Greensite… on Why are all new developmental units Rentals? What’s the impact?… Steinbruner… Hirahara House, Santa Cruz County Fair business, Rule 20?… Hayes… Fardening… Patton… … Rebutting The Case For Monarchy… Matlock… clipboards & traffic safety…just the cash, please…1984… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Peter Kay… Quotes on… “August”

|
Dateline: July 30, 2025
AUGUST IS HERE! Did we get much of a summer this year? I kinda don’t feel like we did… which is the same way I’ve felt for a few years at this point. I seem to be a little off with regards to time in general, like I feel like I’m heading into summer when in fact it’s August and summer’s ending. The Christmas spirit usually hits me in January… It’s a little disconcerting, to be honest.
Either way, this is my first summer in Ben Lomond, and I’ve found it to be quite a bit warmer than Aptos! Also, Ben Lomond has Swedish pastries, baked right here! I think I’ve mentioned this before, but it bears repeating: Fika Bakeshop in Ben Lomond is worth visiting! Her schedule changes, but for August, Susan, the proprietess, puts out her bake cart on Thursday mornings at 9am. Stop by, grab a pastry, and leave the money in the tin (or send by Venmo)!
She has a couple of other events in August as well – check out the website for the current schedule!
Enjoy August! We’ll be back with the next issue in a couple of days!
~Webmistress

FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS. In theaters. Movie. (7.5 IMDb)
The First Family of comics finally feels like a real family. Since their 1961 debut, the Fantastic Four have always centered on family dynamics, and this adaptation leans fully into that core. Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal), Susan Storm (Vanessa Kirby), her brother Johnny (Joseph Quinn), and Reed’s lifelong friend Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) share a life-changing space accident that leaves them with strange powers. Thankfully, the film skips the typical origin sturm und drang and instead drops us years after their transformation. The characterizations stay true to their comic counterparts, and the retro-futurist design (evoking the TVA from Loki) is pure visual delight.
Much like Superman earlier this year, this film is more concerned with who these people are than with non-stop action. The Fantastic Four are inherently decent, and the film allows their personalities and relationships to breathe. There’s even a non-human, non-speaking comic sidekick (H.E.R.B.I.E., filling the Krypto slot from Superman), and it works. Some may feel the superhero action is a bit light (Reed’s stretchy powers, for instance, are used sparingly, perhaps to avoid full Jim Carrey territory) but it strikes a fair balance. There’s a ton of CG, particularly in the beautifully realized retro Manhattan, but it blends so well you barely notice.
No bad performances, standout production design, and a few genuinely epic set pieces make this one a win. And for those complaining about woke gender flips: there have been many heralds over the years, male and female, including Shalla Bal. It’s faithful where it counts, fresh where it needs to be, and, most importantly, it finally gives us a Fantastic Four that lives up to their name.
THIS IS SPINAL TAP. Vudu, Google Play, Amazon. Movie (7.9 IMDb)
When I was chronologically less-endowed (the ’80s) and UA owned almost all the screens in town (Del Mar, Rio, River Street Twin, Aptos Twin, and the 41st Ave Playhouse), I worked at the Del Mar and the Rio. I’d catch free movies all over town every week. Obviously, you only have so much mental storage, so with a lot of films, I just filed away whether I liked them or not.
So imagine my surprise when I went to see a Fathom Event 4K restoration of “This Is Spinal Tap” (in anticipation of the upcoming “Spinal Tap 2: The End Continues”) and realized I remembered everything, despite the 41 years between my first viewing and now.
For the uninitiated, this 1984 self-described “mockumentary” by Rob Reiner follows the later years of fictional band Spinal Tap. Told in loose documentary style, it also dives into their earlier phases as a Beatles-style quartet and later a psychedelic rock act. The core trio – Michael McKean, Christopher Guest, and Harry Shearer (who later reunited for “A Mighty Wind”) – are backed by a rotating cast of ill-fated drummers. Most of the dialogue is improvised, and the music manages to be both hilarious and genuinely good.
If you’ve never seen it, track down a copy or be ready to rent or buy it on Amazon. It’s worth going out of your way for a watch.
Sorry if I seem a little hyperbolic. You see, it goes to 11.
~Sarge
SUPERMAN. In theaters. Movie. (7.7 IMDb)
First off, let’s address the Kryptonian Drang in the room: Yes, Superman has always been an immigrant – rocketed to Earth as a baby without “doing it the right way.” But this film doesn’t touch that theme at all. It’s not part of the plot. Nor do they change or even reference the classic “truth, justice, and the American Way” slogan. (In fact, in the comics, at one time he renounced his American citizenship as Superman so his global actions wouldn’t reflect on the U.S.) That, however, is relevant to the plot. Also, the twist with his biological parents WAS NOT Gunn’s creation – it has been off-and-on a part of the character’s backstory for decades, in different revisions, and in different media. Gunn isn’t tugging on Superman’s cape here.
Superman (2025), directed by James Gunn and starring David Corenswet as Superman, Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor – plus Krypto, the super-goodest boy – introduces a new take. Gunn brings back heart and humor that, while sometimes overlooked, are absolutely comic-accurate. Yes, the grim Snyderverse tone was also pulled from the comics, but comics contain multitudes. We’ve been telling Superman stories for over 80 years – different eras, different writers, different vibes.
Thankfully, this movie skips the origin story. We meet a Superman already established in the role, with a working relationship (and chemistry) with Lois Lane. Without giving too much away, the central conflict revolves around how Superman operates on a global scale – and how his idealism runs up against Lex Luthor’s cynicism, technocracy, and media manipulation. Lex plays dirty, and Clark’s just a big honest dope who wants to save people.
Nathan Fillion has fun as Guy Gardner – the canonically bowl-cutted Limbaugh-dittohead Green Lantern everyone loves to punch (there are several Earth-based Green Lanterns – it’s a Corps – so you will likely see him alongside the two who will be featured in the forthcoming “Lanterns” series). His appearance, along with Mr. Terrific and Hawkgirl, may serve as a backdoor introduction to what might become Gunn’s version of the Justice League.
And then there’s Krypto. He often steals the show. First introduced in the ’50s, Krypto has drifted in and out of continuity as Superman’s dog, and here, he’s like the Rocket Raccoon of this universe: A whimsical element, that can hit you deep in the feels.
The story? It’s fine. It touches on serious issues without digging too deep – more Donner Superman in tone than Man of Steel, and blessedly free of Christ imagery. If you’re attached to a particular version of Superman, this one might not click – or it might… some people swear by Adam West’s Batman or Lynda Carter’s Wonder Woman! Don’t get me wrong, I love them both. Nostalgia shapes expectations. YMMV.
Definitely worth a watch.
~Sarge
BUT I’M A CHEERLEADER. Paramount+. Series (6.8 IMDb)
Take a featherweight romcom, toss in some John Waters camp, a dose of LGBTQ satire, and you get “But I’m a Cheerleader” (1999) – a pastel-colored romp through the “hilarity” of forced conversion therapy. It’s a sign of progress, I suppose, that we now have banal lesbian romcoms.
Natasha Lyonne (in her baby-faced era) stars as Megan, a perky, clueless high school cheerleader blindsided when her friends and family stage a gay intervention. She’s promptly packed off to True Directions, a pastel repressed “rehabilitation” camp where gender roles are weaponized like power tools. There, despite the best efforts of the staff (including RuPaul as Mike, an aggressively straight-coded “ex-gay”) Megan starts to figure out who she really is.
It’s not exactly deep, or all that clever, but it is fun enough. The cast helps: Lyonne sarts to blossom, Clea DuVall does her patented broody-outsider-in-crisis (a ‘90s staple), and RuPaul chews the scenery with glee. It was recommended after reviewing Lyonne in “Poker Face”. Worth a watch if you’re in the mood for some light, queer, candy-coated fluff with a subversive wink.
~Sarge
POKER FACE. Peacock. Series (7.8 IMDb)
Poker Face is one of those shows I always meant to watch… and didn’t. Until now.
Starring Natasha Lyonne (Russian Doll, Orange is the New Black) at her most raspy and sardonic, she plays Charlie Cale—a woman with an uncanny, almost supernatural ability to tell when someone is lying. After calling out the shady son of a Vegas mobster (who promptly offs himself), she ends up on the run, wandering the backroads of America like a Gen Z Columbo in denim.
The series, created by Rian Johnson (Knives Out, Glass Onion, and yes, The Last Jedi), wears its love of ’70s detective shows on its sleeve—from the “mystery-first” format (you see the crime, then watch Charlie unravel it) to the delightfully retro opening credits, complete with roman numerals production date, drop shadows, and that plain, dead-serious typeface that screams 1976 CBS drama hour.
It’s part The Fugitive, part Incredible Hulk, and all charm—with a healthy dose of dry humor, shaggy-dog clues, and Lyonne’s lovable weirdness gluing it all together. She’s not a cop, not a PI, and not trying to be either—she just knows when you’re full of it, and can’t help but get involved.
If you miss the days when TV detectives had weird tics, old cars, and zero respect for protocol, Poker Face is your new weekend binge. Second season just dropped on Peacock. Worth a Watch.
~Sarge
SNOW WHITE. In theatres. Movie (1.7 IMDb)
I’m not one of those people who worships at the altar of Disney. I’ve been watching their films for over 50 years, so my ambivalence isn’t from lack of exposure. I genuinely enjoy many of their movies; The Jungle Book was a childhood favorite (though I’m still salty that Mowgli ditched the jungle for a girl…).
That said, changes to Snow White don’t bother me. Disney has been rewriting traditional tales since day one! Remember the stepsisters slicing off toes and heels to fit in the glass slipper in the original story of Cinderella? Yeah, that didn’t make the cut.
The music? Pleasant enough, but nothing that stuck with me. The dwarves (yes, Tolkien says that’s the plural) veer into uncanny valley territory… not stylized enough to feel intentional, but not realistic enough to work. Visually odd.
Otherwise, it’s Snow White. Rachel Zegler gives a solid, competent performance—and no, I’m not bothered that she’s Colombian and Polish. If she can sing, act, and dance, we’re good.
Overall? It’s a “meh” from me. Harmless, and musical fans will probably have a good time. Worth a watch if that’s your thing. (the 1.7 on IMDB is likely heavily skewed by anti-woke snowflakes sitting at the their keyboard, listing multiple negative votes. Adaptions always reflect the world they come from. Deal with it.)
~Sarge

July 28, 2025

Have you ever wondered why all the new high-rise housing being built in Santa Cruz is rental? Neither had I, until I was discussing housing development with my best friend who lives in Australia. Sydney is experiencing similar housing cost increases, although their housing prices are higher than ours as are their wages. I was sharing with her the details of a recent public hearing on yet another out of scale development project and she was sharing what is happening near her. At one point she asked, “are yours all rentals?” “Why yes”, I answered since that is the norm in Santa Cruz. She was astonished, could not believe it was true and said it would not happen in Sydney where home ownership is a big deal and drives the housing market.
That got me thinking. Why is all this housing in Santa Cruz only for rent and not for sale? As the old saying goes, follow the money. Investors and developers make more money from renting than from selling, both for market-rate and below. They do their research. Working families looking for a first-time home is not where the profit lies. It lies in renting to students and single professionals. Hence the unit size and amenities. Many UCSC students come from well-off families who can afford the high price of these new rentals. We are lulled into denial with feel-good, propaganda slogans such as “workforce housing.” It is bogus and bad planning.
What does a small town look like without families, with mainly students and single, highly paid professionals? That’s an important question. I doubt our city planners and city council have asked that question and assessed the answers. So long as money flows to the city seems the main concern. But there are other important issues they should discuss in public. Besides schools closing, the demographics of all the new renters change the very character of the town. There will be fewer family places in the commercial areas. The amenities in our parks will shift towards the active adult professional class and away from children.
An example of this trend is the city’s proposal to get rid of the very popular duck pond in San Lorenzo Park. This shift is to make way for adult amenities. Keeping the duck pond, they say, doesn’t allow space for the proposed new sports. If you examine the proposed new sports, they are not geared for children. This, despite the survey that showed most respondents strongly favored keeping the duck pond. So much for democratic process.
The duck pond issue has not yet gone to council. But it will be soon. Keep track and plan to have your voice heard.
Senate Bill 79: Very disappointing to receive no takers on the Senate Bill 79 issue. We have until August 18 to arrange meetings with John Laird (supports SB79) and Gail Pellerin. Believe me, if you think development impacts in Santa Cruz are bad now, you won’t like the exponential impacts if SB 79 passes.
Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |

Next Tuesday, the County Board of Supervisors agenda will likely have an action to take the Redman-Hirahara Farmstead off the National Historic Registry so that the developers across the street can build a strip mall and maybe another big hotel.
Fate of Watsonville’s Redman-Hirahara House to be decided in August
A golden story of the people in Watsonville rallying to save the home and farmland for the Hirahara family while they were imprisoned during WWII will be lost if this is allowed to happen.
Can you help save this treasure by contacting a prospective buyer that would be willing to revitalize the Redman-Hirahara Farmstead, following the model of the Emma Prusch Farm Park in San Jose?
Please contact me, or contact the County Board of Supervisors.
Matthew Sundt <matthew.sundt@santacruzcountyca.gov> Staff for the Historic Resources Commission.
In my opinion, this is being driven by a cozy deal between the developer and a member of the Historic Resources Commission who supports the Watsonville City 2050 General Plan to gobble this area and vast areas of farmland to create the “Gateway Project”. Take a look at Attachment #4
We owe this effort to save a bright spot in the tragic story of what our Country did to the Japanese-American citizens …and never allow such a travesty to occur again.
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FAIR BOARD CHANGES AND CONTINUED QUESTIONS
The Santa Cruz County Fair Board met this week. I continue to be concerned.
The Board approved last month the request and direction by Director Jody Kolbach that President Rachel Wells and Interim Fair Manager Ken Alstott (who gets paid thousands of dollars monthly to do this job from his home in Tennessee) to return the $338,000 she had discovered past Fair Manager Zeke Fraser had loaned to the Junior Livestock Committee last fall, but was never repaid. Director Kolbach asked that the money be placed into a high-interest-earning account.
Curiously, no action has been taken to address that issue, and there was no explanation in the agenda packet financials as to why. Director Kolbach asked again for the problem to be corrected, to which President Wells explained she just had not been able to get everybody together to set up the account. Hmmm…couldn’t she just get the money returned to the 14th DAA Fair cash account from whence it came?????
Interim Manager Alstott, participating via Zoom, was silent.
On a later matter regarding the Fairgrounds’ insurance policy, President Wells explained that she had been forced to take emergency executive action to prevent the Fairgrounds from losing insurance coverage and having to cancel all reservations and events. She explained that the Board had not been informed at the time of their meeting last month when voting to postpone taking action on the policy renewal because of problems identified, that the policy would be cancelled in three days if not acted upon. Hmmmm…..
Who allowed that to happen, I wanted to know. Silence from the Board and silence from Interim Alstott on Zoom. Silence from the two California Dept. of Food & Ag (CDFA) legal staff that had come from Sacramento and were in the audience.
The final head-scratcher happened near the end of the meeting when the Board was asked to approve a new Delegation of Authority for the new incoming Fair Manager, Ms. Dori Rose Inda. It was explained that she would begin July 31, and the document would be dated as such. “Where is she?” I wanted to know…there had been no introduction of her at all by the Board. I was informed that she was in the audience. Hmmm….
Oddly, Ms. Inda was allowed to stay and participate in the Closed Session, even though it seemed that she was not officially hired on yet. When Director Kolbach and a member of the public questioned this subsequently, President Well said “Well, she is actually working part-time, so she is an employee of the Fairgrounds.”
Hmmm…
Ms. Inda was not introduced until the very end of the meeting, and said very little at the podium. This was followed by Director Nick Calubaquib announcing his resignation. Another Director, Tony Campos, has been absent for nearly all meetings, and was not present this month, either.
Although not announced, I learned that July 30 is Interim Manager Alstott’s last day to get paid to run the Fairgrounds remotely from his Tennessee home. He is a CalPERS annuitant, and his allowable employment time is up.
Stay tuned…The County Fair is happening the second week of September. See the Santa Cruz County Fair Official Website
INSURANCE MODELS APPROVED…WILL POLICIES RETURN?
Just wondering how the State Insurance Commissioner’s actions will help all those who have lost insurance and have to pay ridiculous sums to enroll in the California FAIR Plan for really no coverage? I think this merits a town hall meeting with local elected officials. Please ask for this to happen!
BIG DEVELOPMENT ON OCEAN STREET BACKS OUT
This has been in the news, but merits attention. This monstrous project would be a disaster, in my opinion.
Developer backs out of 389 apartments on Ocean St. in Santa Cruz – Santa Cruz Local
PG&E UNDERGROUNDING IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY? JUST A LITTLE!
A friend is battling with PG&E to save a heritage tree on her property that is an active Acorn Woodpecker granary and nest. PG&E is becoming increasingly aggressive and intimidating. I wanted to know when PG&E might be undergrounding the power wires in her area, so researched the issue. Their progress to put wires underground is not very promising in general, but it is interesting to see how little is actually being done, especially in the rural CZU Fire areas and other fire-prone areas.
Take a look
WHAT ABOUT RULE 20 FUNDS?
I remembered hearing the County Board of Supervisors discuss funding available for undergrounding utilities in the County. I wondered what progress the County is making on this, and if it might help my friend, who lives on a major evacuation route in the County. On March 23, 2021, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors approved Resolution 70-2021, identifying critical evacuation routes in all Districts except #4 to receive this financial support, under Rule 20.
RESOLUTION NO. 70-2021
Page-2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT this Board finds, determines, and declares that Pacific Gas and Electric Company be requested to pay from the County’s existing allocation of funds for utility undergrounding for the conversion of electric service panels to underground services up to $1,500 per service entrance, excluding permit fees, in accordance with Paragraph A.3.b of California Public Utility Commission Electric Rule 20 for the Underground Utility Districts No. 20 thru 25The public hearing and Board action associated added County Code Chapter 9.74: Chapter 9.74 UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICTS
Here is what the staff report stated:
Executive Summary
On August 18, 2020, the Board accepted a list of proposed utility undergrounding projects under Rule 20A and directed Public Works to return with a resolution of intention to declare which underground utility districts shall be formed, with a noted priority for underground utility districts along critical evacuation routes. Background Six districts on that list have been chosen which provide geographic equity throughout the county. No critical evacuation routes were identified for District 4. Projects are listed in order of priority of which the most recent project was completed in District 2 in the Seacliff Drive area.District 1 – Soquel San-Jose Road
Project Site Corridor Limits
a. 1.13 miles Laurel Glen Road to Olive Springs Road
b. 0.73 miles Olive Springs Road to Hoover Road
c. 1.19 miles Hoover Road to Amaya Ridge RoadDistrict 5 – Bear Creek Road
Project Site Corridor Limits
a. 1.73 miles Harmon Gulch Road to Starr Creek RoadDistrict 3 – Empire Grade
Project Site Corridor Limits
a. 1.94 miles Pine Flat Road to Alba RoadDistrict 2 – Trout Gulch / Valencia Road
Project Site Corridor Limits
a. 1.44 miles Quail Run Road to Martha’s WayIn accordance with Rule 20A guidelines, the boundary for the proposed underground utility district includes all full parcels that are served by utility poles within the proposed district. Parcels that are served by a pole that is outside of the proposed district are excluded from the boundary.
Section A of the California Public Utility Commission’s Electric Rule 20 requires electric utility companies to allocate a portion of their revenue to Cities and Counties to fund the undergrounding of overhead utilities. Creating underground districts for each project site will place these projects in the queue for funding.
Analysis
As of May 31, 2020, the work credit balance for Santa Cruz County is $17,510,210. Approximately $500,000 per year is added to the work credit balance. It is estimated that undergrounding electric utilities along a rural route costs approximately $500 per linear foot or $2,640,000 per mile. Additionally, Rule 20A allows for a 5 year “borrow forward” type loan of approximately $2,500,000 for approved utility districts that have been passed by the Board with a resolution.Soooo, what has been done???? Hmmm….. Contact your County Supervisor and ask: Board of Supervisors
Here is information about Rule 20:
CPUC Rule 20 Undergrounding Programs — FAQs
What is the total length of above-ground power lines served by the electric investor-owned utilities?
California has approximately 25,526 miles of transmission lines, and approximately 239,557 miles of distribution lines, of which approximately 147,000 miles of distribution lines are overhead.
(Source: CPUC Undergrounding Programs Description (ca.gov))
CPUC Undergrounding Programs Description
Conversion of Overhead Electric Lines to Underground Facilities and Construction of New Underground Electric Lines
How do cities participate in Overhead Conversion Program? Is it the utility or the city that determines whether a city needs to convert overhead lines?
For Rule 20 Program, Cities identify overhead lines that they wish to convert to underground and in consultation with their investor owned utility (IOU) determine if the conversion project qualifies for any of the Rule 20 A, B, C or D programs. If qualified utility ratepayer funds will cover between 0 and 100% of the costs of the conversion project as detailed below.
Communities interested in overhead conversion identify a project and work with the utility to determine whether it qualifies for utility funding.
How are the credits allocated to each local government? Is it yearly? Is there a formula? Is one credit equal to $1? How many credits are local governments currently banking
The electric utilities annually allocate funds to each of the cities and unincorporated counties (collectively referred to as communities) that the utilities serve in their service territories. Yes, there is a formula and 50 percent of the work credit allocation is based on the proportion of overhead meters in the community to the total overhead meters in the service territory, and the other 50% is based on the total meters in the community (above and below ground) to the total meters in the service territory. Each work credit is equal to $1. The local governments across the state which are served by the investor-owned electric utilities currently have $950,627,101 collectively in unused funds that have been banked.
Under the current Electric Rule 20A Tariff, there is no limit to the number of years a community may accumulate Rule 20A work credits.
COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENTS AT ALL-TIME HIGH
I don’t need to tell you, the reader, that it is expensive to live in Santa Cruz County, but owning property is becoming a real economic challenge. Every ballot holds at least one more economic wound when local sales tax and parcel taxes get added…all for good causes, but the wound bleeds more for those who are on fixed incomes, or barely able to pay basic expenses. How long can this happen without forcing more to leave?
Thank goodness for Prop 13. Otherwise, all would be lost for the Commons, and super-wealthy investors from “over the hill” and abroad would take all. Think about this as you read the recent Santa Cruz County press release below:
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLL SETS NEW RECORD
Assessor-Recorder Sheri Thomas announced that the 2025-26 Assessment Roll has reached a new all-time high of $64.7 billion, an increase of$3.6 billion, or 5.95 percent over the prior year. The 2025–26 property tax roll reflects the net assessed value of all real, business, and personal property in Santa Cruz County as of January 1, 2025, after applying exemptions for homeowners, disabled veterans, and qualifying nonprofit organizations. The primary drivers of this year’s growth were changes in property ownership and new construction. While the total roll increased by 5.95%, the vast majority of property owners will see only a 2% increase in assessed value, thanks to the protections guaranteed by Proposition 13. “The property tax roll helps fund the local services our residents rely on—like public schools, fire protection, and libraries—and it remains one of the largest sources of discretionary revenue for the County’s general fund,” said Assessor-Recorder Sheri Thomas.
[link to PDF on the county website]
THIS AB 470 LEGISLATION WOULD ELIMINATE LANDLINES
Contact your local elected representatives today to ask for their NO vote on AB 470.
When electricity goes out, most all of the people in my rural neighborhood have no telephone service, unless they held onto their hard-wired copper landline phone service. Many “landlines” still disappear when the power goes out, because they depend on internet service, which also disappears when the power goes out.
AT&T is again attempting to convince the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to allow dropping this critical lifeline service, but now Assemblymember Tina McKinnor’s AB470 threatens to give AT&T what the corporate magnate wants…eliminate having to provide Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) landline service to areas deemed to have an alternative service…such as the likes that disappears in emergencies.
Senator John Laird: Contact Us
Calling all Senate Appropriations Committee members takes only about five minutes of your time: Members | Senate Appropriations Committee
Here is a link to the AB470 legislation: California AB470 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session
California AB470 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session
Bill Text (2025-07-17) Telephone corporations: carriers of last resort. [Re-referred to Com. on APPR.]
Many thanks to Ms. Nina Beety for the information below:
AB 470 goes to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Aug. 18. This is its last committee hearing before the full Senate votes. The California Assembly has already approved the bill.
Senate Appropriations Committee
Agenda
Hearing: Aug 18 @ 10:00 am in 1021 O Street, Room 2200Then it will go to a full Senate vote.
This committee’s jurisdiction is on costs, not consumer protection, coverage, safety, etc. Talk about issues on COLR and landlines in terms of costs to the public, the taxpayers, and the state, as well as your personal costs to have COLR and landline taken away.
When you write to the Committee and your state senator, the letter should start with a heading that says something like “AB 470 – OPPOSE”
Then the first sentence should state that you respectfully oppose AB 470, and the last line should urge their rejection/ or a “no” vote on AB 470.This is the last chance any community organizations have to oppose this bill in the official record.
If anyone has contact with Sen. Anna Caballero, formerly mayor of Salinas, please reach out to her. She is a very powerful, senior member of the legislature. She previously voted yes in the Energy and Telecom committee.
Please take action on this urgent issue including contacting your cities and county to send a letter opposing AB 470. If there are town hall meetings or a chance to meet with your state senator during this summer recess, please talk to them about this bill, explain what’s at stake, and ask for their no vote.
COTONI-COAST NATIONAL MONUMENT OPENS AUGUST 15
This is from Supervisor Justin Cummings’ July 2025 Newsletter:
Cotoni Coast Dairies Grand Opening Celebration
- Friday, August 15th
- 10:30-12 PM
- 12:30- 3pm Inaugural Hike
Zachary Ormsby, BLM Field Manager, officially invites the residents of Davenport to the grand opening celebration of The Cotoni-Coast Dairies Unit of the California Coastal National Monument, which is scheduled to open this summer, hosted by Sempervirens Fund at the Cotoni-Coast Trailhead, Cement Plant Road, Davenport. Parking is limited; please carpool.
Please RSVP at: info@pfwconsulting.org
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. ATTEND A PUBLIC MEETING ON A TOPIC THAT MATTERS TO YOU AND ASK QUESTIONS.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.
Cheers,
Becky
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |

If there is a possibility for both farming and gardening, the term would be fardening. Fardening is far from farcical; the concept is important to contemplate. Let’s first consider the unique aspects of farming versus gardening.
Farming
There are few characteristics of farming that seem to approach rules. Farms take up a tremendous part of the world, totaling 15% of the terrestrial land mass. In our country, farming is about making money, but in some places, about 30% of farming globally, farming is about eating (aka ‘subsistence agriculture’). To make money or to feed their families, farmers largely remove much of what is natural on the land that they manage for crops. And so, most farmers are not environmentalists.
Gardening
Likewise, there are some traits that one can assign to most gardeners. Gardens occupy a miniscule portion of the Earth, even if you count large botanical gardens. Most gardeners don’t make money. The for-profit profession that approaches gardening has become known as ‘landscaping,’ but one would not call those workers gardeners. When gardeners raise food, they aren’t so hungry as to need to subsist on it; if they raise a lot of food, they don’t sell it, they give it away. Gardeners increasingly are attuned to nature, welcoming pollinators and birds. Gardeners enjoy the seasons and accept the variability of nature; if they don’t get some type of harvest this season, they roll with it.
Difficulties
It is becoming more difficult to both farm and garden. Climate change is affecting both practices as droughts and extreme storms cause havoc. Farming is also becoming more difficult in the developed world as regulatory burdens require a fair amount of time and money…with a profession that was already marginally profitable. Most farmers are having to increase the scale at which they operate to make enough money to support a family. But, good agricultural land is more and more scarce and so expensive. Much cropland has been poorly managed in the past, soil has been lost and degraded, fertility is low, and, for farmers, time is of the essence so long term investment in improving soil is mostly beyond reach.
Gardening is becoming more difficult for many other reasons. As housing costs rise, many homes don’t have gardening space. Some people have no time to garden, anyway. They are too busy having to earn money to pay the bills. The COVID pandemic made many more people into gardeners, though, and now over half of US households report having gardens. Almost half of those are growing food, probably because produce is becoming so darned expensive (and tasteless!).
The Space In Between
There are a fair number of highly productive gardeners who give away or trade their crops. And, there are a fair number of farmers who aren’t making any money. I suggest that both qualify as fardeners. Their commonalities: producing lots of food for the joy of it and being good stewards of the Earth. They revel in production. The way they produce food is akin to art. They are gentle, kind, and generous. Fardeners would love to tell you about the nature intertwined with the land that they tend. They love it when others enjoy the food they create.
Farmers would say that fardeners aren’t serious farmers and gardeners would say that fardeners are too serious about producing food. Fardeners are stuck in between. They deserve recognition and appreciation. And, with food scarcity, their movement needs to accelerate.
Ask Not
Ask not what fardeners can do for you, but what you can do to help fardeners. Such endeavors take real work. First off, if you know someone like this, recognize them for what they are. Perhaps they don’t know that they are fardeners – let them know! Second, thank them for producing food. Third, if there is an offer to give you food, ask what you can do in return – barter, money, work-trade…all are good propositions to encourage them to keep going. Fardeners need breaks – for vacation, for illness – so, maybe you could help water when they’re gone.
Chances are good that you know a fardener. Make a resolution to reach out and thank them this week.
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |

Monday, July 28, 2025

Our current president, who appears to have monarchial ambitions, has supporters who are ready unabashedly to advocate for monarchy, out loud and unrestrained. One of those advocates for “monarchy” is Curtis Yarvin. I was pleased to see that Danielle Allen, a professor at Harvard, has been willing to take on Yarvin and his argument in favor of jettisoning our system of democratic self-government in favor of a frank, out-front “monarchy.” The New York Times had a nice write-up on the debate.
Does this seem outlandish to you? I mean, advocating for “monarchy” in America? Well, maybe we should take seriously the idea that some people are willing to mount a revolution in favor of “monarchy.” Professor Allen certainly takes that possibility seriously!
I am providing you with a link to Allen’s May 7, 2025, column in The Wall Street Journal, “Why I Debated Curtis Yarvin At Harvard.” If you can’t get access to that column in The Journal, paywall protections being what they are, try this link, which will take you to a website maintained by Harvard. Allen says, among other things – I am citing to the column in The Wall Street Journal – that “we have allowed political parties to capture our institutions, and to govern for their own sake rather than the public good.” Supposing that this is true (and there is some legitimacy to such a claim), “Monarchy” is not the answer – at least according to Allen. Instead, she says, “we need to renovate our democratic institutions, starting with party reform.”
Allen and I, in other words, are singing the same tune. I published a blog posting just a few days ago that I titled, “Is The Party Over?” We can’t expect the Democratic Party, or any other political party, to carry the full weight of what we generally call, “Democracy,” though I like to call our system “Self-Government.” I think my phrasing sends the right message. If we want to preserve the kind of democratic self-government established after the American Revolution – our “Democracy” – we need to get involved in government “ourselves.”
Here is another way to put it: “We, the people,” are supposed to be “running the place.”
WE are supposed to be in charge, not some “Monarch!”
If we aren’t “running the place,” or if we aren’t doing that in any effective way, then that’s on us, and we’d better hop to the task of getting on top of our responsibilities. If we don’t…. Well, check that image at the top of this blog posting. Somebody who looks just like that might want to fill the vacuum.
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |

The fallout from the Paramount/CBS News settlement with Donald Trump still echoes with the charges of bribery since most legal experts termed Trump’s lawsuit as baseless, succeeding only because a merger with Skydance Media was dependent on the FCC, a la the Trump administration, resulting in final approval of the $16 million payoff. That money won’t go directly to Trump, but to his future presidential library — a political monument touting his name, and forever to be recognized as part of his legacy, and his ability to shakedown his victims. As Michael Cohen writes on MeidasTouch, “If American democracy were a deer, it would be standing in the middle of the highway trying to reason with an oncoming semi. That semi, of course, is President Trump. And the Democrats? They’re standing on the shoulder with a clipboard, giving speeches about traffic safety. It’s been a decade since Trump first took a wrecking ball to our political institutions, and still — still — Democrats haven’t figured out how to contend with a president who doesn’t break rules so much as bend them until they no longer resemble anything that could be called a law.” Thus, we have the $16 million payoff by Paramount Global to Trump over a ‘60 Minutes‘ interview with Kamala Harris that was edited much like any other television interview — no “deliberate manipulation,” no “election interference,” and hardly “the biggest scandal in broadcast history.” Cohen reminds us that Trump’s original demand was for $10 billion before bumping it to $20 billion — not being one to allow reality to get in the way of leverage.
Press freedom groups called the suit “beyond frivolous,” and the CBS/60 Minutes release of raw footage and transcripts showed nothing diabolical was afoot. Cohen says the finality achieved its purpose: intimidation, silence, and compliance. A similar shakedown was paid by Disney/ABC after Trump sued George Stephanopoulos for defamation which resulted in a payout to avoid political and regulatory aggravation — no apology required, no admission of guilt sought, just the money will do! Cohen sees this as a new model of media control, which is not about censorship, but consequence. Trump won’t have to muzzle the press if he makes it expensive, risky, and exhausting to be truthful, with valid journalism becoming a liability. And those Democrats with the clipboards find they are no match for Trump’s second term, with no strategy to parry with a president who views the law as a tool, using litigation not as a means to justice, but as a tool to jimmy the works for political power and monetary benefit. Victims of the fallout brought the resignations of ’60 Minutes’ executive producer Bill Owens, and CBS News President Wendy McMahon. Owens cited loss of editorial independence, and McMahon said she disagrees on “the path forward,” — a path of compliance, timidity, and self-censorship facing legal intimidation and regulatory blackmail. Cohen says we are watching not only the erosion of the First Amendment coupled with monetization of fear, but Trump’s proving our guardrails are only as strong as the will to defend them. That will is lacking in media companies, law firms and the Democratic Party, allowing setting of the precedent that a president can and will sue the media into silence, funneling the proceeds into a personal monument, and skate away sans inquiry, with the opposition stumbling over whether to resist or concede. Cohen concludes that though Democrats are writing letters, making speeches, and asking America to believe that norms and decency are enough — not so, not anymore, and perhaps never again. The most noteworthy monument standing at present is the one to Paramount’s surrender.
As reported on The Hartmann Report, in the wake of the Paramount/CBS payoff, CBS is installing a ‘monitor‘ to look for ‘leftwing bias.’ Such as facts. Hartmann writes, “Reality has a well-known leftwing bias because much of the rightwing ideology out there is based, simply, in lies. Trickle-down economics benefits working class people. Immigrants are more likely to be criminals. Women lover getting abortions, particularly late-term. Unions steal from their workers to make ‘union bosses’ rich. Global warming is a hoax. The fossil fuel and chemical industry aren’t poisoning us and our environment. Green energy is more expensive than gas, oil, or coal. People on Medicaid and food stamps are lazy. Unemployment insurance discourages work. Raising the minimum wage increases unemployment. People only value a college education if they go into debt to get it. Healthcare for all Americans is too complicated for any government to create and administer. America was created as a Christian nation. Every single one of those statements is a demonstrable lie, but when they pop up on CBS News going forward don’t expect any push-back. As part of Skydance’s deal with Trump and the FCC, they not only gave the president a personal $16 million bribe (and apparently also offered a similar amount in free advertising) but also agreed to install in the CBS operations a ‘monitor’ to catch and kill any semblance of ‘leftwing bias.’ This is the sort of thing that routinely happens when nations lose their democracy, and is a flashing red sign that we’re in the actual process of losing ours.”
Joyce Vance writes on Civil Discourse that the CBS ‘bias monitor‘ prompts her to comment on George Orwell’s novel, ‘1984,’ which she quotes from in her upcoming book, ‘Giving Up Is Unforgivable.’ She calls Orwell’s novel ‘illuminating‘ as it looks at the risks of succumbing to fascism. “It underscores the vital role of open, truthful dialogues. It’s about the protection of democratic institutions against the corrosive effects of misinformation and attempts to rewrite history. A bias monitor. Accepted by a major news network. Not a huge public outcry as Trump brings the thought police of fiction into fact. We are overdue to read, or reread, 1984.” In the words of George Orwell: “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” In July of 2024, Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank that spawned Project 2025, and one of that document’s chief architects, said on Steve Bannon’s podcast, “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.” Vance tells us that after that announcement, Trump disclaimed all knowledge of Project 2025, and most people moved on. Four months later, Americans returned Donald Trump to office, and now we’re living under Project 2025 — lots of parallels to 1984. FBI deputy director, Dan Bongino tweeted that he knows things that you don’t — a dark brooding vibe, insinuating that there’s more, enflaming any conspiracy theory MAGA may wish to revisit.
In this same vein, Steven Asarch writes on MSNBC, “Franklin Roosevelt mastered the use of radio. John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan were top of the game on TV. And Donald Trump is the first AI slop president. Since January, Trump’s administration has used artificial intelligence to churn out a steady stream of fake images on social media, from alligators in ICE hats to crying members of Congress, while the official White House account on X has used it to portray the president as Superman, the pope and a villain from ‘Star Wars.'” Asarch brings up the AI-generated clip showing President Obama being forcibly detained by the FBI, and another showing various Democrats in orange prison jumpsuits tagged as the ‘Shady Bunch.’ He says it’s not harmless, necessarily, but it’s mostly just lame trolling usually done by a 14-year old boy, or someone who acts like one. It becomes another thing entirely when Trump does it, as he muddies the waters of reality, encouraging his MAGA horde to believe everything and nothing — to a Trumper steeped in these memes, the answer may not even matter. Past presidents may have lied or presented false evidence on occasion, but Trump at this stage of his political presence, has made us all so tired of his commonplace mission to blame everyone else for the problems he’s created, that it’s easily overlooked. Two risks: One is that malevolent forces disseminate a fake video that is widely believed, leading to real-world consequences. The other is that people stop believing video entirely — the next video leak of prisoners being tortured or a presidential candidate bragging about his sexual assaults, may lead Americans to shrug it off, saying it’s fake. Trump is creating a world in which you can’t trust anyone, facts are fungible and the truth is whatever your political team says it is.
MSNBC’s columnist, Michael A Cohen, writes that the biggest political story in the country is the Jeffrey Epstein saga, but that the hidden story is the cratering popularity of President Trump, with Real Clear Politics, Nate Silver, and Elliott Morris all agreeing that Trump has fallen to the lowest point in his tenure, and that the numbers are still in free fall. The populace is souring on his campaign promises, the very issues his zealotry has visited upon the country. Seeing and hearing stories about his ICE secret police and their unmerciful tactics, the construction of Alligator Alcatraz and a promise to build many more, and most of all, the economy and the threat of even higher prices with his new tariffs aren’t passing muster. If we are fortunate enough to hold midterm elections next year, and the president can’t move the needle into a more favorable position in the interim, the GOP could be in a world of trouble — and it’s difficult to see him dramatically changing his mind about any of his agenda items. In MAGA’s realm, the Epstein situation weakens Trump, and even if he can somehow maintain support in this area, he is taking his party into treacherous political waters. With his Big Beautiful Bill, Immigration and Customs gets a huge infusion of money with which he has promised to double down on mass deportation cruelty, and the tariffs have become his mantra, so voters can expect more Republican trickle-down in the form of pain. If Democrats can get it together, they should have an easier chore at recruiting viable candidates to pit against Republicans, while raising the money to compete successfully. Even the campaign slogan, ‘We’re not President Donald Trump,’ which was a midterm success during Trump’s first term, might work for them again.
It’s the Epstein files that are driving Washington, DC’s Republicans and the MAGA bunch, into insanity, prompting the House Speaker to call for the August recess despite unfinished business. And Trump took a cue from Johnson’s action, hotfooting it to Scotland on a business/pleasure trip — the business part being a combination of Trump Golf course business and US government business, all courtesy of the US taxpayer, of course. Scotland’s newspaper, ‘The National‘, greeted him with the headline: ‘CONVICTED US FELON TO ARRIVE IN SCOTLAND.’ Hordes of demonstrators with appropriate signs are welcoming him as well, so he will do his utmost to avoid them, but the Scottish press hasn’t let him forget about his pedo-buddy Epstein. It would probably be his preference to remain on his golf courses until September when Washington comes back to life. Nobody seems to know where JD Vance is hiding out, but he’s saying very little about Jeffrey Epstein in an effort to salvage his political future according to Trump biographer, Michael Wolff. Wolff says, “JD Vance cannot, for his own political future, lose the MAGA base, but at the same time he cannot lose Donald Trump. Go figure.” Some see Vance as the heir apparent to Trump, but the president may have a different view — “We’ll see,” he has said. JD hasn’t been in the White House spotlight lately, which some see as a diminished role in Trump’s hierarchy, with New York Times columnist, Jamelle Bouie describing his function as the ‘president’s official fanboy,’ able to effectively communicate his leader’s vile messages to the base. “And in addition to acting as cheer captain for his boss, Vance also works to give the administration a veneer of intellectualism to cover its cruelty, corruption, and incompetence — a spokesman for the president’s brand of national populism,” Bouie argues.
Even the First Lady is in the middle of the Epstein drama according to Michael Wolff, being “very involved” he commented to Joanna Coles of The Daily Beast. “She was very involved in this Epstein relationship,” Wolff says, adding that Melania was introduced to Trump through model agent, Paolo Zampolli, who had a relationship with both Trump and Epstein. “This is another complicated issue in this — where does she fit into all this? Where does she fit in the Epstein story? Into the whole culture of models of indeterminate age?” asks Wolff. The president has frantically tried to cast off the Epstein tie, trying to blame the Democrats, Obama and Biden, calling it a “witch hunt” and a “hoax.” But with the numerous stories in magazines, tabloids, and the shoeboxes full of photos online, Musk’s revenge won’t be an easy one to turn aside. If doing humiliating and irreparable damage to his former Oval Office buddy was the point with his infamous X post — “Trump is in the Epstein files” — Musk has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. The Washington Post’s Cat Zakrzewski wrote, “If Musk’s goal was merely to stoke the controversy without necessarily settling it, his mission has been accomplished — and then some.” Musk has danced around the periphery of the hidden files, and while not directly attacking Trump since then, he has lent no support either, simply remaining a potent political risk with his reaping of the spoils of his DOGE gleanings. Zakrzewski notes that the X hashtag ‘#TrumpIsAPedoRapist,’ has been popular, and that, “Allies of Musk serving in the Trump administration have had to tread carefully, largely declining to comment on the feud between the president and one of the world’s most powerful business leaders.” Trump posted on Truth Social that he wishes Elon and all US businesses well, for the good of the country, but Elon chose to ignore the post since he still carries a grudge toward the president and the administration for slashing tax credits for electric vehicle purchases, yet retaining subsidies for the petroleum industries.
The House Republican proposal that The Kennedy Center opera house should be renamed to honor Melania Trump— ‘First Lady Melania Trump Opera House‘ — may be on tenterhooks as the Epstein revelations come to light. A House panel voted 33-25 to approve the push to pay homage to the first lady, following President Trump’s takeover of the ‘woke’ institution and naming himself as board chairman. It’s unknown at this time when the GOP plans to bring the legislation to the House floor for a vote by the full chamber, and it’s also unknown if Melania is in rehearsals for the role of Floria Tosca to headline a premiere performance.
Satirist Andy Borowitz writes of his own take on the opera house action in ‘The Borowitz Report‘: “Millions of Americans support renaming of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts after the writer E. Jean Carroll, according to a poll released on Wednesday. Conversely, poll respondents opposed naming the venue after First Lady Melania Trump, strongly agreeing with the statement, ‘An arts center should not be named after someone who finds blood-red Christmas trees aesthetically pleasing.’ At the White House, press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the decision to rename the Kennedy Center after Mrs. Trump, stating, ‘Since President Trump took it over, the Kennedy Center has been just like the First Lady: renovated and vacant.'”
Broadcast TV’s late night hosts were quick to jump on Trump and his Jeffrey Epstein troubles. The Late Show’s Stephen Colbert began his monologue with, “It’s a great day to be me, because I’m not Donald Trump. That guy has got a lot of problems…the Epstein scandal just won’t kill itself.” About the thousand FBI agents who scoured approximately 100,000 records related to Epstein in order to flag any mentions of Trump, Colbert said, “That is a suspiciously Herculean effort. All the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t hide who Dumpty humped with his friend. You cannot blame Trump and his allies for being scared here, because the more we know about Trump’s relationship to Epstein, the more WE wish we didn’t.” Court records show that Trump flew on Epstein’s plane, the ‘Lolita Express‘, at least seven times, about which Colbert commented, “That doesn’t mean he did anything illegal, but it’s not a great look when you fly on the pedophile’s plane enough times to earn Diamond Pervert status.” ‘Late Night‘ host Seth Meyers referenced Trump’s Truth Social post about hitting the six months mark of his second term, “Wow, time flies.” “Does it though? Its’ been six months of this term, but we already did four years of you, and even when Biden was president, you were still the president of every news cycle. It feels like you’ve been president forever. I think it goes Washington, Jefferson, Adams, and then you,” Meyers responded. Meyers also quipped that Trump has finally named First Lady Melania as his emergency contact.
Speculation is high that a pardon for Jeffrey Epstein’s partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, is in the works, with Trump’s former personal attorney, Todd Blanche — now his personal attorney AND now deputy attorney general of the US — has been assigned the task of ‘interviewing‘ Maxwell to ‘garner more information‘ about the Epstein files. A former official who worked with Attorney General Pammy Ann Bondi in Florida predicted that Blanche would work out a “hidden pardon,” and in light of the firing of Maurene Comey who was handling the case for DOJ, it seems that any obstructions are being cleared. Dave Aronberg, Bondi’s former border czar, called this move “extraordinary” leading him to believe a lot of politics is involved, which might get Maxwell some immunity now and a pardon of sorts in the future — if she claims that Trump is innocent of any wrongdoing in the whole mess. Senator Adam Schiff says, “Clearly, this errand that Todd Blanche, the number-two at the Justice Department, is going on now is in his capacity as Trump’s defense attorney. He wants to know what this convicted child sex trafficker has to say about Donald Trump. And, certainly, she wants a pardon. This whole thing stinks to high heaven.” Attorney Ben Meiselas of ‘MeidasTouch‘ believes Trump is giving Ghislaine a golden ticket for a retrial.
With all this activity, Andy Borowitz has a hit upon where VP JD Vance might be found, his theory datelined from Edinburgh, Scotland: “Donald J Trump revealed on Monday that JD Vance has agreed to serve the remainder of Ghislaiine Maxwell’s prison sentence for her. ‘JD wasn’t thrilled about it, quite frankly,’ Trump told reporters. ‘He was crying like a dog. I told him to be a man. It’s only 20 years.’ As for Maxwell, Trump said, ‘I wish her well,’ adding that he expects her to be a ‘terrific vice president’.”
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |


EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.
EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.
August
“Every year, the bright Scandinavian summer nights fade without anyone’s noticing. One evening in August you have an errand outdoors, and all of a sudden it’s pitch-black. It is still summer, but the summer is no longer alive.”
~Tove Jansson
“Dear August, the end of Summer. Golden Sand is wetty by the rain water. Can I call it rainy season? No I can’t. What is the reason behind chilly and windy tan? Three shades of weather, conglomerate together. Whatever! I cannot define, It is my favourite, the August time!”
~Radhika Vijay
“You can’t buy happiness, but it’s Sunday, it’s August, the seas are working, your passport is valid, and your tooth doesn’t hurt – that’s enough for the wise.”
~Djura Kelj
“August is a gentle reminder for not doing a single thing from your new year resolution for seven months and not doing it for next five.”
~Crestless Wave
“The children start school now in August. They say it has to do with air-conditioning, but I know sadism when I see it.”
~Rick Bragg

A small compilation of Peter Kay. I much enjoy his “misheard lyrics” bits… |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
