Greensite… Notes from Australia… Steinbruner… aftermath of the battery fires, and more… Hayes… Autocracy Continues to Build… Patton… Don’t be a scaredy-cat… Matlock… the new pledge…a Faustian deal…somewhere in New Jersey… Eagan… Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Art! Do some art!! Quotes on… “March”

|
Dateline: February 26, 2025
SPRING? I can’t believe we are going into March already. I assume it will not be recognized as Women’s Month in any meaningful way, but we can all recognize women around us, every day. If you have Amazon Prime, there’s a documentary series called Extraordinary Women. There are 13 episodes available on Prime, and the subjects range from Hedy Lamarr to Indira Gandhi to Dr Ruth! I intend to watch the series in March. Join me, and we can talk about it!

COMPANION. Apple TV, Fandango, PrimeTV. Movie (7.1 IMDb) Iris (Sophie Thatcher) and Josh (Jack Quaid) traveling to a friend’s country home for a party where the fact that one of the guests is an android “companion” is the LEAST surprising thing that will be discovered. Some distressingly recognizable relationship dynamics are revealed and explored. Also some violence, and a sexual assault, for those who might be triggered. Well made for a light budget, with some nuanced performances. For those troubled by AI – you might want to start saying “please and thank you” to Alexa and Siri. ~Sarge
MOANA 2. Apple TV, Fandango, PrimeTV, YouTube, Disney+. Series (6.8 IMDb) Moana, after reconnecting her people with their seafaring heritage, discovers the ocean is empty. She’s called back by the Gods to face a greedy deity who sunk a cornerstone island, once the link between all Oceania’s seafaring people. Unfortunately, it’s a step down from the original. “Get Lost,” sung by the mid-film villain Matangi, lacks the charm of “Shiny,” and Maui feels like a shadow of his former self. Moana’s crew is a completely superfluous random mix—grumpy farmer, Maui fanboy, manic tech girl, and another comic relief animal (who’s outshone by HeiHei, the chicken). Only the mute rabid coconut warrior, Kotu, adds any value. Much like the first film, the Big Bad is just an angry, personality-less force, this time throwing lightning instead of fireballs. While it’ll entertain kids, there’s little for the parents this time around. Comes to Disney+ March 12th. ~Sarge
HEART EYES. In theaters. Movie (6.6 IMDb) A meet-cute rom-com – with a slasher! Odd mix, but it seems to be director Josh Ruben’s forte. Ad designer Ally (Olivia Holt) accidently presents a “historic tracic lovers” motif JUST as notorious serial killer, Heart Eyes, who murders romantic couples on Valentine’s Day, resurfaces. She teams up with “ad fixer” freelancer Jay (Mason Gooding) in a “Desk Set” will-they won’t-they team-up, until an unexpected kiss puts them in the sights of Heart Eyes. The slashing is moderately creative, the chemistry fairly good, but it just lacks a real personality for Heart Eyes (which you need for a franchise killer). Not for the timid, but not epic gorefest either. On par with Christopher Landon’s 2020 body-swap horror/comedy “Freaky” (ala Freaky Friday – only instead of mother/daughter, it’s slasher/cheerleader). ~Sarge
THE ÅRE MURDERS. Netflix. Series (6.7 IMDb) A darkly delightful remake of F.W. Murnau’s 1922 original “Nosferatu” (itself, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”). The story points match, down to the use of shadows as characters. The performances by Depp, Hoult, and Skarsgård breathe new life into the story, as do the visual textures of the cinematography and costume design (even the choice of using Dacian – a long dead language from central Europe – for Orlok’s dialogue). Slowly menacing in its pacing, this film builds its mood in a way that most modern horror films fail to. ~Sarge
THE BREAKTHROUGH. Netflix. Series (7.1 IMDb) Thanks to Netflix’s voracious appetite for new material, we’ve had a lot of opportunity to watch movies and tv from all over the place. I’ve been noticing an alarming number of bleak crime dramas from Sweden – one of them was “The Breakthrough”, a police procedural based on a real-life 16 year murder investigation. Though the first 3 episodes were a trifle slow, the final episode finally brings it all together. Peter Eggers stars as a police detective who does a LOT of speedwalking while beating his heart out against an impossible case. ~Sarge
NOSFERATU (2024). Prime. Movie (7.4 IMDb) A darkly delightful remake of F.W. Murnau’s 1922 original “Nosferatu” (itself, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”). The story points match, down to the use of shadows as characters. The performances by Depp, Hoult, and Skarsgård breathe new life into the story, as do the visual textures of the cinematography and costume design (even the choice of using Dacian – a long dead language from central Europe – for Orlok’s dialogue). Slowly menacing in its pacing, this film builds its mood in a way that most modern horror films fail to. ~Sarge
ERASERHEAD. Max. Movie (7.3 IMDb) In honor of the passing of one of the most individual visions in the film industry, David Lynch, I went back and revisited “Eraserhead” for the first time in 40 years. It would become a cult hit during the late 70’s-80’s. There was nothing like it at the time, with a Buñuel level of slow-paced uncomfortable surrealism, and a story that can’t easily be described. As such, it tends to be shoehorned into the genre of horror, which, on a certain level, is fair, but it is so much more. It will be a slog for the short attention-span set, but worth every unsettling moment. Starring Jack Nance, one of Lynch’s personal ensemble favorites. ~Sarge
FLOW. Apple TV, PrimeTV. Movie (7.9 IMDb) “Flow” is a an amazing journey – animated with a small crew on open-source software, it is a personal exploration by animals in the wake of a global flood. A cat is joined by a capybara, a bird, a lemur, and a dog, as they explore the flooded world together on a boat. No dialogue, but actual animal voices in the soundtrack. A refreshing new animaed film, without the glossy signature stylings of Pixar or Dreamworks. We need more of this. Latvian, but it translates well. ~Sarge
STAR WARS: SKELETON CREW. Disney+ series (7.2 IMDb) It’s refreshing when a big franchise realizes they’ve created a universe big enough to tell other stories (look at Star Trek Lower Decks – a successful animated comedy entrenched deeply in the Star Trek Universe), and that’s what Skeleton Crew does for Star Wars. A quartet of children, chafing at the bureaucratic cloister of their homeworld, stumble on a crashed spaceship and find themselves launched into the rough and tumble Star Wars Universe. Using a rough “Treasure Island” plotline, there’s space piracy aplenty: Jude Law’s character is referred to as Cap’n Silvo (nod to Long John Silver from Treasure Island) and the ship’s yarr-voiced droid is SM-33 (Smee was Captain Hook’s first mate in Peter Pan). Good for adults and children (though not TOO young – plenty of life-taking and intense scenes). ~Sarge
NIGHTBITCH. Hulu movie (5.6 IMDb) This film is ideal for husbands and fathers, capturing the mix of profound and bullshit (and profound again) moments in a woman’s journey from being a successful artist to new motherhood. What begins as a seemingly supernatural plot evolves into a raw, magical realist exploration of the chaos and sacrifice of motherhood and identity. It’s a subjective, visceral experience, navigating the emotional and (literal) physical mess of this transformative stage. ~Sarge
SMALL THINGS LIKE THESE. PrimeTV. (6.9 IMDb) A quietly ponderous Christmas tale set in a small town in Ireland in 1985 (swear to god it feels more like the 1940s…). Cillian Murphy plays a loving father and quietly likable coal delivery man, who comes into conflict with the steely “kind” Mother Superior (Emily Watson) of the local school and “Magdelene Laundry” for fallen girls. A bit of a slow walk, and as heartening as it could be, given the Laundries wouldn’t be eliminated till the mid 1990s. Excellent performances all around, particularlly given how little dialogue there was. ~Sarge

February 24, 2025

The photo is a clue to where I’ve been, missing for the past three weeks. Down Under, where it is hot and humid at this time of year, my favorite weather. The view is from one of the commuter ferries that connect the many Sydney Harbor waterfront locations, in this case Manly and Circular Quay. We were headed to the Opera House for a Brahms and Beethoven concert with the Australian Chamber Orchestra.
Today, the Opera House is an immediately recognizable, iconic structure that is world-renowned. However, I remember the controversy, when its design by the Danish architect Jorn Utzon won first place in the open competition and his inspirational concept then faced the formidable challenge of implementation. The state government eventually took over the project, changed architects and funded its ever-increasing cost with an Opera House Lottery. When skeptics suggested that most Aussies prefer horse-racing and rugby to opera, the Dairy Farmers Collective of New South Wales generously offered to hold their annual conference in the new structure. Today, the Opera House seems to be doing fine without the dairy farmers’ support.
After the concert we walked to the Rocks area and found an old pub, the Glenmore Hotel, for dinner. The Rocks area is now a popular food destination that in the early 1970’s faced demolition to make way for new residential high rises. A familiar story for Santa Cruz, a small group of neighbors organized to preserve the old historic buildings that housed mainly low-income residents. Unfamiliar for Santa Cruz, they were joined by the Builders Labourers’ Federation with their green bans, which became a powerful force against development projects harmful to the built and natural environment. They saved the Rocks area and fifty years later, despite gentrification, locals and visitors alike would heartily agree it was well worth saving.

In the spirit of it’s a small world, I was chatting with the two bartenders in the pub bar as they prepared our drinks. I’m never asked where I’m from since I pass as local, however sometimes I feel the need to explain that I live in Santa Cruz, CA as I stare too long at the money or try to figure out how to pay on the bus and train. So, the bartenders were told I live in Santa Cruz. To my surprise, they knew about the damage to the end of the Wharf, which they correctly called a pier but incorrectly believed, from the media, that the whole structure had collapsed. I set them straight on that and added that they were talking with the prime agitator to save the Wharf from gentrification. They liked that.
There’s a lot to like about Sydney and the coast north and south of it. Trees dominate, even close to the city. Great swathes of canopy stretching for miles with the houses tucked beneath them. Very cooling. Very nice visually. Birds are raucous, from an earlier evolutionary time. I grew up on the coast twenty miles north of Sydney, in a small beach town that like Santa Cruz has shifted from working class with cheap housing to management/investor class with expensive housing. Yet that headland looks the same as it did decades ago, except the Norfolk Island pines are much taller. The houses look the same and have not been bulldozed for infill and high rise….at least not yet. Only their value, an artificial concept has been manipulated to rise.
In the photo below you can see that beach and headland which was home until I moved into the city to go to Sydney University and lived with others in an old run-down townhouse. That old townhouse is now gentrified in a gentrified neighborhood and worth a high price, although not demolished. Speculation in housing causing prices to rise is a global phenomenon.
A few nice things about the Sydney area and probably Australia in general. Tipping is not expected nor given, except in very expensive restaurants. Sales tax is included in the price, so you pay what the dish cost and nothing more. It sure makes splitting the cost of a group dinner much easier! I was told that a barista, working full-time could earn $70 grand a year. Not enough to pay rent without sharing but not too bad either. Minimum wage is around $25 an hour. Most earn well above the minimum wage, especially tradies who are among the well-off.
There are many things each country could learn from the other. I saw new single-family houses under construction with steel framing. That seemed a good idea in any fire-prone area, especially if the rest of the house is brick veneer, not wood. To make that construction choice financially feasible, it helps that Australia produces all its own steel. On the other hand, Sydney could follow-our lead and institute smog checks. Despite most cars being new models, I could smell the exhaust even if there was no noticeable smog in the air.
I flew back yesterday and now it’s time to buckle down and tackle the issues here at home. My jaw dropped at first sight today of the slab of high-rise construction which I guess is Pacific Station North. And that is minor compared to the radical transformation contained in the Downtown Extension Project, should it be approved. Get ready, get involved, get organized! It’s time for a new green ban effort in the spirit of the Builders Labourers Federation. It’s discouraging here that the unions have narrowed their sights to a paycheck rather than broadening their sights to see what else is worth preserving. If shown what will be lost, maybe some will care.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |

Last Friday, I attended an excellent presentation at UCSC by Dr. ivano Aiello, a scientist at Moss Landing Marine Lab, explaining his work to sample Slough soils for heavy metals following the Vistra Battery Fire that began on January 16 and burned for days…only to recently be rekindled. Here are the main points to note:
- His team has been sampling soils in that area for about 10 years, establishing a good baseline of pre-fire metal levels.
- His team visited the sampling sites immediately upon being allowed back into the area, finding large chunks of burnt materials on the ground (which they treated as hazardous material).
- His team only scraped off the top 1-2mm thickness of soil surface and used in-field x-ray technology to get readings, but also took samples back to the lab to dry and test via spectrophotometry (“the gold standard” of analyzing materials).
- The levels of nickel, manganese and cobalt were very high and showed a linear correlation with respect to the fire location. Highest levels were found 2-3 miles away from the fire.
- The EPA sampled at least 1″ cores of soil, thereby likely diluting the levels of metals that were on the soil surface.
- The EPA sample sites were all on the upwind side of the fire, except one site in the Hester Slough sampling area that Dr. Aiello’s staff recommended the EPA sample.
- The single EPA site recommended by Dr. Aiello’s staff did show high levels of Nickel, Cobalt, Manganese and Lithium, but the EPA did no further sampling in that area.
- The other EPA sample sites all showed low levels of the metals, so the evacuation order was lifted.
- Dr. Aiello’s team found clear evidence of nickel, manganese, and cobalt attached to nanoparticles in the soils and on plant surfaces examined under an electron microscope,. and the proportion of the metals matched the composition of Vistra’s lithium ion batteries that burned.
- The “Never Again Moss Landing” citizen science work that collected 124 surface swipe samples from the broad area correlated with Dr. Aiello’s “bulls-eye” test areas showing very high levels of nickel, manganese and cobalt.
One student asked if Vistra will have to clean up the contamination? This is not being discussed, said Dr. Aiello. He drew an picture of an oil tank and a leak of a known amount. “What is the difference between an oil spill and this battery fire? Why isn’t anyone talking about remediation?” he asked. Based on his testing results and the area of the slough his team sampled, he calculates 6,369 pounds of nickel, cobalt and manganese were deposited over 154km2 (almost 60 square miles). Further extrapolating, estimating the metals released from the 70% burned Moss 300 facility, over 2.1 million pounds of heavy metal went up in the smoke, with heaviest deposits 3-5 miles west of the fire.
His team has continued to samples every two days. Dr. Peter Weiss is working on sampling water areas. About 20 scientists are working on studying the impacts to micro-invertebrates and plants…how will this disaster affect the food web? There is very little in the literature about such an issue….just one battery fire in Illinois, but that only evaluated HF gas, not heavy metals. Interestingly, he has seen that core soil samples show an increase in the metals at depths that correlate with the 2021 Moss Landing Battery Fire.
So, one must ask….why are Monterey and Santa Cruz County officials so quiet…and Vistra and the CPUC even more so???
Please contact your County Supervisor and demand a town hall meeting. Call 831-454-2200, and/or locate and email your supervisor
COULD PHYTO-MINING FIELDS CONTAMINATED BY MOSS LANDING VISTRA FIRE HELP REGAIN GOOD FARMLAND?
With the Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire flaring up AGAIN this week, one has to wonder about the impacts to local farm land, and waterways. No information has yet to become public from Monterey County or Santa Cruz County testing. No Supervisors in Santa Cruz County have held any town hall meetings to discuss the problems with the people, and the February 25 Board of Supervisor agenda has NOTHING about the County’s response to the disaster.
Have you asked the produce manager where you do your shopping if the items for sale were grown in the areas where the Moss Landing Battery Fire smoke plume travelled? I have…they don’t know.
Extreme nickel hyperaccumulation in the vascular tracts of the tree Phyllanthus balgooyi from Borneo
SUPPORT AB 303 FOR LOCAL CONTROL OVER BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM PROJECTS
In response to the horrible Vistra Battery Fire, District 30 Assemblymember Dawn Addis introduced AB 303 to reverse the power grab of AB 205 that currently allows developers to petition the California Energy Commission for an Opt-In certificate and begin operations, thereby by-passing the local jurisdictions and the people affected.
HAS THE CEC APPROVED ANY OPT-IN PROJECTS FOR BESS?
Here is something to think about, but not relax…
A cautionary note is that the CEC has yet to approve any opt-in projects. Developers in the CEC’s permitting queue under the opt-in program have also described the process as slow and overly conservative. State law prohibits the CEC from approving projects through the opt-in process unless they are determined to be consistent with local regulations, codes, and ordinances unless certain (and potentially difficult) findings are made. To date, the CEC has demonstrated little appetite to override inconsistent local prohibitions or restrictions on battery energy storage development. Projects that cannot demonstrate consistency with all otherwise applicable local or state regulations may face an uphill battle, making it all the more important that jurisdictions considering new regulations do not prohibit future battery energy storage projects.
Given the importance of battery storage to grid resiliency and integration of renewable energy, the California Legislature may be open to changes in state law to make permitting energy storage projects easier. Legislative amendments under consideration include:
- Amendment of the Warren Alquist Act to mandate less stringent findings for CEC override of inconsistency with otherwise applicable laws.
- Streamlined approval for qualifying battery energy storage projects along the lines of AB 1236 (Chiu, 2015) and AB 970 (McCarty, 2021) addressing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. These existing streamlining provisions mandate that local jurisdictions adopt expedited, streamlined permitting processes for EV charging stations via a ministerial, administrative review process that is exempt from CEQA and is limited to health and safety review. A similar mandate could be approved for qualifying battery energy storage projects.
- Mandated streamlined permitting of storage projects through only limited CEQA review such as through some kind of tiered checklist approach from an already certified EIR.
Los Angeles County, after approving what it described as the last battery energy storage project under its current regulations, announced it received grant funding and has hired a consultant to begin environmental review to adopt new zoning regulations specific for battery energy storage. Like Alameda County, San Diego County declined to adopt a moratorium on battery storage projects and recently declined to adopt inflexible new policies to guide best practices for regulating battery energy storage, instead allowing the Fire Chief to implement flexible requirements on a case-by-case basis until the state fire code is updated next year.
Finally, as fire safety concerns associated with lithium-ion technology batteries continue to be addressed, permitting hurdles for battery storage projects should ease. An update to the California Fire Code to address electrical energy storage systems is anticipated in July 2025 (with a draft to fire departments in May 2025). When final, the updated Fire Code will be effective on January 1, 2026.
As noted above, several jurisdictions are willing to approve this key new technology on a case-by-case basis and defer adoption of jurisdiction-specific zoning restrictions until the statewide Fire Code is updated.
DEMAND SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ADOPT AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AND MORATORIUM ON LITHIUM BATTERY STORAGE
As a result of the Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire disaster, several Counties in California have enacted an Urgency Ordinance to implement a temporary moratorium on BESS projects. They have also acted to convene a Technical Advisory Group to assist with crafting a BESS Ordinance that is protective of their residents and the environment.
Santa Cruz County also needs to take this action. Please speak up about this matter on the February 25, 2025 Board meeting and demand for action.
City to write emergency BESS ordinance
Moss Landing fire leads to emergency regulations
Solano County also implemented a moratorium on front of the meter battery energy storage systems and convened a Technical Advisory Group:
On January 23, 2024, Solano County enacted a two-year moratorium on the approval of front-of-the-meter battery energy storage systems to allow planning staff time to develop land use standards that ensure public safety, health, and welfare. The Planning Services Division is engaging stakeholders and the general public for input and guidance in this process. Please attend an upcoming Public Workshop or submit comments or questions to energystorage@solanocounty.com
About the Technical Working Group
The Technical Working Group consisting of stakeholders from various sectors, meets monthly to advise on the ordinance development.
Solano County – Energy Storage
LOW IMPACT CAMPING IS BACK AGAIN!
The crazy idea to let camping (and campfires!) spring up in the high-fire risk unincorporated areas is back again. Due to public outcry, this disappeared last year…but thanks to Assemblyman Ward, it is bubbling again.
AB 518, as introduced, Ward. Low-impact camping areas. Existing law, the Special Occupancy Parks Act, establishes requirements for the construction, maintenance, occupancy, use, and design of special occupancy parks. Existing law defines “special occupancy park” to mean a recreational vehicle park, temporary recreational vehicle park, incidental camping area, or tent camp. This bill would specify that, for purposes of that act, a special occupancy park does not include a low-impact camping area, as specified, that is located in a county that has enacted an ordinance, as specified, authorizing low-impact camping. The bill would define a “low-impact camping area” to mean any area of private property that provides for the transient occupancy rental of a temporary sleeping accommodation, as defined, for recreational purposes that is not a commercial lodging facility and meets specified requirements. The bill would require the county in which the low-impact camping area is located to enforce some of those requirements, relating to waste disposal and quiet hours, as specified. The bill would require that a county that has authorized low-impact camping to take specified actions, including, among others, to establish a registry of low-impact camping areas, as specified.
Consent agenda item 26 on the Feb. 25 Board of Supervisor meeting consent agenda states:
26. Direct the Chair to send a letter to the legislative sponsor opposing the passage of Assembly Bill 518, Low-Impact Camping, and direct the Chair to share the letter with our state legislators and relevant legislative committees (Board of Supervisors – Third District)
Thank you, Supervisor Cummings! Call and write to support the Board’s action.
DOWNTOWN EXPANSION OR EXPLOSION?
The Santa Cruz City Council approved amendments to the Downtown Plan (formerly Downtown Recovery Plan [DRP]) in November 2017. The DRP was originally adopted in 1991 to guide reconstruction of the downtown after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake that destroyed significant portions of the downtown area. The intent of the DRP was to establish policies, development standards and guidelines to direct the recovery process toward the rebuilding after the earthquake. The DRP was adopted as a specific plan (pursuant to California Government Code requirements) to implement policies in the downtown area (PAGE 12)
Implementation of the project would facilitate additional development as a result of various circulation, land use, and infrastructure revisions. For purposes of environmental review, the project area is conservatively anticipated to accommodate: ? Future Development: Up to 1,800 housing units and 60,000 square feet (sf) of gross commercial area. Redevelopment would replace approximately 66 dwelling units and 76,770 gross sf. of commercial uses. ? New Arena: Construction of a new approximately 180,000 sf permanent sports and entertainment arena for the Santa Cruz Warriors basketball team. The arena would contain a main event court with spectator seating for approximately 3,200 seats for basketball, and approximately 4,000 seats for concerts, performances, etc. Additional facilities would include a practice facility consisting of an additional court and training spaces, and supporting concession, retail and administrative uses. This would replace the existing 35,000 sf. temporary arena with 2,475 fixed seats for basketball and 3,100 fixed and temporary seating for other entertainment events. ? Building Height: No new development shall exceed the base heights of 85 feet, 70 feet, or 50 feet except as the result of compliance with any density bonus program or provision of state or local law (as discussed below). Building heights adjacent to Beach Hill hillside shall be limited to no more than 70 feet to provide a transition in height adjacent to the Beach Hill neighborhood. Additional height is permitted through application of a State Density Bonus, the City’s proposed Downtown Density Bonus, or other local density bonus provision. (page 13)
For reference, the Santa Cruz Civic Auditorium has a 2,000 seat capacity.
Civic Auditorium Specifications
Community Spaces: Existing and planned public streets and the Santa Cruz Riverwalk are envisioned to be designed to accommodate public gatherings and events such as pre- and post-arena events, holidays events and festivals, and informal gatherings.
(page 14)
SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS:
CUL-1 (DPA EIR Impact 4.4-2): Historical Resources. Future development accommodated by the proposed plan amendments could result in impacts to historical resources (CUL-a) due to alteration or modification of historical buildings.
Essentially….the buildings will be documented before the bulldozers arrive.
Significant impacts that can be mitigated:
AQ/GHG-3: Exposure of Sensitive Receptors. Future development and growth accommodated by the project would potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations during short-term construction but not during long- term operations (AIR-c)
BIO-3 (DPA EIR Impact 4.3-3): Indirect Impacts to Nesting Birds. Future development as a result of the project could result in disturbance to nesting birds if any are present in the vicinity of construction sites along the San Lorenzo River (BIO-d)
MM CUL-3.1 Cultural Sensitivity Training and Tribal Monitoring Require Native American construction monitoring of future development projects within the project area to include cultural sensitivity training for construction workers and tribal monitoring during ground disturbing construction.
2.3.3 Less-Than-Significant Impacts (page 25-26)
The following impacts were found to be less-than-significant. Mitigation measures are not required.
Page 2-6 | Summary
Draft Subsequent EIR
January 2025
- AES-1: Scenic Views
- AES-3: Visual Character of the Surrounding Area
- AES-4: Introduction of Light and Glare
- AQ/GHG-2: Criteria Pollutant Emissions
- AQ/GHG-3: Exposure of Sensitive Receptors
- AQ/GHG-4: Objectionable Odors
- BIO-1a (DPA EIR Impact 4.3-2): Impacts to Sensitive Riparian Habitat
- BIO-1b (DPA EIR Impact 4.3-1): Indirect Impacts to Special Status Species and Riparian and Aquatic Habitat
- BIO-2 (DPA EIR Impact 4.3-2): Indirect Impacts to Birds
- BIO-3 (DPA EIR Impact 4.3-3): Indirect Impacts to Nesting Birds
- CUL-1 (DPA EIR Impact 4.4-2): Historical Resources
- CUL-2 (DPA EIR Impact 4.4-1): Archaeological Resources
- CUL-3 (DPA Impact 4.4.-1): Tribal Cultural Resources
- HYDRO-1: Stormwater Drainage
- HYDRO-2: Water Quality
- HYDRO-3: Flood Hazards
- NOI-1: Permanent and Temporary Noise Increases
- NOI-2: Excessive Groundborne Vibration
- POP-1: Inducement of Substantial Population Growth
- POP-2: Displacement of People or Housing
- Pub-1a (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-1a): Fire Protection
- PUB-1b (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-1b): Police Protection
- PUB-1c (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-1c): Schools
- PUB-1d (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-1d): Parks
- PUB-2 (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-2): Parks and Recreation
- T-1: Conflict with Circulation Plan, Policy, or Ordinance
- T-2: Conflict with VMT Thresholds
- T-3: Design-Safety and Emergency Access
- UTIL-1 (DPA EIR Impact 4.8-1): Water Supply
- UTIL-2 (DPA EIR Impact 4.8-2): Wastewater Treatment
- UTL-3 (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-3): Solid Waste Generation
- UTL-4: Solid Waste Generation
- UTL-5 (DPA EIR Impact 4.6-4): Energy Use
2.3.4 Impacts Not Found to be Significant
The EIR found no impacts for the following:
- AES-1 (DPA EIR Impact 4.1-1): Scenic Views
- AES-2 (DPA EIR Impact 4.1-2): Scenic Resources
- AQ/GHG-1 (DPA EIR No Impact): Conflict with the AQMP
- BIO-5: Conflicts with Local Ordinances
- LU-1: Physically Divide and Established Community
- LU-2 (DPA EIR Impact 4.9-1): Conflicts with Policies and Regulations
(page 49)
Development Bonus Options
As described in Chapter 4 of the Downtown Plan (as amended), the Downtown Density Bonus
consists of two options for taking a development bonus:
Option A: A qualifying proposal would be allowed up to 75% additional FAR on top of the base
FAR of 3.5, and up to an additional 75% in height not to exceed 145 feet if the project agrees to
go through a discretionary process that includes review by an Architectural Review Committee
for recommendations to support high quality design and materials as well as a Planning
Commission Subcommittee to review materials at the Building Permit stage.
Option B: A qualifying project would be allowed a waiver of the maximum FAR if the project
conforms to the height limits set by the Downtown Plan (50, 70, 85 feet), and agrees to go
through a discretionary process that includes review by an Architectural Review Committee for
recommendations to support high quality design and materials as well as a Planning
Commission Subcommittee to review materials at the Building Permit stage.
(page 50):
Qualification Options
Development projects will be able to qualify for a Downtown Density Bonus in any of the following three ways:
Downtown Plan Expansion City of Santa Cruz
Page 3-16 | Project Description
Draft Subsequent EIR
January 2025
1) On-Site: Provide BMR units in an integrated market rate and BMR development project that meet both of the following criteria:
a) A minimum of 13.4% of the total units in the final project (density bonus plan) would be available to low-income households and
b) An additional 8% of the total units in the final project (density bonus plan) would be available to moderate-income households making up to 110% of AMI. The number of BMR units would represent 21.4% of the total units in the project.
2) Off-Site: Provide BMR units at an off-site project with a minimum number of bedrooms in BMR units equivalent to 26.7% of the total bedrooms in the Downtown Density Bonus proposal and targeting households with incomes up to 80% of AMI.
a) The site with the BMR units must be located either:
i) within a half mile of the South of Laurel project area, or
ii) within the boundaries of the expanded Downtown Plan, or
iii) within the Coastal Zone. (see Maps, attached).
b) The off-site project must demonstrate the following:
i) Land control and an ability to achieve the required number of bedrooms in BMR units, and submission of building permit applications prior to building permit issuance for the market rate project, and
ii) That the project with the requisite BMR units begins construction before a certificate of occupancy is issued to the market-rate project. If that is not feasible, the applicant shall either identify units on site with the market rate project that can be used for BMR housing or post a bond in the amount of the in-lieu fee that would otherwise have been required to qualify for the Downtown Density Bonus.
3) In-Lieu: Pay a fee toward the City’s affordable housing trust fund at a rate of $60 per square foot of housing units in the Downtown Density Bonus proposal.
a) The City is required to spend all of these funds on development and preservation projects serving lower-income households and a minimum of 50% of these funds must be spent inside the Coastal Zone.
Is it all about the ARENA? (page 51)
Construction of a new approximately 180,000 sf. sports and entertainment arena with a capacity of approximately 3,200 fixed seats for basketball, and approximately 4,000 fixed and temporary seating for other entertainment events such as musical concerts. Ancillary uses include a secondary practice court, locker/team support facilities, food service/merchandising, and administrative support services. This would replace the existing 35,000 sf. temporary arena with 2,475 fixed seats and 3,100 fixed and temporary seating for other entertainment events. The number of annual events is estimated (by the Santa Cruz Warriors) to be:
Number of Attendees Annual Events
2,500+ 60 (30 Warriors, 30 concerts/entertainment)
1,000-2,499 40 (20 Symphony, 20 concerts/entertainment)
150-1,000 50 (35 UC Santa Cruz sporting events, 15 other)
<150 Attendees 25
Please make sure you send in your comments by Feb. 21, 5pm:
Comments on the DEIR must be submitted in writing or via email to Sarah Neuse by 5pm Friday, February 21, 2025.Public Review Period: January 8, 2025 through February 21, 2025.
Submit Comments to: Sarah Neuse, Senior Planner, via email: sneuse@santacruzca.gov
OR via US Mail:
City of Santa Cruz
Planning and Community Development Department
Advance Planning Division
809 Center Street, Rm 101
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Santa Cruz Downtown Plan Expansion
Draft Subsequent EIR
APPLY NOW FOR ADVISORY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE THAT WILL DECIDE HOW TO SPEND $7.5 MILLION MEASURE Q MONEY ANNUALLY
On January 28, the County Board of Supervisors discussed at length how they might select the five appointees for the Measure Q Water, Wildfire and Wlldlife parcel tax money Advisory Committee. After receiving a report by Deputy CAO Nicole Coburn, OR3 Director Dave Reid, and County Parks Director Jeff Gaffney, the Board decided to call for applications from the public to be submitted by March 11, with final selection by March 25.
You can listen here (Item #10)
I encourage you to apply! Here is the application
I think the best question anyone asked was by Jean Brocklebank, “Will these Advisory Committee meetings be open to the public?” No one answered her excellent question. Ask your Supervisor and let me know if they answer.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. SEND A LETTER IN SUPPORT OF AB 303 TO STATE LEGISLATORS. ASK FOR A COUNTY URGENCY ORDINANCE AND MORATORIUM ON LITHIUM BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS (BESS).
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.
Cheers,
Becky
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |

I have long labored in this column to outline the frustrating situation all biologists feel in this world as our interests are destroyed by increasingly autocratic tendencies of the government. And no, I have never been partisan about this situation. Both parties are to blame in creating the country we find ourselves in right now, facing a perilous future where generations will not only not be able to enjoy the standards of living we do today but will suffer to keep a standard of living with any comfort at all.
I am not surprised, however, to find many people freaking out about a government bent on destroying social programs. After all, many voters have long been fed a thin gruel diet of small social program ‘wins,’ so that they will overlook that their future is being stolen by the 1% who are paying for both political parties, allowing them to extract wealth and power by destroying Life on Earth.
Tinkering Around the Edges
I was recently listening to the Bay Area’s own brilliant journalist Kara Swisher interviewing Rahm Emanuel, a person who seems like a reliable voice of mainstream Democratic politics. Ms. Swisher pressed Mr. Emanuel on what the Dems should do at this juncture, and his responses were along the lines of ‘messaging the voters’…’adopting a new platform or two’…etc. There was zero reflection about the way politics is using people to enrich the 1% while destroying the environment and no reflection on how to engage and involve citizens in their own governance.
All Politics Is Local
National government tactics are repeated here in California and all around the Monterey Bay. If you think that the current use of Executive Orders is unusual, check out the far-reaching litany of executive orders from California’s governor, who is proud to reduce environmental protections as part of these moves, none of which is primarily directed at environmental conservation.
In Santa Cruz, I see politicians and government staff baselessly blaming and attacking people who are trying to protect the environment, including other columnists who write for Bratton Online. These local politicians and staff have long supported the roughshod environmental analysis of many projects before them as long as the project serves some social good and/or is economically attractive. For instance, many pointed out the inadequacy of the Regional Transportation Commission’s analysis on the estimated numbers of tourists attracted by the new North Coast Rail Trail, but politicians didn’t care enough to direct better work. I have witnessed this same political hunger for other projects that badly impact the environment at Arana Gulch (recreational development), Pogonip (recreation and agricultural developments), Glenwood (housing and school development), Santa’s Village (housing development), Seascape (housing development), Wilder Ranch (recreational development), UCSC (housing development), Terrace Point (educational buildings), Nisene Marks (recreational development), Cotoni Coast Dairies (tourism development), and Neary Lagoon (transportation development).
Up Close and Personal
I have had occasion to be privy to the autocratic decision making that creates the results where the environment, and conservationists, end up losing and here’s how it goes. First, someone who wants to develop and negatively impact nature works with an expert at navigating the review process so that they get just what they want. Second, once they have a plan for meeting regulatory demands (aka “jumping through the hoops”), they meet with one or two of the politicians whose vote they’ll need. Then, they make a deal of some sort to guarantee the votes. Then, the person proposing negatively impacting the environment meets with the bureaucrats who also get calls from the politician, and then they, too, make a deal. Finally, after everyone’s approval to the plans and approach, the project proponent goes through the motions of a public process, taking and ignoring input and moving forward with what they wanted to do in the first place. When pressed about why not do a more authentic public process, anyone that was part of those deals will tell you, “why bother?”…”it just makes more trouble”…”we know best and came up with the best solution.”
Do those trends sound familiar at a national level right now? We have far more potential to affect political change closer to home than further away.
Why Aren’t the Dems Fighting?
Some people who are concerned about the Administration’s actions nowadays ask ‘why aren’t the Democrats fighting?’ The answer is that everyone in power is in awe of what they, too, might get away with one day. Plus, some of what is being highlighted as shocking power grabbing is the same stuff that all politicians have been doing for some time now, but perhaps less bombastically.
During the first round of this administration, there was a surprising assertion that we were suddenly going to war with Iran, a country with about the same number of military as the USA. NPR picked one of their preferred retired generals to interview about the wisdom of this decision and that general said that he could not condone the action because ‘Americans have not been prepared for this war.’ That is, the military demands that politicians prepare citizens for war, presumably so that the funding will keep flowing to support the war effort once it is started.
I believe it has become equally normalized that it is the politicians’ job, in working for their biggest donors, to keep citizens constantly prepared for environmental degradation. And, it is my experience that the staff people of governmental agencies look at legally mandated disclosure and environmental review interactions with citizens as a burden and a waste with no chance of improving the agency’s work and better protecting the environment.
Is It Any Surprise?
Given what I’ve just outlined, I am not surprised by what I’m witnessing at a national level. As a nation, we have prepared ourselves well for this situation to work out excellently for the 1%. I am not happy that many more people get to experience the exasperation that conservationists have been feeling for decades, but so it goes. Perhaps this is the best chance we have had to start working together.
How can we organize an alternative in local politics where the people are prepared for a Monterey Bay that is protected by its citizens for the next 1,000 years? The answer lies with more permanence of residency, sustainable and vibrant economies, and removal of any environmental impacts of growth, but those things are at odds with our current societal structure. And yet, these things (and more) are sorely needed. If we can make it work here, the goodness will spread. It starts with developing leadership and engaging many more people. You’re right there with us, right now.
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |

Monday, February 24, 2025

In my blog posting last Saturday, I warned us all not to stipulate to having “lost” our system of democratic self-government, just because we have a president who is clearly trying to convince us all that our system of self-government is already “gone.”
Citing to Joni Mitchell’s great song, “Big Yellow Taxi,”I pointed out that if we want to avoid the loss of our system of self-government, it is vital that we don’t stipulate to claims that we have already lost it. It is vital that we continue to act upon the premise that “we, the people,” are actually in charge of what the government does, and what the government is entitled to do. If we lose our faith that this is true, we are stipulating to claims that we should not accept – and that we don’t have to accept.
That this kind of “Scaredy Cat” compliance is a real danger can be found in an article printed in The New York Times on Monday, February 17th, “Venting at Democrats and Fearing Trump, Liberal Donors Pull Back Cash,” The Times reported as follows (emphasis added):
While Mr. Trump has not taken action against any liberal groups or lawmakers, Democrats worry his frequent threats of retribution during the campaign have led to a chilling effect on the charitable foundations and nonprofit advocacy groups that have long been pillars of the country’s civil society.
Jeff Skoll, a Silicon Valley billionaire and a longtime friend of Elon Musk’s, said there was “an awful lot of pressure” to side with Mr. Trump.
This month, Mr. Skoll, who has donated tens of millions to Democratic candidates and causes in recent years but said he did not vote in the 2024 presidential election, posted a photo on social media of himself standing with Mr. Trump backstage at the inauguration. On Friday, he had breakfast in Palm Beach, Fla., with Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader, where they discussed the prospect of Mr. Schumer’s using Mr. Skoll to back-channel ideas to the president….
In an interview, Mr. Skoll acknowledged his unique position, saying he had heard from many others who were frightened to fund opposition to the administration.
“There are people who were absolutely against Trump, never Trumpers, who fear that they’ll be retaliated against and they’ll have to leave the country,” Mr. Skoll said. “Folks who wish to oppose him — it may take some time before they gather up the courage.“
When the billionaires start being afraid, that’s a sign of real trouble. Let’s not get infected ourselves!
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |

A BRIONI TUTU, GOLDEN AGED EGGS, 400 YEARS, ANOTHER DIRTY WORD
It appears that Donald and Elon, along with the Project 2025 mob, have resurrected ‘The New Pledge’ which ran in Matt Groening’s Life in Hell comic strip back on December 16, 1994. The pledge reads: “I pledge allegiance to and wrap myself in the flag of the United States Against Anything Un-American, and to the Republicans for which it stands, two nations, under Jesus, rich against poor with curtailed liberty and justice for all, except for Blacks, homosexuals, women who want abortions, Communists, welfare queens, tree huggers, feminazis, illegal immigrants, children of illegal immigrants, and you if you don’t watch your step.” Our current government makeup didn’t miss a beat in the intervening thirty years, and we can bet with assurance that they have a New Constitution waiting in the wings.
Gregory E. Sterling, dean of the Yale Divinity School, in an article on the MSNBC website says that the US Agency for International Development being cast into the “wood chipper” by Musk is a sign that a core Christian value of caring for others “is under threat.” Distressing to Sterling is the alarming and tacit support of many, including Trump’s evangelical horde, who proclaim the Gospels as their guide, and by doing so “have sold their souls in a Faustian deal for political power.” Cited is an NBC News exit poll in the presidential election with the upshot that 63% of voters in the “Protestant or other Christians” demographic supported the new administration — and if restricted to Whites, the number climbs to 72%. In the Catholic fold, 59% supported Trump, with 63% of White Catholics voting for the convicted felon. But — yikes! — 82% of White evangelicals went for King Donald. The Dean is concerned that many will associate Christianity with the worrisome programs of the MAGA administration, and that the “younger generation will either come to dismiss Christianity as amoral or identify with it for its relationship to political power rather than its moral and spiritual principles” — neither of which he finds acceptable.
A colleague of Sterling’s, Phil Gorski, author of ‘The Flag and the Cross,’ an exploration of the rise of Christian nationalism, seconds the concern about Christianity becoming a “dirty word,” and, an acquaintance who is senior pastor of a large Manhattan church now describes himself as a “follower of Jesus Christ,” abandoning his descriptor as ‘Christian.’ Sterling closes his piece by saying that the “closure of USAID and the pulling of funds from other agencies and groups that care for the ‘hungry…thirsty…stranger…
During Trump’s 2016 campaign he sought the backing of the religious right, granting them unprecedented access to empower their agenda during his first term; therefore, they poured millions in contributions toward his 2024 campaign to reseat themselves in the White House to continue their oppressive agenda to strip away rights and freedoms, and to make it safe to “once again” to say, “Merry CHRISTmas!” The level of influence held by the religious right turned the Executive branch into a virtual policy-making arm of their movement in Trump’s first term, and with their continuing domination we see the appointment of lifetime federal judges from religious-right legal groups who will further dismantle church-state separation and undermine our freedoms. With Trump’s favoritism toward these groups, their appetites for even more power and control has brought an uptick in overt and aggressive Christian nationalism, a threat not only to freedom and core democratic values, but non-acceptance of religious pluralism. This movement is also more likely to support authoritarianism and political violence, while nurturing racial resentment and hostility toward immigrants in their so-called “biblical worldview.” Their belief that Trump has been anointed by God to lead the country once again was recently mirrored by Speaker of the House Mike Johnson — genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!
Raymond De Vries who calls himself “a sad observer of political decline” posts on Quora in response to a questioner who asked, “How can you call yourself Christian and not support our most Christian president yet, Donald J. Trump?” His answer: “You seem to think a Christian is someone who says the homeless ‘will be arrested, but they will be given the option to accept treatment and services if they’re willing to be rehabilitated.’ And, it’s just fine for Christians to praise war-waging invaders as ‘genius’ and ‘savvy’ and refer to the displaced and dead in the invaded country as ‘independent.’ Or skipping community services to play golf, and call military service members who gave their lives for their country, ‘suckers’ and ‘losers.’ And since when is it Christian for someone claiming to be a multi-billionaire to beg for the charity of wool-pulled-over-their-eyes sheeple who donate millions of dollars (or buy overpriced Bibles and other tchotchkes) to cover his legal defense costs against charges of rape, financial fraud and insurrection? And asking, ‘Why do I have to repent, to ask forgiveness if I’m not making mistakes?’ But methinks anyone who thinks Donald Trump is a Christian has been possessed by the devil….”
But we know that Trump likes the title, employing the tactics of a mob boss, as demonstrated in many of his proclamations and threats, one of the latest being against Ukraine president Zelensky after he criticized The Don for siding with Russia in the ongoing war. Ukraine has been particularly critical of the supposed ‘peace talks’ between only Russia and the US — no Ukrainians allowed, please. Trump calls Zelensky a “modestly successful comedian” who conned the US out of $350 billion to fight a “war that couldn’t be won, that never had to start, but a war that he, without the US and TRUMP, will never be able to settle.” He also whined that the US spent $200 billion more than European nations contributed as a guaranteed loan, while the US will get nothing back. In a peacetime scenario, Zelensky would have termed-out of office, and despite Trump’s calls for wartime elections due to a “4% approval rating,” the Ukrainians show support at around 60% with no calls for an election, though Zelensky has offered to step down “in the interest of peace if necessary.” Trump called the Ukrainian president a dictator who is responsible for starting the war — words straight from the Putin playbook. British satirical magazine, Private Eye, ran its latest cover with a poke at the Trump/Zelensky standoff. A photo of Trump and Zelensky walking side by side has word balloons added with Trump asking, “Guess what the deal is?” Zelensky replies, “I give in.” “Correct,” Trump agrees. Even the Rupert Murdoch Wall Street Journal’s editorial board called Trump’s criticism of Zelensky an “assault,” warning that his “seeming desperation for a peace deal could come at the expense of his own presidency.” The board wrote: “The only dictator in the war is Mr. Putin, who poisons exiled Russians on foreign soil and banishes opponents to Arctic prison camps.” And a punch to Trump’s gut: “Call us when he holds a free election.” Further, Trump’s attempt to turn the Ukrainians against Zelensky is likely to have the opposite effect, and they agreed with Zelenksy’s “retort to Trump which suggests he’s living in a ‘disinformation bubble.'” WSJ board sums it up with: “Ultimately, any deal that results in Ukraine’s surrender will be a blow to American power — the opposite of Mr. Trump’s promise to restore a golden age of US prestige and world calm.”
A couple of weeks back The Don was facing criticism and mockery on social platforms for calling the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts a “woke” venue, though he admitted he has never attended any events — only that he “got reports” and that “people said the shows were terrible, a disgrace.” Consequently, he announced some new board appointees after “reports” of drag performances, and expressing his desire to become board chair “to make sure it runs properly. We don’t need ‘woke’ at the center.” Social media sprung into action, calling his comments “MAGA movement in a nutshell.” GenXGuy posted, “He heard it from many people the shows were terrible…big strong men…with tears in their eyes…’sir, these shows are terrible. Only you can save the Kennedy Center.'” True to form, satirist Andy Borowitz of The Borowitz Report posted: “Donald J. Trump tightened his grip on the American arts scene on Monday by naming himself principal ballerina of the Kennedy Center Ballet. Announcing a purge of the company’s ballerinas, Trump declared on Truth Social, ‘I will soon be announcing a new roster of ballerinas, with an amazing ballerina, DONALD J. TRUMP.’ He said he was ‘disgusted’ to discover that all of the company’s current ballerinas were women, a state of affairs that he blamed on DEI. Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center has surprised millions of Americans, who previously thought that the worst thing that could happen to the Kennedy brand was JFK’s nephew strapping a dismembered whale’s head to his minivan.”
Of Trump’s intrusion into the arts, The Daily Beast website said, “Revenge, as the saying goes, is a dish best served cold and in Washington time always a moveable feast…When Donald Trump seized control of the performing arts venue, unseating David Rubinstein as chairman, it quickly became clear among the Democrat board members (and some Republicans) there was little they could do to prevent it. And so they will do what the true establishment does; they will bide their time…DC’s permanent elite believe Trump’s sudden, random interest in the center had little to do with content, and more to do with his own, more obvious, payback. The insiders didn’t accept him last time around and they won’t this, and it prickles under his skin like a rash that won’t go away. His own redress is to try to take away their toys. ‘He has kicked over a beehive,’ said one knowing person, ‘but he won’t know until it stings him in the ass.’ They will forgive the intrusion for now…but they won’t forget…even if the Kennedy Center morphs into the Trump Center overnight. ‘This isn’t the Deep State,’ said one insider. ‘This is Deep Society.’ However, if Trump thinks his coup is bloodless, at least for now, then he’d better look closer to home. Melania had apparently told friends she wanted to become more involved in the Kennedy Center and was already on the board as an honorary trustee along with other former first ladies Jill Biden, Michelle Obama, Laura Bush, and Hillary Clinton. Now her husband has stolen her thunder once again. She’d probably get a warmer welcome at the Women’s National Democratic Club.” Strike up the US Marine Corps band! Or how about Trump’s J6 Prison Choir? Never grow tired of those guys, do we?
Steve Schmidt couldn’t refrain from heralding the new Chairman Trump: “Donald Trump, chairman of the Kennedy Center, is a man with no taste and less integrity, who buried his first wife on a New Jersey golf course. Easily distracted and perpetually bored, Donald Trump has given away the powers of his presidency to Elon Musk, while using the prerogatives of his high office to launch meme coins and install himself as chairman of the Kennedy Center. Donald Trump may soon demand that his slow shuffle and jerky spasms to the songs of ‘The Village People’ tunes be called ballet. When this happens 49% of the country will wear leotards on their heads, and cheer for the most beautiful ballerina in the land — the one dressed like a schlub in an oversized Brioni suit, with a too-long tie made in China. It is in this moment that Trump will do for the arts what Tulsi Gabbard is going to do to the intelligence agencies, RFK is going to do to the public health agencies, Kash Patel is going to do to the FBI, and Pete Hegseth is going to do to the military.”
We all remember how Elon Musk flew to Germany to campaign for the ultra-right wing AfD party in the lead up to their national elections, and how he then flew back to DC to stand beside the Resolute desk and lord it over a seated Trump, with Elon’s son, X, wiping his boogers on the desk and telling Trump his time in the chair was about to end? Well, it happened again — this time in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity. According to Leigh Kimmins on The Daily Beast, Trump looked like he was hung out to dry by Musk and Hannity, as they ignored the president, or interrupted him in this high-profile sit-down take-down. Hannity’s softball questions in the Roosevelt Room in the White House briefly became a love-in, but further in it became apparent that the president was being shunted aside, with Musk portraying himself as a hero to save America in his indiscriminate machete-wielding attack on government departments. Trump attempted to chime in about Europe “taking advantage of us,” but bosom-buddy Musk shot him a look in order to keep up his own diatribe. Trump again tried to compliment Musk on his achievements, but was interrupted by Hannity who looked at Musk to ask if he was “trying to be president, as the media suggests.” Another Trump attempt to join in was interrupted by Hannity who wanted to talk to Musk about sending ships to Mars. Their chat rambled on, with Trump blasting left-leaning outlets, and feeding tired, classic lines to his voter base…gotta keep ’em happy, you know! After viewing the interview, Tom Nichols of The Atlantic wrote: “Like many Americans lately, I am seized with curiosity about who is actually running the government of the United States. But I am still not sure who’s in charge.” The official answer from the White House says Trump’s in charge, and that Musk isn’t even in charge of DOGE, or involved in the agency at all — only a “senior adviser to the president with no actual or formal authority to make government decisions himself.” Time to disarm Musk of his machete? Let’s ask Hannity!
Text for a much-needed bumper sticker: MUSK — THE MAN WHO SAVED CANCER! A bill that was up for a 2024 renewal of funding for the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Program was trimmed of this $190 million amount last year because Elon didn’t like the bipartisan effort under President Obama that established the program. The original bill, as presented by Republicans, included the renewal but Musk and former Republican Leader Eric Cantor drove forces that led to its being cut. Musk showed his cruelty by posting on X, photos of the two versions side by side, captioned “Yesterday’s bill vs today’s bill,” accompanied by a laughing emoji. Ultimately, the House rejected the new bill 174-235, with nearly 30 Republicans joining Democrats in voting against it. House Republican Leader Steve Scalise said the same bill will not be brought forward for a vote. Not discouraged by this failure, Musk and his DOGEs have hobbled a federal government facility that does critical research into Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. According to Greg Sargent of The New Republic, the “Trump-Musk cuts” have resulted in the firing of numerous top researchers at the National Institute of Health, “a prediction of big setbacks to fighting dementias.” “The Trump-Musk rationales for deep cuts to spending on medical research are an insultingly ridiculous farce,” Sargent alleges. “Republicans once lavished praise on this research. Trump and Musk are hobbling it. What will those Republicans say now?” Any suggestions, Hannity? How about we start a GoFundMe to buy Musk a seat on his first rocket to Mars — the first Earthling to set foot on the Red Planet — irresistible!
Stephen Miller, Trump’s White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, got some acerbic replies to his post on X directed at his one million followers, when he asked, “Are you enjoying America’s new Golden Age?” The critics seem to think Trump’s term number two is, so far, a case of all glitter and no real gold. Hunter Petro suggests, “Call it the ‘Golden Age’ because it takes a bag of gold bars to afford a dozen eggs,” and Ron Smith offers, “NO, President Musk is a terrible president.” Gojo18 posts a question, “Are we living in the same country?” Eleazar’s Virgins claims, “Yeah, now that USAID has been shuttered, pronouns banned, racists applauded, and water has been poured out of California’s reservoirs, my life is so much better.” Nicadispatch feels as many of us do by requesting, “Let me know when it starts.” Miller, whose title conceals the massive influence he actually commands with Trump and throughout the administration, is helping to drive a maximalist immigration enforcement agenda from which he obviously derives immense sadistic satisfaction. He spearheaded efforts to enact sweeping changes in presidential authority for the dismantling of the federal bureaucracy and to reduce or eliminate entire departments. Miller has worked on his plan for years — prior to his first gig with Trump’s first term — and has now had four years between terms to perfect his plan. He unapologetically pushes traditional boundaries to test the waters, and he avoids the limelight to avoid outshining the boss. In the effort to overwhelm the administration’s opponents, Miller worked to have in place for signatures, on Day One, the dozens of executive orders of which Trump made a spectacle as he signed. “Hello to the Golden Age of America and welcome back Donald J. Trump,” Miller said as he addressed the crowd at Capitol One Arena in DC on inauguration day. “It’s been four long years. It’s felt like 400 years.” On the other hand, it’s been four long weeks and it seems like 400!
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |


EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
March
“As I lay so sick on my bed, from Christmas till March, I was always praying for poor ole master. ‘Pears like I didn’t do nothing but pray for ole master. ‘Oh, Lord, convert ole master;’ ‘Oh, dear Lord, change dat man’s heart, and make him a Christian.'”
~Harriet Tubman
“It was one of those March days when the sun shines hot and the wind blows cold: when it is summer in the light, and winter in the shade.”
~Charles Dickens
“March is a month without mercy for rabid basketball fans. There is no such thing as a ‘gentleman gambler’ when the Big Dance rolls around. All sheep will be fleeced, all fools will be punished severely… There are no Rules when the deal goes down in the final weeks of March. Even your good friends will turn into monsters.”
~Hunter S. Thompson
“I am never at my best in the early morning, especially a cold morning in the Yorkshire spring with a piercing March wind sweeping down from the fells, finding its way inside my clothing, nipping at my nose and ears.”
~James Herriot
“The last time when I handed over information was in February or March 1949.”
~Klaus Fuchs

These kinds of things are why I love YouTube. I’m going all in on this lady’s quest to make 100 tiny paintings from February 23, 2025 to February 23, 2026. I’m so excited to make more art – for way too long I have been proving the theory that buying art supplies is a hobby in and of itself… Let me know if you will be joining the quest! Happy arting! |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
