April 9 – 15, 2025
Greensite… on zoning giveaways to challenge… Steinbruner… town hall meeting Monday, on batteries!… Hayes… ‘Pests’ Reconsidered… Patton… One For All And All For One… Matlock… a disaster of idiocy…piratical penguins…boom, boom, boom… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… long forgotten/never seen photos… Quotes on… “Trees”

|
Dateline: April 9, 2025
STAYING POSITIVE. I find myself torn between wanting to be informed of what is going on and wanting to curl up in bed until this whole mess is over. I see signs and evidence that people are getting involved and doing things, and some of those things are actually working! In Sackets Harbor, NY, a town of 1400 people, a mother and her 3 children were swept up by ICE and moved to a Texas detention center. ICE was looking for a South African man who was wanted in connection with child pornography charges. Why they thought it was a good idea to also take this family is beyond me. However, here’s where it gets good: in this town of less than 1400, there was a protest rally of 1000 people saying “Bring home mom & kids!”. And they succeeded! The family is back, or on their way back as we speak.
I don’t for a second believe that all this commotion didn’t have an effect, even though we’re being told by authorities that it didn’t. As Becky always says, “Write one letter, make one phonecall, just do something!”
SUNRISE SANTA CRUZ. If you want something to do this Sunday, Sunrise Santa Cruz has an event happening at UCSC at 1pm. Gary Patton tipped me off to this one! Click the image on the right for a larger version, which you then just click to close.
MAKE GOOD TROUBLE, and we’ll see you next week!
~Webmistress

MINDHUNTER. Netflix. Series. (8.6 IMDb)
Not a new one – just happened to watch it again, and thought it relevant for locals. Mindhunter, a docucrama based on the non-fiction account of FBI Special Agent John Douglas (renamed Holden Ford in the show) and his trials and tribulations to get the FBI to accept the concept of a “serial killer” back in ’77, and the idea that they could be profiled. Pursuant of this is a recreated serial killer fan-service list including Manson, Berkowitz, and particularly relevant for locals, Big Ed Kemper (for those tuning in late, Ed “The CoEd Killer” Kemper was the best known contributor to Santa Cruz being “affectionately” dubbed “Murder Capital of the World” back in the early ’70s). The show recreates the time and lifestyle of the time remarkably well, and the uneasy partnership of straight-laced Holt McCallany and earnest Jonathan Groff as the leads is well cast. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE RESIDENCE. Netflix. Series. (7.8 IMDb)
I’m happy to see the return of the cozy mystery – Knives Out, Death and Other Details, and even Only Murders in the Building. Sure, Hallmark churns out an endless stream of formulaic/hygienic perky upper middle class “professional women” who solve mysteries while hygienically engaging in romance with some square jawed cop/firefighter/architect, but they lack any sort of charm or character. The Residence gives us Cordelia Cupp (Orange is the New Black’s Uzo Aduba): an acclaimed detective, and stout birder, who finds herself wader deep in drama and intrigue surrounding a murder in the White House. Giving absolutely zero f***s about titles and position, she pursues the truth through a cast of notables: Giancarlo Esposito, Jason Lee, Bronson Pinchot, Molly Griggs, and even Al Franken, reprising his role as a Senator. Might have been a few episodes too long, but worth the wait. Definite watch.
~Sarge
STAR TREK: SECTION 31. Paramount+. Movie. (3.8 IMDb)
I know I’m late to the table for this, but we decided to finally sit down and watch Star Trek: Section 31. Empress Georgiou (the mirror-universe evil counterpart of heroic Capt. Georgiou from Star Trek: Discovery) is pressed back into service with Section 31 – the black-ops division of Starfleet – for essentially a caper “mission”. Things go wrong, and she and a band of misfit specialists have to make it right. Michelle Yeoh is wonderful, as she always is. What she’s given to work with is tepid at best. I’m not a toxic fan – I’ve liked a lot of Trek related stuff that people kvetch about, but I do recognize when they miss the mark. Not just “doesn’t feel like Star Trek”, but feels like a fairly average caper film. No brilliant gotcha moments, no delicious red herrings. Just bland. Which is hard to do with Michelle Yeoh! It doesn’t quite make me feel like I was robbed of an hour and a half, but I was not really entertained. Highlight for the geek crowd: a Cheronian waiter. Watch only for a completionist compulsion.
~Sarge
NO OTHER LAND. In theaters. Movie (8.3 IMDb)
Academy Award-winning documentary, No Other Land, highlights the impact of political conflicts on everyday people. Co-directed by Palestinian filmmaker Basel Adra and Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham, the film follows them in the forced displacement of the small settlement of Masafer Yatta by Israeli forces. The view we get, from the “street” as it were, brings home the workaday world that is being unceremoniously wiped out by forces beyond shame or consequence. It makes it difficult to maintain an objective view of chess pieces being neatly moved around a board – it’s hard and personal, and as foreign as it should feel, hitting you right in the hometown. After winning the award, another co-director, Hamdan Ballal, was arrested and detained by Israeli authorities. The academy’s reaction: a tepid equivalent of “there are good people on both sides”. Definitely requires a watch.
~Sarge
THE ELECTRIC STATE. Netflix Movie (6 IMDb) This has the energy of ’80s adventure films, like Batteries Not Included and War Games, with a touch of Fallout retro-futurism. Here’s the deal: In the ’50s, Walt Disney sparked a robot boom, leading to a robot rebellion in the ’90s. After the war, robots were confined to a walled-off Midwest wasteland. Michelle (Millie Bobby Brown) discovers her genius brother, supposedly dead, stuck in a robot shell and searching for a mysterious doctor. Keats (Chris Pratt) and his robot sidekick help her break into the wasteland. They’re pursued by a robot exterminator (Giancarlo Esposito) working for a tech billionaire, Skate (Stanley Tucci), who wants Michelle’s brother. Fun, nostalgic, and spot-on art direction. Worth a watch. ~Sarge
ADOLESCENCE. Netflix Series (8.4 IMDb) I was going to start off saying this was uninspired in its execution, till I saw a shot fly up from one character, fly several blocks away, drop down to where another character is getting out of a car, and hold a steady close up – all in one shot. A British crime drama about the impact of incel politics on pre-sexual children. Very saddening. Worth a watch. ~Sarge
A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. AppleTV, PrimeTV. Movie (7.4 IMDb) I don’t know how accurate this is as a depiction of young Bob Dylan (Timothee Chalamet), but it does make me yearn for those days as an adult (I wouldn’t be released till ’63). The film basically encapsulates Dylan from ’61 to ’65, following his relationships, and rise in the folk community, and his troubled transition to something more. Ed Norton as the supportive and eventally outgrown Pete Seeger, Elle Fanning as Dylan’s constantly trying-to-stay-in-his-focus lover Sylvie Russo/Suze Rotolo, and Monica Barbaro as the legendary sometime lover/sometime music partner Joan Baez. Worth a watch.~Sarge
THE BRUTALIST. PrimeTV. Movie (7.5 IMDb) I thought the title was JUST a reference to the Brutalist Movement in art and architecture. Oh how wrong I was. A brutal story about love, separation, and power. Adrien Brody is gut-wrenching in his performance as a holocaust survivor, drug addict, and brutalist architect. It’s like dragging yourself along the edge of a straight razor – the further forward you go, the deeper it cuts. Painful, but worth a watch. Interesting note – while Brody’s character is fictional, the name Lazlo Toth (and variants) is out there, most notable to me, it was the name of the guy who vandalized La Pieta, and it was the pen-name of Don Novello (Reverend Guido Sarducci on old SNL) when writing his “Lazlo Letters”. ~Sarge
DAREDEVIL. Disney+. Series (8.6 IMDb) The one that started the Netflix/Marvel cavalcade. Charlie Cox and Vincent D’Onofrio bring depth and humor/tragedy to the David and Goliath of New York. Matt Murdoch/Daredevil (Cox), an attorney who was struck blind as a youth, develops the ability to “see” through the use of organic sonar, and uses that ability (along with rigorous martial arts training) to take on the criminal denizens of the shadowy streets. Wilson Fisk/Kingpin (D’Onofrio), a man of outsized power (figuratively and literally) with rage issues, but also a nuanced romantic side, finds his criminal enterprises falling into the “sights” of the blind kid from Hell’s Kitchen. Subsequent stories dealt with other comic characters, Elektra and The Punisher. Amazing fight choreography (not just martial arts, but the fluidity of the staging) if you’re into that – not for the faint of heart. Now on Disney. ~Sarge
DAREDEVIL – BORN AGAIN. Disney+. Series (9 IMDb) For anyone thinking that Daredevil would lose its edge being on Disney, think again. The original cast of Netflix’s Daredevil are back for this sequel from Disney. After a journey through various other shows (the Defenders, Hawkeye, Echo, and She Hulk) Cox and D’Onofrio are back. In the first two episodes we see Matt, in the wake of a tragedy, hang up the horns, and Fisk coming out of rehabilitation after getting shot in the face by Echo (see: “Hawkeye” and “Echo”). Matt returns to lawyering, and Fisk … has a vision for a better New York, as Mayor. Just a wee tad chilling, given the current climate. First two episodes on Disney right now – new episodes every Tuesday. ~Sarge
COMPANION. Apple TV, Fandango, PrimeTV. Movie (7.1 IMDb) Iris (Sophie Thatcher) and Josh (Jack Quaid) traveling to a friend’s country home for a party where the fact that one of the guests is an android “companion” is the LEAST surprising thing that will be discovered. Some distressingly recognizable relationship dynamics are revealed and explored. Also some violence, and a sexual assault, for those who might be triggered. Well made for a light budget, with some nuanced performances. For those troubled by AI – you might want to start saying “please and thank you” to Alexa and Siri. ~Sarge
MOANA 2. Apple TV, Fandango, PrimeTV, YouTube, Disney+. Series (6.8 IMDb) Moana, after reconnecting her people with their seafaring heritage, discovers the ocean is empty. She’s called back by the Gods to face a greedy deity who sunk a cornerstone island, once the link between all Oceania’s seafaring people. Unfortunately, it’s a step down from the original. “Get Lost,” sung by the mid-film villain Matangi, lacks the charm of “Shiny,” and Maui feels like a shadow of his former self. Moana’s crew is a completely superfluous random mix—grumpy farmer, Maui fanboy, manic tech girl, and another comic relief animal (who’s outshone by HeiHei, the chicken). Only the mute rabid coconut warrior, Kotu, adds any value. Much like the first film, the Big Bad is just an angry, personality-less force, this time throwing lightning instead of fireballs. While it’ll entertain kids, there’s little for the parents this time around. Comes to Disney+ March 12th. ~Sarge
HEART EYES. In theaters. Movie (6.6 IMDb) A meet-cute rom-com – with a slasher! Odd mix, but it seems to be director Josh Ruben’s forte. Ad designer Ally (Olivia Holt) accidently presents a “historic tracic lovers” motif JUST as notorious serial killer, Heart Eyes, who murders romantic couples on Valentine’s Day, resurfaces. She teams up with “ad fixer” freelancer Jay (Mason Gooding) in a “Desk Set” will-they won’t-they team-up, until an unexpected kiss puts them in the sights of Heart Eyes. The slashing is moderately creative, the chemistry fairly good, but it just lacks a real personality for Heart Eyes (which you need for a franchise killer). Not for the timid, but not epic gorefest either. On par with Christopher Landon’s 2020 body-swap horror/comedy “Freaky” (ala Freaky Friday – only instead of mother/daughter, it’s slasher/cheerleader). ~Sarge


The open land pictured is located at the western end of Delaware Ave. across from De Anza Mobile Home Park with UCSC Marine Labs to the west. It is one of the few remaining large open spaces left in the city. The notice announces a Planning Commission meeting for Thursday April 17 when a decision will be made whether to rezone the land; the upper 4 acres to agricultural, the lower 6.3 acres to Low-Medium Residential.
The entire 10.3-acre site is currently zoned Low-Density Residential. Staff is requesting that the upper 4 acres be rezoned agricultural, paving the way for the Homeless Garden Project (HGP) to remain permanently at its current location on the upper edge of the site. This upper area near the railroad tracks is off-limits for housing due to its being a riparian corridor and home to the CA. red-legged frog. Ron Swenson, CEO of Swenson Solar owns the land and generously donated part of it to the HGP, selling an adjacent area near Antonelli Pond for future HGP expansion. So far so good.
If the Planning Commission votes to rezone the remaining 6.3 acres upwards to Low-Medium Residential (upzoning), a developer will then be able to build 252 townhouses on this land. That is not a typo. Under current zoning, prior to density bonuses and Assembly Bill 1287, a developer could build a maximum of 63 townhouses on this site. How did we get from 63 to 252?
The current zoning, Low-Density Residential allows a maximum of 10 units per acre (same as the Meder St. site). If the Planning Commission supports staff recommendation, the new zoning of Low-Medium Residential allows a maximum of 20 units per acre. That gets you to 126. Now factor in AB 1287. This state legislation, passed last year, doubles the allowed density of existing residential zoning, and waives height limits. So now we are at the 252 units of housing. What developer would not be thrilled with this four-fold increase in the value of their land without any exertion or effort? All political decisions.
Should this upzoning pass, what it reveals is the hypocrisy of staff and elected officials. How often have we heard council and staff lament that they no longer have control over land use decisions; that the state has preempted local control. That is largely true, although we don’t see any effort to join other cities in pushing back against the state. However, this upzoning is securely under local control. It is one of the very few local discretions available to temper the rush to build as high, wide, and dense as possible. That upzoning is even on the agenda confirms that staff is unconcerned with the many voices of the community that plead for a little less height, a little less dense, at every new project hearing. Staff seem to have forgotten that they are public not developer servants. Since many do not live in the city, perhaps it’s easy for them to view their decisions abstractly; it won’t affect their views or sunlight or ability to get across town.
It is also poor planning. This 6.3 acres is at the far western edge of town. It is not near shops, or easy walking distance of amenities, nor near a major transit hub. It is not an infill project. It is however within relatively easy access to UCSC. It’s not hard to spot the trend. Most of the units in the massive new projects typically are of dorm room size. Some developers make no bones that what they are building is for UCSC students. Providing housing for the ever-increasing UCSC student population has smoothly been passed from gown to town. Those 3,000 units about to be built on the western side of the campus? That is catch-up, allowing current overcrowded dorms to revert to the capacity for which they were designed. It is not housing for additional students nor to give off-campus rentals some breathing room. Nor is there evidence to support the developers’ claim that students moving into these pricey new off-campus units will free up existing single-family rental houses when student numbers are ever-increasing.
The usual response from electeds and staff is to throw up their arms and proclaim, what can we do? The state has taken away our local control! Easy…do not upzone this land. Thanks to AB 1287, developers can still build double the number of units at the Low-Density zoning for a total of 126 units.
Not Only but Also: At the same meeting, the commissioners will also decide whether to upzone the 29-acre Downtown Extension area; the site for the proposed new Arena and housing for 4,000 new residents. Again, this rezoning decision is under local, not state control. The current zoning is 35 feet over most of the area with 48 feet near the river. Under current zoning and under AB 1287, developers can build structures as high as 8 to 10 stories. If the area is upzoned to 85 feet as is being recommended, then structures as high as 20 stories and above will be legally allowed.
The loss of a sense of place in Santa Cruz due to massive new high-rises is largely out of our control. This is one rare opportunity when your voice will matter. The staff report for the meeting will be available on the Friday or Monday prior to the meeting. If you cannot make the meeting on the 17th which is at 7pm in city council chambers, then write to cityplan@santacruzca.gov. You can watch the meeting on Community TV at Channel 25 or online, but you cannot give input except in person or by prior email.
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |

‘Attend the Town Hall meeting Monday, April 14, at the Watsonville Church of the Nazarene (701 Green Valley Road, Watsonville) at 6:30pm to learn what is happening in Santa Cruz County regarding three proposed lithium battery energy storage system (BESS) facilities. The three locations proposed are Paul Sweet Road (next to Dominican Hospital), Freedom Blvd. in Aptos (near Aptos High School), and 90 Minto Road (off Green Valley Road) in Watsonville…that one is already in the permitting process.
Why are Santa Cruz County Supervisors so silent in the aftermath of the Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire about their plan to put three lithium battery energy storage system (BESS) plants in the County???
Despite residents repeatedly asking for town hall meetings about these projects, NONE of the Supervisors will organize one. Supervisor Felipe Hernandez stated he does not intend to do so until AFTER the Board approves the draft BESS Ordinance to finalize the three locations. That date just got moved to September 9, 2025, but meanwhile, New Leaf Energy and Swift Consultants have applied for permits to build a lithium BESS at 90 Minto Road, just off Green Valley Road, and next to College Lake in Watsonville.
Guest speakers at Monday’s event include Santa Cruz County Fire Marshal Chris Walters, Pajaro Valley Unified School District Trustee Gabriel Medina, survivors of the Moss Landing Vistra BESS Fire, and others.
Please share this information with others.
Information available on STOP Lithium BESS in Santa Cruz County (FB)
Listen to interviews on the BESS issue, including Assemblymember Dawn Addis re AB 303, and other programs. April 11 includes interviews with Moss Landing Vistra Fire survivor and Community grassroots organizers.
Santa Cruz Voice, Community Matters
FIRE SEASON (AND SANTA CRUZ CITY FIRE LEADERS) HEAT UP …BE PREPARED
Fire Season is just around the corner. Improve your defensible space and learn how to be better prepared for evacuations with this entertaining video by Santa Cruz City Fire Dept.
APPLY NOW TO SERVE ON THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY
The Santa Cruz County Court is now accepting applications for the 2025-2026 Civil Grand Jury. Take a look, read some of the past excellent Reports, and consider applying!
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. ATTEND THE BESS TOWN HALL MEETING MONDAY AND DEMAND YOUR COUNTY SUPERVISOR HOLD ONE AS WELL FOR TRANSPARENCY.
JUST DO ONE THING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE!
Cheers,
Becky
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |

Our naturally discerning brains overcategorize a subset of species, nonhuman pests, to our peril. Nature can teach us to be better, and with these lessons our minds open to more than just these lessons.
Bunnies!
It is almost Easter, and the iconic Easter Bunny is once again our heart’s focus. Spring’s promise of fertility, the quickening. Just this past week, this year’s first batch of baby brush rabbits made their debut in my yard. They are tiny; one could easily sit in the palm of my hand. Big dark shiny eyes, tiny ears – so cute! I steward brush bunnies, which is not an easy prospect when also making the world safer for wildfire. These bunnies, as reflected in their name, like brush cover and brush likes to burn. So just big enough patches of brush get renewed in 3-year intervals, separated from other patches so the coming wildfire doesn’t get too hot.
My farming buddies think I’ve lost my marbles hosting brush bunnies on purpose. I admit to the extraordinary harm this species can mete out. I’ve lost young fruiting shrubs and trees to bark gnawing rabbits when their population got too high and there was nothing much otherwise left to eat. I’ve heard that starving humans also resort to gnawing on bark. After the CZU 2020 wildfire, there were 30 brush bunnies packed into my yard, the last green place for miles. Coyote learned where to get lunch pretty quickly, and the population plummeted. Now, they’re recovering.
Rabbits are grazers and they mow my lawn. And they feed the owls, hawks, and coyotes. The safe zones, not too far from the brush, are tight carpets of mown prairie, 2″ tall. As the rabbit population spreads out, I notice new mowing along rabbit-width pathways, forays from newly colonized shrubs, out into the 18″ turf.
Watership Down is an excellent book about rabbit life. I’m happy to be witnessing rabbits cavorting this spring, where they dance together, leap frog-like. Better entertainment than bird feeders by far, and cheaper, and with better side effects.
Rodents
When most people hear the word ‘rodents’ they recoil in disgust, now we are facing deep psychological pest instinct. Rabbits aren’t rodents – they’re ‘lagomorphs,’ off in a far different part of the evolutionary tree. Rodents include mice, rats, voles, squirrels, chipmunks, marmots, beavers and capybara. Mice make some people shriek, but rats are even more triggering. Rats will chew your baby’s ears off I’ve heard tell: can there be anything more horrifying? Even way out on isolated farms in the country, there are invasive black, roof, and Norway rats. They hide in the barn eating the food of the cats meant to keep the rodents at bay. They hunker down near the chicken house to steal chicken food. I’ve seen highways of rats in San Jose, outnumbering afterhours humans, scurrying alongside people hurrying down the sidewalk on Santana Row.
Rats famously carried Black Death through Europe and ground squirrel colonies are reservoirs of bubonic plague throughout the western USA.
As you probably expect, I like most rodents, but only in their place. I can’t find a way to like invasive rats, however – besides the diseases, the destruction they cause to native wildlife is awesome and terrible. Cane rats are supposedly tasty and big enough for a meal. I’ve met southeast islanders who spent their childhoods clubbing the cane rats as they jettisoned from burning sugar cane fields. Yum! (Disclaimer: I have not knowingly eaten rodents). There are two species of rodents I am particularly enamored with: California meadow vole and American beaver.
California Meadow Vole
Voles look like mice, but their ears are short and folded up against their heads, making a sleeker profile for fast moving down narrow grassland trail-tunnels. Also, voles nip at each-others’ ears as a territorial thing, which might have had a role in evolving ears closer to the skull. California meadow voles make networks of runs in the understory of grasslands. Their populations in a good year can eat as much as a rancher will try to get their herd of cattle to consume: almost everything. In those healthy vole population years, voles are so thick that you’ll encounter them climbing over your shoes if you stand still long enough in the grasslands. Voles are the main source of food for wolves as well as many species of hawks and owls. Vole runs are also important transportation corridors for amphibians as well as very tiny harvest mice, which glean food that voles drop alongside their runs.
The main selfish reason I like California meadow voles is that they run out gophers from our orchard. We don’t trap gophers, there’s no need!
Voles must taste bad to domestic dogs and snakes: both avoid eating them. Dogs like to let them age a while before gulping them down whole. Snakes sometimes acclimatize to vole flavor and will eat them thereafter.
American Beaver
Beavers are amazing, but they have unfortunately been hunted out from many of the places where they belong in California. By building and sustaining dams, beavers undoubtedly shaped the river systems and wetlands of much of the State. Those beaver dams back up water, creating fish habitat, recharging groundwater, and breaking up the landscape so that wildfire doesn’t travel as quickly, as hotly. Scientists suggest that restoration of beaver throughout the Sierra Nevada can take the place of a few giant dams on California’s rivers. Beavers store water in the headwaters, keeping rivers flowing more steadily into the summer months.
Unfortunately, beavers have bad habits that make them seem like pests to many humans. I first encountered beavers as pests in a relative’s yard. He woke up each morning to find more of his trees felled on his front lawn, between the house and a pond. He could have caged those trees in metal fencing, but chose to harass the beavers as a less effective alternative. Beavers also eat fruit and nut orchard trees. They’ll plug up culverts, flooding roadways. And, they get into, and dam up, the network of canals and water control structures that farmers maintain to water their crops throughout the Central Valley. Figuring out how to live alongside beavers in those situations is a real challenge. Many beavers get ‘removed’ (aka killed) each year because of these issues.
Meanwhile, there are many people working to restore beavers across California and the Northern Hemisphere where they belong and where they won’t cause too many pest issues for humans. And, some of us are also introducing Californians to beaver coexistence strategies.
Join me in envisioning a world where beavers and humans live side-by-side on a wetter planet.
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |

Wednesday, April 9, 2025
#99 / One For All And All For One

“One for all, and all for one,” the pledge made by the Three Musketeers, is sometimes written out in the opposite order: “All for one, and one for all.”
Click right here for a discussion of the origin of this well-known pledge. It seems to me that the order chosen either highlights the need for individuals to make the welfare of the community their first priority, or (conversely) the need for the community to make support for each individual within the community its primary aim and ambition. I come down strongly on “both sides” of any debate about the most appropriate articulation of the pledge. Both things are absolutely required.
Incidentally, there is a surprise presented in the discussion I have linked above. The claim is made that it was not Alexander Dumas who came up with that phrase, but William Shakespeare.
I am highlighting the pledge of the Three Musketeers to suggest that this is the spirit that should be animating the “resistance” to the outrages that we have already seen and absolutely expect to continue to see coming from the Trump Administration, as the Administration will be attempting to execute on some of Trump’s most outrageous campaign promises – for instance, the extra-legal deportation of millions of undocumented persons, including by way of a military roundup.
Right after November 5th of last year, many who had not supported the election of Donald Trump were discouraged, and more or less stipulated to having been “defeated.” They gave the impression that they were now expecting to walk off the field, and that we had reached the “End of Democracy.”
Others (I think more correctly) took the position that while the election might have been lost, they would not stipulate to “defeat,” and promised “resistance” to the kind of policies advocated by the president, and by his most ardent supporters. What happens now is obviously still in question, and I do think that the Pledge of the Three Musketeers is good guidance. The Musketeers have no connection to Elon Musk, by the way, just in case there might be any confusion on that point.
If the “literary” pledge of the Three Musketeers doesn’t seem compelling as a reliable guide to our “real life” situation right now, please let me remind everyone of a pledge taken by those who signed our Declaration of Independence:
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor (emphasis added).
This pledge tells us exactly what “resistance” requires. Resistance requires that small groups of people come together and pledge both to themselves, and to the world, that they will mobilize their “lives,” their “fortunes,” and their “sacred honor” to achieve what the Declaration promised. And here’s that promise: That “all persons are created equal and that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Would you like a 21st Century update? Why not add the Star Trek Pledge to our renewed commitment to what was pledged in the Declaration? You probably remember that one, even if you forgot about the “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” pledge of 1776.
If you by some chance forgot, here’s that Star Trek pledge. Let’s add it on. The Star Trek pledge is pretty simple:
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |

In an opening monologue last week, Michael Kosta on The Daily Show summed up the first seventy-five days of the Trump administration coup with, “The second Trump administration is off to a roaring start — if you don’t count the economy, inflation, rampant corruption, cyberbullying of allied nations, and we’re all gonna die of measles.” Addressing Trump’s so-called ‘Liberation Day‘ tariffs, Kosta responded to the president’s Truth Social all-caps post (“THE OPERATION IS OVER! THE PATIENT LIVED, AND IS HEALING. THE PROGNOSIS IS THAT THE PATIENT WILL BE FAR STRONGER, BIGGER, BETTER, AND MORE RESILIENT THAN EVER BEFORE. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”), with a deadpanning, “Boy, I feel so much better now.” He advised viewers not to panic about economists’ warnings of a tariff-caused global recession by assuring them that “Trump’s habit of speaking soothing words of comfort in times of need” would see them through the tough times. “Always reassuring when the surgeon comes out screaming at the top his lungs, ‘THE PATIENT IF FINE, EVERYTHING IS GOING GREAT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE A MOP?”, he said, mimicking Trump’s all-caps post. He added, “The thing is, the patient didn’t need major surgery. We just needed a teeth cleaning, keep it clean and shiny. No one wants to wake up from heart surgery to their dental hygienist shouting, ‘I THINK HE’S GOING TO LIVE!'”
Trump kicked off his televised ‘Liberation Day‘ tariffs fiasco with a board charting the list winners and losers among the global community, “like a Hollywood game show host,” wrote David Gardner on The Daily Beast. Gardner described the president as being spray-tanned with lacquered hair, gesticulating and bragging as he unveiled the numbers matching his international contestants in his trade revolution. His catchphrase was, “Let’s make America Wealthy Again,” as world leaders looked on in disbelief, and as the stock market started its tumble, with the dollar sliding worldwide. The tariff percentages ranged from a benign ten percent up to a mind-boggling forty-nine percent, which fell onto Cambodia which charges the US ninety-seven percent according to The Don. Trump’s complaint about “foreign scavengers ripping us off for years” revealed that he was being “kind” by charging the “nations that treat us badly” only about half what they supposedly charge us. What a considerate guy, eh? With his game show host smile he added, “We’re going to start being smart, and we’re going to start being very wealthy again.” He is piling onto China a thirty-four percent tariff on top of the twenty percent already being charged Beijing — claiming that President Xi Jinping should be satisfied since they charge us sixty-seven percent, says the chart-bearing Teletubby. One notable omission on the president’s chart: Russia, along with Cuba, North Korea and Belarus. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt explained that those exclusions are because existing economic sanctions already imposed “preclude any meaningful trade.” Watch this space!
Objections to the glut of tariffs quickly came to the fore, with Ross Gerber of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management calling the action “a disaster of idiocy,” and even Republican senators Rand Paul and John Kennedy expressing concern at this major escalation in a global trade war which will soon impact American consumers. Gerber, a major investor in Tesla, being interviewed by CNN’s Laura Coates, could only foresee gloom and doom as he sought a silver lining in the long term. His short term worries aren’t causing him to panic, but he cautions, “We went from almost an ideal market environment over the last year or two, to now complete and utter sort of destruction of the system of trade that we’ve had for a very long time, that has benefitted America greatly with lower prices! That’s the whole reason that this is set up the way it is.” Even Musk’s expected exit from the White House would not be enough to turn Tesla’s fortunes toward positive territory, according to Gerber — Tesla needs a new face to regain stability. His anger at Musk has little to do with his DOGE organization’s haphazard slashing of government agencies, but with his constant delivery of insulting comments toward people, and should he step away from his government position, Gerber doubts that Musk’s attention would be refocused on autos, which has seen neglect for years, but on xAI and other artificial intelligence projects. “It’s not a great time to buy the stock,” he advises. Musk’s only addition to the Tesla lineup since buying the company, has been the Cybertruck which seems to be in constant recall, especially since the glued-on parts are falling off the vehicles as they are driven, so most now view the brand as broken and unfixable.
Because Trump included two rocky and remote islands near Antarctica inhabited only by penguins and seals, with ten percent tariffs, he has provided us with some hilarity in spite of his ego-driven disaster. Heard and McDonald islands are not countries, though he may have mistakenly thought McDonald Island was the home of the Big Mac, from which he might have extracted favors in subsequent negotiations. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow noted that it takes two weeks by sea to get there from Australia — no scheduled airlines and no airports for that quick weekend getaway! She points out that active volcanoes pose a problem, adding, “Those volcanoes, penguins and seals will never menace the American economy again, as they have in the past, by flooding us with their cheap exports of what? Like, fresh air, cool breezes, a waft of eau de penguin, I don’t know. What do they send us? Are you tired of winning, America? Can you just feel the practical economic benefits that MAGA leadership is bringing to us at last? Isn’t it a relief?” The mockery continued with former Representative Tom Malinowski of New Jersey posting, “The Heard Island and McDonald penguins have been taking advantage of us for too long — it’s about time we stood up to them!”
Economists have sounded the alarm over the past few weeks, that any new tariffs will spike prices for domestic consumer products, with import businesses taking on those costs, but then charging customers higher prices to make up for the import costs. Democratic strategist James Carville said, “There’s no policy behind it. It’s just Trump’s ego playing itself out in public, and I think voters are getting very, very apprehensive about this. These policies will hurt a ton of people with new financial burdens you can’t imagine.” He commented that even the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, some of the most conservative people in the country, shared that concern. Following Trump’s big announcement was a cratering of the stock market the day after, as fears of global economic slowdown brought the worst day of loss since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down four percent, losing almost 1700 points, with the S&P 500 down 4.8 percent and the Nasdaq down six percent, marking new lows for Wall Street after months of speculation about Trump’s trade agenda. In his analysis, Michael Arone of State Street Global Advisors said, “The Trump administration may be playing a game of chicken with trading partners, but market participants aren’t willing to wait around for the results. Instead, investors are selling first and asking questions later.”
Trump is quoted as saying, “The markets are going to boom, the stock is going to boom, the country is going to boom. And the rest of the world wants to see if there’s any way they can make a deal.” In the meantime the markets are going ‘BOOM‘ or as Stephen Colbert terms it: “the traditional sound when everything stays intact.” The administration’s officials have diverse messages regarding any deal-making, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick offering conflicting guidance stressing no “backing off” on tariffs, but that deals could be a possibility. Lutnick said, “This stuff has got to stop. America has got to stop being exploited, and you’re going to see America prosper. And then, and only then, will Donald Trump make a deal with each country when they’ve really, really changed their ways. That’s not ‘back off.’ That is, let the dealmaker make his deals when, and only if, these countries change everything about themselves, which I doubt they will.”
The Associated Press called Trump’s sweeping new tariffs “a historic tax hike that could push global order to a breaking point,” about which John Stoehr of The Editorial Board asks, “Why are we still wondering what Trump voters want? He promised. He delivered. What’s the mystery? I ask, because our discourse seems to be invested in the idea that his supporters don’t really want this, and I just don’t mean his hardcore supporters. Resolving this tension is important. The Democrats believe if they can show Trump is going to make things more expensive, they can get them to support Democrats in the midterms. But conventional wisdom also asks us to do something we should not do…treat Trump supporters as if they didn’t understand what they were getting into…treating them like children, that they can’t be responsible for what they did. We shouldn’t do that. Treat them as adults who have THEIR way of understanding tariffs…look at it this way — Trump supporters are going to trust him no matter how incoherent, no matter how dumb…the dumber and more incoherent, the more they trust. His choices trigger reactions, forcing people to choose between those who say tariffs are a tax, or trusting Trump who says it’s a tax cut. Trump has swept them up in his story of a cosmic battle between good and evil, in which the chosen people have been taken advantage of by ‘globalists,’ trying to replace them with foreigners who are ‘poisoning the blood’ of the US, leading toward destruction. The story can be told in a way that appeals to everyone, even nonwhites — the challenge isn’t just hardcore supporters. It’s swing voters, too. Liberation requires personal sacrifice and ‘short term pain.’ So if supporters end up recognizing that policies are impoverishing them, they almost certainly will not attribute their suffering to him — they will blame whomever he tells them to, hence his use of emergency powers usually reserved for wartime. Suffering Trump supporters will bind themselves closely to the president, using this as proof of patriotism and devotion to the cause of justice, with their savior the only one who can relieve them of their condition.”
Stoehr concludes with his observation that the last election was about money — not in the way most may think. “The economy was booming, inflation was down, wages were up, unemployment had rarely been lower — Joe Biden really did grow the economy…almost everyone prospered. But that may have been the problem, because he did more than any president to expand the economic pie to include all those who are usually left behind, especially Black people — Whites feel something is wrong, that something is being taken from them, someone is cheating them, despite their own prosperity. It’s white-power’s zero sum — if America includes ‘them,’ it excludes ‘us.’ Democrats’ beliefs that Trump voters can be won over with economic politics in everyone’s interest won’t cut it. They want economic policies for them, not everyone. And if tariffs end up hurting them, they take comfort in knowing Black people are hurting more. These tariffs are the biggest tax increase of our lifetimes. But that’s what they wanted. He promised. He delivered. No mystery.” Reactions on social media brought one tweet with a Rodney Dangerfieldesque response: “Just got off the phone with my financial advisor; he just told me my 401k is now a 400k.” Another posted a stock heat map, nearly all red, with a superimposed image of VP JD Vance asking, “Have you even said thank you once?”
Trump insists that his ‘Liberation Day‘ tariffs levied around the world will be borne by his victimized nations and not American buyers, but skeptics within his own MAGA gang are not so sure. Republican senators Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, and Susan Collins joined with Democrats in voting against the emergency powers Trump is using to impose a 25% tariff against Canada. And while Senator John Kennedy did not join them, he made known his concerns in a Newsmax interview with anchor Rob Schmitt, saying, “What the president is saying, is if you want to sell stuff to Americans, move your business to America and hire Americans and contribute to our economy, don’t just sell stuff. In the long run, he’s right. But in the long run, we’re all dead.” He added that he’s heard both favorable and disastrous assessments from economists, and even “late-night psychic hotlines” are more accurate in their predictions, as he slammed blind supporters of the policy. “It may not lead to inflation this time. Am I predicting that it will or won’t? No. I’m going to say it again. We’re in uncharted waters and we don’t know. And anybody who tries to tell that they know what the short-term impact is going to be is just lying. Either that or they’re selling deep stupid,” he concluded. The Daily Show’s Michael Kosta says, “We’re basically punishing OTHER countries for selling us stuff that WE want.”
On The Late Show, host Stephen Colbert asked, “Is everyone feeling liberated?” Because…yeah. Today was the first day of trading on Wall Street since Trump slathered our country in honey and staked it down next to a fire ant hill. So, worst day for our economy since COVID. Just a little reminder: this time, he’s the disease. One bit of good news coming out of all this: it’s all pretty solid proof that there is no deep state, because if there was, they would have stopped this. But if they do exist, I just want to say to the cabal of financial and governmental elites who pull all the strings behind the scenes, maybe put a pause on your ‘5G chip JFK Jr adrenochrome chemtrail orgy’ and jump in here, ’cause we’re dying.”
Conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro pulled a 180 on Trump after calling his tariffs “probably unconstitutional” and “pretty crazy” as he broke ranks with the MAGA boss after supporting, fundraising, and voting for the president. He told his seven million YouTube subscribers of his ‘Ben Shapiro Show,’ that “the president’s vision of international trade is mistaken” and that Trump’s belief that the country is getting swindled by trade deficits is completely false. “We are punishing countries that have a low tariff rate with us.” Shapiro says the president’s math is “all wrong,” that his numbers come from the trade deficit which has “nothing to do” with tariff rates. He noted that Madagascar’s tariff percentage was ridiculously high, but “so what?” if there’s a trade deficit. “The idea that we have to chisel out of the people of Madagascar extra dollars from American products or we are getting screwed by the great and powerful nation of Madagascar makes zero sense,” he asserts. Railing against Trump’s basis for MAGA, he said the tariffs are based on “false notions about the American economy” that the nation is failing economically — “this is a myth propagated by both parties.” Shapiro has no desire to support the MAGA-strong wish to return to the 1980s. “America does not suck and has not sucked for several decades, economically,” disagreeing with the notion that the country has been “hollowed out” by de-industrialization and is no longer manufacturing. Scoffing at having a Ford factory job a la 1955, in a non-air conditioned workplace while riveting metal all day is not an ideal job. No thanks! He claims the upper middle class has grown and wages are up, contrary to Trump’s argument that international trade is destroying that strata of workers. “I can name you a period of American history where there was a fairly large surplus in America’s balance of trade: the entire Great Depression,” he offers.
A viral tweet from @frogs4girls asks readers what the coming economic downturn should be called: “So what are we calling this one? Just ‘Great Depression 2’? ‘Greater Depression’? Any suggestions? Anybody?” Respondents contributed: ‘The Yuge Depression,’ ‘The Greatest Depression,’ ‘The Bigly Depression,’ ‘The Great Deux-Pression,’ ‘The Most Beautiful Depression You’ve Ever Seen Believe Me,’ ‘2 Depressed 2 Be Blessed,’ ‘Great DEIpression,’ and the ‘Great Depression 2: Electric Boogaloo.’ Another contributor suggested we call the period ‘Groceries,’ a word Trump seems to have a fascination with, calling it a beautiful, descriptive word, an “old-fashioned” term that he used a lot in his campaign last year. Social media critics mocked his word salad over the word: “Groceries, that unspoken word lost in the sands of time,” or “This is your king, MAGA. This is your Daddy.” Another posted: “Here’s an old-fashioned term that we don’t use enough. It’s schmuck!” JD Vance will be pretending in 2028 that he never met this guy.
President Trump’s all-caps response to the negativity brought on by his tariff escapade, precipitated the stock market’s reaction, prompting Senator Chuck Schumer to call it the “dumbest” recession ever. Usually loyal Republicans who criticized the Trump plan caused the president to attempt to ease everyone’s minds in a most bizarre way: his message of ‘hope’ was a cryptic five-word, all-caps post on Truth Social: “ONLY THE WEAK WILL FAIL!” Sam Barlow on BlueSky posted that those words are his favorite of Jesus‘ teachings from the book of Matthew. A post on X responded that is an apt response from one who has taken six businesses into bankruptcy — including a casino of all things! One X poster wrote: “Seems like what Trump really means is, ‘ONLY THE POOR WILL FAIL!’ because average Americans are perpetually impacted more than anyone on Earth. So, if you’re struggling, when Trump’s tariffs make life worse, it’s your fault.”
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |


EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
Trees
“If you reveal your secrets to the wind, you should not blame the wind for revealing them to the trees.”
~Khalil Gibran
“Storms make trees take deeper roots.”
~Dolly Parton
“If you think in terms of a year, plant a seed; if in terms of ten years, plant trees; if in terms of 100 years, teach the people.”
~Confucius
“In nature, nothing is perfect and everything is perfect. Trees can be contorted, bent in weird ways, and they’re still beautiful.”
~Alice Walker
“It’s the little things citizens do. That’s what will make the difference. My little thing is planting trees.”
~Wangari Maathai

OMG, this is exhilarating! I get chills and, “holy cow, imagine if it had just gone to the landfill?!?!?” feels when I see things like these. Time is fleeting, friends! |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

April 2 – 8, 2025
Greensite… on important community meeting Steinbruner… Pedestrian over crossing, Moss Landing, County planning commission … Hayes… Community and Self-Identification… Patton… Short-term pain, and no long-term gain… Matlock… Atlantic sinking…fire somebody…but her emails…one bad apple… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… a rare occurrence Quotes on… “Protesting”

|
Dateline: April 2, 2025
PROTESTS IN THE STREETS. So, apparently a lot of people are out there, making their voices heard. This is a Good Thing[TM]. Every day there is more and more distressing news about how much backsliding the US is doing, locally as well as globally. Canada, the nicest of all nations, are severing ties – do you realize how much you have to eff up for Canada to do this?!?
At any rate, I have to limit my intake of news for my own mental health. I will pass this on, however: Tomorrow, April 5 is the National Day of Action, put on all over the place by HANDS ØFF, handsoff2025.com. The Santa Cruz protest takes place as follows:
- Where: 701 Ocean St. Santa Cruz, CA 95060 on the Water St. side of the building
- When: 12pm–2pm on April 5, 2025
If Watsonville is closer to you, join their protest in the Watsonville Plaza at the same time.

THE RESIDENCE. Netflix. Series. (7.8 IMDb)
I’m happy to see the return of the cozy mystery – Knives Out, Death and Other Details, and even Only Murders in the Building. Sure, Hallmark churns out an endless stream of formulaic/hygienic perky upper middle class “professional women” who solve mysteries while hygienically engaging in romance with some square jawed cop/firefighter/architect, but they lack any sort of charm or character. The Residence gives us Cordelia Cupp (Orange is the New Black’s Uzo Aduba): an acclaimed detective, and stout birder, who finds herself wader deep in drama and intrigue surrounding a murder in the White House. Giving absolutely zero f***s about titles and position, she pursues the truth through a cast of notables: Giancarlo Esposito, Jason Lee, Bronson Pinchot, Molly Griggs, and even Al Franken, reprising his role as a Senator. Might have been a few episodes too long, but worth the wait. Definite watch.
~Sarge
STAR TREK: SECTION 31. Paramount+. Movie. (3.8 IMDb)
I know I’m late to the table for this, but we decided to finally sit down and watch Star Trek: Section 31. Empress Georgiou (the mirror-universe evil counterpart of heroic Capt. Georgiou from Star Trek: Discovery) is pressed back into service with Section 31 – the black-ops division of Starfleet – for essentially a caper “mission”. Things go wrong, and she and a band of misfit specialists have to make it right. Michelle Yeoh is wonderful, as she always is. What she’s given to work with is tepid at best. I’m not a toxic fan – I’ve liked a lot of Trek related stuff that people kvetch about, but I do recognize when they miss the mark. Not just “doesn’t feel like Star Trek”, but feels like a fairly average caper film. No brilliant gotcha moments, no delicious red herrings. Just bland. Which is hard to do with Michelle Yeoh! It doesn’t quite make me feel like I was robbed of an hour and a half, but I was not really entertained. Highlight for the geek crowd: a Cheronian waiter. Watch only for a completionist compulsion.
~Sarge
NO OTHER LAND. In theaters. Movie (8.3 IMDb)
Academy Award-winning documentary, No Other Land, highlights the impact of political conflicts on everyday people. Co-directed by Palestinian filmmaker Basel Adra and Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham, the film follows them in the forced displacement of the small settlement of Masafer Yatta by Israeli forces. The view we get, from the “street” as it were, brings home the workaday world that is being unceremoniously wiped out by forces beyond shame or consequence. It makes it difficult to maintain an objective view of chess pieces being neatly moved around a board – it’s hard and personal, and as foreign as it should feel, hitting you right in the hometown. After winning the award, another co-director, Hamdan Ballal, was arrested and detained by Israeli authorities. The academy’s reaction: a tepid equivalent of “there are good people on both sides”. Definitely requires a watch.
~Sarge
THE ELECTRIC STATE. Netflix Movie (6 IMDb) This has the energy of ’80s adventure films, like Batteries Not Included and War Games, with a touch of Fallout retro-futurism. Here’s the deal: In the ’50s, Walt Disney sparked a robot boom, leading to a robot rebellion in the ’90s. After the war, robots were confined to a walled-off Midwest wasteland. Michelle (Millie Bobby Brown) discovers her genius brother, supposedly dead, stuck in a robot shell and searching for a mysterious doctor. Keats (Chris Pratt) and his robot sidekick help her break into the wasteland. They’re pursued by a robot exterminator (Giancarlo Esposito) working for a tech billionaire, Skate (Stanley Tucci), who wants Michelle’s brother. Fun, nostalgic, and spot-on art direction. Worth a watch. ~Sarge
ADOLESCENCE. Netflix Series (8.4 IMDb) I was going to start off saying this was uninspired in its execution, till I saw a shot fly up from one character, fly several blocks away, drop down to where another character is getting out of a car, and hold a steady close up – all in one shot. A British crime drama about the impact of incel politics on pre-sexual children. Very saddening. Worth a watch. ~Sarge
A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. AppleTV, PrimeTV. Movie (7.4 IMDb) I don’t know how accurate this is as a depiction of young Bob Dylan (Timothee Chalamet), but it does make me yearn for those days as an adult (I wouldn’t be released till ’63). The film basically encapsulates Dylan from ’61 to ’65, following his relationships, and rise in the folk community, and his troubled transition to something more. Ed Norton as the supportive and eventally outgrown Pete Seeger, Elle Fanning as Dylan’s constantly trying-to-stay-in-his-focus lover Sylvie Russo/Suze Rotolo, and Monica Barbaro as the legendary sometime lover/sometime music partner Joan Baez. Worth a watch.~Sarge
THE BRUTALIST. PrimeTV. Movie (7.5 IMDb) I thought the title was JUST a reference to the Brutalist Movement in art and architecture. Oh how wrong I was. A brutal story about love, separation, and power. Adrien Brody is gut-wrenching in his performance as a holocaust survivor, drug addict, and brutalist architect. It’s like dragging yourself along the edge of a straight razor – the further forward you go, the deeper it cuts. Painful, but worth a watch. Interesting note – while Brody’s character is fictional, the name Lazlo Toth (and variants) is out there, most notable to me, it was the name of the guy who vandalized La Pieta, and it was the pen-name of Don Novello (Reverend Guido Sarducci on old SNL) when writing his “Lazlo Letters”. ~Sarge
DAREDEVIL. Disney+. Series (8.6 IMDb) The one that started the Netflix/Marvel cavalcade. Charlie Cox and Vincent D’Onofrio bring depth and humor/tragedy to the David and Goliath of New York. Matt Murdoch/Daredevil (Cox), an attorney who was struck blind as a youth, develops the ability to “see” through the use of organic sonar, and uses that ability (along with rigorous martial arts training) to take on the criminal denizens of the shadowy streets. Wilson Fisk/Kingpin (D’Onofrio), a man of outsized power (figuratively and literally) with rage issues, but also a nuanced romantic side, finds his criminal enterprises falling into the “sights” of the blind kid from Hell’s Kitchen. Subsequent stories dealt with other comic characters, Elektra and The Punisher. Amazing fight choreography (not just martial arts, but the fluidity of the staging) if you’re into that – not for the faint of heart. Now on Disney. ~Sarge
DAREDEVIL – BORN AGAIN. Disney+. Series (9 IMDb) For anyone thinking that Daredevil would lose its edge being on Disney, think again. The original cast of Netflix’s Daredevil are back for this sequel from Disney. After a journey through various other shows (the Defenders, Hawkeye, Echo, and She Hulk) Cox and D’Onofrio are back. In the first two episodes we see Matt, in the wake of a tragedy, hang up the horns, and Fisk coming out of rehabilitation after getting shot in the face by Echo (see: “Hawkeye” and “Echo”). Matt returns to lawyering, and Fisk … has a vision for a better New York, as Mayor. Just a wee tad chilling, given the current climate. First two episodes on Disney right now – new episodes every Tuesday. ~Sarge
COMPANION. Apple TV, Fandango, PrimeTV. Movie (7.1 IMDb) Iris (Sophie Thatcher) and Josh (Jack Quaid) traveling to a friend’s country home for a party where the fact that one of the guests is an android “companion” is the LEAST surprising thing that will be discovered. Some distressingly recognizable relationship dynamics are revealed and explored. Also some violence, and a sexual assault, for those who might be triggered. Well made for a light budget, with some nuanced performances. For those troubled by AI – you might want to start saying “please and thank you” to Alexa and Siri. ~Sarge
MOANA 2. Apple TV, Fandango, PrimeTV, YouTube, Disney+. Series (6.8 IMDb) Moana, after reconnecting her people with their seafaring heritage, discovers the ocean is empty. She’s called back by the Gods to face a greedy deity who sunk a cornerstone island, once the link between all Oceania’s seafaring people. Unfortunately, it’s a step down from the original. “Get Lost,” sung by the mid-film villain Matangi, lacks the charm of “Shiny,” and Maui feels like a shadow of his former self. Moana’s crew is a completely superfluous random mix—grumpy farmer, Maui fanboy, manic tech girl, and another comic relief animal (who’s outshone by HeiHei, the chicken). Only the mute rabid coconut warrior, Kotu, adds any value. Much like the first film, the Big Bad is just an angry, personality-less force, this time throwing lightning instead of fireballs. While it’ll entertain kids, there’s little for the parents this time around. Comes to Disney+ March 12th. ~Sarge
HEART EYES. In theaters. Movie (6.6 IMDb) A meet-cute rom-com – with a slasher! Odd mix, but it seems to be director Josh Ruben’s forte. Ad designer Ally (Olivia Holt) accidently presents a “historic tracic lovers” motif JUST as notorious serial killer, Heart Eyes, who murders romantic couples on Valentine’s Day, resurfaces. She teams up with “ad fixer” freelancer Jay (Mason Gooding) in a “Desk Set” will-they won’t-they team-up, until an unexpected kiss puts them in the sights of Heart Eyes. The slashing is moderately creative, the chemistry fairly good, but it just lacks a real personality for Heart Eyes (which you need for a franchise killer). Not for the timid, but not epic gorefest either. On par with Christopher Landon’s 2020 body-swap horror/comedy “Freaky” (ala Freaky Friday – only instead of mother/daughter, it’s slasher/cheerleader). ~Sarge
THE BREAKTHROUGH. Netflix. Series (7.1 IMDb) Thanks to Netflix’s voracious appetite for new material, we’ve had a lot of opportunity to watch movies and tv from all over the place. I’ve been noticing an alarming number of bleak crime dramas from Sweden – one of them was “The Breakthrough”, a police procedural based on a real-life 16 year murder investigation. Though the first 3 episodes were a trifle slow, the final episode finally brings it all together. Peter Eggers stars as a police detective who does a LOT of speedwalking while beating his heart out against an impossible case. ~Sarge


If you think the above graphic is just hyperbole, you haven’t been following the new state housing laws. What the graphic doesn’t capture may be even more alarming. The Downtown Extension Project, or the Downtown Plan Extension Project in SoLa (South of Laurel), is winding its way to city council like a snake on steroids.
The development site is twenty-nine-acres. It starts at Laurel St., extends along Front St. towards the Wharf, is bordered by Depot Park, Beach Hill and the river levee and encompasses the current Warriors Arena. It is easily the largest serious development proposal in the history of Santa Cruz. It is outside the view in the graphic but could easily end up having buildings at the size shown. That is, unless the city council utilizes one of its few remaining discretions over local development since the land use power grab by state politicians.
The current project area zoning is 35 feet with one area at 48 feet. If council rezones upwards, called upzoning, proposed as an option in the draft Environmental Impact Report (dEIR) for the project, then developers have the freedom to build skyscrapers as high as 25 or 30 stories. This unfortunate situation is a result of Assembly Bill 1287 which increased the density bonus to 100% so that cities are now required to approve projects at double the existing zoning density and waive city restrictions on building height, bulk, and setback, if the project includes a net 15% “affordable” units. The absurdity of this “bonus” is that city law already requires 20% “affordable” units in housing projects. So, we are getting exactly what for this give-away to developers? And, yes, the city’s state-required RHNA numbers (Regional Housing Needs Allocation) for the next seven years-and beyond- can be achieved without upzoning.
Unfortunately, the city’s dEIR for this project omits any study of possible environmental impacts resulting from AB 1287 which passed into law in October 2023. This new law should have generated a revision of the dEIR which was being prepared during that time, but it didn’t. Many have written to council asking for a revision of the dEIR to reflect this sea change in potential size and mass of new developments, but don’t hold your breath.
Within current zoning, any new building in this project site can be as high as seven or eight stories since AB 1287 doubles existing height limits. They can also go higher. But if council rezones the area to 85 feet as is proposed, the possibility of twenty to thirty stories or higher can be expected. Optimists who think this will never happen based on remarks from the Santa Cruz Warriors Team President, or the cost of steel construction in tall buildings, or commonsense, has forgotten that real estate is the number one investment in rich people’s portfolios. And don’t forget the equation; more well-off people moving to Santa Cruz, more low-income residents moving out. Affordable housing for local workers becomes unaffordable due to the ever-increasing Area Median Income. Plus, the city has no idea if its affordable housing is actually going to local workers and the city has no intention of finding out. Likewise, the initiatives currently gathering signatures for raising taxes for future affordable housing have no mechanism for ensuring such housing goes to local workers despite the deceptive names on the initiatives.
This massive development of high rises, bringing three to four thousand people into twenty-nine acres, plus creating an entertainment district with no parking, jammed into the main tourist access route to and from the Wharf, Beach and Boardwalk, plus a main access route to and from downtown or across town for the lower westside, suggests at least poor planning or a serious disregard for the community.
Residents and workers are not taking this lying down. A group of neighbors, largely from Beach Hill with activists from other neighborhoods, including yours truly, have formed a group under the banner Santa Cruzans for Responsible Development. We have met with individual council members to explain the importance of their one remaining power; to not change the zoning in this project area.
As always there is strength in numbers. You are encouraged to sign the petition which includes a wealth of helpful information and can be found here.
And attend the community meeting detailed below. Hope to see you there!
Come to a community meeting!
Saturday, April 5th, 10:30am
London Nelson Center
301 Center Street, Santa Cruz
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |

The Board of Supervisors agenda for next Tuesday includes delaying their consideration of the County’s Draft Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Ordinance until September 9, instead of by April 25 as their vote last October mandated. According to the staff report for Consent Item #57, the Director of Community Infrastructure & Development (aka Planning and Public Works) wants more time to learn what caused the January 16 Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire and how to use that information in crafting the Draft Ordinance. Meeting
MONTEREY COUNTY WEBSITE PROVIDES GOOD INFORMATION RE: MOSS LANDING DISASTER, BUT WHY IS SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SILENT?
Sadly, the Santa Cruz County response to the Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire has been woefully void of updated information. With the exception of Consent Item #57 next Tuesday to delay consideration of a BESS Ordinance, the one and only report on January 28 has been the extent of the Board getting any public staff reports on the disaster….despite many residents asking for information and action during Public Comment (items NOT on the agenda) every single meeting…with no response from elected officials.
Take a look at Monterey County’s good information, and contact your local Supervisor to ask why they are so silent.
Moss Landing Battery Facility Recovery 2025 | County of Monterey, CA
LISTEN AND BE HEARD
I hope you will share this information and listen in today 2pm-4pm on “Community Matters”. You can listen on your computer from anywhere in the world at 2pm Pacific Time. santacruzvoice.com/
Today’s program will focus on the ongoing Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire issues, and the work the Green Party is doing to inform the public about energy storage technologies that are a safe alternative to hazardous lithium battery storage facilities.
In the first hour (2pm-3pm), my Guest will be Mr. Neil Pearlberg, pod cast host of “Off the Lip”. We will discuss his recent program interview of Senator John Laird and the Moss Landing Battery Fire response. We will not be accepting any calls from the audience during Mr. Pearlberg’s interview, but I urge you to listen to the story of what he experienced as public outcry subsequent to his podcast with Senator Laird and learn why it is important to have civil discussions on such important topics.
In the second hour (3pm-4pm), my Guest will be Mr. Sean Dougherty, Green Party candidate for Congress. Meet the Green Party candidate challenging Panetta – The Pajaronian | Watsonville, CA
He has organized a 3pm educational rally this Saturday, Rally Against Lithium Fires, at London Nelson Center with others who oppose lithium battery energy storage systems (BESS), such the likes as what led to the Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire in January, flaring again in February…and may be still smoldering.
Learn what safe alternatives exist that Santa Cruz County leaders could be insisting be put in place as they move toward approving three BESS locations: 90 Minto Road in Watsonville (in permitting process), Freedom Blvd. near Aptos High School, and Paul Sweet Road, Santa Cruz (near Dominican Hospital).
There may also be an update on the “Never Again Moss Landing” group activities. Never Again Moss Landing, CA | Community Safety & Advocacy
We will invite callers to join the conversation only in the second hour: 831-265-5050
If you miss the live show, you can always listen to the recording. It will be posted by 5pm on the Santa Cruz Voice website’s “Community Matters” page, whose link is under Current Shows. Santa Cruz Voice – Listen and Be Heard
WHAT IS SHE THINKING??
Also on the April 8 Board of Supervisor Consent agenda it Item #32, where 2nd District Supervisor Kim DeSerpa is appointing Mr. Jesse Nickell of Barry Swenson Builder to serve on the County Planning Commission. What?!
Board Meeting Agenda, Tuesday, April 8, 2025 – 9:00 AM
Whose interests will he support in decision-making and why is he representing the 2nd District area when (I believe) he lives in the City of Santa Cruz?
Maybe he camps out in the Aptos Village Project, the ghetto built by Barry Swenson Builders with lots of money and “unwritten deals” from the County.

WILL THIS WORK?
Recently, I noticed new sidewalk pedestrian crossings installed on Chanticleer Avenue, near the Sheriff Center and the colossal pedestrian overpass on Highway One (scheduled to open next month). It is located about half a block from the busy and hazardous intersection of Chanticleer Avenue and Soquel Frontage Road, where the pedestrian overpass dumps out to an unsignaled intersection with limited visibility.


I wrote County Public Works Dept. staff and asked what the plan is here. They responded:
“This work is a part of the Chanticleer POC (HWY1 Phase 1), funded by multiple grants and Measure D.
There is not a plan to signalize Chanticleer and Soquel at this time.”
Do you think this will work to provide a safer intersection that will have multiple large delivery trucks of hazardous chemicals swinging into the PureWater Soquel Project sewage water treatment facility, also located on this busy corner? Hmmm…
WAGE THEFT AT CONSTRUCTION SITE ON UCSC CAMPUS

More to come on this next week…
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE BY DOING JUST ONE THING THIS WEEK.
Cheers,
Becky
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |

Community and Self-Identification
Beyond my family, I identify as a conservationist, but I have toyed with other identities: how about you? It strikes me as an important time to reinvest in community and to question with what kind of ‘movement’ or subculture do we identify. My idea is that we need more togetherness to move our society past the various forms of dis-ease that have seemed too common for too long. And, to get to that togetherness, we need to better, more consciously, place ourselves in a cultural context.
Communities of the US
Aside from racial identities or geographic affinities how many cultural movements or societal communities can you name? Communities of faith get a fair amount of recognition in the USA. About 67% of the USA identifies with Christianity and most of those are either Protestants (including members of the Southern Baptist Convention) or Catholics. I have met many people who strongly identify with their church community. Alternatively, some people identify as “belonging” to one political party or another: Democrats, Republicans, Green, Libertarian, etc. I have relatives and friends that have such affinities and identify themselves via their political party.
There are also quite a few people who seem to identify themselves as followers of some sport or sports team. I have been amazed at how jazzed such sports enthusiasts can become when encountering one another and sharing details of past player performances. There are similar cultural connections made with music, TV, movies, or books. I have been party to conversations of late where for an hour people throw out the titles of movies and books to see who likes what, getting to know one another, seeing how similar who is to who. Are Deadheads a community just about the music?
There is also the militia movement: guns, guns, and more guns…bonding people together with ammunition and love of…Liberty? Preppers, those that are preparing for the collapse of civilization, have a following. I’ve encountered a little-known subculture of anarchistic homeless earth lovers, quite numerous and hidden. They may or may not be related to Hippies, who are apparently still a thing: I know some self-identifying as such. I know no one who would call themselves a Yuppie, and I’m not sure if the Yippie culture is still around. I know of more than a few folks who identify as environmentalists. I also know people who identify with their approach to thinking, calling themselves first and foremost “scientists.” Perhaps that is more in alignment with the cultures related to professions, which are worlds into themselves. I’m not altogether sure that the artist, musician, or cook communities would altogether fit into the same category kinds of professional communities.
I’m sure we could go on and on.
Helping Your Community
After giving oneself the long, long name of all of one’s communities, the next thing might be to ask oneself how actively supportive is one to each of those communities. If you are a member of the Prunedale Militia, does that mean you have a plan, drill and practice that plan, so as to protect members of your community when necessity calls? If you are a Hippie, do you support your brethren with free food, do you work to reject mainstream culture? If you identify strongly as a member of a political party, how do you support that party…besides voting?
It seems to me that we could all use a little deeper dive into the communities with which we self-identify.
How Do We Do It?
In no particular order, again omitting the familial and geographic ties, I might give my long, long name as: Buddhist, farmer, restorationist, conservationist, deep ecologist, communalist, back-to-the-land, pro-labor, and far left. With each of these identities, I look for conversations with others regularly to keep growing and to identify who else is in those circles. Also, I write (this column and more) and do public speaking, I vote, and I am careful about to whom I give money (either through purchases or as donations). I have been asking myself lately if those things are enough to be more supportive of my communities. It is only through cohesiveness and scaling up do our communities become safe places where our ideals prosper. For instance, I despair that there is no regular, cohesive gathering of conservationists in the Monterey Bay, but who am I to criticize that inadequacy – aren’t many of us overwhelmed and unable to help organize or move forward that or any other group? How do we do this?
How Did We Get Here?
So much of what we take for granted now has been gifted us by our ancestors, who took the time and care to move our communities forward. The weekend and five-day work week are the result of folks organizing, taking their personal time to make a difference. Even the air we breathe and water we drink comes more healthily to us thanks to the Clean Air and Clean Water acts and lots of community organizing. Even more, our ability to choose our own leaders by organizing and voting came to us only through revolution, bloodshed, and keen negotiation.
Where Will We Go?
Like every conservation victory I’ve experienced, the successes I just mentioned must be re-won regularly, we must be ever vigilant and willing to act. We don’t do these things alone, we can only do those things together. And, we cannot get together until we see ourselves as more dedicated members of one of our communities and help others to feel they belong and are valuable to that community, as well.
If you have ideas especially about the dearth of a conservation movement around the Monterey Bay, please let me know.
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |


It is well-established (and makes a good deal of sense) that some short term pain may well be worth it, if the “short term pain” leads to a “long term gain.” Presumably, this might the idea underlying our current president’s recent announcement that “a recession may be worth it.” Let’s examine that premise.
As it turns out, many economists don’t agree that the policy changes being made by our president are going to have any longer-term payoff. What they see is “short term pain” leading to “long term pain.” Click that link in the first paragraph and read what New York Times reporter Ben Casselman has to say on this topic (paywall policies permitting, of course).
I found the most revealing part of Casselman’s article to come right near the end:
Who bears the costs?
The 2017 tax cuts disproportionately benefited higher-income households, according to most independent analyses. Medicaid cuts would overwhelmingly hurt low- and moderate-income families, as would cuts to other government services. Tariffs likewise tend to be hardest on poorer households, which spend more of their income on food, clothes and other imported goods.The short-term pain created by the administration’s policies, in other words, could fall hardest on low-income Americans — many of whom voted for Mr. Trump in hopes of improving their economic situation.
“It’s really hard to see how the Trump voters come out ahead,” Ms. Clausing, the former Treasury official, said. “Prices are going to be higher, disruptions are going to be higher and the safety net is going to get cut.”
Even some defenders of Mr. Trump’s policies, such as Mr. Cass, say cutting benefits to pay for tax cuts runs counter to the administration’s stated goal of restoring the middle class (emphasis added).
Just to highlight the obvious, the adminstration’s “stated” goal is not its “real” goal.
The “real” goal is to benefit the billionaires, and to hell with the rest of us.
That make it clear?
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |

Last week the Trump administration reminded us of the Frank Zappa quote: “Government is the Entertainment division of the military-industrial complex,” — not so entertaining as the reality was an ominous leak of “imminent war plans,” as described by journalist Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic who was an inadvertent recipient of the shocking security breach, being added by Michael Walz, who implied “conspiracy“ during one interview. Included in a group chat on Signal comprised of US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance and seventeen other top officials who discussed upcoming strikes against Yemen’s Houthi rebels, Goldberg disclosed that he had hours of advance notice of the action, not sure that it was authentic initially, only to see the Trump announcement about a “very effective” operation later on March 15. When questioned about the leak by the press, Trump claimed not to “know anything about it. I’m not a big fan of The Atlantic. To me, it’s a magazine that’s going out of business.” though National Security Council spokesman Hughes was already on the case reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the Signal chain. If Goldberg had publicized the details in advance, it could have been deadly to our armed forces in the region, but he chose not to do so until the administration started defending its slip-up, and the Fox News talking heads began making excuses for their old colleague, Hegseth, with charges of “fake news,” a “hoax,” and other improbable spins about conspiracies. Democratic lawmakers were outraged by the security breach, with Senator Coons posting on X that “every single one of the government officials on this text chain have now committed a crime.” Republican Mike Lawler, a New York representative, said: “Classified information should not be transmitted on unsecured channels — and certainly not to those without security clearances, including reporters. Period. Safeguards should be put in place to ensure this never happens again.”
In the chat, Trump’s cabinet complained about “bailing out Europe” by attempting to keep international shipping lanes safe from Houthi missiles for passage through the Red Sea, with JD Vance expressing his doubts that his boss is aware of the inconsistency in regard to his messaging to Europe that they have to go their own way, essentially “loathing of European free-loading.” Vance wrote that only 3% of US shipping runs through the Suez Canal, with 40% of European trade doing so, with Hegseth’s complete agreement. Interesting that he fled shortly to Greenland with his wife — things a bit too heated in the Oval Office? Jeffrey Goldberg’s surprise at being included in the chat message led him to believe that he could be “part of a disinformation campaign,” since he had met National Security Advisor Mike Walz only briefly in the past, and with the “administration’s contentious relationship with journalists,” and him personally, it was clear that this was out of whack. “I also could not believe that the National Security Advisor to the President would be so reckless as to include the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic in such discussions with senior US officials, up to and including the vice president,” said Goldberg. These revelations are surely going to trigger major questions about security within the Trump cabinet and the handling of highly sensitive government information, echoing the scandal brought upon Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign when she was accused of using insecure servers for emails, a major factor in dooming her run for office.
Another shocker is that his team allowed the president to take to the podium before the assembled press, without briefing him on the security breach, raising questions about the care and qualifications of his inner circle, dumbfounding former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta about the entire episode. Panetta said there was “no question” that the chat was legitimate, referring to the incident as a “serious blunder,” and that a proper conversation should have been held in-person in the White House. “It has to be investigated, and somebody, frankly, needs to get fired. Somebody put that name on a list, and whoever that was deserves to be fired,” he told CNN. Regarding the leak, X users displayed a wide range of emotions and opinions, from disbelief to anger, with search terms encompassing ‘War Plans’ to ‘Hegseth.’ ABC’s late-nighter, Jimmy Kimmel commented on the ineptitude, saying, “Our national security is being guarded by a bunch of dudes he wouldn’t trust to throw your cousin a surprise party. The administration accidentally texted me its war plans. No one on the chain thought to ask, who is JG, what are these initials for? They could have been leaking secrets to Jeff Goldblum for all they know. And not only did this happen, after it happened, no one thought to tell Trump.”
Typically, Fox News host Jesse Watters was indifferent to the accidental disclosure, likening it to an incident where a family member is inadvertently added to a group chat about “raunchy” bachelor party plans. “Well, that kind of happened today with the Trump administration. He (Goldberg) heard some things today he probably shouldn’t have. Could’ve been a wee bit of a security breach.” Goldberg disputes this, saying he removed himself from the group after realizing it was authentic and contained sensitive national security information, hitting back at the White House’s insistence that “no war plans were discussed” and “no classified material was sent to the thread.” Watters attempted to discredit Goldberg, calling him “not a good reporter” and “one of the biggest hoax artists around.” After Goldberg provided screenshots of the Signal group chat in a report to back up his story, Watters contended, “I’m sure it won’t happen again.” Fox’s Jessica Tarlov was absolutely taken aback by Watter’s nonchalance, standing her ground in calling the debacle a sign of “incompetence and recklessness on a scale unimaginable,” compounding Trump’s drop in ratings on his handling of the economy, inflation, and cost of living. “So they’re not doing this on a SCIF (a sensitive compartmented information facility), they’re doing it on an app that you and I, we all have on our phones, and it’s obviously incredibly reckless. National security risks — I don’t ever wanna hear ‘but her emails’ again,'” she added, referring to Hillary’s email server brouhaha. She called this incident a perfect example of what James Carville was asking of Democrats, to “run out the clock” and see what happens in Trump’s second term, where “folks have jobs that didn’t deserve them.”
Watters wasn’t done with Tarlov, trying to call it an accident, unlike “purposeful leaks from the Democrats” in the past. He began, “Yeah, they accidentally leaked something to the media instead of to the Democrats — ,” which brought Tarlov’s interruption to tell him, “They didn’t leak it; they invited him in.” “At least they didn’t home-brew a server and acid-wash it — ‘but her emails!’ I just did it,” Watters jabbed back. Hillary Clinton for her part, posted on X in response to the whole fiasco, “You have got to be kidding me,” alongside a side-eyed emoji. Secretary of Defense Hegseth, initially denying anything at all was amiss, jumped into the attack on Goldberg after he made his revelations, calling him a discredited journalist who makes a profession of peddling hoaxes, naming ‘Russia, Russia, Russia,’ or ‘fine people on both sides’ hoax, and the ‘sucker and losers’ hoax as examples of his “peddling garbage.” Donald Trump kept up his criticism by posting on Truth Social a link to the conservative satirical website, The Babylon Bee, and its article “4D Chess: Genius Trump Leaks War Plans to ‘The Atlantic’ Where No One Will Ever See Them.” Elon Musk stepped in to help by posting the link to the article, also writing, “Best place to hide a dead body is page 2 of The Atlantic magazine, because no one ever goes there.”
Pete Hegseth’s post claiming that “nobody was texting war plans, and that’s all I have to say about that,” brought a pushback from Fox’s Brit Hume who said, “Oh, for God’s sake, the administration has already confirmed the authenticity of the message.” Fox News anchor, John Roberts, praised Goldberg following his devastating exposé, saying, “I would think that there are worse people that you could text your secret plans to, but it appears Goldberg has acted responsibly here in writing this article.” Posts on X, call the operation “sloppy — the only thing worse would have been if they had used Facebook to communicate. We are the laughing stock of the world. Allies sharing intelligence is no more,” and “God, dude, this place is worse than China. They are not allowed to take responsibility for anything. Nothing they do is bad, ever. The media has to adore them, or it’s fake or illegal. This party belongs in prison before it’s too late.” The administration’s whitewashing started from the President on down to White House Press Secretary Leavitt, who said Trump “continues to have the utmost confidence in his national security team, including National Security Advisor Mike Walz,” followed by Speaker Mike Johnson rejecting the possibility that Walz or Hegseth might face disciplinary action. Both Leavitt and Johnson praised those involved saying, “top- level officials were doing their job, doing it well and executing on a plan with precision.” However, Politico is reporting that internal discussions among White House officials are considering ejecting Walz, supposedly with Trump to make a decision within a few days. Still holding your breath?
Satirist Andy Borowitz offered his take on the Signal breach in The Borowitz Report: “Defending his decision to use an insecure messaging app to discuss classified war plans, National Security Advisor Mike Walz said on Wednesday that he chose Signal because it offered more emojis. ‘Those sleaze bags at The Atlantic are acting like using Signal is some kind of scandal,’ Walz said. ‘You want to know a real scandal? The government spent billions of dollars on a secure communications system that has zero emojis.’ Walz said that he refused to use the government’s system when it became clear to him that it lacked even rudimentary emojis like fist, fire, and smiley face. ‘I stand by my decision to use Signal,’ he said. ‘When you’re planning to bomb another country, an emoji is worth a thousand OMGs or LOLs.'”
Back during the nomination process for Trump’s cabinet members, red flags were raised about Hegseth’s ability to handle the job he was offered, with many stories about his alleged abusive behavior, public drunkenness, financial mishandling, and bigotry — all ignored as the Senate Republicans approved him with flying colors. “Soooo, we thinking old Pete was drunk on the job or what?” Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett asked. “It would be funny, if it wasn’t so scary! Maybe we need some DEI (Definitely Earned It) hires to get this together because incompetence is OVERWHELMINGLY problematic.” Spotted: A demonstrator’s sign with a photo of Pete Hegseth sipping whiskey from a bottle, captioned “WHISKEY LEAKS…LIKE WATERGATE BUT WITH MORONS.” Journalist Aaron Rupar writes that history repeats itself, but at increasingly high levels of stupidity: “It’s like Watergate, only in this version Nixon directly mails the tapes to Woodward and Bernstein.” And The Onion headline: ‘Teen Warned Not To Accept Group Chat Invites From National Security Advisors She Doesn’t Know.’ Interestingly enough, real estate mogul Steve Witkoff, who was included in the Signal chat group was physically in a Moscow meeting with Vladimir Putin — US military strategy leaking in real time to someone in Russia. Just imagine that — a face-to-face so Putin doesn’t have to bother with reading a text, unless Witkoff handed the Russian leader his cellphone on which the Signal thread was stored.
A US Department of Defense official explained to CNN’s Natasha Bertrand that “information providing indication or advance warning that the US or its allies are preparing an attack” — which Hegseth shared — is classified Top Secret. “It is safe to say that anybody in uniform would be court martialed for this. We don’t provide that level of information on unclassified systems, in order to protect the lives and safety of the service members carrying out these strikes. If we did, it would be wholly irresponsible. My most junior analysts know not to do this,” he continued. Representative Maxwell Frost of Florida is sending letters to all the identifiable officials in the ‘Hegseth Disaster Signal Chat’ demanding they retain all messages for any pending litigation and Congressional investigations, saying, “Any deletion of the chat is a willful destruction of evidence.” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called Hegseth “the most unqualified Secretary of Defense in American history” and demanded his immediate dismissal. Jeffries wrote, “The so-called Secretary of Defense recklessly and casually disclosed highly sensitive war plans — including the timing of a pending attack, possible strike targets, and the weapons to be used — during an unclassified national security group chat that inexplicably included a reporter. His behavior shocks the conscience, risked American lives, and likely violated the law.” Jen Rubin wrote on The Contrarian, “Proud of your votes for Hegseth? This is on you as much as Hegseth. You knew he was not remotely qualified,” as she called out Senators Ernst and Tillis. Fun fact: Former US Air National Guardsman Jack Douglas Teixeira was sentenced to 15 years in prison four months ago for doing the same thing Pete Hegseth and his band of idiots did when they leaked war plans to a reporter.
So, discipline, dismissal or firing? Jimmy Kimmel says the excuses don’t stop, with Trump dragging out one of his old favorites — “witchhunt.” “First, he blamed the reporter, and when that didn’t work, he blamed the Signal app, saying, ‘it could be a defective platform, and we’re gonna have to find that out.’ Right, maybe one of the wires came loose and the gasket got cracked,” Kimmel quipped, adding, “Blaming Signal for this is like blaming Tinder for when you get caught cheating on your wife.” He wasn’t through as he tore into the talking heads at Fox and Newsmax as they continued with downplaying the scandal, calling it “the perfect storm of incompetence, inexperience, dishonesty, and hypocrisy from the same people who spent the last 12 years screaming about Hillary’s emails and Hunter’s laptop, while calling Signalgate a ‘non-story.'” Why cover it if it’s a non-story? Taking a final swing by mentioning Trump’s DEI initiatives, Kimmel said, “Thank God they got rid of DEI. Now you can rest assured that the idiots in charge are not chosen for their race or gender. They were chosen purely based on being idiots. I believe that Pete Hegseth wasn’t drunk. I believe he was perfectly sober when he made this idiotic mistake.” His belief that President Trump might not be very happy with his national security and defense picks may lead him to calling them Eric and Don Jr.
Satirist Andy Borowitz provides another followup view of Hegseth: “Millions of Americans have been rattled this week by the bombshell that a former Fox News host might be a liar, reports on Thursday indicate. According to industry insiders, the revelation that a former employee might have knowingly disseminated falsehoods threatens to tarnish the image of the nation’s most trusted news organization. Harland Dorrinson, a crisis management specialist, said Fox News needs to ‘change the narrative’ by reminding Americans of its peerless and longstanding reputation for honesty. ‘Fox needs to remind people that they are the network of Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, and Tucker Carlson,’ he said. ‘One bad apple doesn’t spoil the whole bunch.'”
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |


EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
Protesting
“When an individual is protesting society’s refusal to acknowledge his dignity as a human being, his very act of protest confers dignity on him.”
~Bayard Rustin
“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
~Martin Luther King, Jr.
“We won’t stop protesting. It’s the engine that moves society forward.”
~Jordi Cuixart
“There are good reasons for being in jail – for protesting.”
~Tracy Chapman
“Every day, I would show up, and there were no kids, just me and my teacher in my classroom. Every day, I would be escorted by marshals past a mob of people protesting and boycotting the school. This went on for a whole year.”
~Ruby Bridges

At the Philadelphia Zoo, Mommy, a Western Santa Cruz Galapagos Tortoise (a critically endangered species) that’s over 100 years old recently laid 16 eggs after mating with Abrazzo, a male tortoise of similar age. The staff whisked away (ouch, bad choice of words, sorry!) the eggs and placed them in incubators of 2 different temperatures. Temperature is what decides if the hatchling will be male or female. So far, 4 eggs have hatched, and they are monitoring the remaining eggs. This is a Big Deal[TM] |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
