Greensite… on Development’s Underbelly … Steinbruner… save the landlines… board of supervisors office hours, The Hirahara house… Hayes… back next week … Patton… Enemy of my enemy … Matlock… everything is broken…catbird seating…backstab…loopy loop… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Titanic’s last moments, minute by minute… Quotes on… “Walking”
|
Dateline: April 30, 2025
MAY DAY. Someone asked me if I knew where the term “Mayday” as a call for help came from, and I actually do! Do you? 🙂 If not, I’ll tell you… it’s from the French “M’aider!”, which means “Help me!”. It was created in 1923 by a senior radio officer in London by the name of Frederick Stanley Mockford. Mockford recognized the need for a simple, internationally understood distress signal. You are suppposed to say it three times in a row, to keep it from being confused with any other communication.
Now you know!
And, believe it or not, the fact that my video this week is about the Titanic is complete coincidence!
~Webmistress
THE MINECRAFT MOVIE. In theatres. Movie (5.9 IMDb) ![]()
Okay, so here’s the deal: I’ve played Minecraft before, so I am familar enough to know the mechanics of its universe, but equally, not SO in love with it that I’m going to freak about any cinematic storytelling compromises. Also, aside from studying film in college, I worked for 15+ years in visual effects for film and tv, as a compositor (I took the cg and the live action and mushed them together, added some blood and dust and blur and film grain etc so that it looked like one image).
This film was an actual disaster. OK cast. Meh story. But the choices made while bringing it all together were BAFFLING. I’ve seen films where janky effects and weird dialoge were a CHOICE – I get it, it can be fun. However, there is no rhyme or reason to the uneven storytelling and effects. In some scenes, the animation does not include mouth movement, and yet later, that same character CAN move their mouth. Some scenes have totally passable blue/green screen extraction, others have completely visible wires and it looks like the crudest animatic. And that’s very much what the film feels like: an animatic. An animatic is a pre-visualization version of a film that may or may not have effects, or rough acting shot to just show what is supposed to happen here – in some cases it’s literally just voices over a series of drawings. What should have been a modestly entertaining b-grade “Jumanji” (real people in a video-game world) instead comes across as Jack Black and friends improv brainstorming, then handing it off to someone’s 15 year old YouTuber nephew to assemble and do … something … with the effects.
NOT worth a watch. Not a “so bad it’s good”, but a “so bad, why am I watching this?”. DO NOT let your kids watch it and have it become their favorite film, because you will end up wanting to strangle them.
I stuck it out for you.
You’re welcome.
~Sarge
DEATH OF A UNICORN. Prime TV. Movie (6.1 IMDb) ![]()
Thank you, Alex Scharfman, for opening people’s eyes to the truth: unicorns were never sweet, cuddly ponies — they’re magical beasts; basically angry horses with a murder stick on their foreheads.
Paul Rudd and Jenna Ortega star as a father-daughter duo who find themselves in way over their heads after accidentally running over a unicorn. Between the vengeful parents of the mythical creature and the greedy interests of Rudd’s pharma overlords (played with relish by Richard E. Grant, Téa Leoni, and Will Poulter, as the Leopolds), chaos — and carnage — ensue.
A literal “eat the rich” horror/comedy, this film is sharp, absurd, and unapologetically dark. Rudd and Ortega have great chemistry, and the Leopolds are delightfully despicable.
Not for the squeamish, but absolutely worth a watch.
~Sarge

MINDHUNTER. Netflix. Series. (8.6 IMDb) ![]()
Not a new one – just happened to watch it again, and thought it relevant for locals. Mindhunter, a docucrama based on the non-fiction account of FBI Special Agent John Douglas (renamed Holden Ford in the show) and his trials and tribulations to get the FBI to accept the concept of a “serial killer” back in ’77, and the idea that they could be profiled. Pursuant of this is a recreated serial killer fan-service list including Manson, Berkowitz, and particularly relevant for locals, Big Ed Kemper (for those tuning in late, Ed “The CoEd Killer” Kemper was the best known contributor to Santa Cruz being “affectionately” dubbed “Murder Capital of the World” back in the early ’70s). The show recreates the time and lifestyle of the time remarkably well, and the uneasy partnership of straight-laced Holt McCallany and earnest Jonathan Groff as the leads is well cast. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE RESIDENCE. Netflix. Series. (7.8 IMDb) ![]()
I’m happy to see the return of the cozy mystery – Knives Out, Death and Other Details, and even Only Murders in the Building. Sure, Hallmark churns out an endless stream of formulaic/hygienic perky upper middle class “professional women” who solve mysteries while hygienically engaging in romance with some square jawed cop/firefighter/architect, but they lack any sort of charm or character. The Residence gives us Cordelia Cupp (Orange is the New Black’s Uzo Aduba): an acclaimed detective, and stout birder, who finds herself wader deep in drama and intrigue surrounding a murder in the White House. Giving absolutely zero f***s about titles and position, she pursues the truth through a cast of notables: Giancarlo Esposito, Jason Lee, Bronson Pinchot, Molly Griggs, and even Al Franken, reprising his role as a Senator. Might have been a few episodes too long, but worth the wait. Definite watch.
~Sarge
STAR TREK: SECTION 31. Paramount+. Movie. (3.8 IMDb) ![]()
I know I’m late to the table for this, but we decided to finally sit down and watch Star Trek: Section 31. Empress Georgiou (the mirror-universe evil counterpart of heroic Capt. Georgiou from Star Trek: Discovery) is pressed back into service with Section 31 – the black-ops division of Starfleet – for essentially a caper “mission”. Things go wrong, and she and a band of misfit specialists have to make it right. Michelle Yeoh is wonderful, as she always is. What she’s given to work with is tepid at best. I’m not a toxic fan – I’ve liked a lot of Trek related stuff that people kvetch about, but I do recognize when they miss the mark. Not just “doesn’t feel like Star Trek”, but feels like a fairly average caper film. No brilliant gotcha moments, no delicious red herrings. Just bland. Which is hard to do with Michelle Yeoh! It doesn’t quite make me feel like I was robbed of an hour and a half, but I was not really entertained. Highlight for the geek crowd: a Cheronian waiter. Watch only for a completionist compulsion.
~Sarge
NO OTHER LAND. In theaters. Movie (8.3 IMDb) ![]()
Academy Award-winning documentary, No Other Land, highlights the impact of political conflicts on everyday people. Co-directed by Palestinian filmmaker Basel Adra and Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham, the film follows them in the forced displacement of the small settlement of Masafer Yatta by Israeli forces. The view we get, from the “street” as it were, brings home the workaday world that is being unceremoniously wiped out by forces beyond shame or consequence. It makes it difficult to maintain an objective view of chess pieces being neatly moved around a board – it’s hard and personal, and as foreign as it should feel, hitting you right in the hometown. After winning the award, another co-director, Hamdan Ballal, was arrested and detained by Israeli authorities. The academy’s reaction: a tepid equivalent of “there are good people on both sides”. Definitely requires a watch.
~Sarge
THE ELECTRIC STATE. Netflix Movie (6 IMDb)
This has the energy of ’80s adventure films, like Batteries Not Included and War Games, with a touch of Fallout retro-futurism. Here’s the deal: In the ’50s, Walt Disney sparked a robot boom, leading to a robot rebellion in the ’90s. After the war, robots were confined to a walled-off Midwest wasteland. Michelle (Millie Bobby Brown) discovers her genius brother, supposedly dead, stuck in a robot shell and searching for a mysterious doctor. Keats (Chris Pratt) and his robot sidekick help her break into the wasteland. They’re pursued by a robot exterminator (Giancarlo Esposito) working for a tech billionaire, Skate (Stanley Tucci), who wants Michelle’s brother. Fun, nostalgic, and spot-on art direction. Worth a watch. ~Sarge
ADOLESCENCE. Netflix Series (8.4 IMDb)
I was going to start off saying this was uninspired in its execution, till I saw a shot fly up from one character, fly several blocks away, drop down to where another character is getting out of a car, and hold a steady close up – all in one shot. A British crime drama about the impact of incel politics on pre-sexual children. Very saddening. Worth a watch. ~Sarge
A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. AppleTV, PrimeTV. Movie (7.4 IMDb)
I don’t know how accurate this is as a depiction of young Bob Dylan (Timothee Chalamet), but it does make me yearn for those days as an adult (I wouldn’t be released till ’63). The film basically encapsulates Dylan from ’61 to ’65, following his relationships, and rise in the folk community, and his troubled transition to something more. Ed Norton as the supportive and eventally outgrown Pete Seeger, Elle Fanning as Dylan’s constantly trying-to-stay-in-his-focus lover Sylvie Russo/Suze Rotolo, and Monica Barbaro as the legendary sometime lover/sometime music partner Joan Baez. Worth a watch.~Sarge
THE BRUTALIST. PrimeTV. Movie (7.5 IMDb)
I thought the title was JUST a reference to the Brutalist Movement in art and architecture. Oh how wrong I was. A brutal story about love, separation, and power. Adrien Brody is gut-wrenching in his performance as a holocaust survivor, drug addict, and brutalist architect. It’s like dragging yourself along the edge of a straight razor – the further forward you go, the deeper it cuts. Painful, but worth a watch. Interesting note – while Brody’s character is fictional, the name Lazlo Toth (and variants) is out there, most notable to me, it was the name of the guy who vandalized La Pieta, and it was the pen-name of Don Novello (Reverend Guido Sarducci on old SNL) when writing his “Lazlo Letters”. ~Sarge
DAREDEVIL. Disney+. Series (8.6 IMDb)
The one that started the Netflix/Marvel cavalcade. Charlie Cox and Vincent D’Onofrio bring depth and humor/tragedy to the David and Goliath of New York. Matt Murdoch/Daredevil (Cox), an attorney who was struck blind as a youth, develops the ability to “see” through the use of organic sonar, and uses that ability (along with rigorous martial arts training) to take on the criminal denizens of the shadowy streets. Wilson Fisk/Kingpin (D’Onofrio), a man of outsized power (figuratively and literally) with rage issues, but also a nuanced romantic side, finds his criminal enterprises falling into the “sights” of the blind kid from Hell’s Kitchen. Subsequent stories dealt with other comic characters, Elektra and The Punisher. Amazing fight choreography (not just martial arts, but the fluidity of the staging) if you’re into that – not for the faint of heart. Now on Disney. ~Sarge
DAREDEVIL – BORN AGAIN. Disney+. Series (9 IMDb)
For anyone thinking that Daredevil would lose its edge being on Disney, think again. The original cast of Netflix’s Daredevil are back for this sequel from Disney. After a journey through various other shows (the Defenders, Hawkeye, Echo, and She Hulk) Cox and D’Onofrio are back. In the first two episodes we see Matt, in the wake of a tragedy, hang up the horns, and Fisk coming out of rehabilitation after getting shot in the face by Echo (see: “Hawkeye” and “Echo”). Matt returns to lawyering, and Fisk … has a vision for a better New York, as Mayor. Just a wee tad chilling, given the current climate. First two episodes on Disney right now – new episodes every Tuesday. ~Sarge

The last item on the April 22 City Council agenda was a topic of concern and importance, rarely discussed: to assess the impact of proposed large mixed-use city developments on the level of service from fire, medical and police. Presented by the Fire Chief and the DTA consultant, they shared the results of the state-required Nexus study on local police and fire to determine how many new residents will need to be served, how much increase in resources is needed to provide the current level of service and how to pay for this increase. Based on the study, an increase in the Public Safety Impact Fee was recommended for new developments, whether housing, hotel, office, or institution.
Staff recommended that council adopt the new fee and charge developers 80% of the total. Council moved to adopt staff recommendation. Mayor Keeley made a convincing argument that the fee should be 100% of the projected public safety cost increase. This is a one-time fee, he said, and could always be adjusted if it proves a disincentive for new development. Council quickly amended the motion to include the mayor’s recommendation and it passed unanimously.
This agenda item was a rare event in that it addressed some negatives involved in the multiple large-scale developments underway or proposed for the city. We are fed only the positives. While the scale and quick approval of these developments is largely state imposed, whether through density bonuses, RHNA numbers or new housing laws, they are uncritically presented by staff and rarely questioned by council.
In his slide deck, the Fire Chief showed side by side views to demonstrate the increase in level of service that will be generated by new or proposed developments compared to current usage, such as the slide above at 530 Front Street. At this site, three small businesses will be replaced by 276 condos resulting in a new population of 700 residents, using a formula of 2.56 people per unit as an average. From the many slides shown, the sea change to the character of Santa Cruz between existing and proposed new development was jaw-dropping. Slide after slide showed what is being lost and what is coming down the pike. That of course was not the purpose of the presentation. The purpose was to show that the increase in population from new development will require more police and fire personnel, more medical first responders and more equipment if public safety standards and level of service are to be maintained.
According to the Fire Chief, there will be a total of 1,600 newcomers housed in proposed downtown developments. That figure does not include future new residents in the Downtown Expansion area which, using the same formula will result in 2,560 new residents, at minimum. Add to that figure the new large-scale developments proposed for Mission, Almar, Water and Ocean and numbers of new residents escalate.
One myth about all this new dense housing is that it is future homes for current residents. There might be some residents who will downsize, move into a condo, and sell their single-family home but that demographic is far from the majority. Nor is this new housing for the currently houseless, nor for multiple people who are crammed into small rentals to afford ever-escalating rents. These new units are priced well beyond their ability to pay. Local low-income workers who have been long-time renters are leaving in large numbers to find cheaper rents, giving lie to the claim that this new housing will allow workers to avoid long commutes and live near their workplace. As for affordable housing, since the city negated the Grand Jury recommendation that the city track and keep data on whether such housing is occupied by local workers or locals with prior residency as required by the Municipal Code, we have no idea whether that law is being followed. Any reference claiming otherwise is invalid.
The simple fact is that most of the new, dense housing being built is for people who currently live elsewhere and earn-or have- big money. They want to either have a second home in Santa Cruz or move here or maybe invest in real estate. They comprise a bottomless pit of demand. Some will be students from wealthy families who can afford the high rents. From the size of most units in most new developments, it appears students and single professionals are the favored demographics. The high incomes of the professionals raise the AMI (Area Median Income) which in turn paves the way for rent increases and puts affordability rental levels further out of reach. The more we build, the more new people with high incomes move here, the worse it gets for low-income residents. The more strain it puts on police, fire, and medical services. The more impact on parks, trails, surf breaks, beaches, roads, and bike lanes. Unlike tourists, the high-income new residents bring daily consumption needs for services that require workers, usually of lower income, who cannot afford to live here.
Maybe the alert from police, fire and medical about the negative impact of new development will wake up the decision-makers at City Hall. Less of “we need housing at all income levels” and more of “we need a Nexus study of projected development impacts across all resources.” Less of “the state has taken away local control so there’s very little we can do” and more of “let’s join other cities in protesting unrealistic RHNA numbers.” And follow the Grand Jury recommendation to document, verify, track, and determine whether inclusionary housing is helping local workers and residents, or is that only a convenient talking point.
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
Keep in the know on what is happening in Santa Cruz County as Supervisors press forward to approve a new County Ordinance for a combining district that would allow three locations in urban areas for fire-prone facilities. Attend the May 12 Public Meeting at Amesti Elementary School (23 Amesti Rd,in Watsonville), 6pm-9pm;, to learn more and take action.
The lithium battery applicant, New Leaf Energy, based in Massachusetts, is essentially writing the County’s ordinance. This is unacceptable.
Speak up May 6 at the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors meeting during Open Public Comment.
Our elected representatives are being convinced that the containerized lithium iron phosphate battery banks are “safer”….but these systems are still very prone to overheating, thermal runaway fires that emit toxic gas and heavy metal contaminants. Such fires have been occurring in Germany.
SPEAK UP TO KEEP YOUR LANDLINE TELEPHONE SERVICE INTACT!
AT&T is at it again to drop emergency lifeline landline telephone service. AB 470 would allow AT&T to simply walk away as Carrier of Last Resort. Join the CPUC public hearings coming up next week regarding AT&T application to drop Carrier of Last Resort responsibility: Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) — TURN
- May 5, 2025 / 6pm
Webcast (to watch only)
Phone: 1-800-857-1917; Passcode: 6032788#
Must call in to make a public comment - May 13, 2025 / 2pm & 6pm
Webcast (to watch only)
Phone: 1-800-857-1917; Passcode: 6032788#
Must call in to make a public comment
AND IT GETS WORSE….
Also…Verizon wants to take over Frontier Communications in California, which is a smaller company that has assumed landline operations in many other states. The CPUC is reviewing this. Please see the schedule and location information below.
2025 Verizon/Frontier Merger — TURN
1. In-Person Forums
- May 29, 2025 / 2pm and 6pm
Palm Desert City Council Chambers
73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 - June 11, 2025 / 2pm and 6pm
Santa Barbara City Council
735 Anacapa Street Santa Barbara, CA 93102 - June 18, 2025 / 2pm and 6pm
Eureka City Council Chambers
531 K Street Eureka, CA 95501 - June 24, 2025 / 2pm and 6pm
Monticola Clubhouse
140 S Lassen Street Susanville, CA 96130 - June 30, 2025 / 2pm and 6pm
Long Beach City Council Chambers
411 West Ocean Boulevard Long Beach, CA 90802 - July 7, 2025 / 2pm and 6pm
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors’ Board Chambers
700 H Street, Suite 1450 Sacramento, CA 95814
2. Remote Forums
- June 16, 2025 / 2pm & 6pm
- July 15, 2025 / 2pm & 6pm
Webcast (to watch only)
Phone: 1-800-857-1917 Passcode: 6032788#
Must call in to make a public comment
Webcast (to watch only)
Phone: 1-800-857-1917 Passcode: 6032788#
Must call in to make a public comment
THE PEOPLE SPOKE OUT…WERE THE SUPERVISORS EVEN LISTENING?
Why were the Supervisors spending more time looking down at their phones than paying attention to the people speaking before them?
Tuesday, April 29, public comment went for nearly three hours, with people from all walks of life filling the chambers to overflowing. Many spoke about the County’s plan to stop funding critical behavioral health services, close the County’s lab and x-ray facility serving the poor, and cut 74 jobs in the Health & Human Services Dept. Other speakers, including the Executive Director of Friends of Santa Cruz County Parks and some Parks Commissioners, asked the Supervisors not to rezone five parcels that are designated for parks, and instead accommodate dense infill housing.
The Supervisors were rude to largely ignore the people, many of whom had never been to the Board chambers and spoken before. Whatsmore, the Board recessed with a long line of people still waiting to speak so that they could hold an online Flood Control meeting at which they were the only attendees. Finally, as their stomachs began to growl, the Supervisors agreed with Chair Felipe Hernandez that those who had waited hours online to speak should only have ONE minute, rather than two.
NO TALK OF CUTS TO ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES
At a time when many programs and jobs are proposed to be cut, was there discussion of cutting the salaries of high-level administrators, such as Robert Brown, Lead Psychiatrist for the County, and Carlos Palacios, County Administrative Officer, who each are paid about a half a million dollars each month in salaries and benefits?
Transparent California salaries, Santa Cruz County
The staff presentation of the 2025-2026 County Preliminary Budget Report that came before the Board well after 3pm was discussion of salary reductions for administrative personnel. Apr 29, 2025 Board of Supervisors – Regular Meeting – Santa Cruz County, CA
I urge you to watch it and ask if the County administration is doing the best to serve the people, rather than themselves?
Write the Board with your thoughts…Budget Hearings begin June 3.
Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors: <boardofsupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov>
WHERE DID HE GO?
Many wondered where former Second District County Supervisor Zach Friend would go after sitting for 12 years in that elected office.
I was surprised to see his name show up in the May 2 Monterey Bay Economic Partnership Economic Summit program:
Political strategist and author Mike Madrid will join us for a keynote address and fireside chat with Zach Friend, exploring his latest book The Latino Century and its timely reflections on cultural transformation, self-governance, and the evolving American identity.
But it seems Zach is a frequent participant of Mr. Madrid’s book promotions and began doing so almost immediately after he left his job as County Supervisor:
January 11, 2025….Madrid is joined by Zach Friend, policy and public affairs communication expert who worked in the Obama White House, to further explore current social and political trends. The Great Transformation of America with Mike Madrid
NEW SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR DESERPA HOLDS OFFICE HOURS
It is refreshing to again have a Second District County Supervisor who holds open office hours…it has been a long time since that happened.
If you have not yet met and spoken with Supervisor Kim DeSerpa, try to attend these office hours, posted on the Board of Supervisor website:
Wednesday May 7th, 3-5 pm,
South County Service Center,
790 Green Valley Road, Watsonville, CANEW DATE/TIME: Wednesday, May 13th, 2-4
Corralitos CalFire Station
120 Eureka Canyon Road, Corralitos, CA
SOME OTHER SUPES ALSO HOLD OFFICE HOURS
Take a look at when your County Supervisor is available to discuss your concerns:
Board of Supervisors
4th District Supervisor Felipe Hernandez:
Office Hours are held the second Friday of the month from 2PM to 4PM at our Watsonville office, 150 Westridge Dr, Watsonville, CA
1st District Supervisor Manu Koenig:
Office hours are on the first Wednesday monthly, 1pm-3pm, at his office within the Sheriff Center, 5200 Soquel Avenue Frontage Road in Live Oak.
First District Townhall – August (Maybe about the County’s utility-scale lithium battery energy storage system or BESS Ordinance?)
Date: August 14, 2025 / 6 PM – 7:30 PM location TBD
5th District Supervisor Monica Martinez (how nice that she schedules time to accommodate people who work!):
Upcoming In-District Open Office Hours
To reduce wait time, we are now utilizing a reservation system. Click here to reserve a 15 minute time-slot in advance
In-District Open Office Hours Reservation
Please indicate the times at which you would like to meet with Supervisor Martinez. Drop-in visitors are still welcome, and will be seen in order of arrival as time allows between or after reservations.
- May 12…..5:00 to 6:30 p.m. (Felton Office, 6062 Graham Hill Road Suite A & B)
- May 27…..3:30 to 5 p.m. (Boulder Creek Sheriff’s Substation, 13210 Central Avenued)
- June 16….3:30 to 5 p.m. (Scotts Valley Library Community Room, 251 Kings Village Road)
- June 30….5:00 to 6:30 p.m. (Felton Office, 6062 Graham Hill Road Suite A & B)
Unfortunately, 3rd District Supervisor Justin Cummings has no office hours posted.
ERASING HISTORY AT A TIME WHEN IT SHOULD SHINE…
Listen this Friday to “Community Matters” at 2pm when local Historian Mr. Ross Gibson will discuss the background of the Redman/Hirahara Farmstead and disappointing support of local Historic Resources Commissioners to see it demolished. santacruzvoice.com
The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, with the zealous recommendation and financial support of the County Historic Resources Commission, may consider yanking the Redman-Hirahara Farmstead in Watsonville from the National Historic Registry, thereby paving the way for Elite Developers Inc. to demolish it for a strip mall idea they favor. Although currently within District 2 County boundaries, the City of Watsonville is planning to annex all of the land and more into the City, creating the “Gateway Project”.
(See page 6: EIR NOP Revised)
The matter may be coming before the Board as early as next Tuesday, May 6….will it be on the Consent Agenda?
Listen in from your computer or smart device this Friday at 2pm and also to last weel’s interview with Ms. Karell Reader, who was involved in the Foundation that tried to save the Farm.
During WWII, the people of the Pajaro Valley paid the property taxes for the Hirahara family when they were shipped off to internment camp prisons, and maintained the farm in their absence. That big-hearted effort allowed the Hirahara family to return to what they owned, unlike what happened in the Salinas Valley.
Don’t you think we could all benefit from keeping that story alive but preserving the historic home, designed by local famous architect William Weeks, for generations to use, much as what San Jose has done with the Emma Prusch Farm Park?
Please write Supervisor Kim DeSerpa <second.district@santacruzcountyca.gov>
Please listen in at 2pm this Friday on your computer, or the recording that will be posted after 5pm here.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. MEET WITH YOU SUPERVISOR AND ASK THEM TO PROPOSE SALARY REDUCTIONS FOR ALL ADMINISTRATORS, INCLUDING THEMSELVES.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Monday, April 28, 2025

You have probably heard the claim that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” That claim, of course, is subject to debate, and doesn’t really make much logical sense, if you think about it, but there is enough truth in this expression that it has become a commonplace assertion since the late 1800’s – at least according to Wikipedia.
Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., who writes for The Wall Street Journal, suggests that our current president’s appeal to his political “base” may be directly related to this idea that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” In saying this, I am citing to one of Jenkins’ columns, published on April 23, 2025. His column was titled, “Understanding Trump’s Trade War.” My apologies if that link leads you to a prohibitory paywall.
The way that Mr. Trump has conducted what really has been a “trade war,” does seem to need some sort of explanation. What our current president has done with respect to his on-again, off-again imposition of tariffs, coupled with other trade-related actions, and blustering threats, doesn’t really seem to make much sense. Jenkins, though, does identify a likely political “upside” for Trump’s controversial trade war, which would seem, on the surface, to disadvantage the very people who have supported him most strongly.
Every president thinks first about his political standing, on which the whole enterprise rests. Mr. Trump is different in one respect only…. In the fight for personal survival…, one tactic has worked over and over for Mr. Trump, and that’s exciting the animosity and overreaction of the country’s elite groups.
No matter how crass or gross his conduct, his enemies turn it into lemonade for him. Even his remarkable 2024 comeback doesn’t change this strange chemistry….
A column like today’s is a hard sell to newspaper readers used to the comfortable illusion that presidents are primarily focused on their carefully considered policies and how they will benefit the country. (Witness the hopeless piling up of commentary seeking the “strategy” in his trade actions). The argument, such as it was, for Mr. Trump’s second election was always: his enemies (emphasis added).
Our current president, in other words, is not trying to “sell himself” by touting all the postive things he is doing, has done, or will do. His biggest appeal is that he hates the “enemies” that are hated by his “base.”
I am your “friend,” he seeks to persuade the dissatisfied (which includes LOTS of Americans). How are we, the dissatisfied, supposed to know how good Trump is? Well, look at the enemies he has! Those are YOUR enemies, too, right? You can back me, you ought to back me, Trump tells all those who are dissatisfied with how things have been going because “the enemy of your enemy is your friend.”
I do think that Jenkins is on to something. Our current president is not very appealing as a national leader. He’s impulsive, inconsistent, self-interested, and actually pretty “stupid,” to pick out an applicable word. But boy does that guy hate the “libs.” Boy, does that guy hate the “elites.” Boy, does that guy hate the “bureaucrats.” Etc.!!
You get the idea. Hating our “enemy,” on our behalf, is the foundation on which our current president has built his political success.
Let me suggest something different. I am proposing to you a politics that is not based on “anger,” or on opposition, or on “rage,” but that is based on the idea that WE (we, the people) ought to be running the place. Self-government, which includes self-promotion of the people, trusting ourselves to run the government, is the way to build a political “base” that is not premised on that old, erroneous claim that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
If you don’t like how this country has been run over the last half century or so, under both Republican and Democratic presidents (and I don’t), and if you are tempted to blame various political “enemies” for how badly the counttry has been run, then let me invite you to take a peek into the most conveniently accessible mirror.
There isn’t any “enemy.” Or, as Walt Kelly has so wonderfully put it: “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
Appealing to our hatred of our supposed “enemies” is not a secure basis for any politics of genuine power, for any politics of transformation and change. Love for ourselves (ALL of us) is the foundation of a politics that might – still might – save the world. Trying to establish our politics on the basis of a coalition that hates the some common “enemy” (including our current president, for those who see him as an enemy) is not going to solve our problems. In fact, it is going to get us the kind of government that has been produced by our current president.
So, let us think again!
Instead of spending our political energies looking for “enemies,” let’s turn our efforts to the task of building a politics that can triumph over adversity, and over the daunting challenges ahead. We can begin to do that, and set our politics onto a firm foundation, by doing what I consistently call for in these daily blog postings. Here’s what we need to do (first step):
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
The Trump administration, and in particular, JD Vance and the head MAGAman himself, have been the butt of jokes and criticisms in the wake of Pope Francis‘ death. Vance started off the previous week by meeting the national champion Ohio State football team in the Oval Office, fumbling and breaking their hard-won trophy in the process. One contributor on X posted that anyone scheduled for meetings with Vance should be shaking in their boots, and with the death of the Pope on the Monday following Vance’s visit on Easter Sunday, the floodgates were opened on social media, making the VP the butt of jokes, confirming him as the anti-Christ. One X user shared similar sentiments, writing, “JD touched a trophy and broke it. Then, he touched the Pope and he broke. I hope he shakes Donald’s hand this week…” Satirist Andy Borowitz contributed on his The Borowitz Report: “JD Vance will represent Satan at Pope Francis’s funeral this weekend, the Devil confirmed on Thursday. In a rare public statement, the Prince of Darkness said that he could not attend the funeral himself because it conflicts with a Tesla board meeting. Explaining his choice of Vance, Beelzebub said, ‘If you can’t have me, JD is the next best thing.’ But longtime Vatican-watcher Harland Dorrinson criticized Satan’s decision to send Vance, noting, ‘With Trump in attendance, this seems like overkill.'”
And indeed, Trump was in attendance as he made doubly sure he was seen, finagling a prized front row seat, though protocol had him, along with First Lady Melania, initially assigned to a third row position. In what was mostly a somber sea of black-clad attendees who followed the requested dress code, there he was resplendent in his bright blue silk suit and blue tie, missing only his bright red clown nose. Melania was respectful in her stylish all-black outfit — blazer dress, gloves, and lace veil, acting as sort of a peace maker between her childish and snub-prone husband and France’s Macron, encouraging him to shake the French president’s hand in the Sign of Peace portion of the mass in following the custom of shaking hands with other mourners. Several photos reveal that he was probably napping — unlikely that prayer was on his mind — and an adult should have taken away his cell phone which was a playtoy during some of his time at the service. Prior to being seated for the ceremony, Trump and Ukraine’s Zelensky were able to have a short face-to-face meeting, both of whom shared positive words of their discussion afterwards, along with an announcement of a meeting to follow afterwards. Zelensky, also seated in the front row, wore all-black, but kept his vow not to dress formally until the Russian invasion of his country is history. Upon the Ukrainian leader’s appearance as he was seated, spontaneous applause from the assembled echoed across the plaza, which likely raised Trump’s hackles since he got no recognition.
Not willing to extend the Sign of Peace to former president Biden for such a momentous occasion, Trump declined to allow Biden and his entourage to fly with him on Air Force One to the Pope’s funeral, despite President George W Bush’s precedent of inviting his father and Bill Clinton to accompany him to the funeral Mass of Pope John Paul II in 2005. Trump has kept his predecessor front and center as his scapegoat, with The New York Times keeping score on his mentions of Biden at 300 in the first 50 days since January 20 — as he whines about the porous southern border, calling him “the worst president in American history.” In 2022, Trump mocked then-President Biden for his placement in the 14th row at Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral, maintaining that it was proof that “there’s no respect for the US anymore,” suggesting that if he were still president, he would have received front-row seating. For the Saturday funeral of Pope Francis, Biden was seated much further back, dressed in his black suit and non-protocol blue tie! Doubtless, the Trump-seating brouhaha would have raised the eyebrows of Pope Francis, who dedicated much political capital into confronting The Don, viewing his immigration policies as “un-Christian” and making his concerns known to JD Vance in the hours before his death. Many are saying that the pope rebuked Trump from beyond the grave through Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re’s homily in the Mass, saying, “Pope Francis incessantly raised his voice, imploring peace and calling for reason and honest negotiation to find possible solutions. ‘Build bridges, not walls,’ was an exhortation he repeated many times.” The Cardinal ensured that Trump’s call for building a border wall got the final criticism from Pope Francis, which the president had called “disgraceful,” labelling the Pope as “a very political person,” who was questioning his faith. There was no missing the finger pointed at Trump in view of the audience of millions worldwide — yep, the so-called world leader in the embarrassing, look-at-me fluorescent blue suit! It’s doubtful the Vatican could have provided a high chair for the occasion.
The Economist magazine blisters Trump with its latest cover, showing an illustration of a wounded and bandaged US eagle, accompanied by the headline, “Only 1,361 Days to go.” Ron Dicker of HuffPost writes, “The Economist is counting the days until President Donald Trump’s second term is over, showing the amount of time left after his first 100 days is up. He has spent his first months dismantling government agencies, sparking a trade war, defying courts over deportations and trying to strong-arm Ukraine into submitting to its invader, Russia. The Economist summed up his strategy in the cover story, which examines the ‘lasting harm’ he has already done: ‘The method is to bend or break the law in a blitz of executive orders and, when the courts catch up, to dare them to defy the president. The theory is one of unconstrained executive power — the idea that, as Richard Nixon suggested, if the president does something then it’s legal.’ This injured eagle might need more than bandages to heal.” Something legal in Trump’s plans is the installation of two 100-foot flagpoles on the White House grounds. On the Jimmy Kimmel Show, Kimmel said, “Trump took a little stroll around the White House, he did a little location scouting just like he would do at one of his golf courses in deciding where to bury an ex-wife.” Kimmel joked that by installing the flagpoles will “clear up a lot of confusion. For years, whenever I’d see a picture of the White House I’d think, ‘Well, that’s a nice building, but what country is it in? You do have to admit, it is crazy the White House doesn’t have a flag — other than that giant one on top of the White House.” He says the new ones will be high enough to be out of Trump’s hugging range.
Raw Story’s David Edwards posts about a historically Jewish newspaper’s comparing President Donald Trump’s tactics to those used by Germany’s Adolf Hitler prior to WWII: In an op-ed for Forward, author Terrence Petty likened Trump’s demonization of his self-declared enemies to Hitler’s attempt to blame Jews for Germany’s loss in WWI — a tactic known as the Dolchstosslegende, or stabbed-in-the-back legend. “Donald Trump has created an American version of the Dolchstosslegende, propagating a myth that the nation is being led to ruination by Joe Biden and the Democrats, prosecutors who go after Trump, judges who go against him, non-MAGA news media, practitioners of ‘wokeism,’ and elite universities, among others,” Petty wrote. “All of this is utter nonsense, of course, but this American S-I-T-B lie is at the core of Trump’s assaults on democracy.” The author compared Hitler’s first speech as chancellor on February 10, 1933, to Trump’s second inaugural address, which he insisted “reads like a S-I-T-B manifesto.” “For many years, a radical and corrupt establishment has extracted power and wealth from our citizens, while the pillars of our society lay broken and seemingly in complete disrepair,” said Trump in his January speech. Gazing into the future, Petty warns the US may be going through the early stages of authoritarianism, though he notes, “There are signs of hope with some law firms and universities fighting back against Trump’s efforts to coerce them into bending to his will. Citizens are mobilizing, legions of them taking to the streets in protest of his power grabs. Courts have been ruling against his attempts to subvert the law. But none of this seems to faze him, even as appeals play out in rulings against him — he keeps using his authoritarian jackhammer against the foundations of American democracy.”
From the moment he regained office, Trump has been following the autocrat’s playbook, step-by-step by going after universities for disobeying his decrees. He has extorted law firms for existing staff, or previous staff members, who crossed him, and he has targeted for prosecution former aides who challenged him. He has now arrested a federal judge for not helping him round up migrants for deportation, and attacking the free press for not bending to his will. The first day in office saw him release from prison, hundreds of domestic terrorists who assaulted police officers in his name — now a personal militia. Less than 100 days into his term he is straight-up defying the US Supreme Court and is getting away with it — no one being fined, no one going to jail — and terrifyingly, the American public is oblivious to what’s taking place. Trump creates one ’emergency’ after another — the foreign ‘invasion’ by immigrants seeking safety and a better life as did many of our forebears — hardly an invading army of ‘military-aged men’ as Stephen Miller would have it; then, there’s the ‘energy emergency’ for which Trump is trampling environmental laws to allow an increase in petroleum production; next, we have an ‘economic emergency’ prompting Trump to impose outlandish tariffs on any and all countries, despite the fact that the Constitution grants the power of taxation to the Congress. Neither the Supreme Court nor the Congress has an army or a police force to see that the Constitution is followed, so we all are dependent upon the Executive Branch to honor our laws. Yet, simply by fiat, the president can designate any person or group or court judge, ‘terrorist’ or ‘invader,’ should they protest or rule against his policies, then arresting them and sending them away to his gulag in El Salvador. Alarmist? We need to examine our bias of normalcy, our failures of imagination, and remember January 6, 2021 when he unleashed his violent mob on the Capitol. Harvie Wilkinson who served 41 years on the federal appellate court bench, as a Reagan appointee, asks, “If today the executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home? And what assurance shall there be that the executive will not train its broad discretionary powers upon its political enemies? We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the executive branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos. This case presents their unique chance to vindicate that value and to summon the best that is within us while there is still time.” Harvie Wilkinson fears for our republic, as we all should be doing.
Trump’s latest attempt to neuter political opposition is his executing yet another memorandum targeting ActBlue, the fundraising platform behind Democratic campaigns and causes, which he claims is accepting foreign contributions, despite the platform’s denial, and an analysis to the contrary by Republican Representative Bryan Stell. The president himself has been accused of accepting Russian bribes, and a political consultant working for Trump-backing Great America PAC, got 18 months in prison for illegally accepting Russian money in 2016. Trump is at present raking in millions from cryptocurrency investors, who are buying his meme coin in a blatantly corrupt pay-to-play effort to meet him, with a dinner and a White House tour — surely with foreign money flowing into his personal coffers. Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut wrote on X, “The Trump coin scam is the most brazenly corrupt thing a president has ever done. Not even close.” Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jake Auchincloss have demanded an investigation into the meme coin scam, but Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice has better things to do, of course. The two Massachusetts Democrats say, “Anyone, including the leaders of hostile nations, can covertly buy these coins, raising the specter of uninhibited and untraceable foreign influence over the President of the US, all while Trump’s supporters are left to shoulder the risk of investing in $Trump and $Melania.” Meanwhile, ActBlue continues to raise massive amounts of money, taking in nearly $500 million in 2025 alone as it gears up for the fight against Trump, not being put off by his bullying tactics. Despite assurances from ActBlue that its service will continue, Democratic strategists are “drafting contingency plans and evaluating other options,” leery of a president who has expressed complete disregard for the rule of law, as he attempts to stamp out all political, electoral and ideological opposition. Cory Archibald, communications director at Turn Left PAC, warned, “There is no other fundraising platform that comes even close to the functionality, security, and stability of ActBlue. Democrats need to democratize their campaign tech, and they need to do it yesterday.”
Meanwhile, Trump is still meddling in Canada’s politics, as he fired off another ultimatum on Truth Social as their polls opened on federal election day: “Good luck to the Great people of Canada. Elect the man who has the strength and wisdom to cut your taxes in half, increase your military power, for free, to the highest level in the World, have your Car, Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Energy, and all other businesses, QUADRUPLE in size, WITH ZERO TARIFFS OR TAXES, if Canada becomes the cherished 51st State of the United States of America. No more artificially drawn line from many years ago. Look how beautiful this land mass would be. Free access with NO BORDER. ALL POSITIVES WITH NO NEGATIVES. IT WAS MEANT TO BE! America can no longer subsidize Canada with the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars a year that we have been spending in the past. It makes no sense unless Canada is a State!” Travis Gettys of Raw Story writes, “The US president has upended relations between the neighboring allies with steep tariffs on Canadian imports and threats to use ‘economic force’ to annex the country as the 51st state.” Thanks to Trump’s policies, analysts at Goldman Sachs estimate the US economy will take a $90 billion hit in lost tourism and export revenue, with many foreign visitors avoiding the US over increased hostility, and reports about Europeans being detained in immigration centers. Canada, in particular, is boycotting US travel and products — with Canadian summer flight reservations seeing a 70% decline, and a 25% decline in bookings from Europe, an overall 10% drop in international visits compared to this same time in 2024. This could amount to an almost $20 billion reduction in international visitor spending.
President Trump maintains he is “actively” negotiating with China on a tariff deal, but China insists his claim is false, and even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent states that talks have not started. Trump reiterates that President Xi has called him for discussions, with the US president saying, “He’s called. And I don’t think that’s a sign of weakness on his behalf,” but no particulars have been provided. Guo Jiakun, of China’s Foreign Ministry, chimed in with his take, saying, “As far as I know, the two heads of state have not called each other recently. I would like to reiterate that China and the US have not conducted consultations on the tariffs issue.” Earlier, the Ministry told the US to be more polite: “If a negotiated solution is truly what the US wants, it should stop threatening and blackmailing China and seek dialogue based on equality, respect, and mutual benefit. To keep asking for a deal while exerting extreme pressure is not the right way to deal with China and simply will not work.” Trump’s threatening ultimatums have produced chaos world-wide, and fear across American political and economic life — a dynamic that could ultimately undo his presidency as many of those tantrums ring hollow, as seen with his easing up on attempting to fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell. David Faris, associate professor at Roosevelt University, explains on Slate, how Trump’s “depressingly familiar loop” keeps playing out: “This loop is now standard operating procedure from the most chaotic White House in history. In fact, it seems to be more or less the only move that this iteration of Trump has, one that he is deploying against everyone from Canada to Harvard University. And it is eerily similar to the nuclear strategy concept of ‘escalate to de-escalate’ — using a shocking act of aggression to convince an adversary to negotiate on your terms.”
Faris says Trump’s strategy isn’t quite working for him because his opponents have taken note of his weakness and his administration’s incompetence, so they’ve essentially rerouted their long-range plans around the United States. “Trump is fundamentally a weak, lame-duck president, whose paper-thin margins in Congress and embarrassing ineptitude at staffing his administration and carrying out his policies are not kinks that will be ironed out with time but rather inescapable features of his already unbearable and disastrous presidency. That weakness, and the servile paralysis of Congress, is leading him to try the same blunt maneuver over and over again, with predictably diminishing returns. Rather than doing the painstaking work of enacting his lunatic agenda through that narrowly divided Congress, Trump has been acting, since Day 1, like a leader who has to resort immediately to vindictive threats and massively escalatory decisions to get what he wants. If it was a useful tactic, Russia would already have deployed it against Ukraine, and China would have come to the negotiating table to plead with Trump to reduce tariffs. Issuing a never-ending stream of escalatory and often nonsensical threats is also no way to run a country, and voters are fast coming around to the understanding that they made a terrible mistake putting this senescent maniac back in power in November. It is not clear how the United States will even survive another 44 months of this circus with anything resembling the status quo, or our battered psyches, intact. But if Trump’s incipient authoritarians ever allow another Democrat to be elected president, that person is likely to discover that some of the damage to America’s reputation and interests is irreversible,” contends Faris.
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
Walking
“Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light.”
~Helen Keller
“If you’re walking down the right path and you’re willing to keep walking, eventually you’ll make progress.”
~Barack Obama
“If you don’t like the road you’re walking, start paving another one.”
~Dolly Parton
“Don’t threaten me with love, baby. Let’s just go walking in the rain.”
~Billie Holiday
“Beauty surrounds us, but usually we need to be walking in a garden to know it.”
~Rumi
“Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time.”
~Steven Wright
|
I wish I got a kickback every time I recommended History Hit and their shows and documentaries… alas, I do not, but I’ll still share their videos 🙂 This is a minute-by-minute retelling of the last moments of the Titanic, which, if you are into Titanic stuff at all, is surprisingly fascinating. There are all kinds of little details, and this video held my attention despite being rather long. |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)















































