Blog Archives

February 19 – 25, 2025

Highlights this week:

Greensite… back soon … Steinbruner… out this week … Hayes… Trails through the woods …Patton… Arrogance and ineptitude … Matlock… L’etat c’est moi…brick-by-brick…stupidity and crankery… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… birdsong for sanity … Quotes on… “Camping”

...

MORE ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABLE LOCAL LOGGING. Again back in the 1890’s these loggers probably used the same justifications for their clear-cutting as our local foresters do today. What would Santa Cruz County look like IF someone prevented this “selective forestry”?

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com

Dateline: February 19, 2025

BACK FROM THE DESERT. I sure do love a roadtrip! We have a travel trailer, and a couple of times a year we take it on the road. We got it for the Non-Burning Man during the pandemic, and have taken it to Western Winter Blast in Lake Havasu, AZ, I think 3 times now. Sometimes I think about how cool it would be to live a nomadic lifestyle, just taking off when the mood strikes, but then I remember how much I love where I live and think better of it. A couple of times a year though! 🙂

...

HEART EYES. In theaters. Movie (6.6 IMDb) **- A meet-cute rom-com – with a slasher! Odd mix, but it seems to be director Josh Ruben’s forte. Ad designer Ally (Olivia Holt) accidently presents a “historic tracic lovers” motif JUST as notorious serial killer, Heart Eyes, who murders romantic couples on Valentine’s Day, resurfaces. She teams up with “ad fixer” freelancer Jay (Mason Gooding) in a “Desk Set” will-they won’t-they team-up, until an unexpected kiss puts them in the sights of Heart Eyes. The slashing is moderately creative, the chemistry fairly good, but it just lacks a real personality for Heart Eyes (which you need for a franchise killer). Not for the timid, but not epic gorefest either. On par with Christopher Landon’s 2020 body-swap horror/comedy “Freaky” (ala Freaky Friday – only instead of mother/daughter, it’s slasher/cheerleader). ~Sarge

THE ÅRE MURDERS. Netflix. Series (6.7 IMDb) ***- A darkly delightful remake of F.W. Murnau’s 1922 original “Nosferatu” (itself, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”). The story points match, down to the use of shadows as characters. The performances by Depp, Hoult, and Skarsgård breathe new life into the story, as do the visual textures of the cinematography and costume design (even the choice of using Dacian – a long dead language from central Europe – for Orlok’s dialogue). Slowly menacing in its pacing, this film builds its mood in a way that most modern horror films fail to. ~Sarge

THE BREAKTHROUGH. Netflix. Series (7.1 IMDb) **- Thanks to Netflix’s voracious appetite for new material, we’ve had a lot of opportunity to watch movies and tv from all over the place. I’ve been noticing an alarming number of bleak crime dramas from Sweden – one of them was “The Breakthrough”, a police procedural based on a real-life 16 year murder investigation. Though the first 3 episodes were a trifle slow, the final episode finally brings it all together. Peter Eggers stars as a police detective who does a LOT of speedwalking while beating his heart out against an impossible case. ~Sarge

NOSFERATU (2024). Prime. Movie (7.4 IMDb) ***- A darkly delightful remake of F.W. Murnau’s 1922 original “Nosferatu” (itself, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”). The story points match, down to the use of shadows as characters. The performances by Depp, Hoult, and Skarsgård breathe new life into the story, as do the visual textures of the cinematography and costume design (even the choice of using Dacian – a long dead language from central Europe – for Orlok’s dialogue). Slowly menacing in its pacing, this film builds its mood in a way that most modern horror films fail to. ~Sarge

ERASERHEAD. Max. Movie (7.3 IMDb) **** In honor of the passing of one of the most individual visions in the film industry, David Lynch, I went back and revisited “Eraserhead” for the first time in 40 years. It would become a cult hit during the late 70’s-80’s. There was nothing like it at the time, with a Buñuel level of slow-paced uncomfortable surrealism, and a story that can’t easily be described. As such, it tends to be shoehorned into the genre of horror, which, on a certain level, is fair, but it is so much more. It will be a slog for the short attention-span set, but worth every unsettling moment. Starring Jack Nance, one of Lynch’s personal ensemble favorites. ~Sarge

FLOW. Apple TV, PrimeTV. Movie (7.9 IMDb) *** “Flow” is a an amazing journey – animated with a small crew on open-source software, it is a personal exploration by animals in the wake of a global flood. A cat is joined by a capybara, a bird, a lemur, and a dog, as they explore the flooded world together on a boat. No dialogue, but actual animal voices in the soundtrack. A refreshing new animaed film, without the glossy signature stylings of Pixar or Dreamworks. We need more of this. Latvian, but it translates well. ~Sarge

STAR WARS: SKELETON CREW. Disney+ series (7.2 IMDb) *** It’s refreshing when a big franchise realizes they’ve created a universe big enough to tell other stories (look at Star Trek Lower Decks – a successful animated comedy entrenched deeply in the Star Trek Universe), and that’s what Skeleton Crew does for Star Wars. A quartet of children, chafing at the bureaucratic cloister of their homeworld, stumble on a crashed spaceship and find themselves launched into the rough and tumble Star Wars Universe. Using a rough “Treasure Island” plotline, there’s space piracy aplenty: Jude Law’s character is referred to as Cap’n Silvo (nod to Long John Silver from Treasure Island) and the ship’s yarr-voiced droid is SM-33 (Smee was Captain Hook’s first mate in Peter Pan). Good for adults and children (though not TOO young – plenty of life-taking and intense scenes). ~Sarge

NIGHTBITCH. Hulu movie (5.6 IMDb) *** This film is ideal for husbands and fathers, capturing the mix of profound and bullshit (and profound again) moments in a woman’s journey from being a successful artist to new motherhood. What begins as a seemingly supernatural plot evolves into a raw, magical realist exploration of the chaos and sacrifice of motherhood and identity. It’s a subjective, visceral experience, navigating the emotional and (literal) physical mess of this transformative stage. ~Sarge

SMALL THINGS LIKE THESE. PrimeTV. (6.9 IMDb) *** A quietly ponderous Christmas tale set in a small town in Ireland in 1985 (swear to god it feels more like the 1940s…). Cillian Murphy plays a loving father and quietly likable coal delivery man, who comes into conflict with the steely “kind” Mother Superior (Emily Watson) of the local school and “Magdelene Laundry” for fallen girls. A bit of a slow walk, and as heartening as it could be, given the Laundries wouldn’t be eliminated till the mid 1990s. Excellent performances all around, particularlly given how little dialogue there was. ~Sarge

EMILIA PÉREZ. Netflix. (6.8 IMDb) ***- A musical for those who don’t like musicals. Emilia Pérez is a spectacular film with a compelling story. A ruthless drug cartel leader, Juan “Manitas” Del Monte (played by Karla Sofía Gascón), seeks the help of attorney Rita Mora Castro (played by Zoe Saldaña, who just won a golden globe) to undergo gender affirmation surgery and begin a new life as Emilia Pérez. However, things go awry when she invites her unsuspecting former wife Jessi (played by Selena Gomez) and her children to live with her. The musical numbers are strong and short. ~Jennifer

A COMPLETE UNKNOWN. In theaters. (7.8 IMDb) ****I don’t know what I can say about this movie that you haven’t heard from your friends or read about in social media or reviews. It’s one of best movies I’ve seen in a long, long time – and I’m not a fan of biopics, especially musical biopics, but this one is so well done! Although the director, James Mangold, did ‘Walk the Line’, the Johnny Cash movie with Joaquin Phoenix, and that was great too. Timothée Chalamet captures our vision of a young Dylan to a T. He’s an incredibly soulful actor, and Ed Norton as Pete Seeger is uncanny. They edited the songs down from their original versions, but they did in such a way that they never feel like they’re being yanked out from under you; it just makes you want to go and listen to the originals. My 25 year old son loved it too. Run, don’t walk, and believe all the hype because it’s true. ~Hillary

...

Gillian is taking a break, but she’ll be back!

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

No piece from Becky this week, but she maintains:

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  REVIEW ONE SECTION OF THE DOWNTOWN EXPANSION PLAN AND MAKE A COMMENT.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.

Cheers,
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
Trails Through the Woods

What could possibly be wrong with trails through the woods? Ad hoc, unsanctioned, illegal, illicit, unapproved…choose your adjective to precede the ‘trails through the woods’ phrase and then ask ‘what could possibly be wrong with unsanctioned trails through the woods?’ While we’re at it, let’s ask the question, ‘what type of person would build and maintain unsanctioned trails through the woods?’ Let’s hypothesize for a moment.

Law Abiding Citizen
There’s a lot going on in our nation with people’s attitudes about abiding by laws. Some people are as apt to decry a convicted felon in the White House as they are to cite the horrors of the justice system, saying it is utterly failing most of the poor souls who face the courts. How does that work, logically? I’m not sure it does. But, are we saying at the same time that we should question the laws, as well? Has ‘law abiding citizen’ become an anachronism or just plain laughable? Or, maybe our culture has become accepting of individual interpretation of laws, but not in all cases. For instance, who in their right minds would support widespread law breaking with hit and run drivers, armed robbery, or homicide? But, say how about the lesser offences of shoplifting, forgery, assault, or libel? Are we getting to your more acceptable level of crimes, yet? How about….driving 20 mph over the speed limit, selling alcohol to minors, extortion, or petty theft? And then, somewhere down the line you encounter the laws against damaging public property, trespass, entering closed areas of public land, visiting public parks when they are closed, and violating federal and state clean water laws or endangered species regulations. How are we feeling about the types of citizens who break those laws? Are we giving them a pass? Someone is. A lot of people are. Hundreds and hundreds of people in our community have decided that the criminals committing that last litany of crimes are ‘okay people’ undeserving of one iota of investigation that might result in at most a warning, and almost never prosecution.

Anarchists I know would scoff at the legal argument here. Many who know how broken the justice system is would also shrug off the legal arguments, as well, understanding that without justice there can be no reasonable pursuit of legal matters. So, perhaps we must turn to ethics to examine the truer nature of those who would participate in unsanctioned trail building and maintenance.

A Matter of Ethics
Should we consider the consequences of illegal trail building? Or, is it enough to ask if rogue trail building is good? Is building an unsanctioned trail in and of itself causing harm to other people? Is maintaining a rogue trail respectful of all people? These are the types of questions one must ask in seeking answers outside of legal context. As I have posed these questions over the years, the most common answer is “I don’t know.” So, we must ask another question of morality: is it unethical for an illicit trail builder to create new trails if they are ignorant of the consequences or context of their actions?

Consequences, Respect
The consequences of constructing and/or maintaining rogue trails are well known, or at least readily available. The most glaring impact of rogue trails is on wildlife. Conservation lands managers have a difficult time providing for some trail access while also conserving wildlife: the two goals are mutually exclusive. Park users disturb wildlife, so one must plan around that to have healthy wildlife populations. Trails constructed outside of that planning process scuttle attempts at nature conservation.

And so, rogue trail builders either have contempt for parks managers’ planning processes or do not care about wildlife or both.

The same sets of arguments also apply to conservation of flora, fungi, soil, and clean water.

And again, it would stand to reason that those who construct illegal trails have contempt for park oversight personnel’s work/expertise and also do not care about conserving native plants or mushrooms and don’t care if soil erodes, that we have clean running streams, or that natural areas provide for drinking water.

Let’s extend these logical frameworks to the element of respect. Morals often refer to respecting others: their lives, their pursuits, safety, happiness, etc. All groups with which I have interacted in the past few decades readily recognize that humans need all species to continue existing for our own survival. And so, those who create and maintain unsanctioned trails score quite low on the ‘respect others’ morality scale with that first test. The majority of USA citizens support wildlife conservation; second test strikes against those who would build trails without the careful planning that parks managers use to weigh the pros and cons of new trails. We could go on…

In Sum
In kind words, how would you summarize the findings above to describe those people who make it a habit to create, or maintain, unsanctioned trails? Excluding nihilism, one would need to start with the term ‘criminal,’ but that would not be enough. The word ‘selfish’ sounds unkind, eh? And, even so, just ‘criminal, selfish…’ lacks something.

Most of the social circles with which I have discourse include short hand lines of reference to describe types of people who love fun just a little too much. You know, when fun overrides respect for others? The term ‘fun-loving’ falls short of describing the types of people referenced in these conversations; the people being referenced generally have problems, which is why they are being discussed. Such conversations generally end in head shaking…no great solutions…sighs and ‘I hope they figure it out….’ or ‘maybe so-and-so (someone possibly close to them) can have a chat with them.’ I think we are getting closer to understanding the types of people we are dealing with.

Next time you take a walk in nature, watch for the many trails veering from the signed, sanctioned one you are hiking. Ask yourself how much traffic that trail must get to be so well rutted and then think about how far that trail must travel, how much work it takes to chainsaw (at night) those trails open after trees fall. What a massive effort by _______ types of people (fill in the blank)! Think about the conversations they must have with one another and their networks… and how that is influencing the goodness of our community.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

#50 / Arrogance And Ineptitude

An article in The New Yorker analogizes the Musk “takeover” of various agencies of the federal government to the “shambolic American takeover of the Iraqi government,” in 2003.

I don’t know much about those events in Iraq, to tell you the truth, and The New Yorker article, “Elon Musk’s Revolutionary Terror,” was revealing. Hopefully, the magazine won’t have deployed a paywall that will prevent interested persons from reading the full story. In case there is a paywall, though, here is the first paragraph. This will certainly give you the basic idea:

Nearly twenty years ago, the Washington Post’s Rajiv Chandrasekaran wrote a classic account of the shambolic American takeover of the Iraqi government, “Imperial Life in the Emerald City.” Most memorably, he described what a Times reviewer called “the lethal combination of official arrogance and ineptitude” that plagued the foreign occupiers from Washington who, after the 2003 U.S. invasion, moved into the Green Zone—the walled-off compound that had once belonged to Saddam Hussein. Young conservatives were favored, heedless of experience. Some job seekers were asked their views of Roe v. Wade. Others were hired after sending their résumés to the right-wing Heritage Foundation back in D.C. While Baghdad spiralled into out-of-control violence, the G.O.P. ideologues who reported for duty in the desert worked to privatize Iraqi government agencies, revamp the tax code, and launch an anti-smoking campaign. A clueless twenty-four-year-old found himself in charge of opening an Iraqi stock exchange. It didn’t work out well.

In the United States, WE – ordinary people – have been legally placed in charge of the government. This is not only “theoretically” true. That is absolutely what both our Constitution and the laws provide. This means that if we exercise our democratic powers of self-government we can dislodge the arrogant and inept Elon Musk, and strip him away from his pretentious idea that he is, somehow, entitled to run the world, just because he seems to be, at the moment, the world’s richest person.

“Arrogant and inept” is a pretty good way to sum Musk up. Let’s not be afraid to comment on “Emperor” Musk’s clothing choices, either, as depicted below, in a cartoon that was published in the Daily KOS.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
LUNCH MENU, A HAPPY KREMLIN, SHUSHING X, SAY SOMETHING!

In an essay in the Ohio Capital JournalDavid DeWitt writes that in January 2020, he wrote about how politics of stupidity and crankery in America was degrading us as a society and as human beings. He concludes his latest piece with, “America’s love affair with swaggering ignorance and confident stupidity continues to reach awful new heights. The bill will come due. The piper will need to be paid. The damage will be extensive.” As if to second DeWitt’s statement, Donald Trump on Saturday made his own statement that stunned observers, in posting on social media, “He who saves his Country does not violate any law.” MSNBC’s Chris Hayes attributes this loosely to both France’s King Louis XIV, and Navarre, saying, “L’etat c’est moi,” translation being “I myself am the nation.” Columnist Jamelle Bouie of The New York Times called it “the single most un-American and anti-Constitutional statement ever uttered by an American president.” Conservative anti-Trumper Bill Kristol said, “We’re getting into real Führerprinzip territory here.” Tech reporter Matt Novak offered, “Dude is quoting Napoleon now. When do we get to the exile portion of the Napoleon timeline?” In a darker vein, writer and actor Bill Corbett adds, “Trump making an excellent argument for his own assassination — good one, dummy!”

In a podcast interview prior to the election, Trump’s FBI deputy director, Andrew McCabe who was fired in 2018, was asked if he thought Trump is a Russian asset, to which he answered, “I do, I do. I don’t know if I would characterize it as an active, recruited, knowing asset in the way people in the intelligence community think of that term…he has given us many reasons to question his approach to the Russia problem, and I think his approach to interacting with Putin, be it phone calls, face-to-face meetings, the things he has said in public about Putin, all raise significant questions.” McCabe also questioned Trump’s approach to his supporting Ukraine and NATO in the face of Russia’s aggression, and certainly in light of his claim that Russia would have avoided aggressive action into its neighboring country had he been president. Trump still maintains that all he wants is “peace — and Ukraine’s rare metals deposits — negotiate, and get this over with!” We have to remember Kamala Harris ridiculing Trump during their presidential debate that his so-called friendship with a known dictator would only result with his being eaten for lunch. McCabe ended his interview, declaring that Russia’s “interest is just simply sowing chaos and division and polarization. If they can do that, it’s a win. If they can actually hurt a candidate they don’t like, or help one that they do like, that’s an even bigger win.” Score one for the dictator(s)!

The Daily Beast columnist, Julia Davis, who monitors Russian media, has reported that there is glee in the Kremlin regarding Trump’s cabinet choices, an ominous sign for the USAVladimir Solovyov, on his show ‘Sunday,’ said, “What an excellent team is coming along with Trump! Not with respect to Ukraine, but as far as everything else goes. If they are allowed to get in, they will quickly dismantle America, brick by brick. They are so great.” TV host Olga Skabeeva enthusiastically pronounced the cabinet picks, “…totally wonderful!” And her husband, Evgeny Popov who is host of Russia’s ‘60 Minutes,’ agreed, calling Trump’s selections his “…radical dream team. All of them personally despise Zelensky,” and on a cautionary note adds, “They aren’t friends of Russia, except for Tulsi Gabbard.” How does that phrase go — ‘Forewarned is fore…‘ — never mind! Russia’s predictions are already being borne out by the actions of those put in place by the GOP-dominated Senate, hellbent on undermining the very agencies they ‘lead,’ brick-by-brick, stone-by-stone. Ja’han Jones of MSNBC says, “Trump is constructing a kakistocracy — a government filled with incompetent or otherwise unsuitable characters. And based on Russian state TV, the Kremlin couldn’t be happier.”

Julia writes that Moscow was initially unsettled by Trump’s stern proclamations regarding the Russia/Ukraine impasse, but his latest actions have transformed into pure joy as he self-destructs America’s standing as a global superpower. The new-old president is also well into his plan to undermine international relationships with our long-standing allies, exceeding Russian expectations. Propagandist Vladimir Solovyov gloated over these developments, saying, “It’s awesome, right? The Canadians and the Mexicans thought all was well, but Trump told them ‘By the way, I don’t like you either.'” This statement provoked jolly laughter from the other pundits in the studio. Putin called President Zelensky’s tenure “illegitimate,” prompting US envoy Keith Kellogg to suggest Ukraine hold a presidential election since “…most democratic nations have elections in their time of war. I think it is important to do so.” Solovyov takes this as a US adoption of the Russian view, and Dean Henry Sardaryan of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations agrees that serious efforts behind the scenes have led to a seismic shift in the American approach. Sardaryan has interpreted words of Secretary of State Rubio to mean the US is abdicating its global leadership position in favor of multipolarity, with Tucker Carlson being “unleashed” to publicly “demolish Zelensky” in order to sway citizens to accept Trump’s future decisions toward Ukraine. Moscow is looking forward to stepping into the void left by the demise of USAID, by creating a tool to exercise influence over other countries, much like China has been doing for years.

By Trump’s outright rejection of bipartisanship in his first term, political scientist Dmitry Evstafiev had predicted the disintegration of existing political institutions in the USA, to be replaced by an authoritarian system — now, to the delight of Russian experts, Trump isn’t letting them down. Andrey Sidorov notes that the US is rapidly moving into a dictatorship, with Americans unable to reverse this trajectory by the usual democratic means. Current Russian prediction for the US: “everything is excellent.” Co-president Elon Musk has co-president Trump’s blessing to dismantle the government and to gut popular programs — a decision that will likely come back to haunt him says the Washington Post’s Philip Bump. Bump suggests Musk is taking his cues from X, where he has cast himself as the main character in a rightwing bubble, and he is being disingenuous or ignorant if he believes his unscientific polls on the platform represent the desires of Americans — not just his echo chamber. According to Bump, Musk seems to believe Americans want less out of government, rather than better — a fatal misreading. “While a significant portion of those who did vote approved of the idea that Trump would overhaul the government, many were voting for other reasons. There’s a reason the bureaucracy exists at the scale it does, which is that constituencies and advocates have convinced representatives that those programs are worth funding. As Musk himself pointed out, when funding stops, complaints start. We can expect a staggering number of complaints over the coming months.” And it has already started — several Red States have dared to criticize the gutting of programs. Musk is following the same stratagems as when he took over Twitter, by slashing budgets, engaging in massive layoffs, while ignoring the long term effects to create his own world, rather than the one the end users want. Bump cautions, “…this is governance, not a right-wing social club. If X crashes, users shrug. If the government crashes, people die. The former is not good for business. The latter is not good for politicians.”

On ‘The Last Word,’ MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell had much to say about the joint Trump/Musk Oval Office press conference last week, pointing out the power displayed by Musk over the sitting president. Elon stood beside the Resolute desk expounding to the press (with 3,666 words), and a seated Trump (who spoke only 2,487 words), that the non-official DOGE is saving American taxpayers trillions of dollars — no breakdown, just take his word for it and ignore the suffering and chaos. O’Donnell described the scene as “a picture of presidential subservience the likes of which we have never seen, the most powerless image of a President of the United States ever created by a camera.” The t-shirted, MAGA-hatted Musk conveyed, with his son X in tow, without saying a word, that “Donald Trump is not the boss of me.” Trump’s first-term Vice President Mike Pence “never had a day like that in the Oval Office with Donald Trump,” and current VP JD Vance “will never have a day like that in the Oval Office with Donald Trump because Donald Trump is the boss of JD Vance,” O’Donnell added. To top it off, Musk’s son was rumored to have admonished Trump with, “Shush your mouth,” when he started to speak. Roy Wood, Jr. appeared on the ‘Daily Show’ giving his take on how much control President Trump has over the DOGE leader as he runs roughshod over the federal government, saying, “I look at this Trump-Elon relationship — you ever had a homeboy who had a girlfriend nobody liked? And the friend has to act as if ‘Oh, we’re fine. We’re happy.’ It is going to take a consecutive series of brave people to keep this administration from going off the rails. You’re going to need a bunch of brave judges because he’s going to come for their heads, too.”

In the aftermath of the joint Oval Office press conference, where Trump also made a big show of signing various death sentences for government agencies, satirist Andy Borowitz wrote a dateline Washington coverage in his The Borowitz Report“Boasting that it was ‘like taking candy from a baby,’ on Wednesday Elon Musk tricked Donald J Trump into signing a reverse mortgage on the White House. ‘All these years, you’ve fixed it, you’ve taken care of it. Maybe it’s time for your home to start taking care of you. There you go,’ he whispered into Trump’s ear, putting the pen in his tiny hand. Assuming ownership of the White House was just the latest real estate coup for Musk, who earlier in the week tricked Trump into signing over the deed to Mar-a-Lago.”

Former RNC chairman and current MSNBC host, Michael Steele, took a Saturday morning discussion into a blistering tirade against both Democrats and Republicans for groveling beneath Donald Trump’s relentless destruction of democracy. ‘Weekend‘ co-host Alicia Menendez read from The Nation’s recent report which said “the courts cannot save us,” spurring Steele to hit the ceiling. Co-host Symone Sanders Townsend asked him, “What would you have us do?” Steele blasted back, “I would like you to show that you give a damn! That you got a little emotion about the fact that people are losing their jobs indiscriminately. That this individual sitting down at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue has given absolute power to one man who brings his son into the Oval Office, whose son says to him, ‘You’re not the president, you shouldn’t be in that chair.’ Now, where did he get that from? He got it from his daddy, because that’s what his daddy thinks of the man who brought him into the Oval Office. So, I’d just like to see somebody wake the hell up and get excited about the fact that your country is under assault! They’re not at the gate anymore, they’re in your bedrooms, they’re in your living rooms, they’re in your businesses, they got your data, they got all your stuff. Elon Musk has his tentacles in everything you’re doing, not just off of X, but now he’s in the Treasury Department, he’s in the Labor Department, he’s in the Department of Homeland Security and nobody seems to give a damn, so that’s all I want. Somebody to show that they care enough to get off their fat ass and say something about it.” When co-host Menendez attempted to interject and point the finger at complicit Republicans, Steele went off again, “The hell with Republicans! They’re not going to do anything, they’re the problem!”

Along with DemocratsAlaska’s conservative Senator Lisa Murkowski is lamenting and criticizing the Trump administrations’s terminating the employment of about 200,000 civil service workers who were in their probationary periods. Murkowski warned of negative repercussions in Alaska with potentially 100 or so in her state being fired. She posted on X, “Any of these abrupt terminations will do more harm than good, stunting opportunities in Alaska and leaving holes in our communities,” continuing that she shares “the administration’s goal of reducing the size of federal government, but this approach is bringing confusion, anxiety, and now trauma to our civil servants.” Some X users were not having her “whining,” and arguing that she and her party are the ones inflicting damage. One post reads, “Your party & you propping Trump up has allowed this to happen. Stop whining about something you enabled.” Another reads, “I didn’t think the leopard would eat MY face,” while another reads, “You failed Alaskans and all Americans by voting for his Russian assets, Fox pundits, election deniers, conspiracy theorists, useful idiots, DOGE and other frauds. What could possibly go wrong?”

Steve Schmidt wrote in his The Warning blog that it was clear in watching Trump’s meeting with King Abdullah of Jordan, the king was “struggling to maintain his composure and dignity as the American president blustered like a fool about a vision for the future of the world that is both utterly insane, and would be a disaster for the USA, Israel, Egypt, Europe, Jordan and the Palestinian people, who would live in ignominy as a crime against humanity,” getting resettled from their homeland. “It is also a repudiation of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, architected by the US. Think about the arrogance at hand. We are witnessing a historic moment. Before it is over, we will all have a role to play. Trust me on this. The king knows what is coming. He just doesn’t know what to say. What can be said? Whatever must be said, it must be said by an American first. The world is waiting to hear a sound, even if it is a whisper. It is the sound of an opposition stirring that makes clear that liberty is not a hollow faith. Or is it?”

On The Tonight ShowJimmy Fallon joked that on Valentine’s Day Melania asked Donald if he forgot again. He was quick to say, “Oh no — I got Elon something.” And Andy Borowitz strikes again, posting, “Melania Trump has determined that the Valentine’s Day card she received on Friday could not possibly be from her husband because her name was spelled correctly, the First Lady has confirmed. ‘If it spelled ‘Melanie,’ ‘Melanin,’ or ‘Malala,’ then I’d know it from him,’ she said. ‘It was signed ‘the President,’ she continued. ‘So guess it from Elon. I wish Justin Trudeau send me card one day,’ she added wistfully. ‘That be best.'”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Camping

“Camping is not a date activity. If you absolutely must bring your girlfriend camping, try to leave her home next time.”
~Unknown Author

“The camping trip will provide welcome relief from civilization.”
~Garrison Keillor

“Camping is not a date; it’s an endurance sport.”
~Gretta Wing Miller

“You can never be too old to camp or too young to camp, camping is for everybody.”
~Elizabeth Gilbert

“Heaven is under our feet as well as over our heads”
~Henry David Thoreau

...

How does an hour of soothing nature and bird sounds sound? Like this, that’s how!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.

Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

...

Deep Cover

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *