Blog Archives

September 25 – October 1, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton… The RTC could use you … Greensite… on the Soquel/Cayuga project … Steinbruner… Vote Yes on Measure U, NO on Measure Q, Prop. 172 allocation … Hayes… A Concern for Passivity… Patton… The Money = Politics Equivalency… Matlock… …ministerial discretion…a life story…just choose a donut, any donut!… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you…Weird Al … Quotes on… “Chinatown”

...

The First Santa Cruz Chinatown. This was on Front Street and was leveled by fire in 1894. That’s Loma Prieta Mountain in the distance. About 60 folks lived here. There were three gambling houses, laundries, and some boarding houses. This was about where Barry Swenson’s Galleria stands today.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: September 24, 2024

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION IN NEED OF SOME HELP. With the senior population of Santa Cruz going so fast (and me along with it), this plea seems extra urgent and necessary. Read it at least two or three times and see if there isn’t room in your life to give a hand back to those who have been your hands and hearts for so long.

-Bruce

RTC Seeking Members for Elderly and Disabled Transportation Advisory Committee

Does this describe you? Are you a Santa Cruz County resident and any of the following:

  • Senior (60+)
  • Living with a disability
  • Transit rider (60+)
  • Paratransit rider, or
  • represent services for senior and disabled individuals

Get involved! Join the Elderly and Disabled Transportation Advisory Committee. As a member of the committee, you will:

  • Speak up about the transportation needs of seniors and disabled individuals.
  • Support transportation services to help seniors and disabled individuals to be independent, involved, and connected.
  • Guide and review planning, policy, and funding for transportation programs.

For information on membership positions, view the membership application, or contact the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission at info@sccrtc.org

CIVIL WAR. Max movie (7.1 IMDB) *** Has some fine scenes, but falls apart en toto. Kirsten Dunst, Jessie Plemons and Wagner Moura lead the cast. It really is about a new civil war right here in the USA. Reporters, photographers and politicians all race around headed to Washington D.C. to talk to and change how the president is thinking. Texas and California withdraw from the union and more hell breaks out. Watch it only if this seems and looks like a nightmare to you.

THE DELIVERANCE. Netflix movie. (5.1 IMDB) ** Glenn Close leads the first part of this haunted house re-hash and she does a fine job. Then all the other characters turn it into the old Hollywood scary movie vehicle and take the thrills and fun out of it. As apparently required nowadays the racial issues are thrown in to give us some thoughtful stuff to focus on.  Avoid this one.

THE PERFECT COUPLE. Netflix series. (6.6 IMDB)  *** It takes place on Nantucket Island in Massachusetts.  Nicole Kidman, Live Schreiber and Dakota Fanning are the lead stars. A big and important wedding is about to happen and there’s a murder of all things. So the movie is all focused on whodunit! Suspicious darts are thrown and there really isn’t much of a surprise left to care about. It’s about a blah movie and you’ve seen it many, many times before.

BREATHLESS.  Net series. (6.3 IMDB) ***This Spanish production centers and details the business side of running a hospital. It deals with, and carefully exploits the union angles of labor managing, it revolves around the constant conflict between medicine and money. There doesn’t seem to be much difference between Mexican and United States in hospital operations

KAOS. Netflix series. (7.5 IMDB). * Even after viewing this one I’m not sure if it’s supposed to be a comedy or a semi serious religious Greek drama. Jeff Goldblum and David Thewlis play their darndest at being Zeus and Hades stomping around Olympus trying to influence any survivors who’ll listen to them. Read a good book instead.

SLOW HORSES. Apple series. (8.2 IMDB) *** There’s been five seasons or series of Slow Horses so far and I never watched any of them. Slow Horses is British slang for “slough house”. And Slough House is where the wild, clever talking M15 British agents who have made professional mistakes hang out between cases. Gary Oldman is the lead and he’s a perfect fit as are Kristin Scott Thomas and Jonathan Price. Set aside some down time and watch this one. It’s been nominated for 9 Emmy awards.

MONSIEUR SPADE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) * Clive Owen is either paying off a bet or simply forgot how to act…he plays at being the Dashiell Hammett character Sam Spade in this political drama set in France in 1963. He lives in the south of France and is supposed to be 60. A priest, an investigator, a mess of a cast all looking for a young girl named Teresa, don’t even think about this one!

HORIZON: AN AMERICAN SAGA. HBO series (6.8 IMDB) ** Kevin Costner (who must have had some lifting of face) not only directed this saga but is one of many featured costars along with Sienna Miller, and Luke Wilson. There is a murder in Montana during our civil war and the movie features a large focus on “Native Americans” being careful to respect them as important humans in a rare drama.

THE WATCHERS. Max movie.(5.7 IMDB) *** An incredibly puzzling movie set in Ireland with Dakota Fanning delivering a parrot to a more than unbelievable and invisible bunch of humans hiding out in an impossible part of a forest. Full of legends, myths, and puzzles, it’s worth your time.

AMERICAN MURDER: Laci Peterson. Netflix series.  (7.0 IMDB) **** It’s a documentary about a murder that happened in 2002. Laci Peterson was murdered and her husband Scott was convicted, and more than 20 years later he and his family are still working to disprove his involvement. It takes place in Berkeley and Modesto and gives us some concept of how big a role the media plays. There’s more documentaries being produced on the Peterson case and we are advised to wait for a better version.

...

September 23, 2024

The Sow’s Ear

If you think the above (proposed) building is a parking garage you would be wrong. If you think it looks like a parking garage you would be right in line with neighbors who spoke or wrote comments at the September 16 zoom community meeting for this project.

The project is in the hands of the local development firm, Workbench, and is in the pre-application stage, which means it could change prior to being submitted to the city Planning Department as a formal project. Workbench is the outfit that circulated images of the proposed sixteen-story Clocktower project which seems to have faded away, at least for now. A look at the Workbench website does not offer much in the way of design inspiration. When one commenter at the Clocktower community meeting suggested that their design (for the Clocktower) be more compatible with existing downtown older buildings, the response from a Workbench rep was “we like modern.” So much for being responsive to the community.

The six-story prefab building pictured above is proposed for 1024 Soquel Avenue at the corner of Soquel and Cayuga St, where in 2000 the stately, iconic Grace United Methodist Church burned down. The Sentinel headline of that event read: “City loses a jewel of the Eastside.” Maybe it’s too much to hope that a jewel of a building would be its replacement but the building above is a bit of an embarrassment. If you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear you sure can make a sow’s ear out of a silk purse.

The project includes seventy-six small units plus four ADU’s that will be built later out of space designated in the plan as “storage.” That makes a total of eighty units. According to Workbench they are designed for “young professionals.” Out of this total, six will be earmarked for Very Low-Income earners, one for Low Income and five for Moderate Income. The planner stated that Moderate is akin to Market Rate although it wouldn’t exceed it. So, out of eighty units of housing, we get seven units at below market rate. That is under ten percent. The city’s Inclusionary rate is twenty percent. Research suggests that the ratio of market-rate to “affordable” units of housing should be in the vicinity of seventy (market) to thirty (affordable) to keep a balance between the consumption needs of the former and the work required to meet those needs by the latter. Below that ratio and long commutes by workers are the result. And that is even assuming the affordable units are occupied by local workers, a metric the city does not track. The Grand Jury report on Inclusionary Housing recommended the city keep track of such data. We will see at an upcoming council meeting whether the city council agrees with the Grand Jury recommendation.

As a sales pitch for this project, one of the Workbench team noted its excellent location: on a bus line, near excellent restaurants, theaters, shops and within proximity of seven schools. That last bit of information prompted me to ask whether it would be better planning to have a project suited more to families rather than single professionals? The Workbench response was that either way, the schools’ tax would be paid. That wasn’t what I was thinking. My concern was on the impact of future declining school enrollment. If you do a quick tally of the unit size of the many proposed significant private projects either under construction, approved or in the planning stage, they are all small unit size, geared for single professionals or students. What is the future development scenario when at least a percentage of single professionals decide to have a family and want living space of two to three bedrooms?

I didn’t get a chance to ask that last question. However, it was addressed by either the planner or one of the Workbench reps, I couldn’t tell the difference. According to them, it will be a demographic swap. They stated that over fifty percent of the single-family houses in Santa Cruz are occupied by multiple unrelated individuals. Mostly students I’d suggest. The claim is that many such individuals would prefer to have their own living space, such as the units in this and other projects, rather than live collectively. Once these individuals move into the new single units, that will open up single family houses for families, they claim.

This sounds reasonable on the face of it except for one fact: the price tag. Students and other unrelated individuals share the cost of a single- family house because it keeps the rent at a relatively affordable level. A four-bedroom house probably rents for $6,000 a month. If four individuals occupy that space, a not unreasonable assumption, the rent is around $1500 a month each. The market-rate rent in any one of the units for this project and other projects is closer to $2500 a month and higher. So, the expectation that single people currently occupying a house will move to these new small, pricey units does not pencil.

This is just one untested assumption that is used to rationalize the push for new high-rise development. Others, from the state and local level assume that it will increase affordable housing; that it will allow workers to live near their jobs; that it will slow the rate of rent increases. It is time to subject these and other assumptions to investigation and research.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

VOTE YES ON MEASURE U TO CORRECT HARSH AND REGRESSIVE SAN LORENZO VALLEY WATER RATES
Water is necessary and must be affordable to those who struggle financially on fixed incomes.  However, the San Lorenzo Valley Water District significantly raised the fixed service charges on customer bills, penalizing the lowest water users, with no way to conserve water to lower their bills.

This plan was brought forth by a committee that included Fifth District Supervisor Candidate Monica Martinez.

Measure U was brought to the ballot by a grassroots group of ratepayers whom the Water District Board ignored during their approval process of this regressive fee that does not encourage water conservation.  They have taken this action in support of the many ratepayers who now struggle on fixed incomes to make ends meet and are now financially harmed by the new regressive water rates that do not support conservation and allow higher water users cheaper water.

According to proponents, the Water District still has unused money borrowed in 2019, and the Board actually lowered the price of water, costing $1 million.  Proponents argue that if the District simply raised the price of water to cover the costs of producing it, there would be money available for infrastructure improvements.

Measure U

Here is what one Board Director who opposed the harsh fixed rate increase states:

Hi everyone, I’m one of the SLVWD Directors. I oppose the proposed rate  increase. If you would like to learn more about why you should oppose  the rate increase by submitting a protest ballot by Feb 15th, please  attend a Zoom meeting I’m hosting on Feb 5th at 7PM. Email me at  bobfultz.slvwd@pacbell.net to receive the invitation details. Additional  dates will be announced soon.

As a preview, I’ve attached a chart that provides you with critical  information that should have been provided in the District mailer.

Facts:

  • The SLVWD Board has not promised how the money will be spent.  But,  only 33% of the last two rate increases went towards infrastructure.
  • Low usage customers face the highest percentage over 5 years:  81% for 1 unit, 62% for 2 unit, 50% for 3 unit bills.
  • Low usage customers will also provide the majority (54%) of the  incremental revenue generated by this proposal.  This is not fair.
  • The District Mailer implication that 6 units is average or typical is  misleading.  59% of all bills in 2023 were 4 units or less.  Only 7% of  all bills in 2023 were 6 units–this is the OPPOSITE of typical.

slvh2o.org

You may be interested to know that Ms. Monica Martinez, serving on the District’s ad-hoc rate committee, was instrumental in pushing the harsh, regressive water rates through.  She is a candidate for 5th District County Supervisor.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BACK-PEDALS ON HOW MEASURE K MONEY IS REALLY GOING TO BE SPENT.

Item #13…the last on the agenda…hoping no one will stay to watch
Consider supplemental report to the Adopted Budget actions for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25, adopt two resolutions cancelling revenue and appropriations in the amount of $7,214,872, approve the FY 2024-25 Measure K spending plan, and take related actions

You may find it interesting to note that tomorrow’s County Board of Supervisor agenda Item #13 Supplemental Budget discussion of how the County will use Measure K half-cent sales tax use of $7.3 million.

No money is being allocated to fund wildfire projects (please see staff report excerpt below), but Measure K ballot claimed:

The ballot title for Measure K was as follows:

To fund essential Santa Cruz County services, including wildfire response/prevention/recovery; affordable housing to support working families and frontline workers including nurses, emergency responders, and educators; mental health crisis programs for children/vulnerable populations; substance abuse programs; improved public safety, road maintenance/pothole repair, parks/recreation; and programs to reduce homelessness, shall Santa Cruz County’s transaction and use tax (sales tax) be increased in unincorporated areas by one-half cent, providing approximately $10,000,000 annually, until ended by voters?

Measure K, Sales and Use Tax Measure (March 2024)

The Staff Report for County allocation of Measure K funds does NOT ALLOCATE ANY MONEY FOR WILDFIRE RESPONSE/RECOVERY:
(Item 13 on September 24 Board agenda):

Measure K Half-Cent Sales Tax

On December 5, 2023, the Board adopted the attached resolution that established budget priorities (uses) for the County’s Measure K half-cent sales tax, which voters approved on March 5, 2024. Following voter approval, a lawsuit was filed that had the potential to delay the expenditure of new revenues. Since the last update on June 4, 2024, that lawsuit has been resolved.

With the resolution of the lawsuit, the ACTTC was able to incorporate Measure K revenue of $7.5 million (prorated for year 1) into the 2024-25 Adopted Budget as presented today. With the inclusion of this revenue (see Table 1), and following prior board direction, the Adopted Budget now includes the planned uses (see Table 2) as described below:

  • $1 million for homelessness programs and services, including the Behavioral Health Bridge Housing project and Youth Homekey project in unincorporated areas (Human Services Department GL Key 391200);
  • $1 million for parks capital projects, as determined by the Board (Capital Projects Transfer In);
  • $1 million to General Fund restricted contingencies for emergency road projects this winter, as described in a separate item on today’s agenda (General Fund Contingencies GL Key 131375);
  • $1 million to General Fund restricted contingencies for housing-related uses  (General Fund Contingencies GL Key 131375) in the following proposed areas:
  • $200,000 for Housing Authority security deposits for units rented in unincorporated areas (Human Services Department Housing for Health Division);
  • $400,000 for behavioral health room and board expenses in licensed residential facilities in unincorporated areas (Health Services Agency Behavioral Health Division);
  • $400,000 for investing in affordable and supportive housing projects in unincorporated areas (Community Development and Infrastructure Housing Division); and
  • $3.5 million to restore the General Fund Contingencies budget due to the threat of climate-driven disasters this coming winter and other potential emergencies.

On June 4, 2024, the Board directed staff to return in September (with the Adopted Budget) to consider current “overall viewpoint of where the allocations of Measure K may be spent.” Accordingly, staff recommend a spending plan, as outlined above, that aligns with the original resolution approved by the Board on December 5, 2023.

In a related action, and as part of the resolution of the legal action discussed above, the County will be modifying the presentation of the 2024-25 Adopted Budget (online version) to differentiate between “General Fund Contributions” and “District Sales Tax Contributions”, which are from the local voter-approved Measure G or Measure K sales taxes. Staff anticipates the work to redesign the County’s online website and provide updated narratives for applicable departments’ “District Sales Tax Contribution” to be completed by or before November 2024.

General Fund Contingencies

The General Fund Contingencies budget for 2024-25 had been cut by $7.2 million and all General Fund capital projects had been eliminated to maintain a balanced budget. On June 4, 2024, the general contingencies balance was only $549,849, but it was the intent to fully restore the 1% general contingencies amount of General Fund expenditures with any unanticipated revenue and/or recognition of Measure K revenue, as specified by concluding action #32(a).

With the addition of Measure K sales tax revenue ($3.5 million) and earlier than anticipated COVID-19 FEMA reimbursements ($4.4 million), the General Fund Contingencies budget has been restored.

Santa Cruz County CA, Agenda Item DOC-2024-779

The GOOD news is that the County will now report with transparency how Measure K and Measure G (also sold to voters in 2018 to fund fire and road fixes) by website changes showing the funds collected and how they are spent.

We should all thank Mr. Bruce Holloway (proponent of Measure U on the November 5 ballot) for taking the legal action against Measure K for this improved transparency and holding the County accountable.

“In a related action, and as part of the resolution of the legal action discussed above, the County will be modifying the presentation of the 2024-25 Adopted Budget (online version) to differentiate between “General Fund Contributions” and “District Sales Tax Contributions”, which are from the local voter-approved Measure G or Measure K sales taxes. Staff anticipates the work to redesign the County’s online website and provide updated narratives for applicable departments’ “District Sales Tax Contribution” to be completed by or before November 2024.”

VOTE NO ON MEASURE Q…THE COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS OPPOSE IT!
The County Fire Chiefs Association (all the Fire Chiefs in Santa Cruz County) oppose Measure Q, the Land Trust’s sneaky  initiative to forever grab $87 annually from every parcel’s owner in the County (some ag and timber excepted but who knows where?), with no guarantee that how it promises to be spent is actually what happens.

Just like Measure K…

Strangely, proponents paid a visit to the Central Fire District Local 3535 to ask for their endorsement.  Purportedly, the firefighters agreed, in exchange for the Land Trust supporting the Measure R $221 Million bond measure Central Fire District placed on the ballot to build three new fire stations and a new training center.  Although Local 3535 steward Rolf Lingens claims the firefighters had no idea the Fire Chief’s Association was opposing the Land Trust’s Measure Q, that is hard to believe because news of Local 3535 endorsement was announced a few days after the Opposition Argument was filed at the Election Dept.

The Fire Chief’s Association Argument Opposing Measure Q is signed by Central Fire Chief Jason Nee, along with other local Fire Chiefs.

When I asked Local 3535 steward Rolf Lingens if the firefighters would consider withdrawing their endorsement of Measure Q to respect and align with the Fire Chief’s Association, he quickly said “That will never happen.”

Hmmmm….One has to wonder why?

Please vote NO on Measure Q.  Stand in support of our local Fire Chief’s Association who know all too well that chances are slim for any of the anticipated $7.3 million this special parcel tax would forever collect will get used for actually funding wildfire risk reduction work in their fire districts.  They see that the Land Trust is once again using “wildfire” concerns to sell Measure  Q to the voters.

Don’t be fooled.  Measure Q

COUNTY SUPERVISORS COULD FUND FIRE PROJECTS BY ALLOCATING PROP. 172 PUBLIC SAFETY REVENUE TO SUPPORT FIRE DISTRICTS
If the County Board of Supervisors were actually serious about improving fire safety in our rural areas, they could allocate a percentage of the state Prop. 172 Public Safety Funds that arrive arrive annually from a statewide half-cent sales tax passed by voters in 1992, to correct the legislature’s grab of local funding to pay for schools.

This year alone, Santa Cruz County received $2.4 MILLION in Prop. 172 funds, according to information in Item #13 of the Sept. 24, 2024 County Supervisor agenda.  That is $1,7 Million more than anticipated.

Revenue Changes to 2024-25 Budget

The 2024-25 Budget for the General Fund received an increase in financing sources of $73.4 million, with $62.2 million related to prior year federal and state grants and contracts that are continuing into 2024-25, $1.3 million of other revenue contracts that continue into 2024-25, $2.4 million in public safety revenue from Proposition 172, and $7.5 million in revenue from the County’s Measure K half-cent sales tax that voters approved on March 5, 2024.

The Board of Supervisors gives ZERO DOLLARS of Prop. 172 to fund County Fire Dept. (the Volunteers who stayed behind in the 2020 CZU Fire and saved many neighborhoods) and NO fire agency receives any of the revenues.

Instead, the Board gives it all, including the unanticipated increased revenue, to the Sheriff:

$1.7 million to the Sheriff-Coroner for medical, mental health, dental, and pharmaceutical services provided at the County’s correctional facilities with  public safety revenue from Proposition 172 (pursuant to concluding action #20);

Please write your Supervisor and demand that a percentage of Prop. 172 revenues be allocated annually for fire agency support to do fire risk-reduction projects in our County.  Other counties do, and if the Board of Supervisors cares about the safety of residents here, they should change the way Prop. 172 revenues are spent here, too.

You can click on the photo of each Supervisor here and find the contact information for them and their analysts.

FIRE PREVENTION WEEK AND 900 FIREWISE COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA
Since its inception in 1922, Fire Prevention Week (FPW) has been observed during the week of October 6. But why this week? The date commemorates the Great Chicago Fire, which began on October 8, 1871. This year’s Fire Prevention Week, beginning on October 6 and ending on October 12, has the goal of educating everyone about the importance of having working smoke alarms in the home.

Celebrating the 900th Firewise Community in California

Recently, CAL FIRE and the City of Dunsmuir celebrated the city becoming the 900th Community Firewise USA® in California! This accomplishment highlights another milestone for California with the most wildfire prepared communities in the nation. The City of Dunsmuir is also the first approved Firewise Community in Siskiyou County. This recognition by the National Fire Protection Association® (NFPA®) demonstrates the dedication the community has taken to ensure that wildfire risk is reduced in their city and that residents are taking steps toward making California more resilient to wildfires.

[The Great Chicago Fire, Building Codes, and the Creation of Fire Prevention Week]

MONTEREY WATER RECYCLING PLANT CATCHES FIRE
This is the equivalent of Soquel Creek Water District’s  PureWater Soquel Project in our area. It caught fire last week when a spark ignited methane in a tank.

CURIOUS AG LAND SUBSIDIES
In doing some research on the Marigoni farmland near the County Fairgrounds, I came across some interesting information about the top ten regional agricultural subsidies the federal government handed out regionally in the last 20 years.  Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Santa Cruz County, California, 1995-2023

Click on the recipient name to see the record of payment.  The early 2000’s seem common.  It should be noted that D & D Ranch Group’s payment is incorrect, showing only $5,972 when it is actually $37,481.  This company, based in Santa Clara County, is now a real estate company.

I have always questioned the wisdom of our tax dollars paying farmers not to farm.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  READ YOUR BALLOT INFORMATON THOROUGHLY AND ASK QUESTIONS.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.

Cheers!
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

A Concern for Passivity
We help ourselves to become victims with the way that we tell our stories. With most people I meet, those kinds of stories are constant. Our minor and more major stories…dramas, comedies, and tragedies…all told in such a way as to create victims. We regularly empower those higher on the hierarchy, helping them to cover up what is truly happening beyond their veil of secrecy. Their culture of secrecy becomes everyone else’s self-imposed culture of ignorance.

Examples
Measure XX is on the ballot…the trails are eroding…badgers have disappeared…the river water is polluted…public access is managed responsibly. All of these statements leave out the most critical piece of information. Without that information, our power is diminished; instead of increasing our agency, we become more like pawns being played for someone else’s power. That missing piece of information is the name of the person who is responsible, those who are accountable for the outcome.

Ballot Initiatives
To see how passive others think you should be, examine any ballot initiative and try to discover who wrote it and, beyond the sales rhetoric, why. Ballot measures do not appear asking for your vote without a lot of work. That work is generally accomplished by actors that stand to benefit and is led by individuals. Those individuals never appear in the endorsements in your ballot information packets or on the links provided to the websites marketing the ballot initiative. Without knowing the WHO behind the initiative, you can’t adequately discern the WHY and, looking forward to implementation, can only superficially discern HOW the initiative will be enacted. So much goes unsaid, and so few seem to care.

Natural Resource Management
When it comes to natural resource management, we tell ourselves similarly vague stories. If we even know to look, we might say ‘wow, the trails at Wilder Ranch State Park have eroded and tons of soil has been washed into sensitive habitats.’

Or, as with so many species, we might say ‘I am so sad that there aren’t any badgers around here anymore.’ You could easily replace ‘badgers’ with nesting snowy plovers, nesting burrowing owls, tiger beetle populations, San Francisco popcornflower, Santa Cruz clover, coastal prairie, maritime chaparral, old growth redwood forest, coho salmon, tidewater goby, and many other species and habitats.

Or, we might say, ‘shucks, the Elkhorn Slough sure is terribly polluted.’ Again, we could replace that arm of what was once the Salinas River with most of the Monterey Bay’s larger streams and rivers.

Another thing I have been hearing people say in their equally passive way is, ‘it sure is nice to know that public access on Santa Cruz County’s precious natural areas is being managed so responsibly.’

What do all of the examples I have listed have in common? The passive voice. Again, there is no WHO there. Whodunnit? Without knowing the person or people behind trail erosion, species loss, water pollution, and management of visitor use in natural areas, we allow ourselves and the natural world to become victims to unknown actors. The opposite of this is accountability.

New Discipline
To combat this plague of the passive voice, the first step is admitting we have a problem. The second step is eliminating passivity in our own story telling. Don’t worry, start first even if you do not know WHO – just state that you don’t know. For instance, you might say ‘whoever placed Measure XX on the ballot would benefit from ____, and has control of the implementation of the measure by ____.” That will help to deduce the WHO when you can’t otherwise make a determination.

For the ‘who’ with my other examples, you might say things like the following:

  • ‘State Parks District Superintendent Chris Spohrer is allowing unsustainable use of Wilder Ranch trails, causing erosion and negatively impacting sensitive habitats.’
  • ‘Wade Crowfoot, Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency, is making it possible for the badger to go extinct because they aren’t holding CDFW accountable to recovering populations in decline.’
  • ‘Ryan Lodge, Executive Officer of the Central Coast Water Board, is allowing the Elkhorn Slough to continue to be terribly polluted because he has failed to adequately implement measures to reduce that pollution.’
  • ‘It sure is puzzling why Kate Huckelbridge, Executive Director of the State Coastal Commission, is allowing State Parks District Superintendent Chris Spohrer to allow unrestricted public access to beaches he oversees that would otherwise support nesting snowy plovers, an imperiled species.’

Opening the Conversation
You might worry that you get the story wrong, that you name the wrong person. If we all tried at least to name the right person, and sometimes we get it wrong, the wrongly named person can help by pointing out the person truly responsible. Voilà, closer to the truth! (This is an invitation for anyone I named wrongly in the prior section to write and let me know – I’ll gladly publish that rebuttal and correct my statement in this column).

The ‘I’ in Passivity
How much of our use of the passive voice is because of shame, or modesty, or both? Some of us have been taught that nothing we accomplish is done alone, so we shy away from saying “I accomplished…” even when it was our actions that manifest something. On the other hand, we might not be proud of something we did, “that stack of plates broke.” Lots of things seem to “break,” as we commonly say. Potted plants dry out, we get sick, and our dog misbehaves…but, none of these things would have happened without our own actions, or lack thereof. Until we become verbally accountable, we might not feel right about acknowledging others’ accountability, or even asking about it. I propose it is that shame that the empowered rely on to keep us from asking ‘who?’ before stating the ‘what.’

From Here Out
Now that you know about the problem with the pervasive use of the passive voice, you can become part of the solution. Start with taking responsibility for your accomplishments and mistakes. Name the person responsible for any actions you admire or detest in every story you tell. We don’t need to know everything – stop trying, slow down, pick fewer stories to tell and tell those stories more completely.

When someone tells a story that impacts you without saying the ‘who,’ ask. If your boss says ‘the policy has changed,’ ask who changed the policy. If your colleague says ‘we think it is time for a change’ ask who the ‘we’ is. If your neighbor says ‘they want to tax you more,’ ask who the ‘they’ is. For goodness sakes, we are in the age of information availability…if all else fails, do some research!

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#267 / The Money = Politics Equivalency

I have noticed that MOST of the political communications I get in my email inbox, or that come to me as text messages, or certainly any that I receive in my old-fashioned postal mailbox, are appeals for me to give money.

I live in California. That does not seem to deter political candidates from every other state in the union from thinking that an appeal to me, for money, has at least some good chance of getting an affirmative, money-laden response.

And then there is the guy pictured above! Shown is Duke Buchan III, a “Hedge-Fund Manager,” and the founder and CEO of Hunter Global Investors. “Duke,” as they call him, was profiled back in early July in The Wall Street Journal. The story, in the July 6 – July 7, 2024, edition of the paper, says that Buchan is a money-raiser extraordinaire. “Duke’s magic is he coaxes out multiples of what you intended to contribute.” For instance, Buchan apparently raised $50.5 million for Donald Trump during one evening.

Another article in the same edition of The Journal reported that the family of Sam Bankman-Fried were deeply engaged with their son in political fundraising (click the link if you don’t remember who he is). The son is currently serving a 25-year sentence for fraudulent activities related to cryptocurrency. The article I have linked above seems to intimate that Bankman-Fried’s father, and maybe even his mother, both of whom are, or were, faculty members at Stanford Law School, could also be facing some prison time.

At any rate, here’s my point: It is received wisdom that “money is the Mother’s Milk of politics.” California politician Jesse Unruh is credited with first drawing the equivalency. And let’s be honest, anyone who runs for political office, from presidential candidates to those aspiring to become a County Supervisor, must raise money if they hope that their campaign can be successful. I know! I did it myself, though I am happy that Santa Cruz County has imposed rather stringent campaign contribution limits, intended to discourage the idea that “politics” and “money” are, in fact, equivalent.

It is that postulated “equivalency” that I am trying to highlight with this blog post. Once we all start believing that “politics” is, essentially, equivalent to raising money (as opposed, for instance, to mobilizing people to achieve a particular policy objective), ordinary people will find themselves in a massively disadvantageous position.

If “MONEY” = “POLITICS,” then that good old “Golden Rule” applies: Those with the gold get to rule!

Isn’t that, in fact, exactly where we are, today? Right back there with Duke Buchan III?

If that is where we are, then we need to find other “political” activities, other than asking for and receiving money, to serve as the foundation of our “political” efforts and engagements.

If politics, today, seems “rotten,” uninspiring, and repellant, making “politics” equivalent to raising money is one of the main reasons why.

But what beats money, you might ask?

Well, TIME can beat money, which means that our personal involvement in “politics,” our personal and “organized” political involvement, at every level, is what we need to mobilize. Those interested in pursuing this kind of politics can click on this link, to visit an earlier blog posting that will connect you up with some resources that will help you do just that.

To recap my message for today: We need to implement activities that are based on this equation: “TIME” = “POLITICS.”

Unless we’re willing to give up on “self-government,” that is.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

GEORGIA INTEGRITY, CORNHUSKER SPLIT, A LOOSE BUNNY

Dawn Roberts, former co-chair of the Nikki Haley 2024 presidential campaign in Iowa, has made a dramatic switch to support Kamala Harris, revealing that the DNC has her on the road to endorse Harris. With Haley abandoning her campaign early on and throwing her support behind Donald Trump, the backing of Roberts only serves to emphasize the flow of previous Trump backers, GOPers, and former associates of the Trump administration into the Democratic Party fold, albeit only as voters. Roberts wrote in the Des Moines Register that she was drawn to Harris’ declaring her intention to be president for all the people, while seeing that Harris likes to bring people together in huge, diverse groups. Imagine! An independent thinker willing to cross over…more please! Over one hundred former national security officials including defense secretaries and CIA directors who worked in previous Republican Presidential administrations endorsed Kamala, writing in a letter that Trump is “unfit to serve again as President,” blaming him for undermining our allies, causing chaos in our government, and placing his personal interests above those of the country, “betraying” democracy. In their conclusion, they feel that, “any potential concerns regarding Harris pale in comparison to those surrounding Trump.”

Unfortunately, these moves contrast with the state of Georgia which is working to undermine the state’s election results, coordinating on a policy to call the results of the November vote into question before any votes are cast, and messaging to push rules and procedures as favored by election deniers. The Georgia Integrity Coalition’s emails were obtained by the Guardian through Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, disclosing a surreptitious group of county election officials across the state made up of zealous supporters of Trump and his 2020 election lies, who are attempting to characterize the upcoming election as being plagued with fraud. Starting last January, the emails reveal the inner workings of the coalition, to include exchanges between state and national groups the Tea Party Patriots and the Election Integrity Network, which is headed by former attorney Cleta Mitchell, who was an informal White House adviser in the Trump White House during the drive to upset the 2020 election results. The Georgia coalition has accused the Georgia Democratic Party of attempting to intimidate elections officials by sending letters to county board of elections members, and threatening legal action unless they vote to certify upcoming elections despite having legitimate concerns about the results. Indeed, letters had been sent by Democrats to elections board members in three counties because they had refused to certify local elections, with a warning that certification was not discretionary.

The United Tea Party of Georgia called the letter(s) “troubling,” pronouncing them “Orwellian” in demanding certification if doubts existed about the results. Election authorities, and Democrats, cite court cases in Georgia as far back as 1899 dictating certification as a “ministerial,” not discretionary, duty of election officials. Gabe Sterling, a deputy to Georgia secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, warned a gathering of state-level election officials from several swing states that court suits could await them for refusing to certify November’s vote results. Georgia Integrity Coalition invited election denier, Dr. Janice Johnson, to speak, and she was recently seen smiling and waving to the crowd at a recent Trump rally where The Don praised her and two other MAGAts on the board, as “pit bulls fighting for victory.” Other emails within the group reveal coordination between members on two rules passed by the state election board giving county election officials more power in refusing to certify results, in addition to ongoing voter purges that Democrats say are in violation of the National Voter Registration Act. Election deniers complain that if the board of elections has no choice but to certify election results, then why the requirement to certify the result? Of course, their goal is to hinder certification ONLY if Trump loses, similar to the delaying tactic used on January 6, 2020…read coup attempt, with more whining in the courts! Meanwhile, Trump’s Georgia campaign is trying to dismiss the use of video footage used in a campaign ad, of meadows and mountains of the old Soviet republic of Georgia, instead of perfectly beautiful scenery found in the southern US state.

At this writing, the state of Nebraska was in the throes of attempting to pass a law changing how the state allocates its five electoral votes as they attempt to deny any votes going into the Harris-Walz column. Distribution is based on two votes apportioned to the overall winner of the state, with one each vote going to its three congressional districts and their winning candidate, an iffy situation for Trump since Harris is polling similar to Biden who had strength in 2020. The push for a winner-take-all scenario is being pushed by GOP Governor Jim Pillen, state legislature speaker, John Arch, and Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Nebraska’s GOP US Representatives Don Bacon and Adrian Smith said the push for a change remained several votes shy as of last Friday. Smith believes the unified slate of electors would give the state “more of a say” in presidential elections, as the current setup gives them a diminished influence; Bacon, on the other hand, says splitting the electors represents the popular will much better, but only if all states follow that arrangement. He thinks it is fair, but having Maine as the only other state with a similar provision is problematic, while noting that Harris has spent millions in Nebraska, with Trump spending almost nothing. Lakshya Jain of analysis firm, Split Ticket, has said that if Nebraska changes its electoral allocation, Harris’ chances of winning the presidency drop from 62% to 58% in her organization’s model. Senator Graham is firm in his belief that Trump will win the state by 20 points should the model be changed, saying, “The whole fate of the country and the world could hinge on one electoral vote.” An April vote to make the change failed a procedural vote, and a push to attach this legislative change to another measure as an amendment did not succeed with only eight lawmakers voting in favor.

Trump’s schedule last week had him slated for a speech against antisemitism…close but no cigar! Instead he delivered speeches loaded with antisemitism with a warning that Jewish voters would be held liable should he lose in November. The event hosted by mega-donor Miriam Adelson, entitled ‘Fighting Antisemitism’ had the former president whining about his 2020 loss, receiving only 24% of the Jewish vote, as he said, “I really haven’t been treated very well, but it’s the story of my life.”  Boo-hoo-hoo! A second appearance at the Israeli American Council’s national summit berated the gathering with the same tired whining diatribe, adding, “If I don’t win, Israel, in my opinion, will cease to exist within two years,” with a majority of voters supporting the “enemy.” He had difficulty distinguishing between the Israeli government and Jewish Americans with his claim, “I was there four years, gave them billions and billions of dollars. I was the best friend Israel ever had, and still in 2020, now, I’ve done all these things, so now, Jewish people have no excuse.” Trump kept referring to an unnamed poll which gives him 40% Jewish support…nearly twice the 24% he got in 2020…yet, one survey actually shows a 68% to 25% voter preference between him and Kamala…a gain of 1% for him…woohoo! Describing Senator Chuck Schumer as “a proud member of Hamas,” and calling Governor Josh Shapiro “a highly overrated Jewish governor,” he says, “I’m the one that’s protecting you…Democrats are the people that are going to destroy you…and Harris hates Israel.” In a radio interview in July, Trump called Jewish voters who voted for Democrats “fools,” while also referring to second gentleman Doug Emhoff as “a crappy Jew.” Does this also mean that if Jews vote for Trump they will get the same ‘reward’ as “my beautiful Christians” – never having to vote again?

One subject undeserving of a mention on his ‘Fighting Antisemitism’ jaunt was the GOP’s North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson, a gubernatorial candidate who has now been linked to statements praising Hitler, along with vile mentions of antisemitism. Robinson, between 2008 and 2012, reportedly posted countless disturbing statements on the message board of Nude Africa, a pornographic website, one stating, “I’m a black NAZI!” A followup post says, “Slavery is not bad. Some people need to be slaves. I wish they would bring it back. I would certainly buy a few.” Trump has called Robinson “better than Martin Luther King,” “Martin Luther King on steroids,” while his darling candidate refers to King as a “commie bastard,” “worse than a maggot,” “a phony,” and a “huckster.” Another forum user accused Robinson of being in the Ku Klux Klan, with Robinson responding, “I’m not in the KKK. They don’t let blacks join. If I was in the KKK I would have called him Martin Lucifer K–n!” using a racial slur in place of King’s surname. CNN has reported him using, regularly, slurs to describe gays, Jews, and Muslims. He has been especially cruel in mentions of transgender people, saying to Trump adviser Sebastian Gorka last year, “The transgender movement in this country, if there’s a movement in this country that is demonic and that is full of spirit of the antiChrist, it is the transgender movement.” A definite change of attitude from when he posted, “I like watching tranny on girl porn! That’s hot! It takes the man out while leaving the man in! And yeah I’m a ‘perv’ too!” Having an account on Ashley Madison, a website designed for marrieds seeking partners for an affair, deserves a mention, as well.

Authors Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck of CNN say they have revealed “only a small portion of Robinson’s comments on the website given their graphic nature.” As news of the CNN Kfile report began leaking, Republicans called on Robinson to withdraw his candidacy, but a Thursday evening deadline arrived too quickly to have any effect, and he vowed to stay in the race, even with Trump disinviting him from a rally in the state. Even Fox News host, Jesse Watters, says he has never heard of Robinson, ‘forgetting’ that he interviewed him on his Primetime show in January. Head of the North Carolina elections board, Karen Bell, said that even with a withdrawal from the race, Robinson’s name probably would still appear on absentee, military, and overseas ballots…an insurmountable hurdle. Robinson was quick to release a video on his social media accounts, saying, “Those are not the words of Mark Robinson. Clarence Thomas famously once said he was the victim of a high-tech lynching. Well, it looks like Mark Robinson is, too.” Noted for scandalous comments in his career, he has said that former first lady Michelle Obama is secretly a man, and that singer Beyoncé’s music is “satanic,” telling Moms for Liberty at a 2023 event that Americans need to read more from Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin. In a 2021 interview, he told The East Carolinian that once a woman is pregnant, “it’s not her body anymore,” although admitting that his wife had an abortion just to soften his rigid stance, but still condemning it for everyone else. After calling the LGBTQ+ community “filth” in the same year, he shrugged off calls to resign, comparing being gay to “what cows leave behind.” In the meantime, Josh Stein, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee, sustains his solid lead in the race, with no plans to debate Robinson. “Mark Robinson has spent his entire public life spewing hate, lying about his record, and spreading dangerous and false conspiracy theories. A debate would only serve to legitimize him and provide a platform for his vile and dangerous rhetoric, and we won’t be part of that,” Stein declares.

Robinson has been soundly criticized by religious leaders in his state, as well as nationally, and it appears that the chickens are coming home to roost, with a weekend ‘mass resignation‘ of his staff. The campaign’s senior adviser, campaign manager, finance director, and deputy campaign manager reportedly left for greener pastures, with the remaining staffers spinning the news as only “staff changes.” A news release praised the efforts of “team members who have made the difficult choice to step away from the campaign,” wishing them well in future endeavors, promising “new staff roles in the coming days.” JD Vance, commenting on these shocking revelations, showed his leadership qualities, saying, “The allegations are pretty far out there, of course, but I know that allegations aren’t necessarily reality. I don’t not believe him, I don’t believe him. I just think that you have to let these things sometimes play out in the court of public opinion.” Come again? Senator Lindsey Graham told Kristen Welker on ‘Meet the Press’ that Robinson “deserves a chance to defend himself.” And Senator Tom Cotton called the allegations “concerning,” and that “He owes the people of North Carolina more answers about it,” as he attempted to divert Jake Tapper’s attention to the bunny running loose in the CNN studio.

Satirist Andy Borowitz says that comments posted to a porn site by “Mark Robinson are virtually identical to passages that appear in Project 2025,” as acknowledged by the Heritage Foundation. According to Foundation spokesman, Harland Dorrinson“When we were assembling Project 2025, we cast a wide net for good ideas, and the website Nude Africa was one of the places we looked. We had no idea who the author was, but we were like, ‘Whoever this guy is, he must be some kind of genius.'” The notions lifted from Robinson’s comments and inserted into Project 2025 include “an embrace of Nazism, a return to slavery, and, of course, the secret surveillance of women. It’s hard to believe that Mark came up with that last one when he was only fourteen.” The Heritage group apologized for failing to properly attribute Robinson’s “brilliant material” in Project 2025, but promised that he would receive “full credit” in all future editions. Borowitz further reveals that “JD Vance abruptly cancelled his entire campaign schedule in order to clear his search history,” after revelations in the Robinson story. “All the blood drained from his face,” said an aide who was with Vance when he heard the Robinson news. “I haven’t seen him that panicked since he was asked to choose a donut.” The campaign tried to project an air of normalcy, particularly after Vance was spotted in a Denny’s parking lot smashing his laptop with a hammer. But the aide said that the history-clearing episode has left Vance’s staff ‘rattled,’ adding, “It’s creeping us out to think that he might be even weirder than we already know.”

Conspiracy theorist and pillow fort aficionado, Mike Lindell, is again facing backlash after his company marked down some of its pillow line to $14.88, a figure seen as symbolic for white supremacists and neo-Nazis. A social media ad, touting the discounted pillows as the “ultimate comfort upgrade,” and a graphic promising “Sleep like a dream with our Standard MyPillow for just $14.88!” showing Lindell holding two pillows with a prominently displayed price. The number ‘1488’ is a common symbol among hate groups, the ’14’ being shorthand for the ’14 Words’ of a white supremacist slogan, while the ’88’ is shorthand for ‘Heil Hitler,’ since the letter ‘H’ is the eighth letter in the alphabet. Posting the ad on four major platforms resulted in hundreds of criticisms denouncing Lindell, with no comment forthcoming from either MyPillow or Lindell. To paraphrase a comment from the Jimmy Kimmel Live! show, “Prosecuting Trump and his MAGAts is like painting the Golden Gate Bridge…as soon as you’re finished, you have to start all over again.” So, keep it up, Mikey…and sleep well!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Chinatown

“Chinatown is tremendously interesting… It’s a part of the city that hasn’t really been explored in crime literature or in any general literature. It’s as though Chinatown didn’t exist. People write about New York without mentioning Chinatown at all.”
~S. J. Rozan

“I was born in San Francisco’s Chinatown in 1948 but grew up in a black neighborhood. During elementary and middle school, I commuted to a bilingual school in Chinatown. So I did not confront white American culture until high school.”
~Laurence Yep

“I think Jack Nicholson in ‘Chinatown’ is a very funny character, but I would never call that a comedy.”
~Ruben Fleischer

“Country town to the city heart, in every corner of the globe you’ll find a Chinatown, a Chinese restaurant or an Asian grocer. From this vast and ancient culture, we credit noodles, dumplings, rice, countless spices and cooking techniques to have enriched every culture that they’ve landed in.”
~Melissa Leong

“The people that are out there saying on social media, being racist towards the Chinatown community and Chinese people in general, I’m asking you to stop. Enough with that hate mongering.”
~Marty Walsh

...

Professor of Rock has some really good interviews on his YouTube channel. Here’s a brand new one with Weird Al!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
84 Blackburn Street, Apt 102
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Cell phone: (831) 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *