Greensite… back soon… Steinbruner… short repeat… Hayes… radio show Friday June 19… Patton… The Ellsberg Paradox… Matlock… …crooked… nepo-baby… broken brain… whitewash… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… commencement… Quotes on… “Time Management”
|
|
If you want to pitch in to |
NOT-SO-SECRET SECRET. Every now and then, when I’m doing a column and I am picking the subject for the quotes for the week, something pops up that I’m either working on, or having some sort of issue with. Hence why “Time Management” made it into this issue!
Am I the only one, or is it getting more and more complicated to find time for things? I know that some of this, at least for me, is ADHD related, because I’ve been told that neurotypical people don’t think, “oh, I have to do The Thing[TM]!” every day for days (weeks, months… years!) and still don’t do The Thing[TM]! Somehow, for them it goes from, “oh, I gotta do” to “ok, doing that now”, and for the life of me I can’t figure out the mechanics of that. It’s like my brain registers the thinking about the thing as the actual doing, or something. Annoying as all get out!
SPEAKING OF TIME. This is a pretty light column, but we will soon be back to our regular weekly schedule again! Listen to Grey Hayes on Bratton on KSCO today, or listen to the archived episode later!
DON’T MISS THE VIDEO THIS WEEK! I went to a graduation ceremony at UCSC on Monday, which was a fabulous affair. Brian‘s brother, Matt, gave the commencement speech, and I’m doing that as this week’s video, because he did such a damn good job! I’m so proud of him 🙂
See you next week!
~Webmistress
Sarge’s computer went on strike, so no new review this week.
~Webmistress

GOOD GIRL’S GUIDE TO MURDER. Netflix. Series. (6.8 IMDb) ![]()
Think Nancy Drew meets True Detective. Five years after the apparent murder of a popular high school student, aspiring journalist Pip Fitz-Amobi decides the case doesn’t add up. What begins as a school project quickly turns into a deeper investigation, uncovering secrets, lies, and long-buried resentments in a town convinced the mystery was solved years ago.
The show’s biggest strength is Pip herself (Emma Myers – Jenna Ortega’s bouncy rainbow werewolf roommate on “Wednesday”): smart, determined, and believable as an amateur sleuth. While it never gets as dark as True Detective, it avoids feeling like a watered-down teen mystery, delivering genuine suspense, credible twists, and enough suspects to keep you guessing. Based on the novel by Holly Jackson, it’s a fast, engaging binge that captures the appeal of a classic detective story while giving it a modern true-crime sensibility.
~Sarge
GOOD OMENS 3. PrimeTV. Movie. (8 IMDb)
In 1990, fantasy legend Terry Pratchett and young comic fantasy maven Neil Gaiman collaborated on a novel built around the question, “What if the Antichrist got switched at birth?” and Good Omens was born.
In 2024, the third season of Amazon’s adaptation of the late Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s Good Omens was put on hold after multiple allegations of sexual assault against Gaiman surfaced in the news.
The Amazon version of Good Omens thrived on the brilliant chemistry between David Tennant and Michael Sheen as Crowley, a demon, and Aziraphale, an angel, who have spent millennia on Earth in what increasingly resembles a Cold War marriage. Faced with the impending Apocalypse, both come to the conclusion that maybe it might be altogether better … NOT doing that.
Featuring a host of charming side stories that all somehow linked together, plus a simmering relationship between the two leads, the first season felt like a delightful Douglas Adams pastiche. Since season one adapted the novel itself, the second season came as a complete surprise. Crafted entirely by Gaiman, it leaned harder into the Crowley/Aziraphale relationship, along with a gloriously naked and amnesiac Jon Hamm as the angel Gabriel. A great deal happens, and it all ends on a heartbreaking cliffhanger.
Then came season 3 … NOT!
As allegations against Gaiman mounted, stretching from the mid-80s into relatively recent years, comics, films, and television projects tied to him began getting canceled or shelved, including Good Omens 3. Fortunately, Gaiman stepped away from the production, allowing fans to get a third season … sort of. Cut down to a single feature-length finale, it still manages to wrap up a surprising number of story threads, and may even produce a few sniffles.
Gaiman’s problematic history aside, worth a watch.
~Sarge
PANTHEON. Netflix. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
What if the threat isn’t AI? What if it’s UI: uploaded intelligence. Human brains destructively scanned, living only in the cloud. “Pantheon” explores this idea as exquisite, real science fiction. Not cheesy animated sci-fi melodrama, but a genuine exploration of love, grief, immortality, endless simulations, conspiracies, global politics, and so much more.
The animation is restrained, there to serve the story rather than distract from it. The characters are rich, not cardboard cutouts, whether good or bad. No supervillains. No Mary Sues.
It’s a dense story, so if science fiction concepts tend to lose you, this may not be for you. But if they don’t, this absolutely deserves a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS – TALES FROM ’85. Netflix. Series. (5 IMDb)
Stranger Things exits stage left…then pops back out for one more bow.
Set between seasons 2 and 3, this animated take brings back the core crew without sanding things down for kids. It’s not anime or cheap knockoff – dipping their pens in the Spiderverse/Arcane inkwell, with a creative, stylized look. It’s also more focused than the later live-action seasons, trimming most of the adults and zeroing in on the kids. Best of all, Will Byers actually gets to be a character instead of a punching bag, helped by the addition of Niki, an Amazonian punk rocker who connects with him over their shared outsider status. The recast voices are a little jarring at first, but you should settle in. Rough reviews aside, it’s worth a watch.
~Sarge
STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb)
Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.
They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb)
This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ![]()
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?
Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge
SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
SPEAK UP TO SAVE LANDLINES FOR RELIABLE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION
The CPUC rulemaking proceeding is R.24-06-012. The proceeding documents are here. At the top of the page is a tab “Public Comments”. The public comments page has a button Add a Comment. Very important: contact state representatives including Sen. John Laird, and the Board of Supervisors to support landlines.
Many thanks to Ms. Nina Beety for posting the information below on her new website, “Monterey Bay Matters”
Critical Deadlines
- June 2, 12:00pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
- June 11, 3:30pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
- June 15 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-120 and 26-121
- June 22 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-123 and 26-125
AT&T petitions to discontinue landline and Lifeline – 26-121, 26-120, 26-125, 26-123
AT&T filed the following petitions to the FCC to eliminate landlines and Lifeline in areas of California including in the Monterey Bay region. These petitions will be automatically granted if there is no opposition.
Deadlines for filing comments/opposition: June 15 and 22, 2026
WC Docket No. 26-121 AT&T application to discontinue residential (due 6/15)
WC Docket No. 26-120 AT&T application to discontinue business (due 6/15)
WC Docket No. 26-123 AT&T petition for forbearance from ETC including Lifeline (due 6/22)
26-125 AT&T petition for preemption and declaratory ruling (due 6/22)
Because the FCC streamlined the process to allow carriers to discontinue landline service as part of a “technology transition”, these requests are automatically granted in most cases. Filing oppositions is the only way to protest AT&T discontinuance plans; it stops the FCC from automatically granting the applications. If they receive opposition, the FCC will remove AT&T’s application from “streamlining” and perform a review.
These applications contain the notice mailed 5/20 to customers.
Filing Oppositions or Comments is not difficult. To submit them to the FCC, you can prepare a letter and upload it (ECFS Standard Filing) or type/paste a comment into ECFS Express Filing. Note on your document which docket you are commenting on.
Instructions for the longer Standard Filing form:
Proceeding: Start typing the docket number such as 26-125 and the docket title will pop up . Click on the title and it will fill in the line.
Fill in starred lines.
Type of Filing: Click on the box and choose Comment or Opposition (I’ve requested clarification from the FCC)
Address of: Click on box and choose whichever is correct
Fill out remaining red starred items.
Upload your document(s).
Click in yellow box.
Click blue Continue to Review Screen and submit from there.
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
You can now listen to a variety of topics discussed by revolving hosts from Bratton Online contributors, every Friday, 6pm-7pm on KSCO Radio, AM 1080 or streaming at: ksco.com/listen
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Monday, June 8, 2026

Jan R. Thomas, working with Daniel Ellsberg’s son, Michael Ellsberg, has published a selection of Daniel Ellsberg’s writings. I am sort of taking for granted that anyone reading this blog posting will know who Daniel Ellsberg was, but click the link to his name if you don’t, for a brief Wikipedia write-up.
The “short version” is that Ellsberg was a Defense Department analyst who made public The Pentagon Papers, a top-secret 1967 Department of Defense study that detailed America’s political and military involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. Ellsberg, who helped write this study, faced years in prison for making these secret papers public, but he escaped a prison sentence (thanks in significant part to the improper activities of President Nixon). By letting the public know what was really going on in Vietnam, Ellsberg helped to bring the Vietnam War to an end, and is a hero to Vietnam-era antiwar activists and draft-resisters, like me, and to those who are working, now, to end the threat of nuclear annihilation.
The image at the top will provide you with the title of the recent book I mentioned above, which is a collection of hundreds of Ellsberg’s thoughts, culled from his handwritten, personal notebooks. They are certainly worth reading!
Not extensively discussed in the book is “The Ellsberg Paradox.” Here is how Wikipedia explains it:
In decision theory, the Ellsberg paradox (or Ellsberg’s paradox) is a paradox in which people’s decisions are inconsistent with subjective expected utility theory. John Maynard Keynes published a version of the paradox in 1921. Daniel Ellsberg popularized the paradox in his 1961 paper, “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms”. It is generally taken to be evidence of ambiguity aversion, in which a person tends to prefer choices with quantifiable risks over those with unknown, incalculable risks.
Ellsberg’s findings indicate that choices with an underlying level of risk are favored in instances where the likelihood of risk is clear, rather than instances in which the likelihood of risk is unknown. A decision-maker will overwhelmingly favor a choice with a transparent likelihood of risk, even in instances where the unknown alternative will likely produce greater utility. When offered choices with varying risk, people prefer choices with calculable risk, even when those choices have less utility (emphasis added).
To provide an example, suppose you will be paid $100 if you pick a white marble out of one of two different urns set before you. You only get one pick! You know that each urn contains 100 marbles, and you know that Urn #1 contains 50% black marbles, and 50% white marbles, with Urn #2 containing an unknown percentage of white marbles and an unknown percentage of black marbles. You can decide which urn to choose from; so, which urn do you pick? As it turns out, people will most often choose to pick from Urn #1, where the probabilities are certain, even if they’re not that great. People intrinsically dislike situations where they cannot attach probabilities to outcomes, even if that is not, really, rational.
With respect to decisions about war and peace, we often think that we can estimate, pretty clearly, what our chances will be if we fight. We don’t, though, have a very clear idea what our chances would be if we didn’t fight – if we were to “give peace a chance,” to quote John Lennon and Yoko Ono.
The Ellsberg Paradox relates to “decision theory,” and what Ellsberg tells us – in his notes in the book pictured at the top, and by way of the “Ellsberg Paradox” – is that we need to take a chance on doing what we think is “moral,” and “right,” and not limit ourselves only to actions that we think will “win.”
Seems like a lesson worth learning, don’t you agree?
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
Uh-oh! Looks as if NBC’s Meet the Press host, Kristen Welker, has made it onto the White House’s Media Offenders page on whitehouse.gov after her Sunday interview with President Trump blew up with a walk-off by the president. That is, if she wasn’t already on the government maintained enemies list already — but, surely to be added to the Media Offender of the Week at the bottom of the page which invites visitors to ‘Scroll for the Truth.’ Without doubt, FCC Chair Brendan Carr had a hand in this list of offenders, to ‘encourage‘ broadcasters they need to watch their steps or risk losing their licenses.
After Welker got a bit too insistent with her questioning regarding Trump’s claims on January 6, 2021, election fraud, and the anti-weaponization fund, our thin-skinned president called Welker and NBC “crooked” and “one-sided‘ before pulling the plug to go home and sulk on Truth Social, making it clear that if journalists ask hard questions they need to watch their backs. The CBS Network was hardly a threat to the Trump administration, but news division head Bari Weiss, and the new 60 Minutes executive producer, Nick Bilton, made sure they stay within the good graces of Brendan Carr by firing Scott Pelley and several staffers of the Sunday night news magazine. It has been evident that Weiss and Bilton were brought onto CBS by oligarchs Larry and David Ellison to destroy CBS News, after purchasing the parent company, Paramount Skydance.
Elliot Kirschner wrote on Through the Fog of the firings, “This is a group of seasoned journalists who had just seen their popular leadership wiped out for no reason other than to crush their independence.” So, Pelley was fired for supposedly creating a hostile work environment after standing up to Bilton in an all-hands meeting, accusing Weiss of having no qualifications for her job, and telling Bilton he has slender qualifications for his job. The following day, Bilton “stepped on his first rake,” says Kirschner, by firing Pelley, writing in his letter, “Yesterday’s performative display of hostility enacted in front of the staff instead of in a civil, private conversation demonstrated that you have no interest in contributing to the future success of the show.”
Kirschner’s summation of Pelley’s approach is that “it is not only about the past. It is about calling out and framing the future. By honing in on Weiss’s hatred of 60 Minutes, her lack of experience, her incompetence, and Bilton as an empty suit, he is establishing the narrative for what is likely to come next. He has cast a dark and unmistakable shadow over everything they and their oligarch overlords now do. Any dip in the ratings. Any loss of trust and the audience. Any violation of journalistic ethics. They will own it. And Pelley’s warnings will echo as context.” Kirschner says the story is far from over, but there is a long way to go before that 60 Minutes stopwatch starts ticking again.
Scott Pelley released a statement on June 2, in which he says, “There has never been anything in America like 60 Minutes. The Sunday tradition is the most successful program of any kind in history…Now, the new owner of our network is casting this legend aside, apparently to curry a moment of favor with the Trump administration. The waste is heartbreaking…For my part, new management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story. I’ve been told to include assertions that are unverified. To date, in every case, I have managed to ignore these instructions or refuse them…But now the collapse of values at the top has become untenable. The leadership of 60 Minutes is no longer recognizable. The principles I hold dear are gone, and so I must leave as well…I depart after 37 years at CBS with one emotion — a heart brimming with gratitude for the men and women of CBS News who encouraged and enriched my work, very often at the risk of their own lives. I pray for a day when those people and their ideals are honored again — a day when sanity, competence, and courage return.”
As might be expected, satirist Andy Borowitz contributed to news of this fiasco: “Embattled CBS News chief Bari Weiss abruptly left the network on Wednesday to accept a new role as general manager of North Korea’s state-run media. ‘I was a big fan of her work at CBS,’ said the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong Un. I’ve spent years trying to purge all the news from our media and she pulled it off in a matter of months. Plus, her willingness to do David Ellison’s bidding proved she can debase herself to a leader who got his position purely from nepotism,’ he added. But Bari Weiss’s tenure at the North Korean network DLT (Dear Leader Television) got off to a rocky start as staffers quit en masse, complaining about her lack of television experience.”
In Thom Hartmann’s post on Raw America from June 5, he tells of his teenage days as a reporter for WITL-AM/FM in Lansing, Michigan, later being a writer/reader of the morning newscasts. The owner of the station was a hardcore Goldwater Republican, the news director was a Libertarian-curious Democrat and Thom was a long-haired anti-war hippie and SDS member. In his experience at WITL, nobody ever told him how to spin the news or what to insert or delete, all the while knowing that the news was sacred, with no thought of reflecting his own opinions — the broadcast license being subject to the Fairness Doctrine. The Fairness Doctrine was respected as the price of freedom, of democracy in our republic. As Hartmann writes, “When Thomas Jefferson said he’d rather live in a country with newspapers and no government than in one with a government but no newspapers, he wasn’t knocking government; he’d helped create ours and was its president for 8 years. He was talking about the vital importance of an honest and free press.”
Left up to the Republicans and Reagan, the Fairness Doctrine was ended in 1987, opening the path for Trump and his oligarch enablers to bury the entire concept of honest, straightforward news. Over the past eighteen months or so, Trump hitman at the FCC, Brendan Carr, has bragged about how he’s going to assault stations that say things he and Trump dislike. Success in taking down Stephen Colbert has now shifted to targeting ABC and Jimmy Kimmel, as they also celebrate Scott Pelley’s firing at CBS. Assuredly, Pelley is being watched like a hawk for any utterances of speaking ill of his former employer in violation of the standard contractual non-disparagement clause — the vultures would love to pick over his bones in a lawsuit. Facing us are Trump, the Ellisons, Weiss, and the billionaire owners of Sinclair, the billionaire Murdoch family’s Fox News, and 1000+ billionaire-owned radio stations across the USA, the billionaire podcasters, and billionaire-owned social media sites like Facebook and X that have been algorithmically slanted toward Trump’s neofascist movement.
All of the above are following the ancient scripts of Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo and Franco who seized control of the news in their countries in their first year in power. Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán took a different path by suing the various news outlets and reporters into bankruptcy for “defamation” or “slander,” then having friendly oligarchs take control. Orbán attended CPAC in Dallas encouraging Republicans to follow his example by turning America’s media over to rightwing billionaires. “Have your own media. It’s the only way to point out the insanity of the progressive left. The problem is that the Western media is adjusted to the leftist viewpoint. Those who taught reporters in universities already had progressive leftist principles. My friend Tucker Carlson is the only one who puts himself out there. His show is the most popular. What does it mean? It means programs like his should be broadcasted day and night.”
Hartmann raises the alarm that Trump is 18 months into his project and has already taken down the Voice of America, defunded PBS and NPR, seen the Washington Post and LA Times acquired by sycophantic billionaires, and turned CBS over to a nepo-baby billionaire who is now going after CNN as his next prize. Combining these tactics with the capture of the police and prosecutorial agencies within the government, Putin has set a good example for harassment and prosecution of anyone who dares to speak up against the destruction of democracy — a classic formula for turning a democratic republic into an oligarchic dictatorship. Ancient Rome, and emperor Caligula in particular, are classic symbols of authoritarian governments using violence as entertainment as we will soon see with the president’s much-ballyhooed UFC 80th birthday extravaganza on the White House grounds.
Hartmann calls our attention to his 2020 ‘The Hidden History of American Oligarchy,’ when he warned of the destruction of America. Trump has packed the courts and thousands of lawyers have been purged from government; the FBI is weaponized against Americans, with Blacks and women being pushed out of senior military commands by our white supremacist Secretary of War; our history is being whitewashed in national parks, museums, and every federal property; and Trump’s face adorns multiple federal buildings peering from 60 foot tall banners.
According to Bernie Sanders, nepo-baby David Ellison owns, controls, or soon will control: “Tik Tok, Warner Bros., Paramount, DC Studios, The Discovery Channel, CNN, CBS, HBO, BET, Fandango, Rotten Tomatoes, Nickelodeon, MTV, Cartoon Network, Food Network, Travel Channel, Investigation Discovery, Animal Planet, Comedy Central, Showtime, TBS, TLC, HGTV, and on and on.” Always tied together are oligarchy and monopoly — the two sides of the same anti-democratic fascist coin. “Monopolies are destructive, but media monopolies are pure Putin-style poison,” says Hartmann. “Trump is following the Orbán playbook of consolidating media ownership among his right-wing billionaire friends. And what we’re seeing unfold at 60 Minutes is only the latest example, WE ARE ALL SCOTT PELLEY!” Perry Bacon writes in The New Republic: “We can’t take 60 Minutes back from Bari Weiss. All we can do is scream and yell that an unqualified right-wing hack is in charge of 60 Minutes now. That’s what Scott Pelley is doing. The rest of us should heed and then repeat his words.”
Daily Dose of Democracy has summed up the Welker/Trump stand off on Meet The Press, calling Trump’s blow-up a furious, demented rant about how crooked the media is before storming off the set. Prior to his exit, the president yelled at Welker, “They’re crooked! Just like you’re crooked. Your press is crooked. Meet The Press is crooked. You’re crooked or you’re stupid. You play right into their hands with this crap. You know these elections are rigged. Your network knows that they’re rigged. You know I won an election in a landslide and I got 94% bad press. You know why I got that? Because you have no credibility.” DDoD says Trump’s delusional volatility is increasing exponentially with each passing day, and it couldn’t be more obvious that he is entirely unfit to hold office — 25th Amendment now! Podcaster Hemant Mehta pronounced that Trump’s “brain is broken and if you vote for any Republican at any level, this is what you’re supporting — that’s what the party is.”
Heather Cox Richardson wrote on ‘Letters from an American,’ how conspicuous it was that as Trump addressed Welker, he kept referring to “your country,” or “your elections,” as if he was a foreign observer criticizing the US. Was he speaking for Russia, North Korea, or China? Richardson points out that Trump “spat at Welker that ‘a country can never be great with a dishonest press,’ illustrating that he was accusing his opponents of what he is doing, a classic authoritarian technique to muddy the waters, so people stop trying to figure out what is real and cease to believe anything. Despite his administration’s insistence that he doesn’t need congressional approval for his war on Iran because IT’S NOT A WAR, Trump repeatedly referred to it as a WAR.”
On The Warning, Steve Schmidt compares Scott Pelley’s appearance on The New York Times podcast, The Daily, with Donald Trump’s appearance on Meet The Press, “because when viewed together, the two interviews tell a larger story about America in 2026,” as portraits of character. The Pelley interview, conducted by Lulu Garcia-Navarro, was in Schmidt’s opinion thoughtful, allowing the fired CBS newsman to show his courage, decency, and politeness because he understands that strength and dignity are inseparable. Schmidt calls Pelley one of the greatest journalists in history, up there with Murrow, Sevareid, and Cronkite, who understands that responsibility accompanies privilege, that leadership means standing between danger and the people you serve.
“When CBS News entered its period of surrender and humiliation, Scott Pelley refused to participate in the lie. He refused to pretend that what was happening was normal. He refused to look away, while colleagues were sacrificed on the altar of corporate greed and political fear. He stepped forward because duty required it; he stood up because conscience demanded it — that’s what gentlemen do,” writes Schmidt. He goes on to say that the corruption is now so obvious it barely bothers to conceal itself, because the firing of Pelley wasn’t an isolated act, but the inevitable consequence of a chain of corruption that began when Paramount chose accommodation over principle, and surrender over resistance. His conclusion is that in dark periods of history, character becomes easier to see with masks falling away, pretenses disappearing, with people revealing themselves, as did both Pelley and Trump — “history will remember them accordingly.”
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Dateline: June 13, 2026
Woods Lagoon (the original name for what is now the Santa Cruz Small Craft Harbor) has left its imprint on Santa Cruz all over the place, as a quick Internet search will reveal. Many of the standard local history resources I depend on reference it. The Santa Cruz History Wiki has entries for both Woods Lagoon, and John Woods (pictured on the right). The Santa Cruz Public Library history site (another great resource for local history) has a photograph of it from the late 1800s. Finally, Santa Cruz Trains (a unique and wonderful local resources) has an extensive entry on the various bridges that have run through/over it.In addition, Ross Eric Gibson wrote an extensive article on the history of the Woods family and their namesake Lagoon for the Santa Cruz Sentinel, “Pilot Woods and his namesake lagoon” on February 1st of 2026 [may or may not be paywalled]. Woods’ descendants still live in the area and many of them were present at the 2001 dedication of a historical plaque at the Santa Cruz Harbor as per the caption on a photo in that article.
![]()
Along with “Researchers Anonymous” which has both a web site and a Facebook page, as well as an in person monthly meeting, the above sites offer the reader a rich variety of choices for digging up details of local history online.
The lagoon that today forms the base for the Santa Cruz Small Craft Harbor. The lagoon was a favorite picnic spot, swimming hole, and duck hunting area during the 1880s and 1890s. Named for the landowner, John Woods, whose property abutted the lagoon. Volume One of the Santa Cruz County Books of Deeds includes a petition, November 14, 1849, by John Woods for this land.
Woods, a charter member of the Santa Cruz County Society of California Pioneers, was born in Georgetown, Ohio, on December 30, 1818; he migrated to Missouri, served in the Mexican war, back to Missouri, married, then left for California on April 20, 1848. After a very short period in the mines, he settled in Santa Cruz county, worked at the Bennett Sawmill on Love Creek, but settled shortly thereafter in the area now known as Seabright in Santa Cruz. Woods died October 11, 1887.
See also Lake Marina and Santa Cruz Small Craft Harbor.

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Time Management”
“Time management is an oxymoron. Time is beyond our control, and the clock keeps ticking regardless of how we lead our lives. Priority management is the answer to maximizing the time we have.”
~John C. Maxwell
“I am definitely going to take a course on time management… just as soon as I can work it into my schedule.”
~Louis E. Boone
“One of the key things that I learnt on ‘MasterChef’ was time management.”
~Kadeena Cox
“I think time management as a label encourages people to view each 24-hour period as a slot in which they should pack as much as possible.”
~Tim Ferriss
“Until you value yourself, you will not value your time. Until you value your time, you will not do anything with it.”
~M. Scott Peck
|
Matt Evans’ commencement speech from June 15, 2026. It is truly inspiring, and I’m super proud of his enormous accomplishments! |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)












