Greensite… on the Gutting of CEQA… Steinbruner… Moss Landing, whale crossing, new park in Watsonville… Hayes… Swanton Pacific Ranch at a Critical Juncture… Patton… … Home on the range Matlock… alligator auschwitz…los desaparecidos…sinful…state overreach… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… the sound of dialup! Quotes on… “Letting go”
|
Dateline: July 9, 2025
CULTURE SHOCK? Or is that environment? Climate? I don’t know, but things are different up in the mountains. I thought our power went out quite frequently in Aptos, but here in Ben Lomond it’s a whole other ballgame. Getting an automatic generator set up is moving up the priority list for sure, especially before we go into fall and get rains and what not.
So, why am I even talking about this? Oh, because our power went out just as I was about to post this column, and everything crashed… Live and learn and do it again, that seems to be the way of things 🙂
Life’s an adventure!
~Webmistress
THIS IS SPINAL TAP. Vudu, Google Play, Amazon. Movie (7.9 IMDb) ![]()
When I was chronologically less-endowed (the ’80s) and UA owned almost all the screens in town (Del Mar, Rio, River Street Twin, Aptos Twin, and the 41st Ave Playhouse), I worked at the Del Mar and the Rio. I’d catch free movies all over town every week. Obviously, you only have so much mental storage, so with a lot of films, I just filed away whether I liked them or not.
So imagine my surprise when I went to see a Fathom Event 4K restoration of “This Is Spinal Tap” (in anticipation of the upcoming “Spinal Tap 2: The End Continues”) and realized I remembered everything, despite the 41 years between my first viewing and now.
For the uninitiated, this 1984 self-described “mockumentary” by Rob Reiner follows the later years of fictional band Spinal Tap. Told in loose documentary style, it also dives into their earlier phases as a Beatles-style quartet and later a psychedelic rock act. The core trio – Michael McKean, Christopher Guest, and Harry Shearer (who later reunited for “A Mighty Wind”) – are backed by a rotating cast of ill-fated drummers. Most of the dialogue is improvised, and the music manages to be both hilarious and genuinely good.
If you’ve never seen it, track down a copy or be ready to rent or buy it on Amazon. It’s worth going out of your way for a watch.
Sorry if I seem a little hyperbolic. You see, it goes to 11.
~Sarge
SUPERMAN. In theaters. Movie. (7.7 IMDb) ![]()
First off, let’s address the Kryptonian Drang in the room: Yes, Superman has always been an immigrant – rocketed to Earth as a baby without “doing it the right way.” But this film doesn’t touch that theme at all. It’s not part of the plot. Nor do they change or even reference the classic “truth, justice, and the American Way” slogan. (In fact, in the comics, at one time he renounced his American citizenship as Superman so his global actions wouldn’t reflect on the U.S.) That, however, is relevant to the plot. Also, the twist with his biological parents WAS NOT Gunn’s creation – it has been off-and-on a part of the character’s backstory for decades, in different revisions, and in different media. Gunn isn’t tugging on Superman’s cape here.
Superman (2025), directed by James Gunn and starring David Corenswet as Superman, Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor – plus Krypto, the super-goodest boy – introduces a new take. Gunn brings back heart and humor that, while sometimes overlooked, are absolutely comic-accurate. Yes, the grim Snyderverse tone was also pulled from the comics, but comics contain multitudes. We’ve been telling Superman stories for over 80 years – different eras, different writers, different vibes.
Thankfully, this movie skips the origin story. We meet a Superman already established in the role, with a working relationship (and chemistry) with Lois Lane. Without giving too much away, the central conflict revolves around how Superman operates on a global scale – and how his idealism runs up against Lex Luthor’s cynicism, technocracy, and media manipulation. Lex plays dirty, and Clark’s just a big honest dope who wants to save people.
Nathan Fillion has fun as Guy Gardner – the canonically bowl-cutted Limbaugh-dittohead Green Lantern everyone loves to punch (there are several Earth-based Green Lanterns – it’s a Corps – so you will likely see him alongside the two who will be featured in the forthcoming “Lanterns” series). His appearance, along with Mr. Terrific and Hawkgirl, may serve as a backdoor introduction to what might become Gunn’s version of the Justice League.
And then there’s Krypto. He often steals the show. First introduced in the ’50s, Krypto has drifted in and out of continuity as Superman’s dog, and here, he’s like the Rocket Raccoon of this universe: A whimsical element, that can hit you deep in the feels.
The story? It’s fine. It touches on serious issues without digging too deep – more Donner Superman in tone than Man of Steel, and blessedly free of Christ imagery. If you’re attached to a particular version of Superman, this one might not click – or it might… some people swear by Adam West’s Batman or Lynda Carter’s Wonder Woman! Don’t get me wrong, I love them both. Nostalgia shapes expectations. YMMV.
Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge

BUT I’M A CHEERLEADER. Paramount+. Series (6.8 IMDb) ![]()
Take a featherweight romcom, toss in some John Waters camp, a dose of LGBTQ satire, and you get “But I’m a Cheerleader” (1999) – a pastel-colored romp through the “hilarity” of forced conversion therapy. It’s a sign of progress, I suppose, that we now have banal lesbian romcoms.
Natasha Lyonne (in her baby-faced era) stars as Megan, a perky, clueless high school cheerleader blindsided when her friends and family stage a gay intervention. She’s promptly packed off to True Directions, a pastel repressed “rehabilitation” camp where gender roles are weaponized like power tools. There, despite the best efforts of the staff (including RuPaul as Mike, an aggressively straight-coded “ex-gay”) Megan starts to figure out who she really is.
It’s not exactly deep, or all that clever, but it is fun enough. The cast helps: Lyonne sarts to blossom, Clea DuVall does her patented broody-outsider-in-crisis (a ‘90s staple), and RuPaul chews the scenery with glee. It was recommended after reviewing Lyonne in “Poker Face”. Worth a watch if you’re in the mood for some light, queer, candy-coated fluff with a subversive wink.
~Sarge
POKER FACE. Peacock. Series (7.8 IMDb) ![]()
Poker Face is one of those shows I always meant to watch… and didn’t. Until now.
Starring Natasha Lyonne (Russian Doll, Orange is the New Black) at her most raspy and sardonic, she plays Charlie Cale—a woman with an uncanny, almost supernatural ability to tell when someone is lying. After calling out the shady son of a Vegas mobster (who promptly offs himself), she ends up on the run, wandering the backroads of America like a Gen Z Columbo in denim.
The series, created by Rian Johnson (Knives Out, Glass Onion, and yes, The Last Jedi), wears its love of ’70s detective shows on its sleeve—from the “mystery-first” format (you see the crime, then watch Charlie unravel it) to the delightfully retro opening credits, complete with roman numerals production date, drop shadows, and that plain, dead-serious typeface that screams 1976 CBS drama hour.
It’s part The Fugitive, part Incredible Hulk, and all charm—with a healthy dose of dry humor, shaggy-dog clues, and Lyonne’s lovable weirdness gluing it all together. She’s not a cop, not a PI, and not trying to be either—she just knows when you’re full of it, and can’t help but get involved.
If you miss the days when TV detectives had weird tics, old cars, and zero respect for protocol, Poker Face is your new weekend binge. Second season just dropped on Peacock. Worth a Watch.
~Sarge
SNOW WHITE. In theatres. Movie (1.7 IMDb) ![]()
I’m not one of those people who worships at the altar of Disney. I’ve been watching their films for over 50 years, so my ambivalence isn’t from lack of exposure. I genuinely enjoy many of their movies; The Jungle Book was a childhood favorite (though I’m still salty that Mowgli ditched the jungle for a girl…).
That said, changes to Snow White don’t bother me. Disney has been rewriting traditional tales since day one! Remember the stepsisters slicing off toes and heels to fit in the glass slipper in the original story of Cinderella? Yeah, that didn’t make the cut.
The music? Pleasant enough, but nothing that stuck with me. The dwarves (yes, Tolkien says that’s the plural) veer into uncanny valley territory… not stylized enough to feel intentional, but not realistic enough to work. Visually odd.
Otherwise, it’s Snow White. Rachel Zegler gives a solid, competent performance—and no, I’m not bothered that she’s Colombian and Polish. If she can sing, act, and dance, we’re good.
Overall? It’s a “meh” from me. Harmless, and musical fans will probably have a good time. Worth a watch if that’s your thing. (the 1.7 on IMDB is likely heavily skewed by anti-woke snowflakes sitting at the their keyboard, listing multiple negative votes. Adaptions always reflect the world they come from. Deal with it.)
~Sarge
SINNERS. In theatres. Movie. (8.1 IMDb) ![]()
Sweat, dust, and sweet, sweet blues pour through this story of twin brothers returning from WWI—veterans-turned-mob-enforcers in Chicago—who head back to their Mississippi hometown to open a juke joint. It’s part roadhouse, part sanctuary for the Black community, and it becomes the stage for the rise (and fall) of “Preacher Boy” Moore, a young blues guitarist with something close to magic in his fingers.
There’s a stunning musical stretch in the middle where the film lets the music breathe—past, present, and future all moving together, dancing in time. It’s pure poetry.
And then… there are vampires.
Honestly, the movie would’ve been stronger without them. They don’t matter until the third act, and when they show up, it’s like a genre switch that crashes the vibe. The first two-thirds are rich and immersive. The final third? Not bad exactly, but it turns the film into something less interesting than it started out as.
Michael B. Jordan does solid double duty as the twins, Smoke and Stack, and newcomer Miles Caton is fantastic as Preacher Boy. You believe every note he plays.
So I’m torn. I can wholeheartedly recommend the first two-thirds. The final act? I can tolerate it—but I wouldn’t push it on anyone else. Taster’s choice.
~Sarge
LOVE, DEATH + ROBOTS. Netflix. Series (8.4 IMDb) ![]()
This show first dropped in 2019. I ignored it. Then two more seasons came and went — I still didn’t watch. But when I heard a fourth season was finally on the way, I figured it was time to see what the fuss was about.
Now I get it.
And so should you.
It’s an anthology, so technically you can jump in anywhere. But honestly? Start from the beginning. There’s so much to see here, and the clunker-to-gem ratio is shockingly low. Nearly every segment hits—hard.
Unlike most anthologies that reuse the same look and crew across episodes, Love, Death + Robots is a true anthology. Every short is handled by a different animation team, each with its own distinct style. Some look like high-end video game cutscenes. Others are pure painterly dreamscapes. Some mix live action and animation. There’s hand-drawn 2D, hyperreal 3D, and everything in between. There’s a Red Hot Chili Peppers video, done entirely as marionettes.
As the title suggests, every segment centers on love, death, robots—or some mix of the three. What you get ranges wildly: dark comedy, cosmic philosophy, dystopian morality tales, sci-fi speculation, brutal war stories, existential horror, and moments of real beauty. It’s a refreshing, unapologetic mix of graphic violence, sex, and nudity (there is a difference) —sometimes all at once, sometimes none at all. I reiterate: sometimes none at all. Some just go for a vibe, or something sweet, or funny.
And yes, there’s equal-opportunity nudity. If you’re cool with boobs but squirm at male parts waving about (or vice versa), maybe keep the skip button handy.
Think of it as a more mature, mostly less juvenile Heavy Metal — or Black Mirror – with no censors and a better visual imagination.
Very much worth a watch.
~Sarge
THE MINECRAFT MOVIE. In theatres. Movie (5.9 IMDb) ![]()
Okay, so here’s the deal: I’ve played Minecraft before, so I am familar enough to know the mechanics of its universe, but equally, not SO in love with it that I’m going to freak about any cinematic storytelling compromises. Also, aside from studying film in college, I worked for 15+ years in visual effects for film and tv, as a compositor (I took the cg and the live action and mushed them together, added some blood and dust and blur and film grain etc so that it looked like one image).
This film was an actual disaster. OK cast. Meh story. But the choices made while bringing it all together were BAFFLING. I’ve seen films where janky effects and weird dialoge were a CHOICE – I get it, it can be fun. However, there is no rhyme or reason to the uneven storytelling and effects. In some scenes, the animation does not include mouth movement, and yet later, that same character CAN move their mouth. Some scenes have totally passable blue/green screen extraction, others have completely visible wires and it looks like the crudest animatic. And that’s very much what the film feels like: an animatic. An animatic is a pre-visualization version of a film that may or may not have effects, or rough acting shot to just show what is supposed to happen here – in some cases it’s literally just voices over a series of drawings. What should have been a modestly entertaining b-grade “Jumanji” (real people in a video-game world) instead comes across as Jack Black and friends improv brainstorming, then handing it off to someone’s 15 year old YouTuber nephew to assemble and do … something … with the effects.
NOT worth a watch. Not a “so bad it’s good”, but a “so bad, why am I watching this?”. DO NOT let your kids watch it and have it become their favorite film, because you will end up wanting to strangle them.
I stuck it out for you.
You’re welcome.
~Sarge
DEATH OF A UNICORN. Prime TV. Movie (6.1 IMDb) ![]()
Thank you, Alex Scharfman, for opening people’s eyes to the truth: unicorns were never sweet, cuddly ponies — they’re magical beasts; basically angry horses with a murder stick on their foreheads.
Paul Rudd and Jenna Ortega star as a father-daughter duo who find themselves in way over their heads after accidentally running over a unicorn. Between the vengeful parents of the mythical creature and the greedy interests of Rudd’s pharma overlords (played with relish by Richard E. Grant, Téa Leoni, and Will Poulter, as the Leopolds), chaos — and carnage — ensue.
A literal “eat the rich” horror/comedy, this film is sharp, absurd, and unapologetically dark. Rudd and Ortega have great chemistry, and the Leopolds are delightfully despicable.
Not for the squeamish, but absolutely worth a watch.
~Sarge
July 7, 2025

Lookout’s Christopher Neely moderates a 2024 panel on affordable housing with L. to R. Senator Scott Wiener, Supervisor Manu Koenig and then City councilmember Sandy Brown.
You are no doubt aware that Governor Newsom has signed two bills championed by Senator Scott Wiener and Assemblymember Buffy Wicks to gut significant portions of the CA Environmental Quality Act or CEQA. That goal has been a long-standing aim of Wiener’s but hitherto had not garnered strong support. That is, until the repeated claim of CEQA as a major obstacle to the building of affordable housing gained enough traction for the governor to tie the bills’ passage to that of the state budget. Opposition from a coalition of one hundred environmental groups was swift but largely ignored by the governor and his supporters.
The central question remains: is there evidence to support the claim that CEQA has been a major cause of the affordability crisis in housing in CA? If so, then a scrutiny of CEQA is in order. CEQA critics claim that it is and cite a few extreme examples. However, the examples and claims such as Wiener’s that “anyone who doesn’t like a project for any reason can use CEQA to delay or even kill a project for reasons having literally nothing to do with the environment.”
-LA Times e-newsletter, Essential California- do not stand up when measured against credible research. The 148-page research document, CEQA by the Numbers: Myths and Facts published by the Housing Workshop for the Rose Foundation in May 2023 can be read here.
It counters with empirical research the exaggerated or false claims made by CEQA opponents. For example, the rate of litigation for all CEQA projects was 1.9 % for a nine-year period from 2013 to 2021. Hardly a tidal wave of litigation. A conclusion in the Executive Summary is instructive. Addressing the claims made by CEQA opponents the authors write, “In many cases, critics had utilized inaccurate data or relied on incorrect assumptions. In others, they had simply overlooked CEQA’s dynamic nature — that the law has been amended to meet changing needs. Their criticisms never recognized the fact that, by 2020, the California Legislature had enacted numerous reforms to the law, streamlining environmental review and expediting CEQA litigation for many projects.”
That part caught my attention. The bills just passed by the governor exempt infill housing from CEQA. But every infill housing project in the city of Santa Cruz in the past five years has been CEQA exempt. That is standard practice. What is going on here? My hunch is that the “infill housing exemption” is a marketing tool or branding since it touches a sympathetic nerve, even though infill housing is already exempt. The other projects that are now CEQA exempt, such as advanced manufacturing may not be so popular, but they are in the same bill. The bills also vastly reduce what is required to be made available in the Administrative Record which an agency, such as the city, is required to present as part of a CEQA lawsuit.
The Administrative Record (AR) prior to now included all electronic internal agency communications and all documents related to a project. Now, the AR excludes electronic internal agency communications that were not presented to the final decision-making body, such as at the city council hearing on the project. The AR would still include communications reviewed by a lead or local agency executive or supervisory administrative official. This is phony assurance. Such “reviews” if they even exist, will quickly disappear.
I have first-hand experience with the AR for the CEQA lawsuit against the city of Santa Cruz Wharf Master Plan. To help keep legal costs down and because I like doing such research, I carefully read the thousand or so pages comprising the AR. There were some very informative emails and some very revealing. None of them would be available under this current legislation.
Most did not play a part in the lawsuit brief, but you had to read all of them to spot the one or two that did. Then there were the emails that revealed the frank views of those heading the project as in, “I’ve gone through the draft Wharf Master Plan and removed as many references to ‘municipal’ as possible.” Such information is now inaccessible.
The claim by Wiener that “anyone can get a lawyer and use CEQA to delay or kill a project for reasons having literally nothing to do with the environment” is not supported by the facts and was not my experience. First off, let’s start by exposing that which is hidden in discussions around CEQA. The first step in the process is that a city or other agency produces a faulty, or inadequate environmental document. That step is the crucial one. Nothing moves if a city or other agency produces a reasonable, adequate environmental document. To go forward with a chance of success a CEQA lawsuit must be strong, meaning the city’s environmental document must have significant, demonstrable inadequacies. The bar is set high, and the timeline is short; some of the changes the Housing Workshop authors referenced.
A CEQA lawsuit does not stop a project. If successful, a big IF, the city or agency is required to redo the parts of the environmental document that the court found unlawful. At worst the project is delayed, at best it is improved by having the agency reveal the environmental impacts that the court found were missing and try to mitigate them. They should have done that in the first place and saved the public the time and expense of holding them accountable. But this is not how the discussion around CEQA evolves. The starting place for anti CEQA voices is to label those bringing a lawsuit as “anti-housing” or “disgruntled homeowners.” Keep repeating that often enough and it appears in every op ed, podcast and interview.
Thanks to Newsom, Wiener, Wicks, and others, CEQA is gutted. Meanwhile the main drivers of the housing affordability crisis are well-shielded behind their portfolios. When housing prices do not drop and environmental effects of the worst projects impact those with the least resources, what else will the real estate industry and its politicians dream up to keep profits high and attention diverted?
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
The folks who have been injured by the Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire have been abandoned by the agencies, such as the EPA, that are supposed to be helping. As the Never Again Moss Landing leaders have said…”We realize now that the Cavalry is not coming.” Luckily, however, social and environmental justice groups have stepped up.
One of them is GreenAction. That group was able to convene a meeting with EPA leaders recently and force them to admit that initial claims of safety regarding the fire were incorrect, but had never been retracted or corrected, yet continue to be relied upon as an informational point.
Here is information about GreenAction:
In January and February of 2025 two major fires occurred at the Vistra Battery Storage Facility resulting in negative impacts on the health of the surrounding community and environment from the release of highly toxic chemicals into the land, air, and water. Never Again Moss Landing is a fast-response grassroots all-volunteer group of residents that advocates for their community’s voice and interests in response to these Battery Energy Storage System (B.E.S.S.) Fires. Greenaction reached out to the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) on behalf of Never Again Moss Landing to demand accountability, better testing, transparency, and urgent action to protect the community and environment! We will help hold government agencies and corporate powers accountable,!
Greenaction Environmental Justice Organizer, Skylar Sacoolas, joined the panel discussion “Healing from an Ecodisaster” and shares how Greenaction holds corporate powers and government agencies accountable!
Check out the full panel discussion on YouTube: Power Plant Fire- Healing from an Eco-Disaster with Never Again Moss Landing, CA
Check Out Never Again Moss Landing’s Website for more information.
GREENACTION INTERVIEW THIS FRIDAY ON “COMMUNITY MATTERS”
Listen this Friday at 2pm Pacific Time to “Community Matters” when I will interview Ms. Skylar Sacoolas of GreenAction to discuss what is happening in Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties regarding the Vistra Fire as well as siting of other lithium battery facilities in a Watsonville neighborhood.
Listen from your computer or smart device. The program will be recorded and posted by 5pm on the Santa Cruz Voice website.
RTC AWARDED $128,7 MILLION FOR SEGMENT 12 WORK BUT WHAT ABOUT PROPERTY OWNERS ADVERSELY AFFECTED?
The RTC now has funding for widening Highway One between State Park Drive and Freedom Blvd, and will include construction of the trail in the rail corridor concurrently. This means the RTC will take alot of private land along the way, such as the front half of the Bayview Hotel and Caroline’s parking lots, a significant amount of land adjacent to the tracks along Aptos Street BBQ area and the Aptos Creek crossings. Some property owners received notice and a purchase offer, but not all. Hmmm….
One of those left in the dark is Mr. Lee Steinberg, whose home sits adjacent to the tracks near Aptos Creek. County and RTC staff met with him a year ago to discuss what the new trail viaduct planned to loom over his driveway would look like. They promised renderings that have yet to materialize. When asked about the solar impact study for the project, staff replied later that the County Ordinance regarding shading impacts of projects on neighboring properties “was repealed”. Hmmm…

Meanwhile, the Campaign for Sustainable Transportation has sued the RTC relating to the highway widening piece of this huge project.
I encourage anyone interested in saving the heritage redwood trees that the RTC will cut to contact the Campaign for Sustainable Transportation and get involved to whatever degree you are able.
CHANTICLEER “WHALE CROSSING” TO OPEN JULY 30
Well, the long-awaited and over-budget pedestrian /bicycle bridge over Highway One (with the whale motif) is scheduled to open July 30. Soquel Avenue Frontage Road is now paved next to the very wide sidewalk bordering the bridge end at Chanticleer Avenue, but no improvements of substance have been completed at the other side near Grey Bears facility for safe travel of future pedestrians and cyclists.
We will all be treated to a bird’s eye view of the noisy and chemical-intensive PureWater Soquel Treatment Plant adjacent to the bridge. Soquel Creek Water District has provided NONE of the landscaping promised when the Project was approved. Aesthetics? Hmmm…..
NEW PARK OPENS IN WATSONVILLE FRIDAY
This Friday, the new large County Park on Whiting Road will officially open to the public at 10am. What once was agricultural land is now going to be used for recreational space, beginning with walking trails…maybe?
New park to open in South Santa Cruz County
Initially, the County bought this shiny new thing with letters of support from the Santa Cruz County Ag History Project leaders who hoped to create a working heritage farm there and invite school groups to tour. The Superintendent of Pajaro Valley Unified School District at the time, Dr. Rodriguez, also provided a letter of support to the County for the purchase. There was also discussion of ‘temporary’ athletic playing fields. Hmmm…
There is a large agricultural well on the property, but it remains to be seen how the County will develop this new park…removing agricultural land use?
Maybe the County Agricultural Policy Advisory Commission (APAC) should weigh in on this, that is if they ever are allowed to meet again. All of their meetings this year have been canceled by Planning Staff Sheila McDaniels.
Write Supervisor Hernandez and ask him about the issue of removing ag land from that use, in violation of the County’s Measure J statute. Felipe Hernandez <felipe.hernandez@santacruzcountyca.gov> He is the current Chair of the Board of Supervisors.
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING AND ASK QUESTIONS. MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY DOING JUST ONE THING.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
The Swanton Pacific Ranch burned in the 2020 CZU Fire and is at a critical juncture: will it become a high use University campus or will it continue its famed reputation of serving as a lower key training center for California’s future land managers? Many people do not know about this important institution or the Scott Creek and Swanton areas where it is located, but these places have been incredibly important to the Monterey Bay area for a very long time.
A Very Special Place
The Swanton Pacific Ranch (SPR) is 3,200 acres of super biologically diverse, privately owned ‘working’ land a little north of Davenport and is affiliated with the California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. The property occupies a significant portion of the Scott Creek basin, which has the most plant species per acre of anywhere in North America. Scott Creek also hosts the southernmost population of the highly endangered central coast races of coho salmon and steelhead. The Swanton area is home to some pretty special other wildlife species, as well, including the endangered California red-legged frog and the rare central coast mountain lion, California giant salamander, and western pond turtle. Large areas of Swanton Pacific Ranch and the watershed in general host endangered coastal prairie and maritime chaparral plant communities. There are even relict old growth redwoods!
Swanton Pacific Ranch: Privately Owned for a Reason
Those who think they know about Swanton Pacific Ranch are often surprised about its ownership. SPR is not owned by Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, it is owned by a private corporation called the Cal Poly Partners. Cal Poly Partners is ‘a strategic partner dedicated to advancing Cal Poly.’ Its mission includes the statement
‘Through our flexible business model and willingness to take on challenges, we push boundaries to provide university resources and services.’
When Cal Poly wants to build on campus without adhering to state guidelines for prevailing wage or unions, Cal Poly Partners “gets ‘er done.” When Cal Poly wants to bypass hiring union workers for its cafeterias or janitorial services, Cal Poly Partners steps in to hire those workers. (Despite these ‘cost savings’ Cal Poly San Luis Obispo has comparatively expensive tuition, charging more fees than other State Universities.) Likewise, Cal Poly Partners may have been ‘useful’ for bypassing State rules for student accommodation at SPR in terms of housing standards, accessibility, etc. And, because SPR’s employees are Cal Poly Partners employees, there is no accountability to the University for the management or oversight of Swanton Pacific Ranch.
Historical Background
How did Swanton Pacific Ranch end up in this situation? The SPR was assembled from various parcels by Al Smith, as he took over ownership and management of Orchard Supply Hardware from his father, who founded it. Al went to Cal Poly SLO and then was a teacher in Los Gatos, bringing students to SPR to teach them how to manage ‘working land’ – land that produced crops, timber, and livestock. He believed in Cal Poly SLO’s once stronger but oft cited motto “Learn by Doing,” so he bequeathed the property to the Cal Poly Partners with a sizeable endowment. According to Al’s wishes, the property must have a certain (undefined) level of natural resource conservation and have some level of management input (undefined) by Cal Poly’s College of Agriculture, Food, and Environmental Sciences. As to the intended use, they say ‘Al would have loved to have seen….‘ things like students learning how to manage natural resources and steward the land. The endowment, which has grown immensely, presumably is supposed to support the SPR. Once part of Swanton Pacific Ranch, the 617-acre ‘Valencia Property’ was sold in 2019. Shortly afterwards, Al Smith’s name appeared on a big plaque on the side of the newly built Frost Building at Cal Poly. What would Al have thought of that use of his generosity? Are his heirs watching? Are other potential donors aware about how previous donors’ wishes have been respected?
2020 Wildfire Destroys Swanton Pacific Ranch
In 2020, most of the buildings at Swanton Pacific Ranch burned to the ground as the CZU Lightning Complex Fire raged through the area. Five staff people lost their homes and most of their belongings. Teaching facilities, labs, community gathering spaces, and meeting halls burned up. The school’s teaching, research, and demonstration forest, where so many foresters learned how to maintain sustainable timber stands, was charred. Most of the staff left, retiring or moving on. Remaining staff quickly created pop-up, temporary housing for student and faculty visitors and began exploring how insurance and FEMA might combine to create new facilities at SPR.
A Dark Future?
Swanton Pacific Ranch is 1/3 larger than UCSC, and some might think it a good place to build a new campus, complete with subdivisions to house faculty and staff. Perhaps there are ideas circulating of selling various of the SPR parcels once they obtain development permits. Working their “flexible business model,” maybe the Cal Poly Partners will explore usurping local planning oversight by declaring the rebuild of Swanton Pacific Ranch a State University project, leaving only the increasingly weak Coastal Commission to help protect the environment. How soon, then, would hundreds of students be living on Swanton Road? As they rush between classrooms, these elite students might enjoy the views of the North Coast from behind guarded gatehouses. Development of this new campus will fundamentally change the community and destroy much of the biological diversity that has been so well stewarded and studied, for so long.
A Brighter Future?
On the other hand, perhaps the future Swanton Pacific Ranch will build on its legacy to become a globally recognized ‘Learn by Doing’ sustainable land management trade school. Already, graduates of SPR are leaders, fostering stewardship of millions of acres across California. Imagine those leaders working with faculty and staff to train the next generations how to see the land, how to chart its course through management planning, what to monitor, how to respond to climate change, and how to work collaboratively with the increasingly diverse groups that make up our State. Such collaborative natural resource management partnerships were once the hallmark of SPR. This model has great potential to bridge Bay Area brilliance and resources with the agricultural and natural resource management emphasis that have long been Cal Poly San Luis Obispo’s strengths.
Forks, Roads
The choice between the darker or the brighter future hangs in balance. These things are being discussed not with the community, not with alumni, and not with thought leaders in the various fields that would benefit from Cal Poly graduates of SPR. For those of you who gave input at public meetings or in online surveys, I’m sure you are wondering what happened to your input, as am I.
For those of us who care about the magnificent North Coast and the Scott Creek watershed, we await an opportunity for public comment, which will probably come as Cal Poly’s consultants manage the legal processes of such developments. Meanwhile, I encourage you to learn more about how special that area is by reading Jim West’s Traversing Swanton Road essay. Jim spent most of his life studying that area and his knowledge has inspired many.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |

I have to give credit to Guy R. McPherson. He has provided me with a real change of pace from the kind of advice and observation I was getting when I was growing up.
You probably have to be of a “certain age” to remember this, but a popular song when I was growing up was titled, “Home On The Range.” That song was, in fact, one of my father’s favorite songs. It featured the following, rather optimistic, first verse:
Oh, give me a home, where the buffalo roam
Where the deer and the antelope play
Where seldom is heard, a discouraging word
And the skies are not cloudy all day
Look at that picture, above, provided by Mr. McPherson. He is “updating” that song. Can’t you just see those deer and antelope bounding around on those great plains? Can’t you just marvel at those massive and magnificent herds of buffalo, grazing peacefully in that landscape above?
The illustration at the top comes from a December 6, 2024, posting by Mr. McPherson in his “Nature Bats Last” Substack blog (you can also access it in the form of a video). Here is the “discouraging word” that Mr. McPherson provides readers, to accompany the picture he has provided:
The current Mass Extinction Event is the most severe in planetary history. It will almost certainly cause the extinction of all life on Earth. Its cause is well-known: the collective actions of too many humans for too long a time, primarily through burning fossil fuels (emphasis added).
Allow me to provide you with my personal reaction to the McPherson view of the world in which we are living today. First, I am very much convinced of the reality of “Global Warming.” Second (as my father taught me), I will never stipulate to “inevitability.”
McPherson is absolutely correct that our “world,” our “civilization,” the physical, economic, social, and political arrangements now prevailing, are ultimately dependent on the “World of Nature.” I’ll agree with McPherson that “Nature Bats Last.” In fact, though, my thought is that by trying to prove that “WE Bat Last,” we are taking the exactly wrong approach to our current situation.
Maybe we’re “doomed,” which I think must be Mr. McPherson’s favorite word. We certainly are if we don’t pay attention to the signals that “Nature” is sending us.
However, we could pay attention to those signals, and we could then “change our way of thinking,” as Mr. Dylan advises. If we were to do that, we might end up surviving, but changing our “way of thinking” is just step one. After that, we need to change what we are “doing,” too, based on what our thoughts are then telling us!
If we could pull that off (and I haven’t given up), the deer, and the antelope, and the buffalo might still be with us. The world wouldn’t be on fire, and there would still be some clear-sky days.
So, how about we give it a try? Let’s pay attention to the portents, provided by Mr. McPherson, and to the possibilities, with the advice provided by Mr. Dylan:
Gonna change my way of thinking
Make myself a different set of rules
Gonna change my way of thinking
Make myself a different set of rules
Gonna put my good foot forward
And stop being influenced by fools
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
Its title had been staring out from the bedside table for some time, a bookmark jutting out from pages closed years ago — ‘How to Overthrow the Government’ by Arianna Huffington, released in 2000, in retrospect a much simpler time. Pre-9/11, pre-Iraq War, pre-COVID19, pre-internet as we know it today — ancient history almost. Despite its sinister-sounding title, the book is hardly a ‘Mein Kampf,’ or even a ‘Project 2025’ manifesto. All those years ago, Huffington wrote, “Entering the political field has become less appealing than visiting a proctologist with a hangnail,” and citing Sean Connery’s character’s line from the movie ‘The Untouchables’: “The other guy pulls a knife, you pull a gun…he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send two of his to the morgue. That’s how you win an election. That’s the American Way!” She termed it the “survival of the unfittest,” as we are subjected to political ads that “are styled as Early Sledgehammer,” which is clearly where we are today, only much more so with the advent of the internet with innumerable podcasts, social media, texts and emails…all of which the GOP/MAGA forces used to their distinct advantage over the Democrats in the last presidential election. In that period when Huffington wrote her book, ‘Campaigns and Elections’ magazine said that 81% of political candidates surveyed believed that press scrutiny keeps qualified people from running for office. Huffington said, “By spotlighting our political leaders’ private weaknesses, we’re in danger of limiting our pool of potential leaders to a group of men and women with no private weaknesses — or, indeed private thoughts or ideas. We’ll eliminate any number of potential Jeffersons or Lincolns and what we’ll get instead will be a parade of smiling, handshaking automatons, programmed with the requisite poll-tested policies and focus group-approved sound bites…personally, I’m willing to countenance a little infidelity in order to expand the field.” And a veritable cornucopia in her wished-for expansion is exactly what we’ve experienced over the past several years!
Huffington laments, “Just as our two-party system is showing unmistakable signs of exhaustion, and the public’s suppressed discontent is ready to be tapped, a disaster in reform’s clothing stands poised to take advantage. Like the townsfolk in an old Western, the millions who feel shut out of our ‘unprecedented prosperity’ may thrill at the sight of a masked man riding to our rescue — until it turns out he isn’t the Lone Ranger, but a racist gunslinger bent on turning them against one another.” Yikes! The racist gunslinger we ended up with is doing his utmost to divide us along racial lines, but also politically as seen by his diatribe in Iowa against Democrats who voted against his ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ and who don’t really count, being the minority in the chamber — in his estimation. He claims they didn’t support his bill because they hate him, but he hates them right back “because they hate our country!” We must remember that candidate Trump described Americans he disagreed with as “evil…the enemy within.” His Independence Day comments are worth noting because past elected leaders have never voiced public “hatred” for those who dare disagree with them. Steve Benen of MSNBC writes, “There’s another angle to this that arguably matters more. Different political scientists define the nuances of authoritarianism in different ways, but I think most would agree that a hallmark of any despotic regime is the delegitimization of political opposition. It’s against this backdrop that the incumbent president, using language foreign to American ears, wants the public to believe that his partisan opponents literally don’t count, are inherently unpatriotic, and are worthy of hatred.” Trump may view himself as the Lone Ranger riding to the rescue, but he is unmasked, telling us exactly who he is and how he wants to remake the US into the dream of every tinhorn dictator who ever lived. The masking duties he has left to his Homeland Security Barbie to see that her ICE secret police are outfitted properly to not only hide their faces, but to instill fear in those who are victimized by the un-American raids and kidnappings — los desaparecidos.
President Trump is thrilled at the new facility in Florida being built with $450 million in FEMA funds to imprison more than 3000 immigrants, in reality a concentration camp meant to frighten fearful immigrants into self-deporting to their countries of origin. Ahead of a visit to the detention camp by Trump and Kristi Noem, the Florida Republican Party gave the place the nickname of ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ and began merchandising t-shirts and other items to capitalize on the Everglades location among the “gators and pythons” (“The moral bankruptcy knows no bounds,” – Emily Singer’s Daily Kos post) which supposedly will thwart any attempted escape by prisoners. The name was soon corrupted to ‘Alligator Auschwitz’ by those who see it bearing a resemblance to the Nazi detention centers of WWII. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt touted the facility as, “An efficient and low-cost way to help carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history. The only way out is a one-way flight. It is isolated and surrounded by dangerous wildlife.” Trump is known to love inhumane prisons and has a fantasy about using wildlife to dissuade immigrants from entering this country, and as he showed his excitement during a Fox News interview, he said of the possibility that immigrants might be eaten by alligators, “I guess that’s the concept. This is not a nice business. I guess that’s the concept.” Many experts are at odds with Leavitt’s summation of the camp being cost effective. “As someone who has studied the costs of detention centers, I can tell you for a fact that this facility will run at a cost substantially higher than average,” Aaron Reichlin-Melnick posted on X. The senior fellow at the American Immigration Council wrote, “Detention tent camps are always more expensive to operate than brick and mortar facilities with permanent infrastructure.” Trump’s deportation agenda is unpopular with voters, who view him as being too harsh, but ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ fills the bill for the president and his MAGA gang as they seek to be even more cruel to immigrants with their torture tactics.
Inaccurately, concentration camps are compared to prisons but in the US, inmates arrive in penitentiaries after being convicted of serious crimes, under processes determined by the US Constitution. Cases begin with probable cause, not skin tone, followed by an arrest during which one has a right to remain silent. Actual voluntary pleading…no coercion…leads to a formal trial with defendant choosing a bench trial or a jury trial, based only on admissible evidence, all stages under Constitutional constraints. If a court falters, appellate courts stand to intervene. Prior to Donald Trump, wrongful, sloppy, or vengeance-driven criminal convictions of the innocent were the product of flawed men, not a flawed system. Establishment of concentration camps is a reflection of an illegal system — detainment is independent of judicial review — no conviction of any crime, simply pointing to incarceration for political reasons. A human roundup based on maniacal whims doesn’t represent the rule of law, only an autocrat’s lust for power. Father Federico Capdepón, a retired priest from the Miami Archdiocese who has been watching this development, describes both the camp and the inhumanity it reflects as, quite simply, “Sinful.” But hey, Father, what do you say of the six Roman Catholic Supreme Court Justices who paved the way for the Trumpian cruelty with their complicity? Those six justices are aware of the statistics that show immigrants account for low crime rates, comprising 14% of the non-US citizen population with data showing only 3% being jailed. The six are also aware of the sinister methods Trump has devised to dismantle the US Constitution; yet, on June 27, the court outlawed nationwide injunctive relief, removing people’s protection from the president’s lawlessness. So whaddya know…hard to believe that three days later, Trump visited the completed ‘Alligator Alcatraz,’ with more on the way?
Andrea Pitzer, author of ‘One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps,’ writes, “the words ‘concentration camp’ evokes another country, another time, describing a facility operating in the dark of night, away from the prying eyes of an outraged public,” but we now have a camp in Florida’s Everglades that’s hardly a secret. We’ve all seen the video of Trump, Noem, and Ron DeSantis laughing in front of the cages which will hold human beings; and, Pitzer relates that she visited four continents in writing her history — and this one fits the purpose of the classic model for holding masses of civilian detainees. Detainees consisting of vulnerable groups for political gain based on ethnicity, race, religion or political affiliation rather than for crimes committed, all without trials as it points to serious dangers ahead for the country. Projected capacity of 5,000 beds is several times the average detention center occupancy, though billed as a ‘temporary’ camp theorized as a seamless processing center with rapid-fire judicial hearings conducted by National Guardsmen performing as immigration judges — an unlikely fluid process. Some defenders of Trump’s policy claim that arbitrary detention or abuse of foreigners doesn’t resemble Hitler’s treatment of citizens, but the Fuehrer’s goal of stripping Jews of legal protections and having no more rights than aliens, and therefore eligible for his encampments, echo an uneasy refrain from our current administration. The Nazis imagined their targets would self-deport with the tighter restrictions, but when that myth dissolved, their uglier and more punitive measures were initiated. And Kristi Noem said it out loud, if immigrants aren’t frightened enough to self-deport, “You may end up here.”
So, what can we expect? Already, aggressive moves against those residing legally in the US are seen, with legal status of half a million Haitians in the crosshairs. The Department of Justice is fast-tracking cases involving possible revocation of citizenship, working to undo birthright citizenship, and earmarking the citizenship of political enemies. MAGA wants to define who can be an American in ways that appear profoundly racist, with immigrants the most politically advantageous large population to target. US history has precedents and parallels for such abuse of populations not viewed as citizens, as we examine centuries of Native American removal and genocide, or courts wielding the weight of law or executive authority to prop up slavery, allowing cross-border trafficking and detention of humans who are denied lawful rights. The confiscation of property and removal of Japanese Americans to concentration facilities at the outbreak of WWII is just one of the most egregious of such actions, with Trump himself praising the ‘Operation Wetback’ deportations of the Eisenhower years, which included camps noted for their abuse and lethality. As the administration looks toward expanding its concentration camp legacy, we are seeing police-state tactics on our streets, as masked agents who refuse to show their IDs, travel in unmarked cars to sweep people from churches, their homes, their work places, from schools, and Home Depot parking lots — some reemerging after their ordeal, others simply ‘disappeared.’
MSNBC reports that the American Immigration Council believes the budget reconciliation bill is likely to make Immigration and Customs Enforcement “the largest investment in detention and deportation in US history,” an expansion which makes ICE the center of gravity for state overreach. And, Trump seems to lean in that direction as he espouses a multi-state network of sites like ‘Alligator Auschwitz,’ having already sent detainees to El Salvador, Panama, Rwanda, and Libya, with deals in-the-making with other countries — the imposition of a global concentration camp network. Members of the Seminole Tribe of Florida have opposed and are protesting the Everglades camp as a threat to their sacred lands, but five Democratic state lawmakers were turned away recently as they tried to inspect the facility. The MSNBC report neatly sums up an untidy situation: “The history of this kind of detention camp underlines that it would be a mistake to think the current cruelties are the endpoint. America is likely just getting started.”
That starting point is seen by Hayes Brown, MSNBC writer and editor, as the $150 billion cash infusion toward immigration enforcement which Republicans handed Trump in last week’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ which he needs to carry out his mass deportation policy. Brown writes, “The intended result is as aggressive as it is likely transformative: Immigration and Customs Enforcement is slated to become the largest law enforcement agency in the country as dozens of new detention centers spring up to hold hundreds of thousands of immigrants awaiting expulsion.” Despite all the arrests from the sweeps, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller is still unsatisfied, insisting that he needs more resources to meet his goal of 3,000 arrests per day. To put this into perspective, the budget reconciliation bill funds $45 billion EACH toward the southern border wall, and expansion of immigration detention capacity — thirteen times the current annual ICE budget for detention, and five times more than the entire annual budget of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The American Immigration Council estimates the money allocation would be enough for ICE to maintain 116,000 beds annually, compared to current support for 41,000 detainees — if one is lucky enough to get a bed. As of June 15, reported inhumane conditions at detention centers now holding around 56,000 immigrants, show the need for rapid escalation in building more facilities — monies which will be spent as quickly as possible with little oversight. Already, ICE has asked contractors for “proposals to provide new detention facilities, transportation, security guards, medical support and other administrative services over the next two years.” Full well we know, that much of that money will go to private companies which have been major political backers of Trump and the MAGA/GOP.
Travis Gettys writes on Raw Story that even though Stephen Miller has become a powerful, and empowered, adviser in Trump’s second term, his ambitions to become national security adviser may be jeopardizing his place in his current lofty position. He has remained in Trump’s inner circle by casting aside former allies like Steve Bannon and Jeff Sessions as they have fallen into the president’s disfavor, while striking up new alliances, as he attempts turning the president against others in his orbit, according to The New York Times’ Jason Zengerle. “At the same time, Mr. Miller is a world-class brown-noser. In an administration that puts a premium on sycophancy, he stands out for just how much he sucks up to his boss,” reports Zengerle. “And yet, Mr. Miller’s power could ultimately unravel because of something far more profound than office politics. Translating Trumpism into a coherent ideological doctrine can be a vexing proposition, as MAGA’s isolationist wing recently experienced with the US airstrikes on Iran,” writes Zengerle. Miller has translated Trumpism into public policy as well as anyone by showing a willingness to embrace the president’s contradictions and reversals, yet he isn’t viewed as indispensable because no one his circle ever was, but Trump can’t imagine Miller not working for him at present. Zengerle concludes, “For the moment, though, it seems Mr. Miller and Mr. Trump are aligned — and that means Mr. Miller has achieved a level of success, and satisfaction, that he never dreamed of during Mr. Trump’s first term.”
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
Letting go
“Everything I read about hitting a midlife crisis was true. I had such a struggle letting go of youthful things and learning how to exist and have enthusiasm while settling into the comfort of an older age.”
~David Bowie
“There’s a victory in letting go of your expectations.”
~Mike White
“Some of us think holding on makes us strong; but sometimes it is letting go.”
~Hermann Hesse
“People have a hard time letting go of their suffering. Out of a fear of the unknown, they prefer suffering that is familiar.”
~Thich Nhat Hanh
“Abundance is a process of letting go; that which is empty can receive.”
~Bryant H. McGill
|
As a dinosaur on the internet, I find this VERY interesting! 🙂
|
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)









