August 26 – September 1, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Miserable warning systems here, out of the ashes, Boardwalk does nice!, false internet chain store ads here, tomato health, BMovie Bratton and Rake, Stockton on my Mind, and Lovecraft Country, KZSC is now all on robotic controls no live programming due to fires. GREENSITE…on the wildfires. KROHN…News from the Santa Cruz Progressive Alliance. STEINBRUNER…County Supes and State of Emergency, General Plan update, emergency services, UCSC impacts, County Homeless care, Soquel Water District in debt. PATTON…Pandemic Positives. EAGAN…Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. QUOTES… “HORIZON”

...

WALGREENS AND DODGE BUILDING. This was February 2, 1949 and of course at the Southeast corners of Laurel and Pacific. It once was George Ow’s property but he sold it long ago, and those owners sold it again.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

UNBELIEVABLY FAST WORKERS

PATSY CLINE SINGS “CRAZY”. There are singers and then there’s Patsy Cline!

DATELINE August 24

POTENTIAL GOOD NEWS. It’s not easy being positive lately with Adolph Hitler in the White House, COVID stalking our friends and neighbors, and the most immediate challenge of the fires that threaten at every moment. But as Octavia Butler quoted “In order to rise from its own ashes, a Phoenix first must burn.” Maybe Santa Cruz city and county can — or will — see the flaws. Encouraging growth at any cost, better treatment and solutions of and for our homeless. Some soon day we’ll be able to state “IT WAS WHAT IT WAS”

MISERABLE FIRE WARNING SYSTEM HERE! Many locals, along with my Los Angeles-based daughter who follows my Santa Cruz situation, have complained that any and all of our Santa Cruz warning systems are non-responding and hard to access. My daughter, who went through the recent Malibu fire, says that their warnings were immediate, easy to sign onto, and helpful. We need to demand that county and civic officials look into and change our systems.

SANTA CRUZ BEACH BOARDWALK GOES NICE. In what seems to me to be a big change in community involvement, the Boardwalk became the evacuating center for the  evacuated UCSC students. I don’t remember that kind of involvement  before. Then, too, the Boardwalk is starting a Friday and Saturday night drive-in movie theatre experience starting this Friday August 28 and 29. 120 cars only, at $25 per car in their River Street parking lot. No alcohol, no sitting on top of your car, no RV’s and you must buy your tickets ahead of time at beachboardwalk.com

FALSE ADVERTISING AND INTERNET ADS. It’s my humble opinion that we citizens of the USA, and the world ,could win a huge lawsuit against every big store ad we see on the internet. How many times have you gone to a store website, punched in the zip code to be sure it was the store near you, get to the store only to be told that “Gee, we don’t carry everything that internet says we do”. That’s false advertising; get somebody to do something about that.

TOMATO SEASON IN SANTA CRUZ. As longtimers know, different varieties of tomatoes grow better in different parts of our county and the city. A long-time friend provides me with his homegrown tomatoes every year. This time I looked up the health benefits of tomatoes, and was amazed at how hugely healthy they are. It seems to me that if Adam had given Eve a tomato instead of an apple we’d be far better off!

B MOVIE BRATTON & BUSHWHACKERS.. Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10am – 8:20am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Dangerous Dan Orange hosts the rest of the Bushwhackers Breakfast. Club. Tune in this Friday and listen to my critiques on

RAKE a Netflix offering from Australia which is a half funny, half murder — and very unpredictable. For example, did you know that Idaho is our only state that outlaws cannibalism? Then there’s STOCKTON ON MY MIND, an HBO feature documentary that takes behind the scenes with the current mayor of Stockton Michael Tubbs as he deals with the infinite problems of that wayback city. Lastly is LOVECRAFT COUNTRY. Another HBO feature that uses many of the famed author  H.P.  Lovecraft’s monsters, locations and names to tell the story of a man in the 1950’s USA looking for his father. It’s new, so I can’t predict how it will develop — but is good fun contemplating it.

August 24th 2020

Wildfires: Tackling the Real Cause

As of this writing, the smell of smoke is still in the air. Multiple wildfires continue to rage. Thousands have been evacuated with many losing their homes. After the crisis is over and the weary pick up the pieces of their lives, there will come the reckoning. My hunch is that climate change will top the list of causes and spark an urgent call for action. That is a good thing since we collectively live as though there is no crisis involved with a rapidly warming planet. However, if climate change is not the main cause and the real cause lies elsewhere, we may leave ourselves open for a repeat of this week’s devastating infernos if we jump to easy conclusions.

On Saturday I attended a 7-hour zoom meeting. Not your idea of fun? Fun may be a stretch but I found it illuminating with respect to this topic and important enough to share. The occasion was the Sierra Club CA Conservation Committee Statewide videoconference. I’m a newly elected member of the Steering Committee and also Northern CA Secretary, which means note-taker so no wandering off to get a snack.

After an update on current state environmental legislation, including that polluting interests are exploiting the opportunity created by Covid to push for bills that are all bad, we had a timely presentation on CA Wildfire Trends by Dr. Alexandra Syphard from the Conservation Biology Institute at Sonoma State. It was a great presentation and a reminder of the importance of good scientific research. The conclusions were not the expected. Turns out climate change is not the main driver or even among the top three and in some areas such as southern CA it has insignificant effect although in montane forests it is significant.

With historical data showing that since 1889 CA has had as big and as hot fires as the current fires, what have changed are the frequency and the level of destruction they cause. Since the 1940’s there has been an 871% increase in development in CA. As the researcher said, “The problem isn’t fire. It’s people in the wrong places.” And I’d add, far more people in far more wrong places. Ninety- nine per cent of fires are started by people: hence the increase in frequency. More people, more development in high fire risk areas, more fires, more destruction. Climate change can take a relatively back seat role on this one. Once again, it’s us humans. Building more and more homes and infrastructure in high fire risk areas results in an ever- higher level of destruction. Unless this top variable is addressed there will be trees cut and habitat removed in a vain attempt to keep the flames tamed. And it will fail.
The only solution is to halt new building in very high fire risk zones and a Resolution including that language was later passed by the attending 70 delegates. The aim is to have it passed into law by the legislature and governor.

This seems so sensible it should happen tomorrow. However opposition will predictably come from the usual line-up of real estate, building trades and housing activists. This alliance can be increasingly seen at city council and Board of Supervisors’ meetings, including a number of non-profits such as the Monterey Bay Economic Alliance. With well-organized turn-out, with environmental and neighborhood activists as scarce as the hairs on a bald man’s head, building after building is approved with no regard for the variable of cumulative fire destruction potential. Even something as simple as flame retardant roofs is not a requirement let alone a moratorium on building in high fire-risk zones. No, the problem is the trees. Cut ’em down!

I predict that there will be a clamor for the removal of trees from those who chose to live under trees and a commitment to beef up climate change efforts with grant applications centering inclusivity and social justice. Meanwhile the ignored real cause is staring us in the face.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

Brainstorming Political Goals

There is a new group known as the Santa Cruz Progressive Alliance. Begun by a pod of 17 individuals who have collectively been through dozens of progressive battles over the past two decades, this group came together to seek out candidates to run for the Santa Cruz City Council. Ultimately the group took a step back before proceeding with that search and began to brainstorm some political goals and vision for our community in these pandemic times. I do not speak for the group, but I took my own notes. See if any of these initial thoughts and ideas resonate with you…

Goals Must be: “…immediate and practical…”

  • Affordable housing and housing for homeless, jumpstarted, centered in downtown and at transportation nodes elsewhere in the city, based on a community planning process.
  • Reconstituted downtown Santa Cruz as a unique community- and visitor-oriented place, with Downtown Commons, Downtown Library at the Civic Center, renovated Civic Auditorium, Civic Center Plaza between library and City Hall — all with reduction of “dead space” or uninteresting side streets currently.
  • Regional and extra-regional green transportation system, adjusted for pandemic conditions, and including on rail corridor from Davenport to Watsonville and, longer term, “rail” service from San Jose to Los Gatos, Scotts Valley, Downtown SC, and the Boardwalk.

The Public Must Steer This Community E-Bus

  • All commission meetings are to be videotaped and available for dial-in access for input on zoom.
  • City budgets should be considered by the public over at least a month period with engagement and robust discussion at the Civic Auditorium.
  • Sustainable economy – define it and own it – growth for the sake of digging one out of a deficit has some unintended consequences. There are plenty of hotels being built, but not for families to live in or for the homeless to stay in.
  • Local economy – support locally owned businesses!
  • City as environmental hub tied with University – define shared values and priorities, and especially education and awareness of one of the most bio-diverse areas of the world!
  • Transportation to address the logjam of Hwy 1 – organizing more means of consolidated transportation based on destinations, rotating hours, and more telecommuting….What seems to work right now and what needs improvement?
  • Acknowledge and enhance upon our status as a culture and creative hub – more art, more music, more comedy, more theater – street art and community events.

Big Stuff

  • In light of Covid-19 pandemic, address student debt, business leases, and mortgage deferrals until they can be refinanced by state-owned bank.
  • Institute a locally owned, self-funding, mortgage-backed CA. Green New Deal.
  • Initiate virtual neighborhood “micro-councils” for instant referendums and inclusive debate.
  • Craft a local credit system that favors local production, local agriculture, and local well-being.
  • Santa Cruz for Santa Cruzans, enabling everyone to contribute to the community (community as community vs. community as a commodity)
  • Educate small business and corporations on how to decarbonize, repair, and upgrade our city and county’s infrastructure, especially transportation. Electric trains to Watsonville, SF, Oakland, Berkeley, San Jose… whoo hoo!
  • Affordable housing–for low and very low income–and housing for homeless, centered in the downtown and at transportation nodes with easy access to medical services, recovery centers, and trauma informed care.

Santa Cruz Dreamin’

  • A noncommercial city center where nothing is bought or sold just art and benches and trees and as place to have speakers, music FREE. Dogs on leashes. (Lot 4, on Cedar between Lincoln and Cathcart?)
  • Address income inequality locally by publicizing how to TAX THE RICH with a “People’s Budget Committee.”
  • A more open community media center. We need a local news show. Independent watchdog on SCPD and Sheriff’s office aired regularly on Community TV. Open up governance at new local radio station and allow diverse voices from our community to be heard. 
  • Allow for opportunities for people to participate local “good government” more than just voting every 2 and 4 years.
Bernie Tweet of the Week

“The world is rapidly becoming more unhealthy and unsafe right in front of our eyes. If we don’t act soon, we will see more devastating fires, more extreme weather disturbances, and massive human suffering. We can’t afford to wait any longer. We need the Green New Deal now. (Aug. 21)

Save the Beach Street Vendors 

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...

COUNTY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE COMMENT PERIOD EXTENDED TO SEPT. 4
If you care about what the quality of life in Santa Cruz County will be like in the near future, you need to take a look at the proposed County General Plan and Sustainability Update Scoping material and send comment.  The deadline for doing this just got extended a second time and will now close September 4.

Don’t worry about being detailed….just send in a list of what growth-related topics concern you and that you want to have included in the environmental analysis of any changes in the General Plan.  Do you want heritage trees protected to promote urban cooling in dense developments?  Do you think the Plan should include changes to code requirements for double-plumbing to use recycled water for toilets?  Do you think there should be dense clusters of multi-story residential development near the railroad tracks that could support future passenger rail?  What about noise levels?  Community gardening and composting centers?

Send in your thoughts by September 4.

CEQA Documents Open for Public Review

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DECLARE COUNTY STATE OF EMERGENCY
In a Special Board meeting on Tuesday, August 25, the Board will declare a Countywide State of Emergency due to the CZU Lightning Complex fires.  As I write this, over 70,000 acres have burned, and 77,000 people have been evacuated from their homes.

Having spent many hours helping at the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds evacuation shelter, I assure you this is indeed a serious situation.

WHY IS CAO CARLOS PALACIOS SUDDENLY THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES?
Only one day after chopping the job of full-time County Office of Emergency Services Director Rosemary Anderson, County Administrative Officer Carlos Palacios assumed the title.  The Warnella Fire near Davenport, which had begun on August 15 with the lightning strikes, was simmering away and filling the air with smoke as Carlos Palacios eliminated her job during the Final Budget hearing and combined it as part-time work for his office.

Shockingly, the Board unanimously voted to accept his recommendations to do so. A fire of unknown origin sprang up on the China Grade area of Boulder Creek that very evening.

On August 19, 2020, the County Administrative Officer, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed a local emergency related to the CZU August Lightning wildfires.

The Board must ratify that proclamation within one week of that act, and hence the Special Board meeting this week.

The Board and CAO Palacios should be questioned now and held accountable for removing the full-time focus of the Office of Emergency Services.  Did they act with the public’s best interest, or simply bow to  the ego-centric control  fixation of Carlos Palacios?

WHY IS THERE MONEY TO FUND A $20,000 STUDY OF UCSC IMPACTS, A $72,000 MOBILE VOTING TRAILER CREATE A BRAND NEW DEPARTMENT FOR HOMELESS SERVICES MANAGEMENT?
That’s right, Carlos Palacios deemed there  is not enough money to fund a full-time Emergency Services Director job and chopped 40+ other County worker jobs,  but there is $20,000 available to approve Supervisor Ryan Coonerty’s wish to fund a $20,000 study of the impacts of UCSC on the County?  (Item #9) Really?

Our County has managed quite well with election polling stations, but suddenly, a $72,000 mobile voting trailer is a must-have expense? (Item #8)

Why is there $152,000 available to create an entire new department for homeless services? (#15)
Is this a new industry for the County?

How did CAO Palacios manage to find money to keep the jobs of 8 cooks for the County jail food service, a the request of Sheriff Jim Hart  until December while an outside food vendor contract is discussed, but he could not find money to fund the jobs for the parking attendants, Senior Secretaries and custodians who lost their jobs?

While it was heartening to hear from SEIU Shop Steward Jim Heaney that employees were organizing an effort to give up a percentage of their pay to help fund and continue jobs of those who suffered Palacio’s ax , neither the  Board of Supervisors nor Carlos Palacios (paid nearly $400,000/year) offered to do the same.  Shame on them.

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT BOARD VOTES TO GO EVEN FURTHER INTO DEBT
At the August 18 meeting, the Board unanimously approved entering into a $89 million loan contract with teh EPA, and also spending an additional $1.3 Million to buy property for a learning center.  Wow.

Look at page 212 to see how much the cost increased for the expensive and risky Project to inject treated sewage water into the groundwater.

The construction cost used to be $90 million, but now the price tag is over $181 million, not including debt burden.  Ouch!

Look at page 214 at the existing indebtedness…..millions more.

And see that the Board just could not show any self-control or fiscal responsibility by agreeing to purchase additional property to build a new learning center (“the one at the District Office is just too small”  Board Chairman Daniels and other said as they patted themselves on the back.)

Meanwhile, the elderly fixed-income ratepayers are struggling to pay their exorbitant  water bills.

Write this out-of-control Board and let them know what you think:

Board of Directors bod@soquelcreekwater.org

Someone needs to tell them to grow up, and that there is a limit to what their ratepayers can shoulder.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK.

Cheers,
Becky Steinbruner
831-685-2915   I welcome your discussion.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

August 23

#236 / Pandemic Positives

An article by Lawrence Wright, published in the July 20, 2020, edition of The New Yorker, has some positive things to say about pandemics – or at least it has some positive thoughts about what has happened in the aftermath of past pandemics:

Great crises tend to bring profound social change, for good or ill. The consequences of wars and economic depressions have been amply studied; the consequences of pandemics, less so. This spring, in order to understand our possible future, I decided to look at the past through the eyes of Gianna Pomata, a retired professor at the Institute of the History of Medicine, at Johns Hopkins University. When we first talked, on Skype, she immediately compared covid-19 to the bubonic plague that struck Europe in the fourteenth century—”not in the number of dead but in terms of shaking up the way people think.” She went on, “The Black Death really marks the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of something else.” That something else was the Renaissance.

Wright’s article, “Crossroads, “part of the magazine’s “Annals of History,” is well worth reading. Wright definitely identifies both the “good” and the “ill,” in terms of lessons from past pandemics, and similarly assesses both the positive and negative possibilities that now face us, as we all wait for the coming conquest of the coronavirus.

It’s that “something else” possibility that is so intriguing to me. I believe that our current social, political, and economic exitence is mired in corruption, on just about every level.

I am thinking we could all use a “Renaissance” right about now.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

“HORIZON”

“A horizon on the road of hope is nothing more than a starting point for the next horizon.”
~Craig D. Lounsbrough, The Eighth Page

“We have always held to the hope, the belief, the conviction that there is a better life, a better world, beyond the horizon”.
~Franklin D. Roosevelt

“There is no horizon in Toledo. There are too many trees”.
~P. J. O’Rourke

“There are always new places to go fishing. For any fisherman, there’s always a new place, always a new horizon”. 
~Jack Nicklaus

They might be old but these vintage kitchen tools are AWESOME! ??????

They might be old but these vintage kitchen tools are AWESOME! ??????

Posted by Emmymade on Thursday, July 30, 2020


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 19 – 25, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Women on our city council and men on our Board of Supes, Cruzio scam warning, super tornado film, Angela Davis zinging Kamala…why? Yellow frames on stoplights, Rio Beach photo news. GREENSITE…on Covid and the Homeless. KROHN…another Covid strike?, Council candidate forums, developers and profit, affordable housing, list of ongoing huge developments. STEINBRUNER…County Supes and that pay cut?, Supes to close beaches for Labor Day?, Rural Roads and buried utilities, Vendorless Vendors-what?  PATTON…Laws of History. EAGAN…Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. QUOTES…”ELECTORAL COLLEGE”

...

BEATLES FANS AT THE DEL MAR “HELP” OPENING DAY. This was August 11, 1965. All of these greeters are 55 years older now. HELP was probably the Beatles’ best film. We need the same enthusiastic support when the Del Mar opens again!!!

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

BIZARRE MOMENTS THAT ARE UNBELIEVABLE

CHILD MARIONETTE DANCE.

DATELINE August 17
 
WOMEN ON CITY COUNCIL, MEN ON BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. Only in Santa Cruz County could you find a city council made up of all women, except for Justin Cummings. And only here too would you find all men on the County Board of Supervisors, all of whom are short except for Greg Kaput. Why is that I wonder?

YELLOW FRAMES ON STOPLIGHTS? It seems like all of a sudden we are seeing yellow frames around some of our local stoplights. It’s a great idea. Who thought that up — and why wasn’t it done eons ago? 

CRUZIO AND SCAMMERS. Being a very long-time Cruzio customer/client, I was surprised last week by an email that looked exactly like an email from Cruzio, telling me that my account was being stopped or my emails and been limited…or something like that. It said I must click on the link to resolve the problem. Being wary, I called and conferred with a crackerjack Cruzio representative who said yes, that is a scam announcement you got. He then said…CRUZIO NEVER SENDS AN EMAIL THAT ASKS YOU TO CLICK TO OPEN. NEVER. I just wanted to send that along to Cruzio users.  

ABOUT KAMALA HARRIS? Hopefully it’s the majority of us who are very happy that Kamala Harris is running for veep with Joe Biden. Why is it then that former activist Angela Davis and black S.F. Chronicle columnist Otis R. Taylor (08/17/20) have to critique and diminish Kamala’s track record and potential? They can’t possibly want another Trump term, but yet…??? 

RIO BEACH PROTEST PHOTO. If you scroll down to last week’s BrattonOnline, you’ll see a bunch of Rio Del Mar locals protesting and demonstrating to Keep Rio Free. I received data and names for that photo. Kate St. Clair tells us that State Parks already charged an entrance fee at Seacliff Beach, and they were going to do the same at Rio Del Mar, so the locals protested. Marilyn Jessup says…. “I was there; I made some of the signs. Carol, Judy, Christine Terry, Hunter and Lori, mostly friends from Watsonville High (before Aptos Hi was) and I’ll have to scratch my head to remember the others. The state wanted to put a toll kiosk at the entrance of Beach Drive. I think they actually did, but it didn’t last through the night…”. Now we know, more or less.

B MOVIE BRATTON & BUSHWHACKERS.. Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10am-8:20am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Dangerous Dan Orange hosts the rest of the Bushwhackers B. Club. Lately of course those screens are on anything but theatre screens . Tune in this Friday and listen to my critiques on RAKE do note that Idaho is the only state that expressively forbids cannibalism, and this Australian series is well worth watching. STOCKTON ON MY MIND is an excellent documentary focusing on their mayor Michael Tubb, the first African American elected to that post in their history. MUCHO MUCHO AMOR is also a documentary and tells the eccentric, fantastic, life story of Walter Mercado. Mercado was a showboating Liberace/RuPaul type character who wa famed throughout the Latin American countries. Tune in Friday at 8:10 am.

August 17

COVID AND THE HOMELESS.
A lead article in Monday’s Sentinel under Local News had experts wondering why Covid 19 has not hit the homeless population as hard as other demographic groups, especially since many have underlying health problems. I’m not sure why this is a head-scratching issue. Mindful of the need to not over-generalize from appearances, yet observant enough to notice that most who live outdoors are recognizable in their appearance due to lack of bathing facilities and lives of hard living, it is probably true to say that few of the houseless engage in the sorts of Covid-spreading behavior typical of the housed. 

I doubt there were many houseless among the more than 2,000 young males who crammed into Harvey West Park last Saturday for an unpermitted, unsanctioned SE Bikes Rideout, trashing the park, blocking access for others, then moving en masse to disrupt traffic and pedestrians along city streets with reported swipes at vehicles as they one-wheeled it to the beach area and West Cliff Drive. Cleanup next day was left to the city Parks and Recreation crew. 

I doubt there are many homeless people among the crowds in southern California in the Bible-Belt, who with pastor encouragement insist on their religious freedom to attend big indoor church gatherings, mask-less, in close proximity, with voices raised in Covid-happy song. 

I saw no apparent homeless people on city beaches this week, crammed with tourists, ignoring the precautions. Who cares if underpaid cooks sweat in masks in tiny overheated kitchens to provide food for the rest of us? While they put their health on the line for the public, others put selfish-interests above the public’s health. No wonder we have a Covid-19 death rate 40 times higher than New Zealand, adjusting for population size. When people refuse to obey the law, there are usually consequences. Where are the enforcers? The city ranger, employed by SCPD has a beat along the length of West Cliff to the end of Main Beach, including the Wharf and a ten-hour a day work schedule from Monday to Thursday. In summer. With crowds ignoring Covid requirements. A small shift in work schedule would have made a big difference. Why was this not done?

As for the unpermitted Bike Rideout that trashed Harvey West Park and violated all mandated Covid requirements, you can watch the same event here from 2017. It was smaller then and less disruptive. Word spreads through social media. This illegal event should have been on the city’s radar, anticipated and prepared for. Why did it come as a surprise? Why was our Park trashed with no one around to take charge? Have the enforcers thrown in the towel? Has fear of overstepping Martin v. Boise bounds made Nervous Nellies of the SCPD and its rangers? Were they elsewhere? If so, where?

San Diego has made its Convention Center available for the homeless population (think Warriors Stadium, the Civic, UCSC East and West Field gyms). The Deputy Fire Chief in San Diego estimates about 3,000 people has come through and with 6,000 tests so far, 18 have been positive. San Diego has seen no deaths among its 8,000 homeless people. According to the Deputy Fire Chief, they strictly adhere to 6 feet spacing, frequent cleaning and mask wearing. He adds: “we have a team of firefighters that walk the floors to put the cots back where they’re supposed to be.” A small point but a bit of Marine discipline would have the folks occupying the cots putting them back at the required spacing. Build responsibility and ownership. You don’t want highly paid fire nannies doing the job.

While it is good news that the local population of people who live in tents has lower than expected Covid cases so far, nonetheless the impact of their unregulated camping has dire consequences for the environment and for others’ safety. Campsites degrade our open spaces; fires are started; bird habitat cleared of brush for law enforcement visibility even as they admit they can do nothing; low income families who have previously frequented city parks are threatened by out of control individuals while rangers drive by without a word spoken: such are their orders. 

It seems at times that social justice and inclusion are rhetoric for grant applications rather than a commitment to achieve those goals in practice. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

August 17 

COVID-19 SPIKE IN SANTA CRUZ, EXPECT ANOTHER ONE SOON.

This is the Santa Cruz Main Beach this past Saturday 8/15. What is up? Not time to close beaches? As of Aug. 17th, there have been 1,454 people who have tested positive for Covid-19. In Watsonville, 753, Santa Cruz 256, Capitola 39, and Scotts Valley 34 residents have tested positive. This weekend saw up to a dozen officers descend upon vendors. They broke up their stands along Beach Street and hauled away their wares. What I am asking myself is, why is the beach still open? Police can go after vendors, but cannot enforce closing the beach at least between 11a and 5p? Seems like the vendors would not be there if the beaches were closed. Seems like most of the vendors were from the LatinX community too. Seems like this raid on the vendors goes against former-Governor Jerry Brown’s 2018 order to allow sidewalk vending because “[T]he safety and welfare of the general public is promoted by prohibiting criminal penalties for violations of sidewalk vending ordinances and regulations.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB946

City Council Candidate Forums
The votes are in… and Santa Cruz City Council candidates Sandy Brown, Kelsey Hill, and Kayla Kumar have pulled off a trifecta and handily won near-unanimous endorsements from SC4Bernie, several labor unions, and just this past week, the People’s Democratic Club. There has not been this kind of unity this early among the progressive community in many years. Covid-19 has gotten candidates to get out their message early and often and in creative ways as well. Oh, it will be likely that the real estate and developer-heavy Chamber of Commerce types will not endorse these three, nor will discredited former council candidate Robert Singleton’s Business Council endorsement, but this is a given and rightly so. Lynn Renshaw and Brad Brereton’s Santa Cruz Together didn’t even think candidates were worthy of an issues forum, they just endorsed the three pro-library garage, pro-7 stories along the river with little affordable housing, and pro-staff driven city decision-making machine.  If you want more rubber stamping of city department head decisions, then don’t vote for the Santa Cruz Squad. As far as campaigning goes, I suspect Brown, Hill and Kumar have enough political acumen up their sleeves and are already implementing inventive ways of addressing vote by mail, which begins Oct. 5.

Story Revisited
Transportation and Public Works Commissioner, Candace Brown emailed me this past week to remind me of what I wrote in an old BrattonOnline column about our development-crazy SC Planning Dept. Here is a portion of that column from July of 2019. All this development was the subtext of the Recall campaign. If you want to see a list of Who’s Who in SC Real Estate, and who paid for bogus recall mailers, petition gatherers, and consultants, go here

If you want to see the mind-boggling list of projects proposed for Santa Cruz, go here

If all this development happens, even half of it, Santa Cruz will likely not only look different, but not be the place we would not necessarily want to call home. But, I have not lost hope in the electoral and activist community I live in. With Brown, Hill and Kumar running for seats on the city council, we have a fighting chance to fashion a city “of, by, and for the people.” (BTW, there are many part of the Declaration of Independence I do not agree with, but I have always been fond of that line.)

Cha-Ching!
The 12 years preceding the 2016 city council election were years of real estate good times, which presaged a developer bonanza-BOOM. It was a time that witnessed a distinct shift in Santa Cruz political culture, one that turned away from no-growth and slow-growth pro-environment policies towards an embrace of market-rate development for wealthier folks who do not yet live here. Mantras were born: all housing is equal, and any housing is good housing. And so, a sign was slowly coming into view on Highway 1 just north of Schaffer Road and on Ocean Street too, just south of Highway 17. That sign now reads: Santa Cruz for Sale, Market-Rate Developers Come on in! First came the Broadway Hyatt hotel, then 555 and 1547 Pacific Ave. condo projects (no affordable rental units), and the 151-room Marriot took shape during these years and is now almost completed. This is not to mention the once affordable apartments that are now gone at the La Bahia site on Beach Street. They have found a hotel developer that will build soon. In fact, the Boardwalk’s nemesis to that project for so many years, a veteran Santa Cruz activist, is now moving to New Mexico (go figure!) having lost this battle for a community-oriented, saner project that would’ve placed historic preservation and lower rents front and center. 

The New Normal (unless the community organizes for real affordable housing…)
So now, let’s turn to chapter 2 in the once politically unlikely, Surf City Development Boom. I write “political” because so often these same developers need variances, parking spaces, and city infrastructure improvements. The city council, acting as an agent for residents given the representative government we have, can get a better deal, or can simply say, no deal, if the developers are not willing give up significant concessions in order to build here. So, what’s on the table as we look out on the next 3-5 years? Thanks for asking. It ain’t pretty if you are a teacher, barista, electrician, or student looking for something affordable in this town.

190 West Cliff Drive & Dream Inn (DONE)
This project is being pitched by Tyson Sales. He’s quite a pitchman too. After an earlier and well-attended public meeting kind of got messy, too many questions and not enough answers, he is pressing ahead with this 89-condo shopping center project across West Cliff from the Dream Inn on West Cliff at Bay Street. As you might imagine, neighbors ain’t too happy. It appears the project will adhere the 15% affordable housing city policy, but that will leave 85% unaffordable units likely destined for the second home crowd, or sucking from the over-the-hill tech bubble. Lots of Google, Amazon, and Apple buses are already traversing Pacific Avenue. Look for their routes to incorporate West Cliff if this project goes in. The proposed traffic light at Bay, large buildings overshadowing the folks at Clearview Court mobile home park next door, and bringing retail above Pacific Avenue all appear to be flies in the development ointment. Stay real tuned: it should be going to the Planning Commission for approval sometime in August.

908 Ocean Street (Getting Near DONE)
Wow! This will be the mother (father?) of all development projects being proposed for Santa Cruz. It’s a 333-unit project planned for Ocean Street between Water Street and Marianne’s ice cream. (The developer did promise to relocate the venerable Marianne’s.) The project’s development group has quietly assembled 19 parcels and plan to construct a 281,854 sq. ft. of “mixed use development with approximately 5,944 sq. ft. of commercial space…” The rub with this development is that it is called an SOU project, meaning “Small Ownership Units.” It’s never been done here before and it sounds like a project catering to tech workers. Of course, some might argue that the Santa Cruz tech sector is growing and perhaps this might satisfy that growth. Again, stay tuned, try to stay woke, and don’t mourn, organize.

Front Street and Soquel Avenue (Try closer to 400 units now!)
This is a Barry Swenson project at the corner of Soquel and Front Street. It was originally talked about as being a boutique hotel, but has since morphed into a 6-story 170 apartment units rental project. Fifty-eight percent of the units from what I understand are planned to be studios (600 sq. ft.) and “micro-studios” (400 sq. ft.). As yet, not a family-oriented 3-bedroom among any of the units. If state density bonuses are applied for and approved, this project could get higher and add 40-50 more units. They also need a permit from the Army Corps to fill in the ditch that separates property from the San Lorenzo River bike path.

“Front and Riverfront Apartments”
This project will bring another 175 units, 20 affordable and 155 unaffordable, to the downtown across from the Metro station. This project also appears to require permission from the Army Corp of Engineers to fill in the ditch area that separates the river side of the property and might result in another modern-esque, 7-story behemoth shadowing the river and the bike path. Whatever happened to Spanish colonial revival? Look at 401 Pacific as well as the new Lunai Lodge at 550 2nd Street. Both keep within a liberal Spanish-California colonial style.

205-unit project at Laurel and Pacific Ave (Permits ready, but I heard those permits might be up for sale)
This Owen Lawlor-Devcon project was approved by the last council on a 5-2 vote. Councilmember Sandy Brown and I voted no because it lacks any affordable units within the project and therefore, yields to the community 205 unaffordable rentals. It is currently mired in litigation because it is out of compliance with the city’s 15% inclusionary ordinance according to those suing. The developers argue that they are “giving” the city the old Tampico’s site in order to comply with the 15% (now 20%) rule, but it may be insufficient given the cost and length of time it would take the city to move a project forward.

1900 Ocean St. Extension
This project, not well-received by neighbors, appears to be on hold because of neighborhood objections. It will contain mostly unaffordable “residential” condos. Originally proposed at 40 units, it was brought down to 32 by the previous council on another 5-2 vote (Brown and Krohn objecting, mostly because of the unaffordability of units to locals and also the proximity to the venerable Santa Cruz Memorial Cemetery’s chapel.) What we know for now, according to the Planning Dept. web site, is that public comment period ended on July 7th…and now “the Community Development Director (Lee Butler) will take the public’s input into consideration in rendering a decision…”

Addendum (350 Ocean, Almost Done and 314 Jessie put on hold for now)

Please, do not take my word as the last one on any of these projects. Go to the Planning Dept.’s web page to see them for yourself. There is one affordable project taking shape on Jessie Street and anther at 350 Ocean Street. Both projects are needed and could offer some relief to renters. To paraphrase the French philosopher Albert Camus, I would like to support well-designed affordable housing and still love my government. As currently planned not very attractive. Low income housing does not have to be ugly. I’m confident we can get a better design for Mid-Peninsula’s project at 314 Jessie. It will be entirely affordable and that is wonderful. I have yet to see the 350 Ocean project. There’s much more on that city web site that I will take up in a future column, but at the end of the day, if the developers are to have their way and spend down our collective Santa Cruz seed corn, those of us who can afford to stay are witnessing an unprecedented era of market-rate apartment growth. If on the other hand, the voters of Santa Cruz push and prod their elected representatives into building only affordable housing until we’ve caught up with all the market-rate crapola that’s gone up; if residents stand up and demand a couple of hundred affordable units at the two major sites the city owns; if we stand up and say no parking garage, leave the Farmer’s Market where it is, and remodel the library at its current site on Church Street, then we will have a town of, by, and for the folks who reside here. Of course, we cannot take our eyes off the university growth machine for a single moment. The U is bringing in students much faster than we can build housing. In addition to scrutinizing all of the above projects, we must demand that the UCSC stick to the 2020 Long Range Development Plan. In other words, 19,500 students, y no mas!

“NYPD union endorsed Trump. I’m sure this is part of their neighborhood outreach plan. 

Also, does anyone else see a potential problem with police unions – enforcement arms of the state with lethal weapons – promoting “preferred” candidates for office or is that just me?”

(Aug. 14)

One More…

Future of Affordable Housing in Santa Cruz?

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
August 17

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CLOSE BEACHES FOR LABOR DAY WEEKEND
The Board will most likely adopt a Resolution on August 18 meeting, as Item #10, to close all beaches over the Labor Day Weekend, even though County Health Officer Gail Newel has stated it is highly unlikely that the virus is transmitted in outdoor environments and the beach poses a very low risk of person-to-person virus transmission.  So, how come the Board wants to do this???

Here is the text of the staff report:

“As the Board is aware, various state and local public health orders have been issued in order to combat the on-going COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 emergency constitutes a serious danger to the health, safety, and welfare of individuals in Santa Cruz County. Recently, we have seen increased community spread, infection rates, and hospitalizations locally and regionally.

Despite warnings, local beaches remain an attractive spot for congregation, particularly for young people, which have also been experiencing the greatest increase in positive cases.  In order to protect the health and safety of our community and to impact the spread of the disease, the attached resolution will close beaches from Saturday, September 5th at 5:00 a.m. until Monday September 7th at 5:00 p.m., with exceptions for public use on Saturday and Sunday from 4:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. each day. While in the past open hours were from 11:00 am to 5:00 pm, both the City of Capitola and the City of Santa Cruz requested these more restricted hours in order to be able to maintain appropriate enforcement staffing.

In order to promote physical and mental health, the ocean will be available for water-based activities such as surfing, paddle-boarding, boogie-boarding, swimming, snorkeling and kayaking, and beaches may be traversed during the closure period to participate in these activities. Additionally, facilities adjacent to County beaches such as parkways, sidewalks and trails will remain open.”

Read more here: Consider resolution to impose beach restrictions for the Labor Day weekend in accordance with the local health emergency, as outlined in the memorandum of the County Administrative Officer – Santa Cruz County, CA

MANY COUNTY RURAL ROADS WILL HAVE UTILITIES BURIED UNDERGROUND
Here is a bit of good news.  The County Board of Supervisors will most likely approve 14 projects that will put overhead utilities underground along rural roads in high-fire risk areas. 

PG&E notified that County of a work credit allocation of $17.5 Million in funds allocated from  July 1, 2019 through May 31, 2020 and includes the 2020 work credit allocation, absent the recent underground work done in the Pleasure Point area. 

Take a look at the locations in Consent Agenda Item #55 on the August 18 Board agenda:

Accept proposed Rule 20A projects; dissolve the East Cliff Drive Underground Utility District No.19; direct Public Works to prepare a resolution of intention and return to the Board by November 1, 2020 with the resolution of intention, as recommended 

Other past projects including work along Soquel Drive in Aptos and Trout Gulch Road to Cathedral.  It is encouraging that the County is considering project areas in the wildland areas where fire concerns are high.

Read more about the Rule 20A overhead conversion program here: Conversion of PG&E electric overhead power lines to underground

Please send your thanks so Matt Machado, Director of Public Works:

Matt Machado matt.machado@santacruzcounty.us  

WILL COUNTY SUPERVISORS REALLY TAKE A 10% SALARY CUT?
The County Board of Supervisors told the people in June that they would take a big cut in salary, in solidarity with the thousands in Santa Cruz County who have lost their jobs and businesses due to corona virus shutdowns.  However, evidence of those promised cuts were not available during last week’s Budget Hearings.  

They are still not all that transparent, but Ms. Christina Mowrey at the County Auditor & Controller’s Office wrote this in response to my query:

“In response to your question, the furlough savings by Department is included in the Concluding Report -Exhibit 2H, page 136 of the agenda packet.  The total general fund furlough savings for the Board of Supervisors Department is $216,722.37 based on 7.5% furlough for all employees except the Board Members calculated at 10%.”

Looking there, I am still not sure the Board is taking a 10% cut, but let’s hope the smoke and mirrors will clear at some point, and transparency will return.

Take a look here to see the big salaries of CAO Carlos Palacios (nearly $400,000/year): 2019 salaries for Santa Cruz County | Transparent California

A 7.5% pay cut for him will have much less hardship than for those workers who are paid much, much less to begin with, and may be barely making ends meet.  And then there are the nearly 50 employees whose jobs are being eliminated completely, such as the County Office of Emergency Services Administrator.   Who will plan for County response in the next disaster?  That will be left to a part-time person in the CAO’s expanded staff, who may or may not know how to do the work. 

“VENDORLESS VENDORS” GET MILLIONS IN COUNTY AGREEMENTS
Does this make sense to you?  I wrote County Auditor-Controller Ms. Edith Driscoll, for an explanation.  Here is what she replied:

Ms. Steinbruner,

A vendorless vendor is listed for contracts that require multiple vendors to fill the needs of the contract. So, one larger amount can be encumbered for the contract with multiple contractors/vendors. When the various contractors submit their invoice, the dollar amount is extracted from the contract and then the vendor number is changed to pay against that vendor.

 Best Regards,

Edith Driscoll

This still makes no sense to me, and does not seem very transparent either.  Write Ms. Driscoll if you are also curious:  Edith Driscoll edith.driscoll@santacruzcounty.us

Look in Item #4 of the August 18 1:30pm  Final Budget Hearings and see the millions of dollars the County expends on nebulous contracts:

2020/08/18 01:30 PM Board of Supervisors Revised BUDGET HEARINGS – Last Day – Web Outline – Santa Cruz County, CA

HOW SANTA CRUZ LOST ITS FIRST HISTORIC LANDMARK…AND CONTINUES TO BULLDOZE ITS HISTORY
Lately, every Monday, on page 2, the Santa Cruz Sentinel features excellent local history articles by Mr. Ross Gibson.  This week’s article is especially interesting, in my opinion, because in many ways, the City’s disregard for historic preservation back in the 1960’s has not changed to date.  I think you will enjoy this article, and reflect on what the City is doing downtown to bulldoze historic structures on Front Street, and other areas.  Many thanks to Mr. Gibson for his interesting articles, and to the Sentinel for recognizing the value of a community knowing its history, and the lessons not to be forgotten.

How Santa Cruz lost its first national landmark

SEND YOUR THOUGHTS BY THIS FRIDAY ABOUT THE FUTURE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY GROWTH 
Send your comments to the County Planning Dept. by this Friday, August 21, to   

tell the Dudek environmental consultants creating the environmental analysis for what matters to you about the future growth of Santa Cruz County.

Comments on the scope of the EIR will be accepted in writing (see the Notice of Preparation for mailing address), or via email. Click here to email comments on the scope of the EIR for this project: CEQA-NEPA@santacruzcounty.us. Please reference the project name in the email title.

It is telling that the County Planning Dept. website shows the last time an Environmental Public Meeting occurred was in 2014.  See the attached screen shot.  What does that say about the County Planning Department’s commitment to holding public meetings to discuss and explain impacts of large projects, such as the current County General Plan and Sustainability Update?

The Planning Dept. rubber-stamps the majority of large projects these days as “CEQA EXEMPT” and lets the developers do what they wish, eliminating affordable housing that “just doesn’t pencil out”  along the way.

Make sure you review the document, focusing on areas that matter to you most (traffic, water, trees and urban cooling, etc) and send your comment by 5pm this Friday.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL PUBLIC HEARING. MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Take care,

Becky Steinbruner

ki6tkb@yahoo.com, 831-685-2915   
I welcome your discussion. 

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

August 11
#224 / Laws Of History?

Are there laws of history? That question is the title of an interesting article in Aeon, an online magazine. Click the link to read the article. That’s where the picture came from. New Yorker profile of historian Yuval Noah Harari, referenced in the Aeon article, is also interesting. If you care about history, and specifically about the study of history and the writing of history, both articles are worth reading.

Neither of the articles, however, as far as I am concerned, provides a dispositive answer to the question posed by Aeon

Not to worry, I am pretty sure I know the answer, and I am happy to share it with you here. 

There are no “laws of history.” History is, in one sense, the story we tell ourselves about the things that humans have done, and about the meaning of the things that humans have done. The word “history” can also mean not just the “story,” but the historical things we have done in and of themselves. So, there is a “history” of World War II, by which can mean the story of what happened in World War II. 

But, again… history is not just a “story.” World War II did happen, so what actually happened in the past (the things we might tell the story about) is the real “history.” History as “event,” and history as “story” (which are different things) are labeled with the same word.

The two articles I have mentioned, the way I read them, are mainly focused on “historiography,” which is the study of the methods that historians use in developing history as an academic discipline. Do the stories keep repeating familiar and predictable patterns? Are the things that have occurred in the past (and about which we will write history) determined by what has happened before, the way that the trajectory of a billiard ball can be predicted with accuracy if you know about the initial force that put it in motion and the characteristics of the table on which the ball moves? Where “history” is concerned (as opposed to what happens to the billard ball) there may be past patterns, but there is no certain predictability, and thus no “law” of history.

There really are “laws” that govern the future trajectory of the billiard ball. But there are no “laws” of history that will allow us to know what will happen in the future, just because we know about what has happened in the past. Why not? Here is the reason: human beings are not determined, but are determining. We can do things that have never been thought about or done before, things that are unexpected, and that will have results that are different from the results that have usually occurred in similar situations in the past. 

This is to say, with respect to human action, that human beings have the inestimable gift of “freedom,” which means that we are always capable of doing something that is unprecedented. We can always tell ourselves a new story, a story never known about or heard before. In the human realm, “anything” is possible. We are not subject to the laws of physics, so that the very word, “law” means two dramatically different things. 

In the Natural World, where the laws of physics (and other natural laws) prevail, a “law” is a statement that “describes” what must and will happen. The “law” articulates an inevitability.

In our world, the world we create, the human world, a “law” is not a description but a prescription. Our human laws are not statements that tell us about what must and will happen, but are our written-down statements about what we want to happen, and about what believe that we should do. 

History is what we do, and history is the story we tell about it later. 

When we follow our prescriptions, we change the world, and when we actually do change the world, we have a pretty nice story to tell!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

 

“ELECTORAL COLLEGE”

“Presidents are elected not by direct popular vote but by 538 members of the Electoral College”. 
~Thomas E. Mann

“The Electoral College needs to go, because it’s made our society less and less democratic”.
~Pete Buttigieg

 “Every citizen’s vote should count in America, not just the votes of partisan insiders in the Electoral College”.    
~Gene Green

“Some of George W. Bush’s friends say that Bush believes God called him to be president during these times of trial. But God told me that He/She/It had actually chosen Al Gore by making sure that Gore won the popular vote and, God thought, the Electoral College. “That worked for everyone else,” God said ‘.
~Sen Al Franken

Sarah Cooper, who does the hysterical lip syncs of Donald Trump on TikTok, is also a standup comedian…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 12 – 18, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…NO new Nissan in Soquel, Community Credit Union moving, Public Bank in Santa Cruz?, Blended Bridges and LONDON Nelson, B Movie Bratton critiques. GREENSITE…on Covid comparisons. KROHN…will be back next week. STEINBRUNER…Supervisors and hosted rentals, County general plan, Sea level rising plans, Historic Resources Commission demolishes history, county COVID policies lacking. PATTON…Beauty and barbed wire. EAGAN…Subconscious Comics, Deep Cover. QUOTES…”PATIENCE”

...

PROTEST AT RIO DEL MAR BEACH. This was July 13, 1968. The signs say “they took Seacliff “, “God gave us Rio” and so on. What the issues and actions were back then I have little/no idea. Any facts on this somewhat organized protest would be appreciated.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

NO GRAVITY GYMNASTICS.

MOZART MUSIC MURDERED.

DATELINE August 10

NISSAN OPTS OUT OF 41ST AND SOQUEL DEVELOPMENT. County Supervisor John Leopold announced Monday (8/10) that Nissan said they are not going to open a dealership at that corner. He said he’ll keep us up to date on who/whatever does decide to do business there. Concerned citizens aren’t sure if it’s Nissan or Don Gropetti (present Nissan Dealership owner) who decided to give up that corner.

MASKS AND MALE PATTERN BALDNESS.
One of the infinite odd features of wearing a mask in public is the almost impossible challenge of recognizing (or ignoring) friends. For example, a masked Ryan Coonerty and I recognized each other at the market through our masks. I realized that the only way that could have happened was by recognizing “male pattern baldness”. No, I don’t know why it isn’t “male baldness pattern”. 

COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION MOVING. Folks at our Santa Cruz Community Credit Union did confirm that they are moving. But they don’t know where to, or why. They cite the apparent unsafety of the large parking lot next door, and employees parking problems. Check out their statement.

OUR COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION AND A PUBLIC BANK. We are seeing and reading more and more enthusiasm and hope in creating a “Public Owned Bank” here in Santa Cruz. Sounds like a perfectly perfect solution to the crazed and unwarranted expending of our deposits to places and causes we don’t like. But I’m trying to learn what the difference is, or would be, between a Public Bank and our Community Credit Union….any explanation would be welcome. 

BLENDED BRIDGE & LONDON NELSON !!
I got many, many notes and emails last week telling me about a group in Santa Cruz named Blended Bridge. They have a great website: www.BlendedBridge.com 

Check out their events, past, present and future. Marches, BLM, speak outs, panels, paddle outs, and super enthusiasm and goals. One of their goals is to correct the name of Louden Nelson to LONDON Nelson. The late Phil Reader worked and researched  LONDON’s history for decades. He and I plotted as many ways as possible to get his name spelled correctly. It’s like this….we’ll never know London’s real slave name, but  his “owner” — who named London’s other two fellow slaves Marlbrough and Cambridge — freed him, and he came to Santa Cruz. Let’s hope and help them rename it before the next Juneteenth!!!

B MOVIE BRATTON & BUSHWHACKERS.
Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10am-8:20am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Dangerous Dan Orange hosts the rest of the Bushwhackers B. Club. Lately of course those screens are on anything but theatre screens . Tune in this Friday and listen to my critiques of Marcella a British woman detective murder chase. Lenox Hill a documentary that views as a complex medical doctors and patients adventure in that hospital in Greenwich Village..More about Athlete A and sex abuse in the U.S. Gymnastics world. The re-releaseing of classics like “Gone With The Wind”, Shawshank Redemption, Godfather,  and dozens more. Plus the maybe news that the Regal chain will re-open August 21st or maybe August 28. They’ll play old classics like Rocky and Jurassic Park for low cost admission then open with Tenet on Labor Day. Tune in.

August 10

COVID COMPARISONS.
In the early 1980’s I happened to be enjoying lunch alone at India Joze on Center Street when a man at a nearby table introduced himself as Buz Bezore, editor of the Santa Cruz Express. He asked if I would consider writing a feature on “Why I Live in Santa Cruz” as part of a series he was running in that popular weekly alternative newspaper. At the time I had lived in Santa Cruz for a mere seven or eight years and worked at UCSC for three or four as founding director of UCSC Rape Prevention Education. Santa Cruz in those days was a relatively small town. There were no techies, mountain bikes, designer dogs and tourists left town right after Labor Day. Rents were averaging $200 a month for a house. I was surprised to be asked but figured my outspoken work in rape prevention, local politics and efforts to save big trees had attracted sufficient interest to warrant the request. I said yes.

It was no short piece and I worked on it for days. The overall theme I chose was to contrast nostalgia for the country I had left, Australia, with its bluest of blue skies, colorful birds, cobalt seas and warm golden sands with a growing affection for my new home, with its grey fog, cool summers, elusive birds and cold ocean waters. The thread throughout was my growing love for Santa Cruz with its funky buildings, historic beach area, unique neighborhoods, lack of pretension, political activism and a small vibrant UCSC where I could ride my horse to work. I used the platform to critique the Regents’ growth plans for the campus. That earned me an irate response in the form of a personal letter from a reader who instructed me to go back to where I came from and he (I assumed a he since he had chosen to remain anonymous) made the hollow offer of a one-way ticket back to Australia. 

I was thinking about that offer recently when it became clear that during the pandemic and for the first time in 45 years I cannot even visit Australia, despite an Australian passport and citizenship. Only residents can return from overseas and they are required to quarantine for 14 days, now at their own expense. The contrast between Australia and the USA with respect to Covid 19 is stark and there is little to applaud on this side of the Pacific.

As of writing Australia has had 21,000 cases of Covid 19 with 313 deaths in a country the same geographical size as the continental USA with 25 million people concentrated in coastal cities and towns. If you do some simple arithmetic to account for population differences, Australia’s death numbers would be 4,069 if the population were approximately the same as that of the USA, which has 170,000 dead from Covid 19. This is a difference significant enough to ask why and while we know some of the reasons, others are worth considering.

It’s not as though Australia did everything right and early on. They let a cruise ship dock in Sydney and passengers disembark,  the source of early contagion. They were somewhat slow to impose lockdowns and initial shortages in PPP were evident. When the government did act in late March, however, it was coordinated and effective. The Prime Minister who is head of the conservative party summoned a National Cabinet comprised of the various state and territory elected leaders who met daily via secure video-conferencing to deliver a consistent response, informed by the chief Medical officer and coordinated with the state medical officers. Both major parties, usually at each other’s throats, agreed to work together as a united team. Yes, they didn’t have a Trump and those who fear and defer to him but there were other factors involved in their success at controlling the spread of the virus.

Besides international border closures and quarantines, Australian states also closed their borders to personal inter-state travel with few exceptions. There is widespread acceptance and adherence to spatial distancing. Tele-health is popular and acceptance of an app to track exposure is supported rather than feared as a way to do contact tracing. It’s true they don’t have a leader spreading false information and leading by bad example but not all the blame can be pointed in that direction. 

The widespread ignoring of masks, large gatherings and spatial distancing by too many in the USA is more typical of this country than elsewhere. The failure of law enforcement to enforce public health measures sets a dangerous precedent and has contributed to the spread of the virus. Australia has its share of conspiracy nuts and those who don’t believe the virus is serious but their numbers are not large enough to make the difference. The vast majority follows the rules. Those who don’t, get a one thousand dollar fine. With the virus largely contained, although not in the state of Victoria, schools in other states are open. Social gatherings of small groups up to ten are allowed. 

More personally, I was struck by the difference in the scene of a popular surfing beach in Australia with a surfer walking down a marked pathway, alone, to go surfing with no crowds around him, compared to the scene at Cowell Beach last Saturday. Probably 30 people crowded in the parking lot, cheek by jowl, no masks, kids and adults co-mingling with not a ranger or cop in sight. It might have been for a paddle out but the attitude of not taking this pandemic seriously was evident as was the absence of those empowered to curtail such ignorance. Our numbers of dead from Covid 19 reflect poorly upon us.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

August 10

Chris will be back next week. 

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
August 10

PUBLIC HEARING TO CHANGE REGULATIONS FOR HOSTED RENTALS AND HOME OCCUPATIONS
I was pleasantly surprised to see the half-page ad in Sunday’s Sentinel (8/9) (page C3) providing proper notice of a crucial public hearing before the Board of Supervisors on August 18.  Usually, this important information is buried in extremely fine print that goes undetected.  However, there is no link provided in the ad that directs the public to the actual proposed changes to County Code 13.10 that are being considered.  The only source provided is “For more information on this subject, contact the Planning Department at 454-3112.  I did so, and left a voice message for Planner Stephanie Hansen.  

The County Planning Department website home page has ZERO information about this critical public hearing scheduled before the Board of Supervisors and is void of any access to the proposed Chapter 13.10 Zoning Regulations.   Here is a link to that section of the Code, but what would be changed?  We simply don’t know.

If the Board of Supervisors and County Planning Dept. Director are sincerely interested having the public weigh in with your opinion regarding the proposed changes in County Code Chapter 13.10, why is there no way to access the actual changes proposed?  Is this yet another chipping away at the extensive Code Modernization that the Planning Dept. rolled out in concept with multiple public meetings in 2015?  Who knows?! 

Contact Planner Stephanie Hansen stephanie.hansen@santacruzcounty.us   454-3112 and the Board of Supervisors 454-2200 and demand the strike-out/underline version of the information be made public now, rather than just the Friday before the August 18 public hearing, in order to provide people ample time to read it, do any necessary research, and submit timely written comment that the Board will then have time to read and consider before the public hearing.

Chairman Greg Caput greg.caput@santacruzcounty.us
Ryan Coonerty ryan.coonerty@santacruzcounty.us
Zach Friend zach.friend@santacruzcounty.us
John Leopold john.leopold@santacruzcounty.us
Bruce McPherson bruce.mcpherson@santacruzcounty.us  

YOUR CHANCE TO SAY WHAT MATTERS TO YOU ABOUT THE FUTURE QUALITY OF LIFE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ENDS AUGUST 21 AT 5PM
The County Planning Department is working with Dudek Consultants to craft the County General Plan and Sustainability Update environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.  NOW is the time to tell the County what you think matters for inclusion in the study….and you only have until August 21 to do it.

Look here, and send your written comments by the deadline. 

It was extended from August 3, but without any further public workshops to explain or describe the importance of the analysis.  Oddly, neither the Planning Department nor the Board of Supervisors wanted the County Commissions on Water, Environment, Fish and Wildlife, Housing, Fire Departments, etc. to get involved with this crucial change to the County’s quality of life planning.  These Commissions did, however, spend an exhaustive amount of energy and time reviewing the proposed County Cannabis Codes recently.  

Does that make sense to you?   Not to me.

ADD YOUR VOICE TO CITY OF SANTA CRUZ SEA LEVEL RISE PLANNING DURING THIS QUICK MOMENT
Will anticipated sea level rise flood the City of Santa Cruz downtown areas?  How would City planners accommodate that possibility?  Are the multiple massive high-rise developments currently being shoved through during the coronavirus lockdowns be able to handle that if it were to happen? 

Now is your chance to weigh in with your thoughts, but do it now because the public comment period is only open two weeks, August 3-17, and ends next Monday!  The City is providing this interesting interactive virtual town hall meeting

Quick…before the City shuts the door in your face!  Many thanks to the astute reader who sent me this information.  Did you see any notices in local papers or receive any notice in the mail? 

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ HAS NO RESPECT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION OR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF MULTIPLE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENTS
I was shocked to read a recent Sentinel article describing the Santa Cruz City Historic Resources Commission approval to demolish multiple historic buildings in downtown because City Planners had paid no heed to preserving them while developing the downtown plan.

Why did the City allocate no resources to allow any level of consideration or respect for historic preservation?  What will become of the quality of life and neighborhood character that we know and care about? 

Many thanks to Ms. Carmela Weintraub for her thoughtful Letter to the Editor in Sunday’s (8/9/20) Santa Cruz Sentinel:  “I was dismayed to hear that the Santa Cruz City Historic Commission recommended approval for the demolition of buildings on lower Front Street, paving the way for a multitude of buildings along the San Lorenzo River. This is only the beginning of many projects slated for apartments and condos downtown.
My dismay is about the apparent complete lack of connection of the buildings and nearby environments, reflecting neither the character of our town nor the natural habitat of the San Lorenzo River.

In the past, there have been many voices advocating for the look and feel of this City. We have betrayed that role in letting this dense, boxy, modern (?), concrete get past the City bureaucratic process. Now let’s get back to light, lyrical and bright and beautiful, wisely reflecting more of what SC is all about.

Let’s not, quote, “let the wrecking ball loose on own town” again!, end quote.

— Carmella Weintraub, Santa Cruz 

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CORONAVIRUS POLICIES MAKE NO SENSE AND CAUSE FURTHER STRESS
Santa Cruz County Health Officer Gail Newel’s statements about the coronavirus issues in this County make no sense, and neither do the actions taken by the Board in response that encourage neighbors to turn each other in to authorities.  

I would like to point out the final sentence in the August 6, 2020 Sentinel report 2 New Deaths reported in county on page A1, continuing on page A2.  Gail Newel states: “Transmission methods suggest it is “very unlikely” a person would pick up the virus while out in public, Newel said.  “It’s almost always from a close contact –a family member, an intimate partner or someone with whom the person has gathered.”

So why the mask laws, now punishable by fines instituted by the County Board of Supervisors?

Also, the report mentions the two new deaths were supposedly due to the virus, but on last Friday’s KZSC interview with Gail Newel by Dangerous Dan, she could not provide any details whatsoever about the cause of death of these two new supposed coronavirus mortalities.  

How can she then claim that the two people died because of coronavirus and add them to the County’s statistics, keeping Santa Cruz County on Governor Gavin Newsom’s restrictive ‘Watch List’? 

Also, take a look at the last sentence in this article, also in the August 6 Sentinel.

Bag fees suspended, ‘blue check’ offered to county businesses” that began on page A1 and continued on page A2 

 “Information on how to join the program and the full list of requirements can be found at sccvitality.org.  Businesses displaying the check but failing to meet guidelines can be reported via email at blue-check@santacruzcounty.us.” 

What on earth is the County thinking?  People can now make life miserable for competing business owners and neighbors, or report them to the County out of sheer malice.  

THE SNEAKY VIRUS
Many thanks to the reader who sent the following read-it-and-weep comment that points out the seriously incongruent policies Governor Gavin Newsom continues to impose on California, wreaking havoc with peoples’ livelihoods and social well-being.

“This coronavirus is the strangest virus l’ve ever heard of….It’s very dangerous the way it spreads….It is so mysterious the way it lurks in schools, but then dies at Home Depot….It can wreak havoc in churches; praying people are exceptionally vulnerable! Although it’s Mind-boggling how it vanishes when people stand close together holding signs, destroying businesses, homes, property, monuments, etc. Yet, standing to watch a marathon or a concert triggers its wrath. It is sneaky. It can spread when buying clothes at Kohl’s but not at Target. It is non-alcoholic. It can’t spread when you are buying beer. It lives for two days on Amazon boxes, you must wait 48 hours to touch them but It can’t survive on Dunkin Donuts coffee cups, so enjoying a hot cup of joe is safe. It is the most curious thing, how it lives on basketballs, baseball bats and ballet bars, but dies on WWE ropes and Walmart shopping carts. It is spread by hair stylists, dog groomers, and dentists, but not by bank tellers, cashiers, and fast food workers. It’s so smart. It won’t bother the first 10 people but it knows when the 11th person shows up so be careful if that’s you. It even knows what you want vs what you need. If you want a massage or your nails done it is very actively on the prowl and not even a mask can stop it but If you need a plumber, it is weak, and a mask will keep it away. It also seems to be most dangerous after 5:30pm so businesses must start to close before the virus comes out and wreaks havoc upon the populations. Whoever heard of such a smart sneaky virus?!?”
– Author Unknown

From the YouTube video “I have had Enough” by Barricade Garage, 

WILL ALL PEOPLE BE REQUIRED TO CARRY PROOF OF COVID-19 TESTING RESULTS  OR VACCINATION TO BE IN PUBLIC PLACES??

Because so many people are now isolated and living in fear, our civil liberties are at great risk.  In my opinion, here is a threat coming down the pike:  being in public means proving your virus test and health status, and possible future vaccination status as well.   

COVIPASS technology, is now available to download and carry that information with you to document such proof.  It can be scanned from a distance of 25′.  This technology is supported and possibly funded by Bill Gates, a prime financial backer of COVID-19 vaccine research and ID 2020 technology.  

With UC Czar Janet Napolitano now mandating all UC students be vaccinated with flu shots by November 1, 2020, I think invasive technologies like COVIPASS will likewise become mandatory.  What a slippery slope…..

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING AND SEND WRITTEN COMMENT.  TAKE A WALK IN THE SUN AND STAY HEALTHY.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK. 

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner 685-2915 ki6tkb@yahoo.com   I welcome your discussions.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

August 6
#219 / This Really Grabbed Me

I saw this photo about a month or so ago, conveyed to me by one of the email bulletins that flow through my inbox. Glen Taylor is the artist who created this. You can learn something about Glen Taylor’s broken-porcelain art work by clicking on this link

Here is a link to Taylor’s personal website

Somehow, the photograph above really grabbed me. I stopped scrolling my emails, and stared at that photo. I tried to think why. Why should this particular artistic creation, which I find horrible to look at, have so completely captured my attention that I literally could not turn away from it? 

I don’t know whether you, my reader, will have the same reaction to Taylor’s art work that I did, but that is the reaction I had. What is depicted is horrible, and I could not turn away from it. 

As I thought about it, I found the answer. Taylor’s art work reminded me of something else, another photograph, another recent photograph, a picture that I just can’t put out of my mind: 

It seems to me that Taylor’s art work is telling us that under that creamy white polish of our high culture, that lovely china from which we eat, each day, and from which we sip our tea, there is a horrible, horrible reality. Taylor’s art reveals a lacerating truth about the massive pain that is hidden under that creamy covering, with all its flowers and flourishes. A similar truth is revealed by the photograph above. 

oooOOOooo

What do we do when we realize that there is a horrible, hidden truth beneath what we have come to accept as our lovely life? 

First, we do not turn away. We never turn away again. 

Then… we throw out all those dinner plates, fine china all. We throw it all out. 

We have yet to do that, of course, with respect to the realities revealed by the photograph above, the photo that shows us the police killing of George Floyd, with that horrible knee on his neck, the photo that makes clear that there is, in fact, barbed wire beneath the ceramic coating of our social, political, and economic life, and that it is not just the killing of George Floyd that has been revealed, but the killing of so many others, past, present, and continuing.

That is the picture that has grabbed us, that has captured all of our attention, and from which we cannot turn away. 

Once we have seen the barbed wire beneath the surface of what so many have thought was beautiful, we know that we must throw out those flawed and fatal plates. 

We have yet to do that, of course.

But we must. 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. Out of the vaults and into the dark, strange world of only you know where. Scroll low down a little.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s hot, new, current, Deep Cover down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “PATIENCE”

“Rivers know this: there is no hurry. We shall get there some day.”
~A.A. Milne, Winnie-the-Pooh 

“Trees that are slow to grow bear the best fruit.”
~Moliere 

“To say that one waits a lifetime for his soulmate to come around is a paradox. People eventually get sick of waiting, take a chance on someone, and by the art of commitment become soulmates, which takes a lifetime to perfect.”
~Criss Jami, Venus in Arms 

“Make your ego porous. Will is of little importance, complaining is nothing, fame is nothing. Openness, patience, receptivity, solitude is everything.”
~Rainer Maria Rilke 

Maximum nerd happiness achieved 🙂


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

August 5 – 11, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Goodbye Drew Glover, Shark Park, MAH a blight, B Movie Bratton. GREENSITE… is off, will return next week KROHN…BLM month summary, Drew Glover and Selma. STEINBRUNER…masks and fines, County selling our election data, will our ballots get counted, hotels for homeless, Grand Jury and our board of Supervisors. PATTON…A flawed Society. EAGAN…more Deep Cover and Subconscious Comix. QUOTES… “BOREDOM”

...

VIETNAM PROTESTERS September 27, 1965. Yes, protesters at our Santa Cruz Post Office. The sign held by the guy in the white short sleeved shirt in front says, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last”.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

TOP SONGS OF 1963. Seems like only yesterday!!!

RAQUEL WELCH AND CHER. Old fashioned views of our stars back when..

DATELINE August 3 

GOODBYE DREW GLOVER. We should have a contest to find the most unusual reaction to Drew Glover’s moving to Alabama last week. It was announced in Alabama before July 8, but the news spread slowly. Here’s what he said to one enquirer… “I moved out of Santa Cruz. It brings with it a combination of sadness and, to be honest, relief. On June 1st I relocated with my fiancée Karen Moorer to the great state of Alabama and I am now the Principal Coordinator of the Selma Bridge Crossing Jubilee, dubbed “the largest celebration of civil rights in the country”. Pretty awesome stuff and I couldn’t be more humbled to be offered the position”.  Read more from Drew in Chris Krohn’s report.  

SHARK PARK. A physical therapist friend was musing last week about “Shark Park” in Aptos. After a bit of research, I found that so many great white sharks are returning that the old name Shark Park has become near-famous again. It’s also known as Sand Dollar Beach. That surfer who was attacked recently was known by sharks as “pied de Surfeur du sang”. 

MOVIE BRATTON & BUSHWHACKERS  Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10 am-8:20 am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Dangerous Dan Orange hosts the rest of the Bushwhackers B. Club. Lately of course those screens are on anything but theatre screens. Tune in this Friday and read my critiques of “Doctor Sleep” starring Ewan McGregor. It’s sort of a sequel to Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining. But not nearly as good. More about the complete season of Defending Jacob featuring Michelle Dockery which is extra slow and also just suspenseful enough to keep you tuned in. There’s more about Tom Cruise working with Elon Musk to make a movie IN ACTUAL SPACE with a budget of $200 million dollars that will go straight to streaming. 

August 3.

Gillian Is off this week. Will return next week.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

August 3

BLM AGAIN, EVERY MONTH AND ALWAYS.
July was declared as Black Lives Matter Month. Well, now it’s August and I say let’s make this month too and for the entire year, and then see where we are. The young people in this town are organizing. Us older folks can either get on the train, stay off, or just watch it go by. A lot has been happening in this town these past two weeks with more called for in presentations, panel discussions, marches, and actions this week and in the upcoming weeks. I am including in the column this week various undertakings and endeavors so as to build bridges between the various communities that make up the Santa Cruz Community. I urge you to go to https://www.blendedbridge.com/post/dear-santa-cruz +and find out more information about the incidents detailed below.

Open Letter to Santa Cruz from Esabella Bonner

Dear Santa Cruz, 

As Black Lives Matter Month in Santa Cruz and the momentum for the movement wind-down simultaneously (or so it feels), it is with a somber heart that I bring forth a number of atrocious events that happened during this historic month in our community. 

For me personally, when I heard that Mayor Justin Cummings had declared July 2020 Black Lives Matter Month in Santa Cruz, I was optimistic. I was excited to think of the incredible actions and policies that would come from this declaration to propel our community forward and be a blueprint for the entire nation. 

Unfortunately, the type of actions that we witnessed were not ones of policy, but rather a month fueled with hate-filled incidents across our entire county. From direct to more subtle forms of racism- our BIPOC (Black Indigenous People Of Color) community experienced an uptick in the wide variety of levels of blatant white supremacy and inaction (apathy) for our Black Lives here in Santa Cruz. 

Below I have highlighted the main incidents that have headlined Black Lives Matter Month 2020. The forms of racism vary and are executed by community members, law enforcement, and a combination of systems that are in place to continue to keep us oppressed and our spirits low. 

With a number of our elected [officials] out on PTO (Paid Time Off ) and the council members not meeting at all during the month of July (which is always the case), #BlackLivesMatterMonth felt like a not so subtle attempt to distract and deter attention from the main goals at hand – policy and sustainable change in our community. 

I close this letter by highlighting that unfortunately Black Lives Matter Month for me was nothing but an attempt to put a band-aid over a gaping wound. This is a reminder that our work as a community towards dismantling racism and white supremacy must be strategic, aggressive, and swift. We cannot continue to allow this culture of hate to thrive in our community. It is my hope that we continue to work toward actionable policies and acceptance within our community for the years to come. 

Happy Black Lives Matter Month.

Signed sincerely, 

Esabella Bonner, Blended Bridge 

Black Lives Matter Month- July 2020

With our leaders nowhere to be found for the entirety of Black Lives Matter Month, it continues to be up to us, the outraged Santa Cruz Community, to continue to use our voices and firmly reject the notions and actions of white supremacy. While we remain hopeful and optimistic about the changes that are to come in our community, we also recognize the importance of accurately highlighting and remembering the first annual Black Lives Matter month in Santa Cruz history. 

Signed sincerely, 

Esabella Bonner, Blended Bridge
Ayo Banjo
Thairie Ritchie
Faith Brown, organizer 
Arianna Jones
Chloe Gentile-Montgomery
Marissa Molina
Ayah Abdul-Hadi
Hector Marin
Naythan Ramos

See pictures, videos and list of further incidences here 

SELMA 1, SANTA CRUZ 0.

Drew Glover’s New Home: Selma, Alabama

This comes from Drew’s recent Facebook posting:
Hello Santa Cruz Family. I have been getting contacted by a lot of you over the last day or two checking-in to see if the rumors are true. I was waiting till August 6th, the anniversary of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, to make the official announcement, but since people are already posting about it I figure you might as well hear it from me.

I moved out of Santa Cruz. It brings with it a combination of sadness and, to be honest, relief.

On June 1st I relocated with my fiancé, Karren Moorer, to the great state of Alabama and I am now the Principal Coordinator of the Selma Bridge Crossing Jubilee, dubbed “the largest celebration of civil rights in the country”. Pretty awesome stuff and I couldn’t be more humbled to be offered the position. 

If you wanna touch base or hear more about the work I am doing, please don’t hesitate to reach out and say hi. Also, if you are an organizer or fundraiser, I am building a National Coordinating Committee that will take on various roles of support to make sure the 2021 Selma Bridge Crossing Jubilee is successful. If you are an experienced organizer or fundraiser and you are interested in lending your talents to the design and development of an educational event that impacts hundreds of thousands of people, or you know someone who is, contact me.

I will miss you all in Santa Cruz and the Bay Area, but I will be back to visit sporadically so the next time I am in town let’s get our social distance hang-out on, or let me know if you wanna connect over Zoom.

“It is our duty to fight for our freedom.
It is our duty to win.
We must love each other and support each other.
We have nothing to lose but our chains.”

Assata Shakur

Very truly yours in peace, love, and justice.

Drew

Here is the news story about it and stuff

“Abolishing ICE isn’t a radical thing to do, it’s a humane thing to do.” (July 31)

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...

August 3

WEAR A MASK OR PAY A LARGE FINE
The County Board of Supervisors will most likely adopt their plan on August 4 to fine anyone not wearing a mask up to $500 and authorize additional “enforcers” to issue the tickets. Item #10 will do just that, but with no definition of what other violations might result in a ticket as deemed a “violation” of public health orders, or exactly who these new “enforcers” would be.  The City of Santa Cruz recently expanded their enforcement officers to include the City Forester and Street Sweeper.  

Read more here about the County’s action considered August 4 by the Board in Item #10:

Consider adoption of an urgency ordinance adding Chapter 7.109 to the Santa Cruz County Code to provide remedies for violation of public health orders, as outlined in the memorandum of the County Administrative Officer – Santa Cruz County, CA

What about people with a medical exemption that will be physically harmed by being forced to wear a mask?  Is it medically advisable to require people to wear a face mask while they are running and need unobstructed oxygen during intense physical exertion?

If you have questions about this, call your County Supervisors 454-2200.  You can also call any of the four people hired by the County to answer “COVID-19 Hotline” questions  454-4242 (nowhere to be found on any County Health website) Monday-Friday 8am-6pm.  

DID YOU KNOW THE COUNTY ELECTION DEPARTMENT SELLS YOUR DATA?
Another excellent investigation and report by the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury this year takes a look at how your personal voter registration information is handled…and legally sold.    

WILL YOUR BALLOT BE COUNTED?
A recent article in the Washington Post described why significant numbers of mail-in ballots were rejected, and should cause us all to wonder how the system can be improved.  

Here is a good article by Santa Cruz County Clerk and Elections Manager, Ms. Gail Pellerin,  that was in the Sentinel last Sunday, describing how careful this County’s election results will be handled. 

I wondered about any problems with signature comparison, knowing that my own signature looks nothing like it did even just a couple of years ago.  When I wrote Gail Pellerin with my question about the need to re-register to update my signature, she responded right away.  Her answer was that Elections staff will contact each person whose registered signature does not match that on the ballot.  Imagine all that work!

COUNTY PLANS TO BUY HOTELS TO PERMANENTLY PROVIDE HOUSING FOR THE HOMELESS
The County Board of Supervisors will consider a report at their August 4 meeting that recommends the County purchase a number of hotels to provide permanent shelter for the homeless.  This is part of the State Project Home Key, formerly known as Project Room Key.

This is moving quickly, because the money must be spent within six months.

Half a billion in half a year: The ticking clock on California’s newest homeless plan

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK.

Cheers,

Becky Steinbruner, 831-685-2915, ki6tkb@yahoo.com   I welcome your discussions! 

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

August 3 
#216 / A Worried Friend

Well, now time passed and now it seems
Everybody’s having them dreams
~Bob Dylan, “
Talkin’ World War III Blues

A couple of days ago, I was holding forth on the topic that when we see some “warning signs” that fascism is coming forward around the bend we should not, thereafter, immediately leap to the conclusion that fascism is in fact already here, or that it is anywhere near likely or inevitable. 

It is that “self-fulfilling prophecy” thing that I am worrying about, and that phenomenon is hugely indebted to our willingness to think of ourselves, mainly, as “observers” of reality, instead of keeping in mind that it is we who create the realities we inhabit. 

At any rate, concerns about the growth of authoritarian tendencies in the United States seem to be multiplying. More and more people are “having them dreams.” More and more people are worrying about fascism’s incipient arrival, including a fellow named Daniel Schwammenthal, who characterizes himself as a “worried European friend.” If you click that link, and can slip by what I am pretty sure will be a paywall of some kind, you can read the entire column in which Schwammenthal outlines his worries. I’ll summarize what he says here, though, just in case you can’t get access to the column in its entirety.

Schwammenthal’s column, which appeared in the July 29, 2020, edition of The Wall Street Journal, makes a case for American “exceptionalism.” 

I learned to cherish the U.S. long before I had the privilege to live and study there. History can be very personal. What Madeleine Albright called the “indispensable nation” meant the difference between life and death for my family. I was brought up in the firm knowledge that had it not been for those unimaginably brave American boys storming the beaches of Normandy, I wouldn’t have been born, and my parents and the rest of my people would have been extinguished. No doubt I’m leaving out entire libraries of nuance, but that is the quintessential truth.

America today is what it has always been: a flawed society, like all others, but also a unique force for good in the world. No other multiethnic, multireligious society can credibly claim to be more democratic, more prosperous and more just than the U.S.

This is giving the United States a lot of credit (and deservedly, I think). However, Schwammenthal is, as the column headline said, “worried.” 

America can’t remain the leader of the free world if it is itself no longer free. To be the guarantor of Western security requires military and economic power, but also a sense of mission. And right now Americans are committing mass character suicide. If the country goes beyond acknowledging that racism and inequality persist and must be fought, and instead convinces itself that it’s inherently and irredeemably racist, it can’t possibly continue to believe that it has any right to lead. Such an America would reject the notion that the West is worth defending and regard Europe as also inherently oppressive. We know who will fill the vacuum left by an America in retreat and at war with itself. As they watch America’s self-immolation, leaders in Moscow, Beijing and Tehran surely can’t believe their luck. 

Any functioning society must extend tribal loyalty beyond the ties of blood. Ethnicity and Christianity were the glue that helped hold the more homogenous European nation states together. America’s Founding Fathers laid the foundation of a society worthy of the motto “e pluribus unum”—out of many, one—by replacing ethnic and religious loyalties with liberal ideas and deist ideals. A shared loyalty to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution allows Americans to see each other not as strangers but as fellow citizens.

Yes, the U.S. has not always lived up to its ideals. But to claim that the Founding’s “promissory note” was never anything but a scam to maintain a system of white oppression is an historical revisionism that will erode the country’s foundation (emphasis added).

I am not sure how many who will read this blog post will find themselves agreeing with what Schwammenthal is saying. It is my opinion, though, that now is not the time to decide that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were, and are, a tissue of deception. Instead, I think we need to reaffirm that both the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution are the foundational pronouncements of our collective intention – an intention to which we continue to pledge allegiance.

Do “We, the people” (those of us alive right now) affirm that all persons are “created equal?” Do those of us present on the scene today affirm that each one of us has an “unalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” Do we believe that our government, which we call “ours” because we take personal responsibility for what it does, must follow the requirements outlined in the Bill of Rights?

If we do, then fascism, or totalitarianism, or a submission to authoritarian practices will not occur in the United States of America. And we can be certain in stating this, because we will not just stand around as observers, noting all the latest outrages perpetrated by our president or the Attorney General, or some other governmental authority. We will, rather, do whatever must be done to ensure that Lincoln’s words at Gettysburg will prevail. 

As before, we will give our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor to ensure that “this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

This is more or less what John Lewis was talking about in the essay he wrote just before he died. 

As for me, I am willing to make the pledge. And I don’t think I am alone. As we contemplate authoritarian actions by the government, and by the president, here is what I think we should make clear to our worried European friends (and to ourselves): 

We’ve Got This! 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. Classic, profound and memorable Subconscious Comics a few knob twirls below.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s inspired and new Deep Covers down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “BOREDOM”

“The two enemies of human happiness are pain and boredom”.
~Arthur Schopenhauer

“To do the same thing over and over again is not only boredom: it is to be controlled by rather than to control what you do”.
~Heraclitus 

“The truth is that everyone is bored, and devotes himself to cultivating habits”.
~Albert Camus, The Plague 

“I’m bored” is a useless thing to say. I mean, you live in a great, big, vast world that you’ve seen none percent of. Even the inside of your own mind is endless, it goes on forever, inwardly, do you understand? The fact that you’re alive is amazing, so you don’t get to say ‘I’m bored.” ~Louis C.K. 

Drunk History is awesome! Watch this 🙂


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 29 – August 4, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Felix Street Development, Justin Cummings Monument, Democratic Socialists of Santa Cruz, Corn on the cob, B Movie Bratton. GREENSITE…on Remembering Al Mitchell. KROHN…Jimmy Panetta letting us down, AOC‘s stinging reply, real estate developers. STEINBRUNER…UCSC and growth, LRDP, enrollment numbers, County General Plan, Washington bust in Watsonville. PATTON…Biden, the liberals and progressives. EAGANQUOTES…”Virtual”

...

WALNUT AND PACIFIC & DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ 1925. That would be Super Silver where the theatre used to be. Berdel’s on the left , Forever 21 on the very close right hand side. And yes, my sources are dated.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

Don McCaslin and Warmth Band on the Capitola Wharf

HOOSIER HOT SHOTS. Pre Spike Jones musical geniuses.

DATELINE July 27 

FELIX STREET DEVELOPMENT, OR??? Friends and neighbors of the Westside Neary Lagoon area emailed me to let all of us know about the proposed development at 101 Felix Street.  Felix runs parallel to Chestnut Street, off Laurel by the Santa Cruz High football field. (That’s five three-story buildings) The would-be developers are Braddock and Logan. Let me know if you can find out any information on their reputation. Below are the points and issues, just as the neighbors sent them.

Issue: Overcrowding

  • The construction of 80 new units in five 3 story buildings on a street with an existing 312 residences, where there is extremely limited parking. 
    • Spot rezoning the project area to higher density would require an amendment to the City’s General Plan, which would set the stage for more 3 story buildings throughout our neighborhoods. 
    • This is not the right area to build– we are the densest neighborhood of the Lower Westside. 
    • Expensive apartments create overcrowding– 16 of the 80 proposed units will be “low income,” while the remaining 64 will be at market value ($3k/month). 
  • We support affordable housing, just not on this already overcrowded street on the banks of a sensitive wildlife refuge.

Issue: Environment & Conservation

  • Cutting of 22 heritage trees (redwoods, cypresses, and willows)
  • Cutting these mature trees depletes a daily supply of oxygen for up to 88 people. 
  • Significant negative impacts to the sensitive and endangered wildlife in Neary Lagoon. 
  • More pets on the shores of Neary Lagoon will negatively impact the habitat. 
  • Weakening of the Local Coastal Program by the California Coastal Commission
  • Construction debris and increased car presence will further pollute the Lagoon, which drains to Cowell’s Beach– one of the most polluted beaches in California

Issue: Social Equity

  • The owners of Cypress Point do not manage or maintain their 240 expensive apartments now, we cannot trust them to manage 80 more units and 100s more new tenants. 
  • 80% of the new units will be unaffordable. 
  • Construction noise for 1.5+ years
  • Less on-property parking for tenants during the construction. 
  • Increased traffic means less family-friendly streets. 
  • Climate crisis– the climate crisis is a social justice issue. Access to clean air is a human right. Heritage trees absorb over a half a ton of carbon each year.
  • Cypress Point Apartments only has one path of egress in the case of a fire or tsunami. Further densifying puts human lives at risk. 

The information below includes links to some basic information on the proposed development at Cypress Point Apartments located at 101 Felix Street, names of who to contact, actions you can take, and other ways to express your opposition to this project.   

How to Express Your Opposition 

Email the following people (and CC savenearylagoon@gmail.com!)

Copy & paste their emails here for convenience:
savenearylagoon@gmail.com, rbane@cityofsantacruz.com, kevin.kahn@coastal.gov, cityplan@cityofsantacruz.com, jcummings@cityofsantacruz.com, dmeyers@cityofsantacruz.com, citycouncil@cityofsantacruz.com, kbeiers@cityofsantacruz.com, sbrown@cityofsantacruz.com, rgolder@cityofsantacruz.com, cmathews@cityofsantacruz.com, mwatkins@cityofsantacruz.com 

If you’ve already contacted these people, we encourage you to do it again. We MUST continue to remind them of our opposition to this project. 

Other Ways to Communicate 

  • Submit concerns directly through the City’s Planning and Community Development webpage for the proposal here
  • On the same webpage linked above, scroll down and sign up to “stay informed” so you can receive information on upcoming City planning meetings and hearings. 

A call for experts!

If you or someone you know is an expert in marine biology, environmental science, birding, etc. please let us know! We need YOU especially to write letters and join our fight”. 

from Your neighbors of the Neary Lagoon Neighborhood. savenearylagoon@gmail.com 

JUSTIN CUMMINGS MONUMENT. A member of the Democratic Socialists of Santa Cruz
wrote to state.. “Justin Cummings’ membership gained him support in his campaign…but now he doesn’t even show up for meetings”. I can attest to Justin Cummings appearing at the Community Water Coalition asking for our support in his campaign for City Council, and he got it. We too believed he’d be community-oriented, environmentally focused and what we still call “progressive”. We soon learned that Cummings is friends with the developers of the Errett Circle Church property. He voted to tear down the church and build many, many condo visitor apartments — exactly the way they wanted him to. His Cynthia Mathews-inspired vote to tear down our community library and build the parking garage combo library monstrosity cements his reputation just about forever. So when it’s time, let’s be sure to join together and tear down any monument to Justin Cummings.

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF SANTA CRUZ. The meetings are the first Saturday of each month. That would be this Saturday August 1st. Here is a link to DSA (Santa Cruz). They have many committee/group meetings check out the ones you’re interested in.

MARY KELLY’S COMMENTS. Mary K. reads, researches, and ruminates on some of the funniest stuff I see online. Here’s an example from Buzzfeed: 19 More Stores With The Perfect Response To People Not Wearing Masks… thank Mary when you see her. 

CORN ON THE COB. I’m not about to start a cooking/food/ column, but I’ve always loved corn on the cob. It was a tradition in my family. So anyway, I had a week-old sweet corn on the cob, with silks, husks and all. The internet said to pop the entire piece into the microwave and cook for 5 (five) minutes. It was perfect. Sweet, no need for salt, easy removal of the silk. Try it.

B MOVIE BRATTON & BUSHWHACKERS. Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10 am-8:20 am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Tune in this Friday and hear my critiques of such a boring, dull, fairly well-acted murder chase as Defending Jacob. Michelle Dockery (star of Downton Abbey) is the only reason to link to this one. She’s  developed an almost perfect American dialect from her snippy, efficient British one. Then there’s “Doctor Sleep” and believe it or not is a sort of sequel to “The Shining”. It contains noting close to the Jack Nicolson insanity. It does have Ewan McGregor in the lead. It’s only for the curious to stream in on. Then I wrote last week …do not miss the odd, grisly, well-acted, murder drama as “The Plagues of Breslau” (2018) It’s a Polish film with a 83 RT score. I’d never heard of it, and lucked on it by chance. (Netflix ). Odd and brilliant plot about a serial killer who kills every day for five days at 6 p.m.. The  there’s huge flops, such as KNIVES OUT. It got great reviews, has a very famous cast including Daniel Craig with the worst fake cowboy accent ever, but even Jamie Lee Curtis and Christopher Plummer can’t save this waste. 

July 27

REMEMBERING AL MITCHELL

I hoped the day would never come when I would write of Al Mitchell in the past tense. But eventually it comes for all of us. I once asked Al if he feared death. “It won’t worry me at all!” he exclaimed. “I won’t be aware I’m gone.” Sadness and grief are for the still living. There will be countless stories shared about Al and many knew him long before I did. I’ll just share a few reflections on a man I liked and admired. 

For those who did not know Al Mitchell, the name Mitchell’s Cove is probably the easiest link. That stretch of beach between Almar and Woodrow was named for Al by a surfing buddy in the early days and the name stuck. Al was born in Santa Cruz and lived for the rest of his life with his wife Ruth Mitchell in the house built by his grandfather on Almar Avenue. Both Ruth and Al were local schoolteachers. Al taught woodshop and math at Mission Hill for many years, which means that most local boys had Al for a teacher and still refer to him as Mr. Mitchell despite their being well into their adult years. 

Al was a marine in the Korean War. I once introduced him to an Army Captain, saying, “Al was a Marine” for which I received the non-judgmental, clear retort, “not were…you are always a Marine.” I’d love to ask him if that still holds true after death if only to hear him laugh. 

My John and I became acquainted with Al at Gilda’s restaurant, the family owned Stagnaro business on the wharf, which recently closed. We were regulars since the 1980’s, far later than many but long enough to cast off the label “newbies.” We eventually graduated from the restaurant to the bar, that pocket sized human space where regulars came to eat, drink, laugh, share stories and gaze out at the ocean glinting with light as birds soar and marine mammals dive. A magical place. Big Boy Stagnaro had honored John and me as “family” and after John died Al noted that only he and I were left with that privilege at Gilda’s. Al’s privilege was etched in stone as it were. A tiny plaque on the wall at the north end of the bar read “Reserved for Al Mitchell.” If a visitor unknowingly sat in his seat and Al happened to come in, as he did almost every day, he would never say anything. The rest of us did that work for him with an, “Oh that’s Al’s seat, we’ll move down.” The Gilda’s shuffle.

One of Al Mitchell’s lasting legacies is the city’s Junior Lifeguard Program, started by Al in 1964 after a trip to Huntington Beach where he saw such a program contributing much for the youth of that community. He brought back the idea and it soon became a reality and a popular city Parks and Recreation program, contributing to the water skills and safety of local youth. Actually Al had a number of ideas and plans for Santa Cruz Harbor, (the area between Lighthouse Point and the Small Crafts Harbor as he never failed to remind me) including a mooring program for boats and the proper placement of the swimming buoys (that one’s for you Al.)

More personally, Al and I had great political discussions. We saw eye to eye on most issues. He was a good listener and a keen observer of people. We shared a feeling for a small town Santa Cruz, a more modest size UCSC and antipathy for the proposed Wharf dolled-up make-over, as do most locals. I am blessed to have known him and keenly feel his passing. RIP dear friend.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

July 27

“Having a daughter does not make a man decent. Having a wife does not make a decent man. Treating people with dignity and respect makes a decent man.”

–Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

AOC AND OUR SANTA CRUZ MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
(Who’s that again?)
It was an astonishing week for women. There she was, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, on the floor of Congress doing her job, on her way up the steps of the capital and then verbally pounced upon by Rep. Ted Yoho who represents the Gainesville, Fl. area in congress. “Fucking bitch” is what Ocasio-Cortez and others standing nearby heard said Yoho utter. (It was also corroborated by reporter Mike Lillis from The Hill.) AOC said later it was not so much the epithet that sent her into justice-action in the house chamber, it was Yoho’s comment after realizing he screwed up and he ran back to congress to enter into the congressional record a statement the following day. “I cannot apologize for my passion, or for loving my God, my family or my country,” were some of the remarks included in his damage controlled non-apology.

What followed from the AOC camp was pure joy from a rhetorician point of view. She took to the house floor last Thursday with a dozen colleagues and spoke truth to Yoho’s white, male Republican privilege. What happened was a celebration of democratic discourse. Conversely, another astonishing incident took place at the front door of a federal judge’s house in New Jersey, but let’s go into that later. First, let’s talk about the person who represents Santa Cruz in Congress, one of AOC’s colleagues. I understand that Ocasio-Cortez put out a call to her colleagues to come to the house floor and speak alongside her about their issues concerning sexism and white-male privilege, and essentially to stand up for equality and against sexism. A bunch came to speak up and speak out, but our Santa Cruz representative wasn’t one of them.

Where was Jimmy?
James Varni Panetta, Jimmy, represents the 20th congressional district in the United States Congress. He is one of 435 members of the House of Representatives. Panetta’s district is geographically large, it includes Monterey, Salinas, Santa Cruz, and oh yeah, by the way it also includes Carmel-by-the-Sea, where I think he makes his home. The reason I led off with AOC was to point out how she is a leader in congress. She took casual name-calling (she says she’s been called a effing B**** before), and turned it into a teachable moment on the floor of the House. Jimmy had a chance to be present, but I guess he declined. It would’ve meant a lot to our community if he could’ve been present. Thirteen of her colleagues were there including super moderate house majority leader, Steny Hoyer, from Maryland. He said for the record he fully backs AOC in this moral dust-up with Rep. Yoho.

Where Was Jimmy Two Days Earlier?
Jimmy Panetta voted for the National Defense Authorization Bill, H.R. 6395 on Tuesday, July 21st. According to govtrack.us, the web site that tracks congressional votes, this bill does the following:

“This was a vote to pass H.R. 6395 in the House. The federal budget process occurs in two stages: appropriations and authorizations. This is an authorization bill, which directs how federal funds should or should not be used. (It does not set overall spending limits, however, which are the subject of appropriations bills.) Authorizations are typically made for single fiscal years (October 1 through September 30 of the next year) but are often renewed in subsequent law.” What was contained in the bill? It basically funds the military, and even increases spending by over $1 billion. In this era of calls to cut police spending how about cutting military spending too? They couldn’t even excise a part of the bill that gives police department’s access to military surplus. (Remember the Santa Cruz BearCat tank?) Yes, from what it looks like it was part of the bill and Jimmy voted, Yay. Where was Ocasio Cortez, the rest of the squad and more than 40 other progressive democrats? They all voted Nay, and that includes Californians Zoe Lofgren, Ted Lieu, Jimmy Gomez, Alan Lowenthal, Nanette Barrragan, Maxine Waters, and Juan Vargas. Did Congressmember Panetta really represent Santa Cruz with his vote? I don’t think so. To see the entire vote, click here

Judge Salas and the Tragedy of Guns
A self-described “anti-feminist” lawyer, Roy Den Hollander, went after federal judge, Esther Salas, last week. He showed up at her home in North Brunswick, New Jersey and couldn’t find the judge, but shot her husband and son, killing her son. It is another low point in the terrible demons the Trump administration has unleashed. No one should have to fear for their life as a judge. Den Hollander had been working on a case before the Salas court that would permit the government to register females for the draft. Judge Salas had ruled that the case should go forward, but evidently Den Hollander did not think it was moving fast enough. Den Hollander killed himself in the Catskill Mountains shortly after killing the judge’s son.

Nix All Market-rate Real Estate Deals First
My favorite writer for the New York Times is Ginia Bellafante. She writes a column every Sunday called “Big City.” It is usually the inside story on housing or homelessness or money and the folks behind it. This week’s column, ““The Urban President Who Hates Cities” includes a quote that is relevant to the Santa Cruz market rate housing piñatas now seeking more financial air after being pushed ever so gently back on its heels because of the pandemic.

Bellafante writes: “In the Trumpian worldview–one certainly shared by other real estate developers–cities are not configured of neighborhoods and ecosystems and a broad constellation of creative aspirations and complexities; they are sales shelves from which to market luxury apartments, ultimately occupied by people who don’t deeply embed in them so much as a pass through. It is a notion largely out of step with how the world has evolved.”

And that my friends is how we progressives are going to beat back the CA. Apartment Association, California real estate lobby, and the Swenson-Rowell-Devcon-Ley developer Serf City Mafioso, which happens to view our town as their private ATM. November 3rd is neigh…saddle up and get ready to get out and vote, beginning Oct. 5th, and bring 10 of your friends.

“The $740 billion military budget is not enough for Senate Republicans. Now they want to give the Pentagon an additional $21 billion. 

Instead of making the CEOs of defense contractors richer, we should provide every working class American $2,000 a month until this crisis ends.” (July 23)

A shrine, a sacred space, a place to be has emerged around the Town Clock. It’s a memorial for George Floyd and all Black people who have been killed at the hands of the police. It is being maintained by word of mouth. Come and be part of the maintenance in keeping this space sacred, secure, and special, every Tues. and Thurs. at 630 pm. All are invited to join in. 

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...

STEINBRUNER STATES.

July 27

LEGAL DECISION WOULD ALLOW UC TO INCREASE ENROLLMENT OVER LEVELS OF 2005 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)

A recent Court decision would not require the UC Regents to have provided additional environmental analysis to address the Universities significantly increasing enrollments to higher levels that what were projected and analyzed in the 2005 EIR. 

The ‘Save Berkeley Neighborhoods’ group sued the UC Regents because the 2005 Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) analysis for UC Berkeley projected an increase of 1,650 students by 2020.  However, by April, 2018, enrollment there had increased by 8,300 students over the 2005 levels. 

The Trial Court ruled that such a significant enrollment increase is not a “Project” that would have required the UC to do additional environmental analysis and that the ‘Save Berkeley Neighborhoods‘ group should have raised the concern in 2005.

The ‘Save Berkeley Neighborhoods’ appealed.  The Court of Appeal found that there was ample evidence to support the Berkeley group’s claims that additional environmental review should have been triggered by such substantial enrollment increases. The case was sent back to the Trial Court for further review. 

For your curiosity, here is the link to the 2005 UCSC 2005 LRDP 

That Plan projected 21,000 students by 2020, but perhaps due to civil and legal challenges, UCSC reported a total of 19,494 students enrolled in 2018/2019

This relates to the next topic, so please read on……

NOW IS THE TIME TO SPEAK OUT ABOUT FUTURE UCSC GROWTH AND STUDENT HOUSING 
If you have thoughts about the impacts of UCSC increasing student enrollment without providing sufficient on-campus housing for them, you need to act now.  The UCSC 2040 Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) would allow significantly more students but potentially ignore adding enough housing and infrastructure to accommodate them and the necessary staff increases. 

Read the message below and use the Action Tool Kit developed by Ms. Morgan Bostic, the recently-hired County/City Climate Change Policy Manager, to sign up to take action and stay informed. 

Demanding that UCSC not increase enrollment so substantially would not be a wise course of action, according to Congressman Jimmy PanettaAt a Special Board of Supervisor meeting last December, he cautioned Supervisors that making such demands would be counter to the State’s mandate that the UC system increase enrollment in order to offer educational opportunity to a broad segment of the population, including underprivileged students.  

Instead, it will be more productive to insist the UC system provide sufficient affordable housing on-campus or nearby, with infrastructure improvements to accommodate the increased population, thereby reducing financial and environmental stress on the community. 

Read about the positive outcome of the 2018 negotiations between UC Davis, City of Davis, and County of Yolo to address the same problems that face Santa Cruz City and County regarding UCSC.

City of Davis, Yolo County and UC Davis Agree to Memorandum of Understanding on Partnership and Growth

Their hard work to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is successful:

UC Davis Survey: City Apartment Vacancy Rate Eases Some The vacancy rate in the city of Davis has eased slightly, according to a survey released by UC Davis Feb. 5.

The Action Tool Kit is excellent.  Act now.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020, 11:28 AM Robert Orrizzi orrizzi@cruzio.com“> wrote:

Greetings!

Many of us remember the overwhelming approval of Measure U on the June, 2018 Ballot. This Measure (approved by 77% of City voters) gave “City Council sole authority to implement policies intended to limit enrollment growth and to establish infrastructure requirement @ UCSC.” At the time, UCSC proposed (in their 2040 Long Range Development Plan/”LRDP”) to increase student enrollment to a staggering 28,000 from the current agreement w/ the City of 19,500 students. On top of this comes all the additional staff and employees.

I was a member of the Community Advisory Group (CAG) for the 2040 LRDP. CAG met several times over the past year w/ University Officials voicing our concerns. Our meetings have concluded, and UCSC is moving forward w/ their LRDP. The EIR has now been compiled. The guiding force behind development is from the Regents and the State Legislature. Local input/action is essential even though UC is exempt from local measures. Now is the time to speak up.

Out of our CAG, a Community Task force has been created. Morgan Bostic has been hired as the Advocate for City-County Task Force to Address UCSC Growth and has created a “Tool Kit” full of information regarding campus growth. Please take the time to peruse (and use) this Tool Kit. We all are aware of the already overabundance to traffic, housing shortage, etc. UCSC has on our community, so please consider getting involved now.

Tool Kit link:  act on UCSC growth TOOLKIT

Yours Truly,
Robert 

PUBLIC MEETING TO GATHER INPUT ON FUTURE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY GROWTH WAS NEARLY SILENT BUT COMMENT PERIOD ENDS MONDAY
If you care about the quality  of life in Santa Cruz County, you need to write the Planning Department and demand a 45-day extension to the Scoping Period Public Comment and at least one more public hearing to allow you to review critical documents and submit meaningful comment on the plan to update the County’s General Plan.  If you don’t, the County will slam the door closed next Monday at 5pm. 

The Santa Cruz County Planning Department teamed up with freshly-hired Dudek Consultants to host a virtual public hearing on July 21 to give the public a chance to weigh-in with what important issues the  Sustainable Santa Cruz County Plan and General Plan Update environmental review should include in the EIR analysis. 

Because the meeting was not noticed to the public, other than being buried in the Planning Dept menu options, ONLY TWO PEOPLE SUBMITTED ANY PUBLIC COMMENT OR ASKED QUESTIONS. 

The Planning Dept. website did not feature the July 21 public hearing information prominently.  Near the bottom of the home page, “News and Announcements” has a button that leads only to the description of updating the 1994 County General Plan, but no mention at all of the July 21 hearing or that the Public Comment period ends this coming Monday, August 3. 

Here is where you really need to look

Comments on the scope of the EIR will be accepted at the scoping meeting, in writing (see the Notice of Preparation for mailing address), or via email. Click here to email comments on the scope of the EIR for this project: CEQA-NEPA@santacruzcounty.us. Please reference the project name in the email title.

In my opinion, the Planning Dept. and Dudek are attempting to push these massive zoning and policy changes through during COVID restrictions and this  is a sham of public participation in a critical California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.   Make no mistake about it, this Plan seeks to drastically change the quality of life throughout Santa Cruz County.  

Demand a 45-day extension of this Public Scoping Period and that there be at least one more public hearing and  that is widely noticed to the public. 

WATSONVILLE CITY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS REMOVAL OF GEORGE WASHINGTON BUST IN CITY PLAZA PARK 
An online and informal petition launched by Revolunas to remove the George Washington bust from the Watsonville City Plaza Park has over 1200 signers.  The claim is that because he owned slaves, he is the epitome of White Supremacy, and therefore the statue must go. 

The Watsonville City Parks & Recreation Commission will publicly discuss this during their August 3, 6:30pm virtual meeting. The agenda will be posted on the website by this Thursday, July 30.

Here is a good article recently reported in the Pajaronian about the issue.

Revolunas, locally-based in Watsonville,  is a women’s collective focusing on healing and community issues. 

What are your thoughts?  Write to the Watsonville City Parks & Recreation Commission staff:

Mr. Nick Calubaquib nick.calubaquib@cityofwatsonville.org 

WATSONVILLE CITY COUNCIL AD-HOC COMMITTEE WILL EXAMINE SOCIAL EQUITY AND POLICING ISSUES…PUBLIC APPLICATIONS TAKEN UNTIL AUGUST 7
The Watsonville City Council is forming an Ad-Hoc Committee to examine social equity issues in Watsonville, and invite the Watsonville Community to get involved.  

“AD-HOC Committee on Policing and Social Equity, composed of City Council members, Police Chief, City Manager, City staff, and community members to facilitate community conversations that will inform the future of policing and community services in Watsonville.

The Committee’s work will include participation in regular meetings, collecting community 
 input, engaging with community organizations and stakeholders, and eventually developing 
 recommendations for the City Council’s consideration.”

Applications to serve on the Committee are due August 7.  

WHY ARE ALL SCHOOLS IN SANTA CRUZ FORCED TO BE 100% ONLINE WHEN THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL ENCOURAGES SCHOOLS TO RE-OPEN THIS FALL? 

Last week, the Santa Cruz County Office of Education Administrator, Dr. Faris Sabbah, mandated that all private, public and charter schools in the County open this fall without any in-person instruction.  While Governor Newsom issued this mandate for Counties on the “COVID watch list” last week, our County was not included on that list. 

However, the County Office of Education felt it critical to make this restriction.  

How can this finding be made when the CDC encourages otherwise, based on scientific data and the overall negative impacts to student health and well-being when kept in lock-down? 

“Death rates [due to COVID-19] among school-aged children are much lower than among adults.  At the same time, the harms attributed to closed schools on the social, emotional, and behavioral health, economic well-being, and academic achievement of children, in both the short- and long-term, are well-known and significant.  Further, the lack of in-person educational options disproportionately harms low-income and minority children and those living with disabilities.  These students are far less likely to have access to private instruction and care and far more likely to rely on key school-supported resources like food programs, special education services, counseling, and after-school programs to meet basic developmental needs” 

Please write Dr. Feris Sabbah, County Office of Education Superintendent and let him know your thoughts:  Dr. Feris Sabbah fsabbah@santacruzcoe.org  831-466-5900 

CORRECTING THE RECORD
I apologize for two errors in my last entry, and would like to correct them.  

1: I still did not get the definition of “SOU” quite right last time, regarding the report on the 908 Ocean Street project.  “SOU” is the acronym for “Small Ownership Unit”

Here is a link to the City’s Chamber of Commerce website, showcasing the City Economic Development plans for a number of projects, including 908 Ocean, where the SOU definition is correctly given but the number of them reported for this project may not be correct (only 33?)

2: A kind and astute Bratton Online reader pointed out to me that the Community Foundation is giving the County $1.5 Million for COVID issues, not the other way around, as I had mistakenly understood and reported in my last blog.  Many thanks to this kind reader for pointing out my error.  

I have learned to do more of my research and writing when I am well-rested, and not in the wee hours of the morning!  Again, my apologies and gratitude for those who take the time to contact me with questions and comments.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND ONE VIRTUAL MEETING, EVEN IN YOUR PAJAMAS!  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.   TAKE A WALK IN THE FRESH AIR AND SUNSHINE AND STAY HEALTHY.

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner, (831) 685-2915

ki6tkb@yahoo.com I welcome your discussion! 

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

#203 / Listen Up, Liberals!

Barton Swaim is a conservative columnist for The Wall Street Journal, and a former speechwriter for Mark Sanford, South Carolina’s Republican, and rather erratic, former governor. Sanford is perhaps most remembered for having tried to trick his staff (presumably including Swaim) into believing that the governor was hiking the Appalachian Trail when the governor was actually visiting his mistress in Argentina. Swaim has a new book out, The Speechwriter. Maybe that book discusses this incident; that could be interesting, but I am definitely not planning to buy the book.

Instead, I am planning to give you a little bit of wisdom (or let’s call it “punditry”) from Barton Swaim, thanks to one of Swaim’s fairly recent columns in The Wall Street Journal. Here is a link to the column, entitled “Joe Biden and the Slow Death of Liberalism.” Given that a paywall may greet at least some people who try to follow the link, and to read the whole column, here are just a few excerpts: 

In nominating Joe Biden, Democrats aren’t choosing a “moderate.” They’re choosing liberalism over revolution. Bernie Sanders said … “Joe and I have a very different vision for the future of this country.” That is not quite right. The idea that Mr. Biden has a “vision for the future” is preposterous. He has a vision for the past, and even that is cloudy. 

Mr. Sanders is a radical, not a liberal. The liberal worldview seeks a more equitable and open polity by means of piecemeal political reform. The radical outlook envisions a new world, not an incrementally better one. 

With Mr. Biden’s ascension and Mr. Sanders’s decision this week to suspend his campaign, Democrats are again choosing liberalism. 

The modern American liberal is the product of what’s commonly called liberal democracy—the social and political order obtaining in North America and postwar Europe. Liberal democracies value divided governmental institutions, a regulated market economy, a generous welfare state, personal autonomy and the expansion of political rights to formerly excluded classes. Conservatives and liberals alike are “liberals” in this broader sense, but American liberals believe more fervently than conservatives in the power of governmental means to achieve human betterment, and liberals tend to scorn habit and tradition as impediments to righteous goals. 

American liberalism’s last great triumphs came during the administration of Lyndon B. Johnson: the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Food Stamp Act of 1964 and the Social Security Amendments of 1965, which created Medicaid and Medicare. Since then it has accomplished no original reforms, only refined or expanded old ones. 

The point here is not to disparage liberalism. It is to point out that liberalism in America achieved the last of its great aims a half-century ago. Since then, liberal successes have steadily diminished in importance. The Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Clean Water Act of 1972 empowered state and federal governments to alleviate pollution. In 1979 Jimmy Carter signed legislation creating the Education Department, but its function has never been clear. In 1996 Bill Clinton signed a monumental welfare-reform law, but its purpose was to curb liberalism’s excesses, not to further its aims. Then there was the Affordable Care Act of 2010, a nonradical version of a radical idea that managed to make an expensive and confusing system even more expensive and confusing. 

Whatever the merits of these laws, none compares, in sheer transformative effect, with the great reforms of the first half of the last century: the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, the Social Security Act of 1935. 

It is a measure of liberalism’s lethargy that Democratic primary voters in 2020 have fixated so exclusively on Donald Trump’s badness. Mr. Trump has inspired liberals in a way that nothing else has in many years. But soon he will be gone, and what then? 

A sizable portion of the Democratic electorate, especially its younger members, has wearied of this state of affairs. They want something more to do than tinker and emote.

There are at least a couple of ironies here. First, the idea that “liberals” should take seriously the comments and criticism of a Republican Party operative, like Swaim, does test the patience of anyone of the “liberal” persuasion. Second, as Swaim disparages liberals for their lack of anything like “vision,” he never lets us in on what the “vision” of the “conservatives” might be. I guess it is also ironic (irony #3) that Swaim is essentially making a case for the politics of Bernie Sanders, whom all true “conservatives” must surely disdain. 

Here is my own view. 

As someone who considers himself a “liberal,” usually operating under the “progressive” banner, I do think that those who profess an allegiance to the “liberal” side of the liberal/conservative spectrum ought to pay attention to what Swaim is saying. Consider the content of the comments, in other words, and not the source.

Considering the content, it is not surprising, as a supporter of Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaigns (both times), that I agree with the gist of what Swaim is saying. We are far overdue for a “revolution” in our politics, which does not mean “violence.” Read Hannah Arendt on that. As her book, On Violence, makes clear, revolutions are accomplished not by violence, but by the assumption of “power” by those whose power has been diminished or denied: ordinary men and women, in other words, or “the 99%” as we have come to speak of our situation since Occupy.

You want another definition of the “ordinary men and women” whose decision to reassume the power they have always had is what makes a genuine revolution? Here it is:

You and Me

Listen up, liberals. Time for a (real) change!  

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

A character in Hamilton that you may not have thought of as a character…

    “VIRTUAL”

“Another day.
How long are you gonna scroll down?
Semicolon
Smile”

~Sanhita Baruah 

Internet is a demon which eventually kills all the emotions inside human heart. Not to mention everything is already virtual.”
~Gurusharan Singh

“Social media is a race in virtual crowd. Have you been lost or found yourself lately?”
~Suyasha Subedi


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 22 – 28, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…City Council election coming up, Housing California, Movie critiques. GREENSITE… Muzzling Debate at the Council Level. KROHN…letter to librarian Susan Nemitz. STEINBRUNER…is taking a one week vacation. PATTON…World View #101 EAGAN…Deep Cover and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”Warmth”

...

ALL HAIL DON McCASLIN AND “WARMTH”. This drawing by James McFarlin reminds us of what an influence Don and Warmth were on our community. Looking closely you can also find John Thompson, Phil Yost and more. This was the mural that was on the wall of the Cooperhouse alley way. Don’s vibes were his outdoor instrument but the piano was his first and biggest love. We’ll miss him.                                                        

photo credit: drawing courtesy of James McFarlin

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

ALDERWOOD RESTAURANT FIGHT.

TUBA SKINNY STREET BAND, New Orleans.

DATELINE July 20

CITY COUNCIL ELECTION TIME. Folks have until August 7th to file for the four seats and run for Santa Cruz City Council, as we are reading and hearing already. One good thing is that Cynthia Mathews is termed out. You can put campaign signs up starting August 5th. No words yet from Robert Singleton or Greg Larson, or from any of the women who have accused them both of harassment…we’ll wait in place. Present council members Kathryn Beiers and Sandy Brown are both eligible and we’re waiting to hear from them. So far we need to listen and take a good look at Kayla Kumar, development director at Food What? And Barrios Unidos too. And at Kelsey Hill with her background with the Lakota Peoples Law project but also with the Romero  Institute.  

HOUSING CALIFORNIA. Long time friend Iris Murillo from Housing California sent this urgent plea and information…

“Eviction moratoriums will expire at the end of the month. Amid COVID, job, and income loss, thousands of Californians are struggling to pay their rent and may have to vacate their homes. As renters try to keep a roof over their heads, private-equity companies are also preparing to purchase distressed multi-family properties as many foreclose in coming weeks and months. We’ve seen this happen before during the Great Recession of 2008. These companies ultimately hike rents and evict tenants including families with children, seniors on fixed incomes, veterans, and those with disabilities. The result is fewer naturally occurring affordable housing units available for low-income Californians. AB 1703 can help stem the tide of displacement by…

The three sponsors, Housing California, Public Advocates, and Stable Homes California, are sponsoring AB 1703. This coalition is supporting the legislation of  AB 1703 that would provide renters in tenant-occupied multi-family properties the first right to purchase their homes and stay housed during COVID 19 and beyond. Renters with help from land trusts may have a chance to own their homes. This legislation is COPA and TOPA at the state-level — community and tenant opportunity to purchase first. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee may hear the bill as early as this Saturday July 25..  We are asking readers to call senate judiciary members, who serve on this committee, to voice support for the bill.  Please contact the legislators through this portal: sjud.fax@sen.ca.gov or call phone: (916-651-4113)

BUSHWHACKERS BREAKFAST CLUB. Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10 am-8:20 am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Dangerous Dan Orange hosts the rest of the Bushwhackers B. Club. Lately of course those screens are on anything but theatre screens. Tune in this Friday and hear my critiques of such monumental flops as KNIVES OUT. It got great reviews, has a very famous cast including Christopher Plummer, Daniel Craig with the worst fake cowboy accent ever, and even Jamie Lee Curtis plus Michael Shannon can’t save this waste. 

July 20

CODIFYING CONFORMITY
Horses ears signal how the horse feels at any given moment. Pointed forward, all is good and whatever you are doing is fine with them. Slightly laid back indicates annoyance. Flat back and you’d better watch out, move away or take control. Ignoring such signals can get you a hard bite or debilitating kick if you are at ground level. Other species have their own means of expressing feelings. Their body language is a reliable indicator. Only humans it seems are capable of duplicity in this regard. 

It took me a long time in my 30 years working at UCSC in Rape Prevention Education to grasp the fact that sometimes people being nice was genuine and sometimes it was not. There is also a cultural edge that makes it more difficult to spot the hypocrisy. By and large, Australians are direct in their communication style with a little sarcasm thrown in to make the point.  Little if any time is spent telling you all the wonderful things you have done but there’s this one thing that’s an ever so slight issue that they would love to discuss…when it’s convenient of course. Aussies get right to the point with scant regard for niceties.  A similar comeback is expected. Whether this is a better or worse communication style is a matter of opinion. In Santa Cruz, it is often misinterpreted and you run the risk of being labeled “aggressive” or “not a team player.” Such terms can be exploited to discredit you and to further the other party’s agenda. Both terms have been deployed against me for that end. 

I found myself pondering all this as I cut a piece of apple for a friend’s horse whose ears betrayed his slight annoyance at my taking too long. Oh, that humans had horses ears! I mused as I recalled the hypocrisy of those at UCSC who smiled and said nice things as they worked behind the scenes to muzzle my voice on behalf of rape survivors and marginalize Rape Prevention Education. The same was true during my tenure as a commissioner on the city’s Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women in the mid-2000’s. At stake, was revealing the horrendous track record of SCPD in its response to those who had reported rape. The goal was an overhaul of police practices. I took the lead in the effort. The pushback from SCPD was outrage. No pretence at playing nice and burying the facts since we had already made them public. They accused the Commission of manipulating and misusing data, which we didn’t, and they produced an apples and oranges response to discredit the findings. Council sided with SCPD, refused to appoint a blue-ribbon committee and I was dumped from the Commission.  

During the process I was accused of intimidating staff. I asked for examples but none could be remembered.  I offered to meet in person but no offer was accepted.  Councilmember Cynthia Mathews from that day on vowed I would never ever again under her watch be appointed to the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women of which I was a co-founder in 1981. 

Similar tactics were used to ignite the recall against council members Drew Glover and Chris Krohn.  With a new council majority, for the first time in a long time, city senior staff felt themselves under scrutiny. They no longer could assume council would heap praise on whatever project they brought forward for approval. Under the previous majority, some council members even apologized for asking a clarifying question of staff if there was a whiff of a perceived criticism involved. You could smell the power shift.

Glover and Krohn asked hard questions of staff, sometimes with ears laid back and a touch of sarcasm. For that they received a public shaming and eventual recall.  What happened to me 15 years ago informally has now been codified into city policy under Human Resources. A direct style of communicating, especially if it is critical of staff, can now result in a violation of the respectful workplace policy with that entry in your file. While the policy may or may not work well for workplace violations involving staff, its broad sweep is being used against people we elect to represent us as well as their appointees to commissions. It is a muzzling of debate, a shift in the balance of power towards the non-accountable, non-elected branch of civil society. Unless checked and changed, expect it to be used increasingly to achieve council as well as commission docility and conformity. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

July 20

AN OPEN LETTER TO SANTA CRUZ LIBRARY DIRECTOR, SUSAN NEMITZ,

Dear Library Director Susan Nemitz,

I have always thought highly of you, Ms. Nemitz. As a councilmember, I enjoyed your enthusiasm and I was caught up in your aura of positivity and can-do spirit. Additionally, you are a librarian and I’ve always had the greatest respect for those who promote reading and individual and collective scholarship and help people with their research needs. The library has always held a special place in my heart and to now have it at the center of political controversy, in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic and combined with the pain of a slow economic meltdown, I am shocked and saddened that you are pinning your Santa Cruz legacy as Library Director onto the garage-library concept. I’ve been involved with this discussion since 1998 (or 2000?) when public works staff wanted to build a parking garage at the same site, “Lot 4.” A hoax is being perpetrated on this community. The public was by no means supportive of the city council’s recent 4-2 garage-library decision. I believe you sensed this earlier, and many now already glimpse an evident looming disaster if this project proceeds. I do not believe the feeling in the community has changed during the four years of this discussion. 

One Question

My question is simple: Why did you as a reasonable and thoughtful director not advise the elected officials to take a step back from this decisional abyss? I believe you had a chance. From my political now-spectator lens, this project is surprisingly similar to the way the desalination issue played itself out here in Santa Cruz. In that case, previous city councils wasted somewhere between $7 million and $15 million on consultants to study, aver, assert, and cajole the community into accepting yet again, a last century technological fix, but in that case, it was to address our water problems. It was soundly defeated at the polls, or at least a past council saw it that way and never again brought it to the ballot for an up or down vote as the original ballot measure as written would force any council to do.

Library-in-a-five-story-garage-atop-the-Farmer’s-Market, Really?

It is absolutely the wrong decision to build the library-in-a-five-story-garage-atop-the-Farmer’s-Market-site. If it is ever built, it will be a municipal mistake of Titanic proportions. It is a political error that’s currently tearing at the heart of this community. Not entering into this library-in-the-basement-of-a-garage deal would have left a door open for more creative solutions. This build baby build action has created a kind of heartache that now throbs through this town like a sucker punch in the gut. What you hear next may well be the sound of an exploding collective community appendix. Whether that takes the shape of a divisive election, a lengthy law suit, or people chaining themselves to heritage trees on Lot 4, it won’t be pretty.

Are You a Betting Person?

This decision hurts for several reasons. First, it defies the will of the thousands of Santa Cruzans. The winning candidates in 2018 said they agreed that voters did not vote for a library-garage project, they voted to remodel the current structure at its venerable downtown site. Even immediately before the vote, hundreds more let the city council know that they stood four-square against moving our downtown library. (By the way, did the city’s pollster, Gene Bregman, ever poll residents to find out if they favored this garage project? That wouldn’t have been difficult to do. I believe it may never have been done because he would’ve found overwhelming support to keep the library where it is and NOT build a parking garage atop the current site of the Downtown Farmer’s Market.) There is a distinct smell of a fait accompli here being carried out against the will of the electorate. My sense—political, social, and psychological—is that this project will likely not be implemented any time soon, if ever. I suspect you might have 5-10 more years with the city? You have a chance of advising the city manager to pull back and begin remodeling the current library as time is running out on using the bond money, and building costs escalate daily as you are well aware. Knowing the deep opposition to this project and the anxious vitriol that has been stirred because of certain city bureaucrats (not you) contempt for the public, I sincerely doubt the current project will even begin before you retire, and I state this for several reasons. 

Santa Cruz’s Fighting Spirit

I have seen many projects going back to the convention hotel that was once planned for our wonderful Lighthouse Field… and then there was the 10,000 housing units once envisioned for the Wilder Ranch site, and other development pressures on the Pogonip. These projects all appeared to be done deals until the most important party came to the table, the community. Those projects never happened because of the powerful sense of civic pride and political acumen harnessed by locals, UCSC transplants, artists, and visionaries who all call Santa Cruz home. In addition, the Dream Inn was never put on a planned steroid diet of concrete once local organizing began. And remember, it took more than 20 years of land-use shenanigans of various sorts to allow the La Bahia to degrade and finally, at the eleventh hour of decrepitude, the Seaside Company prevailed. It was a painful battle that did not have to happen similar to this one. A revamped and remodeled library could have begun this year, and still can, and you could oversee it as it becomes the anchor of our city’s civic core, complementing city hall, the civic auditorium and the Greek church. You may even still be able to cut the ribbon of a remodeled and revamped library if we hurry.

Kafkaesque

The garage-library project promotes and idolizes last century technology. It flies in the face of our Climate Action Plan and oft-stated green community values. While we cannot house our homeless residents (witness the withdrawal of the “done deal” purchase of the Seaborg property to house a 24/7 navigation center on Coral Street), we now stand prepared to figure out how to house automobiles at $75k per space? Surely this is a Fellini dream I am having and will wake up in front of Happy Boys farm stand inside the current Farmer’s Market and purchase some heirloom tomatoes after checking out books at the 224 Church Street site. I know you read a lot. You are familiar with the work of Franz Kafka?  Frankly, this library in a garage, on the site of the Farmer’s Market, goes beyond Kafka. It literally pokes a metaphoric stick not only into the eye of our community’s relationships with one another, but this decision infects our democratic institutions by by-passing either a plebiscite vote, or in not hearing the incredible outpouring of letters, emails. phone calls, newspaper opinion pieces, and civic sense not to build the parking garage. Perhaps Kafka’s unfinished book, The Castle, mirrors our own unfinished garage-library story here. His story was about an uncaring bureaucracy alienated from the community and unwilling to respond to the will of the people. I remind you, The Castle was an unfinished manuscript at the time of Kafka’s death. This garage-library story is not over yet either.

Furthermore, the library-in-a-garage project may well end up costing more than any other that the city has been able to marshal the people’s efforts and tax dollars to create, more than the sewer treatment project and the police department building, more than the purchase of the Pogonip and Moore Creek Uplands, and likely, before it is finally completed, more than the city’s one-year of General Fund revenue of $100 million.

Epilogue

This community deserves better. If I were a betting man, you, the Public Works department, the city manager, and some members of the city council have just thrown down the gauntlet. The clock is ticking and the community knows it. It was an initial decision that roils the community’s sensibilities and will likely be one of the two or three top issues confronted by candidates in the November election. We are confronting so much right now. This library-in-a-garage-atop-the-Farmer’s-Market controversy did not have to be one of them, unless it was to be a community-wide vote. That could’ve sufficed, but now we have what looks to be a looming blood bath of community disagreement. Where will it end? Not on Lot 4. Ms. Nemitz, I urge you to implement your good will, indomitable spirit, and energetic disposition to help turn this project around, it is not too late. 

Sincerely, Chris Krohn

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
July 20

Becky’s taking a one week vacation and will be back here next week.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

July 19
#201 / Worldview 101

Come October, I will be teaching LGST 196, the Legal Studies Capstone course at UCSC. The course will be given online. In other words, just to be clear about what that word “at” implies, I am not actually expecting to be on the UCSC campus in person. Wish it were otherwise!

I first began teaching LGST 196 in Winter Quarter, 2014, and I have taught the course every year since then. As I teach it, the class is focused on the topics of “Privacy, Technology, And Freedom.”

This time around, I will probably teach the course a little bit differently, given that it will be online, but students can still expect to be discussing government surveillance, facial recognition, social media, “big data” and its impact on politics, biometrics, the “Internet of “Things,” and how privacy is protected in our Bill of Rights through William O. Douglas’ famed “penumbra theory” (See Griswold v. Connecticut).

I have greatly enjoyed teaching LGST 196, and as I look back, I see that I have injected into the Syllabus and Class Schedule a lot of my own theories and thoughts. These are outlined in a very summary fashion below. Candidly, the discerning student could probably figure out that the course ought to be called:

Gary Patton’s Worldview 101

  1. – Two Worlds
    I think we best understand our human situation if we explain that situation through what I often call the “Two Worlds Hypothesis.” That way of thinking about our existence suggests that we live in “Two Worlds,” simultaneously. First, we live in the “World of Nature,” or the “World That God Made,” if you would like to remember the traditional way of thinking about it. We find ourselves most mysteriously here on Planet Earth, and we are (though we keep forgetting it) absolutely, totally, and ultimately dependent on the World of Nature (the World That God Made). 

    Most immediately, though, we don’t live in any unmediated way in the World of Nature. We live primarily in a “human world,” a world that human beings have created within the World of Nature. This is “our” world, and it is the immediate reality we inhabit. However, just as a reminder, while we live “immediately” in a human world that we create, we are “ultimately” dependent on the World of Nature, which we most emphatically did not create. 

  2. – Law In The World of Nature
    The “Two Worlds” that we simultaneously inhabit are governed by two completely different kinds of laws. First, within the World of Nature (the world we don’t create ourselves), the laws that govern are descriptions of what must and will happen.

    The “Law of Gravity” is my go-to example (but all the laws of Nature operate in the same way). You can’t disobey the law of gravity, or any of the other Laws of Nature. “What goes up must come down,” and it will come down according to a law that perfectly describes what will happen.

    The fact that the laws that govern the World of Nature cannot be broken, and that they inevitably and exactly tell us what will happen when certain things are done, is the reason that we can be sure that the continued combustion of hydrocarbon fuels, according to our current practices, will ultimately heat the Earth to the point that our human systems (dependent on the World of Nature) will fail, and that human civilization will (probably) come to an end, along with mass extinctions and physical changes in the World of Nature that will remind us (just in case we persist in denying the obvious) that we are ultimately dependent on that World of Nature, and that the World of Nature is governed by laws that we cannot ignore, without experiencing the consequences.

  3. – Law In The Human World
    All that is pretty glum news, perhaps (since we keep ignoring the laws that apply in the World of Nature), but there is another kind of “law,” too. That is the kind of “law” that applies to the human world that we create. Human laws, unlike the Laws of Nature, are not descriptions of what must and will happen in various circumstances. Human laws are prescriptions, written down instructions that we give to ourselves, telling ourselves what we think we ought to do (not what we must do).

    A human law tells us to stop at red lights, but we can run right through them. If we ignore our own laws, there may or may not be a penalty to be extracted. You can run a lot of red lights before you either kill somebody or are killed yourself. Maybe that’s why human beings get in the habit of thinking that all laws are like that, and that maybe we can get away with ignoring the law. Human laws, yes! You can ignore or defy them, and maybe even get away with it. The Laws of Nature, though, are not subject to avoidance or evasion. What goes up, must come down!

  4. – Changing Our Human Laws

    The fact that human laws are not “given,” but that we can change them, is actually extremely good news. If our world is “governed” by human laws (which it is, to the extent that we follow our own laws, which most people do, most of the time), that means that we can change human realities by deciding to change the “law,” the rules that direct and govern our behavior. Human laws are “prescriptions” that we issue to ourselves, telling ourselves what we think we ought to do.

    We are not inevitably constrained, in other words, by any existing realities, within our human world. Again, this is quite different from our situation in the World of Nature. In the human world, what “goes up” does not necessarily have to “come down.” We can change the rules. Since our laws are “prescriptions,” that means that if one prescription isn’t working we can write ourselves another one.

  5. – Possibility And Inevitability
    Because we can change the laws that direct and govern human behavior, and by doing so change what our human activities will accomplish, “possibility” is the key operative category in the human world that we create. To the extent that we can bring ourselves to change the prescriptions that govern our behavior, we can completely change any aspect of the human world. At least, that will be the effect of changing the laws if we then actually follow them. As I say, this is quite a piece of good news! Within our human world, nothing is “inevitable,” and anything is “possible.” That does include, of course, both our most wonderful dreams and our most horrible nightmares!

  6. – Human Observervation

    We are, as human beings, born to be observers. From our earliest moments of life, we look around to see what realities exist, both in the Natural World and in the world that humans have created. If we truly understand the “Two Worlds Hypothesis,” and consistently recognize that we live in two, quite different, worlds simultaneously, then we will understand that the realities we “see” in the human world, are something quite different from the realities we “see” in the World of Nature. If we truly understand that nothing is “inevitable” within the human world, and that “possibility” is the key category for understanding the human world, then we will also understand that whatever we “see” in the human world can be changed.

  7. – Actors Not Observers
    Because we are, as humans, born “observers,” and because the World of Nature is a reality that exists outside our own existence, and is a world that we have not created, it is a common mistake to attribute an absolute “reality” to the things we “observe.” That may be fine as we study aspects of the World of Nature, but it doesn’t work very well in the human world, because the human world is not something that exists outside of our own existence. Human beings have created and can recreate the human world. Therefore, while it is good to know what human realities exist, as we observe them (from greed to goodness and from racism to reconciliation), we must always understand that our human world will be what we “make” it, and that the human world is the product of our “action,” and that what we see is not a definition of what can exist. Observation is only helpful to us if we do not equate what we “see” and observe with a message that what we see is what must be.

    Because “possibility” is the key category for understanding the human world, which exists as it does because human beings have created it that way, then we will also understand that whatever we “see” in the human world can be changed.

  8. – Individuals
    There is another important realization that can help orient us to our situation in the human world, and to how we should conduct ourselves within it. We need, always, to be very much aware of the “I,” and of our individual existence – of how important and powerful each one of us is. In fact, each one of us is an independent and individual human being, and every human reality has begun, or begins, within the mind, and heart, and spirit of an individual human being. Our individual ability to act, to create, to do something unexpected and new must never be forgotten.

  9. – We Are Not Only Individuals
    However, it is equally important to realize we are not just individuals. Thinking always from an individual point of view is a perspective error. While each one of us is an individual, we are also, inevitably, bound up with others, and are part of a larger community. No one can exist individually and independently. Our lives depend on others, and as we are more and more learning today, we are inevitably connected to, and are part of, every other human being in the world. To the degree that we have two political parties in the United States – which is the typical way we tend to think of it – we have a party that clamors to make sure that no one forgets that the “individual” is where everything begins, and that the ability of individuals to act is supremely important. The other party tends to emphasize the collective nature of our lives, and that we must, as a community, provide support and assistance to any individuals who need that.

    Both/And! That is the truth.

  10. – Putting The Formula To Work
    If the human world is something that we create – and not through a bunch of individual and separate actions added up, but through a collective effort – we are talking about a world that we create through “politics.” We are individuals. We are inevitably a community, too. We need to debate and discuss what to do. We need to celebrate the conflict and contention as we have different ideas of what we should, in the end, decide to do (together).

    The process is called “government,” and in the United States, our process is called “self-government,” a process in which we all know that we can be, and need to be, involved. That is how we govern ourselves and create the human world we want. And, of course, we can change our minds, because in our human world, the “Political World” that we most immediately inhabit, anything is possible. We can decide what to do. Should everyone have health care? Should public lands be opened up for oil development? Everything is possible, and noting is “necessary.” We debate, and then we decide. Here is the “formula” that describes this process. After the debate, there is a decision. We make a “law,” a prescription that tells us what we think we ought to do. That is how we govern our human world:

    Politics > Law > Government

    As I say, these ideas have slipped into my Syllabus and Class Schedule for LGST 196. Frequent readers of this blog will have seen these ideas before. I think this ten-point ouline is a good start on a “worldview” that is worth considering.

But, of course, this set of thoughts is really just a start. It’s the “political” part of the course. Besides including a lot more about the World of Nature, I know that a “Worldview 101” course needs to recognize art, music, and the Three Commandments: Faith, Hope, and Love. 

And the greatest of these is Love.

Love for all humans. Love for this wonderful World of Nature, this blue/green planet of oceans and trees into which we have been so privileged to have been born:

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. Out of the vaults and into the dark, strange world of only you know where. Scroll low down a little.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s hot, new, current, Deep Cover down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

Steve Hofstetter is one of my favorite comedians…

    “WARMTH”

“Love your haters. People shed layers when they feel warmth.”
~Richie Norton 

“It is no small thing to feel the warmth of the sun on your skin.”
~Marty Rubin 

“All the statistics in the world can’t measure the warmth of a smile.”
~Chris Hart 

“The glory of fame isn’t in having so many people know you, but in having so many people know you care. Otherwise, it’s like being drawn to a fire to find no warmth.”
~Richelle E. Goodrich 


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

July 15 – 21, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…More Odwalla local history, UCSC’s East Meadow issues, Brommer and 7th and Swenson problems, poetry workshop, Movies on Friday. GREENSITE… is off this week. Will return next week.”  KROHN…Zooming City Council meetings and laughs, Library Garage votes, Democratic Socialist mayor Cummings switch? STEINBRUNER…dumping waste water into ocean, SOU code, Soquel’s old mill and the old house, Aptos radio Tower, local businesses and Covid funds, County health inspections. PATTON…Cryptocurrency. EAGAN…Deep Cover plus Subconscious Comics QUOTES…”COUGHING”

...

SANTA CRUZ CARNEGIE FREE LIBRARY. An early view pre-ivy. One of the many libraries that Andrew Carnegie funded across the United States. This library opened in 1903 and endured until 1966.                                                 

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

Ray Stevens sings “Quarantined’. A true saga.

CHER SINGS “Half Breed”. Just a little comment??

The r-Real Nitty Gritty. Watch for Peter Lawford, Judy Garland and more!

DATELINE JULY 13

ODWALLA & DAVENPORT…MORE HISTORY. I wrote some news last week about Odwalla and its local and historical connections. Those founding folks sent a letter saying…. 

 “We the undersigned, being original creators of Odwalla Juice, read your recent column with interest and wanted to set the record straight on a few points, now that Coca-Cola is sun setting our beloved creation.

** First off, we would like to thank you for the mention in your column … It is an honor! **

We started the company in the fall of 1980 on Seabright Avenue, juicing oranges, first, in our kitchen, then the backyard shed, to deliver to local restaurants every morning in the early hours. Among our first accounts were Aldo’s, The Cook House, Harbor Cafe, and Tapu’s Breakfast Hut.  

In January 1981 we set up shop on Mansfield Street, off 17th Avenue in Live Oak. Our goal was to support our musical passions while providing the best fresh juice on the planet. The loving people of Santa Cruz embraced our “Juice for Humans” and by the summer of 1981 we were selling bottled fresh-squeezed orange juice to retail outlets like Shopper’s Corner, Community Foods, and The Bagelry.

By 1983, Odwalla had outgrown the Mansfield location and, together with the Bailey Family, we remodeled the old Davenport packing shed and created a beautiful juice plant inside.

We processed 100% of our products there and maintained our headquarters next to the juice room with wonderful views of the ocean. Soon Odwalla offered a full range of fresh-squeezed fruit and vegetable juices and some of the world’s first nutritionally enhanced smoothies.

After ten years in Davenport, to keep up with increasing demand and to locate closer to the fruit, we refurbished a former Harry and David packing house outside Dinuba in the Central Valley and moved all manufacturing there in 1994.

As the company thrived, the founders were able to live by many of our core values, in smaller and larger ways… sponsoring our musical mentors The Art Ensemble of Chicago at Kuumbwa, creating scholarships for women nutritionists with our Femme Vitale program, starting one of the first plastic bottle recycling programs in Santa Cruz County, and sponsoring community gardens for local school children, among many other initiatives.

While we continued to distribute to Santa Cruz county residents from Davenport for many years, the company headquarters moved to Half Moon Bay in 1995.

We would like to thank all the folks who supported and gave love to Odwalla in Santa Cruz and beyond… as we used to say, “Drink it and Thrive!”

Greg Steltenpohl, Gerry Percy, Jeannine Bonstelle Bassett, Tom Dill, Don Faia 

BRATTONOTE. The Davenport packing shed they moved to in the 80’s was once owned by the Davenport Producers..That’s a very sexy name when you think about it. They were my landlords too  Also when they mention the Fred Bailey family’s and their son Zach, that’s who Zachary’s Restaurant is named after.

UCSC’S EAST MEADOW DEVELOPMENT. The problem with the many authorities in the UC system is that they are pushing ahead trying to create a stucco village on one of the most beautiful, and meaningful areas of that spectacular campus. Activist and concerned citizen John Aird sent a letter to Chancellor Cynthia Larive and Executive Vice Chancellor Lori Kletzer.         It just about tells the entire story. 

Dear Cynthia and Lori –

I am writing this short note to urge you to take the opportunity that your respective new leadership’s positions afford to change direction on and resolve the corrosive controversy surrounding building the family student housing complex on the East Meadow.  

Here’s my case for doing so –

  1. It will make a positive statement about the leadership style you bring to your roles and your commitment to solutions that garner wide-spread campus and community support alike.
  2. It will protect the East Meadow which provides part of the introductory openness and beauty that distinguishes the UCSC campus and developmental heritage, one that visually projects the particular emphasis of the campus to its commitment to environmental stewardship on the campus itself and on its academic and research emphasis in a whole host of areas including environmental studies, marine biology and other disciplines that have nationally distinguished it.
  3. While the total effect and implications of Covid-19 at this point are unknown, one thing is clear.  It will have a dampening effect on things for quite some time, whether that be in normal university functioning and adequate supportive funding, California State budgetary health as a whole or any kind of short-term “return to normalcy” on or off-campus. All of this buys time and the opportunity for alternative location reassessment and exploration.

Certainly these reasons and others suggest that other alternative sites ought to be re-reviewed with an announced commitment to select one that would leave the East Meadow preserved and protected.

I hope you will seize the opportunity here and make this decision.  You will be justifiably applauded for having done so and it’ll also serve as a striking signal of the sensitivity of leadership that you being to your new roles.

Sincerely,

John Aird

BROMMER AND 7TH & SWENSON DEVELOPMENT ISSUES.  Jean Brocklebank and Michael Lewis remain very eager in following up on the proposed Swenson development at Brommer and 7th. They sent this plea…  

“Hello Harbor Neighbors,~

Having heard nothing since last November 2019, we wrote to Swenson asking about the status of the proposed development on the property at the SW corner of 7th at Brommer. 

We also explained we were especially concerned that a virtual community meeting not be attempted by Swenson. We have attended several of these development community meetings and find them a very poor alternative to having people attend in person. Engaging with the community via Zoom is not “engaging.” It becomes a slide show with screens filled with speakers. True, questions can be asked … and answered … via a Q & A platform. But these virtual meetings are like eating a paper pizza instead of the real thing. Residents are growing weary of starring at computer screens in an attempt to engage with government, business and one another. The value of the human social experience cannot be replicated on a phosphorescent screen. 

Last month we received the following information in response to our email to Swenson, which we think you will find very interesting:

“We received comments back from the County pertaining to the Pe-Application in early March and we are working towards implementing those comments into the plan. Additionally, hospitality has been greatly impacted by COVID-19. As we moved forward with the project, we were in search of a partner/operator for the lodge, and found little traction. Since COVID-19, the lodge component has proven even more challenging, and we are working on other economic alternatives that still satisfy the RFP, Zoning, and Coastal Commission goals.

“When we find an alternative solution, we will most likely need to submit another Pre-Application with the County for their review. You will be our first point of outreach if we are able to find an alternative solution and/or use, prior to us moving forward with the County Pre-App.

“Regarding Community Meetings, we did conduct a Zoom Webinar for one of our projects downtown and received great feedback from the attendees, with the Q&A feature and follow up emails. I certainly understand your concerns and desire for in-person meetings. We will use whatever medium is available to us at the time, and I am not sure if we are allowed to promote community gatherings, even if it was in a large parking lot in order to implement safe social-distancing practices. Realistically, due to COVID-19 impacts in general and pertaining to the viability of this project, I don’t see us holding a community meeting for at least 6 months at the earliest. So hopefully, we will have a solution by then, and shelter-in-place restrictions will be relaxed to where we can hold in person meetings again.”

As always, we will share any information we receive about this matter. Meanwhile, it looks like a lot of development projects are being delayed by at least 2 – 3 years. Frankly, we’re pleased.

All the best,

Jean Brocklebank and Michael Lewis.

POETRY WORKSHOP . Patrice Vecchione is creating an online workshop at Bookshop Santa Cruz on Tuesday, July 21. Check it out

Bookshop Santa Cruz invites you to join us online for an event with acclaimed local poet, editor, and teacher Patrice Vecchione (Ink Knows No Borders: Poems of the Immigrant and Refugee Experience) to celebrate her newest book, My Shouting, Shattered, Whispering Voice—the ultimate writing guide for teens.

BUSHWHACKERS BREAKFAST CLUB. Every Friday morning on KZSC (88.1 fm or live online at KZSC.org) from 8:10 am-8:20 am or thereabouts I present my “B Movie Bratton” segment of short critiques (not reviews) of what’s on our screens. Dangerous Dan Orange hosts the rest of the Bushwhackers B. Club. Lately of course those screens are on anything but theatre screens . Tune in this Friday and learn about    Tom Hanks newest “Greyhound” the ship, not the bus. Plus Hanna, and streaming news and ideas. And probably a few more.

Greensite is off this week. “Will return next week.”  (HER DIRECT WORDS)

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

July 13

THE ZOOM CHARADE 

After you finish with the late-night comedy shows–Steven Colbert, Trevor Noah, and John Oliver–I suggest tuning into the Zoom Charade that has become the remains of what used to be a Santa Cruz city council meeting. It would all be funnier if the council only dealt with Covid-19 related decisions and road maintenance issues during their zoom chaos meetings. But that is not the case. They continue to make momentous decisions and spend real money on things too large to be decided on in council pandemic confusion as they did this past July 2nd. Frankly, I fully expect George Orwell to pop up on the Hollywood Squares Zoom meeting dais and say something about the dystopian moment SC finds itself in, like, “Being in a minority, even in a minority of one, did not make you mad. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.” I feel crazy watching decisions made when the overwhelming preponderance of calls, emails. and community sentiment is against building the library at the bottom of a parking garage. These days, council can make decisions with little scrutiny and scant visibility, but the public one-upped them on audibility during that July 2nd meeting. Around 25 “Noise Makers,” as they called themselves, banged on pots and pans right outside the almost empty city council chambers. Seems that the city clerk and assistant city clerk are the only people allowed inside the chambers, along with the Community TV technician who puts together the Zoom boxes of council members all onto one TV square and broadcasts the entire gobbledygook from city hall. Have a look at the meeting here.

When is a Meeting Not a Meeting?

Start around minute number 34. At 1h:04s the mayor begins reading the protocol of “clearing the chamber” because the protesters outside council chambers, and only two people inside, were making it difficult to “conduct city business.” Justin Cummings read from a city’s handbook and included language that stated, “you will be removed by the Sergeant-at-arms and you will not be able to return to council chambers.” Return? Sergeant-at-arms? Folks, we really are living in strange times, “fictitious” ones as Michael Moore called out about George Bush’s fake war in Iraq in 2012 upon receiving his Oscar award.

There were no members of the public in council chambers on July 2nd. Every one of these council meetings has been quasi-secret because of the extremely limited participation of the public. In case you missed the link, here it is again

The noise-making got so loud that the mayor, I kid you not, read out that he was going to “clear the chambers.”He read the statement into his computer screen. None of the Noise Makers protesting could hear anything the mayor read. There was no “council chambers” filled with residents and certainly no “Sergeant-at-arms” present at the meeting because the meeting was virtual. Cummings then asked his computer screen, “And I would like to ask if you understand this warning?” Ironically, this is where George Orwell’s writing voice can be heard most loudly. There were no audience members in the chambers, so “clearing it “would of course take little time for the fictitious (virtual?) Sergeant-at-arms. The community has been banned from meetings since March. A petition from the public has been submitted to the mayor demanding that the Civic Auditorium be opened, and to hold council meetings there while maintaining the proper CDC social-distancing protocols. Councilmember Sandy Brown has been a strong proponent of opening up the Civic for meetings too, but thus far it has been rejected by ‘da Mayor, the city manager, and some other councilmembers. I understand the noise-makers wanted to hammer home their point about reducing the police budget too, but Cummings sent the police to the city hall court yard instead. In making the protesters point, more than 20 officers swarmed the Santa Cruz city campus, but by the time they arrived the protest was already breaking up. People involved in the protest reported that no arrests were made and maybe four people were left when the police ordered them to leave the area immediately outside city council chambers. I understand the protesters were hoping to get the council to specifically agendize the police budget. Their wish is similar to the national call to reduce and redirect a portion of the police budget towards social services since PD is not really trained in the area of mental health and addiction issues. Many of police calls for service also include issues stemming from people’s unemployment and houselessness issues. We cannot expect the police to provide job training or transitional housing services.

Parking Garage and Library Money Charade, Take III

“To the extent that a parking district generates revenue in excess of what’s required in order to provide and maintain parking facilities that are in existence, and to the extent the City Council makes a policy determination that those revenues are not needed to improve or increase parking facilities with the use of the revenues, then under the Parking District law of the State of California, you are able to put those funds into the General Fund.”
–Tony Condotti, Santa Cruz city attorney

That’s right; the parking fund is part of the city’s general fund. It is discretionary; meaning a majority of councilmembers can decide how to spend it. No denying this, although many supporters of the immense concrete proposed parking garage will say otherwise. In fact, during recent council deliberations on the garage, the Machiavellian Mathews-Coonerty clan were forced to bring back a former city attorney and darling of market-rate housing enthusiasts, John Barisone to, err, correct his business partner Condotti on his parking fund legal opinion. While neither has voted, or can vote on the project, the Mathews-Coonerty political marriage is daily pushing to make the library-in-a-garage-atop-the-Farmer’s-Market their legacy. They direly want to etch this apparent white elephant project onto their political backroom deal six-shooters. If ever built, the massive structure on one of the few remaining city-owned parcels will likely cost over $100 million and be the largest public works project (outside of the water dept.) in the history of Santa Cruz. Do we really want it to be a parking garage? According to Condotti’s legal opinion as described above, the city council can use parking fund fees to finance a homeless shelter, plant trees, offer loans to struggling businesses or, it can even supplement the expenses of remodeling the downtown library WHERE IT NOW STANDS at 224 Church Street. Using the $28 million in bond money to revamp and refurbish this 60’s structure, and thus enhance and firmly establish our town’s civic core will likely be one of the top three issues in the upcoming November elections, which actually begin October 5th. With political stakes high and slates of candidates now developing around rebuilding the library and creating a permanent downtown Farmer’s Market while also creating a Downtown Commons, versus displacing the market and moving our library into the ground floor of a 5-story parking garage, there will be no room for candidates to equivocate! Winning a seat on the city council will be a fiercely competitive endeavor this year. Each side now has at least three candidates and adding a number 4 is being debated over daily. With Covid-19 making a big comeback candidates are uncertain how campaigning may look in election season 2020. Barring a 4-seat sweep, the Campaign for Sustainable Transportation, the Downtown Commons Advocates, Sierra Club, and Santa Cruz Climate Action Network will all be looking to place the library decision into the hands of voters through a ballot initiative. Look for this issue to be with us until at least November of 2022.

Post Script
Does anyone know why in the world former progressive candidate and Democratic Socialists of America member, Justin Cummings would want to be the deciding vote on the library-in-a-garage? It’s perhaps the most controversial project in Santa Cruz since the Beach Area Plan. Will he now become known as Mayor Garage? Car-Carrier Cummings? Or, Just-in Time for Covid: Library-in-a-Garage?

“It’s our real life. While it takes months, sometimes years to study crime data, I personally can tell you that fed & state relief is NOT reaching people. We aren’t getting stimulus checks (mixed status fams), millions can’t pay rent, & summer youth employment has been cut.” (June 13)

See Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez offer a two-minute, Why Defund the Police message.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
July 13

WHEN WILL THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ PLEASE STOP DUMPING WASTEWATER SO CLOSE TO THE SHORE?
Please write the Santa Cruz City Council and State Water Quality Control Board to demand that the City repair the ruptured sewage outfall pipe that is spewing contaminated water close to the shore for the surfers to ingest.   Read on…

In February, 2020, the State Regional Water Quality Control Board enforcement agency sent a letter (attached) to the City of Santa Cruz requiring a detailed investigation and response regarding the known rupture in the City’s Wastewater effluent outfall pipe that has been leaking sewage water into the Bay about 65′ from shore.  The City had to respond by May 31, 2020.

Essentially, the City report admits that it has known about this problem since 1992.  They claim studies done in 1994 showed it was really no big deal, and that sand and rock covered the ruptured pipe, making it impossible to find the exact location of the rupture.  The City had done no inspections of the outfall pipe in 2018, but did one in 2019.  That report is attached at the end of this blog post.  Take a look at pages 36-37 to see the significant dye plume on November 21, 2019.  Take a look at page 23 that discusses the problems with Total Organic Carbon (TOC), fecal coliform and an abundance of large filamentous bacteria in the effluent related to the episodic UV treatment issues.  See pages 10-16 for heavy metals and chemical contaminant levels.

Here is the City of Santa Cruz response to the State Water Quality Control Board…an expensive technical memorandum (see attached) that the State already has, and nothing done to actually fix the leak spewing contaminants close to shore for local surfers.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Wastewater Treatment Facility • 110 California Street, Santa Cruz CA 95060 • Phone 831-420-6050 • Fax 831-420-6489 

June 1, 2020 
John M. Robertson, Executive Officer
Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
895 Aerovista Place, Suite 101
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

Re: REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE SANTA CRUZ WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY OUTFALL STRUCTURE

Dear Mr. Robertson,

Through this letter, the City of Santa Cruz (City) responds to your letter dated February 11, 2020, that required the City to submit a technical report on the condition of the Santa Cruz Wastewater Treatment Facility (SC WWTF) outfall structure. On page 2 of that letter, you request that the City respond to five items. We address each item in order below. 

The City has engaged Brown and Caldwell (BC), the firm that helped the City with original outfall planning and design, to assist the City in its response preparation. BC prepared the accompanying technical memorandum (TM) that gathers relevant information concerning the outfall and historical identification of and monitoring for the leak and its vicinity. The TM includes a summary of the leak history, the annual outfall inspections, and results of the ongoing bacterial monitoring. The City discovered the leak in 1992 during a routine monitoring fly-over inspection. Initial investigations in 1992 failed to locate the leak precisely at the ocean bottom. In 1994, the City engaged Kinnetics Laboratory, Inc. (KLI) to conduct additional investigations to locate and measure the leak and monitor bacteria in the leak area. Diver investigation over the leak could not locate it precisely. A heavy layer of rock and sand cover the pipe at the leak location. The dyed effluent filters from the leak to the sediment surface through interstices (small openings) in the covering backfill and sediment, spreading laterally away from the leak before it reaches the sediment surface. Field measurements by KLI determined that the leak was very small, with an initial dilution of seawater to effluent exceeding 1000:1. 

Based on the small, intermittent nature of the leak, the lack of evidence for adverse leak impacts, the substantial cost to repair a leak of insignificant magnitude, and the possible risk to the integrity of the outfall pipe, the City proposed in 1994 to continue to monitor the leak rather than repair it. The Water Board accepted the City’s proposal. The City has continued regular monitoring and reporting since that time.  

Since the leak was discovered, the City has continued to conduct annual investigations, including dye studies and outfall inspections, as well as weekly bacteriological monitoring. The technical report provides a detailed review of the investigations and is briefly summarized below.  

  • A review of the available dye studies from 1995 to 2019 shows that the leak is still intermittent and (when observed) the plume at the leak site appears smaller than the plume at the diffuser section of the pipeline.
  • A review of the annual outfall diffuser inspection reports from 1995 to 2019 show that the end structure is in good condition and the open diffuser ports are unobstructed.
  • There is no evidence that sediment is impeding the flow of the outfall pipe. If the flow were being impeded, the effluent pumps would be run more often. The operations manager reported no increase in run times or frequency of use for the effluent pumps.
  • The City monitors for potential bacterial contamination at the leak site via sampling boat at the 70-foot contour line above the outfall at the location of the leak site. Over the past 15 years, only three recorded values out of more than 600 tests have exceeded the Permit limits, all for enterococcus. The three exceedances occurred during the peak of the rainy season and are likely due to surface runoff.

From a review of the annual reports, there is no evidence that shows that the leak is increasing in frequency or size. The leak is still intermittent and small. We see no data or circumstances that support a need for additional costly field work or leak investigations and/or repairs.  

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

A GIANT TOWER IN APTOS FALLS 

A giant falls: Fire destroys Aptos radio tower | The Pajaronian

A blaze that Aptos/La Selva Fire said was likely started by a homeless person seeking warmth has felled one of the towers that once reached into the sky alongside Highway 1 in Aptos.

The tower was part of a quintet of now-silent radio antennae that stand at the site.

According to Aptos/La Selva Fire Protection Deputy Fire Marshal Marco Mack, the fire damaged the concrete at the base of the tower, and the porcelain insulators there. [read the whole article]

COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSPECTIONS OF LOCAL FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AVAILABLE FOR YOU TO SEE
County Environmental Health Inspectors regularly visit all establishments throughout the County that sell or prepare food for the public.  They are a dedicated, hard-working and well-trained crew and do an excellent job of keeping the public safe. You can look at the results of their inspections here  

Wondering what the codes mean for various violations noted?  Click on the code and a definition will appear.  That’s how I learned that “VI” means ‘rodent or insect infestation”.  

Many thanks to the anonymous friend who sent me this information to share with you. 

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE BY DEMANDING ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS.  TAKE A WALK ON THE BEACH AND STAY HEALTHY.

Happy Summer,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

July 8

#190 / Maybe Not Such A Great Idea 

Back in the middle of January, The Wall Street Journal celebrated a financial triumph for the world’s best-known cryptocurrency: “Bitcoin Rallies, Approaches $9,000.” That is what the headline said in the print edition of the paper on January 16, 2020. Online, The Wall Street Journal headline was even more emphatic. It added a boast that “Bitcoin … Trounces Stocks, Bonds, Gold and Oil.”

I have never been a big fan of cryptocurrency. The attraction, as I understand it, is that there is no central authority in charge of the money supply. This is considered to be a “feature, not a bug.” Since there is no central authority in charge, no government or bank is in a position to take away your money. Again, that is cited as an advantage, because it is true that sometimes banks and governments do, essentially, steal the money that is on deposit with them, or that is measured in value by the currency issued by the government. 

No such problems are supposed to exist in the case of bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, although I would point out that the value of bitcoin appears to resemble a continuing gamble that the price will, somehow, inevitably go up. Comparing bitcoin to “stocks, bonds, gold, and oil” seems to be on target. If you want your money to be put into constant play in what amounts to a speculative “currency casino,” bitcoin may be just what you are looking for.

That is not the kind “savings” plan I want for my own money. The problem I worry about is this: if your money does disappear (and that has happened with bitcoin), there is no government or other institution that is specifically responsible. Thus, you have no way to hold anyone accountable. At least, that’s the way I see it. 

But let me raise an additional issue, also serious. As Wikipedia tells us, cryptocurrencies exist only by way of an online technology that “creates a distributed ledger, typically a blockchain, that serves as a public financial transaction database.” That database exists, and the cyrptocurrency exists, only because a large number of computers are linked, and are in constant communication. The picture above shows bitcoin “mining” equipment in Quebec, Canada. The article from which I obtained the photo informs us that “Bitcoin consumes more energy than Switzerland.” Vox calls bitcoin “an energy hog.”

In case you hadn’t noticed, we are facing a planetary-level peril that is being created by our use of energy, the greatest source of which is the combustion of fossil fuels. Using less energy, not more, is the correct prescription for human survival. In our current climate crisis, it doesn’t make much sense to develop a whole new concept of money that is based on the production and consumption of massive amounts of energy obtained from the combusion of hydrocarbon fuels. 

In short, for various reasons, including the need to maintain Earth as habitable for ourselves and other living things, it may be that bitcoin, and cryptocurrencies in general, are not such a great idea.  

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

Caitlin is a funeral director and a mortician, and she is so cool! Her YouTube channel is Ask a Mortician. She makes these videos about death, trends and practices in the funeral industry, and mixes new ideas with historical facts. Her delivery is great, her videos are both funny and interesting to watch! This one is about green burials versus “traditional” embalming and cremation.

    “COUGHING”

“Love and a cough cannot be hid”.
~George Herbert

“Whooping cough is not a mild disease. Whooping cough, before the vaccination, could make you very, very sick. First of all, there was a chance you could die from it – small chance, not a big chance. You would be coughing and coughing. It wouldn’t last for a few days, like a cold.”
~Anthony Fauci

“A small cold and cough can actually stop you from going where you are.”
~P. V. Sindhu


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment