Blog Archives

March 18 – 31, 2026

Highlights this week:

Greensite… on why I’m running for Mayor, Part 2 Steinbruner… new County Youth Commission, Santa Cruz transportation… Hayes… Environmental Politics in Polite Company Patton… TDS… Matlock… excursions…supporter list…sleeper cells… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… zippers! Quotes on… “Precision”

...

PACIFIC AVENUE AUGUST 29, 1957. That’s Pacific and Walnut streets. Now we have The Gap, Synergy, and World Market Bazaar plus new light poles. It’s all about progress.

Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com


If you want to pitch in to
keep this work of passion going,
we are ever so grateful!

...

Dateline: March 25, 2026

HOLD YOUR FRIENDS CLOSE. This weekend we say goodbye to my best friend, who passed away in December. I’m having the memorial at my house, and I feel like I’m scrambling more than usual. It will all be fine, eventually, I know that from experience, but in the meantime by brain is running like a car being revved to oblivion, while in neutral… lots of noise, but no movement. Losing people sucks. I think I’ve had a lot of death in my life from a fairly early age, but I’m not sure it’s getting easier to deal with. This was also completely out of the blue unexpected, and I’m not sure I’ve really comprehended that she’s gone yet. It will be nice to see people this weekend, and I since do want this event to go smoothly, I better get back to work. Take care, all of you!

~Webmistress

...

THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ***-
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?

Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge

SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb) **-

This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.

Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).

Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.

Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.

~Sarge

A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb) ***-

Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.

Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.

It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.

~Sarge

THE LAST KIDS ON EARTH. Netflix. Series (1hr pilot). (7.2 IMDb) ***
This largely bloodless animated series began with a pilot-style special and ran for two seasons. It’s based on the children’s book series by Max Brallier, with character designs inspired by the illustrations of Douglas Holgate.

The story follows orphan Jack Sullivan as he adjusts to life after an invasion of extra-dimensional monsters and a zombie apocalypse. He soon bands together with a scrappy group of kids who missed the evacuation – along with a loyal monster-dog – forming their own ragtag survival team.

Aimed primarily at the 8–12 crowd, the show still has enough sharp humor and creature-feature flair to entertain adults. The voice cast includes Nick Wolfhard (brother of Finn), Mark Hamill, Keith David, Catherine O’Hara, and Rosario Dawson. Worth a watch – with or without your kids.
~Sarge

AGATHA CHRISTIE’S SEVEN DIALS. Netflix. Series. (6.2 IMDb) **-

There have been a fair few non-Poirot/Marple adaptations recently, and this is certainly one of them.

The cast is solid – Martin Freeman is great, and Mia McKenna-Bruce really shines in the lead role (though Helena Bonham Carter kind of phones in a stock twitchy character). The film doesn’t quite hook you into the mystery, though. It’s not slow, just… not all that engaging. The highlight for me was definitely Mia jumping out of a window to dodge a wedding proposal. On the plus side, it’s only 3 episodes. Many clocks.

It’s probably worth a watch if you’re looking for something to pass the time before the next episode of your favorite show drops.

~Sarge

THE MUPPET SHOW. Disney+. Series. (8.4 IMDb) ****
Or, as I like to think of it, ANTI-MELANIA. They both star a woman who is completely self-obsessed, clinging to a less attractive mate’s position: I mean, of course, the return of … THE MUPPET SHOW!

That’s right, the same old gang at the same old theatre. Minus the legendary Jim Henson and Frank Oz (who is still alive, at time of writing), it actually defies the concern of losing the magic – it’s almost like it never ended. Which is a good thing. Only one episode so far, but it’s off to a good start. Worth a watch!

~Sarge

LA BELLE ET LA BÊTE (1946). Disney+, Max. Movie. (7.4 IMDb) ****
Just ran back across this amazing version of Beauty and the Beast (literally haven’t watched it since the early 90’s), with amazing magical settings, and honestly a beast you like so much more than the Prince underneath. There are a number of visuals that have found their way into other lesser films. Jean Marais literally smolders in his cat-like beast. In French with English subtitles. Ça vaut le détour.
~Sarge

RIOT WOMEN. BritBox. Series. (8.5 IMDb) ***

In the early ’90s, a musical revolution erupted – one part punk, many parts feminism – spearheaded by bands like Bikini Kill and Bratmobile (<3): "Riot Grrrl". It laid the foundation for bands like L7 and Hole, whose raw energy and unapologetic attitudes reshaped rock music. Fast forward 35 years, and those fierce grrrls are now navigating the challenges of menopause. Enter Riot Women, a series that follows a group of "women of a certain age" who've had it up to here with hot flashes and feeling invisible. What starts as a joke quickly transforms into something more: they decide to start their own band. While only a few episodes are currently available on BritBox (released weekly), the show's got heart, humor, and plenty of punch. If you've ever felt overlooked or dismissed, Riot Women is a riotous reminder that it's never too late to reclaim your voice. Available exclusively on BritBox (via PrimeVideo for me) - worth a watch, so far. ~Sarge

Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.

Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com

...

March 23, 2026

Why I am Running for Mayor: The Issues
Background
I have lived in the city of Santa Cruz for 51 years. I’ve been deeply involved in local city politics for 45 years. I have served on two city commissions with three terms as chair. Most of my political work has been on the public side of the podium.
Why run for Mayor?
I decided to run for Mayor to take a stand against the rapid overbuilding of large projects that are overwhelming our infrastructure, our neighborhoods and our town. What we see now is just the beginning. Unless there is a change of direction at City Hall, the City of Santa Cruz will be unrecognizable in a few years.
Overbuilding
This city-driven overbuilding goes way beyond state housing requirements. The city approved the building of double the number of state-required housing units in the last eight-year cycle, mostly at the upper income levels. Those extra housing units do not count towards the current cycle, which runs from 2023-2031.
Slow down!
The city’s website shows that new large housing projects already submitted to the city, either approved or waiting for approval, total more than 4,000 additional housing units. This number exceeds the state-required 3,736 housing units for the entire eight-year cycle ending in 2031.
No Overlay district
The city has also proposed establishing a “ministerial approval overlay district.” This new district would encompass every buildable city parcel currently zoned mixed use or multi-family. Should this proposal pass, public hearings would be eliminated for all projects labeled one hundred percent affordable. This would give city planning staff sole authority to approve projects, without public oversight. The overlay district weakens current heritage tree protection criteria. It allows eight story projects deep into existing neighborhoods. This overreach is neither required by the state, nor necessary to reach our state housing numbers for the current eight-year cycle.
Overbuilding & higher rents
We cannot build our way into affordability.

More housing does not necessarily lead to lower rents. As more market rate housing is built, and more affluent people relocate to Santa Cruz, the income eligibility levels for affordable housing also rise since they are tied to the Area Median Income (AMI). As the AMI rises—it has risen 25% in 3 years—it leaves more low-income workers out of competition for affordable housing.

Affordable housing: priority for local workers
I am running to make absolute certain that affordable housing built in the city is offered first to local workers and local residents. The 2023-24 Civil Grand Jury, of which I was a member, published an investigative report titled “Housing for Whom?” The report documents that the city has no tracking system to ensure existing local preferences for affordable housing are being followed. If elected, I will work to make sure a tracking and verification system is in place, is followed and is audited. Our city by itself cannot provide affordable housing for the whole county and region. Priority must be given to local workers.
Negative fiscal impact
City planning staff has stated—and council has ignored—the fact that new housing results in a net negative fiscal impact over the long term. If the overbuilding continues, the cost of basic services will increase. Getting a doctor’s appointment will be more difficult. Dominican Hospital is overwhelmed right now. Costs for water, sewer and garbage will rise. Traffic congestion will get worse. Overcrowding has negative impacts for people, the infrastructure and the environment.
State take-over of local control
State housing laws have left cities with little control over their own land-use decisions. If elected, I will join other CA cities in pushing back against the state’s unsustainable housing requirements. Our state representatives must hear our concerns and better represent our interests.
Housing built in the last 50 years
Some claim that the city has built no housing for the past 50 years, that these new outsize buildings are just catch-up. That is incorrect. The US Census shows that since 1970; eleven thousand housing units have been built in the city. False claims to justify overbuilding should have no place in land-use decisions. As Mayor, I will base decisions on facts and evidence.
Where is our money going?
There has been a significant increase in the City’s top and middle management employees over the past three years. Padding at the top has in the long run bankrupted some CA cities. If elected, I will examine the ratio of supervisors to workers in the city to see if it aligns with similar cities in CA. I will scrutinize the over-hiring of consultants. I will ensure proper environmental review of projects to avoid unnecessary lawsuits that in the recent past have cost the city hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The environment
I am running to address environmental issues that have taken a back seat in the city’s priorities. We need to re-instate the ranger program in Parks and Recreation to keep our open space lands safe and clean. We are fast losing our heritage trees; three to four hundred are cut down with permit each year in our eleven square mile city. We can do better. We need to address light pollution, a proven human health risk with negative impacts on nocturnal animals, migrating birds and plant life.
Small businesses
If elected, I will support and protect our local small businesses. Too many are being forced out by the bulldozer. After displacement, few can afford the higher rents in the new projects. We are losing a sense of place as long-time local businesses disappear. I will protect our scarce industrial lands for future job growth.
Community safety
I worked as head of Rape Prevention Education at UCSC for thirty years. I know we can do a far better job of response to the high level of reported rape in the city, currently a buried issue. I will prioritize public safety in our parks.

I deplore the actions of ICE and will not support their presence in Santa Cruz.

Leadership
I am a skilled chair of public meetings. I respect all who work in the city at all levels. I respect all members of the public who attend city council meetings. I have a good rapport with current council members and am respected by city staff.
Democratic process
If elected, I would expand civic involvement by encouraging council members to hold regular constituent meetings in their districts. I would end the current requirement that council members can discuss an item only after a motion has been made. I view this requirement as stifling public debate among the council. It makes public comment largely superfluous since motions are pre-prepared with staff.
My pledge
If elected I will work with council members in a leadership role: to redirect staff away from overbuilding; to comply with state laws but no more; to push back against state take-over of local control; to protect our neighborhoods, our infrastructure and our environment with transparency and a more robust democratic process.

See and read more on the website: Greensite4Mayor.org

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
MIDCOUNTY GROUND WATER AGENCY BOARD PAUSES ON ASSESSING PRIVATE WELL OWNERS

Many thanks to Director David Baskin-Green for his common sense and clear-headed thinking at last Thursday’s MidCounty Groundwater Agency Board meeting to pause the action to continue having SCI Consultants devise methods to tax private well owners to get money to operate the State-mandated Agency.

Last year, on St. Patrick’s Day, the SCI Consultant rolled out his plan to a large room at Simpkins Center filled by private well owners, upset at the idea of being taxed for pumping water from their own wells.  Nevertheless, the MGA and SCI Consultants moved forward with further analysis of possible future assessments.

A few of them were also at the MGA meeting last Thursday and spoke, or had written, opposing any future assessments on their private wells.

Representing the City of Santa Cruz, Director Baskin-Green immediately stated: “What is not equitable about the formula we’ve been using?  I motion we continue this item and direct each agency’s executive director to discuss the existing funding formula with their respective governance Boards and return to the next [MGA] meeting with the results of their discussion and decision-making.”  Director Susie O’Hare, also representing the City of Santa Cruz, agreed and added slight amendment.  The vote to approve was nearly unanimous, with one no vote from the newest of the three Private Well Representatives, Keith Gudger.

Immediately, the Program Director, Tim Carson, announced the MGA would need to hire a facilitator to run the next meeting.  Kerching, kerching….  Once again, the reasonable Director David Baskin-Green, joined by Director Marco Romanini (representing Central Water District) said “NO.  We can manage our own discussion, just as we have here tonight.”

What a breath of fresh air!!

There are four jurisdictions working together to meet the State Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) planning and reporting requirements to ensure the MidCounty Groundwater Basin is taken care of in terms of quantity and quality of water available by 2040.  Historically, the members pay proportionally to the amount of water pumped from the Basin. The jurisdictions agreed in 2017 during formation that each would fund it’s own projects, but would pay to maintain the necessary administration of the MidCounty Groundwater Agency itself.   Soquel Creek Water District’s share is 70%, Central Water District pays 10%, the City of Santa Cruz pays 10% and the County of Santa Cruz (representing small water companies and other private well owners) pays !0%.  That has worked well, despite causing some financial hardship for Central Water District, leading to a rate increase to pay that bill.

In 2022, MGA received a $7.6 million no-cost-share grant from the Dept. of Water Resources’ SGMA Implementation program to pursue
components of its Groundwater Sustainability Plan.  More than $1.5 million of the 2022 award has funded compliance expenses for monitoring, reporting, and other activities…including consultants.

That allowed the member agencies to skip paying their share for the past couple of years, but not the grant money is mostly spent.  Who knows if the State will be willing to fund more such grants. 

The Staff Report begins on page 47, advising the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee to analyze the assessment options, followed by the Memorandum from the SCI Consultants further explaining the options.

The Memorandum outlines commonly used funding methodologies – including volumetric (extraction-based), land-based
(parcel or acreage), irrigated acreage, and hybrid approaches—and discusses considerations of
proportionality, equity, administrative feasibility, and legal defensibility.

Stay tuned for the next MGA meeting on June 18, 2026 in the Capitola Library Ow Community Room at 6pm.
Will the County convene a meeting with the private well owners before then?  Send your thoughts on this matter to Ms. Sierra Ryan, the County’s executive on the Committee: Sierra Ryan < sierra.ryan@santacruzcontyca.gov >  Under SGMA law, groundwater agencies can assess well owners to cover administration fees.

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT BOARD RECOGNIZES LESS PUMPING
The Soquel Creek Water District Board heard a report last Tuesday that less pumping is needed, justifying their revision of baseline levels that influence tier funding rates.  In 2020, that annual pumping volume was 3,900 AcreFeet, but due to customers using less water and finding leaks sooner, the District now anticipates 3,250 Acre-Feet/year  fro the next five years, with actual current production at about 3,000Acre-Feet/year.

How will that affect the rates?  That remains to be seen.  Another rate study is in the works.
Read the Item 6.3 “Water Shortage Contingency” Staff Report. The website has been updated to assist with direct access to items via the left bar item access and is a great improvement!

WHAT IS POSSIBLE FOR SANTA CRUZ TRANSPORTATION?

With recent events regarding the Rail Trail issue, is anything salvageable for public transportation on the rail corridor and otherwise?

Plan to attend the panel discussion this Thursday, March 26 at the Resource Center for Non-Violence (612 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz) at 7pm.

A community conversation is needed about weaving these new technologies into our transportation tapestry. Santa Cruz Personal Rapid Transit (SCPRT)Silicon Valley Clean Cities Coalition (SVCCC), and LoopWorks areorganizing this public forum to discuss whether the promised value of adding robo-taxis and podcars is worth the expected costs.
Does Santa Cruz County need podcars?
Moderator: Stacy Hughes (RCNV trainer)

Panelists:

(Panelist speak as knowledgeable members of our community, not as official representatives of their organizations.)

Occupancy is limited to 200, so register to reserve a seat.

COUNTY SUPERVISORS ESTABLISH NEW YOUTH COMMISSION
The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors considered forming a new Youth Commission that will advise the Board on matters important to the youth in our Community.  What a great idea to encourage youth to get involved in local government!

Take a look at Item #12

Chapter 2.127 would establish the Youth Commission. The purpose of the commission would be to serve in an advisory capacity to the Board by identifying emerging youth issues, providing input on policies and programs that affect young people, recommending policy improvements, and facilitating dialogue between youth and local government. The proposed Youth Commission would be composed of eleven (11) Santa Cruz County high school students ages 14-18. Each member of the Board would appoint one commissioner from their district, and six additional at-large members representing diverse lived experiences and perspectives within the community. These at-large positions are intended to help ensure representation from youth who may otherwise face barriers to civic participation. The membership would consist of the following members: Eleven (11) high school students between the ages of 14 and 18. Each member of the Board appoints one commissioner from their respective district (5 total). The Board will appoint six (6) at-large members from the following key stakeholder groups:

  • Person of color
  • Person with a physical or learning disability
  • Person living in a rural or unincorporated area
  • Person with an immigrant and/or farmworker family background
  • Person who identifies as low-income
  • Person who identifies as LGBTQ+

Let’s hope the Supervisors pay attention to the recommendations these young folks make.  Remember, former CAO Carlos Palacios disbanded many such Community-based advisory commissions before he retired.

MAKING PROGRESS ON COUNTY SUPERVISOR CHAMBER REMODEL
Progress is seemingly slow but the remodeling work at the 701 Ocean Street Board of Supervisor Chambers is shaping up.  What is not visible in the photos below is the significant pop-out media room.  It seems to me that the public space will be less than before, but it remains to be seen.


When will it be done?

The Board calendar schedules one more meeting in the basement on April 14.  What a shame that in all these months of having their meetings in different places, only two meetings have been held in Watsonville, with one of those at the expansive new South County Government Center at 500 Westridge Drive.  Many people from Watsonville attended that meeting….but not at the other locations that have included Scotts Valley…when the Board approved moving forward with a Draft Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) that will greatly impact Watsonville residents.

By the way, the remodel also included a major re-do of  the 5th floor women’s bathroom, too.

MAKE ONE CALL.  WRITE ONE LETTER.  ATTEND A PANEL PRESENTATION ON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND ASK QUESTIONS.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Cheers, and Happy Spring!
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
Environmental Politics in Polite Company

Is the adage ‘never talk about politics or religion in polite company’ still relevant? I was recently at a social gathering in Santa Cruz, surrounded by amazing, creative people, chatting about a variety of interesting subjects. One person I met had lived in the City for decades and recently moved a bit out of town. I asked them what they thought of the trajectory of downtown Santa Cruz – the pace and intensity of developments, the taller and taller buildings, whether they thought we were heading into an era of more affordable housing due to much more development, and how they thought more development would affect traffic and water supplies. As with everyone I’ve spoken with, they had grave concerns about the transformation of downtown, little faith that affordable housing would result, and were certain that traffic would get worse and water become scarcer. When I asked which politicians they saw as most responsible for pushing the downtown situation, their demeanor quickly changed. They had no idea. They had no opinion about Mayor Keeley. They said they lived in the County now and that City politics no longer concerned them. Disappointing! But maybe I should have taken the sage advice to stay out of such conversations.

City Politics IS Your Concern

It seems to me that most people are ready to talk national politics and ill-prepared to talk local politics. Cities have outsized impacts on large areas of the Earth. As the population becomes more and more concentrated in cities, people in those cities become more isolated from Nature. Those votes and the influence of the city elite and the politicians they often control means that cities are able to suck up water from way beyond their borders and dump their refuse into neighborhoods far away from city residents. Cities define where the roads go and how much traffic there is. After building their power and their donor base in the cities, city politicians often go into leadership at larger geographic scales. As much as all politics is local, most of politics is about your relationship with your most local city.

City Elections

The City of Santa Cruz is about to elect a new Mayor, and there is an interesting line up of candidates. As always, I encourage people to dig deeply into how each candidate has described their environmental platform. The City’s website is a good place to start for links for each candidate. We have Ryan Coonerty, who on his website has said ‘protect our greenbelt and parks.’ While Ryan says he is all about protecting parks, those of us who watched his proudly proclaimed work at making Cotoni Coast Dairies a part of a National Monument have to ask…how was that protecting anything? There is no evidence at all and much to the contrary. And, where was Ryan when a large area of Pogonip was going to be fenced and tilled for a non-profit farming adventure? How about the paving of Arana Gulch? What exactly does he mean by protecting Santa Cruz’ parks? With City streets flowing with pollutants into the Monterey Bay, with underfunded Parks unable to protect the numerous endangered species they oversee, and as overdevelopment stretches local water supplies, why has Ryan chosen such minute foci for his environmental platform? Check out the names on the list of endorsements – see any trends? Looks to me like a who’s who of who’s responsible for regional environmental destruction and overdevelopment of the City of Santa Cruz (with a few exceptions who I look forward to speaking with about this). Of note is that Coonerty is the only one running for mayor who declined the campaign expenditure limit: perhaps he is concerned about being on the ‘correct’ side of environmental destruction in order to look out for his donors’ business interests.

On the other hand, we are offered a number of other candidates including Ami Chen Mills, Chris Krohn, Joy Schendledecker, and Gillian Greensite. Many of us who have worked on environmental protection will recognize most of this lineup. Ami Chen Mills has a (draft?) website that presents a current environmental platform, albeit super-brief: “we must protect heritage trees, biodiversity and crucial ecosystems” and “Yes to protecting biodiversity, water and all life” as well as supporting a Very Important initiative ‘Rights of Nature Santa Cruz.‘ Joy Schendledecker’s website focuses mainly on climate change but includes protecting public land and “green space.” Gillian Greensite emphasizes housing issues, but also names park rangers, heritage trees, and light pollution in list of issues on her website. Chris Krohn’s website is not up yet, but those of us who know him have seen him do much good. Santa Cruz needs all of these candidates on the City Council if we are to have any water for fish, clean runoff, healthy greenbelt habitats thriving with even the most endangered of species, and a more open government that engages its citizens. I hope you join me in having discussions with our networks to elevate a pro-environment candidate to become Santa Cruz Mayor during the June 2nd election.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Monday, March 23, 2026

Wikipedia provides the following definition of “TDS,” which I have used as my title, as seen above:

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a pejorative term used to describe negative reactions to U.S. president Donald Trump that are characterized as irrational and disconnected from Trump’s actual policy positions. The term has mainly been used by Trump supporters to discredit criticism of him, as a way of reframing the discussion by suggesting that his opponents are incapable of accurately perceiving the world.

I thought I might make a brief comment on “Trump Derangement Syndrome” since I have been accused of being afflicted by it. Some of my Facebook Friends, too, who have made comments that ended up on my Facebook page, have also been called out as carriers of TDS.

As is so often the case, when arguments over issues of importance occur, accusing the “other side” of something that actually applies to you and “your side” is a well-proven way to defend oneself from criticism. For supporters of our current president to say that Trump critics are “incapable of accurately perceiving the world” is actually humorous, in a way, because a lot of the criticisms of our current president are based on the fact that he frequently says things that, seemingly, don’t actually square with reality – at least reality as most people perceive it.

If you click here, you will be transported to a brief, online comment from the BBC, the theme of which is that our current president has provided contradictory “mixed messages” about the war he started in Iran. I, personally, think it’s pretty accurate to say that these statements, and other statements made by our current president, do not accurately depict the world as the vast majority of the world perceives it. In other words, if there is any “derangement” in our relationship with the current president, the “derangement” is mostly on the president’s side.

I, however, don’t think it’s too helpful to argue about who is the most “deranged,” the president or his critics. To the extent we pursue that approach, we will find ourselves, on both “sides,” slipping around in an increasingly muddy pit full of accusations and responses.

I wrote about our current president in this blog back on January 21st, and suggested that “the people,” to whom the president is legally and constitutionally responsible, need to decide this question: Did we make a mistake in electing him to the presidency?

Back in January, when I published that earlier blog posting, our current president had not yet started a world-altering war with Iran. Now he has. Do we think that what our current president did was a mistake? If so, it was a huge and horrible one. If we think that choosing to begin that war was a mistake – based on what has happened since – then we need to take action to correct that mistake.

I’m suggesting that we – acting through our representatives in the United States Congress – need to deliberate on this question. Seriously! Was it a mistake for our current president to start a war with Iran without obtaining the authority and direction to do so, as the Constitution provides? Was it a mistake, and has that mistake had negative consequences for us (and for the world)?

If our current president’s unilateral action in starting a war with Iran was a huge and consequential mistake, would it make sense to put someone else in charge? The Constitution does provide a mechanism for us to do that, to correct such a mistake, if that’s what we decide it was!

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...
HELP ME, NO PLAN, THEM BONES, THREE STOOGES

Soon after President Trump and Pete Hegseth launched their “excursion” into Iran, a fundraising email was sent out to MAGA supporters, announcing a “massive and ongoing operation” against that country, with a warning that “Democrats want to see us divided.” It encouraged supporters not to “stay silent at this moment,” and to support Trump personally by supporting US troops in carrying out Trump’s new war. The email begins, “It’s Team Trump, and we’re asking every SINGLE Trump supporter who stands with President Trump and our brave US troops in carrying out this mission to let us know by signing the Official Trump Supporter List NOW.” You guessed it! The “supporter list” is a donation form to send cash for Trump’s campaign cash flow — and to support US troops in the process? Trump is calling attention to our military that he placed in harm’s way, in a supposed bipartisan duty, to link their deployment and military actions to his partisan cash grifting. Hardly ethical, you think?

This is all a part of a Trump call for “Team Effort,” as he asks other countries to help him secure the Hormuz Strait out of responsibility — to do their part to get him out of a jam. The US “decimated” Iran, so they owe us, but then failing to mention that the only thing decimated is the taxpayers’ wallets. The president has alienated other countries with his insults, his disrespectful comments, and has dismissed them and pushed them away with unfair tariffs to the point that his depravity disgusts them — a storm cloud in his own private Idaho, as Bocha Blue writes on the Palmer Report. Trying to turn things around isn’t working for him, as he had no plan to start with. His childlike confusion and misjudgment on tariffs broke the US economy which is now in worse shape with soaring gas prices, and consumer goods becoming less affordable as economic growth hits a downward spiral. And despite the ‘Help me!‘ sign he’s waving, even a red-tipped white cane and dark glasses will do Humpty Trumpy no good.

Bill Palmer says Trump appeared even dumber last week, when he attempted to highlight the fact that he gifted his cabinet members with new shoes — probably from a closeout sale, so sizing didn’t matter. Palmer mentions an interview the president did with Jake Paul, an actor and professional boxer, with an internet presence. Palmer says Paul is also famous for being an idiot, so the interview was likened to a Richard Nixon sit-down with the Three Stooges, who he reminds us were merely actors. In the interview, Trump claimed that as many as seventeen hundred Iranian sleeper cells existed in the US — news that we could have used sooner, exclaims Palmer — so, perhaps TrumpNoem, and Bovino could have used their thugs to smoke out the sleeper cells instead of rounding up Hispanic-looking people and murdering white onlookers. Palmer points to Benjamin Netanyahu for giving Trump the sleeper cell rumor, but that we shouldn’t worry regardless, with Jake Paul’s entry into the case.

Daily Dose of Democracy says the war has finished its third week with no end in sight, even with Trump asking for global ‘partners’ to help secure the Hormuz Strait against a “decimated Iran” to release oil tankers to guarantee the global energy supply. President ‘No New Wars’ Trump thumbed his nose at US intelligence, thanks to ‘Bibi’ Netanyahu, and threatening supposed close allies with an “or else” demand is getting him nowhere in cleaning up his mess. Former US allies are forming new partnerships without us because of the chaos, the instability, and the reckless handling of the Iran conflict. Recently Trump remarked that he would know the Iran war was over when he “feels it in his bones,” but we shouldn’t feel assured since he probably is waiting for his bone spurs to reappear.

Satirist Andy Borowitz offers his take on Trump’s Iran debacle: “Washington – Confirming the suspicions of many in the international community, on Monday Donald J. Trump revealed that intelligence played ‘no role’ in his decision to go to war with Iran. ‘People keep asking me about intelligence,’ he told reporters on Air Force One. ‘I made this call with no intelligence whatsoever. Quite frankly, every decision I’ve ever made in my life I’ve made without intelligence,’ he boasted. ‘Intelligence is for losers.’ Trump added that ‘I don’t trust people who have intelligence, which is why I love Pete.”

Australian Richard Quick posted on Quora: “Alright, this one’s for the MAGA crowd. Sit down, shut up, and pay attention because I’m only going to explain this once and I’m using small words so the flag emoji patriots can follow along. Your boy just let the International Energy Agency announce the biggest emergency oil release in its 50 year history. 400 million barrels. Pooled together from 32 countries. And your lot lost your collective minds like Daddy just saved the world. Let’s do the math that none of you peanuts can do: The world uses about 105 million barrels of oil a day. That means your big beautiful release is less than four days of global supply. That’s not a solution…that’s a long weekend. The entire IEA strategic reserve across all 32 countries is only 1.2 billion barrels, so this one release just burned through a third of the whole planet’s emergency safety net in one go. One crisis. One third of the cupboard…gone.”

Quick continues: “But it gets dumber. Keep up. The Strait of Hormuz is closed. Twenty percent of the world’s oil flows through that strait, right now none is moving. Citigroup estimates somewhere between 11 and 16 million barrels a day is being choked off the market. So even if you’re just trying to plug the gap from the strait, 400 million barrels buys you roughly a month. But it gets dumber. America’s share of this is coming from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which only holds 415 million barrels right now. That’s 58% of capacity because your guy never actually refilled the thing despite telling you he did. If the US shoulders the biggest chunk of this release, your tank is basically empty. And then what happens when the NEXT crisis hits? Because there’s always a next one.

Quick’s post adds: “And the US can only physically pump oil out of the reserve at 4.4 million barrels a day, and it takes 13 days from a presidential order before a single barrel reaches the market. So even if they turned on the taps right now, the cavalry doesn’t arrive for two weeks and when it does it can’t keep up with the shortfall. Meanwhile the bloke who started the war that closed the strait in the first place is on local TV In Cincinnati going ‘we’ll reduce it a little bit then fill it up again,’ like he’s talking about the fuel tank on his golf cart. And you clapped. You actually clapped. This isn’t a rescue plan. It’s a press release designed to keep the stock market calm for 48 hours. A band-aid on an arterial bleed. Thirty two countries just torched a third of the world’s emergency oil supply because your president started a war he can’t finish, and if this drags past summer, the cupboard is bare, prices are in triple digits, and there is no Plan B. So, yeah champ, pop a Bud Light. Slap a bumper sticker on it. The adults are definitely in charge.”

HuffPost’s Lee Moran calls our attention to The New York Times‘ editorial board’s damning assessment of Trump’s false claims about the US-Israeli attack on Iran in an opinion piece that warns of the dangers of an ultimate backfire. There’s nothing new about the conflict in the president’s “stream of falsehoods,” since “Lying is standard behavior for Mr. Trump, of course,” the board suggests, noting the 30,000 misleading or untruthful claims from his first term as compiled by The Washington Post. The Times’ board argues that, “Lying about war is uniquely corrosive, creating a culture in which deadly mistakes and even war crimes can become more common, ultimately undermining American values and interests.

The editorial board acknowledges, “There is reasonable debate to have about the wisdom of this war, given what is described as Iran’s ‘murderous’ government and threats to people at home and abroad. But Trump is not making that case, and is just lying about the reasons for the war and about its progress, in an attempt to disguise his poor planning and the war’s questionable basis.” Trump and his MAGA mob have given so many different answers for the various aspects of the incursion, what its actual objectives are, and how long it’s projected to last, that they’ve run out of fingers on which to count motives. Pointing to past conflicts, the board says that Vietnam and Iraq should have reminded leaders that falsehoods can boomerang on the perpetrators who tell them. “Whatever short-term gain Mr. Trump thinks he is getting by lying about the war in Iran is far exceeded by the cost to him, the country, and the world,” the Times concludes.

In one of his unhinged threats to Iran, last week Trump threatened to take out the country’s electrical grid and energy infrastructure “after 48 hours” if they didn’t capitulate and open the Hormuz Strait for oil tanker access. However, the threatened strikes were postponed when Trump announced that talks had made Iran “keen to make a deal.” “Major points of agreement” were said to have been reached, but Iran’s media poured cold water on the president’s announcement, saying there has been no “direct or indirect communication” between parties. After Trump’s post on social media, oil prices declined and the stock market responded positively, but many remained skeptical about the accuracy of the president’s comments. His claim that US envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner were in touch with “a top person” representing Iran for the backchannel talks — not Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

President Trump claims that “regime change” is underway in light of the peace talks — an unidentified leader, Trump calling him “the most respected, and the leader,” who gets five days to produce results, or “we’ll just keep bombing our little hearts out.” Khamenei hasn’t been seen since he was selected to take his father’s place, and as far as his control goes, most believe the Revolutionary Guard are calling the shots. Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, says he has spoken to Hakan Fidan, his Turkish counterpart who has served as an intermediary in negotiations between Tehran and Washington, with Trump claiming that it’s difficult to find somebody to talk with since most of the Iranian leadership has been wiped out. John Byrne of Raw America says, “The question of whether this ends well for Iran is open. The US has significant military advantages it hasn’t fully deployed. But what isn’t open is whether this war is going the way Trump promised. It isn’t. And everyday the strait stays closed, Iran’s leverage grows.

Anthony Davis on Substack, says Trump is demented and deluded, and thinks he’s hosting a reality show. Trump developed some “swagger in his real estate dealings, being performative, a little slippery, and often effective,” but that same instinct doesn’t transplant onto international diplomacy. “It doesn’t make you a savvy negotiator — it makes you unreliable, sometimes dangerously so,” says Davis. Therein lies the problem with Trump’s claims that the US is engaged in productive conversations with Iran, with Tehran’s complete denial of any talks. In a real estate deal or on a reality show such as The Apprentice, this might work, but right now, “those decisions are not abstract. The backdrop here is an active conflict: airstrikes, missile attacks, threats to obliterate infrastructure, and warnings of a regional escalation. In that environment, words are not cheap. They are signals. When a president says talks are underway and progress is being made, it suggests de-escalation,” observes Davis.

If those talks don’t exist, the signal is false — it’s destabilizing — and intermediaries trying to broker something real are left to clean up the narrative mess, and Iran has every incentive to dig in further rather than play along with a fiction resembling a reality TV show with no commercial breaks. Davis asserts, “Credibility, in this context, is currency. Not a moral virtue, not even trust in the traditional sense, but predictability. Other actors need to believe that when you say something publicly, it roughly corresponds to reality. That doesn’t mean full transparency — diplomacy often requires secrecy — but it does mean avoiding statements that are flatly contradicted by the other side. When that baseline collapses, every future statement is discounted.” It signals that there may be no real process at all, especially since Trump said just last week that we have no one to talk to since we’ve killed them all.

It is impossible to close a “deal” with a country that insists no deal is being discussed, and if those claims drift from the truth, the cost is embarrassment, confusion, miscalculation, and escalation. Davis concludes, “If there is a path out of a conflict as volatile as this one, it will to be paved with bravado. It will require quiet channels, verifiable steps, and a level of message discipline that resists the urge to declare victory before a conversation has even begun. Anything less isn’t negotiation. It’s performance — and Trump just wants to be the star of the show.”

Even without a resolution on the Iran war, Trump is rubbing his hands together about his next target. Talking to reporters, he said, “Cuba’s a failed nation. Cuba also wants to make a deal and I think we will pretty soon — make a deal or do whatever we have to do. I think something will happen with Cuba pretty quickly.” Being cut off from its oil supply from Venezuela which is  now under US control, the country has had rolling blackouts and suspended air links. Cuba has been existing under a 1960s embargo emplaced by the US, with only hit and miss support from Russia or China, so Trump is ready to carry out a “friendly takeover” of the island as a neighborly gesture to ease their pain — and find Castro’s stash of gold. Thom Hartmann of Raw America says, “We need to understand what’s really happening here. It’s not just foreign policy. It’s a pattern of a president who’s discovered he can use military force without consequence, without congressional pushback, and without a media willing to challenge him. Once a democracy lets that become normal, it’s very hard to walk it back.” See you in C-U-B-A!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

Thomas is traveling and forgot to bring his book. He’ll be back!

Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts.

Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com

...

“Precision”

“Don’t go in for the “yellowish” if what you need is “yellow”. The attitude called precision is the quality that remarks the accuracy of your demand. Never settle for the less; Go for the exact thing!”
~Israelmore Ayivor

Be precise. A lack of precision is dangerous when the margin of error is small.
~Donald Rumsfeld

Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
~Victor Hugo

In football as in watchmaking, talent and elegance mean nothing without rigour and precision.
~Lionel Messi

Commas in The New Yorker fall with the precision of knives in a circus act, outlining the victim.
~E. B. White

How things work is something that has fascinated me my whole life. I love things that are nifty and clever, and boy does a zipper qualify! Enjoy this video – and any video from Veritasium, for that matter.


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential.

Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

...

Deep Cover

Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *