Blog Archives

August 17 – 23, 2022

Highlights this week:

BRATTON…Tribal gambling propositions, Peter Beagle reimbursed, KSQD interview, movie critiques, Here Now Live. GREENSITE…on light pollution: an updated entry from a year ago. KROHN…Political Heat, council seats, Keeley vs. Schendledecker, goodbye Becky Blythe. STEINBRUNER…County supes term limits, traffic impacts and developers, no fixing emergency routes, Davenport water source, World Bee Day. HAYES… caring about public land management. PATTON…Joshua Trees ad Climate Goals. MATLOCK… Grifting along with the raiders & spy vs. spy in history. EAGAN…Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. WEBMISTRESS’ pick of the week. QUOTES…”Heat Waves”


ORIGINAL STICKY WICKET. October 6, 1958. This original Sticky Wicket was on Cathcart right off Pacific Avenue and was owned by Vic and Sid Jowers. Those stairs in the background led up to the second floor of where the “new” Catalyst is now. The Wicket later moved to Aptos and is mostly known as the birthplace of what became the Cabrillo Music Festival.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email

Donate to BrattonOnline

While this website is a work of passion (Bruce and the other writers don’t get paid), there are still costs associated with it. We are in our 20th year, believe it or not! Should you feel like contributing, know that it will be very appreciated!

The button below will take you to the secure donation form.

Thank you!


DATELINE August 15

THOSE TRIBAL GAMBLING CASINO PROPOSITIONS. We’ve been swamped with TV commercials featuring American Indian tribal members pushing their seemingly opposing views on props 26 and prop 27. I asked our former County Supervisor, column writer, site host at Gary Patton what he’s figured out about those props. Gary is one of the most trustworthy, knowledgeable political-minded people I’ve ever known. Gary not only gave his views on those two props but continued beyond. He stated…

“I did hunt down the qualified ballot measures, online. Here’s where you can find them:

Secretary of State Website
Ballotpedia (more information)

There will be two gambling measures on the ballot. Both would expand gambling opportunities in the state.

Proposition 26 would expand gambling opportunities in two kinds of physical locations: Indian casinos located on tribal lands; and on race tracks, in the four counties where such race tracks already exist. The new arena for gambling is “sports gaming.”

Proposition 27 would allow new gambling opportunities ONLINE, without any need for the gambler to go to any physical location. Again, “sports gaming” would be the new arena for gambling.

It appears that the existing tribal bands having casinos are against Proposition 27, since online gambling would be, essentially, a new business competitor.

The advocates of Proposition 27 say that 85% of the monies generated (after various expenses have been deducted) would go to an expansion of homeless and mental health assistance.

Both measures are pretty complicated, and I did not analyze them in detail.

Looks like the League of Women Voters does intend to provide recommendations, but I don’t see any yet: LWVC Ballot RecommendationsThe “Voters’ Edge” website, recommended by the LWV, is apparently where these recommendations will be found when they’re available.

Other Measures on the Ballot:

Proposition 28 would require a minimum source of annual funding for K-12 public schools, including charter schools, to fund arts education programs. The annual minimum amount established by the law would be equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies received under Proposition 98 (1988) during the prior fiscal year. The minimum under the proposed law would be in addition to the funding required by Proposition 98. According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the ballot initiative would likely result in increased spending of $800 million to $1 billion each fiscal year.

Proposition 29 would enact staffing requirements, reporting requirements, ownership disclosure, and closing requirements for chronic dialysis clinics. – Supported by unions / opposed by the medical establishment.

Proposition 30 would increase the income tax by an additional 1.75% on income above $2 million for individuals. Income above $2 million for individuals is taxed at a rate of 13.3% in California. Revenue from the increased income tax would be appropriated into the Clean Cars and Clean Air Trust Fund (CCCATF). It would then be allocated to the following three sub-funds: Zero-Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Investment Plan Sub-Fund (35% of revenue), Zero-Emission Vehicle and Clean Mobility Sub-Fund (45% of revenue), and Wildfire Green House Gas Emissions Reduction Sub-Fund (20% of revenue). The sub-funds would fund zero-emission vehicles, charging stations, and infrastructure, as well as hiring and training firefighters

Proposition 31 is a referendum, which seeks to overturn Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which was signed into law on August 28, 2020. SB 793 was designed to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products and tobacco product flavor enhancers, with exceptions for hookah tobacco, loose leaf tobacco, and premium cigars. Retailers would be fined $250 for each sale violating the law. A “yes” vote is to overturn the ban.

In terms of the sports gaming initiatives, I think, personally, I will likely be voting “NO” on both of them, since expanding gambling opportunities is not something I think is beneficial. For someone who thinks that gambling on “sports gaming” should be legalized, I tend to think that Proposition 26, tying gambling bets to the need actually to go to a specified physical location tends to be the best way to do it. However, let’s see what the analysis in the Voters’ Pamphlet shows, when that’s available, about what sort of monies would be generated for homeless and mental health support. Could be a lot (and a significant part of that coming from poorer people who can’t really afford to use their scare assets for gambling).

PETER BEAGLE IS ALIVE & WELL AND BEING REIMBURSED. One of our well-read readers sent me a note asking me if I knew Peter Beagle the author of The Last Unicorn. Sure I knew him and told her “Yes I knew him from our Friday night media group drinking gang.  Back in those days the Sentinel, Good Times, Pajaronian, authors, all hung together and went to the old then the new Catalyst, The Oak Room in the Cooperhouse, Santa Cruz Hotel Bar and grill etc. We were easy going, sharing, and happy. Peter also hung with Jim Houston, Morton Marcus, and genuine authors….well it turns out that Peter had been royally screwed out of his royalties from the Unicorn and other books. This article from the NY Times tells all about it. [paywall]  Folks new to Santa Cruz should know that Peter wrote of the Unicorn while he lived here. He also sang in a local pub, which surprised me.

MY KSQD INTERVIEW. Kind friends and relatives asked me if it’s possible to still hear the interview with me that Chris Krohn did last month on KSQD. Yes it’s available here…

I search and critique a variety of movies only from those that are newly released. Choosing from the thousands of classics and older releases would take way too long. And be sure to tune in to those very newest movie reviews live on KZSC 88.1 fm every Friday from about 8:10 – 8:30 am. on the Bushwhackers Breakfast Club program hosted by Dangerous Dan Orange.

CODE NAME EMPEROR. (NETFLIX MOVIE) ( 6.0 IMDB). Luis Tosar a Spanish actor you’ll recognize leads this former cops and robber guy through some extremely delicate and illegal gang scenes in Madrid and beyond. For some believable reasons he gets into cocaine smuggling and dealing with big time killer mobs. Complex, believable and well done movie. Go for it.

THE SANDMAN. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.8 IMDB) This comic book hero Dream also known as Morpheus from Neil Gaiman’s pen comes back from the dead in 1916 Britain and haunts and curses everybody from Berlin to modern day venues. Tom Sturridge plays Morpheus and if you like DC comics at their near best go for it. But only IF…

PERFUMES. (PRIME VIDEO) (6.6 IMDB). A woman who was a world famed perfume maker loses that ability. She regains that talent with help from a fellow middle aged guy who’s a taxi driver. It’s a fine and well executed film with tender and educational parts centering on what we can and can’t smell. Their relationship and being a well-made movie makes it very worthwhile watching.

BODIES BODIES BODIES. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (6.7 IMDB) Six young women (in their 20’s) decide to spend a few days and nights in a friend’s mansion. Along with cocaine, booze and increasing silliness they decide to play a “who kills them” game. So there’s murders and blood, and some very silly dialogue before we find out the truth….and you won’t be able to follow it any ways. Avoid this mess.

EMILY THE CRIMINAL. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (7.1 IMDB) Aubrey Plaza plays Emily and is becoming an excellent actress, whether being serious or into comedies. Emily has a student loan and needs more money to live and pay off her debts. She makes many decisions and gets deeply involved with phony big time credit card duplicators in Los Angeles. She makes friends with Theo Rossi who does a fine job as her mentor and friend. Fine exciting, fast paced movie…go for it.

NOBODY KNOWS I’M HERE. (NETFLIX MOVIE) (6.5 IMDB). A tender, unusual story of a young boy living in Chile who makes a hit record as a teen ager but then has huge issues and grows into a larger than life recluse. Slow pacing and barely average photography keep this from being a classic but it’ll make your troubles seem smaller. Go for it.

MINAMATA. (HULU MOVIE) (7.7 IMDB)  This should be required viewing for anyone concerned with industrial pollution. This true story has Johnny Depp as a Life Magazine photographer who forces his way to Japan to photograph the death and destruction caused by the Chisso Chemical plant that dumps its mercury filled waste into the local’s drinking water. Bill Nighy is the Life Magazine editor and does a memorable job. Don’t miss it.

SPECIAL NOTE….Don’t forget that when you’re not too sure of a plot or need any info on a movie to go to Wikipedia. It lays out the straight/non hype story plus all the details you’ll need including which server (Netflix, Hulu, or PBS) you can find it on. You can also go to and punch in the movie title and read my take on the much more than 100 movies.

BULLET TRAIN. (DEL MAR THEATRE) (7.5 IMDB). This violent mess is billed as a comedy starring the 59 year old Brad Pitt. With zero to no background story there are five professional assassins on board Japan’s Bullet Train. For over two hours they work very hard to out bloody each other. Sandra Bullock and Michael Shannon make unnecessary guest appearances. The stabbings, chokings, murders, and almost continual bloody scenes aren’t anywhere as funny as director Leitch tries to force on us. I don’t need to watch any more violence than what I see every day in the media and you should skip this mess.

THIRTEEN LIVES. (PRIME MOVIE) (7.8 IMDB). Ron Howard directed this near documentary of the saving of 13 Thailand Soccer team who got trapped underwater in a cave. It is intense even though we know the outcome. Viggo Mortensen and Colin Farrell are the lead divers who supervise the rescue. More than 5000 people volunteered from 17 countries to aid the underwater return. It all took place in a tourist cave with railings, steps and the captain of the boys’ soccer team was the one who led the boys into the cave but saved them by human touches. Fine film, tense, claustrophobic, and well worth watching.

RECURRENCE. (or PIPA) (NETFLIX MOVIE) (4.3 IMDB). There was a murder of a 15 year old girl at a party and the woman detective Pipa is bound by guilt and duty to find the murderer. It takes place in the Argentine and makes some points dealing with local Indian history. It’s slow, confusing and is actually the third film in the Pipa series. Don’t bother with this one.

THE 355. (PRIME MOVIE) (5.4 IMDB). Somebody invented a super hi tech iPhone looking thing that could change the world’s communication system. Jessica Chastain, Penelope Cruz, Diane Kruger, and Lupita Nyong’o make up the dynamic action filled quartet that fly all over the world tracking down the thieves who stole that secret iPhone. It’s about these two secret agencies that compete in car chases, climbing tall buildings and keep extra secrets from us in this looney plot.

UNCOUPLED. (NETFLIX SERIES) (7.0 IMDB). A very silly comedy about what rich, light weight gay white men do in New York City. Neil Patrick Harris leads the cast and he’s very gay and in a 17 year relationship. Marcia Gay Harden plays a very wealthy matron and manages to steal every scene she’s in. The movie contains only one gay male stereotype group and I’d imagine that less silly sex driven gays could seriously object to this farce.


HIDDEN VALLEY STRING ORCHESTRA which is Sixteen of Northern California’s finest string players will perform without a conductor. Prepared under the direction of concertmaster, Roy Malan. Comprising sixteen of Northern California’s most talented and accomplished string players, the String Orchestra of Hidden Valley debuted to acclaim in November 2014. Lyn Bronson of Peninsula Reviews said of the String Orchestra’s debut, “A gorgeous performance. Every section . . . a perfect jewel.” Featuring works by Richard Wagner, Efrem Zimbalist, Jean Françaix, Germain Tailleferre, Wiliam Grant Still, and Frank Bridge in Santa Cruz Sunday September 11th at 4:00 p.m. at Peace United Church 900 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060. Go here for more info…

SANTA CRUZ ACTORS’ THEATRE & “8 Tens at 8” NEWS. Andre Neu activist and eager arts enthusiast sent this news.” As an active theatre-goer, I figured you’d be interested in hearing that Santa Cruz Actors’ Theatre is doing a “reboot” of its “8 Tens at 8” series in early September. After Wilma Marcus Chandler and Andrew Cagllio resigned earlier this year, the company regrouped and has come together to stage what was to go forth before COVID struck. The new company, headed by Suzanne Schrag, includes quite a few familiar theater folks and seems pretty secure in what they’re doing, Andre.

August 15


Rarely does a bank get singled out for praise but praise is due to the US Bank Branch at 110 N. Morrissey Blvd. When a member of the International Dark-sky Association (IDA), Santa Cruz Chapter (of which I am a member) brought to the bank’s attention the light pollution blasting from the numerous Wall Pack lights on the bank’s periphery, they were eventually replaced with properly shielded, amber lights and the difference is evident in the before and after photos below.

© Andy Kreyche: IDA Santa Cruz

© Andy Kreyche: IDA Santa Cruz

Eliminating light pollution is not simply an aesthetic preference. It is increasingly recognized as a significant source of human sleep deprivation; human health problems documented by the AMA; a disruptor of avian migration; a killer of migratory birds; a cause of the rapid decline in insect populations as well as negatively affecting the life cycles of plants. To quote from the IDA website which is an excellent resource for learning about light pollution:

“For billions of years, all life has relied on Earth’s predictable rhythm of day and night. It’s encoded in the DNA of all plants and animals. Humans have radically disrupted this cycle by lighting up the night. Plants and animals depend on Earth’s daily cycle of light and dark rhythm to govern life-sustaining behaviors such as reproduction, nourishment, sleep, and protection from predators. Scientific evidence suggests that artificial light at night has negative and deadly effects on many creatures including amphibians, birds, mammals, insects, and plants.”

Not only does light pollution negatively impact all life, in less than 100 years, the bright starry night sky including our own galaxy, which was previously visible with the naked eye, has been lost to over 99% of people in the USA and Northern Europe. This brightening of the night sky with artificial light is termed “skyglow.” For today’s children it essentially is the night sky; featureless, with a yellowish glow that never really gets dark.

The good news is that it is one of the easiest pollutions to fix and reverse. Just turn off the switch! Of course, nothing involving humans is ever easy.

We are conditioned to believe that light equals safety so many feel the more light the better. Perhaps there is an evolutionary sense of safety around a night fire, but we have gone too far in that direction in trying to erase all darkness. Corporate interests capitalize on light to display and persuade. Poorer communities are often the most impacted by light pollution, but globally it is largely a product of greater affluence.

As documented on the IDA website, overly bright lights, especially LEDs and especially in the cool color (white) temperature range, if not properly shielded, make it difficult to see at night due to the glare. They create adjacent deep shadows where a person with bad intentions can hide. Forty years ago, as a new staff member at UCSC and in charge of Rape Prevention Education, I intervened to dissuade the administration from changing the lights in the small wooden bus shelters from the warm low wattage to a bright, glaring alternative. The logic was obvious to me. A brightly lit person in a bus shelter is an easier target for someone to evaluate and surprise. The person in the bus shelter cannot see out into the darkness due to overly bright lights within. I was successful and the lights were not changed, at least during my 30 years, nor were there any reports of attacks on women at night while waiting at bus shelters.  Much of the education I did with new students was to reassure them that the dark woods and softly lit paths on campus were not the sites of sexual assaults. Those sites were parties, usually well lit, loud, and populated. It was difficult to overcome the myths associated with the dark and that hasn’t changed. What has changed is far more light pollution emanating from the City on a Hill, something that IDA Santa Cruz is trying to address. With the return of students will come the return in winter of the rugby field lights that create a massive source of glare for the town and can be seen from 4 miles south along Highway 1. UCSC’s motto of Fiat Lux: Let There Be Light should not extend beyond the metaphor of learning and education.

There are many examples of light pollution in the city of Santa Cruz and far more skyglow than in previous decades. Car lots, ball fields, bridge lights, businesses, private homes, even city hall are all sources. This, even though the city’s General Plan mandates the city take steps to reduce light pollution and create a Dark-Sky Ordinance. Other cities have adopted such ordinances with good effect. We need to catch up.

Hopefully there is light (well-shielded) at the end of the tunnel. IDA Santa Cruz recently worked with city Public Works to ensure that the new lights being installed on both sides of the San Lorenzo River levee north of Water Street, which currently has no lights, be properly shielded, of warmer color temperature and equipped with adaptive controls. While not everything we suggested was adopted, some progress was achieved. IDA also urged the city to address the bridge lights over the San Lorenzo where glare spilled over into the river, affecting salmonids and other river life. The city has installed a temporary fix that has helped the river however glare onto the roads affecting night driving is still a problem.

Rather than community members taking on one source of light pollution at a time, much more progress could be made if the city council adopted a model Dark-sky Ordinance and enforced it. If you would like to get more involved, or share a light pollution example, or find out how to get the city to better shield your streetlight, you can reach IDA Santa Cruz at:

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.


August 15


  It’s only August, but several campaigns are rolling


There’s two city council seats up for a vote this November. They are for districts 4 and 6. In the old days you could vote for both seats, but now you can only vote for one city councilmember who represents your district. Most Santa Cruz city voters will not be voting for any council candidate this year since the city council 5-2 majority—Kalantari-Johnson, Golder, Meyers, Bruner, and Watkins—rammed through a six-district, direct election of mayor scheme this past year. Yep, now we have districts and only a handful of candidates are running. Normally, voters would be able to choose three councilmembers. The window to register as a candidate closes this Thursday (8/18) for District 4. It was extended because Justin Cummings is not running again. So far, only two candidates are running in District 6, incumbent Renee Golder will be up against Planning Commissioner Sean Maxwell. There are four candidates running in District 4—suit and tie UCSC Lecturer Scott Newsome who has practically no digital footprint I could find, Steve Jobs-wannabe Gregory Hyer, UCSC student Bodie Shargel, and just graduated UCSC alum, Hector Marin. (Latest news as of this going to print is that Joe Thompson decided not to run in District 6.) It seems like one or two more candidates may enter the race before the deadline, but I am not holding my breath. This district election scenario appears to have caught many would-be candidates off-guard. Practically no one I’ve spoken with can actually name the district they reside in.


Fred Keeley vs. Joy Schendledecker. Before you say, ‘Joy who?’ maybe take a step back and look at what is occurring in our town. Go to the Santa Cruz city Planning Department website to see what those in charge–developers and real estate industry insiders–and those who are pushing their products of greed–5-member council majority, Economic Development Director Bonnie Lipscomb, and Planning Director Lee Butler—have in store for us rank and file Santa Cruzans. My guess is that the status quo was not doing so well with the mayoral years of Watkins-Meyers-Bruner, so those same real estate and developer entrepreneurs have upped their game and are seeking to install an elected mayor to, well, administrate the 1000-2000 mostly market-rate housing units planned by Lipscomb and Butler, and also to get that Warriors arena built with a couple hundred condos to boot. Their man, in Santa Cruz, appears to be Fred Keeley.


Fred is saying all the right things in helping move more rapidly that ‘build-baby-build’ agenda. Now enter artist, mom, and community activist, Joy Schendledecker and if you have had enough with those get-rich-quick titans of real estate, you will get a warm and fuzzy feeling that finally there is someone to push back on the realtor agenda, and she’s got the luck name, JOY, to go along with an agenda of compassion, social justice, affordable housing, and better-paying jobs. “Go Joy!,” you might hear yourself spontaneously murmuring over the coming months. Next question, who is Joy? Well, go to her website and find out. Joy, by not being a friend of real estate and developer interests is an absolute amigo, cuate, companera, and champion to the teachers, renters, students, and all the hard working folks, you know, “the essential workers,” who make this town go, make it what it is—a surf mecca, environmental show piece, artsy village, and student home…you know, the bulk of the voters in this town. There could not be clearer, cleaner, and more principled differences between two candidates for the same office, and yes, there are only two running for mayor. You decide, Joy or Fred?

Their Positions

Okay, I am going to go out on a limb here and make some predictions about where these mayoral candidates come down on the critical issues facing Santa Cruz. Some of these positions are known, because each candidate has stated a position publicly, or in some cases, they are what I have been able to glean from their years in the public spotlight and the company they keep.


Burning Santa Cruz Issue: Joy: Fred:
Empty Homes Tax Strong supporter Not public yet. Likely opposes.
Our Downtown, Our Future SUPPORTS Not public yet. Likely opposes.
205 Units under construction Laurel & Pacific, with no affordable units Did NOT Support Likely supports market unit building
Over-sized Vehicle Ord. Supports over-turning Work to over-turn? Unlikely.
Cruz Hotel on credit union site at Front & Laurel Does NOT support Supports. 
“density bonus” law that yields less actual affordable housing Does NOT support Likely supports
Car-free Pacific Avenue SUPPORTS ???
Economic sanctions against UCSC for taking on more students without providing resources to support them Likely supports Likely does not support
Further Gentrification of SC Does NOT support Supports
Living wage for SC workers SUPPORTS ???
Cut bloated salaries of City Manager and dept. heads SUPPORTS ???

“It should go without saying that a right to an abortion should never be up for a vote but now that the Supreme Court ensured that it is, they will reap what they sow. This should be the defining issue of the midterms. It’s past time for Dems to stop cowering on abortion.” (Aug. 2)


I just found out today (8/15) that a dear friend of the progressive community, Becky Blythe, passed away in early June after a four-year battle with cancer. I have limited information, and if you have more, please let me know ( Becky ran Keith Sugar’s successful city council campaign in 1998 and later was on the executive board of the Santa Cruz Action Network (SCAN). She worked for many years as a farm certification review specialist at CCOF, California Certified Organic Farmers. Becky loved music and art and theater and she will be greatly missed in this community. She was 66, according to a mutual friend.

Starbucks’ workers staged a successful 3-day strike against the coffee giant at the Water and Ocean store for failing to negotiate a contract…”No Contract, No Coffee” was the chant of the day.

Chris Krohn is a father, writer, activist, and a Santa Cruz City Council member from 1998-2002 and from 2017-2020. Krohn was Mayor in 2001-2002. He’s been running the Environmental Studies Internship program at UC Santa Cruz for the past 16 years. On Tuesday evenings at 5pm, Krohn hosts of “Talk of the Bay,” on KSQD 90.7 and His Twitter handle at SCpolitics is @ChrisKrohnSC Chris can be reached at

Email Chris at


August 13


Last Tuesday, Supervisor Greg Caput tried to get fellow County Board of Supervisors to schedule a Special Meeting and place an initiative on November’s ballot that would allow voters to decide if they want to limit terms of their Supervisors to three consecutive terms.

All four fellow Board members rejected the idea.

“We just don’t historically have a problem with that in this County,” said Supervisor Zach Friend, who is now completing his third consecutive four-year term.  “I am not available on Thursday at 4pm for the Special Meeting,” said Supervisor Bruce McPherson, who is also now completing his third consecutive four-year term.  “This action is just coming too fast,” he added.

Supervisor Caput explained that he had asked County Counsel Jason Heath to bring it forward earlier, but was told there was “just too much on the agenda”, with CORE and the Budget.  That is why he had to bring it to the first meeting in August after everyone returned from vacation for the entire month of July and required to ask for a Virtual Special Meeting in order to meet the August 12 deadline to get the initiative on the November ballot.    Hmmmmm……

There are 12 Counties in California that do have term limits on their District Supervisors.  Supervisor Caput felt it was important to bring in fresh ideas and energy to the Board, and recognized that incumbents always have an advantage at the polls in name recognition and fund raising.

Supervisor Caput made the motion to approve a maximum of three consecutive terms, and to place the action on the ballot at some point in the future (addressing the “rushed” comment by Supervisor McPherson).  The room was silent for an uncomfortable length of time until Chair Manu Koenig seconded the motion “for the sake of discussion”.  There was no further discussion.  All but Supervisor Caput voted NO.

Outside in the hallway after the meeting adjourned, I saw Supervisor McPherson.  “I think that would have been a good thing,” I said, referring to the just-ended discussion.  “I got termed out at the State, that’s why I’m here,” he replied, and ducked into his newly-remodeled office.

I later wrote Supervisor Zach Friend, requesting he send the link to the information he cited in his testimony as to why he felt protecting unlimited Supervisor jobs from term limits was not an historic problem here.  He has not responded….I wonder if he will?

With the exception of Supervisor Greg Caput, it seemed that the Supervisors were more concerned about protecting their own jobs than any forward-thinking to benefit the County residents with action to encourage new ideas and fresh energy in policy making and budget oversight.   Well, you know those Supervisors and their staff are always quick to say….“Change is hard” when we speak out in opposition to monstrous developments, such as the Aptos Village Project.


Last week, the link to the August 9 County Board of Supervisor agenda was broken, prohibiting public access to the agenda and all associated documentation the entire day before the meeting occurred.  Some people wrote the Board Clerk and Chairman to alert them to this problem.

The link to the agenda was finally repaired at 7:51pm the night before the meeting.

At the beginning of the 9am Tuesday Board meeting, the Clerk announced that there were still problems with the public access platform, and that access via computer was not working, but that people could call in on the telephone.  It was not made clear how people prevented from accessing the meeting online would know that.

The meeting proceeded, with few members of the public participating and many important issues discussed by the Board (eg, Report on Response to Homelessness) or hidden in the Consent Agenda.

I had attempted to enter written comment on the agenda portal, but it required a new password to do so.  I requested the ability to get a new password but never received any e-mail notification associated that would enable me to do so.  Hence, I could contribute no written public comments on agenda items.

I stated these problems publicly to the Board when I went in person to their 9am Tuesday meeting.  No Supervisor or staff responded.


The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors approved a Consent Agenda item that will now allow developers who are required to mitigate the traffic their projects would cause to implement those mitigations anywhere in the County…maybe regionally.  Does that make sense to you?

This can all be judged acceptable (on paper) because the County now measures traffic impacts by “Vehicle Miles Travelled”, no longer assessing “Level of Service” at nearby affected roadways and intersections.  This comes on a change issued by the State to assess the overall carbon footprint of the impact, and allows for mitigations to be done on a broader basis.

An environmental mitigation example of this happened last year when mitigations for destroying riparian areas along Highway One widening were allowed to be done on the hilltop above Anna Jean Cummings Park in Soquel.

Now the County will expand that to include traffic mitigations that can be done regionally, and Kimley-Horn consultants will now develop a plan for doing so.

Take a look at Item #34 on August 9 Board of Supervisor consent agenda:

DOC-2022-671 Approve consultant contract in the amount of $283,747 to develop the Santa Cruz County Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Program and adopt resolution accepting unanticipated revenue in the amount of $448,000, and take rela

Contact the Board with your thoughts

County Board of Supervisors   or call 831-454-2200 and ask to speak with your Supervisor.  Not sure who he is?   Check here.


Last Tuesday, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors blindly rubberstamped action that canceled all work on track to improve the emergency routes in our communities because the lowest bid exceeded the County Engineer’s estimate by about $400,000, requiring the County to match more than an anticipated $51,386 in staff time as part of a grant award of $396,614 to improve public safety.

Given the importance of repairing and maintaining our main emergency routes, don’t you think that CAO Carlos Palacios could have come up with a way to fund that and get the work done this year before the price of oil goes any higher?

Take a look at Consent Agenda item #41

Please contact your Supervisors with your thoughts.


Also buried in the Consent Agenda of last Tuesday’s County Board of Supervisors in Item #49 was this:

On November 8, 2016, Santa Cruz County voters passed Measure D, a one-half cent sales tax that funds transportation projects for 30 years.  Subsequently, on June 27, 2017, the Board approved the Master Funding Agreement between the County of Santa Cruz and the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (SCCRTC).  This agreement expired on June 30, 2022.  

The Board’s action extends the agreement to December 31, 2047.

Financial Impact

The County’s anticipation of revenue of Measure D funds

as represented in the Proposed FY2022-23 Road Fund budget is $3,668,209.


Last Tuesday, the County Board of Supervisors heard a presentation from Ms. Ashleigh Trujillo of Public Works about increasing the cost of potable water and for the first time, offering bulk recycled water to be available for sale in Davenport.

I was surprised to learn there is no purple pipe to take the recycled water for local irrigation use by area farmers.

Ms. Trujillo said the farmers were initially interested, but the farmer on the inland side and adjacent to the Recycled Water plant has now decided not to farm the land any longer.  She said the County had actually put a pipe stub under Highway One so that the farmer (who leases the land from State Parks) could finish the piping and install a pump in order to irrigate with the recycled water, she said he now has no interest because it would cost $50,000-$80,000.

Do you have any thoughts about this?  I suggested that there are likely many State grants available for recycled water projects. While the price for recycled water that people can purchase at the Davenport Recycled Water facility to haul away is lower than the price of potable water, I question why there is a charge at all.

Scotts Valley City provides any City resident 250/day

FREE recycled water for irrigation to encourage conservation of potable water.

I mentioned this during public comment on the Item #8 public hearing, but no one responded.

I spoke briefly in the hallway with Ms. Trujillo about the project, and she agreed to send me further information about the water quality, regarding Title 22 Recycled Water compliance testing and data.

Just how much water does this relatively new Recycled Water Facility in Davenport create?  Here is information that Ms. Trujillo kindly provided, answering that question:

  • When the storage pond is full, 3.87 acre-feet of water is available for withdraw
  • When the storage pond is full there is additional recycled water available from the plant, as it is produced.  The amount available is dependent on the amount of wastewater coming into the plant.  Some of the recycled water flow has to be diverted to the Red-Legged Frog habitat that we were conditioned to create as part of the project (adjacent to the water treatment plant).  As it is hard to know how much recycled water will be produced, and how much will need to be diverted to the frog pond (since evaporation and percolation vary at different times of the year), we cannot guarantee a specific quantity of recycled water available.  However, for comparison sake, in 2021 the recycled water plant produced 28.97 acre-feet of water, and 0.05 acre-feet was diverted to the frog swale.  If the pond were full, this would leave 28.9 acre-feet of recycled water to be used for agricultural (or other uses).  As flows are higher in the wet season, there would be more recycled water available during periods when farmers would not need it, and less available when they would need it.

Learn more about why the County thought the Davenport Recycled Water Project felt this was a feasible project in 2015


Last week, Governor Gavin Newsom announced a Plan to financially support new water supply projects that include upgrading existing dams in the State and building new ones to allow for capturing more stormwater when it is available.

Soquel Creek Water District purchased nearly 200 acres of land from the City of Scotts Valley decades ago.  The District holds an “In trust” water right of 7,250 acre feet per annum. 

That is nearly five times the amount of water the District’s ridiculously expensive, energy and technology-intensive PureWater Soquel Project will produce.

Water Rights to Soquel Creek have been adjudicated

Every year, the District Board reviews this land as “excess property” owned by the District, yet makes no effort to sell the land and recover the purchase cost.

Take a look at page 27-28 in this 2012 Soquel Creek Water District Technical Memo

Do you think it is a good idea to capture stormwater in wet years to help augment local water supplies?

Write the District Board of Directors


This Saturday (8/20) is World Bee Day, celebrating the importance of pollinators in our environment.  The Santa Cruz Public Library will host a free screening at the La Selva Beach Branch Library of an amazing film about backyard garden bees.

See bees like you’ve never seen them before in the PBS Nature documentary, “My Garden of a Thousand Bees”.

Locked down during the coronavirus pandemic, acclaimed wildlife filmmaker Martin Dohrn set out to record all the bee species in his tiny urban garden in Bristol, England. Filming with one-of-a-kind lenses he forged at his kitchen table, he catalogues more than 60 different species, from Britain’s largest bumblebees to scissor bees the size of mosquitoes. Over long months, Dohrn observes how differences in behavior set different species apart. He, eventually, gets so close to the bees he can identify individuals by sight, documenting life at their level as we have never seen it before.

After the film, there will be time for discussion.

Date: Saturday, August 20, 2022
Time: 10:30-12:00pm.
Branch: La Selva Beach

Write one letter. Make one call.  Go see a good film and plant something in your garden to support pollinators. Make a big difference this week, and just do something.

Cheers, Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at


August 14


What’s going on with public land management around you, and what are you doing about it?

Most citizens of the U.S.A. state that they want healthy wildlife populations and clean water for their communities and for future generations to enjoy. And yet, repeated surveys of Santa Cruz County residents suggest declining efforts to learn about wildlife so that individuals could take action to protect assure wildlife conservation. We can see this decline also reflected in our activism and politics.

When was the last time you heard about an environmental activist group taking a stand to protect local wildlife? Which politician can you name that had environmental conservation as a major portion of their platforms? Have you looked at the agendas or minutes from Santa Cruz County’s Commission on the Environment or Fish and Game Commission – both advisory bodies to County Supervisors?

I challenge you to find any evidence of solicited or unsolicited advice to the Supervisors. In short, our County, at the top of the nation’s biodiverse counties, is effectively asleep while their precious natural heritage is being rapidly eroded by neglect. I frequently hear how much Santa Cruzans appreciate the wildlife, the open space, and the natural beauty of this area. If we take these things for granted and do not make efforts to be involved with conservation, I think we know what will happen to these values: they will decline, whither, and disappear altogether with time. It is time to make a shift, and the shift is best focused on our public lands management.

One of the most important things we can do as citizens of this county is to be involved with the management of the public lands around us. There are many ways to be involved in wildlife conservation on public lands throughout the region: volunteering for stewardship, rallying political support for increased conservation on public lands, and supporting environmental conservation organizations. There are three main threats facing nature conservation public lands: changed disturbance regimes, invasive species, and poor management of visitor use. I discuss each briefly in the following and present ways that you might be involved in solution for improved public lands management.

With climate change and increased development encroachment on natural areas, natural disturbance regimes, such as fire and grazing, are rapidly changing and present a high degree of danger to nature conservation. With climate change, fires are expected to be more frequent and more severe; this is exacerbated by increased human interactions at the Wildland Urban Interface where accidental fires more frequently occur. Likewise, we have removed tule elk and pronghorn and it is becoming increasingly difficult for natural areas managers to use livestock to mimic natural grazing regimes. With both fire and grazing, public lands managers need more public funding to increase their ability to manage natural systems. There needs to be more public outcry and support for both funding and expertise within those agencies to improve lands management. Those kinds of support are also important for invasive species management. A different kind of support is needed for better management of natural areas in the face of poor visitor use management.

Badly managed visitor use in natural areas is a major cause of concern globally for nature conservation, and locally this seems to be nearly entirely ignored. The most glaring evidence that this is a problem is the nearly ubiquitous and unquestioned philosophy that increased access to natural areas is an important goal for nature conservation. Look carefully around our local parks agencies and you’ll also notice that there are no personnel trained at managing the conflict between nature conservation and visitor use, the field of study necessary to assure nature conservation in parks.

The most recent planning effort for visitor use in a public park was with the BLM’s Cotoni Coast Dairies property, a real disaster in public process with recreational infrastructure development proceeding apace despite an active and unsettled legal appeal by a very small of citizens who have seen too little community support. Of the many larger, environmental groups in the area, only the Sempervirens Fund has offered publicly stated concern“Important details remain to be determined and we look forward to working with BLM to resolve them.” For the grave impacts to nature from visitor use in natural areas, there seems to me to be a need for a fundamental shift in both public perception and in the public lands management agencies to better recognize and address this issue. The following section outlines some actions you can take to help this process forward.

There are many ways, big and small, for you to be more involved with the paradigm shift needed to better address the serious issues surrounding visitor use management in natural areas. First and foremost, many more of us should become educated about the science documenting the concerns and how those concerns are addressed through social and environmental carrying capacity analysis and adaptive management. Social carrying capacity analyses define the limits of acceptable change from visitor use conflicts: conflicts between different types of uses (for instance, mountain bikers vs. passive recreational use of families with children) or conflicts due to overcrowding. Ecological carrying capacity analyses define the limits of acceptable change for soils, biota, or other natural phenomenon (for instance, amounts of trail erosion, wildlife such as cougars that are easily disrupted by visitors).

Another thing we can do to help the situation of poor visitor use management in our parks is to advocate for improvement. We should tune our senses to notice negative impacts of visitor use and then aim our activism towards change: make formal reports of issues to natural area managers, follow up on those reports, and also message higher level administration, commissions overseeing those agencies, and politicians who are invested in agency oversight. Persistence will help. Let’s also vote for politicians who promise to help. And, let’s support environmental groups who promise to work on these issues. Finally, many more people who care about these issues need to be involved with public lands management planning. Currently, mainly exploitive and well-funded non-passive recreational users are organized and vocal during these processes (i.e., Outdoor Industry Association funded groups like mountain biking advocates). Meanwhile, traditional conservation groups like the Sierra Club and Audubon Society have shied away from such issues due to either controversy or co-option. We need a new group or need to sway old groups to take these issues on.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at:

Email Grey at


August 15

#228 / Joshua Trees And Climate Goals

I have to confess that I was pretty offended after reading a recent column in Cal Matters, an online political newspaper that has what I would consider to be a generally “conservative” bent.

A Cal Matters “guest commentary” by Ethan Elkind, entitled, “Joshua tree protection could slow state’s progress on climate goals,” suggests that California needs to “pave the desert” with solar energy facilities, to stave off global warming, and that this needs to be the state’s first and highest priority. Efforts to protect and preserve those damn Joshua Trees are really getting in the way of this beneficial effort, according to Elkind.

How ironic, I thought, as I read the article, since global warming is one of the main reasons that the Western Joshua Tree is in danger of extinction. “Developers,” of course, are also highly implicated in the adverse conditions affecting the future of the Western Joshua Tree, as those developers cut the trees down in connection with new subdivisions and other projects. Still, the Elkind analysis reminded me of that “we need to destroy the village in order to save it” approach that worked out so well in Vietnam!

Elkind’s main thesis is that it is essential to maximize new solar energy development, and he posits that we need lots of desert land for solar collectors – land where sun is abundant and there aren’t any competing human uses. This is, by the way, a position that is endorsed by the big public utilities – those massive private corporations that do that kind of thing. According to Elkind, we need to eliminate any constraints on big energy corporations that might be related to allowing endangered species to survive. Proposed efforts to save the Western Joshua Tree are “excessive,” the way Elkind sees it. He doesn’t think that the trees are that threatened, anyway.

Elkind is an attorney who directs the climate program at the Center for Law, Energy and the Environment at UC Berkeley Law, and I have made favorable mention of him before. The job he holds undoubtedly helps explains his willingness to sacrifice endangered species for more solar energy facilities. I’d like to think, though, that Elkind’s employer might insist that all the words in the Center’s name have equal dignity, and that “Energy” isn’t any more important than “the Environment,” even though “Energy” is listed first.

Is there a way to combat global warming without sacrificing desert species? I think there probably is, but the first essential step is to make a commitment to protecting the endangered species. Then, having established that we are going to protect endangered species, we need to formulate our plans with that constraint in mind.

I think we can do it. Two things strike me.

First, the Elkind-endorsed approach takes for granted that we need to build extensive new energy production facilities (solar, of course) to replace the energy now produced by fossil fuel combustion. To some degree, it is obviously true that we do need new energy production facilities that will produce energy from non-fossil fuel sources. But what Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute used to call “nega-Watts” is another way of getting to where we need to go. Energy “conservation,” in other words, is an alternative (and non-impactful) way to “produce” the energy we need, as we eliminate current fossil fuel generating plants. Before we start paving over the desert with facilities that look like the ones pictured below, let’s put a vigorous energy conservation program in place that will allow us to save desert habitat by maximizing conservation. We’re not doing nearly enough on that front.

Second, if we need to increase new solar energy production, let’s start by installing those new solar energy facilities on already-existing structures, and on infill sites – not on endangered desert habitats. I have already written about efforts along those lines, and there is a lot more we can do:

Only when we have done the two things I suggest above should we contemplate bulldozing our sensitive desert habitats. We haven’t maximized conservation, and we have not utilized already developed properties as the location for new solar energy generating facilities. Elkind’s brief article doesn’t even attempt to convince readers that we have done those things. He jumps immediately to the “easy thing,” proposing to take some non-developed land, and put new development all over it. Isn’t that the way it always seems to go, as Joni Mitchell’s song about that “Big Yellow Taxi” reminds us? And isn’t Mitchell right, too, as she continues to tell us, “you don’t know what you got till it’s gone.”

Wipe out what’s there and put up something new! That is how “development” has been done, from time immemorial. That is not what a Center for Energy AND The Environment should be advocating.

I confess, I got irritated when I read that Cal Matters article. I confess that I am getting tired of hearing arguments that more environmental destruction is the way to cure the problems of the environmental destruction that we are already causing by our failure to respect the limitations of the Natural World. Our past efforts – often so well-intentioned – are putting hundreds of thousands of species in danger of extinction.

The Western Joshua Tree is on that list. We are, too – make no mistake. So, let’s have a little fellow feeling for the Joshua Trees! Their fate, and our, are intertwined.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at

Email Gary at

August 15


This past week provided plenty of entertainment with the bombshell news of the FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-A-Lago mansion – announced by the EXPOTUS Rex himself on his very own Truth Social site. His ‘poor-me’ appeal to his supporters claimed that “my beautiful, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents.” He probably wanted to throw grenades, smoke bombs and flame throwers into the mix of charges, but was likely held back by his supple-fingered keepers. He went on to say, “Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before. After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.” He fails to mention that the Feds had been working with him and his underlings for months to recover materials after a tipster ratted on him about a treasure trove of boxes stolen during his White House flight in January 2020. An FBI visit to the club in June resulted in a subpoena for recovery of the boxes, cautioning Trump to better secure the remaining items. It turned out that twelve MORE boxes were retrieved last week, even after fifteen were voluntarily surrendered in January of this year to the National Archives and Records Administration. The Don rattled on with, “It is prosecutorial misconduct, the weaponization of the Justice System, and an attack by Radical Left Democrats who desperately don’t want me to run for President in 2024. Such an assault could only take place in broken, Third-World Countries.” In other words, “shit-hole” countries as he characterized them during his reign. “Sadly, America has now become one of those countries, corrupt at a level not seen before. They even broke into my safe!” Reportedly, it was a cheap, hotel-type safe which the agents broke into with a convenient McDonald’s toothpick and a couple of bent paper clips.

Butternut Bozo had to be in ecstasy that he could bring Hillary Clinton into his diatribe, claiming that she was allowed to delete and acid-wash 33,000 emails AFTER they were subpoenaed by Congress, and even took antique furniture and other items from the White House. Crooked Hillary wasn’t held accountable for anything! Lock her up, lock her up! While the FBI had chosen to pursue document recovery quietly, out of respect for the former president, Captain Chaos chose to take to his soapbox to inform his minions that the enemy was at the gate! Needless to say, this instigated chatter within the Trumpy underground that it was time to lock and load, with the Republican pols indignantly demanding answers about the warrant and the resulting search. Attorney GeneralSpeak softly and carry a big stick of dynamite’ Garland was quick to answer in defense of the action, while standing up for his agents, explaining that Trump had copies of the warrant and receipts, which he could legally disclose at his discretion – so put up or shut up! Even with that challenge to DJT, Garland asked the judge in the case to make the documents public to settle any misgivings held by doubters, and to head off trouble.

The judge agreed to do so, with Trump’s statement, “Encouraging the immediate release of those documents.” Now, our Man of Steal has Egg McMuffin on his face, dripping down his red tie onto his Brioni suit, and into his cloven-hooved-hiding custom oxford shoes. Not only does the warrant authorizing the raid indicate a federal investigation is ongoing into potential crimes, the resultant recovery of documents provides a clear picture of how the search originated, in both size and scope of the seizure. Investigation of potential violations of the Espionage Act, which states that, an official entrusted with sensitive or classified information who allows it to be taken away from its secure location through ‘gross negligence’ or who knows it’s been removed from safety and doesn’t report such to federal officials can be fined or imprisoned for up to ten years. An inquiry into possible improper removal or destruction of federal records, and obstruction of a federal investigation are also suggested.

The receipt of items removed from Mar-A-Lago, shows eleven sets of documents, including items related to French President Macron, handwritten notes, photos, and TOP SECRET materials. The Washington Post reported that classified nuclear documents may be among those recovered, concerning because of allies and adversaries who have access to the golf club housed in the same building. Receipts are available for viewing online, and it is startling to scan the list of items that Trump absconded with for himself, either to accompany him back to the White House for a second-term, or for profit. Do we know how many secrets are already in the hands of Putin or Prince Mohammed bin Salman? How was son-in-law Jared Kushner able to easily get a two-billion dollar investment into his business by the Prince, six months after the Trump presidency ended? Nuclear Codes R-US!

It should be noted that Trump’s lawyer, Christina Bobb, was present during the search, and the Secret Service detail at Mar-A-Lago had been notified of the impending search earlier to facilitate access to the property, but did not participate in any way. The ex-prez spends his summers at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, and was not present during the FBI visit; but he and his hangers-on declared it to be politically motivated, though the Biden White House had no knowledge of the action. As word spread of the activity at Mar-A-Lago, cars of Trump supporters assembled in the streets nearby, sporting ‘Trump 2020’ banners, and American flags, all of whom were outnumbered by media personnel and their cameras and mics.

Benedict Donald allowed that the invasion of his property was simply more “Russia, Russia, Russia” which will all bounce off his teflon suit in due time. However, Russians were outraged at the raid against their favorite American president, “Trumpushka”, and called out for an offer of asylum, while the broadcast of ‘The Evening with Vladimir Solovyov’ praised the recent CPAC participants in Texas, and other Trump allies. On Russian-state TV program, ’60 Minutes’, military expert Igor Korotchenko sounded a plea for open support of a 2024 Trump candidacy. Kremlin propagandists predicted that such persecution will spark a U.S. civil war “against this symbol of inordinate despotism”, as they claim that ‘one hundred FBI agents and hordes of police dogs rummaged through Mar-A-Lago’. ’60 Minutes’ host, Evgeny Popov, also a deputy of Russia’s State Duma, joked that agents found a couple of matryoshka, Putin’s portrait, a pioneer scarf, two icons, a parachute, and a chained bear with balalaika…humorous to somebody? Popov accuses Biden of turning America into Ukraine, and predicts that Florida will split from the U.S., and that a newly reelected Trump will have a new constitution stating that there are only two genders: male and female. Russian TV correspondent, Valentin Bogdanov, stationed in New York City says, ‘The civil war is already underway in the United States. For now, this is a cold civil war, but it keeps heating up.” Oddly enough, in 2028 Trump amended the very law which could signal his final downfall. A bill signed in January of that year had a provision which increased the punishment for knowingly removing classified materials with the intent to retain them at an ‘unauthorized location.’ Prior to his signature, someone found guilty of this crime could face up to one year in prison; now, a person found guilty of this felony-level offense can face up to five years imprisonment.

As reported by Jon Schwarz in The Intercept, there is a parallel to Trump’s conduct: as LBJ’s presidency ended in 1969, to be succeeded by Nixon, Johnson ordered an underling to surreptitiously take highly classified material with him on the way out. Anti-war protests across the country and around the world were intense, and polls showed Americans now believed troops in Vietnam was a disastrous mistake, with the loss of life on both sides, and the expense of the effort to contain China. Consequently, LBJ chose not to launch a campaign to remain president, also believing that a peace agreement could be reached which would bolster a Humphrey candidacy. Nixon did everything in his power behind the scenes to see that peace was not in the cards to boost his own desirability as a candidate. Johnson’s national security adviser, Walt Rostow, got wind of Nixon’s meddling to block any discussion of peace, but the LBJ administration decided to do nothing, even after FBI surveillance, to reveal the underhanded workings against peace, thinking that should Nixon win the presidency this interference would reflect badly on an incoming administration and against the country’s interests. Upon Nixon’s victory, Rostow gathered up the incendiary documentation of Nixon’s treachery and at LBJ’s request, had him hold it personally. Since no laws governed that type of conduct, it was in a sense ‘legal’, but most who knew of the events viewed it as scandalous. As Dean Rusk explained, revealing the information “would be very unwise. I mean, we get a lot of information through these special channels that we don’t make public…for example, some of the malfeasances of senators and congressmen…I think that we must continue to respect the classification of that kind of material.”

After Johnson’s death, Rostow gave the sealed documents to the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, TX, requesting that the envelope remain sealed for fifty years, or for an additional fifty years if the library felt revelation was too early. The envelope was actually opened in the ’90s but some material is not declassified. Nixon lied until his death about the circumstances of this episode, but his direct involvement has been proven beyond a doubt. Schwarz feels that Trump’s purloined documents could be as momentous as those LBJ tried to extract from a tortured era in our history, but with our presidents efforts to mislead us, don’t count on anything at this juncture. The Department of Justice is opposing the release of details in an affidavit that lays out the argument made by investigators to the magistrate judge explaining the probable cause it had to search Mar-a-Lago, or should the judge decide to make it public it should be heavily redacted. DOJ said disclosure would “cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation. The redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest.” Maybe fifty years from now, or another fifty if Ivanka Trump is president in the interim?

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email:


EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

    “Heat Waves”

“If you saw a heat wave, would you wave back?”
~Steven Wright

“It ain’t the heat, it’s the humility.”
~Yogi Berra

“He who cannot put his thoughts on ice should not enter into the heat of dispute.”
~Friedrich Nietzsche


These are cute! Some of these things I have seen, but not all. We had knob-and-tube wiring in the attic of the house we lived in 20 years ago, for instance.

COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email:
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *