Greensite… hosting radio this week, back next week… Steinbruner… Redman-Hirahara House… supe office hours… Hayes… Politics and “Home”… Patton… Letter To A (Potential) Law Student… Matlock… wow…reality…just wow!… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Lady Arkansas by Sawyer Hill… Quotes on… “Humanity”
|
HOW AM I SO COLD?? I can’t tell you how many times I wake up and just go, “BRRRRR!” and want to stay under the covers instead of getting up and getting dressed, then I ask Alexa, “what’s the weather?”, and she says it’s 69 degrees outside! I don’t understand what’s going on there. Also, it was only today that I realized that I’m about to go back east… in November… LOL! I’ll let you know how that all goes!
I’m expecting to be able to post the column from Delaware, so hopefully there won’t be any weird glitches. I’m giving you the heads up though, just to be safe.
Happy Halloween, y’all! And vote on Tuesday, if you haven’t already.
~Webmistress
HAZBIN HOTEL. PrimeTV. Series. (7.6 IMDb)
Was going to do something serious, but I introduced Gunilla to “Hazbin Hotel” and she wanted me to cover it.
Charlie Morningstar, perky, upbeat daughter of Lucifer, decides that redeeming Hell’s demonic hordes might be preferable to their periodic extermination by Adam (a dudebro douche) and his angelic forces. To that end, she opens the Hazbin Hotel, where demons can earn redemption and a ticket to Heaven.
With the help of her girlfriend Vaggie, a porn star, a knife-wielding gremlin of a housekeeper, and Alastor, a theatrical radio demon who’s a walking “will he or won’t he betray them all?”, she struggles against resistance from both Heaven and Hell.
Oh, and did I mention it’s a MUSICAL? A good musical. Great art design and music make this a keeper.
Dark, adult, funny, tragic, and surprisingly hopeful, it’s one hell of a journey across its first two seasons. Worth a watch, and then some.
~Sarge

FEAR STREET PTS 1, 2, 3. Netflix. Series. (6.6 IMDb)
What if… Back to the Future was a horror movie?
I know, I do a lot of “spooky season” reviews, but next time I promise you the finest bleakness and most saturated human suffering I can find. Maybe something from Siberia.
For now, though, Fear Street, based on the novels of R.L. Stine (not quite Gersberms territory, considerably more adult).
Fear Street is set in Shadyside, a darker mirror of its neighboring town, Sunnyvale. Seems Shadyside has a long and bloody history of serial killers, dating back to a witch’s curse in the 17th century.
Cue the dates. The first film takes place in 1994 (with echoes of Scream), the second in 1978 (set at a summer camp, you do the math), and the third in 1666 (with a healthy dose of Witch Hysteria). All one story, not sequels, but a literal jump backward through time, from one chapter to its predecessor, eventually bringing us full circle to the ’90s. Kiana Madeira’s character, Deena, anchors the story, although Sadie (Stranger Things) Sink’s character, Ziggy, gets plenty of attention as well.
Despite its slasher trappings, Fear Street has more in common with Back to the Future than with most horror franchises. These aren’t three separate stories connected by a recurring menace, but a single, contiguous narrative unfolding across three films and three centuries. Each installment recontextualizes the others, making the trilogy considerably more than the sum of its parts.
There’s a fair amount of gore, but the emphasis is on the interconnected stories rather than serving up another helping of Purina Slasher-Chow.
I haven’t watched what appears to be a disappointing, after-the-fact fourth film set in the same universe, but the original three are well worth a watch. Watch them in order, and think of them as one long movie. Because, really, that’s what they are.
~Sarge
BELOW. Netflix. Series. (6.3 IMDb)
Below keeps threatening to be a deep sea eldritch horror movie, but it soon becomes plain who the real monster is, and, like anyone who grew up here, we know the townies are the real heroes. Set in the severe beauty of a Newfoundland fishing village wrestling with something …below. Below features a solid cast, bleakly beautiful cinematography, and a mystery that rises and falls with the sea, on various fronts. Not brilliant, but a solid enough tale. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
MONSTER MOVIE ORIGINS
IT’S SPOOKY SEASON! Let’s step back from the Universal canon: Karloff, Lugosi, Chaney Jr., and company. Go back just a couple of decades and you’ll find essentially the same lineup, only quieter.
As a kid in the early ’70s, I devoured movie history books, falling in love with films I’d never actually seen. They certainly weren’t showing up on TV. For years I assumed Edison’s “Frankenstein” existed only as that one tantalizing photograph in the history books.
Then came the internet, and suddenly I could watch a film I’d wanted to see since childhood. A hole in my heart I hadn’t even realized was there had finally been filled.
And there’s the original “Nosferatu”, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”. Stoker’s estate sued and won an order to destroy the film. Fortunately, prints had already circulated abroad, or we’d have lost this masterpiece entirely.
So here’s the original monster lineup, before Universal made them household names:
- Frankenstein
- J. Searle Dawley’s “Frankenstein” (1910), produced by Edison. [Watch]
- Dracula
- F. W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu” (1922). [Watch]
- Wolf(wo)Man
- Henry MacRae’s “The Werewolf” (1913), written by Ruth Ann Baldwin. Sadly, a lost film.
- The Mummy
- Georges Méliès’s “Le Monstre” (1903). [Watch]
- Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
- John S. Robertson’s “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” (1920), starring John Barrymore. [Watch]
- The Phantom of the Opera
- Rupert Julian’s “The Phantom of the Opera” (1925), starring Lon Chaney. [Watch]
- The Hunchback of Notre Dame
- Wallace Worsley’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” (1923), also starring Chaney. [Watch]
YouTube is a treasure trove of early cinema. If you’re inclined to explore the roots of spooky movies, there’s also *Häxan* (1922), *Metropolis* (1927), *Vampyr* (1932), and plenty more.
They’re not just historical curiosities. They’re worth watching.
~Sarge
STEPHEN KING: A NECESSARY EVIL. Prime Video, Magellan TV. Movie. (7 IMDb)
Stephen King: A Necessary Evil – welcome to Spooky Season!
“Quadriplegic … unwed mother … telekinesis… waffle hut… and drat, aliens again” – Stephen King with his plotting dartboard.
Stephen King is one of those authors whom I enjoy as a person, but who makes my teeth itch as a writer. Which is why I really enjoyed “Stephen King: A Necessary Evil”- all about King and how/why he thinks about things. Behind the mind of the Shining, Misery, IT!, Stand By Me, the Green Mile, Shawshank Redemption, etc. Not spooky at all, except in just how much he has written (over 200 short stories alone), and impacted readers around the world for the last 5 decades. Fully worth a watch (and no surprise aliens at the end)
~Sarge
PRACTICAL MAGIC 2. In theatres. Movie. (6.3 IMDb)
Practical Magic 2: Magical Boogaloo… The romantically cursed Owens sisters are back, along with the principal cast: Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, Stockard Channing, and Dianne Wiest. Joining them are Joey King and Maisie Williams as Sally’s daughters, who have inherited both the family gift and its rather unfortunate fine print.
The basic premise, for those who missed the original: an Owens ancestor, determined to protect herself from the heartbreak of love, cast a curse that has plagued the family for generations. Any man who falls in love with an Owens woman dies. This time around, it’s the younger generation’s turn to deal with the problem.
Unfortunately, the story has been so drastically truncated from Alice Hoffman’s novel (The Book of Magic) that both the plot and the characters suffer. Maisie Williams, in particular, is completely wasted. It’s fun to see everyone together again, but the whole thing feels fragmented, as though large chunks of the story were left on the cutting-room floor.
A pleasant bit of fluff if you’ve got the time. Otherwise, wait for the streaming release. Worth a casual watch, but hardly worth a trip to the theater.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
Gillian is hosting Bratton on KSCO this week, featuring two guests from DarkSky Santa Cruz.
Tune in on KSCO AM 1080 and FM 104.1 or livestream www.ksco.com
Call in with your questions and join the conversation! 831-479-1080
The topic is Light Pollution:
- What is it?
- Why Should We Be Concerned?
- What We Can Do.
She’ll be back with writing next week.
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
|
Here is a great video about the Redman-Hirahara House and Farmstead.
|
Have you wondered about the three-story Victorian on the outskirts of Watsonville that is visible from Highway One? The historic Redman-Hirahara House is on the National Historic Registry, and has a rich story that simply must be preserved. However, the County is very eager to side with the owner and developer of the modern hotel / strip mall adjacent to bulldoze this precious piece of local history and the only remaining example of famous local architect William H. Weeks farmhouse architecture.
Come find out the amazing history of the Redman-Hirahara House on Saturday Nov 7th at the Aptos Library. 10:30-11:30am.
Archaeologists Patricia Paramoure, Mary Gerbic, and Jacob Stone will be speaking about the Redman-Hirahara house located in Watsonville. The panel will display artifacts uncovered during archaeological excavations at the historic site. They will discuss what these items reveal about home life, community, and the profound resilience of the families who lived there. Pat was part of the excavation team for the site. Come learn about this important piece of our local history!
Sponsored by the Japanese American Memorial Pilgrimages (JAMP)
This was posted on Facebook by Ms. Amanda Dover, who currently works as a report writer for Pat’s cultural resource management company, and worked for Jacob as one of his research assistants while getting her undergrad at UCSC. She got to clean, photograph, and catalog many of the artifacts in this collection.
If you want to follow the legal challenge I am leading against the County of Santa Cruz, it is case 25CV02808 in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. If you want to help preserve this house, please contact me! My email is KI6TKB@yahoo.com
OVERBURDENED BY LOOMING UNFUNDED CALPERS PENSION LIABILITY
Come to CASI’s live event at 4:30pm Thursday October 29th for a deep dive into the risks for public workers, citizens, and taxpayers from California’s generous pension promises. We will discuss hidden costs and long-run implications already crushing city budgets. You will be shocked by how much the average citizen owes, and how California’s infrastructure suffers. We will also discuss how the search for sustainable retirement systems forced the private sector and the federal government to transition from “defined benefit” to “defined contribution” (401K matching) type plans, and how Social Security itself is at risk.
Major experts will provide key input to the CASI panel: Zachary Christensen, who is an authority on California worker pensions; David Quinnert, who has compiled the most exhaustive database on underfunding of Central Coast local government pension plans; Dale Byrne, Mayor of Carmel; Brad Imamura is experienced in management of government pension plans. Francois Melese, who is a nationally recognized economist, and expert in pension matters.
Specific facts we shall delve into:
- California governments are over $250 billion short on pension promises. That debt amounts to about $13,000 per taxpayer household.
- The cost of providing government employee pensions has risen by 50% since 2014, and taxpayers bear the bulk of that new cost (86%).
- The City of Monterey has to pay $14.7 million to CalPERS for its share of the system’s unfunded liability this year. This makes up 12% of the city’s budget.
- There is a grievous inequity between the generous California Government Pensions versus and Social Security Benefits, which can lead to government pensions being five to twenty times higher than a similar skilled worker in the private versus California public sector.
Challenge: Designing ways to recruit and retain highly competent and productive city and state workers to provide the best possible public services along with the lowest possible burden on taxpayer.
The event will take place at 430 pm, October 29 at the Community Shared Space at the Carmel Barnyard. Complimentary appetizers and non alcoholic beverages will be served. [California Pension Bomb/]
I will provide a link to the recording in next week’s Bratton Online and hope to have some of the panelists as Guests on Bratton on KSCO in the near future. Stay tuned!
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ROADS INITIATIVE ON NOVEMBER 17 BOARD AGENDA
Do you think it is acceptable that the County Board of Supervisors have allocated $0 to capital road improvement projects in next year’s budget? Why does maintenance of our roads and culverts get delayed and not well-funded, leading to catastrophic road failures, such as what happened on Valencia Road in Aptos in 2017?
Many other rural roads that suffered similar damage have still not been repaired. How does this all comport with the County’s Emergency Operation Plan for public safety and evacuation planning?
On Tuesday, November 17, the Roads Initiative will be introduced at the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors meeting. Please attend this meeting. We need a strong turnout to show the Board of Supervisors how important safe roads are to our communities.
You can share the Roads Initiative information here: santacruzroads.org
Read the Measure
Many thanks to Susan Tatsui-D-Arcy for leading this excellent work.
SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR’S FINALLY HAS REGULAR OFFICE HOURS
Supervisor Kim DeSerpa has finally established regular office hours, and is scheduling a District 2 El Nino Information Night: November 12, 2026, 5 to 7 pm, Aptos Library (7695 Soquel Drive, Aptos)
Office Hours:
First Fridays: 10 to 11:30 am,
171 Aptos Village Way, Aptos, CA – 15 minute drop-in office hours, first come, first served. Stop in and talk about your concerns:
- November 6th
- December 4th
- January 8th
HOW CAN ANYONE THINK THIS WILL WORK?
How can anyone think this will work? Two 6-story apartments and nearly 200 three-story townhomes next to State Park Drive in Aptos, with poor access and an already-strained emergency response and infrastructure? What I noticed in the image is that there is something more planned for the parcel adjacent, where the Native Revival Nursery used to be and accessing Mar Vista.
496 unit development in Aptos CA
According to the County website, things are still in the pre-application phase. Supervisor DeSerpa helped it along by holding what was termed a town hall meeting, but really just satisfied Swenson’s requirement to hold a community meeting about the project before applying for a permit…
WILL THE COUNTY’S NEW EXPENSIVE RADIO SYSTEM WORK?
Interview with Jim Frawley on Community Matters on KSCO, Friday 2pm-3pm. We will discuss the Santa Cruz County Radio Interoperability Next Gen (RING) Project
Can the County afford this $28 Million project that depends on simultaneous interconnection of 17 new radio repeater sites and coordination with 21+ agencies?
Can the small fire districts in the San Lorenzo Valley afford to pay the $100-$200/month per radio subscription?
Will it work in the next disaster?
Tune in on KSCO AM 1080 and FM 104.1 or livestream at www.ksco.com
Call in with your questions and join the conversation. 831-479-1080
THIS WEEK’S BRATTON ON KSCO
Gillian Greensite will be hosting this week’s Bratton on KSCO, 6pm-7pm. She will have two Guests from DarkSky Santa Cruz. The topic is Light Pollution: What is it? Why Should We Be Concerned? What We Can Do.
Tune in on KSCO AM 1080 and FM 104.1 or livestream www.ksco.com
Call in with your questions and join the conversation! 831-479-1080
The program will be recorded an posted on the Bratton on KSCO webpage.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. DON’T BE FOOLED BY MEASURE E..VOTE NO ON THIS REGRESSIVE TAX.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Hopefully, everyone reading this will have voted for the Fall 2026 elections, but once again the issues seem to have barely mentioned the environment…and still we must vote ‘in the dark’ about the most consequential issue facing humankind. We would be much more vigilant if someone or something was coming into our “home environment” but somehow our definition of home has shrunk to behind our front door. The lessons I promote here apply in any election, so read on…
Santa Cruz Mayor
There is a heated debate about who should be the Mayor of Santa Cruz. When voting for the environment, one can look to Ryan Coonerty’s website and see the one priority: “protect our greenbelt, parks and bay.” His website goes on with these details: “Our greenbelt, parks, beaches, and bay are why people love living in Santa Cruz. I will protect our open spaces, keep our beaches and waterways clean, invest in our parks, plant and care for more trees in our neighborhoods, and make environmental protection part of every major decision about Santa Cruz’s future.” He has chosen his words carefully, avoiding critical concrete, measurable outcomes such as reducing litter everywhere and polluted runoff that pours from City streets as well as invasive species control, endangered species recovery, and stopping sprawling homeless encampments in the greenbelt. On the other hand, Ami Chen Mills’ website says “We must protect…biodiversity and crucial ecosystems” and she supports “efforts to bring the salmon and more steelhead trout back to the headwaters of the San Lorenzo and tributaries,” which is a little more specific about the ways she wants the City’s Water and Parks Departments to act to protect the environment. She also supports the “Dark Skies and Rights of Nature movements,” both of which are applicable to City decision making and much more specific than anything Mr. Coonerty has noted in his materials.
The dominant argument I have heard in favor of Ryan’s role in protecting the environment is that he would be “much more effective” because of his “connections and experience.” This attitude and marketing ploy unfortunately avoids speaking specifically to the issues and the lever points that the Santa Cruz Mayor can use in a City Manager controlled government. I posit that the wildlife dependent on decisions made by the City and specifically the City Parks and the Water Departments would vote for someone that will work to inspire and organize the people of Santa Cruz to pay attention to their issues. This has never been anything near Ryan’s mission, but one clearly sees it in Ami’s. Nature needs more advocates, and we need to support and lift up those advocates as quickly as possible in this rapidly degrading world, even if they supposedly have less “experience.” Meanwhile, for those of you who are so readily voting for “connections and experience” – where are you in helping to recruit and mentor the next generation working in politics, so that we have advocates for nature coming up through the ranks? How do you meter their time and experience so that when they achieve the metrics you cherish you will then turn your support towards them? Or maybe you, too, just refuse to vote for the environment…like so many others. What a shame!
Governor’s Race
Why not comb the other candidates’ websites and statements to learn about their environmental platforms? There’s the governor’s race, for instance. It is interesting that Democrats all seem to rally around the cap-and-trade method of dealing with climate change, though that is highly dubious. On the other hand, regulations that reduce greenhouse gas emissions work and those are opposed by Steve Hilton who turns instead to very dubious claims that reforestation, forest management, and watershed restoration will do more to sequester carbon than regulations: the data with which I am familiar do not support such claims, though I dearly wish we had better data and models. Both Hilton and Newsom support reduced CEQA regulations to expedite housing, and while Becerra has used the strength of CEQA to environmental benefit, it is not clear if he will follow the “populist” anti-regulatory pathway that Newsom fell into. Those who have followed Becerra’s voting record for environmental issues rate him highly, but his election website curiously avoids any clear pro-nature platforms, preferring a more environmental justice type angle. Isn’t it interesting how Steve Hilton is more overtly pro-nature? Let’s not imply that he is acting like his endorser Trump, when Trump said “From day one, my administration has made it a top priority to ensure that America has among the very cleanest air and cleanest water on the planet. We want the cleanest air. We want crystal-clean water, and that’s what we’re doing and that’s what we’re working on so hard.” Guilt by association is not something we want to encourage.
Assembly Pellerin vs. Pefley
Gail Pellerin has a highly rated environmental voting record and her website notes she is in favor of protecting water and air quality as well as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Her opponent Carol Pefley has nothing on her website about environmental protections.
US Congress Panetta vs. Verbica
While I have long been disappointed by Jimmy Pannetta’s ability to protect natural areas from over-visitation, he scores very well in his environmental voting record. It is curious to see where he failed in that score- check out the website! BTW, much legislation reaching him is sponsored by big money, big business, and isn’t something that We The People have put forth. Jimmy’s opponent, Peter Verbica, has nothing on his website about environmental protection, although he says he wants to “Lower Food Costs by Providing Water for Farmers;” we’re not sure where he is proposing to increase water supply to farmers…no details.
Vote for the Environment!
I urge you to cast your vote first and foremost for the environment. Vote like your home depends on it. Can we please see our homes more broadly and think about what is happening to them? Some of my colleagues vocally and rightly promote indigenous rights. One thing we can learn from those cultures is to view our homes as entirely integrated with the natural world. We must cast our ballots accordingly.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Every once in a while, a young person, just getting ready to head off to law school, or maybe somebody studying to take the so-called LSAT, the “Law School Admission Test,” asks me some questions about the law. Do you like being a lawyer? Do you have any tips on the LSAT? What do you think about this or that law school? Things like that.
Recently, a young person who had just graduated from college, and was thinking of being a lawyer, and so was studying for the LSAT, asked me a question that was quite a bit more “philosophical” (or more “profound”) than the kind of questions that I most typically get asked. Here was the question that this prospective law student posed to me:
Do you think that the worldly law creates freedom, or does it primarily create boundaries within which we are free?
As I say, this was not, really, the kind of question that I am normally asked, but I was happy to have been presented with that question. It’s a pretty important one! Here was my reply:
I think that the statement that “worldly law creates freedom” is pretty close to what I think. It might be more accurate to say that my view is that “worldly law” expresses our freedom, since our “freedom” is primary, in my view.
I don’t know whether or not your idea of “worldly” law is the same as mine, but you seem clearly to think there are at least two kinds of law – the “worldly” kind and some other variety. I agree with the idea of TWO different kinds of law. The idea that there are two kinds of law came to me as a kind of revelation (it’s pretty hard, now, for me to remember exactly when that happened). I do think that there are two different kinds of law.
My idea of “law,” prior to this “revelation,” as I have just called it, was that “law” was more or less the opposite of “freedom.” In other words, the “law” tells you what you have to do. While I don’t think I made this distinction at that time, our physical laws (which I am guessing are not the “worldly” laws you are thinking of) is what I was thinking of as the basic “law” by which we are governed. You, know, like the “law” of gravity. You can’t disobey the law of gravity (or other physical laws).
That idea was my basic idea about “law.” The law says what must and will happen (and this is definitely true in the case of the laws that govern our physical world). While It is obviously true that we can disobey human laws, I thought that physical laws were really the only kind of law that is really “law,” so that when we came up with statements that said what should happen in our social and human-created world, we used the word “law” to indicate that you “had” to do something, or had not to do something. “Law,” in other words, was always associated with “necessity,” not “freedom.”
Naturally, since human laws are obviously not like the law of gravity, I assumed that if someone “broke” the law, they should be punished. While we can violate our human laws, we aren’t supposed to, and if we do, we are, or should be, punished – and/or made to do what “the law” prescribes. I think this idea of “law” may be along the lines of “law” being a set of “boundaries within which we are free,” as you put it. This way of understanding human laws suggests that our human laws are intended to constrain what we do in a larger, overall view.
At some point, I changed my idea about human law, and I ended up with what I decided to call my “Two Worlds Hypothesis.” My daily blog is really just a set of daily reflections on the implications of that “Two Worlds Hypothesis,” and the “Two Worlds” mentioned are (1) the “World of Nature” (in which the laws absolutely say what must and will happen – “gravity” being the go-to example) and (2) what I call the “Political World,” the world that we create by our own choices and our own actions.
The actual title of my blog is, “We Live In A Political World.” I hope you’ll read it! I have a new comment every day – and have made those daily comments for sixteen years. As for the title, we most certainly do, most “immediately,” “Live In A Political World.” “Ultimately,” though, we live in the “World of Nature,” where the laws are absolute and tell us what must and will happen. When we get these two “Worlds” mixed up, the problems can be severe.
Global Warming, for instance, governed by the laws that prevail in the “World of Nature,” may well kill us all off, and eliminate the “Human World” entirely. Our “Human World” depends on the “World of Nature,” but since the “freedom” that we are provided in our “Political World” allows us to make choices that can conflict with the “World of Nature,” we can choose to do something that might end up destroying the “Natural World,” on which we ultimately depend. Global Warming could do it. So could Nuclear War.
My experience as a “politician” is what led me to the “Two Worlds” idea, and my claim is that in our “Political World,” anything is possible. The human world is created by our own choices and actions, and is a world in which our “freedom” determines what exists – and what doesn’t. The “Natural World” follows the laws of “necessity,” but our (political) world is governed by the reality of our “freedom,” and in “our” world, our “Political World,” the “law” is the expression of our freedom. In our world, in other words, we, essentially, write down what we have chosen to make real, and then, by following the laws we have enacted, we bring that “world” into reality.
I have ended up with a great enthusiasm for “the law,” because I do see the law as the realm in which we most clearly – and with great consequence – create the world in which we most immediately live.
“Politics,” as you will see, is the realm in which we most directly express our freedom (at least our “collective” freedom). We are each free to act, individually, but we can (and do) act in concert, together, and we have the freedom (collectively) to create any world we want (at least if that world is consistent with the World of Nature, which is primary). I often call that primary world, the “World of Nature,” “The World that God created.”
Much of what lawyers do, of course, is to work within the human world that we have collectively created, that “Political World,” in which the laws provide rules, and prohibitions, and outline opportunities for action, etc. Many lawyers, I believe, end up being more or less frustrated and/or resentful about the “law,” and of the rules that establish what is “legal,” and what is not, and which laws can end up seeming to constrain freedom, or to perpetuate injustice, and that may well impose constraints that are unreasonable, unfair, or even just plain “wrong.”
Since I have never lost my “political” perspective, I have never become as jaundiced, and perhaps even as resentful, as some lawyers end up being. So, I do recommend not losing that larger perspective. The “laws” with which we most immediately deal are the laws that we establish ourselves (by “politics,” by the way). What we “legislate,” in other words, will determine the realities which most directly affect us. “Law,” in other words, is a realm of freedom, not a realm of penalty and constraint.
That’s my view at least. Keep me posted – and really good luck on the LSAT!
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
A delusional President Trump claimed in an interview with the Washington Examiner’s Byron York on Air Force One, that his approval rating is really about 60%, his belief drawing alarm among some notable conservatives. His RealClearPolitics average at the time was 38.8% with Trump calling it “fake — I’m not at 38.” York asked him if he meant he’d be at 60 if he were on the ballot himself, he answered, “I don’t believe I could be beaten by anybody. I think that if I needed it, which I don’t, I think 60. Yeah, I think I’d be in the 60s now,” the subsequent X post spreading pretty quickly. York wrote that Trump “sometimes views his Republican base as if it is the electorate as a whole, which is why the low rating just doesn’t make any sense to him.”
Conservative senior fellow Henry Olsen at the Ethics and Public Policy Center responded, “Very problematic if the President actually believes his job approval is at 60 percent.” Rasmussen Reports founder, Scott Rasmussen, only contributed, “Wow, just wow.” Physician and conservative commentator Pradheep J. Shanker did a harder take: “He probably thinks he looks like a thirty-year old, too. Delusional people are delusional.” CNN chief media analyst Brian Stelter thinks his belief in a higher rating explains a lot about his behavior, and anti-disinformation activist Jim Stewartson observes that his habit of inflating numbers is only getting worse. “He lives in a sealed alternate reality — “the hottest country in the world'”— and expects the rest of us to live in it with him,” says Stewartson.
Progressive commentator Kyle Kulinski paints a darker picture, more pointedly after Election Day. “He is 100% going to try to steal this election after an historic blue tsunami. This country is in for a very, very rough stretch.” Frank and Ernest, the comic strip drawn by Bob Thaves, portrays four characters standing beneath a ‘Wonderland Campaign Consultants‘ sign, surrounded by stacks of poll data sheets. One character is introducing a potential client to Rumpelstiltskin, a media adviser who claims to “do a great job of spinning straw polls into gold for you.” Perhaps this is the alternate reality where Trump is gleaning his gold.
Alexander Willis writes on Raw Story that Trump is fuming over former President Obama’s Michigan crowd size, complaining at a Georgia rally that the media outlets never give his own crowds proper recognition. Obama had campaigned earlier for Abdul El-Sayed and Jocelyn Benson in Detroit, leading Trump to whine, “Now, he’s making a speech for Mohamed in a massive crowd! A massive crowd has shown up? Where are they? They never talk about my crowd!” as he repeatedly hurled his middle name ‘Mohamed‘ as an epithet against El-Sayed. He had the gall to dredge up Bernie Sanders speaking to massive crowds — “they weren’t bad, but they were a tiny fraction, 900 to 1,000 people” insisting that his own draw pulled in 35,000 to 40,000, yet the press “gushed” over Sanders.
The Donald’s “beautiful aide” Margo Martin may have some ‘splainin’ to do after filming a Trump rally in Florida, resulting in videos of empty seats. The clip of the crowd chanting “USA! USA! USA!” toward the podium as Trump took the stage, and a second clip of the president saluting a ‘patriot’ in the audience to strains of the disco hit ‘Y.M.C.A.’ drew satisfied smiles, but the sparsely attended venue shots that were posted were unimpressive to MAGA. One person responded, “Wow…very small crowd…there were more people at our bingo hall tonight…” and another declared, “The midterm game is over for Trump!” Others jumped on the bandwagon with, “Can you book a smaller place?..Can’t fill a junior college gym, hilarious.” Supporters wouldn’t back down with one calling Trump “best president of my lifetime.”
Barack Obama struck a few blows toward Trump as he spoke to a crowd in Cleveland, in the state that has received much attention in the lead-up to the midterms. The former president was in Ohio to campaign for Amy Acton’s gubernatorial candidacy, and Sherrod Brown’s Senate run, using his words to question where Trump’s attention has been directed in his presidency. “I mean, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but he seems very focused on home renovations. He should be on HGTV.” Obama gave a rundown of the projects by naming the ballroom, the Rose Garden makeover, the new helipad, and particularly, Trump’s gold-finish-fetish. “He’s got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory,” commented Obama.
After his White House appraisal, Obama took up Trump’s handling of Iran, blaming the war for pushing domestic costs higher — a war that “he decided to start that nobody asked for and nobody voted for.” He defended his own 2015 agreements with Iran, “a deal that everybody knows kept them from getting nukes,” by placing limits on their nuclear program while allowing international inspections and at the same time removing sanctions. Those inspectors reported that Iran was staying within the guidelines until Trump terminated the agreement in 2018 during his first term in office, causing Iran to push uranium enrichment beyond the limits of the Obama deal.
Obama added that the current administration was marked by “incompetence the likes of which we have not seen in modern times,” populated by unserious people. He accused Trump of excelling “so wildly at just straight-up grifting,” and framed the midterms as an “inflection point” to allow the electorate to say “enough!” Trump’s campaign promise to control costs were a smokescreen, the administration’s actions being directly responsible for rising costs, with Obama singling out tariffs and the Iran incursion. The former president tore into Vivek Ramaswamy for his campaign ad using Amy Acton’s estranged mother, saying that “the standards have gotten so low that somebody can run an ad like that,” adding that “There’s a decency that we should expect out of our public officials.”
Obama also went after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, pronouncing him as an unserious person who is “focused on important matters like the jawlines and testosterone levels of our male troops. And live streaming executions. How much time do you think this defense secretary spends looking at himself in the mirror in the morning? He’s working his hair because that’s how warriors look. These are not serious people, and the problem is, you end up having to pay the price for their lack of seriousness.” The latest from U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Mike Waltz, told the the Financial Times, the war could still be going 12 months from now, a bit different than Trump’s claims that it would last “four to five weeks” or some other random claim for a short duration. Unless of course, we end up “taking all the oil” by taking over “the whole country” as Trump threatens, but in his mind “the real question” is whether to “finish off Iran or let it wither on the vine,” or whether the stock market is up, down, or sideways, or perchance, Melania brokers another deal? So many decisions in this alternate reality!
The MAGA sycophants are still coming out of the woodwork with fake awards to ingratiate themselves to President Trump by stroking his insatiable ego. At an Iowa rally last week, House candidate Joe Mitchell presented the head narcissist with a cheap ‘Man of the Century‘ award, straight from a Hobby Lobby, price tag still intact in all probability. The Donald showed his Cheshire Cat grin with his best ‘Aw, shucks‘ expression, as Mitchell poured it on to “the greatest president we’ve ever had.” It’s gonna look just great in a fancy new gold frame back in D.C.
A new TMZ documentary describes a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and William Mersey, fellow inmates at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center, regarding an alleged remark made by Trump in an unusual glimpse of his view of himself. Mersey had asked Epstein for a story that was “emblematic of Donald Trump’s essence,” with the sex-trafficker delivering an anecdote involving Trump, a private jet flight from New York to Florida, a French woman, and Atlantic City. At the start of the flight, Trump proposed a stop in Atlantic City to show off his casino, but Epstein said, “I’m not landing in Atlantic City — it’s all white trash down there.” The French woman asked for a translation of ‘white trash,’ with Trump responding, “It’s me without money.”
In a campaign swing for Florida gubernatorial candidate David Jolly, former President Bill Clinton lobbed some pointed digs at Trump, hitting him for his overhaul of the White House Rose Garden. “I think Congress made a mistake not protesting turning the Rose Garden into what looks like the entrance to Liberace’s bathroom,” Clinton said to an amused crowd. ‘Fox & Friends Weekend‘ sniped at the comment, providing ammo to spread in even further online. One X user posted, “99 mph fastball on the outside corner,” with another posting, “Old Bubba got bangers,” but some questioned whether it was “wrong to smear the entertainer’s memory this way,” especially in light of his own controversial term in office — the Lewinsky cheating scandal being cited by many.
William Kristol writes on The Bulwark, about early-twentieth-century Marxist thinker and Italian Communist Party leader Antonio Gramsci, who was imprisoned by Mussolini’s fascist government in 1926 until his death in 1937, who said, “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.” After reading about Vivek Ramaswamy, JD Vance, Donald Trump and Steve Witkoff, Kristol updates Gramsci’s formulation to: “Trumpism is dying, and a new liberalism struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters.” He notes that this famous line ascribed to Gramsci isn’t a literal translation from his Prison Notebook which reads “In questo interregno si verificano i fenomeni morbosi più svariati” which is translated by the late Professor Joseph Buttigieg (Pete’s father) as “In this interregnum a great variety of morbid phenomena occur.”
Kristol suggests ‘morbid phenomena’ may describe Trumpists more accurately than ‘monsters.’ “After all, monsters are in a way impressive. They can have a certain grandeur,” he says, very unlike Ramaswamy, Vance, Trump or Witkoff — conclusively, the ‘morbid phenomena’ of our day, “the visible detritus of a failing and flailing movement that’s, sadly, dominated or politics for the last decade — and that, of course, remains powerful today.” He decries Ramaswamy’s disgusting attack on his Ohio gubernatorial opponent, Amy Acton, by running an ad with Amy’s estranged mother calling her a “liar who lies about her past.” The mother lost custody of Amy and her brother, and fled with the stepfather accused of raping the 12-year-old Amy, staying with him until his death. Ramaswamy has only doubled down on his smear campaign, which is backed by a $4 million war chest.
JD Vance then showed his true colors later when he called Acton’s childhood sexual abuse survival a ‘lie’ and, “Whether the ad was appropriate or not is not really my concern,” the vice president said. At a rally with Ramaswamy, he praised his fellow Republican for having “the audacity to run a TV commercial which calls it out like it is,” expressing his disgust toward “fellow Republicans across the country who are whining” about the ad. Kristol writes, “So there it is, the morbid phenomenon of late Trumpism on full display: smearing a survivor of child sexual abuse; running an ad featuring a primary enabler of the abuse; and complaining that some decent people in his party are offended by this.”
He continues: “But the Trumpists don’t just like enablers of child sexual abuse. They also love brutal and aggressive dictators,” referring to Trump’s abandonment of Ukraine and his support for Russia and Vladimir Putin. And indeed, later that very day, Trump told reporters that “Russia, frankly, has been fine on Ukraine.” Kristol says, “Even Neville Chamberlain didn’t claim that Nazi Germany had been fine on Czechoslovakia. And Trump’s befuddled appeasement of Putin has continued full bore all week.” Andrew Egger, Kristol’s partner on The Bulwark, reported that U.S. special envoy, Steven Witkoff, joined the chorus, praising Putin as a “humanitarian” on releasing a 74-year-old American who was unjustly imprisoned for four years. “You talk so much about my president, President Trump, being a humanitarian,” Witkoff told Putin. “You are a humanitarian also, sir, and I salute that, I commend you, and I thank you again, ” which evoked a fox-in-the-henhouse smile from the Russian dictator.
“Yet another morbid phenomena of Trumpism: sucking up to a murderous aggressor and brutal dictator. It’s all repulsive. And dangerous. But let me close by returning, across the aisle as it were, to Antonio Gramsci. I don’t endorse Gramsci’s politics, or much of his analysis, insofar as I understand it — though my sense is that some of it is quite brilliant. But I think Gramsci understood this: You can’t just wait for the morbid phenomenon bedeviling the world to collapse on its own. Yes, fascism has weaknesses. And yes, fascism in its various manifestations needs to be understood and argued against. But above all, fascism has to be confronted. And then defeated. That was true in the last century. It’s true today,” Kristol concludes.
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Who can resist a “Cozy Nook Brook”? I certainly couldn’t. Let’s see what we can find… wow. Unusual. Pretty much nothing (and a whole lot of noise from the generic nature of the name and other places named Santa Cruz across the world).
LocalWiki has an entry on Crystal Creek, which echoes Clark’s comment about the brook being named for an area nearby: “Upstream has been often identified as Cozy Nook Brook. A rhyme for Cozy Nook area nearby.” I don’t know how “often” it has actually be identified, as there’s literally no other reference to it (or the subdivision mentioned in the entry) on the web. I suspect, as I’ve seen before, Clark’s book and the references he cites are the sole source for this information. The contributor, “Harlan”, identified as “John Harlan Pilge” on his bio page, specializes in the Santa Cruz area, so I suspect he’s a fellow fan of Clark.
I checked both Google Maps and Apple Maps, and since neither of them show a “Cozy Nook Brook” at the head of Crystal Creek, my take is that this is not an official name for the spot, as otherwise it would be in the Santa Cruz County GIS system and in turn show up there. I’m going to guess, however, that Happy Valley locals use the term.
I can confirm that “Cozy Nook Park” actually exists as a place name. A couple of entries for “174 Happy Valley Way” in Santa Cruz County on real estate sites yield that as part of the listing, which I’m guessing comes from the County GIS database as a result of the subdivision mentioned.
If you know anyone from Happy Valley (or live there yourself), I’d be curious to know whether or not the name still has currency among locals. This is about as bare a cupboard as I’ve found after digging through references to an entry in Clark’s book.
The upper reaches of what is called Crystal Creek on USGS:9 in Section 28, T1OS, R1W, is given the fanciful name of Cozy Nook Brook on other maps. It was probably named when Cozy Nook Park, a very small subdivision, was laid out at the end of Happy Valley Road. See additional comments under brook in the Glossary.

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Humanity”
“You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty.”
~Mahatma Gandhi
“Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive.”
~Dalai Lama
“Life is to be lived, not controlled; and humanity is won by continuing to play in face of certain defeat.”
~Ralph Ellison
“A feminist is anyone who recognizes the equality and full humanity of women and men.”
~Gloria Steinem
“Humanity is acquiring all the right technology for all the wrong reasons.”
~R. Buckminster Fuller
|
Sawyer Hill’s tour bus driver, David RollingCloud Jackson, died behind the wheel on October 14. He suffered a medical emergency, the bus drifted across 3 lanes of traffic, and rolled. 2 people in the crew were injured, and Sawyer has wisely and understandably postponed his immediate tour dates. There’s a gofundme to help the family.
Sawyer posted this video earlier than originally intended, saying that the words “I’ll be home soon” carry a different weight now… I think it’s a lovely song and video, so I’m sharing it here. I can’t wait to see him when his SF show gets rescheduled. |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)










