March 31 – April 6, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…TOLO and Cleaning up Downtown, Rail plus Trail to Monterey reactions, Laughs from Joshua Searle, streaming, screamings. GREENSITE…on the Plan to Extend Downtown towards the Beach. KROHN…April Fools Day forever. STEINBRUNER…Aptos Creek Stoplight, eminent domain and Bayview Hotel, parking lot @ Aptos Creek, goodbye historic Merriman House and trees, new CZU fire restrications.PATTON…Safe At Home. EAGAN… Deep Cover and Subconscious Comics . QUOTES…”APRIL”

...

RAIL SCENE IN SANTA CRUZ TURN OF THE CENTURY. Both narrow gauge and Broad gauge ran daily at this Union Station in 1905. If you look closely you can see an electric open car train (looks like a cable car) on the far right . Rails took us everywhere back then.

photo by Sam Vestal, courtesy of Carolyn Swift

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE March 29

CLEANING UP DOWNTOWN ie. TOLO (or  Unmanaged encampments in neighborhoods.”) TOLO means The Outdoor Living Ordinance.

As the 3/25/21 Santa Cruz Sentinel stated, “Santa Cruz’s latest anti-homeless ordinance criminalizes the existence of unhoused people using methods that have long proven to be expensive, ineffective, and harmful. For these reasons the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Interagency Council on Homelessness, the United Nations Human Rights Council, the American Medical Association, and the American Public Health Association have all unequivocally condemned policies that penalize homelessness.

A BrattonOnline reader wrote,  ” I hope County Supervisor Ryan Coonerty will put pressure on the city about this, but I doubt it. I think it’s all about cleaning up downtown for developer’s condo sales. ..Another friend said it’s to make the court in San Jose believe that the city has the Martin/Boise safe sleeping locations all ready”. However it’s intended we need to realize that Santa Cruz County Supervisor Ryan Coonerty stated, “It’s the city council’s decision, but I don’t support unmanaged encampments in neighborhoods.”

Another subscriber wrote and attached a letter that was sent to Supervisor Ryan Coonerty… 

“Hello Supervisor Coonerty,                                                                                                      

As you are aware, the city’s proposed TOLO ordinance is in its third iteration but could be the final straw for the lower Seabright businesses that are open at night and have struggled to stay open during the last difficult year.                                                                             

Their 6′ wide sidewalks will host the overnight campers as well as the many pedestrians and customers who walk there already.  . Some are out for an evening walk, many beach bound with coolers and their kids in strollers, their leashed dogs, and maybe grandma in a wheelchair too. Because we are a well used avenue to the beach and because the night businesses are quite busy , this part of the plan will be a disaster for those businesses, and a danger to pedestrians and customers as a bonus.                                                             

Will the pedestrians and customers be forced off the sidewalks into the roadway because of fear of altercation with campers, or just because the 6′ sidewalks are not wide enough to support all activities, including waiting customers? Most likely they will be forced into the roadway and they will eventually avoid frequenting those businesses.                                          

Who could possibly envision these two uses being compatible in an already heavily utilized by pedestrian’s business district, particularly heavy at night?  This has been hard on downtown merchants for years, but their 12′ wide sidewalks make it a bit easier for peaceful coexistence in limited space, but imagine all this activity on space half the downtown width.  I can easily imagine the problems that will be delivered if this becomes a reality.  And it will not be safe for anyone involved.”

Once again I want to thank any/all readers/writers for keeping us informed…do stay in touch. Now we wait and watch and see just what Supervisor Coonerty does about this.                                            

THE RAIL TRAIL PROJECT CONTINUES. Again many more “letters” came in in response to last week’s remarks/opinions on the future of rails in Santa Cruz and all around Monterey Bay. One of the first reactions was from Bud Colligan who wrote three pages of basically denying everything, which was to be expected. Another response was from Barry Scott one of the foremost leaders in saving and promoting keeping the rails and adding more trails. Barry suggests, “Join the Regional Transportation Commission, Coastal Commission, Caltrans, Sierra Club, Coastal Conservancy, TAMC and others and support rail transit and trail”.  

Here’s a link to the complete Monterey Bay Rail and Trail project…and who supports it. 

The broad vision is for a Trail Network project that will span the coast of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary from the San Mateo/Santa Cruz County line to Pacific Grove, in Monterey County. The RTC is leading the planning effort for project development in Santa Cruz County and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) is responsible for Monterey County projects. This approach will ensure that the planned bicycle/pedestrian network will provide connectivity throughout the county and into the Monterey Bay region, and serve as the California Coastal Trail in Santa Cruz County.

We Believe in the Coast Connect Vision

Check it and read names like Sam Farr John Laird, John Leopold, Linda Wilshusen, Adam Spickler, Peter Scott, Kristen Raugust, Don Lane, Justin Cummings, John Brissenden,  Dennis Norten, Donna Meyers, Rock Photenhauer, Sally Arnold , Trician Comings, Greg Larson, Trink Praxel, and many more.

Excerpts from Bud Colligan’s letter…”Rail and Trail is a fantasy—unfundable, unbuildable, infeasible”. ” The proposed train has very little forecasted ridership”. And much more of the same.

Bud Colligan has no way of predicting or stating that there will not be funding for the rail trail. With the enormous changes happening in both Washington and in Sacramento new possibilities for funding environmental and popular people moving projects could become very feasible.

In my many, many years of being involved with issues in this county I’ve never seen one that divides “environmentalists” like the Rail/Trail debate. To visualize a future where seniors, disabled, and of course our tourists could take an oceanside train ride from Davenport to Pacific Grove is nearly perfect. 

Our big car manufacturers in the past welcomed and helped support the removal of trolley and train tracks all across our nation. They rightfully planned on more and more folks being forced to use their automobiles. That hasn’t changed and we are consumed by autos only commuters all our lives. Travel by rail will ease that congestion. 

OUR PART OF THE ACTION (WHAT TO DO IMMEDIATELY) Friends of The Rail and Trail (FORT) has been keeping in touch with the commissioners and several are on the fence.

We know that Randy Johnson and Manu Koenig are hopeless but the following are either No or are on the fence.

Mass emails to the RTC and to all of them have limited impact.

Better for citizens in each district to email their supervisor and council member individually and follow up with phone calls/left messages.These individual efforts carry far more weight than the auto-generated emails FORT creates or contacting info@sccrtc.

REED SEARLE’S SON JOSHUA. Not many local friends of recently departed Reed Searle knew of his son Joshua Searle-White’s comic side, and probably missed this production from last week.

“Truth Out” is the title of this 1/2 hour standup/sitdown comedy that stars Reed Searle’s Son Joshua Searle-White. It’s from the Meadville Community Theater in Pennsylvania. Good laughs about lying and book selling and politics and even sex….don’t miss it.

Subject line of email or message left:  

Vote YES to approve the Rail Transit Business Plan

Let’s remember to personally contact Patrick Mulhearn, Jacques Bertrand, County Supervisor Bruce McPherson and his alternate, Virginia Johnson, Supervisor Ryan Coonerty and his alternate Andy Schiffrin and Kristen Petersen.
They are all potential no votes on the vote to approve the Electric Rail Transit Business Plan, we need to ask them to vote YES.

Why?  Every study done has shown rail transit to have the greatest benefit to equity, the environment, and the economy.

We don’t yet know the full range of solutions, some may be very affordable, and the next steps will tell how to get it done right.
Rail will provide more funding for Metro and help stimulate use of a new expanded public transit network.

The adjacent trail will encourage use of bicycles and ebikes, which will be permitted to roll on the rail system.

We need people to remind Commissioners that their yes vote permits us to find the transit solution we can afford, there’s $17M in Caltrans money for study and a new administration in Washington that supports new funding for transit.

55% of the funding has been identified for construction and operations and more is likely to be available. Public/Private Partnerships and smaller lighter systems could avoid the need for a local sales tax measure, we won’t know if we don’t try.

A YES vote lets us find answers to these important questions.

A NO vote essentially gives up trying, and they should want to be on the right side, the FDR side, of history and do the right thing.

Emails:

jbertrand@ci.capitola.ca.us
ladykpetersen@gmail.com
ryan.coonerty@santacruzcounty.us
andy.schiffrin@santacruzcounty.us
bruce.mcpherson@co.santa-cruz.ca.us
gine.johnson@santacruzcounty.us
Bruce.mcpherson@santacruzcounty.us
Patrick.Mulhearn@santacruzcounty.us

Phone:

Follow up the email with a phone call to your representative depending on district or city or both:

Jacques Bertrand: 831-247-6199
Kristen Petersen: 831-475-7300
Ryan Coonerty: 831-454-2200
Andy Schiffrin: 831-454-2200
Bruce McPherson: 831-454-2200
Gine Johnson: 831-454-2200
Patrick Mulhearn: 831-454-2200

Note, if you’re in Bruce McPherson’s  district, leave your message for him and for Gine Johnson. If you’re in Ryan’s district, leave your message for him and for Andy Schiffrin.

Be sure to tune in to my very newest movie streaming reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange,

QUICKSAND (NETFLIX SERIES). This is a Swedish series about a mass shooting in a grade school classroom. We see part of the shootings and watch as a trial slowly reveals why the 18 year old suspect did the shooting. It got 96 RT. A fine, exciting, well made movie about an all too common an occurrence. 

ULTRAVIOLET. (PRIME VIDEO & NETFLIX SERIES) A very hi tech Polish movie about the murder of a much similar Steve Jobs type genius who is found boiled to death. A beautiful woman returns to her home town to lead some friends into a search to find out not so much who, but how the murder was committed. Fascinating, 96RT. Lots of high tech references and mystery keep us involved. Go for it.

WHO KILLED SARA? (NETFLIX SERIES). A nicely timed suspenseful Mexican murder movie .A beautiful young Sara falls from high atop a surfing sail ride and somebody had cut the straps holding her up. Set within a wealthy, highly connected Mexican upper class, the finger of guilt points in many directions.Then it rambles into prison life and the innocent dude who got nabbed for her murder.  It’s sad, taut, and intelligent. 

BAD TRIP. (NETFLIX SINGLE). 69RT. This is billed as a comedy in the camp of Sacha Baron Cohen. Two guys go on a trip and the camera follows them as they pull gross, obvious pranks on the victims. I found it disgusting, gross, and even insulting. See it at your own risk.

TINA. (HBO DOCUMENTARY) 96RT. When you have a bio movie that stars Tina Turner, Oprah Winfrey, and Angele Bassett you have something worth watching. Her interviews and history deal with the tragedy of her life with Ike Turner and how she pulled herself up and back from that too sad part of her life. She did a concert in Rio to a crowd of 186,000 and also did that Mad Max #3 movie. Tina was and is more than a star she has created a place in our star history that makes her extra special. Don’t miss this one.  (She’s 81 years old now!!)

GINNY & GEORGIA. (NETFLIX SERIES). This was intended to be a mother-daughter comedy it isn’t…there’s not one laugh in it. The half black daughter has to live with a gross, over sexed mother who has some secret. The acting is non-existent, the plot is completely  unbelievable and it’s best just to avoid it.

SHTISEL. (NETFLIX SERIES). Especially since its Passover time, this drama centering on a very orthodox family living in Jerusalem is as fascinating as it is illuminating. From food to marriages and customs that are hundreds of years old we see and feel the pressures and pleasures of a life lived by tradition. I liked it and am continuing to watch each of the 33 episodes.

THE GIFT. (NETFLIX SERIES) This takes place mostly at Gobekli Tepe a real archaeological site in Anatolia, Turkey that’s actually 7000 years older than Stonehenge! The heroine is a beautiful woman artist from Istanbul who is drawn to the site for mysterious reasons. As an artist she has been painting a design that was found in the ancient site and totally unknown to contemporary eyes. I liked it and watched all of season one.

DEADWIND (NETFLIX SERIES) Another woman detective/police officer with many personal issues story. This woman has two children and her husband died. The issues are very much Santa Cruz issues. A huge construction company from out of town wants to build high priced housing that isn’t environmental. The city council has odd ties to the developers and there’s two violent murders to contend with and solve. I’d recommend it just a little bit.

CALLS. (APPLE TV+) SERIES. Unique, demanding and captivating and 88RT. Each story is told completely with online lines. No actors or places physically to be seen just graphics!! You’ll sit and watch voice squibbles, symbols; all graphic effects tell these tense short dramas. See if you’ll like it I’m still making up my mind.

BEARTOWN. (HBO SERIES). Beartown is the English translation of the Swedish town name Bjornstad where this hockey drama takes place. The drama centers on a returning hockey league player who returns to Beartown to coach a losing kid team. His troubles plus all the interfighting keep this really fascinating and good escapist viewing. Go for it with just a little hesitancy .

PAPER LIVES. (NETFLIX SINGLE). Istanbul is the setting for this upside down saga of a Fagin type paper/garbage collector who has a huge team of homeless guys collecting and selling. Mehmet the leader meets a little boy who leads him into some crazed adventures. The ending will shock and maybe disappoint you but you’ll stay glued to figure it all out.

INVISIBLE CITY. (NETFLIX SERIES) I couldn’t watch this for three reasons. It’s dubbed which means their lips are speaking one language, the movies subtitles translate with different words and the Comcast supertitles give us a third translation…and the acting is bad too.

COVEN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) A very dated, poorly directed, terrible acted story about 1609 Argentina’s witch problem. Six sisters fight and compete to worship the devil. Much chasing in the woods, scratching, bleeding and there’s a guy at the ending that looks like Lawrence Ferlinghetti. There’s no reason to watch this mess. But it has 67RT. 

...
March 29

SAN JOSE BY THE SEA
Breaking ground at Pacific, Front, Laurel in downtown.

The attempt by city Planning staff to bypass initial public input for the Downtown Plan Extension Project that I wrote about last week caught the attention of at least some city council members, particularly Justin Cummings and Sandy Brown. This resulted in a lengthy agenda item with staff both rationalizing and apologizing for the process or lack thereof. 

Planning staff assured council they did not intend to bypass the public but didn’t see how the public could make a better decision than the one staff was proposing on the new extended downtown boundaries. They claimed the staff recommendation was “head and shoulders the best option.” They clarified that any action taken, “does not constitute a rezoning per se but is a preliminary geographical scoping of where we are going to be heading with expanding Downtown.”  They added, “when the project starts is when the process starts”. 

Hold it right there. When exactly did the public get to weigh in on whether we want to expand Downtown? That has to be the topic. It was barely mentioned. When it was raised for a brief moment, the city Planning Director didn’t recall if it was raised in the 2017 Zoning Amendments to the Downtown Plan. He thought it might have been mentioned in the context of a grant proposal but it may or may not have meant further south of Laurel. He thought there was some discussion and that council has considered this in the past. 

Given that this rezoning if adopted may be the most significant change in decades to the character, congestion and cost of our town, such vagueness as to whether it has  been publicly noticed, discussed and voted on is surely a violation of public trust? We are being asked to accept that extending and expanding downtown is a given. We will be allowed to weigh in on the details “when the project starts” but the Plan itself is a fait accompli?

Let’s review what the Downtown Plan Zoning Amendments, approved by council in 2017 have meant for the downtown and consider if this is what the community wants to extend towards the beach and lower Westside neighborhoods.

After the 1989 earthquake, the 19- person committee, which guided the downtown re building under the Downtown Recovery Plan was comprised of diverse interests, including business and neighborhoods among others. A difficult consensus was reached to keep a relatively low vertical building profile for downtown. We did not want to become San Jose by the Sea. There were to be a few well-chosen exceptions to the 35 feet height limit (1010 Pacific is one) and of course the historic Palomar is an impressive 93 feet but that was it.

The Planning Department and Planning Commission of 2017 threw that model out, all the while insisting they were not changing the original intent of the Downtown Recovery Plan. Some of us sat through countless meetings in council chambers open-mouthed at the doublespeak. 

You can see the result breaking ground now at Front, Laurel and Pacific where a Taco Bell eatery stood until a few weeks ago, depicted in the graphic above. 

This one under construction is the first with the new height of 80 feet, made possible by the Downtown Plan Amendments. The Front/Riverfront Project at a height of 81 feet will break ground soon, forever changing the character and habitat of the lower San Lorenzo River. These are the first of many. 

If the Downtown is extended to south of Laurel, that area will be included in the Downtown Plan zoning, allowing building heights of 85 feet. The current zoning south of Laurel has building height limits of 35 feet.

Planning staff is full of reassurances that not all new buildings have to be 85 feet. Some may be 50 or even 35. Except thanks to recent state law, if a developer presents to the city a project that meets all zoning and other ordinances, neither the city nor council can reject the project. It is illegal for the city to say no. The city can be sued. Thanks Sacramento! The state has removed local control over land-use decisions.

This is not the time to change zoning boundaries! Right now council and city staff can reject an outsize 85 feet building south of Laurel since it exceeds the current zoning code height of 35 feet. But not if the downtown boundaries are extended and zoning changed to 85 feet. Density bonuses can be 50% of zoning. Imagine those heights all the way to the first roundabout!

If you are thinking that at least we will have more housing then consider that we have already exceeded our regional mandated market rate housing, even before the new 7 story buildings are occupied. That is, if they are occupied. 555 Pacific is currently short on occupants, as is the one near the clock tower.

And higher does not mean providing more affordable units thanks to a 2018 amendment proposed by staff and voted in by then council members Mathews, Noroyan, Watkins and Terrazas. That’s why the Front/Riverfront Project could get away with providing only 11 % of the units at the affordable rate. 

To sweeten the pot, the City Manager talked about the “emergency” for this Downtown Expansion process given that the Warriors have to have a firm commitment for a new permanent arena. And soon! And we all love the Warriors who have given so much back to the community.

Somewhere there’s a fly who sat on a wall and watched all the business heavies and tourist industry heavies and investors and city staff dissect this sweet part of town for profit. No wonder they saw public participation not needed until they are good and ready with plans, proposals and projects. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

APRIL 1ST (March 29)

FOOLING AROUND BUT WHAT IF?

STOP the PRESSES! I hope you’re sitting down. A major political tsunami struck Santa Cruz over this past weekend. It was midnight last Friday night when Santa Cruz city manager Martin Bernal realized he had nowhere else to turn. The city budget was in the toilet as red ink surrounded him, Covid-19’s killing businesses faster than an earthquake, self-centered grumpy city council members want him gone, and the appearance that he is not just callous towards the city’s homeless population, but the sole force behind pushing them out of town and cleansing Surf City of its human detritus, but now Bernal had an exit strategy. He left city hall for the last time early Saturday morning and decided he would never look back. Two hundred and forty G’s a year were his for the remainder of his time on earth with tax payers on the hook. Even though he’d been fired at least twice, by two different councils, Bernal hung on until now because only he, himself, would decide when to get off this stage. 

Bernal Breaking Point

It had all become too much when just last week, while sitting in front of his office computer and watching Zoom, upstart Homeless Union attorney Anthony Prince made mince-meat of his city attorney, right there in Federal court. Now he decided, it was his time to get out. Good riddance Santa Cruz. These terrible Covid days were to be his swan song, a time when he would come out the savior. This Stanford-educated golden boy was to save the hapless post-hippie colony he happened upon twenty years ago from a dreary Mountain View outpost, just one more time. The Monterey Bay beach town had been his for the taking and now he realized it was over.

The City That Might’ve Been

The city council on Saturday acted quickly. Former five-term supervisor, Gary Patton was installed as Interim City Manager. Patton moved to freeze all police over-time, rescind all new positions in the city manager’s office, and rapidly put the brakes on Homeless-Planning Director Czar Lee Butler‘s drive to extirpate the houseless from Santa Cruz while stifling any implementation of his brand of build-baby-build-as-many-condos-as-possible philosophy. It seems Butler was promptly demoted to Interim Planner I, or receive a severance package. He gladly accepted the latter. By Monday morning Butler was even looking forward to the Highway 17 commute while looking to re-capture for his old planning job in San Jose after basically being fired by the new progressive city manager. With the B and B developer shield eviscerated, the Mayor then suddenly stepped down, which made newly-elected Westsider, Councilmember Rene Golder, wince and do the same. If her bestie political bedfellow was headed for the exit, she in turn wasn’t hanging around to see any more governing carnage that might be carried out by a new city manager who prized open space and facts over the unfolding Swenson-Devcon developer nightmare that’s engulfing the city from Branciforte all the way to Front Street. The development blob would finally be thwarted by ghost-buster Patton. By this past Sunday morning, Patton was already reigning in the city attorney’s legal assaults on the homeless, even getting Homeless Union attorney Prince together with city attorney Tony Condotti for an afternoon peace-party beer at Lupulo. Patton left the lawyers to “meet and confer” on homeless encampments while he headed back to city hall and initiated a never before used ordinance to replace the two resigning council members. He called Kayla Kumar to come downtown immediately and be sworn in to replace the outgoing Golder, and then he emailed Public Works Director Mark Dettle demanding his immediate resignation and naming Tiffany Wise-West as the new director. Wise-West emailed Patton back writing she would only accept the new position if Rick Longinotti would be named head of the Parking division, Pauline Seales would be named the new director for Climate Action Planning, and Patrick Siegman would take retiring Traffic Engineer Jim Burr’s position. Longinotti, Seales and Siegman all accepted and immediately began planning for community town hall on transportation. Patton then made a boldly empathetic move, he telephoned Drew Glover in Selma, Alabama.

April 1st, Let the Light Shine

Glover arrived on Thursday, April 1st, to a hastily arranged parade down Pacific Avenue that drew hundreds. He was celebrated as a hometown hero coming home. It began at the Boardwalk and ended at city hall where a new city council majority installed him as Mayor of Santa Cruz. Glover’s first act was to visit the San Lorenzo homeless encampment and assure residents they would no longer face harassment and in fact, would receive his support and city services. He ordered cleaning supplies and dumpsters to the park and after sprucing things up he led over 100 volunteers up the river to the Highway 1 and 9 interchange to clean up that camp as well. He held a press conference after the cleanup. Flanked by council members Justin Cummings and Sandy Brown, he announced he would be bringing resolutions to the next council meeting rescinding the widening of Highway 1 and 9, as well as the city purchasing the Beach Flats Community Garden for the residents of Beach Flats, and the Sea Berg property on Coral Street for a future homeless shelter and RV parking area. This announcement was greeted by thunderous applause. Crowds of locals spilled out onto Highway 1, which brought traffic to a halt, but no one seemed angry. Next, he said that the Harvey West Pool, Junior Guards, and the Metro Bus fare would all be free to any resident under 18 years old; Pacific Avenue would be closed to vehicle traffic; West Cliff Drive would be made one-way to accommodate pedestrians and cyclists; and finally, the city would create public outdoor seating areas so that everyone coming downtown would be able to sit and socially distance. Mayor Glover also pledged to explore the closing off of Soquel Ave. to cars from Pacific all the way to Branciforte Ave. He also announced the council would resume in-person meetings with the entire city council deliberating either outside or in the Civic Auditorium. More applause. Councilmember Brown took to the podium next and said she would immediately be pushing to quash the five-story parking garage fiasco, keep the Farmer’s Market on Lot 4 permanently, and rebuild the library where it is making it the cornerstone of a revitalized and revamped civic plaza at Church and Center Street. Meanwhile, that same April 1st day back at city hall, city manager Patton was drawing up plans to rename the Economic Development Department. It would now be called the Santa Cruz City Office of Housing and its new mission would be to focus on creating and obtaining housing for locals who make less than 60% of the Santa Cruz median income. In addition, he named Kara Meyberg-Guzman as the city communications officer along with Bruce Bratton as Communications Officer Emeritus. A new day was dawning and a community of the people, by the people, and for the people was just beginning. A lot happened in Santa Cruz this past week.

Happy April First Santa Cruz!

I am proud today to take up the Presidency of the United States of America and with my Vice-President, Elizabeth Warren we pledge to rebuild America under the Green New Deal. My Chief of Staff will be Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and I welcome the new Secretary of State, Barbara Lee. It also gives me great pleasure to put in charge of the nation’s defense, Ro Khanna. (Happy April 1st Bernie!)

get out, get out 

Welcome to Point Reyes and the Five Brooks Trailhead. Great place to hike, very few people last weekend too.
Camp sites available. (Me, my daughter, and life partner also pictured)

And if you cannot get away to Point Reyes, here’s a book from a couple of local writers touting 28 walks right around town. 

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
March 29

LIGHTS!  CAMERAS!  ACTION?  
The County will activate the new traffic light at Aptos Creek Road this week.  I hope it helps the traffic problems, especially for the Aptos Creek Road residents. Supposedly, all five traffic lights between Trout Gulch Road and State Park Drive will be coordinated, which should be interesting. This is all traffic mitigation for the Aptos Village Project Phase 2 subdivision development that the County agreed to do…and you and I are paying for.  

The County project also has literally  paved the way for the developer’ new gateway entrance from Soquel Drive to Parade Street by creating a dedicated left turn lane for the eastbound Soquel Drive motorists, and removing a significant amount of precious public parking to do it.  


Significant amount of public parking on Soquel Drive removed by County  to create turn lane for Aptos Village Project gateway entrance.

White fence is current termination of Parade Street gateway entrance to Aptos Village Project.

APTOS VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2B TRAFFIC SIGNAL TO BE POWERED ON. The County of Santa Cruz Department of Public Works has announced that the recently installed traffic signal, located at the intersection of Soquel Drive and Aptos Creek Road, will begin full operation on Tuesday, March 30, 2021. Motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians are advised that the signal will remain in continuous operation from this date forward. Traffic delays may be experienced during the signal power up operation and the Department of Public Works would like the motoring public to avoid this area if possible. The schedule is subject to change due to weather or other conditions. Please visit aptosvillageimprovement.blogspot.com for the latest project information

WILL THE COUNTY DECLARE EMINENT DOMAIN TO TAKE HISTORIC BAYVIEW HOTEL ACCESS AND FURTHER HELP DEVELOPERS? 
In order for the Aptos Village Project developers to get permission from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to create a new private railroad crossing, the County had to apply.  The County Counsel and Dept. of Public Works spent a lot of taxpayer-funded time doing that, and in 2015 got approval, with the requirement that the County close two other existing private railroad crossings.  

The County arbitrarily chose to close the Warenella Road crossing in Davenport, and the Bayview Hotel crossing in Aptos Village.

The Hotel was built in 1870 by Jose Arano.  It is listed on the National Historic Registry (#92000259) and the railroad crossing is part of that historic context.

The Bayview Hotel property extends under the railroad tracks and into the bike lane on Soquel Drive, and is shared 50% with what is now the Trout Gulch Crossing property (Norma Jean’s Coffee Shop and Caroline’s Thrift Store).    Both property owners filed protest with the County early on in the Aptos Village Project hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, as well as with the CPUC.  Their protests were ignored:

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE AND JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

March 28
#87 / Safe At Home!

This great picture was scavenged from one of the many political bulletins that routinely penetrate my email inbox. The thought that came to my mind, immediately upon seeing the photo, was that this ballplayer would soon be celebrated: “Safe at Home!”

That “Safe at Home” phrase, of course, is most commonly utilized in baseball commentary, in just the way I imagined it, and that “Safe at Home” proclamation is almost always expressed with great enthusiasm. When a runner on third base tries to score on an infield hit, the question will necessarily be posed. What’s going to happen? Will he make it? Those who try to make it “Home” aren’t always successful – but it’s most exciting when they are!

“Safe at Home” has now also acquired another meaning. During the last year, almost all of us who are lucky enough to have homes to repair to have found ourselves self-isolated inside the protective space that our homes provide. Sometimes, our self-isolation at home has been willingly accepted. Other times, perhaps, not so willingly. Knowing, however, that venturing out into public spaces would inevitably expose us to the dangers of the coronavirus has kept a lot of people inside. When congregating with other people is verifiably risky, we all have learned that we might be better off to be “Safe at Home.” 

That “Safe at Home” position has had some consequences for the kind of public participation that is the sine qua non of democratic politics. Anyone following local politics in Santa Cruz, California, for instance, has observed how the Santa Cruz City Council and the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors have so quickly and readily accepted the idea that members of the public should not be allowed into the same room with the elected officials who supposedly represent them. Both bodies could have made arrangements for socially distanced meetings, with remote access as an alternative. Both bodies have chosen not to. 

The result (particularly at the City Council) has been decisions that seem oddly detached from an understanding of the real impact that the decisions will have on the public. For instance, the City Council has just recently voted, unanimously, to begin a process to apply high-density (high-rise) General Plan designations on the “South of Laurel” neighborhood. Any decision to begin such a process was supposed to follow a vigorous public outreach effort, but no such public outreach effort was ever made. Still, the Council forged ahead. There was no one in the room but the Council Members and the staff, as this staff-recommended proposal was ratified. Well-connected landowners in the area may be expecting a windfall – and may get one, too – but city residents in general, and those whose neighborhood is about to be transformed, have had no in-person opportunity to have their say.

Even more amazing was another recent City Council decision, again decided upon with no members of the public in the room. That decision, to enact a so-called “Outdoor Living Ordinance,” directed the City Police Department, and other city staff, to require any homeless person found sleeping or living in a tent (and particularly in any homeless “camp”) to pack up that tent at 7:00 a.m. every day, along with any sleeping gear and any personal possessions that the homeless person might have, and then to walk the streets during daylight hours. Homeless persons would be allowed to sleep at night, just not in any area where homeless persons are now sleeping, and where there might be some public facilities they could utilize. The City ordinance suggests that the best place for homeless persons to sleep (and only between sundown and sunup) would be on the sidewalks of residential streets.

Self-governing communities need to interact, in person. Elected representatives who find it comfortable to make staff-recommended decisions without having actually to see the members of the public who will be affected, and who care about what the decision might mean, are undermining the democratic process. 

Democracy is a “public” thing. It will not be “Safe at Home.” 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    APRIL

“Men are April when they woo, December when they wed. Maids are May when they are maids, but the sky changes when they are wives”.
~William Shakespeare

“Here cometh April again, and as far as I can see the world hath more fools in it than ever”.
~Charles Lamb

“The air soft as that of Seville in April, and so fragrant that it was delicious to breathe it”.
~Christopher Columbus

This week it’s belly dance. I love belly dance, I always have!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

March 23 – 29, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Cabrio naming, confidential opinions, rail plus trail names and ideas, Ralph Abraham’s new book, Grey Hayes and fire safety. GREENSITE…on Extending Downtown to the Beach and What That Implies.  KROHN…Look What They are Doing to our Song. STEINBRUNER…Soquel Creek Water District allows no comments on major project, Capitola now a disadvantaged Community? PATTON…Problems of Contemporary Censorship. EAGAN…Deep Cover and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES… “Just good quotes”

...

CABRIO CONSTRUCTION 1959. Watsonville’s Register Pajaronian printed this photo, taken by Sam Vestal, their staff photographer. It directed the trucks and construction workers to the present day site of the college. Those folks interested in using the original local Indian tribal names could choose from this Wikipedia list… Achilla, Aestaca, Agtisrn, Apil, Aulintac, Chalumü, Chanech, Chicutae, Choromi, Coot, Hauzaurni, Hottrochtac, Huachi, Hualquilme, Huocom, Locobo, Luchasmi, Mallin, Nohioalli, Ochoyos, Onbi, Osacalis (Souquel), Payanmin, Sachuen, Sagin, Shiuguermi, Shoremee, Sio Cotchmin, Tejey, Tomoy, Turami, Utalliam, Wallanmi, Yeunaba, Yeunata, Yeunator.[3] And of course there’s Awaswas, Ohlone, Amah Mutsun, even Sokel!

The online college Name Exploration Subcommittee continues its zoom online meetings on April 8, April 15 and April 22. 

photo by Sam Vestal, courtesy of Carolyn Swift

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE March 22

CONFIDENTIALITY, SECRETS, OPINIONS. Every so often I like to remind folks that BrattonOnline is an opinion column. There’s plenty of news here too, but it’s founded and exists on opinions. That means whenever you send me anything, I guarantee anonymity. Unless you want attribution, that is. In the 46 – yes, forty six – years that I’ve been writing this weekly opinion collection, I’ve kept more secrets than J. Edgar Hoover (remember him?) This is in response to the many, many notes, phone calls, emails, and hints I’m receiving in response to the Rail Trail debate now underway.

COLLIGAN, KOENIG, OW & RAILS REMAINING. Very many of the readers/writers clearly suggested that the big money behind the push to remove the rails is Bud Colligan, the George Ow, family and other nearby land owners who will profit from the trail-only future. Relating to the phone survey call I reported on last week, I got this response…

“So, you got hit up with the survey from Greenway/TrailNow/Manu? If you want to know who is behind it besides Bud Colligan, Ow Family, Miles Reiter (CEO Driscoll’s), Gayle’s, etc. go to the Greenway website, which has been seriously misleading folks. Those people who early on signed the “10,000” petition did so at “informational” presentations to business groups and at Dominican events (recipients of big bucks from guess who?) They were bamboozled.

There is a lot more to that story. 

Those early signers were “sold” on the healthy idea of a trail, “Wow! Yes, that sounds great!”, neglecting to mention that a trail had long been in the works by the Regional Transportation Commission. Understandably, they were too busy to keep up with what RTC staff and the Friends of the Rail Trail were advocating, which was to plan for clean light rail for our County (with connections to the rest of the State).  

Anyway, FORT/Coast Connect recently commissioned their own survey by the same firm that did the one for Measure D, which turned out to be very accurate.

Here are the results

The recent RTC vote (9 to 3) to designate the rail line for passenger light rail is a major achievement! Besides excluding a trail-only option, it means that staff can start applying for federal and state funding. If we have the plans shovel ready, we could be first in line.  

FYI in case you haven’t already seen it, here’s a press release from FORT about their recent poll (not the Greenway/Trail Only one you were called about) showing 74% support for clean energy light rail on the coast rail corridor ‘.

STILL MORE ABOUT TRAIL ONLY BACKERS. Grateful readers continued to write…
“Who are they & why is there a lucky-in-life rich white (mostly) guy cabal against this? Bud Colligan. William Ow. Miles Reiter. Robert Stephens. Rowland Rebele. Sibley Simon. and others. Colligan is the ringleader: I’ve heard it’s because he’s heavily invested in futuristic personal mobility devices (google future personal mobility devices images) but I don’t know that for sure. Because of their demographic, he & the others tend, in my experience, to believe that they know what’s best for all the rest. Also, it’s always interesting to me that rich folk are so concerned about how the government spends its paltry share of the world’s wealth. 

An article in the recent Atlantic about private schools includes this quote: “Money is how rich people express their deepest feelings.” That sure feels true to me…even if it’s not their money to spend. & it sort of explains how a very nice person like Rebele can be roped into this nasty group. Colligan moved into SC when he retired from being lucky in Silicon Valley & immediately started throwing his angry, moneyed-wrench around: large donations in trade for support for the anti-rail position. Dominican, SC Community Health Centers, Housing advocates, etc. It’s sickening. & of course you know that they were behind Manu Koenig’s win & are now threatening both Ryan Coonerty & Bruce McPherson with running anti-rail candidates against them.

Thank you for challenging the Greenway myths, perpetrated by liars such as Colligan who are not all that dissimilar from our thankfully-former president”.

An early responder writes…”What I don’t get… and I realize this is coming from me, someone with a deep appreciation for cities and people… is why the Santa Cruz Business Council isn’t in favor of rail. Local shops could do with more foot traffic. It makes no sense to me. Sprawl is pro big-box retailer and pro-Amazon. We’ve got to build better cities that are more inclusive and equitable. Then again, maybe the key issue is that some bigger companies do not want their nearby labor force to have more options (Santa Cruz has a higher minimum wage than Watsonville and commuting by rail costs less than a car over the long haul). Where’s the business coalition in favor of the rail? We’re currently trapped in car culture when we could be embracing walkable & bikeable cities with transit options for everyone. What do you think is the deal there?

MORE ABOUT THE MONEY BEHIND TRAIL ONLY. The intensity and research behind the letters is as amazing as it is useful. Read this one too:

“You don’t know me but I’m a reader of your newsletter. I saw your question about why would local big-money interests want the tracks removed and I can offer a little insight. I did a bunch of research on this topic a few years ago when I first started learning about the Rail Trail project. I called the Surface Transportation Board public info line and spoke with them for about an hour, and also read a bunch of legal articles. After doing this research I ended up becoming a volunteer with the Friends of the Rail & Trail. 

What I found was that because of the way that the federal regulations are written, if the RTC were to ‘Railbank’ the rail corridor, whether or not they remove the tracks, that officially makes it not a freight rail easement any more. Railbanking preserves the option that freight rail might someday return, and preserves the corridor as an intact property, including any easements, but it is no longer a current active freight rail facility. Once that happens, anyone who owns land within the corridor easement can participate in a class action lawsuit against the federal government saying it is a new ‘taking’ (because the easement land isn’t being returned to the original owners, even though the corridor is no longer a freight rail facility.)

These Railbanking class action lawsuits have happened all over the country and resulted in 100% win rates for the landowners: the federal government has had to pay the landowners the full current market value of the easement land.

This doesn’t impact the ownership or integrity of the rail corridor. The RTC still would own it and it would stay intact, including easements, and there would be no cost to the RTC. It would basically be a gift to these local landowners from the fed. 

I think there is a lot of noise from these local landowners (the Rieter family and the Ow family specifically) about wanting Trail Only or a ‘Greenway’ in the rail corridor because that would justify track removal which would in turn justify railbanking. It’s interesting to notice that the RTC has officially decided on passenger rail for the corridor but is now considering Railbanking (while keeping the tracks). Possibly this is intended just as a gift to the local landowners to get them to stop pushing so hard for track removal. The problem is, if they do Railbank they are more vulnerable to political pressure to abandon the passenger rail plan and remove the tracks. So it may be a poison pill.

As for why Bud Colligan is so invested in tearing out the tracks, I have no idea other than he’s a libertarian type who dislikes public transportation and wants a playground for personal electric vehicle toys, like the electric skateboards in which his Central Coast Angels venture capital group is invested. He thinks only people who own self-driving electric cars deserve to be in the road, and wants to give Watsonville residents electric bicycles they can ride to their jobs in Santa Cruz instead of investing in public transportation. I’m not even kidding, this was his real proposal. He bankrolled Koenig’s run and successfully bought himself a supervisor. As for Koenig he’s a straight-up libertarian, same as Bud. Doesn’t support the minimum wage increase, thinks we should give tax breaks to businesses instead, etc”.

SUMMING UP. Concluding our reader/writers reactions we have… 

“If we are concerned about Climate Change, we must reduce fossil fuel use.

Transportation is the biggest user of fossil fuels.

Highway 1 is already congested many hours of the day.

Highway widening is very expensive and eventually doesn’t work.

Santa Cruz County continues to grow, especially in South County.

We need to move people across our County.

Think 20 years down the road. 

To those against a train, tell me – WHAT IS YOUR PLAN?

The RTC had been working on a plan long before Trail Now/Greenway/Manu came on the scene (with their own interests in mind).

Service and restaurant workers, students and others who need to go from Watsonville to Santa Cruz waste hours and gas every day. 

The RTC plan is the Coastal Rail Trail for 32 miles with zero emission “streetcars” for 20 miles with hubs with busses or jitneys circulating to inland places like Soquel, Cabrilho, UCSC, etc.  

The Westside rail trail is finished and open and a segment in Watsonville is almost done. Other sections are in design and planning stages and will be built as funding comes in from Measure D and other sources.  

This survey was just released a couple of days ago  

For more info, ask at: info@railandtrail.org  

or see the websites: www.railandtrail.org and coastconnect.org“. 

IN ALMOST CONCLUSION. This is one of the rare issues I’ve been aware of that really divides some environmentalists. I got notes from some readers supporting rail removal on an environmental basis, but I fail to see their point. This topic will be continued, even though the majority of residents support Rail & Trail.

RALPH ABRAHAM’S NEW BOOK. Ralph Abraham – formerly of UCSC and longtime area resident – has another book now in print titled “Vibrations and Forms”. The book features many articles describing the meaning of what’s been seen, felt and deciphered from types of trips. That means LSD, and various psychedelic excursions. If you’ve never tripped or experienced other-worldliness you’ll learn a lot. Rupert Sheldrake, Ken Kesey, Soquel, Ram Dass , Tabory, are all names we know in the book. If you are a veteran, you’ll recognize spaces and eternities you’ve seen before and will be happy to share. The book is available at Bookshop Santa Cruz and online at Amazon.

GREY HAYES ON CZU FIRE SAFETY. As we sit and stare at the clouds and read the rain predictions, and wonder just how dry our yards will get before the next big CZU season, there’s lots more planning we can do. Naturist Grey Hayes – an authority and veteran of our local blazes – describes in detail what, and how, we can prepare for the next danger period. Whether you’re sitting on a dozen acre ranch or little more than your rented porch, we all should be memorizing Grey’s words of wisdom. Go here to read it…

STOP THEM SCAMMERS. If you have ever wondered how people can fall for scammers on the internet, going so far as to send them money, be sure to scroll down for the “Webmistress video pick” this week. It’s humorous, but also very informational about internet scammers. Do watch!

Be sure to tune in to my very newest and latest movie streaming reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange,

THE GIFT. (NETFLIX SERIES) This takes place mostly at Gobekli Tepe, a real archaeological site in Anatolia, Turkey that’s actually 7000 years older than Stonehenge! The heroine is a beautiful woman artist from Istanbul, who is drawn to the site for mysterious reasons – including the fact that as an artist she has been painting a design that was found in the ancient site, and totally unknown to contemporary eyes. I liked it and watched all of season one.

DEADWIND (NETFLIX SERIES) Another story featuring a female detective/police officer with many personal issues. This woman has two children, and a dead husband. The issues are very much Santa Cruz issues: a huge construction company from out of town wants to build high priced housing that isn’t environmental. The city council has odd ties to the developers, and there’s two violent murders to contend with and solve. I’d recommend it just a little bit.

CALLS. (APPLE TV+) SERIES. Unique, demanding, captivating and 88RT. Each story is told completely with online lines. No actors or places physically seen, just graphics!! You’ll sit and watch voice squibbles, symbols; all graphic effects tell these tense short dramas. See if you’ll like it… I’m still making up my mind.

BEARTOWN. (HBO SERIES). Beartown is the English translation of the Swedish town name Bjornstad, where this hockey drama takes place. It centers on a hockey league player, who returns to Beartown to coach a losing kids’ team. His troubles – plus all the infighting – keep this really fascinating, and good escapist viewing. Go for it with just a little hesitancy.

PAPER LIVES. (NETFLIX SINGLE). Istanbul is the setting for this upside down saga of a Fagin type paper/garbage collector ,who has a huge team of homeless guys collecting and selling. Mehmet the leader meets a little boy, who leads him into crazed adventures. The ending will shock and maybe disappoint you, but you’ll stay glued to figure it all out.

INVISIBLE CITY. (NETFLIX SERIES) I couldn’t watch this, for three reasons. It’s dubbed, which means their lips are speaking one language, the movies subtitles translate with different words, and the Comcast supertitles give us a third translation…and the acting is bad too.

COVEN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) A very dated, poorly directed, terribly acted story about Argentina’s witch problem in 1609. Six sisters fight and compete to worship the devil. Much chasing in the woods, scratching, bleeding… and there’s a guy at the ending that looks like Lawrence Ferlinghetti. There’s no reason to watch this mess. But it has 67RT. 

CHERRY. (APPLE + SINGLE) Tom Holland not just walks but struts away with acting honors in the deep, beautifully structured movie. Too many critics only see the plot and not the creative, fresh, nicely photographed movie. A young Ohio boy nearly of age has severe doubts about his future and joins the Army. He goes to war in Iraq comes back with PTSD and a drug addition that he ends up sharing with his dutiful wife. The Russo Brothers directed it, if that helps convince you it’s very much worth your time and love of the musical score which includes Verdi and Puccini.

DOGWASHERS. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Set in Columbia it’s a murder and mayhem flick centered on the thugs and toughies that guard the drug lords. One of them has a low sperm count and it goes downhill from there. Dogwashers is slang for lowly thug employee/slave. Avoid it and don’t talk about it either. 

THE ONE. (NETFLIX SERIES). I must state that this is the first series that I nearly binge watched completely. Partly in the future some tricky researchers find a way to match all of us to our identical DNA partner for life. Sort of 23 and Me part two. There’s a murder, much lying, very good acting, nice plot and twists and turns to make you wonder if you’d ever sign up for such a pairing and who it would be. 8 episodes and don’t miss it.

MOXIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Amy Poehler directed and appears in this unfunny mess. A high school teenager decides to secretly publish a booklet that gets her in plenty of trouble. The school admin and her friends all start to condemn the zine but change their minds. Boring, pointless, poorly acted and no reason to watch this by any stretch of anyone’s imagination. However you shouldn’t care but Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver’s son Patrick is in it.

HERSELF. (AMAZON PRIME) Single. Heart breaking and emotional story (saga) of a mother of two who has a battering husband. They split and she decides to build a house herself. The neighbors help while she also works at a hotel as a maid. It is an emotional supportive movie and gives great points to this brave woman. It’ll also make you realize just how much prejudice there is everywhere in this world. Well worth your time and tears. 93 onRT.

THE CHOSEN ONE. (NETFLIX SERIES) Not worth watching this poorly dubbed trip into a Chosen One Cult in Brazil. Oddly enough it’s about three doctors who are sent by WHO into the jungle to vaccinate the locals against some other pandemic (filmed in 2019). The locals worship a handsome dude who fools the WHO staff and leads the tribes straight into hell. Watch it at your own risk.

THE TRIAL. (NETFLIX SERIES). This is an Italian series in every way. A 17 year old girl is murdered and a woman investigator is assigned to the case. Complex and well done this will keep you glued to your screen. Suspicions run every which way and high dealing politicos are seriously involved. Go for it.

NEVANKA (NETFLIX SERIES). This is a very timely documentary of a woman explaining and revealing all the reasons she outted the mayor of her small town who pursued her beyond all reasonable doubt. It happened in 2001 in Spain and we get to see and understand the pain and the point of view of women sex victims. Watch it with friends, you’ll have great discussions.

SUPERMAN AND LOIS. Beware of (AMAZON PRIME VIDEO) It sends you to a ad packed streaming source named “CW”. Nearly the same old Superman lore…Smallville, Metropolis, The Daily Planet and the ever evil Lothar. Clark Kent is now a bedraggled father of young sons and he maintains a three day facial hair growth. Nothing new or worthwhile here, avoid it. 

...
March 22

WHOSE INTERESTS ARE BEING SERVED?
I spent two hours Sunday completing a Public Service Ethics course, which is a bi-annual requirement for all elected and appointed public officials. (I am a city Parks and Recreation commissioner.) This was serious stuff. No cute characters and happy sounds letting me know I got it right as I’m used to with my daily Spanish Duolingo course. This Ethics course is based on the Fair Political Practices Act of the Government Code. It is well written, clear and makes no bones about whose interest you are serving as a public official. Not your own, not your campaign contributors, not the staff…you are serving the public. The consequences for forgetting that legal obligation can be severe, including jail time and dismissal from office. The real-life examples were helpful. Apart from obvious transgressions such as bribes, many examples were subtle such as a vote being overturned due to a council member’s rolling their eyes during public testimony. Or votes being discounted due to elected officials checking their emails or otherwise not paying attention as the public spoke. Having one’s mind made up prior to public testimony is disallowed. How might one know that? Public conversations, emails or opinion pieces all counted. Public perception rather than strict legality is the standard. It was with this refreshed sense of public obligation that I turned to review the city council agenda for 3/23/21. 

Item 23 on the agenda is perhaps the most significant city Land Use change since the Corridors Plan. This current Plan, pushed by staff, is to extend the Downtown with its new height limits of 80 feet, towards the beach area, specifically to the first roundabout. What does this mean? Not only the bulldozing of familiar small businesses and loss of sense of place but also a change from the current height restrictions of 3 stories to a new zoning of 6 and 7 stories. This affects the south of Laurel streets of Pacific, Front and the east portion of Center. The last is instructive. If you read my last week’s piece you know that Barry Swenson Builders has submitted two models for his proposed mixed-use development for 130 Center St: one at 6 stories and one at 3 stories. He is no doubt looking to see which way the wind blows at Tuesday’s council meeting. And here I was thinking he was giving the community and council a real choice! The troubling part is that none of this extending Downtown Plan has been made available for public input. In fact, staff recommends council accept their boundary alternative because: “By selecting a geographic boundary by motion, rather than developing a community process to select a boundary, the City Council will shave approximately three months off the beginning phases of the project.” Agenda Report. Item 23.

Staff is paid to make sure private investors and developers adhere to the city’s Ordinances and Zoning Codes. To initiate a re-writing of the Zoning Code to favor developers surely steps over a line. If council votes to adopt the staff recommended motion to by-pass public input, they have according to the Public Service Ethics Code violated the public trust. A serious breach of Ethics.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

March 22

Years from now, when Santa Cruz history is closely examined, historians will note the economic mayhem of this era as possibly mirroring a larger nationwide wealth gap trend. They may even analyze this period as a kind of (20)20’s Covid Gilded Age. This widening gap between rich and poor is surely a train wreck, or a series of train wrecks. The station it occupies now is Obscene Rift, in which twenty-first century capitalism is delivering for the rich and shafting the poor. They will see it was a time when the US experienced its highest unemployment rate ever and likely is largest homeless population. “[E]stimates of homelessness in the United States range from fewer than 600,000 to more than 1.5 million people…” The higher numbers may include homeless students and people living with friends and family, while the lower number is derived from Housing and Urban Development’s flawed “point in time” (PIT) yearly counts, not at all scientific which even “HUD itself cautions against drawing conclusions or trends…” (Population Research Bureau) If the larger number is to be believed, we now have the largest homeless population in history pushing shopping carts filled with meagre belongings from one sidewalk destination to another. The war on the homeless is nothing like LBJ‘s “war on poverty” in the 1960’s.That “war” had a goal: put an end to poverty. The war on the homeless people who now dot the cityscape of Santa Cruz, is called “TOLO,” or The Outdoor Living Ordinance. It is a war directed by some well-off people looking for a way to escape the omen of the miner’s canary, The houseless have become such a disquieting tone among those searching this beach enclave for the perfect second or third home. Homeless people are the human sentinels of the outrageous upsurge in capitalist accumulation for the few.

TOLO—A Too Obvious Loser Operation
The enactment of TOLO by the Santa Cruz city council will be a legal ban on houseless people, a discarding of human life, a dismissal of the many who are experiencing a Dickensian existence as they exist among untold wealth. That untold wealth seeks to abandon, discard, dissect, and dismantle the many houseless pods, and abandon these scraggy denizens forever. Move on! There is no room for you in Santa Cruz. You are the product of another kind of urban species unlike us or you would have a nice house, a fast car, and a reasonable latte budget. This is the constant rhetoric flying out of the mouth of an increasingly smug, imperious, and frankly deluded Santa Cruz Planning Director-cum-Homeless Czar, Lee Butler. Butler assists greed-driven developer’s wettest dreams, directing them through the Byzantine Santa Cruz permitting process while at the same time spending the bulk of his time eliminating the homeless who constitute that last obstacle to developer uber-success in effectively marketing their seaside condos to the non-local well-off. It’s Butler’s perfect gig. The homeless, many of whom grew up here, will be displaced by Butler-ian logic, by moneyed interests who found Santa Cruz on some Forbes list of Best Places to live, but only if the homeless would go away. And poof! Team Butler-Bernal, Martin Bernal is the current city manager but not for long, is leading the charge to oust the houseless from Serf City as fast as Charlemagne’s ouster of the German-Saxons at the Massacre of Verden. I use the Charlemagne analogy here because he was exceptionally ruthless and it went on over a 30-year-long war. That Massacre of Verden in 782 slaughtered some 4.500 Saxons, which is likely the same number of people now living houseless in Santa Cruz County. 

Go Team Butler-Bernal, go!
But don’t forget, we still have a functioning court system. Team Butler-Bernal was again confronted by the law on March 16th, most notably in Federal Court in San José, and the law won. The homeless can still stay within the confines of their insufficient encampment in San Lorenzo Park. Big win? It was neither a win for the houseless, nor for the dozens of activists who agitate for better and more humane public policy, but it was a brief moral victory that thrusts a potent right hook onto the jaw of the city bureaucrats’ many wrongs. It was a classic televised face-off, if anything can be “classic” on Zoom, between the city attorney, Tony Condotti and his minion assistant, Cassie Bronson, vs. Homeless Union defense counselor, Anthony Prince. The event was presided over by Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen whose Wikipedia page states, “[S]he has also regularly represented pro bono clients in cases involving immigration law, landlord-tenant disputes and remedies for victims of domestic violence.” Aha! We potentially have a good “cutman” in our corner, someone who just might care about the problems faced by homeless people, especially within our unfolding and persistent pandemic. And yes, Prince scored again.

The Case
The Santa Cruz city attorneys entered the Zoomzone this time on bended knee and with heads bowed. It was nothing like their January 6th bombastic and rather aloof performance, which Judge van Keulan would have none of and stated, “…the CDC Guidelines before this Court are clear and specific: if there is no alternative housing available, leave the encampments to remain where they are because clearing encampments may increase the potential for infectious disease spread.” The results of this Judge-just-checking-how-the-camp-is-doing court appearance were somewhat similar. She directed the two parties–houseless and houseful–to get together and work out both a vaccination plan and a place where campers could go to shelter in place and sleep when necessary. The current TOLO plan identifies few habitable spaces where people could, or would, want to reside. While the judge cited the coming rains posing perhaps a flooding danger, city attorneys threw up verbal blockades against any kind of homeless storage and access program and seemed to contend that only around 100 people resided at the San Lorenzo camp. Prince countered with a left. He pointed out that the current 200-person San Lorenzo Park camp was perhaps even much larger when you consider that tents dot the river landscape from the Benchlands up and down the San Lorenzo River.

The Decision
The judge left it up to the parties to get together. It was likely a TKO (technical knock-out) for now. She also wanted to know about a vaccination plan–more J&J supplies to arrive on March 19th according to Assistant City Attorney Bronson–and about past “data points” on the flood status of the area. The judge was concerned how moving campers to a flood prone area might change any city plan and the city needed buy-in from campers. Supposedly the city plan is to prepare 122 camping spots on the Benchlands, which Prince immediately disputed would be far too few given the actual numbers of homeless people needing a spot. Prince also made the point that if the camp were to be moved before all campers had access to vaccines, many campers might likely forgo a vaccination before choosing to relocate elsewhere. The judge’s order was that parties must “meet and confer” by March 24th or 25th and “by noon on the 26th submit materials to court.” Judge van Keulen scheduled a new court date for March 30th to try and work out an initial final plan. Assistant City Attorney Bronson would like the court to allow the city to also enforce a “park stay-away order” from San Lorenzo Park against campers if and when they are moved to the Benchlands, a short distance away. The Judge said the court might take up that submission later, but for now Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulan held firm that the park encampment was not to be moved. Again, not a victory for the environment or for neighbors of the park, and especially not for the sad-sack city manager’s office, but it was a victory for those of us who love justice and would still like to love our democracy. The courts, as the third branch of government, are still serving the American people post-Trump, including Santa Cruz.

Ps. I found an informative, and brief, history of homelessness on a National Institute of Health website

“Every benefit, from the minimum wage to the 5-day work week, was earned when people organized. It’s never easy. But workers at an Amazon warehouse in Alabama are standing together right now and if they win, it will send a shockwave throughout this country.” (March 20)

“CEO pay growth from 1979-2019: 1,167% Worker pay growth from 1979-2019: 13.7%” (March 21)

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
March 22

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT REFUSES TO OPEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MAJOR PROJECT CHANGES CAUSING POTENTIAL NEW AND SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Last Tuesday, Soquel Creek Water District’s Board, claiming to be environmentally-concerned, approved a $34.5 Million element of the PureWater Soquel Project’s pipeline that, if there are ever effluent leaks at any of the multiple San Lorenzo River or creek crossings, all aquatic life would likely perish. Mitigations specific to this potential problem? None. Public hearing or formal comment period? NONE…denied by the “environmental” Board.

Here is why you need to contact the Coastal Commission and the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board ASAP and demand the District produce mitigations acceptable to the State Dept. of Fish and Wildlife: the effluent will contain high levels of chloramine, a chemical known to be toxic to all aquatic life. You also need to contact parents, staff and administrators affiliated with Spring Hill Elementary School, Bayview Elementary School, and Santa Cruz High School to warn them of the new large above-ground hazardous chemical storage tanks that the MODIFIED PureWater Soquel Project would add to their sphere 0.25 mile away. Chemical transport trucks on Mission Street???  Hmmmm…….  

Soquel Creek Water District Board merely held a regular meeting with consideration of this item near the end of their meeting…no public hearing that would have required any special level of notice…and rubber-stamped an Addendum to the Project. No public comment period as would be required under CEQA had they done the responsible action of issuing a Subsequent EIR.

And they call themselves “environmentally concerned scientists”?

The chloramine pollutant in the pressurized effluent to be pumped over four miles from Bay and California Street in Santa Cruz to Chanticleer and Soquel Avenue in Live Oak would be added, under the MODIFIED PROJECT, due to the newly-added nitrifying Biological Aeration Filtration (nBAF) treatment plant. It would be required because the treated sewage water the PureWater Soquel Project would use is much higher in contaminants ammonia, nitrite and total organic carbon that was expected or analyzed in the Project’s original EIR.  

The Soquel Creek Water District did not conduct a Subsequent EIR to analyze the potentially significant and adverse environmental impacts of this new nBAF treatment plant, which also add numerous very large above-ground hazardous chemical storage tanks 

Mitigations to protect aquatic environments could include sleeved double pipe in riparian areas, and sensors in the immediate areas of riparian crossings that would quickly detect any changes in hydrostatic effluent pressure within the 8 MILES OF EFFLUENT PIPE LINES.

Contact:

Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board c/o Mr. Matt Keeling matt.keeling@waterboards.ca.gov   

California Coastal Commission c/o Ms. Susan Craig susan.craig@coastal.ca.gov  

Santa Cruz City School District

I am disappointed that the Santa Cruz Sentinel report gave this MODIFIED PureWater Soquel Project glowing reviews, without addressing any of the new elements that add multiple significant and adverse environmental impacts.

Next phase of Pure Water Soquel project gets green light

DID YOU KNOW THAT CAPITOLA IS NOW CONSIDERED A DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY?
The California Regional Water Quality Control announced the City of Capitola has been added in the determination of several Disadvantaged Communities in Santa Cruz County at the January 29, 2021 Central Coast meeting.  

I was curious…and wrote the Board:

“Dear Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board,

I am puzzled by the list of Santa Cruz Disadvantaged Communities listed in Item 7, Attachment #1.

Santa Cruz County Specific Census Tract or Block Group Areas: 

  • Amesti 
  • Capitola 
  • Davenport 
  • Santa Cruz 
  • Soquel 
  • Twin Lakes 
  • Watsonville 

How can the City of Capitola be included as a Disadvantaged Community? The criteria for establishing this determination is not clear. I would appreciate an explanation of this matter.”

Here is the explanation from the Director, Mr. Matt Keeling:

Hello Ms. Steinbruner,  

DACs are identified based on median household income thresholds as compared to US Census data for Block Groups, Tracts and Places. The following website provides a good synopsis and DAC area mapping tools based on these data. California Disadvantaged Communities Mapping Tool | Adaptation Clearinghouse

There are a number of mapping tools, of which this is just one. We typically use the Department of Water Resources or Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) mapping tools and GIS data.

Regards. MK

************

Maybe that will help Soquel Creek Water District get more public grants for the disgusting plan to inject treated sewage water into the clean aquifer water the entire MidCounty area depends upon. Do they really have to do that? Why not just use it for irrigation at golf courses and athletic fields, like the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency does? 

WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers and Happy Spring,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

#80 / Problems Of Contemporary Censorship 

March 21

Spiked is a British Internet magazine focusing on politics, culture and society. The magazine has been funded in part by donations from the Charles Koch Foundation, and Wikipedia says that Spiked is generally considered to be “libertarian” in its editorial approach. 

On February 19, 2021, Spiked published an article by Editor Brendan O’Neill, who is pictured above. O’Neill’s article is titled, “It’s time to get real about freedom of speech.” Wikipedia reports that O’Neill was once a Trotskyist, and was formerly a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party writing for the party’s journal, Living Marxism. O’Neill apparently now self-identifies as a “Libertarian Marxist,” though I must confess that the “Libertarian Marxist” category is not one that is exactly crystal clear in my mind. 

At any rate, I thought that O’Neill’s recent column raised some important issues related to censorship and free speech. I think it’s well worth reading. Here’s how O’Neill starts out:

It’s hilarious when activists piss on the door of a feminist academic’s office because they don’t like her criticisms of gender self-ID. It’s hilarious when a disabled working-class grandfather is sacked from his job at Asda because he posted a Billy Connolly skit on social media that made fun of Islam. It’s hilarious when a Labour shadow minister loses her job because she dared to raise concerns about the grooming and rape of working-class girls in various parts of England. It’s hilarious when JK Rowling is bombarded with messages saying ‘fuck you bitch,’ ‘bitch I’ll kill you’ and ‘choke on my cock’ because she wrote an entirely non-prejudiced essay on trans issues. It’s all so funny. ‘FREEZE PEACH’ lol.

Make no mistake: when the cultural and media elites mock the idea of a free-speech crisis, when they insist cancel culture doesn’t exist, this is the reality they are denying. This is the abuse, demonisation and, yes, censorship that they claim is not real. Actually, it’s worse than that. These censorship deniers do not merely question the reality of these grim assaults on people’s free expression – after all, we can all see the tweets calling JK Rowling a ‘cunt’ and a ‘whore’, and we all know what urine splashed on someone’s door looks and smells like, so we know this stuff is real. No, they also implicitly justify these chilling crusades against open discussion. By refusing to describe these attacks as attacks on freedom of speech, they normalise them, they green-light them.

Most obviously, the censorship deniers, those nominally leftish people who claim there is no free-speech crisis on campus or anywhere else, just cannot be taken seriously. Such is their ideological blindness to the problem of contemporary censorship that they have become impervious even to facts and information. I know from personal experience that you can provide these people with loads of examples of ‘controversial’ individuals being No Platformed, arrested and even physically assaulted for their political or moral points of view, and it makes no difference. ‘Nope, there’s no free-speech crisis’, they’ll say.

Glenn Greenwald, who once wrote for another British publication, The Guardian, has also been thinking about issues related to censorship and free speech. Greenwald’s article, which appeared in his Substack newsletter on February 20, 2021, was titled, “Congress Escalates Pressure on Tech Giants to Censor More, Threatening the First Amendment.” Greenwald pays less attention than O’Neill to individual attacks intended to shut down someone’s ability to comment on contemporary issues. Greenwald is specifically concerned about how elected officials are trying to compel various social media corporations to suppress opinions with which the politicians disagree:

House Democrats have made no secret of their ultimate goal … to exert control over the content on these online platforms. “Industry self-regulation has failed,” they said, and therefore “we must begin the work of changing incentives driving social media companies to allow and even promote misinformation and disinformation.” In other words, they intend to use state power to influence and coerce these companies to change which content they do and do not allow to be published.

I’ve written and spoken at length over the past several years about the dangers of vesting the power in the state, or in tech monopolies, to determine what is true and false, or what constitutes permissible opinion and what does not. I will not repeat those points here.

Instead, the key point raised by these last threats from House Democrats is an often-overlooked one: while the First Amendment does not apply to voluntary choices made by a private company about what speech to allow or prohibit, it does bar the U.S. Government from coercing or threatening such companies to censor. In other words, Congress violates the First Amendment when it attempts to require private companies to impose viewpoint-based speech restrictions which the government itself would be constitutionally barred from imposing.

Both O’Neill’s article, and Greenwald’s, address problems of contemporary censorship that I think need to be taken seriously. Lots of things that people say are things with which I disagree, and some of them I consider to be truly horrible and obnoxious. 

Still, while no “Libertarian,” I am uncomfortable with the idea that obnoxious and horrible ideas should be suppressed – however that is accomplished. I particularly think that Greenwald’s point, that when government officials try to use the power of our government to eliminate opinions which disagree with their own, we are treading into extremely dangerous territory.  

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    Just good Quotes

“You know you’re in love when you can’t fall asleep because reality is finally better than your dreams.”
~Dr. Seuss 

“If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”
~Mark Twain 

“I’ve learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”
~Maya Angelou 

“Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.”
~Oscar Wilde 

Mark Rober is famous for making glitterbombs to irritate porch pirates, but this video is a little more involved, and a little more important. Internet scams are a $20 BILLION dollar industry, and while we often laugh it off with “why would anybody be so stupid?”, Mark explains here why that is simply not the case. Please watch, so you can maybe help someone else (or yourself!) not fall for this.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

March 17 – 23, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…More about Cabrilho, Cabrio and Cabrillo, Rail Trail phone survey, vaccine shot potential, movie reviews. GREENSITE…Yet Another Development: More Is Not Better. KROHN…Will be back next week. STEINBRUNER…Riverfront Development building appeals, septic systems in CZU area problems, Soquel Creek Water rates to increase. PATTON…Persistence book by Pat Bakalian. EAGAN…Deep Cover and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES… “DAYLIGHT SAVINGS”

...

CABRILHO COLLEGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1962. Cabrillo became a community college in 1959, in Watsonville. It has a quite a “changing” history. Now it’s a discussion topic because of plans to build student housing on campus… one of the very few community colleges to even consider such a thing.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE March 15

CABRILHO NAME AGAIN. Last week I plugged the Cabrillo College Name Exploration Committee’s events. The Committee’s ability to publicize its efforts seem to be non-existent, as no one I know has even heard of this community effort and event. So I’m repeating this “NEWS” about our local community college.

CABRILHO BY ANY OTHER NAME! There’s a huge amount of interest in the name, and even the intentions, of the Cabrillo College institution. There is a Name Exploration Subcommittee in existence. They are staging three online events in the next few weeks to canvass community opinions on the name of our local college. Plus, there’s the talk of building student housing for the college – very rare for a community college in California. On March 18, at 6pm, Dr. Iris Engstrand – a retired professor from San Diego – will talk on “Who Was Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo”. We can Zoom it here. My guess is that, being from San Diego, she’ll claim Juan Cabrillo was Spanish (born, raised in Spain) She claims to have proof from a book by Wendy Kramer that he was born there, and not in Portugal – which a book written in 1986 by Harry Kelsey claimed to prove. If you go to Wikipedia, you’ll see that it presents both sides of his birthplace issue. Next on the Name Exploration Subcommittee’s series is retired professor Sandy Lydon, who’ll talk on “How and Why Cabrillo College got its name”. That’s on April 15 at 6 p.m. I talked to Sandy and he’s got the full story on the local angle. Don’t miss this one; it’s full of surprises and area tidbits you’ve never heard. To round it all off at 6 p.m. on April 22 there’ll be a student debate on “Should Cabrillo College Change its Name?” If they do ever change the name, my suggestion in now and has been that they change it to Harrison. That’s of course after Lou Harrison, our world-famous composer… or maybe Wormhoudt after Mardi Wormhoudt, or Patton, after our devoted office-holder Gary Patton. But those names would probably cause some fuss too.

RAIL TRAIL PHONE SURVEY. There’s big money and sneaky plans behind the folks who want to rip out our rails. I got a so-called “phone interview survey” from them last week. They wanted to know if and how often I vote, and asked how I’d vote on which of the many phrases they want to put on a ballot. Why the money interests are supporting rail removal, is a question I can’t figure out. If any of you readers know who’s behind this, let me know…please.

VACCINE SAME FOR SECOND SHOT? I asked the folks who gave me my second Pfizer shot last week (and a few doctors, too) if the contents of shot number two are the same as the first bottle? I still can’t get or find a definitive answer. Any word or words from your sources?

Be sure to tune in to my very newest movie streaming reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange,

CHERRY. (APPLE + SINGLE) Tom Holland not just walks but struts away with acting honors in this deep, beautifully-structured movie. Too many critics only see the plot, missing the creativity, freshness and cinematography. A young Ohio boy nearly of age has severe doubts about his future, and joins the Army. He goes to war in Iraq, coming back with PTSD and a drug addiction that he ends up sharing with his dutiful wife. The Russo Brothers directed it, if that helps convince you. It’s very much worth your time – not least because of the score, which includes Verdi and Puccini.

DOGWASHERS. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Set in Columbia, this is a murder and mayhem flick centered on the thugs and toughies that guard the drug lords. One of them has a low sperm count, and it goes downhill from there. Dogwashers is slang for lowly thug employee/slave. Avoid it and don’t talk about it either. 

THE ONE. (NETFLIX SERIES). I must state this is the first series that I nearly binge-watched completely. Partly in the future, some tricky researchers find a way to match all of us to our identical DNA partner for life. Sort of 23 and Me, Part Two. There’s a murder, much lying, very good acting, a nice plot and enough twists and turns to make you wonder if you’d ever sign up for such a pairing… and who it would be. 8 episodes and don’t miss it.

MOXIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Amy Poehler directed – and appears in – this unfunny mess. A high school teenager decides to secretly publish a booklet that gets her in plenty of trouble. The school admin and her friends start to condemn the zine… but change their minds. Boring, pointless, poorly acted and providing no reason to watch. You shouldn’t care, but Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver’s son Patrick is in it.

HERSELF. (AMAZON PRIME) Single. The heartbreaking and emotional story (saga) of a mother of two who has a battering husband. They split, and she decides to build a house herself. The neighbors help while she also works at a hotel as a maid. It is an emotional supportive movie and gives great points to this brave woman. It’ll also make you realize just how much prejudice there is everywhere in this world. Well worth your time and tears. 93 on RT.

THE CHOSEN ONE. (NETFLIX SERIES) Not worth watching this poorly-dubbed trip into a Chosen One Cult in Brazil. Oddly enough, it’s about three doctors who are sent by WHO into the jungle to vaccinate the locals against some other pandemic (it was filmed in 2019). The locals worship a handsome dude who fools the WHO staff, and leads the tribes straight into hell. Watch it at your own risk.

THE TRIAL. (NETFLIX SERIES). This is an Italian series… in every way. After a 17 year old girl is murdered, a female investigator is assigned to the case. Complex and well done, this will keep you glued to your screen. Suspicions run every which way, and high-dealing politicos are seriously involved. Go for it.

NEVANKA (NETFLIX SERIES). The very timely documentary of a woman explaining and revealing all the reasons she outted the mayor of her small town, who pursued her beyond all reasonable doubt. It happened in 2001 in Spain and we get to see and understand the pain and the point of view of female sex victims. Watch it with friends, you’ll have great discussions.

SUPERMAN AND LOIS. Beware of (AMAZON PRIME VIDEO) It sends you to an ad-packed streaming source named “CW”. Nearly the same old Superman lore…Smallville, Metropolis, The Daily Planet and the ever-evil Lothar. Clark Kent is now a bedraggled father of young sons, and maintains a three day facial hair growth. Nothing new or worthwhile, avoid it. 

COMING 2 AMERICA. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) A huge disappointment. Eddie Murphy is a very good actor, his goofy, funny side is just as great and believable as his tragic side but this movie is just not funny. The cast is stupendous starring James Earl Jones, Morgan Freeman, Wesley Snipes, Leslie Jones, Gladys Knight and Arsenio Hall. But the humor is beneath human level, it’s trite, gross, simple minded and boring. 

CRAZY ABOUT HER. (NETFLIX SINGLE). This is a Spanish comedy but it’ll teach all of us more about our treatment of psychiatric patients than any film ever. A guy meets a girl in a bar falls in love, finds out she’s a mental patient, and declares himself equally crazy to get back to her and gets admitted to her ward. Few laughs but deep to watch. A 76 on RT.

SENTINELLE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) A French film about a woman soldier in Syria who gets sent back home to France where she becomes part of a anti terrorist local army. She’s battle weary, takes drugs, and goes near crazy. Her sister gets raped by a diplomat and she goes after him with a vengeance. It’s a violent, brutal movie that is well paced and nicely photographed. You won’t forget it. 

SISYPHUS:The Myth. (NETFLIX SERIES) This is from South Korea and is well worth watching. A young, rich, genius CEO tries to find out why and how his older brother died. He’s involved in an incredibly tense airplane crash that his genius talents and he survives. Through some odd time travel that’s only a bit awkward he manages with his woman from outer space to survive. It’ll hold your attention because it moves extra fast and isn’t too logical.

LOVE (ft. MARRIAGE & DIVORCE) (NETFLIX SERIES). I don’t know what that “ft.” means but it must be important. There’s plenty of music in this South Korean series. Three couples who are married to women who work on a radio show. Each marriage has its own problems and the women have to deal with their hubbies and vice versa. You’ll recognize and cringe when you watch how they develop and almost solve each of them. Nor fun but tempting viewing. 

MURDER AMONG THE MORMONS. (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY SERIES). It’s a totally fascinating history that involves the unbelievable Joseph Smith history of the Mormon church. The focus is on Mark Hofmann the world’s greatest forger and what and how he forged the historical documents that detailed and changed the legendary start of that church. It’s also about how he killed two people to guarantee the sale of his forgeries. If you’ve ever had Mormon friends (I have) send them to this one. Hoffman is still in prison, unbelievable and well done.

DICKINSON. (APPLE SERIES) Emily Dickinson was an early American poet in case you missed her. This series is sparkly, lively, and tuneful and spins out of time periods often. It’s creative, diverting, cutesy, and contains opium, death and rock music. It’s not what you’d expect, and I’m working on making it watchable.

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

...
March 15

AND YET ANOTHER-

The above is a rendition of the latest in a growing number of 6 and 7 story proposed new developments in the city of Santa Cruz, currently at the Planning Department stage. Named Calypso, Ancient Greek for “to cover, to conceal, to hide, to deceive” this one from developer Barry Swenson takes advantage of all that Senate Bill 35 (Wiener 2017) has to offer in terms of density bonuses, streamlined approval and reduced parking.

The site is 130 Center St., where two small businesses are located, a Hertz Rent-a-Car and an Auto Body Shop, almost opposite Depot Park and the soccer fields. 

The carrot in this case is the inclusion, required under SB 35, of 10% of units (23 out of 233) at the Very Low Income level, that is, for those making less than $62,000 a year for a family of four. A further 8 units are for Medium Income earners, those making less than $132,000 a year for a family of four. The other 202 units will be market rate.

The folks I know at the VLI level work two jobs at $15 an hour, which is about $15,000 a year. They have children. The units at Calypso do nothing for their affordable housing needs. 

All of the units in this proposed development are SRO’s or Single Room Occupancy, that is, a unit from 40 to 140 square feet for one individual with shared kitchen, fridge and bathroom outside of their SRO. Some may have a microwave and small fridge but you get the picture… student dorms. This is how UCSC in their comments on whether an additional 10 thousand students would impact off- campus housing could claim, well not really.

While SB 35 has all but taken local control over land-use decisions out of our hands, there are choices and issues with this one that are worth getting out of bed for. Developer Swenson has offered the city two models. One is the above. The other is a 3-story model with 155 SRO’s and the same percentage of Very Low Income units. Many communities limit heights of new development to 3 stories to keep a balance, retain at least a sense of human scale if not a sense of place as the old familiar businesses are bulldozed for the generic new. Three stories are preferable to six.

Every new development has impacts far beyond the provision of market rate housing even with the obligatory small percentage of affordable units. Whether traffic, water use, overcrowding of parks, open space and facilities, more is not necessarily better. The mantra of “we need more housing” is mindless when each new development makes living here more expensive by attracting the more affluent newcomers who generate the need for more low-income service workers who cannot compete for the pittance of affordable offerings and are forced to find housing further and further away. More housing raises the Area Medium Income on which the VLI rates are set. The deceptive need for more housing was used last week by the CA Coastal Commission to support the mammoth new development on the San Lorenzo River and is used by YIMBY’s (Yes In Your Back Yard) at every hearing. 

In this case the developer is offering a choice. It is up to us to convince the staff at the Planning Department, the Planning Commissioners and ultimately the elected city council members of the wisdom of the smaller choice. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

March 15, 2021

Chris will be back next week.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
March 15

WHY IT MATTERS TO PARTICIPATE IN LOCAL PROJECTS….YOU MAY BE CENSORED LATER IF YOU DON’T!

Here is what the Sentinel reported about last week’s Coastal Commission hearing of Ron Pomerantz’s appeal of the seven-story mammoth the City approved next to the River: Coastal Commission rejects Riverfront project appeal in Santa Cruz

“Several members of the public tried to speak on the matter but found themselves unable. They did not give public testimonies during the city’s review of the project permit, therefore the commission could not hear their testimonies during the appeal.

Only one public commenter was qualified to comment during the appeal. Kyle Kelley, another Santa Cruz local, urged the commission to reject the appeal, as the city is in need of more housing.”

Quite honestly, I think the Coastal Commission committed censorship and hope this will be appealed. 

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY’S NEW SEPTIC SYSTEM REGULATIONS COULD MAKE REBUILDING IN THE CZU FIRE AREA EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE (IF CALFIRE EVEN ALLOWS IT!) AND AFFECT 30-50% OF ALL PERMITS IN THE RURAL AREAS

Last Tuesday’s County Board of Supervisors received the shocking update from Environmental Health Dept. staff that thousands of rural parcels will be affected by the impending new septic system regulations that will require Alternative Mound Systems when built or sold.  

These systems cost an average of $55,000-$75,000 and require hefty annual County inspection fees.  Staff informed the Board the revised Draft plan will likely be reviewed again in June by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.  Santa Cruz County is the only county in this agency’s jurisdiction that has not yet achieved an approved Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP).  The State granted a few extensions to get it done, but Santa Cruz County staff did not comply.  

As a result, the State has taken over issuance of all septic permit applications for any but very routine…meaning greater expense and long delays in processing.

Write your thoughts about this and ask to receive automatic notifications about this:

Marilyn Underwood marilyn.underwood@santacruzcounty.us
Mimi Hall mimi.hall@santacruzcounty.us

Also, contact your County Supervisor: 831-454-2200

See Consent Agenda Item #32:

DOC-2021-182 Accept and file report on the County of Santa Cruz Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP) for permitting and managing septic systems, as recommended by the Director of Health Services – Santa Cruz County,

The LAMP and proposed Code amendments (Appendix A) can be viewed here

Analysis

The proposed LAMP and related ordinance amendments represent substantial changes to the requirements for permitting OWTS (Onsite Wastewater Systems)  in Santa Cruz County. These are summarized in the attachment – Significant Changes in Proposed LAMP from 2016 Standard. Following are some of the key changes (and the estimated number of affected parcels):

  • Minimum groundwater separation for replacement systems will increase from 1-3 feet to 5-8 feet unless enhanced treatment is used (3000-4000 parcels impacted).
  • All new and replacement systems in fast percolating sandy soils throughout the county will require enhanced treatment with nitrogen removal (1500-3000 parcels impacted).
  • Enhanced treatment will be required for replacement of all seepage pits (2000 parcels impacted).
  • Maximum trench depth for replacement systems will decrease from 10 feet to 4 feet unless enhanced treatment is used. This will affect parcels with clay surface soils or other constraints that limit dispersal area (2000-3000 parcels impacted).
  • System repairs may no longer be designed by a contractor, but will be designed by a qualified professional, who also must conduct required soil and percolation testing.
  • All OWTS will be evaluated at the time of property transfer, including system condition, permitted status, performance, and likely requirements for future upgrades. Those that have deferred installation of enhanced treatment will have to do so at that time.

The tighter requirements for conventional systems will require a much greater use of enhanced treatment systems where the new conventional standards cannot be met. It is estimated that the percentage of permits requiring enhanced treatment will increase from 16% to 30-50%.

Some of the proposed LAMP requirements are mandated by the State OWTS policy, but a number of the provisions are being required to provide consistency among the LAMPs already adopted by the Regional Board for other counties in the Central Coast Region. However, HSA staff will continue to work with Regional Board staff and present to the Regional Board further justification for provisions that are more specific for unique conditions in Santa Cruz County.

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FIRE DEPT. ADVISORY COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER CONTINUING TO CHARGE CZU FIRE PROPERTY OWNERS TO DEFEND THEIR NON-EXISTENT HOMES?

Last year, the County pushed through a Special Benefit Assessment for all properties in a large portion of the County and charged a new and additional tax to defend homes and barns from fire.  Over 1000 of those structures burned, but the County seems to want to continue charging the people for protecting them anyway, at the rate of nearly $150/structure.

Tune in Wednesday, March 17 at 4pm-6pm for the County Fire Dept. Advisory Commission meeting and listen to General Services Director Michael Beaton explain the County’s thinking.

Sadly, Mr. Beaton has instituted a new policy for these meetings that prohibits public comment on any agenda item until the very end of the meeting, after the Commission has taken action on every agenda item.  I think he needs a refresher on the Brown Act.  Shockingly, County Counsel Justin Graham enforces this policy of public gag-order.

However, if enough people protest to your County Supervisor, this could improve.  Demand that those who lost their homes in the CZU Fire are not required to continue the CSA 48 Special Benefit Assessment fee to defend it from fire (a new annual fee of about $150/structure)

Greg Caput greg.caput@santacruzcounty.us
Ryan Coonerty ryan.coonerty@santacruzcounty.us
Zach Friend zach.friend@santacruzcounty.us
Manu Koenig manu.koenig@santacruzcounty.us
Bruce McPherson bruce.mcpherson@santacruzcounty.us

831-454-2200 

STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY MEETS MARCH 22 TO FINALIZE CHANGES THAT WILL MAKE REBUILDING IN SOME CZU FIRE AREAS PROHIBITIVELY EXPENSIVE 

The State Board of Forestry is moving quickly to finalize a Draft Fire Safe Regulation rule making plan that would cause lengthy delays, significant expenses, and make it nearly impossible to obtain building permit approval from CalFire in many areas destroyed by the CZU Fires.

March 22 (1pm-5pm) will be the final opportunity to really make a difference in what regulations the Board will consider for final approval on April 6-7.  Supposedly, that approved Plan would have a 30-45 day comment period, but often, little gets changed at that point.

Here is the link to next Monday’s agenda: Welcome to Meeting Agendas and Annual Schedules

E-mail: publiccomments@bof.ca.gov
Fax: (916) 653-0989
U.S. mail: Board of Forestry and Fire Protection 
PO Box 944246 
Sacramento, CA 94244-2460

All written materials shall be due no later than 12:00 p.m. on March 17, 2021.  Written materials submitted after the deadline will not be considered.

This is serious.  Call and write.  Contact your County Supervisor (454-2200) and let them know your thoughts.

Here is what the Rural Counties Representatives of California (RCRC) published last week on the matter:

On Thursday, the Board of Forestry (BOF) noticed a special meeting to discuss and possibly approve its Fire Safe Regulations proposal for submission to the Office of Administrative Law.  Once the proposed rulemaking is published in the Regulatory Notice Register, the formal 45-day public comment period will begin.  It is anticipated that a revised draft of the proposal will be released prior to the BOF meeting.

The current proposal, released February 8th, continues to include language that preludes all development on roads that fail to meet specified standards.  These “no-build” areas apply to the construction of Accessory Dwelling units and wildfire rebuilds.

The State Fire Safe regulations set forth basic wildfire protection standards for development in the State Responsibility Area and, beginning July 1, 2021, the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones of the Local Responsibility Area.  RCRC, along with the California State Association of Counties and the Urban Counties of California, submitted comments to the BOF on the revised proposal, outlining the extremely detrimental impacts the new regulations will have in all areas of that state, but particularly in rural areas.

For updates from the BOF on the Fire Safe Regulations and other activities of the BOF Resource Protection Committee, subscribe to email updates here.   And, for more information, please contact Tracy Rhine.

Board of Forestry Update and Special Meeting Notice | Rural Counties

AND QUICKLY…

1) Soquel Creek Water District Board is launching a new fact-finding mission (and yet another expensive consultant contract) to prepare for ANOTHER RATE INCREASE TO BEGIN IN 2024.  The existing five-year annual 9%/year rate increase slams on customers will run out in 2023.

2) Soquel Creek Water District Board will approve a $34.5 million Agreement for the five-mile long pipeline project to send pressurized treated sewage water effluent from Santa Cruz to a new plant next to the County Sheriff Center in Live Oak.   However, none of the exhibits showing plans for environmental mitigations and monitoring are included in the document.  

I find it curious that in the Agreement’s TABLE OF CONTENTS, all entries are listed as being on page 2 (See pages 39-42 in Attachment 1).

Is this a mistake, or is the $34.5 Million Amended and Restated Design-Build Agreement for the Conveyance Infrastructure Project of the PureWater Soquel Program really prepared and finalized for Board approval? 

It doesn’t seem like it is…but that won’t stop the Board from issuing a $34.5 million rubber stamp of approval.  

They will always just raise the rates again….and again…and again.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A ZOOM MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS. JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers, Becky 685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

March 14 
#73 / Persistence

Persistence, Pat Bakalian

Pat Bakalian, pictured, has written a very nice book, Persistence: The Power To Make Change. Pat’s book is a “Memoir,” filled with stories of her family life, and with personal recollections from Palo Alto and Santa Cruz, and detailing her forays from Santa Cruz, to San Francisco, and all around the country, and even to China – not to mention her long-ago recollections of a girlhood sojourn in Switzerland.

A lot of of Pat’s memoir is about “politics,” how ordinary people can change the world. I already knew how this can be done – from my personal experience, and because I do know Pat. I found her book nostalgic, since I did know quite a bit (but not everything) about the track she charted in her memoir, from her involvement in politics at the local level to her activism at the state, and national level. Pat traversed that entire route, and she says it’s a story of “one woman’s evolution from shy girl to feminist political activist.” 

Quite an evolution! Did Pat’s memoir make me feel nostalgic? Yes it did – but it’s not just a trip into nostalgia. It’s inspiring, too!

Adelante!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER . See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

   

“I don’t mind going back to daylight saving time. With inflation, the hour will be the only thing I’ve saved all year”.
~Victor Borge

“An extra yawn one morning in the springtime, an extra snooze one night in the autumn is all that we ask in return for dazzling gifts. We borrow an hour one night in April; we pay it back with golden interest five months later.” 
~Winston Churchill  

“Daylight time, a monstrosity in timekeeping.”
~Harry S. Truman

“Daylight saving time: Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket.”
~Anonymous

I think I may have posted this once before, a long time ago. It bears repeating, however.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

March 10 – 16, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Music at the zoo, Cabrilho – the man and the college name, stop the daffodils, Surfer helmets and concussions, movies. GREENSITE…on International Women’s Day. KROHN…UCSC growth, a letter to the chancellor. STEINBRUNER…. CZU fire and rebuilding, eminent domain and the Soquel Creek Water District, Felton Quarry activity. PATTON…Resistance and Insistence. EAGAN…classic Subconscious Comics and Deep Covers. QUOTES… “City Growth”

...

BAY, HIGH AND MEDER STREETS. 1955. This is now the main entrance to the UCSC campus. Center ,near the bottom is UC’s Barn Theatre – now closed.                                                     

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE March 8
   

MUSIC SOOTHES THE SAVAGE GERMAN BEASTS. Mike Rolland sent me this timely and perfect video of what happened when a pianist brought his piano to a zoo in Germany. There had been few visitors (covid) ,the animals were depressed, and…

CABRILHO BY ANY OTHER NAME! There’s a huge amount of interest in the name -and even the intentions – of the Cabrillo College institution, and even a Name Exploration Subcommittee in existence. They are staging three online events to take place in the next few weeks, to discuss community opinions on the name of our local college. Plus there’s the talk of building student housing for the college, which is very rare for a community college in California.

On March 18 at 6pm Dr. Iris Engstrand – a retired professor from San Diego – will talk on “Who Was Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo”. We can Zoom it here. My guess is that, being from San Diego, she’ll claim that Juan Cabrillo was Spanish (in the sense of born and raised in Spain) She claims to have proof from a book by Wendy Kramer that he was born there, and not in Portugal, as proposed in a book written in 1986 by Harry Kelsey. If you go to Wikipedia you’ll see that it presents both sides of his birthplace issue.

Next on the Name Exploration Subcommittee’s series is retired professor Sandy Lydon, who’ll talk on “How and Why Cabrillo College got its name”. That’s on April 15 at 6 p.m. I talked to Sandy and he’s got the full story on the local angle. Don’t miss this one; it’s full of surprises and area tidbits you’ve never heard.

To round it all off at 6 p.m. on April 22, there’ll be a student debate on “Should Cabrillo College Change its Name?” If they do ever change the name, my suggestion is now, and has been, that they change it to Harrison. That’s of course after Lou Harrison – our world famous composer – or maybe Wormhoudt after Mardi Wormhoudt, or Patton after our devoted office holder Gary Patton. But those names would probably cause some fuss too.




MONTHLY PITCH We try to not overload you with the asking, but BrattonOnline can certainly use some financial help. As previously mentioned none of us who write for BrattonOnline receive any funds at all and… the best things in life are never free. Domain fees and charges keep increasing and we need to support webwoman Gunilla Leavitt so she can deal with these increases. You can click the donate button, and use PayPal or any debit or credit card. The PayPal email is support@BrattonOnline.com and you can use the send to family and friends feature to avoid any fees, if you like. The name that comes up when you send money is “Online Payment”.

GREY HAYES AND STOP THE DAFFODILS. Naturalist Grey Hayes places a controversional debate on our public table. Should we fight nature, and plant daffodils like so many folks are fighting to do, or help keep nature natural and let it take its own course. He states it like this.

“I contrast two cultures from the North Coast of Santa Cruz: those who embrace the widespread planting of daffodils versus those who favor the wide ranging management for native species of bulbs. I illustrate how cultural norms of the former are indicative of a wider dis-ease of our species, which is dooming future generations to reduced standards of living and increased poverty of the spirit. And, I outline how a contrary world view can lead us to increased prosperity in a world with clean water, plentiful wildlife and happy, healthy children”. 

Go here and read his entire discussion. It’ll take a minute before you realize just how wide ranging this is.  

SURFER HELMETS AND CONCUSSIONS. Great reactions from folks about surfers and concussions, and whether to wear helmets. Statistics pour in about surfers getting hit from their boards. Matter of fact, my grandson just got 12 stitches last week, when he met his board unexpectedly. Our local water sprites are realizing that skateboarders, footballers and plenty of other less injury-prone sporters wear them. We just need to convince our area dudes that we care. THIS JUST IN…daughter Jennifer sent this news today, about a surfer who was killed last Saturday by a collision. Read it and tell your surfer friends to do more than think about it… 

I don’t “print” these critiques in any special order. There seems to be so very few that are what I’d call GREAT movies anymore. Besides that, I keep fighting the urge and financial demand of coughing up another $15.99 per month to rent from one more streaming outlet. 

COMING 2 AMERICA. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) A huge disappointment. Eddie Murphy is a very good actor, and his goofy, funny side is just as great and believable as his tragic side… but this movie is just not funny. The cast is stupendous, with James Earl Jones, Morgan Freeman, Wesley Snipes, Leslie Jones, Gladys Knight and Arsenio Hall. But the humor is beneath human level. Trite, gross, simple-minded and boring. 

CRAZY ABOUT HER. (NETFLIX SINGLE). This is a Spanish comedy, but it’ll teach all of us more about our treatment of psychiatric patients than any film ever. A guy meets a girl in a bar, falls in love, finds out she’s a mental patient, and declares himself equally crazy to get back to her and gets admitted to her ward. Few laughs but deep to watch. A 76 on RT.

SENTINELLE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) A French film about a woman soldier in Syria who gets sent back home to France, where she becomes part of a local anti-terrorist army. She’s battle-weary, takes drugs, and goes near crazy. Her sister gets raped by a diplomat, and she goes after him with a vengeance. It’s a violent, brutal movie that is well-paced and nicely photographed. You won’t forget it. 

SISYPHUS: The Myth. (NETFLIX SERIES) From South Korea, this is well worth watching. A young, rich, genius CEO tries to find out why, and how, his older brother died. He’s involved in an incredibly tense airplane crash, and through some odd time travel – that’s only a bit awkward – he manages to survivem with his woman… who’s from outer space. It’ll hold your attention because it moves extra fast… and isn’t too logical.

LOVE (ft. MARRIAGE & DIVORCE) (NETFLIX SERIES). I don’t know what that “ft.” means, but it must be important. There’s plenty of music in this South Korean series, about three couples which include women who work on a radio show. Each marriage has its own problems, and the women have to deal with their hubbies, and vice versa. You’ll recognize and cringe when you watch how they develop, and almost solve each of them. Not fun but tempting viewing. 

MURDER AMONG THE MORMONS. (NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY SERIES). A totally fascinating history involving the unbelievable Joseph Smith history of the Mormon church. The focus is on Mark Hofmann, sometimes called the world’s greatest forger, and how he created the historical documents that detailed and changed the legendary start of the church. It’s also about how he killed two people to guarantee the sale of his forgeries. Hoffman is still in prison. This is an extraordinary story, and well done.

DICKINSON. (APPLE SERIES) Emily Dickinson was an early American poet in case you missed her. This series is sparkly, lively, and tuneful and spins out of time periods often. It’s creative, diverting, cutesy, and contains opium, death and rock music. It’s not what you’d expect, and I’m working on making it watchable.

THE GIRL ON A TRAIN. (NETFLIX SINGLE). Taking place in India complete with a few non essential Bollywood musical numbers this is still a murder mystery. A young woman watches what she thinks is a disappearance of another woman. She finds more than she was looking for and you should too…avoid this one.

TELL ME YOUR SECRETS.(AMAZON PRIME SERIES). Three very different people each with their own plot and purpose make this a complex movie. As their stories unfold we find a serial killer, a sex offender and all sorts of complexities. No Oscar winner or even Golden Globe material but it’ll keep you glued for a few takes.

CAPITANI. (NETFLIX SERIES) Filmed in Luxembourg this one is due for a second season already.  Luc Capitani is the police inspector who has the job of looking for the murderer of the 14 year old who has a twin sister, who also vanished. It takes place in a small town where everybody knows everybody and everything that happens in it. They won’t cooperate with Capitani who along with a beautiful assistant has issues of his own. A good one, and worth your time, by all means. 

WALKER. (CW SERIES) This is a remake of an earlier Walker,Texas Ranger series. Do not watch or even search for it. Especially don’t link up with CW and be forced to watch their ads. The acting in Walker is terrible. The lead looks like Chris Krohn. Walker goes away for his town for a year and comes back to get involved in some dopey plot that makes little sense. Avoid at all costs. 

RED DOT. ( NETFLIX SINGLE) A genuinely tense Swedish movie. Almost as tense as Hitchcock at moments. A young married couple with relationship problems and a baby on the way decide to go camping in vast snow country. They accidently anger some townspeople, and we learn more about their own past later as they become targets of these crazed racially prejudiced locals.. Not great, but you stay fixated on it almost all the way through it.

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

...

March 8

As of writing, today is March 8, recognized worldwide as International Women’s Day (IWD). We in the US do not mark the day as an official holiday as do some countries and efforts to make that happen have languished in a Congressional committee since 1994.  China marks it as a half-day holiday for women only (I quite like that approach) and Australia minted a 20-cent coin to commemorate the date. A one or two dollar coin might have carried more weight but at least it was something. As of 1975 the United Nations began celebrating IWD and the theme for 2021 is “Women in Leadership: Achieving an equal future in a Covid-19 world”.

The idea for such a day originated as early as 1909, organized by the Socialist Party of America in New York City, which inspired delegates to take up that theme at the 1910 International Socialist Women’s Conference in Denmark. Then on March 8, 1917 in Petrograd, women textile workers demonstrated with a demand for an end to war, food shortages and czarism. The resulting Revolution abolished czarism, secured women’s right to vote and proclaimed the date of March 8 as IWD. In many countries March 8 is still associated with labor struggles centering on women’s demands for equality. In the US, second wave feminists revitalized IWD in the 60’s and well into the 1980’s with leftists and labor demands for equal pay, equal legal rights, reproductive rights, subsidized child care and the prevention of violence against women.  This was the political scene when I arrived in Santa Cruz in 1975.

It’s hard to believe now that as recently as 1971 women had to secure their husband’s permission to get a credit card, open a checking account, get a mortgage or a business loan. Thanks to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, such glaring gender inequalities seem hard to believe in today’s world. 

A significant change for the better over the past two decades is the depiction of women in the popular media. During my 30 years at UCSC as head of Rape Prevention Education and before cell phones and iPods, I would show popular feature films for students to bring attention to the ways in which women and men were depicted differently in the media. Women as weak, sex objects (always the object rarely the subject) passive, confined to the domestic sphere, controlling, frivolous….the list did go on. Men were the doers with exciting jobs and fast cars. Women and men of color had other stereotypes to contend with. Those stereotypes have been successfully nudged to the side with more egalitarian gender images and gender diversity becoming the norm. I’m sure you can find the old stereotypical images if you look but that is different from being immersed in them and not recognizing what you are being sold. Such stereotypes played a significant role in fostering gender violence but they are by no means the full story. And however equal the gender image may be, we are artfully being seduced to become consumers with scenes of happy families and the obligatory dog, gaining fulfillment with yet another pharmaceutical drug. We are the only country that allows pharmaceutical drugs to be peddled this way. 

Another shift towards gender equality is the # MeToo movement uncovering decades of sexual harassment and toppling male giants. It was such a hidden norm there wasn’t even a term for it until Lin Farley coined one in the mid-seventies.

However as much as things change, they also stay the same as the saying goes. Much gender inequality and violence is still hidden, in other cultures and also in modern Santa Cruz. 

We hear a lot about sexual harassment and little about rape unless it is in a work context or involving Trump. When did you last see local media coverage of a rape recently reported to the police? It’s been a while since I researched the SCPD website for data on rape. I wasn’t surprised today to see the numbers are still up there: 33 reported rapes in the city in 2020, a 14% increase over the previous year. And as usual, the police statement that: “the overall crime rate is down” andSCPD would like to thank our community members and hardworking officers for contributing to our low crime rate through the combined efforts of enforcement, education, and prevention.” 

I checked out Salinas. With a population of 156,000 compared with our 64,000 they had 66 reported rapes last year. That puts our rate of reported rape at well over twice that of Salinas, adjusting for population. That was also true in 2007 and 1981, two years in which I did an in depth analysis of the rate of rape in Santa Cruz compared with other CA cities and uncovered that we had one of the highest reporting rates and lowest arrest rates for rape in the state. 

Nothing in that to celebrate on International Women’s Day.  The work is ongoing.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

March 8

UCSC, AGAIN
As I write this, the deadline for submitting comments on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as part of UCSC’s Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) process is today, Monday March 8th. The university administration and UC Regents are planning on adding up to 14,000 students, faculty, and staff over the next decade. Because the UC Regents has never provided the resources needed to comply with the 2005 LRDP, there is no reason to believe that the quality of education and the quality of living in Santa Cruz will not deteriorate–larger class sizes, less study spaces on campus, more traffic, less water, and less housing. Most startling was that the 2005 LRDP stated, without any teeth, that 70% of students would be housed on campus. That figure still arguably hovers around 50%. This is a most distressing situation this community is presented with, especially in light of all that has happened this past year. To make matters worse, UCSC Chancellor, Cynthia Larive who arrived last year from UC Riverside, is doubling down on not only building a 7-story dorm, but she also supports re-building the family student apartments on the much-contested, East Meadow. Given this oncoming slow earthquake of development, I wrote the following letter to the chancellor.

Dear Chancellor Larive,

We all love UC Santa Cruz. It has brought great things to this community and enriched all of our lives, for the most part. But now is the time to say 19,500 students is enough. UCSC began as that special “teaching-first” campus within UC system. We can retain those roots of quality, vision, and curiosity not by exploding campus to 28,000 students, plus 5,000 more faculty and staff, but by cutting our losses now and focusing on what we do well, by shoring up the campus transportation system and making it the best and most efficient within the UC, and by building the classroom space that was needed a decade ago just to keep up with the current student population. Let’s get back to the central mission of teaching excellence when it comes to our undergraduates.

As a long-time Santa Cruz resident, employee, and alum, it saddens me that you are daring to go forward with an ill-fated project of bringing yet more students to a community that is unprepared and already over-taxed by the number of people now residing in this area of the world. People get it. We now know much more about the environmental sensitivity of the campus, far more than was known back in 1965 when the campus opened. For example, the lawsuit over situating buildings atop the East Meadow proved to be quite costly, lengthy, while achieving popular support among our alumni. 

Furthermore, many students I’ve spoken with had no idea before coming here of the resource-poor budgetary environment they were entering, and that goes double for graduate students. It’s expensive to live in Santa Cruz. Lots of undergrads now clamor to leave in three years, forgoing the traditional four-year experience. Why? Because the cost of living on campus far exceeds the cost of living in town, and landlords know that, students know that, and parents know that. Students feel the financial pressure to move off campus because “rents” on campus are so high. “Student Housing West” will not fix this situation. Students move off campus into, say, a 3-bedroom house where six or eight students and sometimes more, occupy that house for a lot less than it costs to live in the dorm and at the same time, a Santa Cruz family has one less place to live in the city where they work. You simply cannot keep inviting students to this town when there is no room to house the residents who already reside here.

Chancellor, you sat in on one or two of the Community Advisory Board (CAG) meetings that I and other community members were a part. We met with your predecessor, Chancellor Blumenthal, four or five times as I remember. Members of the CAG included current and former city councilmembers and supervisors, as well as members representing the Chamber of Commerce and the city’s planning department. It was a group composed of individuals who rarely see eye to eye on policy issues and who have differing political views. But what I saw and experienced within that group was something rare. There was unanimity on the fact that this city and county cannot continue to shoulder evermore students without first fixing the many problems that exist on campus and in the city as well. Many of those burdens were brought on by an already large student population. Frankly speaking, I have been an educator most of my adult life, 16 years here at UCSC, and I have come to the conclusion that it would be irresponsible to bring any more students to this city or campus without first providing the resources in the areas of housing, transportation, and pedagogy, which we now so sorely lack.

These are sobering times and they call for bold leadership, Chancellor. Growing UCSC is the wrong response. I urge you to go to the Regents and let them know that this community loves UCSC and therefore feels strongly that it cannot continue to grow, 19,500, y no más. Santa Cruzans are a generous and compassionate bunch, but we have been pushed to the brink here. I understand it is not the news the Regents wants to hear, but it is the unvarnished truth from the community perspective. If UCSC actually adds 14,000 more students, staff, and faculty over the next decade, we will surely kill this tired old goose which bequeathed us such a wonderful shiny golden egg that is the UCSC community. Fiat Lux will become Fiat Death for Surf City.

Respectfully,

Chris Krohn

Readings
You can read the chancellor’s brazen growth challenge to the community here

You can see how expensive it is to live on campus and those rates, while placing students in great debt when they leave the university, these prices also drive up prices to places just below the university’s rent rates. These rental rates should be half of what they are. Students should be clamoring to live on campus, but given the current UCSC “rents,” it’s the opposite. Students, and often their parents who are paying, can’t wait to get off campus, even though we know that graduation rates are higher for students who live on campus for four years. The deep secret that the administration is hiding is that they will not enter into a legal agreement with the city of Santa Cruz concerning the percentage of students they will house on campus. So far, only platitudes about housing all new students, but no clear signed agreements. Frankly, unless the Regents drastically reduces the price of staying in a campus dormitory nothing will change and the housing situation in town will become more acute. Even with “reduced” Covid-19 rates in campus “apartments,” not dorms and with no meal plan, is $2,834 for a “double.” It is more expensive to stay in the dorm. The only housing bargain on campus is living in the trailer park with a sewer hook-up comes in at $702, but few of these spaces exist. The financial aid office estimated that it would cost a student $18,864 to live on campus for nine months. That’s a whopping $2,096 per month. Of course, the academic experience and environment is far superior on campus and we should be striving to offer that experience to all undergraduates, but it comes with a heavy price. From my conversations with undergraduates, the cost of living off campus can easily be half of the on-campus expense.

UCSC Financial Aid figures
UCSC Housing office rates

“The actual crisis is how entire generations are sunk w/inhumane levels of student debt, low incomes, high rent, no guarantee of healthcare & little action on climate change which creates a situation where feeling stable enough to have a kid, can feel more like a luxury than a norm.” (Mar. 3)


Are you kidding me? The building of 205-units, which will contain no affordable units, is underway and they have put fences around the site that take the entire sidewalks and bike lanes on Pacific, Front, and Laurel Streets for the developer’s staging area…Anybody remember the Annie Glass law suit against the city when they closed half of Cooper Street to rebuild the Cooper House? Get ready for the $$$ suits…

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
March 8 

CALFIRE CALLING VIRTUAL TOWN HALL MEETINGS TO DISCUSS CZU FIRE
People will finally have an opportunity to discuss with CalFire what they think could have been handled better in the CZU Lightning Fire.  Local County Supervisors will be on hand Monday,  March 15 (Ryan Coonerty) and Tuesday, March 16 (Bruce McPherson) to help field questions from the public.  Both virtual meetings begin at 5:30pm and will last approximately two hours.  

Click here for Zoom access information.

Hopefully, there will be some good discussions; clear answers that will address some real mistakes that could help improve how things go in future disasters.   Please share this meeting information with others.

CALIFORNIA BOARD OF FORESTRY PUSHING REGULATIONS FORWARD THAT COULD LIMIT REBUILDING IN FIRE-DAMAGED AREAS
Article in the Santa Cruz Sentinel: Santa Cruz community pushes for answers on fire regulations

COUNTY DECLARES EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION AGAINST SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT
The good news is that this action would allow the RTC to move forward with plans to build the Chanticleer Bicycle / Pedestrian Overcrossing for the Live Oak Community.  The bad news is, unless the Soquel Creek Water District and RTC work together to add mitigations, the Overcrossing will be a miserable and perhaps hazardous experience for many who would use it.

The Water District has been dragging their feet for over a year on negotiations, causing the County to take this action.

Financial Impact
The costs of the condemnation will be the appraised value of the Easements in the amount of $441,000 as just compensation. The value of the Easements will be paid by the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission via reimbursement to the County. 

No doubt, Soquel Creek Water District wants a lot more money or is worried about CEQA matters associated.

Item #12 on the March 9, 2021 Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors meeting, wherein the County is declaring Eminent Domain against the District for Chanticleer Bicycle / Pedestrian Overcrossing easements (APN 029-013-54) needs to address the hazardous chemicals there, and real dangers to those who might use the crossing.

This parcel is land the Soquel Creek Water District proposes for use the Modified PureWater Soquel Project Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility.  Several large above-ground storage tanks of hazardous chemicals will be stored and used at this site, directly below or very near the proposed Chanticleer Bicycle /Pedestrian Overcrossing.  

On November 17, 2020, Soquel Creek Water District Board approved significant Project modifications that would allow some of the tanks and processing infrastructure to include structures 25′ tall. (see page 59)

Soquel Creek Water District

The Modified Project would include these hazardous chemical storage tanks:

  • One 5,800 gallon tank of sodium hypochlorite
  • One 1,500 gallon tank of sodium hydroxide (lye)
  • One 3,500 gallon tank of sodium bisulfate
  • One 1,500 gallon tank of liquid ammonium sulfite
  • One 16,000 gallon tank of calcium hydroxide
  • Two 330-gallon totes sulfuric acid
  • Two 330-gallon totes threshold inhibitor storage (what chemical is that??)
  • Two 330-gallon totes hydrogen peroxide
  • A Carbon Dioxide feed system adjacent.

There has been no Subsequent Environmental Impact analysis conducted regarding potential hazards to pedestrians or bicyclists using this overcrossing who would be near the Modified PureWater Soquel Project hazardous chemical storage tanks.  

There has been no meaningful analysis of potential Modified Project hazards at all, and no schools within 0.25 mile have been notified in writing of the hazardous chemical above ground storage, use or transport. 

It is likely that children will use the Chanticleer Bicycle / Pedestrian Overcrossing. 

AND IT WILL BE OFFENSIVELY NOISY UNLESS MITIGATED…..
Furthermore, the Modified Project significantly increases the noise caused by the Reverse Osmosis and MF Blower pumps in that “…the three pump stations at the northern portion of the site are now proposed to be unenclosed. The Modified Project noise level for the Chanticleer Site would not exceed the County’s nighttime stationary noise standard of 45 dBA Leq.”

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

AND QUICKLY……

1) This Wednesday (3/10) the County Planning Commission will consider the Draft Santa Cruz County Plan Report for 2020 in Item #7

It is really worth your time to read this 33-page Report before it goes to the County Supervisors, and to submit your thoughts in writing.

2)  Many thanks to State Parks for continuing to work with Aptos residents to address long-standing public safety problems regarding access and parking for Nisene Marks State Park visitors.  Last Wednesday, Park staff moved the ranger kiosk to create space for a pass-through lane for local residents.   There is still a lot of work to do, but there are hopes to create a Gateway to Nisene Trail that will link to an existing Aptos Rancho Road Trail across from the Rancho del Mar Center.  Currently, Aptos Creek Road main Park entrance is a hazardous mess. See the photos below.

...

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A ZOOM HEARING…JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK.

YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Cheers, Becky (831) 685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

 March 4, 2021
#63 / “Resistance” And “Insistence”

“Resistance” is a political term with which I have long been familiar. “The Resistance” is what we called the anti-draft movement in the 1960’s, a movement with which I, as a draft resister, profoundly identified. 

The above graphic is a more recent use of the term and comes from the Blackspot Collective, which is associated with Adbusters. I received a bulletin in my email, not so long ago, with this image at the top, and with this message below:

oooOOOooo

This Is the New Face of Resistance

Let’s get into something personal right off the hop.
Let’s talk about resistance.

Resistance is what people feel when they just can’t face what needs to be done. Something important is right in front of them, but it’s so hairy, so scary in its implications on their life, their cozy way of keeping on keeping on, that they can’t deal with it.

Resistance grips us when our very soul recognizes just how much is on the line. Like right now.

Caught in an existential crisis with no obvious way out, we begin to question the hidden coordinates of our reality and start thinking about a new operating system for Planet Earth. We hatch a new grand narrative, a set of ideas so fundamental, so systemic, so profound that a sane sustainable future is unthinkable without them. 

And then we deploy them.

At this critical juncture for our species, this is the new face of resistance. In our upcoming mindbomb, AB 153: The New Left, we unleash a movement that operates completely outside of geographic borders and political structures — a Third Force.

oooOOOooo

If you don’t really understand what this means, I am not a bit surprised. I don’t either. For some time, Adbusters and its Blackspot Collective have been sending out advisories that something big is on the way. A “mindbomb,” I guess we should be expecting. Issue #153 of Adbusters (the magazine) seems to be where the revelation will be found.

Thinking about “resistance,” as depicted above, I am starting to believe that I may be more committed to the idea of “insistence,” instead. 

If that blood red fist is the “new face of resistance,” then an appeal to get involved with a new resistance movement might actually be a call to physical violence, and perhaps an invitation to overcome any personal or internal “resistance” to using personal and political violence to achieve social, political, and economic change. That may not be what is being talked about here, but if that’s the idea, that kind of “resistance” is not an attractive proposition, at least to me!

My “resistance” during the Vietnam War was in direct opposition to violence, and operated on the model set by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. That’s the kind of movement with which I was, and still am, willing to get engaged. What the Blackspot Collective is talking about might be a call to a renewed nonviolent effort to change the world – or it could be a call to something else. It’s not really clear, but I’m nervous about what that message, and specifically that graphic, are meant to convey. 

This brings me to the idea that we should probably be thinking about “insistence,” instead of “resistance.” That is perhaps where we ought to begin. Gandhian nonviolence, which served as a model for Dr. King, was premised on what Gandhi called “satyagraha,” or “clinging to the truth.” The idea, in other words, was that individuals would organize themselves to “insist” (nonviolently) that the society actually do the “right” thing. Those committed to the cause would certainly “resist” any effort to dislodge them from their “insistence” that the right thing be done, but the major effort was “insistence” on necessary change, not “resistance” to the unsatisfactory status quo.

I continue to think that this is the basis for all effective and transformative political action. It is a way to commit oneself to a positive effort, instead of framing political action as negative and oppositional. It is also an approach that is premised on a realization that people have power. “Resistance” is premised on the idea that power is virtually all on the other side, and that we therefore must “resist” that power, as our first order of business. Well, we must, of course, resist those who perpetrate injustice, but far more important is the positive position, in which we simply insist that justice be done. 

I am hoping that the Blackspot Collective, and all of us, are seeing things in this light. We must insist on racial justice, we must insist on the elimination of the obscene income and wealth inequality that has blighted our common lives, and we must insist on an end to the combustion of fossil fuels, to save our planet. 

We know what’s right. Can we cling to the truth?

Resistance, is fine. It’s necessary. But insistence comes first! 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    CITY GROWTH

“If you are a pedestrian, you are not mechanical enough to be of priority to traffic engineers.” 
~Archimedes Muzenda

“Traffic congestion is caused by vehicles, not by people in themselves.” 
~Jane Jacobs. 

“Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic; but destroy our farms and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country”.
~William Jennings Bryan

 “It is more difficult to rule yourself than to rule a city”.
~Jordan Peterson

“Growth for the sake of growth, is the ideology of the cancer cell” –
~Edward Abbey

I could watch this all day…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

March 3 – 9, 2021

Highlights this week:BRATTON…Ant solutions, Manu Koenig issues, Regal correction, Ferlinghetti in Santa Cruz. GREENSITE…on UCSC Growth: It’s the 11th Hour. KROHN…Where was Jimmy Panetta, $15 minimum wage, homelessness blues. STEINBRUNER…Rebuilding rule changes, fire insurance coverage, renegade firefighters, Swenson closes parking, Soquel Water transfer. PATTON…Green New Deal. EAGAN…classic Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. QUOTES… “March”

...

RONALD REAGAN SPEAKING IN OUR CIVIC AUDITORIUM. This was October 8, 1966. Ronnie was running against Pat Brown, and beat him. He became president in 1981.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE March 1 

ANT SOLUTIONS…LITERALLY! I am humbled, amazed, and very grateful by the response to my plea for ways to get rid of my ant problem in last week’s BrattonOnline. Phone calls and emails all had detailed instructions on how to get rid of those tiny devils. By far the most mentioned weapon was Borax, in one form or another. Then again, Rita Darling told me about peppermint oil, peroxide, or cayenne pepper. Cinnamon seems to repel them, she said. Many, many touted buying Terro, a liquid bait sold at local stores or even Amazon. Terro too contains Borax. Here are some of the many battle strategies.

Matthew Werner sent…With ants, as with rats, mice, & roaches… it is us or them. My solution is to mix some Twenty Mule Team Borax powder with water, add a little sugar, pour some into an old salsa container with a couple holes punched high on the sides, and place it as close to where the ants are entering your domicile as you can. Ants will feed on the stuff, bring it back to the colony, and wipe themselves out. Gets your clothes clean too.

Dean Quarnstrom contributed…Years ago, I discovered an easy solution to keeping the ant population home invasion issue under some modicum of sensible warfare control. I would find the spot where the most ants entered my home, then put an easy-to-access bowl or dish filled with white sugar mixed with water to feed the invaders nearby on the floor.  The ants quickly learned and passed along this new source of sweetened water data to the invading army population, and the ants quit searching any further for what they wanted.  It worked like a charm, and our lives returned to a blissful co-existence, and ecological sanity…except, of course, for how negatively the climate was affected by the amount of fossil energy needed to create the white sugar most preferred by the home invaders. Food, Not Bombs.

Debbie Bulger adds…You can kill ants with Orange Guard, a spray product sold in many grocery stores and hardware stores. It is non-poisonous to humans. The active ingredient is an orange peel extract (d-Limonene) Additionally you can make a saturated solution of 2 teaspoons of boric acid, 2 teaspoons of sugar dissolved in about a cup of warm water. The boric acid is available in drugstores or garden stores. The ants make a beeline for the cup containing this cocktail and carry the mixture back to their nest. After a while, they no longer come—-until the next time. These tiny Argentine Ants are not native to California.

Dorene Blake forwarded… New York Times; Best Ant Killer

Ron Sandidge sent…Consumer Reports: How to get rid of ants in the house

We’ll keep up this battle. If you too have ideas, let me know. Ant season isn’t over yet, I assume.

MANU KOENIG, COUNTY SUPERVISOR. Reports are coming in faster than ever that Koenig keeps sloughing off requests, changes, and any moves he doesn’t like. He claims that he won’t respond or move to action because too many of his supporters disagree. He’s got a lot to learn. Most of us are still wondering how he got elected in the first place.

REGAL THEATER CORRECTION. Last week in talking about the closure of the Regal 9 Cinema I wrote that it opened in 1985.  Matthew Werner read it and corrected it…. “While it is sad to learn that the big 9 theater is closing, I felt compelled to point out that it was a product of the post Loma Prieta earthquake rebuild of the “Pacific Garden Mall”, and so could not have opened in 1985. Probably you meant 1995, eh?” He’s right of course. It just seems like the Regal was here nearly forever.

LAWRENCE FERLINGHETTI AND SANTA CRUZ. It’s surprising that with all the tributes and memorial poetry that Lawrence Ferlinghetti has been receiving that there’s been no mention of his many, many retreats for years to Santa Cruz. I won’t mention her name, but a very good friend of his who lives on Ocean View had Lawrence visiting here to hide from his public persona for years. I only met him once, in the Davenport Collectibles shop about five years ago.

I’m not “printing” these critiques in any special order. There seems to be so very few that are what I’d call GREAT movies anymore. Besides that, I keep fighting the urge and financial demand of coughing up another $15.99 per month to rent from one more streaming outlet.

DICKINSON. (APPLE SERIES) Emily Dickinson was an early American poet ,in case you missed her. This series is sparkly, lively, tuneful and spins out of time periods often. It’s creative, diverting, cutesy, and contains opium, death and rock music. It’s not what you’d expect, and I’m working on making it watchable.

THE GIRL ON A TRAIN. (NETFLIX SINGLE). Taking place in India, complete with a few non-essential Bollywood musical numbers, this is still a murder mystery. A young woman watches what she thinks is a disappearance of another woman. She finds more than she was looking for and you should too…avoid this one.

TELL ME YOUR SECRETS. (AMAZON PRIME SERIES). Three very different people, each with their own plot and purpose, make this a complex movie. As their stories unfold we find a serial killer, a sex offender and all sorts of complexities. Not Oscar winner or even Golden Globe material, but it’ll keep you glued for a few takes.

CAPITANI. (NETFLIX SERIES) Filmed in Luxembourg, this one is already due for a second season. Luc Capitani is a police inspector with the job of looking for the murderer of the 14 year old, whosetwin sister, has also vanished. It takes place in a small town where everybody knows everybody, and everything that happens in it. They won’t cooperate with Capitani who along with a beautiful assistant has issues of his own. A good one, and worth your time, by all means.

WALKER. (CW SERIES) This is a remake of an earlier Walker, Texas Ranger series. Do not watch or even search for it. Especially don’t link up with CW and be forced to watch their ads. The acting in Walker is terrible. The lead looks like Chris Krohn. Walker goes away for his town for a year and comes back to get involved in some dopey plot that makes little sense. Avoid at all costs.

RED DOT. ( NETFLIX SINGLE) A genuinely tense Swedish movie – almost Hitchcockian at moments. A young married couple with relationship problems, and a baby on the way, decide to go camping in vast snow country. They accidently anger some townspeople, and we learn more about their own past later as they become targets of these crazed racially-prejudiced locals. Not great, but you stay fixated almost all the way through it.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

TIGER. (HBO) This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

I CARE A LOT.(NETFLIX SINGLE) When you watch Rosamund Pike,  Peter Dinklage and Dianne Wiest in what’s called a dark comedy you know you’ll like it. Rosamund plays a wheeling, dealing, crooked professional senior citizen guardian. She exists to bilk seniors out of their savings. She works with a senior home named Berkshire Oaks that looks suspiciously like our Dominican Oaks. You’ll think about it long after it’s finished.

BEHIND HER EYES.(NETFLIX SERIES) 63 RT. A married psychiatrist who’s got several problems of his own and isn’t very likable anyways has an affair with his beautiful younger secretary who has a daughter. It’s needlessly complex and very hard to like anyone in the cast. Don’t use your next to last dollar to rent this one.

ALLEN V. FARROW.(HBO SERIES) 85 RT. Woody Allen has made several great movies in his career. He also played pretty good clarinet. I met him a few times when he’d sit in with Turk Murphy’s band in San Francisco and I was living in Turk’s hotel at the time. Mia Farrow pulls out all the stops in this documentary and her daughter Dylan tells us what it was like being raised with a deviant like Woody for a father. Episode 2 begins with Woody’s taking naked photos of his adopted daughter Soon-Yi and how she handled it. Sad, disturbing, revealing and engrossing and you’ll be sorry you know this much about Allen….but there he is…or was. Watch it every Sunday night on our local Comcast HBO. Woody gets even more perverse in the second episode!

A DISCOVERY OF WITCHES. (AMC SERIES) A pretty time walker goes back to 1590’s England and meets Sir Walter Raleigh among other characters. She denies she’s a time traveler even though she’s the only one without a British accent. She joins a vampire partner and they work out answers to age old mysteries. Good fun and diverting but no award winning from this one.

CB STRIKE.(HBO MAX SERIES) J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter) wrote this private detective chase puzzle. Cormoran Strike is the private eye who is missing one foot. He and his beautiful partner get mixed up with other love affairs and other crimes. Tom Burke plays Strike. The acting is fine, the photography is very well done and if you love detective plots this one will hold you well through the first episode. That’s all that has been released so far.

CLARICE.(CBS SERIES) This movie tries to tell us about the young agent Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster)who dealt with Hannibal Lecter back in 1993. It is baffling to see how she’s treated by her superior officers in the police force and how she deals with them. Clarice has many deep seated problems of her own and the movie is complicated but you’ll stick with it.

CRIME SCENE:THE VANISHING AT THE CECIL HOTEL.(NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY SERIES). Los Angelinos know that the Cecil Hotel is a real place. It’d now called “Stay In Main” hotel. It has 700 rooms and is in the worst part of the city. It’s notorious for the suicides, rapists, murders, dealers and other missing people over the last 100 years. Ron Howard directed this documentary and it’s well worth watching. 46RT.

A VIGILANTE  (NETFLIX SINGLE) Olivia Wilde gives her all as she plays an abused woman who spends her life trying to help other such victims. It’s tense, very depressing as it keeps revealing deeper and deeper issues among each woman in the movie. There’s a murder and some chases and watch it even today’s reality can’t be that bad.

TO ALL THE BOYS: ALWAYS AND FOREVER.(NETFLIX SERIES). It’s alight hearted romp containing all teen agers doing silly things. It’s known as a romantic comedy. Waiting to get into Stanford one girl has many problems relating to her favorite boy toy. She goes to New York and has more adventures…if you care. I didn’t .

SQUARED LOVE. (NETFLIX SINGLE). Wikipedia and I both call this a Polish comedy.  It takes place in Warsaw. So there’s a guy who meets and falls in love with a very sexy pinup fashion model. We know on the other hand that she’s really at heart a grade school teacher. It’s in the same ballpark as Call My Agent. Good fun actually but you’ll spend extra time suspending your disbelief.

MALCOLM AND MARIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Zendaya the co star of this movie is from Oakland. She and John David Washington plus a few friends filmed this in a “glass house” in Carmel during the pandemic and did a super job. The plot involves John a filmmaker who has just received a great review of his new film in the LA Times arguing throughout the entire film with Zendaya. Their fights are our fights, their issues are our issues and it’s an excellent movie. 59RT

ADU.(NETFLIX SINGLE).Some poor director decisions make the weaving of three almost totally unrelated stories into one heartwarming movie. Adu is a little boy who has to escape his warlike Africa hometown. Another story centers on the conflicting feelings of border guards. The most involved saga deals with illegal elephant ivory tusks and a father/daughter entanglement. It’s a fine movie but hard to follow.

FIREFLY LANE (NETFLIX SERIES) a 48 on RT. Katherine Heigl and her BFF Sarah Chalke go through some show biz type plots and make this a pretty ditzy movie. There are laughs and cute twists but nothing, absolutely nothing here that you’ll remember while you’re looking for a new mask to wear later today.

BLISS. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) I’m giving up trying to figure out the plot of this one. Owen Wilson gets fired from his job and meets Salma Hayek and it goes sci-fi and nonsense from there on. Local fans should watch for Joshua Leonard son of Bob and Joann Leonard of Watsonville, he plays Cameron. The movie switches from realities to fantasies and back again. You’ll probably give up long before it’s over….don’t worry about it. 81 RT

SOMEONE HAS TO DIE.(3 PART Netflix Series). Set in Spain in the 1950’s during Franco’s rule this is a genuine period piece. It centers on Spain’s prejudices against Mexico and any immigrants from there. It goes on to make a spy movie about which of the boys are gay and how to disown them. After those two themes it ends on secret sex between two families and who is genuinely faithful to their marriage vows. A very heavy handed, serious movie. Watch it.

LADY AND THE DALE. (HBO SERIES) This nearly unbelievable documentary has a 100 RT. It’s the result of executive directing by the Duplass brothers which makes any movie near great to begin with. Jerry Dean Michael was a con artist from birth. He later changed his name to Elizabeth Carmichael a Trans woman and managed to convince a lot of the world that the motorcycle with two tires in front would change the world. See it as soon as possible, great fun betwixt the grimaces.

RADIOACTIVE.(AMAZON PRIME Single) The lovely and effervescent Rosamund Pike plays the Polish born Marie Curie. This pointless drama includes Curie’s secret love affair, it adds her belief in the occult and as a movie it is beautifully filmed. Curie also was the first woman to win the Noble Prize. It lacks a driving force in spite of showing us Curie’s fight against sexism, and from ethnic prejudice. I’d give it a 5 out of 10 if I was giving anything.

PALMER. (APPLE TV+ Single)The big deal here is that it stars Justin Timberlake as Palmer who was a football star in high school but then got sent to prison. He returns back to his hometown and becomes a full time parent to a gay little 7 year old boy. Many sobs later Palmer settles into his leading role and it’s fairly predictable. Watch it if you want to feel good about something.

BELOW ZERO (NETFLIX Single)  A Spanish film about the trailer that is transporting prisoners from one prison to another. The trailer is stopped by spiked tires and a long search among the prisoners for one in particular. Which prisoner, and why him is the main plot. It’s tense, exciting, and nearly believable. Don’t miss it for sure! It was number one on Netflix a week ago!!!

THE DIG. (NETFLIX SINGLE) You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this 1939 setting that centers on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. British Museum’s battle over the rights to own and move the ship and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional.

 LOSING ALICE.(APPLE + Series) It’s filmed and set in contemporary Israel. A woman film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game playing between them as they deal with a beautiful young screen writer who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. (APPLE + SINGLE)Try to imagine an intimate get together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first big time director achievements

THE RIPPER. (NETFLIX Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

LUPIN. (NETFLIX SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND. (HBO MAX SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boy’s hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

...

March 1.

UCSC GROWTH. IT’S THE 11TH HOUR.

Much has been written and spoken about the University of California’s plan to expand the UCSC campus to add 10 thousand additional students to the current 18 thousand, plus 5 thousand additional faculty and staff. The plan includes new buildings to take development from the current 2 million assignable square feet (ASF) to 5 million ASF including building on the meadow west of Empire Grade (ocean side and UCSC owned) and eventually the North campus. Any new housing planned is for the additional students and a small percentage of faculty and staff.  As always, half of the student body (plus most faculty and staff) will be competing for off-campus housing, only it will be half of 28 thousand rather than half of the current 18 thousand, plus faculty and staff.  The city of Santa Cruz made it clear in its vote on Measure U, which passed with a 77% percent majority, that this relatively small community cannot handle any more UCSC growth. This cry for relief has been brushed-off by the UC decision-makers since the city has no legal power over UCSC or the UC system. But we do have political power. It’s up to us whether and how we use it.

In response to UCSC’s Notice of Preparation, in advance of circulating its draft Environmental Impact Report, there were 20 written comments from a variety of state departments and community organizations plus comments from 85 individuals. Not bad but a fraction of what is needed to catch a Regent’s eye.

So this is to encourage one and all to write a comment on the DEIR by the due date. If you have time the full document is here.

If you have little time, the short summaries and pithy comments on the website of the City/County Task Force on UCSC Growth under the capable hands of Advocate Morgan Bostic at actonucscgrowth.org is a great resource. The table below on how to make your comments effective is helpful.

Contacting city and county elected officials and urging them to do all in their power to influence the legislators and Regents is critical. They have our mandate.

Don’t sit this one out.

Public Review
The Draft EIR has been released for a 60-day review period, beginning on Thursday, January 7, 2021 and concluding on Monday, March 8, 2021. Written comments on the EIR will be accepted anytime during the EIR review period. Please state “LRDP EIR Comments” in the subject line, and send your electronic responses via email to eircomment@ucsc.edu by 5:00 pm on Monday, March 8, 2021.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.
...

March 1

$15 MINIMUM WAGE NOW!
A group of 23 progressive and courageous and creative congress members wrote a letter to Vice-President Kamala Harris dated March 1, 2021 urging her to put the $15 minimum wage back into$1.9 trillion stimulus package previously passed by the House of Representatives, but stalled in the US Senate. Seems like there is this “non-partisan parliamentarian” position who dots i’s and crosses t’s on what can and can’t be approved to be voted on by the Senate. The position is occupied by one Elizabeth MacDonough. VP Harris can move the $15 an hour provision forward by including it in the stimulus bill and by not recognizing the “point of order” procedure, should it come up, when the Senate votes on the measure. It is all within their rules. The letter states in part,

“This has significant historical precedent. In 1967, Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey disregarded the Parliamentarian’s advice while pushing to reduce the filibuster threshold from two-thirds of those present to three-fifths. Vice President Humphrey did the same again in 1969. “Ultimately, Republican Vice President Nelson D. Rockefeller partnered with future Vice President Walter Mondale and succeeded in 1975 while again refuting the parliamentarian.

For the last twelve years, working Americans have struggled to get by under a federal minimum wage that remains stuck at $7.25 per hour. Since its establishment in 1938 as part of the New Deal, the federal minimum wage has never gone this long without a boost. In fact, its purchasing power has fallen by nearly twenty-five percent due to inflation since its last increase in 2009. As you know, this policy has disproportionately hurt women and Black and Brown workers. Women make up nearly sixty percent of hourly workers making less than $15 per hour despite comprising only fifty percent of the overall hourly workforce. The disparate impact is even starker among Black and Brown workers, who make up only thirty-six percent of the hourly workforce yet work in nearly half of all jobs earning less than $15 per hour.”

Where Was Jimmy (Panetta)?
Those congress members who signed onto the letter, unfortunately, did not include Santa Cruz’s representative in congress, James Varni Panetta, Jimmy. It is becoming clearer and clearer how the 20th congressional district is being left in the moderate and middle of the road dust in how we are represented in the 117th congress. Who are among the 23 urging VP Harris to push forward one of Joe Biden’s signature 2020 campaign issues, a $15 minimum wage? Three-quarters of “The Squad”–Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Tlaib–signed it. Old liberals Ike Earl Blumenauer from Oregon, Mark DeSaulnier from the Bay Area, and Alan Lowenthal from Long Beach are all there. Real lefties, if there are real lefties in the US Congress, are there in the form of Barbara Lee from Berkeley, Chuy Garcia from Chicago, and Primila Jayapal from Seattle. And the recently elected Black Lives Matter candidates signed on too: New Yorkers Richie Torres, Mondaire Jones, and Jamaal Bowman, and of course, St. Louis’s Cori Bush was there too, but I still wonder, where was our Jimmy? If you want to see the entire letter and who signed, go here.

Stuck Inside Homelessness with the Santa Cruz City Council Blues Again
Last Tuesday (Feb. 23rd), the Santa Cruz city council was in session past 1am. discussing, debating, and delineating all the places houseless people cannot lay their weary head. The council failed miserably to actually define anywhere homeless people can actually be and by default issued a de facto deportation order. It was yet another quick passing of that historically hot political football, the homeless. It is an issue most pro-real estate and pro-market rate condo developer councilmembers would rather not deal with, so they usually tacitly turn over their policy powers to the city manager. But, when forced to make a decision under the harsh light of Zoom, they invariably stumble and fall, usually in trying to protect the haves from the have-nots. If the 5-person pro-real estate city council could, they would segregate all of the homeless from the city, not allowing homelessness anywhere inside of the Shaffer Road and 7th Ave. city boundaries. But the Supreme Court of the United States says they cannot do that. That court allowed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Martin vs. Boise to stand. In the Ninth District, which Santa Cruz is a part; you cannot criminalize homelessness when adequate shelter does not exist. From my read of the recent city council ordinance, the city attorney is performing legal gymnastics in order to get around both the San Jose judge’s more recent decision and the 2019 Martin v. Boise case as well. See you in court counselor!

Solutions?
It was in the spirit of need and crisis that a group met this past Saturday in an emergency session to discuss possible responses to the city council’s euphemistically-named “Outdoor Living Ordinance.” I know, they can’t be serious with that name. So, the brainstorm was on Saturday with some 35 of us on a mid-afternoon Zoom call, blue sky and a 70-degree temperature outside. What did the ad hoc group come up with? Here’s a partial list of some of the 50-plus brain storm ideas:

  • help organize the movement and storage of houseless camper’s property;
  • lobby councilmembers for a managed camp near downtown, one managed by the residents;
  • communicate closely with local media in order to tell the stories of the houseless–most are local and most are not “homeless by choice;”
  • Explore legal avenues…Is this ordinance contravening the Federal judge’s order which currently allows campers to stay in San Lorenzo Park? Or, is it just a means of intimidation?
  • Continue to independently live stream city council meetings and allow listeners to post comments as an organizing tool;
  • Organize a Town Hall on houselessness hosted by UCSC students and local progressives;
  • Identify downtown businesses who oppose this anti-homeless ordinance;
  • advocate that the ACLU of Northern California intervene and file a law suit;
  • Organize vaccinations for all campers who want to be vaccinated;
  • Demand to be heard at next city council meeting, as dozens of speakers were shut down by the mayor at the Feb. 23rd council session;
  • Make a video highlighting the voices of the houseless;
  • Challenge NextDoor as an unauthorized, non-registered political action committee;
  • advocate for “social housing;”
  • establishing and maintaining a social housing fund by increasing the real estate transfer tax and the hotel tax as well as creating a vacancy tax on all vacant units in the city of Santa Cruz.
“Any person who thinks that a $15 minimum wage is the ‘crazy socialist agenda’ is living in a dystopian capitalist nightmare.” (Feb. 28 on the Mehdi Hason Show)

Mobile on Pacific Avenue…If the recent city council decision to not allow the houseless to be anywhere in Santa Cruz, we can look forward to more mobile campers on the Avenue.
...
(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com
...
MARCH 1STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY MEETS MARCH 3 TO FINALIZE NEW RULES AFFECTING REBUILDING AND NEW DEVELOPMENT 
Last week, the Board of Forestry held a webinar inviting Board and public comment on proposed new rules that could make rebuilding in fire-damaged areas prohibitively expensive for many.

This Wednesday, March 3, the Board will “button up” the accelerated Fire Safe Regulations that, in my opinion, will prohibit rebuilding for many average property owners, due to the restrictive road improvements CalFire would require.  Depending on Board action this week, local jurisdictions may have little ability to have discretionary control over much.

Article II Section 1273.05.02 “Built Roads”  Parts (a) and (b) of this section apply to fire rebuilds.

This refers to existing roads that are substandard.  If the road is below the fire safety threshold, NO building would be allowed until the road is improved.  The intention of the Board of Forestry (BOF) is that there are many roads unsafe for construction to occur, and it would be irresponsible to allow development dependent on such unsafe roads.

Proposed new rules:

  • a)substandard roads (less than 14′ wide) must be improved to include sections of road where it is  14′ wide for a distance of 22′ but it is yet to be determined how frequent those turnout sections must be installed.
  • b)substandard roads with areas where the road grade is greater than 20% have yet to be determined what length of the road that grade would be allowed.

If there are ADU’s involved, this rule would be applicable to rebuild areas and wildfire rebuild areas.

Here is the link to the Board of Forestry website.  Click on Committee agendas for March 2 if you see this in time, and on Full Board agendas for March 3 meeting.

According to Ms. Edith Hannigan, Land Use Policy Specialist for the Board of Forestry, the rule making is being accelerated by SB 901 which amended Public Resources Code 4090.  I have read the law, and do not see anything that compels such haste over broad applications during a time when much of California is trying to rebuild from devastating fires.

Send written comment to Chief Matt Dias matt.dias@bof.ca.gov and participate in these virtual meetings this week if you can.

STATE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER PROPOSES NEW REGULATIONS TO PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY BY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANIES RE: CANCELLATIONS
Insurance companies are cancelling policies in the rural areas of Santa Cruz County at an alarming rate.

California Insurance Commissioner, Ricardo Lara, has just proposed new rules that would require insurance companies to provide the fire risk assessment score upon request.  That will hold the insurance industry much more accountable for justifying policy cancellation, and acknowledge any mitigations possible.

California Commissioner Wants Rate Transparency Rules for Wildfire Risk

The Insurance Commissioner has asked that people report cancellations to their office.  It helps them track the growing problem and develop solutions.

Resources to Help Recent Wildfire Victims

These reports are updated with the information gathered via complaints about cancellations: Wildfire Availability and Affordability Report

Revised Appendix D to Availability and Affordability Report

Resources to Help Recent Wildfire Victims

California Commissioner Wants Rate Transparency Rules for Wildfire Risk Please contact the Insurance Commissioner’s Ombudsman office with questions: Jon Fernandez jon.fernandez@insurance.ca.gov

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING.  ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPECT CLEAR ANSWERS. MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK, AND JUST DO SOMETHING.

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner, (831) 685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com
...
February 28
#59 / More On That “Green New Deal” Idea

On January 28th, I pointed out that not everyone is completely sold on the “Green New Deal.” Of course, the oil companies don’t like it, but I was talking about “sincere environmentalists.” There are a number of such environmental critics, who express concern that our modern civilization will attempt to solve the so-called “climate problem” with the same kind of high-tech tools that we have deployed to deal with other social and economic problems, and that what is needed, actually, is something like “degrowth.”

I ran across another article that makes a related point, with the focus being, in this case, on who might be expected to implement the “Green New Deal.”

Jack Delaney, writing in CounterPunch+, puts it this way:

While a handful of elected officials recognize the gravity and push for a Green New Deal (GND) — that rightfully strives to curtail carbon-intensive economic growth — it must also be recognized that the GND is only an initial step. The GND hints at contradictions within the U.S. economy and outlines a transition to alleviate some of these contradictions, yet it is a mere jumping-off point and a framework that leaves questions regarding its implementation.

What are those “contradictions” mentioned by Delaney? What is he getting at? I will let him spell out his argument, himself:

The current mode of production and distribution — of private ownership motivated by unlimited growth and profits — is incompatible with ensuring the survival of humanity, serving the common interest, and staving off ecological collapse. To effectively limit the destructive tendencies of a system based on carbon-intensive growth, mitigate economic contradictions, and reverse course from impending ecological collapse, a bold conversation offering implementation with explicit class politics is urgently needed from GND champions.

GND supporters — Congressional, amongst the public, and media — must begin to look at how to achieve the resolution’s goals and consider the ideological framework of the GND’s implementation… As the clock ticks down and the urgency to correct climate change draws near, the GND’s future implementation cannot rely on rudderless ideological appeasement to the market (emphasis added).

In California, arguably a bold leader in efforts to combat global warming, the promise of the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 has been transmogrified into a so-called “Cap and Trade” system of “market mechanisms” that allow major carbon-emitting industries to pay money to the state, instead of actually reducing emissions that they could, technologically speaking, eliminate.

THAT is what Delaney is talking about. He is absolutely right!

In other words, we have a bigger job ahead of us than we might have expected. Not only do we need to rework our entire economic system, aiming to eliminate the combustion of fossil fuels by the earliest possible time, we need to rework our political and economic system, too, so that we don’t let corporations transfer to the government their responsibility to make the maximum reductions technically possible. I am hoping that there will be a real effort, in California, to make that happen.

We know what the alternatives are, if we don’t succeed!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.netEmail Gary at gapatton@mac.com
...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    MARCH

“POOR MARCH. It is the HOMELIEST month of the year. Most of it is MUD, Every Imaginable Form of MUD, and what isn’t MUD in March is ugly late-season SNOW falling onto the ground in filthy muddy heaps that look like PILES of DIRTY LAUNDRY.”
~Vivian Swift.

“It was an overcast day, but the cloudy weather did not detract from the signs of spring that were evident all around them. It was the second week in March, and the official start of the season was just a couple of weeks away. The magnolia trees had already bloomed, and tulips, daffodils, and wildflowers were shooting up all around the convent’s gardens.”
~Rosanna Chiofalo.

“It was a bright spring morning, full of promise. Most travelers are familiar with this kind of weather- when the wind blows westward and warm but the ground still chills the soles of your feet, when the tree buds have begun to unfurl and scent the air with secret springtime madness- and they know those days are made for leaving.”
~Alix E. Harrow,

Ok, I love James Corden, and I have a soft spot for Prince Harry…

 

COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

February 24 – March 2, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…John Tuck died, Regal Theatre closed, ant problem, Reed Searle zoom memorial, bad heart advice. GREENSITE…on taking the last stand on the Riverfront Affront. KROHN…City Council power issues and Martin Bernal, words from Gary Patton, Cyndi Dawson and Brent Adams. STEINBRUNER…Calfire wants to ban rebuilding… PATTON…Goodbye to normal. EAGAN…classic Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. QUOTES…”Political Power”

...

PEACE IN VIETNAM PROTEST. This was taken on April 8, 1967, at the steps to our post office. That’s my old and recently departed friend John Tuck with goatee, trench coat and folded arms in the front row. If you look closely on the right hand side between the girl with glasses and the Peace in Vietnam poster, you’ll see our favorite musical saw player – Tom Scribner.                                                          

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 22  

REGAL THEATRE CLOSES. Wouldn’t it be great if our do-nothing Santa Cruz City Council came up with some ideas and ordinance changes that would make it possible for new businesses to move into the nine (9) empty halls upstairs in the Regal Theater? I remember when it opened in May 1985, with a big benefit for MAH with Chuck Hilger, the then museum director presiding. Many of us had fought Ceil Cirillo’s pushing to have another movie theater downtown, fearing it would wipe out the Nickelodeon and the Del Mar. We were wrong. The Regal – then the Signature theater – brought many more folks downtown. It’s probably not a good idea to hold your breath until the Regal is refilled.

ANT PROBLEM. Rumors have it that Santa Cruz will be soon be named the Ant Capitol of the world. Even living on the second floor, I’ve never seen or squashed so many ants in one season. I’m pleading for some knowledgeable local to share a solution with us all. Any spray, any poison, anything at all to deter these bite-size beasts. Send cures to bratton@cruzio.com, and we’ll all thank you. 

BAD HEART ADVICE ONLINE! A well-meaning friend sent me a real-looking document about how to handle a heart attack before the ambulance gets there. It stated you should cough and take deep breaths, etc. I checked with Dominican Hospital’s cardiac risk program. They said that coughing advice has been strewn about for years and not to take much stock in it. I’m not sure what to do instead, but I’ll pass it on when I get word. 

JOHN TUCK FAREWELL. One of my best friends forever, John Tuck, died last Thursday, February 18. He died from Covid followed by pneumonia, in a rest home in Texas, where he moved a few years ago. I met John way back in 1970, when he was writing a weekly column for Jim and Katie Heth’s Buy and Sell Press. With Manny Santana’s pushing, John and I became board members of the Santa Cruz County Fair. I was the treasurer, John a director. Then Manny further convinced us to join the Cabrillo Music Festival. John, being as political as much as he was great fun to drink with, later got me involved with Operation Wilder and the saving of Wilder Ranch. John was also serious about acting, had the lead in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf and co-starred with Billie Harris in some productions at UCSC’s Barn Theatre. John and I bought the first beers at the new Catalyst, and at Chris Mathew’s Poet and Patriot, and Lulu Carpenters (a tradition). Last Sunday (Feb. 21) Jack Jacobsen created a farewell gathering at the Mosaic Restaurant. At least 45 folks showed up (masked) to share goodbyes. The world will miss him. 

REED SEARLE FAREWELL. Chris Krohn did a beautiful tribute to Reed Searle in these spaces last week. Reed’s son Joshua created a zoom farewell last Sunday (Feb.21), that had over 83 online participants. Even with Zooming it was a deeply felt and a very shared memorial. Reed and I were best of friends, and shared a love of Richard Wagner’s Ring for many years. I’ve written here about Reed before, check it out. Reed died Last February 21, 2020.

I’m not going to “print” these critiques in any special order. There seems to be so very few that are what I’d call GREAT movies anymore. Besides that I keep fighting the urge and financial demand of coughing up another $15.99 per month to rent from one more streaming outlet

I CARE A LOT. (NETFLIX SINGLE) When you hear that Rosamund Pike, Peter Dinklage and Dianne Wiest are in what’s called a dark comedy, you know you’ll like it. Rosamund plays a wheeling, dealing, crooked professional senior citizen guardian – who lives to bilk seniors out of their savings. She works with a senior home named Berkshire Oaks that looks suspiciously like our Dominican Oaks. You’ll think about it long after it’s finished.

BEHIND HER EYES. (NETFLIX SERIES) 63 RT. A married psychiatrist who’s got several problems of his own – and isn’t very likable anyways – has an affair with his beautiful younger secretary. It’s needlessly complex and very hard to like anyone. Don’t use your next to last dollar to rent this one. 

ALLEN V. FARROW. (HBO SERIES) 85 RT. Woody Allen has made several great movies in his career. He also played pretty good clarinet. I met him a few times, when he’d sit in with Turk Murphy’s band in San Francisco and I was living in Turk’s hotel at the time. Mia Farrow pulls out all the stops in this documentary and her daughter Dylan tells us what it was like being raised with a deviant like Woody for a father. Episode 2 begins with Woody’s taking naked photos of his adopted daughter Soon-Yi and how she handled it. Sad, disturbing, revealing and engrossing and you’ll be sorry you know this much about Allen….but there he is…or was. Watch it every Sunday night on our local Comcast HBO. 

A DISCOVERY OF WITCHES. (AMC SERIES) A pretty time-walker goes back to 1590’s England and meets Sir Walter Raleigh, among other characters. She denies she’s a time traveler even though she’s the only one without a British accent. She joins a vampire partner and they work out answers to age-old mysteries. Good fun and diverting but no award-winning from this one.

CB STRIKE. (HBO MAX SERIES) J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter) wrote this private detective chase puzzle. Cormoran Strike is the private eye, who is missing one foot. He and his beautiful partner get mixed up with other love affairs and other crimes. Tom Burke plays Strike. The acting is fine, the photography is very well done and if you love detective plots this one will hold you well through the first episode. That’s all that has been released so far. 

 SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to Brattononline.com and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.  

CLARICE. (CBS SERIES) This movie tries to tell us about the young agent Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster)who dealt with Hannibal Lecter back in 1993. It is baffling to see how she’s treated by her superior officers in the police force and how she deals with them. Clarice has many deep seated problems of her own and the movie is complicated but you’ll stick with it.

CRIME SCENE:THE VANISHING AT THE CECIL HOTEL.(NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY SERIES). Los Angelinos know that the Cecil Hotel is a real place. It’d now called “Stay In Main” hotel. It has 700 rooms and is in the worst part of the city. It’s notorious for the suicides, rapists, murders, dealers and other missing people over the last 100 years. Ron Howard directed this documentary and it’s well worth watching. 46RT.

A VIGILANTE  (NETFLIX SINGLE) Olivia Wilde gives her all as she plays an abused woman who spends her life trying to help other such victims. It’s tense, very depressing as it keeps revealing deeper and deeper issues among each woman in the movie. There’s a murder and some chases and watch it even today’s reality can’t be that bad.  

TO ALL THE BOYS: ALWAYS AND FOREVER.(NETFLIX SERIES). It’s alight hearted romp containing all teen agers doing silly things. It’s known as a romantic comedy. Waiting to get into Stanford one girl has many problems relating to her favorite boy toy. She goes to New York and has more adventures…if you care. I didn’t .

SQUARED LOVE. (NETFLIX SINGLE). Wikipedia and I both call this a Polish comedy.  It takes place in Warsaw. So there’s a guy who meets and falls in love with a very sexy pinup fashion model. We know on the other hand that she’s really at heart a grade school teacher. It’s in the same ballpark as Call My Agent. Good fun actually but you’ll spend extra time suspending your disbelief. 

MALCOLM AND MARIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Zendaya the co star of this movie is from Oakland. She and John David Washington plus a few friends filmed this in a “glass house” in Carmel during the pandemic and did a super job. The plot involves John a filmmaker who has just received a great review of his new film in the LA Times arguing throughout the entire film with Zendaya. Their fights are our fights, their issues are our issues and it’s an excellent movie. 59RT 

ADU.(NETFLIX SINGLE).Some poor director decisions make the weaving of three almost totally unrelated stories into one heartwarming movie. Adu is a little boy who has to escape his warlike Africa hometown. Another story centers on the conflicting feelings of border guards. The most involved saga deals with illegal elephant ivory tusks and a father/daughter entanglement. It’s a fine movie but hard to follow. 

FIREFLY LANE (NETFLIX SERIES) a 48 on RT. Katherine Heigl and her BFF Sarah Chalke go through some show biz type plots and make this a pretty ditzy movie. There are laughs and cute twists but nothing, absolutely nothing here that you’ll remember while you’re looking for a new mask to wear later today.

BLISS. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) I’m giving up trying to figure out the plot of this one. Owen Wilson gets fired from his job and meets Salma Hayek and it goes sci-fi and nonsense from there on. Local fans should watch for Joshua Leonard son of Bob and Joann Leonard of Watsonville, he plays Cameron. The movie switches from realities to fantasies and back again. You’ll probably give up long before it’s over….don’t worry about it. 81 RT

SOMEONE HAS TO DIE.(3 PART Netflix Series). Set in Spain in the 1950’s during Franco’s rule this is a genuine period piece. It centers on Spain’s prejudices against Mexico and any immigrants from there. It goes on to make a spy movie about which of the boys are gay and how to disown them. After those two themes it ends on secret sex between two families and who is genuinely faithful to their marriage vows. A very heavy handed, serious movie. Watch it.   

LADY AND THE DALE. (HBO SERIES) This nearly unbelievable documentary has a 100 RT. It’s the result of executive directing by the Duplass brothers which makes any movie near great to begin with. Jerry Dean Michael was a con artist from birth. She later changed her name to Elizabeth Carmichael a trans woman and managed to convince a lot of the world that the motorcycle with two tires in front would change the world. See it as soon as possible, great fun betwixt the grimaces.

RADIOACTIVE.(AMAZON PRIME Single) The lovely and effervescent Rosamund Pike plays the Polish born Marie Curie. This pointless drama includes Curie’s secret love affair, it adds her belief in the occult and as a movie it is beautifully filmed. Curie also was the first woman to win the Noble Prize. It lacks a driving force in spite of showing us Curie’s fight against sexism, and from ethnic prejudice. I’d give it a 5 out of 10 if I was giving anything. 

PALMER. (APPLE TV+ Single)The big deal here is that it stars Justin Timberlake as Palmer who was a football star in high school but then got sent to prison. He returns back to his hometown and becomes a full time parent to a gay little 7 year old boy. Many sobs later Palmer settles into his leading role and it’s fairly predictable. Watch it if you want to feel good about something.

BELOW ZERO (NETFLIX Single)  A Spanish film about the trailer that is transporting prisoners from one prison to another. The trailer is stopped by spiked tires and a long search among the prisoners for one in particular. Which prisoner, and why him is the main plot. It’s tense, exciting, and nearly believable. Don’t miss it for sure! It was number one on Netflix a week ago!!!

THE DIG. (NETFLIX SINGLE) You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this 1939 setting that centers on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. British Museum’s battle over the rights to own and move the ship and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional. 

 LOSING ALICE.(APPLE + Series) It’s filmed and set in contemporary Israel. A woman film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game playing between them as they deal with a beautiful young screen writer who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. (APPLE + SINGLE)Try to imagine an intimate get together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first big time director achievements 

THE RIPPER.(NETFLIX Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

TIGER. (HBO) This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

LUPIN. (NETFLIX SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND. (HBO MAX SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

...
February 22, 2021

APPEALING THE UNAPPEALING.
The project depicted below will become a defining feature and future of the San Lorenzo River unless the CA Coastal Commission (CCC) at its March meeting determines that an appeal of the project raises substantial issues. This project has already been approved by city council majority, which leaves the CCC as the last hope to scale the project down.  

The zoning for the riverfront area of Front St. allows for a maximum height of 70 feet, a relatively recent zoning change and height increase over the 50 foot limit in place before adoption of the updated Downtown Plan. Few people attended the many public hearings on the changes, probably because there are no neighborhoods impacted, just a river that happens to be a significant habitat area and small local businesses such as University Copy.  

How did a project that should have been capped at 70 feet end up at 81 feet plus 5 feet of  “accoutrements” on top of that? Enter the state’s density bonus. Intended to increase the amount of “affordable” units in a project, it allows a developer to add height and density if more affordable units are included onsite. In practice, at least in Santa Cruz, it allows extra height without increasing the “affordable” units. The “bonus” for this project adds an extra floor to allow for a total unit development of 175 condominiums. This plus ground floor commercial space fronting the levee to replace existing buildings, two of which are historic. Only 20 units are to be “affordable.” That is 11% of the total. Had the Density Bonus been applied properly there should be 35 “affordable” units or 20%.

The CCC weighed in on the project before council approval. They found the project to be inconsistent with the Local Coastal Program (LCP) requirements on maximum height, number of floors, top floor proportional relationship and required setbacks. They recommended the project be reduced.  The extra height they saw as impacting the downtown character and aesthetics and they expressed concern about the impact on the river itself. Despite the expressed concerns, at the final hearing the CCC deferred to the city’s discretion. The council vote was to approve the project at the increased height and density with 11% affordable units.

The Appeal will be heard by the CCC at its Friday March 12th zoom hearing. There are some virtues in zoom. You don’t have to travel to far off corners of the state to attend a CCC hearing. A colleague and I once drove 7 hours to northern CA to attend and defend an Appeal to the CCC on a quite different issue.  We were 20 minutes too late. Although the Appeal was last on the Friday’s agenda, they swept through the other business and it was all over bar our shouting at 10:15 AM. 

Remember that this is just one of many similar scale, height and density projects in the works for Santa Cruz.  If we don’t speak up to try to save what’s left of the character, feel and scale of this town the newcomers sure won’t. I hear some young newcomers like such buildings.  I suggest they put down roots in cities that are more to their liking rather than working to change the character of our town. 

Your input will make a difference. The deadline to have your email or letter received by the CCC is March 5th by 5PM. The subject line must include the Appeal number and name of project: A-3-STC-21-0013 Riverfront Mixed-Use Building 

Send emails to California Coastal Commissioners at CentralCoast@coastal.ca.gov

Send snail mail letters to California Coastal Commission, Central Coast District Office, 725 Front Street, Suite 300, Santa Cruz 95060-4508.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

February 22, 2021

“COLUMN WRITING”

Executive Power
Sometimes these “Political Reports” just write themselves. With a Santa Cruz city council Closed Session agenda larger, and perhaps longer, than the public agenda, the secret government bureaucrats led by city manager Martin Bernal, are likely in high spirits this week. Far too much government business already takes place behind closed doors during non-pandemic times, but during the Covid-19 era even the public agenda is usurped by the obsessive control the city exercises over Zoom technology: other meeting attendees cannot be seen; members of the public do not know when they can speak; and the “chat” function is disabled. Covid-19 is often spat out as the reason ju jour, the go-to message from these same bureaucratic mouths as to why the council has to hold meetings only by way of the internet. It’s the best way to minimize the participation of an often pesky public ooh-ing and ahh-ing in front of the faces of dumb-founded city councilmembers within the confines of council chambers. Why in the world would council members want their actual votes exposed to public scrutiny? Giving over broad decision-making powers to one person, Bernal, is having disastrous consequences…ask Gavin Newsom whose detractors filed 1.1 million recall petition signatures last Friday…and then there’s New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, whose executive powers apparently helped him hide a significant number of nursing home deaths. But remember, Bernal was never elected. When the history of putting political power into the hands of one person, because decisions need to be made quickly, that pandemic memoir will include tales of a vast webs of deceit, double-dealing executives, and a constant refrain of lying to the public, for their own good of course, just ask those thousands of New Yorker’s relatives who were never informed that nursing homes were full of Covid positives and deaths until it was too late to move your loved one.

Significant Decisions Made in Secret
Only the ill-starred library-in-a-garage fiasco has been left off this week’s council agenda. That agenda is basically a Who’s Who of major city council issues. The homeless camping in San Lorenzo Park? Check. Moving forward on placing city wharf on steroids? Check. UC Regents suing city over water? Check. City Manager Bernal’s job under scrutiny? Check. And that’s just the closed session part, which incidentally is scheduled to begin at 9:30 am and go all the way until 1pm. That is the longest closed session I can remember. It must be difficult for Bernal being the keeper of so much power during these uncertain times that calls for these lengthy cloak and dagger-type sessions. And, what better place for him to exercise that power than behind closed doors in the comfort of Zoom?

Bereft of Real Public Policy?
just rely on the old one that never worked.
The bloated city morass inside the city manager’s office has wretched up yet another green, slimy, putrid pool of political vomit and is being shot into the direction of our community’s most vulnerable: the homeless. It is item #25 and euphemistically labeled by some heartless housed denizen from inside of city hall as the “…the Santa Cruz municipal Code Related to Regulations for Temporary Outdoor Living.” I beg your pardon? People are destitute, really hurting, and “The City,” aka Bernal, lobs poorly worded, poorly crafted, and poorly proscribed legal mechanisms at homeless people, which is sure to kick them even harder while they’re down. Public to City Bureaucracy: Drop Dead! The ordinance is a non-starter. I include below the words of three close watchers of city hall and homeless issues for many years, former 20-year Santa Cruz county supervisor Gary Patton, current Planning Commissioner Cyndi Dawson, and Warming Center founder Brent Adams. Their combined wisdom on this topic is not only informative, but compellingly direct in their critique of this abysmal-looking public policy on “Outdoor Living.”

GARY PATTON: Please Do Not Do This
I am distressed to think that the Council might enact the “Temporary Outdoor Living” ordinance proposed as Agenda Item #25. I have outlined my very strongly-felt views in an editorial comment, made in my daily blog, which I call “We Live In A Political World.” I will provide a link below. As you will note, I am particularly upset that three members of the Council, including the Mayor, would endorse this proposal without having first heard from members of the public. 

Our homelessness crisis is severe, and local residents are suffering impacts that all of us wish could be eliminated. Homeless persons, of course, are themselves suffering even more than the citizens and residents who complain about the impacts that accompany the camp sites established by homeless persons. For everyone’s sake, the City should mobilize all of its powers to help solve the problem – and should take action only when they will make things better. Ultimately, that means lots more money, more than we have access to, locally. Let’s use our political power to work on that problem – or to find ways that we can use the limited funding we have available actually to make things better. Making things better means making things better for homeless persons – AND the community. Both. 

The proposed ordinance does not solve any problem, or make things better, at least as far as I can tell. Homeless persons living in Santa Cruz have nowhere else to go. Dislodging homeless persons from current camp sites won’t make them disappear, and what the proposed ordinance would do is simply to make life harder for them, which will NOT make things better for residents who are not homeless. In fact, directing homeless persons to look for “temporary” overnight camping spots in residential neighborhoods, showing up after dark and leaving in the morning, is an unworkable and hugely inhumane idea. 

PLEASE do not do this! It doesn’t solve any problem; it doesn’t help anyone. 

Thank you for taking my strongly-felt concerns into account as you deliberate on this on Tuesday. For those Council Members who indicated support prior to any public review or discussion – which I hope you can understand was a mistake – your signing on to the Agenda Memo does not mean you have to vote for this terribly flawed and inhumane idea. 

Outdoor Living in Santa Cruz  

PS:
And the name only makes it worse, really! “Outdoor Living” is a magazine aimed at upscale homeowners. What were the City Manager and all those highly-compensated staff members thinking?

“Outdoor Living Magazine (OLM) showcases the latest and most innovative resources for all your outdoor living spaces, bringing together the best quality products and professional services in the industry. … Outdoor Living Magazine covers the latest design trends and product offerings for home owners on any budget.”

If you want to visit more problems on homeless persons, don’t try to pretty up the name, and pretend there’s anything nice about it.

CYNDI DAWSON: Follow Your Own “Health in All Policies”

How to write to city councilmembers, what to include:

  • Councilmembers Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson and Martine Watkins have championed Health in all Policies. A key tenet is health, equity and sustainability and the policy states, “Equity is essential for positive health outcomes.” How does this policy treat our unhoused neighbors equitably and promote healthy outcomes? Constant instability in having a place of refuge and living outside generally create immense challenges both physically and emotionally. 
  • Councilmember Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson we know your professional history as a trained social worker and are looking to you to provide leadership to your fellow Councilmember in best practices to support our unhoused neighbors. There are approaches that have worked elsewhere that we are not even trying. Could zoning be changed to allow faith communities to host small encampments on their properties? Can we provide pop up shelters/tiny homes on city properties? Establishing no camping zones simply increases the stress on our houseless neighbors increasing their challenges instead of providing them with the options needed to meet their most basic human needs of shelter and sleep. Council member Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson we are looking to your leadership to step out of the old and lead us into a new more compassionate way to help the most vulnerable in our community with real solutions and not just another ban that helps no one.

BRENT ADAMS: How Did We Get Here?

We knew this moment would eventually come; the dreaded reinstitution of the many decades-long Santa Cruz camping ban.  So much has happened, and not happened with homelessness over the past years that we may not remember where we’ve been in order to know precisely where we are now.  We’ve grown accustomed to seeing large tent encampments that last many months only to be closed and then pop-up someplace else.  We’ve seen million dollar managed camps that disappear as quickly as they came. 

Firstly, what about the old camping ban – do you remember it?  It was so horrid that we can hardly imagine it now. Since the 1980’s it’s was illegal to even cover up with a blanket outside between the hours of 11 pm and 8 am.  One must admit, the proposed ordinance allowing camping in a tent between 8 pm – 8 am, is a vast improvement.

How did we get here?  It was the Martin vs. Boise 9th Circuit court case demanding that criminalization of homeless not be allowed if there isn’t sufficient shelter. That’s likely never going to happen in this city, so tents quickly began to proliferate.  During this détente, what has been proposed to improve conditions of those who sleep outside? Transitional Camps had won unanimous support on City Council, though where are they?  There were months-long surveys by councilmembers resulting in sets of recommendations that were never fulfilled.  There were seasons of CACH meetings producing nothing substantial.

The encampments along Highway 1 and San Lorenzo Park are examples of what happens when a city abandons a population.  We’d already seen it happen years before in the Benchlands in 2018, then a year later at the Ross Camp in 2019. Watching it all again, how can we say that the city isn’t culpable when they’ve done nothing in the meantime?  What has become of plans to establish the HEAP funded Navigation Center, let alone an interim shelter? What has become of that money?  Where are the day services programs, and where-even is the well-funded rhetoric of housing the chronically homeless?  It has all evaporated and all we’re left with is a tent that must be broken down in the morning with nothing much else offered.

 Remembering the old camping ban in which people were criminalized for simply laying down outside at night, we’ve made some strides with the allowance of tents being erected. Noting the membership of the current city council, it’s highly likely this new ordinance will pass. People who sleep outside need more than what’s being offered, so in addition to encouraging a
“no” vote, what’s our compromise move in order to make sense of things and to help benefit those who sleep outside? 

 Please contact your city council persons – contact info at the end of this email.

I recommend these amendments:

  • If the city is to allow overnight camping, then the parks are most fitting for these encampment areas.  Parks aren’t used by the general public at night so it’s only logical that parkland be used for these over-night encampment spaces. People will break camp in the morning leaving the park open to be enjoyed by all.
  • The above, begs the question of where the tent storage locations are to be situated, and it follows that these be located as near-to the tent areas as possible; the city parks.
  • An allowance of Agreement Camps in limited parkland by those who can maintain the agreements.  Harvey West Park has such a camp that’s been successfully in-place and without complaint for as long as 4 months.
  • There should be an opportunity for churches and non-profits to operate managed transitional encampments under a city and/or county permit.

Truly,  Brent Adams – Director Warming Center/Footbridge Homeless Services 

“Developed nations with the best healthcare, family leave, vacation & retirement benefits: 

1) Denmark 
2) The Netherlands 
3) Finland 
4) Sweden 
5) Switzerland 
6) Norway 
7) Germany 
8) UK 
9) Canada 
10) Japan 
30) United States – Dead last.

We must end this international embarrassment.”

Which Way Santa Cruz?

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...

CALFIRE WANTS TO PROHIBIT REBUILDING IN AREAS SUCH AS THE CZU FIRE ZONE
The State Board of Forestry is working fast and hard to prohibit those in areas devastated by fire from being able to rebuild.  This Wednesday, February 24, join the public workshop where the latest version of the Rulemaking will be heard.  If successful, CalFire could prevent many of the nearly 1,000 Santa Cruz County property owners whose homes and businesses destroyed in the CZU Fire from rebuilding or even placing an ADU on their property.

This is serious.

Here is an excerpt of the seven-page comment submitted to the Board by three agencies who support rural property owners and seek to preserve local control over land use policies:

“The proposal to flatly prohibit rebuilding of existing homes and businesses lost due to disaster within these “no-build” areas is more severe than the prior draft regulations and is especially ill-conceived. Rebuilding an existing home or business creates no new impact, no heightened fire risk, and no increased fire serve need. 

There is no nexus to require upgrades to existing public roads as a condition of rebuilding these structures. Moreover, prohibiting homeowners and small businesses who have lost everything from rebuilding their homes is unfair, particularly to under-insured and lower income residents who cannot simply afford to move elsewhere. 

The resulting displacement would also hinder achievement of the region’s housing goals, further exacerbating the housing and homelessness crisis. Board staff’s concern for “replicating an excessively hazardous situation” is notable, but this does not justify dispossessing residents of their homes and livelihoods. “

Here is information about links to the February 24 virtual workshop:

Update on Board of Forestry Proposed Regulations
This week RCRC, along with the California State Association of Counties and the Urban Counties of California, submitted comments to the Board of Forestry (BOF) on its latest draft of the State Fire Safe regulations, released February 8th.  The revised proposal was intended to address concerns expressed during regulatory workshops and in comment letters submitted to the BOF.  All public comments received by the BOF since the first workshop in November are now available for viewing on the BOF website and will be updated weekly.

The State Fire Safe regulations set forth basic wildfire protection standards for development in the State Responsibility Area and, beginning July 1, 2021, the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones of the Local Responsibility Area.  As reflected in our comments, the BOF proposal will have extremely detrimental impacts on rural areas of the state, essentially creating “no-build zones” in some communities, prohibiting all residential and commercial building construction, including disaster rebuilds.

The BOF has scheduled a public workshop for February 24 at 8:30 a.m. to discuss the revised draft rulemaking language.  For updates from the BOF on the Fire Safe Regulations and other activities of the BOF Resource Protection Committee, subscribe to email updates here.  And, for more information, please contact Tracy Rhine.

Contact Assemblyman Mark Stone and Senator John Laird right away.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  HELP YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY BE ABLE TO REBUILD BY SPEAKING UP AT THIS VIRTUAL MEETING.

Cheers,
Becky Steinbruner
685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

#47 / Say Goodbye To Normal 

February 16 

Roy Scranton is the director of the Notre Dame Environmental Humanities Initiative and the author of We’re Doomed. Now What? He has also authored Learning to Die in the Anthropocene. Immediately below, I am providing a couple of excerpts from Scranton’s column in the January 26, 2021, edition of The New York Times. In fact, I am also providing a copy of the entire column. I do so because I think that what Scranton has to say is important – and because I want to make sure that The Times’ paywall doesn’t prevent you from reading the whole thing. 

Here is an excerpt:

It’s easy to forget that 2020 gave us not just the pandemic, but also the West Coast’s worst fire season, as well as the most active Atlantic hurricane season on record. And, while we were otherwise distracted, 2020 also offered up near-record lows in Arctic sea icepossible evidence of significant methane release from Arctic permafrost and the Arctic Ocean, huge wildfires in both the Amazon and the Arcticshattered heat records (2020 rivaled 2016 for the hottest year on record)bleached coral reefs, the collapse of the last fully intact ice shelf in the Canadian Arctic, and increasing odds that the global climate system has passed the point where feedback dynamics take over and the window of possibility for preventing catastrophe closes.

Trying to get back to “normal,” Scranton tells us, will simply confirm the trends that have gotten us to the place he has just identified. “Normal” will make sure that we do all “die in the Anthropocene.” Scranton would like to see a different outcome. And so would I. So, I presume, would you. 

If that is our objective, then we should pay attention to what Scranton has to tell us. Here is his column-ending appeal:

The next 20 years will be a period of deep uncertainty and tremendous risk, no matter what. We don’t get to choose what challenges we’ll face, but we do get to decide how we face them. The first thing we need to do is let go of the idea that life will ever be normal again — elsewhere, I’ve called this “learning how to die.” Beyond that, we need stop living through social media and start connecting with the people around us, since those are the people we’ll need to depend on the next time disaster strikes. And disaster will strike, you can be sure of that, so we must begin preparing today for the next shock to the social order, and the next, and the next.

None of this will matter, though, if our preparations don’t include imagining a new way of life beyond this one, after the end of fossil-fueled capitalism: not a new normal, but a new ethos adapted to the chaotic world we’ve created.

The full column is below. It is worth reading. 

Worth heeding! 

oooOOOooo

I’ve Said Goodbye to ‘Normal.’ 

You Should, Too.

Climate change is upending the world as we know it, and coping with it demands widespread, radical action.

The other night, I went to pick up takeout at a local Irish pub. It was a gray and rainy evening at the end of a long week, and my partner and I were suffering from Zoom fatigue. We love this pub not just because it has good food, but because it’s a living part of our community. Pre-Covid, they used to have Irish traditional music sessions, and any cold and snowy night you’d be greeted with a burst of cheer, a packed house, friends and families all out for a cozy good time.

Now it’s a ghostly quiet. Social distancing rules mean that even at max capacity, it still only has a tiny fraction of its usual clientele. Standing in that empty pub, haunted by the sense of what we were missing, I felt an ache for “normal” as acute as any homesickness I ever felt — even when I served in the Army in Iraq. I still feel the twinge every time I put on my mask. I want our normal lives back.

But what does normal even mean anymore?

It’s easy to forget that 2020 gave us not just the pandemic, but also the West Coast’s worst fire season, as well as the most active Atlantic hurricane season on record. And, while we were otherwise distracted, 2020 also offered up near-record lows in Arctic sea ice, possible evidence of significant methane release from Arctic permafrost and the Arctic Ocean, huge wildfires in both the Amazon and the Arctic, shattered heat records (2020 rivaled 2016 for the hottest year on record), bleached coral reefs, the collapse of the last fully intact ice shelf in the Canadian Arctic, and increasing odds that the global climate system has passed the point where feedback dynamics take over and the window of possibility for preventing catastrophe closes.

President Biden has recommitted the United States to the Paris Agreement, which is great except that it doesn’t really mean much, since that agreement’s commitments are voluntary. And it might not even matter whether signatories meet their commitments, since their pledges weren’t rigorous enough to keep global warming “well below” two degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels to begin with. According to Climate Action Tracker, a collaborative analysis from independent science nonprofits, only Morocco and Gambia have made commitments compatible with the goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, and the commitments made by several major emitters, including China, Russia, Japan and the United States, are “highly insufficient” or “critically insufficient.”

It’s also worth noting that the two degrees Celsius benchmark is somewhat arbitrary and possibly fantastic, since it’s not clear that the earth’s climate would be safe or stable at that temperature. In the words of a widely discussed research summary published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, even if the Paris Agreement targets are met, “we cannot exclude the risk that a cascade of feedbacks could push the Earth System irreversibly onto a ‘Hothouse Earth’ pathway.”

More alarming, recent observed increases in atmospheric methane, a greenhouse gas more than 80 times stronger than carbon dioxide over the short term, are so large that if they continue they could effectively overwhelm the pledged emissions reductions in the Paris Agreement, even if those reductions were actually happening. Which they’re not.

Meanwhile, the earth’s climate seems to be changing faster than expected. Take the intensifying slowdown in the North Atlantic current, a global warming side effect made famous by the film “The Day After Tomorrow.” According to the climatologist Michael Mann, “We are 50 years to 100 years ahead of schedule with the slowdown of this ocean circulation pattern, relative to what the models predict … The more observations we get, the more sophisticated our models become, the more we’re learning that things can happen faster, and with a greater magnitude, than we predicted just years ago.”

In 2019, the Greenland ice sheet briefly reached daily melt rates predicted in what were once considered worst-case scenarios for 2060 to 2080. Recent research indicates that rapidly thawing permafrost may release twice as much carbon dioxide and methane than previously thought, which is pretty bad news, because other recent research shows very cold Arctic permafrost thawing 70 years earlier than expected.

Going back to normal now means returning to a course that will destabilize the conditions for all human life, everywhere on earth. Normal means more fires, more category 5 hurricanes, more flooding, more drought, millions upon millions more migrants fleeing famine and civil war, more crop failures, more storms, more extinctions, more record-breaking heat. Normal means the increasing likelihood of civil unrest and state collapse, of widespread agricultural failure and collapsing fisheries, of millions of people dying from thirst and hunger, of new diseases, old diseases spreading to new places and the havoc of war. Normal could well mean the end of global civilization as we know it.

I remember last March, in the first throes of the pandemic, when normal was upended. Everything shut down. We hoarded toilet paper and pasta. Fear gripped the nation.

I was afraid, too: I was afraid for my mother, who has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. I was afraid for my sister, whose husband works in a prison. I was afraid for my cousin, who’s a nurse. I was afraid for my country, under the leadership of an incompetent and seemingly deranged president.

But along with the fear, I remembered a lesson I’d learned in Iraq. I’d been a soldier in Baghdad in 2003-2004, where I saw what happens when the texture of the everyday is ripped apart. I realized that what we call social life was like a vast and complex game, with imaginary rules we all agreed to follow, fictions we turned into fact through institutions, stories, and daily repetition. Some of the rules were old, deeply ingrained and resilient. Some were so tenuous they’d barely survive a hard wind.

What I saw in Iraq was that every time you shock the system, something breaks. Sometimes those breaks never heal. There’s no way we can undo the damage we did to Iraq or bring back the lives lost to Covid. But sometimes those breaks are openings. Sometimes those breaks are opportunities to do things differently.

In March last year, watching an unknown plague stalk the land, I felt fear, but I also felt hope: the hope that this virus, as horrible as it might be, could also give us the chance to really understand and internalize the fragility and transience of our collective existence. I hoped we might recognize not only that fossil-fuel-driven consumer capitalism was likely to destroy everything we loved, but that we might actually be able to do something about it.

As the pandemic has worn on, the desire to get back to normal has increased, and I worry that the hope for radical positive change has subsided. But we must not let it dissipate. We can’t afford to. Because we won’t see “normal” again in our lifetimes. Our parents and grandparents burned normal up in their American-built cars, with their American lifestyles, their American refrigerators and American dreams. And now China and India are doing it, too, because capitalism is global, and we sold it wherever we could. More than three-quarters of all industrial CO2 emissions have occurred since 1945, and more than half have occurred since 1988 — since we knew what global warming was and what a danger it posed.

Now, as a new administration takes office and we look ahead to life after both Covid and Donald Trump, we need to face the fact that the world we live in is changing into something else, and that coping with the consequences of global warming demands immediate, widespread, radical action.

The next 20 years will be a period of deep uncertainty and tremendous risk, no matter what. We don’t get to choose what challenges we’ll face, but we do get to decide how we face them. The first thing we need to do is let go of the idea that life will ever be normal again — elsewhere, I’ve called this “learning how to die.” Beyond that, we need stop living through social media and start connecting with the people around us, since those are the people we’ll need to depend on the next time disaster strikes. And disaster will strike, you can be sure of that, so we must begin preparing today for the next shock to the social order, and the next, and the next.

None of this will matter, though, if our preparations don’t include imagining a new way of life beyond this one, after the end of fossil-fueled capitalism: not a new normal, but a new ethos adapted to the chaotic world we’ve created.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    POLITICAL POWER

“There will be no end to the troubles of states, or of humanity itself, till philosophers become kings in this world, or till those we now call kings and rulers really and truly become philosophers, and political power and philosophy thus come into the same hands”.
~Plato 

“I spend all day figuring out how to beat the machine and knock the crap out of the political power structure”.
~Bella Abzug 

“The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth. This alignment destroys the commonwealth – that is, the natural wealth of localities and the local economies of household, neighborhood, and community – and so destroys democracy, of which the commonwealth is the foundation and practical means.” ~Wendell Berry

This is a delight to watch. Beautiful choreography, talented fire dancing, an all around joy!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

February 17 – 23, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…CNN, MSNBC, surfer protection, Reed Searle, Covid shots. GREENSITE…on yet another blow to neighborhood activism. KROHN…Reed Searle, City Hall rot, who manages the city manager. STEINBRUNER…CZU fire rebuild issues, George Washington Bust and Inaugural address, Santa Clara County and Supreme Court, Mid Peninsula project contamination, Japanese Internment, Swenson Developers Bike jump anniversary. PATTON…Read the fine print. EAGAN… classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”COMPUTERS”

...

PACIFIC AVENUE January 26, 1965.  That’s the original location of Palace Stationary on the left, next to Weber’s Photo Shop. The Hotel Palomar and their coffee shop were fully operational, and successful. The Del Mar theatre is way down there somewhere. Ferrari Florists was doing well, and again note how wide Pacific Avenue is, with two lanes of parked cars and plenty of space for two-way traffic in the middle. This was how it looked when UCSC moved in.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 15

MUMBLES, MURMURS AND QUESTIONS. It’s about time and way past due that surfers get the attention and care regarding concussions that football players are beginning to receive. Long regarded as nothing more than a hobby, surfing is a way of life for a growing number of humans. Education, facilities, and understanding are much needed, and especially here in Santa Cruz – but around the world too. 

Spending as much or as little time as possible watching TV – mostly CNN and MSNBC – I learned that the MS in MSNBC stands for Microsoft, who used to own the channel, together with General Electric. CNN on the other hand stands for Cable News Network, and was created by Ted Turner in Atlanta. But what I really wanted to ask is why these two channels have such flakey, off-beat advertisers? Here are two leading news channels with vast viewers, only able to get advertising from Liberty Liberty Mutual, Florida Key resorts, Kay Jewelers, mortgage lenders, weight loss scams and old age prescription meds. Why nothing from brands and products with good reputations? Are they afraid of our political leanings? 

REMEMBERING REED SEARLE. Reed Searle was one of my best friends. He died a year ago on Feb. 21. Chris Krohn writes about Reed this week, and reminds us… “H. Reed Searle was a community activist and august mentor to a generation of rabble rousers and political change-makers in Santa Cruz. He died on Feb. 21, 2020, he was 87. There will be a memorial on Zoom for Reed this Sunday, Feb. 21st at 11am. Please join us.” 

COVID SHOTS…WHO’S IN CHARGE?  A regular reader sent this concern…”On Thursday, February 5th, Sutter Health announced that they are expanding Covid vaccinations to their clients in the 65-74 age category. Great for their patients, but what about those in the most vulnerable age category, 75+ who are not members of Sutter Health?  Why isn’t the vaccine allocated on an equal basis to everyone in the Phase 1b, tier 1 category (age 75+) regardless of where one obtains healthcare? I guess membership has its privileges. 

There is one aspect of vaccine distribution that I believe is overlooked and deserves examination. I’ve been reading about the major healthcare providers: Dignity, Kaiser, Sutter/PAMF, and their successful distribution of the vaccine to Phase-1a, and now 1b. That is a good thing for their clients and beneficial overall for protecting vulnerable populations. Just as important are the recent vaccinations of farm workers, a significantly vulnerable group. However, from the standpoint of equitable distribution to vulnerable populations, this effort falls short. I’m seventy-seven, my wife is eighty, but we don’t use one of the aforementioned providers for healthcare services. My doctor’s practice is simply not equipped to deal with mass inoculations, lacking the equipment and the staff. We are left to fend for ourselves. We’ve signed up with the State of California and a local pharmacy chain, hoping to get in the queue in a reasonable time frame. While I appreciate the complex infrastructure needed to manage vaccine distribution and the obvious reliance on major healthcare providers who have the expertise to facilitate widespread vaccinations, but why are they allowed to limit vaccinations only to their clients? Shouldn’t vaccinations be given to everyone in Phase 1b, age 75+ first, regardless of healthcare provider? How is this equitable? Shouldn’t the County of Santa Cruz take charge of vaccine allocations and use Dignity, Sutter/PAMF, and Kaiser to inoculate vulnerable populations so that fair distribution of this limited resource can be accomplished? In addition to the distant Fairgrounds, multiple vaccinations sites could be established at Cabrillo, Kaiser Arena, and UCSC. These changes would be for the greater good, not just for the chosen few, in my opinion”

A VIGILANTE. (PRIME VIDEO SINGLE). Olivia Wilde does a surprisingly fine job as an abused woman who works hard to regain her sense of self, after terrible, horrible beatings. She becomes so confident that she then starts assisting other women victims in revenging their scenes. It has a 90 RT score. 

CLARICE. (CBS NETWORK SERIES) This movie details what happened to the Jodie Foster character in Silence of the Lambs. Hannibal Lector (Anthony Hopkins) doesn’t appear in this one. Adjusting to “normal” life, the heroine agent is now assigned to an investigative team who gives her a terrible time, and it’s hard to understand why it happens. Lots of really bad acting, some phony plot twists. Try playing solitaire instead.

CRIME SCENE: THE VANISHING AT THE CECIL HOTEL. (NETFLIX SERIES)  57RT.   L.A’S Cecil Hotel is the focal point of this documentary series. The hotel is very real, and in the last 100 years has been the site of many, many murders and strange events. The disappearance of a young woman student sets off this backtracking saga of tragedy. Watch it, it’s hard to believe it’s true – and should convince you to cancel any reservations you have at the  Cecil. In case you care, it’s now called “STAY ON MAIN” and records show 16 deaths at the then Cecil. It has 700 rooms and is also closed for renovation, soon to reopen.

SQUARED LOVE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) A Polish comedy involving a beautiful woman who hides, and combines, two careers. She’s a beautiful, sexy, near-nude model who then somehow manages to teach youngsters in a grade school. It’s light, breezy, and a change of pace. It reminded me of Call My Agent. It’s distracting and will help you get through the next two hours.

TO ALL THE BOYS: ALWAYS AND FOREVER.(NETFLIX TRILOGY) Lots of online hype about this light-hearted teen age comedy. It has a 75 Rotten Tomatoes rating. Silly, foolish, unreal, pointless and poorly acted. Anyone over 12 years of age should avoid it by every means necessary.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, PBS) you can find it on.

MALCOLM AND MARIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Zendaya the co star of this movie is from Oakland. She and John David Washington plus a few friends filmed this in a “glass house” in Carmel during the pandemic and did a super job. The plot involves John a filmmaker who has just received a great review of his new film in the LA Times arguing throughout the entire film with Zendaya. Their fights are our fights, their issues are our issues and it’s an excellent movie. 59RT 

ADU. (NETFLIX SINGLE).Some poor director decisions make the weaving of three almost totally unrelated stories into one heartwarming movie. Adu is a little boy who has to escape his warlike Africa hometown. Another story centers on the conflicting feelings of border guards. The most involved saga deals with illegal elephant ivory tusks and a father/daughter entanglement. It’s a fine movie but hard to follow. 

FIREFLY LANE (NETFLIX SERIES) a 48 on RT. Katherine Heigl and her BFF Sarah Chalke go through some show biz type plots and make this a pretty ditzy movie. There are laughs and cute twists but nothing, absolutely nothing here that you’ll remember while you’re looking for a new mask to wear later today.

BLISS. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) I’m giving up trying to figure out the plot of this one. Owen Wilson gets fired from his job and meets Salma Hayek and it goes sci-fi and nonsense from there on. Local fans should watch for Joshua Leonard son of Bob and Joann Leonard of Watsonville, he plays Cameron. The movie switches from realities to fantasies and back again. You’ll probably give up long before it’s over….don’t worry about it. 81 RT

THE VANISHED. (NETFLIX Single) I’ve always liked Anne Heche but she wasted her time and talent in this mixed up saga. A couple with their little daughter go to a trailer park. The daughter disappears and it takes a long time to stage the reason why. Do not waste your time trying to outwit the movie…take a nap instead. 21 on RT.

SOMEONE HAS TO DIE.(3 PART Netflix Series). Set in Spain in the 1950’s during Franco’s rule this is a genuine period piece. It centers on Spain’s prejudices against Mexico and any immigrants from there. It goes on to make a spy movie about which of the boys are gay and how to disown them. After those two themes it ends on secret sex between two families and who is genuinely faithful to their marriage vows. A very heavy handed, serious movie. Watch it.   

THE LAST PARADISO. (NETFLIX SINGLE). This movie takes place in Italy in the 1950’s. Lower class farmhands fight the wealthy and crooked landowners. They fight over the price of olives, the rising cost of living in such squalor and of course the secret love affairs carried on between the fighting families. The hero is killed and his brother comes to the small town to investigate and we are not told how it all works out. Involving but forgettable.

LADY AND THE DALE. (HBO SERIES) This nearly unbelievable documentary has a 100 RT. It’s the result of executive directing by the Duplass brothers which makes any movie near great to begin with. Jerry Dean Michael was a con artist from birth. He later changed his name to Elizabeth Carmichael a Trans woman and managed to convince a lot of the world that the motorcycle with two tires in front would change the world. See it as soon as possible, great fun betwixt the grimaces.

RADIOACTIVE. (AMAZON PRIME Single) The lovely and effervescent Rosamund Pike plays the Polish born Marie Curie. This pointless drama includes Curie’s secret love affair, it adds her belief in the occult and as a movie it is beautifully filmed. Curie also was the first woman to win the Noble Prize. It lacks a driving force in spite of showing us Curie’s fight against sexism, and from ethnic prejudice. I’d give it a 5 out of 10 if I was giving anything. 

HACHE. (NETFLIX Series)You’ll remember that the lead woman’s name is HACHE which begins with H as does Heroin. Taking place in Barcelona in 1960 it’s the story of Hache a prostitute who eventually (about three episodes) figures out how to not just break into the controlling mob scene but become a significant player. You’ll see lots of violence, much police illegal activity plus brutality and sex. There are better things to do with your time.

PALMER. (APPLE TV+ Single)The big deal here is that it stars Justin Timberlake as Palmer who was a football star in high school but then got sent to prison. He returns back to his hometown and becomes a full time parent to a gay little 7 year old boy. Many sobs later Palmer settles into his leading role and it’s fairly predictable. Watch it if you want to feel good about something.

BELOW ZERO (NETFLIX Single)  A Spanish film about the trailer that is transporting prisoners from one prison to another. The trailer is stopped by spiked tires and a long search among the prisoners for one in particular. Which prisoner, and why him is the main plot. It’s tense, exciting, and nearly believable. Don’t miss it for sure! It was number one on Netflix a week ago!!!

THE DIG. (NETFLIX SINGLE) You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this 1939 setting that centers on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. British Museum’s battle over the rights to own and move the ship and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional. 

 LOSING ALICE.(APPLE + Series) It’s filmed and set in contemporary Israel. A woman film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game playing between them as they deal with a beautiful young screen writer who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

PENGUIN BLOOM. (NETFLIX Single) One of the most shallow, corny, cutesy movies in decades. Naomi Watts becomes wheel chair bound and a magpie named penguin is supposed to be some message to her to keep living. It’s a 100% Australian production, which adds some interest but it’s so treacley you’ll have a tough time staying with its predictable and weak plot.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. (APPLE + SINGLE)Try to imagine an intimate get together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first big time director achievements 

THE WHITE TIGER.(NETFLIX Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi and centers on Balram a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system Balram succeeds and ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant, go for it by all means.

THE RIPPER.(NETFLIX Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI / HAJI. (NETFLIX Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series.  It’s set in London and Tokyo where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother.  Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs.  No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (NETFLIX Series) Set in 1813 London this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds like Downton Abbey, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voice over for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL. (HBO MAX parts one and two). Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY.(NETFLIX SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is both her producer and her interviewer and enabler as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

TIGER. (HBO) This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

LUPIN. (NETFLIX SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(HBO MAX SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (NETFLIX SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (NETFLIX SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

...
February 15

NEIGHBORS WAGE A VALIANT EFFORT

David took aim against Goliath at the February 9th Santa Cruz city council public hearing on the appeal of a proposed development at 418 Pennsylvania in the Seabright neighborhood. Goliath was in Sacramento, leaving the city Planning Department staff and city attorney to break the news that we are out of stones. We no longer have local control over housing developments, however much they change the small town character of Santa Cruz.

Sacramento passed Senate Bill 330, the Housing Crisis Act in 2019 to address what they see as a critical state housing shortage. The policy-makers attribute the high cost of housing in the state to the shortage of supply, expensive permits and lengthy public hearings. The Bill takes aim at all three.

Since Santa Cruz has already fulfilled its state-mandated supply of market rate housing, one might hope the lawmakers would use a scalpel to dissect the communities that lag behind and sew up that hole rather than use a club to bludgeon all. Such is not the case. Despite the fact that recent projects such as 555 Pacific have market rate units standing empty, developers see a hot market in Santa Cruz, fueled by Silicon Valley, UCSC growth, second homers, work from home re-locators and with the new state law, no impediments to getting their projects approved. 

Projects in the works include the 151 unit Water St. project, the 89 unit Bay/West Cliff project, the 408 unit Ocean St. project, the 205 unit Pacific Front project, the 175 unit Front St. project, the 175 unit Front/Riverfront project, the 120 unit Coral St. project and many more of varying sizes, either already approved and moving forward or close by. Most of the large ones include thousands of square feet of retail beneath the housing. Add density bonuses and soon the heights tower above zoning height limits of 80 feet.

The project at 418 Pennsylvania is small by comparison. It consists of three, three-bedroom, and three bath units in a rectangular box-like structure, thirty feet tall. There is an existing legally non-conforming house on the lot that will remain. Over 50 residents wrote protesting the design and challenging staff’s position that their recommendation for approval was solidly in conformance with state law. Nearby residents spoke to how the project will overwhelm the area. They questioned staff’s reading of SB 330, asked for a better, more compatible design that among other things didn’t block sunlight from their backyard, a quality of life-altering impact in my mind. While SB 330 disallows a reduction in the number of bedrooms and units in a project, I couldn’t follow the Planning Director’s reasoning why the three bedrooms in each unit couldn’t be made somewhat smaller, keeping SB 330’s edicts while allowing for a better design, and lowering the market rate cost of each unit. Three-bedroom, three bath market rate houses are not cheap.

What irked me the most (I have the good fortune to not live next door to this project) was the manipulation of images, distorting the size and impact of the project. This is standard developers’ toolbox. The rendition below is what was presented at the hearing. The existing single story house on the lot is fore-grounded, along with a few other small structures to be removed. The three-story project is in the background, rendered modest by the manipulation of perspective. Every hearing I have spoken at I’ve asked Planning staff to request developers to give the public realistic images or better still, like other communities, story poles so we can assess the visual impact on site. Not only did staff allow the developer to use this image, staff used the same image in their presentation. Not hard to guess which side they were cheering for.

The presentation from the developer, Workbench was the usual run-down on how much we need housing, how a teacher who faces leaving Santa Cruz will be able to stay here now this project is being built and so on. A few supporters claimed low-income marginalized locals would benefit from this project. I’m not sure how or why since market-rate housing for newcomers means the well-off moving to town, raising the Area Medium Income and displacing lower-income current residents as rents rise to keep up with the market. Council member Justin Cummings supported by council member Sandy Brown tried for a motion to have the developer and neighbors meet one last time to try for a better design. Despite Workbench’s website proclaiming that “Collaboration and consensus-building are at the core of our development philosophy” they didn’t nod their heads and no other council member supported the motion.

It’s only a matter of time before most neighborhoods face similar projects. At the State level there is no shortage of housing activists, speculators and compliant politicians preparing legislation for the removal of single-family zoning, plus a weakening of CEQA so that triplexes and duplexes can replace older single-family homes, bulldozed as soon as the current owners die or sell. The sad part is that this trend not only lines the pockets of developers, drives out the working poor, urbanizes our small towns, it also raises the cost of housing. That’s the elephant in the room and it’s tramping all over town.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

Feb. 15, 2021

REED SEARLE
I first met Reed Searle in the living room of Gordon Pusser’s home on Swanton Blvd. it was for a SCR[a]P meeting, Santa Cruzans for Responsible Planning. The Terrace Point Action Network evolved into SC[a]P, Santa Cruzans for Responsible Planning. Somewhere between those two groups, SCAN, the Santa Cruz Action Network, which began electing progressive city councilmembers beginning in the 1980’s, saw its demise. Then SCR[a]P seemed to transition into the CWC, the Community Water Coalition, and we began meeting at Reed’s house on Swift Street. It’s a craftsmen cottage where you can hear the Pacific’s waves in the distance lapping at the base of West Cliff Dr. The CWC later seemed to yield to the more insular and crusty, Save Santa Cruz, which unfortunately became an invitation-only group primarily formed to disseminate the real estate and developer schemes always hanging out on Surf City doorsteps. Save Santa Cruz continues to try and stir up the no-growth passions of eastsiders, particularly as they concern the supposedly defunct Corridor Plan (or is it defunct?), and now the looming building boom projects at 831 Branciforte, the “RiverFront” project downtown at the corner of Front and Soquel, and also the enormous 400-plus “SOU” project at 908 Ocean Street, but I digress. These meetings at Reed’s were forums, seminars, and discussion sections about Santa Cruz growth and how to preserve the historical, geographic, and social character of this place we call home. Were we Nimbys? Preservationists?  Slow-growth and no-growth advocates? Affordable housing activists? Democrats with a radical agenda? Or, as an old professor of mine used to say, were we simply “coffee cup revolutionaries?” Well Reed, who only served sparkling water and plates of mixed nuts from those big canisters from Costco, effected some sizeable changes in this town. At the end of the day, many of those house discussions led to some profound policy changes in the city such as no desalination plant has yet been built; a water advisory committee was formed to assist in our city’s leading the way in water conservation while insuring an adequate supply for many years to come; conversations and activism around Measure S and the “library-garage” project became staples in these meetings; preservation for a long while (and then not) of the historic La Bahia; Reed helped in limiting the number of “vacation rentals” here; he advised in establishing a current cap of 19,500 students at UC Santa Cruz, and a community advisory committee to UCSC on growth was formed and it met periodically. In his quiet, erudite, bubbly, and articulate way, H. Reed Searle was a community activist and august mentor to a generation of rabble rousers and political change-makers in Santa Cruz. He died on Feb. 21, 2020, he was 87. There will be a memorial on Zoom for Reed this Sunday, Feb. 21st at 11am. Please join us.https://allegheny.zoom.us/j/6188776686

More Reed
Reed Searle was a real anti-development mensch, a real person of integrity and honor. Even into his 80’s he offered spot-on critiques of many major building projects, some built and many not, threatening to over-run our town, and he continued all the way to the end of his life to offer sage advice on how to checkmate developers’ money and tricks. He never acted out of self-interest and always brought much mirth and good will to every gathering. When I was elected to the city council for the second time, Reed opened up his living room to hold steering committee meetings, he called them “kitchen cabinet” sessions. Twelve to 15 of us met each Saturday before a council meeting to discuss the often-lengthy council agenda. Reed was always prepared no matter if it was thin at 200 pages or over 500, he had a comment on almost every item of city business. Reed was born in Rockport, Ill. and he graduated from the University of Chicago before obtaining his law degree from Hastings College of Law. Reed was a lover of both opera and PRT (Personal Rapid Transit), spent a number of years living in England and once ran for State Assembly. He is survived by two ex-wives, Barbara Searle and Suzanne Searle; his long-time companion Yvonne Jaycox; two children, David Joshua Searle-White and Karen Linnea Searle; four grandchildren, and many, many friends.

Something Rotten at City Hall? (Reed would like this being exposed.)
Political egg, and a little bit of money, were left on the face of city manager Martin Bernal from last week’s city council meeting. It goes something like this… Lee “100 units here and 400 over there” Butler is the planning director for the city of Santa Cruz. He was brought into that position, having been the “third” choice for planning director because the first two who were actual planning directors, turned the job down. City manager Bernal hired Butler and the poor guy–Butler–is currently only making over $200k per year. So, his boss, Bernal, was stumbling around the city hall shop trying to figure out how to get him a raise, and also hoping the community did not hear about it because it might look bad since many city workers have been laid off during these pandemic times.  So, what does chief executive Bernal do? He comes to the city council meeting last week to create another executive position within the city manager’s office called “deputy city manager,” and it’s for Butler, and the salary is set at $15k more than he gets now because I guess, Frederic Lee M. Butler cannot live on his current salary of $253,859 in pay and benefits in 2019 (https://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/search/?a=santa-cruz&q=lee+butler&y=). The city budget is bleeding more red ink daily and more layoffs are looming. Bernal justifies the raise because he added another task to the Lee Butler portfolio: homelessness. And on a side note, does anyone for a minute seriously think that the now-houseless will be occupying any of those hundreds of planned SOUs and condos that Butler is shepherding into town that I mention above?!? See all city salaries here …and by the way, there is not one female employee in the top 45 salaries in the city of Santa Cruz according to the web site, Transparent California

Bring the Popcorn and Watch the Tape
See the city council tape for yourself. The questioning of Bernal starts with vice-mayor Sonja Brunner, “Can you (Bernal) speak to the deputy city manager position being filled…” at 1 hour and 59:00-minute mark on the tape and it continues with Councilmember Sandy Brown’s lawyerly follow-ups (at the 2:00:00 hour mark on the video) that bring out the fact(s) that something really smells around the Bernal city hall, the foul odor even comes through on the Zoom app. Pay close attention to the Zoom pictures of councilmember’s faces as it seems like Bernal’s padding of the city manager office budget is not being bought. (Video tape can be seen here.) I am sure after watching the tape you will agree that Councilmember Brown is standing up for tax-payers and closely scrutinizing the actions of a sometimes slippery city manager as that is what she was elected to do.

“A $15 minimum wage is not a radical idea. What’s radical is the fact that millions of Americans are forced to work for starvation wages, while 650 billionaires became over $1 trillion richer during a global pandemic. Yes. We must raise the minimum wage to a living wage.” (Feb. 14)


The City Staff’s Worst Nightmare, the Kitchen Cabinet is plotting”

L-R Sandy Brown, Maggie Ama, Roland Saher, Bruce Bratton, Katherine Beiers, behind Katherine, R-L is Ed Porter, Reed Searle, Fred Geiger, Candace Brown, Sarah Durant, and Shelley Hatch.  

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
TWO TOWNHALL MEETINGS LAST WEEK FOR CZU FIRE REBUILDING EFFORTS
On February 8 and 10, the County held virtual Town Hall meetings to inform the public, especially those who lost their homes, about the progress to issue permits to rebuild in the CZU Fire areas. The many people participating were told to expect at least THREE YEARS before being able to rebuild.  Most will not be allowed to re-use the foundations of their damaged homes, due to heat degradation of materials.

Property owners must get a temporary PG&E hook-up before allowed to apply for a building permit.  What about those who never were on the power grid?  Assistant Planning Director Paia Levine assured the group there are current discussions with high-level PG&E executives regarding the White House Canyon area.  CalFire has to sign off on all road and access requirements.  There will likely be neighborhood-level meetings soon.  She also said the Board of Supervisors will be considering possible fee reduction  issues in March or early April.

Other speakers included Marilyn Underwood, Director of County Environmental Health, discussing the requirements for hazardous debris and septic approvals that must occur before any property owner can apply for a building permit.  The map available here provides the numbers of Phase II Clean-Ups that are in progress, have been signed off, and the number of permit applications in the works.  On February 8, there was only ONE applicant, and Ms. Underwood stated that was the first in the entire state.  This permit application includes allowing temporary housing on the site.

ArcGIS Dashboards

She said no erosion control (hydro-mulching) could be done at a site until the hazardous debris evaluations are completed. Only 40% have had the debris removal done.

Here is a link to FAQ’s and answers regarding debris removal

Another speaker was Mike Renner, representing the 4Leaf Consultants.  The County has hired this firm to operate the Recovery Permit Center in the basement of the 701 Ocean Street Government Building to streamline the permitting process for the CZU Fire property owners.  He outlined the process for all who want to rebuild:
1) Pre-Application Meeting /Screening
2) Geological, Fire , Environmental Health requirements (being streamlined)
3) Permit Issuance.
He emphasized that people really need to come in and talk with the Permit Center…but you have to make an appointment.

The next speaker was Matt Johnson, County Code Compliance.  He stated that there will need to be rigid set-backs met for septic systems and potable water supplies, as well as riparian areas.  Hydrants and water storage tanks shown on all plans as a condition of approval.  He is working with local fire agencies who will make recommendations and compliance requirements for state fire codes, and can reject an application based on this compliance.

He stated that Code Compliance and fire agencies will review the permit applications when submitted, and review the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) options.  Unlike the usual permit review dialogues, there will be no Comment Letters sent to the applicants, eliminating the “back and forth discussions”.  Instead, the applicant will receive  a list of suggestions of what they have to do to meet compliance, and the applicant can answer “yes” to agree to do those things, or “no” to reject them.   He said there will be ONE point of contact for the inspection process, rather than a revolving door of different inspectors (who may issues a revolving door of endless requirements).

The question I wanted to ask, but could not, was: What is the appeal process???  Our County has no effectively functioning Building Code and Fire Code Appeal Board composed of industry professionals that could help achieve safe and habitable alternatives for the property owner.  In 2009, then-County Administrative Officer Susan Mauriello eliminated this alternative for property owners, shifting the responsibility to the County Board of Supervisors, who know little about these trades, rely 100% on staff say-so, and charge $1800 to rubber stamp whatever they are told to do. (See Code 12.12.080

Many in the Community have recently been asking for the re-instatement of the former, more functional and equitable Building and Fire Code Appeal Board, especially in light of what the State Board of Forestry as well as impending legislation SB 55 are proposing.

Last week’s meeting included many excellent questions from the people, including questioning why it should take so long to even place a tiny home or ADU on their own property to begin to recover and be present to take care of their land.  Many expressed overwhelm by the number of separate applications for soils, septic and fire, and wondered why it cannot be done with one application?  The answer was the agencies all have different tracking systems for the information, and require their own applications.

Others worried about a possible moratorium on wells.  County Environmental Health Director simply recommended “get a professional to look at it”.

County staff had no answer for the questions about housing constructed with shipping containers

Both meetings were recorded, and should soon be posted on the Recovery Permit website.

Contact Supervisor Bruce McPherson bruce.mcpherson@santacruzcounty.us and Supervisor Ryan Coonerty ryan.coonerty@santacruzcounty.us   or call 454-2200 with your thoughts.

WATSONVILLE CITY COUNCIL VOTES TO DISREGARD SURVEY RESULTS AND RELOCATE GEORGE WASHINGTON BUST FROM CIVIC PLAZA
Last Tuesday, the Watsonville City Council voted to remove the George Washington bust in Civic Plaza Park.  The public opinion poll of over 1200 showed  over 60% felt the bust should stay.  Many thanks to Councilmembers Ari Parker and Lowell Hurst who voted against removing the bust, and wanted the matter to come to the people as a ballot measure.

City Council votes to move George Washington statue from Plaza to library

Ironically, the Council took this action shortly before the national holiday honoring the birthday of our first President of the United States of America, George Washington.  Will that paid-holiday soon be revoked?

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING, ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPECT ANSWERS.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK, AND JUST DO SOMETHING.

Cheers,
Becky Steinbruner
(831) 685-2915


Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

February 13, 2021
#44 / Fixing The Fine Print

I know that lots of people feel somewhat guilty about signing up for some new online account or application without checking out the “fine print,” the “terms and conditions” that will govern how users are treated by the application that will be providing them with the services that they are hoping to utilize. After all, signing something without reading it just isn’t the right way to be responsible. Right?

Right. But… what’s the real point of reading those “terms and conditions,” anyway? It’s not like you can negotiate for anything except what is being offered. The only real question is whether or not you want to use Gmail, Facebook, Twitter, Tik-Tok, Spotify, Snapchat, or any of the other online applications that have now become ubiquitous, and that are actually quite essential to many people’s lives. If you want the service you “accept” the terms and conditions. There isn’t any other option.

The “contracts” established by our decision to accept the terms and conditions imposed by those internet platforms and application providers – and make no mistake, when we “accept” those terms and conditions we are definitely entering into a “contract” – are a “take it or leave it” deal. That kind of a contract is called a “Contract of Adhesion,” and internet service providers aren’t the only ones that use them, either. In fact, automobile insurance policies, healthcare policies, title insurance policies, appliance warranty contracts, rental agreements, and many other such contracts, make “adhesion contracts” the most common type of legal contract which most consumers are likely to encounter.

An editorial in the January 23, 2021, edition of The New York Times, suggests that “It’s Time To Fix The Fine Print.” Here’s how The Times outlines its concerns: 

Violations of such terms and conditions agreements recently gave Amazon the power to block the right-leaning social media site Parler and for Twitter to ban Donald Trump and to sweep tens of thousands of QAnon pages into the digital ether. Time will tell the degree to which tech companies will police their own sites in the coming months and years. But if they do, terms and conditions will be a pretext they use to do so.

The potential for abuse on the one hand and restricting speech on the other hand has spurred calls for major reforms to the tech sector from politicians of both parties. Courts and lawmakers are also zeroing in on reforms to terms of service agreements that would help reset the balance of power between consumers and tech companies. At the same time, several large companies, like Google and Facebook, have been buffeted in recent months by antitrust lawsuits and investigations into their market dominance. Regulators and lawmakers say their propensity for acquiring smaller rivals, gobbling up user data and striking exclusive deals with one another has allowed them to operate illegal monopolies that ultimately hurt consumers.

How, though, do you actually “fix” this problem? Individual negotiation won’t work, as already discussed. What about a methodology that would allow us to negotiate collectively?

There is such a methodology. It’s called “legislation,” or “regulation.” Decisions about what the internet platforms must do can be established by appropriate legislation and/or by regulations promulgated by governmental agencies. I, for one, would like to see a “standard” set of terms and conditions that would apply to all internet providers, and that would level the playing field, giving us, collectively, the ability to “bargain” and “negotiate” with these billion-dollar behemoths. 

An online news article, dated January 22, 2021, makes clear just how arbitrary the giant internet platforms have become. 

It’s time to renegotiate. It’s time to fix the fine print!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

Computers

“I do not fear computers. I fear lack of them.”
~Isaac Asimov 

“The computer was born to solve problems that did not exist before.”
~Bill Gates

“Never trust a computer you can’t throw out a window”.
~Steve Wozniak

“To err is human, but to really foul things up you need a computer”.
~Paul R. Ehrlich 

Fascinating!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

February 10 – 17, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Humans, dishonesty and Trump, Bookshop revisited, Palm Oil dangers. GREENSITE…on cutting down our future. KROHN…UCSC Growth Strategy, Joe Biden’s presidency, podcast suggestions. STEINBRUNER…Supervisors changing county properties, Seabreeze Tavern ownership issues, County Fairgrounds and animal evacuations, Nevada’s big tech giveaways. PATTON…Cellphones and privacy. EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”Valentines”. 

...

CHUCK AND ESTHER ABBOTT AT HOME. The Abbotts were mostly responsible for bringing and encouraging businesses to open in the Pacific Avenue Downtown. They also donated funds to build our noted lighthouse, in honor of their son who drowned surfing. This photo was taken June 3, 1965, in front of the Abbotts house at Lincoln and Chestnut Streets. It shows the Abbotts with some volunteers and friends.                                                         

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 8

      

DISHONESTY, TRUMP, THE INTERNET. In between all the robo scam calls I get every day, I got to thinking that Trump didn’t create the terrible racial hatred in the United States – he just allowed what was already there to become visible. Same thing for the internet: it only gave voice to the evil, crooked human nature that was already there, or here. We live amongst infinite attempts to cheat us out of what is rightfully ours. It’s not just us; it’s present all over the world, as we see by the daily reports of war and murder. Human beings are now, and always will be, just like our animal relations: constantly fighting, and at war over what we perceive to be our “given rights”. Look back at the records of our ancestors, even at the early Hawaiian folks who lived in paradise and yet fought horrendous bloody fights among their groups. Is there ever hope for a peaceful world? Will we ever “come together” and share? More to follow!!!

BOOKSHOP HISTORY REVISITED. Dr. Paul Lee, author, lecturer, co-host of the Penny University writes… “Just to fill out one more step in the Bookshop Santa Cruz History. I visited Santa Cruz prior to moving here, and was told by Page Smith and Byron Stookey of UCSC to go meet Al DiLudovico at the Catalyst deli, and to contribute to the founding of the Catalyst as a town/gown project of Stookey’s. So I did. Al told me the Hip Pocket book store had recently folded, and they were looking for a month’s rent to carry it until a new owner could be found. I wrote him a check. And then Ron Lau arrived to take it on.” 




THINK ABOUT IT! BrattonOnline can certainly use some financial help to meet the internet technical support. As previously mentioned none of us who write for BrattonOnline receive any funds at all and… the best things in life are never free. Domain fees and charges keep increasing and we need to support webwoman Gunilla Leavitt so she can deal with these increases. You can use PayPal directly, or click the donate button. The PayPal email is support@brattonline.com and you can use the send to family and friends feature. The name that comes up when you send money is “Online Payment”. You can also use Venmo (@Godmoma) or CashApp (@Godmoma9) if you would rather. We thank you for the support!

PALM OIL DANGERS CONTINUED. Last week we heard from Sara Cloud about the dangers from palm oil in Girl Scout Cookies. Linda Burman-Hall of the Santa Cruz Baroque Festival and KSQD writes…

“I’ve worked in southeast Asia, especially Indonesia, since 1978 and I’ve kept my eye on the palm oil situation since I first learned about the terrible effects on local communities in 2011. Although your readers will probably know me as the director of Santa Cruz Baroque Festival (SCBAROQUE.ORG), I work as a research ethnomusicologist annually with shamans of tribes living in the rainforest.

The forest is owned communally by clan tradition, and clans live off the forest bartering for all needs using the forest rather than cash. But if the government forces a tribe to contract with a palm oil company for government payoffs, then the palm oil company will not only clearcut the forest and sell all the wood, depriving the tribe of their ability to grow fruits, the staple of their traditional diet, but also assigning each family a small plot of individually owned land of what was previously collective land. The family must then mortgage their newly titled land to pay for training in how to farm the oil palm, which provides no food, and buy food from the company store.

Typically, the plantations are visited by ‘foreign’ men with cash money who teach the locals to gamble, woo and impregnate the young daughters of the locals with no intention to be there to raise the resulting children, and teach the young people to want coca cola, jeans, radios, TVs and phones, all available on credit from the company store. With these pressures, realistically, a family never can clear the mortgage on their land; and if the younger generation opts to leave the plantation to go to the city to live under a bridge and try to drive a pedicab for a living (for example), then the aging generation can only hire sharecroppers, further subdividing their own minimal income which becomes solely from palm oil.

Usually, as a consequence of government poor choice to opt for oil palm the rainforest families will lose the land of their ancestors in a generation or two in this manner, along with their culture, traditions and self-respect. Endangered primates and all animals who lived in the natural jungle lose out with the destruction of their habitat, and the hungry ones still left will still try to eat oil palm after the land is converted, which becomes a death sentence since the fences are usually inadequate to keep them out, and they are poisoned or shot, or both, by the plantation guards.

Ultimately, vigilant consumers are among the best guardians of the orangutans, gibbons and the rainforest itself: JUST SAY NO TO ALL PALM OIL.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie, to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non-hype story, plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, PBS) you can find it on.

MALCOLM AND MARIE. (NETFLIX SINGLE) Zendaya, the co-star of this movie, is from Oakland. She and John David Washington plus a few friends filmed this in a “glass house” in Carmel during the pandemic, and did a super job. The plot involves John, a filmmaker who has just received a great review of his new film in the LA Times, arguing throughout the entire film with Zendaya. Their fights are our fights, their issues are our issues and it’s an excellent movie. 

ADU. (NETFLIX SINGLE).Some poor directorial decisions mar the weaving of three almost totally unrelated stories into one heartwarming movie. Adu is a little boy who has to escape his warlike Africa hometown. Another story centers on the conflicting feelings of border guards. The most involved saga deals with illegal elephant ivory tusks, and a father/daughter entanglement. It’s a fine movie, but hard to follow. 

FIREFLY LANE (NETFLIX SERIES) a 48 on RT. Katherine Heigl and her BFF Sarah Chalke go through some show biz type plots, and make this a pretty ditzy movie. There are laughs and cute twists – but nothing, absolutely nothing here that you’ll remember while you’re looking for a new mask to wear later today.

BLISS. (AMAZON PRIME SINGLE) I’m giving up trying to figure out the plot of this one. Owen Wilson gets fired from his job and meets Salma Hayek and it goes into sci-fi and nonsense from there on. Local fans should watch for Joshua Leonard, son of Bob and Joann Leonard of Watsonville, who plays a character called Cameron. The movie switches from realities to fantasies and back again. You’ll probably give up long before it’s over… don’t worry about it.

LADY AND THE DALE. (HBO SERIES) This nearly unbelievable documentary has a 100 RT – the result of executive directing by the Duplass brothers, which makes any movie near great to begin with. Jerry Dean Michael was a con artist from birth. He later changed his name to Elizabeth Carmichael – a trans woman – and managed to convince a lot of the world that a motorcycle with two tires in front would change the world. See it as soon as possible, great fun betwixt the grimaces.

RADIOACTIVE. (AMAZON PRIME Single) The lovely and effervescent Rosamund Pike plays the Polish-born Marie Curie, the first woman to win the Noble Prize. This pointless drama covers both Curie’s secret love affair, and her belief in the occult. It lacks a driving force, in spite of showing us Curie’s fight against sexism, and ethnic prejudice, and being beautifully filmed. I’d give it a 5 out of 10 if I was giving anything. 

HACHE. (NETFLIX Series) You’ll remember that the lead woman’s name is HACHE, which begins with H as does Heroin. Set in Barcelona in 1960, it’s the story of Hache, a prostitute who eventually (about three episodes) figures out how to not just break into the controlling mob scene, but become a significant player. You’ll see lots of violence, much police illegal activity, plus brutality and sex. There are better things to do with your time.

PALMER. (APPLE TV+ Single)The big deal here is that it stars Justin Timberlake as Palmer, a football star in high school but then got sent to prison. He returns to his hometown and becomes a full time parent to a gay little 7 year old boy. Many sobs later, Palmer settles into his leading role and it’s fairly predictable. Watch it if you want to feel good about something.
 

BELOW ZERO (NETFLIX Single) A Spanish film about a trailer transporting prisoners between prisons. The trailer is stopped by spiked tires, and a long search ensues among the prisoners for one in particular. Which prisoner, and why him, is the plot. It’s tense, exciting, and nearly believable. Don’t miss it for sure! It was number one on Netflix a week ago!!!

THE VANISHED. (NETFLIX Single) I’ve always liked Anne Heche, but she wasted her time and talent in this mixed-up saga. A couple with their little daughter go to a trailer park. The daughter disappears, and it takes a long time to stage the reason why. Do not waste your time trying to outwit the movie…take a nap instead. 21 on RT.

THE DIG. (NETFLIX SINGLE) You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this 1939 setting that centers on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. British Museum’s battle over the rights to own and move the ship and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional. 

 LOSING ALICE.(APPLE + Series) It’s filmed and set in contemporary Israel. A woman film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game playing between them as they deal with a beautiful young screen writer who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

PENGUIN BLOOM. (NETFLIX Single) One of the most shallow, corny, cutesy movies in decades. Naomi Watts becomes wheel chair bound and a magpie named penguin is supposed to be some message to her to keep living. It’s a 100% Australian production, which adds some interest but it’s so treacley you’ll have a tough time staying with its predictable and weak plot.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. (APPLE + SINGLE)Try to imagine an intimate get together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first big time director achievements 

THE WHITE TIGER.(NETFLIX Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi and centers on Balram a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system Balram succeeds and ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant, go for it by all means.

THE RIPPER.(NETFLIX Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI / HAJI. (NETFLIX Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series.  It’s set in London and Tokyo where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother.  Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs.  No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (NETFLIX Series) Set in 1813 London this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds like Downton Abbey, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voice over for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL. (HBO MAX parts one and two). Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY.(NETFLIX SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is both her producer and her interviewer and enabler as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

TIGER. (HBO) This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (NETFLIX SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

LUPIN. (NETFLIX SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(HBO MAX SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (NETFLIX SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (NETFLIX SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

...
February 8

FELLING OUR FUTURE
I know how this man feels. If I had to pick a negative from my 46 years in Santa Cruz, anguish over the wanton killing of big trees would be at the top. The sound of a chain saw evokes dread. 

So many big trees on the lower west side have been cut down during my time here and many more before that. Lighthouse Field was a forest until it was cleared of trees in the 1960’s to make way for a shopping center, predating the plan for a Convention Center. A few survivors remain. The nesting owls and hawks have gone.

I’ve been through the appeal process to try to save a few neighborhood big trees where tree safety or health was not at issue. No support from the city and never support from the various council majorities. Hostile homeowners hell bent on getting rid of the heritage tree that graced their yard and pre-dated their arrival, only to sell and move on when the tree was sacrificed to their hubris. Some are big players such as the Seaside Company, owner of the Sea and Sand Inn and whose bidding any number of geologists and tree “experts” are willing to accommodate. The sky is falling! 

In the early days the imperative to save the big trees focused on their beauty and habitat value. If that wasn’t enough, now climate change offers us the compelling need and still we sacrifice them as though our survival weren’t linked with theirs. 

Recent scientific studies in the Pacific Northwest show that big trees are superb carbon sinks (three per cent of the largest trees contain almost half the forest’s carbon). Yet even with this knowledge, people, including some who call themselves environmentalists, seem satisfied with a couple of saplings planted as mitigation for the loss of an 80-foot tall tree. Some don’t see a problem with 47 trees to be cut down for a three quarter mile rail trail section between California Street and the Wharf Roundabout. After all, there will be tree art on the retaining wall, which is needed to shore up the bank when the trees are removed. No one it seems has counted the number of big trees that will be cut down over the 32 miles of the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail in order to accommodate a rail and trail. It may be in the thousands. Beauty, shade, habitat, carbon apparently don’t count for much in this context. Even expressing concern over such environmental impacts led to a disinformation campaign by rail trail activists to oust two members of the Sierra Club Executive Committee a year ago.

In the spirit of Gramsci’s “Pessimism of the intellect: optimism of the will” it is heartening that many in the community are mobilized to protect the big magnolias in the parking lot where the library/parking garage development is planned for downtown. Leaving aside the bad idea of relocating the library and building a parking garage, a more enlightened city leadership, both staff and council, would assure the public that the trees will be saved. After all the Heritage Tree Ordinance states that, outside of reasons of health, safety or compromising a structure, a heritage tree can be removed only if a building design cannot accommodate the tree. Since there is as yet no specific design, saving the magnolia trees on the outside perimeter should be a given. Trees within the footprint could be relocated rather than killed. 

A recent grant funded the planting of 500 young trees throughout the city. A positive step but negated by the number of big trees cut down every month. If we were serious, every big tree that the city permits to be cut down for a new development would be required to be relocated at the developer’s expense. Such big tree relocation is doable and has a 90 per cent success rate. 

While the city’s Heritage Tree Ordinance has failed to protect many big trees, (disproving the urban myth that it is impossible to get a city permit to remove a tree) county trees have even less protection. Outside of the narrow coastal zone, county trees are unprotected. The photo below shows a small number of the total stumps of approximately 40 trees hacked down for the planned new complex on Capitola Road next to the Live Oak Supermarket. A sad sight indeed. These are the small ones. Maybe not the best specimens but at some point in our future, if we have one, some will look at such pictures and exclaim, “what were they thinking!” Apparently we aren’t.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

February 8

“NO ROOM AT THE INN”
University Growth Strangling Community
Is there anything more infuriating to Santa Cruz voters than the mere fact that University of California, Santa Cruz “planners” are going forward with a growth plan that is sure to make life worse in Surf City: more traffic, higher rents, more pressure on our water supply, and of course it will lead to larger class sizes and a drop in the quality of the UC education experience. There is no longer an argument that the growth of the university will at some future time disrupt and put asunder the idea of a healthy Santa Cruz community controlling its own political and social destiny because UC’s growth has already drastically altered done so, and the notion of a sane, predictable, or just housing market is in tatters. What part of the June 2018 vote does Oakland, where UC is based, not get? Just asking. Seventy-six percent of Santa Cruz voters said YES to the following question:
“Shall an Ordinance be adopted expressing the Santa Cruz community’s opposition to the proposed enrollment growth at the University of California, Santa Cruz?” 

Yes: 12,606, No: 3,783

Again, what is not clear? This ballot initiative included the following language:

–There should be no additional enrollment growth at UCSC beyond the 19,500 students allowed by the current 2005 LRDP (UCSC has already reached this number)

Source

But Growth There Will Be?

Growth is not inevitable. There is no freeway down Chestnut Street. The Dream Inn steroid project was defeated. Wilder Ranch, Lighthouse Field, and the Pogonip have all been preserved for open space. Any growth is always dependent on the will of the voters vs. the real estate and developer duo, but in this case, throw in the University of California. In spite of voters, the Long-Range Development Plan (LRDP) seems to call for a 30% growth in students on campus and thousands more in support staff and faculty in spite of the strong anti-growth 2018 vote. I was a member of the Community Advisory Group, which had members from the Chamber of Commerce, Santa Cruz Neighbors, and the Monterey Bay Economic Partnership along with former Supervisor Gary Patton, current Supervisor Ryan Coonerty, Councilmember Cynthia Mathews, and Westside activist, John Aird. In all my time in and out of local government spanning over 25 years, I had never seen such unanimity on any single issue across the political spectrum as I witnessed in this group. The group message was consistent to the then Chancellor George Blumenthal: UCSC is big enough and future growth should be constrained as much as possible. This advisory group met several times and each time the no more growth sentiment only became stronger, so strong that the group was evidently disbanded because scheduled meetings were cancelled and then no more meetings were held that I am aware. The message the Community Advisory Group was sending to the university administration was not a welcome one, but it without a doubt it was reflective of the community’s dissent for any more university growth.

Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)

The Draft EIR is now out and needs to be responded to by the community. It is an important piece of the LRDP process. This is what the UCSC web site states:

“The Draft EIR has been released for a 60-day review period, beginning on Thursday, January 7, 2021 and concluding on Monday, March 8, 2021. Written comments on the EIR will be accepted anytime during the EIR review period. Please state “LRDP EIR Comments” in the subject line, and send your electronic responses via email to eircomment@ucsc.edu  or written responses via U.S. mail to the following address by 5:00 pm on Monday, March 8, 2021.”

Source 

Let’s All Keep Our Eyes Wide-open and Focused on the Biden Presidency Because…

Remember, Joe Biden:

Podcast Suggestions

The Daily Poster, with David Sirota and Thomas Frank’s, on how the “liberals” led by Larry Summers, are trying to downsized the once $2000 care package, now $1400 and possibly going down fast,  [link here]    

On The Media, with Brooke Gladstone and Bob Garfield, “Slaying the Fox Monster,” [link here] 

Le Show, with Harry Shearer is a summary of the week’s politics with music and Shearer’s theatrics which are enshrined in his Simpson’s voice-overs. [link here] 

Blindspot: The Road to 9/11, with Jim O’Grady is eight-part series on the political, social and economic implications leading up the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. [link here]  

And, if you still wonder if Black people have not been short-changed economically and legally segregated into poorer conditions than their white counterparts, here’s a segment from Terry Gross’ Fresh Air that really makes the case if not for reparations for our Black brothers and sisters, then at least it deserves some hard thinking about how to move beyond systemic racism, which created economic ghettos, consider Levittown, Daily City, Baltimore and St. Louis. [link here]   

“I congratulate Speaker Pelosi, Chairman Scott@USProgressivesfor including a $15 minimum wage in the House reconciliation bill. In 2021, a job should lift workers out of poverty, not keep them in it. 

Bookshop workers vote to affiliate with the Communication Workers of America (CWA) union. Wow!

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
February 8

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVE PLAN FOR SWEEPING CHANGES FOR COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTIES
The parking lot at 701 Ocean Street could be eliminated and sold for a mixed-use development.  All but one building at the County Emeline Street Health Facilities would be demolished, two new multi-story building constructed, and the rest of the land sold for mixed-use development.  The empty lot next to the County offices on Freedom Boulevard where FEMA trailers provided shelter for nearly 100 families displaced by the Loma Prieta Earthquake damage would be sold for mixed-use development. The Roy Wilson Maintenance Yard in Watsonville may disappear.

Amazing changes, with no money currently budgeted to do anything.

However, consider the benefits of consolidating the many services for which the County taxpayers now pay to lease properties to provide various services.

Freedom Boulevard facilities would become four-stories tall, if the City of Watsonville allows that. (see page 106 of the Long Range Facilities Plan and the map on page 102): DOC-2021-106 Consider presentation on the Long-Range Facilities Plan, as outlined in the memorandum of the Deputy CAO/Director of Public Works – Santa Cruz County, CA

*175 Westridge Drive, Watsonville: Eliminate lease and relocate 15 Ag. Commissioner staff 
*420/ 440 May Ave., Santa Cruz: Eliminate lease and relocate 54 CSS staff 
*245, 432 Westridge Drive, Watsonville: Eliminate lease and relocate 97 HSD staff 
*18 W. Beach St., Watsonville: Eliminate lease and relocate 
*169 HSD staff County Government Center: Relocate 33 HSA (Environmental) staff and 8 CAO (Cannabis) Staff 
*215 E. Beach Street, Watsonville: Relocate 3 BOS (district 4) staff

Emeline facilities would become three stories tall, and provide a logical area for transitional housing for those served. (See page 97 of the Plan)

Support a “one-stop shop” for Health, Human, and Homeless Services » Provide housing and/or supportive or transitional housing alongside relevant HSA/HSD services. Redevelop the campus to accommodate the growing headcount of the existing HSA and HSD departments. In addition, HSA and HSD leadership have expressed interest in providing much needed supportive housing, transitional housing, and navigation centers. This campus would be a good candidate for integration of such uses. Furthermore, explore potential for affordable housing, market-rate housing, and/or other non-County uses, as the residential neighborhood character adjacent to the southern section of the campus makes this area a good candidate for housing development.

Sell the 701 Ocean Street parking lot for a mixed-use development???

(See pages 90-92 of the Plan):

» Capitalize prime downtown location 

» Densify site with non-County uses. Surface parking consumes approximately 4 acres of the site, which can be monetized through non County uses. This can be achieved by engaging a private development partner to develop the eastern portion of the site. 

click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)

NEVADA PROPOSES CITY-STATES FOR BIG TECH
Here is a shocking development.  Keep your eyes on this, as it would seemingly allow large corporations to have their own jurisdictions to rule as they wish, including courts.

According to a draft of the proposed legislation, obtained by the Review-Journal but not yet introduced in the Legislature, Innovation Zones would allow tech companies like Blockchains, LLC to effectively form separate local governments in Nevada, governments that would carry the same authority as a county, including the ability to impose taxes, form school districts and justice courts and provide government services, to name a few duties.

Bill would allow tech companies to create local governments.

This is the Draft Bill linked in this other article.
 
WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A VIRTUAL MEETING, ASK QUESTIONS AND DEMAND ANSWERS.  SAY “HELLO” TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE.

MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND DO SOMETHING KIND THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner 831-685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

#39 / Their Apps Betrayed Them

On Saturday, February 6, 2021, The New York Times ran an article by Charlie Warzel and Stuart A. Thompson. The headline on the hard-copy version of the article said, “Capitol Mob’s Phone Apps Betrayed Them.” The message of the article was that our cellphones are collecting, at all times, a detailed record of our physical location. This is true whether or not we permit the applications on our phones to use “location services.” 

Cellphones work by communicating with cell towers that pick up the signals from our phones, and then relay those signals on, whenever we become involved in a call, or when we use some application that requires network or internet connectivity. However, even if we are not actually “using” our phone to make a call or to access the internet, our phones and the nearest available cell tower are in continuing contact. Since the location of each cell tower is precisely known, anyone who can access “Cell Site Location Information,” so-called CSLI, can pretty much pinpoint the location, at all times, of any cellphone user. 

If you didn’t know this before, now you do. I can guarantee you that every student in my Legal Studies class at the University of California, Santa Cruz has definitely been made aware of the implications of this technology. My course is titled, “Privacy, Technology, And Freedom,” and hopefully you can see that issues of privacy and freedom are most definitely implicated in our use of cellphones. 

The Supreme Court has held, in a very important case, Carpenter v. United States, that law enforcement authorities must get a search warrant, based on some probable cause, before they can access CSLI for a specified person. Read The Times‘ article (paywall permitting) and you will learn that a “source,” perhaps someone within a telephone company, was easily able to get access to CSLI for those involved in the January 6th insurrection, and then decided to “leak” such information, which is one way that The Times has been able to prove who was actually involved.

The source shared this information, in part, because the individual was outraged by the events of Jan. 6. The source wanted answers, accountability, justice. The person was also deeply concerned about the privacy implications of this surreptitious data collection. Not just that it happens, but also that most consumers don’t know it is being collected and it is insecure and vulnerable to law enforcement as well as bad actors — or an online mob — who might use it to inflict harm on innocent people. (The source asked to remain anonymous because the person was not authorized to share the data and could face severe penalties for doing so.)

“What if instead of going to you, I wanted to publish it myself?” the source told us. “What if I were vengeful? There’s nothing preventing me from doing that. It’s totally available. If I had different motives, all it would take is a few clicks, and everyone could see it (emphasis added).”

So, heads up, folks. Tin foil hats, unfortunately, are unlikely to provide a workable solution!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    VALENTINE’S

“A heart is not judged by how much you love, but by how much you are loved by others”.
~Frank Morgan

“All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn’t hurt”.
~Charles M. Schulz

“I’ll love you, dear, I’ll love you till China and Africa meet and the river jumps over the mountain and the salmon sing in the street”.
~W. H. Auden

“How did it happen that their lips came together? How does it happen that birds sing, that snow melts, that the rose unfolds, that the dawn whitens behind the stark shapes of trees on the quivering summit of the hill? A kiss, and all was said”.
~Victor Hugo

You can find a “reaction video” for pretty much anything! This one is pretty cute.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

February 3 – 9, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Flu shots and Covid Vaccine, Literary Guillotine, Girl Scout Cookies, movie critiques. GREENSITE…UCSC Long Range Destruction Plan. KROHN…Council meetings, zoom meetings, 831 Water Street meetings, AOC tweet of the week. STEINBRUNER…$400,000 gift to Swenson & Aptos Village, 831 Water Street community meeting…who listens, Board of Supes and censorship, Fair grounds unfair to evacuees. PATTON…The Devil and the New Deal. EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”Masks”

...

COOPER HOUSE (Santa Cruz County Court House) October 30, 1961. This was a Civil Defense Fallout shelter display. The sign on the commercial shelter on the left says it costs in four figures, compared to the do-it-yourself sand bagger one, which only runs $35 !!!                                                     

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 1

FLU SHOTS OR COVID VACCINE??? As I sit (and stand and sulk)  patiently waiting for my covid shot, and read so much about the troubles we in the USA have with getting the vaccine, I think we would all be better off if we knew the truth behind the distribution problem. We have no problem going to CVS or Safeway and getting flu or shingle shots… so why the difference? What government officials, or which department, decided this system wouldn’t work as efficiently?  

LITERARY GUILLOTINE NEWS!  David Bolam sent definite proof that the Literary Guillotine that I mentioned under last week’s historic photo is gone. He says, David Watson flipped the sign in the doorway of The Literary Guillotine on Dec.31, 2019, notifying passersby and customers that the bookstore was closing, this time for good. Feb 7, 2020″ Watson ran the bookstore for 30 years. City on a Hill Press: Remembering the Literary Guillotine

GIRL SCOUT COOKIES REPLY. Sara Cloud sent this note after my attack against the cookies last week. “I was glad you talked about the Girl Scout cookie boycott. I agree that it’s a misuse of girls’ energy and need to support their projects. Years ago I ran into a Girl Scout that was boycotting the cookie sale because of the palm oil, and it educated me on the whole issue which is quite critical for the ecology of Indonesia and the life of orangutans. Since then I’ve noticed how many products are using palm oil. Almost every cookie sold by Trader Joe’s contains palm oil ,and I don’t mean the organic palm oil which I assume might be grown more ecologically.”  

LOSING ALICE. (Series) Filmed and set in contemporary Israel, a female film director is facing getting older while raising three daughters, and living with her husband who’s a famous movie star. Much sensitive game are played between them, as they deal with a beautiful young screenwriter who wedges her way between and amongst them. A first class movie, with fine directing, good camera work and a plot that will keep you completely involved. Don’t avoid it. It has a 71 on Rotten Tomatoes.

THE DIG. You can’t beat the pairing of Britain’s Carey Mulligan and Ralph (“Rafe”) Fiennes in this movie set in 1939, centering on the excavation of an Anglo-Saxon burial ship named Sutton Hoo from the seventh century. The British Museum claims the rights to own and move the ship, and Mulligan fights them. Brilliant, absorbing, great scenic splendor and never better acting. See this one as soon as possible. Checking upon this I read… “The 27 meter long Anglo-Saxon ship from Sutton Hoo no longer exists. It was made of oak and after 1,300 years in the acidic soil, it rotted away leaving only its ‘ghost’ imprinted in the sand. The movie never deals with this fact, making us believe that the wooden ship itself was three dimensional”. 

PENGUIN BLOOM. (Single) One of the most shallow, corny, cutesy movies in decades. Naomi Watts becomes wheelchair bound, and a magpie named penguin is supposed to be some message to her to keep living. It’s a 100% Australian production, which adds some interest, but it’s so treacly you’ll have a tough time staying with its predictable and weak plot.

ONE NIGHT IN MIAMI. Try to imagine an intimate get-together with Muhammed Ali, Malcolm X, Sam Cooke and Jim Brown from the NFL in 1964. Their shared and unshared reactions to the racial issues of their time is amazingly realistic and educational. It has a 98 on RT, and deserves it. It’s an adaption of the play and shows the sensitive, delicate reactions to racial prejudice. Watch it and think about the genius behind Regina King’s first bigtime director achievements.

WHITE TIGER.(Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi and centers on Balram a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system Balram succeeds and ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant, go for it by all means.

THE RIPPER.(Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888) . This documentary is not only well done but it centers on the very poor and later exposed police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888)  was never caught even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI / HAJI. (Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series.  It’s set in London and Tokyo where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother.  Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs.  No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (Series) Set in 1813 London this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds like Downton Abbey, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voice over for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL, parts one and two. Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY.(SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is both her producer and her interviewer and enabler as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

TIGER. This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

SURVIVING DEATH. (SERIES)There are 6 episodes, near-death experience, mediums (2 parts) signs from the dead, seeing dead people and reincarnation. The first one on near death experience reports on hundreds of folks who have died and experienced some startling sites. The two parts on mediums seems too hokey. If you’ve ever wondered about seeing ghosts watch the last two parts. It’s well done and even informative…no matter what/how you believe. 

LUPIN. (SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable. Reader Judi Grunstra writes…” In your blurb about the Netflix show “Lupin,” you say there are 7 episodes.  There are only 5 (more to come in a 2nd season)”.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

...
February 1

HORROR ON THE HILL
When it comes to overblown growth, we are used to sugarcoated rhetoric from the city. UCSC’s latest Long Range Development Plan takes the cake. There are so many examples you need to read it yourself here. Just a few and by no means the worst. 

Under the Aesthetics section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) we are assured that new development “will be consistent with existing compatible facilities.” There is much space devoted to the beauty of the campus and the past careful design and siting of buildings. They are fond of quoting early campus leaders, so here’s one they didn’t include from Landscape Architect Thomas Church in 1963: “The buildings are less important in the visual composition than the trees.” And so it was until now. Below is a before and after of current Family Student Housing (slated to be bulldozed and re-built on the East Meadow) and the proposed new Student Housing West. This mega- complex is not yet built but is approved to accommodate past student growth so is not included in the 2021 DEIR. If this is the new yardstick, imagine what is forthcoming with the plan to grow Building Space from the existing, 2 million Assignable Square Footage (ASF) to the proposed 5 million ASF?

Even if the aesthetics of new construction on campus or visible from off-campus doesn’t concern you, the provision of housing for the additional 9,482 students and 2,550 employees probably does. Expect to see much written from UCSC and in the local press on how UCSC will house ALL additional students on campus. While this may lull the community into thinking the problem has been taken care of, don’t believe it. Not only is it not accurate it is highly misleading. Under the DEIR question (Table 3.13-11): “Would All of the Increased Housing Demand be Accommodated On-Campus?” their answer is No. 

Beyond the increased housing demand from additional growth, remember that the growth is on top of the current 19, 500 students plus employees. If all the growth is realized, total campus numbers will be around 34,000 (students, staff and faculty.) Half of the total students and seventy five per cent of new employees will be seeking housing off-campus despite new students and 25% of new employees being accommodated on campus. That means around 17 thousand UCSC affiliates will be looking for housing off-campus compared to the current 10 thousand.

Now it gets interesting.  Given the above, one would expect a DEIR to find at least some significant off-campus housing impacts requiring mitigation. But it doesn’t. They inform us they aren’t studying the planned growth impacts, only unplanned growth. In their words:

Such cool manipulation: Impacts of the planned campus population growth neatly swept away. The DEIR does address (although not study) the planned-for numbers and with reassurance to none but themselves or those standing to make money from growth, says: “Existing data on the city’s vacancy rates (5.6%) as well as planned developments nearby, suggest that housing is generally available within the county and city to accommodate additional students, faculty and staff and non-UC employees (contractors etc) for whom on campus housing would not be accommodated.”

If you’ve ever wondered who will be living in the overbuilt, expensive new mixed-use developments planned, approved or being built in town, you’ve got the answer.

Forget water being a limiting factor. The campus karst topography (underground caves) is filled with water just waiting the drill even if the city hadn’t made a legal commitment to supply UCSC with city water, short of the upper campus.

The LRDP is laced with feel-good meaningless jargon such as “UCSC strives to be a valuable community partner and is committed to mutually advantageous growth”.  (Measure U: 77% wants no more UCSC growth). And of course they have made a “commitment to climate adaptability, social justice and inclusion, and equity and access, to guide a responsible planning approach.” Expect a whole lot more rhetoric along these lines. The smiling faces of students of color peering down at us from one of the campus’ bridges will be the theme.

Their ace, they believe, is that in the early days of campus planning the expectation was that UCSC would have a student population of 27,000 by the 1990’s. They take pains to remind us of that at every opportunity. Perhaps they should re-read Chancellor Dean McHenry’s words from 1963, with which they end their Executive Summary: 

We have tried to plan ahead…but the future is dimly seen at best, and change will undoubtedly be made from time to time.”

McHenry was aware of the 27,000, projected future student number. I have a hunch in light of the subsequent environmental movement and current knowledge of species decline, the speculation in housing with inflated values and the pressures of growth on the town; he would support a reduced student enrollment at UCSC, especially with the availability of an additional campus at UC Merced with an enrollment of around 8,000 students. 

UCSC may feel it has an ace in hand with that outdated number but we have a full house. 

Try to attend one or both of the UCSC zoom meetings on the LRDP and DEIR on Wednesday and Thursday of this week (2/3 & 2/4) from 5-7PM. Register here

You don’t have to be an expert, just a concerned member of the community. The only tool available to us is massive community opposition to further UCSC growth. And be mindful that such growth is not in students’ best interests. Luring students to the most expensive UC community is callous and prospective students are largely unaware of the housing cost crisis in our community. 

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

 “MEETINGS”
Meetings, Meetings, Meetings
Most educational, work-related, activist-related, and city council business has been relegated to Zoom since last April. Of course, not all Zoom meetings are equal. Most Zoom meetings allow participants to see each other, if folks have their cameras on, and communicate individually or collectively through the “chat” function. The chat function is perhaps the only improved benefit to on-line meetings vs. in-person ones, aside from seeing a long-lost relative in Bangor, Maine on a family reunion chat, for example. On the other hand, zoom meetings can be abused by those running the meeting. The Santa Cruz city council meetings are a case in point. 

Council Meetings
Council meetings are considerably more degraded, alienating, and have even taken on darker political contours, than the pre-Zoom ones. The city bureaucracy refuses to allow meeting participants to see one another or even to use the chat function during regular city council meetings. While the public is almost entirely shut-down from seeing one another, the councilmembers and city staff can be seen preening, popping off, and parrying just a little bit as they have access the normal Zoom functions. When it comes time for the public to participate there are many dropped calls and missed opportunities on the part of the public due to the difficulty of figuring out the exact time that the public might be able to participate. Without seeing fellow colleagues, activists, and community members in the Zoom room, or city council chambers the forces that work against democracy are out in full force and looking to get their development approvals from a compliant council, one they paid for (see campaign donation statements here). In fact, those two to three current councilmembers who hold public comments in utter contempt are probably much happier living in Zoom world, but the rest of us have been placed on “hold” as we wait to be vaccinated and allowed back into the people’s chamber at city hall once again. Of course, the council could hold outdoor sessions with proper social distancing, or indoor public sessions at the Civic Auditorium during this Governor-directed public health “purple period” we are now in. Certainly, a public council meeting in the parking lot under the solar panels behind city hall is at least as important as being able to sit down for a “Mike’s Mess” in the Zachary’s restaurant parking off Pacific Avenue. If you think about this comparison for long your head might explode, or you might just realize how certain councilmembers are delighted not to have the public present during “their” city council soirée every other week.

Meetings, cont.
The Zoom meetings just keep piling up. On one hand, it is functionally easier to just sit down and parachute into any gathering, political or social, by the magic of pushing on computer keys. But frankly, it is often emotionally stultifying not seeing friends up close, hugging or high-fiving and checking in with the minor chit-chat before a city meeting begins and ends. We all experience some loss of feeling and therefore the political outcome is affected. How? If we met in-person, there is body language, which does indeed effect decision-makers–commissioners, councilmembers, supervisors–and their body language, faces, rhetorical maneuvering have affects on the audience members present as well. I attended six meetings this past week and missed three others I had planned to attend because of on-going work and writing commitments. Zoom leaves much to be desired, especially the soul that gives us life, it’s hard over Zoom. One meeting, attended by almost 300, while different and also somewhat anonymous and alienating, it did afford the community an opportunity to hear from the developer class, an exchange of information and public comments over the planned 151-unit, 6-story, 2-tower project, 831 Water Street.

831 Water Street
First of all, the “831 Water St.” proposed project actually includes 823, 825, 827, and 833 Water Street, according to the Santa Cruz city planning web page.  The city planners state on their web page, “The Project is requesting a maximum State Density Bonus of 35% pursuant to providing a minimum of 11% of the base density units as affordable to Very Low Income households, however the Project may provide as much as 51% of units as affordable to households between 30% and 80% of Area Median Income.”On the face of it, the numbers are impressive. Hard to bypass on that level of affordability. The developers do tout “51% affordable” units being built in this project. I am not sure how they will get there. Isn’t that what Santa Cruz longs for? The devil is in the details. 

The Project
The building will be 59-feet high with a roof-top bar, which would arguably bring the space to well above 60 feet with people drinking and dancing on top. The site sits across form Branciforte elementary school. The size and massing, in the pictures offered by the developers stands tall and taller and will shadow the neighborhood, which its backside abuts (see below). The neighbors knew little about the project coming in to the meeting and most were not asked for their input as to size and neighborhood compatibility as that might’ve saved the severe criticism the project is receiving by locals. Indeed, the developer was only meeting its requirement by holding this 200-plus Hollywood Squares Zoom extravaganza. Finally, the building appears to be institutional, boarding on retro-prison or antiquated dormitory-style. But yet, there is that affordability component. It’s huge. I would urge the developers to hold a series of meeting with neighbors and interested SC community groups. They could be neighborhood planning sessions with tables and pieces to move around, charrette-style, and see what is possible and most acceptable to the greatest number of those who will be affected by such an enormous physical imposition plopped down onto the edge of a pretty tranquil eastside neighborhood.

Top Ten List on why 831 Water St. Should be Re-thought
The meeting last week attracted more people, almost 300, than I’ve seen since the 700-plus who showed up at the Civic Auditorium in 1999 to discuss the entry of the now long-closed Borders Bookstore(now Forever21)into the Pacific Ave business zone. Those facilitating the Zoom discussion did a pretty good job of not cutting people off (is city council listening?) and community members responded by offering generally cogent and succinct remarks, most not so welcoming to the project. So, when it came my time, I offered my top ten list of why the community will likely reject the 151 mostly cubicle-style units (ONLY two 2-bedroom apartments proposed).

  • #10–The number of residents present on this Zoom meeting reflects the great concern in this community about the project (over 200 are still on the Zoom call after two hours);
  • #9–I am not a YIMBY, Yes in My Backyard because all housing is NOT equal. 
  • #8–Santa Cruz is way over its limit in building market-rate housing and way under on low, and very low affordable units…there’s not a “housing crisis,” there’s an affordable housing crisis;
  • #7–What happened to Spanish-colonial/California colonial architecture in Santa Cruz? Look no further than across the street at 708 Water to see a moderating architectural example. We need to honor the once-thriving Villa Branciforte.
  • #6–There will be two EV-charging spots as part of the project. TWO!?
  • #5–Why all the studio and one-bedroom apartments? What happened to family-style 2,3,4-bedroom apartments? Who is this project really for?
  • #4–If you want this project to be successful you must commit to submitting a full-blown EIR–environmental impact report–to gain support and confidence of the community.
  • #3–The poll you attempted during the meeting was folly. It was in the form a “push poll,” one designed to lead those participating towards the development goals of the project.
  • #2–I am not so sure Santa Cruz wants this project, as is.
  • #1–The ill-fated, under the radar “Corridors Plan” was killed not long ago by an eastside voter uprising resulting in a newly elected city council majority cancelling it in 2019.

PLEASE NOTE: ReImagine Santa Cruz is presenting a conference, Is Affordable Housing Possible? on Feb. 4-5, this Thursday and Friday. To find out more information and who the featured guest speakers and panelists are go to: reimaginesantacruz.com

“Imagine thinking that ‘healthcare is a human right’ vs. white supremacist conspiracy theories are two views “just as extreme” as the other.” (Jan. 30)


Hey, Belvedere neighborhood, meet your new neighbors! 831 Water Street, at corner of Branciforte.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
February 1

ANOTHER $400,000 HANDED TO APTOS VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO HELP SWENSON DEVELOPERS.
Santa Cruz County Public Works just got a $400,000 grant from the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD) to coordinate all five traffic lights in the Aptos Village area, promising the carbon emissions will decrease because everyone can just zoom along without having to stop at each light.  Will that really work? 

The $400,000 grant of public monies, approved by the Board of Supervisors as Consent Agenda Item #44 last week, will help reduce the cost, which was supposed to be already covered, thanks to multiple large state and federal grants administered by the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission. 

“Financial Impact 

At this time, the overall estimated project cost is $550,000 for the Aptos Area Adaptive Traffic Control System project. The AB2766 Grant will provide $400,000 towards the estimated project cost, under 621100/62330. A local match of $65,000 in soft costs is budgeted in this fiscal year 2020-21 CSA 9 funds. The remaining local match of $85,000 will come from various transportation funding sources and will be budgeted in the years that the funds will be spent.”

Why does the matching funding have to come from CSA 9 and other County transportation projects?  The project was initially fully funded for the budgeted amount to include the $550,000 cost to synchronize the lights.  This Project has been the County’s top priority for getting grant money from the RTC for the past 5 years.  

It remains to be seen, but the current Phase 2 Aptos Village Traffic Improvement work at Aptos Creek Road is supposed to wrap up on February 11, according to the County traffic delay warning signs in the Village.  According to Project Manager, Ms. Cristina Crocker, the highly contaminated railroad bed soils excavated for the railroad crossing, and that have been stored and draining onto Swenson’s Phase 2 development were scheduled to get hauled off Friday, January 29,  to the Class 1 landfill in Kettleman City…over 170 miles away.

Where is the new railroad signal that the PUC requires be installed?  No sign if it being yet delivered.

Here is the County’s timeline for work remaining:  Aptos Village Improvement

MORE CENSORSHIP AT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR MEETINGS
Several members of the public wrote comments to the Board during last Tuesday’s January 26 meeting, and should have been read publicly by the Clerk of the Board.  However, the Clerk read NO comments that members of the public submitted on any agenda item.  One woman spoke up, protesting that she had submitted written comment during the meeting on previous agenda items, but none were read.

2021/01/26 09:00 AM Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting – Web Outline – Santa Cruz County, CA

The Clerk did not read any comments throughout the meeting.  Another blow to public participation. 

OUTSTANDING PUBLIC INTEREST SHOWN AT 831 WATER STREET PROJECT COMMUNITY MEETING….WILL THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY EVEN LISTEN?
There were over 300 people logged on to the 831 Water Street Project Zoom meeting last Wednesday, January 27.  The meeting went on for three and a half hours, with many excellent points raised.   How can the developer claim that adding white stucco to the facade of the two five-story modern structures satisfy  the City’s requirement that the architecture blend with the historic mission style, Villa de Branciforte adobe character?  How can anything about what is proposed fit with the character of the neighborhood?  Many, many people pointed out that it just doesn’t!

The project construction would not likely provide many local jobs, either, as the developer plans to have the buildings prefabricated in a factory (somewhere else and transported in) as modular units that could be installed within a matter of just two weeks.   That is purely a cost-saving measure that was attempted to be sold as a means of reducing construction noise and dust for the neighborhood.

We learned that all 77 affordable units (most are 342 SF) would be separated into one building, and the more spacious “Workforce housing” would be in the other building, the one with the 2000 SF full bar on top.   We also learned that the project would only provide TWO electric car charging stations, total.  

Most importantly, we learned that this project is the first in this area in which a developer has applied for eligibility under SB 35, the Affordable Housing Streamlining Act, authored by Senator Scott Wiener and approved by the Governor in 2017.  The City Attorney is reviewing that, and must notify the developer in writing if the project conflicts with any City design requirements.  If the City does not notify the developer in writing of any conflicts, it is assumed that there are no conflicts, and the project is ministerially deemed approved, without any further public hearing.  

Many people asked for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project.  But if the City Attorney deems this project qualifies under SB 35, the developer would not have to conduct any environmental assessment for traffic, water, archaeology, noise, hydrology, impacts to neighborhood shading, cumulative impacts to the area, or any project alternative.

Several people compared the developer of the Calvary Housing Plan that had come before the City Council just the night before.  That developer is voluntarily conducting a full EIR for that project: View Meeting – OnBase Agenda Online   

Read more about SB 35 here

This law expires January 1, 2026

WHY DIDN’T THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ALLOW DEBRIS FLOW EVACUEES OR THEIR ANIMALS SHELTER LAST WEEK?
Many are still wondering why the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds was not “ready” when the County and CalFire issued evacuation orders last Sunday, January 24.  Equine Evacuation leaders were informed at 3pm on Sunday that the Fairgrounds were not available for animal sheltering needs, but without reason.

When asked to respond to public questioning on the issue at the County Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, January 26, Assistant CAO Michelle Coburn stated it was true that Equine Evac. volunteers were “triaging” large animal shelters throughout the County, but using Quail Hollow Ranch County Park as a headquarter.  Usually, the Graham Hill Showgrounds in Felton would be that spot, but PG&E leased the space 100%, so it was not available.  

Read this report in the January 26 Santa Cruz Sentinel about the problem:  Equine Evacuation helps find temporary homes for San Lorenzo Valley horses

Although Fairgrounds Manager Dave Kegebein stated the Fairgrounds would be “ready” on Wednesday, January 27, it was of no valuable assistance because by Tuesday late afternoon, the storm had made evacuation efforts too dangerous for the volunteers.  Equine Evac. volunteer teams halted trailering any animals to shelter after 4pm on Tuesday.

It did not help that on Wednesday and Thursday, during the storm, that the Fairgrounds livestock entry gate was locked, and the limited number of shelter spaces for animals were barricaded and not accessible.(see photo) 

Also troubling was that neither the Harvest Building nor the Crosetti Building were available for any of the 5,000 people who evacuated to seek shelter from the potentially life-threatening debris flows predicted.  The Fairgrounds rented out the Harvest Building to a hot tub and spa show.  The Crosetti Building was in use for COVID inoculations, even though it was half-full of the empty tents the CZU Fire evacuees had used in August and September, and the ten portable canopy tents set up in the parking lot for that vaccination effort that had just begun on Monday January 25, were not being used at all.. 

Fifth District Supervisor Bruce McPherson sent out a list of local hotels for those who had to evacuate, along with the locations of three Evacuation Points that provided no inside shelter, just a parking lot for RV’s.

The County has a valid 30-year contract with the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds to provide emergency shelter in times of disaster.  The County paid to install an industrial kitchen in the Harvest Building for mass feeding of those sheltered at the Fairgrounds.  But that building was full of hot tubs and spas last week, when the evacuees needed it most.

Please contact County Supervisors and ask why things were so chaotic, and the 5,000 evacuees were left without any emergency shelter for themselves or their animals.  831-454-2200

LOCAL WATER ISSUES

In an effort to remain brief here, I want to simply list a few events and bits of information.

  1. Santa Cruz City Water Shortage Plan…how would it affect your business (if you still have one left)?  

    The City of Santa Cruz Water Department is partnering with the Santa Cruz County Business Council and Chamber of Commerce to host an input session on their Water Contingency Plan, which governs what restrictions will be adopted when, in the event of a sustained water shortage. Thankfully, we as a community have made a lot of strides in bolstering the resiliency of our collective system, having made it easier to share water between districts, created a county wide groundwater management framework and plan, and explored the potential for supplemental supply options down the road. Yet the potential for a water shortfall is still very real, and could have a major impact on your business. Learn more and RSVP using the links below.

    Business Input Session on Santa Cruz Water Department Water Contingency Plan
    Thursday, February 4th, 2021
    1:30pm – 3:00pm
    Virtually Via Zoom

  2. Santa Cruz City Water Rates Will Be Going Up… See pages 7.1-7.19 of the City Water Commission February 1, 2021 agenda

    The Ad Hoc Committee recommends”Scenario #4″ with a 10% annual rate increase in 2023-2027 to achieve $658 million in project costs over 15 years.

  3. Soquel Creek Water District Continues to Pump and Sell Water in Seascape with High Chromium 6:
     See page 37.

    but the new Granite Way Well in the Aptos Village Project is a low-producer (see page 38)

     “In 2019, the District had adequate source capacity to meet the 10-year PHD of 1.4 MG.” See page 40

    (So is it really necessary to pressure -inject treated sewage water into the aquifer, claiming an emergency???)

    Item 7.1, page 52: Why does the Maplethorpe developer, John Swift, have to pay full fees up front for this development, but the Board re-affirmed and extended  the special privilege granted Swenson and the Aptos Vilalge Project, not making them pay fees up front???   (see the 12/15 public hearing, Item 2.1)

  4. The Monterey Peninsula Water Shortage Could Be Solved With Flow From the Salinas River.  So Why Isn’t It?

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A ZOOM MEETING.  SAY HELLO TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE AND JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky 685-2915  I welcome your discussion.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

January 28
#28 / The Devil And The Green New Deal

The New York Times article from which I grabbed the picture above is headlined as follows: “People Actually Like the Green New Deal.” That strikes me as a kind of surprising headline, since I tend to think, “What’s not to like?”

The Green New Deal resolution that was introduced into the Congress in February 2019 is described as follows in the official press release that announced its introduction:

Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) today introduced a Green New Deal resolution in both the Senate and House of Representatives that would create millions of good, high-wage jobs in the United States, provide unprecedented levels of prosperity and economic security for Americans, and counteract systemic injustices – all while addressing the existential challenge of climate change. Recent landmark studies such as the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report and the U.S. National Climate Assessment Fourth Report have made it clear that we need bold action to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, and we may have as few as 12 years to achieve it. The extreme weather, storms, droughts, and wildfires of recent years have made the worsening effects of climate change impossible to ignore.

Senator Markey and Congress Member Ocasio-Cortez (both of whom are pictured above) were joined by a number of co-sponsors, who also signed onto the Green New Deal resolution. Those co-sponsors included Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth Warren, and our current vice-president, then a Senator, Kamala Harris. 

Markey and Ocasio-Cortez are certainly right about the need to take immediate action to deal with our global warming crisis. If we can do that in a way that will “create millions of good, high-wage jobs,” that seems likes a legislative winner to me. As I say, “What’s not to like?”

Well, it does appear that not everybody likes the Green New Deal – and I am not talking about benighted Republicans and corporate CEOs, either – those who are dedicated to maximizing corporate profits even if doing that brings on a “Sixth Extinction.” 

As it turns out, a number of very sincere environmentalists are expressing concern about the whole Green New Deal concept. Jasper Bernes, writing in Commune, is one of the critics. He titles his critique, “Between The Devil and the Green New Deal.” More extreme in her views is Cory Morningstar, who seems to believe that there is a carefully coordinated and malign effort to promulgate a destructive Green New Deal program, and this effort involves both the global corporate elite and what she calls “the non-profit industrial complex.” 

I must say that I discount the idea that there is a bonafide conspiracy by groups like Conservation International and the World Economic Forum to go to war against both humanity and nature, all in the name of world domination and increased profits for the corporations that have already come pretty close to ruling the world. This is, pretty much, the charge levelled by Morningstar.

Other concerns, however, I do think have some validity. Here, for instance, is how Bernes begins his article: 

From space, the Bayan Obo mine in China, where 70 percent of the world’s rare earth minerals are extracted and refined, almost looks like a painting. The paisleys of the radioactive tailings ponds, miles long, concentrate the hidden colors of the earth: mineral aquamarines and ochres of the sort a painter might employ to flatter the rulers of a dying empire. 

To meet the demands of the Green New Deal, which proposes to convert the US economy to zero emissions, renewable power by 2030, there will be a lot more of these mines gouged into the crust of the earth. That’s because nearly every renewable energy source depends upon non-renewable and frequently hard-to-access minerals: solar panels use indium, turbines use neodymium, batteries use lithium, and all require kilotons of steel, tin, silver, and copper. The renewable-energy supply chain is a complicated hopscotch around the periodic table and around the world. To make a high-capacity solar panel, one might need copper (atomic number 29) from Chile, indium (49) from Australia, gallium (31) from China, and selenium (34) from Germany. Many of the most efficient, direct-drive wind turbines require a couple pounds of the rare-earth metal neodymium, and there’s 140 pounds of lithium in each Tesla.

This is, in essence, the same argument that was advanced by Jeff Gibbs and Michael Moore in Planet of the Humans – although Bernes addresses the basic point in a slightly different context. 

I have written about the Gibbs-Moore movie previously, and I wrote about it pretty positively, because I do think it is important to admit that our first instinct is often to believe that some new “technology” is going to solve the problems caused by the way we have developed and deployed our earlier technologies. That is often a huge mistake. 

We, as humans, are quite enamored with our own great capabilities, so if Mother Nature is telling us that our civilization is “Out of Balance” (to reference another, much earlier environmental movie, Koyaanisqatsi), then we tend to think that our task is to solve that problem ourselves. In fact, quite often, our real task is to realize that we are the problem!

The critics of the Green New Deal that I am talking about are concerned that when we start talking about amping up our economy as we try to deal with our global warming crisis, we can easily become confused. 

We are, in fact, way “out of balance,” and a bigger economy is not what is called for. What is called for is a reorganization of how we live together and conduct our lives within the limits established by the laws that govern the World of Nature. 

We do live, ultimately, in that World of Nature, and not in the human world that we create. This failure to understand the utter dependence of our own, humanly-created world on the world that we did not create, and in which we find ourselves so marvelously and mysteriously alive, is the general cause of many of our problems. It is definitely the cause of the global warming crisis that now threatens our species, and many more, and everything we have established over thousands of years of human civilization. 

I am in favor of dealing with economic injustice as we also take steps to reorient our relationship to the World of Nature, and to turn away from an economic and political system that always wants more, and that wastes more, day by day.  

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s ” Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    MASKS

“Do they love you or the mask you put on everyday?”  
~Shimika Bowers

“The irony of life is that those who wear masks often tell us more truths than those with open faces.”  
~Marie Lu

“I believe in my mask– The man I made up is me
I believe in my dance– And my destiny”
~Sam Shepard 

“Harvey wasn’t interested in the clothes; it was the masks that mesmerized him. They were like snowflakes: no two alike. Some were made of wood and of plastic; some of straw and cloth and papier-mâché. Some were as bright as parrots, others as pale as parchment. Some were so grotesque he was certain they’d been carved by crazy people; others so perfect they looked like the death masks of angels. There were masks of clowns and foxes, masks like skulls decorated with real teeth, and one with carved flames instead of hair.”

~Clive Barker

Invisible People is a YouTube channel that features interviews with homeless people from all over. Mark Horvath has done these interviews for years, and they are real and unvarnished. You can start with this one, and then check out the channel for more.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

January 26 – February 1, 2021

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Joe B. over Bernie or Elizabeth! Girl Scouts protesting cookies, Democratic Socialists of Santa Cruz. GREENSITE…on yet another David and Goliath development. KROHN…Journalism II, Bellafonte, Crowley and Klein. STEINBRUNER…831 Water Street development, affordable housing possible, legalizing tiny homes, UCSC and UC Davis expansion. PATTON…Turnabout and revenge and humiliation. EAGAN…classic Deep Covers and Subconscious Comics. QUOTES…”February”

...

CEDAR AND LOCUST STREETS (DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ) 1920. That would be the Red Restaurant and The Little Shanghai restaurants. The Literary Guillotine is in there somewhere too.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE January 25

BIDEN OVER BERNIE AND ELIZABETH. After a lot of watching and reading and thinking, I am finally of the opinion that Biden will do a much better job as our president than either Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would have. I don’t believe either Bernie or Elizabeth has the patience or experience to face the myriad of small but dividing issues that have separated so much of our lives and politics. Their end goals might be even more beneficial to our Untied States than Joe B. would be able to push through, but I don’t think they have the calmness and friendliness that such a huge undertaking requires. Watch closely as Trump keeps fading into the shadows, as the far right recedes ,and as the long-time promises and needs of our national community are slowly brought into reality.

GIRL SCOUT COOKIE BOYCOTT. For actual decades I’ve urged boycotting Girl Scout Cookies. The encouragement of parents to teach girls to go door to door to compete against each other in selling a lousy and unhealthy product seems cruel to me. The cookie companies make much more money than the Girl Scouts do. Now Jennifer Bratton sent me the following

Scouts Boycotting Cookie season over palm oil concerns.

You’ll see concerns over child labor, deforestation, and the negative factors of the palm oil itself. Little Brownie Bakers and ABC Bakers (Weston Foods) are the two cookie companies that make the little devils. Interbake Foods and the Keebler Company are their owners. 

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA LOCAL MEETING DATA. If you’ve wondered what Democratic Socialism is all about ,go to  https://dsasantacruz.org . The site will

give you DSA positions on The San Lorenzo site displacement, Bookshop Santa Cruz and the union and more. There will be an orientation meeting of the Santa Cruz DSA Sunday, January 31st from 4-5 p.m. For zoom link, email membership@dsasantacruz.org 

WHITE TIGER. (Single) A wonderful story and movie from a book about the class system in India. It takes place in Delhi, and centers on Balram, a young boy who grows from a very wise to near genius level in fighting India’s rigid social structure. Struggling upwards in the illegal government system, Balram ends up controlling a business of his own. A long war between servants, ruling classes, mobsters, and family ties, it’s brilliant. Go for it by all means.

PRETEND IT’S A CITY. (SERIES) 86 on rt. There are seven episodes in this diatribe about New York City, by author and critic Fran Lebowitz. Martin Scorsese is producer, interviewer and enabler ,as Fran takes apart the many sides of why people live in New York. If you like or even love New York City, you’ll howl over the issues, problems and challenges she makes such good fun of hour after hour. High rents, street crimes, crowds, weather, she covers them all.

THE RIPPER. (Series) There was a mass murderer in London in the late 1970’s and early 80’s who patterned his killings after the famed Jack the Ripper the century before (1888). This documentary is not only well done, but it centers on the very poor police investigations. A real change in online viewing… it’s perfectly assembled, logically developed and surprising in the exposing the lousy job the police and other authorities did in the decades during which they tried to catch The Ripper. The real Jack the Ripper (1888) was never caught, even though he’d sent letters to the police.

GIRI/HAJI. (Series) Giri Haji means Duty/Shame. Tricky, involved, many flashbacks, stabbings and only a fair series. It’s set in London and Tokyo, where a detective goes searching for his gang involved brother. Yakusas (Mafia) battle each other and share very weak promises and loyalties to their gangs. No standout acting or direction, it just seems to go in circles with no purpose. You can easily avoid this one, and no-one will know the difference. Trust me.  

BRIDGERTON. (Series) Set in 1813 London, this is a poor copy of Downton Abbey (1912-1926). Even the music background sounds the same, but the acting is miserable, the casting lacks class and the sub-plots are boring. One interesting thing is that the casting is multi-racial. That means there are blacks and Asians in roles that seem out of historical accuracy, but it is odd to think about what the real times were like. Julie Andrews does the entire voiceover for the series, but it doesn’t help the overall phoniness. 

KILL BILL, parts one and two. Quentin Tarantino created a masterpiece of movies with these dramas. Uma Thurman and David Carradine keep us totally absorbed in this saga of blood, sweat and brilliance. Sure you’ve seen it before (back in    ) but watch it again, there’s so many subtle touches we missed the first time.

TIGER. This is a two part documentary on HBO that tells us, or reminds us of all the troubles Tiger Woods has faced in his golfing career. His sex life, his injuries, his children, his completely domineering father; it’s all in this expose. Still we watch and admire Tiger for the way he’s survived. Completely riveting and revealing. Watch it quickly while HBO is still featuring it.

PIECES OF A WOMAN. (SINGLE) This movie is just a bit corny and cute but it’ll grab you in many different ways. A young couple has a baby with the help of a midwife. The baby dies and the plot thickens around the midwife and mom’s mother. The mother is well played by Ellen Burstyn. You could guess the ending but I’m not going to help you. If you need to shed a tear or two during these sad times go for it. I liked it a lot.

SURVIVING DEATH. (SERIES)There are 6 episodes, near-death experience, mediums (2 parts) signs from the dead, seeing dead people and reincarnation. The first one on near death experience reports on hundreds of folks who have died and experienced some startling sites. The two parts on mediums seems too hokey. If you’ve ever wondered about seeing ghosts watch the last two parts. It’s well done and even informative…no matter what/how you believe. 

LUPIN. (SERIES). A neatly twisted robbery plot of Marie Antoinette’s necklace from the Louvre. There’s revenge, politics (French politics) and many, many Louvre scenes. The plot is complex enough to keep you glued to your viewing device for all seven episodes. What is outstanding is that the acting is excellent and believable.

THE KING OF STATEN ISLAND.(SINGLE) Staten Island like New Jersey has a nutty and not too good a reputation around the New York City area. Marisa Tomei does a great job as mother to a bunch of teen agers trying to grow up on the island. Steve Buscemi has a bit part too. The boys hopes, dreams, smoking weed, and trying to face their predictable future make this a near tear jerker, I recommend it.

NOTES FOR MY SON (SINGLE). An 80 on R.T. this is a nearly true to life sad saga of a well known Argentine woman is dying of ovarian cancer. She’s got a 4 year old son and an engrossing husband who combine to make this a vastly superior movie. It deals with assisted suicide, euthanasia, sedated death in a completely realistic way. Be prepared to be overwhelmed by the emotions, and it’s a fine movie.

THE MIRE (SERIES). A Polish murder mystery taking place in the early 80’s . An important community leader and a prostitute are found dead and some competing journalists/ writer’s  search for the guilty guy or woman will keep you centered. Well done, nicely acted, and another season is coming soon.

HISTORY OF SWEAR WORDS. (SERIES) Nicolas Cage hosts this six episode child like-idiotic documentary on our now way over used swear words. The six are fuck, shit, bitch, dick, pussy and damn. These words are so common and so often used on the internet and TV and the movies you’ll wonder why they bothered. The origin of “fuck” is interesting but not a shit to watch. And you’ll learn that Samuel L. Jackson is not the actor who has sworn the most on camera!!!

...
January 25, 2021

THERE GOES THE NEIGHBORHOOD

Developers’ renditions of projects are designed to minimize the visual impact. You can be sure that the development pictured above will be even more jarring and out of scale with the existing eastside neighborhood of one-story homes if the project is approved and built. And that is the likely outcome given the pro-development complexion of the current council majority and a planning department seemingly hell bent on bulldozing the character of Santa Cruz. That is, unless the community is vociferous in demanding council stick to its stated policy to protect existing neighborhoods and small businesses.    

The location for this proposed development is the corner of Water and Branciforte, kitty-corner to the Branciforte Small Schools building, which is a historic site. The school grounds were the center of Villa de Branciforte, founded in 1797 by Governor Diego de Borica of California on orders from Spain through Viceroy Branciforte in Mexico. The settlement existed as a separate township until 1905, when it was annexed to the city of Santa Cruz. 

While the address is listed as 831 Water St. the project will bulldoze 5 parcels of existing small businesses including DJ Mini-Mart and a Laundromat, which currently sit modestly on top of a marine terrace where the road descends steeply towards downtown. You’ll notice from the rendition that the plan for underground parking enters and exits on Water St.  That will make for dramatic collision opportunities.

How would you like this in your back yard? Well, you may be next.

The project is designed for a height of 59 feet (plus “accoutrements”) and for 151 units plus 9,000 square feet of retail with a 2,229 square foot bar on the roof.  No doubt we will be subjected to the usual yada yada of the need for all types of housing (not true) by YIMBY and Monterey Bay Economic Partnership cheerleaders plus a few building trades union members thrown in for good effect. Curious that the YIMBY’s (Yes In My Back Yard) never actually face a proposed mammoth development in their back yards but are sure happy to have it built in yours.

You can be fully supportive of the need for low cost housing and still oppose developments such as this one and others of similar scale such as last week’s approved Riverfront Development of mostly luxury condos. There seems no regard from council majority or planning department for established neighborhoods that include many low-income long-term residents. There is a growing body of research showing that this type of new mixed-use development mushrooming in Santa Cruz leads to the displacement of low-income residents who are forced to move, usually far away, as property values rise with the new buildings, and owners of small properties are seduced into selling their older single family homes or small scale businesses, to be razed and replaced with these large scale developments. 

A closer look at the size of the units should raise some eyebrows, or at least some questions about who will be the likely buyers or tenants. Building A will have 34 studios, 38 one-bedroom units and 2 two-bedroom units. Building B will have 68 studios, 8 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom unit. 

The low-income workers I know, who are cooks, janitors, maids or house cleaners are mostly families with young children. None of these units, even the ones that are so-called affordable is geared towards their needs. Just 3 two-bedroom units out of the 151 total! It is clear what demographic this and all the other developments are marketed for: single high tech and other professional newcomers and second homers. If you doubt that, check out the marketing brochures for all the big new developments already built in Santa Cruz. Not only is this trend forcing out long-term low-income residents, it is also shortsighted. Once the single, affluent professionals decide to “settle down” and raise a family, they then look around to buy a single family home to buy, bulldoze and have built a high end modern, big footprint home, further gentrifying the town at both ends.  Their lifestyles leave a far bigger carbon footprint than the cook forced to move to Salinas.

If this is published before Wednesday evening, you can join the zoom meeting where the developer lays out his plans for this development. There will be a second zoom meeting at a later date, not yet determined. Neighbors directly affected will be there. Your support is important. Turning this development tanker around will take a town.  

Voice your Concerns!
Community Zoom Meeting 1/27/2021, 6 pm
https://zoom.us/j/92953946577 
Meeting ID: 929 5394 6577 
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

January 25

JOURNALISM PART II.

Newer Journalism
I had begun writing this column with the idea of highlighting some incredible writing about America, now. I am fast running up against the BrattonOnLine.com Monday deadline. In the age of internet, livestreaming and the 24-hour news cycle the journalists job has changed considerably. Often when I pick up my hardcopy New York Times and San Jose Mercury News in the driveway I often feel like I am reading yesterday’s news, or even two days ago, especially sports news because more often than not I am. The business model has changed for these companies and I would predict my generation will be the last one to receive paper copies of “the paper of record” or of the “Merc.” How I enjoy that tactile sensation of turning the paper, retreating back to the front page, and ripping a story out and placing it on the fridge for all to see. That era is near over with the next one still being churned out. 

Resisting a discussion of Tom Wolfe’s 1973 anthology, The New Journalism in which the dispassionate presentation of facts utilizes the literary devices of fiction writing, which Gay Talese, and Joan Didion are among the stars. Journalists today really have to be able to stand in front of a mike, know how to operate a video camera, understand best times of the day to post on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, and be able to book spots on radio and podcast shows to highlight their stories. It’s a breath-taking skill set and may produce a new millennial’s super-journalist,’ and those who resist mastering new skills may be contributing to their own, and the field’s, future demise. That’s why I was surprised when a couple of local writers not long ago refused to come on a radio program I was hosting on KSQD 90.7FM to discuss their recent writing, but no worries, there were several others who were eager. Journalists and journalism outlets need all the free press they can get. This profession should not be constantly in survival mode, but recreating itself and responding to the various ways people receive information.

From Caen, Ivins, and Cockburn, to Bellafante, Klein, and Crowley
This week, I highlight three stories that came across my radar screen recently by Ginia Bellafante, one of my all-time favorite NY Times writers, UCSC graduate Ezra Klein, and S.J. Mercury News sports columnist Kerry Crowley. They are all exemplary political narratives that bring our attention to an ongoing historical narrative on how the wealthy keep getting over on the rest of us. These pieces might just also represent Wolfe’s new journalism of the 70’s, but fast-forwarded to a 2021 deadline I doubt even he could see from his Electric Kool Aid Acid Test days.

Journalism Today
Ezra Klein writes clearly, and rather brilliantly (note to self: show, don’t tell), in a New York Times opinion piece critiquing how Trump supporters treat him, “seriously, but not literally.” Klein writes: “But Trump did not want every legal vote counted. He wanted legally counted votes to be erased; he wanted new votes discovered in his favor. He wanted to win, not lose; whatever the cost, whatever the means. But in his pre-storming of the Capitol speech, Trump supporters seemed to take him literally. Klein states, “But at the same time, Trump was telling his supporters that the election had actually been stolen, and that it was up to them to resist. And they took him literally. They did not experience this as performative grievance; they experienced it as a profound assault. They stormed the Capitol, attacked police officers, shattered doors and barriers, looted congressional offices. One woman was shot in the mayhem and died.” Klein describes why Trump’s base was willing to follow him and that Trump has always been the sore loser. Remember, Ted Cruz stole the Iowa caucus vote; the Dems rigged the 2016 vote because Hillary received more votes even though he ended up as President, and so of course 2020 had to produce fake election results because that’s Trump’s life narrative. Klein’s conclusion offers an aha! moment: “The problem isn’t those who took Trump at his word from the start. It’s the many, many elected Republicans who took him neither seriously nor literally, but cynically. They have brought this upon themselves — and us.”

Kerry Crowley’s recent piece on billionaire and fanatical rightwing donor, Charles B. Johnson, is yet another display of hard news making it into the sports section. It might be okay if some yahoo billionaire is contributing his largesse to right wing causes like Rep. Lauren Boebert who “packs” while walking the halls of congress and who may have tweeted out Nancy Pelosi’s location during the insurrection, and losing Georgia Senator Kelly Loeffler, along with the max $2800 for a dozen other right of the conservative right candidates. This might not even be a story except for the fact that billionaire Johnson is majority owner of the San Francisco Giants. Yes, those SF Giants. Crowley writes, “Candidates around the country received a financial boost from Johnson around the same time the Giants announced they were laying off 10% of their full-time employees ‘due to unprecedented impact and continued uncertainty of the pandemic on our operations.'” Crowley’s reporting goes on to cite, “Reports in recent months have shown no owner in American professional sports (not Trump’s pals like Robert Kraft who owns the New England Patriots or Woody Johnson who owns the New York Jets) has donated more to campaigns than Charles B. Johnson. He gave out more than $4.2 million during this cycle and has donated upward to $10 million since 2015.” Well Giants fans, isn’t it time you ask Johnson to kindly leave? Will the baseball commissioner ban him for the Republican haters that he funds? Or, will everything be back to normal once everyone gets the vaccine and buys a seat in the outfield at Giants stadium this spring? I say, Goodbye Chuck, so long, farewell… (Kerry Crowley)

Ginia Bellafonte writes a golf story in this past Sunday New York Times, “New York and Trump, Unlinking at Last.” On the face of it, a mobster (not Trump yet) is forced to give up running a public golf course in the Bronx and the Trump organization later steps in. If it did not have so many of the trappings of the insular, locals (whites) only history of our Delaveaga golf course it would not have hit home as powerfully. While the city of New York spent $127 million constructing the course over a former landfill, it would take some 226 years for the city to recoup its investment. “The deal is structured to give the city 7 percent of gross receipts annually” on green fees that are $185 for each round of golf. Now, here is where Bellafante’s writing about New York inequities meets Santa Cruz. “If Trumpism in much of America is marked by righteous rage and nationalist grievance, among New York’s liberal ruling class it lives in gilt and self-deception, in the placement of a luxury commodity where there ought to be a utilitarian asset, in the capitulation to real-estate interests often with the distorted view that the benefits of serving the dominant will redound to the powerless — they just didn’t know it yet.”  Say it again Santa Cruz, “In the capitulation to real-estate interests often with the distorted view…” (Read the whole story here )

“This country has socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for the poor.” 

–Martin Luther King, Jr. 


Is this the society we want to live in? A man in a motorized wheelchair precariously perched at the end of traffic island hoping for a few dollars from cars passing by? Welcome to Santa Cruz.

(Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and was on the Santa Cruz City Councilmember from 1998-2002. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 14 years. He was elected to the city council again in November of 2016, after his kids went off to college. His term ended in April of 2020.

Email Chris at ckrohn@cruzio.com

...
January 25

IS IT A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE A FULL BAR ACROSS THE STREET  FROM FOUR SCHOOLS?
Does it make sense to have a 2000SF full bar across the street from a school campus that includes four schools, three of which include high school students?  That is exactly what the five-story 831 Water Street project proposes to do, across from the Branciforte Small Schools Campus.  The State’s Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Licensing regulations do not allow liquor sales to be licensed if they occur within 600′ of a school, or within 500′ of a residence.  How can the City Planning Dept. ever make a finding that this mammoth project is compatible with the neighborhood character? 

Here is the information about the Project and this Wednesday’s Zoom meeting! 

I hope you will participate in the virtual public meeting this Wednesday, January 27, at 6pm and weigh in with your thoughts.  Please see the attached flyer at the end of this contribution for neighborhood information. 

IS AFFORDABLE HOUSING POSSIBLE?
Why did the Santa Cruz City Council approve three buildings, each seven stories tall, with only 11% of the units dedicated to affordable housing, rather than the City’s own requirement that it be 15%?? I hope you read Gillian Greensite’s excellent recap of this in  last week’s www.BrattonOnline.com   Online, wherein she reported Councilmember Golder’s conclusory statement that requiring the developer to comply with the City’s affordable unit requirement “wouldn’t pencil out” for the developer.  

Isn’t this just sickening???

Join others interested in seeing something different for a “Re-Imagine Santa Cruz”  Conference on February 4 (4pm-6pm) and February 5 (4pm-6pm) Conference | ReImagine Santa Cruz and a subsequent Brown Bag series of discussions, Housing & Transportation

LEGALIZING TINY HOMES
This Tuesday, the County Board of Supervisors will consider proposed changes to County Code to allow tiny homes to be permitted and legal.  See Item #12:

2021/01/26 09:00 AM Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting – Web Outline – Santa Cruz County, CA

This was authored by Supervisor Manu Koenig, and is supported by Supervisor Bruce McPherson.  Read more about it in Supervisor Koenig’s inaugural newsletter:

COVID Vaccine Update, Live Oak Parking Program and More!

I think it is promising that Supervisor Koenig is scheduling virtual constituent meetings on the Monday evening before Board meetings to gather their input for decision-making and transparency.  Maybe the other Supervisors will follow his good example. 

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE UC SANTA CRUZ PLAN FOR EXPANSION TO PROVIDE ON-CAMPUS HOUSING?
You have the opportunity to weigh in on what UCSC is proposing to do to accommodate increased student enrollment, mandated by the State in order to provide educational opportunities for all.  

lrdp.ucsc.edu

Here is a link to a good report that includes an interview with University planning staff, discussing the intent of the Plan: UCSC releases draft for new 20-year development plan

Wondering how to submit meaningful comment on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Plan?  Below is a very helpful guide recently sent out by the City County Task Force to Address UCSC Growth Plans

Santa Cruz Task Force on UCSC Growth Plans info@actonucscgrowth.org

Thu, Jan 14 at 1:30 PM

TIPS TO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE EIR MORE EFFECTIVE

Get Prepared

  • Read the EIR (volume 1 volume 2) – or just read strategically those subsections related to your interests/concerns;
  • If you can,  search online for articles, studies, reports, and even contact organizations that support or have expertise in subjects relating to your initial concerns;
  • Look at the Executive Summary’s impact table for environmental categories discussed;
  • Outline/organize your letter (introduction, comments, conclusion, address, title of project, and attachments);
  • Visit affected locations or use Google Maps to view the proposed project sites. Even if you know the area, refresh your memory;
  • Decide on the main comment(s) or theme to express in your letter;
  • Questions to consider while reading:
    • Does the EIR ask the right questions?
    • Does it provide enough information to describe the likely impacts of a project?
    • Is the EIR identifying and analyzing the feasible alternatives?

Write Your Comments

  • Objectively evaluate the project, present your comments in a neutral tone, and be VERY specific. Generalities can be dismissed with generalities.
  • Separate your concerns into clearly identifiable paragraphs or headings and keep a tight focus on each separate issue. Don’t mix topics.
  • Avoid saying “I support the UCSC growth, but…” – just list your concerns, or your letter may be classified as a letter of support.
  • Consider ways to avoid impacts or enforceable ways to reduce the severity of impacts.
  • Quantify your objections whenever possible
    • If a potential significant impact has not been adequately identified; or
    • If no mitigation has been proposed for a potentially significant impact; or
    • If the mitigation proposed doesn’t appear to be sufficient or appropriate, then:
      • Identify the specific impact in question;
      • Explain why you believe the impact would occur;
      • Explain why you believe the effect would be significant; and, if applicable;
      • Explain what additional feasible mitigation measure(s) or changes in proposed mitigations or to the project you would recommend.
      • Explain why you would recommend any changes and support your recommendations with evidence. 
  • Whenever possible, present facts or expert opinions. If not, provide personal experience or your personal observations. Don’t just complain.
  • Focus on correcting their discrepancies, lapses in logic, lack of evidence, old data, etc
  • Include suggestions for making the Draft EIR better or offer specific alternatives and describe how your comments meet the requirements of the project and CEQAYour goal should be to write something that causes them to respond in a future document based on the evidence you have given.
  • Point out any inconsistencies in the document or the data. Point out outdated information or errors in logic. Focus on the sufficiency of the EIR in identifying and analyzing the possible impacts of the project on the environment and feasible alternatives. 
  • State your comment(s) with specifics and include attachments. Ask substantive questions. 

Send Them In!

Deadline: 5:00 pm on Monday, March 8th, 2021
Email your comments to eircomment@ucsc.edu

  • Send your comments in as early as possible, so UCSC has time to consider your concerns.
  • Address your comments to: 

Erika Carpenter
Senior Environmental Planner
Physical Planning, Development, and Operations
University of California, Santa Cruz
1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

  • Mention your expertise/experience briefly and include a return address
  • If you are submitting on behalf of an organization, include the name of a contact person who would be available for questions or consultation along with your comments.
  • Write a comment that includes a valid name and address. Submit it before the deadline. Keep a copy of your comments.
  • If you would like, send a copy to the City-County Task Force via email at info@actonucscgrowth.org.

Content: Disclaimer: This information is intended to serve as a guide and is not intended to be legal advice. Please seek professional help from a lawyer if you have legal questions or concerns.
Sources: 1) Quick Tips for Effective EIR Comments
2) How to Effectively Participate in the Environmental Review Process By Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Santa Monica, CA Website

Attend The Public Meetings:
February 3rd @ 5:00pm (zoom link TBD)
February 4th @ 5:00pm (zoom link TBD

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM NEGOTIATIONS OF UC DAVIS WITH THE CITY AND COUNTY?
Wouldn’t it be better to get representatives from UC Santa Cruz together at a table with representatives of the City and County and come to a legally-binding agreement to address problems about housing and infrastructure, rather than another threat of lawsuit?  That is exactly what the leaders of Yolo County and the City of Davis did in 2018.  We should follow their example and try to negotiate a similar legally-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). 

Read about the 2018 negotiations here.

The University agreed to increase housing to accommodate 100% of the new enrollment and catch up on unhoused existing student numbers by 2021, and also agreed to provide $2.3 million for infrastructure improvements.  The three entities agreed to form a joint task force to work out exactly how to plan and implement those improvements.  

When I recently wrote Santa Cruz County Supervisors about this, in relation to the County’s continued legislative priority to fight UCSC’s expansion, Supervisor Ryan Coonerty angrily responded that the City voters passed Measure U by 77%, and essentially that he felt the battle must rage on with legal sabers drawn because the UC Davis agreement was not legally-binding.  In my opinion, that attitude only serves to make the attorneys fat and happy. 

I responded to Supervisor Coonerty, asking him if he had contacted any Yolo County representatives to ask how the deal is progressing.  He never replied.  However, had he taken the time to actually read the article I sent all Supervisors about this (the same referenced above), he would have learned in the first paragraph that the MOU negotiated was legally binding. 

Out of curiosity, I phoned the Yolo County Board of Supervisor whose district includes UC Davis, and asked…”How is it going?”  The discussion switched to e-mail, with the response below from Yolo County Counsel Eric May: 

“I’m unaware of UC Davis being in violation of any terms of the MOU, and COVID likely gave us a bit of a breather on their growth and the demand for housing in the community.  

My sense is that the relationship among the University, City, and County has improved in the last few years.  I’m not sure how much the MOU contributed to that improvement, but it probably doesn’t hurt to have certain policy issues ironed out in an agreed-upon document.  The three entities also have been brought together by the COVID emergency to work together more, which hopefully will allow for more dialogue on housing issues when they (inevitably) come back to the fore.”

So, I hope you will contact your Santa Cruz County Supervisor and Santa Cruz City Council to ask that they consider following the excellent example demonstrated by UC Davis, Yolo County and the City of Davis.  Negotiations can work for the benefit of all involved, if given the chance…let’s try it here. 

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER. ATTEND A ZOOM MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.  SAY HELLO TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE. 

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE AND JUST DO SOMETHING THIS WEEK.

Cheers, Becky Steinbruner 831-685-2915

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

January 21
#21 / Turnabout Is Fair Play – Could That Be Right?

I feel certain that this saying, “turnabout is fair play,” must be familiar to most of those who are reading this blog posting. The Grammarist dates the saying to the 1700’s: 

The phrase … originated in reference to gaming, meaning [that] taking turns assures a fair game. At that time, turnabout was rendered as two words as in turn about. Today, the term has taken on the connotation of revenge or retaliation, in the sense of two parties taking equal advantage of each other. Occasionally, turnabout is fair play is used in a friendly, teasing manner as an admonishment to keep things fair and equal.

Setting aside the occasional use of this phrase in a “friendly, teasing manner,” I’d like to focus on its use as a justification for revengeful and retaliatory actions against those who have wronged us. Let’s consider the possibility of that, as we think about the behavior of our former president, Donald J. Trump, and how we will respond to his behavior, now that he is gone. Is turnabout fair play?

Shortly after his election, in 2016, The New Republic noted that Trump specialized in humiliation:

Few people know how to humiliate like Donald Trump—he told his Twitter followers to check out a sex tape; he instructed Chris Christie to stop eating Oreos and forced him to assume the role of doting butler—but even fewer take humiliation as personally as Trump does. For eleven months, the Hillary Clinton campaign—as well as almost the entire Republican establishment—waged a war against Trump by attacking and undermining his claims that he was rich and smart and had a working penis. But you have to have shame to be humiliated, and Trump lacks it completely. The only thing these attacks achieved was the inevitable retaliation.

As The New Republic observed, Trump is a master of humiliation, and during the last four years, humiliation is exactly what Trump has so often dished out to others – and in great abundance. If that “turnabout is fair play” rule applies to politics – and why wouldn’t it? – shouldn’t we feel more than comfortable in trying to humiliate our former president right back? 

By extension, shouldn’t we also feel quite comfortable in seeking to humiliate his followers, too, millions of whom have rallied to him, and to his false claim that the 2020 election was some sort of gigantic fraud. Shouldn’t we, in particular, seek out ways to humiliate and pay back those elected officials (take Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley as examples) who pandered to Trump’s untruths, and who helped set in motion the events of January 6th?

The idea of seeking the humiliation of our former president, and of his followers, came to me as I read a recent article in Psyche, titled, “The History of Humiliation Points to the Future of Human Dignity.” The article began as follows: 

Humiliation is more than an individual and subjective feeling. It is an instrument of political power, wielded with intent.

Our former president certainly used humiliation as a political weapon, and in what appears to have been a very effective manner. Surely we all remember Jeff Sessions. After that example, who would want to cross Trump? Not very many people! So, shouldn’t we take a “turnabout is fair play” approach now, and give Trump and his supporters exactly the same kind of treatment the president gave to others while he was in office? 

The Psyche article suggests that we should not, and the article is well worth reading in its entirety. Here’s a short excerpt:

Mass opposition to the politics of humiliation began from the early 19th century in Europe, as lower-class people increasingly objected to disrespectful treatment. Servants, journeymen and factory workers alike used the language of honour and concepts of personal and social self-worth – previously monopolized by the nobility and upper-middle classes – to demand that they not be verbally and physically insulted by employers and overseers.

This social change was enabled and supported by a new type of honour that followed the invention of ‘citizens’ (rather than subjects) in democratising societies. Citizens who carried political rights and duties were also seen as possessing civic honour. Traditionally, social honour had been stratified according to status and rank, but now civic honour pertained to each and every citizen, and this helped to raise their self-esteem and self-consciousness. Consequently, humiliation, and other demonstrations of the alleged inferiority of others, was no longer considered a legitimate means by which to exert power over one’s fellow citizens (emphasis added).

I read this article yesterday, on a day that our new president called for “unity.” Maybe that word, “unity,” is not quite the right word – or, at least, it is not the most important word – because the divisions of thought, opinion, and circumstance in the public are profound, and real, and an appeal to something that is not widely felt or acknowledged will be unavailing. 

What will heal us, ultimately, will not be an appeal to a “unity” that many don’t believe exists. What will heal us, instead, will be our recognition of the dignity of every person, whoever they are, wherever they come from, whatever they believe. Using that approach to restoring a functioning democracy will require us to do the opposite of trying to humiliate those with whom we disagree – and who are, in fact, “wrong.”

This is not, really, saying anything different from what I wrote about yesterday, in my posting on “Talking With Strangers,” or that I wrote about on Monday, in “Trust Me On That.” 

Talk and trust. That’s what we need. We need to talk with those whom we believe have made a mistake – and who have made a mistake. We must trust that from such conversations can come conversion and real change. However tempting – however justified – we must try to avoid lording it over all those who have been mistaken, and wrong – Trump supporters, for instance, who don’t think that “white privilege” even exists, and who are resentful and aggrieved for reasons we don’t judge to be worthy. With all such persons, with everyone, we must talk as equals, and with no thought to humiliate. The opposite of humiliation is what is called for, conversations that provide no intimation that those with whom we disagree are “deplorable,” or unworthy. 

I am hoping that our new president, who has chosen the word “unity” to describe what I am talking about, will be a model for this kind of healing approach, an approach that aims to repair all those things that have so disproportionately divided us. The responsibility for such conversations cannot be delegated entirely to our Chief Executive. That responsibility must ultimately fall on every one of us. 

We are, each one of us, as citizens, responsible for the maintenance of democratic self-government, and that requires us to treat with dignity all whose with whom we share the world, and especially those with whom we differ. That is, of course, the hard part! Despite how hard it is to turn away from the “turnabout is fair play” response to legitimate grievance, it is our responsibility to acknowledge and triumph over our differences by elevating the dignity of every other person, and by setting aside an easy recourse to the humiliation of those with whom we have disagreed, and disagree. 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog

    FEBRUARY

“February – the month of love..?!!
No wonder the shortest one in the calendar.”
~Dinesh Kumar Biran 

“Even though February was the shortest month of the year, sometimes it seemed like the longest.”
~JD Robb 

“In the small hours of a cold February dawn, we walked to the Pacific, high cliffs eroding over the ocean, crashed and crashed by lapping salty waves. Their spray misted us in day’s young purple air, exhilarating. Walking the Golden Gate Bridge, our world receding, pale gold sunrise lit thin fog, morning coloring us like a faded fairy tale.” 
~Aspen Matis

Crime Pays But Botany Doesn’t is an awesome Facebook page. Here’s a sampling!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!

Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com

...

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment