May 13 – 26, 2026
Greensite… will be back … Steinbruner… Non-flammable BESS… Cabrillo Dorms… Hayes… Book Review… Patton…We Want To Get Along Well… Matlock… a wink and a nod…dubl-snub…chess master… / …commercial opportunity…capitalist politburo…oligarchical coven… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Line Rider… Quotes on… “Travel”
|
|
If you want to pitch in to |
PORTLAND, OR. I find myself in Portland for a weekend. It is lovely here, and I’m excited to see my friend from way back in my teens back home, who lives here. The first day here was a lot of back and forth over the river – there was a hotel mix-up, and then there was a phone malfunction which resulted in a visit to a repair place, which necessitated a bunch more travel. We used a combination of lightrail and Uber, and I must say I really like the lightrail here! You tap to pay, with your phone or a card, and then you just get on the train. A ticket is valid for several hours. The trains I saw were clean, and it was clear where you were, what the next stop was, etc.
We’ll see what is going on for the rest of the weekend! This is a very spontaneous and improvised trip. Our only real plan is for the Stars on Ice show on Sunday. I’ll let you know how it was!
Happy Memorial Day!
~Webmistress
GOOD OMENS 3. PrimeTV. Movie. (8 IMDb)
In 1990, fantasy legend Terry Pratchett and young comic fantasy mavin Neil Gaiman collaborated on a novel built around the question, “What if the Antichrist got switched at birth?” and Good Omens was born.
In 2024, the third season of Amazon’s adaptation of the late Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s Good Omens was put on hold after multiple allegations of sexual assault against Gaiman surfaced in the news.
The Amazon version of Good Omens thrived on the brilliant chemistry between David Tennant and Michael Sheen as Crowley, a demon, and Aziraphale, an angel, who have spent millennia on Earth in what increasingly resembles a Cold War marriage. Faced with the impending Apocalypse, both come to the conclusion that maybe it might be altogether better … NOT doing that.
Featuring a host of charming side stories that all somehow linked together, plus a simmering relationship between the two leads, the first season felt like a delightful Douglas Adams pastiche. Since season one adapted the novel itself, the second season came as a complete surprise. Crafted entirely by Gaiman, it leaned harder into the Crowley/Aziraphale relationship, along with a gloriously naked and amnesiac Jon Hamm as the angel Gabriel. A great deal happens, and it all ends on a heartbreaking cliffhanger.
Then came season 3 … NOT!
As allegations against Gaiman mounted, stretching from the mid-80s into relatively recent years, comics, films, and television projects tied to him began getting canceled or shelved, including Good Omens 3. Fortunately, Gaiman stepped away from the production, allowing fans to get a third season … sort of. Cut down to a single feature-length finale, it still manages to wrap up a surprising number of story threads, and may even produce a few sniffles.
Gaiman’s problematic history aside, worth a watch.
~Sarge

PANTHEON. Netflix. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
What if the threat isn’t AI? What if it’s UI: uploaded intelligence. Human brains destructively scanned, living only in the cloud. “Pantheon” explores this idea as exquisite, real science fiction. Not cheesy animated sci-fi melodrama, but a genuine exploration of love, grief, immortality, endless simulations, conspiracies, global politics, and so much more.
The animation is restrained, there to serve the story rather than distract from it. The characters are rich, not cardboard cutouts, whether good or bad. No supervillains. No Mary Sues.
It’s a dense story, so if science fiction concepts tend to lose you, this may not be for you. But if they don’t, this absolutely deserves a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS – TALES FROM ’85. Netflix. Series. (5 IMDb)
Stranger Things exits stage left…then pops back out for one more bow.
Set between seasons 2 and 3, this animated take brings back the core crew without sanding things down for kids. It’s not anime or cheap knockoff – dipping their pens in the Spiderverse/Arcane inkwell, with a creative, stylized look. It’s also more focused than the later live-action seasons, trimming most of the adults and zeroing in on the kids. Best of all, Will Byers actually gets to be a character instead of a punching bag, helped by the addition of Niki, an Amazonian punk rocker who connects with him over their shared outsider status. The recast voices are a little jarring at first, but you should settle in. Rough reviews aside, it’s worth a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb)
Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.
They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb)
This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ![]()
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?
Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge
SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge
A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb)
Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.
Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.
It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
May 20, 2026
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
Last Tuesday, in the face of an anticipated local construction boom, representatives of the Monterey Bay Labor Council presented a compelling argument to the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors to adopt a new Responsible Construction and Wage Theft Ordinance. The County has already taken action to require a Project Labor Agreement on 10 of the County’s capital improvement projects that will support hiring local workers at prevailing wage, but the problem of wage theft, said the representatives, is rampant in the County, estimating over $2.8 million with only two of the trades’ data.
The State’s Deputy Labor Commission verifies claims of wage theft. However, a May, 2024 State Audit of this Commission found that there is a failure to enforce laws that prohibit wage theft. Claims investigations used to take 135 days now take an average of 900 days, and only 12% of the workers filing claims get paid money owed them by construction companies seeking to cut corners.
The proposed new Ordinance would require any large construction project in the County to verify they have no judgments over $10,000 before or after a project. It would be a one-page verification form and would require no investigation by staff. It would not apply to remodels, small business construction or ADU projects.
The matter was brought to the Board by Supervisor Justin Cummings. Discussion was interesting. CEO Nicole Coburn wanted more data. Supervisor DeSerpa worried it would have a chilling effect on contractors bidding on projects in the County? Supervisor Hernandez wanted examples of construction wage theft happening in Santa Cruz County.
The Labor Council representative Mr. Casey Van Den Heuvel, assured that this verification requirement would only apply to large construction projects and seeks to screen out the “bad actors”. Currently, many “good actors” do not bid on projects in the County because they know the “bad actors” will be awarded low bids. Of over 300,000 licensed contractors, about 1,000 would not pass the verification muster. He emphasized, “This is not about union vs. non-union contractors. It’s about good contractors.” He cited local examples such as the City’s recent award to a “bad actor” for the new Downtown Library Project.
Superiviosr Koenig remarked it is unusual to have non-staff presenting a proposed Ordinance, and motioned to have County staff conduct independent research on the issue, returning to the Board in October. That did not pass. Ultimately, the Board agreed to have staff work with the Labor Council representatives and return on September 26 for consideration and possible first reading.
You can listen to the discussion of this matter here, clicking on Agenda Item #10: May 05, 2026 Board of Supervisors – Regular Meeting (trimmed) – Santa Cruz County, CA
I WILL BE INTERVIEWING MR. CASEY VAN DEN HEUVEL THIS FRIDAY, MAY 15, ON KSCO RADIO (AM 1080) AT 2PM ON “COMMUNITY MATTERS” .
CABRILLO COLLEGE NEW FIVE-STORY DORMS PROGRESSING
The discussion of wage theft at the Board of Supervisor meeting reminded me of seeing construction workers picketing last year at the entrance to UCSC, where Devcon Construction was building new student dorms.

Cabrillo College / UCSC new dormitories, also awarded to Devcon Construction, are going up quickly, “on time and on budget”, according to an interview with the new College President Dr. Jen Capps earlier this year (February 27 interview): Community Matters – Santa Cruz Voice
However, one has to wonder how the workers are doing???
View from Highway One.
MONTEREY COUNTY GRAND JURY FINDS 42% OF THE COUNTY HAS INADEQUATE EMERGENCY RADIO RESPONSE COVERAGE
A Report from Monterey County LAFCO caused the Monterey County Civil Grand Jury to investigate radio communications in the County.
Emergency radio coverage gaps impacting Monterey County fire agencies
Santa Cruz County is also considering radio communication system changes, but it is controversial. Many smaller fire districts already struggling financially will not be able to afford the new system. CalFire is not participating in the new system, so some wonder how communications in disasters requiring multiple agencies would work. Santa Cruz County, Cities Signal Support for Encrypted Radio System
The Executive Committee overseeing this expensive and questionable matter that will cost participating agencies $110/month per radio met this week, but is not scheduled to meet for another year. There are no radio experts on the Committee that will determine whether the claim of contractor EF Johnson to provide 95% radio coverage will actually be met.
Stay tuned.
FELTON FIRE DISTRICT BOARD VOTES TO PROCEED WITH BALLOT MEASURE
Last Monday, the Felton Fire District Board voted to proceed with the Prop. 218 mailed ballot special benefit assessment that will give all property owners in the District a chance to approve new funding that will enable full time paid staff to respond. Felton Fire is an all-volunteer response District, and has not raised fire assessments in decades. The District now responds to over 900 calls annually with volunteers, but relying heavily on neighboring fire agencies to help out.
The ballots will go out soon, with final tabulation July 24.
You can find the Engineer’s Report in the Public Documents here
I will be interviewing members of the grassroots group FC4ER (Felton Community 4 Emergency Response) on “Community Matters” on KSCO Radio at 2pm on Friday, May 22.
[fc4er.org]
NON-FLAMMABLE BATTERY STORAGE PROJECTS ARE POSSIBLE
Now that New Leaf Energy has decided to go to the California Energy Commission (CEC) for permitting, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors have the opportunity to further amend the County’s Draft BESS Ordinance to be more protective of residents and the environment. Will they follow the good example of the City of Vacaville to adopt a BESS Ordinance that prohibits flammable lithium BESS projects?
Currently, Supervisors say there is no money to conduct environmental reivew of the Draft Ordinance, which includes a Zoning Overlay. However, if that piece of the Ordinance were removed, the Ordinance itself would not require environmental review.
Consider what Mr. Albert Enault, Senior Planner for the City of Vacaville states:
The draft ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 15061 (b)(3) since there is no possibility that the addition of regulations for BESS Facilities will have a significant effect on the environment. Proposed future BESS facilities will be reviewed in compliance with the provisions of CEQA at the time of application to determine appropriate environmental review.
Albert Enault
Senior Planner
(707) 449-5364
Please contact your Supervisor to urge amendment of the County’s Draft BESS Ordinance to prohibit lithium battery technology in grid-scale BESS projects, and to remove the zoning overlay component. Now that the CEC is in charge of New Leaf’ Energy’s Seahawk BESS Project, it is critical that our County have a protective and codified BESS Ordinance.
If the City of Vacaville can do it, why not Santa Cruz County? Non-flammable BESS is possible and being installed around the world. Why not in Santa Cruz County? Invinity “Super Battery” Delivered in UK First
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
I haven’t traditionally written book recommendations in this column, but here we go. Jeff Miller is the author. You might have heard of him through his work with the Center for Biological Diversity, a group I strongly support for its work conserving species around the Monterey Bay and far beyond. Mr. Miller’s 2024 book “Bay Area Wildlife: An Irreverent Guide” is an especially important gateway into delving deeper into nature around the San Francisco Bay area. He mentioned that he is working on a similar book for “Central Coast Wildlife” but don’t wait for that- get this book!
Jeff Miller
Over the years, I had some email exchanges with Jeff and it was a pleasant surprise to run into him at the recent Salmonid Restoration Federation annual conference in Redding. Jeff has been quite active in a campaign against livestock grazing on public lands, most recently with the controversy at Point Reyes National Seashore. On the other hand, I have been active with both research and collaborative natural areas management involving livestock as a restoration tool for California’s endangered coastal prairies. So, the two of us have long been working in the same system, but with seemingly opposing perspectives.
What I didn’t previously appreciate about Jeff was his writing prowess and obvious love of the natural history of wildlife. We share that.
Approachable Handbook
The biggest strength of “Bay Area Wildlife” is that it is extremely entertaining to read, and not just for readers ‘in the know.’ For those of us who are fans of the fungi books – either the tome “Mushrooms Demystified” or the much smaller handbook “All That the Rain Promises and More” by one time Santa Cruz denizen David Aurora – Jeff’s wildlife book will be a particular joy. Here is that same kind of storytelling and humor that removes ‘inside knowledge’ barriers and promises to enthrall readers of any background or age.
Are you the kind of person with libraries composed mainly of biological field guides, or maybe nonfiction books, or even fiction novels? In all cases, this book would fit well with your reading proclivities.
Know Your Place, Redux
One theme of this column is my urging everyone to (puh-lease!) get to know this wonderful part of the Earth. But, how does anyone do this? Certainly, you won’t get any pleasure or much useful knowledge by reading most of the interpretive signs or brochures at any of the natural areas around the Monterey Bay. Check in with a park docent or “interpretive specialist” and you might hear a tired yarn fit for a 6th grader, sometimes told with exaggerated wonder. Or, you could try reading a website and end up with such little information as to be astounded. For instance, take a glance at the website for Henry Cowell State Park and ask yourself if it does justice to such a rich and diverse part of the world.
On the other hand, pick up this book and you might just start seeing the natural world around you with more open eyes. How can you resist diving into the chapter entitled “Newts: Psychedelic Pond Orgies?.” How about the chapter on Peregrine Falcon subtitled “Screaming Death Parrot?” Each entry is chock full of novel information that enriches your understanding not just of the animal but specific times and places that will help you seek out a glimpse of those critters. Use it as a tour book of the Bay Area, let the chapters draw you into a day of exploration through seeking specific wildlife, and you will no doubt find much, much more.
Bay Area Wildlife: An Irreverent Guide is published by Heyday Books and illustrated by Obi Kauffman. You can buy it online directly from the publisher. Such money helps a great nonprofit, to quote their mission:
“Heyday is an independent, nonprofit publisher founded in 1974 in Berkeley, California. We are a diverse community of writers and readers, activists and thinkers. Heyday promotes civic engagement and social justice, celebrates nature’s beauty, supports California Indian cultural renewal, and explores the state’s rich history, culture, and influence. Heyday works to realize the California dream of equity and enfranchisement.”
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Pictured above is Milly Zhu, a 34-year-old who recently met up with Ana Swanson, who was covering our current president’s visit to China for the New York Times. It seems that their meeting was mostly by chance. Zhu works in China in film and TV promotion, and was walking around in a shopping mall in Beijing when she stopped to talk with the New York Times reporter. Here’s what Zhu said:
We don’t want war, we want peace. We want to get along well with the United States, and we want to develop our economy. Only peace can create a better economy.
Another person interviewed by Swanson was Peng Shuiming. When he was asked about our current president’s visit, his comment was this: “My impression of him isn’t very good; he’s quite brutal.” Pictures from our current president’s recent visit to China can be seen below. Also, as I mentioned in my blog posting yesterday, our current president has also recently issued a so-called “Counterterrorism Strategy” that promises to kill those whom the president believes threaten the United States. Click here to read that statement.
Now, take a look at the pictures. How could Peng Shuiming have ever gotten such a bad impression of our country?


|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
ANOTHER ONE BITES THE BUS, FLEECING, BAFFLEMENT
President Donald Trump’s trip to China was anticipated by both leaders in differing ways — Xi Jinping expecting Trump to bend his knees, offering non-binding promises with a wink and a nod on issues like Taiwan, and Trump only playing for headlines that make him look like a great man by association, happy to come home with money in his pocket with any side deals. David Rothkopf of the Daily Beast called the trip “a high-stakes scramble to escape the Iran wreckage and his plunging opinion polls, a global ‘inflection point’ where the adults have left the room, the goalposts have been moved to a different zip code, and the ‘leader of the free world’ seemingly auditioning to be China’s most valuable — if accidental — player.”
Ben Meiselas of MeidasTouch cautioned everyone to pay close attention to Trump’s trip, and most importantly what the media was ignoring. The first thing to understand is that China downplayed the president’s visit, minimizing his entourage’s arrival to be greeted by lesser lights in the Chinese government. China’s state-controlled outlets like China Daily, Xinhua News and others barely treated the visit as a major event — the strategy being about China’s dominance and leverage. “And Trump is playing it all wrong,” says Meiselas, by bringing a massive delegation of American CEOs, thinking it’s a power move to project strength, when it actually projects his insecurity, his inadequacy to stand across from Xi all by himself. “Trump knows Xi Jinping is prepared, disciplined, strategic, and operating from a position of long-term leverage. Trump knows he’s outmatched in these settings, so he surrounds himself with CEOs and business leaders because he thinks they can compensate for what he lacks,” contends Meiselas.
Globally, the image being projected is devastating for the US, the image of America going begging to China for rare earth minerals, for supply chain access, for a deal — for economic relief at perhaps the weakest moment imaginable for the country on the world stage. Trump’s destabilization of the Strait of Hormuz, his Iran strategy in the toilet, domestic inflation surging and consumer confidence collapsing, with poll approval numbers dropping by the minute, will all provide a moment of truth for the president and his administration. It should be noted that Iran’s foreign minister met with China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, before Trump’s arrival, and now Iran is proposing “reconstructing the security architecture” of the Middle East in what would amount to Iran and China replacing the American security umbrella in the region in a China-centered power structure, with Iran becoming the dominant regional force — a massive geopolitical shift. If NATO credibility weakens and American deterrence disappears in the Middle East, then countries in Asia start recalculating, Japan and South Korea in particular.
China sees American weakness accelerating the inevitability of its unification with Taiwan and expansion of Chinese influence globally — all without firing a shot. So, the US president’s visit was intentionally minimized, a psychological as much as a geopolitical ploy, no elevating him and his entourage, just a routine get-together with chess-master Xi Jinping. Ho-hum! Short-term markets’ initial reactions were slightly positive based on Trump’s tag-along CEO band, but in the long run, if the US continues projecting instability, weakness, and transactional chaos instead of coherent leadership, the trajectory is fraught with danger. The president has been called out for his exclusion of any China experts, or any of the diplomatic corps — many of which have been systematically purged during his tenure. It was seen as total unpreparedness for his inclusion of son Eric, daughter-in-law Lara, Elon Musk, ‘Melania‘ documentary Director Brett Ratner, Marco Rubio (twice-sanctioned by China), and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who assisted in placing tariffs on China. And where in the world is Melania?
Melania’s spokesperson offered, “First Lady Melania Trump is not traveling this time,” shutting down any further questions for details, marking the first conspicuous snub for the president’s China junket. The Daily Beast says, “Her absence is all the more glaring because it follows a trend that has stood out in Trump’s second term — she’s been appearing alongside him less and less on state visits.” The second snub by Xi Jinping was summed up by Trump’s niece, Mary L. Trump, with, “Xi couldn’t be bothered to meet Donald a the airport because he understands as well as Donald does that humiliating your underlings is a great way to keep them in check.”
Satirist Andy Borowitz contributed his take on the China trip with dateline SHANGHAI: “Donald J. Trump accomplished what he called ‘the main goal’ of his trip to China on Thursday by inspecting the printing plant where his $60 Trump Bibles are printed. Accompanied by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump said he wanted ‘to be sure that the Chinese printed the lyrics to ‘God Bless the USA’ right, because those are Jesus’s most important words.’ President Xi praised his American counterpart, telling him, ‘You have created more Chinese jobs than I have.’ Trump cancelled his plans to visit the factory that manufactures gold Trump Mobile phones after learning that it didn’t exist.”
It should be noted that in the Trump Scams record is the Gold Mobile Phone for which brothers Don ‘Tweedledumb’ Jr., and Eric ‘Tweedledumber’ shook down over a half million people over a year ago for a $100 deposit towards their fantastic cell phone — as in “l’ve got a bridge to cell you.” To date, no phones are available and no mobile service has been set up, with a recent change in the terms of service which states there was “No Guarantee of Release, Delivery or Timing,” with indications that the phone might never be released. As the Bulwark blog contributor, Andrew Egger, says, “That’s right, MAGA Patriot! You might have thought you were preordering a phone to be sent to you; in reality, what you were ordering was just a conditional opportunity to buy a Trump phone later, should they ever get around to making them. This is hardly the first time Trump and his family have cashed in on his cult of personality to part his superfans from their cash.” Even if refunds occur, does the interest the Trumps earned from the deposits benefit the superfans in any way? Trump entered politics on the promise that he would stand up for the “forgotten man,” so this is a perfect opportunity for him to follow through on that pledge. Can you fleece me now?
It appears that the “forgotten man” promise now extends to other countries, as well. In a FoxNews interview with Bret Baier, Trump began throwing Taiwan under the bus as a result of his meeting with Xi Jinping — described by Simon Rosenberg on Hopium Chronicles, giving them the “stop being so uppity” Ukraine treatment. “When you look at the odds, China is a very, very powerful big country. That’s [Taiwain] a small island. Think of it, it’s 59 miles away. We’re 9500 miles away. That’s a little bit of a difficult problem. Taiwan was developed because we had presidents that didn’t know what the hell they were doing. They stole our chip industry,” Trump whined to Baier. Rosenberg writes, “Whether through compromise, or a deep desire to be like them, Trump has a history of yielding to and appeasing strongmen. He has done it for years with Putin, giving him so much and getting nothing in return for the US. He did it with Bibi in February, yielding to his ill-thought through war on Iran. He’s now doing it with Xi on Taiwan, getting nothing in return.” Rosenberg says he gets played like a fool again and again, accelerating our global geopolitical and economic decline. He gets admission to this club of autocrats, and as he walks through the door they pick his pockets, give him a table without a view of the stage, and howl with laughter at their ridiculous good fortune.
Rosenberg warns us to be “clear eyed about what Trump is doing and who he is, as he imagines himself to be like MBS, Bibi, Putin, and Xi,” in a world run by a handful of strongmen. He is trying to help Putin win in Ukraine, and Xi in his taking of Taiwan, even as he dreams about making Venezuela the 51st state. With the help of the corrupt Roberts Supreme Court he is working to install minority rule in this country for the so-called Republicans, ending American democracy. Trump is leaving the country less prosperous, less safe, and less free, as he builds his ballrooms and golden statues, and enriching himself and his family, expecting us to be thankful for the pain he is inflicting upon us. Despite his fantasies, he is no strongman — he is a fool, a coward, and a traitor who is laughed at around the world, also with their laughter now directed at citizens of this nation.
Andy Borowitz also reports: “Calling it a landmark deal, on Monday Presidents Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir Putin of Russia inked an agreement to jointly own Donald J. Trump. According to sources familiar with the deal, the two leaders crafted a timeshare arrangement under which each will have the right to use Trump when the other is not. Putin and Xi scooped up Trump at a bargain price since they acquired him in distressed or ‘as is’ condition, sources said. Both presidents were reportedly offered joint ownership of Eric Trump but passed.”
Thomas Kika on Alternet says that Trump is “painfully, obviously baffled,” according to a scathing new takedown from the New York Times, as he runs headlong into his “true weakness“: people who cannot be bought or threatened into compliance. Conservative Trump critic, David French, published in his piece that the Iran war has revealed “a kind of person who truly flummoxes Trump, the person he just can’t understand — the true believer.” The president’s inability to handle collisions with these sorts of people, French explains, is one of the major reasons why he is flailing so badly as he attempts to bring the disastrous Iran conflict to a swift conclusion. “The transactional nature of the Trump administration is perhaps its most obvious characteristic,” writes French. “And transactional people often soothe their own consciences with the belief that everyone else is ultimately transactional as well — the only question is their price.” But not everyone is transactional — some actually have beliefs they are willing to die for, and Trump is painfully, obviously baffled when he encounters beliefs as that.
Trump expected a brief, Venezuela-like excursion with Iran, where he easily topples a leader, bending the next regime to his will; but by destroying of almost all of Iran’s leadership he is left with the most fanatical elements in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, rather than the slightly more moderate clerics. “In response, Trump plays the only cards he knows how to play — alternating between threatening death and destruction and proposing business deals,” French continues. “Remember when he considered a ‘joint venture’ to control the Strait of Hormuz with Iran?” French explains that the Republican Party has done nothing to disabuse Trump of his transactional views, since he has been able to offer them money or power, or both. Even the religious leaders around Trump are fundamentally transactional, the president knowing that millions of his voters possess similar values. Their commitments to character or ideology took a back seat to the simple desire to defeat their opponents — the most important thing being to win. Anything else was luxury.
Steve Schmidt writes in The Warning that we are now passing from one era to another, with the hour approaching when the beginning of the 21st century can no longer be delayed. He says that it’s likely another 40+ years will pass before America is led by someone who was born in the 21st century, which means this century is now being formed by those who were born in, and approximate, the era during which America achieved its maximum power and maximum triumph. Therefore, it calls for a season of renewal, reform, reconciliation and national reinvigoration on this edge of a new American age. “Our great national challenges should be occasions to see opportunities for new greatness steeped in new justice. Things are falling apart in America, and the ideas which were once new must be fought for again with new conviction about the necessity of liberty for each human being,” concludes Schmidt.
Elliot Kirschner writes on Through the Fog, “There is no tidy package for democracy, no ribbon and bow capable of containing our complexities, contradictions, and struggles. It is through dialogue, mutual respect, persuasion, and listening that we must find our way forward. But all of that is predicated on having a democracy sturdy enough from which to build. Our challenge is to ensure that it survives, while also not losing sight of what is required of us once it does.”
[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]
SUPERPOWER SUICIDE, UNQUALIFIED, NO VICTORIES
Author, lecturer and professor Timothy Snyder, noted particularly for his two small books, On Tyranny and On Freedom, opens his latest blog entry with, “The United States has just spent billions of dollars to lose a war that enriches oligarchs, impoverishes the citizenry, sabotages its alliances, and strengthens its enemies. As justification for the self-destructive mindlessness, the White House gestures towards Jesus and genocide.” He recounts a recent speaking engagement at the Council on Foreign Relations, where he called Trump’s utterly unethical and self-destructive war, a catastrophe in itself, while suggesting the guiding principle of his foreign policy is “superpower suicide.”
[ click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse) ]
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Dateline: May 20, 2026
Webmistress here… Thomas’ great aunt, Hulda Hoover McLean, said something to me about Thomas once, as he walked through the room we were sitting in at her house on Walnut Avenue. She said, “Thomas’ mind is very often not on what he’s doing.”
I’m telling you this because he left Arizona to come out here for a bit, and didn’t bring the book with him… He’ll be back next week, if he can find a copy at the library to use!

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Travel”
“Like all great travellers, I have seen more than I remember, and remember more than I have seen.”
~Benjamin Disraeli
“To travel is to take a journey into yourself.”
~Danny Kaye
“Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry, and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends.”
~Maya Angelou
“One travels more usefully when alone, because he reflects more.”
~Thomas Jefferson
“Never go on trips with anyone you do not love.”
~Ernest Hemingway
|
LINE RIDER. This is not a new video, but it’s a good one. It’s almost hypnotic to watch! Set it to fullscreen, and enjoy! |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

April 29 – May 12, 2026
Greensite… tackles the “we need more housing” question… Steinbruner… BESS… 3CE… SB1078… Hayes… Don’t Look Back! State Parks Forward? Patton… Get Rich Now, Or Else… Matlock… …reform… hatchets… rogues… term out.|. drama queen… legacy… band aid… just a dinner… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… A Killing in Cannabis… Quotes on… “Jury Duty”
|
|
If you want to pitch in to |
BRATTON ON THE AIR ON KSCO RADIO! With blessings of Bruce’s daughters, Bratton Online contributors are now also going to be on the local KSCO radio air waves. The station owner, Mr. Michael Zwerling, invited Bratton Online contributors to have a one-hour program on Fridays, 6pm-7pm, to provide greater diversity in programming and engage more listeners. We are all for that!
The program goes live Friday, May 8 and will be a regular program. Tune in and join the conversation! Find AM 1080 or FM 104.1 on your radio, or you can listen online – on your computer, phone, or tablet. Click to listen, or download the app!
|
Jellies to study/relax/work to! Put this on, fullscreen – or stream to your TV – and have it on in the background while you get things done! I find that I can be very productive with this kind of stuff, or with high-powered techno… What’s your favorite “git ‘er done” music? 🙂 |
The inaugural program will feature Becky Steinbruner as host, introducing the new program, a tribute to Bruce Bratton (who did radio himself for years and years!), and talking about local issues including County Budget woes, and whatever you want to call in and discuss!
Other BrattonOnTheAir hosts will include Grey Hayes and Thomas Leavitt, with Gillian Greensite joining in later. Who knows, maybe we’ll even have guests?
JURY DUTY. Growing up in Sweden, all I knew of juries was from television. We don’t have “a jury of your peers” in Sweden. Many other countries don’t, so we’re not unique that way. Anyway, the whole system has always intrigued me. I get sent jury summonses, despite not being a citizen, and that doesn’t exactly inspire faith in the system… My partner, Brian, got a jury summons in January this year, and it became clear fairly early that he was on track to get on the jury. The judge said something pretty profound, in my opinion. He said, and I paraphrase, “I know many of you are thinking about how to claim hardship and not get on the jury, and I would like you to think about how to get on the jury instead. For our system to work, we need to not have juries that only consist of retired and independently wealthy people. If it’s not actually a hardship, but rather just an inconvenience to you, then do your civic duty.”
It is a weird system, to me. It is also, I know now, very hard and emotionally draining to be on a long trial, nevermind a murder trial, because unlike when you’re having a hard day at work, you can’t come home and decompress and talk about it! The trial Brian was on for all of February and part of March was the trial of final defendant in the Tushar Atre murder that happened in Santa Cruz in 2019. A book about it came out recently, A Killing In Cannabis, and there’s an interview with the author as my video this week.
Now I turn you over to our intrepid contributors. Happy Mother’s Day!
~Webmistress
PANTHEON. Netflix. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
What if the threat isn’t AI? What if it’s UI: uploaded intelligence. Human brains destructively scanned, living only in the cloud. “Pantheon” explores this idea as exquisite, real science fiction. Not cheesy animated sci-fi melodrama, but a genuine exploration of love, grief, immortality, endless simulations, conspiracies, global politics, and so much more.
The animation is restrained, there to serve the story rather than distract from it. The characters are rich, not cardboard cutouts, whether good or bad. No supervillains. No Mary Sues.
It’s a dense story, so if science fiction concepts tend to lose you, this may not be for you. But if they don’t, this absolutely deserves a watch.
~Sarge

STRANGER THINGS – TALES FROM ’85. Netflix. Series. (5 IMDb)
Stranger Things exits stage left…then pops back out for one more bow.
Set between seasons 2 and 3, this animated take brings back the core crew without sanding things down for kids. It’s not anime or cheap knockoff – dipping their pens in the Spiderverse/Arcane inkwell, with a creative, stylized look. It’s also more focused than the later live-action seasons, trimming most of the adults and zeroing in on the kids. Best of all, Will Byers actually gets to be a character instead of a punching bag, helped by the addition of Niki, an Amazonian punk rocker who connects with him over their shared outsider status. The recast voices are a little jarring at first, but you should settle in. Rough reviews aside, it’s worth a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb)
Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.
They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb)
This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ![]()
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?
Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge
SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge
A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb)
Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.
Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.
It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.
~Sarge
THE LAST KIDS ON EARTH. Netflix. Series (1hr pilot). (7.2 IMDb) ![]()
This largely bloodless animated series began with a pilot-style special and ran for two seasons. It’s based on the children’s book series by Max Brallier, with character designs inspired by the illustrations of Douglas Holgate.
The story follows orphan Jack Sullivan as he adjusts to life after an invasion of extra-dimensional monsters and a zombie apocalypse. He soon bands together with a scrappy group of kids who missed the evacuation – along with a loyal monster-dog – forming their own ragtag survival team.
Aimed primarily at the 8–12 crowd, the show still has enough sharp humor and creature-feature flair to entertain adults. The voice cast includes Nick Wolfhard (brother of Finn), Mark Hamill, Keith David, Catherine O’Hara, and Rosario Dawson. Worth a watch – with or without your kids.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
May 6, 2026

In an April 14th Opinion piece in Santa Cruz Lookout, Don Lane writes, “As voters consider housing in the months ahead, the most important step is not choosing a side—it’s understanding the issues and getting the facts right.” I heartily agree with his statement about getting the facts right. If you get the facts right and understand the issues, one side has clearly got its facts wrong and is misleading the community into accepting housing growth as a solution to rising rents. Housing growth may be making things worse.
Don Lane argues that gentrification is not caused by the new housing we see rising above the skyline downtown, along the river and soon to be along Water St. and Mission St. He says it is a result of the slow growth movement from the past 40 years which created a housing shortage. Santa Cruz pro-housing YIMBY members at every public hearing claim that we have built no housing in the past 40 years; that what we see rising today is just catch-up. This is simply not accurate.
If you research the US Census, you will see that there have been 11,000 housing units built in the city of Santa Cruz in the last 40 years; 79% more housing than existed at that time. This is not nothing. If you claim it is “not enough” how are you measuring that? There is probably a bottomless pit of demand to live in this city.
UCSC doesn’t figure in Don Lane’s calculations, but it should. About fifty percent of UCSC students choose to live off campus in any given year. Forty years ago, there were 6,000 enrolled UCSC students; now there are close to 20,000. That increase in numbers represents a significant increase in student demand for off-campus rental housing. Rather than blaming slow growth for the current high price of housing, a more accurate statement is that significant housing has been built in the city over the past 40 years, along with continued growth at UCSC.
Will building more and making it easier to build lower the price of housing? Most likely not. A February 2026 study from Economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the National Bureau of Economic Research, authored by Schuyler Louie, John Mondragon and Johannes Wieland found the following: “Our conclusions challenge the prevailing view of housing markets and suggest that relaxing regulatory supply constraints may not affect affordability.”
Their research, studying the years 2000 to 2020 found that “higher income growth predicts the same growth in house prices, housing quantities and population regardless of the estimated housing supply elasticity.” The same conclusion applied to rents. In other words, it is not housing supply, or limited supply that leads to increased prices for housing; it is the income of the people moving into the housing that determines the cost of housing. If you’ve lived in Santa Cruz long enough you’ve seen this happening in real time.
The mistaken belief that the cost of housing is a supply problem leads decision makers into risky territory. Since the state-required housing numbers (RHNA) are larger at the market-rate end, the cost of housing and rents will continue to rise as more people with bigger incomes move into Santa Cruz. The Area Median Income has already risen 25% in a three-year period. More people moving into the new six and eight story housing puts a strain on all infrastructure. City staff acknowledge that new housing in the long run will raise the cost of city services, or in their words “are a net negative fiscal impact.” Don’s claim that new units reduce the pressure on the older, more modest homes, opening them up for younger families is not based on data and side-steps the higher-income issues raised in the research. Older, more modest homes are priced above a million dollars.
What about affordable housing? Housing advocates state without evidence that such housing is going to local workers. If local means workers in the city of Santa Cruz, the city has no such data. The 90% figure they quote for Santa Cruzans moving into recently built affordable housing is a county-wide statistic.
Sonnenfeld and Roeth urge that all new housing projects that meet objective standards be ministerially approved “by-right,” which means no public hearings, with staff approval only. This includes projects at heights of six or eight stories, some of which will go deep into existing neighborhoods. They regard public hearings and impact fees as constraints on the building of more housing units. Their position is at odds with the research. More market-rate housing attracts more people with higher incomes which means the cost of rents and housing remain high.
The more you build, the worse it gets for lower income workers and residents. Affordable rents are based on the AMI and that keeps rising. Time to re-evaluate the “we need more housing” assumption and its impacts.
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
If State Senator Laird’s SB 1078 makes it through the Assembly and is signed by the Governor by this August, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors plans to approve placing a new Sales Tax measure on the November ballot. The SB 1078 is an urgency measure that would become effective immediately to allow the Board’s rapid action in August to pose a ballot measure that would allow the County to waive a sales tax cap of 2% imposed by the Transaction and Use Tax Law. It is co-authored by Assemblymembers Dawn Addis and Gail Pellerin.
Second District Supervisor Kim DeSerpa testified to the State Senate on April 8, 2026 in support of this bill. She claimed it is necessary to keep the Watsonville Hospital from closure and would help save many residents’ CalFresh and MediCal benefits that HR 1 threatens.
SB 1078: Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Cruz. | Digital Democracy
The bill passed in the Senate, and now is before the Assembly.
BUT IS THIS AN EMERGENCY?
Following along on the issue above, when the County CEO Nicole Coburn and County Budget Officer Marcus Pimental (who also serves on the Pajaro Valley Health Care District Board of Trustees), presented the draft 2026-2027 Draft County County Budge on May 5, some on the Board of Supervisors questioned why the CEO did not want to declare a “fiscal state of emergency”? The bleak outlook projected $23 Million deficit, but claiming a “balanced budget” only due to withdrawing $43 Million from the County’s Reserve Fund. The Board has set a Reserve Fund Goal of 15%, but the CEO’s actions to rob that “rainy day account” would result in a 10.4% Reserve level. That would be enough to fund two pay cycles of County workers.
Supervisor Cummings pointed out that if the County did declare a fiscal state of emergency, it would require all contracts to be re-opened, but would help support the future half-cent sales tax planned for the November ballot.
Do you see how this chess game is shaping up???
Meanwhile, Supervisor Koenig stated that he felt instead of adding 6 new analysts to the OR3 staff and salary load, it would be better to spend the money replacing culverts and addressing deferred maintenance of County infrastructure. He also pointed out that the proposed plan by County Parks to begin charging for parking at County Parks is not a good idea when there is such a maintenance problem at many parks…such as broken play equipment and $90 Million in deferred maintenance projects.
When questioned about the massive Law Enforcement Dept. budget, CEO Coburn admitted that the County is seeing an unusually large number of law enforcement staff on leave, many of whom have been on leave for a very long time. “We will need to look into that before June budget hearings,” she said.
Last year, the County’s CAO Carlos Palacios took the unprecedented action to convince the Board of Supervisors to approve a $90 Million bond debt for the County, to address storm repair and other emergency debt obligations not yet reimbursed by FEMA. Mr. Pimental said the County has a special account set up to deposit FEMA monies that is used to pay that annual $3 Million debt service. He answered Supervisor DeSerpa’s question about reimbursement levels by saying the County has been receiving about $10-$12 Million a year, and does get applied to the debt principle as well.
Deputy CEO Elissa Benson noted the County will receive about $10 Million in CDBG grant money for culvert work…but who knows when or where that work would happen.
Budget hearings are scheduled for June 10 at the new South County Government Center (500 Westridge Drive, Watsonville) and on June 11 in the 701 Ocean Street Government Building basement (the massive remodel of the 5th Floor Chambers is still not done). The Final Budget hearing on June 24 is at a location yet to be determined.
Search – PrimeGov Portal
The County entered FY 2026-27 budget development facing a projected General Fund deficit of $23.2 million along with additional cost pressures including federal policy changes such as H.R.1, with forecasted deficits exceeding $67 million in subsequent years absent corrective action. Balance is achieved through shared departmental restraint, a countywide hiring freeze, the elimination of a net 57.88 vacant positions, targeted revenue increases, and the strategic use of $43.0 million in one-time resources from General Fund reserves and department trust funds. There are no proposed reductions in force resulting in the layoff of current employees.
SUPPORT THE VETERANS
The Veterans filled the Board room on May 5 to testify in support of returning the Veterans Service Office to an independent department, rather than being sat upon by the County Health Services Department (HSD), and micro-managed to the harm of effectively serving the County’s 20,000 Veterans. The large group had to sit through the County Budget presentation, but at least was the second Regualr Agenda item, rather than the last, as had happened on January 27, 2026.
Why does it make sense to the County administration to tie the hands of the Veteran’s Service Office? The claim is that 31% of the Veterans also receive other social services administered by HSD. “We have some questions about that data and would like to evaluate that more carefully,” said Veterans Dave Ramos and Dean Kaufman.
For now, the Board approved the MOU between the County HSD, CEO and Veterans Service Office to continue building trust and examining data and solutions. They will submit quarterly reports to the CEO…and hopefully the Board and the Public.
Supervisor Justin Cummings added an amendment to the motion to require a report to the board at the February mid-year Budget Hearings in 2027, rather than waiting until May, 2027.
Good idea.
3CE POWER PAYS BIG BUCKS TO STAFF
How can it make any sense to add another layer of administrative bureaucracy to your power bill, adding 91 employees and salary levels of top executives at nearly half-a-million dollars, and purchasing multiple properties for new offices (e.g. Soquel Village area)?
Take a look and think about it
GCC : Central Coast Community Energy Authority (2024) < < Special Districts
3CE STAFF MADE A $5.7 MILLION MISTAKE
The 3CE staff failed to let their Policy Board know until a couple of weeks ago that the number of applications for solar / battery reimbursements had skyrocketed beyond the $3 Million budgeted for the reimbursements until the amount to re-pay people was nearly $5.7 Million. Staff knew of the situation in January, 2026 but did not freeze new applications, did not notify the 3CE Board, and failed to change the website applications to alert new project owners that money might not be available.
At a Special Meeting on April 20, 2026, staff recommended that the Board simply let the people know that the fine print of the application states that “terms can change”, and not reimburse the people. A few solar installation contractors testified that some customers had already spent tens of thousands of dollars to design and build projects, based on the assurance that 3CE would reimburse them.
After great deliberation, the Board decided that the threat of bad press and customers opting out as 3CE customers would not look good, so voted to find the extra $3.7 Million to make good on the agency’s promises.
Policy Board of Directors, April 20, 2026
One really has to wonder about the inner workings of this mysterious agency that holds 94% of the County’s electrical rate payer accounts, pays big bucks to alot of staff, purchases lands for new offices (in Soquel) and is pushing our County to parallel their 2030 goal of 100% renewable energy.
Seriously consider Opting OUT of 3CE. Their agency supports and is waiting in the wings for permitting of the large lithium Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) project in Watsonville’s working class neighborhood, unconcerned of the known risks of flammable explosions emitting toxic hydrogen fluoride gas.
Many people who have opted out of 3CE report their utility bills decreased markedly.
EPA REPORTS ON MOSS LANDING VISTRA FIRE CLEAN-UP WORK
Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire Response: Response Timeline | US EPA
Here is what the Monterey Bay Air Quality Control Board discussed on February 18, 2026 meeting:
Air Monitoring staff installed four Clarity PM 2.5 sensors at the Vistra battery plant
earlier this month. These sensors were installed at the facility’s property line to prepare
for the possibility of a fire during the facility clean-up. Data from this localized
monitoring will be available to the community in the event of a fire. The sensors are
paid for through a contract with Vistra.
Monterey Bay Air Resources District; BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA
It is curious that the Board elected Santa Cruz county 4th District Supervisor Felipe Hernandez to chair the Board, even though he never showed up at the meeting.
TRUST THE LOCAL SCIENTISTS
In contrast to the Vistra-funded consultants who have argued “there is nothing to see here” in heavy metal contamination following the January 16, 2926 Vistra Battery Fire in Moss Landing, the local scientists have impartial data that local government officials should heed. Presented March 17, 2026 to the Monterey County Board of Supervisors, take a look at this good information and ask Santa Cruz County and Monterey County Boards of Supervisors to receive regular updates from this group:
Dr. Kerstin Wasson EMBER presentation 3-17-26
- Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors <boardofsupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov>
- Monterey County Board of Supervisors <cob@co.monterey.ca.us>
Also take a look at this interview with Dr. Michael Hogan, California Arts & Sciences Institute
WILL THE TRIBES REALLY HAVE A VOICE?
The California Energy Commission (CEC) is holding an IN-PERSON ONLY meeting on May 12 in Cabazon, CA to hear the opinions of the Central Southern Tribes regarding impacts of clean energy policies and energy independence.
Will the CEC listen to their voices?
On March 17, 2025, the CEC issued an Order Instituting an Informational Proceeding (OIIP) on Tribal Affairs and Tribal Energy Sovereignty. Chair David Hochschild is the Lead Commissioner, and Commissioner Noemí Otilia Osuna Gallardo is the Associate Commissioner for the OIIP. The OIIP (also called proceeding) is in alignment with the March 2, 2023 CEC Resolution Committing to Support Tribal Energy Sovereignty, which was adopted in alignment with Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order N-15-19 (EXECUTIVE ORDER N-15-19), where he issued an apology to California Native American tribes for the violence against tribes committed by the state and established the Truth and Healing Council
Lithium batteries, commonly used in large-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) projects is not only flammable and hazardous, but is also NOT clean energy. Consider the plight of the Native People at Thacker Pass: One Native Group’s Fight to Protect Sacred Land From Destructive Lithium Mining | First Nations Development Institute
Write the Monterey County and Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors and ask that the Draft BESS Ordinance not allow lithium BESS projects at all.
- Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors <boardofsupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov>
- Monterey County Board of Supervisors <cob@co.monterey.ca.us>
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING AND SPEAK UP ABOUT WHAT MATTERS TO YOU AND YOUR NEIGHBORS.
DO JUST ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers, and Happy Mothers Day,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Press is rolling unveiling what might seem like a ‘new’ initiative, obscuring and ‘moving on’ from some really UGLY past issues with California State Parks. But, hey- we all want to move on, keep moving forward…especially those with criminal records or histories of abuse.
Parks Forward: a brief history
The origin of the Parks Forward initiative was a crushing blow in 2012, an event that should make every Californian, especially those dedicated to natural areas access and conservation, doubt whether the California Department of Parks and Recreation can be trusted. Some may recall the closing of many State Parks supposedly due to budget shortfalls, which some of us recognized at the time as being a political ploy to pressure the California legislature into increasing Parks’ budget. Sure enough, ‘fiscal irregularities’ (as stated euphemistically in Parks’ subsequent report) were discovered, but only after the panicky scuttling of thousands of volunteers, non-profit organizations, and private donations to keep parks from closing down. Many nonprofits made good money from this fundraising boon, which also cemented their cache with the public.
The Bigger History
The State Parks corruption boondoggle in 2012 needs to be put into context with a larger history for a wholistic understanding of the situation. Since its inception, State Parks has been the recipient of lands purchased by private organizations. It has been typical that ‘conservation’ organizations use private donor funds to purchase properties while lobbying for public bond initiatives earmarked in such a way that they profit by subsequently selling those properties to the State. This process violates all sorts of legal and moral codes such as illicit 501(c)3 lobbying, private organizations setting State priorities, adding land to an agency already unable to manage the lands it holds, etc. Conservationists recognize that purchasing and ‘setting aside’ land for ‘protection’ is the relatively easy and affordable first step- the real work is sustaining species on those lands in perpetuity. For a while, recognition of these ‘irregularities’ put a halt to adding more land to the State Parks system.
Santa Cruz County Parks History
Much of that ‘bigger’ history is reflected in what has been occurring in Santa Cruz County where a disproportionate percentage of land is owned by State Parks. State Parks General Planning processes were successfully challenged for Castle Rock State Park, Nisene Marks State Park, and the Gray Whale Ranch addition to Wilder Ranch State Park. In each instance, private organizations were instrumental in transferring land to State Parks while State Parks was unable to either plan for or manage those properties in alignment with California law. And yet, each park welcomes visitors, pouring funding into private businesses at the expense of biodiversity protection and visitor experience. Henry Cowell State Park and the State Park beaches at Cotoni Coast Dairies were opened and remain highly used without any planning, whatsoever. The General Plan for Wilder Ranch State Park, a mecca for mountain bikers, does not allow mountain biking and private recreational businesses openly operate mountain biking concessions. Yet, Parks rangers have been ordered not to enforce prohibitions against either mountain bikers or their unpermitted concessions.
The ‘New’ Parks Forward Initiative
Surrounding Earth Day 2026, there has been much press about the Parks Forward initiative. One might even think it was ‘new.’ More new parks were added to the network of State Parks and some parcels were added to expand certain existing State Parks. In some cases, the press releases note property was ‘donated’ and in other cases, the situation is far opaquer. Nowhere in the press releases is there any mention of species conservation- it is all coached in ‘more access.’ Both access and conservation are expensive to do correctly, are not being done correctly in any State Park currently, and are conflicting uses with vast tradeoffs that go unanalyzed by Parks’ mandated General Plans and concomitant ‘carrying capacity analysis.’
Symptoms Make Sense
This new roll out of “Parks Forward” is quite predictable given public amnesia, popular myths, and the level of oversight from the Parks Forward Commission. Apparently, the public has forgotten about the origins of the Parks Forward initiative: if citizens remembered, there would be some acknowledgement in the many press releases. Overriding the grave concerns of the past is a fervor for more public access to natural areas. The myth, echoed by everyone touching this new version of the Parks Forward initiative, is that ‘more people accessing more natural areas is good for conservation.’ This balderdash flies in the face of science and common sense. The logical conclusion of this thinking is that if every human accessed every last piece of nature then every species would be conserved…the opposite is true. But, conservation organizations want to make money from donors and State politicians want to look successful, so enter the echo chamber of the deeply mistaken myth, which is doing permanent damage to the potential for wildlife conservation in California.
It is amazing to me that there is a Parks Forward Commission with smart people allowing such misguided endeavors to continue within State Parks. Perhaps they, too, accept the mythology. The symptoms of their complicity were present many years back when the Commission swallowed the poison of the progress report in year 2 of their formation. That report includes ‘four strategic focus areas’ with no metrics for success and two incredibly tiny ‘natural and cultural pilot efforts underway,’ which likewise have no metrics for conservation success. The apparent acceptability of these puerile efforts to the Commission point to an inability of the Commission to provide substantive oversight and input into the broken State Parks system.
Ask, Please
With the unveiling of new parks and new land ‘protections,’ we must ask: is there any additional funding for long term stewardship for biodiversity conservation, or are these new areas merely to continue the silent death of species to the overwhelmingly poorly managed public access/private inurement money machine?
Has California State Parks apologized to the People for the lies and manipulation it promulgated in 2012? Does that apology include details of what they will do to change this sordid past? Can we identify specific individuals who were responsible for those actions? Is there new management? Or, is this situation much like that exposed by the Epstein situation, where the abusers are still in charge? Abusers – is that too much to say? Well, in this case the victims do not have voices and will never speak out…the wildlife will simply go away while the abusers will vocally claim victory with their empty promises of conservation alongside public recreation and access to natural areas.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
The picture above is associated with a column by Tim Higgins. His column appeared in The Wall Street Journal on January 20, 2026. Online, the title of Higgins’ column read this way: “Why The Tech World Thinks The American Dream Is Dying.” The title on the print version, I suggest, was a little more inflammatory:
Tech World Says Get Rich Now, Or Else
I am reacting to that print version headline.
The essence of what Higgins is saying is that there is a good argument, which must be taken seriously, that “the current artificial intelligence boom will be the last chance to get rich before artificial intelligence makes money essentially worthless.”
Presumably, those who are already rich, and the “tech bros” who are getting rich on the current A.I. boom, will be just fine. However, what about the rest of us poor schmucks? Well, the implicit lesson is found in that print version headline. You had better get rich now – or else! The door on “rich” is closing!
This idea, of course, is contrary to what we have all been told from time immemorial. Our faith, largely justified by past experience, too, is that new technologies ultimately make everyone better off. That “rising tide” we have always heard about will lift all boats.
Higgins doesn’t, completely, say that there is going to be a fundamental change. But he takes that headline I quoted pretty seriously. Here is how he ends his column, citing to a tech entrepreneur who predicted, last year, that “the mother of all tech booms is coming.” Here is what he said, by way of advice, just following that quote:
Get Some While You Can
I am somewhat dubious about the value of the A.I. developments that are driving massive investments right at the moment – and I don’t necessarily believe that there is no stopping A.I.. The massive (and negative) impacts that giant data centers are having on the natural environment, the environment that sustains all life on the planet, makes me think that this may be a “pride goeth before a fall” moment.
However, let’s assume that A.I. will proceed to “take over” our lives, making everyone almost totally dependent on it, and upon the infrastructure that makes it all possible. If that might turn out to be true, it probably does make sense to pay some attention to Higgins’ warning.
Upon reading Higgins’ column, and thinking about the question, I had two immediate reactions. First, being “rich” doesn’t mean that a person’s life is going to be either “better” or more satisfying. Being “poor” is a different story. If I don’t get “rich,” I am not going to pout. If A.I. makes us “poor,” however, so my grandkids won’t get medical care, a good education, or enough to eat – and if the advent of A.I. means that my family members and all our friends won’t have a roof over their heads (all these things going along with being “poor”), I am going to be very upset.
In fact, I think that what Higgins is suggesting is that missing the A.I. boom will, essentially, make huge numbers of people truly “poor,” and that talking about how missing the A.I. boon might foreclose a person’s chance to be “rich” is just trying to put a positive spin on things. If it does turn out to be true that if you don’t end up being “rich” then you are going to be “poor,” and plunged into poverty, then we ought to be doing something to stop what’s happening, as opposed to trying to figure out how to become individually “rich.”
This brings up the second thought I had. Higgins column focuses on the “individual.” The column doesn’t provide any sense of our collective ability, perhaps, to make everyone “rich.” In truth, we are not just a collection of individuals, we are “in this together.” If A.I. is going to increase productivity, and cut costs, and produce economic benefits, then society at large, which includes all of us, should be the beneficiary.
In order to make that idea work out in real life, of course, those who are not likely to become individually rich need to get organized, and start making rules that will insure that everyone benefits from the new technologies that are coming.
That means “politics.” That means, to alter the headline I have quoted, that the following admonition is the advice we need to follow:
Get Organized Now, Or Else!
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
Well, they finally did it last week! And you can’t say it came out of nowhere. It’s only the “culmination of a decades-long effort that’s the logical result of a broken system that needs reform,” says Brian Tyler Cohen. He says that the Supreme Court’s taking a hatchet to the Voting Rights Act was depressingly unsurprising, because of course they would — since this court has pretty much declared their fealty to Trump over the Constitution. In Cohen’s opinion, it was a foregone conclusion. Even with the ideal situation of Democrats ensconced in the three branches of government, being able to enact a new Voting Rights Act, the current 6-3 court will be there, hatchets at the ready. So “we have six unelected judges in robes deciding that Black voices are unconstitutional, segregation by map, Jim Crow with a gavel,” says Louisiana Congressman Cleo Fields.
Cohen proposes that to restore democracy, and to overhaul the judicial system, the Supreme Court needs reforms that are based on principle, not politics, in order to have legitimacy or public support. “If any subsequent reforms are to stand a chance at surviving, we cannot leave in place a rogue branch of government with the power to strike down anything that doesn’t comport with its far-right ideology. The first reform should be to expand the Court, in line with the principles that determined the number of justices in the early years of the republic,” adds Cohen. He recounts historically, the initial six justices to reflect the six federal courts; the year 1807 saw an additional justice added when a seventh circuit court was added. The court grew to nine with the addition of two circuit courts in 1837, and today there are thirteen federal court circuits with no ensuing changes in the court makeup. Cohen believes the Supreme Court should reflect the size of the country and the scope of its legal challenges, as it did over a century ago.
A second reform proposed by Cohen, also supported by 75 percent of Americans according to a PRRI survey in 2025, are term limits for the court justices. He sees a term of eight years which would allow newly elected presidents to choose their own nominees regularly, reducing the opportunities for procedural delays, which occurred with President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016, his final year in the White House. In Cohen’s view, the regular flow of new appointments would help remove the national drama from each nomination by diluting the novelty of each new appointment.
A USA Today poll in 2024 shows support by 76 percent of Americans, for the establishment of an enforceable code of conduct, which would empower a panel mandated to investigate allegations of wrongdoing and impropriety. The panel should be given the power to force the recusal of justices in cases where they have personal ties, and even go so far as to remove justices in cases of conduct unworthy of the Supreme Court. A final Supreme Court reform would be to retire any justice over age seventy, regardless of who appointed them. The interpretation of the Constitution that judges “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior,” has given lifetime appointments to court appointees, but there are other considerations — a retired justice could be moved to a lower court and still stay within a constitutional framework.
The Pew Research Center discloses that public support for retiring all public officials over a certain age has widespread consensus, in particular for elected offices, but also for the Supreme Court, with Democrats being in the upper echelons of the poll. The only age specified by the Constitution requires that presidential candidates must be thirty-five years of age. A mandatory retirement of seventy years of age would lead to four immediate vacancies on the current Supreme Court: three conservatives (Alito, Roberts & Thomas) and one liberal (Sotomayor), leaving all three Trump judges. It has been almost a century since President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to expand the high court (termed ‘packing’ back then), a plan which Congress defeated, and since that time no changes have been attempted. Included in FDR’s plan as he struggled to get his New Deal revivals during the Great Depression, was to retire justices at age seventy, and if they refused, he would be able to add an additional justice until the court reached fifteen members. Despite the Congressional defeat, time was on his side, because within five years, seven of the nine justices were appointed by him.
Cohen warns, “Today’s Supreme Court has weakened itself by its political activism, repeatedly disregarding the Constitution and its code of conduct. It is populated by older justices at a time when the American people are yearning to reform the status quo. If we want to revive our democracy, we need to revive our Supreme Court. If that seems extreme, consider an alternative that is already upon us: a Court that undermines the very Constitution it’s supposed to uphold. This week’s ruling on the Voting Rights Act was not a one-off. It’s the logical endpoint of a decades-long effort to disenfranchise minority voters and minority representation to an absolute minimum. The three longest-serving conservative justices on the court right now have a combined 75 years on the bench. This is their pet project. They own it. And the other three conservatives, all Trump appointees, are comparatively young and spry. Without court expansion, we’re stuck with this right wing majority for another couple of decades at least. We need to normalize ourselves to the idea of court expansion, so that when we have power, we don’t waste our time negotiating what we should be doing, but rather spend our time doing it.”
Pema Levy writes in Mother Jones that the high court’s gerrymandering decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, against the Voting Rights Act is hardly a “mere tweak,” or as Justice Alito characterized it, a “humble update.” Levy terms the 6-3 opinion a “counter-revolution” against Section 2 of the 1965 act, which requires that people of color have an equal opportunity to elect representatives of their choice, taking us back to the dark days when Black and brown voters in many states cast meaningless ballots. Since the original enactment, the reversal of previous diluted, powerless and gerrymandered votes, resulted in Southern states sending Black representatives to Congress, state legislatures, and local political bodies, with Congress repeatedly defending and continuing the protections. In last week’s diminution by the court, Justice Kagan chided the majority for downplaying the gravity of its decision, by laying “the groundwork for the largest reduction in minority representation since the era following Reconstruction.”
The Robert’s Court has been slowly dismantling the Voting Rights Act since 2013, and Levy sees this recent action as the final nail in the coffin, improbable that any plaintiff will ever be able to avail themselves of the law’s protections. By elevating permission to conduct partisan gerrymandering above voting rights, Black voters become dispersed, lacking any ability to elect a representative of their choice — wasted votes again! Kagan writes, “For how else, the majority reasons, can we preserve the authority of States to engage in this practice than by stripping minority citizens of their rights to an equal political process? And with that, the majority as much as invites States to embark on a new round of partisan gerrymanders.” The majority does not dispute this — it’s a damning silence that tacitly admits just how sweeping is this decision.
Quickly responding to the Supreme Court decision was Louisiana’s Republican governor Jeff Landry, as he suspended his state’s US House primaries to allow lawmakers to draw up a new congressional map. No matter that early voting was set to begin, with some absentee ballots already cast, the executive order states that the primaries are “suspended for the duration of the May 16, 2026 and June 27, 2026 election cycles and until July 15, 2026 or until such time as determined by the Legislature,” the legislature then to follow instructions to “pass legislation to enact new congressional maps.” Outraged and alarmed, Joel Payne of MoveOn Civic Action charged that, “Republicans are colluding in broad daylight to try to rig the election and silence Black voters. The MAGA court made their decision to gut voting rights just in the nick of time for Louisiana Republicans to postpone the scheduled primaries to slice and dice voting maps to pick and choose voters of their liking.”
Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee said, “Even in ruby red states, Republicans see the writing on the wall that voters will hold them accountable for soaring costs this November, which is why they’re rigging the system to dodge accountability — the mission to transform the landscape of state legislative power has never mattered more.” The Washington Post reported that Governor Landry notified Republican US House candidates that he planned to suspend the Louisiana primaries, with The Post noting that one or two more GOP seats could result in the midterms from his delay. Democracy Docket’s Marc Elias responded by saying, “What is happening in Louisiana right now is both a redistricting power grab and a dry run for authoritarian election subversion this fall.”
US House Speaker Mike Johnson voiced support for the new congressional maps, but Landry’s order is already facing legal action from state residents. “These harms are not speculative. They are imminent: early in-person voting commences on Saturday, May 2, 2026. They are irreparable: once an election day passes, no monetary remedy can restore the franchise,” warns one lawsuit. Voting rights group Fair Fight Action analyzed that Democrats could redraw anywhere from 10 to 22 additional congressional seats for their party in time for the 2028 elections if they push hard enough with redistricting in seven blue and swing states. “Democrats have a clear path to neutralize this GOP power grab if they want to take it,” says Max Flugrath, senior communications director of Fair Fight Action. “This is the ‘break the glass in case of emergency’ moment for American democracy.”
“Twenty-two House seats across seven states may sound like a heavy lift,” says Flugrath, “but our analysis shows it’s well within reach if blue-state governors and legislatures squeeze every potential seat out of the maps. What’s more, much will be decided by how hard Democrats push.” But they are gearing up with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries telling Politico that Democrats will seek gerrymanders at minimum in New York, Colorado, Maryland and Illinois. None of this should have to happen, though Democrats have gerrymandered themselves, but Republicans went full throttle after capturing many state legislatures in their 2010 midterm rout.
The Democrats position has been that neither side should gerrymander, attempting to model an alternative path with independent redistricting commissions, and with federal legislation ending gerrymandering for both sides, believing that it disrespects the opposition’s voters and allows lawmakers to insulate themselves from accountability. But if Republicans make good on their threats, the choice for Democrats will be stark: push forward, or perish. No matter if Republicans don’t like it — this is the world they wanted, and it is now they who are now inflicting it upon their rivals. “The arc of the moral universe doesn’t bend toward justice unless we bend it,” says Bryan Fair of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Satirical writer, Andy Borowitz, followed up recent news from the English crown with his Borowitz Report: “A visibly shaken Donald J. Trump told reporters on Thursday that the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten of Windsor set a dangerous precedent of pedophiles facing consequences. ‘King Charles released a statement where he said no one is above the law,’ he said. ‘That was a horrible thing to say.’ Calling Andrew’s arrest ‘disgraceful,’ Trump said it had made him ‘rethink the whole idea of becoming king. If you can be a member of the royal family and still get arrested, what’s the point of having a crown?’ he said. ‘You’re better off just having your own Supreme Court.‘”
[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]
The lead up to last Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner had garnered much commentary by a diverse press corps, many choosing to boycott the event with Donald Trump’s first attendance as president. The decision to abandon the tradition of inviting a comedian to roast the attendees because of the thin-skinned snowflake of a leader, and enlisting mentalist Oz Pearlman for entertainment, prompted Jimmy Kimmel to do his own scathing alternative ceremony on the Thursday preceding the main event. As he explained on his show, his substitute presentation would consist of some jokes and commentary that a comedian might do if “the trembling drama queen who’s scared of comedy” might hear under accepted circumstances. Video footage shows Kimmel standing behind a podium as he delivers quips to an audience full of photoshopped politicians and celebrities, saying, “Look at you, all dressed up in formal wear, dresses, tuxedos. I haven’t seen this much black since every page of the Trump-Epstein Files.” The comedian addresses President Trump with: “I’m happy you decided to stay, Mr. President. And don’t worry if we bruise your ego — it will only make your hands look less disgusting. By the way, in the unfortunate event that our president has a medical emergency tonight, do we have a doctor in the — I mean, I’m sorry. Do we have a Jesus in the house? I always confuse them, too.”
click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse)
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Dateline: May 3, 2026
Recently, I talked a little about the prospective town of Folger (one of many prospective real estate development efforts that never fully materialized), named after the San Francisco coffee/business magnate. Santa Cruz also had a local Folger family (no idea if there was a relationship) after which a local canyon in the Watsonville area is informally named. The persistence of informal names like this, long after the original rationale is no longer relevant, fascinates me (see previous entry on Rob Roy Junction for another example). There’s a whole thread of un/barely documented history in these names, passed down from one generation to the next.
What actually caught my attention about this entry was the elided comment about Peter Folger running a local “skating rink”. The idea of late Victorian/early Edwardian Americans zooming around a roller skating rink is irresistibly fascinating to think about, especially being a chid of the 1980s when roller skating was a big thing and rollerblades were invented. Apparently, roller skating was a huge thing in the late 1800s after roller skates became affordable due to mass production. See this article from the London Science Museum, [Wonderful Things: Roller Skates, 1880], for more information on that. The Santa Cruz Public Library has an old article from the Register-Pajaronian, [Skating a long time Watsonville tradition], talking about the history of roller skating rinks in Watsonville dating back to before 1900.According to Jerome Alexander, that canyon shown as unnamed on the Watsonville East Quadrangle (USGS:17) as trending from the summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains in a southwesterly direction immediately to the west of and parallel to Casserly Ridge is known locally as Folger Canyon. Origin undetermined; however, Ed Martin in his 1873 Directory of the Town of Watsonville mentions “Peter Folger [who ran a skating rink at that time] has a snug little farm well improved of 200 acres on the former Rancho Salsipuedes” and the map listed below shows the lands encompassing the gulch were owned in 1908 by Clara Folger.

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Jury Duty”
“Getting out of jury duty is easy. The trick is to say you’re prejudiced against all races.”
~Dan Castellaneta
“Political systems are run by self-selecting politicians. We don’t draft people; it’s not jury duty.”
~P. J. O’Rourke
“I vote and I do jury duty.”
~Christopher Hitchens
“It’s rare to find someone excited over jury duty. If they’re out there, I’ve never met them. Not a one. When the summons for jury duty arrives in the mail, how many people scream, ‘Yes!’ and run to clear the calendar? None. Our first and only reaction is, ‘Oh, no,’ quickly followed by, ‘How can I get out of this?'”
~Regina Brett
“Serving jury duty is a fascinating little slice of life, with its motley crew of personalities.”
~Nina Garcia
|
A KILLING IN CANNABIS. This is an interview with the author of a book about a murder that took place in Santa Cruz in 2019. The sentence for the last of the perpetrators was just handed out, and, fun fact, my partner Brian was on that Jury for over a month! If you are interested in the book, here’s a link that lets you buy it, and not on Amazon! (Full disclosure: it’s my shop on Bookshop.org, where you can set up curated book lists and have sales benefit local bookstores.) |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)













