Greensite… Back soon… Steinbruner… Stop lithium BESS… Aptos apartment complex… property tax assessments… Hayes… Our Ongoing Civil War… Patton… Curtains For The Movie Theater?… Matlock… ignorance…fascinate…muzzle…swingiest… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Alexander and Stellan Skarsgård
Quotes on… “Showing up”
|
|
If you want to pitch in to |
TIME KEEPS ROLLING ON… It’s amazing. No matter how much you feel like the world should just stand still for a freaking moment, it won’t. I’m a little lost, but I’ll be OK.
Enjoy this week’s column, and we’ll see you again next week!
~Webmistress
THE MUPPET SHOW. Disney+. Series. (8.4 IMDb) ![]()
Or, as I like to think of it, ANTI-MELANIA. They both star a woman who is completely self-obsessed, clinging to a less attractive mate’s position: I mean, of course, the return of … THE MUPPET SHOW!
That’s right, the same old gang at the same old theatre. Minus the legendary Jim Henson and Frank Oz (who is still alive, at time of writing), it actually defies the concern of losing the magic – it’s almost like it never ended. Which is a good thing. Only one episode so far, but it’s off to a good start. Worth a watch!
~Sarge
LA BELLE ET LA BÊTE (1946). Disney+, Max. Movie. (7.4 IMDb) ![]()
Just ran back across this amazing version of Beauty and the Beast (literally haven’t watched it since the early 90’s), with amazing magical settings, and honestly a beast you like so much more than the Prince underneath. There are a number of visuals that have found their way into other lesser films. Jean Marais literally smolders in his cat-like beast. In French with English subtitles. Ça vaut le détour.
~Sarge

RIOT WOMEN. BritBox. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
In the early ’90s, a musical revolution erupted – one part punk, many parts feminism – spearheaded by bands like Bikini Kill and Bratmobile (<3): "Riot Grrrl". It laid the foundation for bands like L7 and Hole, whose raw energy and unapologetic attitudes reshaped rock music. Fast forward 35 years, and those fierce grrrls are now navigating the challenges of menopause. Enter Riot Women, a series that follows a group of "women of a certain age" who've had it up to here with hot flashes and feeling invisible. What starts as a joke quickly transforms into something more: they decide to start their own band. While only a few episodes are currently available on BritBox (released weekly), the show's got heart, humor, and plenty of punch. If you've ever felt overlooked or dismissed, Riot Women is a riotous reminder that it's never too late to reclaim your voice. Available exclusively on BritBox (via PrimeVideo for me) - worth a watch, so far. ~Sarge
COVER-UP. Netflix. Movie. (7.5 IMDb)
I was all of eight years old when I first heard about William Calley and the massacre at My Lai. No details, just that someone had destroyed a village. For years I assumed it was a bombing: distant, impersonal. I was today years old when I finally learned just how VERY up-close and personal it actually was. I’ve experienced true tunnel vision only twice in my life. This made it the third.
“Cover-Up” is an extraordinary first-hand (self-)account of the life and career of Seymour Hersh, a journalist hip-deep in some of the most damning exposés of the last half-century – from My Lai to Watergate to Abu Ghraib.
Fair warning: the first quarter focuses on My Lai, and the images and descriptions are brutal enough to send you – perhaps not for the first time – into the streets to protest the Vietnam War.
This is the biography of an irascible reporter who will stop at nothing – for better or worse – to get at the truth. It’s deeply uncomfortable viewing, and absolutely worth it.
~Sarge
PRINCESS BRIDE. Hulu. Movie. (8 IMDb)
Meathead made good…
- Spinal Tap
- When Harry Met Sally
- Stand By Me
- A Few Good Men
- Misery
- The. Princess. Effing. Bride.
Undoubtedly, you’ve all heard about the murder of Rob & Michele Reiner, allegedly by their son Nick (who suffered from drug addiction and schizophrenia – not, as the Tangerine Pustule would have you believe, from “T***p Derangement Syndrome”).
Rather than dwell on the sadness, I’d point you to the brightest light Carl Reiner’s boy ever put into the world: The Princess Bride. It’s a film that keeps finding new fans, while never losing the old ones. I read William Goldman’s 1973 novel and was in no way disappointed by Reiner’s loving, pitch-perfect adaptation.
My review? Go watch it again. In this terrible time, belief in the triumph of True Love feels urgently necessary. Worth a watch — again, and again, and again.
~Sarge
JAY KELLY. Netflix. Movie. (6.6 IMDb)
Jay Kelly opens with a whiff of Day for Night by Truffaut, and plays like a confession muttered into a drink at closing time. It’s a film about old age not as wisdom earned, but as damage tallied: friendships undervalued, moments lost in a “life lived stupid”. On that note it was very personal for me. There’s no grand reckoning here, no cinematic redemption arc, just the quiet, gnawing regret of realizing that time didn’t betray you; you squandered it yourself. Also, a touch of Rashomon in how a memory is different depending on who’s recounting it. George Clooney, Adam Sandler, Laura Dern, and a very old Stacy Keach. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
WHEN WE WENT MAD! PrimeTV. Movie. (7.1 IMDb)
A loving tribute to MAD Magazine – the publication (starting in 1952) that taught several generations how to distrust authority, mock sincerity, and never, ever respect a straight face. This film rounds up the Usual Gang of Idiots for one last glorious food fight. Mixing interviews with MAD’s brilliant artists, writers, and editors alongside famous readers who clearly had their brains permanently rewired by Alfred E. Neuman, it charts the magazine’s outsized influence on comedy, politics, and general American smartassery. What emerges is less a tidy history than a celebration of joyful vandalism: a reminder that MAD didn’t just parody culture, it trained its readers to question it, break it, and laugh while doing so. Honestly, the modern world could use an antivirus like MAD again. Worth a watch (and a back cover fold-in).
~Sarge
MY NEXT GUEST NEEDS NO INTRODUCTION WITH DAVID LETTERMAN. Netflix. Series. (7.8 IMDb)
If you’ve missed David Letterman since he left late night, he hasn’t gone far: he’s simply changed channels. My Next Guest Needs No Introduction on Netflix gives us Dave unfiltered, freed from network guardrails and sitting down for deep, intimate conversations with a carefully curated lineup of guests.
He launched the series in 2018 with Barack Obama, even joining Senator John Lewis for a walk across the bridge in Selma. Since then, he’s interviewed everyone from Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Miley Cyrus to Melinda Gates, Billie Eilish, and Ryan Reynolds – often in their own homes or creative spaces.
Unvarnished, thoughtful, and disarmingly honest, it’s a quietly addictive pleasure to watch.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes, then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
Gillian will be back soon!
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
If you disagree with the County’s plan to allow New Leaf Energy (based in Massachusetts) and Sequoia Energy LLC (based in Canada) place 300 metal cargo containers filled with explosive, flammable lithium batteries next to Schapiro Knolls low income housing (87 famlies) and hundreds of other working class people in the 90 Minto Road area of Watsonville, please sign this petition:
While the New Leaf Energy developer is assuring the County the project will be safe, due to a different design and battery chemistry than what went up in flames at Moss Landing last January, the truth is the project would still be a hazard to local residents and the environment. the same design and battery chemistry went up in flames recently in Warwick, NY:
https://www.energy-storage.news/battery-storage-fire-in-upstate-new-york-involved-unauthorised-system-mayor-says/
There was an event on February 5: Climate Justice and the Moss Landing Battery Fire — Institute of the Arts and Sciences. Keep your eyes peeled for more events and ways you can support.
STRATEGIC PLAN SPECIAL WORKSHOP
Imagine gathering all the high-level County Department Directors, all five County Supervisors and their staff and County Counsel in one spot for an entire day, while hiring a consultant from the east coast to facilitate a discussion about what it means to be a County Supervisor and distribute a flurry of sticky notes? That’s what happened at the January 30 Special Meeting of the Board of Supervisors, beginning at 9am and lasting until 3:30pm, to update the County’s Strategic Plan.
The agenda DID NOT INCLUDE PUBLIC COMMENT. I inquired about that unfortunate issue the day before with the Clerk of the Board, and was informed that there would be an opportunity for Public comment, but she was not sure when. It would depend on the discretion of the Chair of the Board, Monica Martinez.
The meeting was held at Simpkins Center Community Room (at least it was not in the expensive Paradox Hotel).
I listened in at 9am as the Special Meeting began because I knew I could not arrive in time to be there in person, due to traffic, and did not want to miss my opportunity to speak if the only time were to be at the very beginning. I heard Chair Martinez annoounce that the only Public Comment time would be AT THE VERY END OF THE DAY. Wow.
The Consultant, Ms. Aviva Luz Argote, then began by asking the Supervisors to take some time to reflect on what they feel their job entails. Hmmm…
The colorful and artistic note-taking by her staff began…..
Then began the “data walk through the islands of opportunity”, where each Supervisor met with County staff to discuss concerns regarding various topics…..
Supervisor Monica Martinez at the Transportation and Infrastructure “island of opportunity”…..
Supervisor Felipe Herandez had been absent all morning but finally arrived close to lunchtime to participate here
in the environmental “island of opportunity”…..which was located adjacent to the free catered lunch provided for everyone…Hmmm….our tax dollars at work.
Did the Public Comment opportunity ever happen????? I could not stay the entire day to participate, but I did take advantage of the Public Comment “island of opportunity”. It was blank when I arrived, even though I was informed that a member of the public had been there earlier and wrote comment on the tablet.
Had it already been shredded, I wondered?
I filled it up with colorful comments…..
CEO Nicole Coburn let me know that each Supervisor will now be holding Town Hall Meetings to receive public comment on the County’s Strategic Plan update.
“..a roadmap that will help guide County priorities, investments, and services in the years ahead. The Strategic Plan is intended to reflect community values and help the County respond to both current and emerging challenges, including housing, public safety, climate resilience, infrastructure, and overall quality of life. Community input is essential to this effort, and residents are encouraged to share their ideas, priorities, and perspectives. To view the current plan, visit sccvision.us.”
Hmmm…..Maybe it is time to invest in the companies that produce those colorful sticky notes…..
THANKS TO APTOS TIMES FOR ILLUMINATING IMPENDING LARGE SEVEN-STORY APARTMENT PROJECT IN APTOS
Who would know that Swenson Builder is moving behind the County’s curtain to build a seven-story apartment and nearly 200 townhomes on the former Par 3 Golf Course in Aptos, next to State Park Drive and Highway One? Who would know that the County could allow all this with NO public hearings required?
Many thanks to the Aptos Times for providing clear information on the status, because otherwise, in my opinion, the public would have been deceived by responses from the Second District County Supervisor office. Housing Proposed on Old Par 3 Golf Course
I had recently written Second District Supervisor Kim DeSerpa to ask if there would be public hearings and environmental review? She assured me “I think all those things will all happen.”
However, her analyst, Maureen McCarty, wrote differently:
During the pre-application phase, there isn’t any public noticing.
If and when a project moves forward to the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the public can receive hearing notices by signing up for the relevant distribution lists:
Planning Commission (PC)
If you’d like to receive an email with a link to the public hearing packet, please email Donovan.Arteaga@santacruzcountyca.gov to be added to the Planning Commission distribution list..
Zoning Administrator (ZA)
If you’d like to receive an email with a link to the public hearing packet, please email Riley.Rhodes@santacruzcountyca.gov to be added to the Zoning Administrator distribution list.
I responded with the following information from the County’s website:
Neighborhood Meeting
After the DRG, but before you file your application, you must hold a meeting with your neighbors to discuss your proposal with them. This is a very important step and can reduce or eliminate neighborhood concerns at the Planning Commission and/or Board of Supervisors public hearings. You must provide a report about the meeting along with your application (see Guidelines for Neighborhood Notification of Proposed Development).
County Code Section 18.10.113 describes requirements for a neighborhood meeting that is conducted prior to application for any project acted upon by the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors.
Meeting Summary. The County Code requires that a summary of the neighborhood meeting(s) be submitted with the application. No application shall be deemed complete without the summary of the neighborhood meeting when one is required.
[Planning Commission and
Board of Supervisors Discretionary Permits]
I attended Supervisor DeSerpa’s constituent meeting on January 29, as noticed on her webpage and in her newsletter. She was not there, but her two Analysts were. When I asked the status of the “Village on the Green” project proposed for the Par 3 parcel, Ms. McCarty assured me nothing was happening yet, and reaffirmed her opinion that there was no public meeting required before Swenson files an application.
Two days later, the Aptos Times report illuminated that Swenson filed a pre-application on November 20, 2025 and is in consultation with the County’s Development Review Group (DRG), and that the County enacted rules to allow projects like this to be ministerially approved, with NO public hearings needed. We also now know that the County has added this large Village on the Green project, proposed for 2600 Mar Vista Drive in Aptos, to the CDI (Planning) Major Projects webpage:
Should we trust this process? Should we trust those who are guiding the “Village on the Green” project through County approvals?
Supervisor DeSerpa appointed former Vice-President of Swenson Builder to represent the Second District on the County Planning Commission, even though he does not live in the Second District.
You may also remember that in 2016, Swenson Builder illegally removed an underground fuel tank from the Aptos Village Project area where the historic Lam-Mattison Apple Dryer had been that potentially contained toxic bunker oil, but covered the area up and hauled the tank away during the night, never alerting any officials. Builders to pay $125K for mishandling Aptos Village storage tank | The Pajaronian | Watsonville, CA Swenson was never made to install groundwater monitoring wells in the area, even though the groundwater table is shallow, and Soquel Creek Water District‘s new Granite Way Well is directly in the downflow path of a potential plume from the buried tank site.
You may be interested in knowing that Aptos Village Project developers pirated water from Soquel Creek Water District via an unauthorized connection on Granite Way. It was brought to the District’s attention by an observant fellow named Tom Stumbaugh. Curiously, it took quite awhile for the District to take any action after being notified.
Please write Supervisor DeSerpa with your thoughts: <Kimberly.DeSerpa@santacruzcountyca.gov> or call the office 831-454-2200.
Many thanks to the Aptos Times reporter Jon Chown for bringing this large project proposed in Aptos to light! Housing Proposed on Old Par 3 Golf Course
Here are other 100% affordable subsidized housing projects in the pipeline…what about public hearings?
CDI – Community Development & Infrastructure > Planning > Housing > County Housing Projects > Current Projects
TAXATION ERRORS CONTINUED
Folks, check your property tax bills carefully, because there may be erroneous assessments!
In the last issue of Bratton Online, I reported having discovered what appeared to be an error in the County’s taxation of a mobile home in Live Oak for fire protection by neighboring fire agency Santa Cruz County Fire, which is funded by two separate County Service Area (CSA) 48 assessments. Since Central Fire District provides fire and emergency medical response for the Live Oak area, this $189 charge made no sense.
General Services Dept., the agency overseeing Santa Cruz County Fire and CSA 48 assessments, merely explained that the parcel (a mobile home) was included in the applicable Tax Rate Area deemed by the County Assessor to be included in the State Board of Equalization Tax Rate.
That non-answer made no sense, so I asked for an investigation.
Here is the answer…
Parcel APN 0266510420 was reviewed and determined to have been incorrectly assigned to a different tax rate area. It has now been corrected to the appropriate tax rate area (082-040), and the CSA 48 – County Fire assessment will be removed. Any applicable refunds for prior years will be processed.
This will be a significant amount of money due this property owner because that particular CSA 48 assessment went into effect in 2020. The GSD staff assured me that the property owner will receive an amended tax bill immediately.
Given that Second District Supervisor DeSerpa has asked staff for a report explaining the cause of the problem with 24,000 parcels being erroneously billed regarding the Pajaro Valley Health Care District assessments, we should all be carefully examining our property tax bills and perhaps checking in with others to do the same, especially those who may be vulnerable.
Write your County Supervisor and ask about this issue…what is the County Assessor doing to check the validity of Tax Rate Areas? The number to call is 831-454-2200 to talk with your Supervisor. Write the Board of Supervisors <boardofsupervisors@santacruzcountyca.gov>
RIP TOM STUMBAUGH
I was saddened to learn that Mr. Tom Stumbaugh passed away recently. He and I worked together to illuminate many questionable issues about the Aptos Village Project. Tom discovered that the developers were pirating water from Soquel Creek Water District during the first year of the project’s construction. He testified against the County moving the centrally-located Metro bus stop to the far end and on a non-ADA compliant grade without handrails, just so Swenson Builders could build the new Parade Street entrance to the project from Soquel Drive.
Tom was a great writer, and took great pleasure in penning his Letter to the Editor and driving to Watsonville to personally deliver it to The Pajaronian office. Here are a couple of his letters: Blinding Headlights
The Worst President of the United States
Rest in Peace, Tom. You lived a full life and inspired many.
WRITE ONE LETTER. MAKE ONE CALL. SIGN THE PETITION TO STOP LARGE LITHIUM BESS PROJECTS IN OUR COUNTY.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK, AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
While the PBS American Revolution series is popular (as it should be), I recently watched Ken Burn’s Civil War series with equal delight, pondering parallels with the current situation. As readers have come to expect, my reflections turn to Earth, Nature, and the local environment.
The War Didn’t End
There are frequent mutterings about how our Nation is fracturing and worries about a new civil war. In Ken Burns’ documentary, during the last episode, historian Barbara Fields reflects on the question of who won the Civil War. She says obviously the Union Army did in the sense that wars are won by who is left with the ability to use their weapons at the end of the conflict. But, she says, if we reflect on winners and losers as those who get (or lose) “something higher and better,”….”it gets more complicated.” She says that if the Civil War was about creating a citizenry of equals, then the civil war continues: “if some are living in houses and others in the street, the civil war is still going on.” I suggest that the issue of being un-housed now seems so ‘yesterday’ because the color of one’s skin has frightfully thrown us into an even closer understanding of Barbara Fields’ supposition.
Social War Hides Environmental Plundering
As with the Civil War, I am heartened that the vast majority of US citizens oppose those who would divide the Nation to brazenly subjugate huge portions of the population which are seen, to them, as ‘others.’ These are the peaceful protesters we are seeing increasingly on the streets. And, as with the Civil War, I am concerned that the racist minority seem well armed and dangerous, seemingly pleased to be manipulated by the wealthy elite to stand for ridiculous notions of tribalism and homeland, and so poor in wealth, body, and spirit that they have little to lose if they are called on to fight bloody battles. The majority is quite unprepared for those people’s rage, and they somehow (ironically for many) are assured by the police and military, which are quickly and methodically being separated from The People those institutions are meant to serve. This ‘social divide’ of course is an artificial construct based on greed, manipulated by the (increasingly) few. I am full of consternation that this divide is being used to distract us from the much more real concern that should unite The People: the plundering of the Earth for short-term wealth.
The Plundering Unites
What unites the Democrats and Republicans more than anything? The plundering of Nature. Nothing divides them in this endeavor. How brazenly they pursue it. The Republicans force feed The People the pill that makes them accept the destruction of our world while the Democrats slip the notion into the water to make sure it goes unnoticed. The greed-torn media is the distraction machine and our minds have become patterned to the conflicts it highlights, which rarely include the destruction of nature. Long gone from the media melee are any notions that the Earth itself is being completely unraveled. Somehow, completely dysfunctional Climate Change ‘solutions’ are cheered. How about launching meaningful audits of California’s Carbon cap-and-trade system…oh, no- don’t do that – there is too much money for “conservation” NGO’s at stake!
Imagine All The People
Imagine a Martin Luther King for the Earth. Imagine if someone had the charisma, the stage, the backing, the oratory prowess, the wisdom and intelligence to galvanize people to wake up and realize that they are united in the cause of saving the Earth. The Environmental Rights movement would quickly grow, and the Green Wave would dash apart whatever bulwarks the Ultra Rich might hastily erect. “Environmental Justice” would replace “Corporate Injustice” all the way to the Supreme Court. “We The People” would become “We The People of The Earth.”
Saviours Aside
Saviours aside, we build the Green Wave ourselves, right now. As many are ‘writing off’ ever speaking to the ‘other side,’ it has become more crucial than ever to bridge those divides through the common concerns of Earth plundering. Hidden under the headlines is the recent bi-partisan funding of what passes for popular ‘nature’ programs – parks, science, etc. They know what unites us, but don’t want to make much of it, for obvious reasons.
Do you hear anything from your local Democratic representatives about what Federal policy changes mean for our personal access to clean water or clean air…for the plant and animal species teetering on the brink of extinction? Of course not- their corporate backers would be irate! Anyway, we stopped asking about these ‘minor’ issues. Please, let’s start the conversation with the ‘other side’ by simply asking things like ‘how do you see the political candidates comparing with their platforms protecting…clean water….clean air…wildlife…parks.’
You Are It
We must have those difficult conversations and we must be patient as they play out over the long term, but we have crucial votes to cast in the near term. Politics is ‘shaking up’ with splits in traditional forces. Beware of those who would continue the tired distractions with tired solutions, ignoring the uniting force of opposing Earth plundering. Voting for our personal needs of economic prosperity, healthcare, etc. must be at least matched by the greater concern of an intact Biosphere. Imagine northern voters in the Civil War who voted against Lincoln because their grocery prices were going up and slavery was a secondary concern.
Can you name a single environmental platform of any of the local candidates you have voted for? City Council member platforms to reduce Earth plundering? County Supervisor platforms to answer the great concerns of a degrading planet? State Assemblyperson stances to reverse environmental degradation? Federal Congressional representative proposals to reverse Trump’s anti-environment policies? We need those answers and we need better candidates NOW.
Center-Right Democratic Presidential Candidate Rahm Emanuel’s fundamental answer to everything is educational reform. Other potential candidates are suggesting ridiculously incremental tax reforms to reduce economic disparities. No one has yet come forward with a platform that is primarily For-the-Earth. From very local to national politics, let’s empower those people to help to win the most consequential battle of our ongoing Civil War.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Monday, February 2, 2026

In an “Upward Mobility” column in The Wall Street Journal – a column that appeared in print on December 9, 2025 – Jason L. Riley opined that it would “soon be curtains for the movie theatre.” He could be right! As a “pull quote” in the hardcopy edition of the newspaper put it: “older generations can’t be bothered to go, and younger people want to stream their films.” Right at the end of his essay, Riley expanded on this “pull quote,” as follows:
Younger generations raised on smaller screens can’t miss what they never experienced, and they seem mostly to enjoy staring at themselves on their devices, which is a topic for another day. In any case, streaming allows them to consume movies on their terms rather than the theater’s, and Netflix is giving them what they want.
Let me address Riley’s “topic for another day” right here – and right now. As he notes, our relationships with truth and reality, are now most typically experienced as we gaze into a “screen” of some kind. That includes how we relate to the movies we watch, but the same phenomenon is evident in education, in business, in social interchanges, and in politics. A preference for human interactions mediated by our “screens,” and by “online” exchanges instead of “real life” exchanges, has diverted a lot of real life political action into online engagement – when it hasn’t switched it off, entirely.
I don’t think this kind of approach to politics will “compute,” to pick a verb. Effective political action requires real people gathering in small groups, meeting frequently and jointly working to achieve specific governmental actions – making our so-called “elected representatives” actually represent the people they are charged with representing.
I recently had occasion to respond to a Santa Cruz County resident who is upset with a proposed development proposal in an unincorporated part of the County, and who had written me for encouragement, asking if she and her neighbors were, now, basically, “powerless.” As I read Riley’s observations about the movies, and thought about some of the political implications of the migration of so much of our lives, including our politics, “online,” my advice to this county resident came to mind:
I don’t really know anything about this proposed development. It’s in “the County,” not the City, so the land use policies of the County will apply, and the Supervisor who represents this District is, by reputation, pretty pro-development. State law is also very supportive of higher density housing developments, so I am sure this is an uphill battle. However, “powerless” is not the right word.
The key thing, I believe, is to have an organized group in opposition. Such a group would need to meet, in person, on a frequent (probably weekly) basis, and learn everything that can be known about the project, and then build broad opposition to the project as now proposed, and then make the County Supervisor who represents this area know how much opposition there is, so the Supervisor starts working to respond to local constituents.
Bottom line, local residents are not “powerless,” but they need to get organized to consolidate and maximize their power – they need to spend a lot of time (and probably some money) to impact governmental decisions, in an environment in which lots of residents are really “detached,” and in which the state government is now affirmatively helping development interests defeat local residents who [oftentimes quite properly] are opposed to a development proposal that might have very negative environmental and other impacts.
The need for “in-person” engagement is necessary for effective political action at all levels – local, state, and national. To be politically effective, in other words, we need to do it in “real life,” not “online,” and we need to reallocate our time so that “politics” and “political organizing” gets some increased and appreciable share of the time not already absolutely committed somewhere else.
Less “entertainment,” and more “engagement.” Whatever the future for the movie theater, that’s the prescription that will keep our politics healthy.
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
FACE OFF, LINES DRAWN, WISDOM FOR A PRISONER
Judging by many of the letter writers to local newspapers, it seems that many of our Santa Cruz Countians assume that the USA is still a democratic republic — a view taken for granted for too long. Those writers praising President Trump’s one-year accomplishments, including DOGE’s tidying up the ‘deep state’ by firing workers which then necessitated call-backs of employees to right the ship of state — hardly a cost-saving maneuver. Closing the border and arresting the “worst of the worst” is a joke as Proud Boys/ICE hooligans attack, arrest, and kill US citizens, never to be considered a proud moment in our history. Invading Democratic Party controlled states and cities with National Guard troops and large contingents of ICE goons purportedly to ‘control crime’ is only a cover for political harassment. ‘Drug boat strikes’ with no proof of criminality, and killing survivors struggling in the water is a violation of the ‘rules of war’!? What should we think about a deranged, senile, grifting, narcissistic dictator who is untrustworthy about keeping his finger away from the red button on the doomsday football if the Epstein files begin to become too incriminating?
Isaac Asimov once warned that one of the dangers of a democracy is that for some, ‘democracy’ translates to “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” If we persist in this direction we might one day wake up without a democracy, and finally realize that our persistent disregard for the careful and reasoned cultivation of the truth plays right into the hands of a dictator. Bertrand Russell is quoted as saying, “First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent.” This brings up the farcical case(s) of Don Lemon and Georgia Fort being arrested for reporting on a Minneapolis church congregation’s protest against their pastor. The Trump administration has used the FACE Act in the charges, but the act itself was written, being passed in 1994, with a very specific purpose of protecting those who seek abortions without restricting First Amendment-protected speech. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances resulted after a string of attacks on reproductive care facilities and providers across the country; but, Trump is twisting its purpose to chill dissent by prosecuting two independent journalists for the crime of reporting, even though the supposed crime was a start-to-finish livestream on the protest from an organizational meeting and its conclusion at the Cities Church in St. Paul.
Allegations by federal prosecutors is that Lemon and Fort approached the part-time pastor, whose day job is running the local Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office, in ‘close proximity’ as they oppressed and intimidated him with questions. Shocking! What reporters won’t do to get to the truth! US Attorney Pam Bondi interprets their actions as violations of the FACE act, which has a provision focused on houses of worship, despite the fact that the act protects ‘expressive conduct (including peaceful picketing or other peaceful demonstration) from the jeopardy of prosecution. A federal magistrate and an appellate court, both refused to issue a warrant for arrests, interpreting the act as it was written, so Bondi’s Justice Department convinced a grand jury to indict the pair. In viewing the video of the protest, it’s plain that the two journalist were not interfering, obstructing, or intimidating attendees that would violate the FACE Act, regardless of the poignancy of their questioning — it’s what journalists do.
This is only one of the indicators which means a closer watch on the 2026 midterms is necessary, a Trump warning shot across the bow in which a sitting president is willing to use federal law enforcement as a secret weapon to silence his critics. This is the playbook of Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, Turkey’s Erdogan, and Russia’s Putin where they have arrested journalists, intimidated the opposition, and consolidated power — a line that separates democracy from autocracy. “The past weeks have seen an escalation in ICE enforcement that should terrify anyone who cares about due process,” says John Byrne of Raw America. “Reports emerged from multiple cities of immigration agents conducting questionable searches, agents entering homes without probable cause, detaining individuals based on nothing more that suspicion. This is not law enforcement — this is state-sanctioned intimidation.” Byrne goes on top say, “And where is the mainstream media in all this? Largely silent. Or worse: normalizing. Major networks don’t treat this as the incredibly damaging threat to our democracy that it is. It’s just part of their daily broadcasts, and some have stopped pushing back entirely. When autocracy creeps forward, it relies on a press that’s either too intimidated or too distracted to sound the alarm. Cruelty is the point. Punish the opposition and reward the loyal. This is governance by vendetta.”
So, using two dozen federal law enforcement officers to arrest a single journalist is not only apprehending a suspect — the message is that no journalist is safe from retribution in America, in which case we may as well crumple up the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and kick them to the curb along with Don Lemon. Trump has hated Lemon from his political beginnings, since Lemon was on his case from the start. And besides, a gay, Black, independent mainstream journalist with no corporate backing is the perfect victim for retribution. The absurdity in this whole episode is that the charges were announced by the Department of Homeland Security, and not the Justice Department. Important to note, as reported by NPR, two other reporters were arrested for covering the protest — Trahern Jean Crews and Jamael Lydell Lundy, both Black. A quote attributed to Nelson Mandela seems relevant for our time: “Minds that seek revenge destroy states, while those that seek reconciliation build nations. Walking out the door to my freedom, I knew that if I didn’t leave all the anger, hatred and resentment behind me, I would still be a prisoner.” Words of wisdom for Prisoner Trump?
Perfect for the occasion, satirist Andy Borowitz writes: “Hoping to calm nerves after his government arrested reporters Don Lemon and Georgia Fort, on Friday Donald J. Trump reassured the staff at Fox News Channel that he does not consider them journalists. ‘It’s true that I’m engaging in a systematic attack on the First Amendment rights of journalists,’ he told Fox employees. ‘But obviously none of that applies to you.’ Offering further comfort, Trump added, ‘I would never have hired Pete Hegseth if I thought he was a journalist.’ In a sentiment widely echoed by his colleagues, ‘Fox & Friends’ co-host Steve Doocy responded, ‘Mr. President, we weren’t really worried.’ At the White House, press secretary Karoline Leavitt revealed that Trump had sent a similar message of reassurance to CBS News chief Bari Weiss.”
Last week Trump launched yet another criminal investigation into the 2020 election by sending his FBI to search the Fulton County Georgia election center, confiscating boxes of envelopes, and raising another red flag as we look toward the midterms. The biggest red flag during the raid was the presence of Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard — not a ceremonial visit by any means. She was messaging that Trump’s political appointees are now embedded in law enforcement operations, personally overseeing investigations that align with the administration’s enemies list — political persecution with a federal badge, with justice in the rear view mirror. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN’s Dana Bash he was unsure of the purpose of Gabbard’s visit to Fulton County, saying that, “She’s an expert.” Who knew that Trump University even offered a degree in election integrity to insure free and fair elections? Of course, Blanche said he believes Trump was not involved in the decision toward this action, though the president was quoted as saying, “Investigators got a signed judges order in Georgia and you’re going to see some interesting things happening.” Things like redactions?
Reuters photographer Elijah Nouvelage released a shot of Gabbard, clad in a dark jacket and a baseball cap, speaking on her phone outside the Fulton County election office, spurring Democrats to call for her to testify about the record search. The search was conducted pursuant to a warrant seeking 2020 election records authorized by US Magistrate Judge Catherine Salinas. The Deputy AG called it a “criminal investigation, tightly held under law. It’s a criminal investigation, and that’s how we’re proceeding,” Political activist Greg Palast says the real agenda behind the FBI raid is just a legal excuse for “storm trooping.” He writes, “This is NOT, as the media seems to think, about Trump’s attempt to prove he won the 2020 race, as if he’s some political Captain Ahab trying to chase the Moby Dick of 2020 revenge.” Palast believes that it’s all about 2026 and 2028, advising us to look at the map of Fulton County — the heart of ‘Blacklanta,’ with Atlanta being the electoral heart of Georgia.
Palast goes on to call Georgia “the swingiest of swing states,” and if the GOP fails to cut down on the Black vote in Atlanta, they lose the crucial seat now held by Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff — leading to a 2028 loss of the White House if they don’t suppress the vote in Fulton County. Fulton was the fulcrum of Trump’s loss in 2020, spelling a doomsday for MAGA in 2028, all because of voting drop-boxes. African-American voters are under such rigid rules, with fewer polling places which result in long lines on Election Day, that early voting has become the norm, with over one million ballots being cast in drop-boxes in the Fulton-Atlanta area in 2020. As a result, Governor Brian Kemp signed the infamous SB202 bill, his opening shot in the war against early voting — especially in secure drop-boxes which were reduced in number by 77%, and early voting days cut from 60 to only 7. To make matters worse, voters who can only vote after their workday were out of luck, as the boxes were sealed up at night in state office buildings.
In 2022 the new restrictions reduced mail-in ballots cast by 83%. Conspiracy theorists convinced MAGA — through their slippery documentary, ‘2000 Mules,’ that 2000 Black men were paid $10 each to stuff drop-boxes with tens of thousands of fraudulent ballots, targeting Fulton County. Lack of evidence didn’t sway the MAGA Mob, even though every drop-box had a video camera to prevent wrong-doing, with videos being available for public examination. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation proceeded to arrest alleged Black ballot box stuffers statewide, only to find that the accused were innocent, legal voters. The state of Georgia, in a recount failed to find any forged ballots! Joe Biden can claim that early voters were key to his 2020 election success, and voter suppression in 2024 led to Trump’s victory. After the 2020 election, over 20 Red States passed laws eliminating or restricting drop-boxes, citing the ‘evidence’ of the ‘2000 Mules’ documentary.
Palast feels that Democrats don’t get the importance of early drop-off votes, especially when it comes to Black and student communities, but the GOP certainly gets the message. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton says that had he not gone to court to stop Houston from mailing out absentee ballots to voters, “Donald Trump would have lost Texas,” Houston’s population of Black voters being the largest in any American city. Palast sees Attorney General Bondi as saving her job by suppressing early voting, and saving the GOP from the wrath of an angry electorate, especially as she demands that Minnesota hand over its voter rolls. Bondi’s seizure of Minnesota voter files has to do with the restoration of more trickery — the return of ‘Interstate Crosscheck,’ a purging program that was once ruled illegal, but is now back in operation. ‘Crosscheck’ in 2016 was key to Trump’s first election, costing almost one million voters their registrations prior to the election according to Palast’s investigation as seen in Rolling Stone magazine.
Miles Taylor on his Defiance blog, writes that a few weeks ago Trump openly said he wished he had seized the ballots in the 2020 election, having “authority to do so.” Taylor says this is not the case, since he “helped write the executive order” to which the president referred in 2018 — Executive Order 13848. Trump and his cronies believe the president has the power to intervene in elections, even to the point of seizing voting machines or ballots. Taylor says, “I co-drafted the order alongside experts from DHS, DOJ, the Intelligence Community, and other agencies. The central idea was to make it easier for a president to impose real consequences on foreign actors who interfered in US elections. NOT to revisit vote counts. NOT to rummage through ballot boxes. And certainly NOT to allow a president to deploy the military against local election infrastructure because he didn’t like the outcome.” Taylor goes on to say that Trump was annoyed with being presented the executive order, not wanting to sign it, probably because he didn’t want to punish Russia for its help in his election success.
But now, Trump is conveniently reinterpreting the order as an “all-powerful election snooping tool.” Taylor wants us to understand that the order resulted from foreign interference in 2016 to make it easier for the executive to impose sanctions on foreign actors meddling in our elections — NOT to confer domestic law-enforcement authority; NOT to override state and local control of elections; NOT to authorize seizure of voting machines by the National Guard, or anyone else. The order stresses the need to “maintain an appropriate separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgements,” emphasizing insulation from political bias. It explicitly states that nothing creates new rights or benefits or alters existing legal authorities — certainly no new right for presidents to go rummaging about in ballot boxes. So the president wishing to do something like seize ballots is only an admission he wishes to make an illegal act and pretend the law would sanction doing so.
Senator Mark Warner is alarmed that Gabbard’s presence during the raid is either because she believes that some foreign intelligence nexus justifies her being there, or she’s dragging the intelligence community into a domestic political stunt to legitimize conspiracy theories. Miles Taylor believes her skulking about in a baseball cap means she didn’t wish to be seen, and that a Congressional oversight committee should announce an investigation immediately, calling Gabbard to explain her presence and under what directives she was acting. Since the Constitution places administration of elections with the states, the raid could be a violation of state law, and state and local prosecutors are responding by announcing action by Fight Against Federal Overreach, a national coalition of district attorneys seeking to hold federal officials accountable when they exceed their lawful authority.
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
New place name from Thomas next week!
|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Showing Up”
“Most of life is showing up. You do the best you can, which varies from day to day.”
~Regina Brett
“I don’t think my kids have to worry too much about me embarrassing them because that’s not how I would want to grow up, with wacky dad showing up at school and performing for everyone.”
~Steve Carell
“Showing up in the lives of children is everything.”
~Greg Boyle
“Showing up every day isn’t enough. There are a lot of guys who show up every day who shouldn’t have showed up at all.”
~James Caan
“It is important to show up. Showing up at marches and rallies and town halls and protests.”
~Ted Lieu
|
These two! Father Stellan Skarsgård, son Alexander – both are internationally well known and successful actors, and they are Swedish! Enjoy! |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)
















