Blog Archives

April 15 – 21, 2026

Highlights this week:

Greensite… campaigning, back soon… Steinbruner… out this week… Hayes… The Upcoming Fire… Patton… Apology Time… Matlock… image laundering…going rogue…rearview coverup… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… proof?… Quotes on… “Lies”

...

NEW LEAF MARKET-BANK OF ITALY-BANK OF AMERICA BUILDING. Chase’s Sidewalk Guide says this “1929 zig-zag Moderne building” was desdigned by Henry A. Minton. In 1977 it won a preservation battle and Thacher and Thompson adapted it for New Leaf Market. Before it was built there was a two story building there that contained the Santa Cruz Surf’s pressroom and a Buddhist Church presided by Swami Mazzanandi.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com


If you want to pitch in to
keep this work of passion going,
we are ever so grateful!

...

Dateline: April 16, 2026

COMPARED TO LAST WEEK, I don’t have much to report on. It’s hard to beat a huge fireworks show, after all… We have a short crew this time around, but will be back in full force soon!

Do enjoy, and have the best time!


~Webmistress

...

STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb) ****

Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.

They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.

~Sarge

PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb) ***-

This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.

~Sarge

THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ***-
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?

Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge

SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb) **-

This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.

Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).

Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.

Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.

~Sarge

A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb) ***-

Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.

Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.

It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.

~Sarge

THE LAST KIDS ON EARTH. Netflix. Series (1hr pilot). (7.2 IMDb) ***
This largely bloodless animated series began with a pilot-style special and ran for two seasons. It’s based on the children’s book series by Max Brallier, with character designs inspired by the illustrations of Douglas Holgate.

The story follows orphan Jack Sullivan as he adjusts to life after an invasion of extra-dimensional monsters and a zombie apocalypse. He soon bands together with a scrappy group of kids who missed the evacuation – along with a loyal monster-dog – forming their own ragtag survival team.

Aimed primarily at the 8–12 crowd, the show still has enough sharp humor and creature-feature flair to entertain adults. The voice cast includes Nick Wolfhard (brother of Finn), Mark Hamill, Keith David, Catherine O’Hara, and Rosario Dawson. Worth a watch – with or without your kids.
~Sarge

AGATHA CHRISTIE’S SEVEN DIALS. Netflix. Series. (6.2 IMDb) **-

There have been a fair few non-Poirot/Marple adaptations recently, and this is certainly one of them.

The cast is solid – Martin Freeman is great, and Mia McKenna-Bruce really shines in the lead role (though Helena Bonham Carter kind of phones in a stock twitchy character). The film doesn’t quite hook you into the mystery, though. It’s not slow, just… not all that engaging. The highlight for me was definitely Mia jumping out of a window to dodge a wedding proposal. On the plus side, it’s only 3 episodes. Many clocks.

It’s probably worth a watch if you’re looking for something to pass the time before the next episode of your favorite show drops.

~Sarge

THE MUPPET SHOW. Disney+. Series. (8.4 IMDb) ****
Or, as I like to think of it, ANTI-MELANIA. They both star a woman who is completely self-obsessed, clinging to a less attractive mate’s position: I mean, of course, the return of … THE MUPPET SHOW!

That’s right, the same old gang at the same old theatre. Minus the legendary Jim Henson and Frank Oz (who is still alive, at time of writing), it actually defies the concern of losing the magic – it’s almost like it never ended. Which is a good thing. Only one episode so far, but it’s off to a good start. Worth a watch!

~Sarge

Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.

Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com

...

Gillian will be back soon!

Greensite4Mayor.org
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org  Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

Back soon, and in the meantime:
 
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. TAKE A WALK IN A PLACE THAT YOU LOVE AND ENJOY THE DAY.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

 
Cheers, 
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
The Upcoming Fire

How do you know if a catastrophic fire is coming? If you live around the Monterey Bay, the answer is not ‘if’ but ‘when?’ Here’s another piece of not-news: you can’t rely on the historic fire return interval to inform the ‘when’ part of the question. Best bet: plan on it coming this summer…are you ready?

Mechanisms

Several things add up to catastrophic wildfire: heat, drought, ignition and wind chief among them. I collected temperature data at 900′ elevation near Davenport from 2008-2020, when the CZU Lightning Complex Fire ate up my data loggers. That first decade had an average of 3 hours above 94F per year and an equal number of hours below 34F.  In 2019 and 2020, there were days and days above 94F with a stretch of many hours above 100F. Since then, we have regularly had heat waves for many days in the mid-90s. It seems to be getting hotter. March 2026 was the warmest March on record across the USA and the driest in most Californians’ lifetimes. Drought fuels wildfires by killing vegetation. In the shrublands and forests, drought kills back portions of plants, making the worst kind of wildfire fuel: dead woody vegetation. Add lots of dead stuff to the heat waves and you have half of the equation for wildfire. Next, we need some source of flame and then wind to feed the flames some oxygen and push the fire along. Wildfire ignition used to be caused by automobiles and backyard barbecue accidents. More recently, it is caused by remnants of summertime hurricanes. With human-caused greenhouse gas emissions filling the skies, the warmer planet holds more moisture aloft and the atmosphere becomes more energy-charged: hurricanes become more frequent and stronger. Recently, pieces of these hurricanes are sweeping from south to north up California during our dry-dry, hot-hot summers. Lightning starts the fires and the hurricane-originated winds get them going.

Directions

Directionality is meaningful for a few wildfire reasons: fire spread and escape routes. Firefighters still rely on historic fire data to predict how fires spread. In Santa Cruz County, it is been from north to south. Because vegetation is moister closer to the ocean, wildfire tends to calm a bit when getting close to the sea, “until it doesn’t” (firefighter joke).

More importantly, plotting an exit strategy is important…even in town. Recent bumper sticker sighting: “nothing ends well when it involves a getaway car.” If you live in town, you’ll need to think about how to flee wildfire on foot or bicycle because chances are there will be too much traffic to get out otherwise. Rural roads are much the same. Take home message: get out quickly when there’s an evacuation order. But how? To where? Do you know where you would go and how you would get there? Plan now!

Go Bag!

Too often, people are delayed in escaping wildfire because of their ‘stuff.’ Do you like ‘stuff?’ Most people do, but which stuff do you really need if, say, all the rest of your stuff is going to burn up in a wildfire? If you have 15 minutes to leave your house, how much of your stuff can you organize enough to fit in your car? Maybe don’t wait for that moment to come. Here’s a link to CALFIRE’s ‘Go Bag’ website replete with a well-informed list of what to take.

Preparing Your Home

Where I live out in the country, my neighbors report having to commit 4 hours a week, year-round, to protecting their homes from wildfire. We do pretty well in the preparation, judging from 2 wildfires and what structures survived. That’s 100′ radius all around every structure that needs vegetation management. That’s more than three quarters of an acre and an acre of vegetation production per year, dried bone dry, is at least 2 tons: lots to manage! Wait a year and do even more! No dead vegetation shall exist in that zone or else it will burn and threaten your home. The Zone 0 recommendation is for the 0 to 5 feet from the exterior wall of your house: not only no dead vegetation but also nothing else that could possibly burn – no cardboard boxes, wood chips, piles of leaves, etc. Speaking of leaves, time to clean off the roof and clean out the gutters! Something oft overlooked: wooden fences or gates that join the house wall – that’s continuous fuel…a wick…a fuse! Replace at least the final section up against the house with inflammable something.

Air Filters

One last thing that would behoove you to prepare for the upcoming wildfire season: air filter reminder! We can be miles and miles from the nearest wildfire but still suffer from the smoke. Inevitably, there’s a run on air filters right then. Don’t be one of those people. The time to save your lungs is now when air filters are available. Studies have indicated that wildfire smoke inhalation has major deleterious health effects…that are avoidable if you seal your house well, stay inside, and run an air filter when (not if) the wildfire smoke comes. Check for smoke ratings and have some backup filters handy for the occasion.

Remember: Only YOU can prepare YOU for wildfires (and vote for those most dedicated to real climate change solutions!)

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

From An Article In The New York Times

By engaging in a war of choice in a critical region for global trade and utterly ignoring the probable consequences for the economies of its closest allies, the Trump administration has destroyed the legitimacy of American power,” asserted Anatol Lieven of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

What do I say to this assertion?

TRUE!

The United States of America (actually, our current president, acting as though he, as president, was entitled to make an individual decision that the United States should go to war) has made a huge and consequential mistake.

When someone (an individual or a nation) makes a mistake, the responsible party needs to apologize. And to be effective, an apology needs to be more than simply “verbal.” The apology needs to be accompanied by some sort of action that fully acknowledges the error made, and that demonstrates an effort to show genuine remorse, and some significant effort to set things right.

We, the people of the United States, are bearing the responsibility for the mistake made by our current president. I don’t think there is a way to set things right without an apology accompanied by doing something to make clear that we, the citizens of the United States, do fully understand and apologize for what has been done.

Our Constitution provides a couple of ways for the nation to make such an apology, in a manner that would have a chance, at least, of being accepted by the nations of the world (and particularly our “friends,” our “allies,” those whom have been so dramatically impacted by what has been done).

Who can take such an action? First, our current president’s Cabinet.

Second, The Congress of The United States of America.

Absent action by the Cabinet, there isn’t a way to make the right kind of apology, other than by Congressional action. If the nation wants to recapture the “legitimacy” of our conduct affecting the world, Congress must take action, and “partisan” votes are not going to do the trick.

Action!

Promptly Undertaken!

That might have a chance.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
SURPRISE, NEW YORK PARTY, GENOCIDAL MANIAC, HOSTAGE VIDEO

Back in the news this week — the Epstein Report — as a result of a random press conference called by First Lady Melania Trump, a surprise for everyone including the president himself who claimed to know nothing about it. As Joanna Coles writes on Substack, “Melania Trump, last seen smiling alongside the Easter bunny, emerged briefly on Thursday from her gilded witness protection program to issue a statement about Jeffrey Epstein. Why now? Her documentary ‘Melania,’ a long and frictionless Instagram exercise in image laundering, offered the perfect, hermetically sealed environment to address any lingering questions about proximity, rumor, or denial. A captive audience, a sympathetic frame, and not a whisper of Epstein. One might think the omission was the point.”

Melania’s White House statement denying ties to Jeffrey Epstein and knowledge of his crimes, and calling for a congressional hearing for survivors allowing them to testify before lawmakers and have their stories entered into the congressional record, comes at a time when President Trump and his administration had finally succeeded in moving beyond the controversy with the Iran “excursion” dominating headlines. While lawmakers had complained at the limited release last month of files by the Justice Department, the agency said more time was needed for review to ensure no sensitive information about victims was released. The First Lady didn’t waste any of her time defending her husband, and the White House was blindsided with her admitting that she had partied with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York in 1998. Journalist Aaron Rupar wrote on X, “I am not sure why Melania Trump decided to make a statement about Jeffrey Epstein seemingly out of nowhere today, but if the idea was to put the ongoing coverup in the rearview mirror it will backfire spectacularly.”

She denied being a victim of Epstein, to which research paralegal and progressive commentator, RJ Riley, posted on X: “Again, no one asked you if you were Epstein’s victim. That’s a deflection. The actual question is why you and your husband were, at MINIMUM, embedded in the same elite party circuit as a known predator for years, praised him publicly, and only distanced himself after Epstein became radioactive. That’s not chance. So no, a self-written book isn’t evidence, it’s clean up.” Paul Kavanagh, a columnist at the Scottish publication, The National, posted on Bluesky: “Melania Trump is talking about Epstein in order to distract from the Iran war her husband started in order to distract from Epstein.” David Rothkopf on The Daily Beast speculates that Donald Trump has apparently decided that being heavily linked to a notorious sex trafficker, while bad enough to make him want to start a war to distract from it, is not as bad as being seen as a genocidal maniac, behaving like Hitler.

Rothkopf goes on to say that suggesting the president’s wife never had a relationship with Maxwell, seems a stretch, since the internet is flooded with images of the First Lady looking very cozy with Epstein and Maxwell, which raises the questions about her intervention — why? And why now? Is there a pending legal matter in which she is involved? It seems that she would be unable to commandeer the White House stage without approval of and support of the president’s staff, and why would they condone it? Especially in light of Pam Bondi’s firing, she being unable to make the story go away. As delicious as the possibility of Melania’s going rogue may seem, Rothkopf says that is very unlikely since it took place at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue; and he leaves us with the choices of believing the president decided to place Epstein center-stage, or that he was blindsided by his wife because he is the old guy who is no more aware of, or in control of, what goes on in the White House than he is of anything else at the moment.

Jimmy Kimmel, on his show, says that Melania might have highlighted the Epstein scandal out of sheer resentment towards her husband, saying, “He spent the past six weeks trying to bomb this Epstein story out of the headlines. Two days after the ceasefire, she puts it right back on top. She must really hate him. I don’t know how else to explain it. For whatever reason, she didn’t ask. She didn’t give a heads up. She just went right out in front of the cameras and fired away.” To Melania’s demand that lies and rumors about her “cease today,” he ponders if ‘tomorrow’ would be okay, since he needs to catch up on what her concerns are. Melania declared that she is not Epstein’s victim, but Kimmel insisted she meant, “I am my husband’s victim,” and theorizing that the 5+ minute speech was the same one Donald gave to her after the Stormy Daniels brouhaha erupted. Political scientist, Professor Kristoffer Ealy, wrote on Lincon Square, “She spoke for five minutes, reading from a prepared statement, plugged her book, told Congress what investigations to conduct, and walked away without taking a single question. A press conference where you don’t take questions isn’t a press conference — that’s a hostage video with better lighting.

Ealy goes on: “I want to be very clear about something before we go any further. I do not believe this woman. I have not believed this woman for a long time. And it is not because of anything Jeffrey Epstein-related. It is because I have been watching Melania Trump operate for the better part of fifteen years, and what I have observed is a person who lies the way most people breathe — reflexively, efficiently, and without apparent discomfort. The difference between Melania Trump lying and Melania Trump telling the truth is not something you merely hear. It is something you feel. It settles in the room like humidity. And what settled into the White House Grand Foyer on April 9, 2026 was very, very familiar. The media will spend the next several days debating whether her denial was credible. I am not interested in that debate. I am interested in the record. Because the record is long, it is documented, and it has more receipts than a Whole Foods on a Saturday afternoon.”

On The Hartmann ReportThom Hartmann asks “when will the other Melania shoe drop?” He says the great mystery this week, is why Melania Trump would go on TV from the White House and pull a ‘Richard “I am not a crook” Nixon’ for no apparent reason. “That didn’t work out well for Nixon, and it’s unlikely her demands will do anything other than fuel more speculation and a faster circulation of her nudie pictures and photos of her and Jeffrey Epstein. Speculations about what provoked her, run from a woman close to threatening to ‘expose’ her ‘pedophile’ husband, to the possibility of a new book release claiming Melania and Epstein were once involved, to weird theories that Trump asked her to do it to distract from the Iran debacle,” writes Hartmann. “Something very, very weird is going on with this couple (if you could call two people who live and sleep separately a couple). But then, if you were married to Trump, wouldn’t you be a bit on edge, too?

As expected, NBC’s Saturday Night Live’s cold opening ripped into the Melania speech, with two regulars portraying the First Couple in a phone conversation. Melania has called her husband to warn him about her bombshell press conference, saying, “I decided I should do a big random speech completely out of nowhere and say, ‘I am not Epstein’s victim.’ Is that good?” The president replies, “Darling, I gotta admit that sounds a little insane. Who are you…me? Melania, I’d really love to talk to you more, but I have a meeting with, uh, Ronald Reagan.

Oliver Willis, on Daily Kos, provides some details on Melania Trump’s standing in this country, with polling showing the First Lady is netting some of the lowest approval ratings in US history. Despite the White House-backed documentary, ‘Melania,’ which attempted to promote her image around the world, a CNN poll last month showed her favorability rating standing at a -12, a drop from the +3 she had upon her return to the White House in January 2025. This contrasts with second-term First Ladies Michelle Obama and Laura Bush who had a +42 rating, while Nancy Reagan netted a +50; and even Hillary Clinton, who suffered slings and arrows for most of her public life, garnered a +25. CNN data analyst, Harry Enten, notes, “Melania Trump is breaking records in the way that you don’t want to break records — historically awful. The American people don’t really care for her.”

The ‘Melania‘ documentary, costing billionaire Jeff Bezos $75 million, has a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and is regarded as “shallow, sycophantic and absent a single unguarded moment, a near-two-hour infomercial disguised as a documentary,’ says reviewer Peter Travers. The First Lady’s recent activities might explain her poor standing, starting with her walking with a robot at the White House, touting use of A.I. in education. “This is exactly what Big Tech wants to create: a sense of a society being led by and taught by robots, displacing all of who we are, starting with education,” says AFT President Randi Weingarten. Melania’s recent chairing of a United Nations session on ‘children in conflict’ was frowned upon, in particular for her husband’s Iran war bombing of a school in which 168 children lost their lives. The administration has been blamed for traumatizing children in its anti-immigrant activities and the attacks on LGBTQ+ rights. Oliver Willis writes that Melania’s poor ratings only echo the low ratings she held upon exiting the White House in January 2021, and that historically, unpopular presidents have been unable to rely on public support for first ladies, even while dealing with political headwinds of their own. Donald Trump has had no such luck — his wife is disliked just as much as he is.

With less than 20% of Americans identifying as MAGA Republicans, they continue to support nearly every decision President Donald Trump makes, yet his “contempt” for his most loyal supporters “is getting worse,” argues writer Amanda Marcotte on Substack. “To Trump and his top brass, like JD Vance, feeling like they owe anything to anybody, especially the red-hat yokels who got them into office, is insulting,” she writes. “Their resentment at their own voters for actually expecting results is getting worse, and that’s starting to be reflected in policy choices.” Trump’s deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in the nation’s airports to supposedly alleviate staffing shortages sparked by the partial government shutdown also impacts MAGA voters — after all, Trump voters fly, too!

Marcotte says that more revealing, and aggravating, was Trump’s response to questions about rising gas prices, which should have been a predictable outcome once war against Iran was initiated. “Trump and even the Vice President can’t help but sneer with annoyance each time they are asked to care about skyrocketing prices at the pump,” says Marcotte. “Trump even tried to spin that as a good thing, claiming that ‘we make a lot of money’ when gas prices go up. Of course, that ‘we’ does not include approximately 99% of Americans, so he’s basically just telling the rest of us we don’t matter. Including his own voters.” Marcotte’s conclusion? “I think Trump and the rest of the White House really do hate Americans. They view the majority who don’t support the MAGA agenda as bratty liberals who need to be squashed into silence. But they also hold most Trump voters in contempt, seeing them as easily duped morons — which is hard to argue with, honestly!

SFGate columnist, Drew Magary, launched a diatribe against Trump and his war last week, following the TACO president’s chickening-out on destroying the Iranian nation. He congratulates the Iranians for calling Trump’s bluff, and is thankful that we are all still here, though it got a bit dicey. A two-week ceasefire was agreed upon, although things have been iffy, and with JD Vance’s 21-hour negotiations with Iran falling through — provoked by the White House — everything is drifting back to square one. Magary says Trump believed Israeli PM Netanyahu’s pitch that a war would be a cakewalk, even after “human footstool” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the plan “b.s.” Every war at its core is a self-inflicted wound, Trump’s wound so wide that the Artemis crew could see it from the dark side of the moon — a decisive loss for the US, with Magary hoping it portends many electoral losses for the orchestrators.

Hawkish politicians who kept the Iranian bogeyman alive for half a century were waiting for a useful idiot to occupy the Oval Office to make the war happen — enter Donald Trump — the best and last chance to make war a reality. Netanyahu convinced Trump that Iran would fold in short order, and that he could seize the Strait of Hormuz, with Iranians greeting the US as liberators — shades of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld! Didn’t happen! Mojtaba Khamenei took control of everything, gas prices soared, global markets went haywire, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps began to charge nations to use the strait, which was free until Trump went off the deep end. Easter Sunday saw Trump screaming curses, throwing a hissy fit, throwing insulting names, and threatening to destroy the entire civilization — no matter that the US was getting low on munitions! Then Russia and China backed Iran, knowing a winner when they see one, as Iran dared Trump to blink. He did so, Iran winning the PR campaign, withTrump complaining the Strait of Hormuz is closed, yet is somehow open. Go figure.

Initially, the administration said Iran could keep its nuclear weapons program, as Trump tried to fish the Obama agreement out of the toilet, but that was transitioned in JD Vance’s negotiations, so expect the sound of flushing once again. As part of the ceasefire agreement, Iran might have received punitive damages from the US for bombing destruction, and with Trump’s negotiating acumen, Iran probably could have gotten Alaska thrown in had they wanted it. Magary accuses Trump of starting this “excursion” for no reason at all, quickly found himself in over his head, then tried to skulk away from it, while the country is stuck with skyrocketing gas bills and a nosediving stock market. Magary says he is outraged and mortified, and is sick to death of living in a country with a ruling party stupid enough to think this war was a good idea, especially when every war in his lifetime has been an unmitigated failure. “I’m sick of the fact that threats of a nuclear holocaust are now routine because our president is a terrorist who has a bowl of oatmeal for a brain. I’m sick of our military professionals having to take orders from politicians who have no idea what they’re doing. And I’m sick of the United States being run by a bunch of absolute losers. Trump lost this war. I hope that, one day soon, he loses everything else,” concludes Magary.

The last word belongs to satirist Andy Borowitz, datelined Tehran: “In its first act of goodwill since the declaration of a ceasefire, on Wednesday Iran permitted a container ship loaded with copies of the Epstein files to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. ‘In recent weeks, the closure of the Strait has cut off the world’s supply of Epstein files,’ and Iranian government statement read. ‘Now, those files will flow freely to the four corners of the globe.’ Although Iran is charging vessels millions for safe passage through the Strait, ‘We are sending the Epstein files through free of charge,’ the statement indicated. The Iranians said they had taken Donald J. Trump’s threat to destroy their civilization ‘very seriously,’ noting, ‘We see what he’s already done to American civilization.‘”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.

   “Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!

Dateline: April 10, 2026

Did you know that Santa Cruz has a direct connection to the Folger coffee family? James Athearn Folger II, the owner of J.A. Folger’s Coffee Company, was also a director of the Ocean Shore Railroad, along which the proposed town of “Folger” was to be located. Santa Cruz Trains (an excellent web site for local railroad related history) has an extensive write up on the prospective town of “Folger”, with a map illustrating the intended layout (Clark’s book is cited as a source for the article, by the way).


Former railroad stations live on in place names all over Santa Cruz County, you’ll see references to them scattered all throughout Clark’s book. The Santa Cruz Trains website has a wealth of related historical information (as with this week’s column). It’s amazing to see how many railroads have been operated in this county at one point or another; their history dates back to 1860. If you’re at all interested in Santa Cruz history, you should definitely check it out!

Folger

A former “station” on the Ocean Shore Railroad between Scott Junction and Swanton. Sections 19 & 20, T10S, R3W. The projected town of Folger was laid out by the Shore Line Investment Company in 1908, but never amounted to more than a very small settlement serving as the center for the lumber industry that developed around Little Creek. It was named for J. A. Folger, the so-called “coffee king” of San Francisco, who was the first vice-president of the Ocean Shore Railroad.

At the time he was also the president of J. A. Folger & company, one of the largest and oldest mercantile enterprises on the Pacific Coast…. Outside of his own business Mr. Folger had been personally connected with some of the most important businesses in California and had for years been a leading and public-spirited citizen…. Although Mr. Folger was known as a shrewd and conservative businessman with a long and successful career, it was only natural that he would be one of the enthusiastic investors and officers of anything as dramatic as a new railroad–Wagner (1974, p.17).

Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts.

Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com

...

“Lies”

“The truth has no defense against a fool determined to believe a lie.”
~Mark Twain

“People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election.”
~Otto von Bismarck

“A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”
~Vladimir Lenin

“A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.”
~Winston Churchill

“In politics, a lie unanswered becomes truth within 24 hours.”
~Willie Brown

LIES, DAMN LIES, AND STATISTICS… With enough random data points, you can “prove” almost anything…


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.

Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

...

Deep Cover

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *