Greensite… on the Wharf end collapse…. Steinbruner… Workbench, Capitola Mall… Hayes… Renewal… Patton… tik tok, tiktok… Matlock… kissing the ring…free to think…funniest idea… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… New Year’s…bingo? Quotes on… “New Year”
|
Dateline: January 1, 2025
WE ARE STILL HERE. I told you we’d let you know what we came up with, but you’ve probably already figured it out. We are continuing much the same as before. The consensus is that Bruce would not have wanted us to shut down operations. I have archives of historic photos to pull from, we are figuring out some other details moving forward, and we are keeping the name, BrattonOnline. We will do our best to do good by him.
Thanks for sticking with us,
~Webmistress (Gunilla)
CELEBRATING BRUCE. As of yet, we don’t know any details about the who, what, where and when with regards to a memorial or celebration of life being held for Bruce. After all, it’s been Christmas and New Year’s, and people have understandably been busy and unavailable. Something will happen though, and as soon as we know, we will let you know all about it here. Promise.
NOTE: Since we used to keep Bruce’s reviews up for some time, I’m phasing these out slowly. I don’t believe movie reviews will go away though, so watch this space…
THE LAST NIGHT AT TREMORE BEACH. Netflix series. (7.0 IMDB). An extra dramatic and moody plus scary drama about a composer/ pianist. It centers on his composing plus memories of his deceased wife. It’s all in Ireland at a beach house/cabin. It deals with fate, his predictions coming true. You’ll be mesmerized, don’t miss it.
BLITZ. Apple movie. (6.4 IMDB). This is much more of a saga of a young half black boy and what he has to deal with after he and his mom are separated. Apple pushes the Blitzkrieg attack on London by Hitler at the start of World War II. The prejudice, bigotry, and inhumanity are much more the main thrusts of the plot.
EMILIA PEREZ. Netflix movie. (7.3 IMDB). An amazing mix of musical and drama like I’ve never seen before. Zoe Saldana and Selena Gomez take leads in this Mexico City mystery that flips between sex changes and family values. We’ll see more of this film around Oscar time as Netflix continues to sell it. DO not miss it.
LA MAISON. Apple series. (6.0IMDB). All about two of the top French fashion houses and their internal and external pressures to be number one in the world of fashion. It’s foolish, pointless, not funny, nor meaningful…do not watch, no matter what or who says so.
THE SECRET OF THE RIVER. Netflix series. (8.2 IMDB). Frida Cruz and Mario Guzman are two Oaxaca born boys who accidentally watch the accidental death by drowning of a neighbor. As they become older they grow closer and try to determine whether or not they are gay. 20 years later they reunite and deal with the ongoing issues. Definitely worth watching.
MARTHA. Netflix movie (7.2 IMDB). This is an amazing, even shocking. interestingly created documentary centering on the world’s most successful businesswoman Martha Stewart. Marrying into wealth, she parlayed her love and her acumen into becoming one of the most influential world citizens. Open, honest, even charming, she made one or two stock investment mistakes. Her failure, plus prison time, involves Justin Bieber and it’s hard to believe, but you will when you watch this portrait. Inspirational.
BILLIONAIRE ISLAND. Netflix series. (6.3 IMDB). We learn from this drama that Norway is the world’s salmon producer. Because of this there’s a ruthless woman rival who works very hard and only partially honestly to take the Salmon farm and business from her. It also tells us the difference between farmed and wild salmon. There’s lots of rich people living their lives with golf and generally focusing on making more money. Interesting but not compelling.
NOBODY WANTS THIS. Netflix series (8.1 IMDB). Adding a so called “romantic comedy” is rare for BrattonOnline but this one has a 8.1 IMDB AND THAT’S RARE. It stars Kristin Bell as the shiksa (now 44 years old) and Adam Brody as the Rabbi. It’s all in L.A. and it’s fast paced and focuses on the relationship between LA Angelenos and the large and influential Jewish population. Plus the gay population gets their share of the comedy in their 25 minute programs.
December 30, 2024
Sadly, everything in the photo at the end of the Wharf collapsed into the ocean on Monday, December 22. Now the blame game has begun. The city manager said at Friday’s press conference, with the mayor nodding in agreement, that “we have projects that could have prevented this most recent collapse.” He cited delays caused by lawsuits against the city, “that have left our Wharf more vulnerable.” In short order that story was picked up by major news outlets with the predictable onslaught of hate directed at the community group, Don’t Morph the Wharf! and me, as its most visible spokesperson.
Being on the receiving end of hate is no fun. You wonder how far people will take it. I thought of those poll workers whose lives were shattered by the hatred whipped up by the election lies of Giuliani and others. Many years ago, someone left a dead fish jammed in the window of my truck. Being rather naïve about such symbolism, I wondered if it was a gift. Ignorance can be bliss. I must have angered someone over attempts to save a heritage tree, back when there were big trees left to save.
If facts still matter, the reasons for the collapse of the Wharf’s last 150 feet are easy to explain. Neither a lawsuit nor protected birds played any part, but they are easy targets, especially for those who uncritically accept the headlines and never ask why. Why did a community group file a lawsuit against the city over the Wharf Master Plan? Why did the court rule against the city? Did the city do something illegal under CEQA? The answer of course is yes. It was captured in a quote by an environmental attorney, Stuart M. Flashman from Oakland who was not involved in the lawsuit. He saw the city as partly responsible for the litigation. This was his statement on the issue to reporter Malcolm Maclachlan in the Daily Journal, a statewide legal journal.
It (the city) failed to be entirely honest in the CEQA evaluation of the project. It claimed some of the impacts weren’t significant, when the evidence before it indicated they would be.
Judge Paul Burdick ruled that the city was required to revise sections of its EIR to be legal under environmental law. So, is the lawsuit to blame for this delay? What about a city trying to pass off an illegal EIR?
It’s worth remembering that at the beginning of the Wharf Master Plan process, the city tried to fulfill its legal requirements with a Mitigated Negative Declaration rather than a full Environmental Impact Report. That was the beginning of the many concerned individuals coalescing into the Don’t Morph the Wharf! community group. Our first action was to ask environmental attorney Susan Brandt-Hawley to write a letter to the city, pointing out that an EIR was necessary for a project of this scale on a historic structure. At the council meeting that addressed her letter, the city attorney advised council that, “out of an abundance of caution, the city should do an EIR.” So, who was responsible for this delay?
What about the comment to the press from the city manager that they had projects that could have prevented the collapse? Let’s review the facts and timeline.
In 2014, to accompany the Wharf Master Plan, an Engineering Report was completed. This Report involved divers inspecting each of the 4,445 pilings plus stringers that give the Wharf its strength to withstand the ocean’s pounding for over 100 years, or at least up until December 22. The engineers’ conclusion was that the Wharf was in good condition, due to careful maintenance by the various Wharf crews and I would add, the brilliant design in 1914 of Master Engineer Brunnier. The Report noted that 5% of the pilings needed replacement due to damage. You can see a map of this 5% on the city’s website (hard to find but it’s there.) Many of these damaged pilings were under the demolished Miramar and have been replaced. Many others were under the end of the Wharf. They have not been replaced in the ten years since the Engineering Report tagged them for replacement. Such lack of attention should raise eyebrows and redirect the pointed fingers away from a community group and back to the city. The excellent Wharf crew should not be scapegoated for the decision to neglect the end of the wharf: it is a top management decision.
The claim by the city that they could not get funding for such maintenance work until the Wharf Master Plan was approved is belied by the fact that the city secured funds to replace the pilings under the Miramar before the approval of the Wharf Master Plan and during the lawsuit.
As for those projects that it is claimed could have prevented the collapse. Well, none of them could have been built without first replacing the damaged pilings which puts us back to square one. Even without a lawsuit it is doubtful such projects at the end of the Wharf would have been underway before now. And, without the lawsuit, the end of the Wharf would have included that highly unpopular 40-foot-tall Landmark building with the loss of the sea lion viewing holes.
One last fact: At the specific request of Don’t Morph the Wharf, the court order after judgment directed that the replacement of the 5% pilings called out in the Engineering Report, which had never been contested, could proceed unaffected by the judgment, as could all other proposed Wharf maintenance projects.
This loss and the impact on the workers who are out of a job until the Wharf is re-opened could have been prevented. The community deserves a thorough investigation without finger-pointing and scapegoating.
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
For first time in the State, AB 2011, which allows developers to convert commercial property to affordable housing is being instituted…right in Scotts Valley. Known as the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, the developer (in this case, Workbench) has the benefit of a streamlined, ministerial approval process, not subject to a conditional use permit if the development satisfies specified objective planning standards in commercial areas, making development a use by right, requiring the Labor Commissioner to enforce the obligation to pay prevailing wages.
Because the bill would impose new duties on local governments, it would impose a state-mandated local program.
Local government must submit annual reports on the effectiveness of developments under AB 2011 until the program sunset on January 1, 2033.
The City of Scotts Valley is against this development, but has no say at all because of the aggressive path Workbench is taking.
AB-2011 Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022
AB 2011, by Wicks. Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022.
Here is what Workbench proposes: Scotts Valley
Here is a good report from LookOut Santa Cruz about the issue:
State-approved Workbench project will be Scotts Valley’s first affordable housing development in decades. City leaders don’t want it.
NEW COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS TO REPLACE WORKBENCH PRINCIPAL TIM GORDIN AS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONER
Tim Gordin resigned from his influential appointed spot on the County Planning Commission in November. Hmmm….
That is likely a good move, considering the many large projects Workbench is pursuing, including the controversial one in Scotts Valley, and the Clocktower Project in the City of Santa Cruz.
It will be refreshing to see how the new appointments made by Supervisor Manu Koenig, for 1st District Planning Commissioner and Alternate play out.
Planning Commissioner Shane Pavonetti
Alternate Planning Commissioner Luke Rizzuto
From Supervisor Manu Koenig’s newsletter:
Last week we seated a new D1 Planning Commissioner and Alternate Planning Commissioner.
Commissioner Shane Pavonetti (who was sworn in by Clerk Tricia Webber in the County’s wedding room) is an architect, who I first met near the recent Maciel subdivision. As an owner and builder of single-family homes he questioned why the 21-unit developer should have concessions that were unavailable to him on smaller projects.
Alternate Commissioner Luke Rizzuto has been a general contractor in Santa Cruz County for 45 years and a resident of the Santa Cruz Mountains for 75 years. He served as President of the Loma Prieta Joint Union School Board and knows how to run a meeting.
I’m confident that these two will serve the district well by standing up for everyday residents, good architecture and cutting red tape.
WILL THIS FIVE-YEAR PILOT LABOR AGREEMENT PROGRAM HELP LOCAL SANTA CRUZ CONTRACTORS AND WORKERS?
The County Board of Supervisors approved a five-year pilot program restricting contractors bidding on any of the 10 County capital improvement projects, each $5 million to $90 million in estimated cost, selected by the County Administrative Office (CAO) Carlos Palacios to abiding by a new Project Labor Agreement (PLA) terms requiring union labor from Santa Cruz County, Monterey County or San Benito County to be hired on the jobs, paying prevailing wages. Many workers from K&D Landscaping, a family-owned Watsonville business with over 130 employees, spoke against the PLA because their company would be locked out of bidding on many projects to be considered in the future.
Public Comment on the item was significant. It was clear that staff from the CAO office had worked closely with the Union leaders to craft the language of the Pilot Program, leading outgoing Supervisor Zach Friend to strongly question why it would allow a bid exceeding up to 25% of the staff estimate to still be accepted. He asked that it be lowered to 10%, but staff was not supportive because “we started with a much lower number, but this was what was negotiated.” with the Union leaders at the table.
Supervisor Friend worried that the PLA will drive project costs up to the point that the County will not be able to get them done.
Supervisor Friend also felt the narrow definition of what non-union local contractors would be allowed to bid on projects under $3 million would cause harm and exclusion of local small contractors already doing good work and providing jobs in the Community. He asked for changes to the language of the Pilot Program
Outgoing Supervisor Bruce McPherson did not support the PLA Pilot Program as presented because he read the Survey of Local Contractor Responses and noted none of them felt the PLA Pilot Program would benefit their businesses or workers. “The County already has provisions for preference to local workforce, and to me, this [PLA] seems like a solution in search of a problem.”
In the end, the matter passed with modifications including reducing the bid excedance to 10%, changing the definition of local contractors to “any contractor with license in Santa Cruz County” (it had been more restrictive to more than 20 employees and gross annual revenue of $7 million) and data provided on project cost overruns and scheduling by November, 2025 to the Board. It passed 3:1. Supervisor McPherson voted NO. Supervisor Cummings was absent.
Here are the 10 projects selected for the five-year PLA Pilot Program (page 34 of the document)
Project Labor Agreement Pilot Program for the County of Santa Cruz
Addendum B
COVERED PROJECTS LIST / PILOT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
B.1 Covered Projects. This Agreement applies only to Covered Work performed under the
Construction Contract for the following Covered Projects:
B.1.1 Buena Vista Road Full Depth Reclamation.
B.1.2 County Facility Energy Savings Project.
B.1.3 Buena Vista Transfer Station.
B.1.4 1400 Emeline HVAC Replacement Project.
B.1.5 Anna Jean Cummings Park Athletic Sports Field Improvements.
B.1.6 Rail Trail Segment 10/11.
B.1.7 Ben Lomond Transfer Station.
B.1.8 South County Behavioral Health Facility.
B.1.9 South County Health Campus / Clinic.
B.1.10 Wheelock Facility Improvements.
B.2 The County shall provide the Council with additional information as to the scope of the Construction Contract(s) for, and estimated dollar value of, each Covered Project prior to bid.
B.3 Compliance with CEQA. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”), nothing in this Agreement commits the County to undertake any act or activity
requiring the subsequent independent exercise of discretion by the County. The Covered Projects shall only be performed if and after certification, adoption or approval of any analysis required under CEQA. The Parties acknowledge that compliance with CEQA will be required in connection with consideration of the Covered Projects, and the County shall retain the discretion in accordance with CEQA and other applicable law to
- adopt or certify an environmental analysis of a Covered Project or any portion thereof, prepared in accordance with CEQA,
- change the scope of Covered Projects, identify and impose mitigation measures to mitigate significant environmental
impacts, and/or limit the anticipated scope of any required public improvements, - select other feasible alternatives to avoid significant environmental impacts, including the “no project” alternative, or
- adopt a statement of overriding considerations in accordance with Public
Resources Code Section 21081(b) relative to any significant environmental impacts of a Covered Project or any portion thereof, or implementation of any required public improvements, prior to taking final action if such significant impacts cannot otherwise be avoided, or (5) determine not to proceed with the Covered Projects or any portion thereof. Any action taken by the County in the exercise of its discretion relating to any analysis required by CEQA, shall not constitute a default or a breach of the terms of this Agreement by the County.
The individual project cost estimates were shown in the CAO staff presentation, but are not in the document above. Staff stated the total anticipated costs of the 10 Covered Projects is $200-$230 Million. The cost of the Segment 10/11 Rail Trail was $90 Million while the Anna Jean Cummings athletic fields improvements was $5-$10 Million, and the County Facility Energy Savings Project (not sure which one that is on the list in the document) was $5-$7 Million.
Take some time to listen to the comments and discussion here:
It will be interesting to see what the CAO staff has to report next November.
PROBLEMS AT THE SANTA CRUZ WHARF
In light of the Santa Cruz Wharf’s catastrophic loss of 150′ into the ocean last week, I thought it would be meaningful to review
the improvement plan adopted by the City Council last February. What do you think will happen next? Mayor Fred Keeley has already said restoring the 150′ segment is questionable.
WHAT DOES SANTA CRUZ CITY DO WITH THE PUBLIC SAFETY DEVELOPER FEES COLLECTED?
The City collects many fees whenever building permit project applications are approved. What happens with all that money?
I happened to find some information about the “Public Safety Fees” assessed and found it of interest.
Write your City Council member and ask about this and other fees the City is collecting…how is it justified? Who decides how it gets spent…or not?
APPLY TO SERVE ON A CITY OF SANTA CRUZ ADVISORY COMMISSION
Here is a chance to be at the table when critical local issues are discussed before the Councilmembers weigh in with their votes.
Current Openings | City of Santa Cruz
WHAT IS THE LATEST NEWS ON REDEVELOPMENT AT THE CAPITOLA MALL?
Listen in this Friday at 3pm on “Community Matters” to hear Capitola City Mayor Yvette Brooks discuss the latest news of the City…what will happen at the Capitola Mall? Will the Rispin Mansion continue to sit empty while the City pays to have it beautifully landscaped?
Listen in on your computer or smart device to Santa Cruz Voice.com and call in to join the discussion: santacruzvoice.com/
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. ASK QUESTIONS AND EXPECT ANSWERS.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers and Happy New Year,
Becky
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Winter Solstice, for me, is the beginning of the new year and, in this Mediterranean Place, a time for Earth’s renewal. As the legend of Ebenezer Scrooge teaches us, every moment presents an opportunity to choose a new path. How do we, how does this place, take this opportunity?
The Rain Soaks In
The soils are wetted. Sporadic storms have spread enough precipitation through our bioregion to soak the soils, and the earth is awakening. Not long ago, the ground was rock hard and dusty. Picks and shovels bounced from the soil with pinging noises, puffs of dust erupting at every thrust. The dry soil seemed lifeless, but close examination revealed insects and worms curled up in tight spheres of summer-protective cases. Roots were shriveled.
Recently, the ground in those same places welcomes the shovel’s gentle push; earthworms and soil insects wriggle and squirm in upturned dirt. The newly moist soil is shot through with white fungal threads, some places dense mats, other places more diffuse. Sweet earth aromas emanate from the ground. The surface of the earth is quickly becoming matted with newly germinating seedlings. Freshly hydrated perennials unfurl new leaves and tendrils.
Early Breeding Birds and Their Favorite Flowers
Zeeee-eeeng, POP! Hummingbirds have begun their dive-bombing whistles, a sign that nesting time is at hand. Between dive bombing displays and sips of nectar, Anna’s hummingbirds are gathering spider webs, which they weave into nests, adorning the outsides with lichen. Winter flowering salvias are a favorite food source, but native flowering currant is the nectar-producing prize, the earliest native hummingbird plant.
Hummingbirds hold a special place for many of the local native people. I wonder if they once helped hummingbirds by cultivating native flowering currant, which is nowadays very uncommon. Gardeners and restorationists might consider stewarding this native shrub. If you decide to plant it, please consider choosing very local genetic stock, preserving the legacy of evolution or deep historical cultivars. Central Coast Wilds has collections from many local watersheds. Flower color varies between populations, which might also have adaptations to very local soils, climate, etc.
Walks and Reflections
The short days and rainy spells force us walkers to be more inventive if we are to get outside. For many people, this time of year is disruptive…hopefully for the better. People seem more prone towards social events, family and friend get-togethers proliferate. Diets change for holiday fare. Many people take time off from work, making time for socializing and reflection.
For every few hours spent relaxing in the cozy indoors, renewal and fresh perspective happens much faster with time out of doors, in the fresh air, however wet or cold. This might be time to be alone or could be time with others; either way, nature presents good chances for breaking mental or emotional patterns, showing us new paths. The way to take those chances is to be quiet, to give over to our senses….look carefully, listen, feel, and smell. When I have really opened up into nature, I sometimes feel I am being watched and, looking around, I see a fox or a bird gazing at me.
Longer strolls with time to rest along the trail are the best. What will you consider if you give yourself a half hour sit-time with a good view?
New Year’s Resolutions
We are emerging from the longest nights with any luck having slowed down…reflecting…with new perspectives on ourselves, our communities, and the world around us. With calmer minds and more open eyes we might see how lucky we are to be in such a profoundly beautiful, deeply biologically diverse place. How can we better integrate into the natural world around us? We shun narcissistic tendencies, tending towards generosity to others, including the non-humans that depend on our respect for their survival. We each have something to contribute to the future of badger, to the next generation of mountain lion, for the wellbeing of humpback whale.
So, while we rightly reconsider how we might take better care of ourselves in 2025, we increasingly recognize that caring for others is absolutely necessary for self-care. What are we without a vibrantly healthy environment? Will future generations enjoy more, or fewer wildlife species? How do you build these ideas into your new self, into your renewed actions in the coming year?
The newly moist soil is rich and receptive. The earth is providing a gentle and productive place to grow.
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Monday, December 30, 2024
An article in the December 9, 2024, edition of The New York Times alerted readers to a potential “ban” of Tik Tok in the United States. As Wikipedia tells us (any of us who may be otherwise unaware), Tik Tok is “a short-form video hosting service owned by a Chinese internet company, ByteDance. It hosts user-submitted videos, which can range in duration from three seconds to 60 minutes. Tik Tok can be accessed with a smart phone app or the web.”
The United States government believes that “national security” is imperiled by the use of Tik Tok by American citizens, given that Tik Tok is owned by a Chinese company, which presumably means that the Chinese government might have easy access to any information that appears on Tik Tok, and might also be able to use the application to undermine our democracy.
As The Times’ article tells us, it turns out that “a panel of three judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit” agree with the government ban. Unless ByteDance sells Tik Tok to some company of which the government approves, it will be banned in the United States by mid-January (apparently, at just about the time the nation welcomes its next president).
I am not a Tik Tok user. I have no real idea what its fate may be. However, I want to use the occasion of the discussion about Tik Tok to make a more “general” point.
More and more, our avenues of communication are all “online.” We talk to friends and others, debate the issues of the day, and become informed about what’s going on by way of various internet platforms. Tik Tok is one of them (and is owned by a Chinese company). Other platforms are owned by U.S. companies (Google, and Facebook, and “X,” for instance).
Here’s the issue I suggest we need to think about: If our ability to communicate and to participate in society, and in the “politics” that I think is so very important), depends on internet platforms (and especially ones that are under the control of giant corporations that operate in their own, private interest, not in the “public” interest) we are absolutely at risk of losing our ability to communicate among ourselves, and we might lose that ability at a moment’s notice.
Tik Tok, Tik Tok, Tik Tok…. the clock is ticking down towards a massive internet outage. Maybe that outage will be caused by some natural event, like a solar flare, or maybe it will be caused by some action by a government hostile to the United States, or maybe it will be caused by some action of our own government, or perhaps even by private corporate action. If, or maybe better said, “when” that occurs, we will not be in a position to “organize,” or to do much of anything else. Our ability to communicate with each other, and to find out what is going on in the world, is something that we take for granted. But… all that is now almost totally dependent on systems that live on the internet.
We have built our interconnected society, in other words, on a massively unreliable foundation. This is true because the “online world” is different from the “real world.” It is particularly noteworthy that our online world is “owned” by private corporations, controlled by billionaires whose interest is not “public service,” but private profit.
This is just something to think about, as you ponder my oft-repeated suggestion that you “Find Some Friends.”
I mean “real world” friends!
Tik Tok, Tik Tok, Tik Tok.
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
Well, the electorate has spoken — a mandate according to the MAGAts, putting the man from Mar-a-Lago back into the Oval Office! But wait! It turns out The Man at Mar-a-Lago is none other than Elon Musk hibernating in one of the cottages onsite! Is he president, co-president, vice president or VP-in-waiting? It’s all very suspicious in light of all the shenanigans being pulled by this “high status male” peering over Mr. Trump’s shoulder and whispering in his good ear. During the recent presidential campaign, Musk used his X social media platform to promote the theory that a free-thinking ‘Republic’ can only exist under the decision-making of “high status males,” excluding women or “low T men,” of course. The theory was derived from 4chan, first seen in 2021 on that social media site, posted by an anonymous user who suggested that the only people able to think freely are “high testosterone alpha males” who would be qualified to a run a “Republic” designated “only for those who are free to think.” “People who can’t defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism,” says the anonymous poster. “Only high T alpha males and aneurotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objecive ‘is this true?’ filter,” they add. “This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think.” “Aneurotypical” is not a word but it is assumed the writer meant neurodivergent individuals.
This theory, and others similar, promote hegemonic masculinity, being criticized for being sexist, exclusionary, not realistic and “toxic,” all popular in alt-right communities. “Interesting observation,” said Musk of this post. Mr. Tesla views such controversial or offensive positions as ‘free speech’ and should be allowed on his own platform even if it holds false or misleading information. The 4chan site itself is a hub of internet subculture, influenced by hacktivist and political movements, such as Anonymous and the alt-right. Posting can be done anonymously, a mainstay of the site, which has resulted in harmful content from a toxic community, which is emboldened to post hateful and abusive messages without fear of reprisal, with burgeoning of cyberbullying, harassment, and illegal activities; indeed, incidents of violence and harm must be taken into account. But now, talk about “interesting observations,” president-elect Trump has chosen to put Musk in charge of a ‘government efficiency commission‘ to audit the entire federal government, implementing “drastic reforms,” bringing with him his track record of bristling against regulation and government intervention. His efficiency in running a business and his abysmal stewardship of X should raise a few red flags, as we examine his repeated employee pay cuts and mass layoffs which resulted in a sputtering and barely functional social media site. Millions of previous users have abandoned the platform which is now a cesspool of hate speech, disinformation, and propaganda…the main proponent being Musk himself. His confounding missteps and micromanagement style may eventually eat away at the successes of SpaceX and Tesla, which may suggest that his real motivation in accepting Trump’s invitation is to deconstruct government from the very center rather than saving it money to continue operating. But, what the heck…with a former reality TV star president with an erratic business record, what could go wrong?
Former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, on his Countdown podcast, is afraid there’s nothing to stop Musk from buying his former, troubled cable news network, though it is not technically up for grabs. Olbermann asks, “Is there anybody to stop someone, Musk or not, from buying MSNBC and turning it into pro-Trump propaganda? Well, who stopped Musk from doing that to Twitter?” Musk suggested the idea after Donald Trump, Jr. joked that making that purchase would be “the funniest idea ever!!!” Olbermann’s comments about a degraded Twitter note that it is now basically a place for Musk to talk to bots and “fellow brain-dead tech bros.” Fidelity Investments estimates that X is now worth 80% less than when Elon got his mitts on it. Comcast has plans to spin off most of its struggling cable networks into standalone entities owned solely by existing shareholders, and may ultimately divest from cable completely. However, Musk is already spread incredibly thin with all his enterprises, so MSNBC is in no danger…yet…only our government should fear his clutches.
And the clutches of his designated partner, Vivek Ramaswamy, in the new non-agency called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)…not legally recognized as yet. The two co-leaders are making a list and checking it twice of government employees they intend to fire when Trump is sworn in to the presidency, actually two lists obtained from former administration workers. The first lists people who they served with who would make possible political appointees; the other list grades people they worked with, with an ‘A’ for those who should stay, and a ‘B’ for those who should be ‘blacklisted or fired.’ Typically, civil servants or career officials are protected from political raids at agencies, but Trump has claimed he can use Schedule F, an executive order that would make them fireable, and most certain to end up before the court. Many applicants are seeking work in the DOGE inquisition agency, but few who are willing to work for free, as are Musk and Ramaswamy. M & R are eager to start their new assignments as they goad their adherents to start cyberbullying government employees, calling their positions “fake.” Some may remember that in 2022, Yoel Roth, Twitter’s head of trust and safety, was targeted by Musk who charged Roth was endangering children, which led to a multitude of haters accusing him of being a pedophile and calling for his death. Roth was chased away from Twitter after the Musk takeover, and had to relocate for his safety after the billionaire’s cyber campaign, a sign of what may lie ahead with M & R’s ‘efficiency’ moves.
The two claim to have a mandate from the American people and the Supreme Court as they try to reshape the federal government. They are advancing legally questionable arguments on tactics, but as ‘outside volunteers,’ they have no authority to actually cut anything or fire anyone. Those powers lie with Trump, Congress, federal agency heads, or anyone with actual power to do so; yet, the two imply that they will take a much more direct roles to personally achieve their desired result. It is estimated that Musk spent in excess of $200M to buy Trump’s presidency, so in return Trump is giving Musk free rein to reshape federal agencies that regulate Musk’s companies by purging the civil service that awards him lucrative government contracts. According to odactionnews, DOGE is not aiming to eliminate a wasteful, lawless, and antidemocratic bureaucracy in Washington — it is hoping to become one. Conservative critic George Conway joked, “It’s weird to think that Elon Musk will end up having paid far less for the United States government than he did for Twitter.”
Musk has proven his power by killing a bipartisan government funding bill that was set to be voted on, avoiding a government shutdown. His over-the-top social media posting spree encouraging Republican members of Congress to vote against the proposed plan succeeded, and it took several days to get it back on track in the nick of time. Stephen Colbert wasn’t surprised by his action, saying that the billionaire has a history of blowing things up…“particularly on the launch pad,” he joked by showing a SpaceX rocket failure in Cape Canaveral. Colbert continued, “I’m sure the founders are spinning in their graves with joy at the way all of this is playing out. After all, the Constitution does start with ‘We the people do whatever rich boy tells us. Rich boy makes the big square truck! And we obey! We the people, obey rich boy.” He then pointed out that Trump weighed in on the bill’s failure, echoing Musk’s posts, which then spurred comments of “President Musk, and Vice President Trump.” “Woof, well, if he’s gonna be the guy running everything, I’m gonna have to work on my Elon Musk impression. Here goes,” as he jumped into the air in mockery of Musk’s jumping on stage during a Trump rally. Senator Bernie Sanders posted, “Democrats and Republicans spent months negotiating a bipartisan agreement to fund our government. President Elon Musk doesn’t like it. Will Republicans kiss the ring?”
Elon is facing accusations of political meddling not only in this country, but across Europe, including the German Alternative for Germany (AfD) and Britains’s Reform UK parties. “Only AfD can save Germany,” Musk has written on X, leading one senior German politician to remark, “Stay out, Elon.” It is reported that Musk is considering a donation of $100M to the anti-immigration Reform UK after meeting that party’s leader at his new digs in Mar-a-Lago. Wary politicians in Italy, Ireland, and France have told him “hands off” our domestic politics. Back in the USA, many are saying it’s Musk’s House now, with many Republicans proposing a Speaker of the House Musk, though he is backpedaling with Trump to make his actions on the funding bill appear to be Democrats‘ fault. Tiny cracks are beginning to appear in the GOP, stimulating calls for a Civil War within the party, which will make Trump a lamer duck than he desired to be. Trump wanted the world’s richest man as his sidekick, for the glamor and the fat wallet, and now it’s about to blow up on the launch pad. With Musk’s perceived clout, who owns the MAGA brand? Former MSNBC anchor and political analyst Chris Matthews called out Musk for tanking the funding bill by saying, “You’ve heard of a bull in a china ship — this guy is an elephant in a china shop.” Steve Schmidt on The Warning blog, speculates that, “Maybe we should call Elon ‘Daddy.’ I bet that’s what Trump calls him in private. Barron too.”
Satirist Andy Borowitz writes, “Elon Musk’s strenuous efforts to obtain power have dismally failed to make him an interesting person, a leading expert revealed. Professor Davis Logsdon of the University of Minnesota, a scholar who has written the definitive study about tedious graspers, said that Musk has made ‘the classic misjudgment that many boring people make: believing that access to power would make them less boring. He is still the reason all his employees want to work remotely.’ In more upbeat news for the Tesla CEO, Donald J. Trump has tapped Musk to mastermind mass deportations, arguing, ‘Elon already got millions of people to leave Twitter.'”
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
New Year
“This is a new year. A new beginning. And things will change.”
~Taylor Swift
“Every single year, we’re a different person. I don’t think we’re the same person all of our lives.”
~Steven Spielberg
“To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.”
~Winston Churchill
“The best way to predict the future is to create it.”
~Abraham Lincoln
“Many years ago I resolved never to bother with New Year’s resolutions, and I’ve stuck with it ever since.”
~Dave Beard
This is such a good idea… off to make a bingo card! Happy New Year everyone! |
Email: webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)