serves over 200 students in kindergarten through eighth grade. Moreland Notre Dame Catholic School is accredited by the Western Catholic Educational Association (WCEA).” You can find their web site at Moreland Notre Dame (link: https://mndschool.org/). Kind of cool, I think.

If you want to check out the book yourself (literally), the Santa Cruz Public Library has copies available at almost every branch in either the reference section or available to be checked out: Santa Cruz County Place Names. They also have copies of his companion book, “Monterey County place names : a geographical dictionary”, although most of these are reference only.
Other SF Bay Area libraries (as well as the UCSC library) also have copies, as per WorldCat
Copies are also available for purchase on various platforms, but they’re not cheap!
A Catholic school for girls on Brennan Street in Watsonville, operated by the Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur; opened October 1899.
The situation of the school, in the beautiful Valley of the Birds, in the quiet suburbs of the pretty little city of Watsonville, beside the sea, beneath the bounding hills, was unsurpassed.–In Harvest Fields (1926, p.234).
Named for the order [Notre Dame, “Our Lady,” for the Virgin Mary] and to honor Josephine Moreland, the daughter of Mrs. Margaret S. Moreland who founded the school in her memory. Josephine died in 1888 at the age of nineteen. Margaret S.
Loftus [Moreland] was born in Ireland in 1829; arrived in the United States in 1852 and in California in 1862. “When a young lady, Miss Loftus learned of the beautiful climate of California and having friends in Santa Cruz decided to join them.”–Guinn (1903, p.392). She married Samuel Moreland, a prominent Pajaro Valley rancher in 1866. Mrs. Moreland died in 1919. The school is located at 133 Brennan Street, Watsonville. Also known as College of Notre Dame.

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts.
Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |

“Summer”
“What is one to say about June, the time of perfect young summer, the fulfillment of the promise of the earlier months, and with as yet no sign to remind one that its fresh young beauty will ever fade.”
~Gertrude Jekyll
“Summer means happy times and good sunshine. It means going to the beach, going to Disneyland, having fun.”
~Brian Wilson
“Deep summer is when laziness finds respectability.”
~Sam Keen
“People don’t notice whether it’s winter or summer when they’re happy.”
~Anton Chekhov
“Summer is a promissory note signed in June, its long days spent and gone before you know it, and due to be repaid next January.”
~Hal Borland
|
Ilia Malinin, absolute super star and a joy to watch! Enjoy this video I shot at the Stars on Ice show in Portland!
|
COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice as soon as the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
May 13 – 26, 2026
Highlights this week:
Greensite… will be back … Steinbruner… Non-flammable BESS… Cabrillo Dorms… Hayes… Book Review… Patton…We Want To Get Along Well… Matlock… a wink and a nod…dubl-snub…chess master… / …commercial opportunity…capitalist politburo…oligarchical coven… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Line Rider… Quotes on… “Travel”
SANTA CRUZ OPERA HOUSE. The Knight’s Opera House which was located on Union (then Park Street) and Center streets opened 11/23/1877. Jack London spoke there, Paderewski played there and boxer John L. Sullivan spoke there too. Zasu Pitts was in some plays staged here while she was a student at Santa Cruz High. The building was actually moved to Capitola in 1921 and burned down (or up) in 1961.
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com
|
|
|
If you want to pitch in to
keep this work of passion going,
we are ever so grateful!

|
Dateline: May 15, 2026
PORTLAND, OR. I find myself in Portland for a weekend. It is lovely here, and I’m excited to see my friend from way back in my teens back home, who lives here. The first day here was a lot of back and forth over the river – there was a hotel mix-up, and then there was a phone malfunction which resulted in a visit to a repair place, which necessitated a bunch more travel. We used a combination of lightrail and Uber, and I must say I really like the lightrail here! You tap to pay, with your phone or a card, and then you just get on the train. A ticket is valid for several hours. The trains I saw were clean, and it was clear where you were, what the next stop was, etc.
We’ll see what is going on for the rest of the weekend! This is a very spontaneous and improvised trip. Our only real plan is for the Stars on Ice show on Sunday. I’ll let you know how it was!
Happy Memorial Day!
~Webmistress
GOOD OMENS 3. PrimeTV. Movie. (8 IMDb)
In 1990, fantasy legend Terry Pratchett and young comic fantasy mavin Neil Gaiman collaborated on a novel built around the question, “What if the Antichrist got switched at birth?” and Good Omens was born.
In 2024, the third season of Amazon’s adaptation of the late Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s Good Omens was put on hold after multiple allegations of sexual assault against Gaiman surfaced in the news.
The Amazon version of Good Omens thrived on the brilliant chemistry between David Tennant and Michael Sheen as Crowley, a demon, and Aziraphale, an angel, who have spent millennia on Earth in what increasingly resembles a Cold War marriage. Faced with the impending Apocalypse, both come to the conclusion that maybe it might be altogether better … NOT doing that.
Featuring a host of charming side stories that all somehow linked together, plus a simmering relationship between the two leads, the first season felt like a delightful Douglas Adams pastiche. Since season one adapted the novel itself, the second season came as a complete surprise. Crafted entirely by Gaiman, it leaned harder into the Crowley/Aziraphale relationship, along with a gloriously naked and amnesiac Jon Hamm as the angel Gabriel. A great deal happens, and it all ends on a heartbreaking cliffhanger.
Then came season 3 … NOT!
As allegations against Gaiman mounted, stretching from the mid-80s into relatively recent years, comics, films, and television projects tied to him began getting canceled or shelved, including Good Omens 3. Fortunately, Gaiman stepped away from the production, allowing fans to get a third season … sort of. Cut down to a single feature-length finale, it still manages to wrap up a surprising number of story threads, and may even produce a few sniffles.
Gaiman’s problematic history aside, worth a watch.
~Sarge

PANTHEON. Netflix. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
What if the threat isn’t AI? What if it’s UI: uploaded intelligence. Human brains destructively scanned, living only in the cloud. “Pantheon” explores this idea as exquisite, real science fiction. Not cheesy animated sci-fi melodrama, but a genuine exploration of love, grief, immortality, endless simulations, conspiracies, global politics, and so much more.
The animation is restrained, there to serve the story rather than distract from it. The characters are rich, not cardboard cutouts, whether good or bad. No supervillains. No Mary Sues.
It’s a dense story, so if science fiction concepts tend to lose you, this may not be for you. But if they don’t, this absolutely deserves a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS – TALES FROM ’85. Netflix. Series. (5 IMDb)
Stranger Things exits stage left…then pops back out for one more bow.
Set between seasons 2 and 3, this animated take brings back the core crew without sanding things down for kids. It’s not anime or cheap knockoff – dipping their pens in the Spiderverse/Arcane inkwell, with a creative, stylized look. It’s also more focused than the later live-action seasons, trimming most of the adults and zeroing in on the kids. Best of all, Will Byers actually gets to be a character instead of a punching bag, helped by the addition of Niki, an Amazonian punk rocker who connects with him over their shared outsider status. The recast voices are a little jarring at first, but you should settle in. Rough reviews aside, it’s worth a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb)
Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.
They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb)
This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) 
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?
Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge
SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge
A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb)
Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.
Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.
It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.
Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |

May 20, 2026
Go to her website to see how you can support Gillian!

|
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.
|

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MOVE FORWARD WITH NEW ORDINANCE ADDRESSING WAGE THEFT
Last Tuesday, in the face of an anticipated local construction boom, representatives of the Monterey Bay Labor Council presented a compelling argument to the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors to adopt a new Responsible Construction and Wage Theft Ordinance. The County has already taken action to require a Project Labor Agreement on 10 of the County’s capital improvement projects that will support hiring local workers at prevailing wage, but the problem of wage theft, said the representatives, is rampant in the County, estimating over $2.8 million with only two of the trades’ data.
The State’s Deputy Labor Commission verifies claims of wage theft. However, a May, 2024 State Audit of this Commission found that there is a failure to enforce laws that prohibit wage theft. Claims investigations used to take 135 days now take an average of 900 days, and only 12% of the workers filing claims get paid money owed them by construction companies seeking to cut corners.
The proposed new Ordinance would require any large construction project in the County to verify they have no judgments over $10,000 before or after a project. It would be a one-page verification form and would require no investigation by staff. It would not apply to remodels, small business construction or ADU projects.
The matter was brought to the Board by Supervisor Justin Cummings. Discussion was interesting. CEO Nicole Coburn wanted more data. Supervisor DeSerpa worried it would have a chilling effect on contractors bidding on projects in the County? Supervisor Hernandez wanted examples of construction wage theft happening in Santa Cruz County.
The Labor Council representative Mr. Casey Van Den Heuvel, assured that this verification requirement would only apply to large construction projects and seeks to screen out the “bad actors”. Currently, many “good actors” do not bid on projects in the County because they know the “bad actors” will be awarded low bids. Of over 300,000 licensed contractors, about 1,000 would not pass the verification muster. He emphasized, “This is not about union vs. non-union contractors. It’s about good contractors.” He cited local examples such as the City’s recent award to a “bad actor” for the new Downtown Library Project.
Superiviosr Koenig remarked it is unusual to have non-staff presenting a proposed Ordinance, and motioned to have County staff conduct independent research on the issue, returning to the Board in October. That did not pass. Ultimately, the Board agreed to have staff work with the Labor Council representatives and return on September 26 for consideration and possible first reading.
You can listen to the discussion of this matter here, clicking on Agenda Item #10: May 05, 2026 Board of Supervisors – Regular Meeting (trimmed) – Santa Cruz County, CA
I WILL BE INTERVIEWING MR. CASEY VAN DEN HEUVEL THIS FRIDAY, MAY 15, ON KSCO RADIO (AM 1080) AT 2PM ON “COMMUNITY MATTERS” .
CABRILLO COLLEGE NEW FIVE-STORY DORMS PROGRESSING
The discussion of wage theft at the Board of Supervisor meeting reminded me of seeing construction workers picketing last year at the entrance to UCSC, where Devcon Construction was building new student dorms.
Cabrillo College / UCSC new dormitories, also awarded to Devcon Construction, are going up quickly, “on time and on budget”, according to an interview with the new College President Dr. Jen Capps earlier this year (February 27 interview): Community Matters – Santa Cruz Voice
However, one has to wonder how the workers are doing???
View from Highway One.
MONTEREY COUNTY GRAND JURY FINDS 42% OF THE COUNTY HAS INADEQUATE EMERGENCY RADIO RESPONSE COVERAGE
A Report from Monterey County LAFCO caused the Monterey County Civil Grand Jury to investigate radio communications in the County.
Emergency radio coverage gaps impacting Monterey County fire agencies
Santa Cruz County is also considering radio communication system changes, but it is controversial. Many smaller fire districts already struggling financially will not be able to afford the new system. CalFire is not participating in the new system, so some wonder how communications in disasters requiring multiple agencies would work. Santa Cruz County, Cities Signal Support for Encrypted Radio System
The Executive Committee overseeing this expensive and questionable matter that will cost participating agencies $110/month per radio met this week, but is not scheduled to meet for another year. There are no radio experts on the Committee that will determine whether the claim of contractor EF Johnson to provide 95% radio coverage will actually be met.
Stay tuned.
FELTON FIRE DISTRICT BOARD VOTES TO PROCEED WITH BALLOT MEASURE
Last Monday, the Felton Fire District Board voted to proceed with the Prop. 218 mailed ballot special benefit assessment that will give all property owners in the District a chance to approve new funding that will enable full time paid staff to respond. Felton Fire is an all-volunteer response District, and has not raised fire assessments in decades. The District now responds to over 900 calls annually with volunteers, but relying heavily on neighboring fire agencies to help out.
The ballots will go out soon, with final tabulation July 24.
You can find the Engineer’s Report in the Public Documents here
I will be interviewing members of the grassroots group FC4ER (Felton Community 4 Emergency Response) on “Community Matters” on KSCO Radio at 2pm on Friday, May 22.
[fc4er.org]
NON-FLAMMABLE BATTERY STORAGE PROJECTS ARE POSSIBLE
Now that New Leaf Energy has decided to go to the California Energy Commission (CEC) for permitting, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors have the opportunity to further amend the County’s Draft BESS Ordinance to be more protective of residents and the environment. Will they follow the good example of the City of Vacaville to adopt a BESS Ordinance that prohibits flammable lithium BESS projects?
Currently, Supervisors say there is no money to conduct environmental reivew of the Draft Ordinance, which includes a Zoning Overlay. However, if that piece of the Ordinance were removed, the Ordinance itself would not require environmental review.
Consider what Mr. Albert Enault, Senior Planner for the City of Vacaville states:
The draft ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 15061 (b)(3) since there is no possibility that the addition of regulations for BESS Facilities will have a significant effect on the environment. Proposed future BESS facilities will be reviewed in compliance with the provisions of CEQA at the time of application to determine appropriate environmental review.
Albert Enault
Senior Planner
(707) 449-5364
Please contact your Supervisor to urge amendment of the County’s Draft BESS Ordinance to prohibit lithium battery technology in grid-scale BESS projects, and to remove the zoning overlay component. Now that the CEC is in charge of New Leaf’ Energy’s Seahawk BESS Project, it is critical that our County have a protective and codified BESS Ordinance.
If the City of Vacaville can do it, why not Santa Cruz County? Non-flammable BESS is possible and being installed around the world. Why not in Santa Cruz County? Invinity “Super Battery” Delivered in UK First
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |

Book Recommendation – Bay Area Wildlife: An Irreverent Guide
I haven’t traditionally written book recommendations in this column, but here we go. Jeff Miller is the author. You might have heard of him through his work with the Center for Biological Diversity, a group I strongly support for its work conserving species around the Monterey Bay and far beyond. Mr. Miller’s 2024 book “Bay Area Wildlife: An Irreverent Guide” is an especially important gateway into delving deeper into nature around the San Francisco Bay area. He mentioned that he is working on a similar book for “Central Coast Wildlife” but don’t wait for that- get this book!
Jeff Miller
Over the years, I had some email exchanges with Jeff and it was a pleasant surprise to run into him at the recent Salmonid Restoration Federation annual conference in Redding. Jeff has been quite active in a campaign against livestock grazing on public lands, most recently with the controversy at Point Reyes National Seashore. On the other hand, I have been active with both research and collaborative natural areas management involving livestock as a restoration tool for California’s endangered coastal prairies. So, the two of us have long been working in the same system, but with seemingly opposing perspectives.
What I didn’t previously appreciate about Jeff was his writing prowess and obvious love of the natural history of wildlife. We share that.
Approachable Handbook
The biggest strength of “Bay Area Wildlife” is that it is extremely entertaining to read, and not just for readers ‘in the know.’ For those of us who are fans of the fungi books – either the tome “Mushrooms Demystified” or the much smaller handbook “All That the Rain Promises and More” by one time Santa Cruz denizen David Aurora – Jeff’s wildlife book will be a particular joy. Here is that same kind of storytelling and humor that removes ‘inside knowledge’ barriers and promises to enthrall readers of any background or age.
Are you the kind of person with libraries composed mainly of biological field guides, or maybe nonfiction books, or even fiction novels? In all cases, this book would fit well with your reading proclivities.
Know Your Place, Redux
One theme of this column is my urging everyone to (puh-lease!) get to know this wonderful part of the Earth. But, how does anyone do this? Certainly, you won’t get any pleasure or much useful knowledge by reading most of the interpretive signs or brochures at any of the natural areas around the Monterey Bay. Check in with a park docent or “interpretive specialist” and you might hear a tired yarn fit for a 6th grader, sometimes told with exaggerated wonder. Or, you could try reading a website and end up with such little information as to be astounded. For instance, take a glance at the website for Henry Cowell State Park and ask yourself if it does justice to such a rich and diverse part of the world.
On the other hand, pick up this book and you might just start seeing the natural world around you with more open eyes. How can you resist diving into the chapter entitled “Newts: Psychedelic Pond Orgies?.” How about the chapter on Peregrine Falcon subtitled “Screaming Death Parrot?” Each entry is chock full of novel information that enriches your understanding not just of the animal but specific times and places that will help you seek out a glimpse of those critters. Use it as a tour book of the Bay Area, let the chapters draw you into a day of exploration through seeking specific wildlife, and you will no doubt find much, much more.
Bay Area Wildlife: An Irreverent Guide is published by Heyday Books and illustrated by Obi Kauffman. You can buy it online directly from the publisher. Such money helps a great nonprofit, to quote their mission:
“Heyday is an independent, nonprofit publisher founded in 1974 in Berkeley, California. We are a diverse community of writers and readers, activists and thinkers. Heyday promotes civic engagement and social justice, celebrates nature’s beauty, supports California Indian cultural renewal, and explores the state’s rich history, culture, and influence. Heyday works to realize the California dream of equity and enfranchisement.”
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |

Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Pictured above is Milly Zhu, a 34-year-old who recently met up with Ana Swanson, who was covering our current president’s visit to China for the New York Times. It seems that their meeting was mostly by chance. Zhu works in China in film and TV promotion, and was walking around in a shopping mall in Beijing when she stopped to talk with the New York Times reporter. Here’s what Zhu said:
We don’t want war, we want peace. We want to get along well with the United States, and we want to develop our economy. Only peace can create a better economy.
Another person interviewed by Swanson was Peng Shuiming. When he was asked about our current president’s visit, his comment was this: “My impression of him isn’t very good; he’s quite brutal.” Pictures from our current president’s recent visit to China can be seen below. Also, as I mentioned in my blog posting yesterday, our current president has also recently issued a so-called “Counterterrorism Strategy” that promises to kill those whom the president believes threaten the United States. Click here to read that statement.
Now, take a look at the pictures. How could Peng Shuiming have ever gotten such a bad impression of our country?
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |

ANOTHER ONE BITES THE BUS, FLEECING, BAFFLEMENT
President Donald Trump’s trip to China was anticipated by both leaders in differing ways — Xi Jinping expecting Trump to bend his knees, offering non-binding promises with a wink and a nod on issues like Taiwan, and Trump only playing for headlines that make him look like a great man by association, happy to come home with money in his pocket with any side deals. David Rothkopf of the Daily Beast called the trip “a high-stakes scramble to escape the Iran wreckage and his plunging opinion polls, a global ‘inflection point’ where the adults have left the room, the goalposts have been moved to a different zip code, and the ‘leader of the free world’ seemingly auditioning to be China’s most valuable — if accidental — player.”
Ben Meiselas of MeidasTouch cautioned everyone to pay close attention to Trump’s trip, and most importantly what the media was ignoring. The first thing to understand is that China downplayed the president’s visit, minimizing his entourage’s arrival to be greeted by lesser lights in the Chinese government. China’s state-controlled outlets like China Daily, Xinhua News and others barely treated the visit as a major event — the strategy being about China’s dominance and leverage. “And Trump is playing it all wrong,” says Meiselas, by bringing a massive delegation of American CEOs, thinking it’s a power move to project strength, when it actually projects his insecurity, his inadequacy to stand across from Xi all by himself. “Trump knows Xi Jinping is prepared, disciplined, strategic, and operating from a position of long-term leverage. Trump knows he’s outmatched in these settings, so he surrounds himself with CEOs and business leaders because he thinks they can compensate for what he lacks,” contends Meiselas.
Globally, the image being projected is devastating for the US, the image of America going begging to China for rare earth minerals, for supply chain access, for a deal — for economic relief at perhaps the weakest moment imaginable for the country on the world stage. Trump’s destabilization of the Strait of Hormuz, his Iran strategy in the toilet, domestic inflation surging and consumer confidence collapsing, with poll approval numbers dropping by the minute, will all provide a moment of truth for the president and his administration. It should be noted that Iran’s foreign minister met with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, before Trump’s arrival, and now Iran is proposing “reconstructing the security architecture” of the Middle East in what would amount to Iran and China replacing the American security umbrella in the region in a China-centered power structure, with Iran becoming the dominant regional force — a massive geopolitical shift. If NATO credibility weakens and American deterrence disappears in the Middle East, then countries in Asia start recalculating, Japan and South Korea in particular.
China sees American weakness accelerating the inevitability of its unification with Taiwan and expansion of Chinese influence globally — all without firing a shot. So, the US president’s visit was intentionally minimized, a psychological as much as a geopolitical ploy, no elevating him and his entourage, just a routine get-together with chess-master Xi Jinping. Ho-hum! Short-term markets’ initial reactions were slightly positive based on Trump’s tag-along CEO band, but in the long run, if the US continues projecting instability, weakness, and transactional chaos instead of coherent leadership, the trajectory is fraught with danger. The president has been called out for his exclusion of any China experts, or any of the diplomatic corps — many of which have been systematically purged during his tenure. It was seen as total unpreparedness for his inclusion of son Eric, daughter-in-law Lara, Elon Musk, ‘Melania‘ documentary Director Brett Ratner, Marco Rubio (twice-sanctioned by China), and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who assisted in placing tariffs on China. And where in the world is Melania?
Melania’s spokesperson offered, “First Lady Melania Trump is not traveling this time,” shutting down any further questions for details, marking the first conspicuous snub for the president’s China junket. The Daily Beast says, “Her absence is all the more glaring because it follows a trend that has stood out in Trump’s second term — she’s been appearing alongside him less and less on state visits.” The second snub by Xi Jinping was summed up by Trump’s niece, Mary L. Trump, with, “Xi couldn’t be bothered to meet Donald a the airport because he understands as well as Donald does that humiliating your underlings is a great way to keep them in check.”
Satirist Andy Borowitz contributed his take on the China trip with dateline SHANGHAI: “Donald J. Trump accomplished what he called ‘the main goal’ of his trip to China on Thursday by inspecting the printing plant where his $60 Trump Bibles are printed. Accompanied by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump said he wanted ‘to be sure that the Chinese printed the lyrics to ‘God Bless the USA’ right, because those are Jesus’s most important words.’ President Xi praised his American counterpart, telling him, ‘You have created more Chinese jobs than I have.’ Trump cancelled his plans to visit the factory that manufactures gold Trump Mobile phones after learning that it didn’t exist.”
It should be noted that in the Trump Scams record is the Gold Mobile Phone for which brothers Don ‘Tweedledumb’ Jr., and Eric ‘Tweedledumber’ shook down over a half million people over a year ago for a $100 deposit towards their fantastic cell phone — as in “l’ve got a bridge to cell you.” To date, no phones are available and no mobile service has been set up, with a recent change in the terms of service which states there was “No Guarantee of Release, Delivery or Timing,” with indications that the phone might never be released. As the Bulwark blog contributor, Andrew Egger, says, “That’s right, MAGA Patriot! You might have thought you were preordering a phone to be sent to you; in reality, what you were ordering was just a conditional opportunity to buy a Trump phone later, should they ever get around to making them. This is hardly the first time Trump and his family have cashed in on his cult of personality to part his superfans from their cash.” Even if refunds occur, does the interest the Trumps earned from the deposits benefit the superfans in any way? Trump entered politics on the promise that he would stand up for the “forgotten man,” so this is a perfect opportunity for him to follow through on that pledge. Can you fleece me now?
It appears that the “forgotten man” promise now extends to other countries, as well. In a FoxNews interview with Bret Baier, Trump began throwing Taiwan under the bus as a result of his meeting with Xi Jinping — described by Simon Rosenberg on Hopium Chronicles, giving them the “stop being so uppity” Ukraine treatment. “When you look at the odds, China is a very, very powerful big country. That’s [Taiwain] a small island. Think of it, it’s 59 miles away. We’re 9500 miles away. That’s a little bit of a difficult problem. Taiwan was developed because we had presidents that didn’t know what the hell they were doing. They stole our chip industry,” Trump whined to Baier. Rosenberg writes, “Whether through compromise, or a deep desire to be like them, Trump has a history of yielding to and appeasing strongmen. He has done it for years with Putin, giving him so much and getting nothing in return for the US. He did it with Bibi in February, yielding to his ill-thought through war on Iran. He’s now doing it with Xi on Taiwan, getting nothing in return.” Rosenberg says he gets played like a fool again and again, accelerating our global geopolitical and economic decline. He gets admission to this club of autocrats, and as he walks through the door they pick his pockets, give him a table without a view of the stage, and howl with laughter at their ridiculous good fortune.
Rosenberg warns us to be “clear eyed about what Trump is doing and who he is, as he imagines himself to be like MBS, Bibi, Putin, and Xi,” in a world run by a handful of strongmen. He is trying to help Putin win in Ukraine, and Xi in his taking of Taiwan, even as he dreams about making Venezuela the 51st state. With the help of the corrupt Roberts Supreme Court he is working to install minority rule in this country for the so-called Republicans, ending American democracy. Trump is leaving the country less prosperous, less safe, and less free, as he builds his ballrooms and golden statues, and enriching himself and his family, expecting us to be thankful for the pain he is inflicting upon us. Despite his fantasies, he is no strongman — he is a fool, a coward, and a traitor who is laughed at around the world, also with their laughter now directed at citizens of this nation.
Andy Borowitz also reports: “Calling it a landmark deal, on Monday Presidents Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir Putin of Russia inked an agreement to jointly own Donald J. Trump. According to sources familiar with the deal, the two leaders crafted a timeshare arrangement under which each will have the right to use Trump when the other is not. Putin and Xi scooped up Trump at a bargain price since they acquired him in distressed or ‘as is’ condition, sources said. Both presidents were reportedly offered joint ownership of Eric Trump but passed.”
Thomas Kika on Alternet says that Trump is “painfully, obviously baffled,” according to a scathing new takedown from the New York Times, as he runs headlong into his “true weakness“: people who cannot be bought or threatened into compliance. Conservative Trump critic, David French, published in his piece that the Iran war has revealed “a kind of person who truly flummoxes Trump, the person he just can’t understand — the true believer.” The president’s inability to handle collisions with these sorts of people, French explains, is one of the major reasons why he is flailing so badly as he attempts to bring the disastrous Iran conflict to a swift conclusion. “The transactional nature of the Trump administration is perhaps its most obvious characteristic,” writes French. “And transactional people often soothe their own consciences with the belief that everyone else is ultimately transactional as well — the only question is their price.” But not everyone is transactional — some actually have beliefs they are willing to die for, and Trump is painfully, obviously baffled when he encounters beliefs as that.
Trump expected a brief, Venezuela-like excursion with Iran, where he easily topples a leader, bending the next regime to his will; but by destroying of almost all of Iran’s leadership he is left with the most fanatical elements in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, rather than the slightly more moderate clerics. “In response, Trump plays the only cards he knows how to play — alternating between threatening death and destruction and proposing business deals,” French continues. “Remember when he considered a ‘joint venture’ to control the Strait of Hormuz with Iran?” French explains that the Republican Party has done nothing to disabuse Trump of his transactional views, since he has been able to offer them money or power, or both. Even the religious leaders around Trump are fundamentally transactional, the president knowing that millions of his voters possess similar values. Their commitments to character or ideology took a back seat to the simple desire to defeat their opponents — the most important thing being to win. Anything else was luxury.
Steve Schmidt writes in The Warning that we are now passing from one era to another, with the hour approaching when the beginning of the 21st century can no longer be delayed. He says that it’s likely another 40+ years will pass before America is led by someone who was born in the 21st century, which means this century is now being formed by those who were born in, and approximate, the era during which America achieved its maximum power and maximum triumph. Therefore, it calls for a season of renewal, reform, reconciliation and national reinvigoration on this edge of a new American age. “Our great national challenges should be occasions to see opportunities for new greatness steeped in new justice. Things are falling apart in America, and the ideas which were once new must be fought for again with new conviction about the necessity of liberty for each human being,” concludes Schmidt.
Elliot Kirschner writes on Through the Fog, “There is no tidy package for democracy, no ribbon and bow capable of containing our complexities, contradictions, and struggles. It is through dialogue, mutual respect, persuasion, and listening that we must find our way forward. But all of that is predicated on having a democracy sturdy enough from which to build. Our challenge is to ensure that it survives, while also not losing sight of what is required of us once it does.”
[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]
SUPERPOWER SUICIDE, UNQUALIFIED, NO VICTORIES
Author, lecturer and professor Timothy Snyder, noted particularly for his two small books, On Tyranny and On Freedom, opens his latest blog entry with, “The United States has just spent billions of dollars to lose a war that enriches oligarchs, impoverishes the citizenry, sabotages its alliances, and strengthens its enemies. As justification for the self-destructive mindlessness, the White House gestures towards Jesus and genocide.” He recounts a recent speaking engagement at the Council on Foreign Relations, where he called Trump’s utterly unethical and self-destructive war, a catastrophe in itself, while suggesting the guiding principle of his foreign policy is “superpower suicide.”
[ click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse) ]
Snyder spells out his definition, saying that empires have risen and failed before, but to his knowledge no state has ever chosen to kill its own power, succeeding with such rapidity as has our president in his bumbling. It is difficult to see the overall picture even as most of the population opposes his individual “excursions.” And while some may hope that each adventure is based on some understanding of the national interest, that has not proven to be the case. To provide perspective, clarity is needed into this anti-strategic self-slaughter, for which Snyder discusses the traditional bases of state power. First, a superpower must be a modern state with an arrangement that includes, “via law and other institutions, a larger body of citizens within a common endeavor.” However, Trump and his MAGA gang do not view the USA as a state — its existence being simply a commercial opportunity for a select few, American or otherwise.
The national interest is another minimal requirement of a superpower, with a sense of why that power must be used. Again, Trump and his gang exhibit no interest in the good of the people. Theorists of international relations may differ on how leaders might understand national interests, but US citizens are intellectually unprepared for this situation in which the head of the country simply does not care about the nation. To maintain itself over time, a superpower state must guarantee a succession principle, “a means by which authority is transferred from some people to other people, while institutions continue to function.” Democracy in the US traditionally enables succession, while other countries historically may use a dynastic system, or a politburo system. Snyder says “getting from democracy to such different arrangements would end the American republic,” — a capitalist politburo, “the sort of oligarchical coven that resulted in VP Vance.” President Trump aspires to stay in power indefinitely, “two more terms,” in his own words. By putting the power of the ballot in question, he puts America in question, and American power.
Snyder sees no way for states to thrive and maintain power unless the right people are in charge, which means the inevitable tensions arise since there is no perfect means to accomplish this. In the past, powerful states found ways to enable qualified individuals to serve in positions of authority, such as ancient China’s examination system, or Napoleon’s merit principles for both civil and military positions. Tragically, we see the Trump administration disabling our civil service system, and Trump, along with SecDef Hegseth, are purging the military of experienced and qualified personnel from the armed services. The wildly unqualified appointees in Trump’s cabinet should not have been considered, let alone appointed, a certain marker of superpower suicide.
Educating the populace provides a mechanism to refresh its society, administrating its politics, and preparing new leaders to understand the challenges and dynamics of the world. The Trump administration has done the opposite by silencing university students, threatening faculties, and purging libraries, while supporting scams which result in transfer of monies from poorer to richer schools. The chaos of the administration reaches into the internet, which is hardly regulated in its realm of emotions and recriminations. Beginning in the 1940s, the US was an outstanding example of an alliance between politics and science, building institutions to fund science and attract scientists, but current American policy is to fund science on the basis of primitive ideological taboos, as doubt is cast upon basic scientific observations. Young scientists are discouraged from immigrating to this country, as we see older, established scientists leaving the country for better environments elsewhere.
The early humans who mastered fire, or domesticating plants using solar energy, and by understanding weather, climate and wind for the purposes of exploration and conquest, learned that those primitive energy resources could further their successes in the quest for power. The USA found early success in transitioning to hydrocarbon energy with coal, oil and natural gas, forms now becoming obsolete in ecological, as well as economic terms. Unfortunately, the Trump administration chooses to cancel the country’s attempt to transition toward using renewable energy, choosing instead to subsidize the old technologies that have no future. Timothy Snyder sees this as superpower suicide in its most basic form — and a distinct benefit to China. The president may be defeating his drive for hydrocarbons by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off oil supplies around the globe, and reawakening the push toward renewables.
The advances in technology are obvious with the rise of the great powers, with military achievements being associated with various innovations; and while the great sums in the Pentagon’s budget are eye-opening, President Trump has elected to focus on weapons from the past, notably his plans for ‘Trump-class‘ battleships. Modern nations understand that this type of weaponry has been obsolete since World War II, which in today’s world of warfare only provides an adversary with a large, highly vulnerable target for the weapons that are in use currently. At the very least, Trump should be taking a page from the war between Russia and Ukraine for learning what is involved, especially with Ukraine’s ability at self-defense.
The art of diplomacy depends upon the deliberate construction of a diplomatic corps, training people in languages and knowledge of other countries, but these efforts are now ignored by Trump and his crew — the foreign service being trashed. The president prefers his bullying techniques, portraying himself as the leader of a big, bad entity who demands that other nations kowtow to his wishes, which has proven to be ineffective. Snyder says that the notion that the president can “make deals” is the sign of a religious cult, which results in generation of creative excuses for the lack of performance. “There is no evidence that Trump knows how to negotiate, and abundant evidence that he does not: for example, defeat in trade wars with China; personal vulnerability to the preferences of Russian leaders, and the disaster of Iranian nuclear enrichment,” says Snyder. He points to the critical negotiators, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who see the obvious economic stakes in the relevant conflicts, their diplomacy having less sophistication than that of the Huns. Snyder maintains that “it is hard to overstate how primitive the current American approach is, and how much joy it brings to America’s enemies.”
History shows that all great powers have alliances, and that active diplomacy was a key to success in maintaining power, as the architects of American superpower understood. However, for Trump, he chooses to mock and marginalize useful allies for no other reason than his personal whimsy and a sense of grievance, having no sense of state or national interest, and not understanding that alliances are of service. The president is annoyed that he is losing a war, so he removes troops from Germany, not comprehending that they were assigned there to enable us to win wars, an action inconsistent with the maintenance of power. Instead, he chooses to treat middle eastern countries as allies, “countries that have nothing to offer except their own interests in the use of American armed forces in their region, permanent engagement in the disastrous politics of oil, and financial opportunities for people personally close to Trump,” charges Snyder.
After WWII the US not only built a system of alliances — it created a set of laws, rules, and norms that allowed American power to maintain itself and to expand. Its policies were designed to maximize American trade and security interests by indirectly and directly influencing NATO and the European Union, which also served to keep the country in the center of the world. The Trump administration has chosen to abuse the laws and conventions of this postwar setup, and attendance at global forums and conferences only brings out the whining and complaining that the rules are against this country, even though we essentially made the rules. So, our government is deliberately destroying its own International system as it improves the positions of rivals China and Russia, something the two have been unable to achieve — leave it to Trump!
Timothy Snyder holds that a superpower wins in confrontations some of the time, but the Trumpers lose again and again, losses glaringly seen by other nations. Trump’s big announcement that tariffs would be his main weapon of influence only saw a loss to China, strengthening and emboldening Beijing. The US would be better served if Ukraine received support, but a policy switch pivoted the country to favor Russia. Even without US support Ukraine seems to have the upper hand, with Russia performing badly, and this country on the losing end in an obvious strategic defeat. Trump’s failed Iranian policies have created an even more radical regime, with their enriched uranium, and now holding new sources of economic power in the world. Trump and Hegseth willfully demolished institutions within the Iranian society, cutting off any hope of communicating, or influencing the trajectory of the country’s future, by using self-humiliatingly exhaustive military options — NO victories!
Snyder sees the US being “governed by people who celebrate defeat in symbolic terms characteristic of states in disastrous decline. Consider Defense Secretary Hegseth’s description of the rescue of a US pilot as the resurrection of Jesus. The screaming blasphemy of this might distract us from its strategic helplessness. Christological images of this sort are used as propaganda to transform defeat in the real world into victory in some imaginary one.” The downing of a US fighter jet means that an individual mission failed, with the pilot luckily surviving, but it points to an unsustainable air campaign, an indicator of a lost war against Iran. “The notion that [rescue of the pilot] this was a ‘literal miracle,’ as Hegseth claimed, brings the US, sadly, into the tradition of losers who use Jesus to claim to be winners. Donald Trump’s own self-deification has to be seen in similar terms: a president who could assert power in this world would not have to claim that his real authority comes from another. His fantasies of the total destruction of Iranian civilization are part of an apocalyptic panorama that is inconsistent with decent politics,” writes Snyder.
Perhaps not the most interesting of historical subjects, finances and budget disaster stands behind many of the most notable collapses of state power, as we watch Trump’s national debt approaching $40 trillion. Our national debt is a higher GDP of the country for the first time since the end of WWII, the notable point being the normality of running big deficits with the challenge of a large scale war. However, we are running huge deficits for an entirely different reason: declining to tax wealthy individuals and corporations — an approach inconsistent with fighting and winning wars or maintaining social services that allow a modern society to function. It profoundly reflects an approach to politics — government as customer service to the very wealthy — that leads us from power to ethics.
The current war may indicate a diagnosis of superpower suicide, because wars cannot be won by people who have no idea what they are doing, having no frame of reference beyond their own “gut feelings.” Wars can’t be fought well when the wrong people are making the daily decisions, with the wrong weapons being deployed, and no reasonable end is possible without practice of diplomacy, with no notion of the value of alliances and no concern about corruption. So if the war is only a symptom of superpower suicide, superpower suicide is only a symptom of a still deeper condition that must be addressed. We must ask ourselves how to undo the distortions of democracy and the drastic inequalities of the enabled world-historical levels of strategic buffoonery. If only a year of Trump could bring about superpower suicide, indicators should show us that the prior status was unsustainable.
Snyder concludes his essay with some meaty food-for-thought: “The systems that made the United States a superpower cannot be rebuilt as they were, nor should they be: they involved structural injustices that made the present attempt at self-annihilation possible. From where we stand now there are two ways forward: one is the self-induced downfall of the American republic; the other is to reconsider American ideals and to restructure American politics so as to bring the people greater power over a more just future.”
Carron J. Phillips writes in The Contrarian on Substack, that America becomes outraged only when it’s too late, and that if this country had believed Trump the first time and understood Project 2025, this would not be our reality. Before he was elected he told us he would build migrant detention camps, deploy the US military both at the border and inland; he would let red states monitor women’s pregnancies and prosecute those who violate abortion bans; he would, at his personal discretion, withhold funds appropriated by Congress; he would be willing to fire a US attorney who doesn’t carry out his order to prosecute someone, breaking with a tradition of independent law enforcement that dates from America’s founding; he was weighing pardons for every one of his supporters accused of attacking the US Capitol on January 6, 2021; he might not come to the aid of an attacked ally in Europe or Asia if he felt that country wasn’t paying enough for its own defense; he would gut the US civil service; deploy the National Guard to American cities as he sees fit; close the White House pandemic-preparedness office; and staff his administration with acolytes who back his false assertion that the 2020 election was stolen! Take notice! Trump 2028 isn’t propaganda; it is a preemptive campaign slogan. Republicans tip their pitches because they know Americans will ignore the signs. A sure path to further our superpower suicide!
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com.
|

Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Dateline: May 20, 2026
Webmistress here… Thomas’ great aunt, Hulda Hoover McLean, said something to me about Thomas once, as he walked through the room we were sitting in at her house on Walnut Avenue. She said, “Thomas’ mind is very often not on what he’s doing.”
I’m telling you this because he left Arizona to come out here for a bit, and didn’t bring the book with him… He’ll be back next week, if he can find a copy at the library to use!

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts.
Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |

“Travel”
“Like all great travellers, I have seen more than I remember, and remember more than I have seen.”
~Benjamin Disraeli
“To travel is to take a journey into yourself.”
~Danny Kaye
“Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends.”
~Maya Angelou
“One travels more usefully when alone, because he reflects more.”
~Thomas Jefferson
“Never go on trips with anyone you do not love.”
~Ernest Hemingway
|
LINE RIDER. This is not a new video, but it’s a good one. It’s almost hypnotic to watch! Set it to fullscreen, and enjoy!
|
COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice as soon as the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
|
OUR SPONSORS
OUR FRIENDS
|