Well, they finally did it last week! And you can’t say it came out of nowhere. It’s only the “culmination of a decades-long effort that’s the logical result of a broken system that needs reform,” says Brian Tyler Cohen. He says that the Supreme Court’s taking a hatchet to the Voting Rights Act was depressingly unsurprising, because of course they would — since this court has pretty much declared their fealty to Trump over the Constitution. In Cohen’s opinion, it was a foregone conclusion. Even with the ideal situation of Democrats ensconced in the three branches of government, being able to enact a new Voting Rights Act, the current 6-3 court will be there, hatchets at the ready. So “we have six unelected judges in robes deciding that Black voices are unconstitutional, segregation by map, Jim Crow with a gavel,” says Louisiana Congressman Cleo Fields.

Cohen proposes that to restore democracy, and to overhaul the judicial system, the Supreme Court needs reforms that are based on principle, not politics, in order to have legitimacy or public support. “If any subsequent reforms are to stand a chance at surviving, we cannot leave in place a rogue branch of government with the power to strike down anything that doesn’t comport with its far-right ideology. The first reform should be to expand the Court, in line with the principles that determined the number of justices in the early years of the republic,” adds Cohen.  He recounts historically, the initial six justices to reflect the six federal courts; the year 1807 saw an additional justice added when a seventh circuit court was added. The court grew to nine with the addition of two circuit courts in 1837, and today there are thirteen federal court circuits with no ensuing changes in the court makeup. Cohen believes the Supreme Court should reflect the size of the country and the scope of its legal challenges, as it did over a century ago.

A second reform proposed by Cohen, also supported by 75 percent of Americans according to a PRRI survey in 2025, are term limits for the court justices. He sees a term of eight years which would allow newly elected presidents to choose their own nominees regularly, reducing the opportunities for procedural delays, which occurred with President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016, his final year in the White House. In Cohen’s view, the regular flow of new appointments would help remove the national drama from each nomination by diluting the novelty of each new appointment.

A USA Today poll in 2024 shows support by 76 percent of Americans, for the establishment of an enforceable code of conduct, which would empower a panel mandated to investigate allegations of wrongdoing and impropriety. The panel should be given the power to force the recusal of justices in cases where they have personal ties, and even go so far as to remove justices in cases of conduct unworthy of the Supreme Court. A final Supreme Court reform would be to retire any justice over age seventy, regardless of who appointed them. The interpretation of the Constitution that judges “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior,” has given lifetime appointments to court appointees, but there are other considerations — a retired justice could be moved to a lower court and still stay within a constitutional framework.

The Pew Research Center discloses that public support for retiring all public officials over a certain age has widespread consensus, in particular for elected offices, but also for the Supreme Court, with Democrats being in the upper echelons of the poll. The only age specified by the Constitution requires that presidential candidates must be thirty-five years of age. A mandatory retirement of seventy years of age would lead to four immediate vacancies on the current Supreme Court: three conservatives (Alito, Roberts & Thomas) and one liberal (Sotomayor), leaving all three Trump judges. It has been almost a century since President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to expand the high court (termed ‘packing’ back then), a plan which Congress defeated, and since that time no changes have been attempted. Included in FDR’s plan as he struggled to get his New Deal revivals during the Great Depression, was to retire justices at age seventy, and if they refused, he would be able to add an additional justice until the court reached fifteen members. Despite the Congressional defeat, time was on his side, because within five years, seven of the nine justices were appointed by him.

Cohen warns, “Today’s Supreme Court has weakened itself by its political activism, repeatedly disregarding the Constitution and its code of conduct. It is populated by older justices at a time when the American people are yearning to reform the status quo. If we want to revive our democracy, we need to revive our Supreme Court. If that seems extreme, consider an alternative that is already upon us: a Court that undermines the very Constitution it’s supposed to uphold. This week’s ruling on the Voting Rights Act was not a one-off. It’s the logical endpoint of a decades-long effort to disenfranchise minority voters and minority representation to an absolute minimum. The three longest-serving conservative justices on the court right now have a combined 75 years on the bench. This is their pet project. They own it. And the other three conservatives, all Trump appointees, are comparatively young and spry. Without court expansion, we’re stuck with this right wing majority for another couple of decades at least. We need to normalize ourselves to the idea of court expansion, so that when we have power, we don’t waste our time negotiating what we should be doing, but rather spend our time doing it.”

Pema Levy writes in Mother Jones that the high court’s gerrymandering decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, against the Voting Rights Act is hardly a “mere tweak,” or as Justice Alito characterized it, a “humble update.” Levy terms the 6-3 opinion a “counter-revolution” against Section 2 of the 1965 act, which requires that people of color have an equal opportunity to elect representatives of their choice, taking us back to the dark days when Black and brown voters in many states cast meaningless ballots. Since the original enactment, the reversal of previous diluted, powerless and gerrymandered votes, resulted in Southern states sending Black representatives to Congress, state legislatures, and local political bodies, with Congress repeatedly defending and continuing the protections. In last week’s diminution by the court, Justice Kagan chided the majority for downplaying the gravity of its decision, by laying “the groundwork for the largest reduction in minority representation since the era following Reconstruction.”

The Robert’s Court has been slowly dismantling the Voting Rights Act since 2013, and Levy sees this recent action as the final nail in the coffin, improbable that any plaintiff will ever be able to avail themselves of the law’s protections. By elevating permission to conduct partisan gerrymandering above voting rights, Black voters become dispersed, lacking any ability to elect a representative of their choice — wasted votes again! Kagan writes, “For how else, the majority reasons, can we preserve the authority of States to engage in this practice than by stripping minority citizens of their rights to an equal political process? And with that, the majority as much as invites States to embark on a new round of partisan gerrymanders.” The majority does not dispute this — it’s a damning silence that tacitly admits just how sweeping is this decision.

Quickly responding to the Supreme Court decision was Louisiana’s Republican governor Jeff Landry, as he suspended his state’s US House primaries to allow lawmakers to draw up a new congressional map. No matter that early voting was set to begin, with some absentee ballots already cast, the executive order states that the primaries are “suspended for the duration of the May 16, 2026 and June 27, 2026 election cycles and until July 15, 2026 or until such time as determined by the Legislature,” the legislature then to follow instructions to “pass legislation to enact new congressional maps.” Outraged and alarmed, Joel Payne of MoveOn Civic Action charged that, “Republicans are colluding in broad daylight to try to rig the election and silence Black voters. The MAGA court made their decision to gut voting rights just in the nick of time for Louisiana Republicans to postpone the scheduled primaries to slice and dice voting maps to pick and choose voters of their liking.”

Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee said, “Even in ruby red states, Republicans see the writing on the wall that voters will hold them accountable for soaring costs this November, which is why they’re rigging the system to dodge accountability — the mission to transform the landscape of state legislative power has never mattered more.” The Washington Post reported that Governor Landry notified Republican US House candidates that he planned to suspend the Louisiana primaries, with The Post noting that one or two more GOP seats could result in the midterms from his delay. Democracy Docket’s Marc Elias responded by saying, “What is happening in Louisiana right now is both a redistricting power grab and a dry run for authoritarian election subversion this fall.”

US House Speaker Mike Johnson voiced support for the new congressional maps, but Landry’s order is already facing legal action from state residents. “These harms are not speculative. They are imminent: early in-person voting commences on Saturday, May 2, 2026. They are irreparable: once an election day passes, no monetary remedy can restore the franchise,” warns one lawsuit. Voting rights group Fair Fight Action analyzed that Democrats could redraw anywhere from 10 to 22 additional congressional seats for their party in time for the 2028 elections if they push hard enough with redistricting in seven blue and swing states. “Democrats have a clear path to neutralize this GOP power grab if they want to take it,” says Max Flugrath, senior communications director of Fair Fight Action. “This is the ‘break the glass in case of emergency’ moment for American democracy.”

“Twenty-two House seats across seven states may sound like a heavy lift,” says Flugrath, “but our analysis shows it’s well within reach if blue-state governors and legislatures squeeze every potential seat out of the maps. What’s more, much will be decided by how hard Democrats push.” But they are gearing up with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries telling Politico that Democrats will seek gerrymanders at minimum in New York, Colorado, Maryland and Illinois. None of this should have to happen, though Democrats have gerrymandered themselves, but Republicans went full throttle after capturing many state legislatures in their 2010 midterm rout.

The Democrats position has been that neither side should gerrymander, attempting to model an alternative path with independent redistricting commissions, and with federal legislation ending gerrymandering for both sides, believing that it disrespects the opposition’s voters and allows lawmakers to insulate themselves from accountability. But if Republicans make good on their threats, the choice for Democrats will be stark: push forward, or perish. No matter if Republicans don’t like it — this is the world they wanted, and it is now they who are now inflicting it upon their rivals. “The arc of the moral universe doesn’t bend toward justice unless we bend it,” says Bryan Fair of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Satirical writer, Andy Borowitz, followed up recent news from the English crown with his Borowitz Report: “A visibly shaken Donald J. Trump told reporters on Thursday that the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten of Windsor set a dangerous precedent of pedophiles facing consequences. ‘King Charles released a statement where he said no one is above the law,’ he said. ‘That was a horrible thing to say.’ Calling Andrew’s arrest ‘disgraceful,’ Trump said it had made him ‘rethink the whole idea of becoming king. If you can be a member of the royal family and still get arrested, what’s the point of having a crown?’ he said. ‘You’re better off just having your own Supreme Court.‘”

[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]

The lead up to last Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner had garnered much commentary by a diverse press corps, many choosing to boycott the event with Donald Trump’s first attendance as president. The decision to abandon the tradition of inviting a comedian to roast the attendees because of the thin-skinned snowflake of a leader, and enlisting mentalist Oz Pearlman for entertainment, prompted Jimmy Kimmel to do his own scathing alternative ceremony on the Thursday preceding the main event. As he explained on his show, his substitute presentation would consist of some jokes and commentary that a comedian might do if “the trembling drama queen who’s scared of comedy” might hear under accepted circumstances. Video footage shows Kimmel standing behind a podium as he delivers quips to an audience full of photoshopped politicians and celebrities, saying, “Look at you, all dressed up in formal wear, dresses, tuxedos. I haven’t seen this much black since every page of the Trump-Epstein Files.” The comedian addresses President Trump with: “I’m happy you decided to stay, Mr. President. And don’t worry if we bruise your ego — it will only make your hands look less disgusting. By the way, in the unfortunate event that our president has a medical emergency tonight, do we have a doctor in the — I mean, I’m sorry. Do we have a Jesus in the house? I always confuse them, too.”

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

KETCHUP, DEAD IN THE WATER, REPENTANCE

The illegal war against Iran is humming along with President Trump and Pete Hegseth continuing with their threats to destroy the country completely, though the president insists, “Whether we make a deal or not makes no difference to me, because we’ve won,” though Iran appears to be in control of the situation. International shipping is at a virtual standstill through the Strait of Hormuz, “the geopolitical equivalent of stabbing the global economy’s femoral artery,” in the words of Matt Ford in The New Republic. On-again-off-again cease fires, and passage through the strait, continue to plague any resolution, a result of the election of a loser to lead the world’s only superpower, says Ford — “loser” being the president’s favorite insult, followed closely by “failing” and “low IQ.” Ford sees that a loser is not someone who is left behind, nor someone who simply failed at something, since failure is a part of life and a possible step toward subsequent success.

His definition of a loser is one who thinks in terms of winners and losers at all, and believes that they have not received the status and rewards to which they feel entitled, always slighted by the world at large which has cheated and denied them things that they think belong to them by virtue of their supposed innate superiority. It’s curious that JD Vance wrote in ‘Hillbilly Elegy‘ that the message of the right-wingers is increasingly: “It’s not your fault that you’re a loser; it’s the government’s fault,” his implication being “it’s your fault if you’re a loser.” The Vice President probably regrets inclusion of that sentiment in his book. Ford writes, “Losers do not actually care about the reality of winning and losing — instead, they care about the perception of success and failure, a basis for Donald Trump’s insistence that he was the biggest and best in the New York real estate scene.” Trump is quoted as saying, “Show me someone without an ego, and I’ll show you a loser,” which might explain his tacky gold ornamentation in the White House. Also, when your blood type is ketchup…

Ford writes that “losers internalize their own self-perception and seek to reinforce it in the world. They are drawn to hierarchy, and are therefore hostile to America’s fundamentally egalitarian ethos. A stratified society gives them a clearer sense of their inferiors, which is usually bound together with their perceptions of race, sex, genetics, or some other apparently inborn trait. Racism is the most familiar redoubt for the loser, since it provides what they think as highly visible proof of their own supposed superiority.” Trump describes himself as “highly intelligent” based on genetic grounds — his uncle was an MIT professor, therefore becoming a credential for his own cognitive ability. Fascism and loserdom go hand in hand because fascism is predicated on the notion that the fascist has been unjustly cheated and robbed, and that only force can lead to restoration and revitalization. Fascists idolize losers because no fascist society has ever flourished and because they see themselves reflected in other people’s failure. Hence, the praise lavished upon the likes of General Robert E. Lee, the loser of ‘The War of Northern Aggression.’

Ford concludes his piece with, “The goal of Trumpism, is to create losers of us all. The political and economic project’s goal is not to materially improve its adherent’s lives. Instead, it is to create a sense of social order for some people that offers an aesthetic sense of improvement, even as one’s standard of living declines in real terms. These illusory gains can only go so far. Or as one frustrated Trump voter once told reporters, ‘He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.'”

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman wrote on Substack: “President Trump has lost the war with Iran but is refusing to accept it.” Krugman says the president is “flat out unable” to deal with the fallout of the war, and is unable to accept that his intervention has failed — “it’s been clear for awhile that the United States has basically lost this war.” Goals to achieve regime change and take Iran’s uranium will not happen, with the regime being even more hardline. Iran is demonstrably strengthened with its ability to control the Hormuz Strait, and though temporarily permitting some access, Trump’s announced blockade hastened Iran’s decision to shut down all shipping, stating, “Control of the Strait of Hormuz has reverted to its previous state, and this strategic waterway is under strict management and control of the armed forces.” So, until Trump stops his meddling, allowing Iranian ships to navigate freely, the president is dead in the water.

American psychologist and psychotherapist, Dr. John Gartner, believes that Donald Trump is more like an animal at this point in his presidency, and will lash out at anything and everyone. As he told The Daily Beast, “A cornered, wounded animal is the most vicious and dangerous kind of animal there is, and that’s where he is right now.” Gartner worries that if the midterm elections bring about a complete turnover in both houses of Congress, Trump will still be a commander-in-chief who is getting off on the omnipotent destructiveness and power of blowing things up. Any thought Trump might have now is what he believes, even if it is completely false. Gartner says it’s a primitive type of thinking, where if you imagine it, it must be true — magical thinking! “Anything that occurs to him — any stray, crazy thought — is true,” warns Gartner. “His grandiosity is so extreme that not only does he want to be the Pope, and Jesus, and the president of Venezuela, and the Mullah of Iran — he wants to be all of these things at once. He wants the world to worship him, and he wants to erect massive monuments to praise himself.”

The now-infamous A.I.-generated image of Trump’s Truth Social post depicting himself as Jesus healing a patient, or raising someone from the dead, with an entourage of heavenly hosts and a plethora of American iconography, outraged religious and political leaders across the board. The president’s explanation that he saw himself as a Red Cross doctor healing the sick fell on deaf ears, so he was convinced to use his lighted celestial fingers for deleting the post. We can expect a surge in Halloween costumes this year of celebrants wearing white robes and carrying stethoscopes. Trump, of course, couldn’t let sleeping dogs lie, so he quickly followed up his chastisement with a Truth Social A.I. post depicting him being comforted by a Jesus-like figure.

Trump’s second A.I. post prompted a number of snarky comments on social media: “Wait a second. That’s not Jesus, that’s clearly a DOCTOR! Why does he look so forlorn? Is something wrong? Are the test results back? Is he breaking bad news to the president about his failing health? Is Trump trying to tell us something?“; and “Donald Trump is testing out a new portrayal of himself as the chosen one after deleting a post that sparked backlash for depicting himself as Jesus Christ.” As might be expected, Trump then posted, “The Radical Left Lunatics might not like this, but I think it is quite nice!!!! ” Right, warm fuzzies all around!

Since his return to the Oval Office, Trump has enacted changes that have encouraged a resurgence of religion within the federal bureaucracy, which some federal workers view as an alarming breakdown of the boundary between church and state which can be seen in the proselytizing emails, invitations to worship services, and religious undertones in high-profile policy pronouncements. Most government employees see their jobs as working on behalf of all Americans, but what they are observing is very explicitly Christian — in a very narrow representation of the faith, at that! Administration officials scoff at these charges on the pretext that such expressions are not new and shouldn’t be controversial. Last year, Trump established the White House Faith Office, headed by Televangelist Paula White-Cain, who has compared the president to Jesus, inviting a bit of mockery after she claimed that Trump, as a child, attended Saturday and Sunday school up to three times a week. “Church was a big part of his life,” she insists. Perhaps this is only a test of the emergency fascism system — do not adjust your conscience.

The Office of Personnel Management, in July of last year, released a memo permitting federal workers to “encourage” peers “to participate in religious expressions of faith, such as prayer,” and on Easter Sunday, Department of Agriculture Secretary Brook Rollins sent an agency-wide email with the subject line “He has risen!” The email message described the life of Jesus as “the greatest story ever told, the foundations of our faith, and the abiding hope of all mankind.” One department employee called the email “grotesque,” adding that such conduct would be unacceptable even for military chaplains; but, a department spokesperson felt that the secretary was within her rights to send such a message. A government employee says “people are uncomfortable,” with another saying “there’s a lot of carrying on” and while no one’s forcing you to pray, it’s happening in the middle of a government workplace — meaning that we, the taxpayers, are supporting the breakdown of the wall? It seems that Christo-fascism can be defined as a belief that being productive at work equals having the right to tell co-workers they are going to hell.

The Daily Dose of Democracy website reports on “Secretary of War Crimes Pete Hegseth authorizing the deployment of weapons-grade cringe” last week at a Pentagon prayer service, as he quoted a Biblical-sounding verse that film buffs immediately recognized as the Samuel L. Jackson monologue from Quentin Tarantino’s black comedy ‘Pulp Fiction.’ The movie verse was delivered just before Jackson’s hitman character murders an unarmed man in cold blood, with Hegseth being too myopic to recognize that the speech is satirizing men who hide behind religion in order to justify unholy acts of violence — which is exactly what the Secretary himself is doing in Iran. “Nothing sums up the Trump regimes relationship with religion better than using fake Bible quotes to justify an illegal war of imperial aggression,” the writer charges. The verse is similar to Ezekiel 25:17 in the Old Testament, which uses only part of the scripture, the remainder being scripted by Tarantino. The comments section on DDoD prompted this post by Cy Clops: “And the Lord sayeth: ‘Spread out, numbskulls. Why I oughtta…’ Customized from The Book of Stooges: Nyuk 1, Nyuks 2 and 3.”

But wait! There’s more! Not satisfied with angering Christians all week, President Trump will be reading from the Bible as a publicity stunt in an effort to spread the lie that we live in a Christian Nation. MAGAs in the administration will be participating in a week-long Bible recitation as part of an initiative called ‘America Reads the Bible‘ at the Museum of the Bible to commemorate ‘250 Years of the Bible in America.’ As Hemant Mehta writes on The Friendly Atheist blog, Trump being fresh off posting the image of himself as Jesus while healing a Jeffrey Epstein-lookalike, and offending Pope Leo and Catholics world-wide, will be attempting to do damage control. To start, a recording of Trump reading a verse from the Old Testament — hopefully not Ezekiel 25:17 which should be given to Hegseth — to be released next week, to be followed by his reading of 2 Chronicles 7:14, a section about repentance. That’s sensible to Mehta, who says, “If the man lies during every speech and press conference, he might as well read a Bible verse he doesn’t believe in either. It’s not like they were going to ask him to read the Sermon on the Mount. Or anything from the Gospels.”

Mehta goes on to say that Trump was never going to be asked to follow the message of Jesus because he’s never been interested in that, so this is the next best thing for the right-wing Christians who have latched onto a man now being dubbed the Antichrist by many on the right. It’s good that they are recording it, which will be the only proof we ever get of Trump actually opening up The Book. In a more prudent world, those who cause as much harm in the world as that group would never be asked to hold a Bible, much less read from it, but conservatives have gone all in on hypocrisy. While no one is perfect, most of us put in a bit of effort, unlike Trump, who goes out of his way to be cruel and chaotic. That the people organizing the event won’t denounce his actions tells you a lot more about their values than a reading of the Bible that no one will ever listen to in full.

Mehta concludes that the event isn’t really about honoring the Bible, “It’s about projecting power over non-Christians. The fact that so many so many self-described Christian leaders are participating in the performance — when they would be appalled by a Democrat even citing one verse from the Qur’an in a speech — tells you everything you need to know about their intentions. If they cared about Christianity, they wouldn’t be reading a section of a book they’ve never bothered to read in full for an audience that’s never going to listen to them. They would talk from the heart about things like humility, repentance, compassion, and the vulnerable. But the same dishonest, cruel authoritarians who only care about Christianity to the extent that it keeps them in power don’t actually care about following any of the lessons from the faith. They don’t care if they have a leader shaped by the Bible; they just want one who knows how to use the Bible to control everyone else. That’s what Christian Nationalism is all about.”

The introduction of an exhilarated religious fervor by Trump and Hegseth into the Iran war is a gift to the mullahs of that country according to two former diplomats, who say that they are only going to make things worse. ‘Morning Joe‘ contributor Sam Stein approached former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan with his question, “When you frame war in matters of theology, when you have the president mocking Islam in his tweets or Truth Social posts, how does that play with the leadership of Iran? How will they view this war when you have the defense secretary talking like that?” Sullivan answered, “Well, it does two things. First, in a way, it plays into their hands because these guys are theocrats themselves. And so the idea of having a holy war against the Great Satan, the United States, and the Little Satan, Israel, is core to their identity and core to their argument, to their own people who they were just mowing down. ‘You’ve got to back us in this holy war.’ So it really plays on the turf of the Iranian mullahs and clerics.”

MS NOW host Joe Scarborough added, “The continued deification, to follow up on what Jake said, and having people coming in — scam preachers, phony preachers saying Donald Trump is Jesus Christ is grotesque…every single day. Jake’s exactly right — they are turning this into a crusade. They are literally playing right into Iran’s hands, right into the Revolutionary Guards’ hands.” Former president of the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haas replied, “Absolutely. And again, it works against the idea of compromise. For the Iranians this has become an existential conflict. For us, this is a limited conflict. It’s very hard to prevail in a limited conflict when you’re up against someone who basically feels if they lose, they’re gone.” As Lawrence Wright wrote in his novel, ‘The End of October,’ “Reverence for Life affords me my fundamental principle of morality, namely, that good consists in maintaining, assisting, and enhancing life, and that to destroy, to harm or to hinder life is evil. When good people do good, and evil people do evil, it is not surprising. But when good people do evil, it takes religion to do that.”

Instead of shrinking from the idea that there is a religious aspect to the Iran “excursion,” US administration leaders are leaning into it, invoking God and promising fire and brimstone, once again, for Iran’s civil society if its leaders do not buckle to US demands. A reporter asked Trump if he thinks God supports the US in the war. “I do, because God is good, and God wants to see people taken care of,” Trump said, adding that neither he nor God “like what’s happening.” In Trump’s mind, he may think God is on his side, but international law is not if he carries out the threat to bomb bridges and power plants, which is a war crime by targeting a civilian population. Trump apologist and Representative Russell Fry of South Carolina explained to Fox Business why the GOP-controlled Congress refuses to do its job and rein in the Iran war. “Congress, right now, certainly has an obligation in some ways to assist in matters of international importance, but to micromanage the president with 535 CEOs of the country doesn’t make sense to me — doesn’t make sense to the American people.” What a low IQ, failing, loser of an answer, eh?!!

And this just in from satirist Andy Borowitz, dateline Tehran: “In a major setback for Donald J. Trump, Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz will be closed the next two years for renovations. The Strait of Hormuz board also approved a plan to put Mojtaba Khamenei’s name on the renovated waterway. ‘The Khamenei Strait of Hormuz will be the biggest and most beautiful trade chokepoint EVER!,’ the ayatollah announced in a social media post. In the same post, he indicated that the renovated strait would have a ‘world-class tollbooth’ fitted with marble armrests ‘unlike anything ever done or seen before.‘”

Back in the news this week — the Epstein Report — as a result of a random press conference called by First Lady Melania Trump, a surprise for everyone including the president himself who claimed to know nothing about it. As Joanna Coles writes on Substack, “Melania Trump, last seen smiling alongside the Easter bunny, emerged briefly on Thursday from her gilded witness protection program to issue a statement about Jeffrey Epstein. Why now? Her documentary ‘Melania,’ a long and frictionless Instagram exercise in image laundering, offered the perfect, hermetically sealed environment to address any lingering questions about proximity, rumor, or denial. A captive audience, a sympathetic frame, and not a whisper of Epstein. One might think the omission was the point.”

Melania’s White House statement denying ties to Jeffrey Epstein and knowledge of his crimes, and calling for a congressional hearing for survivors allowing them to testify before lawmakers and have their stories entered into the congressional record, comes at a time when President Trump and his administration had finally succeeded in moving beyond the controversy with the Iran “excursion” dominating headlines. While lawmakers had complained at the limited release last month of files by the Justice Department, the agency said more time was needed for review to ensure no sensitive information about victims was released. The First Lady didn’t waste any of her time defending her husband, and the White House was blindsided with her admitting that she had partied with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York in 1998. Journalist Aaron Rupar wrote on X, “I am not sure why Melania Trump decided to make a statement about Jeffrey Epstein seemingly out of nowhere today, but if the idea was to put the ongoing coverup in the rearview mirror it will backfire spectacularly.”

She denied being a victim of Epstein, to which research paralegal and progressive commentator, RJ Riley, posted on X: “Again, no one asked you if you were Epstein’s victim. That’s a deflection. The actual question is why you and your husband were, at MINIMUM, embedded in the same elite party circuit as a known predator for years, praised him publicly, and only distanced himself after Epstein became radioactive. That’s not chance. So no, a self-written book isn’t evidence, it’s clean up.” Paul Kavanagh, a columnist at the Scottish publication, The National, posted on Bluesky: “Melania Trump is talking about Epstein in order to distract from the Iran war her husband started in order to distract from Epstein.” David Rothkopf on The Daily Beast speculates that Donald Trump has apparently decided that being heavily linked to a notorious sex trafficker, while bad enough to make him want to start a war to distract from it, is not as bad as being seen as a genocidal maniac, behaving like Hitler.

Rothkopf goes on to say that suggesting the president’s wife never had a relationship with Maxwell, seems a stretch, since the internet is flooded with images of the First Lady looking very cozy with Epstein and Maxwell, which raises the questions about her intervention — why? And why now? Is there a pending legal matter in which she is involved? It seems that she would be unable to commandeer the White House stage without approval of and support of the president’s staff, and why would they condone it? Especially in light of Pam Bondi’s firing, she being unable to make the story go away. As delicious as the possibility of Melania’s going rogue may seem, Rothkopf says that is very unlikely since it took place at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue; and he leaves us with the choices of believing the president decided to place Epstein center-stage, or that he was blindsided by his wife because he is the old guy who is no more aware of, or in control of, what goes on in the White House than he is of anything else at the moment.

Jimmy Kimmel, on his show, says that Melania might have highlighted the Epstein scandal out of sheer resentment towards her husband, saying, “He spent the past six weeks trying to bomb this Epstein story out of the headlines. Two days after the ceasefire, she puts it right back on top. She must really hate him. I don’t know how else to explain it. For whatever reason, she didn’t ask. She didn’t give a heads up. She just went right out in front of the cameras and fired away.” To Melania’s demand that lies and rumors about her “cease today,” he ponders if ‘tomorrow’ would be okay, since he needs to catch up on what her concerns are. Melania declared that she is not Epstein’s victim, but Kimmel insisted she meant, “I am my husband’s victim,” and theorizing that the 5+ minute speech was the same one Donald gave to her after the Stormy Daniels brouhaha erupted. Political scientist, Professor Kristoffer Ealy, wrote on Lincon Square, “She spoke for five minutes, reading from a prepared statement, plugged her book, told Congress what investigations to conduct, and walked away without taking a single question. A press conference where you don’t take questions isn’t a press conference — that’s a hostage video with better lighting.”

Ealy goes on: “I want to be very clear about something before we go any further. I do not believe this woman. I have not believed this woman for a long time. And it is not because of anything Jeffrey Epstein-related. It is because I have been watching Melania Trump operate for the better part of fifteen years, and what I have observed is a person who lies the way most people breathe — reflexively, efficiently, and without apparent discomfort. The difference between Melania Trump lying and Melania Trump telling the truth is not something you merely hear. It is something you feel. It settles in the room like humidity. And what settled into the White House Grand Foyer on April 9, 2026 was very, very familiar. The media will spend the next several days debating whether her denial was credible. I am not interested in that debate. I am interested in the record. Because the record is long, it is documented, and it has more receipts than a Whole Foods on a Saturday afternoon.”

On The Hartmann Report, Thom Hartmann asks “when will the other Melania shoe drop?” He says the great mystery this week, is why Melania Trump would go on TV from the White House and pull a ‘Richard “I am not a crook” Nixon’ for no apparent reason. “That didn’t work out well for Nixon, and it’s unlikely her demands will do anything other than fuel more speculation and a faster circulation of her nudie pictures and photos of her and Jeffrey Epstein. Speculations about what provoked her, run from a woman close to threatening to ‘expose’ her ‘pedophile’ husband, to the possibility of a new book release claiming Melania and Epstein were once involved, to weird theories that Trump asked her to do it to distract from the Iran debacle,” writes Hartmann. “Something very, very weird is going on with this couple (if you could call two people who live and sleep separately a couple). But then, if you were married to Trump, wouldn’t you be a bit on edge, too?”

As expected, NBC’s Saturday Night Live’s cold opening ripped into the Melania speech, with two regulars portraying the First Couple in a phone conversation. Melania has called her husband to warn him about her bombshell press conference, saying, “I decided I should do a big random speech completely out of nowhere and say, ‘I am not Epstein’s victim.’ Is that good?” The president replies, “Darling, I gotta admit that sounds a little insane. Who are you…me? Melania, I’d really love to talk to you more, but I have a meeting with, uh, Ronald Reagan.”

Oliver Willis, on Daily Kos, provides some details on Melania Trump’s standing in this country, with polling showing the First Lady is netting some of the lowest approval ratings in US history. Despite the White House-backed documentary, ‘Melania,’ which attempted to promote her image around the world, a CNN poll last month showed her favorability rating standing at a -12, a drop from the +3 she had upon her return to the White House in January 2025. This contrasts with second-term First Ladies Michelle Obama and Laura Bush who had a +42 rating, while Nancy Reagan netted a +50; and even Hillary Clinton, who suffered slings and arrows for most of her public life, garnered a +25. CNN data analyst, Harry Enten, notes, “Melania Trump is breaking records in the way that you don’t want to break records — historically awful. The American people don’t really care for her.”

The ‘Melania‘ documentary, costing billionaire Jeff Bezos $75 million, has a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and is regarded as “shallow, sycophantic and absent a single unguarded moment, a near-two-hour infomercial disguised as a documentary,’ says reviewer Peter Travers. The First Lady’s recent activities might explain her poor standing, starting with her walking with a robot at the White House, touting use of A.I. in education. “This is exactly what Big Tech wants to create: a sense of a society being led by and taught by robots, displacing all of who we are, starting with education,” says AFT President Randi Weingarten. Melania’s recent chairing of a United Nations session on ‘children in conflict’ was frowned upon, in particular for her husband’s Iran war bombing of a school in which 168 children lost their lives. The administration has been blamed for traumatizing children in its anti-immigrant activities and the attacks on LGBTQ+ rights. Oliver Willis writes that Melania’s poor ratings only echo the low ratings she held upon exiting the White House in January 2021, and that historically, unpopular presidents have been unable to rely on public support for first ladies, even while dealing with political headwinds of their own. Donald Trump has had no such luck — his wife is disliked just as much as he is.

With less than 20% of Americans identifying as MAGA Republicans, they continue to support nearly every decision President Donald Trump makes, yet his “contempt” for his most loyal supporters “is getting worse,” argues writer Amanda Marcotte on Substack. “To Trump and his top brass, like JD Vance, feeling like they owe anything to anybody, especially the red-hat yokels who got them into office, is insulting,” she writes. “Their resentment at their own voters for actually expecting results is getting worse, and that’s starting to be reflected in policy choices.” Trump’s deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in the nation’s airports to supposedly alleviate staffing shortages sparked by the partial government shutdown also impacts MAGA voters — after all, Trump voters fly, too!

Marcotte says that more revealing, and aggravating, was Trump’s response to questions about rising gas prices, which should have been a predictable outcome once war against Iran was initiated. “Trump and even the Vice President can’t help but sneer with annoyance each time they are asked to care about skyrocketing prices at the pump,” says Marcotte. “Trump even tried to spin that as a good thing, claiming that ‘we make a lot of money’ when gas prices go up. Of course, that ‘we’ does not include approximately 99% of Americans, so he’s basically just telling the rest of us we don’t matter. Including his own voters.” Marcotte’s conclusion? “I think Trump and the rest of the White House really do hate Americans. They view the majority who don’t support the MAGA agenda as bratty liberals who need to be squashed into silence. But they also hold most Trump voters in contempt, seeing them as easily duped morons — which is hard to argue with, honestly!”

SFGate columnist, Drew Magary, launched a diatribe against Trump and his war last week, following the TACO president’s chickening-out on destroying the Iranian nation. He congratulates the Iranians for calling Trump’s bluff, and is thankful that we are all still here, though it got a bit dicey. A two-week ceasefire was agreed upon, although things have been iffy, and with JD Vance’s 21-hour negotiations with Iran falling through — provoked by the White House — everything is drifting back to square one. Magary says Trump believed Israeli PM Netanyahu’s pitch that a war would be a cakewalk, even after “human footstool” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the plan “b.s.” Every war at its core is a self-inflicted wound, Trump’s wound so wide that the Artemis crew could see it from the dark side of the moon — a decisive loss for the US, with Magary hoping it portends many electoral losses for the orchestrators.

Hawkish politicians who kept the Iranian bogeyman alive for half a century were waiting for a useful idiot to occupy the Oval Office to make the war happen — enter Donald Trump — the best and last chance to make war a reality. Netanyahu convinced Trump that Iran would fold in short order, and that he could seize the Strait of Hormuz, with Iranians greeting the US as liberators — shades of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld! Didn’t happen! Mojtaba Khamenei took control of everything, gas prices soared, global markets went haywire, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps began to charge nations to use the strait, which was free until Trump went off the deep end. Easter Sunday saw Trump screaming curses, throwing a hissy fit, throwing insulting names, and threatening to destroy the entire civilization — no matter that the US was getting low on munitions! Then Russia and China backed Iran, knowing a winner when they see one, as Iran dared Trump to blink. He did so, Iran winning the PR campaign, withTrump complaining the Strait of Hormuz is closed, yet is somehow open. Go figure.

Initially, the administration said Iran could keep its nuclear weapons program, as Trump tried to fish the Obama agreement out of the toilet, but that was transitioned in JD Vance’s negotiations, so expect the sound of flushing once again. As part of the ceasefire agreement, Iran might have received punitive damages from the US for bombing destruction, and with Trump’s negotiating acumen, Iran probably could have gotten Alaska thrown in had they wanted it. Magary accuses Trump of starting this “excursion” for no reason at all, quickly found himself in over his head, then tried to skulk away from it, while the country is stuck with skyrocketing gas bills and a nosediving stock market. Magary says he is outraged and mortified, and is sick to death of living in a country with a ruling party stupid enough to think this war was a good idea, especially when every war in his lifetime has been an unmitigated failure. “I’m sick of the fact that threats of a nuclear holocaust are now routine because our president is a terrorist who has a bowl of oatmeal for a brain. I’m sick of our military professionals having to take orders from politicians who have no idea what they’re doing. And I’m sick of the United States being run by a bunch of absolute losers. Trump lost this war. I hope that, one day soon, he loses everything else,” concludes Magary.

The last word belongs to satirist Andy Borowitz, datelined Tehran: “In its first act of goodwill since the declaration of a ceasefire, on Wednesday Iran permitted a container ship loaded with copies of the Epstein files to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. ‘In recent weeks, the closure of the Strait has cut off the world’s supply of Epstein files,’ and Iranian government statement read. ‘Now, those files will flow freely to the four corners of the globe.’ Although Iran is charging vessels millions for safe passage through the Strait, ‘We are sending the Epstein files through free of charge,’ the statement indicated. The Iranians said they had taken Donald J. Trump’s threat to destroy their civilization ‘very seriously,’ noting, ‘We see what he’s already done to American civilization.‘”

ARMAGEDDON, STUPID PEOPLE, VICTORIOUS

The long-standing notion of separating church and state took another blow last week with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s revelation of monthly worship services for military personnel, led by evangelical faith leader Hegseth himself, as reported by The Washington Post. Pentagon staffers, current officers, former high-ranking military officials, the chaplain corps, and veterans groups expressed concerns the Hegseth is flouting the Constitution by pushing his evangelical beliefs onto service members. One source told the Post, “I don’t approve of cramming your religious faith down people’s throats, and when the top of the chain couches these operations in this hyper-Christian tone, it flies in the face of the freedom of religion that the Constitution enshrines and that our men and women in uniform sign up to defend.” Some critics say Hegseth’s approach may be bad for overall morale, but Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson disputes that contention, insisting, “The prayer undoubtedly improve morale for those who attend. No special treatment or punishment is given as a result of one’s choice to attend these services.”

Military officials have long looked askance at Hegseth’s Jerusalem cross tattooed across his chest, and are unsettled that he wears his evangelical faith on his sleeve, along with his proselytizing comments, especially in connection with the US/Israeli action in Iran. In a press briefing on March 19, the Secretary encouraged viewers to pray for US success in the Middle East, saying, “To the American people, please pray for them everyday on bended knee with your family, in your schools, in your churches, in the name of Jesus Christ.” In a recent worship service, Hegseth called for “overwhelming violence” against Iran, unconcerned about the 2,500+ killed in both Iran and Lebanon, including hundreds of children. Pentagon Pete recently announced that he was downsizing the number of faith codes used in the military, from 200 to 31 in an effort to address “political correctness and secular humanism,” which he believes has afflicted the Chaplain Corps, or the ordained, interfaith clergy supporting service members. The result of this move according to retired Army Major General Randy Manner is that “dozens and dozens” of active-duty chaplains who don’t identify with Hegseth “are being marginalized” and some are “not included in staff meetings.”

During the first month of the Iran “excursion,” many service members have reported unsettling rhetoric from their commanders citing the idea of a holy war. Advocate for service members’ constitutional right to religious freedom, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, reports that it received over 200 calls from active-duty personnel following strikes in Iran, as military leaders spoke of Armageddon to encourage troops to fight. One caller who identifies as a Christian, told the MRFF his commander told troops this was “all part of God’s divine plan,” specifically referencing citations from the Book of Revelation, referring to Armageddon and the “imminent return of Jesus Christ.” The commander is also quoted as saying, “President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark His return to Earth.” Hegseth is a member of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, an archconservative network co-founded by Doug Wilson, who identifies as a Christian nationalist, and who infiltrated the Pentagon in February with a sermon.

A lawsuit has been filed by Americans for Separation of Church and State over the Pentagon services, and is seeking to compel the Pentagon to hand over internal documents about their cost, attendees, and any complaints raised by employees. A corresponding suit has been filed against the Labor Department, where Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer runs her own monthly gatherings inspired by Hegseth’s model. Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United, charges, “Secretaries Hegseth and Chavez-DeRemer are abusing the power of their government positions and taxpayer-funded resources to impose their preferred religion on federal workers. Even if these prayer services are presented as voluntary, there is pressure on federal employees to attend in order to appease their bosses.” At a gathering of Christian broadcasters in February, Hegseth dismissed critics of the Pentagon prayer services, saying, “We hear a lot from the ‘freedom from religion’ crowd. They hate it. The left-wing shrieks, which means we’re right over the target.”

The military’s historical approach to faith has been in a more nondenominational manner, but Hegseth’s faith leader, evangelical minister Brooks Potteiger is due to relocate to Washington, DC to lead a new congregation, encouraged by Hegseth. Potteiger found himself in hot water recently for calling for the death of a Democrat candidate, Texas candidate James Talarico. On the extreme Christian nationalist podcast, Reformation Red Pill, the show’s co-host declared, “I pray that God kills him,” to which Potteiger agreed, “Right. Right. We want him crucified with Christ.” Later, a spokesperson for the organization insisted that the pastor did not ‘call’ for Talarico’s death, but for his Biblical ‘conversion.’ At last week’s prayer service, Hegseth called for “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy, that ‘wicked souls’ be ‘delivered to the eternal damnation‘” in the fight against Iran. An unidentified senior Army civilian describes the current situation as “terrifying — if US troops are trained to believe that ‘God is on our side,’ what precludes us from doing anything we want to win?” “It feels like decades worth of progress has been undone in 12 months. It’s heartbreaking and it’s heartbreaking to watch our chaplains try to navigate this,” says an unnamed Air Force general.

President Trump hosted a group of MAGA pastors and religious allies for a luncheon on the Wednesday before Easter, making several off-the-wall remarks during the event — never meant to be seen by the public, so they were quickly deleted from the White House pages, but too late! Bryan Metzger of Business Insider saved the footage, revealing that Trump expressed his true feelings about the Supreme Court hearing he had stormed from earlier in the day. “Republicans, judges, and justices,” Trump ranted. “They always want to show that they’re independent. ‘I don’t care if Trump appointed me, I don’t care, if it doesn’t make any difference to me. I’m voting against him.’ ‘Cause they want to show their independence, you know, stupid people.” The visibly annoyed president then went on to insult French President Macron for not supporting him with the Iran engagement, and implying that Brigitte Macron is a tough cookie. He then took credit for sales of the Bible, saying, “Bible sales are now at the highest number in many decades. And church attendance among young people nearly doubled compared to five years ago.”

Trump then went on to liken himself to a king, complaining about the delay on his ballroom vanity project because a federal judge ordered a halt on construction. “I can’t get a ballroom approved. It’s pretty amazing, right? If I was a king, we’d be doing a lot more. I’m doing a lot, but I could be doing a lot more if I was a king,” he whined. In a confession, he explained why he aligns himself with unsavory characters. “You know, we’re not supposed to be seduced that way, right? But I am. When someone’s nice to me. I love that person. Even if they’re bad people. I couldn’t care less. I’ll fight to the end for them.” Sure, buddy — let’s hear what Pam Bondi has to say about that! Trump’s spiritual adviser, televangelist Paula White-Cain caused a bit of an uproar during the Holy Week luncheon, when she compared the president’s legal battles and assassination attempts the trials endured by Christ. Standing near the president, she said, “Jesus taught so many lessons through his death, burial and resurrection. He showed us great leadership, great transformation requires great sacrifice. And Mr. President, no one has paid the price like you have paid the price. Because he was victorious, you are victorious.”

White-Cain’s praise ended with applause by the attendees, but social media posts identified her remarks as “insanity;” “blasphemous — stunning to see a US Bishop on stage while Paula White compares Trump to Jesus;” “Turning this White House lunch toward the Divine is a campaign prop — it’s theatrical;” “Freaks, liars, charlatans, grifters, criminals — anything but Christians. All of them.” Televangelist Paula has been in contact with Donald Trump since 2002, when he called her after seeing her on TV, and she was in the White House circle in 2019 as an adviser. In 2020, she delivered a sermon calling upon Jesus to “command all satanic pregnancies to miscarry,” and has previously declared the White House as “Holy Ground,” saying that, “to say ‘no’ to President Trump would be saying ‘no’ to God.”

It wasn’t exactly an Easter message, but in March US Secretary of State Rubio said, “Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars, supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” That quote was voiced on ‘Good Morning America‘ in a discussion on the US “excursion” into Iran, and now available on YouTube. A few days later, President Trump’s Easter luncheon message was that the US has “to take care of one thing: military protection” and isn’t able to provide people in this country with necessities like healthcare and childcare, demanding that states fully fund daycare programs. “We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare. You gotta let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it too. It’s not possible to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things.” Michigan Representative Rashid Tlaib commented about Trump’s statement, “The warmongers in the White House and Congress will always fund death and destruction. They will let people in our country starve and die before they will stop funding wars.”

Attorney Dina Doll’s guest post on MeidasTouch addresses Trump’s grifting, writing, “You didn’t buy the Bible. You didn’t mint the coin. You didn’t sign up for Trump University or bid on the NFTs or book a room at Mar-a-Lago. You’re opted out of every scheme, every hustle, every grift and it didn’t matter. Because while you were watching an illegal war burn through a billion dollars a day and TSA workers suffered because Congress couldn’t find the money to pay them, Trump was doing something quieter. He was taking yours. Trump has grifted his entire life. Now he’s just taking it.” She goes on to say that Trump transferred $1.25 billion in foreign aid to Trump’s Board of Peace, pulling $1 billion from international disaster assistance, $200 million from peacekeeping operations, and $50 million from international organizations. Moneys that Congress had authorized for hurricanes and refugees, moved in Trump’s direction without a congressional vote, into a fund that Trump created by executive order and controls PERSONALLY! Reporters approached the State Department regarding the transfers, but they had “nothing to announce at this time.” Maybe later?

The defining characteristic of the Board of Peace is that Trump controls it forever, naming himself chairman for life with no audits, no transparency requirements, no conflict of interest rules, with countries paying $1 billion into a fund he runs to get a seat at the table. No money has been transferred to Gaza, nothing has been disclosed about its spending, but it has received $1.25 billion of YOUR disaster relief money with no explanations offered. When Trump leaves the White House, he keeps the fund — not a loophole, it’s by design. Attorney Doll reminds us of another pending grift initiated by Trump — the $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax records by a contractor. Problem? Trump controls the government  he is suing — he gets to work out the settlement with himself! With Todd Blanche heading the Department of Justice, and Treasury Secretary Bessent’s pen ready to sign the check, we don’t have to purchase cheap trinkets this time — the money wasn’t going to you, or you anyway, so we’ll just skip the transaction! And we don’t have to read a cheap brochure or visit a crappy web page.

President Trump’s dismissals of Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has sent a clear message to this remaining Cabinet members, that job security is no longer guaranteed. He has become increasingly willing to consider firing top officials who he believes are underperforming, amid deepening frustration with his declining approval ratings and fears of a wipeout in the upcoming midterm elections. “This is a recalibration. There are high expectations that are not being met,” said one Trumper. “It’s just a function of whether he thinks you’re doing your job well. When it comes to this stuff, it’s an audience of one,” said another. CNN reports that beyond Trump’s personal feelings, there are also more conventional concerns in play when it comes to dismissing his top officials — chief among them who might serve as a viable replacement. “I don’t think anybody’s safe. Ever,” said one White House ally. Like Pam Bondi famously shrieked, “The stock market’s over 50,000! Why are you laughing?” Ha-ha!

AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION, UNFORGIVABLE, COUNTDOWN

Who would have anticipated that the annual CPACKKK gathering in Texas on March 27 was to give the NO KINGS! rallies an extra boost on the Friday preceding their impressive worldwide Saturday gatherings. Conservative Trump loyalist, Matt Schlapp, attempted to rouse the CPAC crowd by asking if they wished to see impeachment hearings against the president and he was taken aback by the cheers from the assembled group. Schlapp immediately responded, “No! That was the wrong answer!” Presenting the question once more brought forth a mix of responses, providing for an awkward moment and revealing the growing divisions within the Republican Party — in particular over the decision to go to war against Iran. Trump’s ‘America First‘ platform has run aground, getting backlash for not adhering to his emphasis on reducing foreign entanglements.

The president decided against attending the Grapevine gathering, and that combined with the drop in his approval ratings, seems to have affected the attendance seen in previous years. MS NOW reporter, Rosa Flores, saw the usual proliferation of MAGA-hawkers’ booths, but with thin crowds in those  areas. Show host, Chris Jansing of MS NOW, asked Flores what the overall mood was like and the camera showed empty booths and one seller staring at his cellphone. Flores said that in her on-site interviews, most respondents don’t believe the Trump disapproval ratings as seen on Fox News, and that higher oil prices are Biden’s fault, with the Iran “excursion” being “what’s best for America.” CPAC host, Mercedes Schlapp, in her on-stage interview with border czar Tom Homan, asked him to compare the current administration with the Biden years. She then stopped the conversation to face the audience, scolding them with, “I’m not hearing a ‘boo’ when I say ‘Joe Biden,’ people! Come on! We do audience participation here!” That brought jeering from the crowd, but Homan’s mention of the former president as he explained the illegal alien disparities between the two regimes failed to garner a response — probably watching Klan videos on their phones!

Turnout numbers have yet to be confirmed for the NO KINGS! protests but organizers expected as many as nine million would participate for the third event (but eight million ain’t so bad), a marked increase over the June and October events of last year. Minneapolis was the designated flagship city, which attracted over 200,000 demonstrators, who heard speakers Tim Walz, Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar and Jane Fonda, and a special performance by Bruce Springsteen covering his musical tribute to slain protesters Renee Good and Alex Pretti. The 3,300 organized protests across the US, and in several larger cities around the world, prompted White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson to dismiss the event with, “The only people who care about these Trump Derangement Therapy Sessions are the reporters who are paid to cover them.”

Jon Clemence writes on Quora that prior to protest marches, the naysayers claim that “nothing will be achieved, so why bother?” So, Clemence decided to study just how effective such events are, and what is achieved. He found that historically, a 53% success rate of achieving goals through nonviolence — though since 2010 in this digital age, the rate has dropped to about 34%, but nonviolence is the most viable path for systemic change. Researchers found that once mass protests grow to a size of 3.5% of the population (12 million protestors in the context of the US population), the success rate is 100%! Protests provide public pressure that can influence legal and local victories. In 2025, the ACLU took 239 legal actions against the Trump administration and won 64% of cases. Protests like NO KINGS! send a strong signal to business leaders and media executives that remaining loyal to the Trump regime could cost them in terms of business outcomes — losing money!

Protests are an easy entry point, helping people become involved in political activism in other needle-moving ways. Sixty-six percent of RSVPs for last weekends’s NO KINGS! event were from people who live outside of major urban centers. It’s no longer just a ‘liberal’ thing — if it ever was. People in conservative and battleground districts are now pushing back. So, Clemence asks if the NO KINGS! protest will have any effect on the Trump administration? Perhaps not directly, he assumes, but it does not matter as long as it angers the president. However, it does matter as a part of the litany of actions that, taken together, can affect change; it tells anyone in power that supporting Trump is a losing strategy; and, it shows anyone in MAGA who still has a functioning brain that they are also supporting a loser. He challenges anyone to go ahead and tell him that what he and millions of others are doing is pointless — just understand that the data doesn’t agree with that charge.

Among the doubters of the effectiveness of protests are The New York Times, which questioned whether the throngs were diverse enough, the message focused enough, and whether the participants have “mastered the harder work of organizing,” calling the rallies “collective therapy” fretting over the lack of a single demand. Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal’s op-ed by a New York psychotherapist compared the protests to “bad group therapy,” arguing that the protests offer validation without challenging participants’ thinking. The Raw America blog says Rupert’s message is to ‘go home,’ as the mainstream media tells you ‘don’t believe your own eyes,’ in light of the fact that the movement is growing — spreading into Red States, crossing oceans to more than a dozen countries. Raw America believes nobody went home feeling as if they’d just done therapy — they went home feeling like they were part of something real, because they are! The world isn’t confused about what is happening in America. They see it clearly. The only ones who can’t seem to see it are the billionaires who own our media.

Brad Reed of Common Dreams reports that Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible, is calling for a nationwide general strike for May 1, modeled on the day of action residents of Minnesota organized in January against the brutality carried out by federal immigration enforcement officials. Levin appeared at the NO KINGS! rally in Minneapolis, praising protesters in the face of the ICE siege earlier this year, and announcing that Indivisible wishes to replicate it nationwide. “It is a tactical escalation…an economic show of force. We are saying, ‘No business as usual, no work, no school, no shopping.’ We’re going to show up and say we’re putting workers over billionaires and kings. We are going to build on that courage, that sacrifice, to demonstrate that regular people are the greatest threat to fascism in this country.” Indivisible co-founder Leah Greenberg says the goal of a nationwide strike is to send “a clear message: we demand a government that invests in our communities, not one that enriches billionaires, fuels endless war, or deploys masked agents to intimidate our neighbors.”

Many see Trump looking for scapegoats in his cabinet to bail him out of his troubles, with Kristi Noem being the first to fall with revelations of her wild, self-aggrandizing spending in her post as Homeland Security Secretary — her “grifts — er, gifts that keep on giving,” says Lisa Needham at Daily Kos. The $220 million contract for her “horsey ad,” blame for which she tried to shift to the president, sealed her fate. Noem had near-complete authority to waste your tax dollars, however she liked — those glamour shots in front of Mount Rushmore did not come cheap, but money is really no object when you’re playing with house money, says Needham. So, why not soak the taxpayers for as much as possible to get fancy “horseys and flattering makeup“? Renting, transporting, and boarding three ponies for two days cost us $20,000 — ponies from competitive barrel racer champion, Jill Moody, a South Dakotan, and longtime friend and backer of Noem. Four hair stylists based in Washington, DC were flown in, tallied up to $3,800 for the quartet, and South Dakota’s Bombshell Beauty Makeup Studio (a Noem backer) billed us for $2,070, so with this much money to waste, you have to spread it around among friends!

Kristi Noem’s new gig as special envoy for the Shield of the Americas won’t provide her with a bottomless trove of cash, so maybe she’ll have to do with the costumes and paraphernalia leftovers from the Homeland Piracy. And the $50,000 Rolex she was so keen about flashing during her media hit at CECOT prison in El Salvador? Don, Jr. and Eric may have to arm wrestle for that prize. The president is allowing her to retain ten staffers, but it’s a good bet they won’t be traveling in the cowgirl’s private jet. It was painfully obvious the Mount Rushmore video was designed to feature Noem, and that was the real problem in Trump’s view. She made herself the face of DHS, the face of deportations, the face of ICE — okay with Trump as long as her reputation didn’t eclipse his. But it was about Noem — “the most unforgivable sin of all,” says Needham.

Greg Sargent of The New Republic writes that, “On the surface, Trump wants less attention paid to mass deportations. Meanwhile, Stephen Miller is taking new and hidden steps to wreak havoc in the lives of undocumented children and their families.” Sargent asks whether or not Trump has figured out that Miller’s fascist cruelties have become a niggling political liability for him? The Wall Street Journal suggests that the president may be moving to marginalize Miller’s influence, believing that the difficulty can be cured by a few optical tweaks, when the real culprit is a deeper ideological one. The Journal reveals that Trump wants to “lower the profile of his mass deportation efforts,” which are hideously unpopular, wishing voters would view the targets as “bad guys,” and not noncriminal undocumented residents. That Trump is siding with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, is a sign of his political panic and a rebuke to Miller, with Wiles advising that deportations are a liability for the midterm elections. Yet Miller delights in flaunting the administration’s vicious sadism and overt white nationalism, certain that latent majorities are quietly cheering him on.

Sargent writes that the Journal report deserves some skepticism, and bears watching, since Trump mostly wants the ‘appearance’ of an ICE pivot, focusing on ‘criminals’ in GOP ‘messaging,’  as the project fully forges ahead. Stephen Miller recently met with Texas state legislators to discuss the idea of ending state public funding for the education of undocumented children, limiting funding only for kids who are citizens or are lawfully present in the country. The aim of denying public school is to destabilize the lives of undocumented families as another way to encourage them to self-deport, but this would run afoul of a 1982 Supreme Court decision which blocked states from denying public education to the young based on immigration status. The civil rights ruling, Plyler v. Doe, holds that restricting public education violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s enshrinement of equal protection before the law. Naturally, Miller and his anti-immigrant allies are gunning for Plyler in order to provoke another court battle in hopes that our right-wing Supremes would overturn the 1982 ruling.

Such a ruling would be seismic, the issue being whether these kids are to be regarded as equal persons despite being undocumented, relegating them to an unacceptable subclass status. Immigration law scholar Hiroshi Motomura, explains that “the emergence of a permanent subcaste is intolerable within a national constitutional culture based on equality,” which Miller is keen on ending. It’s too early to tell whether Texas lawmakers will do as Miller wishes, or how the high court might rule if that occurred; but if it worked in Miller’s favor, other red states with many immigrant families would be jumping on the bandwagon. Should Miller’s project advance, that opens up another can of worms — Trump’s desire to end birthright citizenship, which clashes with the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee that all persons born in the US are automatic citizens.

Pursuing these maliciously profound rulings would result in a constitutional order more ‘hereditary’ and ‘caste-like,’ says legal scholar, Akhil Reed Amar — which is exactly what Trump and Miller want. This is echoed in VP Vance’s suggestion that heritage, not adherence to creedal ideals, makes one an American. Jamelle Bouie calls Vance’s vision “tiered citizenship” based not on equality of birth but on one’s “connection to the soil and to the dead.” Ned Resnikoff hears hints of this in Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s Western-civilizational-supremacist rhetoric, as well, writes Sargent. “Miller’s true goal is to use immigration as a tool to chisel away at the Fourteenth Amendment, and until he’s ejected from the White House, all our rights are in danger,” says counsel Chris Newman at the National Day Laborer Organizing Network.

Perhaps Miller should watch his actions, since Marin Scotten of The New Republic says he was caught on video letting out a big sigh of boredom during one of Trump’s speeches justifying his “excursion” into Iran. At a recent roundtable in Memphis, attended by Miller, Trump, FBI Director Patel, AG Pam Bondi, and SecDef Pete Hegseth, the sigh was seen as an unintentional show of disagreement with the president and his war. But, despite this slip-up, Miller later showed complete agreement with Trump’s crackdown on crime in Memphis and five other cities (which has cost taxpayers nearly $500 million, if you’re keeping score.) Miller added, “What President Trump has done on border security and public safety is a national miracle that will be studied not only for generations but for centuries to come.”

Some anonymous claims by former and current DHS officials accuse Miller of overriding direct orders from Trump, prompting Governor Gavin Newsom to post on X his prediction that Miller is on his way out. His post shared an article by the Daily Mail which alleges that at times Miller holds more power than the president. “START THE COUNTDOWN!!! Stephen Miller is going to be fired!,” Newsom predicted in his post, which was accompanied by an image of Harry Potter villain Voldemort. The Daily Mail report asserts that DHS officials accused Miller of making decisions on the immigration program that caused complete chaos within the department, such as Trump’s directive not to target farm workers in one operation — which Miller then changed. One insider claims that Miller selected Markwayne Mullin to head DHS, to be used as his puppet — no comment by Miller.

Emily Singer, in her post on Daily Kos, believes that the Defense Secretary may be next in line for dismissal, writing, “Pete Hegseth, you in danger, girl!” She reports that last week President Trump laid the groundwork to blame Pistol Pete for the ongoing disaster in Iran, as he said the Secretary convinced him to begin the “excursion,” despite the lack of a coherent rationale. At the Memphis event, Trump bragged about the stock market and the “fantastic” economy, but he “unfortunately” called advisors to discuss possible action in Iran, and Hegseth was “the first one” to recommend the attack. Pointedly, he addressed Hegseth saying, “You said, ‘Let’s do it’ — because you can’t let them have a nuclear weapon.”

Trump has been accused of stock market manipulation as he hints at, lies about, negotiations taking place with Iranian leaders to end the war, a ploy that seems to work for him and his billionaire backers. Iran says it wasn’t dealing with Trump, and the president continues to make threats and carry out limited forays, clearly terrified about the chaos he has unleashed in the world. Polling by CBS/YouGov finds that a majority of Americans think the war is going “very” or “somewhat” poorly, while another 60% disapprove of the conflict altogether. Singer writes that Hegseth should start polishing his resume and reaching out to friends at Fox News, his old stomping grounds prior to his Pentagon appointment.

The president has no qualms about firing officials to make them scapegoats if that is necessary to get the monkeys of his cruel and unpopular agendas off his back — Noem should be a good lesson for the survivors. The administration has seriously considered replacing Hegseth, particularly after the SignalGate fiasco of discussing classified military operations in which a journalist was allowed to be in on the secrets. Now that the war has been publicly laid across Pete’s new Florsheim’s as an advocate of the bombings, he makes a better fall guy than Jared Kushner or Steve Witkoff, even though they are seen to be instrumental in warning about an “imminent” attack by Iran. Singer concludes that, “If there’s any consolation for Hegseth, it’s that his firing would let him unlock the liquor cabinet he claimed to have shut when he became Secretary of Defense. A scotch on the rocks may be in your future, Pete! At least you have that.”

Soon after President Trump and Pete Hegseth launched their “excursion” into Iran, a fundraising email was sent out to MAGA supporters, announcing a “massive and ongoing operation” against that country, with a warning that “Democrats want to see us divided.” It encouraged supporters not to “stay silent at this moment,” and to support Trump personally by supporting US troops in carrying out Trump’s new war. The email begins, “It’s Team Trump, and we’re asking every SINGLE Trump supporter who stands with President Trump and our brave US troops in carrying out this mission to let us know by signing the Official Trump Supporter List NOW.” You guessed it! The “supporter list” is a donation form to send cash for Trump’s campaign cash flow — and to support US troops in the process? Trump is calling attention to our military that he placed in harm’s way, in a supposed bipartisan duty, to link their deployment and military actions to his partisan cash grifting. Hardly ethical, you think?

This is all a part of a Trump call for “Team Effort,” as he asks other countries to help him secure the Hormuz Strait out of responsibility — to do their part to get him out of a jam. The US “decimated” Iran, so they owe us, but then failing to mention that the only thing decimated is the taxpayers’ wallets. The president has alienated other countries with his insults, his disrespectful comments, and has dismissed them and pushed them away with unfair tariffs to the point that his depravity disgusts them — a storm cloud in his own private Idaho, as Bocha Blue writes on the Palmer Report. Trying to turn things around isn’t working for him, as he had no plan to start with. His childlike confusion and misjudgment on tariffs broke the US economy which is now in worse shape with soaring gas prices, and consumer goods becoming less affordable as economic growth hits a downward spiral. And despite the ‘Help me!‘ sign he’s waving, even a red-tipped white cane and dark glasses will do Humpty Trumpy no good.

Bill Palmer says Trump appeared even dumber last week, when he attempted to highlight the fact that he gifted his cabinet members with new shoes — probably from a closeout sale, so sizing didn’t matter. Palmer mentions an interview the president did with Jake Paul, an actor and professional boxer, with an internet presence. Palmer says Paul is also famous for being an idiot, so the interview was likened to a Richard Nixon sit-down with the Three Stooges, who he reminds us were merely actors. In the interview, Trump claimed that as many as seventeen hundred Iranian sleeper cells existed in the US — news that we could have used sooner, exclaims Palmer — so, perhaps Trump, Noem, and Bovino could have used their thugs to smoke out the sleeper cells instead of rounding up Hispanic-looking people and murdering white onlookers. Palmer points to Benjamin Netanyahu for giving Trump the sleeper cell rumor, but that we shouldn’t worry regardless, with Jake Paul’s entry into the case.

Daily Dose of Democracy says the war has finished its third week with no end in sight, even with Trump asking for global ‘partners’ to help secure the Hormuz Strait against a “decimated Iran” to release oil tankers to guarantee the global energy supply. President ‘No New Wars’ Trump thumbed his nose at US intelligence, thanks to ‘Bibi’ Netanyahu, and threatening supposed close allies with an “or else” demand is getting him nowhere in cleaning up his mess. Former US allies are forming new partnerships without us because of the chaos, the instability, and the reckless handling of the Iran conflict. Recently Trump remarked that he would know the Iran war was over when he “feels it in his bones,” but we shouldn’t feel assured since he probably is waiting for his bone spurs to reappear.

Satirist Andy Borowitz offers his take on Trump’s Iran debacle: “Washington – Confirming the suspicions of many in the international community, on Monday Donald J. Trump revealed that intelligence played ‘no role’ in his decision to go to war with Iran. ‘People keep asking me about intelligence,’ he told reporters on Air Force One. ‘I made this call with no intelligence whatsoever. Quite frankly, every decision I’ve ever made in my life I’ve made without intelligence,’ he boasted. ‘Intelligence is for losers.’ Trump added that ‘I don’t trust people who have intelligence, which is why I love Pete.””

Australian Richard Quick posted on Quora: “Alright, this one’s for the MAGA crowd. Sit down, shut up, and pay attention because I’m only going to explain this once and I’m using small words so the flag emoji patriots can follow along. Your boy just let the International Energy Agency announce the biggest emergency oil release in its 50 year history. 400 million barrels. Pooled together from 32 countries. And your lot lost your collective minds like Daddy just saved the world. Let’s do the math that none of you peanuts can do: The world uses about 105 million barrels of oil a day. That means your big beautiful release is less than four days of global supply. That’s not a solution…that’s a long weekend. The entire IEA strategic reserve across all 32 countries is only 1.2 billion barrels, so this one release just burned through a third of the whole planet’s emergency safety net in one go. One crisis. One third of the cupboard…gone.”

Quick continues: “But it gets dumber. Keep up. The Strait of Hormuz is closed. Twenty percent of the world’s oil flows through that strait, right now none is moving. Citigroup estimates somewhere between 11 and 16 million barrels a day is being choked off the market. So even if you’re just trying to plug the gap from the strait, 400 million barrels buys you roughly a month. But it gets dumber. America’s share of this is coming from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which only holds 415 million barrels right now. That’s 58% of capacity because your guy never actually refilled the thing despite telling you he did. If the US shoulders the biggest chunk of this release, your tank is basically empty. And then what happens when the NEXT crisis hits? Because there’s always a next one.”

Quick’s post adds: “And the US can only physically pump oil out of the reserve at 4.4 million barrels a day, and it takes 13 days from a presidential order before a single barrel reaches the market. So even if they turned on the taps right now, the cavalry doesn’t arrive for two weeks and when it does it can’t keep up with the shortfall. Meanwhile the bloke who started the war that closed the strait in the first place is on local TV In Cincinnati going ‘we’ll reduce it a little bit then fill it up again,’ like he’s talking about the fuel tank on his golf cart. And you clapped. You actually clapped. This isn’t a rescue plan. It’s a press release designed to keep the stock market calm for 48 hours. A band-aid on an arterial bleed. Thirty two countries just torched a third of the world’s emergency oil supply because your president started a war he can’t finish, and if this drags past summer, the cupboard is bare, prices are in triple digits, and there is no Plan B. So, yeah champ, pop a Bud Light. Slap a bumper sticker on it. The adults are definitely in charge.”

HuffPost’s Lee Moran calls our attention to The New York Times‘ editorial board’s damning assessment of Trump’s false claims about the US-Israeli attack on Iran in an opinion piece that warns of the dangers of an ultimate backfire. There’s nothing new about the conflict in the president’s “stream of falsehoods,” since “Lying is standard behavior for Mr. Trump, of course,” the board suggests, noting the 30,000 misleading or untruthful claims from his first term as compiled by The Washington Post. The Times’ board argues that, “Lying about war is uniquely corrosive, creating a culture in which deadly mistakes and even war crimes can become more common, ultimately undermining American values and interests.”

The editorial board acknowledges, “There is reasonable debate to have about the wisdom of this war, given what is described as Iran’s ‘murderous’ government and threats to people at home and abroad. But Trump is not making that case, and is just lying about the reasons for the war and about its progress, in an attempt to disguise his poor planning and the war’s questionable basis.” Trump and his MAGA mob have given so many different answers for the various aspects of the incursion, what its actual objectives are, and how long it’s projected to last, that they’ve run out of fingers on which to count motives. Pointing to past conflicts, the board says that Vietnam and Iraq should have reminded leaders that falsehoods can boomerang on the perpetrators who tell them. “Whatever short-term gain Mr. Trump thinks he is getting by lying about the war in Iran is far exceeded by the cost to him, the country, and the world,” the Times concludes.

In one of his unhinged threats to Iran, last week Trump threatened to take out the country’s electrical grid and energy infrastructure “after 48 hours” if they didn’t capitulate and open the Hormuz Strait for oil tanker access. However, the threatened strikes were postponed when Trump announced that talks had made Iran “keen to make a deal.” “Major points of agreement” were said to have been reached, but Iran’s media poured cold water on the president’s announcement, saying there has been no “direct or indirect communication” between parties. After Trump’s post on social media, oil prices declined and the stock market responded positively, but many remained skeptical about the accuracy of the president’s comments. His claim that US envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner were in touch with “a top person” representing Iran for the backchannel talks — not Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

President Trump claims that “regime change” is underway in light of the peace talks — an unidentified leader, Trump calling him “the most respected, and the leader,” who gets five days to produce results, or “we’ll just keep bombing our little hearts out.” Khamenei hasn’t been seen since he was selected to take his father’s place, and as far as his control goes, most believe the Revolutionary Guard are calling the shots. Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, says he has spoken to Hakan Fidan, his Turkish counterpart who has served as an intermediary in negotiations between Tehran and Washington, with Trump claiming that it’s difficult to find somebody to talk with since most of the Iranian leadership has been wiped out. John Byrne of Raw America says, “The question of whether this ends well for Iran is open. The US has significant military advantages it hasn’t fully deployed. But what isn’t open is whether this war is going the way Trump promised. It isn’t. And everyday the strait stays closed, Iran’s leverage grows.”

Anthony Davis on Substack, says Trump is demented and deluded, and thinks he’s hosting a reality show. Trump developed some “swagger in his real estate dealings, being performative, a little slippery, and often effective,” but that same instinct doesn’t transplant onto international diplomacy. “It doesn’t make you a savvy negotiator — it makes you unreliable, sometimes dangerously so,” says Davis. Therein lies the problem with Trump’s claims that the US is engaged in productive conversations with Iran, with Tehran’s complete denial of any talks. In a real estate deal or on a reality show such as The Apprentice, this might work, but right now, “those decisions are not abstract. The backdrop here is an active conflict: airstrikes, missile attacks, threats to obliterate infrastructure, and warnings of a regional escalation. In that environment, words are not cheap. They are signals. When a president says talks are underway and progress is being made, it suggests de-escalation,” observes Davis.

If those talks don’t exist, the signal is false — it’s destabilizing — and intermediaries trying to broker something real are left to clean up the narrative mess, and Iran has every incentive to dig in further rather than play along with a fiction resembling a reality TV show with no commercial breaks. Davis asserts, “Credibility, in this context, is currency. Not a moral virtue, not even trust in the traditional sense, but predictability. Other actors need to believe that when you say something publicly, it roughly corresponds to reality. That doesn’t mean full transparency — diplomacy often requires secrecy — but it does mean avoiding statements that are flatly contradicted by the other side. When that baseline collapses, every future statement is discounted.” It signals that there may be no real process at all, especially since Trump said just last week that we have no one to talk to since we’ve killed them all.

It is impossible to close a “deal” with a country that insists no deal is being discussed, and if those claims drift from the truth, the cost is embarrassment, confusion, miscalculation, and escalation. Davis concludes, “If there is a path out of a conflict as volatile as this one, it will to be paved with bravado. It will require quiet channels, verifiable steps, and a level of message discipline that resists the urge to declare victory before a conversation has even begun. Anything less isn’t negotiation. It’s performance — and Trump just wants to be the star of the show.”

Even without a resolution on the Iran war, Trump is rubbing his hands together about his next target. Talking to reporters, he said, “Cuba’s a failed nation. Cuba also wants to make a deal and I think we will pretty soon — make a deal or do whatever we have to do. I think something will happen with Cuba pretty quickly.” Being cut off from its oil supply from Venezuela which is  now under US control, the country has had rolling blackouts and suspended air links. Cuba has been existing under a 1960s embargo emplaced by the US, with only hit and miss support from Russia or China, so Trump is ready to carry out a “friendly takeover” of the island as a neighborly gesture to ease their pain — and find Castro’s stash of gold. Thom Hartmann of Raw America says, “We need to understand what’s really happening here. It’s not just foreign policy. It’s a pattern of a president who’s discovered he can use military force without consequence, without congressional pushback, and without a media willing to challenge him. Once a democracy lets that become normal, it’s very hard to walk it back.” See you in C-U-B-A!

Borrowing a line from comedian Steven Wright who said, “The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese,” we might classify President Donald Trump as the early bird in his June 2025 bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities. However, as the first mouse, the president is caught in his own trap, as Benjamin Netanyahu sweeps in to claim his prize of deciding who gets credit for initiating the second incursion into Iran — in the planning stages since November. As John Stoehr of The Editorial Board states, our ally put Trump in a no-win situation toward launching an illegal war, though Trump could have condemned Netanyahu after the fact; but, apparently the appeal of being in a war had a greater influence on the commander of the world’s mightiest military. Allowing the foreign head of state to lead him around by the nose has resulted in a plethora reasons for entering into combat, and no matter how unconvincing those reasons put forth by him and his cabinet may be, it still draws attention — in the views of many — that Trump is probably not entirely in charge. It’s like Netanyahu told him, “I couldn’t repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder.”

That viewpoint is problematic for many in Congress who declare that if Trump was not acting in our self-defense, then this is a war of choice which did not receive the consent of that governing body. Now, Trump will have to explain himself, risking his being held accountable for consumer prices, the rocky Wall Street situation, and chaos and destruction all around the Middle East as the war spreads. The best White House rationale for the war is that the US was forced to attack, because if Iran was forced to defend itself against a lone Israeli attack, they would also launch attacks on US facilities in the region. Trump asserted to CNN that in his opinion “Iran was going to attack first if the US didn’t.” If the MAGA crowd has faith in this lie, Trump will have affirmed his dominance. If he’s seen as Netanyahu’s puppet, this will be problematic far beyond the abstract debates in Congress over war powers. The problem the president has initiated for himself is not rooted in high-minded principles like freedom and national sovereignty, but in conspiracy theory and antisemitism — terms given the veneer of respectability by right-wing intellectuals and gullible reporters.

The largely ignored isolationist group, America First Committee, has an unshakeable belief in a global Jewish conspiracy against America, which was beneath the drive to release the Epstein files in the 2024 presidential campaign. Trump represented the God-sent hero to fulfill a prophecy to save America from a secret cabal of powerful Jews involved in sex-trafficking young girls to untouchable elites, with Jeffrey Epstein heading this syndicate. John Stoehr says, “Once reelected, Trump was supposed to bring them all to justice. When he didn’t, he triggered a crisis of faith that can be registered in polling that lumps him in with the rest of the ‘wealthy elites’ who act with impunity for the law — the so-called ‘Epstein class.'” However, these supporters can shift from anti-war to pro-war as smoothly as has the president; but not being rooted in high-minded principles — only Jew-hate — supporters are not going to warm up to the appearance of an American president seeming to take orders from the leader of a Jewish state. Instead, they might see Trump doing to believers in America First what he has done to supporters who demanded the release of the Epstein files. Thus, the president’s lie that he forced Netanyahu’s hand. Yet, this assertion of dominance is compounded by his heel-turn in the Epstein files case — the crisis of faith within MAGA leaves a growing suspicion that instead of destroying the global Jewish conspiracy against America, he has joined it.

The host of Anchor Watch on Lincoln Square, retired Navy commander Bobby Jones, offered his opinion on a week’s worth of warfare with Iran: “It’s important that people understand this is not going to be something that is a shot-term or easy operation to get out from under. If we’re not careful, it’s going to make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a church picnic.” To emphasize the lack of leadership, Jones says, “Depending on which one of the three — Trump, Hegseth, or Rubio — you’re talking to, you get a different justification for why these actions are taking place, which is a telltale sign that strategically, people are not aligned across the board.” Donald Trump’s claims of an imminent Iranian threat are so unbelievable that the Associated Press had given him personal ownership of the fiasco, reporting that Republicans in Congress stopped a war-powers vote last week concluding efforts to end ‘Donald Trump’s war against Iran.’ Pete Hegseth, obviously replaying one of his favorite video games, said, “This was never meant to be a fair fight. And it is not a fair fight. We are punching them while they’re down, which is exactly how it should be.”

The Raw America blog reports that as President Trump was threatening Iran with annihilation on Truth Social, the “White House was quietly doing something that should alarm every mayor, police chief, and sheriff in America: blocking the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the National Counterterrorism Center from warning local law enforcement that his war has raised the terror threat on American soil.” The Daily Mail reported that the three agencies had prepared a five-page joint intelligence bulletin entitled ‘A Public Safety Awareness Report: Elevated Threat in the United States During US-Iran Conflict’ to send to state and local authorities. Detailed were elevated threats from Iranian government operatives, Iranian proxies, threats to Jewish and Israeli institutions, and the danger that radicalized individuals of varying ideologies might use as cover for their violence. Local law enforcement will never know how to respond because the bulletin never went out — Department of Homeland Security gave the White House a heads-up beforehand and Trump’s cronies put it on hold.

The White House didn’t deny killing the bulletin, with spokeswoman Abigail Jackson offering that the administration was “ensuring information being disseminated is accurate, up to date, and has been properly vetted.” A senior DHS official slammed the decision with, “They don’t want anything getting out that says what they’re doing in Iran is raising the threat level at home.” Such bulletins are meant to be politically untouched — neutral, fact-based, and issued without White House input. Such speculation was borne out in an Austin, Texas bar after Operation Epic Fury was launched, when a gun-toting supporter of the Iranian regime opened fire, killing three people and wounding fifteen before law enforcement dispatched him. Following the incident, FBI Director Kash Patel placed counterterrorism teams on high alert nationwide. As Raw America says, “The threat is real. The bulletin was real. And the White House sat on it.”

Hegseth’s accusations against the Islamic Republic that it is “hell-bent on prophetic Islamic delusions,” and Rubio’s statement that the country needed to be attacked now because “that entire regime is led by radical clerics who make decisions based on their view of theology, which is an apocalyptic one,” stand in contrast to the executors of the war which phrase the conflict in apocalyptic terms of their own — that they are fulfilling the promises of their own holy books, and that their justice is in fact God’s. As Séamus Malekafzali, journalist and writer focusing on Middle East politics, writes in The Nation, “Both the US and Israel have long asserted the right to commit imperial violence with impunity, while expecting other countries to pay a high price if they do the same. Now that double standard is being applied to the idea of holy war itself. Theocracy, it would seem, is wrong only when some people do it. To play an old trope: ‘The apocalyptic prophecies are coming from inside the house.‘”

The Raw America site exposes the central horror of this moment: “Plainly, we are fighting a war under the direction of a man whose motivations nobody — not his allies, not his Cabinet, not the people who work for him every single day — can fully explain. Trump has made something of a brand out of this. He brags, openly, that nobody knows what he’s going to do because he doesn’t know what he’s going to do. In a previous life, in a different kind of man, that might be strategic ambiguity. In Donald Trump, it is simply the truth.” As for the people around him, Marco Rubio wears the expression of a man who has realized the building is on fire. JD Vance has pivoted so many times he’s lost track of which direction he’s facing. And even Benjamin Netanyahu, after wanting American military action for decades, has the energy of a man attempting to cash a check before the bank changes its mind.

It comes down to one person who understands Trump most clearly — Jared Kushner — who is not in the government but is likely running foreign policy for his father-in-law. Jared collecting a $2B investment from a Saudi-backed fund after leaving office in Trump’s first tenure, earned Trump’s respect, despite not being a pART of the DEAL — or was he? The Donald’s reaction was  blissful unawareness in his expression of satisfaction: “Jared can really work the Arabs. They like Jews to handle the money.” For some — who question what Trump sees in this war — it has nothing to do with strategic interest, security, or regional stability, but something far simpler: what’s in it for him! The oil in Iran (which the Israelis are burning, to his horror), reconstruction money, and Persian Gulf sovereign wealth funds looking for a post-war landscape to invest in. Perhaps Trump can’t explain why he’s taken us to war, but his son-in-law will figure out what it all means and how to profit from it.

As Steve Schmidt tells us in The Warning, “Only a fool would be surprised to discover that Jared Kushner is at the center of a growing scandal around highly sensitive national security matters — a torrent of corruption that follows in the footsteps of Kushner and Trump’s Middle East negotiator, Steve Witkoff.” Schmidt says it is stunning, with no words to adequately describe the depravity of the theft and their betrayal of the USA, as the full details of the sale of America’s most sensitive computer chips to the UAE become known. It is estimated that the Trump and Witkoff families pocketed $187 million and $31 million, respectively, in the sellout of American security, not in a corrupt business deal, but in an act of espionage. While The New York Times detailed Kushner’s $2 billion deal in April 2022, no one seemed to care, but Schmidt calls the corruption so gargantuan that it is beyond comprehension.

Trump has shattered every convention and tradition that requires dignity and integrity, while obliterating the law, duty, responsibility and obligation. Even the honor of being twice-elected to the presidency only bolstered his belief that his temporary power was a license to take, steal, smash, punish, destroy and avenge, with the current term experiencing his unleashing of cruel Gestapo-like secret police to terrorize the American people. Kushner has been an abhorrent contributor to American decline and division over the last eleven years, a sinister and corrupt figure who perfectly represents the fantastical levels of corruption that have engulfed Washington, DC in the Trump years. Schmidt describes Kushner as a soft-handed and fragile-boned child of privilege, whose only skill is the flattery of sociopathic egos. His family’s wealth obscured his mediocrity as he entered Harvard University, before diving into the “jungles of Manhattan” where he continued to prove that any child of an indulgent billionaire parent can make it anywhere…’New York, New York!‘

Kushner’s failed business decisions found him drifting into the Oval Office with Donald Trump, where they have done more damage to the US than any people since Secession, adding $6.7 trillion to the national debt, but parlaying $2.4 billion in personal income into their pockets. Anything and everything was for sale, with the American people being cut out of the equation, as the government was only for the Trump Crime Syndicate and the MAGA movement, with Kushner serving as an “informal advisor.” The ‘advisor’ was denied a security clearance, failing background investigations, as security officials deemed him untrustworthy and not to be trusted with classified information. Not a problem for father-in-law Don who then gave him the highest level security clearances, leading the classified-briefings-loving Jared to request them more often than any staff member as he began his flitting around the world as an architect of Middle East ‘peace.’ Both Jared and wife, Ivanka Trump, were “mediocrities who were unread, inexperienced, sheltered, arrogant beyond measure, and surprisingly simple fraudsters who didn’t know very much about anything except where to look for money,” says Schmidt.

Understood by most, that the US Congress is a thoroughly broken institution, though shining through is the January 6 Committee which showed what is possible when honorable men and women come together, putting America ahead of political parties and cults of personality. Schmidt says that in this vein, the Kushner payoff deserves scrutiny by Congress, counter intelligence officials, and the media until every detail comes out. Extremist movements are always corrupt and corrupt movements always become extremist movements — the NRA and CPAC being perfect examples of this circumstance. We should all care about knowing the details of what Jared Kushner did to get this money, as well as the reasoning behind Director of National Intelligence’s Tulsi Gabbard locking away in a safe a whistleblower’s report about Kushner.

President Trump has been insisting that he must be personally involved in the process of selecting a new leader in Iran, and that the Iranians are “wasting their time” in considering the 56-year old son of the late Ayatollah, Mojtaba Khamenei, as the likely replacement. Trump said, “We want someone that will bring peace and harmony to Iran — Khamenei’s son is a lightweight. Potential future leaders keep dying — everyone who wants to be leader ends up dead.” There was some political dissension among leaders in Iran about the hereditary selection of the Ayatollah’s son, which resembled a clerical version of the rule of the shah who was toppled in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, but the leadership of the Assembly of Experts were in favor of this appointment for prosecution of the war. So, in the end Mojtaba was chosen to be in charge of Iran’s armed forces and any decision regarding pursuit of Tehran’s nuclear program. The successor has never held any governmental post, either elective or appointive, and he is said to be even more hard-line than his father, which will put him directly in the gunsights of the Israelis, but Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and Lebanon’s Hezbollah both issued statements of support.

Trump’s pronouncement insisting on his involvement in choosing a successor was likely to complicate efforts to end the ongoing conflict, but now that Mojtaba has been selected, our president will view him as a “transitional figure” with a bullseye on his back, even as some Iranians are “chanting for his death.” The Trump administration may be willing to keep the Iranian regime in place if they accede to US demands involving the enrichment of uranium, ending their ballistic missile program, and an end to terrorist proxies around the world. CNN’s Fareed Zakaria termed Mojtaba’s appointment “a very bad sign for the war” in that Iran’s hardliners now have the upper hand, “showing that the Iranian regime is dug in.”

So we’ll just have to wait for a slithering Trump to provide us with an answer or justification for going to war, even as he demands “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” from the Iranians. Satirist Andy Borowitz offers his take on the new Iranian leader with this: “In a blistering takedown of Iran’s new Supreme Leader, on Sunday Eric Trump claimed that the late Ayatollah’s son was an incompetent idiot who only attained his position through nepotism. ‘The last thing the world needs is yet another total bonehead getting a leg up just because of who his dad is,’ Trump said. ‘If this dope’s last name was Henderson instead of Khamenei, he wouldn’t even be in the conversation.’ He added that giving someone control over massive sums of money just because he had a powerful father is ‘a recipe for disaster.’ ‘What kind of backward country showers someone with riches because of who his dad is?’ Trump asked. ‘All I can say is, congratulations, Iran: you just chose a member of the Lucky Sperm Club.'”

LAP DOGS, WATCHING A CHILD, PILLARS CRUMBLING

President Trump received his comeuppance from the Supreme Court last week, when they handed back to him his unlawful tariffs on a fool’s gold platter. As Bill Maher joked on his show, the court told him not to mess with the money and he took it very well…NOT! The president called the ruling a disgrace, cursing at the courts. Maher mused, “He’s such a Karen. You know, I mean, everything he does. Everything is always, ‘I want to speak to the manager.’ And the Supreme Court said, ‘We’re the manager.’ After this whole year of tariffs we’ve been going through, have you been thinking to yourself, ‘why didn’t other presidents think of doing this and not confiding in Congress when the Constitution says they have to?’ They did think of it. They thought it was illegal, so they didn’t do it. Now, the president says there are other ways he can get what he wants with the tariffs. I don’t know what they are, but…if you’ve ever been to Washington, DC, and you’ve seen that majestic Supreme Court building, it’s going to make a lovely ballroom.”

David McAfee writes on Raw Story that the Supreme Court justices may be fearing for their lives after Donald Trump’s response to their legal smackdown. The impending danger possibility was broached by Temidayo Aganga-Williams, an attorney who served as an investigator for the House J6 Committee, in his appearance on MS NOW, when he was asked about Trump’s response to the court ruling against his acting on a whim. The attorney says the president went personal because he nominated two of the justices, and there could be dangerous consequences. “It’s always about the person. And I think what’s stark is that he cannot hide behind who appointed them. These are folks that he appointed, that he picked, that he shook hands with, nominating them, and espousing how great they are. And even they came down against him. So he has to go down to attacking them personally, which I think is incredibly, incredibly dangerous because it’s one thing to say a judge got it wrong, but when you attack the person, you suggest that the way to rectify this is with that person. And in a world of political violence, I think we get closer to teaching the American people that what they have to do to rectify their needs is not to go through institutions, but instead something far more dangerous. And I think that’s the path we’re down.”

Trump continues to be filled with rage at the six court judges who ruled that he exceeded his authority by imposing tariffs based on a “national emergency,” which then prompted him to immediately institute a global 10% tariff, before he decided to increase the rate to 15% the following day. He lashed out at justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett in particular, saying their “families should be ashamed” of their decisions, calling them “lap dogs,” “a disgrace to our nation,” and “disloyal to the Constitution.” Joanna Coles of The Daily Beast  said that watching Trump’s news conference was like “watching a child,” threatening to do tariffs anyway. “It absolutely is the mad queen from Alice in Wonderland. ‘Off with their heads, off with their heads.'” Author Michael Wolff commented that “he wears it all on his sleeve…done that for years now,” noting that his erratic strategy can be hard for the opposition to combat. Trump now has a new enemy in Chief Justice John Roberts, in direct contrast to the friendliness seen between the two following last year’s State of the Union speech when all seemed to be peaches and cream.

Attorney Neal Katyal, who successfully argued against Trump’s tariffs before the Supreme Court, argues against the new 15% global tariffs the president wants to impose as problematic. The particular statute Trump wants to use has “no obvious application here,” and, “If he wants sweeping tariffs, he should do the American thing and go to Congress. If his tariffs are such a good idea, he should have no problem persuading Congress. That’s what our Constitution requires,” said Katyal. Democratic strategist Jon Cooper responded that “Trump CANNOT legally impose a global tariff because the US doesn’t meet the clear emergency economic conditions envisioned by Section 122, and if  he tries to invoke it, it would certainly face immediate legal challenges, economic pushback, and potential congressional scrutiny.” Author James Surowiecki called the imposition of global tariffs “just ridiculous,” since Trump has made it clear that his action is for ‘retribution.’ Journalist David Stockman had the most observant solution, saying, “Help…the man needs his meds!!”

click here to read the rest (link expands, click it again to collapse)

~

PROTRACTED DISTRACTION, OPEN BETRAYAL, COLD WAR MOMENT

Last Monday, NPR’s revelation that their investigation into Trump’s Justice Department showed removal of Epstein files that contain allegations of sexual abuse against Donald Trump — at least 50 pages of FBI interviews with a woman who accused the current president of sexually assaulting her when she was 13 years old — gone! She was interviewed four times, resulting in documents with cross-referencing serial number stamps, which proved to NPR that those pages had vanished. Representative James Comer agreed to investigate and, remarkably, both political parties wanted answers about why the files were hiding Trump’s name. A few days later, The Washington Post reported that the Justice Department was investigating in an internal review to determine if the missing documents were wrongly withheld — Trump’s walls were closing in.

Hillary Clinton, after much fanfare back-and-forth, relented to sit for a closed-door House Oversight Committee deposition last week regarding her ties with Jeffrey Epstein, and the GOP’s attempt at humiliating her was handily turned around by her six-hour ordeal. With The New York Times‘ news that Trump, Melania, Mar-a-Lago and related terms appeared in the Epstein files more than 38,000 times, Clinton accused the committee of using her to distract from Trump’s ties to the accused pedophile/trafficker. The committee scheduled Bill Clinton for his closed-door session on Friday, with not much to show for that deposition, either. But things were working in the background with the Trumpers, and even with Oman’s foreign minister’s statement that negotiations between the US and Iran were making progress, the president later announced that he was “not happy” and would allow more time for discussions. Just hours later, he wagged the dog — he chose war.

Military strikes on Iran began early Saturday morning, as millions of Iranians were commuting to work or dropping kids at schools, without warning. Trump’s video statement calling on Iranian citizens to shelter in place accomplished little, as the first confirmed civilian casualties were at a girls’ elementary school in Minab, near the Strait of Hormuz. Initially, Iran’s state media reported 40 students killed, then 53, and by day’s end 85 killed and 63 wounded, as the detritus was scoured by rescuers. The death toll by morning was over 150. Of course, none of these actions were authorized by the US Congress, and curiously a vote on war powers resolutions had been scheduled to restrict exactly what Trump’s unconstitutional bullying had wrought. So now we are in a regional war caused by a president who is in cahoots with a Justice Department who chose to hide his presence in the Epstein files.

President Trump now faces a political minefield with this second strike on Iran, particularly after his claim that the Iranian nuclear threat was destroyed in June of last year. Conservative and MAGA voters were promised no new foreign wars during his ’24 campaign, and this new adventurism has created a firestorm within his base. According to Politico’s Erin Doherty, “The political damage is substantial and immediate action is necessary.” This global news and information company found in a recent poll that only half of Trump voters would support military action against Iran, with 30 percent opposed. Doherty wrote, “Those fractures, combined with largely unified Democrats, meant Americans broadly did not want an attack on Iran.” An Economist/YouGov poll also confirmed broad public opposition to action in the region. The future seems particularly dire for the GOP as they head into the midterm elections, and even small rebellions within the 2024 coalition will carry hefty consequences. Trump’s support within this coalition was tepid before his decision for war, resulting in a volatile situation depending on the aftermath. Republican strategist Jason Roe said, “The political risk depends on the outcome. If we break Iran without terrorist attacks coming to America or harm coming to allies in the region, it will be a political win for Trump. If this expands into a protracted conflict, or ends up with troops on the ground, it will be a liability.”

click here to read the rest (link expands, click it again to collapse)

~

If only this headline from The Onion were true: “Terrified Conservatives Lose Ability To Speak English After Exposure To Bad Bunny Performance — ‘Dios Mio!’ Cry Millions of Panicking Republicans.” Conservatives are struggling in their ranks over Puerto Rican superstar Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance as they observe President Trump’s criticism of him and his stage act in light of the rapidly dwindling loss of Hispanic voters. Trump termed the all-Spanish language performance an “affront” to the country and “one of the worst of the worst,” also echoed by many in his MAGA entourage. “It makes no sense, is an affront to the greatness of America, and doesn’t represent our standards of Success, Creativity, or Excellence. Nobody understands a word this guy is saying,” read the president’s Truth Social post. Caroline Sunshine, a deputy communications director in Trump’s presidential campaign, also a staffer who later worked in his first term in office, lauded Bad Bunny for featuring an actual wedding ceremony onstage, saying, “Unpopular but interesting take: there was only one Super Bowl halftime show this year that highlighted the institution of marriage. And it wasn’t the Turning Point halftime show.”

The late Charlie Kirk’s conservative group, Turning Point USA, staged an alternative halftime show featuring Kid Rock, that was solidly panned by most, and it was whispered about that Trump was a viewer of the entire Bad Bunny presentation, which gave rise to his irate foaming at the mouth commentary. Harrison Fields, a former Trump staffer provided no mention of Bad Bunny, but felt it noteworthy to mention his Puerto Rico-born grandmother as a full American citizen, who happened to vote for Trump. Republicans are grimacing at Trump’s disgorging of anti-Latino gibberish with his disapproval rating among Latinos hovering at 70 percent, according to the Pew Research Center. Republican strategist and Trump critic, Mike Madrid, questions the calculus of fighting over Bad Bunny in front of tens of millions of Americans. “If the Republicans don’t stop hemorrhaging with young, male Latinos thirty years old and younger, they’re cooked,” says Madrid. “This shows that they’re not even aware of the size of the problem they have.”

On the face of it, the Super Bowl show was less political than BB’s acceptance speech at the Grammy Awards, when he denounced Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “Before I say thanks to God, I’m going to say: ICE out, we’re not savages. We’re not animals. We’re not aliens.” As might be expected, the veins on the necks of the MAGA faithful stood out as they voiced their condemnation en masse, but conservatives were divided on the Super Bowl presentation. Conservative commentator and sports journalist, Emily Austin was impressed that Bad Bunny, carrying a US flag, led a parade of flag bearers with flags from the Western Hemisphere — which garnered Austin’s disapproval with followers, unsubscribing from her posts. In her defense, she responded, “Not everyone who loves America and loves our President thinks the same way on everything. Different perspectives and shared love of our country is our strength.” Conservative media star Meghan McCain also defended the performance in a post on X, saying, “Everything in life doesn’t have to be ruined by politics. I’m sorry, but I just genuinely question your taste level if you didn’t enjoy the Bad Bunny halftime show.”

Most people consider the conclusion of football season coinciding with the Super Bowl victor being decided — except for Donald Trump, who continued the celebration by pardoning five former NFL players for various criminal convictions, including drug trafficking and perjury. White House pardon czar, Alice Marie Johnson, posted on social media, “As football reminds us, excellence is built on grit, grace, and the courage to rise again. So is our nation. Grateful to @POTUS for his continued commitment to second chances. Mercy changes lives.” Now the four survivors can look forward to winning again, something the president hopes is in his future. Recently, the White House published an ‘article’ attempting to assure some unnamed people that Donald Trump is winning. It should be obvious — if you’re winning you don’t have to explain why, and there should be no need to dissuade voters from panicking, a lie which is done only when you’re losing. And Trump is losing.

Except that our golden boy did manage to pick up more bling last week, another trophy invented just for the occasion of naming him ‘Undisputed Champion of Beautiful Clean Coal.’ Lobbyists from the pro-coal organization, the Washington Coal Club, were on hand to present the winning trophy as the president signed an order requiring the Department of Defense to buy billions of dollars worth of coal-fired energy. As Lisa Needham of Daily Kos writes, “Nothing like using the full force of government to prop up a dying industry, right? And hey, if it comes with a cool trophy, all the better.” Needham says this seems to be the only thing the Coal group has done lately, having a dead website, and $23,192 in assets according to ProPublica. She discloses that the organization gave out another “doofus-y” award in 2017, a lifetime achievement award to Robert Murray, a coal company CEO and climate change denier whose company declared bankruptcy in 2019.

Needham feels that Trump is a worthy successor to Murray’s Lifetime award, but Washington Coal Club felt the need to create a new one for a very special boy. Trump’s ego hardly needs a boost, nor does he need encouragement to promote coal usage, though it’s apparent that the country doesn’t want it. Throwing open public lands for private companies to bid on for mining was a total bust, and as utility companies decommission their coal burning plants, Trump has tried to force one to stay open, which will result in higher consumer costs. Needham concludes by saying, “It’s fitting that Trump is falling all over himself to accept an award as champion of something that doesn’t really exist, but Trump will always be a champion, and no one can take that fake award away from him.”

After all is said and done, the coal trophy might be of some consequence as we find that the administration has now unravelled most of the climate change regulations — not a voter-driven subject by any stretch of the imagination. However, Democrats are attempting to make a case about Trump’s links to powerful interests, and in particular Big Oil, in light of his campaign ask for a billion dollars from the industry in the lead-up to the 2024 election. About the president’s move to repeal the ‘endangerment finding,’ the notable legal finding that climate change is a threat to the public, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse made the terse comment, “Corrupted.” The finding is/was the underpinning of the country’s climate rules, and in particular those rules governing cars and trucks – wiped out like the oil on a crankcase dipstick. Senator Chuck Schumer describes the dissolution of the rules as a “corrupt giveaway to Big Oil, an industry which has worked tirelessly to undermine rules that protect against emissions, and now that they have their guy in the White House, they are taking their biggest swing yet.”

Gas powered vehicles can now be expected to bolster the consumption of oil-based fuels, with the auto industry relaxing their shift toward EVs to meet required standards. Senator Ed Markey told The Hill that the change is “just another payback by the Trump administration to the oil, gas and coal industry.” Get ready to preview the all-new Trump coal-fired autos coming to a dealer near you! In his announcement, Trump said, “We are officially terminating the so-called ‘endangerment finding,’ a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and massively drove up prices for American consumers,” as he scoffed at environmental and health concerns, calling them “a giant scam.” Representative Sean Casten told The Hill that in spite of Trump and his MAGA backers, the US will still make climate progress in the coming years. “We are decarbonizing in spite of this setback, because markets want cheap stuff, and cheap stuff is clean stuff.” Casten believes the pace is slowed because of subsidization of Trump’s buddies, who will not be able to compete in the market, but the absence of leadership remains depressing.

Feef, a contributor on Quora brings to our attention an advertisement for Brits who might wish to ship baggage ahead in order to travel light to the USA. The ad asks, “Moving to the USA?,” as it provides a link to get a shipping quote. Clicking on the comments section of the company’s website, we find quite a collection of interesting opinions: “Maybe after the lobotomy but for now I’ll pass…thanks!,” “Yes please, can’t wait. I have friends in El Salvador,” “North Korea sounds more appetising at the moment to be honest, thanks though,” “Did you know Canada is lovely and sane?,” “This is brilliant, thank you I need a laugh,” “Yep. Can’t wait to move to Gilead,” “Just packing my black shirt and some books to burn, I’ll be right over,” “Yeah great idea…why did I not think of that before?,” and “The US has plenty of its own baggage; it doesn’t need mine too.” Risky decision? Sure! But as Neil Simon said, “If no one ever took risks, Michelangelo would have painted the Sistine Chapel floor.”

Much of the snark above may have to do with a news story about an Irish citizen with legal permission to work in the US, who has spent nearly five months in a Texas ICE detention facility. Seamus Culleton describes the conditions in the “modern-day concentration camp” in an interview that details widespread illness, and competition for food as the meals are small and everybody’s always hungry and tired. Toilets and showers are described as “completely nasty” since they are very rarely cleaned. Most detainees fear for their safety and their very lives, with security staff being accused of killing people — “you don’t know what’s going to happen here on a day-to-day basis…it’s a nightmare,” Culleton says. Married to an American citizen, he has been in the country for nearly 20 years, and despite holding a valid work permit, and being in the final stages of receiving a green card — with no criminal record — he was detained by ICE as he drove to work. Ireland’s Department of Foreign Affairs is engaging “at a senior level” with the US about Culleton’s case, and the Irish prime minister has plans to raise it directly with President Trump in a March meeting. As is often heard: “This is Trump’s vision for America, folks. Any questions?”

Canada no longer has any questions about trade with the US. As Thom Hartmann writes on Raw America, “Economist Dean Baker summed it up perfectly: Trump negates trade pacts with Canada and then gets upset when Canada looks elsewhere for partnerships. Kick your allies in the teeth, then complain when they find a better deal.” The president has turned his attention to our northern neighbor again, to make demands that would be laughable if they weren’t coming from our irrational Oval Office occupant. In a Truth Social post , he has threatened to block the opening of the new Gordie Howe Bridge connecting Windsor to Detroit unless Canada hands over partial ownership — the $5.7 project being funded by Canada’s taxpayers, who expect to recoup the costs through tolls. Trump also claimed that Xi Jinping would “terminate ALL ice hockey being played in Canada” if Prime Minister Carney completes the trade deal with China. Catherine McKenna, former environment minister, summed it all up with, “It’s all a grift.”

In a guest article on MeidasTouch, California Representative Ami Bera writes that he is torn, as a member of Congress, on his obligation to attend the upcoming State of the Union address by President Trump. Bera has decided to make this year different after watching the president “run roughshod over the Constitution, display utter disregard for Congress, and openly engage in corruption as he and his family use the office to enrich themselves and tarnish this country that I love. I will not give him the dignity of my presence at the State of the Union.” He calls Trump a troll, who will spend his time at the podium trolling Democrats and Republicans alike, making outrageous and inflammatory statements. “I expect him to make outright lies and exaggerations, boastfully talk about his brilliance, and stare down my Republican colleagues until they stand, applaud feverishly, and demonstrate their fealty to this malignant narcissist.” Bera still believes that America is that “shining city on a hill,” believing that “who we are as a nation is reflected in our Pledge of Allegiance,” wishing that only if the president believed these words. “Donald Trump does not define the United States of America. We do.” Inscribe this message on that empty seat!

Follow the bouncing ball if you dare: Trump’s Truth Social post depicting the Obamas as apes went from 1) A ‘Lion King‘ meme, so stop being such sensitive you snowflakes, 2) A young, rogue staffer is to blame, 3) The President posted it without viewing it in its entirety, but no apology is forthcoming because the portion about the 2020 Big Lie Election Conspiracy is true. And there you have it — a despicable presentation by shameless, malignant racists. Roxane Gay on Bluesky punches back with her take: 1) It was not an accident, 2) It was not a staffer, 3) While the president may have dementia, his racism is not due to dementia, 4) He isn’t sorry; he means every racist thought he shares, 5) His base agrees with him, 6) He will do it again, 7) No one in power will hold him accountable.

Anthony Davis also fires back on his Substack post entitled ‘This Is Exactly Who We Are,’ subtitled, ‘Trump’s post depicting the Obamas as apes is not new.’ He writes, “Every time Donald Trump does something overtly racist, a familiar chorus rises up from pundits, politicians, and the professionally aghast: ‘This is not who we are as Americans.’ It’s a comforting phrase. It reassures the speaker that the rot is external, temporary, an infection rather than a condition. And yet, after nearly a decade of Trump’s racial provocations — rewarded, normalized, and repeatedly excused — the line sounds less like a moral claim and more like a lie we tell ourselves to avoid reckoning with reality. Trump’s repost of a video depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as apes should have been disqualifying on its face. The imagery is not subtle. It draws on one of the oldest racist tropes in Western history, a dehumanizing comparison used to justify enslavement, segregation, and violence. That the targets were the country’s first Black president and First Lady only sharpened the insult. This was not edgy humor or political satire. It was naked racial contempt.”

Elliot Kirschner prefaces his Through the Fog post on Substack with ‘venality and vanity, hatred and hubris, and farce and fascism.’ He questions whether we are able to take in the scale of this miserable tableau as we seesaw “between the ridiculous and the reprehensible, feeling the urge to both laugh and cry, recoil and bear witness.” His worry is that one of the most enduring failures of the MAGA era has been the inability of everyone to find an aperture wide enough to let in the full extent of Trump’s moral, psychological, constitutional, temperamental unfitness for the office of president. Kirschner concludes that, “He would fail even the lowest bar for any role of significance or power in a fair, decent, and just society. We have never seen in a president such a toxic mixture of petulance, pettiness, puerility, and perversity. Metaphors struggle to keep pace. Whatever bounds of credulity we inherited from past generations are stretched to a breaking point by what is before us now.”

As authoritarianism expert, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, writes in her New York Times essay, “Trump is falling into the same trap that has undone authoritarian-minded leaders throughout history — he believes his own hype, despite declining approval ratings.” Ben-Ghiat, author of ‘Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present’, has followed strongman megalomania and observed the adverse effects it has on leaders and their governments, and in her lectures at New York University, she describes the phenomenon as “autocratic backfire.” Trump has fallen into this trap by cutting himself off from expert advice and objective feedback, then “doubling down and engaging in even riskier behavior.” Ben-Ghiat sees the result in “a disillusioned population that loses faith in the leader and elites who begin to rethink their support,” citing Italian dictator Benito Mussolini and Russian President Vladimir Putin as historical examples of the pattern she sees emerging around Donald Trump. Drawing parallels between Trump and past dictators, she notes that the president’s pompous self-praise echoes a fascist slogan from Mussolini’s Italy: “Mussolini is always right.”

Garry Kasparov writes on his ‘The Next Move‘ blog that though we are seeing the evisceration of the American news media with its alarming headlines and push notifications amid eroding journalistic standards, his personal antidote to being overwhelmed is in reading history. While this doesn’t guarantee a happy ending for the present situation, it can provide structure to strategies to be drawn from those who experienced similarities in the past. Authoritarians try to cultivate a sense of aimlessness by committing outrage after outrage, normalizing transgressions and numbing the senses — a new Watergate every hour, as Kasparov terms it. Though consequences are in short supply at present, we can only hope that the same fates await Trump and his MAGA crooks that befell Tricky Dick Nixon and his covert operatives.

Trump’s range of destruction and debasement is purposely overwhelming — the chaos serves his quest for power, to stay on the offensive, to move fast and break things such as doors, windows, bones, and skulls with no apologies. Never let the opposition gain a foothold and keep those federal forces on the march into local communities such as Minneapolis, and ignore the voices of dissent. The president did make a concession by replacing the Nazi-like Bovino with Border Czar Homan in the Twin Cities area, who then announced that 700 ICE agents would be sent packing — only 2,000 more to go, points out Jimmy Kimmel! In his monologue, Kimmel said, “Never in my lifetime did I imagine that we’d be celebrating a troop withdrawal from Minnesota, but 700 agents, as we speak, are packing up their 48″ waist, 28″ inch inseam Carhartt pants and their XXL Punisher T-shirts and heading home. Get ready, 700 moms of ICE agents. Your boys are coming back home to the basement.” And we might conclude that if the moms don’t lock the basement doors, her Proud Boy(s) will be using their baseball bats and flag staffs to disrupt the midterm elections.

The Lincoln Project sarcastically commended Trump for “firing the guy who walked like a Nazi, talked like a Nazi, and even dressed like a Nazi after he oversaw his SECOND murder in January. Kudos, fatso. You did the thing everybody else would’ve done a month ago. Second, we’d like to express our (expected) disappointment with Trump’s follow-up hire, Tom Homan. Also known as the only guy in this administration who gives Trump a run for his money as the most corrupt person in Washington. Come on, Tom. $50,000 in a fast food bag? From undercover agents? On video? And your defense is ‘I didn’t do it’? No wonder you’re in this bonehead administration. Seriously, though. Did Trump have to hire another criminal to head this thing up? Did he have to take the most dysfunctional and deadly area of our government and say, ‘Yeah, put the bribery guy in charge’?”

Satirist Andy Borowitz had to get in on this one: “As part of the DHS drawdown from Minneapolis, on Thursday Tom Homan ordered all 700 ICE agents leaving the city to return their signing bonuses to him in a paper bag. In a memo sent to all departing officers, the border czar instructed them to place $50,000 in a paper bag from the restaurant chain Cava, and meet him in the DHS parking lot after sundown. ‘And make sure no one’s freaking filming us,’ he added. While some ICE agents grumbled about transferring their signing bonuses to Homan, he sternly reminded them, ‘Taking away people’s freedom isn’t free.'”

Nick Turse on The Intercept has an unsettling story about the use of the ace of spades playing card — popularly known as a ‘death card‘ — by ICE officers in Eagle County, Colorado. Motor vehicles were discovered on the roadside, engines idling, hazard light flashing, and no occupants or drivers nearby. Family members arrived at the scene to discover that loved ones had been stopped by the notorious ‘fake traffic stops‘ used by ICE agents who then leave behind a customized ace of spades that read ‘ICE Denver Field Office‘ in place of the abducted vehicle occupants. “Leaving behind a racist death card after targeting Latino workers is an act of intimidation. This is not about public safety. It is about fear and control. It’s rooted in a very long history of racial violence,” said president Alex Sánchez of Voces Unitas, an immigrant rights group. “We are disgusted by ICE’s actions in Eagle County.”

During the Vietnam War, US troops were known to embellish corpses with ‘death cards,’ and the US Playing Card Company furnished thousands of these cards free to servicemen who requested them. Alex Sánchez has been given identical cards found by two different families, with the impression that the cards appear to be designed solely for use by the Denver ICE agents. A DHS spokesperson told the local NBC affiliate that the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility will “conduct a thorough investigation and will take appropriate and swift action.” One federal official pointed out that the ace of spades, in Spades, is the trump card and it’s possible the death card is an homage to President Trump — “these guys are not too subtle, to be honest.” Colorado’s Senator John Hickenlooper denounced the ICE calling cards since they have a history of being used by white supremacist groups for intimidation.

“Uh oh. Somebody’s about to get audited,” Sha Val posted on Bluesky after Illinois Representative Jonathan Jackson prayed to God to improve the president’s moral failings, with Trump standing just a few feet away after he had addressed the gathering at the bipartisan National Prayer Breakfast. Jackson prayed that God might open the president’s heart to greater compassion as he stood behind the representative, eyes cast down with pure venom in his closed heart, his eyebrows raising as if had been scolded. Jackson was applauded for his courage to call out the president amid the gathering of religious and political leaders with one observer saying, “This brave man has single-handedly salvaged what little was left of any genuine spirituality at the breakfast.”. “This is speaking truth to power in the best tradition of MLK,” applauded retired librarian morereading.” “Of course, we’ll hear about it in a late night rant,” posted Bluesky user Sure Bongiovi. “When you’re almost 80, old ducks rarely change their ways, especially malignant dementia-addled narcissistic ones.” “Representative Jackson: ‘We pray that you lead this president to greater levels of compassion,'” wrote Illinois State professor Yusuf Sarfati. “God: ‘Sorry, that’s above my pay grade.'”

A writer on Quora posted: “Trump has been vile since birth, and parading it for decades as a well-known public figure, MAGA seeing exactly what we see in Trump — the difference is they love it! So it’s best to face up to certain realities: MAGA worships Trump because of, not in spite of how vile he is; no amount of proof in the vileness area, not even some unlikely smoking gun surfacing from the recent flood of Epstein files, is going to dissuade the worshippers.” It’s pointless to expect MAGA’s regretfulness, since they are the ones most responsible for our current state. If the political pendulum swings one more time, we may yet save our democracy. If it doesn’t, worshipping Trump may soon become what is expected of all of us — only in public, of course.

In his analysis, The Guardian’s Washington bureau chief, David Smith, says Trump exposed the religious right’s “devil’s pact” in his performance at the National Prayer Breakfast, hurling insults at political enemies, taking swipes at “transgender insanity,” and quoting right-wing evangelist, Baptist Robert Jeffries. Trump hasn’t forgotten that Jeffries praised him, saying, “He may not be as good with the Bible as some of them. He may not have read the Bible as much as some of them. In fact, he may not have ever read the Bible, but he will be a much stronger messenger for us and he will get things done that no other man has the ability to get done.” Trump boasted, “You know, I didn’t want to admit anything, but that was very interesting and I think we’ve gotten more done than anybody could have ever gotten done.” So sayeth the religious right’s chosen instrument to turn the tide against liberal, godless America. Oh, and don’t worry about those shards of the Ten Commandments strewn in the pathway!

Emily Singer of Daily Kos covered the recent press conference in defense of Donald Trump’s “partying” — as Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche debased himself — with Jeffrey Epstein and underaged girls that were trafficked. Blanche offered that it wasn’t a crime to “party,” nor is it “a crime to email with Mr. Epstein.” Trump and his wife, once close friends of Epstein, are referenced more than 38,000 times in files released so far according to The New York Times. Despite Blanche’s discounting that Trump’s actions aren’t necessarily a crime, on a basic human level, it looks horrible to have been a close associate of Epstein, traveling to his party island steeped in criminality. Democratic Representative Robert Garcia called Blanche’s comments “gross and sick” and he owes an apology to all the survivors who are seeking justice. Singer says, “Ultimately, the latest dump of Epstein files looks really bad for Trump and the people he surrounds himself with. And Blanche’s tone-deaf defense won’t do anything to change that.”

Andy Borowitz gets the last word on the Epstein affair as seen across the pond: “King Charles III of the United Kingdom announced on Tuesday that he was cancelling his upcoming trip to the United States and would send his disgraced brother, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, in his place. Charles gave no reason for the abrupt cancellation, saying only that Andrew was a ‘better fit’ for a visit to Donald J. Trump. ‘I’m sure they’ll have plenty to reminisce about,’ Charles said. ‘And if they run out of activities, Trump can always give Andrew a Sharpie and put him to work redacting those bloody files.'”