February 10 – 17, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Humans, dishonesty and Trump, Bookshop revisited, Palm Oil dangers. GREENSITE…on cutting down our future. KROHN…UCSC Growth Strategy, Joe Biden’s presidency, podcast suggestions. STEINBRUNER…Supervisors changing county properties, Seabreeze Tavern ownership issues, County Fairgrounds and animal evacuations, Nevada’s big tech giveaways. PATTON…Cellphones and privacy. EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”Valentines”. 

...

CHUCK AND ESTHER ABBOTT AT HOME. The Abbotts were mostly responsible for bringing and encouraging businesses to open in the Pacific Avenue Downtown. They also donated funds to build our noted lighthouse, in honor of their son who drowned surfing. This photo was taken June 3, 1965, in front of the Abbotts house at Lincoln and Chestnut Streets. It shows the Abbotts with some volunteers and friends.                                                         

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 8

      

DISHONESTY, TRUMP, THE INTERNET. In between all the robo scam calls I get every day, I got to thinking that Trump didn’t create the terrible racial hatred in the United States – he just allowed what was already there to become visible. Same thing for the internet: it only gave voice to the evil, crooked human nature that was already there, or here. We live amongst infinite attempts to cheat us out of what is rightfully ours. It’s not just us; it’s present all over the world, as we see by the daily reports of war and murder. Human beings are now, and always will be, just like our animal relations: constantly fighting, and at war over what we perceive to be our “given rights”. Look back at the records of our ancestors, even at the early Hawaiian folks who lived in paradise and yet fought horrendous bloody fights among their groups. Is there ever hope for a peaceful world? Will we ever “come together” and share? More to follow!!!

BOOKSHOP HISTORY REVISITED. Dr. Paul Lee, author, lecturer, co-host of the Penny University writes… “Just to fill out one more step in the Bookshop Santa Cruz History. I visited Santa Cruz prior to moving here, and was told by Page Smith and Byron Stookey of UCSC to go meet Al DiLudovico at the Catalyst deli, and to contribute to the founding of the Catalyst as a town/gown project of Stookey’s. So I did. Al told me the Hip Pocket book store had recently folded, and they were looking for a month’s rent to carry it until a new owner could be found. I wrote him a check. And then Ron Lau arrived to take it on.” 




THINK ABOUT IT! BrattonOnline can certainly use some financial help to meet the internet technical support. As previously mentioned none of us who write for BrattonOnline receive any funds at all and… the best things in life are never free. Domain fees and charges keep increasing and we need to support webwoman Gunilla Leavitt so she can deal with these increases. You can use PayPal directly, or click the donate button. The PayPal email is support@brattonline.com and you can use the send to family and friends feature. The name that comes up when you send money is “Online Payment”. You can also use Venmo (@Godmoma) or CashApp (@Godmoma9) if you would rather. We thank you for the support!

PALM OIL DANGERS CONTINUED. Last week we heard from Sara Cloud about the dangers from palm oil in Girl Scout Cookies. Linda Burman-Hall of the Santa Cruz Baroque Festival and KSQD writes…

“I’ve worked in southeast Asia, especially Indonesia, since 1978 and I’ve kept my eye on the palm oil situation since I first learned about the terrible effects on local communities in 2011. Although your readers will probably know me as the director of Santa Cruz Baroque Festival (SCBAROQUE.ORG), I work as a research ethnomusicologist annually with shamans of tribes living in the rainforest.

The forest is owned communally by clan tradition, and clans live off the forest bartering for all needs using the forest rather than cash. But if the government forces a tribe to contract with a palm oil company for government payoffs, then the palm oil company will not only clearcut the forest and sell all the wood, depriving the tribe of their ability to grow fruits, the staple of their traditional diet, but also assigning each family a small plot of individually owned land of what was previously collective land. The family must then mortgage their newly titled land to pay for training in how to farm the oil palm, which provides no food, and buy food from the company store.

Typically, the plantations are visited by ‘foreign’ men with cash money who teach the locals to gamble, woo and impregnate the young daughters of the locals with no intention to be there to raise the resulting children, and teach the young people to want coca cola, jeans, radios, TVs and phones, all available on credit from the company store. With these pressures, realistically, a family never can clear the mortgage on their land; and if the younger generation opts to leave the plantation to go to the city to live under a bridge and try to drive a pedicab for a living (for example), then the aging generation can only hire sharecroppers, further subdividing their own minimal income which becomes solely from palm oil.

Usually, as a consequence of government poor choice to opt for oil palm the rainforest families will lose the land of their ancestors in a generation or two in this manner, along with their culture, traditions and self-respect. Endangered primates and all animals who lived in the natural jungle lose out with the destruction of their habitat, and the hungry ones still left will still try to eat oil palm after the land is converted, which becomes a death sentence since the fences are usually inadequate to keep them out, and they are poisoned or shot, or both, by the plantation guards.

Ultimately, vigilant consumers are among the best guardians of the orangutans, gibbons and the rainforest itself: JUST SAY NO TO ALL PALM OIL.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie, to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non-hype story, plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, PBS) you can find it on.

MALCOLM AND MARIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Zendaya, the co-star of this movie, is from Oakland. She and John David Washington plus a few friends filmed this in a “glass house” in Carmel during the pandemic, and did a super job. The plot involves John, a filmmaker who has just received a great review of his new film in the LA Times, arguing throughout the entire film with Zendaya. Their fights are our fights, their issues are our issues and it’s an excellent movie. 

ADU. (NETFLIX SINGLE).Some poor directorial decisions mar the weaving of three almost totally unrelated stories into one heartwarming movie. Adu is a little boy who has to escape his warlike Africa hometown. Another story centers on the conflicting feelings of border guards. The most involved saga deals with illegal elephant ivory tusks, and a father/daughter entanglement. It’s a fine movie, but hard to follow. 

FIREFLY LANE (NETFLIX SERIES) a 48 on RT. Katherine Heigl and her BFF Sarah Chalke go through some show biz type plots, and make this a pretty ditzy movie. There are laughs and cute twists – but nothing, absolutely nothing here that you’ll remember while you’re looking for a new mask to wear later today.

BLISS. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) I’m giving up trying to figure out the plot of this one. Owen Wilson gets fired from his job and meets Salma Hayek and it goes into sci-fi and nonsense from there on. Local fans should watch for Joshua Leonard, son of Bob and Joann Leonard of Watsonville, who plays a character called Cameron. The movie switches from realities to fantasies and back again. You’ll probably give up long before it’s over… don’t worry about it.

LADY AND THE DALE. (HBO SERIES) This nearly unbelievable documentary has a 100 RT – the result of executive directing by the Duplass brothers, which makes any movie near great to begin with. Jerry Dean Michael was a con artist from birth. He later changed his name to Elizabeth Carmichael – a trans woman – and managed to convince a lot of the world that a motorcycle with two tires in front would change the world. See it as soon as possible, great fun betwixt the grimaces.

RADIOACTIVE. (AMAZON PRIME Single) The lovely and effervescent Rosamund Pike plays the Polish-born Marie Curie, the first woman to win the Noble Prize. This pointless drama covers both Curie’s secret love affair, and her belief in the occult. It lacks a driving force, in spite of showing us Curie’s fight against sexism, and ethnic prejudice, and being beautifully filmed. I’d give it a 5 out of 10 if I was giving anything. 

HACHE. (NETFLIX Series) You’ll remember that the lead woman’s name is HACHE, which begins with H as does Heroin. Set in Barcelona in 1960, it’s the story of Hache, a prostitute who eventually (about three episodes) figures out how to not just break into the controlling mob scene, but become a significant player. You’ll see lots of violence, much police illegal activity, plus brutality and sex. There are better things to do with your time.

PALMER. (APPLE TV+ Single)The big deal here is that it stars Justin Timberlake as Palmer, a football star in high school but then got sent to prison. He returns to his hometown and becomes a full time parent to a gay little 7 year old boy. Many sobs later, Palmer settles into his leading role and it’s fairly predictable. Watch it if you want to feel good about something.
 

BELOW ZERO (NETFLIX Single) A Spanish film about a trailer transporting prisoners between prisons. The trailer is stopped by spiked tires, and a long search ensues among the prisoners for one in particular. Which prisoner, and why him, is the plot. It’s tense, exciting, and nearly believable. Don’t miss it for sure! It was number one on Netflix a week ago!!!

THE VANISHED. (NETFLIX Single) I’ve always liked Anne Heche, but she wasted her time and talent in this mixed-up saga. A couple with their little daughter go to a trailer park. The daughter disappears, and it takes a long time to stage the reason why. Do not waste your time trying to outwit the movie…take a nap instead. 21 on RT.

THE DIG. (NETFLIX SINGLE) You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this 1939 setting that centers on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. British Museum’s battle over the rights to own and move the ship and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional. 

 LOSING ALICE.(APPLE + Series) It’s filmed and set in contemporary Israel. A woman film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game playing between them as they deal with a beautiful young screen writer who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

PENGUIN BLOOM. (NETFLIX Single) One of the most shallow, corny, cutesy movies in decades. Naomi Watts becomes wheel chair bound and a magpie named penguin is supposed to be some message to her to keep living. It’s a 100% Australian production, which adds some interest but it’s so treacley you’ll have a tough time staying with its predictable and weak plot.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. (APPLE + SINGLE)Try to imagine an intimate get together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first big time director achievements 

THE WHITE TIGER.(NETFLIX Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi and centers on Balram a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system Balram succeeds and ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant, go for it by all means.

THE RIPPER.(NETFLIX Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI / HAJI. (NETFLIX Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series.  It’s set in London and Tokyo where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother.  Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs.  No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (NETFLIX Series) Set in 1813 London this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds like Downton Abbey, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voice over for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL. (HBO MAX parts one and two). Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY.(NETFLIX SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is both her producer and her interviewer and enabler as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

TIGER. (HBO) This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

LUPIN. (NETFLIX SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(HBO MAX SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (NETFLIX SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (NETFLIX SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

...
February 8

FELLING OUR FUTURE
I know how this man feels. If I had to pick a negative from my 46 years in Santa Cruz, anguish over the wanton killing of big trees would be at the top. The sound of a chain saw evokes dread. 

So many big trees on the lower west side have been cut down during my time here and many more before that. Lighthouse Field was a forest until it was cleared of trees in the 1960’s to make way for a shopping center, predating the plan for a Convention Center. A few survivors remain. The nesting owls and hawks have gone.

I’ve been through the appeal process to try to save a few neighborhood big trees where tree safety or health was not at issue. No support from the city and never support from the various council majorities. Hostile homeowners hell bent on getting rid of the heritage tree that graced their yard and pre-dated their arrival, only to sell and move on when the tree was sacrificed to their hubris. Some are big players such as the Seaside Company, owner of the Sea and Sand Inn and whose bidding any number of geologists and tree “experts” are willing to accommodate. The sky is falling! 

In the early days the imperative to save the big trees focused on their beauty and habitat value. If that wasn’t enough, now climate change offers us the compelling need and still we sacrifice them as though our survival weren’t linked with theirs. 

Recent scientific studies in the Pacific Northwest show that big trees are superb carbon sinks (three per cent of the largest trees contain almost half the forest’s carbon). Yet even with this knowledge, people, including some who call themselves environmentalists, seem satisfied with a couple of saplings planted as mitigation for the loss of an 80-foot tall tree. Some don’t see a problem with 47 trees to be cut down for a three quarter mile rail trail section between California Street and the Wharf Roundabout. After all, there will be tree art on the retaining wall, which is needed to shore up the bank when the trees are removed. No one it seems has counted the number of big trees that will be cut down over the 32 miles of the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail in order to accommodate a rail and trail. It may be in the thousands. Beauty, shade, habitat, carbon apparently don’t count for much in this context. Even expressing concern over such environmental impacts led to a disinformation campaign by rail trail activists to oust two members of the Sierra Club Executive Committee a year ago.

In the spirit of Gramsci’s “Pessimism of the intellect: optimism of the will” it is heartening that many in the community are mobilized to protect the big magnolias in the parking lot where the library/parking garage development is planned for downtown. Leaving aside the bad idea of relocating the library and building a parking garage, a more enlightened city leadership, both staff and council, would assure the public that the trees will be saved. After all the Heritage Tree Ordinance states that, outside of reasons of health, safety or compromising a structure, a heritage tree can be removed only if a building design cannot accommodate the tree. Since there is as yet no specific design, saving the magnolia trees on the outside perimeter should be a given. Trees within the footprint could be relocated rather than killed. 

A recent grant funded the planting of 500 young trees throughout the city. A positive step but negated by the number of big trees cut down every month. If we were serious, every big tree that the city permits to be cut down for a new development would be required to be relocated at the developer’s expense. Such big tree relocation is doable and has a 90 per cent success rate. 

While the city’s Heritage Tree Ordinance has failed to protect many big trees, (disproving the urban myth that it is impossible to get a city permit to remove a tree) county trees have even less protection. Outside of the narrow coastal zone, county trees are unprotected. The photo below shows a small number of the total stumps of approximately 40 trees hacked down for the planned new complex on Capitola Road next to the Live Oak Supermarket. A sad sight indeed. These are the small ones. Maybe not the best specimens but at some point in our future, if we have one, some will look at such pictures and exclaim, “what were they thinking!” Apparently we aren’t.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

February 8

“NO ROOM AT THE INN”
University Growth Strangling Community
Is there anything more infuriating to Santa Cruz voters than the mere fact that University of California, Santa Cruz “planners” are going forward with a growth plan that is sure to make life worse in Surf City: more traffic, higher rents, more pressure on our water supply, and of course it will lead to larger class sizes and a drop in the quality of the UC education experience. There is no longer an argument that the growth of the university will at some future time disrupt and put asunder the idea of a healthy Santa Cruz community controlling its own political and social destiny because UC’s growth has already drastically altered done so, and the notion of a sane, predictable, or just housing market is in tatters. What part of the June 2018 vote does Oakland, where UC is based, not get? Just asking. Seventy-six percent of Santa Cruz voters said YES to the following question:
“Shall an Ordinance be adopted expressing the Santa Cruz community’s opposition to the proposed enrollment growth at the University of California, Santa Cruz?” 

Yes: 12,606, No: 3,783

Again, what is not clear? This ballot initiative included the following language:

–There should be no additional enrollment growth at UCSC beyond the 19,500 students allowed by the current 2005 LRDP (UCSC has already reached this number)

Source

But Growth There Will Be?

Growth is not inevitable. There is no freeway down Chestnut Street. The Dream Inn steroid project was defeated. Wilder Ranch, Lighthouse Field, and the Pogonip have all been preserved for open space. Any growth is always dependent on the will of the voters vs. the real estate and developer duo, but in this case, throw in the University of California. In spite of voters, the Long-Range Development Plan (LRDP) seems to call for a 30% growth in students on campus and thousands more in support staff and faculty in spite of the strong anti-growth 2018 vote. I was a member of the Community Advisory Group, which had members from the Chamber of Commerce, Santa Cruz Neighbors, and the Monterey Bay Economic Partnership along with former Supervisor Gary Patton, current Supervisor Ryan Coonerty, Councilmember Cynthia Mathews, and Westside activist, John Aird. In all my time in and out of local government spanning over 25 years, I had never seen such unanimity on any single issue across the political spectrum as I witnessed in this group. The group message was consistent to the then Chancellor George Blumenthal: UCSC is big enough and future growth should be constrained as much as possible. This advisory group met several times and each time the no more growth sentiment only became stronger, so strong that the group was evidently disbanded because scheduled meetings were cancelled and then no more meetings were held that I am aware. The message the Community Advisory Group was sending to the university administration was not a welcome one, but it without a doubt it was reflective of the community’s dissent for any more university growth.

Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)

The Draft EIR is now out and needs to be responded to by the community. It is an important piece of the LRDP process. This is what the UCSC web site states:

“The Draft EIR has been released for a 60-day review period, beginning on Thursday, January 7, 2021 and concluding on Monday, March 8, 2021. Written comments on the EIR will be accepted anytime during the EIR review period. Please state “LRDP EIR Comments” in the subject line, and send your electronic responses via email to eircomment@ucsc.edu  or written responses via U.S. mail to the following address by 5:00 pm on Monday, March 8, 2021.”

Source 

Let’s All Keep Our Eyes Wide-open and Focused on the Biden Presidency Because…

Remember, Joe Biden:

Podcast Suggestions

The Daily Poster, with David Sirota and Thomas Frank’s, on how the “liberals” led by Larry Summers, are trying to downsized the once $2000 care package, now $1400 and possibly going down fast,  [link here]    

On The Media, with Brooke Gladstone and Bob Garfield, “Slaying the Fox Monster,” [link here] 

Le Show, with Harry Shearer is a summary of the week’s politics with music and Shearer’s theatrics which are enshrined in his Simpson’s voice-overs. [link here] 

Blindspot: The Road to 9/11, with Jim O’Grady is eight-part series on the political, social and economic implications leading up the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. [link here]  

And, if you still wonder if Black people have not been short-changed economically and legally segregated into poorer conditions than their white counterparts, here’s a segment from Terry Gross’ Fresh Air that really makes the case if not for reparations for our Black brothers and sisters, then at least it deserves some hard thinking about how to move beyond systemic racism, which created economic ghettos, consider Levittown, Daily City, Baltimore and St. Louis. [link here]   

“I congratulate Speaker Pelosi, Chairman Scott@USProgressivesfor including a $15 minimum wage in the House reconciliation bill. In 2021, a job should lift workers out of poverty, not keep them in it. 

Bookshop workers vote to affiliate with the Communication Workers of America (CWA) union. Wow!

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
February 8

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVE PLAN FOR SWEEPING CHANGES FOR COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTIES
The parking lot at 701 Ocean Street could be eliminated and sold for a mixed-use development.  All but one building at the County Emeline Street Health Facilities would be demolished, two new multi-story building constructed, and the rest of the land sold for mixed-use development.  The empty lot next to the County offices on Freedom Boulevard where FEMA trailers provided shelter for nearly 100 families displaced by the Loma Prieta Earthquake damage would be sold for mixed-use development. The Roy Wilson Maintenance Yard in Watsonville may disappear.

Amazing changes, with no money currently budgeted to do anything.

However, consider the benefits of consolidating the many services for which the County taxpayers now pay to lease properties to provide various services.

Freedom Boulevard facilities would become four-stories tall, if the City of Watsonville allows that. (see page 106 of the Long Range Facilities Plan and the map on page 102): DOC-2021-106 Consider presentation on the Long-Range Facilities Plan, as outlined in the memorandum of the Deputy CAO/Director of Public Works – Santa Cruz County, CA

*175 Westridge Drive, Watsonville: Eliminate lease and relocate 15 Ag. Commissioner staff 
*420/ 440 May Ave., Santa Cruz: Eliminate lease and relocate 54 CSS staff 
*245, 432 Westridge Drive, Watsonville: Eliminate lease and relocate 97 HSD staff 
*18 W. Beach St., Watsonville: Eliminate lease and relocate 
*169 HSD staff County Government Center: Relocate 33 HSA (Environmental) staff and 8 CAO (Cannabis) Staff 
*215 E. Beach Street, Watsonville: Relocate 3 BOS (district 4) staff

Emeline facilities would become three stories tall, and provide a logical area for transitional housing for those served. (See page 97 of the Plan)

Support a “one-stop shop” for Health, Human, and Homeless Services » Provide housing and/or supportive or transitional housing alongside relevant HSA/HSD services. Redevelop the campus to accommodate the growing headcount of the existing HSA and HSD departments. In addition, HSA and HSD leadership have expressed interest in providing much needed supportive housing, transitional housing, and navigation centers. This campus would be a good candidate for integration of such uses. Furthermore, explore potential for affordable housing, market-rate housing, and/or other non-County uses, as the residential neighborhood character adjacent to the southern section of the campus makes this area a good candidate for housing development.

Sell the 701 Ocean Street parking lot for a mixed-use development???

(See pages 90-92 of the Plan):

» Capitalize prime downtown location 

» Densify site with non-County uses. Surface parking consumes approximately 4 acres of the site, which can be monetized through non County uses. This can be achieved by engaging a private development partner to develop the eastern portion of the site. 

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

NEVADA PROPOSES CITY-STATES FOR BIG TECH
Here is a shocking development.  Keep your eyes on this, as it would seemingly allow large corporations to have their own jurisdictions to rule as they wish, including courts.

According to a draft of the proposed legislation, obtained by the Review-Journal but not yet introduced in the Legislature, Innovation Zones would allow tech companies like Blockchains, LLC to effectively form separate local governments in Nevada, governments that would carry the same authority as a county, including the ability to impose taxes, form school districts and justice courts and provide government services, to name a few duties.

Bill would allow tech companies to create local governments.

This is the Draft Bill linked in this other article.
 
WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING, ASK QUESTIONS AND DEMAND ANSWERS.  SAY “HELLO” TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE.

MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND DO SOMETHING KIND THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner 831-685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

#39 / Their Apps Betrayed Them

On Saturday, February 6, 2021, The New York Times ran an article by Charlie Warzel and Stuart A. Thompson. The headline on the hard-copy version of the article said, “Capitol Mob’s Phone Apps Betrayed Them.” The message of the article was that our cellphones are collecting, at all times, a detailed record of our physical location. This is true whether or not we permit the applications on our phones to use “location services.” 

Cellphones work by communicating with cell towers that pick up the signals from our phones, and then relay those signals on, whenever we become involved in a call, or when we use some application that requires network or internet connectivity. However, even if we are not actually “using” our phone to make a call or to access the internet, our phones and the nearest available cell tower are in continuing contact. Since the location of each cell tower is precisely known, anyone who can access “Cell Site Location Information,” so-called CSLI, can pretty much pinpoint the location, at all times, of any cellphone user. 

If you didn’t know this before, now you do. I can guarantee you that every student in my Legal Studies class at the University of California, Santa Cruz has definitely been made aware of the implications of this technology. My course is titled, “Privacy, Technology, And Freedom,” and hopefully you can see that issues of privacy and freedom are most definitely implicated in our use of cellphones. 

The Supreme Court has held, in a very important case, Carpenter v. United States, that law enforcement authorities must get a search warrant, based on some probable cause, before they can access CSLI for a specified person. Read The Times‘ article (paywall permitting) and you will learn that a “source,” perhaps someone within a telephone company, was easily able to get access to CSLI for those involved in the January 6th insurrection, and then decided to “leak” such information, which is one way that The Times has been able to prove who was actually involved.

The source shared this information, in part, because the individual was outraged by the events of Jan. 6. The source wanted answers, accountability, justice. The person was also deeply concerned about the privacy implications of this surreptitious data collection. Not just that it happens, but also that most consumers don’t know it is being collected and it is insecure and vulnerable to law enforcement as well as bad actors — or an online mob — who might use it to inflict harm on innocent people. (The source asked to remain anonymous because the person was not authorized to share the data and could face severe penalties for doing so.)

“What if instead of going to you, I wanted to publish it myself?” the source told us. “What if I were vengeful? There’s nothing preventing me from doing that. It’s totally available. If I had different motives, all it would take is a few clicks, and everyone could see it (emphasis added).”

So, heads up, folks. Tin foil hats, unfortunately, are unlikely to provide a workable solution!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    VALENTINE’S

“A heart is not judged by how much you love, but by how much you are loved by others”.
~Frank Morgan

“All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn’t hurt”.
~Charles M. Schulz

“I’ll love you, dear, I’ll love you till China and Africa meet and the river jumps over the mountain and the salmon sing in the street”.
~W. H. Auden

“How did it happen that their lips came together? How does it happen that birds sing, that snow melts, that the rose unfolds, that the dawn whitens behind the stark shapes of trees on the quivering summit of the hill? A kiss, and all was said”.
~Victor Hugo

You can find a “reaction video” for pretty much anything! This one is pretty cute.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

February 3 – 9, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Flu shots and Covid Vaccine, Literary Guillotine, Girl Scout Cookies, movie critiques. GREENSITE…UCSC Long Range Destruction Plan. KROHN…Council meetings, zoom meetings, 831 Water Street meetings, AOC tweet of the week. STEINBRUNER…$400,000 gift to Swenson & Aptos Village, 831 Water Street community meeting…who listens, Board of Supes and censorship, Fair grounds unfair to evacuees. PATTON…The Devil and the New Deal. EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”Masks”

...

COOPER HOUSE (Santa Cruz County Court House) October 30, 1961. This was a Civil Defense Fallout shelter display. The sign on the commercial shelter on the left says it costs in four figures, compared to the do-it-yourself sand bagger one, which only runs $35 !!!                                                     

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 1

FLU SHOTS OR COVID VACCINE??? As I sit (and stand and sulk)  patiently waiting for my covid shot, and read so much about the troubles we in the USA have with getting the vaccine, I think we would all be better off if we knew the truth behind the distribution problem. We have no problem going to CVS or Safeway and getting flu or shingle shots… so why the difference? What government officials, or which department, decided this system wouldn’t work as efficiently?  

LITERARY GUILLOTINE NEWS!  David Bolam sent definite proof that the Literary Guillotine that I mentioned under last week’s historic photo is gone. He says, David Watson flipped the sign in the doorway of The Literary Guillotine on Dec.31, 2019, notifying passersby and customers that the bookstore was closing, this time for good. Feb 7, 2020″ Watson ran the bookstore for 30 years. City on a Hill Press: Remembering the Literary Guillotine

GIRL SCOUT COOKIES REPLY. Sara Cloud sent this note after my attack against the cookies last week. “I was glad you talked about the Girl Scout cookie boycott. I agree that it’s a misuse of girls’ energy and need to support their projects. Years ago I ran into a Girl Scout that was boycotting the cookie sale because of the palm oil, and it educated me on the whole issue which is quite critical for the ecology of Indonesia and the life of orangutans. Since then I’ve noticed how many products are using palm oil. Almost every cookie sold by Trader Joe’s contains palm oil ,and I don’t mean the organic palm oil which I assume might be grown more ecologically.”  

LOSING ALICE. (Series) Filmed and set in contemporary Israel, a female film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters, and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game are played between them, as they deal with a beautiful young screenwriter who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

THE DIG. You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this movie set in 1939, centering on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. The British Museum claims the rights to own and move the ship, and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… “The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact, making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional”. 

PENGUIN BLOOM. (Single) One of the most shallow, corny, cutesy movies in decades. Naomi Watts becomes wheelchair bound, and a magpie named penguin is supposed to be some message to her to keep living. It’s a 100% Australian production, which adds some interest, but it’s so treacly you’ll have a tough time staying with its predictable and weak plot.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. Try to imagine an intimate get-together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT, and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first bigtime director achievements.

WHITE TIGER.(Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi and centers on Balram a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system Balram succeeds and ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant, go for it by all means.

THE RIPPER.(Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI / HAJI. (Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series.  It’s set in London and Tokyo where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother.  Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs.  No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (Series) Set in 1813 London this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds like Downton Abbey, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voice over for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL, parts one and two. Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY.(SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is both her producer and her interviewer and enabler as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

TIGER. This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

SURVIVING DEATH. (SERIES)There are 6 episodes, near-death experience, mediums (2 parts) signs from the dead, seeing dead people and reincarnation. The first one on near death experience reports on hundreds of folks who have died and experienced some startling sites. The two parts on mediums seems too hokey. If you’ve ever wondered about seeing ghosts watch the last two parts. It’s well done and even informative…no matter what/how you believe. 

LUPIN. (SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

...
February 1

HORROR ON THE HILL
When it comes to overblown growth, we are used to sugarcoated rhetoric from the city. UCSC’s latest Long Range Development Plan takes the cake. There are so many examples you need to read it yourself here. Just a few and by no means the worst. 

Under the Aesthetics section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) we are assured that new development “will be consistent with existing compatible facilities.” There is much space devoted to the beauty of the campus and the past careful design and siting of buildings. They are fond of quoting early campus leaders, so here’s one they didn’t include from Landscape Architect Thomas Church in 1963: “The buildings are less important in the visual composition than the trees.” And so it was until now. Below is a before and after of current Family Student Housing (slated to be bulldozed and re-built on the East Meadow) and the proposed new Student Housing West. This mega- complex is not yet built but is approved to accommodate past student growth so is not included in the 2021 DEIR. If this is the new yardstick, imagine what is forthcoming with the plan to grow Building Space from the existing, 2 million Assignable Square Footage (ASF) to the proposed 5 million ASF?

Even if the aesthetics of new construction on campus or visible from off-campus doesn’t concern you, the provision of housing for the additional 9,482 students and 2,550 employees probably does. Expect to see much written from UCSC and in the local press on how UCSC will house ALL additional students on campus. While this may lull the community into thinking the problem has been taken care of, don’t believe it. Not only is it not accurate it is highly misleading. Under the DEIR question (Table 3.13-11): “Would All of the Increased Housing Demand be Accommodated On-Campus?” their answer is No. 

Beyond the increased housing demand from additional growth, remember that the growth is on top of the current 19, 500 students plus employees. If all the growth is realized, total campus numbers will be around 34,000 (students, staff and faculty.) Half of the total students and seventy five per cent of new employees will be seeking housing off-campus despite new students and 25% of new employees being accommodated on campus. That means around 17 thousand UCSC affiliates will be looking for housing off-campus compared to the current 10 thousand.

Now it gets interesting.  Given the above, one would expect a DEIR to find at least some significant off-campus housing impacts requiring mitigation. But it doesn’t. They inform us they aren’t studying the planned growth impacts, only unplanned growth. In their words:

Such cool manipulation: Impacts of the planned campus population growth neatly swept away. The DEIR does address (although not study) the planned-for numbers and with reassurance to none but themselves or those standing to make money from growth, says: “Existing data on the city’s vacancy rates (5.6%) as well as planned developments nearby, suggest that housing is generally available within the county and city to accommodate additional students, faculty and staff and non-UC employees (contractors etc) for whom on campus housing would not be accommodated.”

If you’ve ever wondered who will be living in the overbuilt, expensive new mixed-use developments planned, approved or being built in town, you’ve got the answer.

Forget water being a limiting factor. The campus karst topography (underground caves) is filled with water just waiting the drill even if the city hadn’t made a legal commitment to supply UCSC with city water, short of the upper campus.

The LRDP is laced with feel-good meaningless jargon such as “UCSC strives to be a valuable community partner and is committed to mutually advantageous growth”.  (Measure U: 77% wants no more UCSC growth). And of course they have made a “commitment to climate adaptability, social justice and inclusion, and equity and access, to guide a responsible planning approach.” Expect a whole lot more rhetoric along these lines. The smiling faces of students of color peering down at us from one of the campus’ bridges will be the theme.

Their ace, they believe, is that in the early days of campus planning the expectation was that UCSC would have a student population of 27,000 by the 1990’s. They take pains to remind us of that at every opportunity. Perhaps they should re-read Chancellor Dean McHenry’s words from 1963, with which they end their Executive Summary: 

We have tried to plan ahead…but the future is dimly seen at best, and change will undoubtedly be made from time to time.”

McHenry was aware of the 27,000, projected future student number. I have a hunch in light of the subsequent environmental movement and current knowledge of species decline, the speculation in housing with inflated values and the pressures of growth on the town; he would support a reduced student enrollment at UCSC, especially with the availability of an additional campus at UC Merced with an enrollment of around 8,000 students. 

UCSC may feel it has an ace in hand with that outdated number but we have a full house. 

Try to attend one or both of the UCSC zoom meetings on the LRDP and DEIR on Wednesday and Thursday of this week (2/3 & 2/4) from 5-7PM. Register here

You don’t have to be an expert, just a concerned member of the community. The only tool available to us is massive community opposition to further UCSC growth. And be mindful that such growth is not in students’ best interests. Luring students to the most expensive UC community is callous and prospective students are largely unaware of the housing cost crisis in our community. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

 “MEETINGS”
Meetings, Meetings, Meetings
Most educational, work-related, activist-related, and city council business has been relegated to Zoom since last April. Of course, not all Zoom meetings are equal. Most Zoom meetings allow participants to see each other, if folks have their cameras on, and communicate individually or collectively through the “chat” function. The chat function is perhaps the only improved benefit to on-line meetings vs. in-person ones, aside from seeing a long-lost relative in Bangor, Maine on a family reunion chat, for example. On the other hand, zoom meetings can be abused by those running the meeting. The Santa Cruz city council meetings are a case in point. 

Council Meetings
Council meetings are considerably more degraded, alienating, and have even taken on darker political contours, than the pre-Zoom ones. The city bureaucracy refuses to allow meeting participants to see one another or even to use the chat function during regular city council meetings. While the public is almost entirely shut-down from seeing one another, the councilmembers and city staff can be seen preening, popping off, and parrying just a little bit as they have access the normal Zoom functions. When it comes time for the public to participate there are many dropped calls and missed opportunities on the part of the public due to the difficulty of figuring out the exact time that the public might be able to participate. Without seeing fellow colleagues, activists, and community members in the Zoom room, or city council chambers the forces that work against democracy are out in full force and looking to get their development approvals from a compliant council, one they paid for (see campaign donation statements here). In fact, those two to three current councilmembers who hold public comments in utter contempt are probably much happier living in Zoom world, but the rest of us have been placed on “hold” as we wait to be vaccinated and allowed back into the people’s chamber at city hall once again. Of course, the council could hold outdoor sessions with proper social distancing, or indoor public sessions at the Civic Auditorium during this Governor-directed public health “purple period” we are now in. Certainly, a public council meeting in the parking lot under the solar panels behind city hall is at least as important as being able to sit down for a “Mike’s Mess” in the Zachary’s restaurant parking off Pacific Avenue. If you think about this comparison for long your head might explode, or you might just realize how certain councilmembers are delighted not to have the public present during “their” city council soirée every other week.

Meetings, cont.
The Zoom meetings just keep piling up. On one hand, it is functionally easier to just sit down and parachute into any gathering, political or social, by the magic of pushing on computer keys. But frankly, it is often emotionally stultifying not seeing friends up close, hugging or high-fiving and checking in with the minor chit-chat before a city meeting begins and ends. We all experience some loss of feeling and therefore the political outcome is affected. How? If we met in-person, there is body language, which does indeed effect decision-makers–commissioners, councilmembers, supervisors–and their body language, faces, rhetorical maneuvering have affects on the audience members present as well. I attended six meetings this past week and missed three others I had planned to attend because of on-going work and writing commitments. Zoom leaves much to be desired, especially the soul that gives us life, it’s hard over Zoom. One meeting, attended by almost 300, while different and also somewhat anonymous and alienating, it did afford the community an opportunity to hear from the developer class, an exchange of information and public comments over the planned 151-unit, 6-story, 2-tower project, 831 Water Street.

831 Water Street
First of all, the “831 Water St.” proposed project actually includes 823, 825, 827, and 833 Water Street, according to the Santa Cruz city planning web page.  The city planners state on their web page, “The Project is requesting a maximum State Density Bonus of 35% pursuant to providing a minimum of 11% of the base density units as affordable to Very Low Income households, however the Project may provide as much as 51% of units as affordable to households between 30% and 80% of Area Median Income.”On the face of it, the numbers are impressive. Hard to bypass on that level of affordability. The developers do tout “51% affordable” units being built in this project. I am not sure how they will get there. Isn’t that what Santa Cruz longs for? The devil is in the details. 

The Project
The building will be 59-feet high with a roof-top bar, which would arguably bring the space to well above 60 feet with people drinking and dancing on top. The site sits across form Branciforte elementary school. The size and massing, in the pictures offered by the developers stands tall and taller and will shadow the neighborhood, which its backside abuts (see below). The neighbors knew little about the project coming in to the meeting and most were not asked for their input as to size and neighborhood compatibility as that might’ve saved the severe criticism the project is receiving by locals. Indeed, the developer was only meeting its requirement by holding this 200-plus Hollywood Squares Zoom extravaganza. Finally, the building appears to be institutional, boarding on retro-prison or antiquated dormitory-style. But yet, there is that affordability component. It’s huge. I would urge the developers to hold a series of meeting with neighbors and interested SC community groups. They could be neighborhood planning sessions with tables and pieces to move around, charrette-style, and see what is possible and most acceptable to the greatest number of those who will be affected by such an enormous physical imposition plopped down onto the edge of a pretty tranquil eastside neighborhood.

Top Ten List on why 831 Water St. Should be Re-thought
The meeting last week attracted more people, almost 300, than I’ve seen since the 700-plus who showed up at the Civic Auditorium in 1999 to discuss the entry of the now long-closed Borders Bookstore(now Forever21)into the Pacific Ave business zone. Those facilitating the Zoom discussion did a pretty good job of not cutting people off (is city council listening?) and community members responded by offering generally cogent and succinct remarks, most not so welcoming to the project. So, when it came my time, I offered my top ten list of why the community will likely reject the 151 mostly cubicle-style units (ONLY two 2-bedroom apartments proposed).

  • #10–The number of residents present on this Zoom meeting reflects the great concern in this community about the project (over 200 are still on the Zoom call after two hours);
  • #9–I am not a YIMBY, Yes in My Backyard because all housing is NOT equal. 
  • #8–Santa Cruz is way over its limit in building market-rate housing and way under on low, and very low affordable units…there’s not a “housing crisis,” there’s an affordable housing crisis;
  • #7–What happened to Spanish-colonial/California colonial architecture in Santa Cruz? Look no further than across the street at 708 Water to see a moderating architectural example. We need to honor the once-thriving Villa Branciforte.
  • #6–There will be two EV-charging spots as part of the project. TWO!?
  • #5–Why all the studio and one-bedroom apartments? What happened to family-style 2,3,4-bedroom apartments? Who is this project really for?
  • #4–If you want this project to be successful you must commit to submitting a full-blown EIR–environmental impact report–to gain support and confidence of the community.
  • #3–The poll you attempted during the meeting was folly. It was in the form a “push poll,” one designed to lead those participating towards the development goals of the project.
  • #2–I am not so sure Santa Cruz wants this project, as is.
  • #1–The ill-fated, under the radar “Corridors Plan” was killed not long ago by an eastside voter uprising resulting in a newly elected city council majority cancelling it in 2019.

PLEASE NOTE: ReImagine Santa Cruz is presenting a conference, Is Affordable Housing Possible? on Feb. 4-5, this Thursday and Friday. To find out more information and who the featured guest speakers and panelists are go to: reimaginesantacruz.com

“Imagine thinking that ‘healthcare is a human right’ vs. white supremacist conspiracy theories are two views “just as extreme” as the other.” (Jan. 30)


Hey, Belvedere neighborhood, meet your new neighbors! 831 Water Street, at corner of Branciforte.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
February 1

ANOTHER $400,000 HANDED TO APTOS VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO HELP SWENSON DEVELOPERS.
Santa Cruz County Public Works just got a $400,000 grant from the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD) to coordinate all five traffic lights in the Aptos Village area, promising the carbon emissions will decrease because everyone can just zoom along without having to stop at each light.  Will that really work? 

The $400,000 grant of public monies, approved by the Board of Supervisors as Consent Agenda Item #44 last week, will help reduce the cost, which was supposed to be already covered, thanks to multiple large state and federal grants administered by the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission. 

“Financial Impact 

At this time, the overall estimated project cost is $550,000 for the Aptos Area Adaptive Traffic Control System project. The AB2766 Grant will provide $400,000 towards the estimated project cost, under 621100/62330. A local match of $65,000 in soft costs is budgeted in this fiscal year 2020-21 CSA 9 funds. The remaining local match of $85,000 will come from various transportation funding sources and will be budgeted in the years that the funds will be spent.”

Why does the matching funding have to come from CSA 9 and other County transportation projects?  The project was initially fully funded for the budgeted amount to include the $550,000 cost to synchronize the lights.  This Project has been the County’s top priority for getting grant money from the RTC for the past 5 years.  

It remains to be seen, but the current Phase 2 Aptos Village Traffic Improvement work at Aptos Creek Road is supposed to wrap up on February 11, according to the County traffic delay warning signs in the Village.  According to Project Manager, Ms. Cristina Crocker, the highly contaminated railroad bed soils excavated for the railroad crossing, and that have been stored and draining onto Swenson’s Phase 2 development were scheduled to get hauled off Friday, January 29,  to the Class 1 landfill in Kettleman City…over 170 miles away.

Where is the new railroad signal that the PUC requires be installed?  No sign if it being yet delivered.

Here is the County’s timeline for work remaining:  Aptos Village Improvement

MORE CENSORSHIP AT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR MEETINGS
Several members of the public wrote comments to the Board during last Tuesday’s January 26 meeting, and should have been read publicly by the Clerk of the Board.  However, the Clerk read NO comments that members of the public submitted on any agenda item.  One woman spoke up, protesting that she had submitted written comment during the meeting on previous agenda items, but none were read.

2021/01/26 09:00 AM Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting – Web Outline – Santa Cruz County, CA

The Clerk did not read any comments throughout the meeting.  Another blow to public participation. 

OUTSTANDING PUBLIC INTEREST SHOWN AT 831 WATER STREET PROJECT COMMUNITY MEETING….WILL THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY EVEN LISTEN?
There were over 300 people logged on to the 831 Water Street Project Zoom meeting last Wednesday, January 27.  The meeting went on for three and a half hours, with many excellent points raised.   How can the developer claim that adding white stucco to the facade of the two five-story modern structures satisfy  the City’s requirement that the architecture blend with the historic mission style, Villa de Branciforte adobe character?  How can anything about what is proposed fit with the character of the neighborhood?  Many, many people pointed out that it just doesn’t!

The project construction would not likely provide many local jobs, either, as the developer plans to have the buildings prefabricated in a factory (somewhere else and transported in) as modular units that could be installed within a matter of just two weeks.   That is purely a cost-saving measure that was attempted to be sold as a means of reducing construction noise and dust for the neighborhood.

We learned that all 77 affordable units (most are 342 SF) would be separated into one building, and the more spacious “Workforce housing” would be in the other building, the one with the 2000 SF full bar on top.   We also learned that the project would only provide TWO electric car charging stations, total.  

Most importantly, we learned that this project is the first in this area in which a developer has applied for eligibility under SB 35, the Affordable Housing Streamlining Act, authored by Senator Scott Wiener and approved by the Governor in 2017.  The City Attorney is reviewing that, and must notify the developer in writing if the project conflicts with any City design requirements.  If the City does not notify the developer in writing of any conflicts, it is assumed that there are no conflicts, and the project is ministerially deemed approved, without any further public hearing.  

Many people asked for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project.  But if the City Attorney deems this project qualifies under SB 35, the developer would not have to conduct any environmental assessment for traffic, water, archaeology, noise, hydrology, impacts to neighborhood shading, cumulative impacts to the area, or any project alternative.

Several people compared the developer of the Calvary Housing Plan that had come before the City Council just the night before.  That developer is voluntarily conducting a full EIR for that project: View Meeting – OnBase Agenda Online   

Read more about SB 35 here

This law expires January 1, 2026

WHY DIDN’T THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ALLOW DEBRIS FLOW EVACUEES OR THEIR ANIMALS SHELTER LAST WEEK?
Many are still wondering why the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds was not “ready” when the County and CalFire issued evacuation orders last Sunday, January 24.  Equine Evacuation leaders were informed at 3pm on Sunday that the Fairgrounds were not available for animal sheltering needs, but without reason.

When asked to respond to public questioning on the issue at the County Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, January 26, Assistant CAO Michelle Coburn stated it was true that Equine Evac. volunteers were “triaging” large animal shelters throughout the County, but using Quail Hollow Ranch County Park as a headquarter.  Usually, the Graham Hill Showgrounds in Felton would be that spot, but PG&E leased the space 100%, so it was not available.  

Read this report in the January 26 Santa Cruz Sentinel about the problem:  Equine Evacuation helps find temporary homes for San Lorenzo Valley horses

Although Fairgrounds Manager Dave Kegebein stated the Fairgrounds would be “ready” on Wednesday, January 27, it was of no valuable assistance because by Tuesday late afternoon, the storm had made evacuation efforts too dangerous for the volunteers.  Equine Evac. volunteer teams halted trailering any animals to shelter after 4pm on Tuesday.

It did not help that on Wednesday and Thursday, during the storm, that the Fairgrounds livestock entry gate was locked, and the limited number of shelter spaces for animals were barricaded and not accessible.(see photo) 

Also troubling was that neither the Harvest Building nor the Crosetti Building were available for any of the 5,000 people who evacuated to seek shelter from the potentially life-threatening debris flows predicted.  The Fairgrounds rented out the Harvest Building to a hot tub and spa show.  The Crosetti Building was in use for COVID inoculations, even though it was half-full of the empty tents the CZU Fire evacuees had used in August and September, and the ten portable canopy tents set up in the parking lot for that vaccination effort that had just begun on Monday January 25, were not being used at all.. 

Fifth District Supervisor Bruce McPherson sent out a list of local hotels for those who had to evacuate, along with the locations of three Evacuation Points that provided no inside shelter, just a parking lot for RV’s.

The County has a valid 30-year contract with the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds to provide emergency shelter in times of disaster.  The County paid to install an industrial kitchen in the Harvest Building for mass feeding of those sheltered at the Fairgrounds.  But that building was full of hot tubs and spas last week, when the evacuees needed it most.

Please contact County Supervisors and ask why things were so chaotic, and the 5,000 evacuees were left without any emergency shelter for themselves or their animals.  831-454-2200

LOCAL WATER ISSUES

In an effort to remain brief here, I want to simply list a few events and bits of information.

  1. Santa Cruz City Water Shortage Plan…how would it affect your business (if you still have one left)?  

    The City of Santa Cruz Water Department is partnering with the Santa Cruz County Business Council and Chamber of Commerce to host an input session on their Water Contingency Plan, which governs what restrictions will be adopted when, in the event of a sustained water shortage. Thankfully, we as a community have made a lot of strides in bolstering the resiliency of our collective system, having made it easier to share water between districts, created a county wide groundwater management framework and plan, and explored the potential for supplemental supply options down the road. Yet the potential for a water shortfall is still very real, and could have a major impact on your business. Learn more and RSVP using the links below.

    Business Input Session on Santa Cruz Water Department Water Contingency Plan
    Thursday, February 4th, 2021
    1:30pm – 3:00pm
    Virtually Via Zoom

  2. Santa Cruz City Water Rates Will Be Going Up… See pages 7.1-7.19 of the City Water Commission February 1, 2021 agenda

    The Ad Hoc Committee recommends”Scenario #4″ with a 10% annual rate increase in 2023-2027 to achieve $658 million in project costs over 15 years.

  3. Soquel Creek Water District Continues to Pump and Sell Water in Seascape with High Chromium 6:
     See page 37.

    but the new Granite Way Well in the Aptos Village Project is a low-producer (see page 38)

     “In 2019, the District had adequate source capacity to meet the 10-year PHD of 1.4 MG.” See page 40

    (So is it really necessary to pressure -inject treated sewage water into the aquifer, claiming an emergency???)

    Item 7.1, page 52: Why does the Maplethorpe developer, John Swift, have to pay full fees up front for this development, but the Board re-affirmed and extended  the special privilege granted Swenson and the Aptos Vilalge Project, not making them pay fees up front???   (see the 12/15 public hearing, Item 2.1)

  4. The Monterey Peninsula Water Shortage Could Be Solved With Flow From the Salinas River.  So Why Isn’t It?

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A ZOOM MEETING.  SAY HELLO TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE AND JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky 685-2915  I welcome your discussion.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

January 28
#28 / The Devil And The Green New Deal

The New York Times article from which I grabbed the picture above is headlined as follows: “People Actually Like the Green New Deal.” That strikes me as a kind of surprising headline, since I tend to think, “What’s not to like?”

The Green New Deal resolution that was introduced into the Congress in February 2019 is described as follows in the official press release that announced its introduction:

Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) today introduced a Green New Deal resolution in both the Senate and House of Representatives that would create millions of good, high-wage jobs in the United States, provide unprecedented levels of prosperity and economic security for Americans, and counteract systemic injustices – all while addressing the existential challenge of climate change. Recent landmark studies such as the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report and the U.S. National Climate Assessment Fourth Report have made it clear that we need bold action to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, and we may have as few as 12 years to achieve it. The extreme weather, storms, droughts, and wildfires of recent years have made the worsening effects of climate change impossible to ignore.

Senator Markey and Congress Member Ocasio-Cortez (both of whom are pictured above) were joined by a number of co-sponsors, who also signed onto the Green New Deal resolution. Those co-sponsors included Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and our current vice-president, then a Senator, Kamala Harris. 

Markey and Ocasio-Cortez are certainly right about the need to take immediate action to deal with our global warming crisis. If we can do that in a way that will “create millions of good, high-wage jobs,” that seems likes a legislative winner to me. As I say, “What’s not to like?”

Well, it does appear that not everybody likes the Green New Deal – and I am not talking about benighted Republicans and corporate CEOs, either – those who are dedicated to maximizing corporate profits even if doing that brings on a “Sixth Extinction.” 

As it turns out, a number of very sincere environmentalists are expressing concern about the whole Green New Deal concept. Jasper Bernes, writing in Commune, is one of the critics. He titles his critique, “Between The Devil and the Green New Deal.” More extreme in her views is Cory Morningstar, who seems to believe that there is a carefully coordinated and malign effort to promulgate a destructive Green New Deal program, and this effort involves both the global corporate elite and what she calls “the non-profit industrial complex.” 

I must say that I discount the idea that there is a bonafide conspiracy by groups like Conservation International and the World Economic Forum to go to war against both humanity and nature, all in the name of world domination and increased profits for the corporations that have already come pretty close to ruling the world. This is, pretty much, the charge levelled by Morningstar.

Other concerns, however, I do think have some validity. Here, for instance, is how Bernes begins his article: 

From space, the Bayan Obo mine in China, where 70 percent of the world’s rare earth minerals are extracted and refined, almost looks like a painting. The paisleys of the radioactive tailings ponds, miles long, concentrate the hidden colors of the earth: mineral aquamarines and ochres of the sort a painter might employ to flatter the rulers of a dying empire. 

To meet the demands of the Green New Deal, which proposes to convert the US economy to zero emissions, renewable power by 2030, there will be a lot more of these mines gouged into the crust of the earth. That’s because nearly every renewable energy source depends upon non-renewable and frequently hard-to-access minerals: solar panels use indium, turbines use neodymium, batteries use lithium, and all require kilotons of steel, tin, silver, and copper. The renewable-energy supply chain is a complicated hopscotch around the periodic table and around the world. To make a high-capacity solar panel, one might need copper (atomic number 29) from Chile, indium (49) from Australia, gallium (31) from China, and selenium (34) from Germany. Many of the most efficient, direct-drive wind turbines require a couple pounds of the rare-earth metal neodymium, and there’s 140 pounds of lithium in each Tesla.

This is, in essence, the same argument that was advanced by Jeff Gibbs and Michael Moore in Planet of the Humans – although Bernes addresses the basic point in a slightly different context. 

I have written about the Gibbs-Moore movie previously, and I wrote about it pretty positively, because I do think it is important to admit that our first instinct is often to believe that some new “technology” is going to solve the problems caused by the way we have developed and deployed our earlier technologies. That is often a huge mistake. 

We, as humans, are quite enamored with our own great capabilities, so if Mother Nature is telling us that our civilization is “Out of Balance” (to reference another, much earlier environmental movie, Koyaanisqatsi), then we tend to think that our task is to solve that problem ourselves. In fact, quite often, our real task is to realize that we are the problem!

The critics of the Green New Deal that I am talking about are concerned that when we start talking about amping up our economy as we try to deal with our global warming crisis, we can easily become confused. 

We are, in fact, way “out of balance,” and a bigger economy is not what is called for. What is called for is a reorganization of how we live together and conduct our lives within the limits established by the laws that govern the World of Nature. 

We do live, ultimately, in that World of Nature, and not in the human world that we create. This failure to understand the utter dependence of our own, humanly-created world on the world that we did not create, and in which we find ourselves so marvelously and mysteriously alive, is the general cause of many of our problems. It is definitely the cause of the global warming crisis that now threatens our species, and many more, and everything we have established over thousands of years of human civilization. 

I am in favor of dealing with economic injustice as we also take steps to reorient our relationship to the World of Nature, and to turn away from an economic and political system that always wants more, and that wastes more, day by day.  

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    MASKS

“Do they love you or the mask you put on everyday?”  
~Shimika Bowers

“The irony of life is that those who wear masks often tell us more truths than those with open faces.”  
~Marie Lu

“I believe in my mask– The man I made up is me
I believe in my dance– And my destiny”
~Sam Shepard 

“Harvey wasn’t interested in the clothes; it was the masks that mesmerized him. They were like snowflakes: no two alike. Some were made of wood and of plastic; some of straw and cloth and papier-mâché. Some were as bright as parrots, others as pale as parchment. Some were so grotesque he was certain they’d been carved by crazy people; others so perfect they looked like the death masks of angels. There were masks of clowns and foxes, masks like skulls decorated with real teeth, and one with carved flames instead of hair.”

~Clive Barker

Invisible People is a YouTube channel that features interviews with homeless people from all over. Mark Horvath has done these interviews for years, and they are real and unvarnished. You can start with this one, and then check out the channel for more.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

January 26 – February 1, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Joe B. over Bernie or Elizabeth! Girl Scouts protesting cookies, Democratic Socialists of Santa Cruz. GREENSITE…on yet another David and Goliath development. KROHN…Journalism II, Bellafonte, Crowley and Klein. STEINBRUNER…831 Water Street development, affordable housing possible, legalizing tiny homes, UCSC and UC Davis expansion. PATTON…Turnabout and revenge and humiliation. EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”February”

...

CEDAR AND LOCUST STREETS (DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ) 1920. That would be the Red Restaurant and The Little Shanghai restaurants. The Literary Guillotine is in there somewhere too.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE January 25

BIDEN OVER BERNIE AND ELIZABETH. After a lot of watching and reading and thinking, I am finally of the opinion that Biden will do a much better job as our president than either Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would have. I don’t believe either Bernie or Elizabeth has the patience or experience to face the myriad of small but dividing issues that have separated so much of our lives and politics. Their end goals might be even more beneficial to our Untied States than Joe B. would be able to push through, but I don’t think they have the calmness and friendliness that such a huge undertaking requires. Watch closely as Trump keeps fading into the shadows, as the far right recedes ,and as the long-time promises and needs of our national community are slowly brought into reality.

GIRL SCOUT COOKIE BOYCOTT. For actual decades I’ve urged boycotting Girl Scout Cookies. The encouragement of parents to teach girls to go door to door to compete against each other in selling a lousy and unhealthy product seems cruel to me. The cookie companies make much more money than the Girl Scouts do. Now Jennifer Bratton sent me the following

Scouts Boycotting Cookie season over palm oil concerns.

You’ll see concerns over child labor, deforestation, and the negative factors of the palm oil itself. Little Brownie Bakers and ABC Bakers (Weston Foods) are the two cookie companies that make the little devils. Interbake Foods and the Keebler Company are their owners. 

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA LOCAL MEETING DATA. If you’ve wondered what Democratic Socialism is all about ,go to  https://dsasantacruz.org . The site will

give you DSA positions on The San Lorenzo site displacement, Bookshop Santa Cruz and the union and more. There will be an orientation meeting of the Santa Cruz DSA Sunday, January 31st from 4-5 p.m. For zoom link, email membership@dsasantacruz.org 

WHITE TIGER. (Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi, and centers on Balram, a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system, Balram ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant. Go for it by all means.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY. (SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City, by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is producer, interviewer and enabler ,as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City, you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

THE RIPPER. (Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888). This documentary is not only well done, but it centers on the very poor police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades during which they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888) was never caught, even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI/HAJI. (Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series. It’s set in London and Tokyo, where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother. Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs. No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (Series) Set in 1813 London, this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds the same, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub-plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voiceover for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL, parts one and two. Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

TIGER. This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

SURVIVING DEATH. (SERIES)There are 6 episodes, near-death experience, mediums (2 parts) signs from the dead, seeing dead people and reincarnation. The first one on near death experience reports on hundreds of folks who have died and experienced some startling sites. The two parts on mediums seems too hokey. If you’ve ever wondered about seeing ghosts watch the last two parts. It’s well done and even informative…no matter what/how you believe. 

LUPIN. (SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

HISTORY OF SWEAR WORDS. (SERIES) Nicolas Cage hosts this six episode child like-idiotic documentary on our now way over used swear words. The six are fuck, shit, bitch, dick, pussy and damn. These words are so common and so often used on the internet and TV and the movies you’ll wonder why they bothered. The origin of “fuck” is interesting but not a shit to watch. And you’ll learn that Samuel L. Jackson is not the actor who has sworn the most on camera!!!

...
January 25, 2021

THERE GOES THE NEIGHBORHOOD

Developers’ renditions of projects are designed to minimize the visual impact. You can be sure that the development pictured above will be even more jarring and out of scale with the existing eastside neighborhood of one-story homes if the project is approved and built. And that is the likely outcome given the pro-development complexion of the current council majority and a planning department seemingly hell bent on bulldozing the character of Santa Cruz. That is, unless the community is vociferous in demanding council stick to its stated policy to protect existing neighborhoods and small businesses.    

The location for this proposed development is the corner of Water and Branciforte, kitty-corner to the Branciforte Small Schools building, which is a historic site. The school grounds were the center of Villa de Branciforte, founded in 1797 by Governor Diego de Borica of California on orders from Spain through Viceroy Branciforte in Mexico. The settlement existed as a separate township until 1905, when it was annexed to the city of Santa Cruz. 

While the address is listed as 831 Water St. the project will bulldoze 5 parcels of existing small businesses including DJ Mini-Mart and a Laundromat, which currently sit modestly on top of a marine terrace where the road descends steeply towards downtown. You’ll notice from the rendition that the plan for underground parking enters and exits on Water St.  That will make for dramatic collision opportunities.

How would you like this in your back yard? Well, you may be next.

The project is designed for a height of 59 feet (plus “accoutrements”) and for 151 units plus 9,000 square feet of retail with a 2,229 square foot bar on the roof.  No doubt we will be subjected to the usual yada yada of the need for all types of housing (not true) by YIMBY and Monterey Bay Economic Partnership cheerleaders plus a few building trades union members thrown in for good effect. Curious that the YIMBY’s (Yes In My Back Yard) never actually face a proposed mammoth development in their back yards but are sure happy to have it built in yours.

You can be fully supportive of the need for low cost housing and still oppose developments such as this one and others of similar scale such as last week’s approved Riverfront Development of mostly luxury condos. There seems no regard from council majority or planning department for established neighborhoods that include many low-income long-term residents. There is a growing body of research showing that this type of new mixed-use development mushrooming in Santa Cruz leads to the displacement of low-income residents who are forced to move, usually far away, as property values rise with the new buildings, and owners of small properties are seduced into selling their older single family homes or small scale businesses, to be razed and replaced with these large scale developments. 

A closer look at the size of the units should raise some eyebrows, or at least some questions about who will be the likely buyers or tenants. Building A will have 34 studios, 38 one-bedroom units and 2 two-bedroom units. Building B will have 68 studios, 8 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom unit. 

The low-income workers I know, who are cooks, janitors, maids or house cleaners are mostly families with young children. None of these units, even the ones that are so-called affordable is geared towards their needs. Just 3 two-bedroom units out of the 151 total! It is clear what demographic this and all the other developments are marketed for: single high tech and other professional newcomers and second homers. If you doubt that, check out the marketing brochures for all the big new developments already built in Santa Cruz. Not only is this trend forcing out long-term low-income residents, it is also shortsighted. Once the single, affluent professionals decide to “settle down” and raise a family, they then look around to buy a single family home to buy, bulldoze and have built a high end modern, big footprint home, further gentrifying the town at both ends.  Their lifestyles leave a far bigger carbon footprint than the cook forced to move to Salinas.

If this is published before Wednesday evening, you can join the zoom meeting where the developer lays out his plans for this development. There will be a second zoom meeting at a later date, not yet determined. Neighbors directly affected will be there. Your support is important. Turning this development tanker around will take a town.  

Voice your Concerns!
Community Zoom Meeting 1/27/2021, 6 pm
https://zoom.us/j/92953946577 
Meeting ID: 929 5394 6577 
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

January 25

JOURNALISM PART II.

Newer Journalism
I had begun writing this column with the idea of highlighting some incredible writing about America, now. I am fast running up against the BrattonOnLine.com Monday deadline. In the age of internet, livestreaming and the 24-hour news cycle the journalists job has changed considerably. Often when I pick up my hardcopy New York Times and San Jose Mercury News in the driveway I often feel like I am reading yesterday’s news, or even two days ago, especially sports news because more often than not I am. The business model has changed for these companies and I would predict my generation will be the last one to receive paper copies of “the paper of record” or of the “Merc.” How I enjoy that tactile sensation of turning the paper, retreating back to the front page, and ripping a story out and placing it on the fridge for all to see. That era is near over with the next one still being churned out. 

Resisting a discussion of Tom Wolfe’s 1973 anthology, The New Journalism in which the dispassionate presentation of facts utilizes the literary devices of fiction writing, which Gay Talese, and Joan Didion are among the stars. Journalists today really have to be able to stand in front of a mike, know how to operate a video camera, understand best times of the day to post on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, and be able to book spots on radio and podcast shows to highlight their stories. It’s a breath-taking skill set and may produce a new millennial’s super-journalist,’ and those who resist mastering new skills may be contributing to their own, and the field’s, future demise. That’s why I was surprised when a couple of local writers not long ago refused to come on a radio program I was hosting on KSQD 90.7FM to discuss their recent writing, but no worries, there were several others who were eager. Journalists and journalism outlets need all the free press they can get. This profession should not be constantly in survival mode, but recreating itself and responding to the various ways people receive information.

From Caen, Ivins, and Cockburn, to Bellafante, Klein, and Crowley
This week, I highlight three stories that came across my radar screen recently by Ginia Bellafante, one of my all-time favorite NY Times writers, UCSC graduate Ezra Klein, and S.J. Mercury News sports columnist Kerry Crowley. They are all exemplary political narratives that bring our attention to an ongoing historical narrative on how the wealthy keep getting over on the rest of us. These pieces might just also represent Wolfe’s new journalism of the 70’s, but fast-forwarded to a 2021 deadline I doubt even he could see from his Electric Kool Aid Acid Test days.

Journalism Today
Ezra Klein writes clearly, and rather brilliantly (note to self: show, don’t tell), in a New York Times opinion piece critiquing how Trump supporters treat him, “seriously, but not literally.” Klein writes: “But Trump did not want every legal vote counted. He wanted legally counted votes to be erased; he wanted new votes discovered in his favor. He wanted to win, not lose; whatever the cost, whatever the means. But in his pre-storming of the Capitol speech, Trump supporters seemed to take him literally. Klein states, “But at the same time, Trump was telling his supporters that the election had actually been stolen, and that it was up to them to resist. And they took him literally. They did not experience this as performative grievance; they experienced it as a profound assault. They stormed the Capitol, attacked police officers, shattered doors and barriers, looted congressional offices. One woman was shot in the mayhem and died.” Klein describes why Trump’s base was willing to follow him and that Trump has always been the sore loser. Remember, Ted Cruz stole the Iowa caucus vote; the Dems rigged the 2016 vote because Hillary received more votes even though he ended up as President, and so of course 2020 had to produce fake election results because that’s Trump’s life narrative. Klein’s conclusion offers an aha! moment: “The problem isn’t those who took Trump at his word from the start. It’s the many, many elected Republicans who took him neither seriously nor literally, but cynically. They have brought this upon themselves — and us.”

Kerry Crowley’s recent piece on billionaire and fanatical rightwing donor, Charles B. Johnson, is yet another display of hard news making it into the sports section. It might be okay if some yahoo billionaire is contributing his largesse to right wing causes like Rep. Lauren Boebert who “packs” while walking the halls of congress and who may have tweeted out Nancy Pelosi’s location during the insurrection, and losing Georgia Senator Kelly Loeffler, along with the max $2800 for a dozen other right of the conservative right candidates. This might not even be a story except for the fact that billionaire Johnson is majority owner of the San Francisco Giants. Yes, those SF Giants. Crowley writes, “Candidates around the country received a financial boost from Johnson around the same time the Giants announced they were laying off 10% of their full-time employees ‘due to unprecedented impact and continued uncertainty of the pandemic on our operations.'” Crowley’s reporting goes on to cite, “Reports in recent months have shown no owner in American professional sports (not Trump’s pals like Robert Kraft who owns the New England Patriots or Woody Johnson who owns the New York Jets) has donated more to campaigns than Charles B. Johnson. He gave out more than $4.2 million during this cycle and has donated upward to $10 million since 2015.” Well Giants fans, isn’t it time you ask Johnson to kindly leave? Will the baseball commissioner ban him for the Republican haters that he funds? Or, will everything be back to normal once everyone gets the vaccine and buys a seat in the outfield at Giants stadium this spring? I say, Goodbye Chuck, so long, farewell… (Kerry Crowley)

Ginia Bellafonte writes a golf story in this past Sunday New York Times, “New York and Trump, Unlinking at Last.” On the face of it, a mobster (not Trump yet) is forced to give up running a public golf course in the Bronx and the Trump organization later steps in. If it did not have so many of the trappings of the insular, locals (whites) only history of our Delaveaga golf course it would not have hit home as powerfully. While the city of New York spent $127 million constructing the course over a former landfill, it would take some 226 years for the city to recoup its investment. “The deal is structured to give the city 7 percent of gross receipts annually” on green fees that are $185 for each round of golf. Now, here is where Bellafante’s writing about New York inequities meets Santa Cruz. “If Trumpism in much of America is marked by righteous rage and nationalist grievance, among New York’s liberal ruling class it lives in gilt and self-deception, in the placement of a luxury commodity where there ought to be a utilitarian asset, in the capitulation to real-estate interests often with the distorted view that the benefits of serving the dominant will redound to the powerless — they just didn’t know it yet.”  Say it again Santa Cruz, “In the capitulation to real-estate interests often with the distorted view…” (Read the whole story here )

“This country has socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for the poor.” 

–Martin Luther King, Jr. 


Is this the society we want to live in? A man in a motorized wheelchair precariously perched at the end of traffic island hoping for a few dollars from cars passing by? Welcome to Santa Cruz.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
January 25

IS IT A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE A FULL BAR ACROSS THE STREET  FROM FOUR SCHOOLS?
Does it make sense to have a 2000SF full bar across the street from a school campus that includes four schools, three of which include high school students?  That is exactly what the five-story 831 Water Street project proposes to do, across from the Branciforte Small Schools Campus.  The State’s Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Licensing regulations do not allow liquor sales to be licensed if they occur within 600′ of a school, or within 500′ of a residence.  How can the City Planning Dept. ever make a finding that this mammoth project is compatible with the neighborhood character? 

Here is the information about the Project and this Wednesday’s Zoom meeting! 

I hope you will participate in the virtual public meeting this Wednesday, January 27, at 6pm and weigh in with your thoughts.  Please see the attached flyer at the end of this contribution for neighborhood information. 

IS AFFORDABLE HOUSING POSSIBLE?
Why did the Santa Cruz City Council approve three buildings, each seven stories tall, with only 11% of the units dedicated to affordable housing, rather than the City’s own requirement that it be 15%?? I hope you read Gillian Greensite’s excellent recap of this in  last week’s www.BrattonOnline.com   Online, wherein she reported Councilmember Golder’s conclusory statement that requiring the developer to comply with the City’s affordable unit requirement “wouldn’t pencil out” for the developer.  

Isn’t this just sickening???

Join others interested in seeing something different for a “Re-Imagine Santa Cruz”  Conference on February 4 (4pm-6pm) and February 5 (4pm-6pm) Conference | ReImagine Santa Cruz and a subsequent Brown Bag series of discussions, Housing & Transportation

LEGALIZING TINY HOMES
This Tuesday, the County Board of Supervisors will consider proposed changes to County Code to allow tiny homes to be permitted and legal.  See Item #12:

2021/01/26 09:00 AM Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting – Web Outline – Santa Cruz County, CA

This was authored by Supervisor Manu Koenig, and is supported by Supervisor Bruce McPherson.  Read more about it in Supervisor Koenig’s inaugural newsletter:

COVID Vaccine Update, Live Oak Parking Program and More!

I think it is promising that Supervisor Koenig is scheduling virtual constituent meetings on the Monday evening before Board meetings to gather their input for decision-making and transparency.  Maybe the other Supervisors will follow his good example. 

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE UC SANTA CRUZ PLAN FOR EXPANSION TO PROVIDE ON-CAMPUS HOUSING?
You have the opportunity to weigh in on what UCSC is proposing to do to accommodate increased student enrollment, mandated by the State in order to provide educational opportunities for all.  

lrdp.ucsc.edu

Here is a link to a good report that includes an interview with University planning staff, discussing the intent of the Plan: UCSC releases draft for new 20-year development plan

Wondering how to submit meaningful comment on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Plan?  Below is a very helpful guide recently sent out by the City County Task Force to Address UCSC Growth Plans

Santa Cruz Task Force on UCSC Growth Plans info@actonucscgrowth.org

Thu, Jan 14 at 1:30 PM

TIPS TO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE EIR MORE EFFECTIVE

Get Prepared

  • Read the EIR (volume 1 volume 2) – or just read strategically those subsections related to your interests/concerns;
  • If you can,  search online for articles, studies, reports, and even contact organizations that support or have expertise in subjects relating to your initial concerns;
  • Look at the Executive Summary’s impact table for environmental categories discussed;
  • Outline/organize your letter (introduction, comments, conclusion, address, title of project, and attachments);
  • Visit affected locations or use Google Maps to view the proposed project sites. Even if you know the area, refresh your memory;
  • Decide on the main comment(s) or theme to express in your letter;
  • Questions to consider while reading:
    • Does the EIR ask the right questions?
    • Does it provide enough information to describe the likely impacts of a project?
    • Is the EIR identifying and analyzing the feasible alternatives?

Write Your Comments

  • Objectively evaluate the project, present your comments in a neutral tone, and be VERY specific. Generalities can be dismissed with generalities.
  • Separate your concerns into clearly identifiable paragraphs or headings and keep a tight focus on each separate issue. Don’t mix topics.
  • Avoid saying “I support the UCSC growth, but…” – just list your concerns, or your letter may be classified as a letter of support.
  • Consider ways to avoid impacts or enforceable ways to reduce the severity of impacts.
  • Quantify your objections whenever possible
    • If a potential significant impact has not been adequately identified; or
    • If no mitigation has been proposed for a potentially significant impact; or
    • If the mitigation proposed doesn’t appear to be sufficient or appropriate, then:
      • Identify the specific impact in question;
      • Explain why you believe the impact would occur;
      • Explain why you believe the effect would be significant; and, if applicable;
      • Explain what additional feasible mitigation measure(s) or changes in proposed mitigations or to the project you would recommend.
      • Explain why you would recommend any changes and support your recommendations with evidence. 
  • Whenever possible, present facts or expert opinions. If not, provide personal experience or your personal observations. Don’t just complain.
  • Focus on correcting their discrepancies, lapses in logic, lack of evidence, old data, etc
  • Include suggestions for making the Draft EIR better or offer specific alternatives and describe how your comments meet the requirements of the project and CEQAYour goal should be to write something that causes them to respond in a future document based on the evidence you have given.
  • Point out any inconsistencies in the document or the data. Point out outdated information or errors in logic. Focus on the sufficiency of the EIR in identifying and analyzing the possible impacts of the project on the environment and feasible alternatives. 
  • State your comment(s) with specifics and include attachments. Ask substantive questions. 

Send Them In!

Deadline: 5:00 pm on Monday, March 8th, 2021
Email your comments to eircomment@ucsc.edu

  • Send your comments in as early as possible, so UCSC has time to consider your concerns.
  • Address your comments to: 

Erika Carpenter
Senior Environmental Planner
Physical Planning, Development, and Operations
University of California, Santa Cruz
1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

  • Mention your expertise/experience briefly and include a return address
  • If you are submitting on behalf of an organization, include the name of a contact person who would be available for questions or consultation along with your comments.
  • Write a comment that includes a valid name and address. Submit it before the deadline. Keep a copy of your comments.
  • If you would like, send a copy to the City-County Task Force via email at info@actonucscgrowth.org.

Content: Disclaimer: This information is intended to serve as a guide and is not intended to be legal advice. Please seek professional help from a lawyer if you have legal questions or concerns.
Sources: 1) Quick Tips for Effective EIR Comments
2) How to Effectively Participate in the Environmental Review Process By Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Santa Monica, CA Website

Attend The Public Meetings:
February 3rd @ 5:00pm (zoom link TBD)
February 4th @ 5:00pm (zoom link TBD

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM NEGOTIATIONS OF UC DAVIS WITH THE CITY AND COUNTY?
Wouldn’t it be better to get representatives from UC Santa Cruz together at a table with representatives of the City and County and come to a legally-binding agreement to address problems about housing and infrastructure, rather than another threat of lawsuit?  That is exactly what the leaders of Yolo County and the City of Davis did in 2018.  We should follow their example and try to negotiate a similar legally-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). 

Read about the 2018 negotiations here.

The University agreed to increase housing to accommodate 100% of the new enrollment and catch up on unhoused existing student numbers by 2021, and also agreed to provide $2.3 million for infrastructure improvements.  The three entities agreed to form a joint task force to work out exactly how to plan and implement those improvements.  

When I recently wrote Santa Cruz County Supervisors about this, in relation to the County’s continued legislative priority to fight UCSC’s expansion, Supervisor Ryan Coonerty angrily responded that the City voters passed Measure U by 77%, and essentially that he felt the battle must rage on with legal sabers drawn because the UC Davis agreement was not legally-binding.  In my opinion, that attitude only serves to make the attorneys fat and happy. 

I responded to Supervisor Coonerty, asking him if he had contacted any Yolo County representatives to ask how the deal is progressing.  He never replied.  However, had he taken the time to actually read the article I sent all Supervisors about this (the same referenced above), he would have learned in the first paragraph that the MOU negotiated was legally binding. 

Out of curiosity, I phoned the Yolo County Board of Supervisor whose district includes UC Davis, and asked…”How is it going?”  The discussion switched to e-mail, with the response below from Yolo County Counsel Eric May: 

“I’m unaware of UC Davis being in violation of any terms of the MOU, and COVID likely gave us a bit of a breather on their growth and the demand for housing in the community.  

My sense is that the relationship among the University, City, and County has improved in the last few years.  I’m not sure how much the MOU contributed to that improvement, but it probably doesn’t hurt to have certain policy issues ironed out in an agreed-upon document.  The three entities also have been brought together by the COVID emergency to work together more, which hopefully will allow for more dialogue on housing issues when they (inevitably) come back to the fore.”

So, I hope you will contact your Santa Cruz County Supervisor and Santa Cruz City Council to ask that they consider following the excellent example demonstrated by UC Davis, Yolo County and the City of Davis.  Negotiations can work for the benefit of all involved, if given the chance…let’s try it here. 

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER. ATTEND A ZOOM MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.  SAY HELLO TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE. 

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE AND JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner 831-685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

January 21
#21 / Turnabout Is Fair Play – Could That Be Right?

I feel certain that this saying, “turnabout is fair play,” must be familiar to most of those who are reading this blog posting. The Grammarist dates the saying to the 1700’s: 

The phrase … originated in reference to gaming, meaning [that] taking turns assures a fair game. At that time, turnabout was rendered as two words as in turn about. Today, the term has taken on the connotation of revenge or retaliation, in the sense of two parties taking equal advantage of each other. Occasionally, turnabout is fair play is used in a friendly, teasing manner as an admonishment to keep things fair and equal.

Setting aside the occasional use of this phrase in a “friendly, teasing manner,” I’d like to focus on its use as a justification for revengeful and retaliatory actions against those who have wronged us. Let’s consider the possibility of that, as we think about the behavior of our former president, Donald J. Trump, and how we will respond to his behavior, now that he is gone. Is turnabout fair play?

Shortly after his election, in 2016, The New Republic noted that Trump specialized in humiliation:

Few people know how to humiliate like Donald Trump—he told his Twitter followers to check out a sex tape; he instructed Chris Christie to stop eating Oreos and forced him to assume the role of doting butler—but even fewer take humiliation as personally as Trump does. For eleven months, the Hillary Clinton campaign—as well as almost the entire Republican establishment—waged a war against Trump by attacking and undermining his claims that he was rich and smart and had a working penis. But you have to have shame to be humiliated, and Trump lacks it completely. The only thing these attacks achieved was the inevitable retaliation.

As The New Republic observed, Trump is a master of humiliation, and during the last four years, humiliation is exactly what Trump has so often dished out to others – and in great abundance. If that “turnabout is fair play” rule applies to politics – and why wouldn’t it? – shouldn’t we feel more than comfortable in trying to humiliate our former president right back? 

By extension, shouldn’t we also feel quite comfortable in seeking to humiliate his followers, too, millions of whom have rallied to him, and to his false claim that the 2020 election was some sort of gigantic fraud. Shouldn’t we, in particular, seek out ways to humiliate and pay back those elected officials (take Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley as examples) who pandered to Trump’s untruths, and who helped set in motion the events of January 6th?

The idea of seeking the humiliation of our former president, and of his followers, came to me as I read a recent article in Psyche, titled, “The History of Humiliation Points to the Future of Human Dignity.” The article began as follows: 

Humiliation is more than an individual and subjective feeling. It is an instrument of political power, wielded with intent.

Our former president certainly used humiliation as a political weapon, and in what appears to have been a very effective manner. Surely we all remember Jeff Sessions. After that example, who would want to cross Trump? Not very many people! So, shouldn’t we take a “turnabout is fair play” approach now, and give Trump and his supporters exactly the same kind of treatment the president gave to others while he was in office? 

The Psyche article suggests that we should not, and the article is well worth reading in its entirety. Here’s a short excerpt:

Mass opposition to the politics of humiliation began from the early 19th century in Europe, as lower-class people increasingly objected to disrespectful treatment. Servants, journeymen and factory workers alike used the language of honour and concepts of personal and social self-worth – previously monopolized by the nobility and upper-middle classes – to demand that they not be verbally and physically insulted by employers and overseers.

This social change was enabled and supported by a new type of honour that followed the invention of ‘citizens’ (rather than subjects) in democratising societies. Citizens who carried political rights and duties were also seen as possessing civic honour. Traditionally, social honour had been stratified according to status and rank, but now civic honour pertained to each and every citizen, and this helped to raise their self-esteem and self-consciousness. Consequently, humiliation, and other demonstrations of the alleged inferiority of others, was no longer considered a legitimate means by which to exert power over one’s fellow citizens (emphasis added).

I read this article yesterday, on a day that our new president called for “unity.” Maybe that word, “unity,” is not quite the right word – or, at least, it is not the most important word – because the divisions of thought, opinion, and circumstance in the public are profound, and real, and an appeal to something that is not widely felt or acknowledged will be unavailing. 

What will heal us, ultimately, will not be an appeal to a “unity” that many don’t believe exists. What will heal us, instead, will be our recognition of the dignity of every person, whoever they are, wherever they come from, whatever they believe. Using that approach to restoring a functioning democracy will require us to do the opposite of trying to humiliate those with whom we disagree – and who are, in fact, “wrong.”

This is not, really, saying anything different from what I wrote about yesterday, in my posting on “Talking With Strangers,” or that I wrote about on Monday, in “Trust Me On That.” 

Talk and trust. That’s what we need. We need to talk with those whom we believe have made a mistake – and who have made a mistake. We must trust that from such conversations can come conversion and real change. However tempting – however justified – we must try to avoid lording it over all those who have been mistaken, and wrong – Trump supporters, for instance, who don’t think that “white privilege” even exists, and who are resentful and aggrieved for reasons we don’t judge to be worthy. With all such persons, with everyone, we must talk as equals, and with no thought to humiliate. The opposite of humiliation is what is called for, conversations that provide no intimation that those with whom we disagree are “deplorable,” or unworthy. 

I am hoping that our new president, who has chosen the word “unity” to describe what I am talking about, will be a model for this kind of healing approach, an approach that aims to repair all those things that have so disproportionately divided us. The responsibility for such conversations cannot be delegated entirely to our Chief Executive. That responsibility must ultimately fall on every one of us. 

We are, each one of us, as citizens, responsible for the maintenance of democratic self-government, and that requires us to treat with dignity all whose with whom we share the world, and especially those with whom we differ. That is, of course, the hard part! Despite how hard it is to turn away from the “turnabout is fair play” response to legitimate grievance, it is our responsibility to acknowledge and triumph over our differences by elevating the dignity of every other person, and by setting aside an easy recourse to the humiliation of those with whom we have disagreed, and disagree. 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    FEBRUARY

“February – the month of love..?!!
No wonder the shortest one in the calendar.”
~Dinesh Kumar Biran 

“Even though February was the shortest month of the year, sometimes it seemed like the longest.”
~JD Robb 

“In the small hours of a cold February dawn, we walked to the Pacific, high cliffs eroding over the ocean, crashed and crashed by lapping salty waves. Their spray misted us in day’s young purple air, exhilarating. Walking the Golden Gate Bridge, our world receding, pale gold sunrise lit thin fog, morning coloring us like a faded fairy tale.” 
~Aspen Matis

Crime Pays But Botany Doesn’t is an awesome Facebook page. Here’s a sampling!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

January 20 – 26, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…What Covid shots?, Bookshop History details, Lord’s Last Supper revisited, Santa Cruz protest documentary, Move to Amend, movie critiques, Brattyworld. GREENSITE…on the Riverfront Development. KROHN…3 Dot journalism, Caen, Ivins, Cockburn. STEINBRUNER…Regional Transportation Commission mystery, sewage and disease, Aptos La Selva fire district dissolved,  censorship and the Board of Supervisors. PATTON… “Protestors are like our children” EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”LOVE” 

...

SCOTTS VALLEY 1959. Yes, that’s the intersection of Scotts Valley Drive and Mt. Hermon Road. You can see the airport in the upper right side, and note how much “progress” that unplanned development has wrought ,in just this mile-wide section.                                                        

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE January 18

COVID SHOTS IN SANTA CRUZ? What’s going on with the miserable state of not getting our Covid shots in Santa Cruz County? Other small counties are much more efficient and transparent in handling the distribution. Now we’re hearing that some of our friends, or co-workers, or even neighbors are getting their shots… but not us. Palo Alto Medical Facility, also known as Sutter Health, states on their hard-to-navigate website that no Covid shots are available in the 95060 zip code…yet a few are getting them. Is it at our County level? Are our Board or Supervisors doing anything about this? This is a serious problem…let’s make our health officials be clear with some facts and statistics about our Covid problem. 

BOOKSHOP SANTA CRUZ ADDENDUM. Thanks to Shelley Hatch, and some other long time friends and readers, I need to add and correct last week’s statement in this space… “The Bookshop has been downtown for over 55 years, and has been owned and operated by the Coonerty family all of that time”.  The reality is that Peter Demma and Ron Bevirt owned and operated the Hip Pocket Bookstore which was located in the St. George Hotel. When they closed the Hip Pocket in 1966 Ron and Sharon Lau bought the books and opened Bookshop Santa Cruz across the street at 1547 Pacific Avenue. As Neal Coonerty stated in the press…” I still remember my first day as owner of Bookshop Santa Cruz. The Bookshop had been open for seven years, run by founders Sharon and Ron Lau. When they decided to sell the store, my wife Candy and I were delighted. Owning Bookshop Santa Cruz was our dream come true. We took over on November 1, 1973″. The 1989 earthquake destroyed the Bookshop and the Santa Cruz Coffee Roasting Company sites killing two employees of the Roasting Company. Ron and Sharon then had to fight enormous and unfair battles to develop their property at 1547, which we know today as the Park Pacific condos built by Swenson Developers. Ron Lau’s son Eric went on to create Oswald’s restaurant.

SANTA CRUZ RESPONDS TO THE GULF WAR. John Malkin made a 25 minute documentary about local Santa Cruz reactions to the USA getting involved in the Gulf War in 1991. You can, and should, watch it on the right.

You’ll see Scott Kennedy, Gary Patton, Leon Panetta, Bettina Aptheker and hundreds of locals question and condemn President George H.W. Bush’s approach to the Middle East “conflict”. The UCSC rallies and highway sit-ins show a real connection to the continuing divide between our Washington government and the popular hopes for world peace.

January 16, 2021 marks the 30th anniversary of the 1991 Gulf War and the United States’ Operation Desert Storm in Iraq. In honor of those who objected to the destruction of another war, local journalist John Malkin is releasing online for the first time his 1991 film “Santa Cruz Responds to the Gulf War.” The 25-minute documentary highlights rallies, demonstrations, teach-ins and direct actions that took place in Santa Cruz and San Francisco in response to the “first” Gulf War.

Santa Cruz Museum of Art and History podcast with director John Malkin 

The Rio Theatre in Santa Cruz will be hosting online screenings of “Santa Cruz Responds to the Gulf War.” For details, go to riotheatre.com

“Santa Cruz Responds to the Gulf War” is NOW available online on YouTube

MOVE TO AMEND. Irana Sheperd sent this reminder… Move To Amend has been doing great work since 2009, and now (finally!) have many cosponsors in the House, including many from CA. They started as anti-corp, anti-Citizens United; now have same goals, a slightly different approach. Very interesting, and hopeful – especially in this climate”. MOA works to legalize democracy and end corporate rule. They’ve got a big kick-off on January 21. Check them out here.

 BRATTYWORLD. My artistic, creative daughter Hillary has created a great product and website called “brattyworld” brattyworld.com . Be sure to check it out and see the unique, beautiful, useful, durable placemats she developed from scratch. We used them at Thanksgiving and Christmas, and they really add to the eating experience. My favorites are the ones by Levi Yaggy, an artist from the 1890s. With carefully chosen pictures on both sides, and a special durable laminated surface, these placemats will outlast everything. Check them out.

LAST SUPPER REACTIONS. After running the “historic” photo last week of the prepping of the Lord’s Last Supper, long-time friend and writer/reporter Lee Quarnstrom replied… “It brought back some odd memories to see that great photo of The Last Supper, which used to be the main attraction at the Santa Cruz Art league Gallery around the corner from my longtime residence on Ocean View Avenue. Over the years, I several times wrote my thoughts on the wax sculpture, which boiled down to the fact that Jesus and 11 of his dozen waxen disciples look like blond Norwegians with one stereotypical Semitic comrade, Judas, who is the dark-haired fellow in the  picture in your column. Imagine a band of Scandinavians wandering around the deserts of the Holy Land! I always imagined that they were desperately looking for a bottle of sunblock! 

~Lee Q. 

I really wish I could bring you positive or even late-breaking inside industry news about the future of physical movie theatres, but no one on earth is predicting anything as to whether or not movie theatres will ever “come back”. And they just aren’t making or releasing movies like they used to.

KILL BILL, parts one and two. Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before, but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

TIGER. A two -art documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (SINGLE) This movie is a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending, but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

SURVIVING DEATH. (SERIES) Six episodes about near-death experience, signs from the dead, seeing dead people, and reincarnationincluding reports on hundreds of folks who have died and experienced some startling sights. The two parts on mediums seem too hokey. If you’ve ever wondered about seeing ghosts, watch the last two parts. It’s well done, and even informative…no matter what/how you believe. 

LUPIN. (SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. The acting is excellent and believable.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND. (SINGLE) Staten Island, like New Jersey, has a nutty and not-great reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does an excellent job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up there. Steve Buscemi has a bit part, too. The boys’ hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker. I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (SINGLE). An 80 on R.T., this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well-known Argentine woman dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband ,who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sand edated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions. It’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s. An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead, and some competing journalists/writer’s  search for the guilty guy (or woman) will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

HISTORY OF SWEAR WORDS. (SERIES) Nicolas Cage hosts this six episode childlike-idiotic documentary on our now (way over-used) swear words. The six are fuck, shit, bitch, dick, pussy and damn. These words are so common, and so often used on the internet and TV and the movies, you’ll wonder why they bothered. The origin of “fuck” is interesting, but not a shit to watch. But you’ll learn that Samuel L. Jackson is not the actor who has sworn the most on camera!!!

...
January 18

WELCOME TO THE FUTURE

Can you guess where the development captured in the rendition above will be located? If you guessed San Jose or Fremont you’d be wrong. If you guessed Santa Cruz along the San Lorenzo River between Laurel and Soquel bridges you’d be right.

And the red line? That was the 50 feet maximum building height allowed downtown until 2017 when the Downtown Recovery Plan was amended by staff, planning commissioners and city council to allow for heights up to 70 feet along the river and 80 feet on Pacific. This project will soar to 85 feet since the developer asked for and got a density bonus and a waiver for an additional story. The city attorney has determined that state mandated density bonuses don’t add a requirement for any additional affordable units to a project, hence the paltry 20, although other communities are contesting that legal opinion. 

This development, named the Front Riverfront Mixed Use project is for 175 condominiums of which 155 will be market rate with 20 affordable for low and very low-income earners. This, plus 11,500 square feet of commercial space fronting the river, combining 5 current properties and bulldozing businesses such as India Joze and University Copy. I can’t imagine a future without either on Front St. but so it goes. (I recall the consultant for the Downtown Plan Amendments warning against fronting the businesses on the river side but that warning has long been forgotten.) 

I, and others attended the many Downtown Plan Amendment public hearings at the Planning Commission during 2017. We voiced objections to the 20 feet height increase over the 50 feet limit set after the earthquake by the 19 member diverse committee tasked with addressing the rebuilding of downtown. Despite the challenge of reaching consensus under such a diverse group, they did and the Plan going forward was for downtown to retain its low profile in terms of height. The Plan called for two and three story buildings with a few exceptions. Obviously the iconic historic Palomar at 93 feet was the exception and was viewed as such. Fast-forward from 1989 to 2017 and now the Palomar is the yardstick by which new high rises are measured. “It’s not as tall as the Palomar” goes the refrain.

At the 2017 hearings, our concerns were met with a “don’t worry! When an actual project comes up for deliberation, changes can be made.” Indeed. A change from a maximum height of 70 feet to 85 feet. Can the Wharf Master Plan new buildings be far behind?

If you are interested in how the new council members voted you will be disappointed or pleased depending on where you stand. Council member Justin Cummings, while lauding the activation of the river that such development will bring (disappointing for a biologist) tried to secure more affordable units into the total. He made a substitute motion that asked the developer to consider earmarking 5 units beyond the affordable few for those with Section 8 vouchers. Since the government pays the difference between market rate and Section 8 the developer comes out even. Although recent state law requires all new developments to allow Section 8 folks to apply, you’d be naïve to believe that will actually happen. Given that all council members express concern over housing affordability one might expect full support for the motion. Only council member Sandy Brown voted in support. She reminded us that Santa Cruz has exceeded the state requirements for above market rate and market rate housing and the area in which we are woefully inadequate is low and very low-income housing. The substitute motion failed 5-2.

Council member Renee Golder opined it wouldn’t “pencil out” for the developer even though developer Owen Lawler would not lose a penny. New council member Sonja Brunner said: ” I of all people am really strongly for affordable housing. It’s a priority. A necessity. I said that in my campaign.” And then voted against the motion. 

For those committed to affordable housing and uneasy about big scale market rate developments it is a difficult decision. Where do you draw the line? Foist a mammoth development on the sensitive habitat of the San Lorenzo River for a measly 20 affordable units or call it for what it is, woefully inadequate and a form of blackmail? Those 20 affordable units could well go to students, not current low- income working families since there are no family size condos included in the development. The city should keep track of what demographic actually gets to live in affordable units. Ten Ten Pacific was promoted as being affordable for our police, fire fighters and teachers. I hear the affordable units are full of students.

A yet unexamined variable is that “affordability” is based on the medium income of an area, known as the AMI (Area Medium Income). With 155 units in this development geared towards the wealthy, along with other similar large-scale developments already approved or in the works ( heads-up eastside), the AMI is pushed ever upwards. The result is less and less affordability in real terms and the destruction of the character of Santa Cruz in the process.   

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

January 18

JOURNALISM, PART I.

Three Dot Journalism. 
Herb Caen. Last week’s column was about some old-time Santa Cruz activists that I am missing the hell out of, and this week, it’s about some old-time writers that I am really missing in these troubled times. (Next week, I will highlight some new-timers, writers who are just killing it in the journalism world.) Herb Caen, rumor-monger, gossip columnist, and Bay Area humorist-journalist, formerly of the San Francisco Chronicle, was almost always worth the read…Caen was the king of the ellipse…and is credited with terms like beatnik, Bagdad by the Bay, the city, and Berserkeley…Caen’s was a kind of never-ending love story of “Ess Eff,” social life marinated in Ess Eff politics, which music, drugs and drinking, the Tenderloin and the Haight were always strong actors in a cast of thousands, 1000’s of Left Coast “fruits” and veggies, many of whom rolled onto the Barbary Coast from points farther east. A few Caen-isms: People who say “It’s not the money, it’s the principle,” mean it’s the money…You know how crowded it is on Union St. these days. That explains why Ida Brown, leaving a spa there, called out, “Anybody want my legal parking space across the street?: Louis Saroni: ‘Wait a second – I’ll go out and buy a car”…On “Herb Caen Day” back in February of 1997 he told the crowd, One day if I do go to heaven, I’m going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven — he looks around and says, ‘It ain’t bad, but it ain’t San Francisco’.  Caen was born in Sacramento in 1916 and his love-letter-to-San-Francisco-life ended in 1997.

Texas Street Brawler
Molly Ivins. Back in the day she was the clearest and most logical journalist out of Texas who brought the Texas twang right into whatever she was writing. Always self-effacing, Ivins pulled no punches. About George Bush, and with a future crystal ball eye on the lugubrious Ted Cruz, she wrote: Next time I tell you someone from Texas should not be president of the United States, please pay attention. About the sleazy side of Texas politics Ivins penned, The thing about democracy, beloveds, is that it is not neat, orderly, or quiet. It requires a certain relish for confusion. She was cutting, incisive, and funny. She found her threesome, bookended as she was by Texas liberal glitterati former governor, Anne Richards, and Texas Agricultural “minister” Commissioner and colorful down to earth humorist, Jim Hightower. The 80’s and 90’s Texas progressive humor and mirth (remember congress people Jack Brooks and Barbara Jordan too!) has been swallowed, succumbing to the ugly, smack-down of the Republican cock fighting of current governor, Greg Abbott, retrograde Sen. John Cornyn, and the unctuous Cruz. None of this latter trio could be accused of injecting any kind of smart and humorous Texas aphorisms into their everyday rants like Ivins, Richards, and Hightower displayed. Ivins did political satire quite well. She once pointed out that Satire is traditionally the weapon of the powerless against the powerful. I only aim at the powerful. When satire is aimed at the powerless, it is not only cruel—it’s vulgar.” It was a good time for the progressives and Ivins, Richards, and Hightower were hell-raisers, whereas the other three, they’re likely going to hell. Ivins, born in Monterey in 1944, died all too young in Austin in 2007.

The Interesting Leftist Contrarian
Alexander Cockburn wrote a column, Beat the Devil, for the Nation Magazine from 1984 until his death in 2012. He possessed the wit and sarcasm of both Caen and Ivins, but sounded more bitter. In fairness, all three were accused at various times of being bitter. Cockburn held onto both Caen and Ivins’ best traits of skewering the rich and comfortable with pure caustic, sarcastic, and insightful political witticism. But Cockburn added another side, contrarianism. He was an unrequited leftist and what made him interesting is that he could ably argue and story-tell his positions. His columns also appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Village Voice, and the Guardian newspaper. Perhaps his best stuff came through Counterpunch, a lefty newsletter he founded with Jeffrey St. Clair and Ken Silverstein. Cockburn’s early columns came usually in three parts, three stories with each relaying a picture of political life in America. Born in Scotland and brought up in Ireland, most of his writing life was done in the US. He wrote about the beaten and off-beat. “Reagan and Astrology,” Redwood Summer, and the death of San Jose Mercury reporter, Gary Webb who was investigating the CIA’s dealing cocaine for arms to help fund the Contras in Nicaragua. One of his best columns compared the Chicago 8 trail with that of Oliver North’s illegal contra funding, the left having had their day in 1969, the right would now have theirs in 1987. Cockburn wrote: Fascism with a human face, in this case the visage of Lieut. Col. Oliver North, disturbed more than the left political community, which has been correctly proclaiming a Reagan putsch for years. As President Reagan ages in the attic, the youthful colonel spoke up as Reagan écorché, self-satisfied in his contempt for Congress, for law, for the Constitution. If the efficient procedures of the soap opera could be applied, Reagan would now be written out of the script and Ollie brought in as the new lead, as good an actor at half the age. But the scriptwriters are already in Iowa, and Olliemania will have the staying power of the hula hoop. Cockburn spent his later life in Northern California with frequent visits to Santa Cruz. He died on July 22, 2012.

Note: next week I will feature three writers who are “afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted as past writers Caen, Ivins and Cockburn did during their time.

Martin Luther King Quote of the Week:


Whenever the government provides opportunities in privileges for white people and rich people they call it “subsidized” when they do it for Negro and poor people they call it “welfare.” The fact that is that everybody in this country lives on welfare. Suburbia was built with federally subsidized credit. And highways that take our white brothers out to the suburbs were built with federally subsidized money to the tune of 90 percent. Everybody is on welfare in this country. The problem is that we all too often have socialism for the rich and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor. That’s the problem. (Feb. 23, 1968)


The standoff in San Lorenzo Park, cops vs. campers, continues at least until the judge issues her decision on Jan. 20th. Ironically, it is the same day as the presidential swearing-in ceremony in Washington, D.C.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
January 18

WHAT IS THIS MEETING ABOUT?
What exactly is the Santa Cruz County “Regional Conservation Investment Strategy” public meeting this Thursday, January 21, going to be about?  The Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) put a paid ad in the Sentinel last month, inviting people to comment during the virtual meeting between 6pm and 8pm, but there was absolutely nothing to explain what the material to comment upon actually involves.  I wrote the RTC to ask, and received a reply two weeks later directing me to the “now-active” link on the website.

“Interested parties are invited to attend a Virtual Public Meeting to learn about and provide input on the proposed Santa Cruz County Regional Conservation Investment Strategy (RCIS).

The Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) and the Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County (RCD) are developing the RCIS to provide a cohesive and comprehensive conservation strategy and link potential environmental mitigation for proposed infrastructure projects to high-priority conservation projects.

RCIS is a voluntary, non-regulatory regional planning process guided by Assembly Bill 2087″.

….What does THAT mean?

According to the RTC staff, the Santa Cruz County Resource Conservation District (RCD) is the lead agency in the work to be unveiled this Thursday.  If that is true, why is there NO information about it on the RCD website? It is not even listed on the agency’s Calendar of events.

Researching Assembly Bill 2087 gave more information, but still does not provide any clear picture of whether the conservation projects that could be considered would be providing environmental mitigation for destruction caused by local projects, or others somewhere far away within California.  Also, having read the text of AB 2087, the lead agency is the Department of Fish and Wildlife, there is no guaranteed funding for anything.

However, most puzzling is the language in the final section of AB 2087 that states:
1861.
The department shall approve no more than eight regional conservation investment strategies before January 1, 2020. The department shall not approve a regional conservation investment strategy or regional conservation assessment pursuant to this chapter on or after January 1, 2020, and shall not enter into a mitigation credit agreement pursuant to this chapter on or after January 1, 2020.  

Assembly Bill No. 2087

So, what is the point of all this now if the Department of Fish and Wildlife will not approve what is done???

I hope you will be able to join the RTC staff this Thursday, January 21, 6pm-8pm, and ask questions.  Let’s hope the answers are in plain language and not “Grant-Speak”.

SEWAGE AS A DISEASE PREDICTION IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Local UCSC scientists have been taking samples from the Watsonville Sewage Treatment Plant and found that tests determined spikes in SARS-CoV-2 that correlated with later spikes in the disease outbreak.  The sampling program had also been done at the Santa Cruz City Sewage Treatment Plant, halted, but may resume.   Now Watsonville will be divided into quadrants, and sampling will occur in each quadrant, to get better information about where to expect future disease outbreaks.

This fascinating information was sent to me by a friend, who forwarded the link to a new local online news source

The report describes that sampling could target certain buildings, such as schools.  Here is how it works:

“To monitor for the prevalence of the virus, wastewater samples can be collected from either centralized locations such as treatment facilities, or more targeted locations such as outside a particular dorm building. Samples are analyzed for presence and quantity of the virus. Researchers can then calibrate their findings based on the presence of another harmless contagion called pepper mild mottle virus that is reliably found in high levels across the population.”

I find it interesting that a plant pathogen would be used as an indicator for general viral loading in sewage. The Pepper Mild Mottle Virus referenced is thought to be related to a tobacco virus

Studies in Italy testing the ability to use it as an indicator for general viral pollution status in sewage showed it present in 75% of the samples.

The researchers at UCSC are now busy fine-tuning their analytical ability to be on the lookout for the arrival of more virulent strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has mutated and been a problem in the UK.  We are lucky to have a great research institution in Santa Cruz that is working with local health officials and policy makers. Also, many thanks to the new Lookout news and community partners for making this information know to the public.

 APTOS/LA SELVA FIRE DISTRICT DISSOLVED BY THE BOARD RIDING HIGH ON THEIR OWN EGOS
The Aptos/La Selva Fire District Board missed a great opportunity last week to reconsider the three members of their Board who will continue to serve the public upon consolidation with Central Fire District.  The three men, all retired firefighters, refused to put their egos aside to allow two new Board members, one of whom is a woman specializing in labor relations and financial management and with deep local family ties to rural fire protection, and the other a man with professional expertise in public outreach and marketing. 

The reason the issue was on the agenda was because Central Fire District Board decided to change the two members from their agency that will serve on the consolidated District Board.  They chose the two newest members, both retired firefighters, but bring fresh energy to the table.

The existing “good old boys” at the Aptos/La Selva Board were angry that members of the public asked that they reconsider their appointments made in 2019, before the new fresh civilian professionals came to their Board.  Chairman Scanlon declared “This has ZERO to do with Aptos / La Selva and I see NO reason to make any changes.”  Director Darbro declared he had no reason to back away and urged the two new Board members, Marsha Larkin-Marani and Michael Hushaw, to run for election in 2022.  Director Luchessi was the most vitriolic.  “I will NOT step down from this just because of politics and accusations!”

Apparently none of those three retired firefighters could put their egos aside for one moment to consider an opportunity provided by the Central Fire Board that perhaps the consolidated district could be better-served by inclusion of the fresh energy of two business professionals and labor-minded experts that could be more responsive to the bumps that are certain to arise as the consolidation process transitions. After all, it was Director Larkin-Marani alone, at her first Board meeting, who raised the question last month about the District’s $85,000 legal services contract, and wondered how that served the District.  None of the three Directors moving forward has asked such thoughtful questions, leading me to wonder in the past if they had even read budget materials.

It was very disappointing to witness yet another local game of “King of the Mountain” in Santa Cruz County…where supposedly the world is more progressive and inclusive.

The reassuring point is that the new consolidated Fire District will have Chief John Walbridge leading as the official chief.  He is accessible, humble and really cares about publicly serving the local community in which he was raised.  

The consolidation effort will be finalized on February 3 with the Santa Cruz County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) rubber stamp, despite lack of a protest hearing held within the Districts affected, as is legally required, and would have been possible because both Fire Districts continue to hold in-person Board meetings.  The link to the January 6 virtual protest hearing was not provided on either Fire District website, and was difficult to find on the LAFCO website.  Thankfully, Aptos/La Selva Fire Administrative Assistant Ms. Sarah Melton, sent out a link that morning that allowed two members of the public to register comments.  One was by a woman in La Selva Beach, voicing her community’s concern that the Fire District would get so large that the current neighborhood connections and close relationships will be lost.  

CENSORSHIP IS ON THE RISE
A parting thought for the week ahead…who has the right to decide what is misinformation, and thereby censor it?  Would not it be better if people could read all sides of an issue and think for themselves?

Censorship & Misinformation: A Risk to Secure Messaging?

The Social Dilemma movie review

Meanwhile, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors no longer allows in-person meetings, has reduced public comment time by 33% and requires all commenters to submit written responses to register and agree to allow their material to be deleted at any time.  In order to read any comments that people have submitted attached to various agenda items on the Board agenda website, you also must register your information.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPECT TRUTHFUL ANSWERS.  BE KIND TO YOUR NEIGHBORS REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK AND JUST DO SOMETHING.

Cheers, and Happy Martin Luther King Day,

Becky (831) 685-2915 (I welcome your discussion.) 

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

January 16
#16 / Protesters Are Like Your Children
  

Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. has written a column in The Wall Street Journal about the profoundly upsetting mob action that occurred in Washington, D.C. on January 6th. He tells his readers, whom I believe he knows are upset, disheartened, and outraged – as I certainly am – “Don’t Expect Police to Shoot at Crowds.” That’s the title of Jenkins’ column. The police didn’t shoot at the crowd on January 6th, of course, and perhaps had the police shot at the crowd, the actual invasion of the Capitol Building would have been prevented. Or maybe not. 

I am having a bit of a hard time figuring out exactly what to think about what happened on January 6th – and even more important, to decide, with any sense of certainty, what I think should happen now. I wouldn’t be surprised if readers have similar feelings. I seem to be thinking lots of different things, simultaneously, and they don’t add up to any easy to define and consistent judgment about either the past or the future. I am trying to work that out.

I do hold the president responsible for what occurred on January 6th, because he encouraged a huge crowd to move towards the Capitol, and his directions did not suggest any limit or restraint with respect to the kind of action that he wanted his supporters to take. He didn’t actually say, “go kill Mike Pence,” but he didn’t tell the crowd that they needed to go “in peace,” either. He only said that after five people had died and those who actually invaded the Capitol Building had failed to carry out what seems clearly to have been their objective – stopping the certification of the Electoral College ballots that officially gave Joe Biden the election.

I suspect that what happened after Trump sent his huge crowd on its way to the Capitol was not just a spontaneous occurrence. I suspect there was a plan, and I also suspect that the president and his close associates were involved in the planning. I tend to believe, in other words, that what happened on January 6th was an “inside job,” as some news reports are now claiming. Anyone who schemed or worked to bring down our democratic government should be tried, and should be punished if found guilty. And some are guilty of exactly that – at least, that is my deep suspicion. That includes, perhaps, the president himself.

But what other persons should be held responsible in this drama? Anyone who actually planned or acted directly to prevent the transfer of power according to the Constitution should be tried and punished, if found guilty of doing that. I find no big problem there. But were Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, who led the fight against the certification of the Electoral College ballots, part of a coup attempt? And what about those Republicans in the Senate and the House who voted against certification of the ballots? Were they, too, part of a coup attempt? That is certainly one possibility, I suppose, but maybe these elected officials were acting, in a typical fashion, as self-interested and self-aggrandizing politicians often do. In other words, maybe they were acting not that much differently from the way most politicians act from time to time. Maybe we ought to let the normal electoral process deal with those elected officials, even though their actions indisputably contributed to the incredibly dangerous events of January 6th.

Those who broke into the building and caused damage, if they can be identified, are clearly guilty of various criminal acts. But what about the rest of the demonstrators? How do we think about them? There were thousands of demonstrators in Washington, D.C. that day, though an accurate crowd size estimate is difficult. The picture above shows men and women who came to demonstrate and protest in Washington, part of the huge crowd that surged to the Capitol with the president’s encouragement. Were the people pictured here part of an “insurrection?” They didn’t bring weapons, and they didn’t actually enter the Capitol Building. They are, in fact, a church group from Martin County, Kentucky.

Virgil Ferguson, one of the members of that church group, was distraught at what happened:  

“We thought we would come and just show our support by helping Trump and then later on, it just went, after he got through his speech, it just went down from there,” Ferguson said.

What do we think of, and how do we treat people like those in the Kentucky church group? Here is how Jenkins approaches this issue, in his Wall Street Journal column, comparing what happened on January 6th to events at the 2017 Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville:

In the end, most of the invaders of the Capitol behaved more like tourists than insurrectionists, allowing themselves to be herded out when police had assembled a superior force. It could have been much worse but wasn’t because sense was prevalent on both sides. 

A careful postmortem in Charlottesville showed that protesters are like your children: Each one is different. Political activists, gawkers and journalists show up as well as hatemongers of every description, drawn by a hope of mayhem and not overly observant of partisan narratives adopted for the convenience of the media (emphasis added).

Evan Osnos was on the ground with the demonstrators, or protesters, or insurrectionists (you pick the label that you like most), and here is an excerpt from his write-up in the New Yorker. His column is titled, “Mob Rule in the Capitol.” 

 

As another puff of tear gas wafted over the melee with police, Sharon Krahn, a grandmother from Dallas, looked on approvingly. “Our congressmen should be shitting their pants. They need to fear, because they’re too posh,” she said.”Their jobs are too cush, and their personal gain has taken priority over their sense of duty. Maybe they all started off with a good heart, you know, but power corrupts. Our government is proof positive of that.” 

She wore a plaid scarf and a gray wool hat, studded with sequins. I asked if the violence in front of us was going too far. “Whose house is this? This is the house of ‘We the People.’ If you do a bad job, your boss tells you about it,” Krahn said. She nodded toward the Senate, where the elected officials had already evacuated to safety: “We’re not happy with the job you’ve done.” She drew a distinction between the scene in front of her and the domain of enemies she called “Antifa and B.L.M.,” who, she said, have “no true aim except destruction and anarchy.”

What should we think about misguided churchgoers who came to Washington, D.C. to support their president, believing that there was fraud in the election that left him defeated? And what about non-church members who showed up for the same reason? And what about that “Kick Ass Grandma” who talked to Osnos? Aren’t they, in fact, a lot like me (and maybe a lot like you, depending on how you are)? I have been to a lot of protests, and I have been just as mad as that grandmother – though our political views don’t match. I actually like the idea of church groups engaging in political demonstrations – and “disruptive” demonstrations, too. Demonstrations about global warming, for instance; or against nuclear weaponry. 

I really liked what Jenkins said: “Protesters are like your children. Every one is different.” Looking ahead, maybe we need to respond as if these protesters were members of the family. After all, they sort of are, unless we want to concede that there isn’t any common cause between citizens who disagree, even profoundly disagree, on political issues. 

We do love our children, don’t we, even when they act in ways we don’t approve? Don’t we have to love (or at least tolerate) those who get engaged and who demonstrate for their political positions, even if we disagree with those positions, and even if their manner of demonstrating is not to our liking? After all, we all want that kind of treatment for ourselves, and for our own causes. Black Lives Matter demonstrators went marching right through the rich white sections of town, in demonstrations that happened early in 2020. I was so happy to see them do it! Lots of people didn’t like it, though!

Those who came to Washington, D.C. on January 6th, to support President Trump, absolutely contributed to what seems to have been a fairly serious effort to topple democratic government in the United States. But I can’t really fault them for coming out to demonstrate (even though I think that their support for the president’s false claims about the election was terribly and tragically misguided). The demonstrators who came to the Capitol, and other people like them, are properly upset with the United States government. The “Kick Ass Granny” is right on target, too, when she says that too many Members of Congress put personal gain ahead of good public policy. And she’s right that the Capitol is our house, not the property of those politicians whom we send there.

We are not going to save our democracy by turning the United States Capitol into a building defended by wire fences and guns – currently the approach being taken to provide security for the Inauguration of President-Elect Biden on January 20th. In order for our democracy to endure, we are going to have to remember that most of the protesters who showed up in Washington, D.C. on January 6th are “different,” just like our children are. Differences admitted, they are still part of the “family.” Let’s not forget that. 

In his column, Jenkins makes this important observation:  Let’s focus on a general trope among the Trump opposition: Because I dislike X about Trump, therefore his supporters like X.

When talking to Trump voters or surveying them, the evidence overwhelmingly shows they disliked X too. They disliked most of what non-Trump voters disliked but they voted for him anyway for reasons critics were too lazy and self-satisfied to recognize.

In other words, as I read Jenkins, there is likely to be some significant common ground between those who are still supporting President Trump and those who don’t, never have, and never will. Let’s think about the implications of that. 

As I have already said, I think we need criminally to prosecute and punish anyone who can be proved to have planned and/or acted to overthrow democratic government in the United States. That might even include President Trump. For those who can be shown to have violated laws, as they invaded the Capitol, existing criminal penalties are appropriate. For those politicians who played such an ignominious role in helping to make possible the events of January 6th, those Senators and House Members who acted like blatant untruths needed to be taken seriously, I suggest we let the normal political process take care of them. 

But the biggest group is the most important. I am talking about those demonstrators who came to Washington, D.C. to support the president, but who didn’t invade the Capitol Building themselves. This group includes “Kick Ass Grannies,” church group members, and others. We might also include those who didn’t come to Washington personally, but who sympathized with and agreed with those who did. That is a very large share of voters who are registered as Republicans, as I understand recent polling. A column in my hometown newspaper, this morning, written by one of those Trump-supporting voters who didn’t actually go to Washington on January 6th, but who sympathizes with and identifies with those who did, suggests some sort of effort at reconciliation might be worthwhile. 

I think those of us who are upset, disheartened, and outraged by what happened on January 6th, need to start talking to our Trump-supporting fellow citizens. 

Let’s listen to what they have to say. Let’s see what we can work out. I don’t think that there is really any other good choice. 

*For folks from Santa Cruz, the University of California has just recently released its proposed “Long Range Development Plan” (LRDP), which proposes adding almost 10,000 new students to the Santa Cruz Campus. The EIR process just described will have to be followed. Click right here to be directed to a website where you can obtain a copy of the LRDP and the Draft EIR. The deadline for comments is March 8, 2021.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    LOVE

“You know you’re in love when you can’t fall asleep because reality is finally better than your dreams.”
~Dr. Seuss

“We accept the love we think we deserve.”
~Stephen Chbosky

“When one sees something especially wonderful, it’s always nice to have someone to share it with.”
~Mary Anne Schwalbe

I had a totally different video lined up for today, but then I saw this, and couldn’t possibly use anything else.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

January 13 – 19, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Capitol Punishment, untweeting Trump and censorship, Pence’s secret plans, Bookshop Santa Cruz & Palace Stationers, Movie Critiques. GREENSITE…on UCSC Growth. KROHN…Chris Krohn will be back next week. STEINBRUNER…Contaminated soil in Aptos Village, access (NOT) to board of Supes, building in rural areas, PATTON…Three dimensions of history. EAGAN…historic Deep Cover and Classic Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”Inauguration”

...

HOLY JOHN GETTING A HAIRCUT. April 23, 1954. One of my favorite photos, showing Katherine Strubergh and her daughter working hard at their sculpture of the Last Supper. They built it around 1930, in Los Angeles. This 3/4 size sculpture is probably still located at the Santa Cruz Mortuary. Call 831-423-1601 if you’d like to see it. 

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE January 11

CAPITOL PUNISHMENT. The investigations of the who, why and how about the January 6th attack on the Capitol are going slowly. We may never get a definitive truth from 1/06, just as we’ve never been provided the honest facts from 9/11, or J.F. Kennedy’s assassination. From reports we know the invaders knew where unmarked offices were. We know there were numerous warnings that an attack would be forthcoming, and yet there was insufficient protection in place. It looks to me like there was much inside planning and direction before, during, and after the invasion. Now we need to wonder and prepare for January 17 – and of course inauguration day. But January 17th…what’s planned for that date? And can’t we have this inauguration be special, and extra safe, by doing it virtually on the 20th? Tradition is tradition but so are assignations and riots. Jumping ahead just a little, could we suppose that Mike Pence had a controlling hand in all of this, including his supposed split from Trump? And that just maybe Pence will be running for president in 2024, based on his “split” from the Trump? There’s also the possibility that this split is part of Trump’s overall strategy for that dark future!!!

THE NEWS, GOOGLE, TWITTER. AND FREE SPEECH? With the cries to stop Trump and his Tweets, and his followers using Facebook, Parler and the internet to broadcast their hate messages, we need to consider the difference between internet sources and our newspapers and mass media principles. Who decides what Fox news announces,? Who makes the CNN or MSNBC decisions? We call those free speech sources ,but their owners are the deciders and the decision makers. So shouldn’t the internet message sources be just as free in their content? A

BOOKSHOP SANTA CRUZ AND PALACE STATIONERS SUPPORT. So sad to read and learn about Palace Stationers store leaving Pacific Avenue and downtown. Old-timers remember when the Trowbridges opened the first Palace Stationers almost 72 years ago, and had a few other locations downtown. We need to support our remaining downtown, especially Bookshop Santa Cruz. The Bookshop has been downtown for over 55 years, and owned and operated by the Coonerty family all that time. I am very happy to relate that I have bought every one of my Christmas gifts — and continue to buy all my relatives’ birthday gifts — at the Bookshop for years, and I want to continue to do so….




THANKS FOR CONTRIBUTING. Last week I ran an appeal for financial support to maintain BrattonOnline’s technical support. Webwoman Gunilla Leavitt tells me the response was wonderful. I haven’t, and won’t, check up on who gifted what, and I still have no idea even about how many subscribers we have. WE can always use more funding, and as previously mentioned – none of us who write for BrattonOnline receive any funds at all. As I stated last week… Those costs have risen, and we want to pay webwoman Gunilla Leavitt more so she can better handle those finances. You can use PayPal directly, or click the donate button on the right. The PayPal email is support@brattonline.com and you can use the send to family and friends feature. The name that comes up when you send money is “Online Payment”. You can also use Venmo (@Godmoma) or CashApp (@Godmoma9) if you would rather. We thank you for the support! 

...

Aside from CNN, MSNBC, PBS and a few sneak peeks at FOX news this past week, here are some of the movies worth considering. 

HIS HOUSE. (SINGLE). A young couple from the Sudan migrates to a town in England and is assigned to a haunted, beaten up government apartment. They fight the ghosts of their young daughter who drowned, even stranger neighbors, and a genuinely scary night witch. In addition to these problems, the couple has to deal with racism. Go for it.

EQUINOX. (SERIES). 26 years ago, this Danish girl’s classmates (21 of them) suddenly disappeared. She decides to investigate this mystery which has most of the town and her relatives completely mystified. Half truths are revealed and the real truth seems too impossible to believe, but you’ll appreciate it when you watch the entire series, I did.

TINY PRETTY THINGS. (SERIES). Not much to watch here, as a young black girl (16-18) from Compton goes to dance school in Chicago. She has many, many problems with the other male and female students and faculty. The acting is terrible; the plot is relenting, trite, and boring. Do not watch. 

DNA (SINGLE). The French title is actually ADN. This is a French film about the Alzheimer’s death of an old man, and the infinite decisions and interplay of emotions it brings to the surface. The strained relationships and brutal battles this Algerian family are forced to face, are so realistic that it’s painful – but well done. 

30 COINS. (SERIES). You guessed it…the 30 coins are the ones that Judas received for betraying Jesus. There’s this priest in Spain who has a very shady past, and also does exorcisms. 

More than that, a cow gives birth to a human baby – and there’s enough plots to keep you focused at least through the first two episodes

The movies below are not ranked in any particular order. I’ve eliminated some of the most boring, time wasting flops…enjoy what’s left!!  

DOCTOR SLEEP. Stanley Kubricks’ The Shining, taken from Stephen Kings’ book, and starring Jack Nicholson, remains a classic. Doctor Sleep stars Ewan McGregor and claims to be – and tries hard to be – a sequel taking place 40 years after The Shining. There’s a Jack Nicholson lookalike, a few scenes near the end of that classic hotel, views of the twin girls standing in the hallway, but it’s a lame attempt. There’s also the repeating phrase “Pain purifies steam”, which is as mystifying as it is confusing. Do not go to any trouble or expense if you expect to be treated to a deserving sequel.  

BORDERTOWN. Be sure to link on to the Finnish Bordertown, there are many Bordertowns online. A conflicted chief investigator leads his team through clues and false leads to solve some complex murders. Like Sherlock Holmes, the investigator has his flaws and a mysterious past. Watch this one it’ll take your mind off reality.

THE MIDNIGHT SKY. George Clooney plays a terminally ill, very alone guy stationed on a doomed earth in 2049. He tries to communicate with astronauts including Felicity Jones, warning them to not return to earth after an EVENT that destroyed everything. It’s mystical, dull, pointless, and a poor addition to Clooney’s career.

NEVER RARELY SOMETIMES ALWAYS. 99 on Rotten Tomatoes, and yet it’s hard to find. Try HBO, or Prime video. It’s the story of a teenage girl and her girlfriend traveling to New York City from Pennsylvania and having to go through very realistic, inhuman, authentic issues and problems to end her pregnancy. It’s cruel, truthful, and will leave you with new energy to change the abortion laws and practices…don’t miss it. 

THE MESS YOU LEAVE BEHIND. An engrossing series. A young new teacher in Spain replaces one who either committed suicide or was murdered. The Students are hiding something, and they share or lie about their connections. Many time frames, from past to present. It’s based on a book and is well worth watching. 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

MA RAINEY’S BLACK BOTTOM. (Single) This near musical is adapted from the play by the same name. It’s also acted as a play more than as a movie or straight drama. It all takes place in 1927 when Ma tries to record the first of her more than 100 songs. The late Chadwick Boseman is Ma’s choice for first trumpet, and Ma’s played by Viola Davis in case you don’t recognize her.

MY OCTOPUS TEACHER. (Single) A documentary by a filmmaker who for some personal reason decides to relate to an octopus in the ocean near the tip of Africa. The octopus is about 1 1/2 feet across and has a very threatened life from sharks and nature. The octopus befriends the filmmaker and the movie is surprising and revealing in the ways it details the complexity of all our lives. Highly recommended. 100 Rotten Tomatoes

ROSE ISLAND (Single) Based on a true and fascinating, engrossing story of an Italian  guy back in 1968 who actually built a platform off the Rimini coast and tried to establish it as his own country. It actually went to the United Nations and later they moved international territory boundaries from 6 to 12 miles offshore. Watch it and dream. 78 Rotten T’s

THE CALL.(Single) Korean movies have a certain something that set them way apart. It’s mostly intelligence, clever plots and not quite spelling everything out for the audience. 100 on Rotten Tomatoes!!! An old cell phone rings and communicates between 20 years of haunting calls. Daughters talk to dead grandmothers and all in the same house. Time switches, serial killers separated by time. Fine acting. You’ll be puzzled and completely engaged watching this one.

THE PROFESSOR AND THE MADMAN. (Single) Try very hard to imagine Mel Gibson and Sean Penn together in a true story about the creating of the first Oxford English Dictionary. This movie was made three years ago and it’s so bad Mel Gibson tried suing the production company to get out of it. He lost. Sean Penn is supposed to be a lunatic murderer who is also a language fanatic. Gibson who’s from Australia fakes a Scottish accent and takes charge of the Oxford dictionary through the letter T. Sean Penn becomes bald with a ten inch beard and adds a significant amount of words to the project. To realize our Oxford Dictionary has this history is mind boggling. The movie is dull but unusually fascinating…if you like words. 43 on RT

EUROVISION SONG CONTEST: THE STORY OF FIRE SAGA.  (Single) Will Ferrell is too old now to be playing these loony goofballs. There really is a Eurovision Song Contest and apparently it’s almost as odd as this movie makes it out to be. Rachel McAdams who is now 42 plays her dimple cheeked cute role as best she’s allowed to do. It’s Farrell  (aged 53) who has outgrown the kind of humor he worked so hard at 15 to 20 years ago. 64 on RT. Oops I forgot to relate that Pierce Brosnan is in it too, most likely just for the money.

PROM. (Single) This is a big new musical in every sense of the word. It stars Meryl Streep singing, dancing and mugging her way through this simple copy of a Stephen Sondheim type show. Even though the “plot” centers on our serious and contemporary prejudice against gay men and lesbians Streep, Nicole Kidman and James Corden make it all cute flashy, obvious, and not quite memorable. 

WHAT WE WANTED. (Single) An Austrian relationship challenge. A couple can’t have children, whose fault is it? His or hers? We watch and relate to their problems. They take a vacation in Sardinia. The couple next door add huge problems to our main characters. If you’ve had issues in your relationships this may or may not be your best choice…but you will relate to this saga I guarantee.

MANK. (single) Mank is short for Mankiewicz as in Herman Mankiewicz who was the screenwriter of  Orson Welles “Citizen Kane”. C. Kane for non movie goers has been generally regarded as the best movie ever made. It’s on several worldwide “best of” lists and you owe it yourselves to see it at least once. But Mank the movie is mostly made for movie nuts. Amanda Seyfried plays Marion Davies, Charles Dance is William Randolph Hearst, and Tom Burke is Orson Welles. Mank was a professional screenwriter who drank more than anybody and somehow managed to finish the script for Citizen Kane just in time. Gary Oldman is way over the top when he plays Mank, but with the flash of this very Hollywood script he fits in perfectly. You’ll love it.

THE MITFORDS. (single) A fine documentary movie about the wild, wooly, and brilliant  six Mitford sisters. Plus there’s info here for all Santa Cruzans who remember when Jessica Mitford visited and lectured at UCSC. It should be called A Tale of Two Sisters. Jessica who we called Decca was an ardent left wing proponent. She married Oakland Civil Rights Attorney Robert Truehaft and they both attended my wedding in San Francisco back in 1967. Decca’s sister Diana was actually in love with Adolf Hitler and remained that far fascist right all of her life.  Watch this documentary it’s a family like no other.

A RAINY DAY IN NEW YORK. (single) This is Woody Allen’s newest movie and although it bears a lot of resemblance to his earlier movies it’s only a poor copy at best.  It has a 45 on Rotten Tomatoes and that’s generous. Elle Fanning plays a poor copy of Diane Keaton in Annie Hall doing her flighty-nutty best to be like other humans. Jude Law is in it too but we’ll never figure out why, he does nothing to further anything. Timothee Chalamat is the usual Woody Allen type character in the movie and he has little reason to be there either.  It lacks the charm, sharp humor, social commentary and the class of what used to be Woody’s signature on cinema.

PROFESSOR T. (Series) Egged on by daughter Jennifer I too really liked the Belgian crime series Professor T. It’s not easily available so try going to PBS Passport series, it’s well worth your searching time. The Professor teaches at the Antwerp University and is a habitual germophobe. He advises the local police and detectives and manages to bring in humor which makes this 3 series very enjoyable. Beware of the German version and the Czech copy, 

THE LIFE AHEAD.(Single) To see Sophia Loren at age 86, and see her looking like she’s 86 is a treat. She plays a holocaust survivor who acts as mother to some children of prostitutes.  Her interaction with a Senegalese 14 year old boy is a neat piece of cinema and it’s directed by her son Edourdo Ponti. 

...

January 11

SPEAKING WITH FORKED TONGUE.
UCSC has just released its draft Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). The coverage in the Sentinel with quotes from upper management attempts to lull us into a false sense of complacency. It’s the same tactic used by city upper management when they presented their Wharf Master Plan to the various commissions and ultimately to the city council in late November. Don’t fret, they say, it isn’t what it seems.

With the Wharf Master Plan, as they ignored 2,600 petition signers and scores of emails protesting the new buildings that will tower over the current Wharf building profile and cover the sea lion viewing holes, and walkways that will change the historic character of the Wharf, project managers assured that approving the Plan won’t necessarily mean that it will happen. “It’s just a placeholder” they bleated. “A benchmark. It gives us maximum flexibility. Plenty of time for public input to make changes later on.” 

With respect to the LRDP, the placating tone started with the Sentinel reporter writing: “Despite public belief, this is not a goal the university is trying to reach, it is a number it is prepared to be able to accommodate within the next 20 years.” That number refers to a projected 28,000 students (plus staff and faculty) by 2040: a one third increase over the current enrollment of 19,000 students (plus staff and faculty). 

Continuing with this “don’t get your knickers in a knot” language, the director for Physical and Environmental Planning Services is quoted as saying: “It is not an enrollment plan. I think that is sometimes not made clear”…”It doesn’t constitute a mandate for projected enrollment. In any kind of plan, we really need to think through where we might be in 20 years, so we project out to the outer envelope of what might be possible. The purpose of the land use plan is to establish the capacity that would be needed to support that enrollment, should we get to that number.”

UCSC used the same assurances with past LRDP’S.  Enrollment in 2005 when the current expiring LRDP was drafted was 14,500. Here we are 15 years later with an enrollment of 19,000. It was capped at that number for 2020 only after major efforts, lawsuits and settlement agreements from community members and politicians who worked hard to get that cap. 

There’s no basis for believing the doublespeak. In the same article the Vice-Chancellor addresses the controversial proposal to build on the East Meadow. Despite massive opposition and a successful lawsuit for the time being, she is quoted as saying: “When you look at the history, many have said the intention of the campus founders were that the location would be kept pure.” “When you actually look at the first two LRDP’s, development was planned in the East Meadow. It was envisioned to have professional programs. It was envisioned to have some housing to support those students.”

The message is clear. If it is “envisioned” in the LRDP it will come to pass. That is the intent. The only hope to protect our town that simply cannot absorb a third more UCSC student, staff and faculty growth is massive, organized opposition of a political and legal nature. Measure U passed by 77% of Santa Cruz voters. Despite its having no teeth, Measure U sent a clear message. The town is not anti UCSC or students: it is an issue of carrying capacity and we are beyond maximum on every level. Roughly half of the student body of any size wants to live off-campus after their first year. You can’t force them to live on campus and there is no plan for low rent campus housing. 

When I started work at UCSC in 1979 the campus population was 6,000. That meant 3,000 students renting in town. At the current 19,000 students, that means (pre and post Covid) 9,000 students renting in town. A 300% increase. The impact on off-campus rents is obvious…it raises them. The student increase allowed for in the new draft LRDP means 14,000 students will be renting off-campus. Who do you think the market rate new downtown (and coming soon to your neighborhood) 8 story apartments are aimed at? Low-income workers? There will be a few crumbs swept in their direction perhaps, but this class and demographic shift in the make-up of our community will change Santa Cruz far more than a mere earthquake was able to do. Unless we all get involved. You can find how to do that at www.ActOnUCSCGrowth.org 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
January 11

Chris will be back next week.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...

January 11

CONTAMINATED SOIL IN APTOS VILLAGE
Why is the County allowing their contractor to store highly-contaminated soil in the Aptos Village Project Phase 2 area?  That’s what I asked County Environmental Health staff member, Ms. Patricia Atkin, when I recently happened to notice multiple piles of soil on plastic and covered.  She confirmed the soil removed from the railroad bed excavation at the County’s Aptos Creek Road intersection with Soquel Drive is contaminated, but assured me it will soon be hauled away to a Class 1 landfill at Kettleman City.  That’s about 170 miles away!

She refused to provide me with any soil test results that would make known what the contaminants are or at what levels they were found.  The Environmental Health Data files show no recent reports or analysis submitted since the September 20, 2019 independent environmental consultant’s review of the Soil Management Plan (maybe paid for by Swenson, maybe paid for by the County) that indicated numerous irregularities and errors to correct.

Apparently, someone at the County signed off on it anyway.  What bothers me is that, compared to the identical project that you and I paid for at the nearby Trout Gulch Road and Soquel intersection, the piles of contaminated soil at Aptos Creek Road are much, much smaller.   What happened to all the soil excavated from the railroad bed areas?  Hmmm… 

This project, known as Aptos Village Project Phase 2B, includes adding traffic lights as mitigation for the traffic increase anticipated by Swenson’s Aptos Village Project Phase 2.  The County’s Phase 2A involves Swenson building another railroad crossing connecting Parade Street with Soquel Drive, eliminating most of the precious on-street parking for existing Village businesses due to a new turn lane on Soquel Drive to accommodate Swenson’s new gateway entrance.  

However, before that can be done, the County will likely declare eminent domain proceedings, on Swenson’s behalf, against the Bayview Hotel to close that private crossing, as a condition of Swenson and the County getting approval from the Public Utilities Commission for the new Parade Street crossing.  Never mind that the 1876 deed stipulates that the Hotel owner, Jose Arano, allowed the railroad to pass through his property on condition the crossing to the Hotel remain open in perpetuity.  

You and I will pay for all legal fees the County has to spend, as part of the deal favoring Swenson.  Cozy, no?


Take a look at the new lights, and note the cameras watching at both Aptos Creek Road and Spreckles Drive, just across the bridge.  All told, this project will cost public taxpayers about $7 million, and has been top priority by County Public Works for annual funding requests from the state since 2014, largely for the benefit of the Aptos Village Project developers, primarily Swenson.

ACCESS (NOT) TO VIRTUAL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR MEETING
Just a mere handful of people were able to call the Board Clerk and figure out how to access the virtual-only Board of Supervisor meeting last Tuesday, January 5.  The access information is hard to find on the website agenda for this Tuesday, January 12, as well.

Somehow, one is supposed to intuitively know to click on “agenda” as the agenda is in fact before you, in order to find access information to participate in the meeting.  One improvement made over last week is that the telephone access number is provided, however the meeting ID number that is required to access the meeting is not.

Last week’s Special Board meeting ushered in Supervisor Bruce McPherson as Chairman, who took immediate action to reduce all public comment to only two minutes.  I think Supervisors should also be held to two minutes, as is the policy of the Watsonville City Council that public and elected officials have equal time.

Supervisor Manu Koenig was installed as Vice Chairman, and did a stellar job of asking staff to address questions raised by the public: Why are the CZU Fire evacuees staying at the County Fairgrounds having to pay $900-$950/month?  How many are having to do that and why?  Staff did not know, but Supervisor Koenig requested they report back at the next meeting with clarification.  

Wow.  A breath of fresh air and respect for the public!

It will be interesting to observe how many people are successfully able to access this Tuesday’s meeting.  As always, there are many critical matters buried in the Consent Agenda.  For example, Item #44 wherein the Count Public Works Director / Deputy CAO Matt Machado will be given the ability to sign multiple contracts awarding emergency repairs and tree removal (Swanton Rd., Felton Empire Grade, and Smith Grade) worth a total of $4.82 million. 

No competitive bidding.  That explains why the Board voted last week to extend the Local State of Health Emergency Due to the CZU Fires.

Community Tree Service got all three emergency contracts for tree removals.  That company also got the contract without competitive bid a few years ago to remove all the large trees from around the County Building.  One would think the County would at least consider Huerta’s Tree Service, the local company who did the massive shaded fuel break tree work on Highway 17 last year, under CalTrans competitive bidding.

Also, consent Agenda Items #40 
Public Hearing to Consider Modifications Proposed by the California Coastal Commission to the County’s Vacation Rental Ordinance, County Code Section 13.10.694; adopt a resolution accepting the Commission’s modifications; adopt a revised Vacation Rental Ordinance based on the modifications, and take other actions as outlined in the memorandum of the Planning Director  This will  affect vacation rentals in the Aptos/Seacliff, Live Oak, and Davenport communities.

and #41 will : Schedule a public hearing for January 26, 2021, beginning at 9:00 AM or thereafter, to consider Coastal Commission modifications to recent County Code amendments approved by Resolution 190-2020 and Ordinance 5346, related to Accessory Structures, Home Occupations, Temporary Uses and Structures, and Hosted Rentals, and take related actions, as recommended by the Planning Director

2021/01/12 09:00 AM Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting – Web Outline -…

This will pertain to agricultural, residential and timber areas.

Consent Agenda Item #34 will approve the County Sheriff to hire 10 new deputies from other law enforcement agencies, provide a $25,000 incentive to work here for three years, and provide 10 weeks of vacation immediately after completing training.  

Consent Agenda #19 agrees to have the County foot the bill an additional year (until June 30, 2022) for Redevelopment Agency holding and gift of public land to the MidPen Housing group for the affordable housing and two medical clinics that will be built on highly contaminated soil at 1500 Capitola Road.


BOARD OF FORESTRY…RESTRICTIONS ON BUILDING IN RURAL AREAS

There are many new rules coming down the pike that will further restrict and likely ban development and rebuilding in rural areas of the State. 

The new rules would restrict building or re-building in areas with single ingress/egress in both State and Local Responsibility Areas.  This could mean neighborhoods such as Rolling Green Estates in Aptos, and many other rural communities.

SB 55 (Stern) Development Prohibition on State Responsibility Lands

On the first day of the 2021-2022 Legislative sessions, Senator Henry Stern (D-Calabasas), introduced Senate Bill 55, which would prohibit all commercial and residential development in Very High Fire Hazards Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) and State Responsibility Areas (SRA).  This measure is identical to the unsuccessful SB 474, a last-minute effort by Senator Stern which RCRC ( Rural County Representatives of California) strongly opposed in the previous legislative session.


While RCRC supports the underlying goal of mitigating the loss of life and property in high fire prone areas, SB 55 will ban anything from a simple Christmas tree farm in one area of the state to a new restaurant in another. Depriving individual property owners of the ability to utilize land or engage in legitimate business also presents potential “takings” challenges, adding associated costs, not only for the affected individual, but to taxpayers of the state. Meanwhile, California continues to struggle with a housing shortage, especially homes affordable to those with low and very-low incomes.  In addition, the increased loss of life and structural damage caused by California’s recent wildfires have caused reconsideration of housing development in fire-prone areas and the further winnowing of available lands for development. RCRC believes that these challenges require a holistic, equitable, and reasonable policy solution – something that is lacking in SB 55.

RCRC’s letter of opposition can be accessed here. This legislation will be eligible for action January 7, 2021; however, it is not anticipated this bill will be set for hearing before March. For more information, contact Tracy Rhine, RCRC Legislative Advocate at (916) 447-4806 or trhine@rcrcnet.org  The devastation in the CZU Fire area is heart-breaking.  But the forest is beginning to regenerate.  Let’s all hope the people will find the strength and resources to rebuild their spirits, homes and livelihoods, keeping our County’s rural communities alive and well.


MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  PARTICIPATE IN A VIRTUAL MEETING AND ASK FOR HELP IF YOU CAN’T ACCESS IT.  THINK GOOD THOUGHTS TO UNIFY OUR COMMUNITY AND OUR COUNTRY.  MAKE A DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky 831-685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

January 11

#11 / History In Three Dimensions

Reinhart Koselleck

A fairly recent article from Psyche, on the Aeon website, has introduced me to Reinhart Koselleck, who is pictured above. The article, by Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann, is titled, “Repetition and Rupture.” Hoffman identifies Koselleck as “the last great theorist of history,” saying that Koselleck sought to find, in “the apparent chaos of events, a science of experience.” 

I am somewhat chagrined to admit that I had never heard of Koselleck until I read that Psyche article. Wikipedia says that Koselleck “is widely considered to be one of the most important historians of the twentieth century.” Here it is, twenty years into the Twenty-First Century, and I am just now getting the word. I guess it’s a case of better late than never! I certainly recommend Hoffman’s article, for anyone who cares about history and the study of history.

As I understand it, Koselleck thought that most historians were writing what amounts to “a secularised version of eschatology.” Koselleck argued that any claim that we can uncover some sort of “law of history” is fundamentally in error. Those who have read a few of my blog postings will know that this is just what I think, too. Our innate ability to do things never thought of or accomplished before, stemming directly from the fact that “anything is possible” in the human world, means that there isn’t any “law,” or any “determinism,” that can definitively predict our future.

Despite this insight, Koselleck does, apparently, want to make history into a kind of “science.” Here is how Hoffmann explains Koselleck’s approach to history, making clear that while Koselleck strongly opposed the idea that history moves towards some predetermined future, he still sought to find patterns that could provide guidance, and maybe even predictive power. Hoffman puts it this way:

For Koselleck, all modern ideologies claimed to have the ‘laws of history‘ on their side to justify violence …. Dismantling the concept of history and coming up with a new theory of how histories actually unfold – chaotic, contingent, messy and ferocious, yet with discernible patterns – was therefore the most important task for historians. 

This remained a theme to which Koselleck would return time and again, up to his very last published essay. In ‘What Repeats,’ written the summer before he died unexpectedly in 2006, Koselleck claimed that we can make novel experiences only if there are structures of repetition within the chaotic stream of events that we call history. History is neither just more of the same – that is, constant and circular repetition (Friedrich Nietzsche’s idea of ‘eternal recurrence’) – or the experience of Bill Murray’s character in Groundhog Day, in which we start over, again and again. Both repetition and rupture are conditions of possible histories. 

The urge to understand what’s new motivated Koselleck to identify structures of repetition in history: geographical and climatic preconditions that, independent of humans, make all life possible; biological conditions, such as birth and death, human sexuality and generations; our institutions, for instance work and law, but also language that captures human experiences; and finally historical events themselves (such as a worldwide pandemic), which contain their own repetitive structures. Only by understanding what repeats can we discern what’s new and unprecedented in our present. As we find ourselves again in a world of global convulsions and crises, in which events have surprised many, Koselleck reminds us to sort out what repeats in a moment of rupture.

One of Koselleck’s ideas, as I get it, is that there are patterns of “repetition” in history, and that these patterns will appear even in times of historic “rupture,” when the existing state of the world is undergoing major changes. I suppose that this could be a rather comforting thought – and that seems to be what Koselleck wants it to be. However, taking our current historic situation as an example, my eye moves quickly towards the “rupture,” which fills my vision first and foremost. As I watch the disintegration of the current human reality that I assumed was pretty stable, my ability to find a few repetitive elements bobbing up here and there in the floodwaters is not as comforting as I might wish.

This pairing of “repetition” and “rupture” is not the only idea that Koselleck advances, at least the way Hoffman explains Koselleck:

According to Koselleck, three basic oppositions structure all historical experience. Every possible history is conditioned, first, by before and after, for example the anthropological span between birth and death that makes each life singular and part of a shared experience distinct from other generations, times and experiences. The possibility for new beginnings is as much a part of the human condition as the necessity of death or the ability to kill. Second, all possible history can’t escape the political difference between inner and outer (or, in a conflict, friend or foe). Hence, Koselleck’s repeated critique of the idea that human difference can be morally resolved and not just politically mediated. Only the recognition of difference allows for compromise. Finally, Koselleck claims that the opposition between above and below, ‘master’ and ‘slave’ in the terminology of Hegel and Marx, structures all social relations in history. This isn’t to say that more equality and freedom can’t be gained in the course of events, but that social hierarchies permeate all forms of human community, generating new conflicts and hence new histories (emphasis added).

Koselleck, in other words, suggests that we consider history, including our historical situation and historical events, in three dimensions. That seems to me to be good advice. These “three dimensions” are tools of analysis, helping us better to observe and understand what is happening, or has happened.

The best advice on how to consider history, however, is not really touched upon in Hoffman’s article, perhaps because Koselleck didn’t think in these terms. Pursuing a “science” of history is to avow that we should think of historical events, and history, as something to be first observed, and then understood. The hope, of course, is that if we have observed correctly, and have learned from all that we have come to understand, we will be best able to navigate the history that we must inevitably confront in our own lives. 

In fact, though, is is possible to understand history not as something that we observe, but as something that we ourselves create. It is we who “make” history. No “law” constrains what we can do, and the tripartite tools of analysis that Koselleck provides us do not determine how we ourselves will use these tools and the knowledge that they bring us. 

Through our actions and our choices, it is we who will make history. Depending on the choices we make and on those actions that we take, we will either bring our dreams – or our nightmares – into the world in which we live.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “INAUGURATION”

“This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory”.
~Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933

“There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America”.
~Bill Clinton, 1993

“For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace”. 
~Barack Obama, 2009 

This terrifies me more than I can express…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

January 6 – 12, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Bemoaning our “educated” community, request for support. GREENSITE on Houseless camping at San Lorenzo Park. KROHN…remembering Ruth Hunter. STEINBRUNER…Cleaning up the Davenport Cement Plant, no public access for Board of Supes, saving the Robert Merriman House’s last chance. PATTON…Risk. EAGAN…Classic Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. QUOTES…”Common Sense”

...

PACIFIC AND WATER STREETS, DECEMBER 26, 1951. I can’t read the gas prices at Spike Jones’ (not that Spike Jones) station, and it’s probably just as well. This was our most “official” holiday tree way back then.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE January 4

ANOTHER YEAR AHEAD. Let’s hope we see an end to the terrible fighting right within our self labeled “educated” community. Brave protectors of the homeless, against the police trying to evict and crush our homeless camps. Right-wing Take Back Santa Cruz, trying to stop Harm Reduction Coalition from saving addicts’ lives. Developers lying about their ability to build affordable units, and catering to Silicon Valley commuters. While you’re thinking about, it check out the Harm Reduction Coalition site. Be sure also to check out Becky Steinbruner in this week’s emergency reminder of how our county is completely disrespecting the Robert Merriman house at 1500 Capitola Road, in favor of the Mid pen Development. If you’ve missed their message, read the Homeless Union’s Facebook page, and learn what accomplishments and goals they’ve achieved. 

Our long-standing heroes at Food Not Bombs need help of many kinds. Go to santacruz.foodnotbombs.net. Lest we forget, the Trump vote in 2019 was bigger than his last: he got 26,438 votes here in our liberal territory last November. I’ve said it before but I seriously doubt this crop of Santa Cruz City Council persons will display any real courage or leadership when it comes to facing Martin Bernal, and his self-serving machinations in dealing with any or all of above.




ABOUT BRATTON ONLINE. None of our weekly writers (Krohn, Greensite, Steinbruner, Patton, Eagan, and specifically me, have ever received one cent from BrattonOnline. There’s no such thing as members, dues, fees etc. We create it every week, to spread news and opinions. Our only costs have been in the online transcribing of the works. Those costs have risen, and we want to pay webwoman Gunilla Leavitt, so she can better handle those finances. Please consider sending what you can afford. You’ll be glad you did, and so will we.

You can use PayPal directly, or click the donate button. The PayPal email is support@brattonline.com and you can use the send to family and friends feature. The name that comes up when you send money is “Online Payment”. You can also use Venmo (@Godmoma) or CashApp (@Godmoma9) if you would rather. We thank you for the support!

I am forced to admit that I haven’t seen a movie especially in the recent year that would come close to Marcel Carne’s  “Children of Paradise” or “Les Enfants du Paradis”. It was filmed in 1945. I watched it for the umpteenth time again last week. It’s the perfect movie. None of the following even come close.

DOCTOR SLEEP. Stanley Kubricks’ The Shining, taken from Stephen Kings’ book, and starring Jack Nicolson, remains classic. Doctor Sleep stars Ewan McGregor and claims to be – and tries hard to be – a sequel taking place 40 years after The Shining. There’s a Jack Nicolson lookalike, a few scenes near the end of that classic hotel, views of the twin girls standing in the hallway, but it’s a lame attempt. There’s also the repeating phrase “Pain purifies steam”, which is as mystifying as it is confusing. Do not go to any trouble or expense if you expect to be treated to a deserving sequel.  

BORDERTOWN. Be sure to link on to the Finnish Bordertown, there are many Bordertowns online. A conflicted chief investigator leads his team through clues and false leads to solve some complex murders. Like Sherlock Holmes, the investigator has his flaws and a mysterious past. Watch this one it’ll take your mind off reality.

THE MIDNIGHT SKY. George Clooney plays a terminally ill, very alone guy stationed on a doomed earth in 2049. He tries to communicate with astronauts including Felicity Jones, warning them to not return to earth after an EVENT that destroyed everything. It’s mystical, dull, pointless, and a poor addition to Clooney’s career.

NEVER RARELY SOMETIMES ALWAYS. 99 on Rotten Tomatoes, and yet it’s hard to find. Try HBO, or Prime video. It’s the story of a teenage girl and her girlfriend traveling to New York City from Pennsylvania and having to go through very realistic, inhuman, authentic issues and problems to end her pregnancy. It’s cruel, truthful, and will leave you with new energy to change the abortion laws and practices…don’t miss it. 

THE MESS YOU LEAVE BEHIND. An engrossing series. A young new teacher in Spain replaces one who either committed suicide or was murdered. The Students are hiding something, and they share or lie about their connections. Many time frames, from past to present. It’s based on a book and is well worth watching. 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

The movies below are not ranked in any particular order. I’ve eliminated some of the most boring, time wasting flops…enjoy what’s left!! 

MA RAINEY’S BLACK BOTTOM. (Single) This near musical is adapted from the play by the same name. It’s also acted as a play more than as a movie or straight drama. It all takes place in 1927 when Ma tries to record the first of her more than 100 songs. The late Chadwick Boseman is Ma’s choice for first trumpet, and Ma’s played by Viola Davis in case you don’t recognize her.

MY OCTOPUS TEACHER. (Single) A documentary by a filmmaker who for some personal reason decides to relate to an octopus in the ocean near the tip of Africa. The octopus is about 1 1/2 feet across and has a very threatened life from sharks and nature. The octopus befriends the filmmaker and the movie is surprising and revealing in the ways it details the complexity of all our lives. Highly recommended. 100 Rotten Tomatoes

ROSE ISLAND (Single) Based on a true and fascinating, engrossing story of an Italian  guy back in 1968 who actually built a platform off the Rimini coast and tried to establish it as his own country. It actually went to the United Nations and later they moved international territory boundaries from 6 to 12 miles offshore. Watch it and dream. 78 Rotten T’s

AVA. (Single)Watch John Malkovich, Colin Farrell and mostly Jessica Chastain try to save this boring, poor copy of a spy movie. 15 on RT. Geena Davis was brought back from somewhere to play a ridiculous role and she too fails miserably. It’s war within war as international spy teams distrust each other. Don’t bother.

THE CALL.(Single) Korean movies have a certain something that set them way apart. It’s mostly intelligence, clever plots and not quite spelling everything out for the audience. 100 on Rotten Tomatoes!!! An old cell phone rings and communicates between 20 years of haunting calls. Daughters talk to dead grandmothers and all in the same house. Time switches, serial killers separated by time. Fine acting. You’ll be puzzled and completely engaged watching this one.

THE PROFESSOR AND THE MADMAN. (Single) Try very hard to imagine Mel Gibson and Sean Penn together in a true story about the creating of the first Oxford English Dictionary. This movie was made three years ago and it’s so bad Mel Gibson tried suing the production company to get out of it. He lost. Sean Penn is supposed to be a lunatic murderer who is also a language fanatic. Gibson who’s from Australia fakes a Scottish accent and takes charge of the Oxford dictionary through the letter T. Sean Penn becomes bald with a ten inch beard and adds a significant amount of words to the project. To realize our Oxford Dictionary has this history is mind boggling. The movie is dull but unusually fascinating…if you like words. 43 on RT

EUROVISION SONG CONTEST: THE STORY OF FIRE SAGA.  (Single) Will Ferrell is too old now to be playing these loony goofballs. There really is a Eurovision Song Contest and apparently it’s almost as odd as this movie makes it out to be. Rachel McAdams who is now 42 plays her dimple cheeked cute role as best she’s allowed to do. It’s Farrell  (aged 53) who has outgrown the kind of humor he worked so hard at 15 to 20 years ago. 64 on RT. Oops I forgot to relate that Pierce Brosnan is in it too, most likely just for the money.

PROM. (Single) This is a big new musical in every sense of the word. It stars Meryl Streep singing, dancing and mugging her way through this simple copy of a Stephen Sondheim type show. Even though the “plot” centers on our serious and contemporary prejudice against gay men and lesbians Streep, Nicole Kidman and James Corden make it all cute flashy, obvious, and not quite memorable. 

WHAT WE WANTED. (Single) An Austrian relationship challenge. A couple can’t have children, whose fault is it? His or hers? We watch and relate to their problems. They take a vacation in Sardinia. The couple next door add huge problems to our main characters. If you’ve had issues in your relationships this may or may not be your best choice…but you will relate to this saga I guarantee.

MANK. (single) Mank is short for Mankiewicz as in Herman Mankiewicz who was the screenwriter of  Orson Welles “Citizen Kane”. C. Kane for non movie goers has been generally regarded as the best movie ever made. It’s on several worldwide “best of” lists and you owe it yourselves to see it at least once. But Mank the movie is mostly made for movie nuts. Amanda Seyfried plays Marion Davies, Charles Dance is William Randolph Hearst, and Tom Burke is Orson Welles. Mank was a professional screenwriter who drank more than anybody and somehow managed to finish the script for Citizen Kane just in time. Gary Oldman is way over the top when he plays Mank, but with the flash of this very Hollywood script he fits in perfectly. You’ll love it.

THE MITFORDS. (single) A fine documentary movie about the wild, wooly, and brilliant  six Mitford sisters. Plus there’s info here for all Santa Cruzans who remember when Jessica Mitford visited and lectured at UCSC. It should be called A Tale of Two Sisters. Jessica who we called Decca was an ardent left wing proponent. She married Oakland Civil Rights Attorney Robert Truehaft and they both attended my wedding in San Francisco back in 1967. Decca’s sister Diana was actually in love with Adolf Hitler and remained that far fascist right all of her life.  Watch this documentary it’s a family like no other.

A RAINY DAY IN NEW YORK. (single) This is Woody Allen’s newest movie and although it bears a lot of resemblance to his earlier movies it’s only a poor copy at best.  It has a 45 on Rotten Tomatoes and that’s generous. Elle Fanning plays a poor copy of Diane Keaton in Annie Hall doing her flighty-nutty best to be like other humans. Jude Law is in it too but we’ll never figure out why, he does nothing to further anything. Timothee Chalamat is the usual Woody Allen type character in the movie and he has little reason to be there either.  It lacks the charm, sharp humor, social commentary and the class of what used to be Woody’s signature on cinema.

PROFESSOR T. (Series) Egged on by daughter Jennifer I too really liked the Belgian crime series Professor T. It’s not easily available so try going to PBS Passport series, it’s well worth your searching time. The Professor teaches at the Antwerp University and is a habitual germophobe. He advises the local police and detectives and manages to bring in humor which makes this 3 series very enjoyable. Beware of the German version and the Czech copy, 

THE LIFE AHEAD.(Single) To see Sophia Loren at age 86, and see her looking like she’s 86 is a treat. She plays a holocaust survivor who acts as mother to some children of prostitutes.  Her interaction with a Senegalese 14 year old boy is a neat piece of cinema and it’s directed by her son Edourdo Ponti. 

THE MAN WITHOUT GRAVITY. (Single) Another Italian near fable about a baby born and floating to the ceiling attached to his umbilical cord. What he does with his life, and his decisions about letting the world know he floats make a near masterpiece. Not too near Italian Classics like “Life Is Beautiful” or “Amarcord” it’s still fun to think about.

CALL MY AGENT. Daughter Hillary found this one and she’s right, it’s a good one. There might be a problem in finding this one under that title on Netflix, if so try “Dix Pour Cent”. Billed as a comedy it centers on the lives of the talent agents and stars who work at a famous show biz agency in Paris. Tempers, jokes, love affairs, and much talent all get very mixed and still it’s almost riveting.

THE VOW. 82 ON Rotten Tomatoes is just about what I’d give this documentary. NXIVM is the name of a self awareness, mindfulness group. It has masters and slaves and even branding women members in private places. It’s a documentary but not your average documentary. If you’ve ever belonged to or have thought about joining one like maybe Scientology don’t miss this partial opening of their secret doors. Just a few weeks ago (Nov.2) Keith Raniere, the real life NXIVM leader was sentenced to 120 years in prison.

...
January 4

HOUSELESS CAMPING IN SAN LORENZO PARK
We are no closer to handling the houseless crisis in the new year than we were in the old. If anything, the situation has worsened with the latest standoff over city manager -ordered evictions from the unsanctioned ever-increasing camping at San Lorenzo Park. Faced with a hostile push back, the police backed down, apparently to avoid escalating the potential for violence. Supporters then obtained a temporary restraining order (TRO) to stop any further evictions. The TRO ends on January 6th. By the time you are reading this we may know what comes next.  I doubt it will be a workable solution.

The need to step in to terminate the camping at San Lorenzo Park was evident to all but the campers and their supporters. The latter dismiss as lies the documented incidents of theft, public defecation, aggressive behavior, destruction of public property and impact on city maintenance staff. The most vociferous supporters are Trump-like in their creation of an alternate reality hurling phrases such as “homeless haters” “privilege” “fascist city staff”, making dialogue difficult if not impossible. While the majority of those camping may indeed be down on their luck and trying to hold things together, never bothering anyone, there are plenty of others whose behavior, not housing status is unacceptable by any standard.

I stepped in where angels fear to tread by posting a comment online pointing out that San Lorenzo is a children’s park: that the most impacted by the camping take-over of the Park are the children of low-income mostly Mexicano families who live in nearby small apartments with no back yards. The levees and San Lorenzo Park were where the families used to take their children to play and ride their bikes. No longer. Now they stay inside. Some have had their bikes stolen. One family had bags of clothes ready for the laundromat stolen from the trunk of their car. Next day they saw men who were camping lying on their clothes on the banks of the river. They have had racist insults shouted at them when they went for a walk on the levee. They have turned their children towards home on seeing a man masturbating in the middle of the levee path. Although the father of one of the families could ride his bike to work along the levee he doesn’t feel safe doing so. He leaves for work in the dark and comes home in the dark. Doesn’t this all somewhat complicate the picture? Who are the less fortunate here?

The city spent $200,000 cleaning up some of the unsanctioned large campsites in Pogonip. I saw the environmental damage. It was not pretty. Fecal pollution drained into the San Lorenzo River while piles of garbage next to empty dumpsters attracted rats. 

It’s obvious that a site suitable for large-scale camping has yet to be found. It won’t work if it is anywhere near where people live in houses and neighborhoods given the reality of the anti-social impacts described above. Arm chair radicals can talk all they want about the impacts of late stage capitalism, private property and privilege but that doesn’t get us closer to a solution that provides shelter, attends to addiction and curbs anti-social behavior. The current dichotomy with one side seeing saints and the other side seeing scum, with insults traded in equal amounts is not the path to a solution. 

I thought I had a solution on a recent hike in the New Brighton State Beach area. Walking through the campground it became obvious that this would be a perfect location for a houseless campground when space is not available at current indoor sites in the city.  It can accommodate RV’s. There are 114 well laid out, large campsites with nearby toilet blocks. There are no neighbors. The campground is currently closed. State Parks would have to agree so politicians would need to be involved. Since the State has imposed its will on our local ability to have reasonable zoning laws to protect neighborhoods, perhaps they can give something in return. It would need an investment of maintenance staff, shower blocks and shuttle for those who can’t walk to a bus stop. Expensive but not when compared to what is being outlaid right now with little success. Food Not Bombs and Harm Reduction Coalition are both mobile.  Even if it were temporary until the Park opens in the summer, it gives time to locate an alternative permanent site in the county and takes the brunt of the impact off the city. 

Take a walk along the levee from the trestle to Water Street Bridge, note the tents growing in number on Main Beach and next to the river, see the piles of garbage, talk to Parks maintenance staff and low-income renters in nearby apartments before you decide to support continued camping at San Lorenzo Park or any city park for that matter.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

January 4

REMEMBERING 
I am remembering Ruth Hunter. She died three years ago, but in this time of remembering and making new year resolutions, I want to resolve in myself to be more like Ruth: inspiring, thoughtful, creative, and courageous. Many of us in Santa Cruz truly stand on the shoulders of those incredible activists who came before us like Ruth and…Bill and Bernice Belton, Jerry Kaufman, Fred Hirsch (died last month), Mardi Wormhoudt, Keith Sugar, Joyce Malone, Reed Searle, Gordon Pusser, Doug Rand, Marge Franz, Sherry Conable, David Minton Silva, and Dick Doubrava. There are many more, but these are the activists I am thinking about this week.

“Those we love don’t go away,
They walk beside us every day.
Unseen, Unheard, But always near,
Still loved, still missed, and very dear”
(Irish Prayers)

Peace Activist Ruth Hunter Lives Until 102?
Ruth Davis Hunter was anything but conventional. She raged with the Raging Grannies; stood firm in solidarity with the people El Salvador and Nicaragua during Ronald Reagan’s not so secret wars in Central America; she yelled “no nukes” long before it was fashionable and became a movement that all but ended the growth of nuclear power in the US; and she even stood with militant laicized priest, Roy Bourgeois, in protest outside the dreaded, “School of the Americas” in Georgia where foreign army personnel are trained to keep their country’s domestic activists at bay by US soldiers. Ruth Hunter was a mentor for many in the Santa Cruz community, and a pillar inside the Woman’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILF). 

Ruth had been arrested 17 times in the pursuit of her ideals: equality, environmentalism, feminism, and justice for all. I was witness to her arrest in Seattle in 1999 during the World Trade Organization protests. Once handcuffed, Ruth went quietly through the tear gas into an awaiting bus. Earlier she had been spotted dancing with Turtles and Steelworkers as the “Battle in Seattle” played itself out on national TV. She always smiled too when the police put the cuffs on, it might’ve been her trademark. Ruth’s activism was legendary, her writing prolific, and her empathy voluminous. She died this past election day, Nov. 6th, at 102 years young. 

Ruth Hunter–mother, activist, rabble rouser, and genuine Mensch–was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota on July 15, 1916. Her parents, Molly and Isadore Davis emigrated from Russia and settled in Minneapolis, where they raised five children: Julius, Edith, Ruth, Evelyn and Samuel. Ruth married Seymour Borshell in 1936 and their first child, Sue Carol, was born in Minneapolis in 1938. In 1944, the young family settled first in Santa Monica, and later moved to Van Nuys. Ruth and Seymour divorced in 1950 and she moved on with her daughters to San Francisco near the beginning of the Beat era. Ten years later, she married Carl Hunter who into the new family with four children, and the two families blended, living out a real-life Brady Bunch scenario. 

Ruth studied to be a bookkeeper, and later became an academic counselor for adults on career education. She taught eighth-grade social studies in Daly City and later opened a business with Carl, The Button Moulders, “turning rocks into beauty.” Eventually she and Carl also designed, made, and sold stained glass. 

Throughout most of her centenarian life, Ruth was an outspoken advocate for feminism, social justice, and peace. She was a political activist’s political activist. Beginning with the League of Women Voters petition drives, city council campaigns, No Nukes rallies, and most recently, the Occupy Movement she carried on her own vigorous brand of activism and social change. Ruth traveled to more than 49 countries, expressing opposition to war, fascism, and government corruption everywhere she went. 

As a writer, Ruth wrote about getting arrested for civil disobedience in Santa Cruz, Seattle, and Santa Monica. She published dozens of op-eds, letters to the editor, essays, interviews, and memoirs, always standing on the side of afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted. Her book is titled, What a Life, a collection of interviews with women over 80, and it inspired two musicals, The Activist and The Activist II. They were written and composed by her husband, Carl Hunter. 

This fierce, feisty, funny, brave woman, is survived by her daughters, Sue Leonard and Peggy Brooks, step-daughters Pat Gordon and Terry Brown, step-sons Richard Hunter (and wife Kim) and Michael Hunter (and wife Lani). She had three grandchildren, seven step-grandchildren, and fourteen great-grandchildren. Her activism was as fierce as it was forthright. Ruth is already greatly missed. 

A Celebration of Ruth Hunter’s Life was held on Friday, November 30 at the Louden Nelson Center from 5:30 to 7:30pm and one of the highlights was former Congressmember Sam Farr’s recollection of drinking mojitos with Ruth at the bar in the Havana Libre hotel in Cuba.

“I’ve survived sexual assault, police abuse, domestic violence, and being unhoused and uninsured. That’s not a unique pain I carry. It’s one that so many of us live with each day. Today, I take my seat in Congress to fight for a world where nobody has to endure that pain.” (Jan. 3 @CoriBush)

I forgot what a magical place Land of the Medicine Buddha is…it sits Soquel alongside a spectacular part of Nicene Marks State Park too. If you need to get outside, this place is so close and so cool. 

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
January 4

Greetings and Happy New Year to All,

In response to requests, my columns this year will be shorter, covering no more than three topics.  This is a real challenge for me because there are so many issues that I feel Bratton Online readers should be made aware of…it’s like drinking from a fire hose these days.  If there are certain types of issues any of you are especially interested in, please do let me know. I really welcome discussion and always enjoy hearing from readers. Thanks! Becky 831-685-2915

YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP AT DAVENPORT CEMEX PLANT EXTENDED
The County Planning Dept. extended the public comment period to January 22, 2021, so here is your chance to weigh-in with your thoughts about having 165,000 cubic yards of grading and contaminated storm water runoff in the Davenport area.  The Regional Water Quality Control Board is the primary enforcement agency here, but the Planning Dept. claims a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) will suffice.  This essentially means “no big deal”.  But take a look: CEQA Documents Open for Public Review 

How can such extensive work in a contamination zone, with the town of Davenport residents immediately adjacent, be “no big deal”?

Here is a description of what’s in those 13 appendices you will find on the Planning Dept. website:

  1. #1 Final North Cement Kiln Dust Area Closure Plan & Post Closure Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 
  2. #2 Storm water Hydraulic Analysis Report
  3. #3 Final Geotechnical Design
  4. #4 Multi-Season Construction Wet Weather Preparedness Plan
  5. #5 Dust Mitigation Plan
  6. #6 Retention Pond Corrective Action Plan
  7. #7a Waste Discharge Requirements-Order from State Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central Coast Region)
  8. #7b Monitoring and Reporting Program (I could not get this file to work)
  9. #8 Plans
  10. #9 Biotic Assessment
  11. #10 Air Quality Modeling
  12. #11 Construction Noise Model
  13. #12 List of Mitigations 

Send your comments to: PROJECT PLANNER: David Carlson, (831) 454-3173 EMAIL: David.Carlson@santacruzcounty.us  by January 22. 

The matter will come before the Planning Commission at some point, to be determined.

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FIRST VIRTUAL-ONLY MEETING PROVIDES NO ACCESS INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC?
If you want to participate in the County Supervisor Board meetings, you may be in for a real challenge because as of this writing, the day before the January 7 Special Board Meeting, the website provides NO ACCESS information for the public. 

Hmmm…..

I couldn’t believe it either, so I took a screenshot and have attached it. None of the various link access modes is active.  Again, on the day before the first virtual-only Board meeting, there is no access information provided to the public.

I think many people would like to participate in the meeting wherein the Board will install Bruce McPherson as Chair and Manu Koenig as Vice-Chair for 2021.  I also think that many people would be interested in hearing discussion about whether the County will continue a Local Health Emergency due to the CZU Fires.  See an excerpt from the staff report below.

January 5 Special Board of Supervisor Meeting Agenda

On December 1, removal activities under the Government Program began. Five teams of CalRecycle contractors are currently conducting toxic ash and foundation removals as part of the Phase II work. As of December 29, 2020, CalRecycle and their contractors have removed toxic ash and foundations on 56 properties. The Environmental Health (EH) Division has received approximately 669 applications for the Government Program. EH has received 177 applications for the Private Contractor Program and work is underway on some of those parcels. The County has issued a certificate of completion to four parcels that were cleared under the Private Contractor Program. Progress on Phase II can be found at https://sccgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/c634374b8853470dbec 5244e18396528. Public Health staff has confirmed that it is necessary to keep the local health emergency in place during this stage. Staff will continue to monitor conditions and report back to the Board on whether and when it is appropriate to terminate the local emergency. 

Call your Supervisor and ask when this big censorship problem will be fixed: 831-454-2200. 

FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS….ONE FINAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE MERRIMAN HOUSE IN LIVE OAK
Sadly, the County cares nothing for preserving important historic resources such as the Robert Merriman House in Live Oak that could serve as an inspiration to young people and link everyone to how a world-famous hero who lived in our agricultural community went on to do great good for the world.

Your final chance will come January 11, 9:30 am, to weigh in on any shred of historic interpretation of this site, a condition of approval for MidPen Housing to begin bulldozing highly contaminated soil and build affordable housing on top of the carcinogenic vapors.  Don’t worry, the County Redevelopment Successor Agency has dropped the sales price of this publicly-owned land to $ZERO for one parcel, and essentially pennies for the other.

The New Year’s Day edition of the Santa Cruz Sentinel Classified Ads featured a small-print Notice about the Public Hearing that will be held before the County Historic Resources Commission on January 11 at 9:30 am to consider the interpretive panel(s) honoring Robert Merriman.  This is a condition of approval for the MidPen Housing development project planned for the site.  I have scanned the ad and attached it below.   

The legal notice ad has not appeared in the newspaper since.  How clever.

There is no information about this hearing on the County’s Historic Resources Commission website.

Earlier Commission discussions about this Project included interpretive panels that also addressed the historic ranchette farm that this parcel modelled and likely initiated in the Live Oak Community.  The newspaper legal ad makes no mention of that topic, only describing Robert Merriman’s role in fighting fascism in the Spanish Civil War.

There are significant serious soil contamination problems at that site.   Will the Commissioners be made aware of that issue as they discuss placement of the interpretive panel(s)?  The eastern side of the property should certainly be avoided if MidPen takes no clean-up action.

Here is a link to a recent Santa Cruz Sentinel report about that problem. 

Let’s hope that full information about this hearing and the text and graphics of what the Commission and public will consider on January 11 are made easily available on the website as soon as possible.  Write Annie Murphy <annie.murphy@santacruzcounty.us> and Michael Lam <michael.lam@santacruzcounty.us> with your thoughts.

Read about the importance of Robert Merriman in past Bratton Online posts:

July 10-16, 2019
November 27 – December 4, 2019
September 4-10, 2019

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING…ESPECIALLY AN ACT OF KINDNESS.

Cheers, and Happy New Year,

Becky 685-2915 

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

December 27, 2020
#362 / Risk

The image at the top of this blog posting celebrates the board game “Risk,” which can be played online. The online “risk” that I want to comment upon, however, isn’t a “game.” 

In an article published on November 27, 2020, New York Times reporters Ellen Barry and Nicole Perlroth advise readers as follows: “Patients Put at Risk as Russian Hackers Sabotage U.S. Hospitals.” That is the headline I read in the hard copy version of the newspaper. Online, the Barry-Perlroth article bears the following headline: “Patients of a Vermont Hospital Are Left ‘in the Dark’ After a Cyberattack.”

The events recounted in the article are pretty horrible. Hackers, believed to be Russian, penetrated the computer systems of something like a dozen United States hospitals and made it impossible for doctors, nurses, and other hospital personnel to access patient records. A hospital in Vermont was especially hard hit: “In Vermont, the damage radiated out through a sprawling network, hitting especially hard in the cancer center.” Without access to patient records, chemotherapy and other treatments could not be given. Recovery will take “months and months,” according to hospital administrators.

While the compromise of the hospital’s computers took the form of a “ransomware” attack, in which the target person or institution is told that their access to their suddenly inaccessible computer files will be restored upon a ransom payment, the payments demanded in this instance were so impossibly large that it seemed that the real objective was not to obtain the ransom, but simply to create chaos and disruption. If that was the real purpose, it succeeded.

Besides the empathy any reader might feel for those patients affected – cancer victims in this case who are now facing their life threatening disease without any way to get immediate medical help – my sense is that this news story, and the stories documenting other hacks, more recently revealed, ought to make us rethink our commitment to computers in more general terms. Virtually all of our vital services, from hospitals, to power companies, to water companies, to… (you name it) are now increasingly reliant on computer systems that are susceptible to attack, and the consequences of such attacks can be life threatening. 

We have based our contemporary society and economy on the idea that the complex computer systems that operate them, mostly based “in the cloud,” are reliable and secure. In fact, they are not. 

The issue is not unlike global warming, in this sense; the problem is huge, and while we can intellectually understand the danger, there is nothing immediate (until something bad happens) that suggests that today, right now, we need to start making profound rearrangements in how we have organized our lives.

And yet… so we must!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “COMMON SENSE”

“Common sense is not so common.”
~Voltaire 

“Common sense is what tells us the earth is flat.”
~Stuart Chase 

“In the present case it is a little inaccurate to say I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible to any public office of trust or profit in the Republic. But I do not repine, for I am a subject of it only by force of arms.” 
~H.L. Mencken

“Common sense is the most widely shared commodity in the world, for every man is convinced that he is well supplied with it.”  
~Rene Descartes

I love this stuff so much! Did you know that statues in ancient times were never marble white? They were painted, and very colorfully so! But in the 1800s, when many of these were “found” (stolen, if we want to be honest about it), they would scrub them clean, ignoring all trace of paint, and doing much to promote whiteness as an ideal. Anyway, I ramble, and this video is about colorizing statues digitally. It’s amazing how different they look! You should google the brightly colored ancient statues though…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

December 23, 2020 – January 5, 2021

Highlights this week:

NO BRATTONONLINE NEXT WEEK…BRATTON…holiday homeless cruelty, Cynthia Mathews’ next campaign, screamers & screeners. GREENSITE…Reflections on Monarchs KROHN…Progressive victories, watch these groups, City Attorney loans. STEINBRUNER…Rural area building issues, Soquel Creek Water Board privileges, egos, and money issues. PATTON…The Brain is not for thinking. EAGAN…more Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. QUOTES…”FORTITUDE”

...

DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ 1957. The traditional Holiday photo for non-believers, to show we do and did have snow. We also had the Santa Cruz movie theatre on the distant right, as well as the Del Mar. Obviously it’s 7:45am, by the original town clock atop the Odd Fellows Building.                                                       

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE December 21

SANTA CRUZ? NO…. IT’S SANTA CRUEL. Homelessness is a worldwide problem, especially with covid so close and growing. In a move that can only be called cruel and heartless, our City Manager Martin Bernal has ordered all the tents and occupants in San Lorenzo Park to be cleared before Christmas Day. Bernal’s patented response is “it’s for their own good”, and lies like that. How can any city especially Santa Cruz be that cruel? What can we expect from our do-nothing City Council? I predict they’ll avoid the issue. Speaking of cruel and local development, Berkeley has apparently changed some minds and is allowing one or more high rise to be built near the central part of town. Building higher means fewer commute miles, less traffic and so forth. More thinking needs to be done on this.

CYNTHIA MATHEWS CAMPAIGN TIME BEGINS. Watch for Cynthia Mathews’ longtime campaign plots as she restarts her City Council reign. Soon we’ll be seeing her photo in many local photo ops. She’ll be posing with John Laird, some Democratic Women’s Club members, especially Carol Fuller, and probably someone from MAH. The other question is will Mike Rotkin also be running again? If so, watch for his photo and some quotes carefully placed in do-gooding places. Mark my words, and we’ll check them out in a couple of months.

Scrolling around the tech universe to find something/anything worthwhile to watch can take patience, time, and disappointment. To aid your search I’ve added “Single” to the movies that are complete in one screening and “Series” to those with episodes.

MA RAINEY’S BLACK BOTTOM. (Single) This near-musical is adapted from the play of the same name. It’s also acted as a play, more than as a movie or straight drama. It all takes place in 1927, when Ma tries to record the first of her more than 100 songs. The late Chadwick Boseman is Ma’s choice for first trumpet, and Ma’s played by Viola Davis ,in case you don’t recognize her.

MY OCTOPUS TEACHER. (Single) A documentary by a filmmaker who for some personal reason decides to relate to an octopus in the ocean near the tip of Africa. The octopus is about 1 ½ feet across and has a very threatened life from sharks and nature. The octopus befriends the filmmaker and the movie is surprising and revealing in the ways it details the complexity of all our lives. Highly recommended.  `100 Rotten Tomatoes

ROSE ISLAND (Single) Based on a true, fascinating, engrossing story of an Italian guy back in 1968, who built a platform off the Rimini coast and tried to establish it as his own country. It actually went to the United Nations, and later they moved international territory boundaries from 6 to 12 miles offshore. Watch it and dream. 78 Rotten T’s

AVA. (Single)Watch John Malkovich, Colin Farrell and mostly Jessica Chastain try to save this boring, poor copy of a spy movie. 15 on RT. Geena Davis was brought back from somewhere to play a ridiculous role, and she too fails miserably. It’s war within war, as international spy teams distrust each other. Don’t bother.

THE CALL. (Single) Korean movies have a certain something that set them way apart. It’s mostly intelligence, clever plots and not quite spelling everything out for the audience. 100 on Rotten Tomatoes!!! An old cell phone rings and communicates between 20 years of haunting calls. Daughters talk to dead grandmothers and all in the same house. Time switches, serial killers separated by time. Fine acting. You’ll be puzzled and completely engaged watching this one.

THE PROFESSOR AND THE MADMAN. (Single) Try very hard to imagine Mel Gibson and Sean Penn together in a true story about the creating of the first Oxford English Dictionary. This movie was made three years ago, and it’s so bad  thatMel Gibson tried suing the production company to get out of it. He lost. Sean Penn is supposed to be a lunatic murderer who is also a language fanatic. Gibson, who’s from Australia, fakes a Scottish accent, and takes charge of the Oxford dictionary through the letter T. Sean Penn becomes bald with a ten inch beard and adds a significant amount of words to the project. To realize our Oxford Dictionary has this history is mind-boggling. The movie is dull but unusually fascinating…if you like words. 43 on RT

EUROVISION SONG CONTEST: THE STORY OF FIRE SAGA. (Single) Will Ferrell is too old now to be playing these loony goofballs. There really is a Eurovision Song Contest, and apparently it’s almost as odd as this movie makes out. Rachel McAdams, who is now 42, plays her dimple-cheeked cute role as best she’s allowed to do. It’s Farrell (aged 53) who has outgrown the kind of humor he worked so hard at 15 to 20 years ago. 64 on RT. Oops, I forgot to relate that Pierce Brosnan is in it too, most likely just for the money.

The movies below are not ranked in any particular order. I’ve eliminated some of the most boring, time wasting flops…enjoy what’s left!! 

PROM.(Single) This is a big new musical in every sense of the word. It stars Meryl Streep singing, dancing and mugging her way through this simple copy of a Stephen Sondheim type show. Even though the “plot” centers on our serious and contemporary prejudice against gay men and lesbians Streep, Nicole Kidman and James Corden make it all cute flashy, obvious, and not quite memorable. 

UNDERWATER.(Single). A truly unbelievable copy of every deep sea monster movie we’ve ever seen. Kristin Stewart and Vincent Cassel are in charge of a six mile deep oil drilling station in the Marianna Straits or maybe Los Angeles!! If you stay awake or interested long enough you can see T.J. Miller the geeky neighbor from the old Silicon Valley series doing very little to keep this poorly plotted saga from sinking deeper. 47 RT

THE GODFATHER. (Series). Now that Francis Ford Coppola has re-hashed and edited Godfather III into the newly released The Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone I wanted to see just how memorable the series was/is. Watching Marlon Brando with stuffed cheeks, Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, James Caan, Robert Duvall and good old and evil Sterling Hayden brings back many memories of the 1972 original thriller. Watch it again.

WHAT WE WANTED.(Single) An Austrian relationship challenge. A couple can’t have children, whose fault is it? His or hers? We watch and relate to their problems. They take a vacation in Sardinia. The couple next door add huge problems to our main characters. If you’ve had issues in your relationships this may or may not be your brest choice…but you will relate to this saga I guarantee.

MANK. (single) Mank is short for Mankiewicz as in Herman Mankiewicz who was the screenwriter of  Orson Welles “Citizen Kane”. C. Kane for non movie goers has been generally regarded as the best movie ever made. It’s on several worldwide “best of” lists and you owe it yourselves to see it at least once. But Mank the movie is mostly made for movie nuts. Amanda Seyfried plays Marion Davies, Charles Dance is William Randolph Hearst, and Tom Burke is Orson Welles. Mank was a professional screenwriter who drank more than anybody and somehow managed to finish the script for Citizen Kane just in time. Gary Oldman is way over the top when he plays Mank, but with the flash of this very Hollywood script he fits in perfectly. You’ll love it.

THE MITFORDS. (single) A fine documentary movie about the wild, wooly, and brilliant  six Mitford sisters. Plus there’s info here for all Santa Cruzans who remember when Jessica Mitford visited and lectured at UCSC. It should be called A Tale of Two Sisters. Jessica who we called Decca was an ardent left wing proponent. She married Oakland Civil Rights Attorney Robert Truehaft and they both attended my wedding in San Francisco back in 1967. Decca’s sister Diana was actually in love with Adolf Hitler and remained that far fascist right all of her life.  Watch this documentary it’s a family like no other.

A RAINY DAY IN NEW YORK. (single) This is Woody Allen’s newest movie and although it bears a lot of resemblance to his earlier movies it’s only a poor copy at best.  It has a 45 on Rotten Tomatoes and that’s generous. Elle Fanning plays a poor copy of Diane Keaton in Annie Hall doing her flighty-nutty best to be like other humans. Jude Law is in it too but we’ll never figure out why, he does nothing to further anything. Timothee Chalamat is the usual Woody Allen type character in the movie and he has little reason to be there either.  It lacks the charm, sharp humor, social commentary and the class of what used to be Woody’s signature on cinema.

PROFESSOR T.(Series) Egged on by daughter Jennifer I too really liked the Belgian crime series Professor T. It’s not easily available so try going to PBS Passport series, it’s well worth your searching time. The Professor teaches at the Antwerp University and is a habitual germophobe. He advises the local police and detectives and manages to bring in humor which makes this 3 series very enjoyable. Beware of the German version and the Czech copy, 

THE LIFE AHEAD.(Single) To see Sophia Loren at age 86, and see her looking like she’s 86 is a treat. She plays a holocaust survivor who acts as mother to some children of prostitutes.  Her interaction with a Senegalese 14 year old boy is a neat piece of cinema and it’s directed by her son Edourdo Ponti. 

THE MAN WITHOUT GRAVITY. (Single) Another Italian near fable about a baby born and floating to the ceiling attached to his umbilical cord. What he does with his life, and his decisions about letting the world know he floats make a near masterpiece. Not too near Italian Classics like “Life Is Beautiful” or “Amarcord” it’s still fun to think about.

CALL MY AGENT. Daughter Hillary found this one and she’s right, it’s a good one. There might be a problem in finding this one under that title on Netflix, if so try “Dix Pour Cent”. Billed as a comedy it centers on the lives of the talent agents and stars who work at a famous show biz agency in Paris. Tempers, jokes, love affairs, and much talent all get very mixed and still it’s almost riveting.

THE GLORIAS.(Single) This bio-pic of Gloria Steinem is a good one. Julianne Moore, Alicia Vikander and two more women/girls play her in this near dream like history of the women’s movement and her part in it. Julie Taymor directed it and does portray Gloria as her real mini-skirt, long nails gorgeous self. Timothy Hutton is in it too nut he shouldn’t have been. It has much fantasy, dreams, animation and oddly placed moves that obscure the important view of women’s equality fights that Steinman was an integral part of. Bette Midler plays Bella Abzug. Watch it, and don’t snicker at the odd ball parts

THE VOW. 82 ON Rotten Tomatoes is just about what I’d give this documentary. NXIVM is the name of a self awareness, mindfulness group. It has masters and slaves and even branding women members in private places. It’s a documentary but not your average documentary. If you’ve ever belonged to or have thought about joining one like maybe Scientology don’t miss this partial opening of their secret doors. Just a few weeks ago (Nov.2) Keith Raniere, the real life NXIVM leader was sentenced to 120 years in prison.

...
December 21

MECHANICAL MONARCHS
Getting out of my truck for a morning swim at Cowell’s on Saturday, I almost stepped on a Monarch butterfly, wings open, on its back on the asphalt parking lot next to the West Cliff trestle bridge pictured below. Gently picking it up, hoping it was still alive, I relocated it to a nectar flower growing next to the railroad tracks. After the swim I checked on it, happy to see it clinging to the flower in a more encouraging position than I had left it. Despite the cold and the call of a hot shower, I paused to reflect on this small creature’s precarious existence, an existence in this location the city of Santa Cruz denies.

This is where Segment 7 Phase 2 of the rail trail will spill out onto Beach Street and the roundabout at the base of the Wharf. This segment, measuring 7/10 ths of a mile requires the removal of 44 trees, 27 of them of heritage size, the paving over of a wetland, the removal of thousands of cubic yards of soil, the erection of a retaining wall up to 19 feet tall, the construction of the asphalt trail with fencing, lights and security cameras for a cost somewhere in the vicinity of $11 million.

This is also the site of a Monarch Butterfly overwintering grove, marked by a city plaque on the eastern side of the tracks stating that fact. Despite such identification, when the city circulated its Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), its low level environmental review for this project, there was no mention of the existence of a Monarch overwintering site. Similar to the city’s neglecting to mention in its initial MND for the Wharf Master Plan, the existence of the migratory Guillemots that nest under the Wharf before returning to the far north each year. 

Monarch under the trestle bridge eucalyptus grove earlier this year

When the city was alerted to these omissions, the respective MND’s were required to be re-circulated with the “missing” butterflies and birds included the next time around. Nevertheless, the final environmental documents concluded no significant impact to either species from the rail trail or the Wharf Master Plan. For the rail trail project, the city does not consider the trestle eucalyptus grove to be a Monarch butterfly habitat despite erecting a plaque stating that it is. I guess the Monarch I found at this site on Saturday failed to read the MND. To compensate for any eradicated butterflies, even though they don’t exist, Segment 7 Phase 2 of the rail trail will include butterfly artwork for the retaining wall as well as mechanical Monarchs with moving parts. Some supporters find this exciting.

We may live long enough to witness the extinction of these amazing Monarch butterflies or Brown Wanderers as they are called in Australia. Not a happy note on which to end a difficult year. 

Trying to think of a happy ending… I would be happy if when faced with an environmental impact to be studied, city top staff did not fudge facts to fit an a priori agenda. I would be happy if council members listened more to the public rather than kowtow to staff. I would be happy if moneyed interests held less sway at city hall. I would be happy if trying to preserve what’s left of Santa Cruz were supported and not dismissed as NIMBY “nostalgia.”

Lots of good work for the New Year!

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

December 21

YEAR END IN REVIEW

Who Won in 2020

  • Eight counties along the coast of California reflected true progressive credentials insuring there is at least a Northern California “left coast” (okay, LA county too). These counties include S.F., Marin, Alameda, Sonoma, and Santa Cruz. The voters in these counties cast ballots tax business property (Prop. 15) to help fund schools and government services; believe in the power of affirmative action policies to right past discriminatory practices (Prop. 16); agree that 17-year olds should be able to vote in a presidential primary (Prop. 18) when they will be 18 by that year’s Nov. election; want cities to be able to expand rent control through a vote of locals; and there were large constituencies who do not believe Uber and Lyft and DoorDash’s $200 plus million largesse campaign should be able to buy laws (Prop. 22) and decide California labor policies. Believe it or not, the US was looking to California to lead the way on these important public policy decisions. As a state, we failed the nation at a critical juncture in our history, but I suspect we will be coming back on all of these initiatives.
  • Santa Cruz City Councilmember, Sandy Brown. Consistent. Leftist. Willing to speak her mind. She is a gem that we all need to keep on polishing as she will only get better.
  • Prop 17 restored the right of felons to vote after they served their sentence. This surprisingly won statewide. Surprising, only because Props 15, 16, 18, and 22 did not go in the progressives, or socialists, win column.
  • Manu Koenig defeated 12-year incumbent, and perhaps this county’s leading progressive voice, John Leopold. (Now it is up to you, Sandy Brown!) And it wasn’t even a close election. I am still trying to figure it out. Some will of course say that they have the answer and it was “trail only” movement that catapulted Koenig into office, or that the voters wanted a fresh younger face. It might just be possible that Manu did a better job in spending his hundreds of thousands than John did in spending his. Over $300 k was spent in the race. What the results do indicate to is a possible sprint by politicos toward the center. Third district supervisor, Ryan Coonerty appears to be teaming up with center-right SC city councilmember Renee Golder in fighting needle distribution. Both are feeling very centrist-ee and have signed on to an anti-science, anti-homeless, kick-the-vulnerable-when-they’re-down lawsuit. Centrist Dem and former SC mayor, David Terrazas, is the plaintiff’s attorney. Denise Elerick and the Harm Reduction Coalition are BIG winners this year. They received state authorization in August to dispense and collect syringes from people who use injection drugs,” according to Santa Cruz Local, but now have to deal with this law suit.

Groups to Watch in 2021

  • Campaign for Sustainable Transportation (CFST), Don’t Bury the Library (DBL), Downtown Commons Advocates (DCA), People’s Democratic Club (PDC), and Santa Cruz County Action Climate Network (SC SCAN). These groups are winners this year if only because they have continued to fight the good fight to rebuild the downtown library using Measure S funds. These groups also continue to plant seeds for a downtown commons/park and permanent home for the Wednesday Farmer’s Market, all the while staving off the group Downtown “Forward’s” trickster PR campaign to build a five-story parking garage for the real estate and developer class on Lot 4 downtown next to Toadal Fitness. Bravo! Living to fight another day folks, if 2020 has taught us anything that’s what one value all of these groups have in common during the Covid-19 lockdown.
  • DSA, Santa Cruz. The Democratic Socialists are now the hottest, most effective local progressive political force in Santa Cruz County, perhaps now surpassing SC4Bernie. They have more working groups than Santa Cruz has city commissions, everything from Racial Justice, alternatives to policing, electoral, and their Love Boat working group helps feed the community’s growing houseless population. Between the DSA critique of “defund the police” to its fierce support for SC city councilmember Brown, to leading some of the largest protests this past year, 2021 may be the year DSA/Santa Cruz finally begins to feel comfortable and gets its Santa Cruz political groove going. The group’s membership, which hovered around 25 a few years ago, now tops 350. They have slowly been consummating the wedding between the town’s progressive activism and university student radicalism. Look for this group to still have their internal differences as they move forward, construct their share of insider firing squads, but likely come out of it with principled, constructive, and consistent leadership for Santa Cruz. Which way to 2022? The DSA will be presente!

SideNotes
The law firm, “Atchisone, Barisone &/$ (Tony) Condotti, A Professional Corporation,” handle city attorney services for the city of Santa Cruz. They scored big in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan world this past year. They received $275, 200, for 16 employees, from the Feds according to a July report by Gerben Law. (https://www.gerbenlaw.com/blog/law-firms-that-received-ppp-loans/) I have to wonder if the city is paying them any less than the $1 million-plus they shelled out last year for “legal services” to fight the Ross Camp lawsuit and politically tar and feather Drew Glover among other expenses. Remember the now discredited attorney Reed Gallogly’s remarks on DruGlover, “drug lover” in court? I doubt Covid-19 affects that contract. To city attorney Condotti’s credit, he did quickly dispense of Gallogly’s services. On another side note, Penrose, Chun, & Gorman LLP, a Santa Cruz firm, also received PPP loans totaling $166,282 according to the same web site. Grunsky Law Firm PC of Watsonville received $520,484 covering their 27 employees. These were three firms among the 14,363 law firms receiving PPP loans of $150,000 or more.

Happy New Year everyone! See you next year and thanks so much for your support over the past year, and the past four years, really. These are tough times, but the Santa Cruz I know from the ’55 flood to the ’89 earthquake to 2008 recession and all the way through the complete wacko presidency of Trump and the Covid-19 meltdown, we will prevail and be stronger for it. You are the best! Thanks to Bruce Bratton and Gunilla Leavitt for their unstinting dedication to getting these words out each week. Congratulations! See you next year.

Bernie and AOC Tweets of the Week

“One major difference between GOP and Dems is that GOP leverage their right flank to gain policy concessions and generate enthusiasm, while Dems lock their left flank in the basement bc they think that will make Republicans be nicer to them.” (Dec. 20)
“Never forget. The same “centrists” who tell us we cannot afford to give the working class and seniors a direct payment to pay the rent and feed their families during a pandemic, all voted to give the bloated Pentagon a record $740 billion without “paying for it.” Unacceptable!” (Dec. 19)

In case you are wondering who sets the Progressive agenda in the electoral world of these not so United States, check out this list of the progressives’ “Fighting Fifteen.” It is a beautiful thing to behold. 

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
December 21 

STATE LEGISLATION PROPOSED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT ALL BUILDING IN RURAL AREAS
Watch out…this is bad news for Santa Cruz County rural residents and businesses!

On the first day of the 2021-2022 Legislative sessions, Senator Henry Stern (D-Calabasas), introduced Senate Bill 55, which would prohibit all commercial and residential development in Very High Fire Hazards Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) and State Responsibility Areas (SRA).  This measure is identical to the unsuccessful SB 474, a last-minute effort by Senator Stern

SB 55

The legislation could be considered on January 7, 2021.  Contact your local and State representatives right away.

Senator Stern’s attempt at this last year with SB 474 stated:

For purposes of this section, “development” means either of the following:

(1) A project containing residential dwellings, including, but not limited to, mobilehomes, accessory dwelling units, and junior accessory dwelling units, of one or more units or a subdivision of land for the purpose of constructing one or more residential dwelling units.

(2) A project for commercial, retail, or industrial use.

SEC. 2.

 The Legislature finds and declares that the prohibition on the creation or approval of a new development within a zone of high fire danger as specified in this act is a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair

SB 474

STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY MOVES FORWARD WITH NEW RULES TO RESTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT CERTAIN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS
This news, released recently by the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC) also indicates the rural dwellers are under government siege.  Contact your reps. now:

The California Board of Forestry (BOF) released proposed revisions to its State Fire Safe regulations. These rules set forth basic wildfire protection standards for development in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones of both the State Responsibility Area (SRA) and the Local Responsibility Area (LRA) beginning July 1, 2021.

The draft rulemaking, presented at the BOF Joint Committee on Tuesday, provided the first opportunity for the public to evaluate the specific changes being proposed to the fire safe standards.  At the meeting, RCRC staff conveyed serious concerns regarding the scope of the changes, and the extraordinary impacts this proposal will have on housing production, not only in rural areas of the state, but also in more urbanized regions of California. 

For instance, the draft regulations would prohibit any future building construction on property served by a road that has not been upgraded, or that cannot be upgraded to meet current standards, such as dead-end roads. These upgrade requirements include road widening, re-surfacing, leveling grades and curves, and bridge improvements, from the property line to the nearest fire station, and apply to the building of a single residential unit or any business increasing its “service capacity.”  All required upgrades would be at the expense of the property owner.

California Board of Forestry Unveils New Draft Fire Safe Regulations | Rural Counties

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT GIVES SPECIAL PRIVILEGES TO SWENSON BUILDER AT THE APTOS VILLAGE PROJECT THAT NO OTHER CUSTOMERS ARE PRIVILEGED TO RECEIVE???
Soquel Creek Water District policy requires that any developer pay in-full all fees associated with the application for new water service…EXCEPT Swenson Builder!  The Board granted a five-year variance in 2015 for Swenson to post a bond for $538,000 (guaranteeing they would pay) and waived payment of  $1,263,513.41 (that’s over $1.2 million!!!) in fees that everybody else is required to pay up-front, to be paid when the development is operational.  

Findings: 

A – Granting the variance is required by special circumstances applicable to the property and as a result of which the strict application of District resolutions and ordinances would cause the property to be deprived of privileges enjoyed by other similar properties in the District; 

B – Granting the variance would be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the ordinances, resolutions and policies of the District but would not be materially detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare.; 

C – Granting of the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with those placed upon other parcels where payment in full is required prior to executing the subdivision agreement. 

(See page 4: 12-15-20 Board Packet)

See page 8 for the undated letter from Swenson, crying about their problems.  (The truth of the matter is that the County of Santa Cruz Public Works Dept. intends to assist Swenson and declare Eminent Domain against the Bayview Hotel and Trout Gulch Crossing property owners to force closure of their private crossing to Soquel Drive, a condition imposed upon Swenson by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for their new private crossing at Parade Street.)  

See page 16 for the terms of this sweet back-room deal with Swenson.

Board President Bruce Daniels made it clear that Swenson is the ONLY developer that the District has granted this privilege, and did not feel it was right to extend the favor.

However, the Board again granted that variance for another two years and yet another two years if Swenson needs it.  Director Tom LaHue expressed the concern that maybe Swenson doesn’t have the money, and has been operating on the assumption that the variance would be extended, so not granting the variance could impose a hardship! 

What about all the other developers?  They should all line up and demand this privilege as well.  

Swenson also got special privileges regarding metering that saves them lots of money.  The developers at Rancho del Mar Center somehow learned of this and likewise asked for the favor when the remodeling was about to begin.  The Board had no choice but to grant the privilege to them, because after all, they had done so for Swenson at the Aptos Village Project.

TWO MEN WITH BIG EGOS REPEATEDLY PREVENTED AN INTELLIGENT WOMAN FROM BECOMING A LEADER: SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT BOARD VOTED STATUS QUO
Bruce Daniels and Tom LaHue played “King of the Mountain” last Tuesday to prevent Board member Carla Christensen  from becoming Vice-President.  It was sickening.  Not only did they shove Ms. Christensen aside, Bruce Daniels essentially made it known that he has little confidence in the strength of newly-elected Board President Rachel Lather, explaining that it is necessary to have someone knowledgeable to train the new Vice-President, and therefore Tom should be in Vice-President this year, and maybe the Board could consider Carla for Vice President next year, when Tom would be President.

Bruce Daniels’ initial motion to elect Tom as Vice-President did not gain a majority of vote to pass. But he refused to accept that result.

When a call for a second motion came to the floor, Bruce Daniels AGAIN nominated Tom LaHue for Vice President!  At that point, Bruce Jaffe nominated Carla Christensen.   The vote on that motion was Tom voting for himself, along with Bruce Daniels, and Carla voting for herself, along with Bruce Jaffe, and newly-elected president Rachel Lather abstaining, with no explanation.

Carla, who has been asking to be the Vice-President for three years straight, explained that she felt the Board and ratepayers benefit when there is a rotation of leadership, and cited the example of past eras when Dan Kriege was the President for decades.  Tom and Bruce Daniels have merely traded the job of President and Vice-President for years and years.

Tom explained that the reason he was so determined to be Vice-President was because he has worked hard for years on the PureWater Soquel Project and it will be due to come online in 2022, when he would be President.  Essentially… so that his ego could fill the aquifer and no doubt, the headlines of the press.

Sadly, Bruce Jaffe suggested the Board decide who would serve as Vice-President with a coin toss.  Carla said she detested that method of choosing a leader, so withdrew her nomination for Vice President.  

Shame on Bruce Daniels and Tom LaHue, for claiming they support gender equality and justice, but taking actions that clearly show their egos reign supreme.

Listen on YouTube to the disgusting process at about minute 1:25:00

SOQUEL CREEK WATER BOARD: SPEND $600,000 FOR A STUDY BUT NO MONEY TO BUILD THE PROJECT
Rather than abandon the Country Club Well in Seascape, which is polluted with a carcinogen, the Board approved spending $600,000 for environmental analysis and design of a 1.2.3-TCP  Treatment Plant at 521 Baltrusol and  drill a new well, in the same contaminated location.  Engineering Director, Taj Dufour admitted this will be a multi-million project but the District has no money to build anything.  See plans on pages 147-148.  

Why not just abandon the Country Club Well and drill in another area not plagued by this carcinogenic contamination? This is the only well contaminated with the carcinogen.   Or not drill a new well at the cost of $600,000-$800,000, and instead rely on the water from the new supply provided by the Granite Way Well in Aptos Village Project?

It appears that the District leadership feels money is no object.

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT: NO MONEY TO FUND CAPITAL OPERATING RESERVES THIS YEAR.
District Financial Director Leslie Strohm let that bomb drop, citing a memo, before turning over the floor to the auditor.  That means there is no money available this year to increase the fund for maintenance and infrastructure improvements.

Where did the money go to build the new Quail Run Storage Tank behind the Aptos Post Office?  The design and environmental analysis is done.  The legal threats of the neighborhood, thrust by attorney Bill Parkin, now a resident of Aptos Village Project, were settled.  The District borrowed millions in a Bond to build it.  The tank has not been built.  The District just returned $5.7 million from the Bond money not spent, in order to take out a loan to build the PureWater Soquel Project.  That Project is a risky and expensive plan to pressure-inject treated sewage water into the MidCounty aquifer and force private well owners nearby, as well as District customers, to drink it.

Director Tom LaHue admitted earlier in the evening that financial reports are not his strong-point.  That explains why all he and the other Board members could say about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Status Report was that the photographs inserted in the Report by Financial Director Leslie Strohm were very nice.

See the Report and the Memo, page 182

WATER CONTAMINATION FROM PLASTIC PIPES… WHENEVER THERE IS A FIRE?
Take a look at this and ask your local water supplier what they would do to flush lines in your neighborhood if there were a house fire?

Plastic pipes are polluting drinking water systems after wildfires – it’s a risk in urban fires, too

Here is the link to the new study released last week showing that at temperatures of only 200-400 degrees Celsius (392-752 degrees Fahrenheit), plastic water pipes begin to leach harmful contaminants:

Drinking water contamination from the thermal degradation of plastics: implications for wildfire and structure fire response

This could happen in a small structure fire, and potentially affect the home or business water quality for a very long time.  That’s something to think about.

“IF YOU HAVE SPOKEN, YOU MUST LEAVE!”
Carlos Palacios tried to censor the nearly 40 members of the public who testified December 10, many upset with the economic hemorrhage of the County’s policies and draconian shutdowns.  Carlos Palacios, the CAO, repeatedly sent the sheriff deputy into the corridor to reason with people.  Exasperated, Palacios issued the shocking orders “If you have spoken, you must leave!  We cannot have crowds!”  

What if those people also wanted to swoon over John Leopold’s honorary celebration that was waiting to happen? (Leopold kept passing  notes to Caput that were followed by Chair Caput pleading with the people lined up to speak that they really had to get moving with the other things on the Board’s agenda, and he had to soon cut off the public speaking time (already reduced from three to two minutes per person).

OMITTING A CRITICAL PIECE OF INFORMATION…CONTAMINATION AT MIDPEN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT IN LIVE OAK
This good report by Sentinel reporter Hannah Hagemann discussed the serious contamination problem at the 1500 Capitola Road affordable housing and medical clinic development.  Oddly, the headline in the print version of the article omitted all reference to contamination. 

Mixed-use affordable housing project moves ahead, despite contamination

THIS PUBLICLY-FINANCED AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES A VOTE BY THE PEOPLE, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 34 OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION
This may be the only way to stop the County Redevelopment Successor Agency from forcing poor people to live on top of a contaminated site without cleaning it up first...not just monitoring the level of toxic vapors seeping into the buildings.  Better move quickly on this idea…legislation just was proposed to repeal Article 34:

SCA 2, introduced by Senators Ben Allen and Scott Wiener, would, if approved by voters statewide, repeal Article XXXIV (34) of the California Constitution, which requires voter approval for publicly financed affordable housing developments. 

California Legislators Introduce New Bills as 2021 Session Kicks Off

MAKE ONE CALL.   WRITE ONE LETTER.  DO SOMETHING KIND THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Happy Winter Solstice,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

December 19
#354 / Your Brain Is Not For Thinking

Lisa Feldman Barrett is a distinguished professor of psychology at Northeastern University. In a November 24, 2020, column in The New York Times, Barrett makes what struck me as a rather extraordinary claim – the claim I have featured in my title today: “Your brain isn’t made for thinking.” 

What, we might well ask, is our brain made for then, if not for thinking? Barrett says that the brain has mainly evolved to supervise the operations of our physical body, and to make sure that adequate resources will be available whenever the body and its organs make demands. The brain oversees what Barrett calls our body’s “budget,” “automatically predicting and preparing to meet the body’s [physical] needs before they arise.” 

One of the points that Barrett makes is that “in body-budgeting terms, [the] distinction between mental and physical is not meaningful. … There is no such thing as a purely mental cause, because every mental experience has roots in the physical budgeting of your body.”

Certain practices I associate with Buddism – breath meditation for instance – are illustrations of how this works in practice. We can achieve “insight” or “knowledge” not by “thinking” but by a proper relationship with our body and its processes. 

Barrett ends her column with the following observations: 

We’re all living in challenging times, and we’re all at high risk for disrupted body budgets. If you feel weary from the pandemic and you’re battling a lack of motivation, consider your situation from a body-budgeting perspective. Your burden may feel lighter if you understand your discomfort as something physical. When an unpleasant thought pops into your head, like “I can’t take this craziness anymore,” ask yourself body-budgeting questions. “Did I get enough sleep last night? Am I dehydrated? Should I take a walk? Call a friend? Because I could use a deposit or two in my body budget.”

This is not a semantic game. It’s about making new meaning from your physical sensations to guide your actions.

I’m not saying you can snap your fingers and dissolve deep misery, or sweep away depression with a change of perspective. I’m suggesting that it’s possible to acknowledge what your brain is actually doing and take some comfort from it. Your brain is not for thinking. Everything that it conjures, from thoughts to emotions to dreams, is in the service of body budgeting. This perspective, adopted judiciously, can be a source of resilience in challenging times.

What Barrett is saying here seems like good advice to me. It’s practical advice, too. However, my mind went on from Barrett’s practical observations to my own speculations. With apologies to Barrett, I would have to call my speculations “thinking.” What I started thinking about was what seems to have happened to our brains in some evolutionary way. 

Presuming that Barrett is right, and that our brains were not “made for thinking,” we do use those brains to “think.” If so, doesn’t that mean that we have somehow pushed our brains into an activity that Nature did not, and perhaps does not, really intend? In fact, our “thinking” is associated (in our minds) with an implicit assertion that we are more than our “bodies,” and that “we” have some sort of real existence that is more than, and that is above and beyond, our bodily and physical existence.

Religious types will remember the Garden of Eden. Our natural physical bodies suddenly seemed shameful, according to the Bible, and we got kicked out of our right relationship with the Natural World. 

And here we are!

The human desire to master the Natural World, rather than to live within its boundaries, is an assertion that we, as human beings, should be establishing the reality we inhabit. And, of course, we largely do that. We have even pushed our poor brains into “thinking,” something for which, apparently, they were not designed, and we have used our “thinking” to direct us in establishing our mastery over the Natural World, a mastery which our “thinking” allows us to claim and to which we aspire. 

Take a deep breath (and pay attention). That’s one way to try to establish peace and harmony between ourselves and the World of Nature. I wish I thought that were going to be enough. 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “FORTITUDE”

“…The primroses always come back. Even after a hard winter, they find a way to survive. They come back every spring.”
~Susan Meissner, The Shape of Mercy 

“Let’s be very clear: Strong men – men who are truly role models – don’t need to put down women to make themselves feel powerful. People who are truly strong lift others up. People who are truly powerful bring others together”.
~Michelle Obama

“It takes incredible fortitude to keep on the road, even though it’s fun and it’s rewarding and you can’t complain – it’s just a great life – but, you know, it takes a lot of energy”.
~Kate Pierson

2020, the year that wouldn’t end. Here is an excellent recap, featuring songs from some of my favorite musicals, but with 2020 lyrics. Enjoy, and I’ll see you in 2021!!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

December 16 – 22, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…College towns voting for Biden, Quarnstrom poetry book, Scribner Statue news. GREENSITE… on how to ruin a historic icon: the Wharf and where to go from here. KROHN…District elections, conservatives & moderates, ranked choice voting, direct election of the mayor. STEINBRUNER…no column this week, Becky is filing a legal brief re. PureWater Soquel Project EIR. PATTON…Leftists and Moderates should get along. EAGAN…Classic Subconscious Comics and more Deep Cover opinions. QUOTES…”GIFTS”

...

SANTA CRUZ CHRISTMAS EARTHQUAKE FLOOD. December 22, 1955. This is Pacific Avenue between what is now Rip N’ Curl and Paper Vision. This was also just about the week that Wally Trabing first started writing for the Sentinel. 

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE December 14      

DANCING IN LOS ANGELES. Big thanks to Scott MacClelland for finding this breathtaking video and using it in his Performing Arts Monterey Bay weekly

HOW BERKELEY AND SANTA CRUZ VOTED. Thanks to the Berkeley Daily Planet we now know what we probably suspected all along…Cities and towns with large student populations whose major employer is a college or university also tend to be strongly anti-Trump and pro-Biden. In addition to Berkeley, Cambridge and Amherst Mass, Evanston Illinois and the city of Ithaca New York make the list of cities with under 10% support for Trump. If you look at cities where Trump got only 10-15%, you’ll find even more college towns, including Santa Cruz, Davis and Palo Alto in California; Ann Arbor, Michigan; Madison, Wisconsin; Boulder Colorado; Charlottesville, Virginia; Hanover, New Hampshire, and Burlington, Vermont.  Other cities where Trump managed only 10-15% include San Francisco; Portland, Oregon; Baltimore, Maryland; New Haven and Hartford, Connecticut; Richmond, Virginia, and Richmond, California. How Berkeley Voted Biden 93.3% Trump 4.0% – Trump Vote Second Lowest in Nation -Rob Wrenn

QUARNSTROM BOOK OF POETRY. Lee Quarnstrom is a noted reporter for the San Jose Mercury and the Watsonville Pajaronian. He also mucked about with the Merry Pranksters and we had many, many party nights together. He’s lived in La Habra for almost two decades. His wife Christine just wrote a book of fine poetry titled “I Knew I Was a Girl”, which she calls a memoir in poetry. In addition to a fine cover photo of Christine at a party with James Dean, it is full of poems that will impress you with their soul, humor and very unique style. You can order it at Bookshop Santa Cruz, or online at Amazon. (ps. There are some surprising stories involving Lee ,that I’d never heard.) 

TOM SCRIBNER, SCOPE PARK AND THE STATUE. During a recent interview on KSQD, Tom Noddy was a little vague on some details when he was talking about Tom Scribner and the statue’s conception. Marghe McMahon (that’s “Mar-“gee”, rhymes with “Mar key”) was a sculpture student at UCSC, and Professor Doyle Foreman was her teacher. On her own she decided to make that statue of Tom. She didn’t have enough money to pay for the bronze so Tom’s idea was to create a Musical Saw Festival, with the ticket sales to go to Marghe. That Musical Saw Fest drew, and has continued to draw, players and audiences from around the world, especially China. The organizers of S.C.O.P.E. welcomed the statue into SCOPE Park. SCOPE stood for Santa Cruz Organization for Progress and Euthenics. They managed the small triangle area at the intersection of Pacific and Mission streets by the Town Clock. Unfortunately Larry Edler and other Republicans in our then “right wing” town objected to the leftist Scribner statue being in so prominent a spot, and demanded its removal. Fortunately Neil Coonerty – then owner of Bookshop Santa Cruz – kindly offered a much more prominent location, right in front of the Bookshop, where it remains today. One other little-known fact is that Marghe was shocked, hurt, and disappointed when, in the final casting cool-off, the back of the statue collapsed! It’s hardly noticeable, and looks more like Tom’s aged frame. 

Scrolling around the tech universe to find something/anything worthwhile to watch can take patience, time, and disappointment. To aid your search I’ve added “Single” to the movies that are complete in one screening and “Series” to those with episodes.

PROM. [single] This is a big new musical, in every sense of the word. It stars Meryl Streep singing, dancing and mugging her way through this simple copy of a Stephen Sondheim-type show. Even though the “plot” centers on our serious and contemporary prejudice against gay men and lesbians, Streep, Nicole Kidman and James Corden make it all cute, flashy, obvious, and not quite memorable. 

UNDERWATER. [single] A truly unbelievable copy of every deep sea monster movie we’ve ever seen. Kristin Stewart and Vincent Cassel are in charge of a six mile deep oil drilling station in the Marianna Straits, or maybe Los Angeles! If you stay awake or interested long enough, you can see T.J. Miller – the geeky neighbor from the old Silicon Valley series – doing very little to keep this poorly-plotted saga from sinking deeper. 47 RT

THE GODFATHER. [series]. Now that Francis Ford Coppola has re-hashed and edited Godfather III into the newly released The Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone, I wanted to see just how memorable the series was/is. Watching Marlon Brando with stuffed cheeks, Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, James Caan, Robert Duvall and good old and evil Sterling Hayden brings back many memories of the 1972 original thriller. Watch it again.

WHAT WE WANTED. [single] An Austrian relationship challenge. A couple can’t have children – whose fault is it? His or hers? We watch and relate to their struggle. They take a vacation in Sardinia. The couple next door add huge problems to our main characters. If you’ve had issues in your relationships, this may or may not be your best choice…but you will relate to this saga, I guarantee.

RAGNAROK. [series] A Norwegian environmental adventure. An interesting mix of Norse legends, Wagner, Thor and his hammer and all that jazz – except no Valkyries!!! A little Norway town called Edda is controlled by a PG& E type monster organization. Only Magne, the young hero – who looks like Chris Krohn – can save them. Good fun IF you like Norse/Viking/rune type history. 67 on RTomatoes. 

Still new Idea. The movies below are not ranked in any particular order. I’ve eliminated some of the most boring, time wasting flops…enjoy what’s left!!

MANK. [single] Mank is short for Mankiewicz as in Herman Mankiewicz who was the screenwriter of  Orson Welles “Citizen Kane”. C. Kane for non movie goers has been generally regarded as the best movie ever made. It’s on several worldwide “best of” lists and you owe it yourselves to see it at least once. But Mank the movie is mostly made for movie nuts. Amanda Seyfried plays Marion Davies, Charles Dance is William Randolph Hearst, and Tom Burke is Orson Welles. Mank was a professional screenwriter who drank more than anybody and somehow managed to finish the script for Citizen Kane just in time. Gary Oldman is way over the top when he plays Mank, but with the flash of this very Hollywood script he fits in perfectly. You’ll love it.

THE MITFORDS. [single] A fine documentary movie about the wild, wooly, and brilliant  six Mitford sisters. Plus there’s info here for all Santa Cruzans who remember when Jessica Mitford visited and lectured at UCSC. It should be called A Tale of Two Sisters. Jessica who we called Decca was an ardent left wing proponent. She married Oakland Civil Rights Attorney Robert Truehaft and they both attended my wedding in San Francisco back in 1967. Decca’s sister Diana was actually in love with Adolf Hitler and remained that far fascist right all of her life.  Watch this documentary it’s a family like no other.

A RAINY DAY IN NEW YORK. [single] This is Woody Allen’s newest movie and although it bears a lot of resemblance to his earlier movies it’s only a poor copy at best.  It has a 45 on Rotten Tomatoes and that’s generous. Elle Fanning plays a poor copy of Diane Keaton in Annie Hall doing her flighty-nutty best to be like other humans. Jude Law is in it too but we’ll never figure out why, he does nothing to further anything. Timothee Chalamat is the usual Woody Allen type character in the movie and he has little reason to be there either.  It lacks the charm, sharp humor, social commentary and the class of what used to be Woody’s signature on cinema.

GHOSTS OF WAR. This World War II movie has a handful of  American troops occupying  a house that once belonged to a family that was tortured by the Nazis. The troops have visions both of the past and of the future including war scenes in Afghanistan. It’s about PTSD in the extreme. Maybe there are ghosts, maybe not. The makeup is poorly done, the acting is amateur at best. 

HILLBILLY ELEGY. A startling and impressive cast including Glen Close and Amy Adams in this movie directed by Ron Howard makes it worth watching. It’s a depressing story taken from the biography of J.D.Vance the author. He had a horrific, cruel childhood with a drug addict from law school. Heroic but depressing and it’s probably even worse than your childhood. Watch it but stay happy anyways.

PROFESSOR T. [series] Egged on by daughter Jennifer I too really liked the Belgian crime series Professor T. It’s not easily available so try going to PBS Passport series, its well worth your searching time. The Professor teaches at the Antwerp University and is a habitual germophobe. He advises the local police and detectives and manages to bring in humor which makes this 3 series very enjoyable. Beware of the German version and the Czech copy, 

LOVE AND ANARCHY. [series] It’s a Swedish half comedy with a fine plot. A beautiful babe who is mother to two children gets a job in a publishing company. There’s a lot of film buff material like Ingmar Bergman references, and that’s fun. But then the babe Sofie starts flirting and gets flirting back from a much younger techie at the company. How she and he handle it and their lives makes it fascinating and we get to watch the rise and fall of their relationship and the publishing house.

CARMEL or WHO KILLED MARIA MARTA. This documentary takes place not in Our Carmel but in Carmel, Buenos Aires. Thought to be an accident Marias body was found drowned in her bathtub. After much politics and news reporters telling of the story bullets were discovered  in her skull. Well paced, excellently timed, perfectly photographed, this is one to enjoy as the unsuspected truth is unraveled.

EYE FOR AN EYE. This is a Spanish drama and one you won’t forget. A wealthy, feared drug lord wants to get out of the “business” and goes to a rest home to retire. As luck has it he gets assigned to a male nurse who has suffered greatly from his unwanted connections with drug use. He has to decide in many ways whether or not to revenge the wrongs that were done to him. How he treats the drug king is so touching and revealing…and well done.

THE LIFE AHEAD. To see Sophia Loren at age 86, and see her looking like she’s 86 is a treat. She plays a holocaust survivor who acts as mother to some children of prostitutes.  Her interaction with a Senegalese 14 year old boy is a neat piece of cinema and it’s directed by her son Edourdo Ponti. 

THE MAN WITHOUT GRAVITY. Another Italian near fable about a baby born and floating to the ceiling attached to his umbilical cord. What he does with his life, and his decisions about letting the world know he floats make a near masterpiece. Not too near Italian Classics like “Life Is Beautiful” or “Amarcord” it’s still fun to think about.

THE 12TH MAN. The 12th Man is one of 12 Norwegian resistance soldiers who plan to blow up the Nazi invaders of their land. The Nazis kill 11 and the extra brave survivor becomes the target of a Nazi general. The very most loyal locals help hide the man who suffers terribly from ice, rain, and bullets survive and he makes it finally and safely back to Sweden. Fine film (or movie) and it’s based on a true story.  

CROWN. [series] I binged watched almost all of the new fourth season of Crown last Sunday, and loved it. Margaret Thatcher, The Falkland Islands, and of course Princess Diana make for exciting and involving viewing. Super acting and gorgeous photography make it even better. It’s odd and curious how Americans remain so hooked on and fascinated by England’s hierarchy. Not one in a thousand of us could tell you who runs Canada or Mexico but Britain’s Elizabeth’s and Diana’s secrets just never stop hooking us in. By all means view this Netflix series.   

INDUSTRY. [series] A young black female student from NYC goes to London to handle a job with a huge financial institution. She competes, challenges, loses, and wins against her fellow young employees. Well written, great acting, extra fast moving with little script padding. It’s on HBO and got a 78 on Rotten Tomatoes for its’ first episode. 

FIREBALL: VISITORS FROM DARKER WORLDS. If you are a fan or follower of Werner Hertzog ( Fitzcarraldo, Heart of Glass, Lessons of Darkness) you won’t be surprised to know this new “documentary” of his involves visitors from outer space. Herzog and crew travel the earth finding bits and pieces of meteorites millimeters across to craters measuring miles across that have some traces of outer space creation. This movie makes a strong case for extraterrestrial life, and for the idea that we have been ignoring messages from way out there. Good to watch.   

THE QUEENS GAMBIT. [series]This earned a 100 on Rotten Tomatoes and deserved it. It’s from a novel about an orphan who learns chess from the janitor. She takes pills to cause phantom chess games, drinks , and in spite of all her weaknesses she manages to take on and beat almost every world champion. You don’t need to know chess to enjoy it.

SECRETS OF THE SAQQARA TOMB. [single] A straight documentary about how archeology works. It digs around a pharaoh’s tomb and will teach you much more about archeology than you thought you knew. It’s a change from what we “normally” watch.

THE UNDOING. [series] (HBO) Nicole Kidman and a older looking and very serious Hugh Grant take the leads as a gorgeous psychiatrist who’s married to a kind and empathetic doctor. They have a son who has a beautiful girlfriend. Everything’s fine until a murder happens. Being HBO this takes weeks to watch and the first three episodes look good so far. The finale is terrible and makes us wish we never watched any of this series. 

 DOLLY PARTON: HERE I AM. We’ll never see an off-screen minute of Dolly Parton. She’s always on and always surprising. She’s written over 3000 songs, she’s 74 years old, been married 30 years and this documentary is wonderful whether you are a fan or not.  Jane Fonda and Lilly Tomlin love her and talk about their friendship when they made “9 to 5”. Click on it.  

BORAT: SUBSEQUENT MOVIEFILM. [single] Supposedly a follow up to Sasha Baron Cohen’s earlier Borat movie. I copied some adjectives from other critics that I agree with…repugnant, filthy, incestuous, shocking, crude, cringing, appalling, harsh, repellent, menstrual and more. It also has a very strange actual scene with Rudy Giuliani and another with Tom Hanks that I’ll never figure out. Do not watch this mess.

THE TRIAL OF THE CHICAGO 7. [single]This new movie written and directed by Aaron Sorkin is a fascinating movie , a good movie BUT it simply isn’t an honest look at what happened at the trial of the Chicago 7. Characters are added, romances are hinted at and Eddie Redmayne’s role as Tom Hayden is simply off base. Senator Bill Monning sent me a critique of the movie by Rennie Davis who is/was part of the 7. Former Santa Cruz Mayor Chris Krohn sent me another political reaction from the Berkeley Barb. They agree that this movie really adds lightness and Hollywood touches to a very important civil rights stepping stone. Watch it but be very aware. I’m also proud to tell you that on October 30, 2008 our then State Assemblyman Bill Monning (now our retired Calif. Senator) brought Tom Hayden to my KZSC radio program Universal Grapevine. We didn’t talk about his marriage to Jane Fonda and the movie doesn’t touch it either.   

BORGEN. [series]I started watching this series months ago, it’s one of the finest series I’ve seen. Now the world’s critics and audiences are catching up on it. Here’s what I wrote back on Feb. 5…

Borgen translates as “the castle” in Danish, and I must tell you that I’ve been totally immersed in this three season iTunes saga since my daughter Hillary found and recommended it. It’s the story of a woman who becomes the first female Prime Minister of Denmark. If you like politics and wonder what a politician’s life is like, forget any American versions and watch this instead. The show started in 2010, and from what I hear it won’t go past the third series. Forget “Veep”, “House of Cards”, “The West Wing” and the rest… Borgen is far superior. I’d give you your money back IF and etc….but it would be too much trouble, and you’ll love it too. Now there’s talk of a fourth episode to be released in 2021 with the original cast and on Netflix.

CALL MY AGENT. Daughter Hillary found this one and she’s right, it’s a good one. There might be a problem in finding this one under that title on Netflix, if so try “Dix Pour Cent”. Billed as a comedy it centers on the lives of the talent agents and stars who work at a famous show biz agency in Paris. Tempers, jokes, love affairs, and much talent all get very mixed and still it’s almost riveting.

THE GLORIAS. [single] This bio-pic of Gloria Steinem is a good one. Julianne Moore, Alicia Vikander and two more women/girls play her in this near dream like history of the womens’ movement and her part in it. Julie Taymor directed it and does portray Gloria as her real mini-skirt, long nails gorgeous self. Timothy Hutton is in it too nut he shouldn’t have been. It has much fantasy, dreams, animation and oddly placed moves that obscure the important view of women’s equality fights that Steinman was an integral part of. Bette Midler plays Bella Abzug. Watch it, and don’t snicker at the odd ball parts

EMILY IN PARIS. [series] Lily Collins is Emily. Emily is from Chicago and is sent to Paris as a company rep. The Paris group doesn’t like her and Emily has a rough time adjusting to France. Cute, clever, time consuming, charming, and I imagine the series will be the same.

TEHRAN. It has a 93 on Rotten Tomatoes!! An international spy killer-thrill series. It mixes Iran, Tehran, Jordan, Israel’s internal wars with a young woman’s attempt to steal government high tech secrets. Complex, well acted, and if you can keep up with identities, you can continue forgetting about movie theatres.

CRIMINAL. [series] This is an unusual series that consists of four different story lines on four different websites. There’s Criminal: United Kingdom, Criminal: Germany, Criminal: Spain and Criminal: France. All episodes were filmed in Spain and center on criminals each being questioned and interviewed in exactly the same interrogating room with a very important two-way mirror separating them from the cops and legal team. I’ve watched almost all of the four series, they are clever, well acted, puzzling in a good way and well worth your time.

THE VOW. 82 ON Rotten Tomatoes is just about what I’d give this documentary. NXIVM is the name of a self awareness, mindfulness group. It has masters and slaves and even branding women members in private places. It’s a documentary but not your average documentary. If you’ve ever belonged to or have thought about joining one like maybe Scientology don’t miss this partial opening of their secret doors. Just a few weeks ago (Nov.2) Keith Raniere, the real life NXIVM leader was sentenced to 120 years in prison.

RATCHED. Named and promoted as a back story to the famed Nurse Ratched played by Louise Fletcher in Jack Nicolson’s and Ken Kesey’s  “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” book.For some reason the hospital is changed from a military rehab center in Menlo Park, where Kesey did time, to a spacious retreat in Lucia, which is near Big Sur. Judy Davis, Sarah Paulson, Cynthia Nixon and believe it or not, Sharon Stone are in it. It’s a gruesome movie with such scenes as a doctor hammering an ice pick into a patient’s eye or being given a severed head as a present. The lesbian sub plot is very insensitive, so is the sodomy story…don’t bother.

THE SOCIAL DILEMMA. [single] This one hour and 20 minute documentary a Netflix original is so important, good, and timely. It focuses on the control the internet has over us now and the inevitable growth it will take as time goes by. The control goes much deeper than your searching for a toaster on Amazon and seeing toasters pop up on the next 20 screens you open. It’s about how Facebook, Twitter, Google, You Tube and many more. Are controlling how long we watch and how often we click on any site, then selling the data from our views to advertisers. They work hard to change our groups of friends to bring people with similar views together politically, religiously and change our lives in the process. My notes while watching say things like…the future and Utopia or oblivion,  causing a civil war, ruining a global economy, prioritizing what keeps us on our screen, election advertising, existential threat, can’t agree on what is truth, assault on democracy and on and on. Do see this documentary and think about it and us and yourself. … 

RAKE. [series] I’m still enthralled with watching RAKE. It’s one of the most consistent brilliant funny, curious, serious, series I’ve ever seen. It’s a Netflix feature from Australia back in 2010. This week Netflix introduced Charlie Kaufmann’s newest movie “I’m Thinking of Ending Things”. You need warnings about Kaufmann’s films. Remember “Being John Malkovich”, “Synecdoche, New York” and especially “Eternal Sunshine of the Eternal Mind”. “I’m Thinking” is one of his impressionistic, dreamlike. Psychological adventure voyages. It’ll stay with you for days after. 

...
December 14 

CHOPPING OFF THE WHARF’S HISTORY
What would Henry John Brunnier think of the recently approved Wharf Master Plan (WMP) with its changes that threaten to transform the Wharf into an almost unrecognizable structure? Born in Iowa and the first in his town to go to State College, he moved to San Francisco in 1906, establishing an engineering firm that helped design many of San Francisco’s most prominent buildings and landmarks. He also designed the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf. It is said that he spent a year living on Beach Hill, carefully studying the winds, the waves and the storms before attempting any design. That the Wharf (strictly speaking a pier) is still going strong after 106 years is no small testament to his engineering talents. Jutting a half-mile into the Pacific Ocean with its distinctive L-shape to lessen the impact of storm waves, it is among the longest wooden ocean piers in the world and the longest on the Pacific Coast of the United States.

Any changes to such an iconic structure belonging to the people of Santa Cruz (Municipal) should be broached with care, mindful of preserving its history and with broad support of the community.  With recent approval of the WMP, city staff and the city council majority failed on all three accounts. From the initial solicitation of federal Disaster Relief Funds based on the bogus claim of “severe damage” to the Wharf due to the tsunami, to the slipping of this Disaster Relief money to a SF design firm to draft the WMP, to the dismissal of massive public opposition, city staff and council majority have made it clear, we barely matter. Nor it seems does the Wharf, except as a cash cow and that is not a given.

Just one example of cash cow thinking is the plan to achieve 40 extra parking spots by restriping the current Wharf parking bays. That is, to make them narrower down to the legal limit. If you’ve ever parked on the Wharf on a busy day you might be forgiven for not thinking “wow, these parking spaces are overly wide; they sure could narrow them!” Zero thought given to those with a little less mobility and no, it won’t encourage them to ride a bike; it will only discourage them from visiting the Wharf. Many of these are long time locals whose support of the Wharf over decades has helped keep it afloat financially. But as the ROMA design firm said, there’s a need to change the demographics of visitors to the Wharf.

In the community’s critique of the most objectionable changes in the WMP, focus has been on the domineering Landmark Building at the Wharf’s southern end, an empty, hollow building that will cover the sea lion viewing holes. That plus the lowered Western Walkway, which both impacts migratory bird habitat and ruins the historical character, form and line of the wooden pilings. 

Yet there is another change that threatens the essence of this historical landmark and that is the new Wharf entrance plus sign. This new entrance, 70 feet wide, will be built on steel, not wood pilings with an 18 feet tall roll down gate to be closed at night plus a 6-8 feet tall sign on top of that. From the artist’s rendition it has all the charm of a freeway toll-booth. If you haven’t quite got the picture, visualize this entrance a long way down the Wharf, where the Wharf currently widens. So much for historical uniqueness as one of the longest wooden ocean piers in the world! The city has essentially chopped off 500 feet of its length, leaving the historical beginning of the Wharf as little more than a gangplank to the fun and recreation platform beyond the toll-booths. I believe I heard a gasp from Mr. Brunnier. As if that isn’t enough, to pay for parking, unlike the current arrangement, visitors will need to park and then hunt for one of the dozen parking pay stations that will be strategically placed along the Wharf’s length. We all know how much fun they are, let alone the visual clutter they will introduce.  

Some, including the CA Coastal Commission detailed concerns about the entrance and the sign but the city consultants in their trademark sunny, upbeat tone, celebrate this abomination as: “An attractive entrance sign will be centrally located atop the parking gates and will be designed to be visible from a distance, while keeping with the character of the Wharf, as determined through additional community engagement” 

The photos below are what the city staff and council majority view as inspirational images and examples of effective landmark signage.

While the WMP has been approved by city council with council members Sandy Brown and Katherine Beiers voting against it, approval from the CA Coastal Commission has to be obtained as it relates to the Coastal Act. Access is important to the Coastal Commission. If you consider narrowing the current parking bays and requiring people to use pay stations on a long Wharf negatively impacts access for certain demographics, now is the time to let them know. It is also germane to let them know what you think of the entrance, the gate and sign, the Landmark building and the Western Walkway since the Coastal Commission had questions and concerns about all those aspects of the WMP. They and the overwhelming majority of the community were brushed off by the city: so much for government by, of and for the people.  

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

December 14, 2020

DISTRICT ELECTIONS IN SANTA CRUZ
The conservatives and moderates–the Con-Mods–in Santa Cruz are getting near giddy. They just elected a super-majority, a solid 5-2 real estate-developer-friendly city council. Before, it was a 4-3 progressive council. That is, before the recall of Drew Glover and me the city council was consistently opposed to district elections. Not only did we oppose district elections we likely would’ve joined in the Santa Monica city council law suit in their fight to preserve at-large elections. The law suit is now headed to the state supreme court. By the way, anti-union right-wing Republican, Lanny Ebenstein from Santa Barbara assisted in bringing this law suit against Santa Cruz forward. His suit basically would impose district elections because Latinos, a “protected class,” do not often get elected to the Santa Cruz city council, it happened twice since 2000, Tony Madrigal and David Terrazas (Santa Cruz Faces Voting Rights Lawsuit ). Fair Vote, a Washington, D.C. voting rights organization that promotes Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) looked at where Latinos vote in Santa Cruz and determined that a Latin X district could not be fairly put together because Latinos are spread throughout the city. This case may seem simple on the surface, after all who wouldn’t want Latinos more fairly represented on the city council? But in reality, it’s a bit more complex and its real intention, politically and cynically, is to actually go after the most diverse voting base in the city, UCSC students. That is, why not gerrymander the campus vote and include it with that of upper Westside homeowners, then it would be unlikely that the bulk of campus votes could even sway that one district let alone the election of councilmembers over the entire city. 

Political Triple Crown
The Con-Mods believe they’ve just returned from the crusades. They mounted their bi-annual political dark horse campaign, expecting to cut off only a few leftist trophy heads, but lo and behold, they’re about to arrive into the Triple Crown winner’s circle. First leg; obtain a super-majority council, done. Second leg,  get council to support district elections in order to extirpate that pesky student vote, done. Third leg, direct super majority to hire a demographer who will conjure up district maps favorable to the new super-majority and then they will vote on it, almost done. With the Santa Monica case now waiting to be heard by the state supreme court, the prudent, and cheaper, thing to do would be to wait for their ruling. The ostensible reason for the city of Santa Cruz to move towards a district election system was because of the law suit, but the Santa Monica case… (Closing Brief)  is similar and no law suit here will have much weight until that voting rights case is settled by the supreme court. The Con-Mods, supported by other status quo political-types, will have none of it. They plan to plow forward with district elections by possibly as early as the next election in 2022. But the worst part of this district election decision is that the current super-majority shoves this issue into closed session every time it comes up. There has never been a public discussion, that I am aware, at a regularly scheduled city council meeting. This is called, government in secret.

Ranked Choice Voting
Ranked Choice Voting, RCV, cannot always be neatly explained, but has proven to be a more equitable voting system because it works in electing diverse candidates and potentially saving money. Instead of moving towards district elections, which I am not opposed to outright, could RCV be a remedy in getting more LGBTQ and BIPOC residents elected to the city council? Secondly, on that same diversity front, Santa Cruz elected two African-American men in 2018 and two African-American women in 2020. The current city council now also has six females occupying seven of its seats, and there are at least three renters among them. This does not only represent change, it is a tectonic shift in minority and female representation. If we want fairer elections, we might turn towards ranked choice voting which San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, and San Leandro have all implemented in recent years.

How RCV works:

  • Everyone has 1 vote. Ranking your favorite candidate more than once will not help them because your vote will only be counted once for that candidate. 
  • Indicating only one choice or “bullet voting,” does not help your favorite candidate because a 2nd choice only counts if your 1st choice is eliminated.

For more information, go to: Fair Vote CA, Tips For Voters 

Direct Election of Mayor
For far too long the Santa Cruz mayor has been elected by a majority of seven city councilmembers. “Learn how to count to four,” is the way one long-time councilmember used to intone. The prevailing myth among voters, and touted by certain councilmembers, is that the top vote-getter first becomes vice-mayor and then mayor. The reality is that this unwritten rule has been violated several times throughout recent history. Lining up and commanding four votes is the basic reality for any mayor chosen by the council, but is this the fairest method and does it produce the most effective mayor for the city? Many cities directly elect their mayors, and many here in Santa Cruz falsely believe the voters elect the Santa Cruz mayor. Anecdotally, when I was mayor (2002) people often would remind me that they voted for me when in fact the city council made that decision. So, why not end this charade and have voters directly elect the mayor? The mayor could then take a more commanding role in local government, a role that is often usurped by the city manager. 

Electoral Suggestion List
How do we make elections in Santa Cruz fairer, more inclusive, and realize better policy out comes? Glad you asked. Here are my suggestions. I am taking my ideological hat off and from my experience in and out of government I believe Santa Cruzans would be better served if the following changes were implemented:

  1. Institute a Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) system county-wide, if not state-wide.
  2. divide the city up into FOUR districts representing four city council seats, all chosen by districts, Eastside, Westside, Downtown, and University. Then elect two other members at-large, meaning all city residents get to vote on these two seats as well. That’s six seats so far.
  3. Directly elect the mayor, who would also be the seventh city council vote. Allow the mayor to choose the city manager, but give veto power to the city council in making that decision. This means the mayor and council have to work more closely together too. Now, a big one…allow the mayor to hire and fire city department heads as is now done only by the city manager. Again, the seven-member council would be able to veto any department head selection.

Final Note–The reason for two at-large seats is to allow all voters to retain the ability to vote for FOUR city councilmembers, a council majority that would include their own district representative, the two at-large members, and the mayor as well. Let me know your thoughts about these suggestions at ckrohn@cruzio.com

The Santa Cruz Political Report Goes to KSQD, 90.7
KSQD gave me a few shows and I am on my third week now. This Thursday at 5 pm my guests will include David Terrazas and Tim Fitzmaurice. We will be discussing district elections, Ranked Choice Voting, and the direct election of our mayor. Join us, Thurs. Dec. 17, at 5 pm, 90.7 FM, or on the internet.

“I represent Corona. It has an extremely high concentration of frontline, essential, & immigrant workers. Our people are the ones who ride subways hours to clean houses, deliver takeout, etc w/o insurance & left out of relief. It’s not a mystery, it’s inequality.” (Dec. 14)

Over 200 union enthusiasts came out, masked and socially distanced, last Friday night to support a unionizing effort on the part of Bookshop Santa Cruz workers. Among the demands were a living wage, healthcare, and pursuing alternatives to police entering the store when possibly a counselor or healthcare worker is actually needed. 
c

Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...

December 14. 

There’s no column this week from Becky…she’s filing a legal brief in the Court of Appeals today regarding the PureWater Soquel Project EIR.

(Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes).

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

December 12
#347 / Comments On The Democratic Civil War

Michelle Goldberg, who writes for The New York Times, has some advice for the Democratic Party, as conveyed in the headline of Goldberg’s November 18, 2020 newspaper columnLeftists and Moderates, Stop Fighting. You Need One Another.

Goldberg calls the phenomenon she discusses a “Democratic Civil War.” As an example of what she is talking about, she specifically references recent exchanges between Connor Lamb (pictured to the left, above) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (pictured to the right). Lamb is a Democratic Member of Congress from Pennsylvania, just reelected. Ocasio-Cortez is a Democratic Member of Congress from New York. She was just reelected, too. 

After the election, according to news reports, Lamb “slammed” Ocasio-Cortez for “not being a team player,” and Ocasio-Cortez faulted Lamb for what she thought was a rather uninspired and lackluster campaign. The Atlantic weighed in on this conflict in an article by Elaine Godfrey that carried the headline, “The Democratic Truce Is Over.”

Here is how Goldberg described the situation in her column:

Today’s Democrats … are currently locked in an internecine battle between progressives and moderates. It’s a frustrating and destructive fight because both sides are partly right.

It’s the job of the activist left to push political limits, staking out positions that sound radical today but could, with enough work, seem like common sense in the future. But in the short term, an assertive left that garners national attention can threaten the political survival of Democrats who answer to a more conservative electorate.

In a postelection interview with The Times’s Astead Herndon, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez expressed frustration with those who are blaming leftists for Democrats’ down-ballot losses. “Progressive policies do not hurt candidates,” she insisted, noting swing-district Democrats who had co-sponsored Medicare for All legislation and the Green New Deal and had kept their seats.

But most candidates who endorsed those initiatives were in safer districts than those who didn’t. When moderate Democrats like Conor Lamb and Abigail Spanberger say that left-wing slogans are poisonous in their communities, people who don’t live in those communities should take them seriously.

Moderates need radicals to expand their scope for action. Radicals need moderates to wield power in a giant heterogeneous country with sclerotic institutions and deep wells of reaction. Neither camp could have defeated Donald Trump on its own. It’s frustrating now, as it was heartbreaking in 2004, that revanchist Republicans retain such a hold on America. But that’s all the more reason for Democrats to stop their counterproductive sniping and work together to beat them.

Goldberg’s observation that Democrats should “work together” is certainly appropriate. “Internecine” battles always weaken the group in which they occur. In fact, as the built-in Google Dictionary puts it, the word “internecine” is an adjective that is applied to anything that is “destructive to both sides in a conflict.”

If it’s a “lose-lose” argument, why don’t both sides just cut it out?

Well, Democrats might well join Goldberg in hoping they will, but let me suggest a factor that is not much noted in our national political discussions. I have actually mentioned this before, in my blog posting on November 19, 2020. The factor I am talking about is the decline of a genuine federalism, which is the basis upon which our particular form of democratic self-government is supposed to operate.

We do live in “a giant heterogeneous country,” as Goldberg says, and our Constitution, acknowledging this, deemphasizes the “national” government, and emphasizes the primacy of our “state” governments. We are, after all, the United “States” of America, with our national government specifically identified as a government of “limited” powers. It is our different state governments that are supposed to do most of the “governing.” 

Why should Lamb and Ocasio-Cortez fight? He is from one place. She is from another. They’re different places, and they have different constituencies. It is presumptuous for Ocasio-Cortez to tell Lamb what sort of a campaign he should have run (he did get reelected, after all), and it is presumptuous of Lamb to suggest that Ocasio-Cortez’ advocacy, employing arguments that are winning arguments in her district, should have been modified to be pleasing to voters in Lamb’s district, where Ocasio-Cortez wasn’t running.

In a truly federal system, each individual congressional campaign would be separate. There wouldn’t be any need for Lamb and Ocasio-Cortez to snipe at each other. Once elected, the different flavors of “Democrats,” elected from all across the nation – which is, truly, a giant and “heterogenous” nation – would then work in Congress on policy issues and try to come to a politically effective resolution. Please note, “Republicans” could even take part in those negotiations and discussions. Working out differences – and thus illuminating those differences – would occur within the halls of Congress, not so much in the various campaigns, which all would be different, and reflect local conditions. That may not be the way it is now, but that is the way it used to be.

Today, our Members of Congress no longer run solely in their own districts, with campaigns aimed to succeed in those districts. All Democrats, and this includes the entire spectrum, from Ocasio-Cortez to Lamb, are actually running “nationally.”

This last election was an election in which “Democrats” were trying to make a national appeal to all voters, everywhere, as Democrats. Democratic Party candidates from every state in the nation were seeking money and assistance from all across the country. National media illuminated the issues on a national basis. Of course, the Republican Party was doing the same thing as the Democrats. Our politics, in other words, has become “nationalized,” and if there is going to be a “national” Democratic Party that operates a “nationalized” campaign, as opposed to individual candidates who run campaigns aimed at their individual districts, and whose campaigns are based on local issues, there really will be no way to avoid the problems documented by Goldberg and Godfrey. 

When you think about it, the kind of national politics that has been emerging in the United States reflects a “parliamentary” approach. In a parliamentary system, what is most important is the candidate’s “party,” not the individual candidate. Parliamentary systems operate from the “top down,” not from the “bottom up,” which is how our system of federalism is intended to operate. 

Which system is better? There are some advantages to each. One way or another, though, we need to find a way to end the “Civil War,” and until and unless we actually change the system that is reflected in our Constitution, I think I’m inclined to stick with federalism, and with that timeless advice from Tip O’Neill

All Politics Is Local

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

“GIFTS”

“Youth is the gift of nature, but age is a work of art”.
~Stanislaw Jerzy Lec

“Critique, feedback, reaction to one’s work or the way they have presented it, regardless of intention, is a gift”.  
~Mark Brand 

“The great gift of human beings is that we have the power of empathy”.
~Meryl Streep

To me, life is a gift, and it’s a blessing to just be alive. And each person should learn what a gift it is to be alive no matter how tough things get”. 
~Tony Bennett

Reaction videos are a thing. Some of them are fun and cool, some of them are oh-so cringey… this one is somewhere in the middle, but a fun topic, so I went for it.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

December 9 – 15, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Highway One and the RTC overpass plans, new book on Secret walking Santa Cruz. GREENSITE…is off this week. Will return next week with Don’t Morph the Wharf! and the next steps to save our historic icon. KROHN…Developers’ connections and development plans for Santa Cruz. STEINBRUNER…Supes and no in-person meetings, UCSC and water, RTC projects, decline in County population, Mission Bells, septic water systems, Soquel Creek Water District issues. PATTON…The Electoral College. EAGAN… Classic Subconscious Comics and more Deep Cover opinions. QUOTES…”PATIENCE”

...

THE WAVE MOTOR, 1890’S.   This wave motor was on West Cliff Drive, and used to sprinkle the dusty Santa Cruz streets in summer time. It hauled ocean water up to the 600 gallon water storage tank. According to historians, it was invented by J. E. and William V. Armstrong.                                             

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE December 7
      
MAR VISTA BRIDGE…AND STAIRWAY!!!
Along with the Regional Transportation Commission’s plot to construct Bus on Shoulder and other auxiliary lanes with the new source of funds, is the plan to construct a Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing. Ever-active Debbie Bulger coordinates the Mission: Pedestrian group. Mission: Pedestrian is a Santa Cruz pedestrian advocacy group affiliated with CaliforniaWALKS. They are very concerned about the design of the Mar Vista Bridge that is planned to cross Highway One. They submitted the following… “Out of direction travel and long access ramps are a deterrent to foot travel. Long access ramps designed to accommodate bicyclists and ADA requirements cause able-bodied pedestrians to travel 2 or 3 times the distance of a direct route. 

They also state…”Stairways provide the most direct bridge access for able-bodied pedestrians, and can be built in space-constrained areas. . . . . stairways complement adjacent curvilinear or switchback ramps. Shortcuts for pedestrians will encourage foot travel and greatly decrease the distance from origin to destination. A stairway can provide a pedestrian shortcut instead of forcing those on foot to walk the entire lengthy loop needed for ADA and bicyclists.

*Public comment period now open for the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment for the proposed Highway 1 Auxiliary Lane Project from State Park to Bay/Porter and Mar Vista Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing

The 45-day public review and comment period is open through Jan. 11, 2021. A virtual public hearing will be held to provide the public with the opportunity to learn more about the project and submit comments before a final design is selected.

Virtual Public Hearing
Date: Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2020
Time: 5-6:30 p.m.
Place: Register ahead of time at bitly.com/Highway1-SC (URL is case sensitive)  Written comments may also be submitted by mail to Lara Bertaina, Department of Transportation, 50 Higuera St., San Luis Obispo, CA, or by email to lara.bertaina@dot.ca.gov. All comments must be received by 5 p.m. on Jan. 11, 2021. Read more about it here…  

WALKING IN SANTA CRUZ. Debbie Bulger and Richard Stover created a great book for real Santa Cruzans, and just as “necessary”, it’s a super book for visitors to seek and find the many, many nearly-hidden walkable treasures we have at our doorsteps. Its title is ‘Secret Walks and Staircases in Santa Cruz’. I have a copy and am sharing it with my visiting daughter and grandsons. The press release says: “Secret Walks & Staircases in Santa Cruz is a guidebook to fascinating walks in Santa Cruz, California, ranging from one mile to more than six miles in length. The vibrant route descriptions reveal the location of many unmarked stairways and hidden passageways in this California Central Coast town. The featured walks lead to scenic vistas, historic structures, and natural areas. More than 130 photographs include over 75 way-finding pictures and numerous photos of plants and animals likely to be seen by the walker. All walks are rated by distance and elevation gain”. I couldn’t say it any better. It’s selling out rapidly so get to Bookshop Santa Cruz ASAP. Secret Walks & Staircases is available at Bookshop Santa Cruz and at www.lostballoonpress.com

...

With all our movie theatres closed, we now have the choice of hundreds and hundreds of new and old movies (formerly known as films) to take up our very vacant time. The online choices of movies – both domestic and foreign – are staggering. 

MANK. Mank is short for Mankiewicz, as in Herman Mankiewicz, who was the screenwriter of  Orson Welles’ “Citizen Kane” – which, for non-movie goers, has been generally regarded as the best movie ever made. It’s on several worldwide “best of” lists, and you owe it yourselves to see it at least once. But Mank the movie is mostly made for movie nuts. Amanda Seyfried plays Marion Davies, Charles Dance is William Randolph Hearst, and Tom Burke is Orson Welles. Mank was a professional screenwriter who drank more than anybody and somehow managed to finish the script for Citizen Kane just in time. Gary Oldman is way over the top when he plays Mank, but with the flash of this very Hollywood script he fits in perfectly. You’ll love it.

THE MITFORDS. A fine documentary movie about the wild, wooly, and brilliant six Mitford sisters. Plus there’s info here for all Santa Cruzans who remember when Jessica Mitford visited and lectured at UCSC. It should be called A Tale of Two Sisters. Jessica – who we called Decca was an ardent left-wing proponent. She married Oakland Civil Rights Attorney Robert Truehaft and they attended my wedding in San Francisco back in 1967. Decca’s sister Diana was actually in love with Adolf Hitler, and remained that far fascist right all her life. Watch this documentary – it’s a family like no other.

A RAINY DAY IN NEW YORK. This is Woody Allen’s newest movie, and although it bears a lot of resemblance to earlier movies… it’s a poor copy at best. It has a 45 on Rotten Tomatoes, and that’s generous. Elle Fanning plays a poor version of Diane Keaton in Annie Hall doing her flighty-nutty best to be like other humans. Jude Law is in it too, but we’ll never figure out why, as he does nothing to further anything. Timothee Chalamat is the usual Woody Allen-type character in the movie and he has little reason to be there either. It lacks the charm, sharp humor, social commentary and the class that used to be Woody’s signature.

GHOSTS OF WAR. This World War II movie has a handful of  American troops occupying  a house that once belonged to a family tortured by the Nazis. The troops have visions of both the past and the future, including war scenes in Afghanistan. It’s about PTSD in the extreme. Maybe there are ghosts, maybe not. The makeup is poorly done, the acting is amateur at best. 

New Idea. The movies below are not ranked in any particular order. I’ve eliminated some of the most boring, time wasting flops…enjoy what’s left!!

HILLBILLY ELEGY. A startling and impressive cast including Glen Close and Amy Adams in this movie directed by Ron Howard makes it worth watching. It’s a depressing story taken from the biography of J.D.Vance the author. He had a horrific, cruel childhood with a drug addict from law school. Heroic but depressing and it’s probably even worse than your childhood. Watch it but stay happy anyways.

PROFESSOR T. Egged on by daughter Jennifer I too really liked the Belgian crime series Professor T. It’s not easily available so try going to PBS Passport series, its well worth your searching time. The Professor teaches at the Antwerp University and is a habitual germophobe. He advises the local police and detectives and manages to bring in humor which makes this 3 series very enjoyable. Beware of the German version and the Czech copy, 

LOVE AND ANARCHY. It’s a Swedish half comedy with a fine plot. A beautiful babe who is mother to two children gets a job in a publishing company. There’s a lot of film buff material like Ingmar Bergman references, and that’s fun. But then the babe Sofie starts flirting and gets flirting back from a much younger techie at the company. How she and he handle it and their lives makes it fascinating and we get to watch the rise and fall of their relationship and the publishing house.

CARMEL or WHO KILLED MARIA MARTA. This documentary takes place not in Our Carmel but in Carmel, Buenos Aires. Thought to be an accident Marias body was found drowned in her bathtub. After much politics and news reporters telling of the story bullets were discovered  in her skull. Well paced, excellently timed, perfectly photographed, this is one to enjoy as the unsuspected truth is unraveled.

EYE FOR AN EYE. This is a Spanish drama and one you won’t forget. A wealthy, feared drug lord wants to get out of the “business” and goes to a rest home to retire. As luck has it he gets assigned to a male nurse who has suffered greatly from his unwanted connections with drug use. He has to decide in many ways whether or not to revenge the wrongs that were done to him. How he treats the drug king is so touching and revealing…and well done.

THE LIFE AHEAD. To see Sophia Loren at age 86, and see her looking like she’s 86 is a treat. She plays a holocaust survivor who acts as mother to some children of prostitutes.  Her interaction with a Senegalese 14 year old boy is a neat piece of cinema and it’s directed by her son Edourdo Ponti. 

THE MAN WITHOUT GRAVITY. Another Italian near fable about a baby born and floating to the ceiling attached to his umbilical cord. What he does with his life, and his decisions about letting the world know he floats make a near masterpiece. Not too near Italian Classics like “Life Is Beautiful” or “Amarcord” it’s still fun to think about.

THE 12TH MAN. The 12th Man is one of 12 Norwegian resistance soldiers who plan to blow up the Nazi invaders of their land. The Nazis kill 11 and the extra brave survivor becomes the target of a Nazi general. The very most loyal locals help hide the man who suffers terribly from ice, rain, and bullets survive and he makes it finally and safely back to Sweden. Fine film (or movie) and it’s based on a true story.  

HAPPY AS LAZZARO. Another Italian near- fable centering on a young teenager who was raised on an illegal sharecropper tobacco farm. He leaves the farm gets into accidents, befriends another  young boy and they remain life long friends. But Lazzaro falls down a cliff and wakes up 10 years later and is befriended by fellow survivors of the farm and the many years that have passed. It’s impossible to tell you the plot here, see it and enjoy it and try to explain it to your friends. 

CROWN. I binged watched almost all of the new fourth season of Crown last Sunday, and loved it. Margaret Thatcher, The Falkland Islands, and of course Princess Diana make for exciting and involving viewing. Super acting and gorgeous photography make it even better. It’s odd and curious how Americans remain so hooked on and fascinated by England’s hierarchy. Not one in a thousand of us could tell you who runs Canada or Mexico but Britain’s Elizabeth’s and Diana’s secrets just never stop hooking us in. By all means view this Netflix series.   

INDUSTRY. A young black female student from NYC goes to London to handle a job with a huge financial institution. She competes, challenges, loses, and wins against her fellow young employees. Well written, great acting, extra fast moving with little script padding. It’s on HBO and got a 78 on Rotten Tomatoes for its’ first episode. 

FIREBALL: VISITORS FROM DARKER WORLDS. If you are a fan or follower of Werner Hertzog ( Fitzcarraldo, Heart of Glass, Lessons of Darkness) you won’t be surprised to know this new “documentary” of his involves visitors from outer space. Herzog and crew travel the earth finding bits and pieces of meteorites millimeters across to craters measuring miles across that have some traces of outer space creation. This movie makes a strong case for extraterrestrial life, and for the idea that we have been ignoring messages from way out there. Good to watch.   

THE QUEENS GAMBIT. This earned a 100 on Rotten Tomatoes and deserved it. It’s from a novel about an orphan who learns chess from the janitor. She takes pills to cause phantom chess games, drinks , and in spite of all her weaknesses she manages to take on and beat almost every world champion. You don’t need to know chess to enjoy it.

THE HATER. A Polish movie about a young boy who loves the tech world and becomes an internet hacking genius of the wrong kind. He gets more and more involved in politics and infiltrates/ hacks bad things into campaigns. It ends in a terrible but watchable tragedy and is well worth watching. 

THE ENDLESS TRENCH. Based on some very true stories this covers Franco’s takeover of Spain in their civil war circa 1936. For many reasons like pacificism, many Spaniards went into hiding for as long as 30 years. They lived in narrow fake walled rooms and dealt with keeping their families together all those years. Good movie, and certainly shocks us into realizing just how similar and political our lives are today.  

SARAH COOPER: EVERYTHINGS FINE. Sarah is an online sensational comedienne. She pulls off her great Trump lip-synching, and is just totally fun to watch. Ben Stiller, Jon Hamm, and Marisa Tomei all get in on it. She also takes on Mr. Pillow, Melania Trump, Qanon and all in 49 minutes. We need more laughs like this. 

SECRETS OF THE SAQQARA TOMB. A straight documentary about how archeology works. It digs around a pharaoh’s tomb and will teach you much more about archeology than you thought you knew. It’s a change from what we “normally” watch.

THE UNDOING. (HBO) Nicole Kidman and a older looking and very serious Hugh Grant take the leads as a gorgeous psychiatrist who’s married to a kind and empathetic doctor. They have a son who has a beautiful girlfriend. Everything’s fine until a murder happens. Being HBO this takes weeks to watch and the first three episodes look good so far. The finale is terrible and makes us wish we never watched any of this series. 

 DOLLY PARTON: HERE I AM. We’ll never see an off-screen minute of Dolly Parton. She’s always on and always surprising. She’s written over 3000 songs, she’s 74 years old, been married 30 years and this documentary is wonderful whether you are a fan or not.  Jane Fonda and Lilly Tomlin love her and talk about their friendship when they made “9 to 5”. Click on it.  

BORAT: SUBSEQUENT MOVIEFILM. Supposedly a follow up to Sasha Baron Cohen’s earlier Borat movie. I copied some adjectives from other critics that I agree with…repugnant, filthy, incestuous, shocking, crude, cringing, appalling, harsh, repellent, menstrual and more. It also has a very strange actual scene with Rudy Giuliani and another with Tom Hanks that I’ll never figure out. Do not watch this mess.

THE TRIAL OF THE CHICAGO 7. This new movie written and directed by Aaron Sorkin is a fascinating movie , a good movie BUT it simply isn’t an honest look at what happened at the trial of the Chicago 7. Characters are added, romances are hinted at and Eddie Redmayne’s role as Tom Hayden is simply off base. Senator Bill Monning sent me a critique of the movie by Rennie Davis who is/was part of the 7. Former Santa Cruz Mayor Chris Krohn sent me another political reaction from the Berkeley Barb. They agree that this movie really adds lightness and Hollywood touches to a very important civil rights stepping stone. Watch it but be very aware. I’m also proud to tell you that on October 30, 2008 our then State Assemblyman Bill Monning (now our retired Calif. Senator) brought Tom Hayden to my KZSC radio program Universal Grapevine. We didn’t talk about his marriage to Jane Fonda and the movie doesn’t touch it either.   

BORGEN. I started watching this series months ago, it’s one of the finest series I’ve seen. Now the world’s critics and audiences are catching up on it. Here’s what I wrote back on Feb. 5…

Borgen translates as “the castle” in Danish, and I must tell you that I’ve been totally immersed in this three season iTunes saga since my daughter Hillary found and recommended it. It’s the story of a woman who becomes the first female Prime Minister of Denmark. If you like politics and wonder what a politician’s life is like, forget any American versions and watch this instead. The show started in 2010, and from what I hear it won’t go past the third series. Forget “Veep”, “House of Cards”, “The West Wing” and the rest… Borgen is far superior. I’d give you your money back IF and etc….but it would be too much trouble, and you’ll love it too. Now there’s talk of a fourth episode to be released in 2021 with the original cast and on Netflix.

CALL MY AGENT. Daughter Hillary found this one and she’s right, it’s a good one. There might be a problem in finding this one under that title on Netflix, if so try “Dix Pour Cent”. Billed as a comedy it centers on the lives of the talent agents and stars who work at a famous show biz agency in Paris. Tempers, jokes, love affairs, and much talent all get very mixed and still it’s almost riveting.

THE GLORIAS. This bio-pic of Gloria Steinem is a good one. Julianne Moore, Alicia Vikander and two more women/girls play her in this near dream like history of the womens’ movement and her part in it. Julie Taymor directed it and does portray Gloria as her real mini-skirt, long nails gorgeous self. Timothy Hutton is in it too nut he shouldn’t have been. It has much fantasy, dreams, animation and oddly placed moves that obscure the important view of women’s equality fights that Steinman was an integral part of. Bette Midler plays Bella Abzug. Watch it, and don’t snicker at the odd ball parts

EMILY IN PARIS. Lily Collins is Emily. Emily is from Chicago and is sent to Paris as a company rep. The Paris group doesn’t like her and Emily has a rough time adjusting to France. Cute, clever, time consuming, charming, and I imagine the series will be the same.

TEHRAN. It has a 93 on Rotten Tomatoes!! An international spy killer-thrill series. It mixes Iran, Tehran, Jordan, Israel’s internal wars with a young woman’s attempt to steal government high tech secrets. Complex, well acted, and if you can keep up with identities, you can continue forgetting about movie theatres.

CRIMINAL. This is an unusual series that consists of four different story lines on four different websites. There’s Criminal: United Kingdom, Criminal: Germany, Criminal: Spain and Criminal: France. All episodes were filmed in Spain and center on criminals each being questioned and interviewed in exactly the same interrogating room with a very important two-way mirror separating them from the cops and legal team. I’ve watched almost all of the four series, they are clever, well acted, puzzling in a good way and well worth your time.

THE VOW. 82 ON Rotten Tomatoes is just about what I’d give this documentary. NXIVM is the name of a self awareness, mindfulness group. It has masters and slaves and even branding women members in private places. It’s a documentary but not your average documentary. If you’ve ever belonged to or have thought about joining one like maybe Scientology don’t miss this partial opening of their secret doors. Just a few weeks ago (Nov.2) Keith Raniere, the real life NXIVM leader was sentenced to 120 years in prison.

RATCHED. Named and promoted as a back story to the famed Nurse Ratched played by Louise Fletcher in Jack Nicolson’s and Ken Kesey’s  “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” book.For some reason the hospital is changed from a military re hab center in Menlo Park where Kesey did time to a spacious retreat in Lucia, which is near Big Sur. Judy Davis, Sarah Paulson, Cynthia Nixon and believe it or not, Sharon Stone are in it. It’s a gruesome movie with such scenes as a doctor hammering an ice pick into a patient’s eye or being given a severed head as a present. The lesbian sub plot is very insensitive, so is the sodomy story…don’t bother.

THE SOCIAL DILEMMA. This one hour and 20 minute documentary a Netflix original is so important, good, and timely. It focuses on the control the internet has over us now and the inevitable growth it will take as time goes by. The control goes much deeper than your searching for a toaster on Amazon and seeing toasters pop up on the next 20 screens you open. It’s about how Facebook, Twitter, Google, You Tube and many more. Are controlling how long we watch and how often we click on any site, then selling the data from our views to advertisers. They work hard to change our groups of friends to bring people with similar views together politically, religiously and change our lives in the process. My notes while watching say things like…the future and Utopia or oblivion,  causing a civil war, ruining a global economy, prioritizing what keeps us on our screen, election advertising, existential threat, can’t agree on what is truth, assault on democracy and on and on. Do see this documentary and think about it and us and yourself. … 

RAKE. I’m still enthralled with watching RAKE. It’s one of the most consistent brilliant funny, curious, serious, series I’ve ever seen. It’s a Netflix feature from Australia back in 2010. This week Netflix introduced Charlie Kaufmann’s newest movie “I’m Thinking of Ending Things”. You need warnings about Kaufmann’s films. Remember “Being John Malkovich”, “Synecdoche, New York” and especially “Eternal Sunshine of the Eternal Mind”. “I’m Thinking” is one of his impressionistic, dreamlike. Psychological adventure voyages. It’ll stay with you for days after. 

...
December 7

Gillian is off this week. Will return next week with Don’t Morph the Wharf!  And the next steps to save our historic icon. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

December 7

DEVELOPMENT BEAT
“What’s the benefit of basically bending the Coastal Act standards when you’re not really getting much more affordability?” 

–Ryan Moroney, California Coastal Commission, District Supervisor quoted by Santa Cruz Local

Accomplice One
The rush to destroy paradise continues. It mostly consists of housing built for rich folks who don’t yet live here. A rustic wharf stands humbly off of Main Beach, while the Economic Development Director makes her plans–coolly, coldly, and calculatingly–to spruce it up a bit, cover the sea otter viewing holes, put in a large barn-like structure for high-end weddings, increase the retail square footage, and build toward the sky. After all, La Gente (us?) deserve a more upscale pier, don’t we? For all those folks who will buy second homes from C. Barron “Barry” Swenson of 777 N. 1st Street, San Jose, these new people will require a cleaner place to stroll. They’ll come down for a weekend from wherever, and pick out Gucci sun glasses from one of the Bigger-ed Shoppes, find a deal on Speedo Technical Wear, and head back up to their Bay Area principal residence right after spending the evening drinking Long Island Ice Teas atop Five55 Pacific. Case Swenson, Barron’s progeny, appears now to run the company. His interests, according to the website, look to be golf, the chamber of commerce, and real estate. Sound familiar? Case, along with David A. Gibbons, Senior VP who’s “responsible for hundreds of projects with Swenson, totaling in excess of 1$ billion,” have their sights set on Santa Cruz. The same web site that boasts “experience” and “dedication to quality” also carries pictures of several over-50 white guys who are part of the “management team.” Nary a person of color in site. No fewer than 13 Santa Cruz area developments are listed on the Swenson “Santa Cruz Group Projects” list. 

Accomplice Two
Another major player in the Surf City economic development give-away machine is Devcon Construction, Inc. at 690 Gibraltar Drive in Milpitas. It’s overseen by a “management team” and one Gary Filizetti seems to be Their Man in the Cruz. Devcon thinks big. It began “as an ambitious dream of a group of valley entrepreneurs.” Devcon Inc. appears to have been major players in the construction of both the Ess Eff 49ers and S.J. Earthquakes stadium projects. You want big? They got big, and bigger, and they’re coming to Santa Cruz. Again, not a BIPOC person on their board, and not even a hint of this town’s core values either in the Devcon mission statement. What happened to environmental quality, climate mitigation, affirmative action, and affordable housing? But Devcon Inc. claims they are committed to “exceptional customer service,” according to the web site. Well, I guess that means they will be open then to recommendations from Santa Cruz voters on environmental quality, climate mitigation, affirmative action, and affordable housing before they consider building here.

The Fixer
Devcon Inc., and other firms, have hired what appears to be the local version of Trump’s “Fixer, “Michael Cohen. Meet the Santa Cruz Fixer, Owen Lawlor.  He seems to have quite the prodigious working relationship with Economic Development Director, Bonnie Lipscomb. He’s apparently learned the ins and outs of Santa Cruz planning (with some assistance by way Planning Director Lee Butler? Or vice versa?), and presents himself as someone who can get things done in a town that’s known for its luxury building dissenters. It’s why YIMBY–yes in my backyard–has become such a favorite tool for the average real estate and developer class Fixer.  By the way, all I did was Google, Devcon’s man in Santa Cruz, and Lawlor’s name appeared in the first entry, “Major downtown Santa Cruz housing project advances.” In that 2018 project of 205 units approved, not a single unit of affordable housing was mandated by the city council. It was in complete disregard of the city’s inclusionary housing ordinance. He bills himself as a land-use consultant, “Principal, Lawlor Land Use.” My Linked-In account says we share “38 mutual connections.” Ouch. Owen’s account (Can I call you Owen?), states that his firm “offer(s) guidance navigating the complexities involved in both the political (he’s now got his dream city council!) and bureaucratic aspects of project approvals. He just happens to be a real estate broker too…like I said, The SC Fixer. Oh, and by the way, lest you wonder more about how close The SC Fixer is within two degrees of separation from Michael Cohen. It is through a Rudolph Giuliani connection. Seems like Lawlor donated ($250) to Rudolph Giuliani’s Presidential Committee Inc. back in 2007. Yes, that Rudy. It is right there on “City-Data.com” stuck between one of my heroes, Gabrielle Stocker’s donation to Dennis Kucinich and Pat Bakalian’s $250 to Hillary Clinton. In-between these two names it lists “Mr. Owen Lawlor (self-employed/Real Estate, (Zip code: 95060) $250 to Rudy Giuliani’s  Presidential Committee Inc. on 06/30/2007” Are you kiddin’ me? Of course, this was before Rudy’s service to the Emperor, but after Giuliani’s misguided “stop and frisk” policies locked up so many black and brown people. Stop and Frisk was racist and that was known in 2007. It has been harshly criticized and dispensed with by the current Mayor, Bill De Blasio. The silver lining here is that Giuliani’s reign of error gave rise to formidable political types like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the recently elected congress members, Jamaal Bowman of NYC and Cori Bush of St. Louis. C’est la vie.

Accomplice Three
There’s a BIG project planned for Ocean Street between Water and Marianne’s Ice Cream. It’s known in planning circles as 908 Ocean Street. Sridhar Equities, “commercial real estate experts” of 1777 Saratoga Ave. #2 in San Jose, has assembled 19 parcels, (yes, NINETEEN!) in its quest to build baby build, 333 condos. Has there ever been a bigger project than this one in Santa Cruz? I don’t think so. If you go to Sridhar’s web site, the graphics appear frightening. There’s a hazel rectangular blob that has descended over this entire stretch of Water Street, and it appears to be leaking its shape-shifting hard edges into the surrounding neighborhoods. Matt Sridhar’s “team” (everybody has a team, don’t they? we need to put one together too), “will also provide fantastic commercial and retail space…as well as providing solutions for issues with traffic and parking.” I kid you not, this language is included in their proposal and Sridhar does deals too. They boast “Deal Size[s]” of $1 million to $35 million,” just contact their “Acquisition Team.” Matt says his portfolio has “grown to nearly $200 million…” If you are brave enough, and take a really deep breath before you enter SC commercial development hell, then here I present to you the city’s euphemistically named, “Planning and Community Development” web site, if you want to see more of these eating-our-seed-corn projects. 

People who lost health insurance during the pandemic:
Canada: 0
United Kingdom: 0
Germany: 0 
France: 0 
Australia: 0 
Japan: 0 
South Korea: 0 
Taiwan: 0 
Denmark: 0 
Finland: 0 
Norway: 0 
United States: 14,600,000 

Health care must be a right, not an employee benefit. #MedicareForAll (Dec. 7)

Lest we forget those, with the least stuff, among us. We have to do better. This was taken at the bike bridge near Soquel along the San Lorenzo River across from Trader Joe’s.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
December 7

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY NO LONGER HOLD IN-PERSON BOARD MEETINGS
With no explanation as to how people without internet access or old computers that cannot accommodate video streaming are supposed to attend meetings, the Board of Supervisors will approve suspending al in-person Board meetings.  Although the staff report recommends reviewing this policy in March, 2021, you can bet that the comfort of keeping distant from constituents will over-rule any protest of censorship.  

One must wonder why Supervisors Zach Friend and Ryan Coonerty have refused to show their images all this time during their virtual participation in Board meetings and important discussions.  Sometimes, the Clerk has to call their name repeatedly when the roll call vote is happening.  Are they listening to anything at all?  Who knows?

Why has the Board and CAO put the issue of suspending in-person meetings on the Consent Agenda?  

Consent Item #33:

Approve request to conduct all Board of Supervisors meetings only virtually beginning in January 2021, direct staff to return in March 2021 for a review of this policy, and take related actions, as recommended by the County Administrative Officer – S

COUNTY WATER ADVISORY COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER DRAFT PLAN FOR SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS
The County Water Advisory Commission will be reviewing the proposed Local Area Management Plan (LAMP) required to return septic approvals to local control on December 16 at their virtual 4 pm meeting. This group usually meets the first week of event months, but this month, it will happen later.

Water Advisory Commission 

Tune in and participate.  This is likely the final hurrah action by County Water Resources Manager John Ricker, who is retiring at the end of the month after decades of service.

Many thanks to those many people who wrote me about their difficulties in permitting to get an ADU due to the County’s lack of attention to timely submitting a Local Area Management Plan (LAMP) to the State for septic system approvals.  Look forward to the County Board of Supervisors taking action to move this issue forward early next year.

SANTA CRUZ CITY WATER COMMISSION EXAMINES COST OF WATER TRANSFERS TO SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT TO HELP WITH AQUIFER OVERDRAFT
The City Water Commission will consider a presentation by some crafty rate consultants at their December 7 meeting.  The proposed pricing would make the District financially responsible for the infrastructure the water transfer “would touch.”  This is called a Wheeling Rate, and is completely ridiculous.  Why can’t the City just treat Soquel Creek Water District as a customer, and factor in the benefit to the City that the conjunctive use of abundant water would help recharge the aquifer in the areas where the City also has production wells?

The slick Raftelis Rate Consultants, also used by Soquel Creek Water District to shove through the five-year annual 9% rate increases to pay for the expensive PureWater Soquel Project, has come up with the Wheeling Rate scheme to make the cost of the conjunctive water use and a regional water management solution unaffordable.

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY RTC GOT A $107.2 MILLION GRANT FOR PROJECTS
At their December 2 meeting, the County’s Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) announced the great news that the agency received a $107.2 million grant for transportation improvements throughout the County.  That came just in time for the Commission’s discussion of what to do about the rail corridor; highway expansion and bicycle overpass improvements. 

Here is how that money will be spent:

The Cycle 2 Project includes improvements on Highway 1 between Soquel Avenue/Drive and State Park Drive and on Soquel Avenue/Drive between La Fonda Avenue, near Harbor High School, to State Park Drive in Aptos. This project will result in the construction of:

  • Three new sets of auxiliary lanes on Highway 1 between Soquel Drive and State Park Drive with the first 5.75-miles of an ultimate 7.5-mile hybrid bus-on-shoulder/auxiliary lane facility, where transit buses can travel in the auxiliary lane between intersections and on the shoulders at intersections to bypass traffic
  • Two new Highway 1 bicycle/pedestrian overcrossings (Chanticleer Avenue and Mar Vista Drive) and a bridge replacement at Capitola Avenue, with sidewalks and bike lanes
  • Soquel Avenue/Drive multimodal improvements including, buffered/protected bicycle lanes totaling 5 miles, 46 green bike boxes for left turn movements, sidewalk gap closures, 100 ADA cramps, 96 crosswalk upgrades, crosswalk warning devises at 10-mid block locations, and adaptive traffic signal control with transit prioritization at 23 intersections

RTC Receives $107.2 Million in Grant Funding for Innovative Multimodal Transportation Improvements Throughout the County

This is good news for our County.  I just wish the RTC would listen to the Aptos residents who have loudly voiced concerns about the location of the planned Mar Vista Bike/Ped Overcrossing and relocate it closer to Cabrillo College and Mar Vista Elementary School.  I don’t think that will happen, having observed the geotechnical analysis soil boring work occurring last week in the RTC-favored location.

YOUR CHANCE TO GET INVOLVED IN LOCAL TRANSPORTATION GOVERNANCE AND DECISIONS
The Santa Cruz County RTC is looking for people to help serve on three of their citizen-based Commissions.   Here is your opportunity to be at the table when important issues that matter to you are discussed, and hopefully have some input that is genuinely considered before the deals are done.

Sign up!

Community Members Sought to Serve on RTC Advisory Committees

ERASING HISTORY?  CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER REMOVING LAST OF THE MISSION BELLS
The Santa Cruz City Council will consider taking action to remove the final Mission Bell in the City at their December 8 meeting, in Item #24.  See the topic below for more thoughts on how very vocal and passionate groups are forcing our country’s history to be erased and re-written (maybe) in the heat of the moment. 

View Meeting – OnBase Agenda Online

What if society forgets the lessons learned by the mistakes we have made in the past and we go down the same dark roads again because no one remembers how that happened before?

Many thanks to Michael Lewis and his excellent weekly compendium of local government meetings and issues for alerting me to this item buried in the Council Agenda.  

PROGRESSIVES ARE NO LONGER THE DEFENDERS OF FREE EXPRESSION
A recent guest Commentary in the Mercury News really gave me pause for thought.

I hope you will read it and let me know what you think.  I don’t necessarily think this issue is restricted to just the Progressives, but it makes me wonder about how we, as a society, can begin to unite on anything again?

Hanson: Progressives are no longer defenders of free expression  

FACEBOOK SAYS IT WILL REMOVE VACCINE MISINFORMATION
Who is to decide what “misinformation” is?  Shouldn’t people be allowed to have access to all information and make their own decisions?  When does “protecting the public from misinformation” become censorship???

I hope you will read this and let me know your thoughts:
Facebook says it will remove coronavirus vaccine misinformation.

Not as many people read a newspaper these days for their information, and those who do often read it online, where the stories differ from the hard copy versions, or are sometimes not even available.  Many people instead rely on social media news sources, which are often tailored to fit the character of what type of sites a person has recently visited.

Many people have recommended watching “The Social Dilemma” that addresses the issue of how much control the social media giants have over the world of information that sways societies around the world.

Here is what Bruce Bratton’s review has said:

THE SOCIAL DILEMMA. This one hour and 20 minute documentary a Netflix original is so important, good, and timely. It focuses on the control the internet has over us now and the inevitable growth it will take as time goes by. The control goes much deeper than your searching for a toaster on Amazon and seeing toasters pop up on the next 20 screens you open. It’s about how Facebook, Twitter, Google, You Tube and many more. Are controlling how long we watch and how often we click on any site, then selling the data from our views to advertisers. They work hard to change our groups of friends to bring people with similar views together politically, religiously and change our lives in the process. My notes while watching say things like…the future and Utopia or oblivion,  causing a civil war, ruining a global economy, prioritizing what keeps us on our screen, election advertising, existential threat, can’t agree on what is truth, assault on democracy and on and on. Do see this documentary and think about it and us and yourself. … 

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPECT ANSWERS.  ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING IN WHATEVER MODE YOU CAN.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING.

Cheers,

Becky Steinbruner

685-2915 or ki6tkb@yahoo.com    I welcome your discussion.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

December 6, 
#341 / Let’s Be Careful About What We Wish For

A short little column in the November 12, 2020, edition of The Wall Street Journal heretically suggests that we would be foolish to pursue what has become commonly accepted as a critically important solution to some of our greatest political problems, at least as these problems (and this proposed solution) are seen from the point of view of “liberal” or “progressive” commentators.

Steven E. Landsburg suggests (get ready for it) that it would NOT be a good idea to abolish the United States Electoral College. Because the column is so short, and because The Wall Street Journal will likely bar most non-subscribers from getting direct access, I am reproducing Landsburg’s column in its entirety. 

If you more or less automatically agree that the undemocratic nature of the Electoral College means that it should be abolished, think about what Landsburg says! 

Our federal system is one of the most important ways we prevent autocrats from taking over the nation. We have learned, from Donald J. Trump, that there may be precious little to constrain the person filling our Chief Executive position from abusing that position, and from claiming, and actually exercising, powers that the president was never intended to have. 

That said, the fact that our national government is a government of limited powers (check the Tenth Amendment for the documentation), and the fact that the primary governing powers in our system are retained by the states, is intended to prevent the kind of totalitarian takeover that people have a real reason to fear. All those elected governors, in those fifty different states, have genuine countervailing power – and since we elect them, we have that power. One of the key features of our federal system is its built-in ability to work against totalitarian government, and this is one of the main points made by Hannah Arendt in her wonderful book, On Revolution

Let’s be careful about what we wish for! Check out what Landsburg has to say:

oooOOOooo

Want a Coup? Abolish the Electoral College
Imagine the current standoff, but with the president in charge of a nationwide election.

Imagine a future presidential election in which the incumbent refuses to concede and enlists the full power of the federal government to overturn the apparent democratic outcome.

Now imagine that the election in question is actually run by a federal agency or by some nationwide quasigovernmental authority charged with collecting and aggregating the results from all 50 states. 

I don’t know about you, but I might worry a bit about the pressure that could be brought to bear on that single authority. I might worry a bit about the objectivity of the attorney general and the federal election commissioners who would be in a position to ramp up that pressure.

I might even cast a sober look at what tends to happen in other countries where leaders are chosen in elections conducted by the national government—countries like Russia, where two years ago Vladimir Putin claimed 77% of the vote. 

I might also be tempted to meditate on the general perils of centralizing power, and the specific perils of centralizing the power to decide who will yield power. 

By then, I might be so worked up that I’ll manage to forget why the Electoral College is a threat to democracy, and how its abolition—and the nationalization of presidential elections—would help make democracy function more smoothly. 

But I’ll know who to ask for a refresher. By and large, it seems like the people who are most in a dither about the current president’s attempt to retain power are the same people who think we ought to make it easier for the next president who wants to do the same thing. I’m sure they can explain that to me.

Mr. Landsburg is a professor of economics at New York’s University of Rochester and author of “Can You Outsmart an Economist?” 

(Gary is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read his blog at www.gapatton.net  

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “PATIENCE”

 “Rivers know this: there is no hurry. We shall get there some day.”
~A.A. Milne, Winnie-the-Pooh 

“Patience is a conquering virtue.”
~Geoffrey Chaucer 

“Make your ego porous. Will is of little importance, complaining is nothing, fame is nothing. Openness, patience, receptivity, solitude is everything.”  
~Rainer Maria Rilke 

I vividly remember hearing about the death of John Lennon. I’m too young to recall JFK (nice to still be too young for “anything”, right?), and I can. not. believe. that it’s been 40 years since John Lennon was shot. Imagine (see what I did there?) all the music that could have come about, had he been allowed to live… This is one of my favorite songs of his.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

December 2 – 8, 2020

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Cotoni-Coast Monumental Park again, Del Mar, Capitola, Scotts Valley movie theatres all closed, Streamers and screeners. GREENSITE…on the Wharf hearing. KROHN…The real left coast, Santa Cruz’s left, looking at state props. STEINBRUNER …Septic tanks permits in the county, Live Oak Merriman House contamination, Pure Water Soquel questions, Aptos High student Nepal project. PATTON…Splitting and Separation.  EAGAN…Subconscious Comix and Deep Cover. QUOTES…”HOLIDAYS”

...

1906 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION. This is the Ocean Shore Railroad trestle being built, to bring lumber back from Davenport, and further up to the then town of Swanton.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE November 30

COTONI-COAST DAIRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT MANAGEMENT.
All of a sudden we see the Department of the Interior is going to present a re-shaped plan for the Davenport-based National Monument to the California Coastal Commission, on Dec. 13. We need to send in our concerns, worries, doubts to https://www.coastal.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/#/2020/12 . What struck me and others as unusual is that The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has been – and probably still is – so very short of funds to take even halfway decent care of the lands they manage right now. To take on these 6000 acres and manage them won’t work now, any better than when they announced back in 2017. Remember their plans for a 500 car parking lot by the old Davenport Cement plant? Remember too, what the proposed car traffic of the thousands of tourists will do to Highway 1 – i.e. Mission Street? The BLM plan will allow hunting, but no camping. It’ll need protection from our County Sheriff’s department for law enforcement. There’ll be nearly 17 miles of trails, already being plotted by local bikers and their organizations. As I wrote in this space on March 7, 2017 ….. Cotoni-Coast Dairies faces the same dilemma as most other protected lands. They are managed for two conflicting purposes: public recreation, and environmental and habitat preservation. But Cotoni-Coast Dairies is different from most other large protected lands: it is just two hours or less away from a population of 8 million people, many of whom are enthusiastic hikers and bikers. It isn’t hard to foresee that when a visitor center and trails are established, 500,000 or more people a year may be enjoying the property. [State Parks estimates that that many visitors—obviously, many of them locals who use it frequently—tramp or ride about on Wilder Ranch State Park each year. We think that estimate is high.] Since being named a monument, Ft. Ord’s visitation has zoomed to over 400,000.  Just remember the December 13 date, and get in your concerns.

DEL MAR, CAPITOLA, SCOTTS VALLEY MOVIE THEATRES ALL CLOSED.
I’ll never figure out why our newspapers, including Good Times, or anything I found online, have never reported that our movie theatres are all closed.

...

I still haven’t been to a movie theatre and now that all of our local theatres are closed it’ll be quite some time before any of us go. Movie industry reports say that fewer and fewer big budget movies are being made ,and the time between movies in theatres (those few that are left) and when streaming starts will get shorter and shorter. Even the Academy awards have changed their rules and regulations to allow for these covid changes.

HILLBILLY ELEGY. The startling and impressive cast – including Glenn Close and Amy Adams – in this movie directed by Ron Howard makes it worth watching. It’s a depressing story taken from the biography of J.D.Vance, the author. He had a horrific, cruel childhood with a drug addict from law school. Heroic but depressing and it’s probably even worse than your childhood. Watch it, but stay happy anyways.

PROFESSOR T. Egged on by my daughter Jennifer, I too really liked the Belgian crime series Professor T. It’s not easily available, so try going to PBS Passport series. It’s well worth your searching time. The Professor teaches at the Antwerp University, and is a habitual germophobe. He advises the local police and detectives and manages to bring in humor, making this series very enjoyable. Beware of the German version, and the Czech copy, 

LOVE AND ANARCHY. It’s a Swedish semi-comedy, with a fine plot. A beautiful babe who is mother to two children gets a job in a publishing company. There’s a lot of film buff material, like Ingmar Bergman references, and that’s fun. But then Sofie starts flirting, and gets flirting back ,from a much younger techie at the company. How she and he handle it, and their lives, makes it fascinating – and we get to watch the rise and fall of both their relationship and the publishing house.

CARMEL or WHO KILLED MARIA MARTA. This documentary takes place not in our Carmel, but in Carmel, Buenos Aires. Thought to be an accident, Maria’s body was found drowned in her bathtub. After much politics and news reporters telling of the story, bullets were discovered  in her skull. Well paced, excellently timed, perfectly photographed, this is one to enjoy as the unsuspected truth is unraveled.

EYE FOR AN EYE. This is a Spanish drama, and one you won’t forget. A wealthy, feared drug lord wants to get out of the “business” and goes to a rest home to retire. As luck has it, he gets assigned to a male nurse who’s suffered greatly from his unwanted connections with drug use. He has to decide whether or not to revenge the wrongs that were done to him. How he treats the drug king is so touching and revealing…and well done.

New Idea. The movies below are not ranked in any particular order. I’ve eliminated some of the most boring, time wasting flops…enjoy what’s left!!

THE LIFE AHEAD. To see Sophia Loren at age 86, and see her looking like she’s 86 is a treat. She plays a holocaust survivor who acts as mother to some children of prostitutes.  Her interaction with a Senegalese 14 year old boy is a neat piece of cinema and it’s directed by her son Edourdo Ponti. 

THE MAN WITHOUT GRAVITY. Another Italian near fable about a baby born and floating to the ceiling attached to his umbilical cord. What he does with his life, and his decisions about letting the world know he floats make a near masterpiece. Not too near Italian Classics like “Life Is Beautiful” or “Amarcord” it’s still fun to think about.

THE 12TH MAN. The 12th Man is one of 12 Norwegian resistance soldiers who plan to blow up the Nazi invaders of their land. The Nazis kill 11 and the extra brave survivor becomes the target of a Nazi general. The very most loyal locals help hide the man who suffers terribly from ice, rain, and bullets survive and he makes it finally and safely back to Sweden. Fine film (or movie) and it’s based on a true story.  

HAPPY AS LAZZARO. Another Italian near- fable centering on a young teenager who was raised on an illegal sharecropper tobacco farm. He leaves the farm gets into accidents, befriends another  young boy and they remain life long friends. But Lazzaro falls down a cliff and wakes up 10 years later and is befriended by fellow survivors of the farm and the many years that have passed. It’s impossible to tell you the plot here, see it and enjoy it and try to explain it to your friends. 

CROWN. I binged watched almost all of the new fourth season of Crown last Sunday, and loved it. Margaret Thatcher, The Falkland Islands, and of course Princess Diana make for exciting and involving viewing. Super acting and gorgeous photography make it even better. It’s odd and curious how Americans remain so hooked on and fascinated by England’s hierarchy. Not one in a thousand of us could tell you who runs Canada or Mexico but Britain’s Elizabeth’s and Diana’s secrets just never stop hooking us in. By all means view this Netflix series.   

INDUSTRY. A young black student from NYC goes to London to handle a job with a huge financial institution. She competes, challenges, loses, and wins against her fellow young employees. Well written, great acting, extra fast moving with little script padding. It’s on HBO and got a 78 on Rotten Tomatoes for its’ first episode. 

FIREBALL: VISITORS FROM DARKER WORLDS. If you are a fan or follower of Werner Hertzog ( Fitzcarraldo, Heart of Glass, Lessons of Darkness) you won’t be surprised to know this new “documentary” of his involves visitors from outer space. Herzog and crew travel the earth finding bits and pieces of meteorites millimeters across to craters measuring miles across that have some traces of outer space creation. This movie makes a strong case for extraterrestrial life, and for the idea that we have been ignoring messages from way out there. Good to watch.   

THE QUEENS GAMBIT. This earned a 100 on Rotten Tomatoes and deserved it. It’s from a novel about an orphan who learns chess from the janitor. She takes pills to cause phantom chess games, drinks , and in spite of all her weaknesses she manages to take on and beat almost every world champion. You don’t need to know chess to enjoy it.

THE HATER. A Polish movie about a young boy who loves the tech world and becomes an internet hacking genius of the wrong kind. He gets more and more involved in politics and infiltrates/ hacks bad things into campaigns. It ends in a terrible but watchable tragedy and is well worth watching. 

THE ENDLESS TRENCH. Based on some very true stories this covers Franco’s takeover of Spain in their civil war circa 1936. For many reasons like pacificism, many Spaniards went into hiding for as long as 30 years. They lived in narrow fake walled rooms and dealt with keeping their families together all those years. Good movie, and certainly shocks us into realizing just how similar and political our lives are today.  

SARAH COOPER: EVERYTHINGS FINE. Sarah is an online sensational comedienne. She pulls off her great Trump lip-synching, and is just totally fun to watch. Ben Stiller, Jon Hamm, and Marisa Tomei all get in on it. She also takes on Mr. Pillow, Melania Trump, Qanon and all in 49 minutes. We need more laughs like this. 

SECRETS OF THE SAQQARA TOMB. A straight documentary about how archeology works. It digs around a pharaoh’s tomb and will teach you much more about archeology than you thought you knew. It’s a change from what we “normally” watch.

THE UNDOING. (HBO) Nicole Kidman and a older looking and very serious Hugh Grant take the leads as a gorgeous psychiatrist who’s married to a kind and empathetic doctor. They have a son who has a beautiful girlfriend. Everything’s fine until a murder happens. Being HBO this takes weeks to watch and the first three episodes look good so far. The finale is terrible and makes us wish we never watched any of this series. 

 DOLLY PARTON: HERE I AM. We’ll never see an off-screen minute of Dolly Parton. She’s always on and always surprising. She’s written over 3000 songs, she’s 74 years old, been married 30 years and this documentary is wonderful whether you are a fan or not.  Jane Fonda and Lilly Tomlin love her and talk about their friendship when they made “9 to 5”. Click on it.  

BORAT: SUBSEQUENT MOVIEFILM. Supposedly a follow up to Sasha Baron Cohen’s earlier Borat movie. I copied some adjectives from other critics that I agree with…repugnant, filthy, incestuous, shocking, crude, cringing, appalling, harsh, repellent, menstrual and more. It also has a very strange actual scene with Rudy Giuliani and another with Tom Hanks that I’ll never figure out. Do not watch this mess.

THE TRIAL OF THE CHICAGO 7. This new movie written and directed by Aaron Sorkin is a fascinating movie , a good movie BUT it simply isn’t an honest look at what happened at the trial of the Chicago 7. Characters are added, romances are hinted at and Eddie Redmayne’s role as Tom Hayden is simply off base. Senator Bill Monning sent me a critique of the movie by Rennie Davis who is/was part of the 7. Former Santa Cruz Mayor Chris Krohn sent me another political reaction from the Berkeley Barb. They agree that this movie really adds lightness and Hollywood touches to a very important civil rights stepping stone. Watch it but be very aware. I’m also proud to tell you that on October 30, 2008 our then State Assemblyman Bill Monning (now our retired Calif. Senator) brought Tom Hayden to my KZSC radio program Universal Grapevine. We didn’t talk about his marriage to Jane Fonda and the movie doesn’t touch it either.   

BORGEN. I started watching this series months ago, it’s one of the finest series I’ve seen. Now the world’s critics and audiences are catching up on it. Here’s what I wrote back on Feb. 5…

Borgen translates as “the castle” in Danish, and I must tell you that I’ve been totally immersed in this three season iTunes saga since my daughter Hillary found and recommended it. It’s the story of a woman who becomes the first female Prime Minister of Denmark. If you like politics and wonder what a politician’s life is like, forget any American versions and watch this instead. The show started in 2010, and from what I hear it won’t go past the third series. Forget “Veep”, “House of Cards”, “The West Wing” and the rest… Borgen is far superior. I’d give you your money back IF and etc….but it would be too much trouble, and you’ll love it too. Now there’s talk of a fourth episode to be released in 2021 with the original cast and on Netflix.

CALL MY AGENT. Daughter Hillary found this one and she’s right, it’s a good one. There might be a problem in finding this one under that title on Netflix, if so try “Dix Pour Cent”. Billed as a comedy it centers on the lives of the talent agents and stars who work at a famous show biz agency in Paris. Tempers, jokes, love affairs, and much talent all get very mixed and still it’s almost riveting.

THE GLORIAS. This bio-pic of Gloria Steinem is a good one. Julianne Moore, Alicia Vikander and two more women/girls play her in this near dream like history of the womens’ movement and her part in it. Julie Taymor directed it and does portray Gloria as her real mini-skirt, long nails gorgeous self. Timothy Hutton is in it too nut he shouldn’t have been. It has much fantasy, dreams, animation and oddly placed moves that obscure the important view of women’s equality fights that Steinman was an integral part of. Bette Midler plays Bella Abzug. Watch it, and don’t snicker at the odd ball parts

EMILY IN PARIS. Lily Collins is Emily. Emily is from Chicago and is sent to Paris as a company rep. The Paris group doesn’t like her and Emily has a rough time adjusting to France. Cute, clever, time consuming, charming, and I imagine the series will be the same.

TEHRAN. It has a 93 on Rotten Tomatoes!! An international spy killer-thrill series. It mixes Iran, Tehran, Jordan, Israel’s internal wars with a young woman’s attempt to steal government high tech secrets. Complex, well acted, and if you can keep up with identities, you can continue forgetting about movie theatres.

CRIMINAL. This is an unusual series that consists of four different story lines on four different websites. There’s Criminal: United Kingdom, Criminal: Germany, Criminal: Spain and Criminal: France. All episodes were filmed in Spain and center on criminals each being questioned and interviewed in exactly the same interrogating room with a very important two-way mirror separating them from the cops and legal team. I’ve watched almost all of the four series, they are clever, well acted, puzzling in a good way and well worth your time.

THE VOW. 82 ON Rotten Tomatoes is just about what I’d give this documentary. NXIVM is the name of a self awareness, mindfulness group. It has masters and slaves and even branding women members in private places. It’s a documentary but not your average documentary. If you’ve ever belonged to or have thought about joining one like maybe Scientology don’t miss this partial opening of their secret doors. Just a few weeks ago (Nov.2) Keith Raniere, the real life NXIVM leader was sentenced to 120 years in prison.

RATCHED. Named and promoted as a back story to the famed Nurse Ratched played by Louise Fletcher in Jack Nicolson’s and Ken Kesey’s  “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” book.For some reason the hospital is changed from a military re hab center in Menlo Park where Kesey did time to a spacious retreat in Lucia, which is near Big Sur. Judy Davis, Sarah Paulson, Cynthia Nixon and believe it or not, Sharon Stone are in it. It’s a gruesome movie with such scenes as a doctor hammering an ice pick into a patient’s eye or being given a severed head as a present. The lesbian sub plot is very insensitive, so is the sodomy story…don’t bother.

THE SOCIAL DILEMMA. This one hour and 20 minute documentary a Netflix original is so important, good, and timely. It focuses on the control the internet has over us now and the inevitable growth it will take as time goes by. The control goes much deeper than your searching for a toaster on Amazon and seeing toasters pop up on the next 20 screens you open. It’s about how Facebook, Twitter, Google, You Tube and many more. Are controlling how long we watch and how often we click on any site, then selling the data from our views to advertisers. They work hard to change our groups of friends to bring people with similar views together politically, religiously and change our lives in the process. My notes while watching say things like…the future and Utopia or oblivion,  causing a civil war, ruining a global economy, prioritizing what keeps us on our screen, election advertising, existential threat, can’t agree on what is truth, assault on democracy and on and on. Do see this documentary and think about it and us and yourself. … 

RAKE. I’m still enthralled with watching RAKE. It’s one of the most consistent brilliant funny, curious, serious, series I’ve ever seen. It’s a Netflix feature from Australia back in 2010. This week Netflix introduced Charlie Kaufmann’s newest movie “I’m Thinking of Ending Things”. You need warnings about Kaufmann’s films. Remember “Being John Malkovich”, “Synecdoche, New York” and especially “Eternal Sunshine of the Eternal Mind”. “I’m Thinking” is one of his impressionistic, dreamlike. Psychological adventure voyages. It’ll stay with you for days after.

...
November 30

PUBLIC BE DAMNED!

Last week’s city council hearing on the Wharf Master Plan put to rest any doubts about whom the council majority represents. It ain’t us babe! 

Despite widespread, consistent community opposition to the Wharf Master Plan, the council majority of Meyers, Cummings, Golden, Watkins and Mathews voted to approve the Plan and its Environmental Impact Report. Ignored were an online petition with 2,600 signatures, hard copy petitions with 277 signatures and scores of emails from individuals and groups all opposed to the controversial elements of the Plan. The council majority marched lock step behind the Economic Development (ED) staff’s slick 75- minute presentation. What part of Municipal do they not understand? 

Supporters were few in number although not without influence. NOAA, who is called out in the documents as a client for the proposed 200- ton boat landing at the south-east end of the Wharf weighed in with an email of support. I have a hunch the massive Landmark Building earmarked to be built next to the boat landing is somehow tied to that interest despite the posturing that it will be public space. The CEO from the Chamber of Commerce spoke in support as did one Wharf business owner plus one member of the public. That was it.

Economic Development staff dismissed concerns raised “from the opposition” as “myths” while they created their own, which the council majority uncritically adopted as gospel. 

Council has accepted the ED hype that the Wharf is in dire straits and only this Master Plan and EIR can save it.  That grants cannot possibly be applied for without this Plan. Council member Meyers who supported the whole package feared that without approval, “the wharf will fall into the ocean bit by bit.”  She applauded the  prospect of people coming from all over the world to visit the Wharf, apparently ignorant of the fact that they already do that and what they like about the Wharf is its current charm and historic feel.

The ED Assets Development manager trotted out the old saw about “the end of the Wharf getting all the damage.” Wasn’t that the original reason for the 2012 Disaster Relief fund grant application to the feds to fix the “severe damage” at the end of the Wharf from the tsunami of 2011?  Never mind that the Wharf sustained no damage from the tsunami. Never mind that the grant money allocated to fix the non-existent damage was diverted to create the WMP. Now this “damage” is being used to justify the proposed 40 feet tall, 6,000 square foot Landmark building that has received visceral, massive opposition from the public. 

ED knows where it wants to go with our Wharf. The ED director said there will be shifts at the end of the Wharf, that the “Dolphin restaurant will come down” and “something is needed to replace the Dolphin.”  Reference was made to a “new demographic for economic success.” In other words, morph the Wharf to attract the younger, affluent crowd: the assumption being that such demographic needs something new, that they can’t appreciate the Wharf without the city changing its nature. Transform the Wharf to a platform over the water for recreation activities, private weddings, lowered walkways, upscale eateries and the like. 

I was struck by the lack of council challenge to staff given the detailed challenges from the public. Not one voice raised for the migratory guillemots who will be significantly impacted. Access to their nesting sites under the Wharf will be blocked on 3 sides by new structures, a fact the EIR failed to assess. One wonders if council members read only the staff report.

Something occurred at the meeting that I have rarely seen. When councilmember Brown made a substitute motion to remove the Landmark building and cap other heights at 35 feet, seconded by council member Beiers, the Mayor invited staff to respond to Brown’s points. That they did, with skill and well-honed rhetoric sufficient to bury the points. That’s not how the power structure is meant to work. Staff’s role is to give their report and recommendations. Then, other than answering any clarifying questions, they take a back seat role, leaving it to elected council members to duke it out to make policy. The players have changed positions. Staff now occupies both seats.  There was no council exchange of positions, concerns, questions, just little individual speeches parroting staff myths. 

This augurs badly for the public voice being heard and represented by council. There are massive projects coming down the pike requiring council deliberation. There is no ambiguity from ED and Planning on these developments: tear down the old, the funky, the human scale. Erect the tall, the commercial, the San Jose aesthetic. 

Today the Wharf: tomorrow the town. That is, if we let it happen. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

November 30

SC LEFT EXCLUSIVE.  

Left Coast, “A slightly derogatory word for America’s west coast, used by Republicans to refer to the primarily Democratic California, Oregon, and Washington.”

-Urban Dictionary

Looking for the Real Left Coast
Given the fact that California is anything but Donald Trump country, and Joe Biden won by more than 5 million votes, 63.5% to 34.3%, you might conclude those numbers would swing the political pendulum leftward. Furthermore, there was an 80% turnout statewide, the highest in 20 years. Was this election going to turn-out to be the one in which California might cement its apparent “left-coast” image? There’s been a decade-long trend of voters sending the entire state into the throes of the Democratic Party. Might this be the election too in which socialism might become respectable? After all, Bernie Sanders won the state in the presidential primary back in March. The field of left ballot initiatives seemed almost to be a political set-up, a chance for a united victory lap around the civil liberties and immigrant cesspool of lies Trump has marched a good portion of the country down into. The 2020 election could at long last mark the Golden State solidly in the left political column for years to come. Rent control, taxing business property, affirmative action, and legalizing 17-years to vote in presidential primary elections were all on the ballot, and so was Trump. 

Santa Cruz, Part of Real Left Coast?
The good news is that Santa Cruz County voted overwhelmingly against Donald Trump, 78.5% to 18.5% while every state proposition with the exception of 21, rent control expansion for cities, also prevailed locally. The bad news is what does it mean that Trump received more than 4,000 votes in 2020 in Santa Cruz County than in 2016, while Biden also received 18,500 votes more than Hillary Clinton? County turnout was 84% in 2016 and 85% in 2020. More actual voters turned out this year than in any year in the history of our county. While the Democratic Presidential candidate did considerably better, Trump’s vote total increase equaled Biden’s over Hillary Clinton, both saw around a 16% increase. More bad news are the final outcomes of the state’s ballot propositions. One-by-one the more progressive initiatives failed to see a harvest of California’s sharp turn away from the right-wing Presidency of Trump. There was not even a hint of some sort of leftish political coat-tail effect. Several of these propositions were avowedly progressive attempts to make life better after years of racial discrimination (Prop 16), share the wealth (Prop 15), and finally bring some relief to renters (Prop21).

The Left Coast of Marin, Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo, Los Angeles, and Santa Cruz
Proposition 15, “Schools and Communities First,” was to be restoration of the pre-1978 Proposition 13’s property tax roll-back, but it was to be limited to businesses. It would not increase homeowner property tax, only businesses would be taxed, and it would help provide badly needed dollars for the state’s school system. It passed in 15 of California’s 58 counties, including Santa Cruz, but lost over all, 52% to 48% statewide.

Proposition 16, “affirmative action,” got clobbered, 57% to 43%, and in this the year we wanted to believe Black Lives Matter. But not as much at the ballot box? It passed in only six counties, all in Northern California with the exception of Los Angeles. The five other counties are contiguous and perhaps would form the back bone of any real Left Coast: Marin, Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz. The no-vote in usually progressive Santa Clara, Sonoma, Solano, and Contra Costa counties was almost equal, losing by five percentage points in each area.

Proposition 18, in which 17-year olds would be able to not only vote in a presidential primary if they will be 18 by the general election but to also run for office, was rejected by California voters 56% to 44%, while those same six counties all passed it by healthy margins. Why state voters rejected extending the voting franchise to 17-year olds is on its face baffling and deserves deeper inquiry. If our state is thinking we are progressive and that the prevailing notion in many academic and political quarters is that big policy and political changes always begin California like strict emission standards and organic food regulation. Well, think again when it comes to increasing voter enfranchisement. There are currently 18 states and the District of Columbia that permit voting prior to reaching 18, including some “fly-over” states like Mississippi, Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia.

Proposition 21, which would not have so much imposed rent control, but allowed local governments to impose it on a wider swath of the housing market than is not allowed. The key issue was about increasing local control, but voters did not see it that way. Prop. 21 was defeated in almost every county in the state, except Alameda and San Francisco. In Santa Cruz, it lost by almost 20 points. Once again, the California Apartment Association dumped huge amounts of money to defeat it, almost $50 million this time. (Proposition 21 )

Proposition 22 was the “Uber-Lyft” large ad buy, and it will come to epitomize how legislation, essentially labor law, can be bought in the Golden State. According to the California Secretary of State’s web site, a total of $188.9 million was spent by the “Yes on Prop. 22”  backers. While Prop 22 won handily, 59% to 41%, it essentially denies drivers healthcare, worker’s compensation, and a larger say over their working conditions. (See CA Assembly Bill 5, which it repealed.) What is most remarkable is that the money spent to nullify a pro-labor law and instead institute a corporation policy is the most ever spent by one side on a California ballot measure. Only Santa Cruz, Marin, San Francisco, Alameda, San Mateo, Mendocino, Humboldt, and tiny Alpine counties voted no.

Proposition 17 Ahh, if only the previous ballot initiatives had gone the way of Prop 17, which restores the right to people convicted of felonies who are on parole. This was approved overwhelmingly by California voters, 59% to 41%, while they told 17-year olds, no.

Addendum
Before we go off touting the potential lefty nature of California, we should consider these election results. Similar to Manu Koenig’s victory over Supervisor John Leopold, a few of us will be scratching our heads about state proposition issues. It is a case of the more I learn about these results, the less I am sure of why voters made these decisions. You the reader can do your own head-scratching by traveling the internet to the Secretary of State’s web site. 

“Today many are buying gifts or donations for the holiday season. Right now, small businesses & food aids across the country REALLY need our help. Let’s help & commit to shopping small this year wherever we can.” (Nov. 27)

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
November 30

THE STATE HAS TAKEN OVER ISSUING MANY SEPTIC PERMITS IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
Since 2013, Santa Cruz County Health Services has been on the hook with the State Water Quality Control Board to develop a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) to address the issue of failing septic systems in the County. Because that did not get done, the State took over issuing septic permits for about 10% of the cases when things are problematic. That means trouble for many of those nearly 1000 property owners in the CZU Fire area who want to rebuild their homes that burned.

Finally, the County Health Services Agency and Environmental Health Dept. have the draft LAMP ready for review by the County Water Advisory Commission on December 16, and approval by the County Board of Supervisors next year:

Last year at this time, the Board accepted the report that the Draft LAMP was supposedly submitted to the State, but was it?  It apparently was not included in the Board’s agenda packet with the staff report.

Consider this comment submitted December 10, 2019 to the Board of Supervisors on Consent Agenda Item #57:

The user realrose@norcalbroker.com  has posted a comment on Legislative File 6526: Accept and file update on the County of Santa Cruz Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Local Agency Management Program for permitting and managing septic systems, as recommended by the Director of Health Services. Comment: Honorable Supervisors: Thank you for completing the LAMP submission to allow for submission of certain septic permits to be processed in our County. However, it should be noted that only a Staff Report was submitted, and the actual LAMP Local Area Management Plan and any accompanying documents was not included with the Agenda. Pertinent documents like this should be a part of the agenda packet under a full disclosure of information given to the State. Thank you, Rose Marie McNair, Broker Housing Advocate

Ms. McNair was part of the 2018-2019 On-Site Sewage Disposal Technical Advisory Committee that met on January 31, 2018, March 14, 2018 and November 7, 2019 to develop an updated draft LAMP report to submit to the State for approval.  It is noteworthy that she admonished the Board about not including the LAMP with the report stating that it had been submitted to the State.

Consider this excellent correspondence to the Board of Supervisors on January 28, 2020 from a San Lorenzo Valley resident regarding ADU code approvals (the Board took no action regarding points raised):

“The county is already in trouble with the state regarding the county LAMP (Local Area Management Plan) report. …..The new ADU rules and codes do not make it easier for those in rural areas on septic systems.” Read Mr. Stevenson’s complete letter in Item #11 correspondence here.

Well, it appears the County has finally got a Final LAMP report together and will be submitting it to the State Water Quality Control Board next year. That should be good news to the people hoping to rebuild in the CZU Fire areas.

Here is the text of the summary of the history of this mess, as submitted to the Board of Supervisors on December 10, 2019….nearly one year ago.

County of Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors
Agenda Item Submittal From: Health Services Agency:
Environmental Health Division (831) 454-4000 

Subject: Update – Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Local Agency Management Program 

Meeting Date: December 10, 2019

Recommended Action: Accept and file update on the County of Santa Cruz Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Local Agency Management Program for permitting and managing septic systems.

 Executive Summary
Effective May 2013, the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) adopted the State ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS (OWTS) Policy, which requires counties to implement State standards or to document local compliance with State requirements through a State-approved Local Agency Management Program (LAMP). Per the State OWTS Policy, as of May 2018, the County is only authorized to approve permits for new or replacement OWTS that meet the State standards, pending State approval of the County’s LAMP. On November 14, 2019, HSA submitted to the California Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) a 2019 Draft LAMP and code amendments with the purpose of regaining full permit approval authority.

 Background 
Local municipalities administer installation and operating requirements for OWTS, subject to direction and oversight by the State Board and Regional Board. In Santa Cruz County, permitting for installation and operation of OWTS is managed by HSA’s Environmental Health Division. County requirements for installing and maintaining OWTS are contained in the County Code Chapter 7.38 “Sewage Disposal” and in various General Plan and Local Coastal Plan policies and programs. Since 1986, the County has also been implementing a comprehensive program for OWTS management, the San Lorenzo Wastewater Management Plan, which was also approved by the Regional Board in 1995. In 1999, the California State legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 885, which called for the State Board to develop statewide standards for regulation of OWTS. On June 19, 2012, the State Board adopted a new State OWTS Policy, effective May 13, 2013. HSA’s Environmental Health Division participated throughout the extended process to develop those standards. On June 21, 2005, and February 3, 2009, HSA presented status reports to the Board of Supervisors on AB 885 and development of the State OWTS Policy. In May 2016, HSA submitted an updated onsite wastewater plan to the Regional Board as a 2016 Draft LAMP. Following review and discussion with the TAC, in February 2018, HSA also submitted to the Regional Board proposed amendments to Santa Cruz County Code Chapter 7.38, as a key component of the LAMP package. Completion of the LAMP has been delayed due to extended staff vacancies and other program obligations. For a five-year period from May 2013 through May 2018, the State Board authorized counties to retain full permitting authority over septic systems pending LAMP approval. In May 2018, this authority expired and reverted to the Regional Board until a County’s LAMP secures State approval. Since May 2018, HSA staff can only approve permit applications that meet the State standards for Low Risk Systems (Tier 1 Standards). Due to site constraints in Santa Cruz County rural regions, approximately 10% of the applications cannot meet Tier 1 standards and have to be referred to the Regional Board staff for approval. This has required extra time and expense for those systems requiring Regional Board approval. Additionally, a number of applicants are delaying application submittal, pending a return of full approving authority to the County.

 Analysis 
On November 14, 2019, HSA’s 2019 Draft LAMP was submitted to the Regional Board. HSA anticipates that the Regional Board will negotiate requested revisions to this Draft LAMP and the associated proposed Code amendments. Once HSA receives the State’s requested changes, and negotiates approval of those revisions, including review by the TAC, HSA will produce a 2020 Draft LAMP, and proposed amended Chapter 7.38, and present them to the Board of Supervisors for approval to submit to the State as a Final Draft. HSA anticipates that State approval of a Final Draft LAMP will occur within the upcoming calendar year of 2020. HSA plans to return to the Board before December 2020, requesting authorization to submit a Final Draft LAMP to the State. Once the County’s Final Draft LAMP and its corollary Code changes are formally approved by the Regional Board, HSA will resume permitting authority over all OWTS across the full spectrum and range of operating conditions. HSA will also return to the Board and Planning Commission to formally update Chapter 7.38, which is a Local Coastal Plan implementing ordinance, along with any required General Plan changes. Financial Impact The program for development of the LAMP and the majority of OWTS activities are funded by County Service Area (CSA)-12 service charges.

WHY IS THE COUNTY HIDING THE SOIL CONTAMINATION PROBLEMS AND GIFT OF PUBLIC ASSETS TO MIDPEN HOUSING FOR LIVE OAK PROJECT?
Why did the Clerk of the Board omit the agenda item for the public’s view of the exact terms of the agreement approved on November 10 by the Board of Supervisors that will gift public property to the developers of the low-cost medical and dental clinics at 1500 Capitola Road, and cut an amazing deal worth millions for MidPen Housing to build 57 affordable units on top of soils that are severely contaminated? While the item shows up on the County website, #46 on the Consent Agenda was omitted from the printed copy of the Agenda made available to the public the day of the meeting.

No one is going to actually clean up this carcinogenic PCE (tetrachloroethylene) contamination that has been found to be so high at the proposed development, MidPen Housing and the other developers are required to install an expensive Vapor Intrusion Monitoring System (VIMS) for all structures. The source of the contamination is a former dry cleaner business that is now a Laundromat. 

The land and groundwater beneath the proposed affordable housing units and low-cost medical and dental clinics has such high levels of the carcinogenic PCE contaminant, the County Redevelopment Successor Agency, governed by the Board of Supervisors, is just going to sweep this all under the rug by making deals with the developers to get the project built.

Would YOU want to live or work at this place? Is it ethical to make poor people, with possible language barriers who may not fully understand the contamination issues, live and work in this contaminated development? Why is the County seemingly hiding all this from the public by burying and scattering it in consent agendas and omitting it entirely from printed agenda?

Chairman Greg Caput wisely pulled Consent Items #21 and #23 on the November 10, 2020 Board meeting agenda, both of which described to some extent the nature of the contamination problem and the need to reduce expected tax assessments for public benefits, such as school and fire districts, because of the lowered land price. This visibly angered Supervisor John Leopold, whose District includes this development. However, Consent Item #46, which contained the real Agreement and disclosures, escaped notice because it was not printed on the agenda for the public to review that day.

Here is a copy of my recent letter to Chairman of the Board, Greg Caput (see the attachment proving the Item #46 Disclosure of Agreements was omitted from print for public review):

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

FAREWELL TO DEBRA WHITE PLUME, INSPIRATIONAL DEFENDER OF HER TRIBE

Debra White Plume passed away on November 10, at the age of 66, due to cancer. She had attended high school in San Jose for a time under the Indian Relocation Act of 1956, but lived most of her life on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. She was a prominent Native American activist, leading the 1973 American Indian Movement’s occupation of Wounded Knee on the Pine Ridge Reservation in southwest South Dakota, over demands that the U.S government respect its treaties with Indigenous tribes from the 1800’s and forward. She also led 2015 legal challenges to stop the giant Cameco uranium mining company from expanding into a sacred site in Nebraska and within Lakota treaty territories, an ongoing action. In 2016, she led efforts for the thousands who protested the 1,172-mile-long Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock Reservation, which threatens the drinking water supply of the Lakota People.

“I’m Lakota. I’m a woman, and water is the domain of the women in our nation. And so it’s our privilege and our obligation to protect water. If somebody wants to label me, I guess it would be water protector.” “I fought with cops before. I’ve been shot at by police. I’ve been shot by police. We got it on with police on Pine Ridge back in the day, so I understand that rage. But when we’re together to protect sacred water, let’s do it with dignity, let’s do it with training, let’s do it with unity.”

Thank you, Water Protector Debra White Plume. May we all take up your torch and continue your good work and brave spirit.

Debra White Plume, Defender of Her Tribe, Is Dead at 66.
She championed the rights of the Oglala Lakota in South Dakota and was a leader in protests at Wounded Knee and oil pipeline sites.
[Continue to NY Times article]

...

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL. SPEAK OUT FOR WHAT YOU KNOW IS RIGHT.   LIGHT A CANDLE FOR BRAVE SPIRITS LIKE DEBRA WHITE PLUME.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING SOMETHING. 

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner
(831) 685-2915 – I welcome your discussion. 

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

November 27
#332 / Splitting

On November 4, 2020, the day after our most recent presidential election, The Wall Street Journal ran a column by Andrew Hartz, “A Diagnosis for American Polarization.” Hartz is a psychotherapist in private practice in New York City. His column suggested that “splitting,” a defense mechanism with which psychotherapists are presumably familiar, is what has caused the intense polarization that is in increasing evidence in our national, state, and local politics. 

“Splitting,” according to Hartz, may be described as follows: 

A defense mechanism by which people unconsciously frame ideas, individuals or groups of people in all-or-nothing terms—for example, all good or all bad. The term was popularized in its current usage by the psychoanalyst Melanie Klein in the 1930s and ’40s. Its name describes how intolerable thoughts and feelings are split off from the subject’s awareness, leading to a partial view of the world. To see our opponents as pure evil, we have to split off the parts of them that are admirable. To see ourselves as purely righteous, we have to split off our shortcomings.

At the root of this process is distress over contradictions. It can be painful to think that the people we idealize are flawed and the people we loathe have virtues. By pushing these conflicts out of awareness, splitting reduces anxiety and makes the world appear more coherent—in the short term. It also severely distorts reality, making it hard to develop solutions to problems, which often grow worse as a result. Splitting can warp identity, morality, memories and desires. It makes conversation difficult, impairs relationships and can even lead to mental illness.

Splitting was theorized by Klein to be an entirely unconscious process, so people don’t realize they’re doing it, or why. They’re unaware of the uncomfortable mix of emotions that arose, the anxiety that drove them to split, or their inability to tolerate nuance.

How can we overcome splitting? In psychoanalysis, they say “interpret the defense before the content.” This means it is more effective to talk about splitting and how it works before shifting the dialogue to the pros and cons. Until we address the process of splitting itself, contrary evidence rarely penetrates.

I don’t think there is any doubt that President Trump has adeptly speeded up this “splitting” process within our nation. However, the “cure” has to come from our individual refusal to “split” from those with different political views – no matter what the president says or does, and no matter what those on the other side of the political spectrum say or do. As Hartz suggests, we might best start with acknowledging the process and problem. Let’s start admitting to ourselves that we are, in fact, quite capable of seeing those on the other side of political issues as evil, suppressing our knowledge that they all – even our president – have some “admirable qualities,” and that in this sense they are not much different from ourselves.

If we can do that, we can move on from there. That, at least, is Hartz’ advice.

Seems like good advice to me. It’s worth a shot, at the very least!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    “HOLIDAYS”

“In the old days, it was not called the Holiday Season; the Christians called it ‘Christmas’ and went to church; the Jews called it ‘Hanukkah’ and went to synagogue; the atheists went to parties and drank. People passing each other on the street would say ‘Merry Christmas!’ or ‘Happy Hanukkah!’ or (to the atheists) ‘Look out for the wall!” 
~Dave Barry 

“It came to him that he didn’t like holidays. . . . They bore down on you. Each one always ended up feeling like an exam . . .”  
~Lily King, 

“The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched. They must be felt with the heart. Wishing you happiness.”    
~Helen Keller


This is one in a series of videos of murder mysteries and makeup. Bailey is a very engaging story teller, and I find the videos strangely enjoyable 🙂


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment