September 6 – 12, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…about “brave and free”, letters to the editor concept, housing for people initiative. Greensite…on rendering rape invisible in Santa Cruz… Steinbruner…Big secret city land purcheses,make less garbage, B40 fire district, local opioid addiction, Aptos Village plot? Cabrillo name change.Hayes…a primer in conserving California’s coastal prairies. Patton…sign that petition!. Matlock…sanchismos, copyrights and rolling the dice. Eagan … Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…pick of the week: Standup! Quotes “Hawaii”

...

BEACH BOARDWALK PLUNGE. April 25, 1963. One of almost yearly changes the Boardwalk does to bring in more business. This plunge became their miniature golf course.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE September 4

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR CONCEPT. I decided even before starting BrattonOnline  that Bratton Online wouldn’t deal with “letters to the editor” weekly and that’s been the idea for the almost 20 years we’ve been online. When I ran Keith McHenry’s 4000 word “letter” last week I wanted to give readers a chance to see what Keith was really like. WE read his accomplishments with Bread Not Bombs and his praise for Brave and Free and boasting and bragging… it was an almost auto-biography of one of our most noticeable citizens.

HOUSING FOR PEOPLE INITIATIVE. Steve Bare who is a local activist and much involved community member wrote a letter to Gary Patton. Gary, Steve and I decided that it would help Housing for People to reprint his letter in its entirety right here. Here’s his letter…

“Dear Gary,

This is Steve Bare. You know me when you see me; I’ve been around a long time and been active in peace and social justice efforts.

As you may know, I’m deeply involved with our Housing For People Initiative effort. (Loved the shot of you and our t-shirt!) You also probably realize that the Initiative is a relatively modest one that simply attempts to return some decision-making power to citizen voters and insists on a true 25% “affordable” housing inclusion in new development. It’s not a game-changer; it’s simply a step in the right direction. A step (one you have nobly taken many times in the past) toward retaining livability, community, sustainability, and uniqueness for us and our town.

Gary, this is no longer the unique, accepting, quirky, and eclectic town it was when I moved here over 40 years ago. But it’s still a wonderful place. But for how long? Well, not long at the rate things seem to be evolving. However, folks, and many non-political citizens as well, are shocked and saddened by the changes and the proposed development. The Housing For People Initiative can slow down what is, to my eye, the exploitation and commodification of our precious town. Frankly, what I see is simply an extension of a shameful system of exploitation that harms not helps, profits the few at the expense of the many.

I revere and respect all you’ve done to keep this town livable, civil, and unique. Will you consider giving more help and support to our humble Initiative? We need you, and what we’re doing is an extension of all the effort you’ve made heretofore.

Let’s take the next step. Go to … housingforpeople.org

Peace, Steve Bare

...

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

THE EQUALIZER 3 (Del Mar Theatre) (7.1IMDB). ???? Denzel Washington (age 69) and Dakota Fanning (age 29) head the cast of this conclusion to the Equalizer series. I can’t find or remember what I wrote about the first two Equalizer series…and this part 3 just left me cold, bored and mystified. Somehow Denzel the Equalizer goes to Italy and gets all involved with the Mafia in order to protect his friends who live there. His background/history are mysterious and only hinted at. Go warned.

MASK GIRL. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.4 IMDB).  Most definitely a Korean film that plays out as a semi comedy and some tragedy. A plain looking but shapely girl decides to wear a mask and performs strip dances online. Her followers work hard to expose her and it’s a foolish but curious use of animated cartoons and dance numbers to tell this foolish story.

THE CHOSEN ONE. (NETFLIX SERIES) (5.6 IMDB). **** A movie from Mexico (Baja California) about a 12 year old boy who discovers that he has powers like Jesus. It’s almost an amateur’s first attempt at making a movie. He makes wine from water, helps the handicapped folks and makes some momentous decisions about how to live his life. I’ve watched the first two episodes and will ignore the rest.

Been there, seen that...

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

THE POPE’S EXORCIST. (NETFLIX) (6.1 IMDB). **** This scary, religious horror movie is taken from books by a Roman Catholic priest who actually did some exorcisms in and around the Vatican community. Russell Crowe is the priest and he’s as good as any actor could be in this touch-feely scary role.

TELEMARKETERS. (HBO) (7.7 IMDB). **** A fake documentary about those damned telemarketers who call all of us saying they are with the police and are trying to raise money for some phony police event or cause. It gives us a comedic view of their lives and how fake and almost illegal it is. Watch about half an hour…you’ll learn enough.

GOLDA. (DEL MAR THEATRE). **** Helen Mirren carries the role of Golda Meir and Moshe Dayan is in it and Liev Schreiber acts as Henry Kissinger. Golda is the first head (prime minister) of the new state of Israel and as you’ll be shown is/was a chain smoker (Chesterfields). It’s absorbing, well made, complex and basically covers the three week Yom Kippur war. Don’t miss it.

SHELTER. (PRIME) (6.6 IMDB) **** Tough to follow this mystery. A man dies in a terrible car crash…but does he die? His high school age son is nearly devastated but endures several other worldly experiences involving his dad. It’s even light and cute in parts and there’s even a Batlady and a character named Dylan Shakes. Watch at your own risk.

JURY DUTY. (PRIME SERIES) (8.3 IMDB) ****   Be very careful this is billed as a comedy but if you’ve ever been on a jury or been excused from serving on one…it’s no laughing matter. This jury selection takes place in Huntington Beach near LA. (or as we know it “Surf City”). It’s done in a pseudo-documentary style and goes through all the legal time and mind consuming legal steps in how a jury is selected. Not too bad a movie but torture if you’ve ever done time on a complex court case.

FIVE DAYS AT MEMORIAL. (PRIME SERIES) (7.7 IMDB). **** Not a new one, but a good one about the disaster during and after the Katrina hurricane that hit New Orleans in August of 2005. Vera Farmiga is one of the staff and all the acting and special effects are well worth watching.

JESUS REVOLUTION. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (7.1 IMDB). ???? A very sweet, well intentioned Christian feel good and true movie about Los Angeles teenagers in the 1970’s. Kelsey Grammer plays a minister who eventually sees that the hippies around his part of LA mean well and they all join together to worship Jesus in a slightly different way.

...
September 4

LESSONS FROM TANZANIA

The statement above represents a commitment by the principal and teaching staff of Monduli Teachers’ College in Tanzania to take significant steps to address the serious issues of sexual harassment and rape. Prior to a three- day training for administrators and teachers, which I had been invited to co-facilitate, these issues were largely silenced, hidden by taboos from public discussion and accountability. By the end of the three days, there was a measurable decrease in victim-blaming and an eagerness to publicly tackle both issues that disproportionally affect women and girls.

When I was asked whether the situation is different in my hometown of Santa Cruz, I had to admit that it is. “In Tanzania”, I replied, “you have few resources yet a commitment to highlight these issues and make them public. In Santa Cruz, we have all the resources yet no commitment to highlight and make the issues public.” In Santa Cruz there appears to be a concerted effort to render them invisible. City management and various city councils over the past 18 years have effectively marginalized the city’s forty- year- old Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women, stripping it of resources, programs, and half-time trained staff. Despite an average of thirty reported sexual assaults annually, none is reported in the local media. You could be forgiven for concluding it is a non-issue. My hunch is that is the goal in this tourist town.

One issue of sexual harassment was recently reported in Lookout, Santa Cruz on August 13th, 2023. The story was written by a 16- year-old female high school student who described her experience while waiting for the bus, of being approached by a male who initiated conversation that quickly turned into verbal sexual harassment. She described her reactions, feelings, fears, and criticism of the Metro system for what she saw as a lack of resources to address such intimidation. Regrettably, the Lookout editors allowed a mistake in both the headline and the Quick Take summary of the article to be published. Both erroneously state that the incident took place “on the Santa Cruz Metro” for the headline and “on a Santa Cruz Metro bus” for the summary. This is not a minor mistake and should have been corrected. While the major issue is the sexual harassment, wrongly stating that it took place on a Metro bus not only casts doubt on the integrity of bus drivers to halt such behavior but also potentially discourages other females from taking the bus.

After forty- four years in rape prevention education, my instinct is to listen carefully to how people responded to sexual harassment, and sexual assault. My aim is to help the person lessen self-blame, a common response, while helping them expand their options for any future incident. The self-defense workshops I held at UCSC were titled Alternatives to Fear.  After a gargantuan effort and much student support, we were able to get Women’s Self Defense as a regular PE class at UCSC. One of my first actions as the first chair of the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women in 1981 was to establish Women’s and Girl’s Self Defense Classes through the city’s Parks and Recreation Department and later, in city schools. As a balance, educational programs were aimed at males, as allies, as bystanders and as potential perpetrators. I’ll never forget the words of a young male, found guilty of rape and expressing remorse, who at his sentencing said, “I crossed a line I didn’t know existed.” With sex education non-existent in most states and most families, young males need more than slogans, peers, and popular media to navigate the sexual terrain. Most males don’t rape. And some who do are beyond education. However, look into the family dynamics of men convicted of rape and you will find another male figure who paved the way.

As recently as 2015, most universities and many communities across the country had some version of a Women and Girls’ Self-defense program. Such programs are not traditional martial arts, in fact they are distinctly different from a martial art. Women’s self-defense includes verbal assertiveness as well as simple physical techniques best described as “dirty fighting.” You aim for, not avoid, the vulnerable parts of the attacker. The verbal training helps the transition from a passive “why are you doing this? please don’t” to a loud “back off!!” That, and to trust one’s instincts. I’ve lost count of how many students shared their stories of avoiding an overly intrusive or threatening male by drawing on one or more of these options.

Thus, I was greatly frustrated when I first heard about Women’s Self-Defense no longer supported across the country because of the latest ideological posturing that self-defense was not “primary prevention.” Apparently “primary prevention” means you stop a male raping. How that is achieved gets a bit vague. When I pointed out that a female getting out of a situation by kicking a male in the groin is “stopping that male raping” I was told that,” no, he will go on to rape somebody else.” Such is the absurdity of ideology versus reality. One of the results of this misguided activism was the ending of self-defense classes at UCSC plus those funded and organized by the city of Santa Cruz.

I thought of all this history as I read the 16-year-old’s experience of sexual harassment at the bus stop. When she wrote “I hoped and prayed that maybe my instincts were wrong this time, that I misjudged him,” I could only bow my head in defeat. Trusting one’s instincts is the sine qua non of Women’s Self Defense.

If I return to do rape prevention work in Tanzania and am asked if things have improved in Santa Cruz, reluctantly I will have to say things have gotten worse: that the issues of rape, domestic violence and sexual harassment have been further marginalized and rendered invisible. The example I will use is the recent council approved Strategic Plan. Under the Public Safety section there are eight entries. Not one addresses these issues even though the 1981 Ordinance that created the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women mandates” that the prevention of rape and domestic violence shall be one of the city’s highest priorities”. Noting the absence of these issues in the first reading of the Plan I spoke at city council, reminded council members of the Ordinance requirements, and asked that these issues be added to the Public Safety section of the Strategic Plan. At the next meeting, final reading, and unanimous council vote, they had not been added.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
September 4

COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATED PLAN NOW AVAILABLE:

Project Documents

BIG LAND PURCHASES FOR BAY AREA UTOPIAN CITY KEPT SECRET…COULD IT HAPPEN HERE?

There has been much talk in the news recently about a group of ultra-wealthy investors, one of whom has a residence in Santa Cruz County, buying large tracts of farmland in Solano County and aggressively forcing farmers who do not want to sell their land to enter into legal settlements.  Solano County leaders say the deals have been secretive until recently, and worry about the security of such a new subdivision, Flannery Associates LLP’s “California Forever”, that would border Travis Air Force Base.

Do you think such a thing could happen in Santa Cruz County, say in some of the CZU Fire areas where few have been allowed to rebuild and costs to do so are climbing higher by the minute due to more studies the County wants and wide paved roads CalFIRE requires?  Or maybe on land owned by Lockheed Martin, also ravaged by the CZU Fire?  Hmmm…  Consider this below.

‘California Forever’: Company behind land purchases near Travis Air Force Base launches website, details plans

Below is a list of news sources from Wikipedia on the “Mystery Company” purchase:

  1. Peterson, Kristina; Gillum, Jack; O’Keeffe, Kate (7 July 2023). “Investors Bought Nearly $1 Billion in Land Near a California Air Force Base. Officials Want to Know Who Exactly They Are”The Wall Street JournalISSN0099-9660. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
  2. ^Sierra, Stephanie (21 July 2023). “‘Mystery company’ buys $800M worth of land near Travis AFB, raising concerns about national security”KGO-TV.
  3. ^Dougherty, Conor; Griffith, Erin (25 August 2023). “The Silicon Valley Elite Who Want to Build a City From Scratch”The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 26 August 2023.

Many local landowners are getting sued for not caving in to Flannery Associates LLP’s aggressive land grab tactics: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L for Flannery Assoc. LLC v. Barnes Family Ranch Assoc., LLC et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings

According to a Settlement document filed by all parties in the lawsuit (U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Sacramento Division Case 2:23-CV-00927-TLN-AC), the legal action is on hold while there is  discussion about a possible settlement, due to be complete by October 17, 2023.

Here is a map of current Flannery Associates holdings and areas pending takeover

It adjoins not only Travis Air Force Base, but also the Grizzly Island Wildlife Refuge

Learn more about that Wildlife Refuge here

Would nearby Jepson Prairie and Vernal Pools be affected? Jepson Prairie | Solano Land Trust : Suisun City, CA

The point that concerns me is that the artist’s rendering of this utopian California Forever project reminds me a lot of how the Aptos Village Project was sold to the public, and how easily (and secretively) deals are made behind closed doors to benefit the wealthy and the County coffers.

What would California Forever look like? Here are artist renderings from the developer

Now, think about what the north coast’s Cemex Land and CZU Fire areas look like now, and how the County is making it nearly impossible for anyone but the wealthy to rebuild.  Just think about it, and pay attention.

HOW CAN WE MAKE LESS GARBAGE?

Santa Cruz County’s Buena Vista Landfill has only a few years left before it will be full and will be closed.   Where will our garbage go then?  The plan is to truck it to Marina.

Last week while visiting the County Building, I happened to spot the agenda posted outside for the Santa Cruz County Local Solid Waste Task Force meeting on September 7.  I know some of those Committee members who work hard to help businesses and the general public to reduce, recycle and reuse, and am grateful for their good work.

What impressed me most about the agenda is the thorough review of all State legislation pending that manages to address how we can better handle the piles of garbage by just not creating so much in the first place,  recycling what we can and holding commercial enterprises accountable for reducing packaging.  Take a look at the Sept. 7 agenda, and participate if you can: Local Task Force

WHY IS LAFCO AVOIDING THIS?

Santa Cruz County LAFCO Executive Officer Joe Serrano responded to my Request for LAFCO to reconsider the August 2 approval of a Resolution that was wrought with errors and provided inaccurate voter numbers for the Branciforte Fire District area in the face of a move to dissolve their District.  Basically, he corrected the erroneous dates, arbitrarily shortened the Protest Period by a week, and claimed the updated voter registration numbers were irrelevant because County Elections had not notified him of any changes since he had last asked in May, 2022.

Claims of notices posted in the Sentinel have not been proven, and I could not find them in recent editions of the newspaper.

Initially, the Protest Hearing date of September 27 for the Branciforte Fire District Dissolution was shown on the LAFCO meeting website as “Protest Hearing for RO 22-07”.  How’s that for transparency?  Luckily, the project was described after I asked that this be done.

So, what’s the cause behind this feverish rush and clouded action?  Maybe transfer of tax monies to Scotts Valley Fire District in order to be collected by tax bills for 2024?  Maybe the Director’s application for an award to LAFCO for getting a consolidation accomplished in Santa Cruz County in two years?  Hmmm….Stay tuned. [Staff Report]

WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITH $20.3 TO $26 MILLION TO ADDRESS OPIOID ADDICTION IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY?

The County will receive about $26 million over the next 18 years as part of a class-action settlement against opioid manufacturers, distributors and retailers who settled for $51 billion.  What do you think would be the best use of that money to actually make a difference for people addicted to opioids?

“County Director of Substance Use Disorder Services Casey Swank explained that the Health Services Agency facilitated a community survey in August among Medi-Cal beneficiaries and substance use disorder treatment providers who were asked to rank core strategies within the eligible high impact areas defined in the settlement.”

Public shares priorities for Santa Cruz County opioid settlement spending

The County’s survey of 238 agencies and care providers yielded this:

“…the top three core strategies were treatment and recovery support for people involved in the justice system, reliance on substance use disorder wellness centers to divert people away from the justice system and treatment for individuals in the justice system.

Preferred uses among the 181 providers that responded to the survey are, in order of preference, crisis stabilization centers as an alternative to emergency rooms, peer support specialists or recovery coaches in emergency departments and substance use disorder wellness centers for youth and adults.”

What do you think?

I think the County would do well to launch a pilot project using Ibogaine to address and reduce addiction problems, as is being done in Brazil, New Zealand and South Africa under medical supervision: Ibogaine for addiction: Research, benefits, and more

Studies are showing it is effective and could remove addictive tendencies.

Then, I think we need to give these folks life skills to help manage money and learn new job skills that help them become independent, self-respecting people, and maybe have a farm modelled on the Homeless Garden Project in Santa Cruz to help them along the way.

Notice that I did NOT mention Safe Injection Centers or handing out free needles.

Please let me know your thoughts.

IS THE STATE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER MAKING DEALS?

A front-page article in the September 4  San Jose Mercury News caught my eye, reporting that State Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara may be making deals with insurance companies in hope that Californians will be able to get insurance coverage in the future.  But at what price?

Anxiety builds as coverage dissolves [article]

At issue is that insurance companies who claim they can no longer afford risky coverage in California are now leaving the state, not renewing existing policies and refusing to write new policies.  The claim is that this is brought on by Prop. 103, passed by the voters in 1988 (by 51%), that regulates what insurance providers can charge, subject to approval of the State Insurance Commissioner, which became an elected position rather than appointed.  Insurance companies were required to roll back their rates by 20%..

Information Sheet: Proposition 103 Intervenor Process

What can you do if you have a mortgage and are required to have insurance, but no companies will issue a policy?  The State’s FAIR Plan is the last resort, but is expensive and restrictive.  It is not a government or public tax-funded program but rather high-priced, narrow policies underwritten by a consortium of all insurance companies doing business in the State and that is administered by the FAIR Plan agency.  About FAIR Plan

FAIR Plan Insurance

What is of interest is that State Insurance Commissioner just approved an increase of 15.7% for FAIR Plan rates, yet rates for private insurance companies themselves is being held down.

The article in the Mercury News, California insurance companies have to base rates on historic losses rather than using predictive computer climate model numbers.  That prevents insurance companies from being able to recover their own insurance for large payouts in disasters, which they buy for their own economic survival.

What consumer watchdogs feel is happening is that Ricardo Lara is making deals with legislators to ease the restrictions on insurance companies.

The bottom line is that something has to be done to help those who are receiving non-renewal notices.

Participate in the online presentations on this topic as it relates to wildland fire risk

Listen in online to your local talk program “Community Matters” on Santa Cruz Voice.com this Friday (9/08) 2pm-4pm for a discussion with local insurance and real estate agents about this issue affecting Santa Cruz County. (santacruzvoice.com) State Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara and staff have been requested to participate.

FAIR INSURANCE PLAN RECOGNIZES FIREWISE COMMUNITIES FOR DISCOUNTS

When neighbors work together to reduce wildfire risk, it makes a big difference in favor of safety.  When those neighbors join together to become a nationally-recognized FireWise Community to expand that cooperative work and education, many insurance companies now recognize the effort and grant a discount on insurance policies within the FireWise neighborhoods.

Even the FAIR Plan now recognizes the value of FireWise Communities.  Below is just such information, sent by California Insurance Commissioner’s Office staff, Ms. Mary Beth Bykowsky, forwarded by Ms. Lynn Sestak, FireWise Coordinator  of the Santa Cruz County FireSafe Council:

—– Forwarded Message —–

From: Bykowsky, Mary Beth marybeth.bykowsky@insurance.ca.gov
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 at 06:43:30 PM PDT
Subject: New FAIR Plan Discounts

“I wanted to let all my Fire Safe Council, Firewise Communities and other concerned communities members know that the Department of Insurance has already approved the FAIR Plan to begin offering insurance discounts starting yesterday, August 23, and expects to have other companies approved by the end of the year. The FAIR Plan has offered a 10% discount on policies in a participating Firewise Community since May 2018. Now, the FAIR Plan is offering two more wildfire hardening discounts: one for Protecting the Structure, and another for Protecting the Immediate Surroundings of the dwelling. When applied, these discounts will reduce the wildfire portion of the policy’s premium by 10% and 5% respectively. Depending on your level of wildfire risk, this can be a large component of your overall premium. Contact your broker to find out what this means for your premium, how to qualify, and when you could receive a discount.”

Learn more here: Firewise USA Recognition Program

APTOS VILLAGE TRAFFIC CHANGES THIS WEEK

A friend sent me this note over the weekend:

“Parade Street in Aptos Village will be open to all traffic on Tuesday, Sept. 5 while the Bayview Railroad Crossing will be closed to all traffic from this date forward! ?? Please be prepared for potential traffic congestion as Parade Street reopens and Bayview Railroad Crossing closes. Make sure to plan your commute accordingly and explore alternative routes if possible.”

I wonder why this boondoggle had to happen on a school day, when traffic is already choking the area?

What will be done to close the historic Bayview Hotel private entrance?  At the time of this writing, neither Swenson nor the County has contacted the owner of the Bayview Hotel about what will be happening there.

Contact Santa Cruz County Dept. of Public Works Director Matt Machado<matt.machado@santacruzcounty.us> with your thoughts about Aptos Village traffic issues.

KEEP YOUR EYE ON CABRILLO COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ABOUT THAT DELAY IN NAME CHANGE

The Board of Trustees voted last month to pause on taking further action on selection a new name for Cabrillo College.  There continues to be thoughtful Letters to the Editor in the Sentinel regarding the matter.  We all need to keep paying attention and offering written and public testimonies with solutions to the Board of Trustees because it is important to our Community.

The next Board meeting will be Monday, September 11 at 6pm in the Horticulture Bldg. at the Aptos Cabrillo College campus.

[Board meetings and dates]

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.  JUST DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND YOU’LL MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
September 4

A PRIMER IN CONSERVING CALIFORNIA’S COASTAL PRAIRIES

California’s coastal prairies are super-diverse habitats that (barely) still exist around the Monterey Bay and deserve careful attention by public and private landowners alike if we are to conserve these habitats for plants and wildlife for future generations.

What are Coastal Prairies?

Coastal prairies are dominated by herbaceous species (grasses, grass-like plants, and broadleaved plants aka ‘forbs’) where there is incursion of summer fog. Old growth coastal prairies are where human plows have not ‘turned over’ the soil, mixing the lower levels with upper levels and permanently altering the ecology. Old growth coastal prairies are extremely rare because people have historically farmed so much of what they primarily saw as productive prairie soils. Secondary coastal prairies have been intensively plowed and have a different ecology that requires different management approaches. Beyond the split between old growth and secondary coastal prairies, there are many, many types of coastal prairies.

Hydrogeomorphology Drives Diversity of Coastal Prairie Communities

Understanding soils and the corresponding differences in geology and hydrology will help with understanding of how beautifully complex coastal prairie classification can be. There are three geomorphic subdivisions that have been used to help to start classifying coastal prairies: flat, hillsides, and shallow-soiled ‘balds.’ Because water doesn’t drain quickly off of flat areas, coastal prairies found in such places often support extensive wetlands, some of which are only very wet in the most rainy of times. And, because soil doesn’t erode rapidly from those flat areas, deep soils typically develop under coastal prairies’ productive plants, which are so diverse as to have some species growing in every season. Hillside coastal prairies are better drained, and soil more readily erodes, so these drier, less productive prairies have a different ecology. And, at the top of those slopes there is frequently no soil at all…these areas are called ‘balds’ because only certain plants can grow there among the oft-exposed and bald-looking rock.

Let’s add two more levels of geomorphic complexity to this coastal prairie stew, both related to oceanic activity. Tides strongly influence the rarest types of coastal prairies, which thrive only where floods and King Tides inundate areas, with very salty and occasionally quite wet soils. These areas are also known as ‘saline wet meadows.’ Some line estuaries and lagoons and some are located even far inland where salts have accumulated over eons, like the flat areas where the Pajaro River wends its way across the valley north of Hollister. The ocean’s waves and tides carved stair-step flat areas, aka ‘marine terraces’ into the ocean-facing hills in the Big Sur and Santa Cruz mountains. You can see that terrace formation in action as you watch waves chiseling at the land across wide flat tide-pool-dotted rock: the soft-rock cliffs fall apart, Public Works drops massive piles of boulders, and someone inevitably proposes the ultimate boondoggle, a “sea wall.” Episodically, there’s an ice age, the ocean recedes, and tectonic uplift elevates the lowest marine terrace above the force of waves. There are at least 6 terraces, each with its own diversity of different-age soils and correspondingly diverse different coastal prairie types.

Managing Diverse Coastal Prairies

To conserve plants and wildlife, people looking to manage the bewilderingly diverse coastal prairies have a lot of work to do. The first rule in managing coastal prairies is: steward what you have, not what you want. We know diddly-squat about introducing new species to new places, but humans are apt to want to superimpose ideas from elsewhere on the spot they are looking at: that’s a common mistake. The second rule: manage for the thing you have that you want, not what you don’t want. Those two rules require you to start by cataloging everything. Get to know your place, make lists and maps…ask for help! People love cataloging and mapping species; iNaturalist, CalFlora, eBird, and other platforms offer increasingly easy platforms to help with this. Each species is in each place for its own reasons, and we are just getting to know coastal prairie species, so understanding why species are where is important to understanding how to conserve every species for future generations. For instance, we are beginning to understand that some species are only going to thrive in old growth coastal prairies. Other species require specific amounts of moisture. For decades, I have been working with a research team that has been documenting the importance of cattle grazing in conserving native annual wildflowers of California’s coastal prairies. Grazers can reduce vegetation height and the depth of dead plant material, both critical factors to allowing some species to thrive. Other species like taller, denser vegetation.

Indicator Species

Rightly or wrongly, and this is quite contested stuff, humans gravitate to looking at a small subset of species to indicate whether or not they are good land stewards. Because the citizens of the USA strongly support wildlife conservation and believe in conserving all species, we have national and state laws and policies that provide for the protection of rare, threatened, and endangered species. That focus makes these “listed” species the most commonly used species to inform land stewardship, and they have proven their value as such over and over again. Other government policies provide impetus for other biotic indicators. The California Coastal Commission at times designates suites of species as indicators of legally protected ESHA, Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas because of either their rarity or function. Wetland plant species serve as indicators of the most common ESHA and coastal prairie species have also served in that capacity in some places. Also, the Antiquities Act allows for US Presidents to provide for protection of species, ecosystems, or habitats. In the Monument Proclamation that provided protections for Cotoni Coast Dairies, there are several coastal prairie species listed that will also be used as indicator species for the BLM managers on that property.

Species Indicators of Coastal Prairie Management Success: a case study at Cotoni Coast Dairies

There might be enough policy-mandated indicator species in the coastal prairies at Cotoni Coast Dairies to adequately protect all the species that require those habitats. The Monument Proclamation lists the following species found predominantly in coastal prairies at the Cotoni Coast Dairies site: California buttercups, brown-headed rush, meadow vole, American kestrel, and white-tailed kite. The California Coastal Commission hasn’t yet weighed in on ESHA designation at Cotoni Coast Dairies, so we’ll have to wait and see how those designations change which species are used as indicators. Protections for rare, threatened and endangered species add a few more species to the list: Point Reyes Horkelia, Choris’ popcornflower, American badger, golden eagle, northern harrier, short-eared owl, grasshopper sparrow, and western pond turtle. It is fortunate that BLM is required to manage for, and monitor, so many coastal prairie indicator species: with this wealth and diversity of species, there is a good chance that many other species will be conserved. But, managing for this extensive suite will not be easy.

What’s the Management Recipe?

Each species has its own stewardship requirements. Managing for healthy buttercup populations requires managers to maintain wet meadows, most typically found on the terraces, but also in seeps on hillsides. Conservation of brown headed rush is similar, but this species likes less disturbance intensity. Meadow voles like dense grass in wet meadows, places that buttercup wouldn’t thrive. Choris’ popcornflower and Point Reyes Horkelia won’t thrive without higher disturbance intensity, which provides the extensive bare soil and lack of light competition that they need to proliferate. None of the coastal prairie indicator species will thrive without the right timing and intensity of grazing, mowing, or fire…which vary by species.

Applying the Principles

The guidance to manage for so many coastal prairie indicator species which are extant at Cotoni Coast Dairies provides a great foundation for rule 1: ‘steward what you have, not what you want’ but what about rule 2, ‘manage for the thing you have that you want, not what you don’t want?’ There is a great temptation for managers to focus on the negative in coastal prairie; too often coastal prairie managers say ‘I don’t want non-native grasses,’ with the ensuing endless stewardship battle as wave after wave of new non-native grasses invade following whatever stewardship attempt there was to control the preceding non-native grass management priority. I call this the exotic plant treadmill: one after the next weed keeps coming unless you focus on managing for what you want, the existing native species, to give them a chance to thrive in those same places.

It will be very interesting to see the BLM’s Science Plan for Cotoni Coast Dairies. I wonder how the science and procedures I outlined above might be applied to the property’s extensive coastal prairies.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

FROM GARY A. PATTON  From Gary’s “We Live In A Political World” website…

September 4
#247 / Sign That Petition!

Today’s blog posting is specifically addressed to residents of the City of Santa Cruz. Currently, volunteer signature gatherers are attempting to qualify an initiative measure for the City election to be held in March of next year. Supporters are calling the proposed initiative measure, “Housing For People.” Click that link to find out more about it. You can click the following link, too, to read coverage in the Santa Cruz Sentinel.

In essence, the proposed initiative measure would do two things, presuming that the measure qualifies for the ballot and is then enacted by the voters:

First, the initiative would increase the City’s so-called “inclusionary percentage” from 20% to 25%. When developers build new housing units, the City currently requires that 20% of these new units be reserved for persons with average or below average incomes. Given the housing prices that are set by the private market, this inclusionary requirement is one of the only ways that the City can insure that new development actually opens up new housing opportunities for ordinary, working people and their kids.

Unfortunately, the State Legislature is doing everything it can to reduce the ability of local inclusionary ordinances to make sure that at least some significant share of the new development occurring will benefit average and below average income people. Recent state laws essentially reduce the impact of the inclusionary percentages set by the local City Council, or the voters. That is one reason that the initiative measure now in circulation is so important. It is a way to make sure that we get the maximum amount of affordable housing possible, as new development occurs – even as recent state laws act to reduce, not increase, the mandated affordable housing percentage. Upping the local inclusionary percentage works against these state law efforts to reduce local requirements to benefit the developers.

Second – and I personally think that this is also important – the initiative measure, if ultimately enacted, will require the voters to approve any increase to the height limits currently set in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

The City’s Planning Director was proposing new developments in the “South of Laurel” area that would be on the order of twenty-one (21) stories high – more than twice the height of the Dream Inn. Right after his election last year, Mayor Fred Keeley suggested that the Council reduce this to twelve (12) stories, maximum, and the Council backed up that idea. However, no final decision on height limits in the so-called “South of Laurel” neighborhood has yet been established, and it is worth noting that twelve stories (while much less than twenty-one stories) is still about TWICE the height of the new development at the corner of Laurel and Pacific, as pictured in that Sentinel article.

The proposed initiative measure is being promoted on the following basis:

Secure Your Right To Vote On Height

When the Save Lighthouse Point Association took action to “Save Lighthouse Field,” back in the early 1970’s – an effort in which I was personally involved – one of the key ways that voters headed off planning policies that really didn’t take account of what City residents wanted was by passing an initiative measure that was placed on the June 1974 ballot.

Some have told me that our local community is no longer all that concerned about giving voters real power over the future development of the City. I hope that’s not true. In our system of self-government, City voters ARE the City.

So, let’s up that inclusionary percentage! Let’s “Secure Our Right To Vote on Height!”

Sign that petition!

Even better, get a copy of the petition measure, by clicking this link, and get your friends and neighbors involved, too.

Time is short and the stakes are very high!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
September 4

SANCHISMOS, COPYRIGHTS AND ROLLLING THE DICE

While the phrase ’tilting at windmills’ may not apply directly to our disgraced former president, most experts agree that he exhibits the classic paranoid personality disorder in his eccentric, odd behavior. That is borne out by his suspicions of those around him, along with his refusing to take blame for his past deeds. The Orange Don Quixote, who betrayed the country while catering to a long-time foreign enemy, had his Sancho Panza in the person of White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, who proved to be incapable of being a voice of reason in dissuading his master’s delusional treachery, his ‘sanchismos’ not able to break through The Don’s fantasies. VP Pence lost his ‘sidekick’ designation in the game to throw out the election results, making Meadows a most intriguing persona within the coup team.

He knows all the secrets, where the skeletons are hidden, and where the bodies are buried, but was playing both sides as the investigation dragged on, even as his aide, Cassidy Hutchinson, spilled the jar of beans before the J6 Committee. After his indictment, Meadows sought in a hearing to have his case moved to federal court, where he will attempt to assert immunity as a federal officer during which he was simply doing his job under the Former Guy. At this writing the judge has not made a decision on the switch, but either way, Meadows is going to have to make a decision quickly about whether he will take the bullet for Trump. Meadows’ attorney wrote in his court filings, “These and the other acts that form the basis for the charges against Mr. Meadows all fall squarely within his conduct as Chief of Staff. This is precisely the kind of state interference in a federal official’s duties that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits, and that the removal statute shields against.” Advantages for Meadows in moving to federal court would widen the jury pool to an area more GOP-heavy, plus a televised trial is not likely which would expose him to more embarrassment during the trial.

For the above hearing, DA Fani Willis subpoenaed Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and two others who were present during the infamous “find 11,780 votes” phone call that precipitated two charges against Meadows. In court filings, it was noted that a government watchdog agency found Meadows and other Trump officials in their political activity prior to the election violated federal law. “Since the defendant was forbidden by law to use his authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election or otherwise participate in activity directed toward the success of Mr. Trump as a candidate for the presidency, every single one of these activities fell outside the scope of his duties, both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law,” prosecutors wrote. Should these activities be adjudged to be in the scope of his duties, Meadows must then prove he has a tenable federal defense.

A brief written by eight prosecutors and federal officials backing the prosecutors in the Georgia case, all having served in GOP administrations. One of the individuals was J. Michael Luttig, a former federal appeals court judge with whom we are familiar from his appearance before the J6 Committee and numerous talk shows. The eight wrote, “The purpose of federal-officer removal statute – to protect federal operations by preventing retribution in state court for locally unpopular exercises of federal authority – would not be served by removal here. To the contrary, removal would be perverse, as this prosecution arises from interference with state-government operations and seeks to vindicate Georgia’s voice in a federal election, the very contest from which federal authority flows.” If the judge rules in favor of Meadows‘ move to the federal court, others indicted in the case will attempt to do the same and it is feared that all co-defendants will automatically be moved, as is being argued by indicted former Trump Justice Department official, Jeffrey Clark, whose hearing is scheduled for September 18. We can be certain that Trump is watching closely, though he unsuccessfully tried to move his New York hush money case to federal court, which is under appeal.

A commenter on the Quorum website says, “In a shocking roll of the legal dice, Mark Meadows preemptively put himself on the stand during pre-trial motions in a desperate attempt to convince a judge that participating in a wildly illegal and extremely clumsy conspiracy to overthrow our democracy with a crackpot team of America’s worst lawyers and ideological sociopaths was somehow “part of the job” of being Chief of Staff to the president…riiiiiiiiight!” Bill Palmer on his blog writes, “It’s one thing for Meadows to try the low percentage play of trying to get his Fulton Country criminal charges moved to federal court. Even though he’s unlikely to win, it can’t hurt to try, right? Actually, it can hurt to try, quite a bit, when you’re as much of an idiot as Meadows is. Meadows made the ground-breakingly stupid decision to take the stand under oath during the hearing about moving the trial. During that testimony he appears to have committed perjury, which can disqualify his request and get him hit with additional criminal charges. But it gets stupider. Meadows’ stated reason for going along with Donald Trump’s criminal plot to overthrow the election? He said that if he didn’t go along with it, ‘I know I would get yelled at’ by Trump. No really, he said this, on the witness stand. This admission wipes out a whole range of reasonable doubt defenses that Meadows might have tried to use. Meadows just made it a whole lot easier to convict him a trial. Meadows keeps proving himself to be astoundingly stupid. Fiction writers would have a hard time coming up with this character and making it believable.” As Sancho would say, “Hope is a good breakfast, but a bad supper.”

The aforementioned judge J. Michael Luttig in a recent appearance on Nicolle Wallace’s MSNBC show, claims that he has never been a “political person, or a political partisan” though he held the views, beliefs and principles, and the policy positions of the GOP during his lifetime. He is troubled by the current position and direction of today’s Republican party and is hopeful that it will come to its senses, both collectively and constitutionally. Together with Harvard’s Laurence Tribe, Luttig penned a column in the New York Times explaining their belief that Trump can be barred from holding office by using the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Both the Attorney General and the Secretary of State of New Hampshire announced that they are seriously considering barring Trump’s name from the state ballot, based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which states that those who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” may be disqualified from running for office again…for which Trump has been indicted.

Or how about, as Bocha Blue writes on the Palmer Report, that Trump be tried as an axe murderer? He quotes Georgia Republican and former Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan’s harsh words about Trump and Republicans in general as saying, “Trump has the moral compass of an axe murderer.” Sans axe, Trump managed to kill hundreds through his COVID-19 negligence, and his fomenting of the insurrection resulted in the death of one rioter and eventually several Capitol police officers. Blue says, “So yes, there is blood on Donald Trump’s hands. I thank Duncan for these remarks, not that they will have any weight with the Republican party, but in this case, it’s the thought that counts.”

The Lincoln Project website points to people trying to compare the Georgia case, with Trump and the 18 co-conspirators, to Watergate, but analyzes it as going much deeper because it indicts every member of the GOP…senators, congress members, staffers, the RNC, big money donors…corruption that goes to the very core of the GOP. And that’s why the Former Guy is being defended so vociferously…the whole bunch is tainted! President Nixon had to reckon with his own party, which had a moral conviction in evidence which has long since disappeared. Trump’s criminal enterprise is so feared that it’s easier to go along, in an attempt to legitimize the lies and false conspiracies. Sadly, these ignoramuses have the ear of a good portion of the American electorate who are scarfing up those “Never Surrender” mug-shot mugs, posters and t-shirts following Trump’s surrender.

SiriusXM radio host Dean Obeidallah thinks a legitimate legal case can be made against Trump, that he has violated U.S. copyright laws by hawking merchandise using the Fulton County mugshot. Indictment Don bragged that $7M flowed into his coffers from the $34 t-shirts and $25 mugs as soon as they were offered, but the rightful recipient of that money may be the Fulton County Sheriff’s department, an entity which could use a huge influx of funds for its ailing, poor conditions. According to a 2022 article in the University of Georgia School of Law’s Journal of Intellectual Property Law, “In the context of photographs taken by law enforcement during the booking process, the author of the mugshot photograph is the law enforcement agency.” So, does Fulton County want to see The Don in court…again…over copyright infringement?

Aldous J. Pennyfarthing writes, “After being mugshot (mugshouted? mugsharted?), Trump returned to X, which is what nobody calls the platform formerly known as Twitter, to send an X, which is what nobody calls a post formerly known as a ‘tweet,’ to his supporters in the death cult, which is what many of us call the party formerly known as the GOP. The sweet included Trump’s mugshot and a grift summons. Remarkably, QAnon folks saw something in it other than a surly, glowering weirdo who looks like he’s on Day Two of a three-day Strawberry Yoo-hoo cleanse. ‘It’s always darkest before the storm,’ one Trump supporter tweeted in response to the mugshot. ‘Tsunami Trump is coming for the swamp.'” Aldous J. questions the statement with, “Wouldn’t a tsunami make swamp immeasurably worse? Shouldn’t that be Wet Vac Trump? Or Intracranial Stent Trump?” It has been said that Donald Trump can be described as “a poor man’s idea of a rich man, a weak man’s idea of a strong man, and a dumb man’s idea of a smart man.” Touché! As Steve Schmidt said, “America has had its share of president’s who were crooks (Warren G. Harding, Richard Nixon), bigots (Andrew Jackson, James Buchanan), and incompetents (Andrew Johnson, George W. Bush). But never before Donald Trump have we had a president who combined all these qualities.”

Trump, in one of his Fox News & Agitprop interviews recalled the cognitive test he took during his presidency, under the supervision of White House doctor Ronny Jackson, and indicating that he had taken another test recently. “If you’re in the office of the presidency, we have to be sharp. The exam was 30 or 35 questions. The first questions are very easy, the last questions are much more difficult.” And we all remember the to-do he made earlier over the memory portion, of his being able to recall the words, “person, woman, man, camera, TV” Trump went on to say that his results impressed the medical staff, “They say, ‘Nobody gets it in order.’ It’s not that easy, but for me it was easy. And that’s not any easy question. They say, ‘That’s amazing, how did you do that?’ I do it because I have, like, a good memory. Because I’m cognitively there. Joe Biden should take the test.” Court, jury, verdict, prison…repeat those words several times, Donny.

After Trump’s mugshot was released, Georgia artist Chris Veal began painting a large mural on a building in Atlanta, using the photo in his creation, with right-wingers applauding what they thought was a protest against the arrest of the former prez. Veal finished his mural, to which a word bubble was added, which read, “M.A.G.A. My Ass Got Arrested.” The artist says feedback has been positive, with passersby smiling, laughing and giving him high-fives.

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Hawaii”

 “I thought my book was done, then we went to Hawaii and the whole last chapter happened.”
~Mariel Hemingway

“Hawaii is still the single most frequent fantasy destination, not because of political stability or conveniences, but because Hawaii seduces the imagination. It’s the perfect postcard – no props, no fillers.”
~Robert Wintner

“Hawaii is a paradise born of fire.”-
~Rand McNally

...

Have some fun! Here’s a bit of standup from Matteo Lane, one of my recent favorites 🙂


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Aug 30 – Sep 5, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…reactions to and from Brave and Free Santa Cruz, Sandy Lydon talk, goodbye Linda Burman-Hall, movie critiques. Greensite…on West Cliff Drive well-funded not-so hidden agenda. Schendledecker…what makes safer streets. Steinbruner… county codes and Swenson, coastal commission and grant, new Aptos library, new county charter. Hayes…August’s flower. Patton…Kissinger’s crimes. Matlock…flight risk on the stare away to the big chair. Eagan Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress pick of the week: strange celebrity talents… Quotes. “Hard Work” & “Labor Day”

...

PACIFIC AND COOPER STREETS JANUARY 4, 1965. Back then it was our very own Santa Cruz County Bank. Now it’s Pacific Avenue’s Surf Shop. Do note how wide the streets and the cars are…progress??

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE August 28

BRAVE AND FREE in Santa Cruz.

Joy Schendledecker wrote her weekly piece here in BrattonOnline a couple of weeks ago (August 7). She dealt with and mentioned the Brave and Free group. It caused all sorts of hell. From one reader…

“About the malicious article, it’s clear that Joy knows nothing about Brave and Free and has never been to a meeting. Last week, the featured speaker was Lira Fillipini detailing the work to get the Stop the Skyscrapers on the ballot. We also have had videos about the WEF, the push for digital IDs through the cashless society. Joy has some wonderful politics but she is not cut out for holding office. I don’t think she could win an election as she has alienated some of her base”.

MORE BRAVE AND FREE REACTION. Keith McHenry, who is the co-founder of the global movement Food Not Bombs, wrote a 4000 word response to Joy’s essay. I’m running the entire piece…its well worth thinking about… 

JOY FOR MAYOR – Welcome to Brave and Free Santa Cruz

“It’s easy to understand why people in less-educated classes have rallied around Trump as their best warrior against the educated class” – David Brooks – commentator – August 4, 2023.

In her post on BrattonOnline (8/7), Joy Schendledecker may have jumped to some conclusions about the local community group Brave and Free Santa Cruz. I am pleased that she has given me the opportunity to introduce more people to our efforts to protect our health, defend our civil liberties and work for peace.

Brave and Free’s first action was our participation in the Fourth of July Parades in 2022, where we were greeted with enthusiastic support by the public. It seems many people were done with the coercion, restrictions and mandates, and were relieved that someone was breaking the silence.

With economic conditions growing more difficult, with attacks on our privacy through the implementation of biometric ID connected to programmable Central Banks Digital Currency, and with threats of a global war, we need more groups like Brave and Free Santa Cruz that are bringing people together from diverse political, racial and cultural backgrounds.

I have found that people share much more in common with one another than what the media says divides us. We all want to enjoy time with our families and friends. We want to have a safe place to sleep and tasty food to eat, we want to live a life of meaning with dignity.

But those in power want us fighting and have intentionally magnified our differences, fostering a red blue tribalism.

One of the most terrifying features cultivated by those in power is how close-minded people who support their agenda have become. Anyone who isn’t on board is considered a dumb hick Trump Putin puppet.

We are considered that “basket of deplorables”.  Yet we are that working class that Joy for Mayor’s campaign literature claimed to be supporting. We are the people who repair your cars, prepare your food and wire your homes. We are people who are capable of thinking for ourselves.

Joy’s essay echoes the perspective of David Brooks, when he sneers at struggling Americans calling us “the less-educated classes”, while also assuming we all support Trump. But really, we are the essential workers. Thankfully, a growing number of people are understanding that the amplified caricature of division exploited by the ruling class isn’t a true depiction of our country. It’s a fiction.

I would have never imagined that the left which I have been a part of for over five decades would come to support NATO expansion and the arming of white nationalists and Nazis. A left that supports the escalation in the nine year Ukrainian war. We denounced Victoria Nuland and her boss Dick Cheney when they instigated the Iraq war based on lies, but we praise her today for starting the war against Russia also based on lies. This conflict with Russia is on the verge of becoming a world war, this time between nuclear armed nations.

This is a left that has abandoned class struggle and instead embraces the master’s hyped-up divide and conquer culture wars. Many of my left friends have become enforcers of the program to geofence ourselves into the billionaire class’s digital prison. A left that has abandoned the right to free speech, and now argues that we must be protected from information that might challenge the interests of the military industrial state.

The gatekeepers of correct-think work at places like the Aspen Institute’s Commission on Information Disorder, whose website brags of the inclusion of former CIA agents on its board.  These gatekeepers work at NATO’s Atlantic Council and the International Monetary Fund, with their plans for a programmable Central Bank Digital Currency linked to biometric facial recognition. They also work at the United Nations, which is promising to provide “proof of personhood’ digital ID for everyone on Earth. No wonder Elon Musk plans to place 65,000 satellites in orbit in this program to connect everyone to their totalitarian matrix. Privacy has vanished.

THE LEFT’S LONG TRADITION OF RESISTING THE GLOBALIZATION OF THE ECONOMY

The left I have been a part of has a long history of organizing against the globalization of the economy. On a chilly March 26, 1981, Food Not Bombs set up its first soup line outside the Federal Reserve Tower on Atlantic Avenue in Boston, to protest the policies of the Bank of Boston, its interlocking board of directors, and their investments in a global web of resource extraction and ghetto creating redlining.

We protested Clinton’s NAFTA. We rallied outside the offices of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund during their annual meetings. In 1992 I joined tens of thousands of labor, environmental and human rights activists in Bonn, West Germany to protest the creation of the Euro and the European Union.

Every year the left gathers in Davos, Switzerland to denounce the exploitative policies of the World Economic Forum.  In 1997, I spent two months traveling North America on the UnFree Trade Tour, speaking out against the World Trade Organization’s framework of corporate consolidation.  We formed the Direct Action Network, disrupting the WTO’s Seattle summit in November 1999 and took our protest against the WTO to Cancún and Genoa.

I worked with anti-war activist Ronnie Cummings and food sovereignty activist Vandana Shiva on the Millions Against Monsanto Campaign in an effort to stop the patenting of seeds. Private ownership of life is one key element of the trade agreements that we have been fighting against.

So, when the institutions that those of us had spent decades protesting against started to implement what they called Build Back Better, Fourth Industrial Revolution, and “Great Reset”, I knew I had to push back.

CITIZEN POLICING IN THE SERVICE OF THE STATE AND THEIR BILLIONAIRE MASTERS

What surprised me was how many of those I had been working with suddenly came to the defense of Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, and his deployment of the military counter measures born from the gain-of-function research that my friends and I had spent decades organizing against.

Even more horrifying was the way these allies willingly enforced the authoritarian orders of the corporate state. They blocked the participation of the working class from their meetings, cafes and film showings, a working class which is understandably suspicious of government mandates and threats to their employment.

So, on the day Biden announced the end of the pandemic, I went to London Nelson Community Center to support Joy’s campaign for mayor. Soon after I arrived, when I failed to show my vaccination papers, three of her supporters started physically assaulting me in this public facility. That “show your papers” demand recalled the dark days of Apartheid South Africa, the East German secret police Stasi or my days with working with Palestinian farmers and merchants on the West Bank.  Another local peace activist in her 70’s was also the victim of assault and battery at the same event when she failed to show her papers. Violently brutalizing your supporters might not be the best way to win an election.

Naturally, when I was being personally threatened by the emergence of this new totalitarian atmosphere, I supported the formation of a local movement to stop it. There were many months when my family and I thought we were alone in seeing the formation of a dystopian fascist corporate state. I recalled the sad entries in German artist Kathe Kollwitz’s diary about her colleagues’ growing support of Hitler.   It would be months before I would learn that other progressive activists shared my horror at the clampdown.

ARE THESE PEOPLE REALLY GULLIBLE FAR-RIGHT HOMOPHOBIC RACISTS?

Two local women, Diane D. Jones, a retired carpenter, and Kathleen Lynch, a social worker, started Brave and Free Santa Cruz to defend the freedoms that are under attack. Kathleen expressed that you must be brave in these Draconian times if you wished to stay free.

A mass hysteria had ensued against anyone who did not agree with the messaging of the New York Times, National Public Radio and CNN. People were insulted and bullied into compliance with unscientifically based orders.  We now know, from FOIA emails of the NIH and court cases that the masking and six foot “social distancing” were just made up by the security agencies without any scientific basis. Stopping the virus dead in its tracks with two injections and two weeks to flatten the curve turned into months of restrictions and regular boosters. Our vaccinated friends kept getting COVID while the unvaccinated rarely contracted the illness. Now, it looks like the drumbeat demanding a return to those failed policies is again growing louder in the halls of government, in the media and online. Another winter of virtue signaling and social control.

I was as frightened as anyone when the pandemic was announced, but I soon started to think that some things were not adding up. My friend, virologist Dr. Shannon Murray, who had spent years at the NIH developing the mRNA technology, warned me against using the experimental countermeasure. She explained that the survival rate of their lab subjects was very poor and that there could be another agenda behind the pandemic.

Yet, those who just years before had been my allies in denouncing the military, the CIA and corporate power were now treating me as though I was diseased.  A baseless Witch Hunt of political correctness descended on our community. Noam Chomsky even suggested the unvaccinated be interned in prison camps and left to starve. I could relate to the concerns of Kathleen and Diane.

Joy’s essay included, “I have nothing against any of the individuals in this group, since (as far as I know) I don’t know any of them particularly well. I suspect that a few people that I like very much may be increasingly drawn to them as they are drawn to support RFK Jr’s seriously effed-up presidential bid or Ukraine anti-war positions that may lean towards Putin-apologists.”

ARE THESE PEOPLE REALLY GULLIBLE FAR-RIGHT HOMOPHOBIC ANTI SEMITIC RACISTS? (Part 2)

One of the people Joy doesn’t “know particularly well” is Kathleen Lynch so I will share a bit about her and you can see if you think she is politically naive and would as Joy said, “employ dangerous tropes and misinformation, while partnering with people and organizations that are funded by the far-right”.

When Kathleen was attending San Jose State University, she volunteered with the Catholic Workers sharing meals with the homeless. She became a staff person at the San Jose Peace Center and joined Scott Kennedy and others here in Santa Cruz in organizing against war. She was arrested protesting the nuclear arms race outside Lawrence Livermore Labs, spending two weeks in Santa Rita Jail. She also spent time incarcerated with others from the Abalone Alliance protesting the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Station.

Kathleen joined Peace Brigades International and moved to El Salvador, spending 6 years of the war in the zones of combat. She stood between a death squad and striking workers barricaded inside their factory in San Salvador, helping win their demands. She survived aerial bombing raids and armed assaults, secreted people out of the country to freedom and organized women’s groups across the rebel held territories of Morazán.

When she returned to the United States, she organized a patients’ union at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in San Jose. Years later she would walk precincts in the snow in Reno for Bernie Sanders, and proudly stuck a Bernie for President sticker on her car’s bumper. Kathleen has also been an active member of SEIU walking picket lines.

Kathleen was a Medical Social Worker at Good Samaritan and Dominican Hospitals during the pandemic. She taught our Food Not Bombs volunteers the COVID safety protocol. She helped COVID patients, and once Trump’s vaccines were introduced, she found herself helping the vaccine injured navigate the medical system.

Most of you know something about my history. I will share some of what you may not know about to see if you agree with Joy and share her claims that I am also gullible and would let myself be used by the far right.

You may know that I co-founded the global movement Food Not Bombs in 1980. The movement is active in over 1,000 cities in over 65 countries. When Russia’s Special Military Operation started, our Moscow Food Not Bombs volunteers were arrested for marching for peace. A Putin linked white supremacist group murdered several of our volunteers, including Timur Kacharava in St. Petersburg as he was leaving the Food Not Bombs meal in November 2005.  So, I am not really a fan of Putin.

This is the background of this “deplorable” who must be an anti-semitic racist homophobe. The suggestion that Brave and Free condones racism and homophobia is odd considering my history.

What you might not know is that the Klan marched around my family’s home in Virginia with flaming torches and threw rocks at our house, because my parents stood up for the rights of our town’s only Jewish family during a PTA meeting. That same elementary school was finally forced to allow black children to attend when I was in the sixth grade, but like me they were placed in the special education class to keep us away from the good white students.

I am proud to count as good friends Black Panther leaders Kiilu Nyasha and Carol Hill. I delivered groceries to the Black Liberation Army controlled housing project at Columbia Point in Boston in the early years of Food Not Bombs. I was the director of the Leonard Peltier Defense Committee, the native American political prisoner, and helped Pam and Ramona Africa on the campaign to free Abu Jamal. I have worked with Food Not Bombs volunteers in Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, Palestine, Turkey, and dozens of cities in Eastern Europe, Mexico, the Philippines and Indonesia. Racists always join people of color in addressing the suffering of war and poverty.

I participated with Act Up in protests against Anthony Fauci, and the police violence waged against my gay and trans friends in the Castro. I designed the weekly full color drag queen magazine “Current News”, staffed the Kansas City’s Gay Lesbian Hotline, and like most of us I have gay and lesbian friends and family members who I love.

As you may know, I did 500 nights in jail in San Francisco and faced twenty-five to life in prison for my work with Food Not Bombs. I was captured on three occasions and taken to a dark room, had my clothing ripped off, was lifted by my arms and legs until my ligaments and tendons tore, and was stuffed naked into a stress position cage for three days each time.

The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force sent a memo to the San Francisco Field Office on August 29, 1988 after witnessing our arrests at Golden Gate Park, claiming Food Not Bombs was a “credible national security threat”. That is a huge endorsement of my ability to organize.

When I arrived at Chris Krohn’s recent San Francisco Mime Troupe after party, a dear friend and owner of Veg News happened to walk by with her brother. He had just finished reading Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States.”  He was excited to tell me that I was included in Zinn’s book. I shared that Howard and I had been friends and that he wrote the forward to my first two books. Chris Hedges wrote the forward to my last text, ‘The Anarchist Cookbook.”

NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE TO WAR AND THE ATTACKS ON OUR FREEDOMS

Again, I tell you all this in response to Joy Schendledecker’s attack against Brave and Free in Bruce Bratton’s newsletter www.BrattonOnline.com  (8/7), where she claims the group is some stealth-racist far right group made up by innocent dupes. Do you really think I am that politically unsophisticated?

Kathleen initiated Brave and Free Santa Cruz, using her decades of experience in the peace and social justice movement to inform the strategy of our local resistance to the AI managed digital prison being implemented as this phase of global centralized control. I designed the Brave and Free logo and most of our literature.

Working class people of every background joined the group. We held a series of workshops on how to build a nonviolent movement against a totalitarian government. We asked our members to read “CANVAS:  A Guide to Effective Nonviolent Struggle”.  A group of about thirty people met at the Resource Center for Nonviolence writing our Values and Mission Statement, as suggested by what we had learned from studying the process that the activists in Serbia had used to build their nonviolent resistance movement against Milosevic, much of which was based on the teachings of Gene Sharp.

When CodePink announced a national protest for an end to the nearly decade long war in Ukraine, the members of Brave and Free Santa Cruz agreed to participate. It was chilling to see our peace rally being hijacked by supporters of Ukrainian Nazi leader Stepan Bandera with their “Clear the Skies” signs. This particularly disturbed me because, in May 2014, I watched a livestream video of a mob attacking the Trade Union Center in Odessa, Ukraine, setting the building on fire and killing over 40 people. Some of those attacking the union hall waved red and black flags that I generally associate with left anarchist allies. So I wrote my Food Not Bombs friends in Ukraine to find out why anarchists were involved.  They responded that that was the flag of the far right Nazi group Azov and that their members had been terrorizing our volunteers for years. They said that they had a history of attacking the annual gay pride march and often assaulted the Roma community.

The “Clear the Skies” group at our rally were proud to show me their Facebook pages with Bandera’s photo and red and black profile backgrounds. One board member of the Resource Center for Nonviolence vigorously defended them when I expressed alarm that Nazis were participating in our peace protest, and were calling for an escalation in the conflict that would most certainly lead to a nuclear war.  CodePink’s Medea Benjamin also expressed frustration that they had attended our protests. That red and black flag can still be seen in current videos and photos flapping over the graves of those killed during the war in Ukraine, and flying on the tanks provided to them by the taxpayers of America and Europe.
While social media censors their reporting, if you look hard enough you can follow journalists like Patrick Lancaster, Wyatt Reed, and Eva Bartlett who have been reporting from the Donbas for years covering the war.

I am currently getting 15 to 20 heartbreaking calls a morning from seniors who live in rural America, seeking food. Many express anger that we are sending billions of dollars to Ukraine, while they are down to their last can of tuna and don’t have money to buy gas for their car. This crisis is only going to become more dire.  LendingTree reported on March 30, 2023 that more than 8.07 million people in the United States were behind in their monthly rent payments.

While nearly half of the members of Brave and Free probably call themselves progressive, we also have support of people who may have voted for Biden or Trump. Some members might be backing Trump, Robert F Kennedy Jr or Dr. Cornel West. Others like myself don’t care at all about the divisive Presidential theater that was designed to pit Americans against one another, to insure we will never be a threat to power.  Brave and Free doesn’t endorse any political party or personality. We are united against the threats to our health and freedoms, bound together by our values and mission statement.  We stand against war and the increased escalation in Ukraine that brings us closer every day to a nuclear conflict. That is why we chose to hold a rally for peace in Ukraine on Hiroshima Day, the anniversary of the first use of nuclear weapons on a city.

THOUGHT POLICE – SUPPORTING CENSORSHIP TO PROTECT CORPORATE DOMINATION

Joy Schendledecker also attacked the website “The Last American Vagabond” where independent journalists like Whitney Webb publish their ground breaking research on the inner workings of power and the role of the mafia, finance, and the security state in building a system of control that has no allegiance to any political party or political personality.

Whitney Webb’s two volume book “One Nation Under Blackmail” provides a detailed account of covert manipulation of our society. I can confirm from direct experience that the perspective on power that she details are accurate. We plan to show one of her interviews at our next meeting. Two of my old leftist friends, Dr Shannon Murray and Palestinian American journalist Sam Husseini both suggested I read Webb’s work, and I am pleased that they introduced me to her research.

When social media started to censor unofficial information and flooded the media with their divide and conquer propaganda, the information provided on far left sites like “The Last American Vagabond” and “The Corbett Report” provided access to information that had been silenced at the request of the state. We now know from discovery in federal lawsuits, FOIA requests and the Twitter Files that the government was able to hide experts who expressed perspectives on the pandemic, war or the economy that interfered with the agenda of the corporate state.  We have direct personal connections with the people whose websites we have linked on our website, and we know they are not supporting racists, or homophobic hate.

Joy, you seem to believe that these websites are based on the dog-whistle images on unrelated ads you may see pushed by AI algorithms. You seem to be making things up to fit your ideology. For example, it’s weird to accuse Brave and Free of endorsing a t-shirt simply because it’s on the same merchandise platform as that used by a totally different channel. Currently, I can’t access the braveandfreesantacruz.org website because our “webmaster” Commander X has disappeared with the details, and I have more important things to do. But if I could, I would add more links and sure would not remove the great links we already have.

These censors live among us. Google’s Trust and Safety team is managed by three former CIA agents. A total of 165 people from the Intelligence Community work at Google. Facebook and Twitter also have large numbers of spooks gatekeeping speech. Three years ago, everyone on the left would have been horrified by the use of the security forces to silence dissent.

Our digital history is even being rewritten. The co-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, has been making some serious allegations about the manipulation of information on the platform by intelligence agencies, specifically the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Information I could find three years ago while writing my memoir has vanished.

Before 2020, those of us on the far left lived by a slogan “Question Authority.” We stood against censorship, militarism, big Pharma, mass surveillance and CIA coups. We supported bodily autonomy, labor rights, the protection of the environment, and defended our civil liberties. That seems to no longer be the case for many of our colleague, who see themselves as the “educated class” and believe that the working class are ignorant antisemitic, homophobic, racist rednecks.

“Obey Authority” has become the slogan of the lockdown liberals.

The black, gay, lesbian, trans and Jewish members of Brave and Free Santa Cruz might not agree with Joy Schendledecker and her depiction of our organization.

Thankfully our movement is growing in response to the increasing threats to our freedom and the very real danger of a global war between nuclear armed nations.  I encourage you to join us in what has become one of the most important times in our half century of resistance to the totalitarian policies of these global institutions. I encourage Joy and her supporters to attend one of our meetings to verify their claims.

SANDY LYDON EVENING…plan ahead. On Saturday October 14 Sandy Lydon will give a talk at the Rio Theatre 1205 Soquel Avenue, East Santa Cruz at 7p.m. He’ll start at 7 and the doors open at 6:15. Tickets will go fast… so go to sandylydon.eventbrite.com. It’s sponsored by Leadership Santa Cruz County. If you want to read more from Sandy like his opinion on the college name change go to sandylydon.com/

WE’LL MISS LINDA BURMAN-HALL. It was and will be nearly impossible to enjoy serious music in our community without thinking about Linda Burman-Hall. Herb teaching music at UCSC for decades, her creating and staging the Baroque Music Festival for so many years and so much more. Even recently Linda’s devotion to the “new” radio station KSQD made it a huge success. She was great fun to go to concerts with because she always knew more than the program notes.

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

THE POPE’S EXORCIST. (NETFLIX) (6.1 IMDB). This scary, religious horror movie is taken from books by a Roman Catholic priest who actually did some exorcisms in and around the Vatican community. Russell Crowe is the priest and he’s as good as any actor could be in this touch-feely scary role.

TELEMARKETERS. (HBO) (7.7 IMDB). This is a fake documentary about those damned telemarketers who call all of us saying they are with the police and are trying to raise money for some phony police event or cause. It gives us a comedic view of their lives and how fake and almost illegal it is. Watch about half an hour…you’ll learn enough.

GOLDA. (DEL MAR THEATRE). Helen Mirren carries the role of Golda Meir and Moshe Dayan is in it and Liev Schreiber acts as Henry Kissinger. Golda is the first head (prime minister) of the new state of Israel and as you’ll be shown is/was a chain smoker (Chesterfields). It’s absorbing, well made, complex and basically covers the three week Yom Kippur war. Don’t miss it.

SHELTER. (PRIME) (6.6 IMDB) Tough to follow this mystery. A man dies in a terrible car crash…but does he die? His high school age son is nearly devastated but endures several other worldly experiences involving his dad. It’s even light and cute in parts and there’s even a Batlady and a character named Dylan Shakes. Watch at your own risk.

JURY DUTY. (PRIME SERIES) (8.3 IMDB) Be very careful this is billed as a comedy but if you’ve ever been on a jury or been excused from serving on one…it’s no laughing matter. This jury selection takes place in Huntington Beach near LA. (or as we know it “Surf City”). It’s done in a pseudo-documentary style and goes through all the legal time and mind consuming legal steps in how a jury is selected. Not too bad a movie but torture if you’ve ever done time on a complex court case.

FIVE DAYS AT MEMORIAL. (PRIME SERIES) (7.7 IMDB). Not a new one, but a good one about the disaster during and after the Katrina hurricane that hit New Orleans in August of 2005. Vera Farmiga is one of the staff and all the acting and special effects are well worth watching.

JESUS REVOLUTION. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (7.1 IMDB). A very sweet, well intentioned Christian feel good and true movie about Los Angeles teenagers in the 1970’s. Kelsey Grammer plays a minister who eventually sees that the hippies around his part of LA mean well and they all join together to worship Jesus in a slightly different way.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

DEPP Vs. HEARD. (NETFLIX SERIES) (4.7 IMDB). Watching all 3 episodes was the guiltiest pleasure I’ve had from a screen in months. I was on Amber Heard’s side against the 60 year old Johnny Depp. And since experts say, “About 1 in 4 women and nearly 1 in 10 men have experienced some form of intimate partner violence”. It’s a terrifically spliced together documentary so that we think they were both in court at the same time.  They are both actors and you sense it constantly but do watch it…it’ll take you attention away from almost everything.

KILL BOKSOON. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.6 IMDB). She is an assassin and very good at it except that she has a daughter that she loves and who loves her too. It’s a Korean film as so many are these days…and usually they are a cut above

THE BOYS. (PRIME SERIES) (8.7 IMDB). This mess of a takeoff on Marvel Comics has Jack Quaid and a bunch of sillies dressed as Superheroes acting a nutso plot in the real world. Elizabeth Shue is back and is a welcome addition. The rest of the movie isn’t worth your time or rental.

GUILTY MINDS (PRIME SERIES) It takes place mostly in a courtroom in India when a case against a guy who’s like Harvey Weinstein gets charged with and how he handles his case. It’s complex and includes video games even a murder and an abortion. Absorbing but not great.

UNLOCKED. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.4 IMDB).   A Korean movie that centers on cell phones and hi tech murders. One woman loses her cell phone and a very clever killer finds it and uses it to tease and torture her every single move for days.  It’s fast paced, subtle, well-acted and has a surprise ending which is worth watching and waiting for

...

August 28

SEARCHING FOR THE HIDDEN AGENDA

In the above photo, if you recognize the room as city council chambers, you’d be correct. What are the people doing? My computer auto selected “A group of people praying in a church” which is not correct. Another possibility: a group of people simultaneously discovering their shoelaces are untied. Again, incorrect. It is a group of people, including me, being led in Climate calisthenics by the city’s Sustainability and Climate Action Manager at a City Council Study Session regarding West Cliff Drive on August 15th, 2023. The people in the pews include two Department Heads and other senior city staff. On the other side of the podium were four city council members, the city manager and city attorney, the latter two absenting themselves from the calisthenics portion. A total of thirteen city senior staff was in attendance, either in person or via zoom, not including the city clerk and deputy city clerk. Plus, of course the consultant team from Farallon Strategies.

This is the third city-generated public gathering addressing West Cliff Drive that I have attended. All have abundant senior staff and the consulting team in attendance. This one, held in council chambers was named, Understanding the Dynamic Coast. It was largely a repetition of previous meetings with a few updates. If you believe as I do that there is a not-so-hidden agenda here, then some of the consultant and staff comments were signaling.

Repairing last winter’s storm damage to portions of West Cliff Drive appears as an afterthought at these meetings. Even the diverted traffic off West Cliff, causing headaches for residents is labelled a “pilot-study.” Pilot for what? We did get a brief update from the city Public Works director regarding repairing the Bethany Curve Bridge where Woodrow enters West Cliff. Repairing this bridge is key to re-opening the road. According to the director, the inability to secure contractors earlier on means the timeline for the bridge repairs to begin is predicted to be spring of 2024. If fixing the damage and restoring the drive were the main goals, there would be no need for the ongoing involvement of multiple senior staff, repeated public meetings and the ever-present consulting team. Occasional updates from Public Works would be all that is needed.

The council-approved development of a fifty-year vision for West Cliff Drive should not require such an investiture of senior staff, consultants, and public monies and if it does, then maybe we cannot afford to do visioning at this time. Unless behind the scenes, these players already know what they want for West Cliff Drive and are gaming the system to fulfill that goal.

We heard a lot about Adaptive Management Strategies and Adaptive Pathways, which includes “knowns and unknowns.” That there is “regularity uncertainty” which means agencies such as the CA Coastal Commission (CCC) haven’t yet made up their minds about the future of West Cliff Drive. The red flag is if the staff and consultants who are talking with the CCC staff are pushing their agenda of “managed retreat” which will certainly include turning West Cliff into a one-way road. I suggest that is what is happening, and it excludes the public, especially those who will be most impacted by any departure from the current road configuration.

Then there’s Nature-based solutions which are being promoted and we learned have many definitions. We heard that riprap and sea walls can alter surf breaks which is true except the areas of West Cliff which need repairs already have riprap which failed due to lack of maintenance since the 1990’s, according to the engineer from Public Works whose voice has been curiously silent or silenced since the first days after the storm damage. One Nature-based solution to create wider beaches suggested in an online local publication is the depositing of sand off-shore. The writer used Seabright Beach as a great example. That beach, which significantly widened after the Small Crafts Harbor was built, also deflected the mouth of the San Lorenzo River including the build-up of a summer berm leading to flooding of the Boardwalk basement, necessitating the recent erection of expensive pipelines and pumps to keep the river lagoon water level at five feet. Be careful fiddling with Mother Nature.

We heard from the consultants that there will be limitations in future funding from the state and national levels (not supported by evidence, nor does it apply to repairing the current damage) with the conclusion that the burden for resilience will be shifted back to the local level. Does this imply that future economic development along West Cliff will therefore have to be accepted?  The non-profit Save The Waves which has an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) with the city and accepted money from the city according to its website, highlights economic development for this stretch of the coast.

The constant refrain is that there will inevitably be similar damage from future storms, a conclusion not supported by statements from the city engineers. Of course, if repairing the current damage is delayed, there may be more damage this winter, which becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The consultant handed it over to the city manager to conclude the meeting. His words suggest a very different future in the works for West Cliff Drive. He advised everyone “to recognize the moment, to be bold, to be innovative and forward-thinking. At the heart of all this is to build out the innovative, ambitious fifty-year vision. A foundational vision for achieving some really exciting things along West Cliff over the decades to come.”

The need to fix the damage, to return the road to its pre-damaged state for all to enjoy, to protect the lower westside neighborhoods that will be devastated if they shoulder the burden of future diverted traffic doesn’t rate even a bit part in this vision. That exclusion will not sit well with those impacted. I expect there will be bold, innovative resistance.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
August 28

WHAT MAKES SAFER STREETS, AND FOR WHOM?

Last Saturday I moderated the “Safe Streets” panel at the Transportation Justice Conference put on by the Campaign for Sustainable Transportation. It was an honor to be part of the conversation, and a great opportunity for me to dive into the subject of street safety and “Vision Zero.”

Vision Zero is a program adopted in Sweden in 1997 to eliminate traffic-related serious injury and death. Dozens of countries, and dozens of cities in the US, have adopted it in various iterations since then. At the US federal level, the National Roadway Safety Strategy and Zero Deaths and The Safe System integrate Vision Zero principles, with “Safe Streets and Roads for All” funded by “Build Back Better” infrastructure funding (aka H.R.3684 – Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act).

There are six principles that form the basis of the Safe System approach: deaths and serious injuries are unacceptable, humans make mistakes, humans are vulnerable, responsibility is shared, safety is proactive, and redundancy is crucial. Instead of the Street Smarts program created in San Ramon 3 Es (Education, Engineering, and Enforcement), Vision Zero is moving from individual blame to shared responsibility, including for those who design and implement the systems.

I see a kinship between Vision Zero principles and Harm Reduction and Abolitionist philosophies.

“By taking action at the local (and state) levels to prioritize safety in our policies and practices, we can create a new reality in which everyone — those of us walking and driving, and those of us riding a bus or a bike —feel safe and comfortable moving about our communities.” Vision Zero Network

According to the National Harm Reduction Coalition: “Harm reduction is a set of practical strategies and ideas aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use. Harm Reduction is also a movement for social justice built on a belief in, and respect for, the rights of people who use drugs.”

Miriam Kaba defines abolition as: “It’s trying to bring into being a world where we have everything that we need to survive and thrive. …That includes food and shelter and education and health and art and beauty and all the things. That’s what PIC [Prison Industrial Complex] abolition is as a framework and a practice.”

Vision Zero was adopted by the Santa Cruz County Public Health department in 2017. The Santa Cruz County Community Traffic Safety Coalition has a Vision Zero Work Plan 2020-2022.

The City of Santa Cruz Public Works has been using the “Street Smarts” program. Though in 2019 city council passed their Vision Zero resolution, with a year-long Street Smarts media campaign as the main educational component, county-wide. In addition, the City of Santa Cruz 2021 Local Roadway Safety Plan addresses safety for unhoused pedestrians and cyclists, but not for others with access and functional needs.

At the county level, significant and ongoing unmet needs have been laid out by the county Elder and Disability Transportation Advisory Committee. Vision Zero is working to support municipalities and bring together agencies that historically have not collaborated much, but clearly there are deep structural and cultural challenges to full, fast implementation.

For a fascinating (depending on how much you like public policy) look at some of the challenges with implementing Vision Zero on our local streets, balancing the needs of all street users–including people with disabilities and those who feel unsafe in other ways than by traffic–watch the presentation and community dialog on Item 15 of the March 15th council meeting.

Caption: Under equality, everyone gets the same resources. Under equity, the specific historical and present-day circumstances and abilities of individuals and communities are taken into consideration to provide appropriate solutions that provide everyone with opportunities to live safe and healthy lives. © 2017 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Modified, with permission, by FHWA. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/zero-deaths/equity-roadway-safety

Another problem is the continuation of traditional enforcement measures within many adaptations of Vision Zero. For example, California Office of Traffic Safety (CA OTS) grants money to local police departments for enforcement programs. One funded program is “Before Aggressive Drivers Get Everyone Stopped” or BADGES, a multi-jurisdiction effort focused on enforcement, in place since at least 2006 and ongoing through at least September 2023.

Meanwhile, Santa Cruz County traffic stop data shows a continued pattern of racial profiling in traffic stops. Police accountability and transparency is sorely lacking in all four municipalities, though to comply with state law AB 953, The Racial Profiling and Identity Act of 2015,  we should be seeing that data in their transparency portals any day now.

Image caption: screenshot of https://www.santacruzcounty.us/VisionSantaCruz/PerformanceMeasurement/TransparencyPortal.aspx

I have lots more I want to write but I’m past my deadline! See my notes and an article that I didn’t find a way to link to here. Perhaps there will be a part 2 to this column soon, getting more into mobility justice and traffic stops. In the meantime, I’ll end with an extended quote from the website of Bike East Bay.

“People experience different intersectional barriers to mobility and feeling safe on our streets such as car-based violence, harassment, economic insecurity and public policies and processes. Mobility Justice is about investing in and supporting innovation in our marginalized communities so that we can all move free, safe, and unafraid.” And “We work with people who have lost loved ones to traffic and police violence, in neighborhoods left behind by systemic racism, and fight bureaucracies that neglect the human impacts of its actions. In the face of grief, trauma and frustration, we revive and sustain ourselves by nurturing, healing and caring for each other.”

“We work to ensure transportation planning and policies are developed, applied, and implemented to counter and redress the effects of systemic and institutional racism. We prioritize improving safety and access to bicycling for people of color, lower-income people, and immigrants to improve the health outcomes of these communities. We recognize people of color are more likely to be stopped by police for bicycle and pedestrian infractions and we will call on local police departments to disavow racially biased traffic enforcement. We strongly believe that displacement is a transportation issue and we work to keep communities in place.”

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
August 28

COUNTY CODE COMPLIANCE IS COMPLACENT FOR SWENSON

Last week, I included some photos here regarding the problems that Swenson’s Aptos Village Project Phase 2 is causing the public and the environment.  I filed a Complaint with the Santa Cruz County Code Compliance Dept. about Swenson’s contractors using most of what little public parking is left on Aptos Creek Road, even using a large pickup truck tailgate parked in front of a fire hydrant in a red curb zone.  I asked why the County was allowing this, when there is a Swenson mobile construction trailer and space for parking within the construction zone?

County Code Compliance’s answer below is shocking.  Please write Matt Machado matt.machado@santacruzcounty.us and express your thoughts on the matter.

****************

Hi Becky,

We understand that this project might bring challenges to public roads and public parking.  However, the public space utilized by the project helps meet its needs/goals to make expected progress and will only be temporarily.  We appreciate your time. 

Thank you,
Code Compliance

****************

COASTAL COMMISSION DELAYS CONSIDERATION OF COUNTY’S PLANNING DOCUMENT

The Coastal Commission will grant itself a delay of up to one year for further consideration and approval of the County’s Local Coastal Plan (LCP) proposed update for dense in-fill development in the coastal areas.

The next California Coastal Commission meeting is September 6-8.  It is a hybrid format, with in-person meeting in Eureka (location recently changed to accommodate many large wildland fires in that area). The Commission will take actions on September 6 that affect Santa Cruz County.

Although the County’s LCP was deemed complete on May 24, 2023, the updates within are so significant, tne Commission needs more time to review them. LCP-3-SCO-23-0004-1-Part B (Sustainability Update – Time Extension)

The proposed update would affect agricultural and urban areas in the coastal zones, and would restructure the permitting schemes, change zoning regulations “(including expanding allowable uses in most zoning districts and changing development and design standards), among other changes.”

  • The proposed updates would “foster mixed-use development within existing developed communities and along primary transportation corridors. The amendment also updates much of the LCP’s background text regarding the County’s physical, social, and biological context, allowed uses within particular zoning districts, and standards related to priority land uses and potential conversion of those uses, among other things.”

If you have comments, you can submit them to the Coastal Commission here

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION AWARDS $780,000 GRANT TO SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FOR CONSULTANTS TO STUDY SEA LEVEL RISE IMPACTS AND ADAPTATION PLANS

When in doubt, do a study, and hire expensive consultants to do it.  The California Coastal Commission is set to approve awarding the County of Santa Cruz a $780,000 grant to hire a consultant to study the impacts of sea level rise, gather “robust” public input, and make some recommendations as to how the County could adapt.  Planner David Carlson asked for $733,000 in the application.  Take a look at the cost of the consultants vs. staff.  The photos are amazing, but there are none from the flooding in the coastal areas in the unincorporated areas near Watsonville.

I guess the Commission has extra money…and will award an extra $50,000 more than what Planner Carlson requested from the $31 million the State has made available.  What is not clear is why.

“Staff recommends that the Commission award $780,000 in Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Assistance grant funds to the County of Santa Cruz to complete a series of technical studies on sea level rise (SLR) hazards, economic impacts, and adaptation pathways that will culminate in an LCP amendment on SLR. The project would build adaptation approaches at both the countywide and neighborhood scale, including phased, trigger-based adaptation pathways, as described in the County’s grant application”

I always wonder why such recommendations for our Communities have to come from an outside consultant that knows little about the area?

WILL YOU PLEASE RECONSIDER THAT?

The dates of the LAFCO Resolution approved August 2, 2023 to order the Branciforte Fire Protection District to dissolve are all inaccurate and the CalPERS cost analysis of moving the Branciforte Fire staff over to the Scotts Valley Fire District staff expired July 1, 2023.  There was no accurate budget information given to the Commission to verify the repeated claim that “this ship is sinking”.  Information supplied by the County Elections Clerk, Ms. Tricia Webber, showed that if there were to be district-based elections after the consolidation, Branciforte Fire District voters would have 51% representation in their district, and will compose more than 10% of the total voters in the combined Scotts Valley Fire District, not 7%, as LAFCO’s staff claimed.

For these reasons and more, I filed a REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, for Public Benefit, with the LAFCO, as any person can do.  I feel this is important because LAFCO is planning, in my opinion, a number of annexations (or “reorganizations”, as this one has been termed) and the manner in which the Branciforte Fire Protection District is handled sets a precedent.

As it stands, the people in that existing District will surrender all monies and assets that include their fire station and engines, yet have no effective representation.

At the time of writing this, LAFCO has not yet posted the agenda for the September 6, 2023 meeting when the REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION will be heard.  Meeting Schedule, Agendas & Minutes | Santa Cruz LAFCO

However, you can find the link to the approved document from August 2 meeting here

NEW APTOS LIBRARY GETS BIG MONEY BOOST FROM FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY

Last Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors accepted $394,000 from the Friends of the Santa Cruz Public Libraries. Listen to the presentation here, as Item #7

The new library is massive, and is due to open in October.  I am glad to see the solar panels on the roof…projected to supply all the energy the library will need for operation.

NEW LIVE OAK LIBRARY ANNEX MOVING ALONG BUT WILL HAVE NO BOOKS

If you haven’t visited the Simpkins Swim Center lately, you might be interested in knowing what the new Live Oak Library Annex is looking like these days.   Even though the County used monies from Measure S Library taxation to pay for this, there will be no books and no librarian there.

Read the Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury Report about this

Contact your County Board of Supervisors with your thoughts; Board of Supervisors boardofsupervisors@santacruzconty.us

WE WILL PAY OVER $9,000 EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 13 YEARS FOR A PARK THAT KIDS CAN’T SAFELY ACCESS?

Last Tuesday, the County Board of Supervisors swiftly approved $2.3 million to  purchase the 38-acres property at 188 Whiting Road for a new park out near the County Fairgrounds, with zero discussion regarding how kids will be able to safely access the proposed “temporary soccer fields”.

While the staff report made claims of collaboration and agreements with the Fairgrounds, this park has never been publicly discussed as an agenda item by the Fair Board in the last four years and the current CEO knew nothing about the new park next to the Fairgrounds.

Will it be safe for kids to ride their bikes on Highway 152?  The alternate route is Paulsen Road, which is narrow and has no shoulder.

The deal has been struck behind closed doors.  The taxpayers will shoulder $9,000 every month to pay for this purchase at a time when Parks Dept. cannot even take care of what they already have, and upgrading the existing County-owned Pinto Lake Park or developing the vacant County-owned land at Freedom Boulevard and Crestview where families can easily and safely access the parks was never even discussed.

Write Parks Director Jeff Gaffney jeff.gaffney@santacruzcounty.us with your thoughts and solutions.

WHAT ABOUT A NEW COUNTY CHARTER?

Tune in this Friday at 1pm to Santa Cruz Voice and “Community Matters” to hear a discussion about what happened when citizens tried to change the Santa Cruz County Charter.

A HAPPY AFTERNOON CONCERT IN FELTON

Many thanks to Hallcrest Vineyards in Felton for the wonderful outdoor concert featuring well-known cowboy singer and song writer Dave Stamey and Annie Lydon singing harmony.  It was a great venue, and wonderful music for a lighthearted afternoon.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS THAT SIMPLY NEED TO BE ANSWERED.  GO TO A CONCERT AND HAVE SOME FUN.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
August 28

AUGUST’S FLOWER

California harebell is the native wildflower I’m challenging folks to seek in the near future. August seems like it might be a difficult month to see wildflowers, but this species wasn’t easy to pick out from a wide variety of native wildflowers blossoming right now. I picked California harebell (Smithiastrum prenanthoides) because it is not easy to find, but finding it will lead to lots of other discoveries.

Harebells

Harebells – what an evocative name! Perhaps this common name is from association with rabbit (hare) habitat. I haven’t heard anyone call a local rabbit a hare, but I just saw a large rabbit in the high snowy areas of the Eastern Sierra Nevada which is called a ‘snowshoe hare.’ It would be a mistake to associate this California harebell with bunnies for reasons I’ll share in a bit.

Harebells are common garden plants for folks who are keen on blue flowers in their gardens. Blue is a sought-after flower color for gardeners, and harebells in the garden area large, luxuriant bell-shaped flowers. Our California harebell, however, is a speck of a blue flower, easily overlooked. And, with additional irony, our harebell is not bell shaped, at all. This is getting confusing!

Taxonomy!

One day, if anyone wants to help, I’ll lead a common name registry for plants…to help solve some of the confusion with names. How many people have given up on plant identification from frustration with Latin names or the many vastly different common names assigned to plants. There is also the problem with common names that don’t fit. Like, in this case, ‘bellflower’ – I was imagining what one would need to do in order to make a bell shaped like this flower. The bell would have had to have been made of pliable metal and dropped from a very high location to explore the side of the bell in ribbons. Somehow, in this scenario, the ‘clapper’ of the bell would have to survive to stick way outside of the exploded body. If I were to rename this windflower in a way that makes it easier to relate to the plant, I’d call it something like ‘tiny blue woodland trumpets’ The plural in this case because you always see the flower in bunches, never singly. Delving into the Latin is a cause for a headache, but bear with me to discover what botanists put up with.

When I first learned the plant, it was called Campanula prenanthoides but then it was changed to Smithiastrum prenanthioides. My botanist friends did their solid best to train me to this new name and then I started writing this essay to discover the name has changed yet again to Asyneuma prenanthoides – that genus has similar non-bell shaped flowers but is found in Northern Africa and Eurasia, with lots of interesting species found in Turkey. Being a gardener, and squint as I may, I couldn’t see how this plant was a campanula except for its beautiful blue color. So, any of these new names are better than the old one, with its odd reference to what might otherwise conjure bells and rabbits and such. Oh, but the common name stayed!

If you can get past the issue of Latin names, which seem here to stay with the classification of Life, there is one thing you might celebrate about the bouncing about of Latin names. Let’s smile and shout out cheerily every time something changes its Latin name. It means that someone is making a living studying, and publishing, taxonomy. Yes, someone is actually making a living studying the relationships of living beings to one another.

Where to Look

Back in the real world of flowers, how might you find these beautiful blue wildflowers? Santa Cruz County is ALMOST the southern range limit of this species along the coast. Botanical wizard extraordinaire Dean Taylor documented the species on the West Slope of Cushing Mountain in Big Sur- so, maybe others can find the species in more Monterey County locations. In Santa Cruz County, look in dark moist spots in forests. I find it in areas that are seepy in the winter and dry and shady in the summer where there isn’t much competition. Roadcuts are good, but let’s try to find the species where roads haven’t made marks.

Visiting shady forests is a good thing to do in midsummer, anyways, don’t you agree? Get cool, smell that distinct warm redwood scent, feel the crunch crunch of dry redwood branchlets and needles under your feet. And, celebrate the lack of smoke in the air this summer, at least for the time being.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

August 22

#234 / Kissinger’s Crimes

Having recently had a birthday, Henry Kissinger is now over 100 years old. If you don’t know who he is, please feel free to click the following link, which will take you to an extensive Wikipedia write up on Dr. Kissinger.

The unflattering picture of Kissinger, reproduced above, comes courtesy of an online story from the London Times, dated in May 2021. This current blog posting of mine, referencing Kissinger, was stimulated by a May 24, 2023, story published by Democracy Now. Here’s the Democracy Now headline, with a link to the story:

Kissinger at 100: New War Crimes Revealed in Secret Cambodia Bombing That Set Stage for Forever Wars

To summarize what Democracy Now has to say, let me give you the initial paragraph:

A bombshell new investigation from The Intercept reveals that former U.S. national security adviser and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was responsible for even more civilian deaths during the U.S. war in Cambodia than was previously known. The revelations add to a violent résumé that ranges from Latin America to Southeast Asia, where Kissinger presided over brutal U.S. military interventions to put down communist revolt and to develop U.S. influence around the world. While survivors and family members of these deadly campaigns continue to grieve, Kissinger celebrates his 100th birthday this week. “This adds to the list of killings and crimes that Henry Kissinger should, even at this very late date in his life, be asked to answer for,” says The Intercept’s Nick Turse, author of the new investigation, “Kissinger’s Killing Fields.” We also speak with Yale University’s Greg Grandin, author of Kissinger’s Shadow: The Long Reach of America’s Most Controversial Statesman (emphasis added).

When I was in college, I read what was then Kissinger’s brand-new and much-heralded book, The Necessity of Choice. I gather, from an online search, that this book is pretty much out of print, today. Amazon reported having two paperback copies available (as of May 24, 2023), with the low-priced paperback listed at $84.73. Yesterday (I just checked), those seem to have been sold. I couldn’t find my own copy, which kind of surprised me, since I never throw away a book, but I haven’t exhausted all the bookshelves on which I might have lodged it, and if I can find my copy, maybe I can make some money by selling it off. I more or less remember thinking that the book was quite good, when I read it, shortly after it was published in 1962, but then I met Kissinger personally. Having done so, I have never since been a fan.

MY HENRY KISSINGER STORY

As I say, I did meet Henry Kissinger personally, at Stanford University – and I had some dealings with him. This was back in 1964; at least, I think so. I am a bit unclear on the actual date; it could have been in 1963. Having just read in the Democracy Now story that Kissinger should really be considered a war criminal, I thought I would tell my personal “Henry Kissinger Story,” to demonstrate to those reading this blog why I am NOT a Henry Kissinger fan – aside from the fact that there is a good argument that he is, and should be considered, a war criminal. Based on  my personal experience, I expect the worst from Henry Kissinger, always, and I am not that surprised to hear about how he, personally, helped our government to commit atrocities not previously all that evident. As I reviewed the Wikipedia entry on Kissinger, I noted that it says that the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Kissinger, in 1973, was “controversial.” Well, those who protested were definitely on to something!

I entered Stanford University as a freshman in the Fall of 1961, and during the 1961-1962 academic year, I lived in Wilbur Hall, a dormitory for freshmen men. During the Fall and Winter Quarters of the 1962-1963 academic year, I attended the Stanford overseas campus in Tours, France. I was back on the Stanford campus for the Spring Quarter of 1963, residing in Stern Hall. I also lived in Stern Hall during the 1963-1964 academic year.

While living at Stern, I helped coordinate the Stern Hall “Guest In Residence Program.” Again, I am not certain, now, what year this was. Notable people would come and actually live in the dormitory, eat with the students, and also make speeches for the campus and community at large. During the time I helped run the program, Henry Kissinger was our invited guest. As I say, I am pretty sure that was sometime during the 1963-1964 academic year.

I can’t remember all my responsibilities, but I guess I was considered to be “in charge” of the Guest In Residence Program the year that Kissinger was our guest – although I certainly had played no part in deciding whom to invite. One day, I was called to the phone, to take a call from Dr. Kissinger. There were no “texts” or “emails.” Phones were the high-tech way to communicate, and the call from Dr. Kissinger, which somehow came to me, was made four days before Kissinger was supposed to arrive for his stay at Stern Hall. In the call, Dr. Kissinger told me that he wasn’t coming – at least, he wasn’t coming if I couldn’t pay his first-class airfare to and from Stanford. I think that was then about $1,000. Kissinger was under contract to show up, and there were no provisions in his contract for any reimbursement for transportation. I did know about the contract, and so I reported the contractual situation to Dr. Kissinger. Well, said Kissinger, that was his booking agent’s fault, but WE were going to have to rectify it.

I had not made the arrangements with Kissinger myself, but I was now tasked with getting Kissinger another $1,000 or so, all within a couple of days. If I couldn’t deliver, the whole program would go down in flames.

I more or less remember appealing to the President’s office, and to the Politics Department, and to the administrators of Stern Hall. Somebody, and I don’t remember who, did come through. The money was found. Kissinger came.

When he arrived at Stern Hall, Kissinger was met by an official delegation, and I was among them. He shook my hand cordially, and gave me a big smile. No apologies for shaking down the program. No acknowledgment that he had acted badly.

Like I say, I am NOT a fan of Henry Kissinger. And I am not a fan of his war-mongering foreign policy either.

If you would like to learn a bit more about the kind of foreign policies that Kissinger has enabled, I do suggest that you read the article in Democracy Now. Or, read what The Nation has to say, in its article, “Kissinger, War Criminal – Still at Large at 100.”

On the other hand, there are those who celebrate Kissinger. The former President of Armenia, for instance, Armen Sarkissian, calls him a “great teacher of statesmen.” Click this link to read what Sarkissian has to say. If you can penetrate the paywall erected by The Wall Street Journal, you will find that Sarkissian finds great virtue in the kind of cynical realpolitik that qualifies Kissinger for that “war criminal” designation, in the eyes of others.

Eyes like mine.

Like I say, I am NOT a fan.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
August 28

FLIGHT RISK ON THE STAREAWAY TO THE BIG CHAIR

Donald Trump surrendered on Thursday of last week after being indicted by the Fulton County Georgia grand jury, with all the hoopla that one might expect from him as he took advantage of the prime time TV coverage that milked his every move as he traveled from New Jersey to Georgia and back again. A threatened “major news conference” to prove his innocence with “new evidence” was cancelled the previous Monday at his legal team’s insistence since his claims were without merit, though he insisted he is innocent of any wrongdoing and is being politically persecuted, a broken record that is wearing awfully thin at this point as the evidence continues to mount. Trump’s attempts to relitigate the stolen election claim within the cases against him will certainly be a sticking point for the legal system and will require a strong push to keep him at bay.

Trump had earlier expressed his unhappiness about the judge setting his bond at $200K in the Fulton County Georgia case, but confirmed that he would nonetheless surrender, at the same time lashing out at DA Fani Willis in a bizarre, mocking post on Truth Social. “The failed District Attorney of Fulton County, Fani Willis, insisted on a $200,000 bond from me,” he wrote. “I assume, therefore, that she thought I was a ‘flight’ risk – I’d fly far away, maybe to Russia, Russia, Russia, share a gold domed suite with Vladimir, never to be seen or heard from again.” He added, “Would I be able to take my very ‘understated’ airplane with the gold TRUMP affixed for all to see? Probably not, I’d be much better off flying commercial – I’m sure nobody would recognize me!” Sure, and maybe Putin can arrange a small business jet for the last leg of your journey!

Trump’s bond agreement, known as a consent bond order, sets strict rules for his release. He will not be allowed to communicate with witnesses or co-defendants about the case, except through his lawyers, and is barred from intimidating witnesses or co-defendants. He cannot make any “direct or indirect threat of any nature against the community or to any property in the community,” including in “posts on social media or reposts of posts” from others on social media. His attorneys crack the whip as much as they dare on this restriction, but try as they might, the uncontrollable Former Guy can hardly restrain himself as he slowly digs a deeper hole. Bond agreements set for eighteen of Trump’s co-conspirators varied in bond amounts and court orders, though restrictions were not as strict as those set for Trump, and all were charged and processed during the week like any other arrestee, with fingerprints and a mug shot taken at the main county jail. The booking during prime-time viewing hours was also said by some to be an effort by Trump to minimize the charges and distract from the indignity of his surrender, but the almost instantaneous offer by his campaign for t-shirts with the newly released mugshot dispels that notion. “NEVER SURRENDER” it blares beneath the glowering and hostile shot of the former prez, a pose that he undoubtedly aped, and rehearsed…unlike an unexpected arrest, from a black and white shot of Adolf Hitler, as posted on Steve Schmidt’s The Warning blog on Saturday, August 26…a picture is worth a thousand words.

Some are calling Trump’s look as “The Kubrick Stare,” one of movie director Stanley Kubrick’s techniques, where he had the character stare at the camera with a forward tilt, conveying to the viewer that the individual on the screen has reached the peak of mental derangement. Think Jack Nicholson in ‘The Shining’; R. Lee Emery in ‘Full Metal Jacket’; and Malcolm McDowell in ‘A Clockwork Orange.’ One writer refers to the Greek myth where the goddess Athena punished Medusa by transforming her hair into a bed of serpents, whereupon this monster creation would then turn to stone anyone who gazed into her eyes. Seems right! Instead of snakes, Trump’s head may be covered in mousse or spray, but avoid those eyes. As writer John Waters mightsuggest, our Hairpiece Himmler may use cornstarch to stiffen his locks…which would explain why he avoids going out into the rain, and by ignoring Melania or Barron, keeps his umbrella to himself, otherwise…Gravy Train!

Megan Garber in The Atlantic says, “Welcome to the age of mugshot rule. Trump, evidently pleased with his portrait, broadcasted it on social media. The caption he appended to the shot suggests that, in this elemental legal document, questions of legality are beside the point. And it attempts to turn the language of the accusation against itself. It is a reminder to all who see it of the threat embodied by a vengeful Trump. His photo is a symbolic gesture, but is also something of an omen. This will never be over, it suggests. That face, with all its dangers, will only become more difficult to avoid.” Ned Ryun of the American Majority, a conservative political-training organization, was asked by Fox host Jesse Watters to comment on the mugshot, in reply saying that Republicans should counter with their own indictments. “You’re saying Republicans should promise mugshots of Democrats,” Watters suggested. “One hundred percent,” Ryun shot back. Fox’s Sean Hannity began his show, displaying Trump’s new picture, with the intro, “You are looking at Joe Biden – oh, I’m sorry, Donald Trump’s official mugshot.” Pausing, he went on, “Joe Biden will be soon enough anyway.”

Former Trump attorney, the indicted Kenneth Chesebro, apparently attempted to get DA Willis in a bind with trial scheduling, by requesting a speedy trial, which by law must occur within the next succeeding regular court term, after August 31. Consequently, if a trial is not initiated within sixty days, the defendant goes free, per Georgia law. Chesebro probably choked when Willis indicated she’s ready to go, scheduling a trial on October 23; Trump and his team probably choked since they have been attempting to delay the start of trials until the 2024 election is past. By doing this, citizen Trump might be able to lose twenty-five more pounds of weight, and reach a height of seven feet; upon his arrest in New York he told registrants that he was 6’2″ and 240 pounds, but at his Fulton jail processing he had lost twenty-five pounds and grown an inch taller! Or maybe the lifts in his shoes are saltwater logged. Stormy Daniels then posted on X, “Mmmkay! And I’m 110 lbs and a virgin!” She says she’s known 215 pound men, and Tiny Trump was not one of them.

Alina Habba, attorney and legal mouthpiece for Trump, was interviewed by Fox News Sunday host, Shannon Bream following the Georgia booking, saying, “We’re not concerned because we know the facts of these cases, which I can’t get into obviously for privileged reasons. But I can tell you it’s to tie him up, it’s definitely political.” Habba insists there is no need to prep Trump for any of the four pending trials he’s facing, and the team isn’t concerned because he’s “intelligent.” Bream didn’t fall over backwards, nor ask Habba for clarification on this pronouncement, but we can visualize the MAGA base across the nation, in unison, nodding their heads in agreement. No, that was NOT a Taylor Swift earthquake, only marbles rolling inside spacious skulls, but it was terrifyingly real! Attorney Habba went on to say, “If this was a normal person, I could understand the concern. President Trump is not your average person. He’s incredibly intelligent and he knows the ropes. He knows the facts because he lived them.” She then says he doesn’t have to be prepped for the truth, not when you’ve done nothing wrong. Alina, Alina, Alina…now tell us how a person so smart gets into multiple quagmires of these magnitudes? Oh, and Your Honor, in an effort to guarantee a fair trial, we move for a change of venue to the defendant’s imagination…and free baby unicorns for all.

And keep sending money, folks. Remember, our ex-Commander-In-Cheat is running out of money, having spent more than half of his grifting funds on legal fees this year. It’s reported that his ‘Save America’ pac, which is paying his legal bills, is running low on cash. Assuming he even has it, he certainly won’t be spending any of his personal funds on his troubles…it’s a service to the country, his standing between US and THEM! Donations to the Trump Presidential Campaign see 10% going to the pac. Even Crazy Rudy Giuliani is running out of money, selling off personal property to stay afloat. A trip to Mar-a-Lago to beg for Trump’s assistance on his defense fund resulted only in a promise from The Don that he would sponsor a fund raiser for America’s Mayor, but we know where that’s headed, right? When Trump did fundraising for Herschel Walker’s Senate Campaign during the midterms season, only 10% went to Hersch, so we suggest, Rudy, that you keep those Ebay fires burning!

Recently, CNBC reported that several of Trump’s indicted co-conspirators who put their efforts into overturning Joe Biden’s election, were never paid by the Trump crime syndicate for their legal work, and topping the list are Rudy, Sidney Powell, and John Eastman. Giuliani, who worked five days a week during the last two months of 2022, will never see the $800K in fees he billed – a handshake will have to suffice. All they have to show for their loyalty is careers in the dumpster, and serious criminal charges that may result in prison terms. It appears that Loser Trump took in $250M in donations off his Stop the Steal attorneys, while funneling money into the ‘Save America’ political pac, leaving his loyal band on the outside looking in, as he paid a contingent of different lawyers to serve his own interests. Never mistake the crime syndicate’s godfather for a truth teller. We can only hope that by stiffing this band of corrupt attorneys, the unprincipled Trump has contributed to his own demise.

A few weeks ago, Trump spoke at a rally in Ohio for 103 minutes, speaking over the music playing as they tried to turn off this windbag. “This is deeply, deeply weird,” tweeted conservative writer, Tom Nichols of The Atlantic. “It really is Jonestown-level stuff. These people are worshiping a real estate developer from Queens who can barely hold a thought in his head. This is beyond un-American. It’s psychotic. I think Democrats should run clips of the rally and ask: ‘Is this the party you want running the country?’ Trump is the best weapon Democrats have.” Retired four-star General Barry McCaffrey warned, “Astonishing Trump language. The crowd is similar to a Nuremberg rally in 1936. A lawless Trump in office after a 2024 election would slide us into autocracy and deny our Constitutional safeguards. This is our greatest danger as a nation since 1860.” “Very scarily and tragically, this will only get worse…a rally or a death cult?” wondered Arne Duncan, former Education Secretary. Washington Post columnist, Helene Olen reported, “This is seriously strange. Also: notice the empty seats.” Poignantly, Will Bunch of the Philadelphia Inquirer, wrote, “Fascism…now with music!”  But thanks to Alina Habba, we are assured that he is intelligent!

On Monday Trump posted on Truth Social, “Roomer (sic) are strong in political circles that Ron DeSanctimonious, whose Presidential run is a shambles, and whose poll numbers have absolutely crashed, putting him 3rd and 4th in some states, will be dropping out of the Presidential race in order to run, in Florida, against Rick Scott for Senate. Now that’s an interesting one, isn’t it?” Providing no basis or source for this “roomer”, he later posted, “THE GREATEST & ‘HOTTEST’ FORM, SYSTEM, & PLATFORM OF COMMUNICATION IN AMERICA, & INDEED THE WORLD, TODAY. THAT’S WHY I USE IT. THERE IS NOTHING THAT COMES EVEN CLOSE!!!” Looks as though he needs a more intelligent Spellcheck to make it halfway decent! Now, back to you Ron!?

A scene at the Pearly Gates: God asks George W. Bush, “What do you believe in?” W answers, “I believe in the free market, and a strong, faithful America!” “Very well, come sit at my right hand,” says God. He then asks Barack Obama, “And, what do you believe in?” Barry replies, “I believe in the power of democracy, with equal rights for all!” “Come, sit on my left,” says God. Facing Donald Trump, he says, “I hear you are intelligent…what do you believe in?” Glaring back, Trump answers, “I believe you’re sitting in my chair.” Sounds of trumpets, thunder…lightning flashes…over and out!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Labor Day”

(and hard work)

“Without hard work, nothing grows but weeds.”
~Gordon B. Hinckley

“You always pass failure on your way to success.”
~Mickey Rooney

“Do we settle for the world as it is, or do we work for the world as it should be?”
~Michelle Obama

...

Here’s a neat little Graham Norton compilation of strange celebrity talents…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 23 – 29, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…Schiff info re senate race, movie critiques, Greensite…will be back next week. Schendledecker…recent hate crimes against unhoused people. Steinbruner Hayes…understanding citizenship. Patton…witness statement. Matlock… magic 8 balls, a ginger mint conspiracy, and local calling. Eagan Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress pick of the week. Quotes “Hawaii”

...

DOWNTOWN BOULDER CREEK 1890’S. This was called Central Avenue and you can see the Alpine House on the right.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE August 21

SCHIFF, PORTER AND LEE FOR SENATE.

I wrote in this space last week how I favored Adam Schiff for Senate but was (and still am) open to any/all news opinions. Then I got this piece from Stephen Zunes…Aside from being a professor of politics and international Studies at USF (check him out) he’s an author and authority on Middle East policy. He writes…

“The big concern I have about Schiff is in regard to foreign policy.

He was among the rightwing minority of Democrats who voted to authorize the illegal, unnecessary, and predictably disastrous U.S. invasion of Iraq. To justify his support, he falsely claimed that Iraq had somehow miraculously reconstituted its nuclear weapons program and was amassing stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons programs, dismissing reports from the UN agencies, arms control journals, think tanks, and others showing otherwise. Recall that 90% of Mideast specialists and 80% of International Relations scholars opposed the invasion, recognizing it would be harm U.S. interests and regional security, but Schiff insisted that Bush & Cheney somehow knew better. Similarly, while the Catholic Church and every mainline Protestant denomination came out against the invasion, Schiff sided with the rightwing fundamentalists in support it. (Personally, I would no more vote for someone who allies with the fundamentalists on war and peace issues than I would someone who allies with them on abortion or LGBTQ rights!)

Schiff has also supported unconditional military aid and arms sales to brutal dictatorial regimes in the Middle East and elsewhere. He has been a strong supporter of the Israeli and Moroccan occupations. He has rationalized and covered up for war crimes by allied rightwing governments and has even attacked the United Nations, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court and others which have documented systemic human rights violations by U.S. allies.

Indeed, he reminds me of Senator Henry (Scoop) Jackson and other Democratic hawks of an earlier era who adopted reasonably liberal domestic policy agendas but allied with rightwing Republicans on foreign affairs. Schiff is certainly well to the right of the vast majority of Democrats when it comes to military spending, Israel/Palestine, arms control, human rights, and other foreign policy issues. What I fear is that if a future President Trump of DeSantis called for invading Iran, Venezuela, or some other oil-rich country, Schiff would support it just as he did with Bush’s invasion of Iraq. And he would certainly continue to vote against Congressional efforts to condition military aid and arms sales to Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and other repressive governments.

Fortunately, there are two outstanding Congresswomen who are also running for Senate, both of who take positions much more in line with the majority of Democratic voters on U.S. foreign policy. I really think your readers need to know just how dangerous Schiff’s foreign policy positions are and how out of touch he is with the Democratic rank-and-file regarding human rights, international law, arms control, and related issues”.

Best, Stephen Zunes
Professor of Politics
University of San Francisco

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

DEPP Vs. HEARD. (NETFLIX SERIES) (4.7 IMDB). Watching all 3 episodes was the guiltiest pleasure I’ve had at a screen in months. I was on Amber Heard’s side against the 60 year old Johnny Depp. And since experts say, “About 1 in 4 women and nearly 1 in 10 men have experienced some form of intimate partner violence”. It’s a terrifically spliced together documentary so that we think they were both in court at the same time.  They are both actors and you sense it constantly but do watch it…it’ll take you attention away from almost everything.

KILL BOKSOON. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.6 IMDB). She is an assassin and very good at it except that she has a daughter that she loves and who loves her too. It’s a Korean film as so many are these days…and usually they are a cut above

THE BOYS. (PRIME SERIES) (8.7 IMDB). This mess of a takeoff on Marvel Comics has Jack Quaid and a bunch of sillies dressed as Superheroes acting a nutso plot in the real world. Elizabeth Shue is back and is a welcome addition. The rest of the movie isn’t worth your time or rental.

GUILTY MINDS (PRIME SERIES) It takes place mostly in a courtroom in India when a case against a guy who’s like Harvey Weinstein gets charged with and how he handles his case. It’s complex and includes video games even a murder and an abortion. Absorbing but not great.

UNLOCKED. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.4 IMDB).   A Korean movie that centers on cell phones and hi tech murders. One woman loses her cell phone and a very clever killer finds it and uses it to tease and torture her every single move for days.  It’s fast paced, subtle, well-acted and has a surprise ending which is worth watching and waiting for

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

PAINKILLER. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.4 IMDB).     Mathew Broderick does a perfect job as the reigning head of the Sackler family. As we’ve learned in the last years the Sacklers invented and pushed OxyContin and created Purdue Corporation. OxyContin contains heroin and still the FDA passed on it. An amazing and very true story about how they were finally confronted. The Sacklers are no longer in the Purdue business and they never paid a fine or did time for all the deaths they’ve caused.

HEART OF STONE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.1 IMDB). Gal Gadot (Wonder Woman) is back with a story that flops miserably. Too much violence, too many car/truck chases and it tries to develop an AI theme involving a girl hacker. No character development so we don’t care or know enough to care about any of the characters. Gal Gadot was once crowned Miss Israel and is herself now worth over 30 million dollars!!

PARADISE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.3 IMDB). A German Sci-fi adventure movie that is complex but intriguing. The AEON corporation sells a treatment that takes years off your life…but at a special price which isn’t made too clear. It’s about class differences and power and sexism too but it doesn’t develop any theme or plot too closely.

HIDDEN STRIKE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (5.3 IMDB). When you have a 69 year old Jackie Chan who never was a contender for an Oscar, sharing the screen with John Cena who tops almost everyone’s worst actor list together in a stale saga about rescuing employees and nearby civilians from an oil refinery in Iraq you’ve got a genuine flop of a Mad Max Fury Road counterfeit failure. I lost all interest after about a half hour.

...

Gillian Greensite will be back next week

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

August 21

RECENT HATE CRIMES AGAINST UNHOUSED PEOPLE

My friends, I’m feeling a little down about endemic discrimination and hate in our town and beyond.

This includes: the recent (re)defacement of the BLM mural downtown, diving into the Brave and Free Santa Cruz links (and some of the responses I got to that), the lack of support for a young latinx femme person riding a SC Metro bus, having a queer-femme friend seriously harassed and doxxed online, the mass-shooting murder of a former Santa Cruzan at a queer/trans punk show in Minneapolis, the advertisement of a QAnon-linked film in a local Facebook group that’s meant for mutual aid and resource-sharing, a continued culture of anti-homelessness in Santa Cruz (recent examples to follow), and another death in our jail.

On the other hand, I have gotten a good number of thanks for my Brave and Free column; I’m in conversation with others who are as concerned as me about discrimination, hate, and systemic violence here; and I see others speaking up online and backing each other up. I’m disturbed, but emboldened to continue speaking out and speaking up, even if it might feel risky. I hope you’ll all join me, because as the evergreen union slogan goes, “an injury to one is an injury to all!”

A Few of the Most Recent Assaults Against Unhoused Friends and Neighbors

My friend B and his friend were attacked two Saturday nights ago by a group of 5 young white guys at 2 am on the river levee. B and friend had stopped to look after another unhoused person who needed care. It started with anti-homeless and racialized slurs and demands to clear the pathway–including calling a large Black man “boy” repeatedly. When B and friend stood up for themselves, telling the mob to leave them alone, it escalated to physical assault, including a punch with a rock to B’s temple, causing him to lose sight temporarily (and for it to still be impaired when I saw him 5 days later). Fortunately, the mob left without more major injuries.

K, who has been sleeping in a doorway on the 200 block of Pacific Avenue, was awoken in the middle of the night last week by a man urinating on him and his sleeping bag. K followed the man back into the bar across the street, identified the man to the bartender, and asked him to call the cops for him. He was answered with laughter, and no support or a call to the cops. Aside from the assault, the next day he had to launder all his possessions, which isn’t cheap for someone of limited means.

K has also been denied access to the library because he brings his possessions with him in an old stroller. In his experience, if he leaves his possessions outside of the library, they will be stolen. This means he hasn’t been able to access computers or other resources in a public facility.

V, who herself has been harassed repeatedly, took video of an attack on a Latino man last month at the CVS on Front Street. She got him to the nearby bus stop and cared for his injured ear as best she could.

D, who often stays by Main Beach, has witnessed the aftermath of many attacks on targeted, single, drunk unhoused men. He thinks that it is a group of young white men who do this repeatedly, including video-recording their harassment and assault session. In at least one case, they forced a man to watch the recording of the first assault when they assaulted him at another time.

S reported what he thought might be a new local police tactic: last Thursday morning, police (who arrived in five cars) woke up about 15 people staying in city lot 16, by the downtown library. These residents were men and women in their 50s, who had been told they could stay there (I’m not sure if this was an official or unofficial permission, or who gave it, but that was their understanding). They were threatened with arrest for being on city property and told that they had to leave immediately. Worse, they were told they would be given citations if they took any of their possessions with them. Then all their possessions were deemed abandoned and thrown away.

At other times and places, police allow people to take their things, and wait patiently for them to collect themselves and move on.

People without housing have the right to keep their personal property, Santa Cruz City Police, private property managers, and others continue to discard possessions without storage, violating the constitutional rights of residents. This lack of consistent and legally defensible procedure for respecting the personal property of unhoused people in Santa Cruz is a problem, obviously.

City leaders themselves, including Mayor Keeley; Vice-mayor Golder; councilmembers Watkins, Kalantari-Johnson, Brunner, and Newsome; City Manager Matt Huffaker, and others have stated their support for a city-wide policy of “preventing entrenchment.” Said another way, this is a policy of enforced itinerancy, where individuals are not allowed to stay in one place for more than a few days and communities of unhoused residents are continually disrupted. Unfortunately, these leaders seem to set the tone and standard for the prevailing attitudes towards people without housing, which undermines efforts to alleviate their problems while we work on structural inadequacies.

Science, evidence, and anecdotes tell us that humans need community for survival. We also have decades of research on the connection of housing status to national economic trends and low-income housing supply. These are not new problems, and the various attempts to “solve” homelessness locally have been, and will continue to be, destined to fail as long as the roots of the problem remain the same.

In the meantime, at the very least what the city can do is not make the situation worse with “enforced itinerancy” and destruction of property; and not undermine the efforts of the county, including the Department of Public Health (i.e. by opposing the Harm Reduction Coalition’s needle exchange program).

In my friend B’s first-hand experience, for people without housing, having community equals more safety, both within camps and within the supportive, larger community around it.

He reports that since the Benchlands breakup last fall there has been: more outside harassment and attacks, more in-fighting and stealing, more hunger, more overdoses, more self-destructive behaviors and hopelessness, and more gender-based violence.

He says, “breaking up camps endlessly disrupts communities.”

In K’s experience: designated camps with sanitation work better than not having them at all, and when they’re closed there’s less safety. He flags two concerns: that designated camps need more security to work even better, and the problem is always where to find the land.

So, until we rebuild the local low-income housing that has been lost or underbuilt over the past 50 years, let’s use public property for safe sleeping and parking. And let’s work to shift the false narrative of personal and community failure back to what’s really failed us all: the firmly entrenched and highly successful national project of neoliberalism, with its extraction of wealth from the majority of people to be hoarded for the benefit of the very few.

While many of us disagree with each other (vociferously!) on many of the issues, we may in fact largely be blaming each other for creating problems that are actually rooted elsewhere. While we call each other in to say and do better, locally, let’s also disrupt our cycles of ineffective bickering to work together on bigger system changes that will benefit the vast majority of us, from the most precarious to the comfortably middle-class.

By that I mean: universal health care, federal rent control and tenant protections, reinvesting in non-police community safety and social programs, and public housing, just to name a few. The ordinances that we do pass at the municipal level should be protecting us all from the hoarding of property and wealth by the wealthy, especially global hedge funds, rather than punishing the most vulnerable of our residents. 

In other news

At the Transportation Justice Conference this Saturday, I will be moderating a panel on “Safe Streets First.” Tickets are available with free and donation levels, lunch included.

Xylazine test strips are now available from the Homeless Persons Health Project. I have not been able to confirm yet, but expect that the Santa Cruz County Syringe Services Program and their partner Santa Cruz County Harm Reduction Coalition have or will soon have them too. I’ll keep you posted.

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...

August 21

APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT PHASE 2 HAS TROUBLING IMPACTS ON THE COMMUNITY

Swenson Builder is going full-court press with the Phase 2 Aptos Village Project, but causing some real problems for the Community and the environment.  Although earlier presentations to the public had stated there would be a Phase 2A and 2B, it appears that Swenson got a green light from Santa Cruz County Bank to move ahead with development on both sides of Aptos Village Way.

Swenson has now removed on-street parking on Aptos Village Way between Parade Street and Aptos Creek Road, and allows the construction contractor (Durden) to have their crews park on Aptos Creek Road, rather than within the construction area itself.  The photos below were taken last week.

This is the area adjacent to the hillside that Swenson will dedicate to the County for a new park.  Hmmm…  County Parks staff has stated they have no idea what to do with a hillside like that, but never mind…the County waived all developer park fees ($1000/bedroom in the new subdivision) and granted FREE drainage from this Phase 2 area across Aptos Village County Park for Swenson to dump the storm drain effluent into Aptos Creek.  The light-colored soil you see above in the foreground is capping the actual site of the fuel tank Swenson and SCUP crews unearthed in 2016 and hauled away in the middle of the night with some sort of unidentified petroleum material dripping all the way.  Swenson quickly demolished the foundation of the historic Lam Mattison Apple Dryer that likely relied on the fuel to power the hot air for the dryers.

Last week, I stopped in at County Environmental Health Services and talked with the new Director, Mr. Andrew Strador.  He saw no reason for the County to monitor the soils in this area, and was not troubled that Swenson had lied about the true location of the buried fuel tank their crews hauled out in the night.

Maybe the guy with the white helmet is watching for Native American artifacts begin dug up from this State-registered archaeologic site, but maybe not.  Who knows?  Does the County care?  If you care, please file a Public Records Act request with the County Planning Dept. for the reports submitted as part of the mitigation plan approved in 2012.   You might also ask if the 2010 Parking Study the County approved for this Project has been updated?

This is Aptos Creek Road, the gateway to Nisene Marks State Park, and directly across from Aptos Village Park.  There used to be some wonderful concerts in that Park, but that all went away when Swenson barricaded the dirt parking lot along Aptos Creek Road, removing the necessary staging space for the concert support crews and equipment.  Now the road is barely passable, due to encroachment into the paved road, creating narrowed entry to Nisene with a blind corner so motorists heading into the Park can’t see the walkers and bicyclists coming out until they are nearly on the hood of the vehicles.  Quite a bottleneck for emergency response vehicles and hazard for public safety.  If this bothers you, please contact County Public Works Travis Rieber and ask about the overly-greedy encroachment of pavement that Swenson is gobbling and if that is what was planned (and paid for??) with the County.  If the safety hazard bothers you, please contact Central Fire Marshal Mike DeMars and ask about this hazardous congestion for fire and medical response.

Not only is Swenson barricading Aptos Village Way to prevent any public parking, the construction contractor, Durden, is using Aptos Creek Road as a place to park their mobile office and crews.  Note that the mobile office is parked in a red curb area and in front of the fire hydrant that a fire engine would need to access should there be a fire in Nisene Marks State Park or the luxury homes on Mattison Court, on the hill above the Phase 2 Aptos Village Project construction.

I wanted to verify that the Durden mobile office was associated with Swenson’s construction…yep.  There are the plans and proof on the tailgate of the Durden truck (the one parked in the red curb area).  I happened to be at the site at noon, and witnessed construction crews climb into at least three vehicles parked on Aptos Creek Road.  I wonder why they are not being made to park in the construction area, and use the Swenson construction trailer that is on-site?

If this bothers you… please contact County Planner Randall Adams randall.adams@santacruzcounty.us

and Code Compliance Director Matt Johnston Matt.Johnston@santacruzcounty.us

WHAT WILL UCSC DO TO HOUSE THEIR STUDENTS?

Enrollment is way up at UCSC, according to LookOut Santa Cruz:

From LookOut Santa Cruz;

UC Santa Cruz sent offer letters to more than 43,000 first-year students this year, the largest of any of the nine UC campuses. That number is up nearly 40% from last year, the biggest increase of any UC school. But UCSC is expecting to enroll around just 4,650 first-year students between fall and winter as it juggles a complex confluence of factors that have made it harder to anticipate how many students will ultimately accept admission offers.

Where will all these students live?  I am told by local real estate agents that there are empty rental units in Santa Cruz, but are offered at extremely high rental rates.  The owners are NOT dropping the rent price…I guess they are waiting for the University students to flood in with desperate dollars to crowd the neighborhoods?

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVE SELLING EXCESS PROPERTY TO BENEFIT SEABREEZE TAVERN PROPERTY OWNER?

The Board approved, as Item #42 on the Consent Agenda, the sale of what the County now determines is “Excess Property” on the Esplanade in Rio del Mar.  The claim is that it is prone to flooding, due to sea level rise.  It always has been prone to flooding, but the County twisted the arm of the former owner of the SeaBreeze Tavern to take it over.  The Parks Dept. Director Jeff Gaffney claimed to a surprised Parks Commissioner that it was a good place to sell concessions to beach visitors.  That did not pan out too well, as the concessionaire contracted rarely showed up.

Agenda Item
DOC-2023-713; Adopt resolution to sell surplus real property located at 105 Esplanade

So, I have to wonder if the County’s declaration to sell this parcel will benefit the new Bay Area developer of the SeaBreeze Tavern area, Omar Billawala ……maybe remove restrictions for a large luxury hotel?

Remember, the County just declared a large parcel of land above the Santa Cruz Harbor as “excess property”, likely to make way for a luxury hotel, as Swenson proposed a few years ago.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVE PURCHASE OF LARGE NEW SOUTH COUNTY PARK THAT IS FAR-REMOVED FROM THOSE LIKELY TO USE IT

The Board of Supervisors approved a $2.3 Million purchase of a 38-acre vacant farm near the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds, far-removed from the area’s youth who might make use of the “temporary soccer fields” planned. The staff report states: 

Background

“The Property is approximately 38.54 gross acres located near Watsonville and zoned Commercial Agriculture (CA).  The Property is envisioned as a recreational/ agricultural mixed-use project.  The recreational use would include multiple non-permanent soccer fields, portable restrooms, a natural surface trail, active farming, and agricultural tourism and demonstration for students.  Additionally, the Property has been strategically targeted to address the County’s future emergency response needs due, in part, to its adjoining property line with the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds.”

The problem is that according to Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds CEO Zeke Fraser, the County is not talking with the Fairgrounds about that idea….or are they?  I wrote to David Reid, Director of the County’s Office of Response, Recovery and Resilience (OR3) that is supposedly planning the County’s emergency response matters what plans the County is making to bridge the ravine between this new Park and the Fairgrounds for accessibility.  He did not respond.  The only Metro Bus service to the Fairgrounds is on Sundays for the Flea Market, and during the County Fair.

Santa Cruz County CA Agenda Item DOC-2023-724

Join the discussion on Community Matters this Friday, 1pm on Santa Cruz Voice.com

WHY ARE KIDS IN CALIFORNIA STRUGGLING TO LEARN TO READ?

This is pretty troubling.  See what you think, and offer to help out as a reading mentor, if only in your own family and neighborhood.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND ONE MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS TO HOLD OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE.  HELP A CHILD LEARN TO LOVE TO READ.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
August 20

UNDERSTANDING CITIZENSHIP

I thought I might write this week about how to identify fascism, but then thought of the twist…how best to fight fascism. This builds off of my essay last week – the root of the battle against fascism is compassion. However, it cannot stop there. We need more citizens to be actively engaged in governance! I outline some things that you can do to help below.

Compassion Towards Inactive Citizens

While building compassion, we must also build momentum for change. Last week, I listed a bunch of reasons that we, as individuals, have difficulty acting in any way to help the environment. Earlier, when wondering why more people hadn’t responded to my request to write a short (cut-and-paste, even!) email to help protect Santa Cruz’s wildlife, I wrote about other reasons why I could see that folks weren’t responsive. Here’s a list (compiled from those two essays) of reasons why I think folks have a hard time taking even small steps to respond to local conservation issues that are important:

  • We are creatures of habit living in a difficult world, and behavioral change is a lot of work.
  • It is easy to blame others rather than act ourselves.
  • We are often immersed in bad media, feeding us negativity about the environment, which is disempowering.
  • We have little leisure time, and so no time to learn about conservation priorities, let alone act on them. So, we often say dismissive things like “I hope it turns out okay!” or “Thoughts and prayers!”
  • We have been subjected to a poor educational background and so have little basis for understanding (ecology) or the reasons we should act (civics).

Compassion Towards Ourselves and Future Generations

None of the reasons I list help to make us feel better, or grow into better people…so, to be kind to ourselves, we must do something different. Recently, I suggested that people write a short email asking an official to help protect local wildlife. And, I will do that again, below. Those emails have an impact; they show that someone cares about wildlife conservation. Writing even a brief email to help protect wildlife makes us feel good! And, good public officials know that the first sign of an issue they must resolve is in emails, and those emails can portend more trouble if they don’t act. The media might cover the issue, politicians might get involved and affect their budget, their employees, family members, and friends might start asking them questions about the issue, etc.

Another thing you might do to help is to donate to an environmental conservation organization. Earthjustice is one of the most effective environmental organizations that I’ve experienced with local issues. They are a group of lawyers who fight for the environment, and they are very, very good at their work. Their work protected wildlife at Castle Rock State Park by forcing State Parks to convene scientific advisors to enact measures that will improve their wildlife conservation planning. The Center for Biological Diversity also has an excellent local track record. Their work was essential in forcing the federal government to list the Ohlone tiger beetle as endangered. They have also been active in other endangered species protections locally. The more folks from this area that join and donate to these two organizations, the more that these organizations will be interested in working on local issues. We need them!

Another thing you might do is to talk to someone about the actions above. If we each inspire one other person to take action, environmental conservation momentum will build.

Here’s Something to Do NOW

We need more emails to the State Director Mouritsen of the Bureau of Land Management if we are going to protect wildlife in Santa Cruz. Here’s something to cut-and-paste into an email:

Dear Director Mouritsen,

I care about wildlife and plant conservation on BLM’s Cotoni Coast Dairies property in Santa Cruz County. I write to urge you to help by adding sensitive species found on that property to the State BLM’s sensitive species lists. Only if those species are on the State’s lists will local administrators consider impacts of their management on those species in their analyses and planning for the property. So, I ask that you please:

  • Publish an updated State BLM sensitive wildlife list in collaboration with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, as mandated by the BLM’s 6840 Special Status Species Manual.
  • Publish an updated State BLM sensitive plant list to include the State ranked 1B plant species documented at Cotoni Coast Dairies, as mandated by the 6840 Manual.

I would appreciate a reply to this email with details about how you intend to address these issues.

Signed,

xx

Here’s her email address: kmourits@blm.gov

Why Do Anything?

I heard from BLM during our last email campaign. They are definitely paying attention to our emails. Santa Cruzans have a long track record of success with environmental campaigns, and we can do this!

Our work on this issue is getting other attention, too. The Wildlife Society is considering advocating for this issue.

If the State BLM adds more sensitive species found at the Cotoni Coast Dairies to their State Sensitive Species lists that will mean that they will receive more funding to manage the property for species conservation. If BLM manages the property for sensitive species conservation, there is a better chance that future generations will enjoy the wildlife we take for granted right now.

I hope you’ll consider writing Director Mouritsen an email. Please let me know if you do: coastalprairie@aol.com

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

August 20

#232 / David Attenborough’s Witness Statement

Sir David Frederick Attenborough (born May 8, 1926) is pictured above, at the age of ninety-three. Attenborough is a British broadcaster, biologist, natural historian and author. He is best known for writing and presenting, in conjunction with the BBC Natural History Unit, the nine natural history documentary series that form “the Life collection,” a comprehensive survey of animal and plant life on Earth.

In 2020, in collaboration with Netflix, Attenborough wrote, photographed, and presented another film, “A Life On Our Planet.” Attenborough called this film his “Witness Statement.” In this documentary, Attenborough documents what has happened to Planet Earth since Attenborough began his work as a wildlife documentarian. He tells us what he has “witnessed.” It is a heartbreaking story – a story that we know.

Attenborough’s story both begins, and ends, in the Ukrainian city of Pripyat, adjacent to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Attenborough tells us, as he walks through the deserted city, that nature is now reclaiming it. He tells us that what happened at Chernobyl was a miscalculation; it was a “mistake.” Attenborough’s film documents another such miscalculation and “mistake,” one that has involved the entire planet, and that has extended so long that this mistake is now on the brink of making our entire planet uninhabitable for human beings. This is the heartbreaking story that we know – that virtually everyone knows, and doesn’t want to talk about because it is too painful to do so, and because we think that, by now, there is nothing we can do.

Attenborough’s film, though, is not only a testimony to what he has seen – his “Witness Statement.” It is also a film that tells us how we can restore a right balance between our human civilization and the planet upon which we depend, the blue jewel of the Earth. To me, Attenborough’s presentation on what we can do was as “solid,” and “certain,” as the parts of the film that shows those who watch it what a huge “mistake,” indeed, we have made (and continue to make).

I would like strongly to encourage you to watch Attenborough’s movie.

If you have Netflix, no problem. Click on this link to “Netflix.” I think that should take you to the film. If you do not subscribe to Netflix, I encourage you to seek out another way to watch this film, to stream “A Life On Our Planet” to wherever you are.

Attenborough tells us that the damage that human activities have done to the planet can be reversed within the span of one hundred years – within a lifetime equivalent to the lifetime that Attenborough has spent on Earth. Attenborough includes, specifically, the damage done by human-caused global warming, and he provides specific advice. I think we should believe what he says.

I think we should believe what Attenborough says – and I think we should do what he advises!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
August 21

MAGIC 8 BALLS, A GINGER MINT CONSPIRACY, AND LOCAL CALLING

Donald Trump, who had planned to show us his Magic 8 Ball’s declaration of his “conclusive and complete exoneration” during a news conference last week, cancelled his appearance upon advice of his legal team. “Rather than releasing the Report on the Rigged & Stolen Georgia 2020 Presidential Election on Monday, my lawyers would prefer putting this, I believe, Irrefutable & Overwhelming evidence of Election Fraud & Irregularities in formal Legal Filings as we fight to dismiss this disgraceful Indictment,” which Stephen Miller, in Trumpspeak 101 fashion, obviously wrote for The Former Guy on Truth Social. Shooting from the hip after the Georgia indictment was announced, Trump ad-libbed that he would use the “major news conference” at his New Jersey golf club to reveal an “almost complete report” for his vindication. His ‘report‘ was not prepared by hotshot investigators or election experts, but by his communication aide, Liz Harrington, whose voice we have heard on the recorded conversation during which Trump brags as he shows top secret military plans for a potential invasion of Iraq. He seems to have forgotten the 60+ court decisions that have cast aside the MAGA attempts to overturn the election around the country…always someone who doesn’t get the word? The rabid MAGA base laps this stuff up, but independent and moderate voters say it’s time to move it along…perhaps by having his tailor take precise measurements to ensure a perfect fit for his orange jumpsuit? It’s certainly imperative by now, as we saw from his Pillsbury Doughboy tux back when he called on Queen Elizabeth.

The federal district judge, Tanya Chutkan, overseeing the Georgia election conspiracy RICO indictment against Trump warned him of the limits to which he can spill publicly any of the evidence as he attempts to recapture the GOP nomination for the presidency. The judge warned that the more “inflammatory” his public statements, there will be a greater urgency to move to trial quickly to combat witness intimidation or sullying the jury pool. Even Georgia’s Republican governor, Brian Kemp, criticized the Former Guy’s attacks on the integrity of the vote, X-tweeting, “The 2020 election in Georgia was not stolen. For three years now, anyone with evidence of fraud has failed to come forward – under oath – and prove anything in a court of law.” But, The Donald will not be silenced, as he attempts not to prove his innocence of the mounting crime charges, but to harp on the stolen election in the now turgid atmosphere of his own making.

Trump actually cancelled his Magic 8 Ball event after Governor Kemp made his comments, and radio host ? suggested the governor’s opposition to Trump’s accusations may have had some influence on the cancellation. “You saw that he cancelled that press conference saying his lawyers didn’t think it was a good idea? I don’t know when he has done anything because his lawyers thought it was a good idea,” she opined. Kemp’s name weighs heavily in the RICO indictment, with DA Willis citing a phone call from Trump to the governor, as well as several tweets attacking him over the election, as “overt” acts “in furtherance of the conspiracy” to overturn the election. Kemp and Trump, at loggerheads since 2020, resulted in Trump throwing his endorsement to Senator David Perdue in the 2022 governorship primary. Trump’s 2021 statement about Democrat candidate Stacey Abrams, “she might be better than having your existing governor, if you want to know the truth,” further inflamed the relationship.

Despite Judge Chutkan’s setting of behavioral boundaries for Trump, he is surely evaluating how far he can push the envelope, weighing whether or not incarceration will boost his standing among the electorate, well beyond the MAGA horde’s support. House arrest would seem to be out of the picture…confinement to a golf resort in Florida is not likely to instill fear in the accused. Detention with no access to the internet agitation ability would likely be the fear factor, which would spur the defense team to ask for a speedier trial. So, lock him up!

Mark Sumner provides an interesting summation, writing on Daily Kos, that the GOP and Representative Gym ‘Shower Monitor’ Jordan in particular, are attempting to break Trump’s crimes down into such small increments that nothing is a crime on its own. He asks: Since when is it a crime to buy a rope, a knife, and a few garbage bags? A guy in Manhattan buys a new burner phone, which later is found to be used to contact female victims, later murdered and abandoned at Gilgo Beach. Another guy rents a Ryder truck in Kansas to drive to Oklahoma City…innocent enough, but Timothy McVeigh then destroyed a building. A neat-freak buys some garbage bags to clean up his residence, later being accused of murdering his wife when an overlooked blood-stained knife was found. Sumner says all three guys would be on the street if the courts used the same standard that Jordan and his colleagues are applying to Trump’s criminal escapades…after all, cyanide is just nitrogen and oxygen, and we gotta breathe. Reducing Trumpian actions to being simple phone calls, tweets and offering legal advice to ensure a legit election process is the gist of their absurdity. After all, since when is it a crime for a doctor to meet with a college athlete, Gym-my-boy?

MSNBC’s Ari Melber, on his The Beat show, has shown a November 5, 2020 video of Trump ally, Roger Stone, dictating a memo to an associate as part of the fake electorate scheme. The video segment is part of a documentary shot by Danish documentarian, Chirstoffer Guildbrandsen, who had followed Stone and his contingent during the 2020 election campaign. But American legal scholar, Laurance Tribe has revealed that such a scheme was in the works as early as February 2019, as shown in the sexual harassment suit against Rudy Giuliani by assistant Noelle Dunphy. She was told by Giuliani that a plan had been prepared in the event that Trump lost his reelection bid, in which he would claim “voter fraud’ and that he had actually won…nineteen months before the election! Indicted in the Georgia case as part of this plan was attorney Kenneth J. Chesebro, a mentee of Tribe, who expressed his disappointment in his student, saying, “He was not making good-faith legal arguments for his client. He was inventing legal fiction that paid no attention to the law and creating a pretext for a conspiracy to steal an election.”

Georgia state law requires that names and addresses of grand jurors be released to boost transparency of the legal process, but already MAGA goons are threatening revenge on them for daring to indict their beloved Golden Calf as seen on a ‘fringe website.’ Trump’s base of violence-minded insurrectionists have posted juror photos, spurring discussions about whether “people need to be outside these people’s houses” or whether it would mean walking into a deep state and media trap. Initially, there was no indication that authorities were taking any actions to protect jurors…maybe that has changed by now. But, we’ll still have these red-hatted militias being the enforcers of their justice, with their sidearms, and showing as much respect for law and order as does TrumpThe Former Guy will go after each juror as surely as he and Giuliani went after poll workers, Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman, who rigged the Georgia election with a ginger mint.

The saber-rattling following the indictment(s) is now only a part of the shifting political scene, where the radicalized partisans believe violence is necessary to achieve their ends. “The idea that violence is legitimate for political purposes has moved into the mainstream,” says University of Chicago political science professor Robert Pape. “It’s still a minority…But if you’ve got 10 or 15 percent of a community that believes violence is acceptable for some political causes, that just encourages more violence for those causes.” The January 6 coup attempt should serve as a reminder that this country does not have an immunity any more than other nations, and threats against our government and its leaders are heightened in these perilous times. Representative Mary Gay Scanlon, Democrat of Pennsylvania, attributes much of this trend to Trump, who was the tough-guy candidate at his rallies in 2016. “Violence and intimidation on the right started following the election cycle in 2016. And so we would see justifications for violence among regular people rising at the election period – 2016, 2018 at Trump’s impeachment – obviously at the different events leading up to certification over January 6. There’s a sense that this violence is increasingly targeted at politics.” Donald J. Trump didn’t change the GOP – he just took off the wraps for a more accurate view.

As Trump prepares to defend himself in the courtrooms of New York, Washington, Georgia and Florida against his alleged crimes, obtaining evidence in Melania’s emails is a target of New York DA Alvin Bragg. A source tells Radar Online that her emails following her husband’s alleged Stormy Daniels escapade might be quite revealing as she shows her anger and possible plans to file for divorce. “She’s likely written emails to counsel asking for guidance on her rights if her husband is convicted on all these charges, and if she should use whatever she knows to squeeze him in divorce court,” says a source close to the Trumps. Previously denied requests to view Melania’s emails, Bragg is still in the hunt. An insider alleges, “Those emails could make Melania relive the entire betrayal again in the public eye. It would also reveal what she knew about the affair along with many other humiliating aspects of her husband’s business and personal life. The emails hang the president out to dry.” In spite of all this, sources say the couple are “on good terms.” 

According to former Trump lawyer, Michael Cohen, all the pressure on Trump is likely to make the Former Guy turn against his closest allies. “He’s going to flip on all of them…he never sees himself as the problem, it’s always somebody else, including his wife,” Cohen maintains. “He’s going to turn on his accountant and point the finger; he’s going to say, ‘Don Jr. handled that, Ivanka handled that; Melania, don’t take me. Take Melania,” Cohen predicted. “That’s the kind of guy he is.” We have to admit that Cohen has seen it all, and judging by the recent account that Rudy Giuliani sought some financial relief from Trump to help with legal expenses, only to be turned away, he is likely correct.

A fiendish character approached Trump in New York City, offering to sell him an inexpensive cell phone, claiming it was Satan’s personal hotline, open for calling the Devil at any time. Trump smirked, but bought the phone anyway, and made a call. A five minute conversation convinced Trump to run for President, with a promise of a guaranteed win. Checking later, Trump found the call had cost him $5000, refusing to use the phone ever again. But he ran for President and won! Having no idea what to do in the job, he swallowed his pride and made another call to Satan. The Evil One was happy to be able to assist Trump in all the destructive policies he would later enact in his tenure. Waiting a few minutes, Trump decided to call about the charges. The bill was $5. He asked, “Why the big discount?” “It’s now a local call, sir.”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “Hawaii”

“One of the happiest times of my life, I lived in a tent on a porch on Hawaii.”
~Diane Greene

“I don’t look down on tourism. I live in Hawaii where we have 7 million visitors a year. If they weren’t there, there would be no economy. So I understand why a tourist economy is necessary.”
~Paul Theroux

Chasing kids on the beach and sleeping is the closest I come to exercising while in Hawaii.”
~Adam Scott

...

Chicken in a snowstorm…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 16-22, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton… California Senate race endorsements, Dave Stamey & Ann Lydon return. Greensite…on San Lorenzo Park hot-air balloon. Schendledecker…does a linear left-right political spectrum make sense? Steinbruner…land use permits and height, city survey issues, Soquel’s farm park, Soquel Creek’s new board member, Zach Friend won’t be missed. Hayes…humanity. Patton…naming some names. Matlock…the deep state, other people’s money and irrelevancy. Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress pick of the week: 18th century automata Quotes “Lighthouses”

...

GERMANIA HOTEL, 1877. This was one of many “railroad hotels” in the Santa Cruz Watsonville area. It was known as the Railroad Hotel, then it became, and is known today as, the Santa Cruz Hotel. It’s at 200 Locust Street and is primarily known for its very active bar and cozy atmosphere upstairs on the second floor.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE August 14

AN ONGOING DISCUSSION. The campaigns for California State Senate are getting deeper and deeper. I’ve liked Adam Schiff for a few years now. Checking out his campaign pages I see that he’s got a very impressive and familiar list of endorsements. They include Nancy Pelosi, Jimmy Panetta, Sam Farr, John Laird, Aaron Peskin, Leon Panetta and Fred Keeley among many others.

Then when you see Katie Porters endorsers you start wondering. There’s Carol Fuller, Hollie Locatelli, Martine Watkins, Renee Golder, Shebreh Kalantri-Johnson.

But now think about Barbara Lee’s endorsements such as London Breed, Dolores Huerta, Anna Caballero, Dr. Cornel West, Fiona Ma, Ro Khanna and Justin Cummings too. This discussion will go on, so send me any and all news and info that seems missing.

DAVE STAMEY & ANNIE LYDON RETURN. Country and western music fans know about this and tickets are going fast. Dave and Ann will be at the Hallcrest Vineyards Sunday August 27. The outdoor show begins at 4 p.m. Hallcrest Vineyards are at 379 Felton Empire Road just up the hill from town. Come early bring a picnic, enjoy the wines. Tickets online at www.hallcrestvineyards.com

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

PAINKILLER. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.4 IMDB).      Mathew Broderick does a perfect job as the reigning head of the Sackler family. As we’ve learned in the last years the Sacklers invented and pushed OxyContin and created Purdue Corporation. OxyContin contains heroin and still the FDA passed on it. An amazing and very true story about how they were finally confronted. The Sacklers are no longer in the Purdue business and they never paid a fine or did time for all the deaths they’ve caused.

HEART OF STONE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.1 IMDB). Gal Gadot (Wonderwoman) is back with a story that flops miserably. Too much violence, too many car/truck chases and it tries to develop an AI theme involving a girl hacker. No character development so we don’t care or know enough to care about any of the characters. Gal Gadot was once crowned Miss Israel and is herself now worth over 30 million dollars!!

PARADISE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.3 IMDB).   A German Sci-fi adventure movie that is complex but intriguing. The AEON corporation sells a treatment that takes years off your life…but at a special price which isn’t made too clear. It’s about class differences and power and sexism too but it doesn’t develop any theme or plot too closely.

HIDDEN STRIKE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (5.3 IMDB). When you have a 69 year old Jackie Chan who never was a contender for an Oscar, sharing the screen with John Cena who tops almost everyone’s worst actor list together in a stale saga about rescuing employees and nearby civilians from an oil refinery in Iraq you’ve got a genuine flop of a Mad Max Fury Road counterfeit failure. I lost all interest after about a half hour.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

QUEENMAKER. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.6 IMDB). Another meaningful and well-made Korean movie. This one tells the dynamic story of a Korean woman who is a public relations chief for a huge corporation who gets into politics. She fights developers and leads a campaign for the mayor of Seoul and realizes where she’s both powerful and weak. Almost reminds us of our very local political scene!

LITTLE WOMEN. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.8 IMDB). Definitely NOT the Louisa May Alcott story or from any other Little Women sagas playing on your video now. This Korean movie tells the tricky and complex story of three sisters who have a cruel mother and face poverty and corporate theft plus alcoholism and even suicide. It does have some plot holes later on but it’s well worth watching.

THE LOST FLOWERS OF ALICE HART. (PRIME SERIES) (8.0 IMDB) It’s good to see Sigourney Weaver back on screen in this Australian movie.  She does a wonderful job as the prime mover in this series dealing with children and women who have been abused. They live in a community named Thornfield and help each other survive and return to their lives. The stories start out with a nine year old’s fate, then a fire and deeper and deeper. Very well done as far into the series as we’ve seen so far.

THE ENGLISH. (PRIME SERIES) (7.8 IMDB). A very serious almost pageant like saga about the relationship between the American Indians and the settlers from England and the rest of the world. Emily Blunt is the English woman who is hunting for the man who killed her son. She runs into such evil doers as Toby Jones and Ciaran Hines but makes close friends with Chaske Spencer who is a real Lakota Sioux. Together they make their way through all the usual western movie plots and scenes. It’s very heavy and serious…especially for a western.

THE LADY OF SILENCE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.4 IMDB). This documentary is from Mexico and deals with the 49 murdered senior women from 1998 to 2005. There are many suspects…all the women were strangled with cords, ropes, or wire. The governor of Mexico is involved and much also happens in Juarez. It comes down to the terrible job the police do in finding and pursuing the killer. It’s well done and has a few surprises which I won’t divulge here.

...
August 14

FLOODPLAIN. WHAT FLOODPLAIN?

The photo above captures the San Lorenzo Park benchlands during a winter flood. While this year’s flooding was more extreme than other recent years, flooding of the benchlands is a normal, natural process. It was one reason, before the winter rains, the city required the removal of the two hundred tents and campers in the city- sanctioned benchlands campsite.

This section of the San Lorenzo River on its east bank is the only area of the river south of Highway 1 that has not been armored with levees. It is wholly contained within San Lorenzo Park. The Park consists of these lower benchlands plus the upper area that has the duckpond, bowling green, restrooms and children’s playground with its distinctive 1964 serpent, recently repainted by volunteers.

My first encounter with San Lorenzo Park was in 1977, at the Spring Fair and then the Pride Parade. Besides these two annual events, I also took my four-year-old son to play on the serpent which became a favorite. So, when the city Parks and Recreation Department embarked on a San Lorenzo Park Redesign Process, I was more than a little interested.

It is no secret that San Lorenzo Park had fallen on hard times with the anti-social behavior of some of the campers making the Park unsuitable for children and nearby senior residents. Erecting a chain-link fence around the playground did not solve the problem nor add to its former welcoming charm.

By the time Bionics Consulting and staff came before city council on August 8th for a vote to continue the process, the redesign had already secured extensive public input from well over a thousand online survey responses, from numerous stakeholder meetings, and been reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission. All agreed that the outreach had been stellar. Congratulations to staff and consultants was unanimous and well-deserved. So, what’s not to like? As it turned out, quite a lot.

My radar pinged when I heard “the more you keep people present, the more you eliminate uses you’d rather not see there” (consultant), and its equivalent, “the more active participation the less we have to think about safety” (council member). Such statements are often used as a rationale for urbanizing open space, especially if there have been some “problems”. We must occupy the land to save it line of reasoning. However, the research is clear that anti-social behavior is more common where there are more people congregating not where there are fewer. So, what really is being addressed is “certain kinds of people.” Not to minimize anti-social, illegal, or aggressive behavior but we have a whole department which is supposed to take care of those problems short of “populating” the land with assumed well-behaved people.

My radar pinged louder when the consultant, after acknowledging that this is a neighborhood park, stated that “the Park redesign is an opportunity for it to be a real asset for downtown growth; that it can serve a wider population and be a destination for many more people; that it can be a real offering for the Bay Area.”  What! We are talking about a 13.8-acre neighborhood park most of which is in a flood plain. Maybe this is the problem with having consultants do the job that in my opinion could be done by staff: the tendency to go beyond what is feasible, to be grandiose and lose sight of reality. And not always be accurate. A member of the public, long-time San Lorenzo River expert and former council member Bruce Van Allen corrected the consultant’s claim that the benchlands lacked wheelchair accessibility, which he had been instrumental in securing many decades ago.

In their stellar outreach efforts, staff and consultants cast a wide net, asking hundreds of community members what they wanted to see in the park. Chances are some or maybe many who responded had never been to San Lorenzo Park, had no idea where it is located nor that it includes a floodplain. As a result, the long wish list included zip lines, Ferris Wheel, pump track, pickleball, disc golf, roller skate dance area, weddings, SUPs, a seasonal dock, yoga, exercise classes, damming the river, playgrounds for different abilities along with events, native habitat restoration, nature trails, and bird walks. Many such suggestions were enthusiastically supported by councilmembers.

Laurie Egan of Coastal Watershed Council did include the topic of how to improve flood protection in her public comments, but it was up to Mayor Keeley to bring the hot air wish-list balloon back to earth. He noted that the lengthy list most likely was a public expression of a shortage of park facilities which then became focused on this one park, which could not possibly cater to all. The mayor stated the need to recognize the flood control aspect of the benchlands; that there should be no permanent structures planned for that area although special events in the off-winter period would be fine. When it became clear that nowhere in the consultants’ Design Goals and Guiding Principles was the flood plain section of San Lorenzo Park acknowledged (despite the above photo in their slide show), an amendment stating that fact was added to the main motion and passed unanimously. The item will be back before council later in the year as specific design elements and environmental review are completed.

There is a cautionary tale here. More and more city projects are being handed over to consultants with apparently no reality-based limits to what their imagination (and commercial interests) can conjure up. West Cliff Drive is another example. A consulting firm, many public meetings, two special council presentations and countless hours of staff time spent on a vision for West Cliff fifty years into the future! Meanwhile we are told the city is strapped for funds and is contemplating yet another sales tax increase on the next ballot. Perhaps they need a consultant to help figure out why the public has lost trust in its city.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

August 14

DOES A LINEAR LEFT-RIGHT POLITICAL SPECTRUM MAKE SENSE?

Within the organized left, some colloquially invoke terms like moderate, conservative, or right-wing, often in derogatory ways towards and against the perceived political opposition, both outside of and within the left.

I’ve been thinking about this kind of linear left-right political assignment for a few reasons. Of course it has long been a big topic in national politics, perhaps more vociferously since the Tr*mp years, or maybe the Bush years. Or was it the Reagan years? Basically, the divide has been intensifying over the course of my life. And it seems like most people in our country are sick of it. People want change for the better, but instead we’ve ended up with increased confusion and polarization.

The right-left argument comes up in Santa Cruz politics, like last election season’s public squabble over who gets to use the “Progressive” label (that squabble also has a long history). And it has been a recurring theme in some of my smaller political organizing groups as a kind of litmus test, with accusations of people moving to the relative “right” or “left” as a result of the strategies and tactics they want to employ (i.e. rank and file worker organizing versus electoral politics).

Image caption: my 11th grader’s AP US History textbook cover and explanatory page on “who were the progressives”

More and more, I think that this language, especially when used to categorize people within the same movement, who are otherwise acting in solidarity, is counter-productive: it sets up false oppositions and flattens people into this or that categories. It also just doesn’t work, because people who are inevitably complex invariably don’t fit neatly into a single spot on the line. I find it misleading and divisive, both broadly speaking and particularly in my own organizing efforts–even while I acknowledge that it is deeply ingrained in me to speak of political positions in this way, so practicing using more descriptive rather than evaluative language is also a personal challenge.

Caption: image origin unknown; this is an example of an inadequate and confusing attempt to graph complex political positions on lines

Focusing In on the “Larger Left” 

I can see that from one perspective, rooted in the history of revolutionary France, it could seem technically true that there is a political spectrum within the left that runs from ultra-left to near-moderate and  relatively to the “right”–even though its application to specific strategies and tactics is far from universally agreed upon. This framing tends to encourage sectarianism and harden internal conflicts, in turn eating away at movement-based solidarity.

For many people, it is easy to perceive being labeled “right” or “left” as dismissive, name-calling, derogatory, alienating, confusing, and insider-jargony. The result is counter to our shared goal of building a diverse working-class movement.

It can lead to people thinking that they must be misinformed, or feeling inadequate or dismissed, as if they have to endlessly argue their position to survive, or they shouldn’t even share their thoughts. Sometimes it causes them to leave the political arena altogether. A winner-take-all logic is the exact opposite of consensus-building relationality, and can come with authoritarian-like results in aiming to shut down the “other side” by invoking a simplistic label, instead of compassionately understanding difference and building shared ground from there.

Often the interpretation of “right” and “left” is based on tactics and strategy. For instance, sometimes one hears that electoral politics is a “rightward” or moderate position. The rationale is that electoral work (especially in relation to candidates and electeds) means compromising and working within neoliberal systems of governance from a minority working-class minority position that can often achieve mere superficial reformism, owing to the anti-democratic and pro-capitalist structural conditions of the electoral framework in the US, including lobbying and corrupt practices that end up serving the ruling class.

But calling electoral work “conservative” unfairly shoehorns an important tactic into near uselessness, if it is granted utility at all. What about electoralism within union rank-and-file organizing? What about socialist electoralism? What about seeing electoralism as a necessary part of a strategic diversity of tactics, one that can and should complement other forms of work-place and social-movement organizing?

It may be true that elections will never secure a socialist future on their own (and who is suggesting this anyway?)—for that we need worker-self-organization, where “worker” is extended to all its diverse representatives, including unpaid domestic workers, migrants, gig-economy and precarious laborers, and so on. But neither will labor strikes guarantee emancipation either, especially if all they aim for is a better contract. The point is to come up with a strategy that integrates and mobilizes multiple interlinked approaches, carefully deployed and backing each other up, for structural transformation, including non-reformist reforms (reforms that are never simply an end in themselves) that can help us get there one step at a time.

No organizing strategy or tactic is inherently “left” or “right,” but is always situational and context-dependent. Labor unions can be extremely conservative, even, in the case of business unions, outright capitalist (total bummer that our Building Trades Council donated $1,000 to Santa Cruz Together in 2018 to help defeat rent control), while base-building social movements can be reactionary or even fascist (hello neo-nazis in our backyards).

Similarly, the most radical rank-and-file unions, as well as democratic revolutionary movements, will include electoral and representative components within their inner organization (for instance, electing leadership, labor reps, and convention delegates), just as leftist electoralism should necessarily have deep connections to labor organizing, base building, and class struggle.

We should also avoid lumping less visibly active co-organizers in with the “right” or assume they are “moderates” just because they’re not out in the streets with us. In reality, one could have an infinite variety of political positions, as well as life circumstances, that determine one’s political involvements—paid work, care work, neurodiversity, temperament, alienation from the organization, illness or disability, access and functional needs, distance, financial hardship—or draw them to this or that tactic. In the end, “we” are not all the same, even if our side shares a broad-based political analysis in its opposition to capitalist exploitation and its embrace of social welfare that answers to the needs of the many rather than the profits of the few. Our movement should hold a place for everyone’s engagements, and we should recognize that this diversity makes us stronger.

Image credit: screenshot of http://christianspreafico.altervista.org/PoliticalNetwork/indexPN.html

Here’s what I’m thinking about and trying to practice right now, to avoid all those pitfalls outlined above:

I really like this Political Network Map by Christian Spreafico, and not just for the cool rhizomatic visualization, clickability, and obscure information. I think it more accurately represents the complex web of relationality and positionality that actual people experience, without reducing them to simple binaries. With all of our complexities, positionalities, and inconsistencies, none of us can fit neatly onto a line. We are multidimensional beings in a web of interconnectedness. Intersectionality–which registers the fact that we lead multi-issue lives and therefore must have a multi-issue politics–is, I believe, the only way to go.

Practicing the use of descriptive rather than evaluative language helps us minimize making assumptions about others’ motivations and positions (and is good practice for any and all relationships).

Trying to slow down and move at the speed of trust (much easier said than done!) is also important, as argues Adrienne Maree Brown’s book Emergent Strategy: “Inspired by Octavia Butler’s explorations of our human relationship to change, Emergent Strategy is radical self-help, society-help, and planet-help designed to shape the futures we want to live. Change is constant. The world is in a continual state of flux. It is a stream of ever-mutating, emergent patterns. Rather than steel ourselves against such change, this book invites us to feel, map, assess, and learn from the swirling patterns around us in order to better understand and influence them as they happen. This is a resolutely materialist “spirituality” based equally on science and science fiction, a visionary incantation to transform that which ultimately transforms us.” Borrow it, buy it, listen here, or download here.

Strategically we must use a diversity of tactics, working inside and outside of existing power structures. In this case, factionalist name-calling within the left, which reinforces the divide-and-conquer tactics of the right, is a hindrance to much-needed solidarity in an era of real fascist threat.

In my column last week (scroll down to see it) I “called-in” Brave and Free Santa Cruz to critically re-examine their website links and disavow the discrimination contained therein. I’ve looked at all of the “resources” and “important links,” and I feel even worse about their organizational alignments to: curtailing access to reproductive health care; content that is anti-trans, pro-gun, anti-“woke”, anti-vegan, and pro-voter suppression (support for requiring photo ID); anti-democratic views (against DC statehood); and opposition to the Special Counsel investigating Tr*mp’s Jan. 6, 2020 actions.

I’ve been accused of fomenting antagonism towards BnF members, and those who are unvaccinated. Some readers may have missed the care I took to say that I don’t think any of the local members of BnF intend to be discriminatory. The messages that I’ve received defending BnF have focused almost exclusively on covid-related issues. I barely mention covid in my column, and in fact explain that I’m not very concerned about vaccine-skepticism even though it turns me off. I have barely even gotten acknowledgement of the linked content that seriously concerns me and was the central point of my column. I find it troubling that there seems to be an insistence on addressing the thing that I find least problematic while avoiding the long list of dangerous content that I detail with examples and links.

So, I invite Brave and Free Santa Cruz once again to look closely at its own questionable connections. Put some thoughtful statements about the need to counter discrimination on your website; get rid of links to hate and hate-adjacent content; and show up for minoritized groups in Santa Cruz, with a commitment to listening, learning, and supporting.

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
August 14

PROPOSING A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO PROTECT LOCAL DISCRETION FOR LAND USE 

You will be shocked when you take a quick look at the Active Building Permit Applications for Significant Projects in the City of Santa Cruz and see the parade of very tall and dense structures planned for downtown:

Active Planning Applications | City of Santa Cruz

Accordingly, an OpEd CalMatters article in Sunday’s Sentinel caught my attention.  A possible Constitutional Amendment on the ballot to restore local land use discretion?  That would be great to push the State’s big stick back, wouldn’t it?

Here is what I learned.

Here is example of what this amendment would provide (see pages 5 and 6)

(2) A county or city shall not supersede or otherwise interfere with any voter approved local initiative. 

 (b) (]) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a local law shall prevail over conflicting land use planning and zoning statutes. 

(c) (l) State funding appropriated before the effective date of the act adding this subdivision shall not be modified due to a city or county adopting or enforcing any local law that pre-empts any land use planning and zoning statute pursuant to this section. 

(2) State funding appropriated after the effective date of the act adding this subdivision shall not discriminate in favor of, or give any preference to, a city or county that voluntarily complies with any land use planning and zoning statute. 

Here is CalMatters analysis of the impact of this Initiative, brought about by the State’s mandate to build 2.5 million new housing units by 2030, double the number in the previous 8-year cycle mandate:

How a ballot measure and population revisions complicate California housing war

But here is the rub:

State Demographers have revised the projected growth and housing needs and now reveal that California’s population trend is stagnant, with no real increase through 2060.

After decades of historic growth, California switching to a period of chronic stagnation

So, shouldn’t the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) also revise the Regional Housing Allocation Number (RHNA) mandates that are currently causing our County and Cities to feverishly re-zone to have dense, tall infill that will obliterate the character of our Communities?

Here is the Attorney General’s analysis of the 2021 Constitutional Amendment Initiative proposed for this same matter, but that was not put on the ballot.

If you want to get involved, join  “Our Neighborhood Voices”, the group of movers and shakers behind trying to preserve our local discretion on land use issues: Our Neighborhood Voices – Our Neighborhood Voices

The “Catalysts for Local Control” also has excellent information about this:

ABAG’s Bay Area population projections are way too high | Catalysts for Local Control

Sign up to participate in their District-wide meetings with elected representatives about this issue.  By and large, the representatives are not up to speed with what is really going on.

Recent Santa Cruz Voice online radio interviews with Lira Filippini and  John Hall from “Our Downtown, Our Future”, and Keresha Durham and Frank Barron from “Housing for People” revealed that the State’s housing mandates would actually reduce the number of affordable units overall, because developers would be allowed Density Bonuses to build many more market-rate units if their plans include a small percentage of the baseline number as “affordable”, sometimes increasing the total size of a development by 50%.

Such is the case of the proposed 908 Ocean Street NEW proposal for 389 units with mixed use retail on ground floor.…demolishing eight commercial buildings, 12 residential units, remove 13 heritage trees, requesting a 42.5% density bonus from a base density project of 273 units. 

Does it concern you that in 10 years, our Communities will be gone, in the interests of the greedy developers who have convinced elected officials to allow them to erase the quality of life and character of our communities, and not provide any real increase in affordable housing, not to mention bypassing developer impact fees for infrastructure?  Please get involved with like-minded people in “Catalysts for Local Control”, and “Our Neighborhood Voices”, or contact your elected representatives with your thoughts and solutions

Pencil in October 14 on your calendar now to attend what promises to be a great public discussion at the London Nelson Center with panelists to address the issue of local affordable housing, RHNA mandates, and what we want our Communities to look and feel like decades from now. 

THE CITY’S SURVEY ABOUT WHAT CONCERNS YOU

Last week, the City of Santa Cruz sent a link to a survey, wanting to better understand public concerns about environmental issues.

Oddly, the survey could only be accessed by a cell phone scanning the QR code

However, digging around in the City’s website revealed a link to the actual survey

What’s on your mind?  Take the survey and let the City know, but beware the veiled grab for personal property restrictions.

I THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO BE A PARK FOR THE PEOPLE

Recently, I saw tractors parked at the Farm Park area along Soquel Drive near the Quik Stop in Soquel, at Hardin Way.  I thought it must finally be progress being made on the bike jumps that County Parks officials have long promised to get built there.

I was wrong.

In reading the County Parks Commission agenda packet for August 14, 2023, here is what I learned:

An undeveloped portion of The Farm County Park is being leased to Monterey Peninsula Engineering, for the next approximately 15 months to use for staging of construction equipment and materials for the County’s Soquel Drive Buffered Bike Lane and Congestion Mitigation Project. Public Works is the contact for any questions. 

(see page 5)

This view of Farm Park is from Soquel Drive, and was supposed to be a bike jump place for the kids, with work donated by the local cycling clubs.

Here is the view from the small parking lot within the Farm Park entrance on Cunnison Lane.  It seems that MPE is already quite at home, but what about the Park promised to the people, decades ago?

Will this equipment be eventually used to help construct a Farm Park for the people?  The soils may get contaminated with oils that leak (see small puddle in the foreground?)

Meanwhile, this bridge. aka “Bridge to Nowhere”, that County Parks Dept. purchased nearly a decade ago to connect the two areas of the Farm Park is still just across the ravine and part of the Farm Park, rusting and in disrepair.  It is an ugly nuisance and hazard for the Tee Street neighborhood.

Please contact Supervisor Manu Koenig and ask why the County’s Farm Park is such a disgusting eyesore, and why the people still have no recreational park there.  831-454-2200   Manu Koenig manu.koenig@santacruzcounty.us

Public Works Director Matt Machado responded to my query with “I suspect the agreement will generate revenue for Parks, I further suspect the agreement and use does not conflict with Parks plans to develop the park further.  All that said it seems this current use is good for everyone, including the community. New revenue, Soquel Drive improvement.

Win-Win”

What an odd statement from a public servant.

SOUTH COUNTY PARK PURCHASE NEGOTIATIONS MOVE FORWARD WHEN COUNTY CANNOT EVEN MAINTAIN WHAT IT HAS BEEN GIFTED?

How can it be that the County Parks Dept. can in good faith move forward to purchase 38 acres at 181 Whiting Road for a new County Park, yet has shuttered the Bert Scott Estate Park for over 20 years, an incredible gift from the founders of Granite Construction Company? Bert Scott Estate Santa Cruz County Park, Corralitos, CA

Take a look at page 7 of the County Parks Commission agenda, and see that:

South County Parkland Acquisition County Parks is negotiating with the owner to purchase the property via owner-provided financing.

PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA, Aug 14

This proposed new County Park will have no safe access for kids to ride bikes to attend future athletic activities, other than riding or walking on Highway 152.  Is this the best use of Parks Dept. public monies?

STRANGE AND PRE-DETERMINED INTERVIEW OUTCOME FOR SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT NEW BOARD MEMBER

I was able to attend most of the interviews last week that the Soquel Creek Water District Board conducted of the 13 applicants for the vacant Board seat.  There were some excellent applicants that would have brought real professional expertise to the Board.

It was nearly comical to witness the haphazard approach the Board took to decide who the finalists would be, and what questions to ask them.  It was painfully obvious that General Manager Ron Duncan was pulling the strings of the puppet Board.  He handed them the questions to ask, and further suggested the Board ask finalists: “Where were you when you found out about the application process?  How did you feel?”

The answer to that odd and seemingly lame question revealed that Ron Duncan had text-messaged the women who were ultimately chosen as finalists to encourage them to apply initially.  They were given priority over other applicants because they had already been hand-picked to serve on the District’s Standing Committees.  Hmmm…Ron did state at the Board meeting when it was quickly decided to fill the vacancy by appointment rather than election that choosing someone from the Standing Committees would be a real possibility.

It sure was a priority for the Board last week.

The new Board member is Ms. Jennifer Balboni, floating to the top of the Applicant list because of her involvement on the Infrastructure Standing Committee and her abundant energy.  It will be interesting to see how she blends with the establishment.

She will be officially sworn in next Tuesday.

MANY IN THE SECOND DISTRICT WON’T MISS THIS FRIEND

A great Letter to the Editor last Sunday summed up the sentiments of many regarding the announcement  of Supervisor Zach Friend not seeking a fourth term of office.  Rest assured, we have not heard the last of this arrogant politico, bound for climbing the ladder at the expense of constituents.  No one can remember when the last time he held a town hall meeting of any sort…and good luck ever getting a reply to your correspondence.

“The announcement by the 2nd District Supervisor on not seeking reelection has been a long time coming. The irreversible damage to my community in Aptos will last forever while he moves to his next political position. When a politician comes into a community without any historical knowledge of previous agendas and the disdain they caused and then carries one of the most contentious developments in this community’s history, it’s time for him to go.

By the way when is the Army Corps of Engineers going to begin repairing that levee? You helped get the funds but what’s the start date? Before or after the next break?

— Arnold L. Versaw Jr., Aptos”

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS TO HOLD ELECTED OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE.

DO JUST ONE THING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
August 14

HUMANITY

Compassion for others in a political setting is a challenge that, as citizens, we must all ponder. As citizens in a democracy, we are active participants in the global experiment on Nature and how future generations will fare based on our individual decisions in the moment. We purchase things, we vote, and we make thousands of choices that each has an impact on other species. Each of us has our way and our reasons. A compassionate approach to others may open the many stuck doors to create a more lasting environmental conservation movement. And, we must ponder how institutions and individuals interact to enact that compassion.

The Government

Our style of democratic government reflects the will of the Nation’s people, over time. We vote directly for one of the three branches of government – the Legislative branch – and the House directly reflects representation of the majority of the population. The Senate changes the ‘majority rules’ notion to evenness of geographic representation, no matter the population, giving small numbers in sparsely populated geographies more power. Election of the Executive branch has a system of election using delegates, which also reflects an intention to create more even geographic distribution of power, but also has aspects that embed extra-democratic power relationships including freedom of delegate choice into the equation. Judicial branch members are appointed by that Executive branch and seated when confirmed by the Senate and so also reflect the problems associated with the elections of those two portions of the government.

In short, we have a system of government designed to amalgamate the geographies, popular opinions, and existing power relations in order to make choices that we are meant to respect as ‘representative.’ The way this works is particularly challenging to issues that do not raise to prominence for voters. When votes matter, politicians and the power network that supports them sway government actions. Environmental conservation is one of those issues that the power structure never wants to see come to the fore, and citizens are easily swayed in other directions. News media and social media, which are easily manipulated, herd citizens towards issues that are both divisive and convenient for those in power. Environmental conservation threatens all members of those in power, no matter what the political persuasion.

The top issues that sway US citizens’ votes are the ones that the media focus on: the economy (always first), healthcare, and safety – e.g., police (local), military (global). Environmental concerns always rank Way Down the list, despite being the single greatest element to having a sustainable economy, healthy humans, and a safe society.

When considering environmental conservation, it is the will of those in power and the government they manifest that creates the challenges to having compassion on two factions of our society: your fellow citizen, who is in some way responsible for the government, and the employees of government institutions, who act within governmental decision frameworks.

The Citizen

How do we approach compassion, to see the humanity in our fellow citizens when the government does so little for environmental conservation? It is easy to blame governmental actions on the citizens of the country, but is it fair?

It is also easy to understand why your neighbors, friends, and relatives do not prioritize environmental conservation with their actions. We are creatures of habit living in a difficult world. It is difficult to change our behaviors, even if they negatively affect the environment. It is difficult to see our individual choices as mattering and easier to blame the impacts on the environment on other people, other nations, or even evolution, fate, or a Deity. We all do these things. When we listen to the news or tune into social media, the messages there do not help us to understand elements of environmental conservation and what we can do about them. Even the supposed ‘neutral’ (really ‘centrist’) NPR rarely covers much of the breadth of environmental conservation import and then mostly with disempowering messages. Because the US has become so expensive and the pace so breakneck, citizens are afforded almost no leisure time to learn about environmental issues. And, with the decline in broad, critical thinking education, environmental conservation has become a tiny part of anything students are exposed to, favored by Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) focus. The term ‘Science’ in STEM doesn’t mean organismal biology nor does it include any conservation elements. Highlighting this STEM education is a real success of the power structure in the US as they hope to create a (somewhat) skilled workforce.

In sum, citizens do not know, and cannot find a way to know, about environmental conservation and without such knowledge they act innocently and ignorantly in ways that collectively negatively impact the environment. Aren’t we all like that? Let’s have a little compassion for everyone and figure out where to go from there.

The Government Worker

Government workers are citizens who have even more burdens on their environmental conservation actions. Those people who work for governmental institutions that are supposed to protect the environment face all the challenges of the average citizen described above. While it is true that the government requires some of those workers to have higher levels of education to qualify for their jobs, the required bachelor’s or master’s degrees never train them for the environmental conservation elements of their jobs. The most relevant field is called ‘conservation biology.’ There are very few institutions of higher education that offer this focus, and the combined top ten programs in the US graduate fewer than 100 undergraduates, and far fewer graduate students, each year. Once out of school, these individuals have a high incentive to work in a lucrative field, environmental consulting where they can earn 5 times more than a government employee. And so, government institution personnel that are responsible for environmental conservation have not received the education they need for their jobs, have not been raised in a culture that supports inquiry, and are strained by economic and social situations that make it difficult to prioritize environmental conservation. And then they go to work in institutions with similar individuals under conditions of extreme political pressure exerted in contravention to environmental conservation.

Governmental Institutions

The government institutions that have responsibility for environmental conservation have never been designed to be effective with that responsibility. Because conservation rarely and briefly rises to the fore for politicians, consistent oversight and policy development is lacking. Instead, environmental conservation frameworks are weak and up to the interpretation of the agency. Locally, State Parks is required to have General Plans for all of their lands, but there is no required timeline for creating them, no mandate to update them (ever), and little guidance on key features of those plans such as what a ‘carrying capacity’ analysis might be. Locally, County and City Parks have no guidance at all about environmental conservation and there is none in the making. Locally, the Bureau of Land Management has guidance documents for environmental conservation, again with no timelines for enacting them and insufficient guidance to maintain the scientific integrity of those efforts.

Workers are Human, Too!

Even if they don’t recognize it and can’t hear it, the too few employees charged with environmental conservation at governmental institutions find themselves without sufficient means and support for substantive, science-based environmental conservation action. And so, they go about their jobs doing what little they can to try to make a difference. Most of them are proud of their accomplishments. Being social humans, they form bonds with their workmates and take their personal pride and form institutional pride. They are proud of the work of State Parks, they are proud of City and County Parks Department accomplishments, and they are proud to be part of the BLM team.

Many of us can relate. Many people find themselves in institutions that have elements of good and elements of bad (which sometimes we don’t want to see!); we choose to focus on the good work we are doing within those institutions. We make friendships at work and want to support those friends. Some of us work for institutions where the public believes that our work is good and just, and so it is easy to become proud of our institution and even to defend our institution when challenged. Let’s have a little compassion for the people we see who have ended up like that and figure out where to go from there so that there is better environmental conservation even by governmental institutions.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Thursday, August 10, 2023

#222 / Naming Some Names

In case you don’t recognize him, that’s Jeffrey Epstein with the Harvard pennant. Wikipedia identifies Epstein as “an American sex offender and financier.” Epstein died in jail on August 10, 2019, exactly four years ago today. Officially, the cause of death was determined to be “suicide.” Others are not so sure about that.

The Nation Magazine published an article about Epstein, which appeared in its August 7/14, 2023, issue. The article is titled, “How Jeffrey Epstein Captivated Harvard.” How? How did he do that? In short, money!

What I thought most interesting in The Nation’s article were the names of all the “famous” people associated with Epstein. Here is a partial list. Read the article for more names. If you don’t recognize someone in the list that I am providing (for instance, Leon Bottstein, the President of Bard College, isn’t known to everyone), just click the link for some biographical information.

All of these people were associated with Epstein. All of them are “famous,” in some way:

Here’s what I thought, when I read the article in The Nation, and started tallying up the names: Ugo Betti.

No, I wasn’t thinking that The Nation had missed adding Ugo Betti to the list of those seduced into a relationship with Epstein by either money, or sex, or both. If you don’t recognize Ugo Betti’s name, click the link. Betti was both an Italian judge and a playwright. And I wasn’t thinking about Betti as an individual so much, but was really thinking more about a speech from one of this plays, The Burnt Flower BedI often think about this speech, and often quote it, too – particularly to students who take courses from me at UCSC:

That’s what’s needed, don’t you see? That! Nothing else matters half so much. To reassure one another. To answer each other. Perhaps only you can listen to me and not laugh. Everyone has, inside himself … what shall I call it? A piece of good news! Everyone is … a very great, very important character! Yes, that’s what we have to tell them up there! Every person must be persuaded – even if he is in rags – that he’s immensely, immensely important (emphasis added)!

Our system of democratic self-government is premised on the idea that each one of us is “immensely, immensely important.” We are so important that we get to run the country ourselves. That’s the idea, anyway!

Letting the rich run the world – and Jeffrey Epstein’s life is an example – underrates our own importance.

Let’s listen to what Ugo Betti tells us.

Let’s not forget it!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
August 14

THE DEEP STATE, OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY AND IRRELEVANCY

“It’s Joe Biden and ‘the deep state’ that are lying and unfairly trying to keep me from winning back the presidency!” That is only one of Donald Trump’s mantras along with his daily whining about the stolen election and his persecution in spite of his “innocence.” Upon closer examination he should discover that it has been an all-Republican crowd that has enlightened the investigations into his criminality beginning with the House J6 Committee and Special Counsel Jack Smith’s grand jury, both of which have found willing participants to weigh in on the former president’s schemes. Some have spoken up out of a patriotic duty, and some have done so to shield themselves legally or politically. Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said to his Senate colleagues, “Trump didn’t get away with anything – yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation, and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one,” as he cast a vote to absolve the president of any wrongdoing after the J6 insurrection. What do you say now, Mitch? The man continues to destroy the Grand Old Party, casting himself as a leader of the MAGA subversives, using party funds to pay his legal team as he continues his grifting within the base to secure even more money. “I love other people’s money,” The Don is captured saying on video.

Many in the Congress have been quieted since the indictments began, but too many others create Trumpian distractions, while emphasizing a need for revenge, taking up The Don’s lead of “Go after me, I’ll come after you!” And as we’ve seen and continue to see, the crazy MAGA base is all too willing to heed the call. Following the Smith indictment, a Reuters/Ipsos poll indicated 45% of the GOP voters would not give Trump their vote if he is convicted of a felony; yet, 35% side with him anyway, with others being undecided. The party needs its leadership to step up, grow a backbone, and get back on course from the right-turn it took after the Nixon debacle, of catering to older, white and rural base, especially with the country becoming a racially diverse, younger and urban crowd. ‘Wokeness‘ cheerleader, Ron DeSantis, has seen his campaign flounder, mainly because he is an unlikeable jerk, but because the ‘anti-woke’ mantra has become boring…imagine, voters being more interested in economics and security! And, hopefully, sensibility! This ain’t no party, this ain’t no disco, this ain’t no fooling around!

Court testimony in Trump’s appearances by an all-Republican retinue will likely favor public support for the legal process, and remind the GOP about its supposed law and order planks of the past. Former VP Mike Pence will surely be a witness, with his recent statement ringing in our ears, “Today’s indictment serves as an important reminder: Anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President of the United States. Our country is more important than one man. Our Constitution is more important than any one man’s career.” Can’t you hear it now, the applause…or, wait, are they saying, “Hang Mike Pence! Hang Mike Pence!” Yep, that’s more like it. Or will we have the likes of the Utah man who fought the FBI’s incursion before Biden’s visit to the state, “dusting off my M24 sniper rifle” which he called ‘the Democrat eradicator?’ We have to end these attacks on democracy, the intentional tactics to divide us, and the vicious hate engendered by the MAGA crowd!

Senator Lindsey Graham’s on-again-off-again relationship with Trump, as he tries to stay in the good graces of the MAGA base, has resulted in his being accused of belittling himself in his home state. He was booed at a recent Silver Elephant Gala where Trump was keynote speaker, when he joked that the former president “beat him like a drum,” in reference their golfing together. Graham exhorted the attendees to “not screw with Trump or you’ll regret it.” Though the senator is not up for election until 2026, possible challengers are testing the waters already, seeing some vulnerability. Graham will likely be called to testify in Georgia, as Fulton County DA Fani Willis presents her case in Trump’s election interference. The Senator claims a commonality with the Former Guy, and “I’ve come to like him.” Maybe they can assign adjoining cells to accommodate this mutual admiration society.

A recent Mike Luckovich cartoon has Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Assistant Supreme Court Justice Ginni Thomas, reacting to the duress of new revelations of even more gifts and travel. Ginni’s word balloon has her saying, “Being criticized for backing the coup and revelations Clarence repeatedly accepted financial gifts is very stressful.” Clarence appeals, “Hey, wealthy benefactors. We could use a vacation!” Sounds very true to life, no? ProPublica and The New York Times aren’t letting up, discovering more and more about the largesse accepted by the Thomases over three decades of Supreme Court tenure from industry titans and the ultra-wealthy.  Vacations aboard their yachts, premium suites at sports arenas, private jets to pick him up to join them in their squalor of riches, by the benefactors who share the ideology that propels his jurisprudence. The tally at this point, includes 38 destination vacations, one of which was a voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 private jet flights and eight helicopter trips; at least a dozen VIP passes to pro and college sports events, most viewed from a skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica, with a standing invitation to an exclusive golf club on the Atlantic shore. This is probably only a partial list, an undercount, due to the difficulty in researching such information. Stays in private residences may not be unethical, but non-disclosure of the other generous gifts is over the line. The consistency of these violations is unprecedented, just for those gifted by Harlan Crow, originally pointed out by ProPublica; but now Berkshire Hathaway exec, David Sokol, is now on the list, as is late billionaire H. Wayne Huizenga. A Christmas tree and stockings hung by the fireplace are left year ’round in the Thomas household, ‘cuz the gifts keep rolling in.

Oil baron, Paul ‘Tony’ Novelly’s gifts have not been reported. Only Crow’s name appears in Thomas‘ financial disclosures as required by law, and who knows what value was given Crow’s largesse. Since 1991, Thomas has probably benefitted in the millions of dollars. Don Fox, the former general counsel of the US Office of Government Ethics and the senior ethics official in the executive branch, said, “It’s just the height of hypocrisy to wear the robes and live the lifestyle of a billionaire.” Working under both Democrat and Republican administrations, he advised every new political appointee the same thing: “Your wealthy friends are the ones you had before you were appointed…you don’t get to acquire any new ones.” The American taxpayer has the right to expect that Supreme Court justices are not living on the dime of others. Thomas and Novelly have not responded to questions, and Huizenga’s son, who survives his father, offered no response. Sokol defended his 21 year friendship with the Thomases and acknowledged trips together, defending the justice as upright and ethical, with conversations about helping young people, about sports, and discussing family matters. With security concerns nowadays, he feels justices should fly privately or on US government aircraft…not commercial. Especially with First Class being phased out by most carriers, huh? As Upton Sinclair said, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” Both Thomases are well short of understanding anything and we just keep giving our tax dollars to him, as well as to his benefactors. Talk about double jeopardy! Comforting to know that Thomas accepts BOTH MasterCard and Visa, as well!

Of course, we can’t forget the $270K Prevost Marathon, the ‘Rolls Royce of Motor Coaches,’ mysteriously purchased for the Thomas Twins with a ‘loan’ by healthcare executive Anthony Welters, a loan never disclosed in 1999. But hey, it allows the part-time RV nomads to travel the country, just being regular schmoes, as they mix it up with the other Unethical DC Road Warrior Sugar Babies, looking for another handout. His accomplice, Supreme Court Justice aka Sugar Baby Alito, purple robed and wearing a tiara, is diligently scoping out the territory on that same trail. Poor Chief Justice John Roberts is probably still lamenting the loss of the retired Justice Stephen Breyer, who he confided was his “only friend on the Court.” That in contrast to Clarence Thomas‘ referring to the court makeup prior to Roberts appointment, as a “fabulous court…we were family.” Sadly, it’s the ‘Robert’s Court’ in name only. “I don’t think I would want to be Roberts right now,” says USC law professor, Lee Epstein, whose specialty is examining voting patterns of the court. “He has some very aggressive, ambitious colleagues on this right who want to do a lot very quickly, and that’s just so not Roberts. He tries to slow things down, but they’re not going to be slowed.” 

Mike Davis, who worked to get Trump’s judicial nominees confirmed, now heading the conservative Article III Project, says of Roberts, “He’s just less relevant now. Trump transformed the 5-4 John Roberts court into the 5-4 Clarence Thomas court, meaning the court’s just going to follow the law and not be concerned about the political fallout.Harvard Law School professor emeritus, Laurence H. Tribe, co-author of the book on the Roberts court, made the same point from the opposite ideological perspective. “He’s largely irrelevant, except that the court has gone so far, so fast that he may become more relevant depending on whether anybody else is chastened,” Tribe says. Roberts risks appearing weak if he insists on a slower approach, losing what little ability he retains to influence and constrain the conservative majority. If he votes with that majority, it’s a risk that he contributes to what he is trying to prevent: the decline of the institution. The vote of the Chief Justice is just one of nine, with his authority of being able to assign the authorship of opinions when he is in the majority. Roberts, with his eye on history has been quoted as saying, “It’s sobering to think of the seventeen chief justices; certainly a solid majority of them have to be characterized as failures; the successful ones are hard to number.” He would prefer that the nine would speak as one, and not with discord and dissent…a charming and old-fashioned idea, not seen for at least thirty-five years or so.

Not likely to make it to the Supreme Court, or even out of the county, Ocean Fathoms, a company which ages $500 wine under the ocean, has been busted by Santa Barbara’s DA over alcohol being stored offshore without any permits. Seems that the firm failed to procure an ABC sales permit, while also failing to pay sales taxes on their limited sales, then abandoning the cache which they claimed would be a developing reef ecosystem, a violation of the Water Code. The FDA considered the wine unfit for human consumption after a prolonged submersion, so what were these guys thinking?

Following Trump’s 2016 election victory, the Obamas invited Donald and Melania to the Oval Office for a preview. After some pleasantries, The Don asked to use the bathroom, and was astonished to see a solid gold urinal, later telling Melania excitedly about his discovery. That evening, Barack and Michelle were discussing the visit, with Michelle asking her husband, “Guess who peed in your saxophone?” Whatever your path there are always a few puddles!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “Lighthouses”

“If you want to help a lighthouse, just don’t block its light, that’s the greatest help!”
~Mehmet Murat ildan

“If you close your eyes, no lighthouse can help you!”  
~Mehmet Murat ildan

“Light-houses, my boy! Beacons of the future! Capsules with hundreds of bright little seeds in each, out of which will spring the wiser, better England of the future.”

~Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes

...

This is a film about automata, mechanical robots from the 18th century. Engineering meets art – this is AI 300 years ago. At an hour long, it’s a short movie, and it’s fascinating and worth the time. Go on, grab some popcorn and marvel at human ingenuity!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 9 – 15, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…Webb space telescope news. Greensite…on debating a YIMBY. Schendledecker…peace, love, and dog whistles in Santa Cruz? Steinbruner…CZU fire rebuilds issues, city housing battles, B’40 fire district annexing. Hayes…migrating butterflies. Patton… the laws of power and the rule of law. Matlock… where have you gone Joe Dimaggio? … and Walter Cronkite? … jobs available! Eagan … Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…pick of the week… Hurt. Quotes…” Leaves”

...

THE RAINS CAME. 1958. This is between Front Street and the river. That’s the Garibaldi Hotel, which was built in 1894 and demolished in 1958. It was on an island, according to John Chase’s book, which you had to reach by a pedestrian bridge from the end of Cooper Street.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Bratton’s private collection.

DATELINE August 7

THE WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE NEWS.I haven’t a clue whether or not our readers will be able to open this link to this profound article from yesterday’s New Yorker. (August 6)

If you can open and read the article you’ll know all the latest known facts about life on other planets, the age of earth, and a very educated expert guess on the size and depth and age of the universe. It’s beautiful and very scary. You’ll go deep into just where religion has taken us/or left us. The James Webb telescope was launched in 2021 and this article gives us the plot, plans, failures, and unbelievable successes that the telescope has brought to our known world…and exposes us to even just a fraction of all the unknown worlds out there to be discovered.

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

QUEENMAKER. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.6 IMDB). Another meaningful and well-made Korean movie. This one tells the dynamic story of a Korean woman who is a public relations chief for a huge corporation who gets into politics. She fights developers and leads a campaign for the mayor of Seoul and realizes where she’s both powerful and weak. Almost reminds us of our very local political scene!

LITTLE WOMEN. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.8 IMDB). Definitely NOT the Louisa May Alcott story or from any other Little Women sagas playing on your video now. This Korean movie tells the tricky and complex story of three sisters who have a cruel mother and face poverty and corporate theft plus alcoholism and even suicide. It does have some plot holes later on but it’s well worth watching.

THE LOST FLOWERS OF ALICE HART. (PRIME SERIES) (8.0 IMDB) It’s good to see Sigourney Weaver back on screen in this Australian movie.  She does a wonderful job as the prime mover in this series dealing with children and women who have been abused. They live in a community named Thornfield and help each other survive and return to their lives. The stories start out with a nine year old’s fate, then a fire and deeper and deeper. Very well done as far into the series as we’ve seen so far.

THE ENGLISH. (PRIME SERIES) (7.8 IMDB). A very serious almost pageant like saga about the relationship between the American Indians and the settlers from England and the rest of the world. Emily Blunt is the English woman who is hunting for the man who killed her son. She runs into such evil doers as Toby Jones and Ciaran Hines but makes close friends with Chaske Spencer who is a real Lakota Sioux. Together they make their way through all the usual western movie plots and scenes. It’s very heavy and serious…especially for a western.

THE LADY OF SILENCE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.4 IMDB). This documentary is from Mexico and deals with the 49 murdered senior women from 1998 to 2005. There are many suspects…all the women were strangled with cords, ropes, or wire. The governor of Mexico is involved and much also happens in Juarez. It comes down to the terrible job the police do in finding and pursuing the killer. It’s well done and has a few surprises which I won’t divulge here.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

BARBIE…SECOND VIEWING. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (7.5 IMDB). With the surprising reactions world wide to this Mattel film I had to check it out to see what I had missed. I missed the 180 million dollar plugging that Mattel spent trying to sell all the other non-stereotypical Barbies. They push Doctor Barbies, Supergirl Barbies, Black Barbies, and Army Barbies ad infinitum. Mattel’s trying to justify their billions in profit and the movie is still a mess plot wise.

FULL CIRCLE. (MAX SERIES) (6.4 IMDB). It’s difficult to follow the plot of this movie about a screwed up kidnapping that happens in New York City. Thugs actually kidnap the wrong teen ager and his real family goes berserk while the victim fights for his life. The kidnappers aren’t the wisest operators, and you’ll wonder how anyone keeps a check on reality during the police chase.

IRMA VEP. (PRIME SERIES) (6.8 IMDB). The very talented, beautiful and fascinating Alicia Vikander plays an American movie star who goes to Paris to film a re-make of Irma Vep. Irma Vep was actually a classic silent film serial from 1915 and she’s a vampire. There’s laughs, great photography, and a switching type plot that will keep you affixed. We watched the original silent series in Earl Jackson’s film class at UCSC years ago it was excellent…so’s this series, so far.

LAST CALL. (HBO SERIES) (7.7 IMDB). A very serious documentary covering the brutal killings of gay men in and around New York City back in the 1990’s. The credits list Leon Panetta as a member of the cast but after watching the first two episodes we don’t see Leon yet. It’s a dark and unrelenting search for the gay butcher who cuts and dices up each of his murders. It’s also a condemnation of the official legal and New York City Police reaction to the murders because the victims are gay. Well worth watching and thinking about.

ALICE IN BORDERLAND. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.7 IMDB).  An unusual Japanese film from a graphic novel about Tokyo waking up, well three boys waking up to an empty deserted  city. Somehow they are directed to, or forced to, enter a game of finding the right door to escape flaming death in each of these rooms.

...
August 7

FULL OF IT

I was recently invited to be a guest on the KSQD radio show, Talk of the Bay hosted by Bodie Shargel. The topic was Heritage Trees. The two other guests on the panel were Cyndi Dawson and Zennon Ulyate-Crow. Cyndi is a current city Planning Commissioner and was coordinator of the Measure N, Empty Home Tax initiative. Zennon is a UCSC student in his first full year living in Santa Cruz, a founder of UCSC Student Housing Coalition, a current city Transportation/Public Works Commissioner and member of Santa Cruz YIMBY (Yes, In My Backyard) a pro-housing development group.

Heritage Trees as the topic quickly shifted to trees v. infill development. The photo above, the new six story mixed-use development on Pacific, Laurel and Front Streets is an example of significant “infill” development. Many more are on their way.

Zennon stated there needs to be a balance between preserving heritage trees and denser, more affordable housing so folks aren’t driving so far to work. That carbon emissions and climate change make this an imperative. This sounds reasonable unless you know it is a false dichotomy: that infill housing is not affordable; that more and more low-income long-time workers are leaving the city for cheaper housing further away and that no heritage tree has ever held up a housing development…ever. I suggested that if a balance needs to be struck, then trees should get more attention than the zero they get now. The city has a record of ignoring its Heritage Tree Ordinance Resolution which requires development projects to alter their design to accommodate healthy, sound heritage trees. The latest example of ignoring this requirement is the library/garage/housing project on Lot 4 where no attempt was made to preserve any heritage trees along the outside edge of the property.

I listened carefully to Zennon articulating the YIMBY position. It seemed largely based on assumptions and cherry-picked data. One assumption is that new infill developments will enable people to live near their work and shop on foot or bicycle rather than by car, thus saving green-house gas emissions. We hear this a lot at public hearings. It may well be true for at-home workers and students. It is not true for most low-income workers, even more of whom will be needed to supply the consumption needs of all the new high-income residents; coffee shops; grocery stores; wine bars; craft breweries; bike shops; receptionists; restaurant workers and the like. The former will increasingly travel long distances into Santa Cruz as they are displaced by rising rents and costs. And if they all travel by a future train (unlikely) then the whole YIMBY argument falls apart. And will high-income residents never drive? To SF, to Lake Tahoe, to a concert, to work? Ah yes, electric vehicles. But back home, where will they park since YIMBY’s are against providing parking?

Most significantly, an increase in market-rate housing puts affordability further out of reach. This fact must be grappled with. According to the 2023 State Income Limits from the Department of Housing and Community Development, in Santa Cruz, an individual is at the low-income level at $92,500 a year, a fraction less than the $92,950 for the individual Area Median Income. Development of ever-more market-rate housing raises the AMI, squeezing more and more earners into the below-market rate categories while not increasing those percentage requirements in new construction. To make matters worse, the percentage requirements for below market rate units are slashed by a third due to state density bonuses. The YIMBY argument is that the number of affordable units is the same even if the total market-rate units increase due to density bonuses. This ignores the impact of an ever-increasing AMI on lower income workers as just described. The oft repeated, “we need more housing!” may well be the wolf in sheep’s clothing. It certainly is not the path towards more truly affordable housing which is the real issue. In fact, it may be a U-turn.

Cyndi expressed a skepticism of orthodoxy from either side, including challenging that density is always a good thing. How we densify, she said, is probably the more important question. That there are cascading effects such as overwhelming open space lands as new residents in small living spaces turn to open space and State Parks for relief. Carrying capacity came to my mind. She urged the need for data; for broadening the focus; for examining the cascading effects and making decisions based on values such as whether there is a need for urban green spaces within the new densities.

As the discussion continued, Zennon tried to bolster his assertion that paying too much attention to heritage trees can hold up much-needed housing by citing the development at 130 Center St. (which I covered last week). He stated (incorrectly) that the project document contained a sixty -page arborists report; that I had appealed the project based on traffic and the arborist report, which held up the project from being developed. Not accurate. The appeal, submitted by the group, Santa Cruz Tomorrow was based on the inadequate traffic study which omitted study of weekend traffic, a quarter mile from the beach and Boardwalk. The arborist report was two, not sixty pages long and I had no problem with the project removing the few scrappy, neglected trees. The appeal made no mention of trees. The project is held up because the developer, Swenson Builders is waiting for better interest rates. Such inaccurate accusations are concerning. Zennon moves in high political circles.

It was Zennon’s Student Housing Coalition that organized a letter-writing campaign generating around 200 form letters urging a no vote on the appeal when it went to city council. The form letter misstated the facts in the appeal. It said we were against much-needed housing when all we wanted was a proper traffic study so those impacts could be mitigated.

For his closing statement on air, Zennon chose to distinguish between the preservation environmentalists of the 1970’s and the climate environmentalists of today. He granted that the former achieved clean air, clean water and protected open space. But, he said, they had an ethos about preventing growth and change and the same folks are now trying to prevent change such as infill development. His assertion that the Sierra Club sued to stop offshore wind turbines at Morro Bay does not comport with the Sierra Club’s enthusiastic support for wind turbines, including Morro Bay, as described on their website. Maybe they pushed for a more complete environmental review to better protect the environment while still providing wind turbines, but they unequivocally support wind energy.

As more and more infill developments move towards city council for deliberation, including the mammoth Downtown Extension Project with its multiple twelve and twenty story towers, with no weekend traffic study, one can be assured that the YIMBY’s will be out in force, along with the Monterey Bay Economic Partnership and the building trades. Be prepared for the worst.

If you want to listen to the radio show you can find it here.

KSQD August 1st Talk of the Bay 5PM.

And I neglected to say last week that you must be a city voter to sign the Housing for People petition. I’m still waiting for an email: gilliangreensite@gmail.com so I can come by and get your signature. It’s our only hope!

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

August 7

PEACE, LOVE, AND DOG-WHISTLES IN SANTA CRUZ?

Last weekend I attended the annual Hiroshima and Nagasaki Remembrance Day event at the Clock Tower, which this year (as in the past) was enveloped by a “Peace in Ukraine” rally. The Collateral Damage sculpture by the Town Clock is cleaned and polished annually, and is an important, intersectionalist anti-war, anti-racist, universal justice symbol for the community to rally around.

Generally speaking, this is my crowd, and the kind of event that I love: grassroots organized, small, peace-loving, intersectionalist, sometimes a little cheesy. But this year I had some qualms about attending at all, because of the involvement of one group: Brave and Free Santa Cruz.

I have nothing against any of the individuals in this group, since (as far as I know) I don’t know any of them particularly well. I suspect that a few people that I like very much may be increasingly drawn to them as they are drawn to support RFK Jr’s seriously effed-up presidential bid or Ukraine anti-war positions that may lean towards Putin-apologists.

I’m used to having close relationships with people that I disagree with strongly on a few issues (including Trump voters and anti-vaxxers). So I’ve been thinking hard about why this group concerns me so much, especially at this particular event, aside from my immediate turn-off due to their anti-vaxx stance.

It’s because they employ dangerous tropes and misinformation, while partnering with people and organizations that are funded by the far-right. It makes the whole world, and our little community, more dangerous for queer, BIPOC, disabled, neurodiverse, nonconformist people. People like me, my kids, and my friends. People I love. What they espouse or endorse is also fundamentally anti-democratic and anti-social, in spite of their stated values.

Scan the Brave and Free Santa Cruz home page and you might decide that their views are not so bad. I think there’s general consensus in our community that we support much of what they include in their vision bullet points: healthy ecosystems, free speech, civil rights, anti-war peace, and the weakening of corporate power.

Scratch the surface and follow their links, and you might start to think: “They’re a little out there, but hey, to each their own. They’re not outright saying they hate Jews or trans people.”

Unfortunately, their foundational Mission Statement, Vision, and Values include beliefs that are inseparable from anti-Semitic, racist, anti-queer, trans-phobic, xenophobic, anti-abortion, and decidedly reactionary movements, ideas, and individuals. They are linked to a world-wide movement that can be incredibly dangerous.

Central to this movement are dog-whistles–insider speak or code words and symbols that outsiders either don’t get the significance of or that can be plausibly denied when called out.

For example, personal sovereignty in the literal sense is something that most of us can probably agree on: privacy and bodily agency are essential to our civil rights and healthcare choices. Personal Sovereignty in the context of the other words on the Brave and Free homepage is also coded to reference the Sovereign Citizen movement, which, in large part, is rooted in white-supremacy, colonialism, patriarchy, and rejection of our social contracts to live together in ways that are developed over time through community, consensus, and democracy. It is anti-communitarian and libertarian in its anti-government and anti-tax stances.

The Great Reset is a real and troubling pro-capitalist program; the Great Reset conspiracy theory employs anti-Semitic tropes and dog-whistles.

Another event they’re holding this week focuses on 15-Minute Cities. 15-Minute Cities are a good thing: its how most people lived for ages, basically getting around by foot or slow transport to everything they needed in their village or neighborhood in about 15 minutes. It’s a great idea for universal accessibility and pro-social economic and environmental justice. Somehow, the 15-Minute City conspiracy theory, on the other hand, invokes the bogeymen of government surveillance, confinement, control, and scarcity.

We have good reasons to oppose Geolitica (FKA PredPol) and I have written about them critically in the past. But I can find no link between them and the concept of 15-Minute Cities at all.

The “News” link on Brave and Free takes you directly to The Last American Vagabond (LAV) website, an implicit endorsement of their content. Among many (MANY!) other troubling elements, in their online shop they sell this t-shirt.

As an outsider, I didn’t get the significance of this name/image at all until I did a couple of internet searches. It’s a reference to a 2018 shooting-suicide at Youtube’s headquarters in San Bruno, CA. The shooter, cis-woman Nasim Najafi Aghdam, was quickly co-opted by the conspiracy world as a trans-woman scapegoat. In part thanks to anti-trans fake news like this, in the US murders of trans people nearly doubled from 2018-2022. And we do have anti-trans shenanigans happening in our own county and state, it’s not just Ron DeSantis’s Florida suffering. Check out this local gem!

I don’t want to get into an encyclopedic listing of problematic LAV partners and merch, so I’ll just flag Lift the Veil and an apparent love of cryptocurrencies.

I’m an artist with ADHD, and I love (or can’t help) thinking outside the box and lateral thinking. But when lateral thinking falls off the edge of the earth and stockpiles weapons or tries to coup or promote hate (even laterally), I’m done. Like the Querdenker movement in Germany tipping over into the Reichsbürger movement.

I’ll leave you with one more resource to help get you grounded: The Transnational Institute. Please, we cannot fall into hate-fueled conspiracy theories that harm or kill people. It’s not enough to say that the less obvious discriminatory views of a group can be ignored so that we can work together on what we do agree on. It’s not enough to tolerate hate so that we’re not seen as canceling members of our community.

We can only come together in solidarity when we are truly and proactively anti-racist and anti-sexist. We must call in our community members to do better if they want to collaborate with us. We must make our community safe for ourselves and all of our diversities. If a rally or meeting is unsafe for any of us, then it’s not okay to keep going.

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
REBUILD NUMBERS THREE YEARS AFTER THE CZU FIRE SHOCKINGLY LOW…WHY?

Three years ago, much of our County’s rural Communities were devastated, instantly rendering nearly 1,000 families homeless.  The journey to rebuild and attempt to recover has been long and painful for many, and the County of Santa Cruz and CAL FIRE have made the permitting process so expensive and tortuous that many gave up.

The rebuilding permit data is shockingly low.

As of July 2023.  CZU fire occurred August 2020, so it’s now three years later.

Houses destroyed:  911

 Houses rebuilt:  32

Permits Issued, Ready to Pick Up: 213

Why is that number so high???   Supervisors Justin Cummings and Bruce McPherson asked that same question, and requested staff report back this month to explain.

Data from page 10 of the August 2023 issue of the Capitola Soquel Times.

Why are the numbers so low?  If you read the article by Mr. Tom Decker in the Aptos Times, you’ll get an idea

From that point it took us:

  • two sets of structural engineers
  • three hi-tech companies
  • one licensed registered environmental engineer
  • two California licensed general contractors
  • three permitting consultants
  • two sets soils engineers
  • one topo map placement consultant
  • one ancient debris flow advisor
  • thirteen months and
  • a 166-page plan set

… just to permit our first home.

Is this in alignment with the County Board of Supervisor action to instruct the County Planning Dept. to be “Pro-Housing”?

County Takes Steps to Seek Prohousing Designation — Housing Santa Cruz County

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ DESIGINATED PRO-HOUSING

What does that mean for the look and feel of downtown Santa Cruz?  Well, for one thing, it means more money for the cash-strapped City.

California Designates Three More Communities as Prohousing for Strides Made to Accelerate Housing Production | California Governor

But what will it mean for those who live here and the environment Santa Cruz has always said we embrace?

A recent interview with Housing for People leaders Keresha Durham and Frank Baron gave me a new insight as to what is in the planning process for the Laurel Street neighborhood, near the Arena.  The City does not need to build the skyscrapers they have planned there in order to meet the new RHNA   mandates.  The reason the City wants to do that is to bring in revenue to fund the new Warriors Stadium planned for the neighborhood.

It seems the City’s focus is purely on the bottom line.

Help the dedicated Housing for People organizers to get enough qualified signatures on the ballot for November to allow the people of Santa Cruz to vote on building heights, densities and to increase the percentage of affordable inclusionary units in developments of 30 or more units.  Housing For People – Santa Cruz – Housing for People Not unaffordable towers! Take Back your Democratic Right to Vote on Height and Increase Affordable Housing

City of Santa Cruz earns Prohousing Designation to allow accelerated housing production – KION546

STATE AUDIT QUESTIONED ACCURACY OF NEED TO TRIPLE HOUSING MANDATES

There is a great article in the August edition of Capitola-Soquel Times illuminating last year’s  State Auditor report of the Regional Housing Number Allocation (RHNA) mandates whipping cities and counties into feverishly working to get their papers in order to build, build, build.

Capitola Soquel Times: August 2023 — Times Publishing Group, Inc.  (“Why did State Housing Demands Double?)

Take a moment and read over the State Auditor’s Report

The auditors examined the Dept. of Housing and Community Development (HCD) developed for RHNA numbers of three regions and found:

1) “We identified multiple areas in which HCD must improve its process. For example, HCD does not satisfactorily review its needs assessments to ensure that staff accurately enter data when they calculate how much housing local governments must plan to build. 

2)  We also found that HCD could not demonstrate that it adequately considered all of the factors that state law requires, and it could not support its use of healthy housing vacancy rates. This insufficient oversight and lack of support for its considerations risks eroding public confidence that HCD is informing local governments of the appropriate amount of housing they will need.

3) HCD’s needs assessments also rely on some projections that the Department of Finance (Finance) provides. While we found that most of Finance’s projections were reasonably accurate, it has not adequately supported the rates its uses to project the number of future households that will require housing units in the State. Although these household projections are a key component in HCD’s needs assessments, Finance has not conducted a proper study or obtained formal recommendations from experts it consulted to support its assumptions in this area. “

Does this mean that HCD sort of made it all up, and now cities and counties are left to scramble their way to get a Housing element approved by HCD to comply?  Never mind the lack of infrastructure and environmental impacts…or quality of life.

Read the State Auditor’s Recommendations to fix this issue on pages 22 and 29 of the Report and start talking with your local representatives to speak up for our quality of life in Santa Cruz County.

LISTEN TO COMMUNITY MATTERS THIS FRIDAY (8/11) TO LEARN MORE ABOUT CITY OF SANTA CRUZ BUILDING ISSUES

Santa Cruz Voice is a new online local radio platform, hosting many programs focusing on local issues.  This week’s “Community Matters” Friday 1pm-3pm program will host John Hall and Lira Filippini with Our Downtown, Our Future.  Listen in and join the discussion: Santa Cruz Voice

WHY WOULD SCOTTS VALLEY FIRE LEADERS REJECT ANNEXING BRANCIFORTE FIRE DISTRICT IF REQUIRED TO TRANSITION TO DISTRICT-BASED ELECTIONS?

The informal opinion of LAFCO director Joe Serrano when I spoke with him after last Wednesday’s meeting.  The Commissioners did not seem to understand or care that the Happy Valley residents and property owners will absolutely lose all representation when the Branciforte Fire District dissolves upon annexation.  Why doesn’t Mr. Serrano think this is important?  He acknowledged it is a concern, but was adamant that the annexation go forward.

He want to submit the annexation for an award at the upcoming State LAFCO convention in Monterey.  Hmmm…

“We can work on pressuring Scotts Valley after the annexation is complete” he told me.  Really?  What incentive would Scotts Valley ever have?

There is a 30-day Request for Reconsideration in which ANY PERSON can submit a request for the LAFCO to reconsider their approval of the Plan for Service that would cause Happy Valley residents to surrender all of the fire engines, the fire station, and all equipment, all tax monies and the Measure T special Assessment the Branciforte Fire District voters approved in 2016 to fund equipment, the station, and “contingencies, yet will have no say at all as to what happens to those assets.  It would all be up to the SVFD existing Board of Directors to decide.

Hmmm….  That is a very rude and ruthless Board.  Unless there are changes, the people of Happy Valley will not be served equitably.

Kate Anderton was the only member of the public from B40 there, along with Chief Lackey and Director Kuksht.  The new Scotts Valley Fire District Chief Correira and Director Patterson were in the audience.  Kate was the only one who spoke.

She brought up real concerns about the Measure T funds and that the B40 Board alone has governance of those funds. How could Scotts Valley Fire Board legally dictate the use of the Measure T or dissolution of it in the future?  She asked that Item 6(i) in the Resolution be omitted.

6(i) Branciforte Fire Protection District Revenue Source: Upon the effective date of the reorganization, the successor agency will receive the property taxes, benefit assessments, special assessments, special taxes, fees, and charges currently in effect and being collected by BFPD, including Measure T and any new benefit assessments to fund the Branciforte Fire Station. Pursuant to Government Code Section 56886(t), all charges, fees, assessments, or taxes existing within BFPD shall be extended and shall continue to be levied and collected by the successor agency until otherwise determined by the successor agency’s board of directors. The successor agency shall have full authority to impose, administer, and collect said special taxes and fire suppression benefit assessments in the same manner as the existing districts within the applicable portions of the successor agency. 

 page 6

I spoke about the need for better representation with district-based elections.

Director Serrano focused ad nauseum about “Branciforte Fire is a sinking ship”.  He made it sound as if the District will fall apart by the end of the year if the annexation does not happen.  He said the new Type 6 engine is being purchased with Measure T funds, which is not true.

The Commissioners asked a bit about Measure T…how much money is it?  Branciforte Fire Chief Lackey did not even go to the podium when asked. : About $167,000 per year.”  Commissioner Roger Anderson asked about the number of calls that other agencies have responded to (Joe reported 159 calls/year for B40).  Joe did not have the information handy, but estimated Scotts Valley responded to about 50% of them.

Supervisor Koenig asked about the effect of removing Item 6(i) regarding Measure T and asked if the LAFCO could alter the Resolution and Plan for Service?  Director Serrano said Yes, then told him the Advisory Commission would be able to address the issue of keeping Measure T monies in Branciforte District after it dissolved.

The Commission then approved the Resolution with no changes.

Director Serrano later told the Board that he plans to submit the Reorganization to the State LAFCO meeting to get an award.

Individuals or agencies have up to 30 days after adoption of the resolution to submit a written request. The reconsideration period is scheduled for August 3 to September 1.

 BFPD Reorganization Staff Report Page 15 of 16

 Protest Proceeding In accordance with Government Code Section 57000, when the Commission adopts a resolution making determinations regarding a change of organization, affected residents within the proposal area will have an opportunity to voice their opposition during the protest period. The Commission shall specify a timeframe between twenty-one (21) and sixty (60) days for the collection and filing of written protests pursuant to Government Code Section 56886(o), and that timeframe shall be included in the terms and conditions of an approval for a change of organization. Within thirty-five (35) days of the adoption of the Commission’s resolution, the Executive Officer shall notice a protest hearing and, in the notice, set the hearing date as prescribed by the Commission in its terms and conditions. LAFCO staff has set forth a 24-day protest proceeding. The protest period is scheduled for September 4 to September 27, 2023. A protest hearing will be held on September 27 to collect the final petitions and hear any resident feedback. A public notice for the protest hearing will be advertised no later than Friday, September 1, 2023. 

Protest Results Upon determination of the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn, the Executive Officer shall take one of the following actions: a) If less than 25% of the affected registered voters or landowners oppose the proposal, then a form of resolution making determinations and ordering the change of organization or reorganization will be adopted without an election; b) If 25% to 50% of the affected registered voters or landowners oppose the proposal, then a form of resolution making determinations and ordering the change of organization or reorganization will be adopted subject to confirmation by the voters; or c) If more than 50% of the affected registered voters or landowners oppose the proposal, then a certificate of termination will be issued, which ends the LAFCO proceedings. For additional transparency, and to clarify the statutory requirements outlined in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act, the Commission adopted a Protest Proceedings Policy (refer to Attachment 17)

LAFCO Branciforte Fire Protection District Reorganization

What happens in Branciforte Fire District can happen in your neighborhood.  This sets a precedent for Santa Cruz County. Please contact Santa Cruz County LAFCO with your thoughts, and urge anyone you know in the Happy Valley area to get involved while they still have a shred of direct representation.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS TO HOLD ELECTED OFFICIAL ACCOUNTABLE. DO ONE THING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
August 7

MIGRATING BUTTERFLIES

Monarchs, painted ladies, and tortoise shell butterflies are three kinds of butterflies that migrate to and from the Monterey Bay area. Each has its own story.

Butterfly Life History, Reviewed

To understand the rest of what I have to tell you, you’ll have to recall some basics about butterflies. The flying creatures you see are just one of the life history stages of these insects. These flying ones are called ‘adults’ because they are the ones that are reproductive. They mate and the females attach eggs to just the right plant where their hatchlings will want to feed. The eggs sit a while before hatching. When they hatch, out comes what is called a larva, or caterpillar. The caterpillar feeds on certain kinds of plant leaves, gets bigger, and one day finds itself yearning to change. At that miraculous point, the caterpillar morphs into an entirely different-looking thing: a chrysalis. The chrysalis hangs apparently doing nothing, but actually it is using stored food to change into an adult. A chrysalis can move a little. Once the chrysalis has developed it morphs once again, this time emerging as an adult.

Co-Evolution

Plants and butterfly larvae co-evolve, plant genetic diversity creates new generations increasingly well-guarded against caterpillars that eat them. Plants evolve caterpillar toxins, better hairs to clog the mouths or throats of larvae, changed leaf shapes or colors so that they are less recognizable to ovipositing female butterflies, and modifications for food and homes for ants that guard against caterpillars. There are countless other evolutionary strategies to avoid what is called predation by caterpillars. On the other side of the playing field, butterfly species also evolve so that new generations are better adapted to those strategies.

Food Plants

Each of the butterflies I focus on in this essay have co-evolved with plants as outlined above. Monarchs eat milkweed, a highly toxic plant that a few other closely co-evolved species can eat. Painted ladies eat a wide variety of plants with many complex adaptations to herbivory – they are super-eaters! California tortoiseshell butterflies eat Ceanothus, a widespread shrub genus with its own chemistry to ward off herbivores.

Butterfly Maps

Monarch butterflies travel west to the Monterey Bay area in large numbers for the winter to avoid inland frost. Painted ladies travel north as their food dries up in the desert and new food is still edible further north. Tortoiseshell butterflies travel west from high elevations in the Sierra Nevada, also to over winter in our more temperate clime. Those are the simple overviews, but the details are much more complex.

Monarch Life History

In Spring through Fall, four generations of monarch butterflies enjoy life across much of the US before returning to their overwintering spots in Mexico or coastal California. That means there are four batches of fattening caterpillars munching away on milkweed, metamorphosing into chrysalises, and emerging again as those beautiful orange and black, big butterflies to move north. That last generation somehow knows that it must move south (or West to CA), where to avoid the frosts that would kill them if they didn’t leave their succulent patches of milkweed.

Many monarch butterflies have been traveling to high elevation northern Mexico where the climate has been just right for their winter respite. People have been harvesting wood from those forests, reducing habitat. Also, climate change is creating hotter, drier conditions, which might be negatively impacting the quality of that habitat. The only other place that monarch butterflies know to go is coastal California.

On California’s coast, there have been approximately 400 historic overwintering locations from Mendocino County to San Diego County. Only a small subset of these overwintering spots are on land managed by conservation organizations. Most people around here know to check out Natural Bridges State Beach, but there are other spots, as well. The UCSC Arboretum’s Eucalyptus Grove has been home to large numbers of overwintering monarch butterflies in the past. And, overwintering sites #3009 and #3010 are in groves of eucalyptus near Davenport on BLM’s Cotoni Coast Dairies property.

Painted Lady Life History

Painted lady butterflies have a slightly more complex life history and some populations travel much farther than monarch butterflies. The African population flies back and forth 9,000 miles! That’s twice the monarch butterfly migration length.

One late spring, I watched as thousands of painted ladies flew by me, moving south to north in the high elevations of Big Sur’s wildlands. They had originated in the deserts near California’s border with Mexico and were headed as far as they could fly, with an ability to fly most of the length of California in about a week. When one uses up their body fat, which they made as caterpillars, they stop, mate, and lay eggs. The next generation hatches, caterpillars eat as much as they can, then they metamorphose through to chrysalis and adults, which then fly, fly, fly, towards the Pacific Northwest. Come August, wherever an adult painted lady might be, they turn to fly south again. You can see painted lady butterflies all summer long here, but they are more numerous in the Spring when you, if you are lucky and it’s a good year for this species, you can spy hundreds moving north.

California Tortoiseshell Life History

8 years after the Lockheed Fire, the California lilac was head-high and abundant in the footprint of that fire. As I led a University field trip in late June, the students were tittering and I couldn’t get their attention. They gleefully pointed out that the shrubs around me were twitching and dancing. I was astonished to see the frantically wiggling chrysalises of hundreds of California tortoiseshell butterflies shaking denuded Ceanothus shrubs all around us. Above the shrubs, clouds of newly emerged California tortoiseshell butterflies were sailing about. Soon, they would be taking flight to the mid-elevation Sierra Nevada to lay eggs on a different species of Ceanothus; they’d run out of tasty leaves here on the coast! After that generation similarly denuded those patches of Ceanothus and made that same wiggle-frenzy of excited chrysalises, those adults fly to the highest elevations in the Sierra Nevada to eat yet a different species of Ceanothus. Running out of Ceanothus and elevation, it is that generation that flies all the way back to Monterey Bay to lay eggs on our Ceanothus and start the cycle again.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

July 29

#210 / The Laws Of Power And The Rule Of Law

There are two sets of laws that people live by. The first are the primordial Laws of Power. These are the rules of the jungle; eat or be eaten. The second set of laws undergird a democratic society; a mutual agreement to live by the Rule of Law. These two sets of rules are in absolute conflict with each other. The Rule of Law is a relative newcomer, where the Laws of Power can be traced back through human history. I propose that the Rule of Law was developed to thwart the Laws of Power and level our playing field. The Rule of Law is a prerequisite for pluralism to survive and flourish in a democratic republic.

Debilyn Molineaux

Debilyn Molineaux is the President/CEO of the Bridge Alliance. According to its website, the Bridge Alliance is a nonprofit organization that hopes to “join citizens from across the country to bridge the divides that separate us and help fix our political system now.”

That sounds like a pretty good objective, right? I don’t want to say, “no; no it’s not,” but I do want to suggest that efforts to “bridge divides” can, possibly, misdirect our efforts to achieve that “Rule of Law,” which I do agree we ought to be striving to achieve. My point is that the “Rule of Law,” properly understood, does not “bridge divides,” in the sense that it reconciles differing views of what we, collectively, ought to do, and thus eliminates “conflict” and “division.”

In fact, the way I see it, the “Rule of Law” is defined by the idea that “we,” collectively, “make the law,” and that the “law” that we decide upon and establish today can be reversed by some other, quite different, and completely contrary “law” that we decide upon, tomorrow.

Conflict and division, in other words – what the political theorist Hannah Arendt calls “plurality” – is absolutely a “feature,” not a “bug,” of our democratic political system. A felt necessity to bring everyone together to agree that one thing is “right,” and that some different thing is “wrong,” is exactly what leads us into the kind of polarization that the Bridge Alliance deplores and wants to eliminate.

We don’t need to agree on what’s right and what’s wrong – in fact, we won’t be able to, and we shouldn’t want to. A society in which only ONE thing is considered to be “right” is commonly called “totalitarianism.” What we do need to agree upon is the process by which we will decide what we, the people, will actually do, and the process by which we will determine how our collective power will be deployed. We need to decide, in other words, on how we will determine what the “law” will provide.

My “equation,” frequently displayed in this blog, and on the blackboards of the classes I teach in the Legal Studies Program at UCSC, is helpful in making the point:

POLITICS > LAW > GOVERNMENT

We do govern ourselves by “law.” In other words, to understand “government” – the rules that will apply to all we do – we need to work from the right hand side of the “equation,” above, and move, one term at a time, towards the left hand side. That is where “politics” is found, at the origin, and that is where the equation of self-government begins. Another way of saying this, which has given me the title under which I write these blog postings, is that “we live in a political world.” We live in a world in which what happens, and how we are governed, is determined by laws, and WE make the laws, as we engage in the political process that ultimately determines what those laws will say.

To think we can “bridge divides,” in the sense of getting everyone, or the vast majority, to come to some Kumbaya moment and agree on everything is not only fruitless; it’s dangerous. As I say, “totalitarianism” is the name given to systems that refuse to recognize the fundamental “pluralism” that is inherent in our human community and human condition.

Note that Molineaux’s statement, printed at the top, agrees that “pluralism” is what we need to maintain. As long as we understand the “Rule of Law” to be a “rule” that grants political power to those entitled to wield it, according to the political principles we have agreed upon, I am right in tune with what Molineaux has to say. I just want to emphasize that the politics of American self-government does not contemplate that we will “agree,” except to the idea that the political process is the way that we will decide how power is deployed, and by whom we will give the right to deploy it.

We yearn, all of us, for tranquility and agreement. If we believe in self-government, let’s not get too starry-eyed about “bridging divides.” Let’s just be absolutely clear that what Molineaux is calling for is not a system in which conflict and division disappear; she is calling for a system in which real power (the power to tax, and the power to spend, and the power to punish, and the power to determine the goals towards which we will, officially, bend our efforts) is a power that belongs to “the people,” and that what Abraham Lincoln called for in the Gettysburg Address, at the moment in which we renewed our commitment to this nation, is a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

A government that is, truly, “by the people,” is a government in which we, the people, make the “laws” by which our nation is ruled. It is “politics” that will decide who has the power to make those laws, and what those laws are, and thus how we will govern events in the world in which we live. If YOU are not engaged, personally, in politics, then you are letting someone else use the power that belongs to you, and to all of us. “Elective autocracy,” which I inveighed against about a month ago, is the opposite of self-government, and it is genuine self-government that comes directly from the “Rule of Law,” as the “Rule of Law” is properly understood.

The “Rule of Law,” properly understood, puts politics first.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
August 7

WHERE HAVE YOU GONE JOE DIMAGGIO? …AND WALTER CRONKITE? …JOBS AVAILABLE!

Former President Donald J. Trump was finally indicted last week on four federal charges: conspiracy to defraud the U.S., conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction or attempted obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy against voting rights. As expected, he pleaded ‘not guilty,’ conducting himself in a respectful demeanor in the proceedings with an air of ‘been there, done that.’ Get used to it Donny Bratso! Before boarding his plane to Washington, Donny had to spew a few words on his social media site about being persecuted for challenging “a corrupt, rigged, and stolen election. It is a great honor, because I am being arrested for you. I need one more indictment to ensure my election!” All words in caps, as you might have guessed.

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/3, 4:08am – Deep State Invasion! Please make a contribution to fight TYRANNY – send money.

After the latest Trump indictment, President Biden had no comment, and other living presidents were quiet as well. The vacuity of any comments from a “trusted singular voice of moral authority,” brought on the Trump partisans with their accusatory rhetoric which will engulf the court cases, as well as the presidential race. Following Richard Nixon’s resignation, Washington Post’s Toluse Olorunnipa cites the presence of Walter Cronkite, Senator Howard Baker and other Republicans, and even Vice President Ford before he fumbled by pardoning Nixon. He quotes presidential historian, David Brinkley, who said, “There’s nobody that the public at large is willing to listen to, because the trust in government has corroded to such a low degree; and, the polling on journalists, the Supreme Court, Congress, the Presidency are all low. People aren’t admiring our public servants.” Biden is keeping a low profile to lessen charges of political interference, with ongoing legal difficulties of Hunter Biden making it more difficult to speak out, thereby playing into the hands of Trump’s rabble-rousing base.

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/3, 1:08pm – My last email before my arraignment. I have committed no crimes! Thanks for your support, prayers, and sacrifices. Contribute to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Trump, after pleading ‘not guilty,’ claims his prosecution is “a persecution of a political opponent. If you can’t beat him, you persecute him or you prosecute him. We can’t let this happen in America.” He has alleged that he is being undermined by “saboteurs, to include journalists, prosecutors, judges, military leaders, intelligence officials, former presidents and government bureaucrats, resulting in a broad list of nonpartisan figures being drawn in to such a point that no national figures have been able to speak to the moment with a sense of gravitas that might be broadly accepted across political battle lines,” says OlorunnipaRussell Riley, presidential historian at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, feels that though American history is full of examples of deep ideological divisions, today’s battles lack a sense of “loser’s grace” in which both sides agree to accept the outcome and move on.

Eric Trump email: 8/3, 1:54pm – A dark day for the country, an innocent man committed no crimes. Patriots, send money!

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/3, 4:13pm – What I thought on the drive back from the D.C. court house. I saw the filth, the decay, the broken buildings, walls of graffiti. Please send money!

“What is distinctive today is not, essentially, that we don’t have a common national figure both sides can turn to. The system wasn’t built to require a Walter Cronkite to pronounce from on high that something is profoundly wrong. It was constructed on the premise that losers would accept the expressed will of the people. That’s the responsibility of a loser. And when it is not exercised, the system wobbles,” says Riley. Brinkley feels that Trump’s strategy of denigrating Special Counsel Jack Smith and the broader justice system, with the implicit goal of effectively putting his case before voters rather than jurors, increases the likelihood that the 2024 race will be dominated by debates over the status of the nation’s democracy. “When Cronkite left in 1981, we lost a referee on public affairs; with the advent of cable and the internet and social media, it’s completely balkanized. Now, everybody is a consumer of the media they want.”

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/3, 6:04pm – I’M BACK HOME. Thanks for the support of the past 48 hours. Nothing truly great in life EVER comes easily. SAVE AMERICA, send money!

Nixon bowed out once his own party was done with him, but Trump’s eminence grows within the GOP with each new indictment. Outliers such as Mitt Romney, Chris Christie, Bill Barr, and Johnny-Come-Lately Mike ‘Too Honest’ Pence are finding themselves even more isolated as they speak out against Trump. Pence didn’t go to the FBI when Trump’s arm-twisting failed to convince him to overturn the election, and he refused to appear before the J6 House Committee, but he was forced to respond and cooperate with Jack Smith, bringing his trove of contemporaneous notes which documented the pressure he was subject to in the days following the 2020 election. He did his legal duty, refusing to join the coup plotters, but the yellow streak down his spine for the past three years had been verging into a brilliant Day-Glo until he was questioned by reporters following his former boss’ recent court appearance. “Today’s indictment serves as an important reminder: anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be President of the United States. Sadly, the president was surrounded by a group of crackpot lawyers that kept telling him what his itching ears wanted to hear. And while I made my case to him, with what I understood my oath of the Constitution to require, the president ultimately continued to demand that I choose him over the Constitution.” That ‘crackpot lawyers’ phrase may be part of The Former Guy’s defense…don’t give it away, Mikey! By the way, the MAGAs hate you more than ever, so don’t try to snap them out of their moral stupor.

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/3, 6:06pm – YOU are the President’s hope. His courage, his unbreakable resolve can’t be bought, bullied or controlled. Send money!

On CNN, Pence admits he testified before the grand jury once he got clarification about the protections he had under the Constitution in his role of president of the Senate as the Congress conducted official count of Electoral College votes on January 6, 2021. He said he has no plans for further testimony, but will always comply with the law. Trump attorney, John Lauro, on the other hand says he can’t wait to cross examine Pence during the trial “because he will completely eliminate any doubt that Mr. Trump firmly believed that the election irregularities had let to inappropriate results,” he told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. Lauro explains, “Trump thought his VP was certifying an election that was not lawful and he had every right to petition Pence to deal with the issue.” Facing Dana Bash on CNN, Lauro defends Trump in saying he “asked” Pence to overturn the election in an “aspirational” way. He said, “Asking is aspirational. Asking is not action. Its core free speech. The Press should be defending free speech. Asking is covered by the First Amendment.” The indictment against Trump is quite lengthy as it details his pressure campaign on VP Pence to cooperate with his plan to stop the counting of the Electoral College votes in his ceremonial duties. Pence’s notes show that The Don accused him of being “too honest” when he rejected his slanted notion of the law.

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/4, 8:37am – Will you join me for dinner? America vanishing under Joe Biden. An important dinner for grassroots patriots – contribute any amount to enter for a chance to win a VIP ticket, round-trip coach airfare and hotel accommodations for two to Nashville. Included is a photograph of the winner(s) with Trump, approximate retail value $5K – send money!

Attorney George Conway, of Lincoln Project and Kellyanne Conway fame, asked what advice he would give Trump if he were on his team, offered, “I would tell him that he needs to own up to it and plead guilty and work out a deal with the government. One of the things the Justice Department will consider doing in settling, in plea-bargaining political corruption cases, is to take a commitment from the defendant, and enforceable commitment, not to hold office again, to resign. Vice President Spiro Agnew had to resign as part of his nolo contendre plea in 1973. And so, what I would say is, you need to work out the best deal possible, and you just have to say, you’re just gonna leave public life and pay a fine, and I’d do my best to keep him out of prison. He’s never going to agree with that. He’s not going to plead. But that would be his best move: I’ll leave the republic alone, and you leave me alone. The problem with it, of course, is that even the suggestion of it that came from the Justice Department would be pointed to by Trump and his supporters as, ‘Ah, this is why you’re doing that.’ And in a sense, they’re not wrong. One of the reasons we have to do this, why we have to make sure we enforce the law, is so that somebody can’t do this again. It is actually an important function of criminal law not just to deter people but to basically prevent them from committing further crimes.” A noteworthy quote from Steve Schmidt on his ‘The Warning’ blog: “Donald Trump did more than break the law. He assailed the American civilization and way of life, while desecrating the sacrifices of ten generations of Americans who recognized that freedom is paramount in the United States and the people are sovereign. Trump broke the American creed and tried to make himself king.” Steve’s entire Sunday posting is worth a look-see, entitled ‘The hour of choosing has arrived’ as he looks back at founding father, George Washington.

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/4, 9:03am – Eric Trump says: My father officially arraigned, in the belly of the beast, closer to Biden Tyranny! Never give up – send money!

The Washington Post says the former President and his legal team see an upside to the latest case against him, allowing him to use the upcoming trial to further argue his false claims of a stolen 2020 election. The showdown is poised to push his insistence that election fraud occurred into the midst of the 2020 presidential campaign, about which many in the GOP, including his own advisers, wish he would stop whining about. Former White House chief of staff, John F. Kelly says, “He is never going to stop saying the election is stolen because that would force him to admit he is a loser.” Trump wants to subpoena prospective witnesses who will argue that he won in 2020, while prosecutors allege he knew very well that he lost. Democrats delight that The Don is choosing this tack, causing consternation among GOP strategists who would prefer to pursue different focal points. Mercifully, Trump did not give a defiant speech after his court appearance, ignoring shouted questions from the press, and conspicuously, no nighttime rally was held. Trump staffers were annoyed that Washington traffic control offered no partiality as his motorcade struggled through rush-hour traffic, forcing them to view a slightly hostile crowd longer than they wished. Especially grating was a Biden flag on a corner near the courthouse.

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: See 8/3, 4:13am above

Governor Chris Sununu of New Hampshire predicted to CNN’s Poppy Harlow that the 2024 election will not be contested by either Biden or Trump. He says Trump is “very, very beatable” with an opportunity for a breakthrough by a rival, Vivek Ramaswamy being especially exciting to people. He also names Pence, Haley and Scott as “great individuals with amazing records,” with a mention of North Dakota’s Governor Doug Burgum starting to raise money. As for Biden, Sununu thinks he will go through the primary process, collect all the delegates, and arrive at a wild convention where he and his people start steering the delegates somewhere else. All this resulting from a health issue and “the Hunter Biden thing.”

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/4, 1:05pm – TRUMP IS CRUSHING GOP RIVALS, according to Times/Siena Poll! George Soros supports CROOKED JOE! Send money to Primary Victory Fund. FIRE Crooked Joe and Love America!

A protective order was given to Trump and his legal team by the judge during the hearing in view of The Don’s history of posts on social media, to protect witnesses, judges, attorneys and prospective jurors, but within hours he had posted, “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” The Justice Department then asked the judge overseeing the case to step in to counter this promise of revenge resulting in an order for the defendant to appear in court to answer this apparent threat. The legal team then asked for a three-day extension, but the judge isn’t playing this game of delay, so Monday was the day! A spokesman immediately posted on Trump’s MAGA site, “The Truth post cited is the definition of political speech, and was in response to the RINO, China-loving, dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs, like the one funded by the Koch brothers and the Club for No Growth.” Let’s add Hair Club for Men, for good measure!

Win.donaldjtrump.com email: 8/4, 1:44pm – FOLLOW UP INVITE TO PRESIDENT’S TRUST FOUNDATION MEMBERSHIP, despicable witch hunt, own party backstabbing, need trusted allies to defend me. Send contribution to fund your membership within The President’s Trust.

Harvard law professor, Laurence Tribe, told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell that Jack Smith’s indictment against Trump is “brilliant,” but that the one factor that could render the whole thing moot is “timing.” He feels that Attorney General Merrick Garland might have proceeded faster to prevent the case from dragging on into the next presidency. “If the next presidency is held either by Donald Trump or by one of his acolytes or by virtually any Republican, there is the horrible prospect that this will be wiped away, being relegated to a historic footnote” he said. Several of Trump’s GOP opponents have indicated they might, or will, pardon Trump, reminding us how “vulnerable and fragile” our legal system is. Tribe adds, “We have a system that might go too slowly, that might be too opaque, and a system that is not at all guaranteed to triumph over politics.”

Win.donaldjtrump.com email (from Team Trump): 8/4, 3:41pm – BIDEN’S WEAPONIZED DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ATTEMPTS TO JAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR LIFE, an innocent man, you are selected from your ZIP Code to participate in a head-to-head poll. IF ELECTION WERE HELD TODAY WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR? ? PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. ? CROOKED JOE BIDEN

So, even with Special Prosecutor Jack Smith’s brilliantly written indictment, he and his team still have a job to do…as do we! Two out of three of Trump’s wives were immigrants to the US, so what conclusion can we draw from this? Immigrants were needed to do jobs that most Americans wouldn’t do. Remember…he is doing this for you! Explains why Trump is still reaching out to Vladimir Putin?

Moral questions: If Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau were drowning and you could only save one of them, where would you and Justin Trudeau go for lunch afterwards? If Donald Trump and Putin were drowning and you could only save one of them, where would you and Justin Trudeau go for lunch instead?

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “Leaves”

“Come, little leaves,” said the Wind one day, “Come to the meadows with me and play. Put on your dresses of red and gold; For Summer is past, and the days grow cold.” 
~George Cooper

“To ask why we fall in love is to ask why the leaves fall. And to ask how we stay in love is to ask how the trees stay.”     
~Jimvirle/Jinvirle

“This is a green world, with animals comparatively few and small, and dependent on the leaves. By leaves we live.”        
~Patrick Geddes

...

The story of Johnny Cash covering the Nine Inch Nails song “Hurt”. Watch this, and then give the song a listen again. It is really good.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 2 – 8, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…words from Bernie, saw fest note. Greensite…on development bribes. Schendledecker…disability justice, race, and a river levee update. Steinbruner…Cabrillo name, Aptos Village and soil, Drinking water = safe? Hayes…will be back next week. Patton…let’s get political. Matlock…instant credibility with pusillanimous cockroaches. Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…pick of the week. Quotes…”Surf”

...

EARLY SANTA CRUZ BEACH BOARDWALK. This dates about 1882 and a hot air balloon ascension which doesn’t look too successful.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Bratton’s private collection.

DATELINE July 31

BERNIE SANDERS SAYS IT ALL.

Look around:

Over the last few days, nearly 2/3 of the population of the United States of America was living under either a flood warning, watch, or a heat advisory. Temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean are the highest ever recorded. Wildfires are ravaging parts of Greece. A typhoon has forced tens of thousands of people from their homes in Beijing. And July is on track to be the hottest month in recorded history.

Meanwhile, the latest report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is very clear and it is very foreboding. If the United States, China and the rest of the world do not act extremely aggressively in cutting carbon emissions, our planet will face enormous and irreversible damage.

Let me be clear about that last part: If the entire planet, led by the largest economies in the world — the United States of America and China — does not get its act together, the world that we will be leaving our children and future generations will be increasingly unhealthy and uninhabitable.

What makes this issue so difficult and so complicated is that it is a crisis that no individual nation can solve alone for its own people. It is a global crisis. It is an issue that requires the cooperation of every nation on earth. Whether we like it or not, we are all in this together.

Just one example:

Despite the frightening impact of climate change on the United States, highly populated Asian countries are facing even worse challenges. Sea levels on China’s coastline are rising more quickly than the global average. Major cities like Shanghai, Tianjin and Shenzhen are all located along the Chinese coast and could face catastrophic flooding in years to come – creating havoc with the entire Chinese economy. There are projections that Shanghai, a city of 24 million, could be underwater by the end of the century.

Now, the bad news is that developing a mutually beneficial relationship with China to save the future of this planet will not be easy. Sadly, there are “hawks” in both countries who are working hard to create a new cold war.

The good news is that we still have time — the United States, China and other countries around the world — to make the decision to act aggressively in combating climate change and prevent irreparable damage to our country and the planet.

While we must work diligently to foster international cooperation on climate change, we must also do something else. In the United States, and around the world, we must ask a very simple question.

How did we get here? How did we get to a place in time where the health and well-being of the entire planet, and the lives of billions of people, is under enormous threat?

And the answer is not complicated.

The truth is that the scientific community, for many decades, has made it crystal clear that climate change — and all the dangers it poses in terms of drought, floods, and extreme weather disturbances, and disease — is the result of carbon emissions from the fossil fuel industry.

As far back as the late 1950s, over 60 years ago, physicist Edward Teller and other scientists were warning executives in the fossil fuel industry that carbon emissions were “contaminating the atmosphere” and causing a “greenhouse effect” that could eventually lead to temperature increases “sufficient to melt the icecap and submerge New York.” That’s what they were saying 60 years ago!

In 1975, Shell-backed research concluded that increasing atmospheric carbon concentrations could cause global temperature increases that would drive “major climatic climactic changes” and compared the dangers of burning fossil fuels to nuclear waste.

Beginning in the late 1970s, Exxon — now ExxonMobil — conducted extensive research on climate change that predicted current rising temperatures “correctly and skillfully.”

The fossil fuel companies knew.

They knew they were causing global warming and therefore threatening the very existence of the planet.

Yet, in pursuit of profit, fossil fuel executives not only refused to publicly acknowledge what they had learned but, year after year, lied about the existential threat that climate change posed for our planet.

So what happened to the CEOs who betrayed the American people and the global community? Were they fired from their jobs? Were they condemned by pundits on cable television and the editorial boards of major newspapers? Were they prosecuted? Did they go to jail for their crimes?

Nope. Not at all. Not a one of them. These CEOs got rich.

It’s obscene.

When a criminal walks into a store and shoots the clerk behind the counter, we make the moral judgment that this behavior is socially unacceptable, and that the gunman should be punished.

When a public official misuses and steals taxpayer money, we make the moral judgment that the embezzler should lose his job and, perhaps, be incarcerated.

Yet, when fossil fuel executives make calculated decisions that are life-threatening to millions of people — or to the planet — we are told that “it’s just business.”

No. That’s just not acceptable.

That is why, earlier this week, I sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland urging him to bring lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry for its longstanding and carefully coordinated campaign to mislead consumers and discredit climate science in pursuit of massive profits. The letter was co-signed by Senators Merkley, Warren, and Markey.

Like the tobacco industry before them, the actions of ExxonMobil, Shell, and potentially other fossil fuel companies represent a clear violation of federal racketeering laws, truth in advertising laws, consumer protection laws, and potentially other laws – and the Department of Justice must act swiftly to hold them accountable for their unlawful actions.

More than 40 states and municipalities have filed lawsuits that seek to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for their illegal campaign of misinformation around the global crisis of climate change.

The Department of Justice must join the fight and work with partners at the Federal Trade Commission and other law enforcement agencies to file suits against all those who participated in the fossil fuel industry’s illegal conspiracy of lies and deception. The fossil fuel industry must begin to pay for the extraordinary damage they are causing.

Climate change is an existential threat to every person on earth. At every level, in every country, we must work aggressively to save the planet for our kids and future generations.

Let’s go forward together.

In solidarity,

Bernie Sanders

IN CLOSING…AND Before you go…

I think we all understand that if Republicans have control of the White House, the House or the Senate after this election, the chances of accomplishing anything significant with respect to climate, or anything else, becomes virtually non-existent.

Our work rallying and organizing progressives across the country takes resources, but it is important work that must be done. So please:

Can you please make a contribution of $27 — or whatever you can afford — to help our movement elect progressives all across this country who are prepared to treat climate change as the existential threat we know it to be?

If you’ve stored your info with ActBlue, we’ll process your contribution instantly:

FESTIVAL OF THE SAWS.  Last week I wrote here in BrattonOnline about the very first Musical Saw Festival happening in 1979 last week. Someone with initials LCM emailed me to addThe festival was sponsored by KUSP. John Coha and I did the audio/stage work. Almost without exception none of them wanted to be mic-ed. They’d push it out of the way. ?? “. I don’t know who the “I” is, but thanks!

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

BARBIE…SECOND VIEWING. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (7.5 IMDB). With the surprising reactions world wide to this Mattel film I had to check it out to see what I had missed. I missed the 160 million dollar plugging that Mattel spent trying to sell all the other non-stereotypical Barbies. They push Doctor Barbies, Supergirl Barbies, Black Barbies, Army Barbies ad infinitum. Mattel’s trying to justify their billions in profit and the movie is still a mess plot wise.

FULL CIRCLE. (MAX SERIES) (6.4 IMDB). It’s difficult to follow the plot of this movie about a screwed up kidnapping that happens in New York City. Thugs actually kidnap the wrong teen ager and his real family goes berserk while the victim fights for his life. The kidnappers aren’t the wisest operators, and you’ll wonder how anyone keeps a check on reality during the police chase.

IRMA VEP. (PRIME SERIES) (6.8 IMDB). The very talented, beautiful and fascinating Alicia Vikander plays an American movie star who goes to Paris to film a re-make of Irma Vep. Irma Vep was actually a classic silent film serial from 1915 and she’s a vampire. There’s laughs, great photography, and a switching type plot that will keep you affixed. We watched the original silent series in Earl Jackson’s film class at UCSC years ago it was excellent…so’s this series, so far.

LAST CALL. (HBO SERIES) (7.7 IMDB). A very serious documentary covering the brutal killings of gay men in and around New York City back in the 1990’s. The credits list Leon Panetta as a member of the cast but after watching the first two episodes we don’t see Leon yet. It’s a dark and unrelenting search for the gay butcher who cuts and dices up each of his murders. It’s also a condemnation of the official legal and New York City Police reaction to the murders because the victims are gay. Well worth watching and thinking about.

ALICE IN BORDERLAND. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.7 IMDB).  An unusual Japanese film from a graphic novel about Tokyo waking up, well three boys waking up to an empty deserted  city. Somehow they are directed to, or forced to, enter a game of finding the right door to escape flaming death in each of these rooms.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

BARBIE. (DEL MAR THEATRE). (7.6 IMDB)   This lush, lavish so called comedy looks like a zillion dollar advertisement from the Mattel company to sell even more Barbies by re making her image (and Ken’s) into a more contemporary multi sexual/ non sexual image. It broke all known box office records on opening day. It’s foolish, extravagant, and meaningless.

OPPENHEIMER. (DEL MAR THEATRE). (8.8 IMDB). Reviews are all over the place on this one. It’s an excellent dramatized biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer who more or less invented the atomic bomb. He was by all accounts a conflicted man and dreamer. Watch his odd mannerisms and his humanitarian conflicts. Its 3 hours long and full of very deep humane decisions. Cillian Murphy does a great job as Oppenheimer. And you’ll be quite surprised by Robert Downey Jr. and his very straight negative role. Don’t miss it.

HUNTERS. (PRIME SERIES) (7.2 IMDB). Quite a cast including Al Pacino, Carol Kane, and Lena Olin. It tells the stories of Jews who are searching for the Nazis who have escaped Hitler’s Germany and from Austria in 1972. It’s painful, well done and puzzling especially when they suspect that Adolph Hitler is alive and well.

DAHAAD. (PRIME SERIES) (7.6 IMDB). Strange suicides which may be murders, happen in this Indian film. A woman officer who has to deal with much sexual harassment plus the remnants of the caste system is the focal point. It’s almost embarrassing to watch and realize just how relevant and demeaning it still is in India and surrounding all of us today.

JUVENILE JUSTICE. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.9 IMDB). This legal court room drama focuses on a woman judge who doesn’t like children law breakers. She does her own investigating and causes all sorts of hell for doing it. It’s from South Korea and is tense, fine acting, and forces you to re-consider your opinion of our own legal system.

...
July 31

BRIBES OR GENEROUS GIFTS?

The intersection pictured above is familiar to most who live on the lower westside of Santa Cruz. It is Bay and Westcliff with a view of the distant hills of the UCSC campus. The trees in the foreground outline the current Dream Inn parking lot, site of the future five story mixed-use project recently approved by the Coastal Commission, which I wrote about last week.

Once this oversized development is built, yet another iconic Santa Cruz view will be lost. I say “oversized” because the site is zoned for three stories not five stories. The extra height, or “density bonus” is what the state government forces us to swallow if a developer earmarks any affordable units for the lowest income categories. That state law might have been easier to digest if our local inclusionary rate (that is, the below-market rate, sometimes called the “affordable” rate) applied to the extra stories allowed by the density bonus. It doesn’t. So, a currently zoned three- story project (no density bonus) with 60 units would require 12 of the total to be affordable and the other 48 could be market-rate, while a five- story project (with density bonus) with say, 90 units would require the same 12 affordable units and 78 market-rate. Seems like the “bonus” is in the developer’s pocket. The Dream Inn parking lot project will have 89 condo units, 10 affordable and 79 market-rate, which gives an inclusionary rate of 11 %, far below what is required by local ordinance, which state law trumps via the density bonus.

When this project went before the city council in 2019 it was by no means a done deal. At that time, city council included four members who were more critical of outsized developments than is the current council majority. Many in the community anticipated that the project may fail to gain the required four votes for approval. However, on the same day council had this item on their agenda, the developers, Ensemble Investments, owners of the Dream Inn and a partner in the La Bahia luxury hotel under construction, offered the city $500,000 for the city’s affordable housing fund should the project be approved. The council vote later that day was 4-3 to approve the project with council member Justin Cummings switching his vote to aye.

You can look at that offer of a half million dollars in several ways. Is it a bribe for aye votes on a controversial project? Or is it a generous offer by a community-minded developer? I regard it as a bribe for votes. The CA Coastal Commission saw it as a generous offer for much-needed affordable housing monies. The test would be if it were offered irrespective of the outcome of the vote. The required ethics course that all council and commission members take at the start of their terms stresses that “appearance” of bias is as unacceptable as actual bias. Offering money on the day of a vote on a big project, if the project is approved, sure gives the appearance of a bribe.

Or take the case of the 130 Center St. project, another outsized project, already approved by council with developer Swenson Builders apparently waiting for better interest rates before starting construction. It already has a name, Calypso, and will be 6 stories due to the state’s density bonus despite the zoned heights of 3 and 4 stories. Here, as for all the big projects approved or under way, the percentage of required affordable units can ignore the additional stories, so the result for this project is 13% affordable rather than the city’s required 20%. (This is the area of town where the city Planning Department is proposing 20 story buildings with an added 12 story option, all being studied in the Environmental Review process anticipated to be released in the Fall).

When Calypso was at the Planning Commission for review and a vote, and some commissioners were questioning the inadequate traffic study and exemption from environmental review, the developer’s agent offered to add 4 more affordable units if the project was not appealed. Despite a commissioner reminding him that it is the public’s right to appeal, that “offer” was sufficient to secure a majority vote for the project. When the group, Santa Cruz Tomorrow deliberated whether to appeal, I was heavily lobbied by a commissioner to not go forward with an appeal because of the 4 extra below market-rate units promised if there were no appeal. All the appeal asked for was a reasonable traffic study and mitigations since the one done by consultants omitted weekends, the time when traffic is heaviest in this area. A similar traffic study omitting weekends is being done for the ambitious, hugely impactful development called the Downtown Extension, the one described above with 20 and 12 story towers. For scale, the one under construction at Front, Laurel and Pacific is 6 stories.

Back to Calypso. Our appeal was heard at city council which was heavily lobbied by hundreds of students in favor of the project, no doubt because the units are all SRO’s or Single Room Occupancy, no good for families, ideal for students, many of whom are supported by wealthy parents. The developer’s agent sulked about the appeal but decided to throw in the 4 units anyway if the project was approved, which it was 7-0.

With bribes passing as generous gifts; with students and building trades supporting every outsized development; with traffic studies not passing the straight-face test; with environmental exemptions handed out like Halloween candy; with state laws shoving local laws aside; with elected representatives believing the fallacy that you can build your way into affordability, the rapid transformation of Santa Cruz into an enclave for the rich with a smattering of cheaper units snapped up by students as they pass low income working families heading out of town seems insurmountable.

The one hope is the initiative aimed for the March ballot. Named, Housing For People, as you have probably read and hopefully signed, it is simple and clear: no heights over current General Plan zoning without a vote of the people (Density bonuses are allowed due to state law. Eighty feet heights downtown and along the river are already approved) That right to vote on height plus 25% inclusionary rates in all projects over 30 units is the full initiative. We will still see outsized projects, but the initiative will temper the enthusiasm for investors and their cheering squads for ever higher, ever denser, everywhere and add more below market rate units. Not enough but more is better.

I’m collecting signatures. If you haven’t yet signed, email me at gilliangreensite@gmail.com and I’ll come by with a petition at a time convenient for you. You must be a registered voter at your current address. Don’t leave me empty-handed.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

July 31

DISABILITY JUSTICE, RACE, AND A RIVER LEVEE UPDATE

I’ve been reading the blog of Mia Mingus, an important leader in transformative justice and disability justice (among other things). I started with a transcript of the short speech Moving Toward the Ugly: A Politic Beyond Desirability. Here are a few excerpts that particularly resonated with me, personally and politically:

“Ableism must be included in our analysis of oppression and in our conversations about violence, responses to violence and ending violence. Ableism cuts across all of our movements because ableism dictates how bodies should function against a mythical norm—an able-bodied standard of white supremacy, heterosexism, sexism, economic exploitation, moral/religious beliefs, age and ability. Ableism set the stage for queer and trans people to be institutionalized as mentally disabled; for communities of color to be understood as less capable, smart and intelligent, therefore “naturally” fit for slave labor; for women’s bodies to be used to produce children, when, where and how men needed them; for people with disabilities to be seen as “disposable” in a capitalist and exploitative culture because we are not seen as “productive;” for immigrants to be thought of as a “disease” that we must “cure” because it is “weakening” our country; for violence, cycles of poverty, lack of resources and war to be used as systematic tools to construct disability in communities and entire countries.”

“As the (generational) effects of global capitalism, genocide, violence, oppression and trauma settle into our bodies, we must build new understandings of bodies and gender that can reflect our histories and our resiliency, not our oppressor or our self-shame and loathing. We must shift from a politic of desirability and beauty to a politic of ugly and magnificence. That moves us closer to bodies and movements that disrupt, dismantle, disturb. Bodies and movements ready to throw down and create a different way for all of us, not just some of us.

“Because we all do it. We all run from the ugly. And the farther we run from it, the more we stigmatize it and the more power we give beauty. Our communities are obsessed with being beautiful and gorgeous and hot. What would it mean if we were ugly? What would it mean if we didn’t run from our own ugliness or each other’s? How do we take the sting out of “ugly?” What would it mean to acknowledge our ugliness for all it has given us, how it has shaped our brilliance and taught us about how we never want to make anyone else feel? What would it take for us to be able to risk being ugly, in whatever that means for us. What would happen if we stopped apologizing for our ugly, stopped being ashamed of it?  What if we let go of being beautiful, stopped chasing “pretty,” stopped sucking in and shrinking and spending enormous amounts of money and time on things that don’t make us magnificent?  

Where is the Ugly in you? What is it trying to teach you?


Photo by Jane Orbuch, meme by Joy Schendledecker

I make a connection between this speech and the second defacement of the Black Lives Matter street mural in front of City Hall, last Saturday evening. It is a sign that we continue to minoritize, racialize, disable, and “other” Black people in our community.

Santa Cruz is founded on white supremacy, genocide, and xenophobia. Some (white) neighbors get VERY touchy and defensive when this is brought up, but it’s objectively true. Repeated defacement of the mural, and mistreatment of BIPOC community members, is evidence of our racist intergenerational inheritance.

My ADHD brain also made a connection between this speech and what has been happening with the San Lorenzo River levee since last December. It has certainly been made more ugly with the clearing of plants and the grouting of animal burrows. The ugliness of bureaucracy led to 150 native plant babies being grouted. It’s an ugliness which is decidedly not magnificent.

We have disabled, colonized, oppressed, exploited, and expropriated our magnificent river for too long. I understand that we have to work with the infrastructure we’ve inherited, that we need to protect people living nearby. AND how can we apply principles of healing justice to respect the magnificence inherent to the river? How can we move away from the bureaucratic violence of capitalism towards holistic ecology and recognition that when we disable the river we disable our ecosystem–which includes ourselves?

Below I am passing on (lightly edited) information from Barbara Riverwoman, who, along with a few others, has been doggedly (and magnificently) following this issue, connecting community members, and sharing information in emails and Jurisdictional Bibliography of San Lorenzo Urban River Flood Control.

I first wrote about this in a February column: Of Consent Agendas and River Levees, Or, Is the San Lorenzo River a Person?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

July 28, 2023

Dear Members of Protect Our River,

I heard officially from Janice Bisgaard in the Public Works Department that the City will be asked to approve the PW Request for Proposal on Tuesday, August 8.

I hope that all our work, as well as the article in Lookout, will stir some interest in the issue – and help encourage people to write letters and show up. We will not stop approval of the RFP, but we must bring more and more public awareness to the many forces at work to destroy our natural environment, including urban green space. This is a good chance to do some public education.

It’s always interesting how a relatively minor misstep–like misdirected grout by an incompetent contractor–will attract public attention to something that is much more seriously flawed. It is powerfully symbolic, though–cement poured on 150 young native plants! Maybe Russ Brutsche can capture this!

Every plant matters!

-barbara

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

July 25, 2023

Hello friends in Sierra Club,

Thank you so much for your interest in protecting the water quality and wildlife habitat of the urban San Lorenzo River. A broad network of support makes so much difference.

I am writing to share the perspective of someone who, as a birder, has been paying careful attention to the flood control policies and practices of the City since 2015, especially on the riverine reach of the levee from Water St. to Highway 1.

I have been engaged with the FEMA certification project since December 2022 when most of us in the environmental community first heard that FEMA was planning to enact a much more aggressive management policy than had been carried out under USACE in the previous decades since the levee was constructed.

Since 2015, I have  monitored the annual flood control work on the levee to verify that the City was complying with the specifications contained in the local governance document San Lorenzo Urban River Project regarding vegetation removal on the inboard side of the river.  In the past, the concern about flooding focused on high waters OVERTOPPING the levee.  As a result, the focus of the management policies emphasized primarily removing large trees from the inboard side of the levee in order to ensure unobstructed flows. Low growing vegetation, especially on the outboard side, was never a consideration in those years because detection of seepage and destabilization of the levee was not a consideration.

In July, 2020 the Army Corps of Engineers turned the management of the levee over to the City of Santa Cruz and gave the City three years to bring its management strategy into line with FEMA guidelines. Although the FEMA guidelines were the same as those of the USACE, FEMA emphasized a much more stringent enforcement policy if the City wanted to continue to qualify for a major 50% discount on FEMA insurance protection.

This situation coincided with the fear of a possible increase in the population of ground squirrels (a diurnal species) and perhaps an equally but less visible increase in the population of nocturnal gophers.

The tunnels of these rodents have indeed, historically, been responsible for destabilizing levee systems. In 2014 a levee collapsed on the Secchia River in Italy due to animal burrows, resulting in flood damage in excess of $500 million (see this link). Some argue that this was caused primarily by lack of maintenance, and others say the hydrology of that river and the San Lorenzo River differ significantly.

In any case, there is no research or documentation to date here in Santa Cruz as to whether or not there is significant destabilization of the levee. So far, the current management policies are based on a feared potential, not a documented reality, as well as an understandable desire for a lower insurance rate.

It is difficult to know how the two new concerns weighed in the balance. Was it a serious concern of the City about increased risk of levee failure that pushed the City to accept unquestioningly the necessity of the environmentally damaging new policies?

Or was it pressure from the City, business community and all property owners in the floodplain, to protect their discounted insurance rates.

Perhaps the city would say a combination. We will probably never know unless MBK Engineering or the City of Santa Cruz releases such information, or reports that there is no documentation.

In any case, an entirely different set of flood control measures were required to protect against a levee collapse, as opposed to protecting against the overtopping of the levee.  The response of the City was to roll out an environmentally damaging method of detecting a possible collapse before it happened. They therefore followed to the letter FEMA guidelines that required a clear line of view of the entire outboard (and inboard) bank in order to spot any seepage, the most reliable predictor of levee failure (also called levee breach or levee collapse). This required the aggressive new policy of removing all vegetation that in any way obscured complete visibility of seepage. It also required, as a complementary policy, that all rodent tunnels be fumigated and filled with grout.

This development set off many alarms among the community concerned about the wildlife habitat on the levee and the water quality of the river. Paramount among the environmental concerns were the possible eradication of two ongoing restoration projects being conducted by the Coastal Watershed Council on the inboard side of the transitional reach, and by the Estuary Project on the outboard side of the estuarine reach. It appeared that both of these restoration projects were seriously threatened by the new directives.

There were no ongoing restoration projects on the riverine reach of the River, but activists identified tens of thousands of square feet of dense native manzanita patches along this reach that possessed a very high wildlife value (nectar in the spring for hummingbirds and pollinating insects, as well as berries in the fall for a range of songbirds). Secondly, the dense woody root system of the manzanita served as excellent erosion control. And, ironically, the dense foliage and root systems of manzanita served as a very effective deterrent to ground squirrels, since not a single ground squirrel cover could be detected in or near the manzanita patches. It was too dense for the squirrels to squeeze through.

The activist group, Protect Our River, communicated by letter and in person with the City about this situation, and proposed several specific variances. But the City went ahead and tore up every inch of the manzanita, leaving wide stretches of disturbed soil, the kind of environment most attractive to burrowing rodents.

(Left) Red-tailed Hawk looking backwards, April 4, 2020, Riverine stretch, San Lorenzo River, Photo by B. Riverwoman;
(Right) Same hawk, about to take flight from willows in the same area. Photo by B. Riverwoman

The priority issues for our group are now:

  • that the City discuss with us the possibility of allowing the manzanita to come back (as it already is beginning to do) since there is no sign of levee destabilization in the areas of manzanita, and in fact the dense patches function as an effective deterrent to ground squirrel occupations of the area.
  • that MBK Engineering and the City of Santa Cruz release any and all information they have regarding the current state of destabilization of the levee due to burrowing animals;
  • that the City seriously consider utilizing electronic imagery to obtain an electronic image of the inside of the levee and possible burrows to verify the extent of tunneling, and;
  • that the City seriously considers nature-based solutions to vegetation management per recent congressional legislation–including the planting of rodent-deterring vegetation like manzanita (and the elimination of rodent-attracting food litter); raptor boxes; and more.

On behalf of our group, Protect Our River, I want to thank the Sierra Club again for taking an interest in this rich urban environment. It is the #14 top birding hotspot in all of Santa Cruz County!

Please feel free to reach out to us if you have any comments or questions.

Sincerely,

Barbara Riverwoman

river@cruzio.com, (831) 454-0252.

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
July 31

WILL THE TRUSTEES LEAVE THE NAME ALONE?

The Cabrillo Community College District Board of Trustees is scheduled to meet August 7 to decide on a new name for Cabrillo College.  The Board was scheduled to meet at the Watsonville campus, in a very small room, but luckily changed the location to the main campus in the Horticulture Building.  Never mind that it is not easily accessible for those who may be arriving on the bus, and forget ADA accessibility up that long steep hill above the Campus if you are in a wheelchair.  So much for equality.

But check here to see of maybe the Cabrillo Trustee and President leadership will change their minds and relocate the meeting into one of the performance halls on lower Campus that would be easy for people with mobility issues to attend.

Will the Board consider the generous offer of Theresa and Richard Crocker to donate an extra $1 million to the Cabrillo Foundation if the Trustees do not change the name?   The Crockers are significant benefactors of the College and the Crocker Performing Arts Theater’s namesake, and donated $100,000 in 2007 to support the Dental Hygiene program from closing down.

As backlash over Cabrillo College name change grows, some donors weigh whether to keep giving

Will the College Trustees “take a pause” on the name change fever that has caused so much divisiveness in our Community?  Many donors are considering “pausing” their donations to the College, because the Board ignored the survey results dismissing 80% of the people who responded and did not want the name to change.

Please attend the August 7 Board of Trustees meeting at 6pm, high on the hill above the campus, with very limited parking.

GEOTECH WORK ON THE ROAD FOR NEW TRAIL STRUCTURE IN APTOS VILLAGE

There is a lot of construction happening throughout the County’s roadways, but last week, I was surprised to see a drilling rig in the middle of Soquel Drive near Aptos Village.

One-way traffic at the Aptos Creek Bridge snarled the already-congested Aptos Village area.  Ms. Sarah Christensen, Project Director for the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) confirmed the drilling was related to the Segment 12 Rail Trail work that will include a brand new pedestrian/bicycle bridge over this area of Soquel Drive and Aptos Creek.

I am a bit worried about the impacts of the heavy construction traffic on the 1928 Aptos Creek Bridge.  It bothers me now to see bright orange lines spray-painted on the venerable Bridge, resembling graffiti.

Maybe we should report it?

Keep your eyes on this area for other construction issues.

DIGGING IN APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT’S CONTAMINATED SOIL?

Construction has begun in the Aptos Village Project Phase 2 area.  Recently, I traveled through Aptos Village Way in the Phase 2 construction area during non-working hours and noted a smell of diesel.  I am aware that there was an Underground Storage Tank (UST) that Swenson crews removed from the north side of the Phase 2 area in 2016.  I personally saw the incident and know that the location Swenson indicated to the County Environmental Health staff at the time, and that was remediated, was not the actual location of the UST.  

Swenson’s crews hauled the tank out right away in the middle of the night and covered up the trench they had hastily created to contain the foul-smelling contents that poured out when the tank was yanked out of the ground.

The Phase 2 construction crew is now doing some excavation in the area near where the UST was located, and where Swenson crews staged the excavated tank in 2016 before hauling it away during the night.

I have respectfully requested that Santa Cruz County Environmental Health monitor the soil work at the Phase 2 construction site on the north side of Aptos Village Way to ensure the public’s health is protected and that any potentially contaminated soils are remediated appropriately.  I urge you to do the same.

While the diesel odor could be from the equipment, parked and not operating,  I believe it would be appropriate for Santa Cruz County Environmental Health staff to monitor the soil disturbances to ensure the soil is not contaminated in this work area, given the history of Swenson’s activity there.

What does Swenson’s contractor do with the soil excavated from there?

Excavation in the Phase 2 area near the existing three-story structure (not shown, but at the right of the excavator) is the true general location of the buried tank illegally removed in 2016.  Maybe it was the fuel tank for the Lam Pon Apple Dryer adjacent, also in Phase 2 area.  Swenson removed that structure’s foundation in 2016 after the tank incident.

What does Swenson’s contractor do with the soil excavated from there?

Please write Santa Cruz County Environmental Health:  Mr. John Gerbrandt john.gerbrandt@santacruzcounty.us and Ms. Sue Ziebersue.zieber@santacruzcounty.us and ask that their staff monitor the soils to protect public health and safety.

In my opinion, it would be a good idea for Soquel Creek Water District to monitor the groundwater quality at their new Granite Way Well, given it is in the “downstream” flow from the former UST and, according to local hydrologists, groundwater levels are shallow in that area.  I have attempted to alert Soquel Creek Water District Operations staff to this potential contamination, but they are never interested.

WONDERING ABOUT CHROMIUM CONTAMINATION IN YOUR DRINKING WATER?

What is considered “safe levels” of a carcinogen like Hexavalent Chromium in drinking water?  The State of California is about to finalize a lower level than before, and separate Hexavalent Chromium from other variants (Chromium 3) of the metal that are not as harmful to health.  Under the proposed new rule, all public water systems will have to comply with hexavalent chromium maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 micrograms/L, according to a system size-based compliance schedule or submit a plan for coming into compliance.  The regulations do not apply to private wells.

There are many wells in the La Selva Beach area that have high Chromium levels, often a mixture of the forms.  The Santa Cruz County Water Advisory Commission will hear a presentation on this matter during their hybrid meeting at 4pm on August 2, (immediately following the State public hearing in Sacramento, 1pm-4pm). Take a look at page 16 of the Commission packet to see what some of the hexavalent chromium levels are like in the La Selva area wells.

The new proposed lower limits were adopted by the State Waterboard in 2011, but large water companies cried foul because of high treatment costs, and took the State to Court on the grounds that there had been inadequate analysis of costs. In May 2017, the Superior Court of Sacramento County issued a judgment invalidating the previously-established hexavalent chromium MCL and ordered the State Water Board to adopt a new MCL consistent with Health & Safety Code 116365 to consider treatment feasibility issues.(California Manufacturers and Technology Association, et al. v. State Water Resources Control Board, Super. Ct., Sacramento County, Case No. 34-2015-80001850.).

This caused some water purveyors, like Soquel Creek Water District, to halt all plans and treatments in process to remove carcinogenic hexavalent chromium from the water they sold to customers until the State could offer the feasibility information the Court required. “Design and installation of a permanent, centralized treatment facility to treat water from Seascape, Bonita and San Andreas wells is placed on hold until the new MCL is established by the State.”

[Soquel Creek Water District: Chromium 6]

Soquel Creek Water District was even charging their customers for a non-existent hexavalent Chromium treatment plant in their tier 4 water rates, collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars.  

Many thanks to ratepayer Mr. Jon Cole who, as a self-represented litigant, successfully brought legal challenge to that rate fraud, causing Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge Paul Burdick to end the District’s charging for that non-existent treatment plant.  Too bad he did not also require the District to refund the money they had collected, too.  

I wonder how that money go spent???  Maybe one of the many trips the management has taken to Washington, D.C. to personally check in with their paid lobbyist about PureWater Soquel Project?

Hmmmmm…..

There is now thorough analysis of treatment costs, as can be found in the State Waterboard Rule Making Comment documentation,

The balancing act is weighing the health and safety benefits, mandated by the Clean Water Act, with the treatment costs.

“While many benefits of this regulation are difficult to quantify, improved public health is the primary benefit, which may be experienced as a reduction in the number of cancer cases (up to 12.8 per year) and noncancerous cases (not quantifiable). Although the number of noncancerous cases (liver toxicity, which can occur at hexavalent chromium concentrations above 2 mg/L) cannot be quantified, the 5.5 million people who will see hexavalent chromium concentrations reduced by an average of 32.4% are likely to see related health benefits.”

The State Water Board determined that the economic impact of the proposed regulations would likely exceed $50 million in a 12-month period.

 Based on current monitoring data, it is expected that 5.3 million individuals – approximately 14% of California’s population – would experience water cost increases. For the majority of people (84%), the increases will likely be less than $20 per month. Increases will likely be higher for those served by small PWS. As is the case with most increases in household costs, increases will be more burdensome for individuals for whom such expenses are already a higher proportion of total household expenses.

The State cannot reimburse any treatment costs for schools, pursuant to Article XIIIB, section 6 of the California Constitution.

Actions to comply with the MCL may include blending, the installation of treatment, drilling a new well, consolidation with another PWS, or not using a specific well at all. 

Here are the current and proposed maximum contaminant levels allowed for hexavalent chromium, as well as other existing regulated contaminants.

What’s the best way to remove hexavalent chromium, found to be toxic at even parts/billion? Take a look here.

Any interested person, or their representative, may submit written comments relevant to the proposed regulatory action to the Clerk to the State Water Board. Any written comments pertaining to these proposed regulations, regardless of the method of transmittal, must be received by the Clerk by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on August 4, 2023.

Comments received after this time will not be considered timely.

To facilitate timely identification and review, please identify the action by using the State Water Board regulation package identifier, “SWRCB-DDW-21-003: Hexavalent Chromium MCL” in any written comments.

Written comments may be submitted via any of following methods:

  1. By electronic mail to: commentletters@waterboards.ca.gov;
  2. By facsimile (“fax”) transmission to: (916) 341-5620;

Do weigh in with your thoughts on the matter.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING AND SPEAK UP FOR WHAT YOU FEEL IS RIGHT.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK, AND JUST DO SOMETHING.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

July 31

Grey will return next week.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

July 26

#207 / Let’s Get Political

The collage presented above comes to you from NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It brings together a number of photographs that document the kind of global warming impacts that are being felt all over the world, and right here in the United States of America, as well.

Facing ever more frequent “climate-related” disasters, American property owners are becoming “uninsurable.” Major insurance companies are unwilling to insure against the fire, flooding, drought, tornado, and other impacts that are now, more and more, expected to occur, as the Earth’s climate systems “fight back” against the environmental impacts that human beings have caused by their massive commitment to the virtually unrestrained combustion of hydrocarbon fuels.

Trying to get the United States government to do something significant about our global warming crisis (like radically reducing our continued combustion of hydrocarbon fuels) has proven more than just “difficult.” It seems, in fact, to have been proven virtually “impossible.”

I am a supporter of the Citizens Climate Lobby, which has been working to get Congress to do something meaningful about the global warming crisis since 2007. One of its goals has been to have Congress enact a “carbon tax,” as a way to induce all of us – individually, but corporations, in particular – to burn fewer hydrocarbons. I think it’s fair to say that CCL has not had any significant success in getting Congress to take action.

Since I continue to believe (some would say against the evidence) that it is possible to use “politics” to make real changes in the laws that govern how we conduct ourselves in the human-created world that we most immediately inhabit, what do I conclude when I see the lack of success of the Citizens Climate Lobby?

I do have an answer.

Let’s focus on the word “lobby” in the group’s title, which, I think, can be fairly said to represent the theory on which CCL operates. The premise is that our elected representatives should be “lobbied” to do something effective about a problem that is directly related to our governmental policies – which, then, have impacts on all of us. I actually think CCL has done a pretty effective job of mobilizing citizens, around the country, to learn about and then lobby for, what would likely be an effective governmental strategy to counter the global warming impacts that are pictured in the collage above. We need, says CCL, a “carbon tax,” and that would really help!

But, as already indicated, besides its rather effective organizing effort, aimed at “lobbying” Congress to do what is needed, virtually no success has been achieved.

Maybe – and this is my personal observation – “lobbying” our elected representatives is not the correct mechanism to change our “politics.”

What do I suggest, then?

Well, I think an effective “politics” needs to take citizen self-government seriously, and that absolutely starts with the idea that our elected “representatives” are supposed to “represent” those whom they have been elected to represent. If any specific elected representative is not doing that, then “asking” them to do that is not the right response. The right response is to vote them out of office, and to replace them with someone who will do what we want. “Representatives” who don’t actually do what the voters want, absolutely must be replaced, because they are not, in fact, properly representing the people whom they are supposed to represent.

This statement about political “strategy” is not, really, aimed specifically at the Citizens Climate Lobby. I am using the group’s name to make clear the basic principle involved in every political issue and political effort. Our elected representatives are placed into positions of power because they are supposed to do what we want. They are supposed to “represent” voters. Currently, with respect to virtually every important issue, these representatives mainly represent “money.”

As anyone who has ever been involved in politics will attest, it is extremely difficult to organize voters to take their power seriously , and to throw out of office any elected representive who is not, in fact, doing what a majority of the voters really want. “Difficult,” yes! “Impossible,” no!

MOST voters, everywhere, want to be able to live without global warming disasters devastating their normal lives. MOST voters want a government that starts eliminating, instead of increasing, the economic inequalities that are ever more evident, throughout our society. MOST voters want women to be able to choose to make their own choices about abortion. MOST voters want a system that provides medical care for everyone, and that provides education for everyone, too.

Etc. There are lots of issues on which there is a broad consensus on what we “want.” People have given up on “politics” because those placed into positions of governmental power are not, in fact, actually “representing” those who put them there.

The coming failure of governments to repair and restore vital infrastructure, after disasters, and to prevent the disruption of “norml life” as global warming impacts manifest themselves in sea level rise, droughts, floods, species extinction, and other such impacts, is an example of what is generally the truth. Our current governments, at virtually every level (the federal government level being the worst) are profoundly unrepresentative. Our elected representatives are not doing what the voters who have put them in office want.

Do we care? Or, maybe more accurately, do we care enough to do something about it?

If we do, then there is only one thing that will change the current situation. Ordinary people, everywhere, must decide that what they care about is not going to be addressed through their individual, personal action alone. We are “together” in this life, and our governments are suppost truly to “represent” what the majority wants. Is there, really, a “majority” on some of these important “political” questions? I think the answer is “yes.” But the way to assert the power of that majority will require many more of us to reallocate our time and money, and personal efforts, so as to put representatives into office who actually do “represent” us, and who actually do what we want.

American history provides us some guidance. There really isn’t any alternative to our personal decision to reorient “our lives, and our fortunes, and our sacred honor” to putting into power, in government, “representatives” who will, in fact, truly “represent” us – who will do what we want them to do.

There are, of course, different ideas about what we should, collectively, do. “Politics” is how we make a decision, as a society, about what we truly do want.

With respect to global warming, to return to the specific issue with which I introduced my general comments, the fate of human civilization is what’s at stake, not to mention the plant and animal species that are being pushed towards extinction. So….

Let’s get political!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
July 31

INSTANT CREDIBILITY WITH PUSILLANIMOUS COCKROACHES

It wasn’t exactly a Zombie Jamboree in the House chambers recently, but it was a belly-to-belly, nose-to-nose confrontation between Representative Eric Swalwell and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy as the bad blood between the two culminated in a scene out of the 1800s, with threats of fisticuffs after the House voted to censure Representative Adam Schiff for being unkind to Former Guy Trump, and to politically harm Schiff’s run for a Senate seat. Following McCarthy’s tedious rise to the speakership, came the removal of Swalwell from the House Intelligence Committee, along with unproven GOP accusations of his having a romantic fling with a Chinese spy, raising the temperature of the animosity between the two. The censure vote immediately brought the Democrat side of the House to gather en masse in the well of the floor facing the podium, with shouts of “shame, shame,” as Speaker McCarthy attempted to restore order. After Schiff took his position in the well to have the censure document read to him, McCarthy was unable to do so for several minutes as the vociferous demonstration continued, eventually blurting out in exasperation, “I’ve got all night!”

During this clamorous protest, a voice directed at the speaker stood out, calling him a ‘pusillanimous, gutless coward’ – or, ahem, something to that effect, prompting angry stares from McCarthy toward Swalwell. The following day, McCarthy approached Democrat Swalwell outside of the chambers, saying, “If you ever say something like that to me again, I’m gonna kick the s*** out of you.” Eyes ablaze, nose-to-nose, Swalwell retorted, “You. Are. A. Pusi….,” whereupon McCarthy exited with his pusillanimous wimpyness tucked between his legs. Democrats are exultant about the confrontation and its outcome, believing it’s indicative of the GOP speaker’s empty threats and ultimate weakness. This incident is yet another manifestation of the negatives in our politics, a reflection of society as a whole. And it’s not just the guys, as we saw in the June floor fight between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert with their intra-party squabble and name-calling. Seems to be a battle against the clock on whether the GOP destroys itself before it’s able to destroy the country.

As Andy Borowitz writes in the New Yorker, with new charges being added onto previous charges brought by Prosecutor Jack Smith against Donald Trump, most political experts believe the Former Guy is but a few indictments away from clinching the Republican nomination. With The Don’s felony counts in the double digits, and likewise in voter polls, Ron DeSantis should just go home because he can’t go big. As Borowitz’s fictitious pollster, Harland Dorrinson, says, “For today’s Republican voter, felony counts confer instant credibility, and, by that measure, no other candidate comes close to Trump.” He adds that pressure is on DeSantis “to get indicted for something — and fast. There’s a chance that he could be charged with human trafficking for transporting migrants from the Mexican border to Martha’s Vineyard, but that indictment might be too little, too late.”

At an early July GOP fundraiser, headliner DeSantis was only able to attract 380 ticket buyers, so to prevent echoing in the oversized space and to make the venue look smaller, ‘air walls’ were placed around the room to close off the unfilled seats. His lackluster speech was too familiar to be of any consequence, sounding like a “bar mitzvah speech” to one attendee. Applause occurred when he was introduced and when he was done…hello and goodbye. Some feel it’s too early to write him off, but homeboy Trump has a better footing by a wide margin, even as Governor DeSantis turns further to the right on many issues. However, many in the GOP feel that  “stabbing Trump in the back” in running against the Former Guy has forever damaged his political career.

DeSantis probably could have picked up an indictment if not for a recent law passed by Florida’s legislature, which shields the governor’s travel records from public disclosure. Seems the gov’s state government vehicle was involved in a minor crash in Tennessee as he campaigned for the GOP presidential nomination. So, Florida’s taxpayers only learned that they were contributing to Ron’s ambitions as a result of the accident. State representative, Anna Eskamani, a Democrat from Orlando, said, “He’s using state resources to boost himself politically. It makes you wonder how often state vehicles and our public employees are being used at out-of-state campaign events.” Poor Ron, having to resort to using state employees to bolster his campaign after firing a multitude of his staff from the sagging fortunes of the campaign thrust. His fall is so dramatic, it’s Kafkaesque as DeSantis has awakened to find himself transformed into a cockroach, a la ‘Metamorphosis.’ Just call him ‘Gregor.’ As Rick Wilson of the Lincoln Project says, “The DeSantis Campaign has developed ‘electile dysfunction.”

DeSantis Campaign filings show over ninety people on the payroll during his first fundraising period, with $12M in the bank, of which $3M must be used only during the general election. The second quarter shows $14M came from donors who gave the maximum legal amount, so two-thirds of his early donors will be unable to give directly to the campaign for the duration. With the campaign gaining little traction, many of the big guns who supported him initially have withheld further donations, and some have switched their loyalties. Little headway has been made to cut into Trump’s big lead in the polls, which will lead to doubling-down in the early voting states, especially Iowa which would be a crucial marker for his candidacy. The ‘Never Back Down’ organization will also focus on the Super Tuesday states, with California slated to see eighty or so organizers hitting the trail soon; but for now, it’s ‘Iowa, Iowa, Iowa.’

Hunter, contributor to Daily Kos, writes that DeSantis is currently on tour in Iowa, on a bus arranged for him by his super PAC as an invited ride-along ‘guest’ independent of his official campaign…he just happened to have some free time to spend with exact dates and locations of the bus! This is a work-around for an otherwise illegal situation. The spitemobile bus is low-slung, perfect for the campaign trail in flatland Iowa, but it could all be undone should it hit a Bud Light bottle discarded on the roadway. For those who wish to either meet or avoid DeSantis, a Google search can locate the bus’s location as it makes the county fair loop around the state.

DeSantis‘ wife, Casey, is seen as a great asset at glad-handing, making Iowa an ideal location for her talents, but Ron himself needs to find his groove, lacking so far. Casey has been called ‘Lady Macbeth’ for the strength she has exhibited in the political arena, with her husband coming to her defense after she was called ‘America’s Karen’ by former Florida Republican congressman, David Jolly on MSNBC. “Casey DeSantis is a fairly compelling political figure in Florida, and now nationally. For many, she’s the brighter side to Florida’s angry governor. For others, she’s become ‘America’s Karen.’ And I think that’s the ultimate disconnect here with a campaign that needs to embrace more constituencies to get to the White House,” Jolly observes.

Aldous J. Pennyfarthing writes that DeSantis initially embraced the COVID19 vaccine rollout, until he decided that living people were ‘too woke,’ thereupon turning against it. Aldous suggests he might work into his campaign speeches, ‘how to get your inheritance early.’ Researchers have found that the gap in excess death rates were larger in counties with lower vaccination rates, with differences in attitudes and uptake among Republican and Democrat voters “may have been factors in the severity and trajectory of the pandemic” in the United States. A Harvard study from December 2022 found that the more control Republicans had, the more likely you were to end up in a pine box. A recent article published by Lancet Regional Health-Americas found that the more conservative the voting records of members of Congress and state legislatures, the higher the age-adjusted COVID mortality rates. Rates were eleven percent higher in states with Republican-controlled governments and twenty-six percent higher in areas where voters lean conservative. You aren’t likely to find that information in any of DeSantis’ campaign literature, the studies exploding the myth that the GOP has ever really cared about human lives…their own or others. As the saying goes, “Nationalism does nothing but teach you to hate people you never met, and to take pride in accomplishments you had no part in.”

Reuters reported a while back that a video shared by the DeSantis campaign attacked Trump’s stance on LGBTQ rights, was scorned by gay Republicans who called it homophobic. It starts off highlighting Trump’s past support for LGBTQ Americans, then contrasts it with clips of commentators attacking the Florida governor’s anti-transgender policies. The Log Cabin Republicans, a group representing LGBTQ conservatives, said the ad ventured into homophobic territory.” Any volunteers to break it to them?

And keeping His Prominence in the news, Elon Musk this week changed the Twitter brand to ‘X.‘ Satirist Andy Borowitz reports that Musk is also changing his name to WTF, “because it fits me better.” The company held a ‘fun name contest’ among employees, as a perk for coming in to the office rather than working from home, enabling them to do cool stuff. The second favorite name voted upon was LMFAO, which presented a strong challenge to WTF, but as long as Elon is happy, everyone is happy.

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “SURF”

“Live life, one wave at a time.”
~Andrew Pacholyk

“Surfing’s a more profound kind of sport than it looks. When you surf, you learn not to fight the power of nature, even if it gets violent.”    
~Haruki Murakami

“It was all balance. But then, she already knew that from surfing.”  
~Eve Babitz

...

If you happen to have some scattered about, here’s a DIY video on “Things you can make from old, dead laptops” 🙂


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 26 – August 1, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…Musical Saw Festival happening now! Movie critiques. Greensite…on the Coastal Commission hearing for 190 West Cliff. Schendledecker…Santa Cruz Together’s politics. Steinbruner… Sewage Water, water commissioner mtg., Branciforte Fire District, Happy valley politics. Hayes…July’s flower. Patton…Genius, self-government. Matlock…underprivileged unitary crusaders in a small town. Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…menopause pick of the week. Quotes “Marathons”

...

FIRST ANNUAL FESTIVAL OF THE SAWS. September 1, 1979. Laurel Community Center (London Nelson Community Center). There’s 14 players in there including Mr. Binks, Rene Bogart (Humphrey’s cousin) Tom Scribner (in the red vest with bow tie), Moses Josiah (from Jamaica), Gordon Mumma from UCSC, Charlie Blacklock main festival organizer, Vicki Bolam, rare woman saw player and organizer, Bob Armstrong of the Cheap Suit Serenaders. I’m in there somewhere too.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Bratton’s private collection.

DATELINE July 24

SANTA CRUZ…THE MUSICAL SAW CITY.

The statue of Musical Saw player Tom Scribner in front of Bookshop Santa Cruz on Pacific draws questions beyond belief. I’ll try to fill in some blanks. Tom was a far left political wood worker and played the saw on Pacific for many years. Never for handouts just for fun. Marghe McMahon was a student at UCSC taking Doyle Foreman’s bronze sculpture class. She made the statue of Tom and needed some funding to pay for the materials. A bunch of us helped her by staging the first ever Musical Saw Festival (see photo). Because Tom was so politically left the then Republican Santa Cruz City Council would only allow the stature to be placed in SCOPE PARK near the Town Clock, so very few folks would see it. Time and pressure got Neal Coonerty owner of Bookshop Santa Cruz to move the statue to its present location.

So this weekend Saturday and Sunday Musical Saw players from all over the world will come and perform in this 44th year of the festival. Present day organizers sent this…

Street Saw jam in front of Bookshop Santa Cruz. Saturday – July 29th – 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm
1520 Pacific Ave, Santa Cruz

Note: We may need to move the street jam to the corner of Pacific Avenue and Front Street. Please look for us there if we are not in front of Bookshop Santa Cruz.

Saturday – July 29th. – 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm at Roaring Camp in Felton, California
Potluck and jam in the outer parking lot.

Sunday  –  July 30th, 2023
Roaring Camp, Felton, California

Bret Harte Hall in Roaring Camp
10:00 – The Public Knew Sense
11:00 – Musical Saw Contest
11:50 – Wildcat Canyon – featuring Dilly
12:30 – The Blacklock Family Band
1:00 – Cindy Webster
1:30 – Lou Mannick & Sam Yodice
2:00 – Rodney’s Bubble Machine
2:30 – Two Bar Three featuring Thomas Spearance (Mr. Hedge)
3:00 – The Golden State Worriers featuring Rowena Southard
3:30 – Presentation of Awards
3:40 – First Place Winner of Musical Saw Contest
4:00 – CHORUS OF SAWS (ALL Sawplayers welcome)
4:30 – Sawyer’s Farewell

It’s an amazing musical tradition and 100 % unique to Santa Cruz. Don’t miss it!
...

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

BARBIE. (DEL MAR THEATRE). (7.6 IMDB)   This lush, lavish so called comedy looks like a zillion dollar advertisement from the Mattel company to sell even more Barbies by re making her image (and Ken’s) into a more contemporary multi sexual/ non sexual image. It broke all known box office records on opening day. It’s foolish, extravagant, and meaningless.

OPPENHEIMER. (DEL MAR THEATRE). (8.8 IMDB).   Reviews are all over the place on this one. It’s an excellent dramatized biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer who more or less invented the atomic bomb. He was by all accounts a conflicted man and dreamer. Watch his odd mannerisms and his humanitarian conflicts. Its 3 hours long and full of very deep humane decisions. Cillian Murphy does a great job as Oppenheimer. And you’ll be quite surprised by Robert Downey Jr. and his very straight negative role. Don’t miss it.

HUNTERS. (PRIME SERIES) (7.2 IMDB). Quite a cast including Al Pacino, Carol Kane, and Lena Olin. It tells the stories of Jews who are searching for the Nazis who have escaped Hitler’s Germany and from Austria in 1972. It’s painful, well done and puzzling especially when they suspect that Adolph Hitler is alive and well.

DAHAAD. (PRIME SERIES) (7.6 IMDB). Strange suicides which may be murders, happen in this Indian film. A woman officer who has to deal with much sexual harassment plus the remnants of the caste system is the focal point. It’s almost embarrassing to watch and realize just how relevant and demeaning it still is in India and surrounding all of us today.

JUVENILE JUSTICE. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.9 IMDB). This legal court room drama focuses on a woman judge who doesn’t like children law breakers. She does her own investigating and causes all sorts of hell for doing it. It’s from South Korea and is tense, fine acting, and forces you to re-consider your opinion of our own legal system.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Max, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

MOVE TO HEAVEN. (NETFLIX SERIES) (8.5 IMDB).   A movie from South Korea that will bring tears to anyone who has had to face a death in the family. Two trauma cleaners (funeral helpers) face fear and try to deal with Asperger’s syndrome. Father and son are close in a genuine feel good heart breaking way. See it when you’re in a good mood.

MR CAR AND THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (4.4 IMDB). For all former (I’m one) and present members of DeMolay (junior Masons) this is a curious mix of the history of Jacques DeMolay and the background of the Knights Templar. This Polish movie tries to link some genuine history and an historian on the trail of truth with fable and it’s a boring mess.

CELEBRITY. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.5 IMDB) . I was reminded of Gwyneth Paltrow and her celebrity world of fashions, make-up and the struggle for publicity and fame. This film takes place in Seoul Korea and the “influencer” society. It’s flat, self-centered, and out of this world (the one we live in).

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – DEAD RECKONING PART ONE. (DEL MAR THEATRE). (8.1 IMDB). Ethan Hunt also known to the real world as Tom Cruise says he does his own stunts in this awful waste of time movie. I’m predicting that we’ll learn later that the script was written by L.Ron Hubbard and yes Scientology does have a church here in Santa Cruz…go here to see what they’re up to now https://www.scientology.org/l-ron-hubbard/ . Yes L. Ron H. died in 1986. This Mission Implausible (7th in the series) is overloaded with CGI effects, insane acting and a huge disappointment to Mission Impossible fans. Don’t go and stop any friends or relatives from going.

THE HORROR OF DOLORES ROACH. (PRIME SERIES) (7.2 IMDB). And there are plenty of Roaches, smokeable ones in this so labeled “comedy” After being in prison for 16 years this woman succeeds and miserably fails at finding a decent life. Accidents, and foolish decisions lead her down some very dark paths including some cannibalism, Watch at your own peril.

...
July 24

NIGHTMARE INN

After three and a half years of waiting, the four appeals of the 190 West Cliff Drive project were voted down seven to three by the California Coastal Commission at its July 12th meeting. The local media covered the outcome, so this is probably not news. However, some of the details may be of interest to those who follow the shenanigans of developers and planning departments and in this case, the CA Coastal Commission.

Full disclosure: I submitted one of the four separate appeals. Mine was a fact-based argument to save as many of the onsite heritage trees as possible. The effort barely rated a mention in the Commission staff report and was summarily dismissed. My follow up letter for the hearing re-stating that the city was yet again failing to follow its Heritage Tree Resolution which mandates that a heritage tree can be removed only “if a project design cannot be altered to accommodate the tree” was ignored. So much for trees.

One of the other appeals focused on the impact to Clear View Court mobile home park, situated directly behind what will be a massive mixed-use project, sharing a common back fence. The appeal cited equity and social justice issues which the Coastal Commission has recently centered in its deliberations. The residents of CVC are predominantly low-income, elderly, some with disabilities. Another appeal focused on the projected height of fifty- seven feet for parts of the project. (The site is zoned for thirty- six feet). This extra height exceeds even that allowed under a density bonus and will be achieved by adding stair towers with overhead trellises and private enclosed decks; essentially making it five stories. Clear View Court homes are all one-story.

Any appeal to the CA Coastal Commission (CCC) must pass the initial hurdle of a finding of substantial issue by majority vote of the commissioners. It helps if the staff report also finds that the appeal contains substantial issues. If there is a substantial issue finding, then the project review is taken over by the CCC and eventually comes back to the CCC as a de novo hearing with a thorough examination of environmental issues and project alternatives presented to the CCC for deliberation.

You might recall that in 2014 the La Bahia project was appealed to the CCC. They found substantial issues raised in the appeal. Despite howls from the Seaside Company and verbal attacks on the CCC by pro-development members of the community, the final project was far better in scale and design in response to community concerns than was the original project. (Many wanted this iconic 1926 historic building renovated but that was not on the development agenda.)

After a wait of over three years for the Dream Inn 190 West Cliff project appeals to be heard, hopes were dashed when the CCC staff report was finally released a week before the scheduled hearing with a finding of no substantial issues in any appeal. Missing from the record and staff report was the lengthy appellant submission citing equity and social justice issues. When that omission was brought to staff’s attention as soon as the appellant spotted it, it was added. Staff then wrote a hasty, last-minute rebuttal finding no significant issues with equity and social justice.

While the project height is twenty feet taller than that allowed under the Local Coastal Program (LCP) staff claimed it is set further back from Clear View Court than an LCP-conforming project, so the impact is the same. Hmm…I think looking at a next-door fifty- seven- foot building from my one- story kitchen window is substantially different than looking at a thirty-six-foot building even if the former is a few yards further away and the shadow is roughly the same.

So, equity and social justice issues for the existing sixty- eight low- income CVC homes were swept aside while the inclusion of eight very-low- income units in a largely luxury development was extolled. Significant impacts of luxury housing on raising the Area Median Income, raising inclusionary rent levels, and displacing existing very-low- income residents are routinely rendered invisible, and this project was no exception. Because the city keeps no data on which demographic eventually occupies low and very-low-income units, we have no idea whether it is students, out of towners or local low- income workers who are benefitting.

It is worth noting that the Coastal Act trumps state-imposed density bonuses. That means extra height sought under a density bonus does not have to be accepted by the CCC as it does by local city councils. The basis for an appeal is to find inconsistencies between a project and the Local Coastal Program, in this case at the least, heights. (I found LCP inconsistencies with heritage trees but as noted before, who cares about trees). If there are inconsistencies, a finding of substantial issue is triggered or, more correctly, used to be triggered. In 2019, the city of Santa Cruz Planning staff presented an LCP amendment to the CCC that was accepted. The amendment allows for LCP inconsistencies if there are no resulting impacts to coastal resources. Ask yourself…in whose interests was this amendment crafted and approved? Neighbors or developers? In this case, the clear beneficiaries are Tyson Sales of Ensemble Investments, owners of the Dream Inn. As for coastal resource impacts, none was found by staff. I can think of a few: perhaps blocking the view of the mountains from the coast as seen from Bay and West Cliff? Perhaps excavating twenty- nine feet for a two-story underground garage and potentially altering underground springs? Perhaps bringing significant commercial activity towards West Cliff Drive? None will be studied since the vote was for a finding of no substantial issues. Commissioner Cummings tried for a motion for a de novo hearing and got a second to his motion and one other vote but that was all.  The last- minute submission of a letter from Mayor Keeley of unqualified, enthusiastic support for the project probably helped the developers and hurt the neighbors. The initial council vote for the project was 4-3 so it wasn’t a slam dunk.

At the end of the hearing, Coastal Commission Chair Brownsey enthused, “We look forward to seeing this wonderful development!” Tell that to the low-income residents of the now ironically named, Clear View Court.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
July 24

ANTI-DEMOCRACY IN ACTION: THE DIVISIVE POLITICS OF SANTA CRUZ TOGETHER

As we head into the looong 2024 election season, I want to turn the spotlight on the local PAC Santa Cruz Together. This is the first in a series of columns looking at their campaigns over the past five years, which I argue are fundamentally anti-democratic and premised on a logic of buying elections that is corrupting governmental politics at large these days. I also ask how those of us who believe in the public ownership of our democratic processes and the representational integrity of our communities in local politics can fight back.

Even in the Democratic Party, democratic politics is meant to be about transparency and fairness, where one person equals one vote. But that’s the exact opposite of Santa Cruz Together’s (SCT) agenda. This local PAC—or political action committee–that is privately funded, is dedicated to advancing the interests of property owners and the real estate industry, but hypocritically poses as good democratic citizens of our community. While they do have dozens of local contributors, and claim to represent the Santa Cruz community’s “togetherness,” in reality most of their support comes from the real estate industry. They basically buy politics to support their narrow class interests, at the expense of the majority of the working poor, barely middle class, renters and students, and the precariously housed and unhoused. It’s a little like Citizen’s United, which is neither by or for the people, and certainly hasn’t united the electorate.

Image: https://fppc.dsasantacruz.org/node-graph

SCT funds, endorses, and buys publicity supporting candidates (including Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson, Renee Golder, Martine Watkins, Sonja Brunner, Scott Newsome, and Fred Keeley), who in turn support the economic base of their funders—largely the real estate industry, developers, big business, and a chunk of the gentrifying class of upper-class homeowners. The group buys publicity for their supported candidates and ballot initiatives, effectively reducing politics to a naked expression of economic power.

Image: https://fppc.dsasantacruz.org/node-graph

In recent years, they’ve opposed Measure M (rent control) and Measure N (the Empty Home Tax), effectively contributing to our city becoming the most unaffordable city in the US, spearheaded the recall campaign of progressive city councilors, and supported candidates for local political office who back their pro-real-estate agenda. As a result of a system that enables this anti-democratic political corruption, city policy tends to express the interests of elite economic power, rather than that of the democratic majoritarian will.

Of course, this phenomenon is also happening nationally, where millionaires and billionaires financially back the policy that supports their material interests—reducing taxes on the rich, deregulation of industry, and funding the police and military, while vetoing popular policies like social welfare, universal reproductive rights, Medicare for all, campaign finance reform, labor protections for workers, the abolition of student debt, and meaningful climate action. With the passage of campaign finance deregulation (with the paradoxically titled Citizens’ United organization supported by the Supreme Court in 2010), and the awarding of free speech rights to corporations, politics in the US is basically a free-for-all expression of private interests buying the world they want and imposing it on the rest of us.

Of course, given the US’s founding in conditions of Indigenous genocide, transatlantic slavery, and patriarchy, with democratic freedoms limited largely to private-property-owning white men, the current system of representative democracy—including in Santa Cruz—is basically the continuation of the country’s anti-democratic origins that favor private wealth and property above all else.

The situation ultimately results in minority rule—that of the ruling class. With millions in dark money in politics, the ruling class is able to overturn the will of the majority, with enormous sums spent on manipulative publicity, fake push polls meant to trick voters with disinformation, conservative campaigns spun as populist, rightwing political infrastructure, obnoxiously sized billboards and yard-signs, and nonstop bot-driven social media propaganda. These initiatives are abetted by gerrymandered districts and voter disenfranchisement.

Santa Cruz mirrors this national situation, with its own unfair political financing advanced by groups like Santa Cruz Together. As a political action committee formed to defeat rent control in 2018, SCT is basically an organization created to direct private funds toward exerting political influence, going against fair, democratic practice. In 2019 they funneled money into a new PAC called Santa Cruz United in order to recall progressive city councilors Chris Krohn and Drew Glover (at the same time accusing anti-recall folks of being divisive). Currently, the FPPC is investigating Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson’s 2022 campaign for violating campaign finance rules by participating in a private event to fundraise for her District 3 supervisor run while she was present (candidates and PACs cannot associate in this explicit manner, even while we all know that such financial and political connections exist).

And as documented above, SCT is funded by real-estate money, supporting the economic interests of landlords and property developers who are attempting to maximize their profits, at the expense of affordable, working-class housing, rent control, and progressive taxation. Their campaign against the Empty Home Tax, for instance, spread disinformation (e.g. that the initiative overestimated empty homes; that the tax would be invasive, that it would criminalize homeowners). These kinds of comments appeared on platforms like Nextdoor.com, in effect a commercial anti-social media outlet for property owners—their often aggressive rhetoric constituting an expression of their basic contempt for public, democratic governance.

On the other hand, SCT supports the criminalization of the unhoused via such cruel measures as the Camping Standards and Services Ordinance, the Oversized Vehicle Ordinance, and the over-funding of policing. But plentiful research shows that criminalization and policing are no solution to the structural causes of poverty, substance use disorder, mental health crises, and houselessness; they only seek to sweep away their visible existence and often make matters worse.

But whatever one thinks about these policies, the crucial point remains: that SCT’s practice of buying political office and city policy is fundamentally anti-democratic. It seeks to replace a system of fair and equal representative government (even if the US has never exactly achieved that ambition) with one that is ruled by the wealthy. If we are to win a world of justice, fairness, and equality, then the minority rule of property owners, speculative real estate investors, and the financialization of housing by the rich must be stopped. This must begin by abolishing the fraudulent, anti-democratic real-estate fronts like Santa Cruz Together and rebuilding the basis of free and fair elections (through, for instance, adopting clear campaign finance rules).

In spite of the SCT-funded defeats of several grassroots ballot initiatives in the past 5 years, the left in Santa Cruz has had some smaller but still significant wins: The coalitional Tenant Organizing Committee recently helped reinstate rent stabilization for Cabrillo Mobile Home Estate Parks in Capitola. Santa Cruz Cares successfully mobilized to get conditions placed on the OVO—organizing the community to appeal to the Coastal Commission, which finally came to its senses and declared OVO to have “substantial issues” that are problematic, specifically targeting a frontline community.

These wins should be celebrated, but there’s more work to be done. To advance the cause of justice, equality, and fairness, we must continue to organize in our workplaces, our neighborhoods and communities, and in our political institutions.

Stay tuned for more columns unearthing Santa Cruz Together’s anti-democratic politics and highlighting truly grassroots efforts to prioritize People over Profits!

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
July 24

PLEASE COMMENT ON STATE RULE CHANGES TO ALLOW TREATED SEWAGE WATER GO DIRECTLY TO YOUR TAP

Here we go…the State will hold a public hearing on September 7 to take public comment on allowing treated sewage water to be in your tap water directly from the treatment plant.  Known as “Direct Potable Re-Use” or DPR, this will allow municipalities to sell the water directly, despite unknown long-term health impacts of low-dose chronic ingestions of endocrine disruptors and other pharmaceuticals that cannot be removed by the existing treatment processes and are not regulated.

State Water Resources Control Board NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING [pdf]

More on this next week.

SANTA CRUZ CITY WATER COMMISSION MEETING WAS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR PUBLIC TO PARTICIPATE

Last Monday (7/17) many people likely were prohibited from participating in the Santa Cruz City Water Commission meeting because it was made nearly impossible to do so. The meeting was in an unorthodox location, not noticed, and the door to the actual meeting room was locked.

These meetings have been in-person only, so I waited in the parking lot at the City Council chambers, where the Commission has been meeting.  No other vehicles arrived.  I looked at the display boards adjacent to the City Council Chambers, but there was NO Notice of the meeting.  I contacted a friend who checked the internet website information…it seemed it was a Zoom only meeting, so I drove home.  I looked up the Zoom access information on my home computer and saw the meeting had been changed to a hybrid format at the last minute.  I called in, but was not admitted to the meeting after waiting 15 minutes..  I hung up, sent an email to Director Menard and Commissioners Engfer and Ryan. and called again.  This time, I could hear Commissioners talking but had no idea where in the agenda they were working.  When public comment time arrived, I simply asked “where on the agenda are you?”  and was informed the Commission was reviewing the new Intertie Project as part of the Santa Cruz City Water Rights Project.

I had missed all presentations and Commissioner discussions.  Ms. Menard informed me the meeting was recorded.  That was good news.

In listening to the last shred of discussion and vote by Commissioners, I learned that on August 8, the City Council meeting will include presentation and approval of this new Intertie Project between City and Scotts Valley.

I also learned that many Commissioners have resigned, leaving the Commission dangerously close to not being able to have a quorum.

I learned the Intertie Project had not received a formally noticed public hearing or a public comment period because the Water Dept. chose to use the faster method of an Addendum, rather than a Subsequent EIR, and all that pesky environmental analysis and public participation was not required.

Commissioner Engfer wanted to know why there was no mitigation stated for the significant number of trees that will be removed?  Staff said that will get worked out.  “I’m not sure what kind of motion we should make here” said Engfer, referencing an apparent earlier comment from Commissioner Tom Burns.  Quickly, Burns moved to approve the Staff Recommendations to accept the Addendum.

Addendum to the Santa Cruz Water Rights Project Final Environmental Impact Report Intertie-1 Project [pdf]

Take a look at the map on page 13.

This will connect the Cities of Scotts Valley and Santa Cruz for sharing surface water supplies in non-emergency as well as emergency times.

The Proposed Intertie-1 Project evaluated in the Santa Cruz Water Rights Project EIR, referred to therein as the City/SVWD intertie, included interconnection of the City’s water supply system to the SVWD’s system through installation of approximately 8,000 linear feet of new 12-inch-diameter intertie piping from Sims Road in the south, along La Madrona Drive to the north to the City of Scotts Valley where a new pump station would be constructed (see Figure 1). A generalized location for the pump station was provided, but the precise location, facility footprint, and equipment characteristics and sizing were not known at the time. Given typical pump stations in Santa Cruz County, this pump station was expected to be a single-story building with an outdoor paved area surrounded by security fencing and low-wattage, shielded outdoor security lighting directed onto the site. Once constructed, the City could deliver water to the SLVWD through the City/SVWD intertie, and the SVWD could then convey the water to the SLVWD through the SVWD’s existing interconnection with the SLVWD. Interconnection of the SVWD and the SLVWD systems (referred to as Intertie2 or IT2) was constructed in 2016 and permitted for 

emergency use as part of the Scotts Valley Multi-Agency Regional Intertie Project. Additional approvals would be required to use the existing intertie between the SVWD and the SLVWD systems for non-emergency use.

The anticipated duration of project construction is 16 months, spanning from approximately March 2024 to July 2025. 

While WSAC recommendations considered only delivering surface water to SqCWD and SVWD, current conceptual-level planning considers delivering surface water to San Lorenzo Valley Water District and Central Water District as well.

The Project has been modified: (see page 12)

The Proposed Intertie-1 Project, as modified, is 20% longer than the previously evaluated project, consisting of approximately 9,600 linear feet of 12-inch-diameter bi-directional intertie pipeline and a pump station between the City and SVWD distribution systems. The intertie pipeline would facilitate transfers of water supply from the City to the SVWD during wet seasons, and from SVWD to the City during dry seasons or drought years. The pipeline would run from the City’s Pasatiempo tanks at the southern extent of the project area along Firehouse Lane to Sims Road, and then north along La Madrona Drive to the City of Scotts Valley where the new pump station would be constructed in a similar, but more specific location. The Proposed Intertie-1 Project would also include installation of appurtenances that are required for pipeline operation, monitoring, and maintenance, including line valves, air release valves, isolation valves, sample stations, and hydrants. Figure 2 shows the modified alignment, pipeline appurtenances, pump station location, and worst-case disturbance buffers.

The pump station would consist of a single-story, approximately 800-square-foot building that would contain three 40- horsepower pumps and their associated VFDs and related electrical equipment and piping. 

The connection between the City and SVWD distribution systems would be provided via pumped flow from the City to the SVWD, and gravity flow from the SVWD to the City

The pumps would be used to provide water to the SVWD distribution system and the SVWD’s Sequoia tank with City water. When SVWD is providing water to the City, the pump station bypass line would operate while the pumps are off, and the SVWD’s Sequoia tank would primarily fill the City’s Pasatiempo tanks. An 8-inch-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) connection to the sanitary sewer in La Madrona Drive would be installed for purposes of flushing sample test water or pipeline potable water during startup and shutdown of the pump station. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) electrical service for the pump station would be provided by installation of a new utility pole near the pump station or by installation of approximately 500 feet of new underground conduit and cable along La Madrona Drive. The pump station would include provisions for connection of a portable backup power generator to provide system operation during power outages—a new feature of the pump station not previously evaluated. 

 Operational agreement terms would include uses for emergency and non-emergency use between the City and SVWD. The operational agreement is expected to include specifications for the duration of the agreement;

 On Firehouse Lane, the City would acquire a 20-foot-wide permanent easement on the parcel along the northern portion (APN 067-202-66), and the City would purchase or otherwise acquire the parcel that comprises the southern portion of Firehouse Lane (APN 067-202-60). On the SVFD property at 6000 La Madrona Drive (APN 021-141-20), the SVWD would acquire an approximately 30,800-square-foot temporary easement for construction staging and 11,000-square-foot permanent easement for the pump station and affiliated appurtenances.

With all the development that all jurisdictions in the County are being required to do by the State’s Mighty Big Stick, will there be enough water, even with the regional sharing?  Attend the Santa Cruz City Council meeting on August 8 and ask.

Also,…next month’s 7pm Santa Cruz City Water Commission meeting on August 21 will again be in an unorthodox place: the Downtown Library upstairs Community Meeting room, whose access is prohibited when the library closes at 6pm.  “People need to arrive early or on time so they don’t get locked out” reminded Ms. Menard.  Hmmmm….it would be nice if the meetings were properly noticed so members of the public can even find out where the meeting is being held, wouldn’t it?

Write the Commission and the Santa Cruz City Council with your thoughts on this as well the Intertie Project.

CityCouncil@cityofsantacruz.com

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT GIFTS FREE WATER FOR 50 YEARS TO TWIN LAKES BAPTIST CHURCH

Part of the sweet deal Soquel Creek Water District has with Twin Lakes Baptist Church is gifting the Church FREE water to irrigate the new athletic field for 50 years.  The Church just completed the new sod lawn last week.  Wouldn’t it have been a good idea to gift that water to Cabrillo Community College, a public agency with large athletic fields just across the road?

One of the three new wells where the District plans to pressure-inject treated sewage water into the aquifer is located on land the District leased from the Church.  That well has been seemingly plagued with problems, and has had to be rehabilitated already…maybe again now, for the second time since it was constructed in 2019.

What an expensive fiasco, especially when one considers the independent report by Haley & Aldrich that was commissioned by Cabrillo College to ensure the injected recycled water would not negatively affect the College’s three private wells.  The analysis determined that harm was unlikely, due to the gradient flow of the groundwater relative to the College’s wells. However, the expert report questioned the wisdom of Soquel Creek Water District for positioning the injection well close to one of their production wells and a handful of private wells “downstream”.  The expert called the placement of the Project’s three injection wells “curious”.

Contact me if you would like to see that Report.  I obtained it in a Public Records Act request with Cabrillo College.  You should also be able to find it on the Soquel Creek Water District website under “Correspondence” for the next Board meeting; I gave the Board a copy at their meeting last Tuesday to review and consider.  By the way, here is a link to Director Bruce Daniels’ letter of resignation

APPLY TO SERVE PRIVATE WATER OWNERS & CUSTOMERS IN THE MIDCOUNTY AREA

Are you a private well owner or get your water from one?  How about a small water system, mutual or other non-municipal water system in the County? If you answered YES, you need to get involved in the management policy related to your water supply.   Apply by 5pm Monday, August 14, to serve on the MidCounty Groundwater Agency Board where there are two vacancies for Well Owner Representatives open.

 “The MGA is responsible for groundwater management in the Mid-County Groundwater Basin in the communities of Soquel, Aptos, Capitola, Live Oak, and La Selva Beach. 

To be eligible, an applicant must own, operate, or be served by an individual well, small water system, mutual, or other non-municipal water system within the Santa Cruz Mid-County Groundwater Basin. The time commitment is approximately 4 hours per month, including evenings. The position is unpaid.  

An ideal candidate will have a demonstrated ability to work with others in a collaborative setting. They will have the means and motivation to communicate with the community they are representing. They will have knowledge and experience that will benefit the MGA and the implementation of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan. 

The application is available at www.midcountygroundwater.org

BRANCIFORTE PROPERTY OWNERS REJECTED EXPENSIVE ASSESSMENT BURDEN

It was standing room only last Thursday (7/20) when the Branciforte Fire District Board met at Happy Valley School for a final public hearing to call for any remaining Special Benefit Assessment ballots before tallying began by the Election Dept. staff waiting there to begin.  Many people again voiced disagreement that they alone should have to pay to staff the Branciforte Fire Station when Scotts Valley Fire annexes their District, taking control of all the engines, the newly-remodeled fire station, property tax monies, and the Special fees the property owners voted to tax themselves in 2016 (Measure T) to pay for new equipment, and facilities needed.  One man said it would more than double his property taxes, and he actually lives close to the existing Scotts Valley Fire boundary.

I asked if the Board planned to send a courier to the fire station, where the voters were instructed to send or deposit their ballots, just in case some people dropped them off after all the staff had left to set up at the School for the meeting?  Their answer initially was NO, “it’s up to people to read the directions on the ballot and come here” said Board President Larry Pageler, but when residents protested, he grudgingly acquiesced.   A firefighter returned with five ballots in hand from the day’s mail.  One man came into the room minutes after the hearing had closed and asked to deposit his ballot.  “NO”, the hearing was closed and tabulation was under way.

I was grateful for the team of four Election Dept. staff, directed by Elections Manager Ms. Tricia Webber, coming to the School to do the tabulation.  The Fire District Board had initially told residents the ballots would be tallied by the SCI Consultants who had developed the method for how much everyone’s Special Benefit Assessment would be, and boasted of a 94% success rate in getting such measures passed.  In observing the Elections Dept. staff working, I was impressed with their thoroughness and focus on accountability and transparency.

In the end, a total of 434 ballots were returned (of 750 parcels potentially receiving assessments) with 379 NO votes, and 53 YES votes and TWO ballots that were invalid because there was no vote indicated.

These were Prop. 218 weighted votes, with the votes of those property owners assessed the most having proportionally more weight given to their votes.  The weighted NO vote was 875,554.23, with the weighted YES vote being 103,393.05, and the weighted vote of the two invalid ballots was 1868.87.

Most of the people who attended were very happy to see the assessment struck down.

The wonderful Elections Dept. staff, including Manager Ms. Tricia Webber (in orange) opened and sorted the ballots.

Sorting out problems with the SCI Consultant software “black box” and weighted vote tabulation.

Ms. Webber read the Statement of the Vote with Branciforte Fire District Board President Mr. Larry Pageler looking on as the news officially announced the incredibly expensive Special Benefit Assessment failed.

BUT DISTURBING DECISIONS HARMING HAPPY VALLEY RESIDENTS ENSUED

Although Scotts Valley Fire staff has never said directly that failure of that whopping assessment would cause them to close the Branciforte Fire Station, LAFCO Director Joe Serrano, who is pushing the annexation forward full throttle, has, and the Board has obediently repeated the narrative.

So it made no sense that the Branciforte Fire Board moved forward Thursday to purchase a new Type 6 fire engine that they confirmed will be housed in Scotts Valley.  They insisted they had to spend the money because it is from a $500,000 gift of the Barnes Family to the Branciforte Fire District for the benefit of Happy Valley residents.

Also very disturbing was the Board’s rejecting a public member’s request that the Board not move forward with the annexation with Scotts Valley fire without a condition that Scotts Valley Fire Board transition to district-based elections upon completion of the annexation.  “NO!” said Director Marilyn Kuksht. “That would break the deal with Scotts Valley, and we would be back to ground zero in the annexation process.”

Wow.

She feels it is more important to shove the deal forward at the expense of fair representation for the people she represents?  The Plan for Service the Board rubberstamped last month meekly acquiesced to handing over all assets and tax monies to Scotts Valley, and only having an “Advisory Committee” that would meet twice a year to make recommendations about how all that money and resources would be used, but with no obligation at all by Scotts Valley to abide by anything requested.

Keep your eye on this.

HAPPY VALLEY RESIDENTS WILL HAVE NO EFFECTIVE VOICE AFTER ANNEXATION WITH SCOTTS VALLEY IS COMPLETE 

The LAFCO Staff Report for the August 2 public hearing is shocking because it states that after the annexation is complete, the existing Scotts Valley Fire District Board will be in charge of deciding how all assets and monies from the dissolved Branciforte Fire District will be used. More than that, the Scotts Valley Fire Board, NOT the people of Happy Valley, will decide who will serve on the Advisory Commission from the dissolved Branciforte Fire District area to make toothless recommendations a once or twice a year.

Do the people in Happy Valley know this?  NO.

It was extremely disturbing that the Branciforte Fire Board completely failed to alert the room full of residents that on August 2, the LAFCO will meet and consider approving a Resolution that would finalize the annexation of the two Districts.  Approval of that Resolution will set the clock ticking for the people of Branciforte Fire District to protest the annexation.  Many in the room last Thursday wondered why this annexation is necessary, saying they are happy with the level of service that a hybrid paid / volunteer staff arrangement has provided for many, many years.

So why didn’t their Chief or the Board even announce it during their Ad Hoc Committee report during the meeting to a room full of constituents? “We haven’t really met because we’ve been pretty focused on the Special Benefit Assessment ballots.” was all that Chief Nate Lackey stated.  When I announced the August 2 LAFCO meeting and impending resolution, the Board seemed nonplussed.

Yikes.  The people of Branciforte need to know about this important August 2 LAFCO meeting and state their opinions.  Their own Board has failed them.

Please share this information with anyone you know in the Happy Valley area

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

(see page 8 and 9 of the 16-page Staff Report);

Governance 

The Scotts Valley Fire Protection District (post-reorganization) will include all the territory currently within the boundaries of SVFPD and all the territory currently within the boundaries of BFPD. The newly reorganized District will be governed by a 5-member Board of Directors, elected at large from the entire district. The SVFPD Board of Directors, as composed at the time the reorganization is deemed complete, will continue to serve until their individual terms expire, at which time the seats will stand for election. Any registered voter within the reorganized district boundaries (both SVFPD and the former BFPD area) may file and run for an open seat on the Board. To avoid conflict with the California Voting Rights Act, SVFPD may consider transitioning to a system of elections by district in the foreseeable future following additional analysis. 

Branciforte Oversight & Representation 

The SVFPD Board of Directors will establish a Service Zone encompassing the territory of the former Branciforte Fire Protection District, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13950. The purpose of the Service Zone is to provide the community with accountability for the use of taxes, assessments, or fees collected solely within the Service Zone (Health and Safety Code Section 13955). Further, the SVFPD Board of Directors will adopt a policy forming the Branciforte Advisory Commission and will also appoint members of the Branciforte community to said Commission in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13956. The purpose of the Advisory Commission will be to review the finances, operations, and projects that directly benefit and/or affect the Branciforte community. The formation of the Branciforte Advisory Commission will be made as soon as practical after the recordation of the reorganization. Following the reorganization, the SVFPD will continue to be managed by the incumbent SVFPD Fire Chief, along with their staff and officers. 

SCOTTS VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT BOARD PLACING BOND ISSUE ON THIS NOVEMBER’S BALLOT TO FUND NEW FIRE STATION

If you live in Scotts Valley, a new proposed bond tax measure is coming your way to help finance a $22 million new fire station.  The Board approved the bond’s necessity at their July 12 meeting (see page 13, with the Ballot Initiative on page 21).

The following is the abbreviated form of the bond measure: 

FIRE PROTECTION AND SAFETY BOND MEASURE. 

To construct a new strategically located fire operations facility, command center and repair/replace outdated stations, to be fully operational during a disaster, and seismically safe and accessible, thereby maintaining essential safety services including medical emergency lifesaving services, improved 911 response, wildfire protection and disaster response, shall the Scotts Valley Fire
Protection District levy approximately $27.50 per $100,000 of assessed value to repay general obligation bonds through maturity?

The estimated total cost of the Project to be paid from General Obligation Bond proceeds is $22,240,000. 

The maximum rate of interest to be paid on the General Obligation Bonds will not exceed 12% per annum. 

The tax imposed by this Fire Safety Bond Measure is an ad valorem tax levied upon taxable real property in the District. The tax will be used to pay the principal and interest on the General Obligation Bonds.

The location will be on La Madrona, near the Hilton Hotel, and will potentially partner with the Santa Cruz City Water Intertie Project.

IS CALFIRE’S RELIANCE ON AI FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION TACTICALS WISE?

Many thanks to a friend for sending this information, describing CAL FIRE’S increasing reliance on models generated by AI to make decisions about how to use resources available when there are large fires.  Will this make responders and fire bosses by giving them orders reliant on screens and data, rather than paying attention to what is happening in real time and consulting with those having local knowledge?

Drones, Satellites, and AI

Consider what happened here in the CZU Fire, as reported in the July 2023 San Lorenzo Valley Post (page 10) in an article about an art exhibit “Light on Water”  “Veteran Firefighter Shanna Kuempel Celebrates Fine Art Exhibit” by Julie Hoorn.

The article explains how Kuempel, a Battalion Chief with Santa Clara County Fire Protection District at the time and a 30-year veteran of the fire service, was fighting a fire in southern California when she received news that her family home on Summit Drive in Bonny Doon had burned in the CZU Fire.  She was released from her strike team to return home.

“She came back up to join those who had stayed behind to fight the fire in the Santa Cruz Mountains. “They were planning to do a burnout operation on all of Smith Grade” she said, “which would have taken occupied homes; people who had either not evacuated yet or had chosen not to leave.  We wondered why are they doing this at this point? The decisions being made weren’t practical decisions.  We had a discussion with CalFire about it, and we got in trouble for it.”

They stayed for days taking 12-hour shifts protecting a 300 acre ranch with tractors, rakes, and makeshift tools.  Even though she was off duty and there were other Santa Clara County firefighters behind Cal Fire lines, Shanna was demoted for her actions.  Still she insists, “They weren’t protecting houses, so people went back.  I think every house that was saved up there was probably saved by a civilian.”  Shanna arbitrated her demotion and was eventually reinstated to her original role. “So many things good and bad have prompted me toward my art,” she said. “I took on the State of California.  It was a David and Goliath situation.  If they hadn’t come after me, I probably would have retired to help my Mom rebuild.  But I’m not going to let this happen to me.  It’s not ethical.  It’s the difference between right and wrong.  We have an oath to protect life and property, and it happened on that mountain.  It was my purpose in life at that moment, that stoicism.”

So, were the CalFire Chiefs issuing orders at the CZU Fire paying attention to models when they ordered the “Stay Behind” crews to leave, stating there were “high winds predicted tonight”?  Those who chose to remain behind the lines and continue to save their neighborhoods monitored the winds…which never materialized.

CalFire has refused to do an After Action Review to analyze what went right and what didn’t…critical information to improve planning for the future.  Wouldn’t that be good information to feed into the AI data banks for modeling fire behavior and response tactics?  Why is CalFire so resistant?

Hmmmm……

NEW COUNTY FIRE DEPT. BATTALION CHIEF SHOULD HAVE COME FROM VOLUNTEER RANKS

The original idea to hire a Santa Cruz County Fire Dept. Battalion Chief to improve the Volunteer trainings and involvement in planning for future emergency response in their Communities originated with the Volunteer Captains.  They were hopeful that those who applied would come from their ranks, many of whom are seasoned Volunteers who worked to protect their neighbors in the 2020 CZU Fire even though ordered by CAL FIRE officials to leave.

However, at last week’s County Fire Dept. Advisory Commission (FDAC) meeting, County Fire/CAL FIRE Chief Nate Armstrong announced that CAL FIRE Chief Sam Filson was selected.  Somehow, it seems like another money grab by CAL FIRE, and another failure to respect the Volunteers and their expertise brought about by many years of responding in their Communities as true public servants.

After the meeting, I congratulated Chief Filson, and asked if he would please make sure an After Action Review for the 2020 CZU Lightning Complex Fire happened right away with County Fire Dept. Volunteers?  He quickly made a note and said he will look into it.

CAL FIRE has refused to conduct such critical analysis that is a standard practice to help better plan for future emergency response.  Write Santa Cruz County Chief Sam Filson and request County Fire Dept. conduct an After Action Review of the CZU Fire immediately.

Sam Filson sam.filson@fire.ca.gov    (nope, not a County government e-mail address).

YET ANOTHER TAX COMING YOUR WAY, THANKS TO THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY LAND TRUST

The Santa Cruz County FireSafe Council met last Thursday and heard a presentation by the Santa Cruz County Land Trust, letting them know there will be a tax on the November 2024 ballot to bring in money, either as a sales tax or parcel tax, to help fund the Land Trust’s vegetation management on the thousands of acres of land the agency has purchased.  Does that seem fair to you?

Keep your eyes open for this one.  There are millions of dollars in State grants already funded by tax payers for this purpose.  Can the property owners hanging on in what is now the most expensive place to live in the Country handle yet another gouge?

TAKE BACK YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE ON LIMITING BUILDING HEIGHT AND INCREASING AFFORDABLE HOUSING!

Housing for People organizer Ms. Keresha Durham will be the Guest on this Friday’s (July 28) “Community Matters” program at 1pm. 

Listen and call in! santacruzvoice.com

Front Street development from across the San Lorenzo River last week.

Preparing for another tall building to create a canyon of buildings in downtown Santa Cruz.

Just last week, this announcement came out:

The City of Santa Cruz has revised the HCD (California Department of Housing and Community Development) Submittal Draft (6th Cycle) Housing Element that was originally submitted to HCD in May 2023, based on preliminary comments from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The Revised HCD Submittal Public Review Draft (6th Cycle) Housing Element is available for review by the public on the Housing Element webpage

The City is accepting public comment on these updates through Tuesday, July 25th, 2023. Comments can be made by emailing me directly.

Sincerely, 

Clara Stanger

Senior Planner
City of Santa Cruz | Planning and Community Development
809 Center Street, Room 101, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Main: 831-420-5110 | Direct: 831-420-5247
Email: cstanger@santacruzca.gov

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS THAT HOLD OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE.  

JUST DO ONE THING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
July 24

JULY’S FLOWER

Summer is on, and I’m naming coastal tarplant (Deinandra corymbosa) the flower-of-the-month. Each month so far in 2023, I’ve provided readers with one of the quintessential native flowers that might best symbolize that month. Coastal tarplant, like many tarplants, is in full bloom right now. Like most of the others I’ve named, it is not easy to find. Let me describe this plant for you and hope that you will be curious enough to seek it out.

Plant Description

You’re looking for little sunflowers. The flower heads are bright yellow. Like horticultural sunflowers, they have two types of flowers in each flower head: ray and disc flowers. The disc flowers have tiny petals that you don’t notice unless you look closely. The ray flowers, the ones that line the outside of the flower head, have a long petal, and it has three lobes. Those ray flowers collectively make the flower head look like a single flower with petals, but really they heads of many flowers.

The plants can get tall, but mostly you’ll probably encounter them as short-statured…less than 8″ tall. And, they are normally very branched. The leaves are narrow with many lobes- they look almost pinnate.

Coastal tarplant smells like roofing tar. I like the smell of many other tarplants, and some folks say that they like the smell of this one, but blech! Straight up roofing tar. So, this plant makes double sense being called ‘tarplant’ – like other tarplants, it is very sticky. Tarplants mostly blossom in summer. The tar, aka ‘resin’ helps the plants not dry out in the baking sun. If you visit the Sierra Nevada foothills this time of year, the smell that accompanies the loud cricket song is a sweet, piney, tarplant. The Central Valley used to smell like that, but now it mostly smells like pesticides thanks to the too many humans that somehow think it’s okay to eat food that isn’t certified organic.

Habitat

Coastal tarplant likes coastal prairie. Like many coastal prairie wildflowers, this species can remain dormant in the ‘seedbank’ for many years. I have carefully studied spots for ten years when coastal tarplant was definitely not there. But, then someone will scrape or otherwise disturb the soil and the next spring the species is abundant in those disturbed areas. So, when thinking about this species’ habitat, think not only about coastal prairie but also about some kind of disturbance that makes for bare soil, which is where it wants to germinate.

Whittling Away

Like so many grassland species, many of the past occurrences noted in herbaria have been destroyed by development. For instance, John Hunter Thomas’ 1961 collection alongside the ‘bog at Camp Evers’ in Scotts Valley. A lot of interesting plants were in that bog, long since destroyed by poorly planned development- as is a too dominant theme of Scotts Valley’s legacy. Scotts Valley’s grasslands were once much more extensive and full of interesting plants. A few iNaturalist loggers have noted coastal tarplant still growing in the Glenwood Preserve in Scotts Valley- that property the result of a hard-fought battle to stop a golf course and subdivision (thanks CNPS and Friends of Glenwood!).

In 1953, J. H. Thomas collected the species at the “Hilton Airport” near Boulder Creek; this is now a golf course, obliterating the coastal prairie that once was there. Other early botanists collected the species in Capitola (1935) and in Corralitos (1896), both sites probably no longer contain habitat.

Where You Might Find It

It would be worth checking out other places that are still intact to see if the species is still there. R. Morgan filed an herbarium specimen from the end of Meder Street, part of the City of Santa Cruz’ Moore Creek Greenbelt. Is the management right this year for the coastal tarplant to thrive? iNaturalist folks have seen it there as of late! V. Hesse collected the species in the grasslands that were partially paved and developed for the ‘Woods Cove’ housing development; next door, this unique coastal prairie has been pummeled by horses and firefighters at the Graham Hill Showgrounds. Lots of good plants were once in those meadows, which have been very poorly stewarded for many years, despite supposed mitigation requirements by the County.

According to CalFlora, my favorite native plant website, some folks have seen the plant along the bluff trail at Año Nuevo.

Now, Go and Find It!

It is your job, now, to go and find this plant. If you find it, enter your observation into iNaturalist. Or, at least let me know! In seeking this plant out, you will undoubtedly find other interesting things. And, you might learn a bit about our coastal prairie grasslands. The easiest place to find the species would be at Glenwood Preserve, but the sightings on iNaturalist would suggest it is probably past flowering…photographers like to show it off in May there. So, head to the bluffs at Año Nuevo and see if you can find it…lots of good stuff grows and flowers along that near-ocean trail.

An Aside – NCMAWG

Few things sound as boring as the “North Coast Facilities and Management Plan Working Group” (NCMAWG – yawn!). But, few groups are as important to anyone who cares about Nature on the North Coast. When many of us complained loudly about the Monument Campaign, those spearheading it said ‘Don’t worry, we promise we’ll convene a collaborative working group to address any overcrowding concerns.’ They said, ‘It will be a lot like the Big Sur Interagency Task Force.’ Well, that Big Sur group at least welcomes the public, and lets them know when and where they are meeting. And listens to them. The NCMAWG is rumored to be about to meet, on July 31st. Betting that they spend all their time on the ‘Facilities’ part of their name…and never get around to management – humans do like to build things!

For more information…the only information I can find…check out the Friends of the North Coast website.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

July 22

#203 / Genius

On June 16, 2023, The New York Times published an opinion editorial by Deborah Pearlstein, who is a Co-Director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy. Pearlstein’s op-ed was titled, “Leaving Trump’s Fate to 12 Ordinary Citizens Is Genius.” Given the fact that The Times maintains a paywall, non-subscribers might not be able to read what Pearlstein has to say. Therefore, I am reprinting her statement, below, for those who find that the link doesn’t work.

Perhaps before you read what Pearlstein has to say, let me tell you what I have to say: We do, in fact, in the United States of America, entrust our government to “ordinary citizens.” In every way, “ordinary citizens” are supposed to be in charge. That means YOU (and me, too, of course). Try to picture Uncle Sam, pointing his finger your way:

Uncle Sam, the personification of American government, “Wants You!”

Self-government” is a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” to quote Abraham Lincoln, probably our greatest president. That “by” the people part is the most important. A government “by” the people is what our government is supposed to be all about.

Are we nervous about what that jury will do if (or when) our former president goes on trial? Of course we are! If “we, the people” are the government, let’s admit that we can make mistakes. Think about that election of 2016. Any mistakes there? How about slavery? What about the War in Vietnam, or the War in Iraq? Sure enough, that trial in Florida, trusting those twelve jurors, could result in another mistake.

What do you do when you make a mistake? You try to recover, as best you can, right? That’s what I do. That’s what we all need to do.

As we deal with the manifold and multiple mistakes that “we, the people” have made in the course of our long history, let’s not allow our fear about making even more mistakes to paralyze us. Winston Churchill was not an American, and “democracy” is not exactly the same thing as “self-government,” which is the phrase I like to use to describe how we do government in the United States. Still, Churchill was definitely speaking the language of self-government in this pronouncement:

No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time….

A failure to maintain our self-confidence in our own ability to govern ourselves is one of the things that is profoundly affecting our ability to deal with the challenges we face today. We do face challenges – big challenges. Dealing with a renegade former president is only one of those challenges.

Let’s not lose faith in ourselves, alright? But let’s start taking that “self-government” thing more seriously. What that “self-government” phrase means is that WE (meaning each one of us) are supposed to be directly engaged, in some way, with how we govern ourselves. We are not supposed to be waiting around for someone else to deal with the problems. We are not supposed to think “self-government” means that we get to elect the people, who hire the people, who run our lives for us.

What should we think about our system of self-government – at least as initially conceptualized? Pearlstein seems to have hit it pretty close to the mark, the way I see it.

Genius!

o o o O O O o o o

Leaving Trump’s Fate to 12 Ordinary Citizens Is Genius

June 14, 2023

By Deborah Pearlstein

Professor Pearlstein teaches at the Cardozo School of Law and is the co-director of its Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy.

Among the criminal charges the former president of the United States now faces, the most extraordinary are 31 counts of violating the Espionage Act, a century-old law prohibiting the unlawful retention of “information relating to the national defense.” Barring a guilty plea — the more common resolution in a case as strong as this — those charges will most likely eventually go before a jury.

In one sense, the indictment of Donald Trump on charges of violating the Espionage Act is just like the other cases the government has brought since the act’s adoption during World War I. The statute does not simply prohibit the retention of any document marked “classified.” It requires the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the information contained in the documents could, if disclosed, pose a threat to U.S. national security.
Whether the documents do pose such a threat is what the courts call a question of fact — meaning that as the case goes forward, this significant question of national security will rest squarely in the hands of a dozen ordinary Florida citizens. If the government doesn’t persuade them, Mr. Trump will be found not guilty.

It is hard to imagine a case that places more pressure on the functioning of the jury — or that more dramatically illustrates its unique value. The case against Mr. Trump does not just put a question of national security in the hands of the jury. It puts in its hands a case that is unprecedented, involving a former — and perhaps future — leader of the nation. The security policy stakes are high. The political stakes may be higher.

The jury system’s constitutional authority makes it, at its best, an essential check on government overreach. In a case like this, its democratic legitimacy also gives it a better chance than any other governing institution to render a judgment that can withstand the political firestorm ahead.

Leaving such a consequential judgment up to ordinary citizens may seem jarring in a political culture accustomed to assuming national security is best reserved to the most expert, most secretive corridors of military and intelligence agencies in and around Washington. Jury trials are, after all, the opposite of this. Neither juries nor judges — especially in courts outside Washington — are known for their national security expertise. And like any jurors, those in Mr. Trump’s case will bring with them their own partisan political views that might shape their interpretation of evidence. Jury decision-making is never without risk, and rarely more so than it will be here.

Jury trials are also necessarily public. The Constitution gives every defendant the right to confront the evidence against him, and for juries to have any basis for deciding the case, they generally have to see that evidence as well. This creates obvious problems when the key evidence against the defendant involves documents that the government argues should never see the light of day.

The indictment unsealed on Friday lists government records describing American nuclear and other weapons capabilities, “potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack,” and U.S. plans for potential response to a foreign attack. This information goes to the heart of the nation’s ability to defend itself. They are documents of the very highest sensitivity.

After the Sept. 11 attacks, courts became especially adept at protecting sensitive information even while sharing access to it with the defense and the jury. The Classified Information Procedures Act proved an invaluable tool, for example, in the prosecutions stemming from the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa, in which classified information, including from foreign intelligence services, was central. With the court’s approval, prosecutors presented redacted documents, drew up summaries and relied on protective orders to ensure terrorism trials did not compromise sources and methods. Juries still found enough information to assess the charges, and in many of those cases, they voted to convict.

But negotiating those accommodations, which must happen before the trial, can take time — time that in this case brings us ever closer to the 2024 election in which the defendant is now a leading candidate.

If the judge says no to compromises like summarizing key documents, the prosecution might decide that some are simply too complex or too sensitive to put at issue in the case. Of course, the more sensitive the document in Mr. Trump’s possession, the more it might tend to show that his actions put the country at risk. But the government may have to make that choice, and quickly, if it hopes to bring the case to resolution before the defendant has the chance to be elected president and appoint his own attorney general again. The jury would then be left to reach its verdict without access to what might be the government’s strongest evidence.

Despite all the challenges, the framers of the Constitution never doubted that national security crimes belonged in front of juries. The original national security crime, treason, is the only offense expressly defined in the Constitution itself, and it has involved juries in deciding, among other things, issues as complex as whether a defendant engaged in conduct that counts as giving “aid and comfort” to our enemies.

Indeed, the framers saw the jury’s role as essential. The British government had used national security charges to silence its political opponents throughout the Colonies. In this nation’s new democracy, citizen juries would stand as an essential bulwark against that kind of abuse.

Mr. Trump has not been charged with treason. But all prosecutions of this kind carry special dangers of government overreach. Ordinary citizens remain the most democratically legitimate way of stopping it in its tracks.

That fact gives the jury in this case a uniquely authoritative voice. Mr. Trump’s supporters argue vociferously that the prosecution of a current presidential candidate by an administration of the opposing party could be motivated only by politics and revenge. However unjustified, these beliefs matter. They matter because the justice system cannot function unless most Americans view it as a legitimate arbiter of social disputes.

Nothing that the current president or attorney general can say will resolve such doubts. For seeing justice done and for preserving the public’s democratic faith, the citizens of Florida are the best chance we’ve got.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
July 24

UNDERPRIVILEGED UNITARY CRUSADERS IN A SMALL TOWN

Country singer and Donald J. Trump advocate, Jason Aldean, has had a tough time recently, as he tries to explain away the backlash his current music video and song lyrics have stirred up. The Macon, Georgia native released the politically charged song in May, but with the hostile warnings in the lyrics and the video footage being performed on the steps of a Tennessee courthouse, the site of a historic lynching, his song Try That In A Small Town,’ has accusers calling it a racist dog whistle. Aldean maintains it has nothing to do with race, but the usual suspects have come to his defense…Ron DeSantis for one. Country Music Television pulled the video from its rotation because of its troubling imagery, which Aldean defends using because, “There isn’t a single video clip that isn’t real news footage.” It has been pointed out that some of the footage is gathered from around the globe. His explanation that the song is wholesome, referring to the community where he grew up, where neighbors were taken care of, regardless of differences of background or belief. His right-wing views were voiced in an interview, “When you got kids and you’re kind of seeing the future for them, it’s pretty scary. So, I think for me, just seeing that, just how everything has been the last couple of years has been pretty wild. A lot of things that I don’t agree with, and sometimes it’s kind of hard for me to sit back and not say anything.” And in the end, Jason, you didn’t really say anything worthwhile!

The Former Guy couldn’t have said it any better, Jason…whatever it is you said! John Ware writes on Quora that he used a chatbot program to analyze Trump’s vocabulary based on 200 speeches and press conferences, using none of his books because he didn’t write any of them anyway, being notorious for his non-writing skills. Even many of his Truth Social posts are ghost-written, with his own POSTS BEING EASILY IDENTIFIABLE. Ware says the average American adult can assimilate 25K to 35K words, though most people don’t use that many words in conversation or writing even though there is familiarity, but adequately incorporating around 10K words. Chatbot tallied only about 1,975 words in Trump’s speeches, with the ‘go-to’ words being adverbs and adjectives. The average American 5-year old uses 2,200 to 3,500 words in their conversations!

And, perhaps a limited vocabulary is all The Don will need as he and his base attempt to overhaul the federal government toward dictatorial powers for the future President Trump. This has been a longstanding GOP plan, and Trump has alluded to such a scenario many times, revealing his admiration for global dictators quite blatantly. Steve Bannon rants, “This is a crusade! This is a Holy War against the Deep State! Donald Trump is our instrument for retribution!” Political advisor, John McEntee, who served in the Trump Administration, says, “Our current executive branch was conceived of by liberals for the purpose of promulgating liberal policies. There is no way to make the existing structure function in a conservative manner. It’s not enough to get the personnel right. What’s necessary is a complete system overhaul.” Former Office of Management and Budget head, Russell Vought, goes further, “What we’re trying to do is identify the pockets of independence and seize them.” Can they make it any clearer that the federal government will be in complete control of one person (and his 1,975 words)? High on The Base’s list is the ability to impound Congress‘ appropriated funds, returning the money to the treasury – which would require changing a 1974 policy responding to President Nixon’s executive overreach. Trump wants more control over independent federal agencies, such as the FCC, the Federal Reserve, and in particular Civil Service for placing his loyalists. The FBI will become his ‘instrument for retribution’ to persecute his political enemies.

Former Attorney General William Barr has long been an advocate of increased presidential power, formerly being AG for a less radical President George H.W. Bush. Barr has long promoted the idea of the ‘unitary executive,’ also favored by the George W. Bush administration, where power lies with the president to make all executive branch decisions including hiring, firing and whether or not to initiate or end a criminal prosecution. Hmm…smell a rat? If Trump can somehow move this forward, elected or not, the next Republican president will gladly accept this gift of fewer checks and balances and continue to push it to the next level to consolidate one man control. Justice Antonin Scalia, another proponent of the theory, believed that Article II of the Constitution gives the president authority to control all executive action with the first line stating, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” Scalia asserted, “This does not mean SOME of the executive power, but ALL of the executive power.”

Robert Reich warns, “Make no mistake: the ‘unitary executive’ theory is thinly disguised justification for authoritarianism. If implemented, it would be a major step for the anti-democracy movement.” Reich worked in the Justice Department under AG Edward Levi to implement the 1974 policy which counteracted Nixon’s use of Justice to go after his political enemies. The new guidelines, which never actually made it into law, allowed a president to set broad policies for the department, but barred a president from involvement in specific criminal case decisions absent extraordinary circumstances, especially one with foreign policy ramifications. Should Trump be elected, at least five Supreme Court justices would have to approve; and it should be noted that in June, three justices suggested use of the ‘unitary executive’ theory to invalidate whistleblowers’ lawsuits because the president didn’t appoint them. Cue the scary music…

Robert Harrington writes on The Palmer Report that there is no insurrection charge against Trump in Prosecutor Jack Smith’s target letter to The Former Guy. It doesn’t mean that charge will be ignored, only that there is no mention, with no law requiring it, nor even requiring a target letter. Harrington is hoping that charge is made, that Trump is found guilty, making him automatically ineligible from holding any public office for the rest of his life per the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. Section 3 says, “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil for military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” Whoa! Who threw in the loophole? We can only hope that with the makeup of the Congress that never comes to pass, but The Base is salivating over that final line. We need to encourage secretaries of state, who oversee the administration of elections at the state level, to follow the law and keep Trump off the ballot should that charge, and conviction, come to pass.

Aldous J. Pennyfarthing reports that MyPillow CEO, and quasi-cognizant pornstache mannequin, Mike Lindell, is still pursuing his truth about rigged electronic voting machines. Rather than any Chinese Communist infiltration, at this point he’s only proven that Chinese weevils have infiltrated his brain, and to celebrate his steadfastness he is having a garage sale. Aldous says, “Lindell has listed more than 850 pieces of surplus MyPillow equipment on K-Bid’s online auction site for people who are on flush #14 of Donald Trump’s comprehensive 15-Flush, life-ruining regimen. Why? Because Lindell bet big on Trump, which is a little like putting your life savings on ‘cerulean 85’ at the roulette table. But hey – at least he’s got a purpose.” It has been reported that WalmartBed Bath & Beyond and Slumberland Furniture will no longer sell his products as a result of his false election claims. In a phone interview, Lindell said, “It was a massive, massive cancellation. We lost $100M from attacks by the box stores, the shopping networks, the shopping channels, all of them did cancel culture on us.” Aldous J. encourages us to check out his industrial sewing machines, a forklift, or a half-spent tube of lavender-and-knockwurst-scented mustache pomade on K-Bid.

Gotta hand it to him for persistence, however! Election results are still wrong and he is hosting yet another event, a Kookchella, next month with suggestions for new election methods. Aldous reveals, “Taking one’s pillows off the shelves for his attempt to destroy American democracy doesn’t really qualify as an ‘attack.’ Walmart eventually stopped carrying Pol Pot pies and Frosted Mussolini Wheats, too. Because it’s the responsible thing to do.” MyPillow is now relying on direct sales through TV commercials, emails, radio spots and direct mail. Due to this change, they are also subleasing some of the manufacturing space. Spin on, Mikey! Aldous J. points out, “There’s still hope for MyPillow despite the potentially apocalyptic defamation lawsuits from Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic that hang over his head like the Arby’s Roast Beef Slicer of Damocles. Guess open fascism isn’t the can’t-miss business model it used to be. Go figure.”

And can it be? Will Ginni Thomas, wife and pillow-talker to Justice Clarence Thomas finally get her day in court? Newsweek magazine reports there are calls for Virginia Thomas to face investigation  for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election results after 16 Republicans were charged in Michigan over a ‘false elector’ plot. She has been under scrutiny over her actions in the wake of the election, including sending messages to Trump Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, urging him to help overturn the election results, describing Joe Biden’s fair victory as the ‘greatest heist of our history.’ She is alleged to have sent emails to dozens of Arizona election officials and lawmakers claiming it was their ‘Constitutional duty’ to install ‘clean slate of electors’ who would be willing to declare Trump the winner in the Grand Canyon State in 2020. Thomas is said to have told the lawmakers to “stand strong in the face of political and media pressure” and falsely claimed the responsibility to choose electors was “yours and yours alone.” No comments so far from Ginni or the Judge…no one knows their whereabouts. Only Harlan Crow knows ‘where in the world are the Thomases?’

Even after the GOP’s House Freedom Caucus grew tired of her antics and ousted her from its ranks a couple of weeks ago, Marjorie Taylor Greene felt the need to further lower herself with more of her fifth-grade-level stunts by showing sexually explicit photos of Hunter Biden during a congressional hearing last week. Faces of those involved in the sex acts were obscured, but Biden’s face was visible. Those attending the House Oversight and Accountability Committee hearing which featured testimony from two IRS whistleblowers who allege that prosecutors slow-walked the investigation into President Biden’s son, were treated to Greene’s posters gleaned from the younger Biden’s laptop hard drive that Republicans have been flaunting for months now. “Before we begin, I would like to let the committee and everyone watching at home know that parental discretion is advised,” Greene warned prior to her first question. Immediately, Jamie Raskin, top Democrat on the panel asked Chairman James Comer“Should we be displaying this?” Greene claimed that Hunter had improperly charged payments from his company to prostitutes, unconfirmed by IRS whistleblower Joseph Ziegler, though he believed some deductions were for escorts, and one payment for a ‘golf membership’ actually went to a ‘sex club.’

The following day, Raskin argued that Greene had violated House Rules. “Yesterday they took us to a new low when Marjorie Taylor Greene decided for completely gratuitous reasons to show purported pornographic scenes of Hunter Biden. I mean, if that is not a violation of rules of decorum of the House, then we don’t have rules of decorum in the House,” he said. “And if those images were in a book, the Republicans would be voting to ban them. Instead, they decided to display them to the whole country in the House of Representatives.”

As might be expected, Hunter’s lawyer, Abbe David Lowell, filed an ethics complaint against Greene, requesting a review of her actions by the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), as being “abhorrent behavior that blatantly violates House Ethics rules and standards of misconduct. If the OCE takes its responsibilities seriously, it will promptly and decisively condemn Ms. Greene for her latest actions.” Lowell added, “Now more than ever, the House has a duty to make loud and clear that it does not endorse, condone, or agree with her outrageous, undignified conduct and brazen violations of the standards of official conduct that do not reflect creditably on the House of Representatives. Rather than evaluate the credibility of the IRS agents’ testimony or review our tax laws, Mr. Greene sought to use the power of her office to generate some clicks online, fundraise, and provide sensationalist clips for Fox News at the expense of harassing and embarrassing Mr. Biden, a private citizen.” According to Lowell, MTG then sent out fundraising emails to her constituents, which included a link to the video she presented to the House, likely in violation of federal law.

The OCE is a nonpartisan, independent entity established by the House, for reviewing allegations of misconduct involving lawmakers, officers and House staff, referring matters to the Ethics Committee if warranted. No comment was forthcoming from the OCE, and Greene was silent as well, as she attempts to finish reading the complete works of Jimmy Swaggart in her off-time. During the session, Greene asked questions regarding the Mann Act, which criminalizes the transport of women across state lines for prostitution, in order to further sensationalize her presentation to the committee.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis‘ glorification of the benefits of slavery which is slated for the curricula of the state’s school children, is given a satirical appraisal by The New Yorker’s Andy Borowitz: “An unskilled Florida man said that he deeply regrets having missed out on the opportunity to be a slave. The man said his ‘lack of access to enslavement’ had made his acquisition of essential skills ‘impossible.’ He argued that being barred from servitude was a form of ‘white underprivilege.’ and that Caucasians who suffer from a resulting skills deficit deserve reparations.” In reality, might we expect that to be the next GOP refrain?

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “Marathons”

“If you want to run, run a mile. If you want to experience a different life, run a marathon”.                   
~Emil Zatopek

“Running for office is similar to being a trial lawyer in a very long trial. It requires adrenaline and stamina; it requires being in shape mentally and emotionally. It’s a marathon”.
~Kamala Harris

“Life is a marathon and you have to pace yourself. I believe that slow and steady wins the race, so in that way, I’ve been training for a marathon my whole life”.     
~Carole Radziwill

...

“Just give her chocolate and wine, let her be” – this does a good job of describing, if not explaining, menopause…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 19 – 25, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…about Housing for People, movie critiques. Greensite…will be back next week. Schendledecker…will be back next week. Steinbruner…water board vacancy, Aptos Village (no monitoring), fire risks locally, plant flowers at the County Fair. Hayes…Abandon hope (BLM) Patton… politics and our community college, about Cabrillo name. Matlock…a cannonade of indictments, delays, and Melania speaks! Eagan Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…pick of the week. Quotes…”TIME”

...

SANTA CRUZ PACIFIC AVENUE 1892. We can see the very functional trolley tracks plus plenty of room for carriages, horses and pedestrians. Today you’ll see Jamba Juice on the left and Lulu Carpenters on the right.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE July 17

Donate to BrattonOnline

BrattonOnline is a work of passion, with varying contributors around the core of Bruce (obviously) and Gunilla, who have been doing this since 2003. That’s 20 years!

We don’t get paid, but there are costs associated with running a website. If you want to pitch in, we are ever so grateful!!

This button takes you to a secure donation form.

...

SECURE YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE ON HEIGHT AND HOUSING.With all the supposed state rulings and developers lies about supplying housing here in Santa Cruz I asked Keresha Durham , a Local Teacher, Climate-Environmental Activist, and Housing For People Team Member, to write a piece for us that explains the issue we are all facing regarding housing and prices here in Santa Cruz…she wrote:

What do you think of the plan to build multiple 12-story towers that will be unaffordable to most people currently living in Santa Cruz?  We are not happy about it also!  Our initiative will grant city voters the right to vote before height is increased AND will boost the affordable housing ratio to 25% in all new development.

Maybe you have seen some of our volunteers asking you to sign our local petition at the Wednesday downtown, the Saturday Westside Farmers Market or at the grocery store with the sign that says:  Secure your Right to Vote on Height and Increase Affordable Housing!  And have you wondered what is that about?

HOUSING FOR PEOPLE- NOT unaffordable luxury towers! is a group of Santa Cruz community members of all ages and backgrounds who are concerned about the multiple, unaffordable 12-story towers that the City plans to build; with 1800 units but very little affordable housing.   These towers would be DOUBLE the height of the behemoth recently built on Laurel, Front and Pacific Streets! That huge complex has 205 units that are too expensive for the majority of people who live and work here!

BUILD WITH CARE
We value thoughtful, human-scale, environmentally-sensitive city design. We think that developers should respect the current height limits that the community helped write into our General Plan over a seven-year process. If 12-story towers are built, it will set a precedent that developers can build as high as they want, wherever they want, without getting the citizens’ approval.  You better believe this unchecked-development will impact the entire county!

AFFORDABLE HOUSING CRISIS
Santa Cruz is now the most expensive place rental market in the entire U.S.  We strive to maintain our diversity by increasing available low-income housing, so family members, low and moderate wage earners, youth and elders can continue to live here. This initiative will increase the affordable housing ratio to 25% in all new development with 30 or more units.

New development in Santa Cruz, with the State’s Density Bonus, has a very small affordable (or inclusionary ratio) of 11% to 13%.  This means that new buildings provide 80% to almost 90% luxury, market-rate units, are out of reach for working residents. These units may be more second-home condos that stay empty during our housing crisis!

STATE REQUIREMENTS
The State has been requiring cities to build housing for a “variety of affordability levels” since 1969. In fact, under current zoning, the City has identified space for 8364 units, which is more than double the 3736 units Santa Cruz is required to build by 2031. We do not need to build towers to reach our State housing goals!

RIGHT TO VOTE PASSED!
Residents in Encinitas, California voted in a similar ballot measure called Prop A- Right To Vote which requires a public vote for any major zoning and density changes. In 2021, a judge in Encinitas ruled in favor of Prop A for the second time, rejecting the City’s attempt to override Prop A in its pursuit to meet state housing requirements. There are several groups throughout the state, fighting for local control and truly affordable housing, such as: Livable California-Your Voice in Sacramento, Community Catalysts for Local Control and Neighborhood Voices.

WE NEED YOU
If you want to sign our petition, donate funds or volunteer to help us get 4K signatures by October 8, please contact Housing For People-NOT unaffordable luxury towers!  www.HousingForPeople.org

Keresha Durham ~ educator, environmentalist
“care-sha”

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

MOVE TO HEAVEN. (NETFLIX SERIES) (8.5 IMDB).   A movie from South Korea that will bring tears to anyone who has had to face a death in the family. Two trauma cleaners (funeral helpers) face fear and try to deal with Asperger’s syndrome. Father and son are close in a genuine feel good heart breaking way. See it when you’re in a good mood.

CELEBRITY. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.5 IMDB) . I was reminded of Gwyneth Paltrow and her celebrity world of fashions, make-up and the struggle for publicity and fame. This film takes place in Seoul Korea and the “influencer” society. It’s flat, self-centered, and out of this world (the one we live in).

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE- DEAD RECKONING PART ONE. (DEL MAR THEATRE). (8.1 IMDB). Ethan Hunt also known to the real world as Tom Cruise says he does his own stunts in this awful waste of time movie. I’m predicting that we’ll learn later that the script was written by L.Ron Hubbard and yes Scientology does have a church here in Santa Cruz…go here to see what they’re up to now https://www.scientology.org/l-ron-hubbard/ . Yes L. Ron H. died in 1986. This Mission Implausible (7th in the series) is overloaded with CGI effects, insane acting and a huge disappointment to Mission Impossible fans. Don’t go and stop any friends or relatives from going.

MR CAR AND THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (4.4 IMDB). For all former (I’m one) and present members of DeMolay (junior Masons) this is a curious mix of the history of Jacques DeMolay and the background of the Knights Templar. This Polish movie tries to link some genuine history and an historian on the trail of truth with fable and it’s a boring mess.

THE HORROR OF DOLORES ROACH. (PRIME SERIES) (7.2 IMDB). And there are plenty of Roaches, smokeable ones in this so labeled “comedy” After being in prison for 16 years this woman succeeds and miserably fails at finding a decent life. Accidents, and foolish decisions lead her down some very dark paths including some cannibalism, Watch at your own peril.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

MARRIED TO EVIL. (MAX SERIES) (7.1 IMDB).  You’d have to become a true sadist to enjoy watching this documentary featuring true stories of killers, brutes, and sick people torturing innocent partners who love them. There is no reason to watch this crazed document except to maybe sense some similarity to someone you know!!!

SUITS. (PRIME SERIES) (8.4 IMDB).   Now we get a chance to see what Meghan Markle looks and ACTS like…and it ain’t that special. This is mostly courtroom drama back when Marijuana was still illegal. So it’s about corporate attorneys, legal picayune details, patents and a judge’s wife ad infinitum. Not worth 10 minutes except to see Meghan Markle at her cutest.

THE INITIATED. (PRIME) (7.6 IMDB).  Part of this movie takes place in the actual Kasbah and centers for a while on toxic water shortages. A journalist with some complex issues in addition to being bipolar takes on everything including lady wrestlers!!

SUSPICION. (APPLE TV) (6.2 IMDB).   There are five British citizens who get involved in a kidnapping of an American business man’s son. Did they do it or not? It’s low key, fairly dull and doesn’t even make sense at times. However there’s a murder and one of the five are totally involved…it keeps you/us guessing.

I’M A VIRGO. (PRIME SERIES) (7.3 IMDB).   I could only stand/stomach this waste of time and however they “film” things nowadays for less than 15 minutes. It’s about a young boy from Oakland who is 13 feet tall…and it gets less believable and unfunnier by the minute.

PAST LIVES. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (8.4 IMDB). A beautifully created movie about a couple who were youngsters together and close friends. They led separate lives moved continents apart then reunite. They explore and debate their similarities and likes and loves together and silently consider their chances on ever getting together again. It’s another Korean delight…as so many are lately.

MY NAME. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.8 IMDB). (also listed as “Undercover”).   Another Korean fine action film. This one is about a young woman whose gangster father gets killed. She becomes an undercover policewoman in the drug investigation department and joins the mafia trying to find the man who killed her dad.

M3GAN. (PRIME MOVIE) (6.4 IMDB). This could easily scare anyone into serious worry about the dangers of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE or AI! It’s about a toy company that made an automated animated doll named M3GAN.  M3gan looks a lot like Scarlett Johannsen. The plot soon turns into a child abuse and child custody story. Many flaws in it but it is absorbing.

THE POWER. (PRIME SERIES) (6.5 IMDB). A not too subtle pitch for a world where women have the ultimate power. That’s electric power coming from their hands. Toni Collette and John Leguizamo make an almost believable couple. Teen age girls are given this power and use it to get even with all the males including a father who has been an abuser. It’s both political and physical and for sure, it’s thought provoking.

...

July 17

Gillian will be back next week.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

JOY SCHENDLEDECKER SHARES.

July 17

Joy will be back next week.

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
July 17

APPLY FOR SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT BOARD VACANCY

You can do a great service to your Community by applying to fill a vacancy on the Soquel Creek Water District Board by Monday, July 31, and you need not feel you have to have a PhD in anything, but possess some common sense and critical thinking abilities.

If you are a ratepayer of Soquel Creek Water District, you know your water bill has jumped significantly over the past four years…9%/year in fact.  Well, hang on because the District is ramping up to initiate yet another significant rate increase because customers have done such a good job of conserving.

Someone like you needs to reel-in the Board and staff with some reality checks about the costs of operations and constantly hiring outside consultants to do work the District is actually paying hefty monthly bonuses to for as long as the PureWater Soquel Project construction drags on.  The Board had initially discussed financial “off-ramps” for this Project but never followed through with any real examination of the situation that has now become a runaway financial hemorrhage.

2023 Board Vacancy

Please share this with anyone you know who would consider signing up to fill this job for two years, when the seat officially comes up for re-election.  Ratepayers should have a voice in this, and not be held at the mercy of those Directors who have chosen to rubberstamp staff recommendations without any real questioning.

APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT PHASE 2…THERE WERE NO NATIVE AMERICAN OBSERVERS PRESENT DURING MASSIVE EXCAVATION WORK

Excavation work  has begun in Swenson’s the Phase 2 area of the Aptos Village Project, but there did not appear to be any Native American observers there to monitor the earth disturbances in this State-registered SCF-CA-222/H archaeologic site, even though it is a condition the County required when issuing the permit.

I phoned the Durden subcontractor to ask about whether there was an observer on site.  Durden management familiar with the Project knew nothing of the requirement.  “That’s up to Swenson, we’re just the subcontractor.”  he said.  Uh-oh.

I let the man (“Louie”) know that when Soquel Creek Water District trenched through the archaeologic site in 2018, two Native American observers were at the toe of the excavation at all times.  The only person I had seen last week was a Durden worker spraying water from a tank truck for dust control.    Louie said he would contact Swenson.

The next day when I drove past the construction site, one guy was standing at a table at the edge of the construction site.  Was that Swenson’s archaeologic “observer”?  If so, chances of spotting any sensitive artifacts or remains are null.  He wasn’t even using binoculars….hmmmm…

If this bothers you, please contact Swenson and ask where the Native American or archaeologic observer is stationed during the excavation work at the Phase 2 Aptos Village Project.  831-475-7100 and contact County Code Compliance (the APN for the site is 041-011-58) Code Complaint Form

WILL SWENSON PAY FOR WATER FOR DUST CONTROL IN APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION THIS TIME?

One difference that’s very visible as the Phase 2 Aptos Village Project construction starts up is the presence of a large bulk water tank on site along Aptos Creek Road.   Nothing of the sort was ever seen in Phase 1 construction.

Do you want to know why?

It was because Swenson was getting free water from an illegal unmetered water connection on Granite Way, near the Phase 1 development. An observant resident near the construction site reported the matter to Soquel Creek Water District as soon as he saw Swenson’s construction crew using long  hoses connected to the illegal hookup to spray water for dust control.  (See the Correspondence on page 206 of the August 15, 2017 District Board agenda

You can listen to Mr. Stumbaugh’s effort at the meeting to get answers to his query  at about minute 2:23

I had also reported this “irregular” connection to the District in July, 2017, but the District took no action  (see pages 59-61)

Soquel Creek Water District management did nothing for many months.   The connection got hidden further by concrete and pieces of broken pipe that could have convinced some that the connection had been destroyed, except that the construction crew continued to connect a hose for more free water needed at the Phase 1 construction site.

Staff did acknowledge there was a service connection and that “a customer” had paid a water demand offset fee for service nearby.  That could have been one of the Aptos Village Project developers, Pete Testorff, who demolished an historic house built in 1906 on Granite Way and built two large homes on the site, just across the road from this “irregular” connection that provided the free unmetered water to Swenson’s crews.

Finally, after many, many months, there appeared a large pond of water at the irregular connection that could no longer hide what was happening and was a big waste of water. The District’s General Manager, Ron Duncan, responded to my report of this leak that someone had struck a fire hydrant there, causing the leak.  However, there never was a fire hydrant.  Hmmm….

Well, the question now is this: who is paying to fill up that large yellow water tank for Swenson’s Phase 2 construction in the Aptos Village Project?

LEARN ABOUT LIVING WITH FIRE WITH UPDATED INFORMATION

Here is excellent information for all rural residents in Santa Cruz County to help with fire risk reduction and planning what to do in case a wildland fire happens.

Through recent grants with the California Fire Safe Council and CalFire, the RCD worked with Cal Fire, Fire Safe Council, and a template from the Burn Institute to update our Santa Cruz County Living with Wildfire Guide. It includes a brief overview of wildfire behavior and things individuals; neighborhoods and communities can do to prepare for wildfire.

Here is the link to the web version

Please share this with others.  The next Santa Cruz County FireSafe Council meeting will be July 20, 10am-noon, via Zoom:

www.firesafesantacruz.org

HELP PLANT FLOWERS AT THE COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS

The Santa Cruz County Fair is just around the corner (September 13-17) and it’s time to plant the flowers there that help make it a beautiful place.  For the first time in many years, the public is being asked to come help with the planting.  Please join the fun on Thursday, July 27 at 4pm.  The Fairgrounds Foundation will provide a hotdog BBQ dinner at 6:30pm Please RSVP

If you are interested in volunteering, contact the Foundation office at (831) 786-9698 or at support@fairgrounds-foundation.org.

OH SAY, CAN YOU SEE?  FREE VISION AND HEARING TESTING IN APTOS

The Cabrillo Host Lions Club will provide free vision and hearing testing on Saturday, August 12 in the brand new A.J. Robinson mobile unit, 8:30am-3pm.  The trailer will be parked at the entrance to Aptos Village Park (100 Aptos Creek Road).  The Lions can provide applications for assistance for those who need glasses but cannot afford them.

The Lions MidSummer Market will also be occurring in the Park, 8:30am-3:30pm, with many vendors selling plants, tools, automobile memorabilia, jewelry and wooden toys.  The Aptos High Leos will be selling BBQ tri-tip sandwiches.  Admission is free.

Vendor space is $35 with limited spaces still available.  For information about the Market, please call Barbara 831-688-3356.

For further information about the free vision and hearing testing, please contact Becky 831-685-2915.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.

JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
July 17

ABANDON HOPE

Pema Chodron suggests we put the statement “Abandon Hope” on our refrigerator doors as a reminder. She shares the teaching that hope and fear are two sides of the same coin and reflect feelings that we lack something essential. I sense that those of us who care about the Monterey Bay’s environment are unnecessarily burdened by a philosophy of resource limitation, of lacking what we need.

Presidential Hope

You may recall that “HOPE” was the meme used in Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. When Sarah Palin ridiculed that slogan with ‘How’s that hopey-changey thing working out for ya?‘ it turned my stomach. More than a decade later, it is ironic that the political left wing uses similar ridicule for the ‘thoughts and prayers’ refrain used after mass shootings.

Obama once emphasized the ‘reality’ of his ‘Hope’ slogan by saying, “Over the past 2 and a half years, the hope poster starts fading. But I tell you what, you travel around the country and talk to the American people, that spirit’s still there.” According to the wisdom of Chodron, Obama was reinforcing the widespread notion of powerlessness. In dealing with environmental issues locally, I see clearly what Obama meant. The feeling of hope is a terrible affliction around the Monterey Bay.

Thoughts and Prayers

As each new environmental battle unfolds around us, as too few of my community does anything to help, I keep hearing the response: ‘Thoughts and Prayers!’ When UCSC moves forward with bulldozing Santa Cruz’ iconic East Meadow, folks who claim to care for the environment seem to be saying, ‘Thoughts and Prayers!’ As the Bureau of Land Management plows ahead with slipshod management of Santa Cruz County’s only part of the California Coastal Monument, people seem to be saying, ‘Thoughts and Prayers!’ As the Coastal Commission pushes maximum public access on every beach and coastal open space despite dwindling wildlife impacted by poorly managed recreation, the refrain ‘Thoughts and Prayers!’ seems to emanate from so many beatifically smiling, caring people who ‘Love Our Coast!’

Louder Paralysis

Action is louder than words, but what prevents action? The most common response I get from folks who are so full of hope but don’t do anything for our local environmental crises is that they don’t have time. To be sure, the bills need paying and we are all So Very Busy. “How are you doing?” someone asks. The reply so frequently is “Busy!” to the point of being funny (peculiar). When the conversation runs longer and one of the many environmental plights gets discussed, the conversation ends when the ‘hope’ word gets trotted out: “I hope it turns out well!”

Seeding Confusion

Greed lies at the root of all seven deadly sins, and that greed is working well with cultivating confusion across the world, resulting in environmental degradation. Let’s examine how each of the following statements has been used to sow confusion in our community. “UCSC needs to house more of its students!” “Cotoni Coast Dairies should be open to the public!” “Our beaches should be for everyone to enjoy!”

Thoughtful, pro-environmental Monterey Bay citizens want to better understand situations before taking action, even if that action is speaking out, talking to their friends or workmates, or voting for the right candidate. To them, they lack the time…they say that having enough understanding costs time, and they don’t have that time. Time is lacking! Maybe the only thing to do is to hope for the best!

There is Enough Time

We don’t have to know more to be engaged citizens and there is enough time to act now. It takes a fraction of a fraction of a second for your neurons to arrive at your personal most pressing question about environmental conservation in the Monterey Bay area. It takes a similarly miniscule amount of time to place that question on your mental checklist of cherished treasures. With those two in place, you will find the moment to ask that question until you arrive at a well-informed conclusion. Asking the questions, sharing your conclusions: you will not notice the time that it takes to do these. These are the easiest, essential actions that go beyond the empty, lacking things notion of ‘hope.’

Working Together, We Are Successful

The list of accomplishments is long: Lighthouse Field, Gray Whale Ranch, Wilder Ranch, Cotoni Coast Dairies, Upper UCSC Campus, the Glenwood Preserve, Arana Gulch, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, State Parks Ecologist positions, City Parks lands managers, pesticide bans…None of those would have taken place by hope alone. We have resources. Our community is strong and capable. There is no need for hope, but there is a need for action. Local history shows that when we take action, we can do great things. When we don’t take action, priceless environmental resources are lost. Already, there are no more breeding local badgers, burrowing owls, or roadrunners. Santa Cruz kangaroo rat, Santa Cruz tarplant, Ohlone tiger beetle, and Point Reyes Horkelia, are slipping towards extinction (on our watch!).

Start by Asking

Last week, I urged readers to write an email to California Bureau of Land Management’s Director Karen Mouritsen and to cc me for my records. I got nothing. Nada. Not one. But, as usual, I heard praise from many people about my writing. I am compassionate about the root of people’s “hope” – that it seems we lack time, understanding, or focus.

I want to cultivate curiosity and see where that leads. What does this political cartoon make you wonder about? Why not ask? I know enough not to hope; I know that, together, we are making a difference. Thanks to Friends of the North Coast!

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#198 / “Politics” And Our Community College

This blog posting is to comment on the “politics” of current efforts to rename Cabrillo College, which is located in Santa Cruz County, California. I think it is fair to say that there is no governmental institution in Santa Cruz County that has had – at least in the past – broader or more dedicated community support.

The name “Cabrillo College,” however, as revered as the school may have been in the past – and Cabrillo College, with its current name, has been revered – is now officially slated for the discard pile.

The Cabrillo College Board of Trustees has voted to change the name, on the basis that the college was named for Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, who was a disreputable person, embodying the worst characteristics of racism and colonial oppression, and whose name should not be celebrated or perpetuated in any way. No “new” name has been decided upon by the Board, as yet, so this is an example of the Board knowing what it doesn’t like, more than what it does like, but the Board’s current plan is to pick some new name, and to do so in August, just a few weeks from now.

SLIGHT DETOUR: The name “Cabrillo College” was chosen in 1959. On the college website, there is a kind of funny reference to the name chosen for the college, and while this humorous reference has nothing, really, to do with the subject of today’s blog posting, I just can’t pass up the opportunity to share it. Until I started writing my thoughts on the “name change” controversy, I had never seen the historic photo displayed below, which is the funny reference I just mentioned.

In Spanish, “Cabrio” is pronounced pretty much the same way that “Cabrillo” is pronounced. “Cabrio” refers (in Spanish) to a convertible car. “Cabrillo,” of course, as already indicated, is a reference to the name of Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, a Spanish explorer for whom the college was, presumably, named. It tickles me that someone, way back when, was already making a joke about the college’s name – and such a good-humored joke, too.

I say that Cabrillo College was “presumably” named for Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo because some seem to believe that the college might actually have been named not for the explorer, but for the section of Highway One that links the two biggest cities in the county, and that bears his name. I wasn’t around in 1959, but I understand that there was quite a bit of competition between Santa Cruz and Watsonville, and that this competition was a significant factor in deciding whether or not to establish a new community college in Santa Cruz County. Where such a college should be located, and what it should be named, were items of significant controversy. As it turns out, the college was ultimately located more or less in the middle, between the cities of Santa Cruz and Watsonville – and along the Cabrillo Highway. The name and the location chosen, in other words, were ways of bringing the community together. The words “Santa Cruz” were not incorporated into the name of the college, which was one proposal on the table, and making sure that the college didn’t tilt towards “Santa Cruz” seems to have been key, in picking a name that could unite the entire community.

At any rate, back in the 1950’s, as these naming and location issues were being debated, it was not inevitable that Santa Cruz County would ever have a local Community College.  Cabrillo was founded “as part of an ambitious higher education plan for Santa Cruz County. Along with UC Santa Cruz, Cabrillo was part of a broad vision to bring post-secondary education into the area.” I am quoting the Cabrillo College website for this history. Let me also quote what the current Cabrillo College website has to say about Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, giving some support to the idea that the college was named for the highway, as much as for the explorer:

Cabrillo College derives its name from the 16th Century explorer Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, an expedition leader who visited several prominent locations on the California Coast in the service of Spain in 1542. Cabrillo’s voyage included stops in San Diego Bay and Monterey Bay. The college sits on the homeland of the indigenous Awaswas and Mutsun communities who were taken by force to Missions Santa Cruz and San Juan Bautista during the Spanish colonization of the Monterey Bay region. Today, their descendants form the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, and they maintain close ties to this land. The college was named during an era when colonizers and their stories were commemorated and valued above those of indigenous peoples. For example, in 1935, the state legislature designated September 28 as “Cabrillo Day” to provide an annual recognition of Cabrillo’s exploration of the California coast. Similarly, portions of State Route 1 are identified as part of the “Cabrillo Highway.” The college was named not long after that state highway designation, resulting in the title Cabrillo College.

The National Parks Service has a rather more “upbeat” description of Cabrillo (the explorer), which you can read by clicking that link. The Parks Service mostly glosses over all the bad parts of Cabrillo’s history, but ignoring the bad parts is simply not acceptable to a majority of the current members of the college’s Board of Trustees.

As I understand the Board’s plans, the Board is proposing to vote on a new name sometime next month. In the meantime, the “Letters To The Editor” column in the Santa Cruz Sentinel continues to be barraged with statements both for and against changing the “Cabrillo” name. In all fairness, most letters have been in favor of retaining “Cabrillo College” as the name of the college, and it appears to me that the majority is strongly against any name change. However, who knows? I certainly could be wrong about that! There are plenty of good reasons to replace the “Cabrillo” name – as well as lots of good reasons not to do so.

Sandy Lydon, a longtime and beloved Cabrillo College history teacher, has weighed into the debate on the proposed name change with two recent columns in the Santa Cruz Sentinel. In Part I of his commentary, Lydon confesses to have been “blindsided” by the Board’s vote to change the name, which came on November 14, 2022, before any broad-based community discussion took place:

I felt blindsided by not only the decision, but also the way it was justified. After earlier offering community members a chance to express their opinion (which resulted in a majority stating their wish that the name not be changed) the board dismissed that result as coming from “older persons” and voted 6-1 to change the name.

The trustees justified their votes as something that “other colleges” were doing. Besides, they said, “majorities aren’t always right.” Maybe not, but using ageism (“older persons”) to combat racism is just flat-out wrong. And I was further saddened by hearing Trustees declare that they felt “ashamed” to be associated with the college.

In Part II of his commentary in the Sentinel, Lydon expanded on his concerns about the proposal to replace the Cabrillo College name, as follows:

An Open Letter to the Cabrillo College Board of Trustees and President Matt Wetstein:

The Five Names.

I was disappointed with the five names the committee is trolling around the county. They have the overall feeling of being developed by a committee, which, of course, they are. Committee processes winnow. In fact that’s exactly the way it was described – several hundred submitted names being winnowed down to five with all personalities and edges removed by the process. Like cheese.

Interestingly, in direct defiance of the rules you instituted, 20% of the submissions suggested keeping Cabrillo. Imagine the result if Cabrillo had been permitted?

In the public sessions I attended, most personal choices were prefaced by the phrase, “Well, if we MUST replace the present name, then, I pick …”

None of the five winnowed names have even a hint of the breadth, reach and yes, diversity of the college district. One name in particular (Santa Cruz Coast), reflects an insensitivity to the rivalry between Santa Cruz and the Pajaro Valley.

Lydon, in other words, clearly speaking for many (and quite possibility the majority), does not support changing the name of Cabrillo College, and he certainly does not support any change of name on the current timetable and in the manner in which this proposed name change is being accomplished.

“Politics”

This brings me to the main point of my blog posting today, which is the “politics” of the proposed “name change.”

I was, for twenty years, a local elected official in Santa Cruz County, and I like to think I have a pretty good idea of “politics,” both with respect to what “politics” is supposed to be about, and with respect to how a healthy “politics” operates in real life. Frankly, as I have been observing how the Cabrillo College name change issue has been playing itself out, I am puzzled by how the Cabrillo College Board of Trustees is conducting that “name change” process. Members of the Board appear to be proceeding in a way that is directly opposite to the way I think a healthy “politics” is actually supposed to work.

For me, “politics” is a category that applies at the “community” level. “Politics” is the mechanism by which a community makes community-level decisions. Although we are all individuals, and each one of us has individual ideas about what is “good,” and “bad,” and about what should happen in our community, elected officials do not, generally, understand that their assignment is to do what they, individually, might think is best. They are elected, specifically, to “represent” the people to whom they are accountable, and most elected officials recognize that this is their basic obligation as an elected official.

We live, in other words, in a “representative” democracy, and the idea is that we will elect people to “represent” us. Those who are elected are supposed to be trying to do what those whom they represent would like to have done.

This is a cardinal political rule, in the way I think of “politics.” Elected officials should always be trying to do what the majority of the people they represent want them to do. Elected officials, in other words, are not expected to pursue and attempt to impose their own, personal, opinion if the community has a completely different preference. This is all the more true when lots of people really care about an issue upon which the elected officials must decide.

Of course, an elected official CAN ignore what the people who elected that representative want to see happen, and they CAN vote against what the people they represent would like them to do. Moreover, on lots of issues, most people in the community really don’t much care, which means that elected officials have a broad ability to exercise their individual, personal judgment.

However, when people DO care, an elected official who acts against what is wanted by a majority should expect to lose the next election, because the job of an elected official is to “represent” the voters to whom the elected representative is responsible. In fact, losing one’s next election is, perhaps, a “best case” scenario from the elected official’s point of view. The “worst case” scenario, for the elected official who decides to put the representative’s personal preference against the preference of the people he or she represents, is that the official should expect to be recalled and removed from office immediately.

Given this understanding of how “politics” works, it should be clear why I am puzzled by what I see happening in this Cabrillo College “name change” process.

At the start, changing the name of “Cabrillo College” to something else was not an issue about which lots of people were thinking. Now, though, lots of people are paying attention, and many feel, like Sandy Lydon, that the proposal to change the name of “their college” has “blindsided” them. In that situation, my idea of how “politics” works is that when this became obvious, members of the Cabrillo College Board of Trustees should have taken steps to make sure they really know what the people they represent want them to do. The few outreach meetings held don’t really give that kind of guidance.

Whatever got the “name change” process started, and despite what I am sure is significant support for the proposed name change, it has become clear, during the course of the process, that there is a LOT of community opposition to the proposal to change the name of “Cabrillo College.” Given that, making the wrong decision – going against what the majority of the community wants – can do real damage to the college. Many local residents, in fact, think that a “name change” is actually taking away something that belongs to them – something they worked hard for. “I got my degree from Cabrillo” is, in a very real way, an asset of value to thousands of Cabrillo graduates.

Given this, the thing I would expect from an elected representative is that the elected representative would take steps, before taking any final vote, to make sure that the representative knows what the majority of the people that the elected official represents actually want that representative to do.

This is NOT what a majority of those who serve on the elected Board of Trustees has done – and that is what is surprising to me.

There are some pretty good arguments on “both sides” of the “name change” proposal. My impression, as I have already said, is that the majority don’t want to change the Cabrillo College name, but I don’t actually know that – and I don’t think anyone else (including the elected members of the Board of Trustees) knows that either.

In such a circumstance, the right thing to do, “politically,” is for the Board of Trustees to let the community vote – either to provide “advice” to the elected representatives who are supposed to be trying to do what the community wants, or actually to make the decision, as a community, that the Board of Trustees has already made in the name of the community, i.e., that the name “Cabrillo College” will be stricken from the books.

If the Board of Trustees doesn’t take that approach – if they don’t take steps to get a truly “representative” vote on the “name change” issue (and IF members of the public care as much as they appear to), those Members of the Board who are planning to change the name of the college in August should get ready for a recall election (worst case) or losing their reelection campaign next time around.

For what it’s worth, my “political” advice is that the Board of Trustees should put the name change to a vote of the community. In case you want to communicate with the Board Members, here’s a list:

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
July 17

A CANNONADE OF INDICTMENTS, DELAYS, AND MELANIA SPEAKS!

“Defendants claim that this court could not select an impartial jury until after the presidential election does not justify further delay here.” And with that assertion, Prosecutor Jack Smith slices through the Trump defense team’s attempt to delay any immediate court action against Benedict Donald before Judge Aileen Cannon. Smith goes on to say, “Our Jury system relies on the Court’s authority to craft a thorough and effective jury selection process and on prospective jurors’ ability and willingness to decide cases based on the evidence presented to them, guided by legal instructions from the court. The demands of the defendant’s professional schedules do not provide a basis to delay the trial in this case. Many indicted defendants have demanding jobs that require a considerable amount of their time and energy, or a significant amount of travel. The Speedy Trial Act contemplates no such factor as a basis for a continuance, and the court should not indulge it here.” At this point (Monday, 7-17) Judge Cannon has made no decision about the delaying tactic which would allow Trump to continue with his so-called presidential campaign; but legal analyst Glenn Kirschner believes that even with her questionable impartiality, it’s not time to lose faith in the justice system. “I’m not prepared to say she’s going to give in to Donald Trump’s demands,” Kirschner says, “but if she does, I think it might inspire the prosecutors to file a motion to have her removed from the case. That’s what I’m hoping for and almost expecting.”

Prosecutors and Trump’s legal team were scheduled for a first appearance before Judge Cannon this past Tuesday, in Fort Pierce, FL, to set the procedure for handling classified materials and pretrial motions, and possibly, to consider the pending motion to reschedule the trial date…post-election, if Trump gets his druthers. On Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures, Trump laid it on thick, saying about Judge Cannon, “I know she’s a very highly respected judge. A very smart judge and a very strong judge. She is very smart, very strong, and loves our country. We need judges that love our country so they can do the right thing.” The hearing was not public because of the issues under discussion…at least until The Don starts his blathering campaign on Truth Social about whether his “strong judge” is still likable, and despite his legal team’s attempts to rein in his commentary of derogation and threats toward the law and his prosecutors.

Trump’s lawyers filed the injunction with Cannon requesting an indefinite postponement of his stolen documents trial since, “Trump can’t get a fair trial because they will never be able to ‘seat an impartial jury because of pretrial publicity and an inflamed community atmosphere.” Robert Harrington writes in The Palmer Report, “Donald Trump has metaphorically just crapped on someone’s porch and rang the doorbell asking for toilet paper. He’s spent years on his crappy, third rate, failing social media platform, ‘Truth Social,’ inflaming the public. Now that they are duly inflamed he is using it as an excuse to avoid responsibility for his own criminal behavior. This is what Trump means when he says he loves the poorly educated. His fans are simply too ignorant or their brains are of insufficient wattage to understand the hypocrisy of what he’s done here. He’s submitted a court filing asking for a delay in a trial because of public inflammation of his own doing. And with a judge like Aileen Cannon, he just might get it.” Let’s hope Jack Smith’s knowledge of the law and his comments headed her off at the pass last Tuesday on a decision about her favorite sociopath!

One issue on which The Don is being given some latitude, is the public name calling he has heaped upon Jack Smith, insulting him as ‘deranged,’ a ‘psycho,’ and a ‘crackhead.’ Neither Smith nor Judge Cannon has shown any interest in tamping down these diatribes the Former Guy hurls at his perceived enemies as he encourages his goony right-wing extremist base to intensify the harassment and online threats. Randall Eliason, a former federal prosecutor, now at George Washington University believes his comments are quite serious, saying, “I think it’s complicated for free speech reasons, but this is getting pretty close to the line.” California attorney Ken White, another former federal prosecutor, comments, “These are the kind of comments that might provoke some judges to issue a gag order,” as he cites the case of Trump confidant, Roger Stone who in 2019 was ordered to ‘knock off the online middle-school behavior’ that might influence potential jurors. White believes judge and prosecutor may choose to ignore the issue, viewing it as a Trump provocation at starting yet another legal battle, portraying himself as a victim of government abuse and censorship…yet another path to grifting off his poorly educated base. Bruce Rogow, who represented Stone in his 2019 trial says gag orders are an ‘extraordinary’ step, one not merited in Trump’s situation, and has doubts that anything the Orange Crybaby says at this stage is likely to influence a jury. Candidate Trump’s comments must be shrugged off to reduce any further publicity for him…which his campaign would thrive on…so, as tempting as a gag order might be, the bait should be ignored. Only if Trump begins to mention witnesses or evidence, and in particular, evidence that has been ruled inadmissible at trial, or if he makes factual-sounding statements, true or not, should a gag order be issued.

In a related vein, Abbe Lowell, an attorney for Hunter Biden sent a cease-and-desist letter to ex-POTUS Wrecks, claiming that his rhetoric on social media, and interview commentary, “could lead to [Hunter Biden’s] or his family’s injury.” Lowell cited past examples when Trump’s words allegedly motivated violence, most notable being the J6 insurrection on the Capitol, the attack on Paul Pelosi, and the Obama neighborhood interloper who showed up with a carload of weaponry. “This is not a false alarm,” Lowell wrote. “We are just one such social message away from another incident…Mr. Trump’s words have caused harm in the past and threaten to do so again if he does not stop.” Attorney Lowell isn’t looking for a response from the Trump team, but wishes them to understand that “his incitement can further hurt people and cause himself even more legal trouble.” And, even more legal trouble is already peeking over the horizon in Jack Smith’s classified documents investigation, with the possibility of more indictments being issued to Mar-a-Lago employees. We can’t forget the January 6th probe, about which we just learned that son-in-law, Jared Kushner, testified several weeks ago, an indication that the endgame may be near as the biggies are finally coming out of the woodwork. Georgia’s Fulton County DA, Fani Willis, still seems to be on track in her previously announced August timetable, with two grand juries on the case. Trump’s appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court to have Willis removed from the case and evidence destroyed has fallen on deaf ears, so his desperation is an exercise in futility. This Clockwork Orange has so many moving parts already, with more to come, that Trump’s legal team won’t be able to take the onslaught.

So, as we enter the second stage of the Trump Takedown, he is casting a blind eye to what should be evident, but he pretends to absolutely LOVE being indicted. Borrowing a comment from Adam Schiff after he was censored by House Republicans when he said he was “proud” of his new standing, Trump wrote on his social media site that he took his indictments as an “honor.” “Getting indicted and arrested by the sick government of this country would be my great honor. I am doing it for our country.” As Bocha Blue writes on The Palmer Report, “Trump isn’t running for anything. He isn’t even running a campaign. Where are the rallies? When do we see him care about anything? I see no platform, just ranting on Truth Social. Donald Trump has given up. Trump is fighting for nothing. He seems tired and irritated, and bored.” But, just imagine! He is doing it for you! Any face saving attempt at bravery won’t cut it, Donny Boy…we know you must be terrified!

In a revised financial filing covering much of his post-presidency earnings, Trump revealed new information about approximately $1B earned from foreign ventures, speaking fees and a Florida golf course. A previously released disclosure in April provided broad ranges of income from each source, but this revision’s new details tally over $1.2B according to the Washington Post. His speaking fees brought in over $4.5M, and Melania(!) earned $1.2M from purported speaking fees, part being from a super PAC in December 2021. The now-defunct committee did not specifically disclose the payments to her, but disguised two different payments paid to Melania’s reps at Designer’s Management Agency with the PAC categorizing the two payouts as fees for ‘event planning and consulting.’ Neither the Trump campaign nor ex-Florida AG, Pam Bondi, and former chairperson responded to The New York Times when asked to comment, though it was concluded Melania was paid to show up at a fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago. Trump earns income by renting out the club for groups to hold events, and the super PAC in question paid more than $350K for use of Mar-a-Lago in ’21 and ’22. The new financial disclosure shows Melania taking in $250K from the conservative LGBTQ+ group known as the Log Cabin Republicans in 2022, and another $250K from the Richard Grenell group, Fix California, an election integrity and voter engagement organization hot on the heels to defeat California Democrats.

One outstanding revision to Trump’s filing shows that instead of earning $201 at a golf resort in Ireland, he actually received $6.2M. Another example shows one previously reported estimate’s range of $1,001 to $2,500 actually amounted to $2,873…this on a New York Central Park carousel. The paparazzi are dying to catch the Orange Toddler on one of his sneaky midnight rides as he reaches for the golden ring. Another substantial revision from his April filing, has income from his Florida Doral resort zooming from around $5M to $159M. It must be difficult for him to remember into which filing box he shoved those checks and cash!

The financial report is required under guidelines from the Office of Government Ethics, which must be filed by a presidential candidate within 30 days of becoming a candidate and on or before May 15 of each year of candidacy. Trump received two extensions, and filed his initial report on April 14, covering part of 2021, all of 2022, with one reference to 2023 showing a payment of $100K. His new filing reports three sources of income over $100M, including $284M from the sale of Trump International Hotel in DC, $259M from his Miami golf resort and $199M across four partnerships with Hudson Waterfront Associates. A disappointing return was reported on the Trump Media & Technology Group, which manages the Truth Social network, receiving only $1.2M in ad revenue. Trump’s early braggadocio about TS replacing Twitter and other rivals must be quite embarrassing to him. In late 2021, the media company planned to merge with a special purpose acquisition company, promising a company valuation up to $1.7B, but that stalled in the face of a federal investigation, with Trump now claiming an evaluation of less than $25M.

In December, 2021, both Donald and Melania appeared at the same event, for which he was paid $900,300, she being paid $250K. The pre-publicity for the occasion, reported by the New York Daily News, indicated the Former Guy was “set to pose for 90 photos with guests” at $10K per shot. Don Fox, the former general counsel and acting head of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), said this type of filing is essential for voters to examine before the election. “It all comes back to the integrity of the executive branch and confidence that the person holding executive branch office is conducting the people’s business, not personal business. As a president is subject to conflict-of-interest laws, the only real remedy for dealing with potential conflicts is complete transparency.” Jordan Libowitz, spokesman for the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, applauded OGE for pushing for more detailed information, saying, “It is crucial for voters to understand potential conflicts of interest. When we have exact numbers, you get a much better look of seeing what his actual net worth is, and where potential conflicts of interest exist. We haven’t had a president making millions of dollars from overseas business before. These disclosures show exactly where the money is pouring in, and that’s something Americans need to know.” Wait a minute guys! Are we talking about the same grifter who ran in 2016? Where were you then…and what happened? Does anyone feel that the last six or seven years counted for nothing and have been cast aside? Transparency, indeed!

You’re probably asking, “Just how bad does a Republican have to be for the rest of the party to attempt to show what’s right?” This warning must be heeded: Appearance of new ethical standards still do not apply to Donald Trump, who may cause headaches, nausea, prolonged rage, gingivitis, and bed sores. If your Donald Trump lasts more than four years, see your doctor!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

“Quotes”

“The most precious resource we all have is time.”
~Steve Jobs

“Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.” 
~Anthony G. Oettinger

“Time is the longest distance between two places.”
~Tennessee Williams

...

I have always liked the idea of beads made out of paper, but haven’t quite liked the way they look. Well, turns out there’s a solution to that! Here it is, go make yourself some beads! 🙂


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 12 – 18, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…Keeley, Portugal and Joao Rodrigues Cabrilho, Alyce Vestal/Caudill’s gone, movie critiques. Greensite…will be back next week. Schendledecker…will be back next week. Steinbruner…carcinogens in our water, county housing project over view, passenger rail services and RTC. Hayes…BLM and managing the Cotoni Coast Dairies territory. Patton…The DeSantis Doctrine: A Petulant Politics. Matlock…FAKE QUOTES, KLANNED KARENHOOD, AND YOKELRY. Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress… does some pyrotechnics Quotes…”The Pope”

...

CONSTRUCTION OF OUR NEW SANTA CRUZ COUNTY COURTHOUSE. This was June 30, 1965. It also shows the Civic auditorium, the Octagon, McHugh Bianchi’s and the almost empty parking lot where Trader Joes, CVS, and Fed Ex would build.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE July 10

PORTUGAL, JOAO CABRILHO, AND FRED KEELEY. Books, documents and historians and especially Portuguese believe that famed explorer Joao Rodrigues Cabrilho was born and raised in Portugal probably near Lisbon. The newly late Rob Edwards of Cabrillo College loaned me a book years ago about Cabrilho being Portuguese. Check out this link. I thought that since Mayor Fred Keeley is going to Portugal he could use his political muscle in Lisbon, do a little research and uncover the true story for the rest of us. Then we would probably have to change the college name again.

ALYCE VESTAL CAUDILL’S GONE. Alyce (Holland) Vestal died Friday July 7. She was a force to be reckoned with and gave a lot to our community. As it says in the Cabrillo Music Festival histories…”Along with Hughes, Ted Toews, Alice Vestal and Gene Hambleton, Lou Harrison was a part of the nucleus group that helped shape the expansion of the Sticky Wicket …” which developed rapidly at Cabrillo College. Not only did Alyce have a beautiful singing voice and performed at The Carmel Bach Festival but she was a fine artist too. She won many prizes and awards for her paintings of special houses and Maxfield Parrish style dreamscapes too. She was married to Sam Vestal photographer for many years at the Register Pajaronian and was the subject of numerous bathing suit poses. For her winning the title of Miss Watsonville in 1954 was very exciting and she used that image and reputation for the rest of her life. She was and is, an inspiration for all of us.

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

MARRIED TO EVIL. (MAX SERIES) (7.1 IMDB). You’d have to become a true sadist to enjoy watching this documentary featuring true stories of killers, brutes, and sick people torturing innocent partners who love them. There is no reason to watch this crazed document except to maybe sense some similarity to someone you know!!!

SUITS. (PRIME SERIES) (8.4 IMDB). Now we get a chance to see what Meghan Markle looks and ACTS like…and it ain’t that special. This is mostly courtroom drama back when Marijuana was still illegal. So it’s about corporate attorneys, legal picayune details, patents and a judge’s wife ad infinitum. Not worth 10 minutes except to see Meghan Markle at her cutest.

THE INITIATED. (PRIME) (7.6 IMDB). Part of this movie takes place in the actual Kasbah and centers for a while on toxic water shortages. A journalist with some complex issues in addition to being bipolar takes on everything including lady wrestlers

SUSPICION. (APPLE TV) (6.2 IMDB). There are five British citizens who get involved in a kidnapping of an American business man’s son. Did they do it or not? It’s low key, fairly dull and doesn’t even make sense at times. However there’s a murder and one of the five are totally involved…it keeps you/us guessing.

I’M A VIRGO. (PRIME SERIES) (7.3 IMDB). I could only stand/stomach this waste of time and however they “film” things nowadays for less than 15 minutes. It’s about a young boy from Oakland who is 13 feet tall…and it gets less believable and unfunnier by the minute.

PAST LIVES. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (8.4 IMDB). A beautifully created movie about a couple who were youngsters together and close friends. They led separate lives moved continents apart then reunite. They explore and debate their similarities and likes and loves together and silently consider their chances on ever getting together again. It’s another Korean delight…as so many are lately.

MY NAME. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.8 IMDB). (also listed as “Undercover”).  Another Korean fine action film. This one is about a young woman whose gangster father gets killed. She becomes an undercover policewoman in the drug investigation department and joins the mafia trying to find the man who killed her dad.

M3GAN. (PRIME MOVIE) (6.4 IMDB). This could easily scare anyone into serious worry about the dangers of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE or AI! It’s about a toy company that made an automated animated doll named M3GAN.  M3gan looks a lot like Scarlett Johannsen. The plot soon turns into a child abuse and child custody story. Many flaws in it but it is absorbing.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

TAKE CARE OF MAYA. (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY MOVIE) (8.1 IMDB). A very devastating document for what has happened and continues to happen when hospitals and “Child Protective Services” cover up their mistakes and blame parents by calling them Child abusers and create prolonged cases in courts, with parents losing. This true case happened in Venice, Florida but exists in many locales. The hospital kept Maya a prisoner for three full months for only so called legal reasons.

INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (6.9 IMDB). A very poor wrap-up and closer to the Indiana Jones series that started with such a literal bang. It’s stuffed full of CGI car chases, bloody roof jumping and the much ballyhooed restoration of Harrison Ford. It doesn’t help but Antonio Banderas and Mads Mikkelsen are almost hidden in it. It’s shallow, monotonous, pointless and painful…don’t go.

BLOODHOUNDS. (NETFLIX SERIES) (8.1 IMDB).   Another Korean film that accomplishes exactly what was intended …and it works. It’s about loan sharks, everybody wearing covid masks, and guts flying everywhere. Guts fly because the lead characters are not just close buddies but also are boxers…Korean style boxers of course.

ROCK HUDSON-ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWED. (MAX DOCUMENTARY MOVIE) 7.8 IMDB). Rock Hudson’s real names were Roy Scherer jr. and Roy Fitzgerald. He died from AIDS in 1984 and was a Republican. He was gay and only hid it from the public, not his friends and fellow actors. He mainly did musicals and comedies and the 70’s were his decade. Doris Day and Elizabeth Taylor both liked him as a person and co-star. He starred big in Giant and author Armistead Maupin tells a lot of the background.

ARMAGEDDON TIME. (AMAZON PRIME MOVIE) (6.5 IMDB). This is a slow tearjerker of a movie with stars like Anthony Hopkins and Anne Hathaway leading the cast. It’s about New York City, it’s about being Jewish, it deals with Nazis and there’s even a character named Fred Trump in it for no good reason. Fred Trump was Donald Trump’s Dad and he died in 1999. It touches on father abuses among other issues, and it’s set in the 1980’s.

...

July 10

Gillian will be back next week.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

July 10

Joy will be back next week.

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...
July 10

PERSISTENT CARCINOGENS IN OUR WATER?  CALFIRE NEEDS TO CHANGE FIRE SUPPRESSION PRODUCTS

Thanks to my friend, Al, who sent a link to a recent USGS report about water contamination by PFAS nationwide…this includes some significant finds in our local water supplies.

The Report features a map with many data points in Santa Cruz County

A common source of PFAS is fire suppression foam material that CalFire and other firefighting agencies use.

There are already alternatives available, including Komodo Fire System product that is non-toxic and plant-based, and is manufactured here locally.  Komodo Fire System materials has been certified by the EPA as non-toxic to mammals and aquatic life, and is registered for use by the US Forest Service for fire suppression.

komodo-fire.com

So, why does CalFire continue to use the toxic product?  Just because it is what has always been done.  Local CalFire staff who have seen the impressive Komodo product at work urge members of the public to contact local and state representatives, asking them to put pressure on the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and CalFire to make the change quickly.

Firefighters have extremely high cancer rates, which could be linked to not only the PFAS suppression foams and other suppressants they use, but also their protective turnout gear containing PFAS.

Other states and countries have banned the use of PFAS containing fire suppression foams, and California needs to do the same.

Please contact your representatives and demand the change to protect our firefighters, our drinking water supplies, and the environment.

Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors BoardofSupervisors@santacruzcounty.us

Assemblywoman Pellerin
Assemblywoman Addis
Senator Laird
California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection

COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT PRESENTED AT A

FIFTH GRADE READING LEVEL?

Did you notice the interesting explanation of the County Planning Dept. Housing Element update wherein the CivicMakers consultants shepherded a new idea to use random people to make recommendations about where to re-zone areas for ultra-dense multi-story housing?

Take a look at the Project Overview statement in Appendix HE-C “Civic Engagement”:

“We also worked to make the facilitation of the meetings accessible, trauma informed, multi-lingual, and understandable at a 5th grade reading level.”

Public Engagement Results

These were two parallel groups of people, Community Panel of random residents, and a Stakeholder Panel of developers and non-profits, getting what sounds like was a watered-down and condescending presentation of what the County has to do to update the 1994 General Plan in order to build the State-mandated Regional Housing number Allocation (RHNA) housing units and were asked to put sticky notes and dots next to the choices provided by the Consultants.

The Community Panel was supposed to have 20-25 people, but only 14 participated.  Look at page 17-18 to see the composition.  Districts 2 and 4 had hardly any representation.

The list of Stakeholder Committee members is interesting (pages 11-17).  Note that the only developer allowed to participate was Jessie Bristow from Barry Swenson.

Shouldn’t there have been some smaller, locally-owned builders in the room?

Page 40 of the Appendix C has some good information in response to questions posed by the Developer and Non-Profit (Stakeholder Committee) that staff could not answer at the time of the first meeting on April 11.  Here is a good example:

Q: Are these state levels or county levels of income that these go by? 

A: Income levels are set by the state and then adjusted (by the state) to reflect regional differences. 

Q: What proportion of the 5th cycle goals have been met? 
A: 79% overall. Above Moderate = 66%; Moderate = 122%; Low 92%; Very Low = 59% 

Q: What proportion of current RHNA units met is not moderate or above moderate?
A: 656 = moderate and above moderate vs. 377 low and very low

One suggestion the Committees presented was to increase densities around the rail corridor.  That makes sense to me, as it would support the use of the rail corridor for passenger commutes and broader use than tourist excursions.

Appendix HE-E is a 17-page inventory of vacant land in the County that could be developed for dense affordable housing.  The Assessor Parcel Number (APN) and acreage are listed with the possible minimum and maximum housing units that could be built.  

I tried to look up some parcel numbers for the Aptos area, but discovered the County Assessor database is broken.  Upon inquiring at the 701 Ocean Street County Government Building, I learned that the database is undergoing major work that will not be completed until July 10 at the earliest, but more likely July 15, so no information is available.

Public Comment on the Santa Cruz County Housing Element closed July 11, but there will be a flurry of Planning Commission and Board of Supervisor meetings that you need to mark on your calendar now, and plan to participate as much as you can.

Get involved

This document, which the County must present to the State Housing and Community Development Dept. by mid-December, will drastically alter the look and feel of our Communities going forward.  The State is wielding a mighty big stick…and in my opinion, we need to push back.

Take a look here at local people doing excellent work by currently circulating a Petition to increase affordable housing to 25% in new development, and grant Santa Cruzans the right to vote on the height and size increases of development above current, reasonable limits: www.housingforpeople.org  They could use your help: 831-471-7822.

Also, on a statewide level, link up with these good folks who are working hard to educate the legislators who seem to be going along with the unreasonable RHNA mandates without regard to local jurisdiction discretion and infrastructure realities:

catalystsca.org/

WHY DID SANTA CRUZ COUNTY RTC REJECT A WHITE PAPER ON REASONABLE PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE HERE?

Last summer, the Train Riders Association of California (TRAC) submitted a Whitepaper to the Santa Cruz County RTC, outlining ways the existing rail could be reconditioned for passenger service at a fraction of the cost stated in recent studies, and recommending proposals for different types of lightweight passenger rail vehicles.

TRAC – Santa Cruz Rail Study 0722 [pdf]

The RTC rejected this proposal.

Want to hear more about all that?  Listen online this Friday to “Community Matters”, 1pm-3pm, on the new online-radio Santa Cruz Voice platform.

Mr. David Schonbrunn, President of TRAC, will discuss efforts to support passenger rail in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, as well as his work fighting the California High-Speed Rail Project.

Meanwhile, the RTC is embarking yet another multi-million dollar study about passenger rail possibilities in Santa Cruz County, citing more information needed regarding easements and bridge repair/maintenance.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.  HOLD OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE TO TRANSPARENCY.

DO ONE THING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers, and Happy Summer,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
July 10

The US Bureau of Land Management- Species Conservationists?

The California division of the Bureau of Land Management suggests that it is concerned about rare species, but what evidence is there for those of us considering their management of Cotoni Coast Dairies? It is crucial that public land managers take care of rare wildlife and plants – doesn’t it seem like public lands are the right place for species conservation? Let’s consider what we’ve seen…

Background

The BLM has some great policies to guide its management of rare species. It has a guidance manual, Manual 6840 “Special Status Species Management,” that says that BLM will manage not only for species on the USA’s list of threatened and endangered species, but also for species that are candidates for listing as well as those which State wildlife agencies consider priorities for conservation. The manual directs each BLM State office to keep a list of State Sensitive Species (both wildlife and plants) and to update those lists every 5 years in collaboration with State wildlife agencies.

BLM California has published the following lists of sensitive plants and wildlife.

California BLM’s Sensitive Species: Problems

Although BLM’s policies are good, somehow their implementation at Cotoni Coast Dairies, designated as one of 5 onshore units of California’s Coastal National Monument, has been faulty. For instance, plant species listed by the State as rare (Rank 1B) are automatically considered sensitive according to BLM policy, but the BLM California sensitive plant list is missing three of the California rare plant Rank 1B species that have been documented at Cotoni Coast Dairies: Choris’ popcornflower, Santa Cruz manzanita, and Monterey pine. In addition, although BLM’s State Sensitive Plant List has Point Reyes Horkelia, it is not noted as occurring under the management of the Central Coast Field Office, which oversees Cotoni Coast Dairies. Moreover, the last time BLM’s sensitive wildlife list was updated was 2009; it is missing many species recognized by California Department of Fish and Wildlife as rare, including some that occur at Cotoni Coast Dairies. Here are the Cotoni Coast Dairies’ wildlife species that would have been included on BLM’s sensitive wildlife list if the BLM California State Director Karen Mouritsen were following her mandated actions under Manual 6840:

Common name Latin name Rarity Status
 
Grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum CA Species of Special Concern (nesting)

Northern harrier Circus cyaneus

 

CA Species of Special Concern (nesting)

Olive-sided flycatcher

Contopus cooperi CA Species of Special Concern (nesting)

American badger Taxidea taxus CA Species of Special Concern

San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat Neotoma fuscipes

annectens

 

CA Species of Special Concern

BLM Central Coast Field Office: Problems

The staff at BLM’s Central Coast Field Office have described themselves as being ‘conservationists.’ If this is so, then they are prevented from carrying out their self-professed ideology by someone higher up in BLM, perhaps at the State BLM level under Director Mouritsen’s oversight. In 2021, Michael Powers is listed as the author of the “Biological Monitoring Plan, Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of the California Coastal National Monument, Updated December 2021.” It is odd that there is a monitoring plan in absence of the science plan mandated by the 6220 Manual, which provides policy for managing units of National Monuments under BLM’s stewardship. This oddness continues when one more closely peruses Mr. Powers’ monitoring plan.

Section V of the monitoring plan is titled “Special Status Species,” but the section fails to mention the majority of wildlife and plants on California BLM’s sensitive species lists. The only species listed in this section are the California red-legged frog, steelhead trout, and coho salmon – these noted as ‘Federally Listed’ at the top of that section.  The section of the monitoring plan fails to list the monarch butterfly, which was published by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as a candidate for listing as endangered a year before the monitoring plan, in 2020. According to BLM policy in the 6840 manual, federally published candidate species are to be considered sensitive species with such monitoring plans.

BLM Natural Resource Impacts

Some would suggest that plans are just plans and lists are just lists, but how do these things really matter? Someone in one of the California BLM offices ordered candidate species monarch butterfly habitat to be destroyed at Cotoni Coast Dairies (one day, we’ll know who!). Destroying that habitat makes it more difficult to restore healthy populations of monarch butterflies on Planet Earth. The increasing rarity of monarch butterflies that BLM has created places more burden on other landowners, both public and private to help monarchs not become extinct.

More broadly, someone evidently told BLM’s Mr. Powers not to consider the entirety of California State BLM-listed sensitive species in the monitoring and, presumably, management of Cotoni Coast Dairies. Since BLM State or local officials have not asked for help with budget, there must be some other issue, but political issues don’t seem logical. BLM’s policy states the following reason for analyzing, monitoring, and planning for the conservation of sensitive species: “to promote their conservation and reduce the likelihood and need for future listing under the ESA.” The majority of Americans on either side of the political divide support wildlife conservation. It is in everyone’s interest for species not to qualify for listing under the Endangered Species Act.

Without concerted collaborative effort, it is likely that at least one of the sensitive plants or animals at Cotoni Coast Dairies will face listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the next 30 years. The Point Reyes Horkelia is probably the most likely species, but the Monarch butterfly is also quite likely. The BLM has no plans to monitor those species, so the agency won’t know if its management of Cotoni Coast Dairies is helping or hurting those species.

What You Can Do

Would you please help? Please write State Director Mouritsen and ask her to protect sensitive species at Cotoni Coast Dairies as well as throughout California. You might mention that she should:

  • Order the Central Coast Field Office to consider BLM California’s sensitive plants and wildlife at Cotoni Coast Dairies as required by BLM’s 6840 Special Status Species Manual.
  • Publish an updated State BLM sensitive wildlife list in collaboration with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, as mandated by the BLM’s 6840 Special Status Species Manual.
  • Publish an updated State BLM sensitive plant list to include the State ranked 1B plant species documented at Cotoni Coast Dairies, as mandated by the 6840 Manual.
  • Respect those who care about natural resource protection as much as she respects those clamoring for access for mountain bikes at Cotoni Coast Dairies.
  • Publish a Science Plan for Cotoni Coast Dairies as required by BLM’s 6220 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas, and Similar Designations (Public) Manual

That could be a short email note….it would be fast to write! It could even be a cut-and-paste of those bullets. What we need is numbers of notes to show the Director that there are lots of people who care. Here’s her email address: kmourits@blm.gov It would be great if you could cc me, so I have a record of the communications: coastalprairie@aol.com

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

July 5

#186 / The DeSantis Doctrine: A Petulant Politics

Ron DeSantis, a Republican Party candidate for president and currently the Governor of Florida, has recently visited the border between the United States and Mexico. He has a solution for our immigration problems: let’s kill us some immigrants!

Some immigrants, says DeSantis, are attempting to bring drugs into our country. He admits that it may not always be possible to determine which immigrants are trying to do that, and which immigrants are merely seeking asylum in the United States, which, in fact, is legally sanctioned. Given the problem, DeSantis suggests that anyone seeking to push past border barriers should simply be shot down and killed, on the basis that trying to reach United States soil in this way demonstrates “hostile intent.” As DeSantis explains it:

If you drop a couple of these cartel operatives trying to do that, you’re not going to have to worry about that anymore. They would end up “stone-cold dead.”

I am quoting from an article in the Tuesday, June 27, 2023, edition of The New York Times. The Times is certainly correct that “DeSantis’s proposal served as an escalation of Republican messaging on the border and was part of a host of plans he unveiled in an effort to match the hard-line immigration stance of former President Donald J. Trump, who privately suggested shooting migrants in the legs during his administration.”

This “DeSantis Doctrine,” suggesting that we simply kill immigrants when they attempt to push past border barriers because immigrants who do that might be drug lords, is definitely an “escalation” of Republican Party rhetoric around the nation’s immigration policies. However, my point in today’s blog posting is not, really, to focus on the specifics of what DeSantis is proposing, as horrific as his policy proposals truly are.

What I really want to comment on is an observation that Times‘ columnist Jamelle Bouie made in the same edition of the paper. The “DeSantis Doctrine” is just an example. The Republican Party candidates for president, Bouie says, have “no appetite beyond red meat.”

Another way of saying this might be that the Republican Party appears to believe that our election campaigns should basically be about all the outrageous things that we are “against,” what we really hate, instead of all the things that we’re “for,” those positive changes that we would like to achieve. I am not sure that the Republicans are alone in their “red meat” preference for “outrage” and “negative campaigning,” but as The “DeSantis Doctrine” demonstrates, they are definitely leading the pack in their appetite for “red meat” issues – and “red meat” solutions.

It is true, of course, that we do need to find ways to oppose and eliminate the things that we don’t like – and there are a lot of things we don’t like, a lot of “problems.” It’s hard to avoid thinking that our political and public policy debates must take account of how we might prevent things we don’t like from happening.

On the other hand, without adorning my blog posting with a big “Smiley Face” (or maybe I should), I would like to propose that our politics could be improved if we were having discussions and debates about what we would like to accomplish, as opposed to highlighting all the things we don’t like and want to eliminate.

I guess I am asking for a “positive” politics, instead of a “petulant” politics. Is that too much to ask?

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
July 10

FAKE QUOTES, KLANNED KARENHOOD, AND YOKELRY

For those of you who may have missed Senator Josh Hawley’s Independence Day tweet, the ‘Manhood‘ author raised his right-wing fist once again by misquoting Patrick ‘Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death’ Henry regarding the importance of Christianity in the founding of this nation. “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ,” he babbled. Further, Hawley claimed Henry said, “For this reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.” That stretches it a bit about slaveholder Henry’s sentiments, but it’s also telling about the senator who is regarded as one of the GOP’s brilliant minds, being a Stanford University grad, thanks to his mother’s alumna status, and a product of Yale Law School, afterwards clerking on the Supreme Court.

The fake quote from Patrick Henry was sourced from the April 1956 edition of the hostile, antisemitic, white nationalist magazine, ‘The Virginian‘, later reprinted in ‘The American Mercury’, a publication co-founded by H.L. Mencken, which featured top writers from the 1920s and 1930s. Mencken described the work as “a serious review, the gaudiest and damnedest ever seen in the Republic. What we need is something that looks highly respectable outwardly. The American Mercury is almost perfect for the purpose. What will go inside the tent is another story. You will recall the late P.T. Barnum got away with burlesque shows by calling them moral lectures.” The magazine’s subscription form featured the Mencken quote, “The dead hand of the yokelry on the instinct for beauty cannot be so heavy if the handsome green and black cover of The American Mercury exists.” 

Ownership changed in the 1940s, attracting conservative writers, one of whom was William F. Buckley. Another change in ownership in the 1950s provided a voice for far-right and anti-Semitic proponents, with George Lincoln Rockwell being a featured writer. Rockwell went on to found the American Nazi Party…enuf said? Later, the magazine sold to the Defenders of the Christian Faith, owned by Reverend Gerald Burton Winrod of Wichita, Kansas. The reverend had charges dropped for violating the Sedition Act of 1918, but he earned the nickname of ‘The Jayhawk Nazi’ during the Second World War. The magazine saw several transitions and mergers, eventually becoming a quarterly, and an article in 1978 praised Adolf Hitler as the greatest Spenglerian, while lamenting his death. The final issue in 1980 lamented the passing of Mencken’s time, “before the virus of social, racial, and sexual equality” grew in “fertile soil in the minds of most Americans,” while pleading for contributions to establish a computer index holding information on the 15,000 most dangerous political activists in the US. The website created in 2010 was condemned by the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2013, calling it a ‘Leo Frank Propaganda Site,’ deeply anti-semitic while retaining H.L. Mencken’s original magazine name. Frank was a Jewish factory worker in Atlanta, wrongfully convicted of murder, and hanged by a mob which removed him from his imprisonment. Senator Hawley knows how to access information to further incite the GOP base as he attempts to tailor himself as a mentor of masculinity, affirming that he is just as dangerous as Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene, Paul Gosar, and Lauren Boebert. The false vision they hold, the perverted version of our history they put forth must be defeated and called out in every instance!

Another case in point, is the recent Moms for Liberty ‘Blessings of the Liberty’ prayer breakfast during which North Carolina LtGovernor Mark Robinson defended the group’s use of a Hitler quote in their newsletter, arguing that we should be re-reading the quotes of Der Fuehrer and other dictators. How convenient that the anti-LGBTQ hate group is living up to their nickname of ‘Klanned Karenhood’ by inviting Robinson, and coincidentally, a Rabbi as well! The Lt. governor had the chutzpah to reference Josef Stalin, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot and Castro as worthy of our attention, even as he runs for the governorship of his state. Need it be mentioned that he has endorsed Donald Trump’s run for a pardon, along with the GOP nomination for president? Former Senator Claire McCaskill said on Morning Joe, “I think it’s time we realize that Donald Trump is not running for president, he’s running for pardon. I think it’s time we realize that the Republicans are afraid of him, and the base that supports him, no matter what.” Sounds logical since The Don hasn’t come up with a platform that any one cares about…no mention of trade, foreign policy, healthcare costs, abortion, guns, the economy…only his victimhood – for another year and a half? Somebody help us!

Charles Blow, in his New York Times column headlined ‘Republicans’ Anti-Woke, Anti-Vote Crusade Has Crashed into the Constitution’, writes, “The same party that argues for parental rights when haranguing and harassing educators about what is being taught and read in the classroom couldn’t care less about the parental rights of those trying to provide the best care for their children or who want their children to have an awareness and understanding of the broad spectrum of humanity and its expressions of love. The Republican politicians pushing these un-American laws aren’t constitutional absolutists; they are constitutional opportunists. The same is true when it comes to elections, where the Republican strategy has become clear: Rather than change their party to appeal more broadly to the electorate, many Republican politicians are whittling away at the electorate and our election architecture, trying to remove or hamstring those aspects of the process that could lead them to losing. They want to change the very meaning of democracy, shrinking to a government chosen by the chosen, a more originalist version of our system in which only certain people participate.” 

When the GOP says ‘woke,’ they mean ‘Black.’ When they say ‘Soros‘ or ‘globalist,’ they mean ‘Jewish,’ When they mention parent’s rights, they mean Christian zealots’ rights to overrule all other parents. ‘Freedom‘ means freedom to indoctrinate and impose agendas, freedom to restrict voting and overturn elections, freedom to deny medical treatment, freedom to inspect children’s genitals, freedom to wield state power while encouraging vigilante violence against those who disagree or look different. The GOP today caters to three groups: the NRA, untaxed billionaires, and white supremacist theocratic bigots, leaving them with only two values: privilege and hate, while being chained to a grifting fraudster, a chronic liar who has no respect for the rule of law.

Though The Former Guy’s hopes for a pardon can’t be initiated by him should he be seated in the Oval Office again…power of the pardon to protect oneself from criminal liability is a no-no, at least at present. He was asked in the recent CNN Town Hall whether he would pardon the J6 Insurrectionists if he wins in 2024. He told Kaitlan Collins next to nothing as he gave one of his noncommittal answers, “strongly considering it, but some of them got carried away.” The ones who “got carried away,” in particular, are the Proud Boys who point their fingers at Trump as their boss, calling themselves the foot soldiers who were only following orders, so it’s too early (or is it too late…who can tell?) to be showing favoritism in the game. But what’s a president to do if some of the J6ers are BLM or Antifa, as many in his Base claim? Or if some participants were FBI who tricked Patriots into committing crimes? And why didn’t DJT use some of the $250k he grifted from his minions, to ‘stop the steal,’ in defense of his followers before they went to trial? But then, why did 500 or so people plead guilty if they were only ‘touring’ the Capitol on a normal day…as some of Trump’s Base followers claim?

Too late we find out about the J6 Truth and Light Festival held last Friday through Sunday in Rogersville, MO, near Springfield, featuring numerous speakers, live and via Zoom, some of whom are facing multiple felony charges in connection with the January 6, 2021 assault on Washington, DC, one recently being sentenced to eighteen years in prison. The website promised “An amazing weekend of love and support for our J6 community! Bring your RV, tent, lawn chairs and the whole family for this annual gathering of the Jan6 community!” A weekend family pass was priced at $150.00, an individual pass was $75.00, the daily pass was $37.50, and the J6 defendant pass was a bargain at $0.00! Opportunity for a donation to the American Patriot Relief fund was provided as well. Plus a fireworks display Saturday evening…what a bargain, and to think it’s an annual event, first held last year – be sure to get your photos taken with the detainees for the family album, an event to remember! However, the promo material specified it was a closed event, only for J6ers and families, with all funds raised going to honor those individuals charged. Seven of the 28 Missouri defendants are from the Springfield area, and those who monitor extremist groups say it only serves to promote future violence by framing the insurrectionists as martyrs and building toward a nationalist insurrection.

Sponsors of the festival included StopHate.com, J6Truth.org, and American Gulag Chronicles, with supporters being listed as J6 Patriot News, Patriot Mail Project, Tommy Tatum News, Freedom Express Media, Mel Hawley of Justice in Jeopardy and Patriots at Large. The organization claims it is raising money to help families attend court hearings and jail visitations, and care for children. Don Haider-Markel, a poli-sci professor at the University of Kansas, and expert on political extremism predicted the festival likely has “a pretty narrow appeal. But I definitely think its further evidence of the sort of radicalization of the far-right, allowing participants to essentially publicly express their identity. That not only reinforces those identities, but it also can tend to radicalize people further.” The professor called attention to Taylor Taranto who was arrested in DC last week, near Barack Obama’s home, in possession of two guns, hundreds of rounds of ammunition, and a machete. “I think we will see more and more incidents like that, where we have individuals who are part of this larger movement who sort of spin off and decide, ‘Hey, I’m gonna go do something.”

Senior Analyst Daryl Johnson, formerly of the Department of Homeland Security, says the J6 defendants and their advocates have hijacked the ‘patriot’ name as they attempt to create the historical view that these people did the right thing, standing up to government corruption, as they attempted to save the Constitution. He says, “These people believe that God’s on their side, and they are self-righteous truth-holders protecting our country. And celebrating these people who participated in the DC riot by calling them patriots is keeping that fervor alive for 2024.” As Aldous J. Pennyfarthing writes, “Nice to know J6 rioters are a ‘community’ now. Of course, it makes perfect sense. Bashing in cops’ heads with flagpoles is hard work, and everyone needs to pitch in. Sadly, conservatives have been doing their best to normalize the J6 events, pretty much since that evening when Fox News and others openly speculated that the riot had actually been launched by liberal agitators who had inexplicably decided to disrupt the election of the guy they’d voted for and desperately hoped would win. As the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) noted on the second anniversary of J6, the danger Trump and his followers posed to our democracy on that fateful day has arguably grown. We had that whole Civil War business in the mid-1800s, and that probably should have settled the issue once and for all. But we let Confederacy-Humpers hang around like a bad bathroom chandelier.”

Aldous J. continues, “We have also learned that white supremacy and hard-right extremism have been normalized and mainstreamed to a dangerous degree. According to a June 2022 poll jointly conducted by SPLC and Tulchin Research, the mainstreaming of hate and anti-government thought, and the willingness to engage in political violence, are now widely accepted on the right. And now, they’re so enamored with their bumblin’ coup, they’re holding events to honor the perpetrators. Because nothing says ‘I’m sorry’ like a $9 Costco sheet cake that actually says, ‘Nice Try, Traitor – Better Luck Next Time!”

Trump’s aide tells him, “Sir, I had a dream you got your parade! It was miles and miles long, winding through Washington, DC. Joyful Americans lining the route, literally in the millions. People were laughing, cheering, playing in the street, and you were riding in the most beautiful carriage!” Trump asks, “I must have been really pleased?” The aide answers, “I couldn’t tell, sir. It was a closed casket.”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “The Pope”

(I re-found these in a BrattonOnline from June 4, 2017).

 “My mother said to me, ‘If you are a soldier, you will become a general. If you are a monk, you will become the Pope.’ Instead, I was a painter, and became Picasso”,
~Pablo Picasso

“I feel much freer now that I am certain the pope is the Antichrist”,
~Martin Luther

“My favorite time in the cycles of public life is the time when the Pope is dead and they haven’t elected a new one. There’s no one in the world who is infallible for those weeks. And you know, I don’t miss it”,
~Christopher Hitchens

“We’re all expendable. We think the world’s going to stop when a pope dies, or a king. And then… life goes on”,
~Sylvester Stallone

...

This was my 4th of July! I shot my first fireworks show, after having worked on them for years at this point. The video starts with my phone being upside down and moving over the edge of the roof of the shooting shack, finally falling down on the deck of the barge. Luckily, the firewatch guy picked it up and put it the right way, so the 2nd half of the show got filmed!

What you see at first is my right arm and my back, and then the phone tumbles. The shaking that happens every time something goes up is because the barge that the fireworks are on shakes from each detonation. It’s pretty cool to touch a stylus to a board and set off an explosion!

Enjoy the Redwood City 4th of July fireworks display by Pyro Spectaculars!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 5 – 11, 2023

Highlights this week:

Bratton…protect our North Coast again, average penis length, movie critiques. Greensite…on how EIRs are manipulated: Downtown Plan Extension. Schendledecker… Skypark! toxic waste disposal! Public trust fund! Steinbruner…County planning dept., county fire dept. & grand Jury, Sheriff Dept. and surveillance composting toilet, Harbor Village, construction consultants $$$, skyscraper canyons. Hayes…Oaks, terrestrial coral analogues. Patton…community over Capital. Matlock…moms, courts and pit-bulls unleashed. Eagan…Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…pick of the week. Quotes “Butterflies”

...

PACIFIC AND CATHCART STREETS, NOVEMBER 29, 1950.  This corner has gone through many changes since this photo. It was actually the Good Times building in the 80’s then Hoffman’s Bistro then Kianti’s Pizza.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com
photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

DATELINE JULY 3

PROTECT OUR NORTH COAST…RIGHT NOW AND AGAIN. I arrived in Santa Cruz County (1970) just in time to help stop PG&E from building their Nuclear Power Plant in Davenport. Then again in the mid 70s we had the enormous battle against developers building 10,000 new houses in Wilder Ranch. Davenport and the North Coast now once again face just a large and threatening a danger…THE COAST COTONI NATIONAL MONUMENT.

The group Friends of the North Coast have valiantly been trying to arouse as many of us as possible to make any/all development as green and livable as possible. Go here to read and learn what FONC is all about… They just sent out a special wakeup call this week with this statement:

“Now that the property is a national monument, visitation and use can increase exponentially, as happened with Ft. Ord, where visitors jumped from 40,000 to 400,000 within a few years of its designation as a national monument”.

That’s 4000,000 in cars driving our Highway One and if you think Highway One is crowded now…wait and worry.

Next go here and see how so much more can be and should be done to preserve what we still have along that precious North Coast.

MY HOW YOU’VE GROAN!
According to the July 3rd issue of the New Yorker …research at King’s College (London) and at the University of Turin (Italy) the average size of the male penis “is 3.6 inches long when flaccid, and 5.2 inches erect. (The average girth is 3.5 inches flaccid, and 4.6 inches erect.)” And now we know!!!

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

TAKE CARE OF MAYA. (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY MOVIE) (8.1 IMDB). A very devastating document for what has happened and continues to happen when hospitals and “Child Protective Services” cover up their mistakes and blame parents by calling them Child abusers and create prolonged cases in courts, with parents losing. This true case happened in Venice, Florida but exists in many locales. The hospital kept Maya a prisoner for three full months for only so called legal reasons.

INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (6.9 IMDB). A very poor wrap-up and closer to the Indiana Jones series that started with such a literal bang. It’s stuffed full of CGI car chases, bloody roof jumping and the much ballyhooed restoration of Harrison Ford. It doesn’t help but Antonio Banderas and Mads Mikkelsen are almost hidden in it. It’s shallow, monotonous, pointless and painful…don’t go.

BLOODHOUNDS. (NETFLIX SERIES) (8.1 IMDB).   Another Korean film that accomplishes exactly what was intended …and it works. It’s about loan sharks, everybody wearing covid masks, and guts flying everywhere. Guts fly because the lead characters are not just close buddies but also are boxers…Korean style boxers of course.

ROCK HUDSON-ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWED. (MAX DOCUMENTARY MOVIE) 7.8 IMDB). Rock Hudson’s real names were Roy Scherer jr. and Roy Fitzgerald. He died from AIDS in 1984 and was a Republican. He was gay and only hid it from the public, not his friends and fellow actors. He mainly did musicals and comedies and the 70’s were his decade. Doris Day and Elizabeth Taylor both liked him as a person and co-star. He starred big in Giant and author Armistead Maupin tells a lot of the background.

ARMAGEDDON TIME. (AMAZON PRIME MOVIE) (6.5 IMDB). This is a slow tearjerker of a movie with stars like Anthony Hopkins and Anne Hathaway leading the cast. It’s about New York City, it’s about being Jewish, it deals with Nazis and there’s even a character named Fred Trump in it for no good reason. Fred Trump was Donald Trump’s Dad and he died in 1999. It touches on father abuses among other issues, and it’s set in the 1980’s.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

EXTRAORDINARY ATTORNEY WOO. (NETFLIX SERIES) (8.7 IMDB). According to some recent article Korean films are leading the world in popularity nowadays. That proves true with this one. Attorney Woo is an autistic and brilliant young woman attorney (27 years old). The plot and drama and the laughs in the first episode makes this well worth hanging with. She defends a senior wife who hit her husband with a clothes iron. Serious, funny heartfelt and worth watching.

HUNGER. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.6 IMDB). A Thai film that gets deeper by the minute as it deals with a high end restaurant named Hunger. The head chef is mean, cruel and very successful and he trains his staff of ex noodle joint kids in ways to make all foods into art pieces…but at what cost personally? Vegies might not like this one.

SLEEPING DOG. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.01 IMDB). This tricky German movie about a policeman who has amnesia and is then assigned a new rookie to investigate a murder case that was supposed to have been solved. It turns out that the police department has some issues that make this a pretty good movie.

BLACK MIRROR. (NETFLIX SERIES) (8.8 IMDB). They call it an anthology series. That means 27 separate episodes, each with its own separate plot and stars. Well-directed and nicely paced and stars such as Jon Hamm, Salma Hayek, Rory Kinnear, Miley Cyrus, Annie Murphy, and Oona Chaplin all have good parts in one of the series. Odd, fascinating, perplexing and well worth watching.

LOUIS ARMSTRONG- BLACK & BLUES. (APPLE TV) (7.4 IMDB). This documentary should be required viewing, especially for Americans. His early New Orleans history, his world travels, his use of marijuana way back when, and especially his side of the scene involving race relations after being accused of Uncle Tomism for decades. Orson Welles, Dick Cavett, Ed Murrow, Leonard Bernstein are a few of the stars in this dynamite treasure.

...

July 3

(Double) Talking Traffic

It’s not a good sign when the public is vastly outnumbered by top level city staff at a city council meeting. The three back rows of senior staff include Planning director, Assistant Planning director, Public Works director and Transportation manager. I am the sole speaker from the public. The Consent Agenda item proposes a further allocation of monies ($295,000) to consultants Kimley-Horn for the traffic study on the Downtown Plan Extension Project. I am speaking to the item because I read the traffic study will be limited to weekdays only.

That’s right. Weekend traffic won’t be studied in the environmental review (EIR) for a major project in an area currently grid-locked on most summer weekends. That omission means mitigations cannot be proposed in the EIR or implemented.

This is the largest single project in the history of Santa Cruz. The proposed housing will bring an additional three to four thousand people into a relatively small area between Laurel Street and the first roundabout. An anticipated 1600 new housing units will be built in multiple 12 story (minimum) structures, plus a new enlarged Warriors stadium. The main road impacted is Front Street, the major route taken by summer tourist traffic and by residents on the lower westside.

Although I was the only member of the public expressing concerns (go figure), after I spoke the issue was taken up by councilmembers Sonja Brunner and Sandy Brown, who asked staff to explain the lack of inclusion of weekend traffic in the study. First the Transportation manager had a crack at it and then the Planning director weighed in.

Their reasons (my comments in italics) for excluding weekends from the traffic study are:

  • Adding weekends would be very expensive. (you don’t omit CEQA issues due to expense).
  • Doesn’t need to be studied if within half a mile of a high-quality transportation hub.
  • Conflicts with the General Plan which accepts more congestion downtown to make it more bike and pedestrian friendly. (this area is not yet “downtown”).
  • Studying weekends would show a need to widen the road which is not good for bikes and pedestrians. (there are several mitigations that don’t require road widening).
  • Would leave less land for development.
  • We don’t need to analyze to know traffic is heavy on the weekends. (doesn’t pass the CEQA test).
  • Study will be done on connecting Laurel St. Extension to Third Street; connecting to that neighborhood and the beach. (take note Beach Hill neighbors).
  • Need to reduce traffic demand (i.e., driving) for people driving in the area. (take note lower westside residents).
  • Level of Service (LOS) or a measure of delay is outside the scope of CEQA. (Not true if local conditions warrant a study of LOS.)

Councilmember Brunner persisted in her questioning and sent a strong message that she wants the issue of emergency vehicle access to have priority emphasis as the project and public meetings proceed. Councilmember Brown added her concerns that these significant impacts are not being fully addressed and supported Brunner’s emphasis on emergency vehicle access.

The Sentinel subsequently covered the issue in a prominent article by reporter Aric Sleeper. If a question had not been raised at the council meeting it is likely that this item, just one out of thirty-three other consent agenda items would have been approved without comment.

In October of 2022 the public was invited to contribute to a Scoping document for the project. This is a formal opportunity prior to the preparation of a draft EIR for the public to comment on what it wants included in the draft EIR. Below is an extract of what I submitted at that time. Other items I included in the original were about light pollution and habitat. You can judge if my requests on traffic and public services were considered or ignored.

Re: Scoping Comments for Downtown Plan Extension Project EIR

October 16, 2022

Dear Ms. Neuse,

The following are my comments submitted for the Downtown Plan Extension Project Subsequent Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). Thank you for your careful consideration.

Public Services

  1. Assess the ability of emergency vehicles (police, fire, ambulance) to access the beach area, Wharf and Boardwalk during summer weekends when traffic currently is grid-locked at the roundabouts. Assess this impact, taking into account the additional traffic generated by 4000 new residents as well as increased commercial and visitor- serving establishments in the project area.

Transportation:

  1. Assess the increase in VMT from the thousands of residents of the lower westside who will divert away from this area due to gridlock and travel to and from their homes via Mission St.
  2. Factor in the delivery vehicles who currently use this route to make deliveries to the Wharf and Beach area, who will divert to Mission St. or California and then Bay St. to avoid gridlock.
  3. While VMT is required under CEQA, that law allows congestion to be studied if there are local conditions that warrant such study. Such conditions exist in the project area. Currently, the roundabout within the project area is grid-locked on summer weekends. Assess the congestion that will be aggravated by this project and fully mitigate. One mitigation is to re-divert beach-going traffic away from the project area so that the increase in traffic can be spread-out between Ocean St. and Front St. Consider a Boardwalk parking entrance and exit at the back as well as the existing front entrance to avoid the current situation of inbound Boardwalk traffic needing to navigate two congested round-abouts.

Fair to say that my comments were ignored if the statements from the Transportation manager and the Planning director at the council meeting are any indication. You should be concerned that the city of Santa Cruz Planning Department is not serving the public. The description from the council meeting is how the environmental review will likely be skewed. The significant impacts of this massive project will be manipulated into insignificance unless more people pay attention and demand better.

There will be more public meetings as well as the release of a draft EIR in probably late summer. There are new groups in town who love all development and could care less about the impacts on neighborhoods. They rely on residents being too busy or too distracted to follow the various meetings and agenda reports. They appear to have a Planning Department in their hip pocket. Time to get involved. There are supportive council members. They need to hear from us.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

July 3

SKYPARK! TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL! PUBLIC TRUST FUND!

Guest columnist Tyler Maldonado, with Joy Schendledecker

City Council met in closed sessions on June 13th and again June 27th regarding real property negotiations over Skypark in Scotts Valley. Valued at $8.5 million, the 8.15 acre vacant lot is one of many abandoned airports in California, and is located on Mt. Hermon Road between Nob Hill and Target.

Closed session meetings are not open to the public, and parties to the meeting are disallowed from disclosing information gained from it following section 54963 of the Brown Act. Both lead negotiators, Director of Economic Development for Santa Cruz Bonnie Lipscomb and city manager Mali Lagoe of Scotts Valley did not comment for this reason.

According to Santa Cruz City law, proceeds from the sale of the Skypark Property are earmarked for the Public Trust Fund, a fund established in a Council Policy Manual update in 1998 to support capital improvement projects in Santa Cruz. Ongoing and future capital improvement projects are annually developed in the 3-year Capital Improvement Plan and can be found on the city’s website.

What does Public Trust Fund money actually fund? May 19, 2022, Planning Commission meeting, the 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program Consistency with General Plan was presented. In 2022, Public Trust Fund monies went to projects like: new Harvey West Ballfield Lighting, the Cowell Beach Water Quality Project, City Residential and Collector Street Reconstruction and Overlay (aka repaving some streets), downtown bike locker replacements and signage, parking garage maintenance and upgrades, some wharf piling replacements, a “Space Utilization Plan” for City Hall, and to the Downtown Library Affordable Housing Project for early phase design and development of the downtown Library/ mixed use affordable housing project (and the list goes on).

In summary, more than $1 million was transferred from the Public Trust Fund to a variety of General Fund line items last year.

Additionally, on November 15, 2022, city council approved a $1.8 million Public Trust Fund-funded loan to For the Future Housing, Inc., affordable housing developer for a project on River Street (which seems like a good use, while some of the 2022 spending seems to stretch the approved uses).

“The City Council majority will have a say in what the money gets spent on, and those decisions would occur in a public meeting,” wrote Santa Cruz city councilmember Sandy Brown in an email response to an inquiry about how the anticipated proceeds of the Skypark sale would be spent.

Brown wrote that Scotts Valley is planning for a “town center,” in line with previous efforts to develop the property, according to the Scotts Valley Downtown Specific Plan established in 2008 to, “guide the development of a mixed-use node that will become the heart of the city.”

The city of Santa Cruz sold the property in 2018 to Scotts Valley Town Green Land LLC, a coalition of Bay Area developers for $8.5 million. Less than a year later, the developers walked away from the contract due in part to concerns over the cost of environmental cleanup of the site, which contained toxic materials such as arsenic and benzene.

Where will that contaminated soil end up? According to a January 2023 Calmatters investigation called, “Out of Site, Out of Mind,” it will likely go to one of two toxic waste landfills near indigenous land in Arizona or Utah. The full report is worth a deep read, but at least look at the summary news story. If and when the city is finally able to sell this toxic land, a stipulation of that sale should be that the soil is disposed of within California, preferably as close to Santa Cruz as possible. There is no possible environmental justice in sending it elsewhere.

The parcel was appraised at $8.3 million “as is” in 2017 by Zeller Appraisal Services for the City of Santa Cruz according to a Sentinel report, meaning the appraiser factored the cost of the cleanup into the valuation of the land.

That valuation was approved by the Santa Cruz city council in closed session and sent to Scotts Valley sometime in the spring of 2017, the Press Banner reported, which led the developer at the time Foothill Partners Inc. to pull out of the project. A year later, Scotts Valley Town Green Land LLC offered to purchase the site for $8.5 million to develop it into the “Scotts Valley Town Center,” a mixed-use development with 350 residential units above retail and entertainment-focused businesses.

Writing for the Good Times in May 2019, Alisha Green reported on the intersecting motivations at the time of the city of Scotts Valley and Town Green Land LLC that brought the project about in the first place. Seeking increased revenue from retail sales tax to offset a million-dollar-deficit, Scotts Valley pushed for increased retail space. Scotts Valley is projected to have a $5.2 million deficit for fiscal year 2023-2024, according to their budget report.

“One of the challenges with housing for me is that—I don’t have a nice number—but I know that housing, in my opinion, costs more in services than we receive in taxes,” Scotts Valley mayor at the time Jack Dilles was reported to have commented at the time.

“Our challenge will be to squeeze the developer so we can get what we want, at the same time there has to be profit in it for them to make it worthwhile,” Former Mayor Reed said in 2018, when the first phase of the development was being negotiated.

Developers on the other hand sought to build more housing, as residential rents would form the bulk of the profits. After a series of community meetings, those 350 units were reduced to 225 in February 2019; the developer pulled out of the project.

“The project that evolved for us, which reduced the housing component and maintained the original retail, did not have enough revenue to offset the costs,” Doug Ross, one of the leaders of the project, reportedly said.

Scotts Valley’s 6th housing element identifies 1,220 total and 392 “very low” affordable units as Scotts Valley’s share of necessary housing. If Scotts Valley doesn’t meet its RHNA goals, California’s Builder’s Remedy, a portion of the Housing Accountability Act of 2017 allows developers to bypass certain local restrictions if they meet some inclusionary affordable housing requirements.

Scotts Valley City law requires that 15% of all housing developments be deed-restricted as “below market rate”, affordable to someone making between 50 and 120% of the area’s median income.

“Because the state has ruled that local inclusionary ordinances can only apply to the base density of a project, we are not really getting any additional affordable units in projects that can seek up to 50% more units, by right,” Brown pointed out. Given this, Scotts Valley could allow developers to build a town center with as few as 10% “Below Market Rate” units.

If a sale finally goes through after multiple failed attempts, Scotts Valley could have its retail-focused town center and consequent tax revenues and meet some of its RHNA goal, and developers could make quite a buck with the state’s stick hanging over the city’s head, the question we are left with is this: what would Santa Cruz get? Given that the Public Trust Fund has been historically stretched to include all kinds of projects, general fund line items and even affordable housing financing, the direction of the funding seems likely to go wherever the city council points.

Perhaps with strong enough public opinion, it could even point in the right direction.

This column was initiated by, and largely researched and written by, Tyler Maldonado. I provided feedback, a little bit of writing, and a very small bit of research. Thanks Tyler!

Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022. You can email her at: schendledecker@icloud.com.

...

(Joy Schendledecker is an artist, parent, and community organizer. She lives on the Westside of Santa Cruz with her husband, two teens, mother in law, and cats. She was a city of Santa Cruz mayoral candidate in 2022 schendledecker@icloud.com).

July 3

PUBLIC COMMENT ON COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT ENDS

NEXT TUESDAY July 11

It is critical that the County Planning Dept. hear from  you  about where to place dense infill development in the unincorporated areas of the Community, and your last chance of substance to do so is next Tuesday, July 11.  This is the update to the County General Plan, and will shape the quality of life in our Community for future generations.

The Project documents are in the link below, but first take time to look at what the two Stakeholder Committees recommended in Appendix C

Will the Planning Dept. staff follow these recommendations?

In the meantime, it is important that you read through their Recommendations and make your own by next Tuesday.  E-mail them to:

2023HousingElement@santacruzcounty.us   or click on the yellow button in the Project document website below:

Project Documents

DISAPPOINTING THAT THE GRAND JURY CHOSE NOT TO REVIEW FIRE DEPT. IMPLEMENTATION OF PAST RECOMMENDATIONS

One of the Grand Jury Reports just issued is “Honoring Commitments to the Public”.  I was really hoping the Grand Jury would review the lack of an After Action Analysis by Santa Cruz County Fire Department and CalFire after the 2020 CZU Fire, to interview the Volunteers and determine what worked well and what did not.  This is a crucial aspect of planning for future emergency response.   However, I was disappointed to read this:

“The Grand Jury also reviewed Ready? Aim? Fire!; however, follow-up responses to this
2019-2020 investigation were not pursued, since over the past three years there has
been a major wildfire and three more fire-related Grand Jury investigations.
The value of the Grand Jury’s reports is realized when government agencies apply the recommendations to improve transparency and efficiency for county residents.”

Well, it would be great if the agencies actually did act in a manner improving transparency, wouldn’t it?

GRAND JURY REPORT ON SHERIFF DEPT. USE OF SURVEILLANCE

The Grand Jury did some good investigative work on other issues, namely the issue of Sheriff Dept. use of surveillance equipment, notably in the jails.

Here is the link to the Press Banner’s analysis of the report

Here is the report

Other Reports just released by the Grand Jury are here and are worth reading:

2022-2023 Grand Jury Reports and Responses

WOULD THIS SPEED PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING?

Last Tuesday, the County Board of Supervisors Consent Agenda was bursting, numbering —–items.  One Item, #29, proposed requiring the Planning Dept. to return within 90 days to report on the possibility of allowing building permit applicants to opt for having a Third Party Plan Check company review their plans, rather than the Planning Dept. staff.

The Planning Dept. has quite a few vacancies, leading to sluggish permit processing times:

Background

As of June 6th, 2023, the County’s Performance Measurement Dashboard for the Permit Center showed the following median processing times: Single Family Dwellings – 64 days; Remodel – 107 days; Multi-Family Housing – 154 days; ADU – 197 days. On average, 18% of this time is the result of the applicant responding to comments, and 82% is county staff’s review time.

Between March 7, 2023, and June 6, 2023, there was an increase in the median processing time for permits in all categories. Specifically, the processing time for a remodel permit increased 10.31% from a median of 97 days to 107 days.

Agenda Item DOC-2023-556

It will be interesting to see what the Planning Dept. staff reports to the Board on this.  When the Board hired 4Leaf consultants to handle the CZU Fire permitting work, Planning Dept. staff complained, seemingly worried about their job security.

COUNTY COMPOSTING TOILET PILOT PROJECT MOVES TO WATSONVILLE

Another Consent Agenda item last Tuesday included changing the location of the County’s Composting Toilet Pilot Project from Crest Ranch in Bonny Doon to the Watsonville City Wastewater Treatment Plant in order to expedite permitting and avoid CEQA analysis.  Now the bio-solids will be collected at the Ben Lomond Transfer Station, and transported to Watsonville for composting.

The idea was originally meant to help the CZU Fire Survivors rebuild their homes more quickly and to potentially avoid having to install the very expensive Alternative Systems that cost $75,000 or more as well as expensive geotechnical analysis for septic leach fields, now required by the County in many areas.  The Supervisors approved a pilot project to compost waste at Crest Ranch, but permitting has been a problem.

Background

The Santa Cruz County CBS Pilot was brought to the Board and approved in October 2022 to further support the rebuilding efforts of families impacted by the 2020 CZU Lightning Complex Fire. When the item was brought before the Board last year, only 14 of the 911 homes destroyed in the 2020 CZU Fire had been successfully rebuilt. Since then, 28 CZU-impacted households have successfully rebuilt their homes.

Agenda Item
DOC-2023-557

The Pilot Project is being enthusiastically shepherded by Watsonville City Sanitation Engineer, Mr. Ryan Smith. He testified before the County Board of Supervisors multiple times supporting the use of the alternative composting toilets when the County’s septic system ordinance was under State-mandated revision.

As the Chief Plant Operator at the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant, Ryan Smith will provide on-site support and supervise the project with GiveLove. The City of Watsonville’s Public Works and Utilities Department has strongly supported this pilot and has agreed to host the Composting site at the treatment plant. Ryan Smith has led efforts on behalf of GiveLove to develop a license agreement between GiveLove & the City of Watsonville. On June 13th, the City of Watsonville’s city council adopted a resolution to execute the license agreement necessary to host the pilot project at the Watsonville Wastewater Treatment Plant.

So now, the six-month Pilot Project will allow 25 households in the CZU Fire area to get free composting toilet kits (usually costing $400 each).  The company providing the kits, GiveLove, will collect the data necessary to inform the Board next year about the success of the Pilot Project, allowing the Board to consider expanding the effort going forward.

This will be interesting to watch…stay tuned.

FORMER HOTEL SITE NEAR THE HARBOR IS NOW

EXCESS PROPERTY TO SELL

Back in 2017, the County Redevelopment Successor Agency wanted to give Barry Swenson exclusive development rights to a large County-owned parcel at 7th Avenue and Brommer, overlooking the harbor.  Maybe you went to those hearings, too, and heard the oily description of the massive project that would include an upscale hotel, condos and yurts for the “Visitor Accommodation” project. Proposed Development

Thank goodness, the County rescinded the deal with Swenson, however, last Tuesday, the Board officially declared the parcel “Surplus Property” and will offer it for sale. This was slipped through in Consent Agenda Item #35.

Here is what happens next:

Following adoption of a surplus resolution, the Surplus Lands Act (SLA) requires the Redevelopment Successor Agency (RSA) to issue a Notice of Availability for open space and for low-, moderate-income housing purposes to all required entities as provided in Government Code section 54221(f)(2) and 54222(a) and allow 60 days for response.  If a responsive notice of interest is received within the 60-day period, then the RSA is required to negotiate in good faith for at least 90 days to attempt to reach terms of sale. If mutually acceptable terms of sale are not reached within the 90-day negotiation period, then the Property may be sold outside of the requirements of the SLA (except that a limited affordability covenant must be recorded against the Property). 

The Property is surplus to RSA needs and not necessary for RSA’s use. It is therefore recommended to adopt a resolution declaring the Property surplus and stating the RSA’s intent to sell the Property.

Financial Impact

Upon successful negotiation for disposition, sale of the Property will result in proceeds that will be distributed to the various taxing entities consistent with the share of the property tax received following approval of one or more Development and Disposition Agreements (DDAs) or other form of document approved by the RSA Board and the Santa Cruz County Consolidated Redevelopment Oversight Board.

The Project will offer the opportunity for an increase and diversity of housing options on the Site.

The Project will stimulate the economy offering lodging, shopping, dining, and indoor/outdoor gathering places.

Agenda Item DOC-2023-562

What exactly will that mean???  Keep your eye on this and contact your County Supervisor when they all return from vacation on August 1.

831-454-2200

APPROVING A QUESTIONABLE CONTRACT WITH CALFIRE

Another large expensive, potentially controversial Consent Item the Board of Supervisors swept under the rug was #46, approving a one-year $7.3 million contract with CalFire to train the Santa Cruz County Fire Dept. Volunteers.

Agenda Item
DOC-2023-573

Here is why I felt the Board should have rejected the contract:

Dear Board, You need to consider this contract AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, not at the Board of Supervisors. The augmented $899,514 to pay for six additional engineers/drivers was supposed to be paid for by the CSA 48 2020 Special Benefit Assessment action. Property owners were also told the new tax would allow a cost-saving three-year contract with CalFire…this is not the case now. Claiming a large cost saving due to arbitrarily reducing the Amador Agreement time is bogus and only saves money on paper. The Fire Dept. Advisory Commission was not happy with the way CalFire Chief Armstrong manipulated the information when it was presented, and the Commissioners voiced concern that CalFire is becoming more dependent on CSA 48 monies buying new equipment that CalFire then leases on demand. This proposed Contract also eliminates local in-house plan checks, and relies on a contracting agency that is far removed from Santa Cruz County and may know little about the needs of the public and building and fire matters, especially relating to topography. Please do not approve this contract. It does not serve the public safety needs of the people, and promotes the needs of CalFire at the expense of the Santa Cruz County Fire Dept. volunteers who are treated poorly. Do not approve any contract with CalFire until there is an After Action Review of the 2020 CZU Lightning Complex Fire with the Volunteers.

The Board paid no attention, and asked no questions of CalFire Chief Nate Armstrong who was loitering in the hall.

Write your County Supervisors and demand an After Action Review be conducted with the County Fire Dept. Volunteers for the CZU Fire.

NEW COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER REPLACES GAIL NEWEL

One would think, with COVID now in the rearview mirror, that the new County Supervisor action to appoint a new County Public Health Officer would be quite public.  Not so.  Last Tuesday, the Board approved the appointment of Dr. Lisa Hernandez via Consent Agenda Item #54:

Agenda Item DOC-2023-581

COUNTY RECEIVES $2.24 MILLION GRANT TO PROVIDE SEVEN UNITS OF HOUSING?

The County received $2.24 million in state Project Home Key grant monies to fund the 801 River Street transitional project that will provide seven housing units.  That works out to be $320,000/person. Isn’t there a more cost-effective way to help more people with these hard-earned public taxpayer dollars?

That was Consent Agenda Item #67 last Tuesday: DOC-2023-594 Adopt resolution accepting unanticipated revenue in the amount of $2,240,000 from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for Project Homekey; ratify the Standard Agreement and local Project Agreement for the 801 R

COUNTY HIRES CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS FOR $9 MILLION EACH

The County Public Works Director Matt Machado claimed in Consent Agenda Item #83 that the County just does not have the staff to oversee construction projects in the County, so the Board of Supervisors approved extending contracts hiring two consultants for $9 million each.

Analysis

Public Works is continuing to complete repairs to several damaged sites from the 2016-17 and 2022-23 storm events.  Due to these and other on-going projects, the current not-to-exceed amounts for each Independent Contractor Agreement are at their current capacity, yet much more construction management services are needed for the upcoming construction season.  This construction season includes several high value projects such as:

  • The Soquel Drive Buffered Bike Lane project awarded at $20,208,885,
  • 2023 Pavement Management awarded at $5,443,330,
  • Emergency Routes Resurfacing awarded at $2,246,700,
  • Highway 152/Holohan Road Intersection with Engineer’s estimate of $2,789,000, and
  • Valencia Creek Sewer Relocation with a low bid of $2,364,836. 

These upcoming projects are in addition to this winter’s emergency projects currently in construction and several others being added. 

Overall, there is approximately $54 million worth of Capital Improvement Projects to be constructed this season and currently estimated value of $32 million worth of Emergency Repairs.  Based on approximately $85 million in construction projects, management oversight is estimated at a cost 17% for roughly $14.5 this season. 

Since 2019, MNS Engineers Inc. has performed oversight services on multiple projects at a value to-date of $45 million while Consor has performed services on a value to-date of $33 million.  Rebidding on-call consultant contracts is not possible at this time as emergency repairs needed immediately on critical County infrastructure are necessary to respond to these emergencies.  Inspection and project management of these emergencies does not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation of bids on new on-call consultant contracts.  These contracts will expire in April 2024; at which time, new contracts will be established. 

To continue managing oversight of 2022 construction season started projects in addition to 2023 construction season projects, it is necessary to increase the agreement with MNS Engineers Inc., and Consor North America, Inc.  Approving amendments of $5,000,000 for each consultant for a total increase of $10 million is less than the estimated needed value of $14.5 million in additional oversight services for this season alone.  This approval allows uninterrupted management services to projects currently in construction as well as multiple projects to start.

Financial Impact

The recommended actions would result in a new not-to-exceed amount of $9 million for each contract. 

DOC-2023-610 Approve amendment to agreements with construction management on-call consultants to increase compensation by $5,000,000 each for a total amount of $9,000,000 each, and take related actions, as recommended by the Deputy CAO/Director of Co

EVEN WITH $8 MILLION BUDGET DEFICIT, SUPERVISORS APPROVE LEASING NEW OFFICE FOR $27,552/MONTH FOR FIVE YEARS?

Consent Agenda Item #87 approved a new five-year lease at 150 Westridge Drive in Watsonville, near the huge new campus the County purchased this year for a South County Government Center.  This 13,776SF leased office space will house health care serviced while the buildings at 1430 Freedom Blvd. are demolished and rebuilt, and also include a new 1,350SF office for Fourth District Supervisor Felipe Hernandez.

DOC-2023-614 Approve lease agreement for real property located at 150 Westridge Drive, Watsonville; authorize the Deputy CAO / Director of Community Development and Infrastructure to execute the lease agreement on behalf of the Health Services Agency

Consent Item #93 approved spending $3.3 million for the architects to design the new building to replace the demolished structure at the Freedom Blvd. campus. DOC-2023-620 Approve agreement with Hawley Peterson Snyder (HPS) Architects for the South County Health Campus Project in the amount of $3,356,086; adopt resolutions accepting unanticipated revenue in the amount of $3,356,086 in Fiscal Year 2022-23;

NEW 10′ WIDE BIKE PATH ON GREEN VALLEY ROAD IN WATSONVILLE MUST BE BUILT IN ONE YEAR

Consent Agenda Item #94 approved funding a bike path on Green Valley Road between Airport Blvd(Holohan Rd.) and Mesa Verde Drive (where the Sheriff Substation is located).

The Engineer’s Estimate for this project, not including design, inspection, overhead, or contingencies, is $4,122,739.  The project is partially funded by multiple sources including $5,000,000 in Clean California Grant Funds, $400,000 in Measure D Funds, and $516,097 in County General Funds.

DOC-2023-621 Approve plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate for the Green Valley Road Multi-Use Trail Improvements Project; set online bid opening for 2:15 p.m. on July 27, 2023; direct Community Development and Infrastructure to return on or

THERE WAS NOT A MEETING OF THE MINDS, SO THE COUNTY TOOK AWAY FLOOD CONTROL MONEY

It was amazing to see that the Board of Supervisors rejected the plea of Pajaro Flood Control Management Director Dr. Mark Strudley to leave the County funding support in place for Pajaro flood control projects for which the money was intended.  He asked the Consent Agenda Item #96 be pulled, in order to have better public discussion.  Chairman Zach Friend refused to do so.

Watsonville City Councilwoman Ari Parker also requested the Board not approve the proposed funding claw-back, but to no avail.  Wow.  Public Works Director Matt Machado dismissively explained to reporters in the hallway who asked why the County was taking back the funding, “It’s just crumbs.”

Agenda Item DOC-2023-623

GOOD LETTERS TO THE SUPS

Make sure you read through the Correspondence of last Tuesday’s County Board of Supervisor meeting.  Mr. Cove Britton wrote a good one regarding the Board’s farce involving the appeal of a Planning Dept. determination requiring expensive studies ad nauseum (Letter #i):

Written Correspondence WC-2023-11

FEDERAL MONEY TO SUPPORT DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ SKYSCRAPER CANYONS?

Russ Brutsche spotted this interesting article on Lookout Santa Cruz, sporting the federal official visit to Santa Cruz.  The City’s proposed new ordinance for all-electric housing seemed charming to Ms. Ariel Marshall from the Dept. of Energy.

As Santa Cruz plots an electric future, U.S. energy officials tour city with offer of federal funds

Why did she come here?  It seems Mayor Fred Keeley and City Economic Development Director Bonnie Lipscomb have grand plans to build a downtown canyon of skyscrapers and want to court federal dollars to help pay for it.

Will they also pay for the cleanup of liquefaction destruction as sea level rise discussions warn?

New Findings on Shallow Groundwater Rise Highlight a Climate Risk Not Addressed by Policy

NEW CHANTICLEER OVERCROSSING WILL OFFER SWEEPING VISTA OF TREATED SEWAGE WATER PLANT

The work on Highway One near the Soquel Drive/Soquel Avenue area is in full swing.  The pedestrian overcrossing that will be juxtaposed to the PureWater Soquel Project treatment plant will have sweeping views of the facility, and likely expose users to loud noise from the reverse osmosis pumps. When I toured a similar facility in Santa Clara, the agency issued ear protection.

Here is the strip of land the Chanticleer Overcrossing will occupy when built.  The County and RTC paid Soquel Creek Water District $740,000 for this strip of land.

Here is the PureWater Soquel Treatment Plant, but what you can’t see here are the multiple large hazardous chemical storage tanks that will be adjacent to the Chanticleer Pedestrian Overcrossing.

If you are interested in learning more about the Highway One and Overcrossing Projects, tune in this Friday at 1pm to “Community Matters” to hear Ms. Sarah Christensen, Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Project Engineer, discuss the work happening now and what else is planned.  santacruzvoice.com

REST IN PEACE, ROB EDWARDS

I was saddened to read the obituary of Rob Edwards in Sunday’s Santa Cruz Sentinel.  Although I never had the pleasure of meeting this amazing fellow who worked hard to build a great training platform at Cabrillo College for archaeology students and was highly respected for his work, I have read and appreciated a number of his reports.  The most notable one was his survey of the barn at the Redman-Hirahara Farmstead, detailing the artifacts associated with the Japanese American families who lived there upon the end of the Internment Camps of WWII, having lost all they had while being imprisoned. Thanks to the Hirahara family and the Pajaro Valley neighbors, the apartments in the barn helped those unfortunate families get back on their feet.

Take a look at who Rob Edwards was, and the great legacy he leaves behind

Rob Edwards Obituary

Rest in peace, Rob, and thank you for your good work while you were here.

THE LEE RESOLUTION INITIATED THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

I recently learned of the Lee Resolution, a document that preceded the Declaration of Independence and shaped the beginning of our Nation.  I had never heard of this piece of history and enjoyed learning more about how the process happened to launch the United States of America into being.   Happy Independence Day!

Lee Resolution (1776)

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A MEETING AND EXPECT ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Cheers and Happy Independence Day,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

July 3

OAKS, TERRESTRAIL CORAL ANALOGUES

This past weekend, I had occasion to gaze for hours on end up into oak trees, reminding me of an analogy I’ve thought about where oak trees are like terrestrial coral reefs. When snorkeling around an atoll with patches of coral, I glide over vast sea grass beds, which hide flounder, conch, rays, and serve as habitat for many more species. Ahead, I see a tall, dark shadow looming and slowly coming into view is a coral patch. As I draw near, many species of colorful fish dart in and out of crevices and caves formed by the coral. Far from those tropical waters, I hike through extensive grasslands startling grasshopper and savannah sparrows, snakes, and a resting fawn. As I draw closer to the oak forest that rings the grasslands, I see new species of colorful birds and many butterflies popping out and flying back into the protection of the oak canopies.

The long-lived evergreen oaks of the central coast serve super-important roles supporting wildlife, and their canopy structure lends for spellbinding entertainment.


Our California Sister

I want to tell you about an oak-related butterfly that often catches my attention. California sister, Adelpha californica. If you spend much time around one of our live oaks right now, chances are good that you’ll see one of these strikingly beautiful butterflies. They can be very, very energetic fliers with bursts of energy followed by short glides, and lots of sudden turns. They behave more like predacious dragonflies than nectar-loving butterflies. Flying in and out of each hole in an oak canopy, they sometimes dart down the top of each branch, methodically seeming to examine every bit of structure. Why?

I have many hypotheses about this high energy ‘patrolling’ of oaks by California sister butterflies. Are they guarding their eggs or larval babies? It takes more than 60 days for an egg to reach its adult stage, growing from tiny to larger caterpillars along the way. During the caterpillar stage, they are vulnerable to predation or harassment by many things, though apparently neither the young nor the adult butterflies are tasty due to concentration of toxic oak-leaf compounds. So, perhaps they are looking for just the right place, and just the right time, to glue one of their eggs to the oak. Back and forth the colorful butterflies go, flitting in and out of shade, deeper into the canopy or out from it in the full sun. Maybe they are thermoregulating through this behavior. I also wonder if they might not be clearing spider webs from their territory, to make it safer for their young to learn to fly after they emerge from chrysalis with their tender young wings and clumsy first flights.

Do the California sister butterflies fly around the trees where they grew up, or do they move around more? Are there generation after generation of the same families in the same trees? Do they guard the flower patches near their trees, to maximize their access to nectar? So many questions…

Other Oak Denizens

While watching the California sister antics, I saw a bright yellow swallowtail butterfly cruise rapidly by. Was it a coincidence that it didn’t slow down or was it wary of the danger of trespassing into California sister territory?

In the heat of the day, a high buzzing noise fills the air around the oak groves; during the morning and evening, there are clicks. Both of those sounds are cicadas. The buzzing noise are male adult cicadas. In the soil beneath the oak leaf duff, unwinged young cicadas are sucking on roots for a living. One day, they emerge as winged adults, shedding a hideous exoskeleton that you can sometimes find laying around. Female cicadas lay eggs in holes they cut into an oak tree’s pencil-thin twig bark.

Occasionally, some say especially at the onset of droughts, oak moths flitter around the canopies of oaks by the hundreds. They look like large, animated confetti. Their larvae drop so much poop in those episodic years that it sounds like its raining. They don’t kill the oaks, generally- perhaps they help defoliate the trees to keep them from using too much water…or perhaps they help cycle nutrients with all of their rich poop.

Still More Oak Friends

More than once, I saw dragonflies perching on the outermost tips of oak branches. So many bugs jet in and out of the oak canopy that there are plenty of chances for those dragonflies to grab one up and make a meal of it.

I recently encountered an oak tree that buzzed. Looking into the canopy, I noticed that yellow jacket wasps were animating the entire tree with buzzing movement. The wasps were eating an outbreak of oak pests, or just lapping up sweet insect exudates, from scale or aphids, I couldn’t tell – they were too high up.

Some of the oak associate insects make odd looking structures called “galls.” There are lots of different things that do that, and that previous link is a great place to explore the amazing variation of species. I add a photo of one I found this past weekend here, next to a canyon live oak acorn cup.

Birds in the Mix

Oak trees also provide for many birds. Acorns are important food to California scrub jays, which have been shown to store 7,000 acorns in the soil and subsequently forgetting about some that germinate and grow. Acorn woodpeckers store their acorns in holes in tree trunks. Lots of other birds eat acorns.

The most colorful oak bird is the Townsend’s warbler, which (unlike many other of its warbler relatives) overwinters along the coast in California. It is a real treat to see this yellow-streaked bird darting around an oak canopy in the otherwise drab winter.

As oaks get older, they drop limbs, leaving behind cavities that provide nesting locations for other colorful birds, such as the Western blue bird. Such nesting cavities are a limiting factor for the survival of many bird species.

Help the Oaks

Besides the many species of life that oaks support, oak trees make great shade, are drought tolerant, and grow nice firewood. The entertainment value of having an oak close to your home is well worth it. You can grow an oak tree almost no matter what kind of soil you have near your house. So, why not plant one? Or not…if you are lucky enough to live near oak trees, you can bet that a scrub jay will plant one for you and all you need do is help the sprouted young plant along.

If you pick a nursery oak tree, make sure that it is less than a year old and that the roots aren’t swirling around inside the pot: messed up roots are terribly detrimental. If one of those early roots goes around in a circle inside the pot, the mature root will follow its path, a disadvantage to long-term tree health.

You’ll want to water a new oak regularly through the first summer, but not thereafter. Try to avoid summer water if at all possible past the first year.

Oaks grow faster than you think! Get ready to plant one this fall by scoping out the right spot…

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

(Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild and whose occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

June 28

#179 / Community Over Capital

I wrote, recently, about The Catholic Worker Movement, and today I am following up.

Let me alert you to the May 15/22, 2023, edition of The Nation, which ran an excellent article by Renée Darline Roden. Her article was titled, “Works of Mercy.” At least, that’s the hard copy version of the headline. Online, the article bears this title: “The Anarchism of the Catholic Worker.”

I think what The Nation has to say about The Catholic Worker Movement is important. My own writing on this topic is not so bad, either. I encourage you to find out more. Just click those links.

The actual purpose of this follow-up blog posting, however, is not to brag about my own writing, or to celebrate The Nation’s important comment about an important topic. As is so often the case, one little phrase in Roden’s article sent me to my computer, to type out today’s blog posting. Here’s the comment, from The Nation, that lets you know why The Catholic Worker Movement is so important:

Resisting capitalism by creating a new economic life is not just a Gen Z innovation on the Worker movement. Choosing community over capital as the basis for an economy is the original Catholic Worker mandate (emphasis added).

Choosing “community” as the organizing principle of our economy is the antidote to much that has made our economy, and society, and our politics, so unwell. Here’s how I usually put it:

“We are all in this together!”

If that is, in fact, true (and that statement is, in my estimation, a profound truth about our human situation), then we need to structure our society, economy, and politics to reflect that reality.  Learning about The Catholic Worker Movement is a good place to start.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

July 3

MOMS, COURTS AND PIT-BULLS UNLEASHED

Before finishing up their summer term, the US Extreme Court showed us how it intends to continue reinventing America. Not content with their earlier decisions of ending the right to an abortion, limiting the EPA’s ability to fight climate change, and eliminating state gun control laws, the rampage continued with their history-making lurching toward the right. The initial rulings issued were deceptive, prompting hopes of moderation for the upcoming remainder, especially in the aftermath of criticisms heaped upon the judicial body over the past months. The heaviest decision dealt with overruling a conservative case which would have allowed state legislatures to have nearly unrestrained power on running elections, with complete control over gerrymandered district maps, a MAGA-supported case that would have altered use of electoral votes in the presidential election. Trump attorney, John Eastman, had maintained that state legislatures could simply ignore election results and appoint electors pledged to Trump, thereby keeping him in the White House after the contested 2020 election; so this decision against the crackpot ‘independent state legislature theory’ was a big relief for liberals who looked with trepidation toward 2024, as the GOP and its billionaire sugar-daddies looked forward to stacking the deck. Justices Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett, stood with liberals SotomayorKagan and Brown for the majority opinion.

Lower court rulings were upheld, determining that Alabama had drawn congressional districts in such a way that voting power in Black populated districts was diluted, which will require that districts be redrawn. Past court decisions which tended to weaken the Voting Rights Act, tended toward more restraint in this instance, some crediting Chief Justice Roberts with being able to rein in his conservative firebrands. Then, the Kraken was unleashed, as college admissions no longer had to consider race, eliminating affirmative action in cases brought forward by Harvard and the University of North Carolina, a decision toward which Justice Thomas has been anxiously waiting to cast a thumb’s down vote. Such a supple wrist, with Ginni aiding him in the lead-up to big day! Saving the final big decision until Friday on the Biden administration’s Student Loan debt-relief order, the court ruled it unlawful, capping its reframing of laws and doctrines that have served the country well for generations.

NAACP President, Derrick Johnson, called out Justice Clarence Thomas as “the worst thing” created by affirmative action in condemnation of the Supreme’s decision to overturn affirmative action in college admissions. Thomas benefitted from the program, gaining a spot in Yale’s law school, and upon graduating, he wrote that racial preference had “robbed my achievement of its true value.” Then turn in your robe, Clarence! Johnson declared, “Race plays an undeniable role in shaping the identities of and quality of like for Black Americans. In a society still scarred by the wounds of racial disparities, the Supreme Court has displayed a willful ignorance of our reality.” On the other hand, former VP Mike-the-whitest-person-in-politics-Pence argued that affirmative action is no longer need as it once was to correct racial bias. “But I can tell you, as the father of three college graduates, those days are long over,” he proclaims. Wow! Who knew that ‘Mother‘ isn’t White?!!

The non-case in the release of the court’s decisions allows a Colorado-based web designer who opposes same-sex marriage to deny her services to LGBTQ+ couples. Lorie Smith, who brought the case was allowed to post a notice that she would not design a site for gay couples due to her religious beliefs, which could have violated Colorado law. According to Smith, a man named Stewart approached her to design a site for his wedding, but Stewart denies contacting her, says he has been married to the same woman for fifteen years and had no idea this case was wending its way through the courts. Although the state could have figured this out early on and saved everyone a lot of trouble, being vacated as a fraudulent case, her lawyers allowed the hoax to proceed. While Smith believes her First Amendment rights would be violated, Justice Sotomayor wrote that the plaintiff was objecting to “conduct,” and ignores the importance of our right to public accommodation. One person suggests, “Every website request begins with, ‘We are gay, and we need a wedding website. If the business is accommodating, then say, ‘Actually, I need a graduation website for my son…I just wanted to make sure you weren’t a complete homophobe.”

Probably shouldn’t be considered out of the ordinary, but an Indiana chapter of Moms for Liberty quoted Adolph Hitler on the cover of their newsletter, ‘The Parent Brigade.’ Their apology rang a bit hollow in light of their dedication to banning books and targeting LGBTQ+ students and school staff, in addition to reaching out to the Proud Boys, Three Percenters, Christian Nationalists and other extremist groups. The Southern Poverty Law Center says the group’s primary goals are to fuel right-wing hysteria and make the world less comfortable for Blacks and LGBTQ+ individuals. On a recent weekend, five GOP presidential hopefuls auditioned before the group’s ‘Joyful Warriors’ conference in Philadelphia, as they trumpeted their parental rights credo against such things as COVID19 precautions, school libraries, school curricula that covers race, sexuality, and gender. The Former Guy told the group, “You’re the best thing that’s ever happened to America.” followed by Nikki Haley saying, “When they mentioned that this was a terrorist organization, i said, ‘Well, then count me as a Mom for Liberty.'” Ron DeSantis praised them with, “Scrutiny of this group is a sign that we are winning this fight.” Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction, Ryan Walters, who has called teachers’ unions “terrorist organizations” capped the praise with, “You know who else was called a terrorist group, an extremist group? Those founding fathers. That’s who you are today. You are the most patriotic group in the country right now.” Other speakers continued the tirade, with James Lindsay describing the Pride flag as that “of a hostile enemy,” and Lt. Governor Mark Robinson (NC), declaring the transgender movement “demonic, and full of the Anti-Christ spirit.” All of this debasement, in Trump’s words is, “In service of fighting a cult of Marxists and perverts,” as these GOP candidates race to the bottom of the barrel.

As Bocha Blue of the Palmer Report writes, “These presidential contenders have no idea what’s about to come at them. They’re like innocent lambs heading to the slaughter…Right now, they’re doing the usual Republican dance, which is – run for President, but avoid attacking His Royal Traitor. Ah, but that’s OK because the ultimate test – the Big Kahuna – is getting ready to fasten its talons around ALL of them. See, it’s a question – one innocent question, but it has the potential to ruin all the candidates. It has the potential because there is no answer to this question. Anything they say makes things worse for them. Picture them being interviewed by reporters or perhaps in a debate. The Question: “Who is the rightful winner of the 2020 Presidential election?” Cue the bells of doom…it isn’t Trump they should be afraid of – it’s MAGA. Nobody in MAGA will EVER vote for a candidate who says Biden is the lawful and accurate President…MAGA wants their fantasy to continue. They will turn like pit-bulls on ANY candidate who doesn’t continue to delude them. And if they say Trump is the rightful winner? They lose all the independents. They lose America…They will try to answer with a non-answer. It won’t work. They will ALL have to say who they think is the President. And if they’re not worried about the answer, they’re in even more trouble that initially thought.”

After the Republican National Committee released its criteria last month with requirements for candidates to participate in the August debate, one of which is signing a pledge to support the Republican nominee, many of the hopefuls are taking umbrage over the mandate. Some are reluctant at signing, at least one refuses to do so, but the RNC is immoveable, chairwoman Ronna McDaniel saying, “It’s the Republican Party nomination, and the pledge is staying.” Time to uncage the pit-bulls, eh, Ronna?

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Butterflies”

“Well, I must endure the presence of a few caterpillars if I wish to become acquainted with the butterflies.”
~Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince

“The caterpillar does all the work, but the butterfly gets all the publicity.” 
~George Carlin

“Butterflies are self-propelled flowers.”     
~Robert A. Heinlein

...

Hope you had a great 4h of July! Here, have a couple of laughs!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...
Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment