Blog Archives

December 10 – 16, 2025

Highlights this week:

Greensite… back next week… Steinbruner… Bridge to nowhere… Hayes… out this week… Patton… Fork it Over… Matlock… pacifier bling…red card…bagging the cat…a next time?…Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… our sixth sense, as per science… Quotes on… “Late”

...

THE ORIGINAL SANTA CRUZ FISHERMAN’S WHARF circa 1910. You can see the Sea Beach Hotel in the upper right hand corner. The fish were for local consumption and according to Sheila O’Hare and Irene Berry most of the fish were packed and shipped to San Francisco. That’s Louis Perez on the left and the boy facing the camera is Stephen Ghio, who died two years after this photo was taken.

Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com


If you want to pitch in to
keep this work of passion going,
we are ever so grateful!

...

Dateline: December 10, 2025

NEW BIO. It dawned on me that all our contributors have a byline, with the exception of Sarge, our intrepid movie reviewer. I figured out why… it’s because he took over from Bruce, and Bruce didn’t need a separate byline 🙂

We have now remedied this oversight, and Sarge has a byline. It includes his email address, in case you want to send him a suggestion or ask him a question or just say hi.

This week was super late, but next week shouldn’t be. See you in a few days!

~Webmistress

...

JAY KELLY. Netflix. Movie. (6.6 IMDb) ***

Jay Kelly opens with a whiff of Day for Night by Truffaut, and plays like a confession muttered into a drink at closing time. It’s a film about old age not as wisdom earned, but as damage tallied: friendships undervalued, moments lost in a “life lived stupid”. On that note it was very personal for me. There’s no grand reckoning here, no cinematic redemption arc, just the quiet, gnawing regret of realizing that time didn’t betray you; you squandered it yourself. Also, a touch of Rashomon in how a memory is different depending on who’s recounting it. George Clooney, Adam Sandler, Laura Dern, and a very old Stacy Keach. Worth a watch.

~Sarge

WHEN WE WENT MAD! PrimeTV. Movie. (7.1 IMDb) ***-

A loving tribute to MAD Magazine – the publication (starting in 1952) that taught several generations how to distrust authority, mock sincerity, and never, ever respect a straight face. This film rounds up the Usual Gang of Idiots for one last glorious food fight. Mixing interviews with MAD’s brilliant artists, writers, and editors alongside famous readers who clearly had their brains permanently rewired by Alfred E. Neuman, it charts the magazine’s outsized influence on comedy, politics, and general American smartassery. What emerges is less a tidy history than a celebration of joyful vandalism: a reminder that MAD didn’t just parody culture, it trained its readers to question it, break it, and laugh while doing so. Honestly, the modern world could use an antivirus like MAD again. Worth a watch (and a back cover fold-in).

~Sarge

MY NEXT GUEST NEEDS NO INTRODUCTION WITH DAVID LETTERMAN. Netflix. Series. (7.8 IMDb) ****

If you’ve missed David Letterman since he left late night, he hasn’t gone far: he’s simply changed channels. My Next Guest Needs No Introduction on Netflix gives us Dave unfiltered, freed from network guardrails and sitting down for deep, intimate conversations with a carefully curated lineup of guests.

He launched the series in 2018 with Barack Obama, even joining Senator John Lewis for a walk across the bridge in Selma. Since then, he’s interviewed everyone from Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Miley Cyrus to Melinda Gates, Billie Eilish, and Ryan Reynolds – often in their own homes or creative spaces.

Unvarnished, thoughtful, and disarmingly honest, it’s a quietly addictive pleasure to watch.

~Sarge

WAKE UP, DEAD MAN – A KNIVES OUT MYSTERY. Netflix. Movie. (7.9 IMDb) ***-

The third Knives Out installment delivers another star-studded puzzle for Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig), the ever-bemused Southern sleuth. This time he’s untangling the secrets of a tight-knit, affluent parish after their magnetic priest turns up dead in a classic locked-room setup.

The film takes a bit longer to get moving than its predecessors, but once the backstabbing – both figurative and literal – start flying, it sharpens nicely. Josh Brolin, Glenn Close, Thomas Haden Church, and Jeremy Renner anchor an excellent ensemble, each giving Blanc plenty of knots to pick apart.

A slightly slower burn, but still clever, stylish, and absolutely worth a watch.

~Sarge

K-POP DEMON HUNTERS. Netflix. Movie. (7.6 IMDb) ***
Most of you know this exists only because your kids or grandkids have blasted it at you, and you’ve sworn never to engage. It’s anime. It’s K-pop (whatever that is). Hard pass, right?

So here’s the setup: the forces of darkness are kept in check by a lineage of “chosen ones” called the Hunters – think Buffy the Vampire Slayer – holding back the darkness with weapons, and song (the music is a weapon). The current team happens to be Huntrix, a K-pop trio. Their fame and wall-to-wall pop anthems supercharge their demon-slaying… until a boy band of demons (in disguise) shows up, poking holes in Huntrix’s mission and threatening to tear the group apart, and then, the world.

And yes, I know – anime makes some of you break out in hives. You’re thinking bad dubbing, (I’m looking at you who haven’t watched anime since Speed Racer in the 60’s), huge eyes, confusing emotional palate, and the occasional shady “lolita” corner. But here’s the twist: this isn’t Japanese anime. It’s Korean, and culturally it lands much closer to Western sensibilities. “Golden” (4 songs from the soundtrack charted domestically) is basically this generation’s “Let It Go” – it’s Disney with demons. Honestly, this could’ve been a Disney film without changing much. The story codes in themes of inclusivity, coming out, and acceptance. The voice actresses even cosplay their characters and perform the songs live, so the music is as legit as pop gets.

Not made for me, but it’s worth a watch – if only so you can have an actual opinion instead of snubbing a phenomenon you’ve never even tried.
~Sarge

BEING EDDIE. Netflix. Movie. (7 IMDb) *
“I’ve never been the real me, ever, on screen,” Eddie Murphy on David Letterman 2006

… and this documentary does little to change that.

As a biopic, it’s surprisingly thin, skimming the surface of a life that’s anything but ordinary. As a career retrospective, though, it functions well enough, offering a highlight reel of Murphy’s remarkable range and the admiration he inspires among peers.

The problem is that none of those peers – nor the filmmakers – seem interested in exploring the person behind the performances. A documentary doesn’t need to be a tabloid excavation, but this one feels almost determined not to ask any meaningful questions. The result is a film that runs a bit long without any moment to give it texture.

I walked away wanting to revisit “48 Hrs.” and “Trading Places”, but not especially glad I’d sat through this to get there. In the end, it’s not really worth the watch.
~Sarge

FRANKENSTEIN. Netflix. Movie. (7.7 IMDb) ***-
Yet another Frankenstein (“that’s Fahnken-steen”) or Oscar Isaac in what feels like his 25th role of the year.

Visually sumptuous and soaked in both blood and atmosphere, Guillermo del Toro delivers a lavish reimagining of the oft-told tale. The film nails the gothic philosophy and metaphysics of its era, pairing beauty with brutality in true del Toro fashion. You can almost imagine the Shelleys and Byron nodding in approval at the moments where it strays, and smiling where it catches the heart of the story perfectly.

It’s not for the faint of heart – one shot that got me, of the Creature twisting a sailor’s arm a few rotations too far, proves that – but the grotesquerie serves the point. After all, this is a story about Build-A-Man from spare parts and asking what makes him human.

Dark, intelligent as always, and unsettlingly gorgeous – this Frankenstein is well worth a watch.

I LIKE ME. Prime Video. Movie. (8.2 IMDb) ****

John Candy was one of the brightest stars born from the supernova that was SCTV (Second City Television) – Canada’s answer to Saturday Night Live in the ’70s and ’80s (if you haven’t seen it, it’s worth digging up). The cast was a who’s who of comedy royalty: Catherine O’Hara, Eugene Levy, Harold Ramis, Rick Moranis, Dave Thomas, Joe Flaherty, Martin Short, Andrea Martin, and more. And right in the middle of it all was Candy — the gentle giant with impeccable timing and a heart to match.

By all accounts, Candy was as kind and humble offscreen as he was hilarious on it. No one seems to have a bad story about him – which, in a crowd of comedians, is practically sainthood.

From “Uncle Buck” and “Planes, Trains and Automobiles” to “Spaceballs”, “JFK”, and even his lesser outings, Candy was always a joy to watch. His performances carried warmth, humanity, and that unmistakable glint of mischief.

Gone far too soon, “I Like Me” remains a sad “must-watch” — a reminder that true comedy often comes from a place of heart.

~Sarge

Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes, then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek with a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries, and who loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.

Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com

...

She is busy with tree appeals, but we’ll hear from Gillian again soon!

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
FARM PARK BRIDGE TO NOWHERE IS NOW SURPLUS

The County has decided to auction off a 180′ bridge to nowhere that County taxpayers spent $97,312 to aquire…after letting it sit in the backyard of the Hardin and Tee Street Community for 10 years…rusting away.

Many years ago, County Parks Dept. got a “good deal on a bridge” intended to be installed in The Farm Park in Soquel.  It was not at all the “foot bridge” that then-County Supervisor John Leopold promised the people who had attended the public meetings about the Park plan would be installed.  But one day, a huge truck and crane delivered the large segments without notice, and there the massive segments of the “Bridge to Nowhere” have sat, posing a public nuisance for illicit parties and drug dealing, as well as a fire and safety hazard…not to mention a big eye-sore.

I recently contacted Supervisor Koenig’s office to ask about the possible use of the bridge as a temporary bike/pedestrian bridge for the Murray Street Bridge access problem.  His Analyst responded that the Farm Park Bridge is only 180′ long, not long enough to span the 355′ width needed for the Murray Bridge span. However, she copied Deputy Parks Director Rebecca Hurley for my questions about the status of the Farm Bridge, who in turn  promptly responded that the Parks Dept. had determined the Farm Bridge was no longer needed there and would be surplused. 

Well, on Tuesday, December 16, the Board of Supervisors will formally approve the rusting behemoth to be auctioned to the highest bidder. (see text of Consent Item #29 below) 

I am surprised it is not handed over to Public Works for emergency bridge use, such as what could have been done on Valencia Road in Aptos when the culvert collapsed and forced Valencia Elementary School students to be sent out to various locations until the expensive culvert replacement project got done.   Federal aid for Valencia Road in Aptos requested  Oddly, a few weeks before the culvert collapsed, I had petitioned Pajaro Valley Unified School District to consider placing the bridge over Valencia Creek to serve as an emergency connector to the School from Soquel Drive.  The School administrator rejected the idea, saying they were not in the business of building or maintaining bridges.  Hmmm…I often wonder if they would now reconsider????


The neighborhood residents have borne the burden of monitoring public safety and enduring a great public nuisance.

Here is the Staff Report for Consent Item #29 on the 12/16/2025 Board agenda:

Executive Summary
The Department of Parks, Open Space and Cultural Services (Parks Department) has determined that the bridge from Farm Park is surplus to the County’s needs.
Discussion
The bridge is an 180′ span by 10′ wide prefabricated steel truss bridge. It was originally installed over Coyote Creek in Sante Fe Springs, California. The bridge was purchased as a cost-effective way to span the ravine at the Farm Park site, 5555 Soquel Dr, Soquel, CA 95073.

The County Board of Supervisors (Board) authorized the Parks Department to purchase the bridge for $97,312 on November 10, 2015. The bridge has remained on site awaiting installation.

In Spring 2025, the Parks Department issued a request for proposals to structural engineering firms to determine the structural integrity, suitability and any further remediation measures that would be required for bridge installation. The proposal received was $62,782.50. This amount, for assessment only, exceeds the anticipated budget for the park. The Parks Department has determined that the installation of the bridge is no longer viable option for the park.

The Parks Department is requesting that the Board declare the items listed as surplus property. This item is no longer required for County operations, has reached the end of its useful life, or is otherwise unsuitable for continued use by County departments. Pursuant to County Purchasing Procedures, surplus property may be disposed of through public auction, sale, donation to local non-profit agencies, or other methods authorized by the Purchasing Agent. Items with an estimated value over $5,000 require formal Board action to be declared surplus before disposition.

Department Description Asset
POSCS Bridge Tag #1911521617 
Condition: Obsolete 
Est. Value: >$5,000 
Disposal Method: Donation
This action addresses the Parks Strategic Plan goals of 1. Great Facilities and 4. Effective Stewardship.

Supervisor Koenig recently stated in his Newsletter that “Personally, I’m ready to see this absurd train proposal permanently put to rest in the annals of “Santa Cruz’s Dumbest Ideas.” First District Supervisor Manu Koenig
Personally, I think the Farm Park Bridge should headline that category.   

What do you think the County should do with the $97,312 “Bridge to Nowhere” that is now determined “surplus” and will go to a bidder for $5,000….maybe?
 
HELLO? CAN ANYBODY HEAR ME?
This could be what goes out over the air waves when the new $28 Million radio system that the Board of Supervisors approved last Tuesday, December 9.  Against the advice of the Santa Cruz County Fire Chiefs Association, the Board approved the contract that will allow encryption of law enforcement radio communication, at a cost of $202/radio/month.  

The problem will be that CalFire will NOT be using these expensive radios that operate on a different band frequency.  Neither will Santa Cruz County Fire Dept. (CSA 48) which includes all areas not within the formalized fire districts such as Central Fire, or the City fire districts in Watsonville, Santa Cruz and Scotts Valley.  Neither will emergency responders coming in from other areas to help in large disasters or to back-fill for fire agencies that have gone out of the County on large emergencies (think of the 2020 CZU Fire and 2025 LA Fire).

When this problem was raised during public testimonies, the County Administrative Officer staff Ms. Benson replied that it will “all connect together with a switch of a knob on the radios.”  Yikes.  

Radio expert friends of mine are extremely worried that all will be chaos in 2029 when the new system arrives…and the $28 Million to pay for it somehow appears in the County’s overdrafted coffers.  

The smaller fire districts already struggling to pay for responders full time will suffer tremendous financial hardship and may not be able to afford opting in on the Countywide system. (see anticipated fire agencies expense chart on page 5):
REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE NEXT-GENERATION (RING) RADIO SYSTEM

Zayante Fire District  $965,634
Felton Fire District    $712,353
Boulder Creek Fire District  $933,974
Ben Lomond Fire District  $854,823
Central Fire District     $3,166,012

Ask your County Supervisor if this is wise and to explain how CalFire responders will be able to hear anybody else working on large emergency events in our County.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY DOING JUST ONE THING.

Cheers and Happy Winter Solstice,
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

Grey will be back next week!

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Saturday, December 6, 2025

In a New York Times article published on October 31, 2025, Patricia Cohen explored the idea that we might “tax the rich,” and impose a “tax on wealth,” as inequality has widened and as government debt has risen. Cohen points out that this is not really a new idea, and that a tax on wealth was actually imposed by colonists in Massachusetts, in the 1600’s, prior to the establishment of our current government as a democratic republic. The idea of a wealth tax continues to be discussed. Click the link below to read what Cohen has to say. Cohen’s article in The Times is titled, “Should A Wealth Tax Compel The Rich To Fork Some Over?

I, personally, think that our elected representatives should, in fact, both explore and implement a tax on what Senator Bernie Sanders calls the “billionaire class,” and specifically enact a tax on “wealth.” I would like to suggest to anyone reading this that any such action would not, in fact, be an illegitimate way to use our collective political power – and should not be characterized as taking something away from those who have legally “earned it,” to provide benefits for people who have done nothing to deserve them. In other words, I would like to persuade anyone reading this blog posting that a responsible tax on wealth is neither unfair nor unjustifiable.

I often say in my blog postings that we are “in this together.” If we are – and I think it is clear that this is absolutely true – that means that we will all either live (or die) together. Accepting that premise means that our government is not only empowered to address our common problems, and our common possibilities, but that this, in fact, is the fundamental reason for establishing our government in the first place. Our government has been established to take any appropriate action to accomplish what our democratically-elected representatives decide will benefit the nation as a whole, and this can certainly include a “tax on wealth,” as long as no provision of the United States Constitution is being violated by any such governmental action.

“Taxes,” including taxes on property, and taxes on income – and lots of other taxes, too – have been challenged as “unconstitutional,” and have, after such challenge, been found to pass constitutional muster. Claims have been made that a person’s income or property belongs solely to the person who is earning, or who has earned (or inherited) that income or property, and that letting the government take away something of value that is owned by someone, to benefit others who didn’t do anything to contribute to the property or income being taxed, is not really “fair,” and is prohibited by the Constitution. Such claims have been rejected by the courts.

Of course, what is constitutionally permissible can only be put into practice if our elected representatives vote to do so. Lots of people don’t think that a “tax on wealth” would be fair, or would be a good thing, as a matter of policy, and so the elected representatives of the people may well choose not to enact a “wealth tax.” In fact, in general, it is pretty hard to get elected officials at any level of government to “raise taxes,” because so many people believe that doing that would not be fair (in general, and to them, specifically).

However, what if a majority of our elected officials did decide that it would be appropriate to enact a tax on wealth? Presumably, the elected officials doing that wouled be representing a majority of the population, who elected them – but any such tax would, of course, be controversial, and there would undoubtedly be lots of “compromises,” to arrive at a specific program to “tax wealth” that a majority of the elected officials would support.

So far, this discussion has really been by way of background. Let’s address the proposition that the majority of us should demand that our elected representatives take action to establish some sort of system that would require “the “wealthy” (which we would have to define, specifically, of course) to “fork some over,” and to provide some part of their wealth to be used to benefit the public generally, and specifically to benefit others who are not wealthy.

Frequently, any proposition to do something like this is called “socialism” by opponents, or even “communism,” with these labels intended to suggest that taxing “wealth” would be contrary to everything we have always “believed in,” here in the United States, and that taxing wealth would contradict everything that has “made this country great.” Opposition to Zohran Mamdani, just recently elected as the Mayor of New York City, revolved around this very debate. Mamdani wants to fund projects (like free busses, and free childcare) that can only be funded if those who are “wealthy” are required to “fork some over.” A very significant majority of the voters in New York City decided that they liked the idea. So, is that idea “fair”?

I would like to advance a single example, to discuss the “fairness” issue, but one that is well-known by almost everyone who lives in the United States of America – if not everyone who lives everywhere else in the world, too. I speak, here, of Amazon, and of Jeff  Bezos, a billionaire who is credited with inventing what has turned out to be an incredibly profitable business – online commerce. According to Wikipedia, Bezos is “the third richest person in the world.” As an incidental comment, let me say that while Jeff Bezos is given the credit for inventing and advancing Amazon, as though he did it all by himself, I think that much credit is also due to Bezos’ former wife, MacKenzie Scott. Because of the success of Amazon, Scott is also very wealthy, but unlike her former husband, MacKenzie Scott is taking steps to give her money away. She is already “forking some over.” Jeff Bezos won’t do that, though, unless we pass a tax law to make him contribute.

Let’s stipulate that Bezos is properly the individual most responsible for the development of Amazon and its fantastically profitable business – though not forgetting my shout-out to MacKenzie Scott helping to come up with the idea, and then expanding and developing it into the monumental and hugely profitable enterprise it is today. Bezos got rich! He deserved it!

But who else has contributed to the immense success of Amazon, and has thus contributed to the wealth that Amazon has produced? Amazon employess have, of course – and it’s my impression that many (not all) have been very well compensaged for their contributions. But what about YOU? You have, and I have, and everyone who has used Amazon has contributed to the wealth that Amazon has produced. Amazon is a pretty clear example of the general truth that it is not only those who own a business who help make that business economically profitable. Those who patronize the business do so, too.

Bezos (and MacKenzie Scott) deserve to be richly rewarded for their creativity, and hard work – as do all those others who have helped make it a success – creating something truly new, and making a fundamental change in our commercial world. But we really are “in this together,” and no such success would exist without us – we who patronize Amazon!

Consider the word “commonwealth,” which the dictionary tells us means “a nation, state, or other political unit.” Our wealth, here in the United States of America, really is, in the end, and when we think about it, created “in common.”

We are, in fact, and not just theoretically, “in this together,” and that means that it is wholly proper and “fair” for us to decide how best to mobilize the wealth of the nation to benefit all those who are and have been involved in its prosperity.

There is nothing “unfair” about taxing the wealth of the wealthiest people in the world in order to make them to “fork some over” to provide health, education, and welfare for those who live here, too.

We are “all in this together,” remember. We really are!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
GROVELING IN FIFA BLOAT, YMCA, FUN, WON, DONE!

Cities with Democratic Party mayors have been on President Trump’s enemies list for a considerable amount of time, with one of his threats being withdrawal of the June 2026 World Cup matches from their locales. But rather than push back or intervene in any way, the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has chosen to offer The Don a pacifier in the form of a specially created peace prize medal for “making the world a safer place.” The pathetic looking gold bling was awarded by FIFA president, Gianni Infantino, in the bootlicking ceremony held at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, commenting that Trump had been selected “in recognition of his exceptional and extraordinary actions to promote peace and unity around the world.” This was yet another attempt, as we have witnessed over the past year, in which other major institutions, companies, and prominent individuals have bent over backwards in a transparent effort to gain favor and purchase themselves immunity from either Trump’s political retribution or criminal prosecution — an embarrassing new low for FIFA.

As Daily Dose of Democracy’s post reads, “One of the world’s most corrupt sports organizations decided to create a participation Nobel Peace Prize to give to Donald.” Dave Braneck of Jacobin writes, “There’s a lot to dislike about the FIFA World Cup. A bloated forty-eight-team tournament spanning all of North America would be tough to pull off in the best of conditions. FIFA openly ripping off fans and charging thousands for tickets ensures that it’ll be, at base, and ugly cash grab. But there are also ills facing fans such as the United States’ immigration regime, roaming National Guard deployments throughout the country’s urban landscapes, and disconcertingly persistent threats to move match venues at President Trump’s whim. The world’s biggest sporting event will have one of its most authoritarian backdrops yet. FIFA president Infantino has responded to concerning developments in the cohost country the same way he responds to despots the world over — shameless groveling.” Braneck asks, “What could be unserious about an award presented ‘on behalf of the billions of people who love this game and want peace?‘”

He goes on to say that Trump was so “jazzed” about “one of the great honors of his life,” that he even stayed awake long enough to graciously accept it. The medal ceremony was squeezed into the formal World Cup draw, providing a bit of levity in the boring lead-in to the tourney proceedings and furnishing a look at “Trump’s authoritarian lurches and FIFA’s sycophancy.” Braneck concludes, “Faced with all this, fans need to exert their power before a terrible World Cup renders the game fully unrecognizable.” Tournaments in previous years faced more criticisms than the upcoming events, those being held in Russia and Qatar, and instead of getting pushbacks fans simply asked with a bemused, “can you believe this crap?” Sports bars in Germany even refused to show the matches on their TVs for the clientele. While Trump doesn’t seem particularly concerned with how he’s perceived prior to the upcoming tournaments, it still is feared that he could continue his threats to Democrat-run cities after the kick-offs. VP Vance offers his comforting words about foreign visitors, “They’ll have to go home, otherwise they’ll have to talk to Secretary Kristi Noem.” Sure, if there IS a next time for her!

The anti-immigrant policies and a proliferation of masked ICE agents throughout the country aren’t especially welcoming, and many foreign fans will be unable to even consider attending FIFA matches — Iran and Haiti citizens are banned from entering the country, a disappointment for Haitians whose team has qualified for the first time in fifty years. FIFA’s Infantino has chosen not to mitigate the situation, lauding his great relationship with Trump and prompting him to book the Village People as ‘entertainment‘ for the World Cup draw to please our brutish president. California’s Governor Newsom mocked FIFA’s ‘peace prize’ award, calling it a participation trophy that means little. However, Newsom’s press team piled on as they reimagined a rendering of a medallion, inscribed ‘If You Had Fun, You Won!‘ — accompanied with a cartoonish and smiling gold star.

Basking in the flood of flattery from InfantinoTrump commented that the sport of American football needs to change its name to allow the current terminology of ‘soccer’ be changed to ‘football’ to replicate that of its global counterparts. “When you think about it, shouldn’t it really be called, I mean, this is football, there’s no question about it. We have to come up with another name. It really doesn’t make sense when you think about it. This is really football.” Got that? Maybe we can call it Kennedyball since that name will soon be discarded at the Kennedy Center…or how about Donnyball…or perhaps Pardonsball? Count on the prez to come up with a self-congratulatory honorific.

After Trump appointed himself chairman of the board at DC’s Kennedy Center, dismissing all Biden appointees, he had no qualms giving FIFA exclusive use of the Center’s Concert Hall for the World Cup draw from November 24 to December 12, reportedly allowing the organization use of the prestigious center for the week. A leaked copy of the FIFA contract involves no rental fees for its use, which was offset by a $2.4 million donation and $5 million in sponsorship opportunities, for a total of $7.4 million for the Center, with FIFA covering event operational costs and security. This deal disrupted Kennedy Center programming, drawing the ire of Senate Democrats for potentially sacrificing millions in revenue for favorable political optics. It should be pointed out that the Center provided staff, utilities, and basic services at its own cost.

Eleanor Clift of The Daily Beast suggests it’s time someone red-carded Donald Trump. She reports that The Concert Hall, which seats 2,465, has been repurposed for the main event, with the Eisenhower Theatre serving as an overflow hall, and that the Roof Terrace Restaurant was reserved for a ‘VVIP‘ dinner. FIFA team seminars were held in the Terrace Theatre, along with a broadcast compound and a media center. A ‘green carpet’ will welcome arrivals, and a few fortunates will have access to a ‘Legends Lounge‘ to meet soccer greats and sports admirers from the Trump world who are lucky enough to be granted access to the inner sanctum.

Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, ex-officio member of the Kennedy Center’s board and ranking member on the Environment and Public Works (EPW) committee, which oversees all public buildings owned by the government, last month launched a ‘cronyism and corruption‘ investigation into the center’s management under former ambassador Germany Ric Grenell, a Trump choice. The Senator is demanding cost estimates to show the impact of the FIFA accommodations, asserting that contracts and invoices reveal the center is being used as “a playground for the President of the United States and is allies,” and is “being looted to the tune of millions of dollars…an unprecedented pattern of self-dealing, favoritism and waste.” Whitehouse alleges the FIFA event amounts to over $5 million in losses, amid broader reputational suffering and declining sales. Eleanor Clift writes that FIFA is the big winner, gaining prestige cost-free, and Trump is a winner as well, gaining a trophy, and wheeling and dealing to one of the world’s biggest sports events. “But he’s also scoring a goal by reducing a world-famous venue for the arts to another crassly branded saloon.

According to CNN, ticket sales to this season’s ‘The Nutcracker‘ are down by 33% compared to tickets sales seen in 2002 through 2024, echoing problems of other productions since the Trump takeover. Even with a sellout on the ‘Nutcracker,’ production costs would outweigh revenue from ticket sales, and other productions have been cancelled due to the imposition of a new policy requiring all performances to ‘break even,’ or from artists resigning their leadership roles for previously scheduled events — ‘Hamilton‘ being a notable cancellation. Broadway productions touring schedules are eliminating Kennedy Center as a venue, and with Trump’s board of trustees vetting performers for their gender identities, the Center is not viewed as a safe venue.

As the Daily Dose of Democracy blog reports, “the cat’s out of the bag on our vainglorious nincompoop-in-chief’s lates pathetic move to deify himself. Having already gone to great lengths to destroy the reputation and prestige of America’s preeminent performing arts center, the MAGA cult leader ‘accidentally’ let slip just what he has in store next. During a speech at the US Institute of Peace yesterday, which he had his name slapped on earlier this week, Trump said with a chuckle, ‘You have a big event on Friday at the Trump-Kennedy Center — op, excuse me. The Kennedy Center. Pardon me, such a terrible mistake.’ Donald’s constant need for praise and validation is without parallel, and he’s not about to leave the myth-making and memorializing to posthumous chance. SAD!

In renaming the above-mentioned Institute of Peace building, adding the ‘Trump‘ monicker, the White House called it “a powerful reminder of what strong leadership can accomplish for global stability.” Or, as Robert Reich termed it, “It’s a reminder of what a strong malignant narcissist can accomplish when untethered from reality.” The absurdity of renaming the Institute building and FIFA’s medal award are part of Trump’s effort to get the Nobel Peace Prize to keep up with President Obama. He sees himself as a valid candidate despite his declaration of war against Venezuela, sans congressional approval, and for allowing SecDef Pete Hegseth to blow over 80 people to kingdom come for ‘drug smuggling‘ — or using the incorrect bait on their fishing equipment, perhaps. Did Vladimir Putin’s flattery, for ending their war against Ukraine, persuad Trump to allow takeover of Ukrainian territory? That must count for something — if we ignore son-in-law Jared Kushner’s wheeling and dealing for business deals with Putin.

Reich asks, “Peace Prize? Please. Trump is taking credit for achieving ‘peace’ between nations that weren’t even at war. According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Peace Prize is awarded to the person who in the preceding year ‘shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.’ Nobel’s will further specified that the prize be awarded by a committee of five people chosen by the Norwegian Parliament. Memo to Norwegian Parliament and the Nobel committee: No president in American history deserves the Nobel Peace Prize less than does Donald J. Trump.

In the midst of his myth-making efforts, Trump recently mused about his eternal fate during a White House news conference when asked about about the ‘America Prays‘ initiative which “invites America’s great religious communities to pray for our nation and for our people” as we approach next year’s semiquincentennial. Trump is quoted as saying, “You know, there’s a reason to be good,” and he wants to be good to prove to God that he deserves a heavenly reward. He seems to be preoccupied with the afterlife of late, especially after his close call on the campaign trail in ButlerPennsylvania last year; and, he told Fox News he has anxiety about gaining entry to heaven upon his demise since “I hear I’m really at the bottom of the totem pole.” He feels he was saved from death by assassination to carry out his ultimate mission of saving America, which prompted him to make yet another appeal to his faithful — ‘send  cold, hard cash to help get the job done.‘ The grift is great, the grift is GOOD!

Satirist Andy Borowitz was inspired to fantasize Trump’s reaction upon the death of Dick Cheney: “Donald J. Trump boasted that his funeral would draw a ‘much bigger crowd’ than former Vice President Dick Cheney’s. ‘Dick Cheney, who was a loser and a terrible person, will be lucky to get a thousand people at this funeral,’ Trump posted on Truth Social. ‘My funeral will draw MILLIONS!’ Remarking that ‘nobody cares’ about Cheney’s funeral, Trump said he expects the turnout at his funeral to set records, noting, ‘Every day, people say to me, ‘Sir, I can’t wait for that day to come.‘”

Lincoln Square’s Rick Wilson speculates about what happens when ‘that day‘ comes in his piece entitled ‘When Trump Dies.‘ He writes, “Every aging dictator, every long-in-the-tooth autocrat, every once-terrifying strongman eventually feels the cold hand of Death reaching out to tap them on the shoulder and whisper, ‘It’s time.‘” Wilson says that we all understand mortality, but we should consider what comes after that tap on the shoulder with the collapse of systems built around that leader. The entire structure that pretended to be a unified movement reveals itself for what it was in actuality: a feeding frenzy for sycophants who think they were born to inherit the golden scepter. As for what happens in the post-Trump era, his daily outrages and excesses make succession the survivors unsolved problem. Reich concludes: “Autocrats are very good at seizing power and holding it. They are very bad at leaving it behind without blowing something up on the way out — personality cult regimes are especially fragile at succession because the leader spends his life eliminating rivals rather than training successors. Trump is not unique. He is just the latest in an ancient story.” What happens next will be ugly and dangerous.

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.

“Nuggets”

If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it here.

This week’s “nugget” is Researcher’s Anonymous: “[A]n informal group for people interested in the history of Santa Cruz County, California.” They meet on the second Saturday of every month, and have an extensive website devoted to the history of Santa Cruz, including a “More Place Names” page, where you can contribute an item that “fits the criteria the author used for inclusion in his book (see page xxi of the 2nd edition)”, but didn’t make it into either edition. There’s several entries on this page already, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some of you could add more.

This week’s selection is “Pajaro River” [p. 242-243]. As I said in my first piece, my intent is historical, not political, but at the same time, “the personal is political“, as the old saying goes, and one of the historical biases of this county has been the cultural and political dominance of “North County“, often to the detriment of “South County“, which not uncoincidentally, happens to be much more heavily populated by Latiné folk (for instance, Watsonville is 80%+ Latiné). Therefore, I’m going to try to spread the love around, and regularly feature items from across the county.

Pajaro (“bird” in Spanish) is a part of several other place names in Clark’s book, all deriving from the river’s name: “Pajaro Dunes”, “Pajaro Gap”, “Pajaro Landing”, “Pajaro Mouth”, “Pajaro Valley”, and even “Pajaro Valley Memorial Park Cemetery” (located on Hecker Pass Rd., north of Watsonville). Undoubtedly, his companion volume, “Monterey County Place Names”, lists many more (such as the town of Pajaro, which is in Monterey County). You may already be familiar with some of these place names, or from broader usage, for instance: “Pajaro Valley Unified School District“, “Pajaro Valley Pride” (for which I’ve volunteered in the past), and Watsonville’s local newspaper, “The Pajaronian“, but how many of you know the full story behind the name?

See also “A Brief History of the Pajaro River“. (some beautiful photographs in this article)

Enjoy, and see you next week!

     From the book, page 242:

One of two rivers in Santa Cruz County, Pajaro River rises in San Benito County and on its way to the Pacific it forms the boundary between San Benito and Santa Clara counties, and after passing the junction of Pescadero Creek it forms the boundary between Monterey and Santa Cruz counties.

DON GASPAR de PORTOLA and his party of sixty seven, on horseback en route from BAJA CALIFORNIA in search of MONTEREY BAY, halted near this spot, the site of an abandoned INDIAN VILLAGE, and then mistakenly pressed on northward to discover SAN FRANCISCO BAY.

FR. JUAN CRESPI made the following entry in his diary on October 8, 1769:

“We came to a large village, the fear of these poor creatures caused them to desert and burn it. We halted on the bank of the river. Not far from the burned village, which was near its very verdant and pleasant plain, full of cottonwoods, alder, live oaks and other species not known to us. We saw in this place a bird which the heathen had killed and stuffed with grass. To some of our party it looked like a royal eagle. It was eleven palms from tip to tip of its wings. For this reason the soldiers called the stream RIO del PAJARO”

This historical marker placed by the COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ and the CITY OF WATSONVILLE and the SANTA CRUZ COUNTY BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION, October 8, 1969

The plaque, adjacent to Baker Bridge over the Pajaro River, cuts the last sentence short. Crespi, in his diary, wrote: “For this reason the soldiers called the stream Rio del Pajaro and I added the name of [Rio de] La Señora La Santa Ana.” Here is another case where a nickname (Rio del Pajaro, Pajaro River, “River of the bird”) given by the soldiers has outlasted the name bestowed by a priest (Rio de la Señora Santa Ana). Burton L. Gordon holds that the bird was a condor. « A blackbird with such a wingspread could hardly have been other than the California Condor.” – Gordon (1974 p.102).

Then there is this bit of folklore, published in the Santa Cruz Surf, December 8, 1887, which suggests two other possible sources for the name:

A friend, who has been reading in boom papers that Pajaro Valley was so named because of the abundance of birds here when the padres first visited it, says all published statements as to the origin of the name Pajaro are incorrect…. He …states that birds were not then anywhere near as plentiful here as in the Salinas valley, and hence there was no reason of that character for applying the name Pajaro.

He says (and he is a native of this country, a man born in the earlier part of the century, and who was well acquainted with the padres) that… in early days the Pajaro river was narrow and full of quicksands; that its crossing was extremely dangerous, and the Californians, in speaking of it would say that “it took a bird to cross it;” and that from this expression came its name.

Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts.

Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com

...

“Late”

“I have noticed that the people who are late are often so much jollier than the people who have to wait for them.”
~E. V. Lucas

“You cannot do a kindness too soon, for you never know how soon it will be too late.”
~Ralph Waldo Emerson

“The idea is to die young as late as possible.”
~Ashley Montagu

“You know when they have a fishing show on TV? They catch the fish and then let it go. They don’t want to eat the fish, they just want to make it late for something.”
~Mitch Hedberg

“Youth is when you’re allowed to stay up late on New Year’s Eve. Middle age is when you’re forced to.”
~Bill Vaughan

I feel like Bill and Ted… WHOOOOAAAAA, dude!!!!!!! This is some seriously fascinating stuff.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.

Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

...

Deep Cover

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *