DONNY TWO-TONE, MCDONALD’S VS BURGER KING, LOSER TRIAD

From a recent Trump campaign rally in Nevada, Texas’ GOP Senator John Cornyn released a photo of himself and the candidate which immediately went viral. Viewers zoomed onto the former president’s face which had a dramatic color difference between his face, and his ear and temple areas. MSNBC contributor Brian Taylor Cohen posted the image on X, quickly gathering 9.2M views and a fever-pitched collection of comments. Over the past few weeks many have been saying that The Trumpster wears more makeup than does Kamala Harris…Maybelline eyeliner king is still JD Vance…with some having flashbacks to their first use of makeup in middle school, one poster confessing that it looked similar to her discovery of L’Oréal Dream matte mousse. Humorist Mrs. Betty Bowers believes Donny Two-Tone has the same approach to liquid foundation as he does to racial politics: no blending, keep the colors separate! Others were united in being reminded of the Tupperware look after microwaving of tomato-based pasta, while others felt it was a definite match for the MinWax Wood Finish color chart, Colonial Maple. Some felt he was simply getting into a pumpkin-faced Halloween spirit, with a few suggesting this represents a true border crisis…another saying a pressure washer wouldn’t leave a dent.

And the deranged guy just can’t get it straight in his head that he was found guilty of 34 felony charges for his scheme to silence porn star, Stormy Daniels, by buying her silence about their previous affair during his 2016 presidential run…he’s trying to do it again! MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow revealed a few weeks back that she had in-hand recorded phone calls, documents and emails from July to prove that Trump was once again attempting to buy her silence in a hush money deal. The new offer involved a lowering of the debt she owes from a failed 2018 lawsuit for defamation if she agreed in writing not to make “defamatory or disparaging statements” about him. Daniels turned down the deal but settled the case for $627,500, yet she still got in a shot last week when she affirmed “Trump is no Arnold Palmer.” A political cartoon making the rounds depicts a cartoonish MAGA-hatted elephant pointing to a wall shelf weighted down with a Trump Bible, Trump trading card collection, a Trump wrist watch, an over-long red tie, Trump golden tennis shoes, and a framed 8×10 glossy of The Trumpster. The MAGA-protagonist is saying, “Up here I used to keep my conservative, moral, and Christian values, but I had to get rid of them to make room for my Trump merchandise.”  You’ll need another shelf before it’s over, buddy!

Anita Chabria writes in the LA Times that “we have passed the point of discerning reality from satire.” As an example, she marvels that she “had to write the sentence about whether the speaker of the House argued with a CNN host about whether it was appropriate that the former president talked about the size of the late golfer Arnold Palmer’s junk at a rally.” Trump is quoted as saying, “Arnold Palmer was all man and I say it with all due respect to women…we have women who are highly sophisticated here.” To this Chabria responds, “Ah yes, I am currently eating my peanut butter and jelly sandwich with both pinkies lifted, fancy-lady style, so I can tell you with authority that sophisticated women love (this type of) joke, almost as much as fart jokes.” Trump welcomed a few steelworkers onstage, asking them if they liked the Palmer story, garnering praise, to which Chabria says, “Which, to make a long story short, is all that matters to Trump.” She then brings in Trump’s adventure at a McDonald’s in Feasterville, PA, where he went for a photo-op of dress-up in a Mac apron (no gloves or hairnet) to run the fry cooker to pass out fries to a hand-selected group of drive-thru customers…25,000 he says. NOT! Chabria closes with, “Trump is many things, but he’s not stupid – especially when it comes to his base. Both his Palmer story and his minimum wage dress-up are forms of aggressive anti-intellectualism and anti-elitism that please his supporters to no end because the rest of us find it offensive. The offense is the point. As Trump said at the Palmer event: ‘The basic is easier to understand.’ In MAGA world, he’s not the joke. We are.”

Satirist Andy Borowitz writes of the McDonald’s appearance: “Calling the selection process ‘rigged,’ Donald J. Trump refused on Tuesday to accept that he was not chosen Employee of the Month at a McDonald’s where he briefly worked over the weekend. ‘I’ve been treated very unfairly by McDonald’s,’ he complained to reporters. ‘Frankly, I did win this selection.’ The Republican nominee alleged that he had ‘the most votes for Employee of the Month in the history of employees and months,’ but that ballots cast for him were stolen by a sinister individual he called ‘The Hamburgler.’ Trump said he would never work at McDonald’s again, asserting that ‘Burger King is better, quite frankly, because it’s a monarchy.’ A co-worker of Trump’s, however, offered a downbeat assessment of his job performance: ‘He kept on stealing fries and whatnot, and when I caught him doing it, he threw ketchup against the wall. That guy sucks.'”

Yale professor and historian Timothy Snyder writes on Substack, “We have seen this before. We know what Trump  losing looks like. Three Trumpian actions are predictable. We know them from the last election. Last time around, when Trump lost, when Trump knew he lost, he: 1. Claimed that he won, 2. Filed lawsuits, 3. Encouraged violence. He did these three things because he lost. They comprise the loser triad. Judging from past behavior, though, a repetition of the loser triad would signal that Trump believes that he has lost. In 2024, though, the sequence will be different. Allies of Trump have already filed dozen of lawsuits. Pro-Trump violence is likely to begin around election day rather than in January. But the timing of Trump’s claiming of victory will likely be the same, shortly after the election but before the outcome has been confirmed. To be clear anything can happen. Either candidate can win. That is why we vote and count the votes. And that is exactly why we should not engage in behaviors like the loser triad. The loser triad indicates that a loser is trying to break the system. This time around, the three actions will likely come in the following sequence. Trump, in the 2024 loser triad: 1. Files lawsuits, 2. Encourages violence, 3. Claims that he won shortly after election day. If Trump again claims too early that he won, this is not just a statement like any other. It is part of a plan to take power by a candidate who believes that he has lost an election – a repeat of a behavior that we know very well. If Trump claims victory, that is a good sign that Harris has won the election.”

Of course, he is setting the stage to contest a potential loss by blustering about the vote’s legitimacy and portraying the Democrats as a bunch of “cheaters” in their campaigning. He continues to escalate his doubts regarding the integrity as election day approaches. Recently, in Erie, PA, he incoherently ranted, “I would’t bother to campaign if they didn’t cheat. I wouldn’t even be here today – you know why? I wouldn’t have to campaign. I’m only here because they cheat. And they cheat in this state. Especially in Philadelphia…Philadelphia is out of control. Detroit is out of control. Atlanta is out of control. Places are out of control. Out of control.” Got that? Out of control! “If God came down from on high and said, ‘I’m going to be your vote tabulator for this election,’ I would leave this podium right now because I wouldn’t have to speak. We wouldn’t have any problem. We have to have a landslide because they cheat so damn much.” Academics and election officials, and even a voter data expert hired by Trump, all agree there is no evidence to support his claims regarding the 2020 election, nor did the few fraudulent votes cast, always exceedingly rare, have any effect on the final numbers in the race. Hello, America…he just needs to “find” 81 million dopes…

During an interview with Dr. Phil McGraw, Trump attacked California and its extensive and successful vote-by-mail program, saying he’d win the state if not for the supposed fraud. “I guarantee you, if Jesus came down and was the vote counter, I would win California. In other words, if we had an honest vote counter, a really honest counter, I do great with the Hispanics, great, I mean I had a level that no other Republican’s ever done, but if we had an honest vote counter, I would win California,” he claims. Weave on, Weaver! The Harris campaign released a statement saying Trump “reached a level of delusion difficult for even Dr. Phil to diagnose.” Social media wasn’t having it either. One poster on X wrote, “If Jesus came down, Donald would demand that he be deported,” and in a similar vein another posted, “If Jesus came down you’d demand to see the birth certificate and then call him a liar, and don’t even get me started on what you’d say about his mom.” Another doubter wrote, “I’m just an ordinary Catholic, but I’m thinking that Jesus probably wouldn’t come down for a man found liable by a jury for sexual assault.” In digs at Dr. Phil, one posted, “A real doctor would be scheduling Trump for a rush visit to get an MRI,” with another posting, “Bro is completely delusional. I wonder if Dr. Phil is ready to make his diagnosis yet?” A closer writes, “If Jesus, Mary, Shiva, Krishna, Holy Spirit and Buddha all came down as vote counters, he would still lose California.” That’s a wrap!

According to Raw Story, if Trump loses, he will likely lobby House Republicans to refuse to certify the results, not a problem in 2020 when Democrats held a majority, but with Republicans now holding a slim majority, it could become a legitimate issue. Politico has reported that a bipartisan group of House lawmakers have banded together to jointly pledge to certify the results of the 2024 vote, and the group so far includes six House Republicans, who if they honor their pledge to certify a win for Harris, Trump allies would be unable to block certification with the current membership of the House. Republican Don Bacon of Nebraska says the group’s pledge is a reflection of traditional American values. “In America we respect election results especially once the courts and appeals work through the process. We fight hard to win during the campaigns and then respect the results when the votes are counted,” Bacon says. For more than two centuries the country enjoyed a peaceful transfer of power between presidential administrations, until Trump in 2020 pushed his MAGATs to refuse certification, lobbied states to “find” votes for him, and pressured VP Pence to reject the election results, before sending angry insurrectionists to fight police, break into the Capitol and ransack legislator’s offices. Four years later, Trump is sending the same message: election results will not be accepted unless the election is “fair” – meaning, if he wins. “If we don’t win, you know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of the election,” he threatens.

Donald Trump, on a break from visiting his golf courses in Ireland and Scotland, sneaks away in a rental car, finds himself down in Wales, a bit lost with no food or water in the bleak countryside. Spotting a gentle, crystal clear stream running at the roadside, he starts to take a drink. A man shouts in Welsh, “Don’t drink the water…the sheep pee in it!” Know-it-all-Donny yells back, “Speak English when you’re in England!” The man shouts back in English, “Use both hands…you’ll get more water.”

Time for a rerun of an old joke: Interviewer asks, “So, Mr. Trump, of the 30,000 lies you’ve told the American people, which is your favorite?” Trump replies, “I don’t lie.” Interviewer responds, “Yeah, that’s my favorite one, too.”

MONUMENTAL SUBJECTS, PREDICATES, NOUNS AND VERBS 

Presidential candidate Kamala Harris walked into the snake pit inappropriately named Fox News last week, to be ‘interviewed’ by Bret Baier, who is now a nearby neighbor of Donald Trump’s in Palm Beach, Florida. Evidently, he likes to be near his friends…in his very own $30M manor house. However, the ‘interview’ turned into more of a debate as both participants sparred, talking over one another to make their points, with Harris getting her wish of being able to defiantly speak to the largest MAGA audience in the cable news world. Baier tried to make the immigration system his battering ram, with Harris admitting that the system needs repair, and that she and Walz will support and enforce federal law. She went after Trump for his opposition to the bipartisan border security proposal simply to deny the Biden administration a victory in the lead-up to election day. Baier then pointed out that she and the former president are split in the current voter polling, asking her if she thinks 50% of Americans favoring Trump are “misguided” or “stupid.” “I would never say that about the American people. In fact, if you listen to Donald Trump, if you watch any of his rallies, he’s the one who tends to demean and belittle the American people. He’s the one who talks about an ‘enemy within,’ talking about locking people up because they disagree with him,” she replied. To counter her answer, Baier shows a clip of Trump responding to Fox News host Harris Faulkner’s question regarding his ‘enemy’ quote, which drew this answer: “I’m not threatening anybody.” Kamala firmly retorted, “Bret, I’m sorry, and with all due respect: That clip is not what he has been saying about the ‘enemy within’ that he has repeated when he is speaking about the American people. That’s not what you just showed. He has repeated it many times, and you and I both know that. You and I both know that he has talked about turning the American military on the American people.” She also made it clear that her presidency would not be a continuation of Biden’s administration, that “…like every new president, I will bring my life experiences, my professional experiences, and fresh and new ideas. I represent a new generation of leadership.” Baier tried to play ‘gotcha‘ for Harris’ support for Biden’s mental fitness as a president, but was quick to parry with, “Joe Biden is not on the ballot, but Donald Trump is. He’s unfit to serve. He’s unstable. He’s dangerous. And people are exhausted.” And so is The Donald, it seems, with his cancellation of several appearances.

MSNBC’s ‘All In’ anchor, Chris Hayes, criticized Fox News for showing a misleading clip of Trump’s “enemy within” comments to Kamala, when The Don referred to Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff as enemies, showing only his charge about “phony investigations.” Hayes believes that on his Fox News show, Harris Faulkner was offering Trump a chance to back off from his fascist rhetoric, but “Trump wouldn’t take it. He never takes it because he actually believes and wants to do what he says he wants to do.” Baier complained to his Fox colleagues that he sensed that Harris “was going to be tough to redirect without me trying to interrupt,” and that she showed up fifteen minutes past the 5:00 p.m. start time, like “icing the kicker” in football parlance. Harris has suffered through criticisms that she was unable or unwilling to sit through tough interviews, but she showed her mettle, and her team was pleased with her face-off with a hostile Fox News interviewer, a dicey move. Billionaire investor Mark Cuban, a Harris supporter, praised her showing at standing up to Baier, saying, “She used examples of policies. She gave a real world context. When Baier went hard after her, she didn’t call him names, she didn’t quit the interview, she didn’t make things up. She never once complained the questions were tough, she never played the victim card, she didn’t lose her temper. She didn’t take the bait to diminish or talk down to Trump supporters.” She was able to convey to 7.1M viewers her messages of affordable housing and small business expansion, while showing off aspects of her personality, with salient comments regarding Trump. Jesse Lee, who served in both Obama and Biden administrations commented, “I think to some extent the fact that she was so combative and just kind of vigorous and strong was a big contrast to Trump looking feeble and like he’s trying to limp past the finish line. There’s not a lot of things that are going to change undecided voters at this point, but I think that contrast is one of those things.”

MSNBC’S Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski called Bret Baier’s interview tactics “embarrassing” and “rude” as he attempted to derail her answers with interruptions “every three words.” Willie Geist claimed, “Bret Baier conducted that interview as if he had something to prove to the former president of the United States,” as Harris constantly repeated, “let me finish!” Geist said, “Kamala Harris went on Fox News, and took all those questions, and hung in there, and kept her calm, and didn’t attack the network or the interviewer or whine things were unfair. She talks policy, and she gave answers to tough questions. It goes without saying that Donald Trump would not be given the same treatment, talked over, not allowed to finish the questions.” Brzezinski added, “It was supposed to give viewers an opportunity to actually hear her plans as President. Instead, it almost immediately devolved into an embarrassing, bad-faith effort by a once-respected host to play to an audience of one…the host’s constant, rude interruptions were designed to distract from the issues and facts that Trump and his acolytes try and twist and distort every day.”

Satirist Andy Borowitz, in his The Borowitz Report, writes, “In a harsh rebuke to the Democratic presidential nominee, Fox News Channel asserted on Friday that Kamala Harris had ‘flagrantly broken’ the network’s ground rules for her interview by speaking in complete sentences. ‘Vice President Harris was hell-bent on uttering sentences that contained both a subject and a predicate,” Bret Baier, who conducted the interview, said. ‘I tried to prevent her from doing so by interrupting her, but she rudely continued.’ Baier added that Harris ‘stubbornly made nouns and verbs agree’ and ‘said things that she knew to be verifiably true. Our fact-checkers determined that on multiple occasions she used facts, in clear violation of Fox policy,’ Baier said. ‘President Trump would never do that.'”

Matt Gertz of Media Matters for America wrote: “Fox’s ‘news side’ has been in steep decline since Trump took over the Republican Party and the network rebranded as his personal propaganda outlet. But even by those standards, the partisan divide it displayed on Wednesday was striking and would be catastrophically embarrassing to Fox’s employees if any of them were still capable of humiliation. While [Bret] Baier has long enjoyed a largely unearned reputation as a credible newsman, he lives in palpable fear of his viewers abandoning his network. His subsequent performance was what you might expect from someone worried primarily about letting down Fox’s pro-Trump audience. Fox’s ‘news side’ always functioned as a cog in the right-wing media machine that laundered its talking points into the mainstream press, and its claim to independence was demolished during Trump’s presidency. But at this point the network seems to have all but given up even pretending to employ a credible news apparatus.”

Meghan McCain, daughter of the late Senator John McCain, in an attempt to force Democratic candidates to stop citing her late father’s memory while campaigning, threatened to release what he really thought abut VP Kamala Harris. She fired off on social media, “Now, I know democrats want to reinvent history and turn my Dad into any illusion you guys need him to be depending on the political moment you need to bastardize his memory for…but please don’t make me start sharing what I remember him ACTUALLY saying about Kamala Harris…And consider this my final warning shot, I will start spilling tea.” Democratic strategist Cliff Schecter who has ‘spilled tea’ on JD Vance regarding his past comments about Donald Trump, said he had some tea of his own to spill about her. “I wrote a book about your dad in ’08, as I’m sure you know, Meghan. So go ahead and do it, nepo,” he countered. “Then I’ll share what your father’s advisors [and] others close to him told me he really though about you. Things I had no reason to publish except to be cruel, but will happily share now in light of what you’ve become. You go first.” In later post Schecter said, “Meghan McCain doesn’t just get to threaten Dems [with] her unearned platform.” All’s quiet to date…

Former NBC executive John D. Miller has written a lengthy apology/editorial printed in U.S. News and World Report, that begins with him saying, “I want to apologize to America” [because] “I helped create a monster.” He goes on to explain how in developing Trump’s reality show, ‘The Apprentice,’ the creators used highly selective editing to make Trump appear much more intelligent, thoughtful, and decisive as a businessman than he is in reality. “I learned early on in my dealings with Trump that he thought he could simply say something over and over, and eventually people would believe it. He would say to me, ‘The Apprentice’…America’s No. 1 TV show.’ But it wasn’t. Not that week. Not that season. I had the ratings in front of me. He had seen and heard the ratings, but that didn’t matter. He just kept saying it was the ‘No. 1 show on television,’ even after we corrected him. He repeated it on press tours too, knowing full well it was wrong. He didn’t like being fact-checked back then either.” Miller was surprised about Trump’s political entrance, where he would continue his lying about immigrants, the COVID pandemic, and the 2020 election results. He adds, “While we were successful in marketing ‘The Apprentice,’ we also did irreparable harm by creating the false image of Trump as a successful leader. I deeply regret that. And I regret that it has taken me so long to go public.”

Georgetown University Law Center professor Neal Katyal wrote in a New York Times editorial, and explained later in an interview with MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, that only one complicated congressional law could stand between the Oval Office and Donald Trump, according to his analysis. He warns that the nation should prepare itself for a legal brawl if Trump loses to Harris on November 5. “The rogues are no longer amateurs. They have spent the last four years going pro, meticulously devising a strategy across multiple fronts…state legislatures, Congress, executive branches and elected judges…to overturn any close election.” Several actions could be taken toward seizing power, such as challenging ballots in swing state lawsuits, sowing chaos on local election boards  and forcing fake electors on allies in state legislatures, before taking up the one through Congress. Katyal says, “The Congress has the power to swing the entire election. The rules are complex…even as a law professor I can barely make sense of them.” He offers one possibility, a 2022 law, that makes it more difficult for a Congressional member to object to a state’s vote by mandating 20% of members in both houses sign on to the challenge, which then must win a simple majority in both chambers as well. He cautions, “The rules are so complicated that they could be stretched, wrongly, to give Congress the power to select the next president by sustaining bogus objections. Don’t get me wrong, such maneuvering is totally inconsistent with the 2022 law. But it can be attempted and create chaos.” He is not optimistic that certain Congress members will put correct legal interpretations above party loyalty to their party’s presidential nominee…the Republican Party, according to Katyal, can no longer be trusted to hold democratic norms as sacrosanct. “We have much to fear…but if either candidate wins the Electoral College decisively, any dispute will be rendered academic,” he concludes.

Donald Trump charges Kamala Harris with lying when she says she worked at a McDonald’s restaurant when she was in college, so to nullify or diminish her claim he arranged to work at the French fry station in a McDonald’s last Sunday, an everyman’s job…no one is sure what this proves, but whatever he comes up with is bound to be good! On his show, Jimmy Kimmel says, “This is a win-win for Trump because working a deep-fryer will give him a new skill he could potentially put to use in the prison cafeteria.” This poke in the face is likely to fry Trump’s brain since he is still steaming from the remark Kimmel used during the Academy Awards in March, when Trump posted a wisecrack on social media about the show. Kimmel responded, “Thank you, President Trump. Thank you for watching. I’m surprised you’re still up. Isn’t it past your jail time?”

After Trump, for ten minutes, made disgusting ‘locker room’ remarks about golfer Arnold Palmer’s impressive body part at a recent rally, satirist Andy Borowitz writes, “Donald J. Trump told supporters at a rally on Monday that if elected he will rename the Washington Monument after the legendary golfer Arnold Palmer.” Borowitz quotes Trump as saying, ‘Unlike Arnie, George Washington had no body parts worth remembering. He had wooden teeth, which, quite frankly, were disgusting. Get him out of here!’ An aide commenting on the former president’s performance said, “At this point I think we’re better off just playing music and having him dance.”

Satirist Andy Borowitz reports on “what the publishing industry experts are calling an unprecedented snafu,” with Melania Trump’s publisher of her new memoir hastily withdrawing the book, ‘Melania,’ from release after discovering “it mistakenly contained the full text of her prenuptial agreement. The prenup, which spans over 200 of the book’s 256 pages, indicates that next year Donald Trump must give Mrs. Trump a large lump sum, an arrangement Melania calls ‘my personal Project 2025.’ Additionally, the agreement stipulates a substantial penalty if Mr. Trump fails to pay, in what is termed ‘the Rudy Giuliani clause.’ Mrs. Trump’s publisher may come to regret its decision to withdraw her memoir, as early reviews are calling the prenup the only interesting content in the book.”

‘America’s Mayor’ Giuliani made the news last week via his daughter, Caroline, when she came out in favor of Kamala Harris in the presidential sweepstakes. She warned about reelecting Trump, using what she called her father’s “implosion” after being caught up in the former president’s “destructive trail.” By becoming a staunch ally of Trump, he lost his cache of being a respected prosecutor and the perception of being a strong leader of New York City after the 9/11 destruction of the World Trade Center buildings, to currently being bankrupt and disbarred from his profession. Caroline calls her father’s great fall as a perfect example of how Trump “destroys everything he touches,” and “watching my dad’s life crumble since he joined forces with Trump has been extraordinary painful, both on a personal level and because his demise feels linked to a dark force that threatens once again to consume America.” A filmmaker and a writer, she wrote in Vanity Fair that his downfall has only caused their already “cartoonishly complicated relationship” to become more desperate, and “after months of feeling the type of sorrow that comes from the death of a loved one, it dawned on me that I’ve been grieving the loss of my dad to Trump. I cannot bear to lose our country to him too.” She looked back on an earlier time when her father mentioned that he was considering becoming Trump’s personal lawyer, but she couldn’t persuade him to turn down the offer, after asking him not to “go down this morally perilous path,” alluding to Trump’s “open racism, rampant misogyny, and total lack of empathy.”

She writes, “I even told my dad that I already felt ashamed of my last name whenever I saw headlines connecting him to Trump, and that this escalation would only deepen that feeling,” but he joined the legal team in April 2018 during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into 2016 election interference by Russia. In November 2020, Rudy was given the job of attempting to reverse the election results nationwide, which only led to his disbarment, to several indictments, and loss of lawsuits which opened the trapdoor to bankruptcy. In her article, she writes, “Trump being the president was the worst thing that ever happened to my dad, to my family, and to our nation’s modern history. The consequences will only be more severe, and irreversible, a second time around.” Caroline blasted Trump’s conservative Supreme Court appointees and their recent decisions favoring the former president, and the “draconian” abortion bans resulting from the reversal of Roe v Wade. Consequently, since Harris is “the one candidate who cares about my rights as a woman,” and “our only chance for a better future,” she will be casting a vote for Kamala in November.

Former president Obama hit the campaign trail in Pittsburgh for Harris/Walz last week with such a vengeance against Donald Trump, one X user posted, “I’d like to report a murder.” Obama presented a laundry list of reasons to spurn Trump in favor of Harris, starting with “the constant attempts to sell you stuff,” naming the gold sneakers, the $100K watch, and the Trump Bible. “Who does that?” he asked incredulously. “You know, he wants you to buy the Word of God, Donald Trump edition. Got his name right there next Matthew and Luke.” Just above the ‘Printed in China’ notation, no doubt!Number 44 roasted Number 45, a father of five children, by asking, “Do you think Donald Trump ever changed a diaper?” which brought a cry from an audience member, “His own!” – delighting Obama. It was reported that Trump wore diapers while recording his reality TV show, ‘The Apprentice,’ being dubbed ‘Diaper Don’ as a result. His MAGA crowd, dismissed the charge, as they started wearing absorbent underwear at rallies, carrying signs reading “Real Men Wear Diapers.” Obama also let it fly against Trump for taking credit for the state of the economy as he took the reins as president in 2017. “I remember that economy when he first came in as being pretty good. Yeah, it was pretty good, because it was my economy. It wasn’t something he did. I spent eight years cleaning up the mess that the Republicans had left me,” he pointed out.

In Tom Tomorrow’s comic strip, The Modern World, created by Dan Perkins, an undecided voter exclaims, “As a freethinking political independent, I simply can’t decide who to vote for!” Sparky the Penguin pops up to help, saying, “Really! Well, let’s think this through! Donald Trump is an elderly rage-filled narcissist in obvious decline. He’s apparently unable to string together a single coherent sentence without going off on bizarre tangents. He’s a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who incited a literal insurrection. He’s surrounded by extremist freaks, like the deranged 9/11 conspiracy theorist he took to the 9/11 Memorial. He and his vile running mate are currently whipping up another round of anti-immigrant hysteria rumors. It’s already inspired bomb threats and will probably get somebody killed. His role models are authoritarians and dictators. He name-checked Viktor Orban during the debate. He’s made it clear that if he gets back into office, democracy as we know it in this country is pretty much over.” Unconvinced, the undecided voter says, “Sure…but I heard that Kamala Harris flip-flopped on some issues and stuff.” This leading Sparky the Penguin to say, “How reassuring it is, to know that this election may ultimately hinge on thoughtful, deliberative voters such as yourself.” Pretty much sums it up after reading the various op-ed pages!

Steve Schmidt on his The Warning blog, writes, “Kamala Harris enjoyed a magical July, a brilliant August and a spectacular September. October, not so much.” Steve says the tough days and their decisive moments have arrived, with campaign teams being exhausted, tempers frayed and a multitude of voices shouting opinions and advice…a high stakes phase in any campaign, a “mistakes were made” phase. Schmidt feels that the worst day for Harris was telling the hosts of ‘The View‘ that “nothing comes to mind” when asked what she would have done differently than Biden. He compares it to John Kerry’s quote, “I voted for it before I voted against it” during his run for the presidency. Schmidt questions, “How did the vice president wind up sipping beer with Stephen Colbert?” after giving her answer on ‘The View.’ He feels that the quote risks being a campaign killer, and that the team needs a timeout to refocus, to examine what worked well previously, and dump the October sloppiness.

Schmidt calls the Walz/Vance debate a debacle, where Vance needed to be confronted as an extremist threat, not given a rubdown, after lying about Haitians eating their neighbors’ pets. Walz’ performance was a refutation of the DNC convention, which pictured Trump as a clear and present danger. It was Kamala Harris‘ duty to reframe the election in the previous three months to make the race about Trump after the GOP had framed it as being about Biden and his cognitive decline. The Democrats were unable to justify Joe as the best candidate to stop Donald, which made Trump into the “truth teller” regarding the economy, the border and Biden with his historically low approval levels. Biden’s reputation and legacy are entirely dependent on a Harris/Walz win. Harris’ fight to increase her stature and standing with voters was well done, but now is threatened with a meltdown, attributable to her media interviews, “making her shrink in stature, putting a target on her back, and shining the light on her instead of Trump,” says Schmidt. He feels that Harris should embark on giving a series of closing speeches that make clear her philosophy about America, the American people, our way of life and our future, and by doing so voters will know who she is, which is what polls are indicating is needed.

Americans don’t want specifics, they want a competent, faithful, dynamic, normal president who confronts the tough issues unafraid. Schmidt suggests that her team read some of JFK’s speeches which contain ideas and aspirations that fit what Americans want to hear, because the interviews she is doing now are strategically wide of the mark…time to stop playing Whack-A-Mole. She has to fix “there is not a thing that comes to mind.”

Jasmine Parish Moreno, a daughter of Mexican-Iranian immigrants, writes on Common Dreams that “this election isn’t about a perfect candidate…it’s about our futures.” She continues, “Harris will never be my community’s liberator. But for right now, for this election, she is my target. My goal is to stop Trump and his MAGA allies from ever getting close to the White House again. Never has my vote been about me. It’s about what gives my family and my community the best chance of survival. I am under no impression that Harris is perfect; but I am not fighting with her. I am fighting to move her. I will vote for Harris on November 5, but my vote is not a profession of my love for Harris or my approval. It’s about making a deliberate choice to pick the playing field for the next four years that my generation and I will be forced, one way or another, to organize under. When I think about this year’s election, I wish I didn’t feel the fear I do about a future life under Trump. As someone who grew up with a family of immigrants, I know this is not mere speculation or exaggeration – Trump and MAGA Republicans have a plan to hurt my community. The anti-immigrant policies outlined in Project 2025 are designed to tear apart families across the nation – both at the border and in the very states and cities we call home. The sprawling immigrant detention camps and deportations carried out under his first administration were just a glimpse at what he could do under a second term, where he has promised to use the military to conduct nationwide raids in the places where we live, work, and pray to target anyone suspected of being undocumented.” Moreno says no perfect candidate exists now, criticizing VP Harris for adopting some Republican talking points on immigration, while ignoring the calls to end the genocide in Gaza carried out with US weapons paid for with American tax dollars.

Steve Schmidt feels that “the Harris campaign seems adrift and satisfied with a level of engagement with Trump that seeks to make an issue out of his trampling of dead norms, but focusing on small issues at the expense of existential ones will not end well.” Andrew Sullivan writes on The Weekly Dish on Substack, that Harris is obviously struggling to close the sale, pointing out that both Clinton and Biden were well ahead in the polls at this juncture in their respective races against Trump. Sullivan sees nothing being shifted, and “if anything, there’s a slight drift back toward Trump right now.” He wants to hear Kamala answer two baseline questions that are still unresolved in his mind: “Why do you want to be president? And what change would you bring to the White House and the country?” He characterizes them as easy, fundamental questions, and having listened to her closely in interviews, he still doesn’t know the answers. “I was born in a middle-class family” doesn’t cut it in his estimation.

Schmidt advises Harris to make her closing message about Donald Trump and the threat he poses to the American republic, liberty and world peace. He must be portrayed as a fascist and a profound danger, simple truths that the media is afraid to say. “To prove that she can confront danger abroad she will have to prove she is ready to face the threat at hand by confronting Trump for what he is” – a decisive debate performance falls short of this task in Schmidt’s estimation.

In fundraising appeals to his extensive mailing list, Donald Trump offered his donors a chance to appear with him on stage during his return to Butler, PA, the site of his bleeding ear problem. For as little as a $5 donation he offers consideration for having a photo made during the stage appearance for the lucky winner. “The crowd is going to LOVE YOU when you’re introduced as my VIP guest,” the blurb reads. It appears the lucky VIP winner was Elon Musk, dressed in all black clothing, performing his jumping jacks routine…no sign of any red MAGA-hatted winner doing the Mar-a-Lardo dance. The Trump campaign had no comment when asked to produce a winners list from all the previous come-ons for donations.

Word from the Trump team regarding the now-humbled Corey Lewandowski, is that he has been sent home to New Hampshire after slinking into the campaign as an adviser, and after suggesting to people he was plotting a coup to take over Chis LaCivita’s and Susie Wiles’ leadership of the team’s objectives. Called Trump’s security blanket, Corey was ready to take complete charge, but the boss had only asked “find something for Corey to do,” which didn’t include doing an audit of the campaign finances for one thing. Lewandowski’s record of being fired before the 2016 election, and being fired from a pro-Trump super PAC in 2021 over unsolicited sexual advances toward a donor should have been fair warning, but as a Trump ally said, “[Lewandowski] is Trump’s comfort blanket, and he’s like a cockroach. He never dies. He blew himself up.” Have the Orkin Man stand by in any case!

RELIGIOUS COERCION, TOURBILLONS, INANITIES & DISINHIBITION

Steve Schmidt on his The Warning blog hosted by Substack, writes, “George Washington did not have the insight to realize that all men are created equal, despite fighting for a cause that declared it an unalienable truth. That said, he certainly had the foresight to see the danger of political parties to warp patriotism into tribalism. In his farewell address on September 17, 1796, he said this:

‘However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion, as they accuse entire peoples of stealing and eating their neighbors pets.'”

Okay, okay…he didn’t say that last part nor did Schmidt write it, but Washington COULD have, had he given his farewell speech in 2024. Schmidt says, “the quote that defines a generation (‘They’re eating dogs!’), and an era that is exhausted, stale, ludicrous and coming to an end. Someday, someone somewhere is going to closely examine the inanity that occurred on CNN during the two hours that preceded the debate (with Kamala Harris) during which Trump psychologically decomposed on national television, and realize the scale of idiocies dressed up as commentary describing he greatest threat to freedom in America since 1860. Trump is most certainly an unserious man, but he is covered by a bevy of unserious people whose smugness blinds them to the reality that they make MAGA grow by fertilizing fascism with so much curiosity, wonder, and detachment. Standing for the proposition that what is cannot be, is as delusional as the fulminations from the deranged gentleman foaming at the mouth about immigrants eating dogs.”  Schmidt accuses CNN in the hours leading up to the debate of heralding Trump as Muhammad Ali incarnate, with Harris being mocked as an empty vessel. MAGA VP candidate, JD Vance, had claimed that Haitian migrants were “causing chaos all over Springfield, Ohio,” by abducting and eating pets, so naturally the former president spouted that charge during the debate. Cue up the bomb threats by crazies toward schools and public buildings in Springfield!

Schmidt takes Ohio Governor Mike DeWine to task over an editorial he wrote defending Battlefield Springfield and its residents, with Schmidt’s calling his piece a struggle between the lie and truth. DeWine describes how he was born in the town, tells of his familiarity with businesses, churches and events, and mentions a rich history of providing refuge for the oppressed and being a place of opportunity, and how it hit tough times in the ’80s and ’90s. He feels Springfield has a very bright future, praising the Haitians who arrived there to make their dreams come true…the American story. He expresses his disappointment that it is now the epicenter of vitriol over the national immigration policy, but here is where DeWine veers off-track according to Schmidt. “Understanding what has happened is materially and significantly different from how it happened, no matter what the event may be. Why is DeWine willing to tell the truth about what is happening…the people being smeared, but afraid to tell the truth about how it happened and why it happened?” he asks. DeWine writes, “As a supporter of former President Donald Trump and Senator JD Vance, I am saddened by how they and others continue to repeat claims that lack evidence and disparage the legal migrants living in Springfield. This rhetoric hurts the city and its people, and it hurts those who have spent their lives here.” Schmidt goes for the jugular, “Come again? Repeating claims? That’s what happened? Really? Why won’t Mike DeWine tell the truth about Donald Trump and JD Vance?…a career public servant, a governor, a father of eight, grandfather of 28, great-grandfather of one, husband of 56 years…in his last years of public life, pushing 80 years old, and not defending his hometown from the men assaulting it? What does Trump have on him?”

Schmidt says that DeWine’s choice is common and typical, a perfect specimen of a fascist apologist…a little man in a job too big for him when courage is in retreat and viciousness is the only virtue that matters within a party led by a rapist and criminal promising retribution, revenge, and violent mass arrests and deportations against his enemies…a hollow man kneeling to a vicious man. If we ever want to know what really happened in Springfield, and everything that mattered in ten years of MAGA, read DeWine’s essay. National Review’s editor-in-chief, Rich Lowry, explains: “Banking on evil is the strategy, and Mike DeWine has played his part. He is an appeaser and a weakling.”

On Fox News’ Media Buzz program, Democratic strategist Tim Hogan pointed out that Biden’s Homeland Security removed a higher percentage of arrested border crossers in its first two years than the Trump administration did in its last two. “You had Karl Rove on this network yesterday talking about the numbers on immigration. Yes, it’s still an advantage for Trump, but that is sliding away from him in some battleground states…in Arizona. But also, nationally, so I think it is smart to go at some of his advantages, and also, when he talks about the issue, sometimes he slips into lunacy,” he charged. “Lunacy?” questioned host Howard Kurtz. Hogan reminded Kurtz, “We saw it during the debate where he’s talking about losing cats and dogs.” Kurtz had to admit, “Well, yeah, and that one I can’t defend.”

Finally, The New York Times has come to its senses, with the editorial board endorsing Kamala Harris for president, claiming that Trump’s “first term was a warning and that a second term would be much more damaging and divisive” than his first stint. Kamala is described as a “dedicated public servant” with “a set of thoughtful plans to help American families,” with the November election being about something “more foundational” than two candidates’ competing visions for the country. The editorial board concludes, “It is about whether we invite into the highest office in the land a man who has revealed, unmistakably, that he will degrade the values, defy the norms and dismantle the institutions that have made our country strong,” adding, “It is hard to imagine a candidate more unworthy to serve as president of the United States than Donald Trump,” a man who “has proven himself morally unfit for an office that asks its occupant to put the good of the nation above self-interest.” The Times says, “He rambles, he repeats himself, he roams from thought to thought…some of them hard to understand, some them unfinished, some of them factually fantastical. He voices outlandish claims that seem to be made up out of whole cloth. He digresses into bizarre tangents about golf, about sharks, about his own ‘beautiful body.’ He relishes ‘a great day in Louisiana’ after actually spending a day in Georgia. He expresses fear that North Korea is ‘trying to kill me’ when he presumably means Iran. As late as last month, Mr. Trump was still speaking as if he were running against President Biden, five weeks after Biden’s withdrawal from the race.” In an interview, he vividly recounted how the audience at his debate with VP Harris was on his side…“they went crazy.” Only problem being it was in an empty hall…no audience to go crazy or otherwise!

A computer analysis conducted by The New York Times in cooperation with ChatGPT reveals that Trump speeches now drone on for 82 minutes on average, compared to 45 minutes in 2016, and proportionately, he uses 13% more all-or-nothing terms like “always” and “never” than in 2016. In the same vein, he uses 32% more negative words than positive words currently, as compared to his first run for office, an indicator of cognitive change; plus, he uses swearwords 69% more often, a trend experts would call ‘disinhibition.’ His comparing Joe Biden’s physique in a bathing suit to that of Cary Grant’s at the same age? Let’s not go there, and let’s skip his claim about his own body – “You have never seen a body so beautiful.” His expertise on any subject is his pride and joy, being well-versed on “nuclear” because “my uncle…yada, yada yada…” Claiming that Venezuelan gangs are arming themselves “with MK-47s…I know that gun very well” since “I’ve become an expert on guns.” Probably meant AK-47s, you think? A Times reporter is annoyed that “it’s not possible to really cover him because he challenges news media process daily, has for years. The systems were not built to deal with somebody who says things that are not true as often as he does or speaks as incoherently as he often does.”

Jon Shore, who identifies himself as a psychotherapist, asks on Quora, “Does Trump’s peddling $100,000 gold and diamond watches make him more relatable to the middle class?” Jon has looked over the website for the Trump watches, reading the fine print, and doing some research, which has led him to these conclusions: The watches don’t exist at this moment; watches not guaranteed to look like product in the photos (for illustration purposes only); watches aren’t returnable; not Swiss made, Chinese made; sold by a fake company in Sheridan, WY, a lawyer’s office from which Trump tchotchkes are hawked, along with sex toys and various other products by unnamed companies; and, watches shipped worldwide. So, if you want to send Donald Trump $100,000, order as many as you wish…doesn’t matter if the product is real, fake or non-existent…just send lots of money. Shore is calling it a typical Trump scam. He doesn’t have to disclose buyers, whether they are Russian oligarchs, Saudi princes or even Elon Musk…it’s simply ‘personal funds’ for unlimited campaign cash. Where’s the Justice Department when you need…oh yeah, never mind!

A distinctive and anachronistic feature of the Trump watch is the use of a tourbillon (a French word for ‘whirlwind’), an 18th century invention used for improving timekeeping accuracy by suspending the components in a rotating cage, therefore counteracting the effects of gravity. The device is no longer functionally necessary with advances existing in today’s watches. But Swiss brands such as Patek Phillipe and Audemars Piguet have used them for years to signify status and success, with their brands costing $250,000 plus, so Trump is touting his watches as “not just any watch; it is one of the best watches made.” TAG Heuer offers one of its versions for less than $25K, and Seagull Watch Company in China sells one for around $1,700. Vintage-watch dealer, Mike Nouveau, calculated the value of some of the watch’s parts, coming up with a reckoning far below the retail price of $100K, saying that any company can order a tourbillon off the shelf and stick it in their watch. The 200 grams of gold and the 100 diamonds might give the Trump watch an added value of $16K, and with fabrication added, the final cost to make each is probably between $20K and $30K. The timepiece’s movement is actually Swiss-made by Olivier Mory of OM Mechanics but the company making the purchase will be producing the final product elsewhere, with Mory not concerned about his movements being used by a brand tied to Trump. He remarked, “I don’t have to be interested by a foreign politician…I don’t see any reason to be ashamed as movement producer. The US political system is like coming from another planet.” Only with if Trump’s name is on the dial face!

The real border crisis in America raised its ugly head last week…the one between church and state…when Oklahoma Superintendent of Schools, Ryan Walters, submitted a request for $3M from the Department of Education to buy 55,000 Bibles for placement in the state’s classrooms. Not only is he pushing Bibles, he’s mounting a scheme to enrich Donald Trump with taxpayer dollars. Seems that the requirements laid down by Walters fit only the Trump-endorsed ‘God Bless the USA Bible’ which raised cries of ‘corruption and manipulation.’ The Oklahoma Watch reported on a fresh wave of criticism in several areas, one of which pounced on the former president’s grifting, in particular with Bibles. Broad efforts have been ongoing by Christian nationalist organizers to assert themselves into the state GOP, encouraging that taxpayer monies be spent to place religious books in public school classrooms. The vendors who bid on the contract for the classroom Bibles must specifically provide the King James Version, with Old and New Testaments, must include copies of the Pledge of Allegiance, Declaration of Independence, US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, with a binding of leather or leather-like material. One vendor carries 2,900 Bibles, but none fit the specs…only one fills the bill…Lee Greenwood’s God Bless the USA Bible, endorsed by Donald Trump, who gets a fee for lending his name to the cesspool. Superintendent Walters said, “We are going to be so proud here in Oklahoma to be the first state in the country to bring the Bible back to every single classroom and every state should be doing this…President Trump praised our efforts. President Trump has been a leader on this issue.” Well, gaaaahly, gee whiz! Why would that be? Prior to the Trump Bible issue, civil rights groups had spent months sounding the alarm over Walters’ push to mandate Christian teachings in public schools.

Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United, released a statement saying, “Oklahoma taxpayers should not be forced to bankroll Superintendent Walters’ Christian nationalist agenda. His latest scheme is a transparent, unlawful effort to indoctrinate and religiously coerce public school students. Not on our watch. Public schools are not Sunday schools.” Experts are warning that contract specifications might actually represent a breach of state law, since they seem to target only one edition of the Bible…the Greenwood/Trump publication. “It appears to me that this bid is anything but competitive,” former state Attorney General Drew Edmondson told The Oklahoman newspaper. “It adds to the basic specification other requirements that have nothing to do with the text. The special binding and inclusion of government documents will exclude almost all bidders. If the bid specs exclude most bidders unnecessarily, I would consider that a violation.” The Atlantic’s David Graham calls the situation “incredible grift,” and Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall declared it “somewhere between hilarious and grotesque.”  While you’re at it, why not go for the watches too, Oklahoma? Those tourbillons will fit right into your very essence!

The Nebraska GOP’s sneaky attack to change their electoral voting system from a 2/3 split among their five electors to a winner-take-all rule was thwarted last week, which will likely give one vote to Kamala Harris instead of all five to Trump in November’s election. The state legislature couldn’t manage to get the votes together for inclusion of a heavily Democratic district into their MAGA cesspool, which could give Harris a bit of an edge in the final Electoral College result. Republicans still have a month to figure out their next attack plan.

North Carolina’s governor’s race lays scattered in ruins since the revelations about ‘Black Nazi’ and Lt. Governor Mark Robinson’s past adventures on porn sites, and his posting of inappropriate comments popping up to derail his gubernatorial candidacy. Several of his campaign staffers promptly resigned, but since then several conservative donors are now wondering how money was spent, especially since his campaign had been lagging behind so badly. The New York Times reports that the departure of chief consultant Conrad Pogorzelski, and finance director Heather Whillier has led to increased scrutiny of the campaign’s expenses, with Pogorzelski taking around $2M and Whillier’s group being paid $1.3M from the coffers which reported $15.8M on hand at July’s end. Former chair of the University of North Carolina, Harry Smith, admitted that he contributed $6,400, expressing regret that he had donated to Robinson with whom he wasn’t very impressed with from the start, as he confessed that Josh Stein will get his vote anyway. Panic took over the state’s GOP with the developments, and some members of Robinson’s team sought help from the Trump campaign to convince their candidate to drop out of the race. Of course it was too late to remove the Lt. Governor’s name from the ballot, and military ballots and overseas voter ballots were already in the pipeline; besides, who would stand in his place as a candidate? Plus, the Trump campaign had no comment, and even Donald Trump being asked for comment by a reporter, only brought his standard reply, “I know nothing about the situation.” He obviously felt he didn’t need to get into another hot mess.

Despite being a detriment to GOP prospects up and down the statewide ballot, Robinson says he is standing pat, so far, all in the face of critics blaming the party for getting into this fiasco. With many Republican leaders touting his candidacy, and Trump’s promise of an endorsement, they blundered ahead, with the national party looking the other way in spite of the many unseemly comments Robinson had uttered publicly. Robinson was probably vetted to a point, but his awfulness was accepted because he was a new, diverse, and magnetic voice for the North Carolina party. Party stalwarts who knew of his weaknesses, about some of his baggage, were horrified at Trump’s pledge for an endorsement, knowing they were rendered impotent to speak out against this apparent rising star. State treasurer, Dale Folwell, says, “Robinson was selected by former president Trump and other party officials who elevated him, and those officials and their consultants did know, should have known, or didn’t want to know about Robinson’s flaws. The party I joined nearly fifty years ago was based on conservatism, common sense, courtesy, humanity, humility, and ethics…not counterfeit conservatives like Mark Robinson who think they can build our party by people who to hate.” With Robinson’s vow to remain in the race, the state GOP concluded the damage had been done, end of conversation.

Another politician has fallen into his own trap, this time a Democrat; New York City Mayor Eric Adams was indicted last week on five federal charges of bribery, fraud, corruption and soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations. As Jimmy Fallon said on ‘The Tonight Show,’ “Its’ always fun when the city mimics the exact plot of the ‘Batman’ movie.” Adams is accused of accepting over $100K worth of free plane tickets and hotel stays from wealthy Turkish nationals and a government official. Fallon joked, “Adams insisted that he’s innocent and made it clear that he has no intention of resigning…unless ‘someone wants to give me $100K to go away. And then maybe we’ll talk about it.'”

Then, we have the case of GOP Mayor Doug Diny of Wausau, WI, who contracted right-wing-bird fever, then dressed up as a maintenance man…hard hat, work gloves, and Department of Public Works Department jacket, and perhaps steel-toed boots…so he could remove a ballot drop box outside the city hall. Moved it to his office for security! Right!..a guarantee to securely reduce the number of ballot box locations for those exercising their voting rights! Mayor Doug said, “I’m a staff member…nothing nefarious going on here…I’m hoping for a good result.” Your Groucho eyebrows, glasses, nose and mustache are slipping down your face, sir. Diny says the city clerk should have sought permission from the city council before situating the box, even after the state Supreme Court had just ruled in July that city clerks were the decision makers for best accessibility for the voting public. Of course, Mr. Vigilante Mayor feels that the best solution is to use a dolly to wheel the offending ballot box into his office closet…make those voters appreciate the value of the vote. Diny is now under criminal investigation in Marathon County, his act being a felony for impeding “the free exercise of the franchise at an election” – due to ignorance, ineptitude, or obtuseness? You choose.

Or, how about Portage County Ohio Sheriff Bruce D. Zuchowski who asked his followers on Facebook to “write down” the address of those who place Harris-Walz campaign signs on their front lawns, in order for him to drop off any undocumented immigrants, or “Illegal Human Locusts” in his words, who turn up. “They’ll need a place to live, so we’ll have addresses of their new families who support their arrival,” he says. Trump won Portage County in 2020, but recent polling points to thousands who support Harris-Walz, undoubtedly to the complete consternation of Sheriff Z.

Donald Trump is being obliged to play his concertina as he enters the stage at his rallies, since most musicians have protested his non-pernitted use of their recordings. He feels disadvantaged that he doesn’t play the guitar, but since he regularly claims that he is “greater than Elvis…the greatest of all time,” and draws bigger crowds, he won’t be buying one soon…though perhaps selling autographed instruments may be on the horizon as he attempts to grift every dollar from the pockets of his base. His latest grift is selling $100K watches, joining the trove of non-fungible tokens, Bibles, or your choice of assassination-themed or gold sneakers. As JD Vance says, “People can’t afford to buy eggs today!” – but maybe they can scrape up a few thou for a Trump tchotchke. And the watches may be appropriate in Senator Marco Rubio’s eyes, who in 2016 suggested Trump would be “selling watches in Manhattan” absent his father’s fortune. Former RNC chair Michael Steele excoriated the former president as a “two-bit huckster,” and Republicans Against Trump mocked him as “truly a man of the people.” Yep, a man of the people who needs their money to fund his failing campaign, pay his legal fees and shore up Truth Social! In all fairness, he is offering a “Fight, Fight, Fight” version of the watch for only $499, which features on the back an image of Trump with his fist in the air ala the post-assassination photograph…but it’s not political he claims.

On his show, Jimmy Kimmel blasted “Trump’s brand crap to sell to his lemmings,” dubbing the watch “Ro-Lex Luthor.” He played the commercial ad for the watch line, to which he responded, “Trump time, by the way, is five to seven years or four with good behavior.” Kimmel didn’t give Melania a break after her appearance on Fox News to promote her upcoming memoir release. “We now see Melania on the same schedule as Punxsutawney Phil, since rarely does Fox News allow a brunette to appear on their shows,” he jabbed. The book, ‘Melania,’ sits atop the Amazon.com best-seller list for pre-orders as doubting-Thomases speculate how many have been purchased by the Trump Crime Syndicate to manipulate the publicity prior to the release date. Kimmel then switched to Rudy Giuliani who was just disbarred from practicing law in Washington, DC, suggesting a New York City mayor opening might be arising soon now that he needs a new gig, especially with current Mayor Eric Adams‘ tenure looking pretty iffy. Kimmel said Democrats are hinting that Adams should step down with his new legal troubles, but encouragingly, “Republicans are urging him to run for governor of North Carolina.” In a poke at Donald Trump who called Kimmel “one of the dumbest human beings ever…what a dope,” he responded with, “Isn’t that sweet…he’s confusing me with one of his sons again!” The Tonight Show’s Jimmy Fallon also got in on the watch grift, saying, “Your can tell it’s a Trump watch because of the tiny hands. Also, if you try to set it to military time, it says, ‘Sorry, I have bone spurs.'”

Two election prognosticators have joined the heated social media posts on their presidential election predictions, in the midst of the many polling result that appear on a daily basis. American University professor Allan Lichtman, who has gained notoriety by correctly predicting nine of the last ten elections, using his ’13 Keys’ method. Political pollster Nate Silver, founder of website Five Thirty Eight, now known as 538, is questioning Lichtman’s readings of his own numbers, saying his keys clearly favor Trump instead of Harris-Walz as he has previously indicated. Silver asks if Lichtman is being “totally arbitrary,” with Lichtman responding that Silver “doesn’t have the faintest idea how to turn the keys.” Silver says that although the Democratic ticket leads national polls by nearly three points, but Trump-Vance have a 56.2% chance of winning the Electoral College. Lichtman maintains that Silver is not a historian or political scientist, and has no academic credentials, while touting their opposing views on Obama’s 2010 re-election. Silver hit back at Lichtman on X with, “He is comically overconfident and doesn’t own up to the subjectivities in his method.” as the X audience cheered on the shouting match. Capitol Forum reporter Paul McCleod commented, “If you don’t know what they’re talking about this whole exchange looks like two wizards bickering.”

A data scientist from Northwestern University, Thomas Miller, has developed a model that uses info from political betting sites rather than polls, outperforming those using multiple voter surveys in three 2020 contests. Miller contends that political betting sites are best at “predicting the wisdom of the crowd,” with polling data being backward-looking. The betting sites have a steady stream of investors, thus a better measure of future outcomes. “It’s gone from a drastic landslide in Trump’s direction to a drastic landslide for Harris,” according to Miller, who adds that it would take an equally dramatic shift in Trump’s favor for the former president to move back into contention…as things stand now it appears as if Harris will win big in November. Shawn Tully, in a Fortune piece, writes: “Miller’s view merits close attention for two basic reasons. First, it’s based on numbers-crunching that’s arguably a lot more scientific than the voter surveys cited in charting the contest’s trajectory, and second, he achieved pinpoint accuracy four years ago.” So there we have it…jump on the winning bandwagon and leave the clown car in the dust!

Tim Walz posted a short video from his campaign stop at H&H Soul Food in Macon, Georgia last week, the main subject being a wall sign that reads, “Mind your own biscuits and life will be gravy.” Serve us up, Tim!