Blog Archives

October 14 – 20, 2026

Highlights this week:

Greensite… on why we must oppose the city’s Prohousing Designation reapplication… Steinbruner… state review of BESS projects… Brown Act violations… Hayes… Your community and prescribed fire… Patton… Talking to eachother less… Matlock… ready…aim…pander… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Golden Gate Park… Quotes on… “Conversation”

...

SELECTIVE TREE HARVESTING IN THE SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS. As the now historic “SELECTIVE” harvesting goes they SELECT all the trees they can make big bucks from and strip the mountain sides.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com


Dateline: October 14, 2026

CONVERSATION. I read the article that Gary Patton links to this week. You can read it for free if you sign up for a free account, which takes a couple of clicks, but is not that bad. It’s about how we talk to one another less, and it made me think of my absolute favorite part of a train ride Brian and I took to New Orleans a few years back. We got a sleeperette, where the opposing chairs folded down to a bed at night, and there was an upper bunk that you pulled down to sleep in. The price included breakfast, lunch, and dinner in the dining car, which was easily my favorite part of the journey!

How they did it all was come around and sign you up for a time slot. At the appropriate time, they called you to the dining car and seated you with two complete strangers! You had to have polite conversation with someone you didn’t know at all, and it was amazing! This was 3 times a day for 2 days, and with different people each time. Some conversations were super interesting, and some people were less captivating, but you can share a table with pretty much anyone for the duration of a meal. It was very liberating and exciting to be reminded of this, and I can’t recommend it enough.

Now I want to take a train somewhere…

~Webmistress

...

BELOW. Netflix. Series. (6.3 IMDb) ***

Below keeps threatening to be a deep sea eldritch horror movie, but it soon becomes plain who the real monster is, and, like anyone who grew up here, we know the townies are the real heroes. Set in the severe beauty of a Newfoundland fishing village wrestling with something …below. Below features a solid cast, bleakly beautiful cinematography, and a mystery that rises and falls with the sea, on various fronts. Not brilliant, but a solid enough tale. Worth a watch.
~Sarge

MONSTER MOVIE ORIGINS ****

IT’S SPOOKY SEASON! Let’s step back from the Universal canon: Karloff, Lugosi, Chaney Jr., and company. Go back just a couple of decades and you’ll find essentially the same lineup, only quieter.

As a kid in the early ’70s, I devoured movie history books, falling in love with films I’d never actually seen. They certainly weren’t showing up on TV. For years I assumed Edison’s “Frankenstein” existed only as that one tantalizing photograph in the history books.

Then came the internet, and suddenly I could watch a film I’d wanted to see since childhood. A hole in my heart I hadn’t even realized was there had finally been filled.

And there’s the original “Nosferatu”, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”. Stoker’s estate sued and won an order to destroy the film. Fortunately, prints had already circulated abroad, or we’d have lost this masterpiece entirely.

So here’s the original monster lineup, before Universal made them household names:

Frankenstein

J. Searle Dawley’s “Frankenstein” (1910), produced by Edison. [Watch]

Dracula

F. W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu” (1922). [Watch]

Wolf(wo)Man

Henry MacRae’s “The Werewolf” (1913), written by Ruth Ann Baldwin. Sadly, a lost film.

The Mummy

Georges Méliès’s “Le Monstre” (1903). [Watch]

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

John S. Robertson’s “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” (1920), starring John Barrymore. [Watch]

The Phantom of the Opera

Rupert Julian’s “The Phantom of the Opera” (1925), starring Lon Chaney. [Watch]

The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Wallace Worsley’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” (1923), also starring Chaney. [Watch]

YouTube is a treasure trove of early cinema. If you’re inclined to explore the roots of spooky movies, there’s also *Häxan* (1922), *Metropolis* (1927), *Vampyr* (1932), and plenty more.

They’re not just historical curiosities. They’re worth watching.

~Sarge

STEPHEN KING: A NECESSARY EVIL. Prime Video, Magellan TV. Movie. (7 IMDb) ****

Stephen King: A Necessary Evil – welcome to Spooky Season!

“Quadriplegic … unwed mother … telekinesis… waffle hut… and drat, aliens again” – Stephen King with his plotting dartboard.

Stephen King is one of those authors whom I enjoy as a person, but who makes my teeth itch as a writer. Which is why I really enjoyed “Stephen King: A Necessary Evil”- all about King and how/why he thinks about things. Behind the mind of the Shining, Misery, IT!, Stand By Me, the Green Mile, Shawshank Redemption, etc. Not spooky at all, except in just how much he has written (over 200 short stories alone), and impacted readers around the world for the last 5 decades. Fully worth a watch (and no surprise aliens at the end)

~Sarge

PRACTICAL MAGIC 2. In theatres. Movie. (6.3 IMDb) **-

Practical Magic 2: Magical Boogaloo… The romantically cursed Owens sisters are back, along with the principal cast: Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, Stockard Channing, and Dianne Wiest. Joining them are Joey King and Maisie Williams as Sally’s daughters, who have inherited both the family gift and its rather unfortunate fine print.

The basic premise, for those who missed the original: an Owens ancestor, determined to protect herself from the heartbreak of love, cast a curse that has plagued the family for generations. Any man who falls in love with an Owens woman dies. This time around, it’s the younger generation’s turn to deal with the problem.

Unfortunately, the story has been so drastically truncated from Alice Hoffman’s novel (The Book of Magic) that both the plot and the characters suffer. Maisie Williams, in particular, is completely wasted. It’s fun to see everyone together again, but the whole thing feels fragmented, as though large chunks of the story were left on the cutting-room floor.

A pleasant bit of fluff if you’ve got the time. Otherwise, wait for the streaming release. Worth a casual watch, but hardly worth a trip to the theater.

~Sarge

OBSESSION. Peacock. Movie. (7.8 IMDb) ***

Obsession is less a “be careful what you wish for” story than a warning to be careful what someone else wishes about you. What begins as desire curdles into something far more complicated, until it becomes difficult to tell who is really the villain and who is simply the victim of a wish that has gone badly wrong. The result is a modest but effective little story about longing, control, and the danger of getting exactly what someone thinks they want. Definitely worth a watch.

~Sarge

KATLA. Netflix. Movie. (7 IMDb) ***

Katla is bleak in the best possible way, set beneath the ash-gray skies of a small Icelandic town, Vik, where everyone seems to have learned to survive by saying as little as possible. But when the volcano begins returning people who should not be there, it does more than produce doppelgangers; it drags old grief, guilt, resentment, and buried secrets out of lives already worn thin. What begins as a supernatural mystery gradually becomes something more unsettling, asking whether identity is really a matter of being the “original,” or whether the person who loves more deeply, suffers less damage, or makes better choices might have the stronger claim to that life. Quiet, strange, and relentlessly melancholy, Katla makes its frozen landscape feel like an extension of the people living in it: apparently still, but with something hot and dangerous moving underneath. Worth a watch.

~Sarge

Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.

Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com

...

October 12, 2026

Drop the ProHousing Designation

If you have no idea what a Prohousing Designation is, you are likely in the majority.  Behind the scenes, it is one of the main drivers accelerating the speed with which large housing projects are being approved by the city with unwelcome additions such as no parking and no public hearings.

Prohousing Designation was voted in under Assembly Bill 101 in 2019. The aim was to encourage CA cities and counties to adopt local policies and programs that support housing production beyond existing statutory requirements.

We’ve all heard the rhetoric from city officials. Yes, this or that project is huge, has no parking, has no setbacks, was approved with no public hearings and we know it takes away your privacy, your sunlight, your neighborhood character but our hands are tied. It’s all due to state housing laws! Except that is not quite true.

Cities apply for a Prohousing Designation to the state HCD (Housing and Community Development) department. HCD then evaluates the applications and selects those who will receive the designation. The designation allows a city or county to have priority processing for state funding. The HCD website states that “The Prohousing Designation seeks to reward jurisdictions for going above-and-beyond what is required by state housing laws in accelerating housing production.”

The city of Santa Cruz applied for the designation in 2023 and scored the fifth highest out of 30 jurisdictions. It was the only city in the tri-county area to get its Housing Element in on time, a pre-requisite for application. The city was approved for a Prohousing Designation. With that competitive edge the city applied for and was granted $500,000 which went to the Community Action Board to help with rent relief for low-income households. A worthy cause.

What did the city have to offer in return to be competitive for such grants? Ay, there’s the rub. Here’s a few of the 48-line items:

  • Identify sufficient building sites to accommodate 150% or greater than the current RHNA sites
  • Permit duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes by right (no public hearings) in low-density (single family) residential zones
  • Adopt density bonus programs that allow additional density for additional affordability beyond the minimum statutes
  • Eliminate minimum parking requirements for residential developments
  • Allow ministerial approval (no public hearings) for multiple housing types
  • Eliminate public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the General Plan
  • Make publicly owned land available for affordable housing

All this was voluntarily made policy by the city. The handwringing over the loss of local control is disingenuous.

The designation ends on January 1, 2027, and the city must apply well before then for renewal. The item went before council on June 23 and the approval for the reapplication was an enthusiastic unanimous vote. Council appeared oblivious to what was being traded.

For some unstated reason, after that vote, in September there was a revised application posted online with a 7-day comment period. It has not yet been put on a council agenda, but time is running out.

September was the first time the public could see what policies the city is agreeing to beyond existing statutes. Some commenters, including myself, expressed concern and opposition to the above bulleted actions. The city’s response was to reassure the public that “this action does not approve any new housing projects, or change zoning, or adopt new policies.” This was a head-scratcher since the bulleted list sure sounds like new polices and new zoning. Then the penny dropped. By “this action” the city wordsmiths cleverly were referencing only the council’s vote to approve the reapplication. And there are “no new policies” since the city has already agreed to them in its 2023 application. Slick, huh?

So, the agents of overbuilding in the city turn out to be the city staff and council. No hiding behind state laws. Sure, there is the RHNA (Regional Housing Needs Allocation) but way beyond that are the actions of the council and staff to fast track, densify, remove parking and public hearings from the equation. Rezoning single-family neighborhoods is policy in the reapplication and if the city gets its reapplication approved, nothing we can do to oppose or change that policy.

Given the impact on neighborhoods, on local businesses, on our infrastructure I think it’s time to remove the veil of innocence and demand the city not reapply for a further prohousing status.

The grant monies that may flow our way (Santa Cruz was not a recipient of the most recent grant allocation) do not offset the negative impacts. Plus, we are way ahead in provision of affordable housing (with still no evidence it is benefitting locals and local workers.)

Let’s rest on our laurels and allow other cities and counties to catch up. Let other cities apply for funding to accelerate their housing development. The  city’s affordable housing development data demonstrate we do not need to be on the fast track. We need to slow down.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org  Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
THANK YOU VERY MUCH?

When Director Jennifer Balboni sharply denied my ability to speak during the Soquel Creek Water District Public Advisory Committee, even though the printed agenda said I could, she violated the Brown Act, in addition to being extremely arrogant and rude.  I was the only member of the public there.

I attended the Soquel Creek Water District Advisory Committee meeting this week to learn more about what is happening with local water management.  There were only three of the seven public Committee members there, but four high-paid staff and two Directors from the Board, Jennifer Balboni and Tom LaHue, attended.  

Director Balboni ran the meeting.  

During public comment, I thanked the District for the GeoTracker on the website that enables the public to view all reports submitted to the State regarding operation and monitoring of the PureWater Soquel Project injection of advanced treated wastewater into the aquifer. Reports & Studies | Soquel Creek Water District, CA   I also thanked the District for replacing unsightly metal storage containers at the water treatment facility on Soquel Avenue Frontage Road, and commented how nicely the vines on the fence are growing to improve aesthetics from the street and sidewalk.
 
However, when I asked to make a comment on a later agenda item about the continued collaboration between the District and City of Santa Cruz for regional water management, Ms. Balboni stopped me.  “NO, but thank you for your interest!”    The printed agenda stated that members of the public could comment on each item and would have two minutes to do so, however, I did not argue.  

During a presentation soon after, General Manager Melanie Mow-Schumacher walked over to Ms. Balboni and whispered something to her.  The two left the room for awhile.  Upon returning, the meeting progressed with no call for public comment until the very end, when Ms. Balboni hurriedly asked if Committee members or public had comments?   Without taking a breath, she continued “No. Okay, let’s move on.”

After the meeting adjourned, I approached Ms. Balboni with the printed agenda in hand.   When I politely greeted her twice she did not respond.  Finally, I just started speaking, holding the agenda in front of her and pointing out the wording that stated the public could comment on each agenda item as it was discussed.  Without looking at me, she quickly said, “Yeah. That’s why I asked for ‘public’ at the end.”  

“But you shut me down on all the other items in the meeting,” I replied. 

“Sorry!” she blurted, and turned away to leave.  

So much for supporting the Mission of the only remaining Standing Committee to “provide an opportunity for community members to communicate, collaborate, and guide transparent decision-making to ensure safe and sustainable water resources for the community and environment.”

Public Advisory Committee | Soquel Creek Water District, CA
 
I think Director Balboni needs to leave her ego at the door and brush up on the Brown Act.
 
To the credit of General Manager Melanie Mow-Schumacher, she asked if I had questions that she could answer.  We talked about how the District plans to charge the City of Santa Cruz for having the water transfer intertie at the O’Neill Ranch Well in Soquel, but that so far, the City is not imposing a similar charge on the District.  Water can be sent in either direction in times of need.  She also said the water transfer from the City to the District that would allow potable water from the City to be sold to District customers when it is plentiful in the winter, allowing the District’s wells to rest and recover, was on hold and under review.  

She said that will be part of the MOU discussed at a future District Board meeting on November 17.  Stay tuned for that discussion, and participate – if you can.

CHANGING THE RULES FOR STATE REVIEW OF BESS PROJECTS
The California Energy Commission (CEC) is changing the rules and requirements for review of grid-scale battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, such as the Seahawk BESS Project proposed for 90 Minto Road in Watsonville.

Learn more about this at the Remote-Only Workshop, November 2, 1pm-4pm 
 

The draft regulations propose incorporating amendments required by Senate Bills 254 and 283 and modifying other aspects of the existing regulations. Among other updates, the proposed changes would expand application requirements to ensure information that has been requested during the permitting process for opt-in projects, in particular to respond to public comments, is provided up front.  [Renewable Energy Update 10.9.26]
 
I hope you can participate. Written comments will be due at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on November 10, 2026.
 
BE GONE, FLAMMABLE BESS!
The grassroots-organized educational event was a great success, with many good speakers, and Spanish translation provided.   Please write Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors and continue to demand the County only allow non-flammable battery technology for grid-scale battery energy storage system (BESS) projects in the County, and to not allow them at all on agricultural land.  

Board of Supervisors <boardofsupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov>   Call 831-454-2200.   

The Board seems to have washed their hands of this issue now that the California Energy Commission is reviewing the Seahawk BESS Project.  Please continue to send you comments to the CEC.
  
Many thanks to Stop Lithium BESS in Santa Cruz County, and BAN Lithium BESS in Santa Cruz County, for this good work to inform the public, as the County leadership remains silent.
 
LISTEN IN TO KSCO THIS FRIDAY
This Friday, listen in to “Community Matters” at 2pm-3pm and “Bratton on KSCO” at 6pm-7pm.  That’s AM 1080 and FM 104.1 on your radio, or livestream : ksco.com

“Community Matters” will be a recorded program of an interview with Blue Shirt Justice League founder Scott Smith and Never Again Moss Landing’s Lead Investigator Ed Mitchell, talking about the September 18 Vistra Batter Fire in Moss Landing and the Whistelblower accounts of how critical health and safety information has been withheld from the public. Here is a link to the interview on September 25, 2026 on KSCO “Community Matters” with Ed Mitchel, lead investigator for Never Again Moss Landing, and Scott Smith, Founder of Blue Shirt Justice League.
 
Grey Hayes will be hosting “Bratton on KSCO”:

Friday October 16, I will be hosting a 1-hour radio show on the habitats of the Monterey Bay region… 6-7pm on KSCO 1080 am or 104.1 fm, Santa Cruz (and across the Central Coast).

831-479-1080 is the number to call

I’d love folks to call in with questions, observations, concerns, history, natural history, and so forth.

Building awareness of nature, many listeners at a time. Maritime chaparral, coastal bluff scrub, coast live oak forest, inland sandhills, dunes, tidal marshes, caves, redwood forest…and so much more. Let’s help people to understand and engage with this special place.

Thanks!

Grey

The Never Again Moss Landing group held a press conference to announce critical new information brought to light by   CTEH Whistleblower Ms. Peggy Dixon.

The affidavit included reference to and inclusion of the CTEH  MOSS LANDING INCIDENT MOSS LANDING, CA DRAFT COMMUNITY AIR MONITORING, SAMPLING, AND ANALYSIS PLAN  Version 1.0 Prepared on Behalf of: Vistra Corp, dated February 17, 2025 (the day before the second fire re-ignited).

Ms. Dixon states many troubling issues, namely that CTEH scientists like herself were noting and reporting HF gas at the Moss 300 battery fire site as late as September, 2025, but neither Vistra nor the EPA reported it.   Monterey County Supervisors and the public were told nothing was found.

I am also including, a copy of the October 2 recording of the interview with Dr. Mark Strudley, Director of the Pajaro Regional Flood Management Agency interview about the work happening to help prevent floods this winter.  Let’s keep our fingers crossed…and ready our rain barrels.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  TUNE IN TO A REMOTE MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

 
Cheers,
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
Your Community’s Relationship to Prescribed Fire: A Very Recent Case Study

This past week, areas of Bonny Doon were surprised to experience the effects of a prescribed fire at Swanton Pacific Ranch. Because of one person’s vigilance, my community and I were not entirely surprised. The experience ignited a conversation about purposeful burning and helped me to renew my philosophy of this accelerating practice.

Property Context: Swanton Pacific Ranch

When I co-managed Swanton Pacific Ranch (SPR)(2016 – 2024), we worked to bridge with the California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo’s forestry program as it expanded to include new teaching and research into wildland fire. At the same time, decisions were made to move SPR away from land-manager derived decisions more towards faculty-led initiatives, at least in a subset of areas of the property, including (in part) fire and forestry. As the ‘polytechnic’ portion of the school’s title designates the institution as a higher-level trade school, the University was attempting to remain relevant to the State’s need to expand its workforce related to wildland fire.

SPR appears to most as a publicly-owned institution, but that is wrong and understanding its decision-making structure is important context for this prescribed burn and any other actions on that property. It is private property, owned by a not-for-profit organization called “Cal Poly Partners,” an organization whose mission is to support Cal Poly SLO. SPR was donated by Al Smith, the heir to Orchard Supply Hardware, with secret deed restrictions that are vaguely publicly revealed (occasionally) to restrict use of the land to student learning related to ‘working lands.’ There does not appear to be any active oversight on land use restrictions by Mr. Smith’s heirs or designees, but student involvement in prescribed fire would seem to be in alignment with Al’s wishes.

It is also important to understand that the privately-owned SPR serves as “The School Forest” for Cal Poly, an essential component of the institution’s ability to award forestry degrees allowing students to become professionally credentialed with a government-issued license to oversee forest management. Forest management globally increasingly involves fire – both the ‘controlled’ type (cultural and prescribed) and the ‘uncontrolled’ type (wildfire, pre- and post-). Cal Poly’s introduction to the ‘controlled’ type via SPR was this very fire now in late 2026, after decade-long conversations about insurance, liability, student and teacher involvement, and CAL FIRE’s ability to help with fires on private properties with timber harvest plans. As Mark Swisher said in a CAL FIRE-posted video about this fire on Facebook, “thousands of students come through here…the fire is a critical element of those programs.”

The Burn

The technical facts about SPR’s October 8, 2026 prescribed fire are difficult for the public to ascertain, so I have limited information. Most of what I know was either included in CALFIRE’s press release the day before the burn (October 7). CAL FIRE planned for burning “3 units” covering a total of 48 acres in grasslands, oak woodlands, and mixed conifer woodland, all of which had last burned with various levels of intensity in the CZU Lightning Complex wildfire in 2020. They actually burned 42.5 acres. Much of the area had received extensive post-fire ‘treatment’ through processing of fire-damaged vegetation (timber felling, brush chopping, pile burning, air curtain or carbonator combustion). With State funding, SPR had also attempted intensive reforestation in some of these areas, which had regrown thickly with brush after 2020. The brush has grown rapidly with many 2-10-foot-tall bushes dying in the interim, adding greatly to wildfire fuel danger.

The ‘resources’ CAL FIRE committed to the day of the burn were impressive. These included “multiple engines, water tenders, a dozer, Alma Helitack Copter 614, Glenwood firefighting hand crews, Ben Lomond Conservation Camp hand crews, and CAL FIRE SCU Mount Hamilton firefighting hand crews.” Lots of people, lots of equipment, lots of time, lots of money…this was an involved and expensive endeavor.

Communications

CAL FIRE’s 21-hour notice via press release was joined by a Watch Duty notification 12 hours in advance, followed by social media posts by CALFIRE 1 hour after smoke appeared in the air from the prescribed fire. Folks could see the CALFIRE releases via Facebook and if they had subscribed to the CZU CALFIRE email list. Watch Duty is a free program with extensive information about fire, including the ability to receive automatic notifications about fires in your designated areas. There was no information about the burn on Swanton Pacific Ranch’s social media or website. Many people took the time to spread the word, sharing social media content to broaden the reach of CAL FIRE’s notifications.

Repercussions

Fire management agencies, public safety personnel, and others involved in prescribed fires hope that repercussions are decreasing over time, but one wonders. People I interacted with stated that the most major repercussion was past wildfire trauma-enhanced fear. Like myself, many felt that notification came too late. I and others experienced disruption to our work, reducing productivity. I and others at Molino Creek Farm were exposed to very unhealthy air pollution during harvest and processing of crops. Indeed, poor air quality affected a large swath of Bonny Doon, Swanton, and Davenport for 48 hours. Wildlife could not avoid breathing the bad air. Inability to ventilate homes during the cool evening hours on the tail end of a major heat wave made for uncomfortable evenings. It is unclear how the fire affected biota, soils, or the hydrology of the waterways surrounding it including Little Creek, Winter Creek, or Archibald Creek. And, it is unclear how much this prescribed burn is expected to mitigate future wildfires.

CAL FIRE staff generously responded to my request for information noting that they received at least eighteen 911 calls from people mostly concerned or just curious. They clarified that CAL Fire doesn’t keep track of the total number of calls, so staff are unable to debrief on the level of concern in correlation with amount/type of outreach effort, which might otherwise help adapt future outreach approaches to increase efficacy.

Societal Good versus Individual Sacrifice

An unexpected question arose for me during this prescribed burn: how are we to balance the public good with the sacrifices of individuals during prescribed fires? Of course, we are assuming that there must be some public good from prescribed fires, right? When State funds are expended (CALFIRE) doing prescribed burns, there MUST be public good. For this fire, the CAL FIRE press release says ‘this prescribed fire is part of a broader strategy to protect communities and natural resources.’ During the last two wildfires, the area of the prescribed fire burned subsequent to wildfire spread into Bonny Doon and Davenport, so it is not clear which communities are more protected through this mitigation measure, or how anyone might know.

I am very familiar with the natural resources of the prescribed fire area and might agree that it helped to protect some of them. For instance, I would expect that the prescribed fire would overall result in less sedimentation of an impoundment along Winter Creek where red-legged frogs live and of Little Creek and, downstream, Scotts Creek, which are home to endangered salmonids and the very rare California giant salamander. And, perhaps the prescribed fire helped to restore forest cover which is crucial to the health of the state-listed mountain lion population. With all of this, though, how will we know what effects the fire really had?

Don’t individuals experiencing negative impacts from prescribed burns at the very least deserve answers to their questions?

Improving the Process

When attending the recent meeting of the Governor’s Task Force on Wildfire and Forest Resilience, I learned that some communities are doing better than ours on some of these issues. For instance, notification periods are longer, so people are better prepared. And, some communities mobilize loaner home air purification systems in advance of fires. I’m less certain about how others might be doing in other areas that need improvement locally (if this prescribed fire is any indication).

Besides earlier notification, various information gaps need addressing if we are to continue building a societally-supported prescribed burning program both locally and state-wide. The announcement of the burn would have been better if it had included links to the burn plan and any environmental compliance documentation. The CAL FIRE press release suggests that prescribed burn plans are ‘developed collaboratively with stakeholders and incorporate community input,’ but I am unaware of any such efforts specific to our community. Also, it would have been better to have ongoing reporting on the progress of the burn, including current and expected smoke conditions. A briefing or information after the burn would also help to include what the burn accomplished, if the fire was entirely extinguished, and the approximate cost of the burn. If all of these could be accomplished, it would go a long way to engaging an increasingly broad audience to gain support for prescribed burning.

We have responsibilities as citizens to be better prepared for prescribed fire. We should make sure to stay alert to notifications about prescribed fires through subscriptions email alerts, software programs, text or by any other means that works for us: we shouldn’t be isolated in this or any other matter for which civic duty calls. And, we should all have air purification systems and well-sealed homes to avoid smoke effects. Also, if and when there are opportunities where prescribed fire plans are ‘developed collaboratively with stakeholders and incorporate community input,’ let’s get involved! Finally, if we don’t already vote for representatives to support the various means of living with fire, we need to do that, too.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

If you click the following link, I am told by The Wall Street Journal that you will be able to read the entirety of a column by Julie Jargon. The column I am talking about is entitled, “We’re All Talking to Each Other Less Than We Did a Decade Ago.” I am recommending that you read Jargon’s column. It’s not that long. Here are the beginning paragraphs:

When was the last time you engaged in friendly banter with your barista, chatted with your neighbor or called your mother?

Chances are, you placed your latte order on an app and ignored your neighbor when you pulled into your driveway. Your mom? She likely had to settle for a text.

Digital interactions are replacing face-to-face interactions with loved ones and strangers. And the rise of AirPods means we’re all tuned into our own little worlds, appearing unapproachable for conversation.

The result: We’re speaking much less than we did a decade ago. Yes, someone counted our daily words.

“Real” life is “in-person” life. When I tell those who follow my blog postings to “Find Some Friends,” I am not talking about the Mark Zuckerberg/Meta/Facebook variety. I’m not talking about striking up a conversation on Zoom.

Democratic self-government (which is something I absolutely do know about) cannot take place “online.” It CAN’T. It’s that simple! Not only is the “online” world completely owned and controlled by massive corporations, it severs the human connections that make a genuine politics possible.

I’ve said this before (many times). It’s TRUE!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
ANNIHILATION, PASSIVITY, NO-BELL

“While shocking, it actually comes as little surprise that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the department will live-stream the firing squad execution of Nidal Hasan,” says, Paul Blementhal of HuffPost. “Since taking office, Hegseth has been preoccupied with death. To be more precise, he has been preoccupied with the aesthetics of killing.” Since the announcement of the December 3 execution of Army Medical Corps psychiatrist Hasan, it has received an eruption of critical commentary, although it is far from the only public celebration of state violence, whether real or imagined, from the Trump administration. We can quickly look back at the highly publicized ‘drug smuggling’ Caribbean boat annihilations, the A.I. (S.I.?) depictions of Trump’s personal attacks on protestors and political ‘enemies’ or other countries (even former allies), and glossy videos of detained immigrants subjected to ICE brutality.

Should it go forward, the execution will be the first public execution in this country in 90 years, a first for live-streaming; but the violent display emphasizes that an essential part of Hegseth’s political vision has also become an ever more intimidating image of power and state-sanctioned violence for Trump’s drive to change the country. Active duty troops and veterans are wary of the plan, asserting that it could cause lasting psychological harm to the specific unit selected to carry out the order by targeting a paralyzed and immobile sixty-something-years-old man confined to a wheelchair while being videoed. Pete Hegseth, on the other hand, as a “slobbering, incompetent boob is thrilled,” writes Mike Nellis on Endless Urgency. Nellis is convinced very few Americans actually want this, outside a handful of incels who worship guys like Hegseth and the Tate brothers. “So, why are we pandering to those losers in tolerating this?,” he asks.

Even Vice President JD Vance is casting doubt on the livestream cruelty, and announces he won’t be a part of the audience. William Kristol wrote on The Bulwark, “It’s all political bluster. But it’s a particular kind of political bluster. It’s Neo-fascist bluster,” citing Hegseth’s celebration of irrationalism and machismo, which Umberto Eco calls “Ur-Fascism.” “Fascism wants to reduce active citizens to passive observers, indeed into voyeurs — especially voyeurs of cruelty and death. Such degradation of a democratic public is key to fascism’s project and to its success,” he asserts. Kristol questions whether or not Americans would fail to understand that the death penalty has been carried out even if the execution weren’t live-streamed. An official in Revolutionary France justified public executions, saying, “It takes a terrifying spectacle to hold the people in check.” Which, perhaps, is so, but it’s also about degrading the populace, desensitizing the public, and normalizing cruelty as the voyeurs view a snuff film.

There is the possibility that Hasan could choose resistance to his fate and file a habeas petition — a legal request to review the legality of a detention — in civilian court, bringing about a significant delay that could outlast the Trump administration, according to Eugene R. Fidell, a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School specializing in military law. According to Brenner Fissell, a professor at Villanova Law and vice president of the National Institute of Military Justice, says firing squads are coming to be seen as a less inhumane alternative, based on the recent failed executions in Arizona and Tennessee, which have raised questions about the manner by which criminal defendants are put to death for their crimes. “Firing squads can be quicker, cleaner, a more precise way to execute a prisoner, but I don’t think that’s what’s motivating this. There’s a perceived masculinity and military-ness to firing squads that is part of the aura Hegseth is trying to emphasize — the ‘lethality culture’,” Fissell judges. Army rules allow for at least two media outlets to be present for an execution, but none has ever been broadcast live in the USA.

Elisabeth Semel, co-director of the Death Penalty Clinic at UC Berkeley Law, says Hegseth’s announcement raises a host of questions, but, “This is a president who’s about spectacles and that’s precisely the message that he intends to deliver.” The White House referred questions about the plans for the live-streaming to the Pentagon. When Hegseth was asked if Hasan had made any final requests or reached out to the Trump administration, he replied, “Don’t care. We’ll see him on December 3.” One logistical detail remains conspicuously missing: nobody has said where this would stream — a broadcast with no broadcaster, seven weeks out?! A couple of verses from Bob Dylan’s ‘Highway 61‘ might offer them some interesting guidance:

Oh, God said to Abraham, “Kill me a son”
Abe said, “Man, you must be puttin’ me on”
God said, “No” Abe say, “What?”
God say, “You can do what you want, Abe, but
The next time you see me comin’, you better run”
Well, Abe said, “Where d’you want this killin’ done?”
God said, “Out on Highway 61”
Now, the roving gambler he was very bored
Trying to create a next world war
He found a promoter who nearly fell off the floor
He said, “I never engaged in this kind of thing before
But yes, I think it can be very easily done
We’ll just put some bleachers out in the sun
And have it on Highway 61”

“I can do whatever I want, if I want,” said Donald Trump last week, before dozing off, telling reporters he “could’ve done very bad things” to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, but only held back out of “respect for the office.” No mention that his administration has already gone after his political opponents — “enemies” — as he openly braces for a Democratic House takeover and the oversight that is expected, beginning with articles of impeachment. Part of his ‘bracing’ has been to send ICE agents to investigate hundreds of voter registration groups, as he considers sending undercover agents to infiltrate. Nearly 1,000 armed private guards from Prosegur Security have been deployed to at least 55 post offices across the country ahead of Election Day, already having gutted the government offices meant to protect our elections from foreign interference, and prompting a Republican election official in Utah to comment that the biggest threats are “mostly from our own government.” The Daily Dose of Democracy blog commented, “Every single day we are forced to confront the fact that our aging, pedophile-protecting president is sundowning before our very eyes, and it is a borderline act of treason that the Republican Party continues to enable his every psychotic whim. 25th Amendment now, please!”

Before a footrace between Donald Trump and Barack Obama, Trump boasted how amazingly well he would perform, and how poorly Obama would do. Of course, Obama wins the race handily, with Trump posting to Truth Social: “As predicted, I did amazingly in the race and Obama turned in a shameful performance. I won second place, and Obama finished next to last.”

For the second year in a row, President Trump is licking his Nobel-snub wounds and is lashing out, not only at the winner, South African jurist and former UN human rights chief, Navi Pillay, but the country of Norway. Jimmy Kimmel said he would have liked to see Peace Prize finalist, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney the winner, “just to see Trump go nuts and eat his golf clubs this weekend,” adding, “I know also [if Carney had won] he’d bomb every Tim Hortons from coast to coast.” Attorney David Schoen, who defended Trump during his impeachment trial after the January 6 attack, posted on Truth Social after the Nobel Peace Prize announcement, “Today the Nobel Committee shamed itself beyond repair and demeaned the once great prize by giving it to the UN’s Navi Pillay, an unabashed hater of America and Israel…She has no credibility in any normal sphere and has never done a thing to foster peace.” The 85-year-old Pillay took a shot at the president when she arrived to applause  at a legal conference at the Nuremberg courthouse, telling the gathering, “If you clap a little bit more, I may share this prize with Trump.”

Trump had spent the week prior to the award announcement making a case for himself, telling reporters that he’d “done stuff nobody else has done before,” while claiming that “no president has probably ever settled any wars,” as he boasted that he has eight to his credit. Tell it to Number 26, Teddy Roosevelt, whose Nobel is on display in the West Wing for his settling the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Donny-boy! Trump reposted Schoen’s rant without as much whining as last year, when winner María Corina Machado of Venezuela presented her medal to Trump for “recognition for commitment with our freedom.” Don’t expect Pillay to do likewise! Christiane Amanpour recalled asking Pillay in 2014 what apartheid taught her, answering that she learned “to be persistent and be totally positive that you will win one day.”

Ben Meiselas of MeidasTouch posted, “What?? You’re telling me the guy who massacred dozens of little girls at a school in Minab and has threatened just about all our allies didn’t win? Cue my shocked face!” You can bet that Republicans are cringing that this is Trump’s biggest concern just weeks before the midterms, as he spent at least ten minutes just ranting about his loss at the Syracuse rally. Kyle Kulinski posted on Daily Dose of Democracy that he sees “Trump’s dementia clearly taking over in the midst of his narcissistic collapse.” He says Trump demanded the Nobel despite: murdering 238 fishermen in boats in international waters; abducting a world leader and stealing the country’s gold and oil; bombing Somalia over 80 times in this term; bombing a girl’s school and their volleyball practice; attacking Yemen, Nigeria, Ecuador; arming and funding Israeli genocide; threatening Greenland, Canada and Mexico; building ICE concentration camps; and green-lighting torture. That’s only nine, so hold up the correct finger to add your own number ten!

Trump wrote on Truth Social in a 600-word tantrum, that his so-called “ending any one of the eight wars would be far more than necessary to win the Nobel Prize. In actuality, I should have won 8 Nobel [or Noble as he actually posted] Peace Prizes, not just 1.” We can all likely agree on the award of at least one prize — the one for lying! John Stoehr, who writes on The Editorial Board says that Trump really does believe “there has never been anybody” more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize than him, and that he stopped “the total obliteration of the world” by going to war with Iran — and anyone who doesn’t share this belief will be punished. So, within hours, the administration placed economic sanctions on the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, preventing US businesses from providing services. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the ICC “a rogue court“, with sanctions in effect until “allies, many of whom are part of the ICC and that rely on American service members for their defense, rein in the court.”

Perhaps Rubio hasn’t noticed, but since Iran has dealt so effectively with the US in the war, US allies have not relied on this country as in the past, seeing a superpower brought to its knees. “More importantly,” says Stoehr, “Trump’s sanctions are an obvious attempt to compel belief in his fantasies. The Washington press corps has ‘normalized having an insane president’ says Aaron Rupar; but allies must see it clearly — they don’t have the luxury. As the economic fallout from the Iran war continues, reporters seem to be getting increasingly blunt with voters as well as administration officials, not necessarily becoming adversarial, but becoming less inclined to play along with the White House line.” The transcript of a recent Times magazine interview with Trump revealed a broken brain to some readers, raising questions as to whether the president can actually tell the difference between fact and fiction.

The New York Times’ Katie Rogers sees strong evidence that the dementia taboo is fading, seeing Trump’s recent rallies with a “feel of the first stops of a farewell tour” with fewer in attendance, swaths of empty seats, which means less press coverage. Rogers reports, “The events are a ritual. He will attack Democrats. His words will probably stop making actual, logical sense for a moment, or for many moments [the “weave”]. He will accuse the Democrats of rigging the 2020 election, he will attack the news media. Then he will dance to a Village People song.” The notorious Mar-a-Lardo moves. Stoehr says critics are pushing harder, with MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell going farther than anyone so far, telling his audience, “If the president of the United States is insane, that is the biggest news of the day or any day. That is what will live in history. That is what historians will devote their attention to if the president of the United States is insane. If the president of the United States’ mind is crumbling before our very eyes, that is the most important story of the day because everything else follows from that, everything!” Stoehr concludes with, “The times, they are a-changing. Normalized insanity won’t last much longer.”

Trump was scheduled to host a celebration of Christopher Columbus at the White House this week where a 13-foot Columbus statue was to be unveiled, and ICE celebrated Columbus Day, sort of like Columbus would have done, by walking into someone’s house, announcing, “We live here now!”

No word on whether or not Homeland Security’s search of Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s home on Monday was part of their Columbus Day activity, but the escalation in a criminal investigation emphasizes Trump’s renewed scrutiny of her in the final weeks of her reelection campaign — more of an early Election Day activity, perhaps? The Justice Department provided no other details, other than that a judicially authorized search warrant was executed in the Washington, DC area in an ongoing federal criminal investigation, the nature and scope of which were not clear. Omar is a Somali-born Democrat whose immigrant status and left-leanings have been constantly attacked by the GOP and the Trump administration, with Omar responding to Markwayne Mullin’s statement that “something’s going to happen” as simply an “attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement.” She claims, “For ten years, Trump has targeted me with baseless lies and smear campaigns. This is just the latest escalation in his campaign of political intimidation. I will not be silenced.”

The Associated Press reported last week that Trump mentioned Omar at one of his rallies, attacking her up upbringing, saying that VP Vance “and our people” were investigating her. Omar has been a target of Vance in the past, indicating that he and “a top White House official were trying to figure out how to investigate her.” Welp, it looks like he and Markwayne, and/or Stephen Miller, figured it out, as agents blocked off the street near her home to carry out their search! Omar’s office dismissed any of Vance’s claims as fabricated and defamatory, with chief of staff Connor McNutt stating, “This is rich coming from someone who literally said they were trying to ‘create stories’ to redirect the media. This is a ridiculous lie and desperate attempt to distract from the pedophile protection party’s unpopular war of choice, increasing gas prices, and rapidly dropping polling numbers.” Omar added, “The point is to waste everyone’s time and resources, and generate negative headlines for his opponents, further proof that he is willing to use the power of the federal government to intimidate and silence anyone who stands up to him.”

Novelist Ocean Vuong wrote, “Freedom is nothing but the distance between the hunter and the prey.” Let’s not be the prey — VOTE!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. 
 

...

Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.

   “Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!

October 14, 2026

This caught my attention, mostly because of the “personal conversation” aspect. I love the idea of oral history like this being documented.

The history of airport is documented in an amazing level of detail, along with multiple photographs and map excerpts, on the Abandoned & Little-Known Airfields: California: Monterey Bay area web site, the creator of which, Paul Freeman, obviously did extensive research about! According to that site, Hilton’s Caterpillar dealership was in Modesto, even though he lived in Santa Cruz, so he built the airport so he could commute to and fro by air! According to that site (and some Facebook comments), the airport continued to exist in some form quite a bit after 1960. There is still a Hilton Drive (where the airport used to be) in Boulder Creek. Reading through the father and son’s obituaries on Find A Grave, it appears that Hilton senior originally lived in Modesto (which is probably why his Caterpillar dealership was located there).

According to Find a Grave, Harold Garside Hilton died in 1981 at the age of 91, and his son, Harold Lloyd Hilton died in 1994 at the age of 75, 13 years after the conversation referenced below (apparently the family tradition was to make the mother’s maiden name the son’s middle name, interesting). The family itself is well established in the area. How neat to have such a fundamental tie to the area you live in! Hilton Sr. also operated the Burl Theater in Boulder Creek (SCPL image of a news article), as well as the Forest Pool (SCPL a postcard image), and loved gardening (as per his obituary and some Facebook comments).

I checked, and I suspect that Valley Tractor and Equipment Company is still in business, and has now morphed into Valley Tractor and Equipment Service (located in Scotts Valley, CA as per their web site). They’ve been in business since 1972, though, so maybe not a match, but then, maybe that’s just when ownership was transferred from the original owner? I tried calling to confirm just out of curiosity, but got voicemail.

Boulder Creek Gold and Country Club is still in existence as a residential Golf Country Club (football legend John Madden lived there at one point according to Facebook comments) and as a destination, as Boulder Creek Golf Club. It is open to the public, offering “golf, disc golf, dining, and easy mountain getaways”. It was established 1961 as an 18 hole course by golf star Tom Culligan according to a 2024 Facebook post and the associated post card image (which labels it “Tom Culligan’s”). Looks like it was reduced to a 9 hole course after the CZU fires from the web site. Culligan Court is a street in Boulder Creek today. According to a Facebook comment, the course was very popular with both Oakland Raiders and San Francisco 49ers players in the 1970s (which probably explains why John Madden wound up living there).

After some digging, what I suspect is that there’s some confusion due to multi-generational naming. The golf star, Tom Culligan, is actually Tom J. Culligan III (according to multiple newspaper articles, other pages, and at least one PGA web site), who graduated from Junipero Serra HS in 1960 and his Dad, Thomas J. Culligan, was actually the developer. Possibly no coincidence that his Dad built a golf course on the old Hilton Airport site? One Facebook commenter on this post says the old hangar is still used to store equipment (as does the airport history site above)! Culligan Management Company, Inc., founded in 1946, is still around, with the son as Chairman of the Board.

According his bio on the Junipero Serra Athletics Hall of Fame web page (and the San Francisco City Golf Championship web site), he won that tournament in 1974 as a regular player and in 1998 as a Masters player. He was elected to Northern California Golf Association Hall of Fame in 2025 (also see this YouTube video) and is still active as a sponsor of the Northern California Family Golf Tourney as per the 2026 registration form (available online). Very cool!

Anyway, once again, it is fascinating to see how much you can discover about something as obscure as a minor local airstrip (one of several within a five mile radius according to Facebook comments) that’s been gone for 50+ years, and how much effort others have made to document its history.

Hilton Airport

This was a small private landing strip along Big Basin Highway about three miles northwest of Boulder Creek. It was abandoned and later absorbed into Boulder Creek Golf and Country Club. It was named for Harold Hilton, a Modesto, California, businessman, owner of the Valley Tractor and Equipment Company, who had the airstrip built near his summer residence around 1938 or 1939 on land that had been in the family for years. In the early 1950s the Hiltons moved to the property as permanent residents. Hilton died in March 1981.
–personal conversation with his son, Harold L. Hilton.

Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts.

Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com

...

“Conversation”

“Conversation, like certain portions of the anatomy, always runs more smoothly when lubricated.”
~Doug Wright

“In the best conversations, you don’t even remember what you talked about, only how it felt. It felt like we were in some place your body can’t visit, some place with no ceiling and no walls and no floor and no instruments”
~John Green

“The art of conversation is the art of hearing as well as of being heard.”
~William Hazlitt, Selected Essays, 1778-1830

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
~Unknown

“We all lose when bullying and personal attacks become a substitute for genuine conversation and principled disagreement.”
~Alicia Garza

GOLDEN GATE PARK. I did not know that Golden Gate Park in SF is larger than Central Park in NYC! How it all came about is fascinating, to say the least.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice as soon as the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.

Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

...

Deep Cover

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *