Blog Archives

September 17 – 23, 2024

Highlights this week:Bratton… More about Marcia … Greensite… on the City’s Grand Jury Response … Steinbruner… what anonymous benefactor, county fairgrounds, and water … Hayes… Whence SCruz Enviros? … Patton… The golden buzzzer… Matlock… TWTWTW…catatonics…chase for a handshake… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover… Webmistress serves you… second hand clothes …Quotes on… “Second hand”

...

CLEAN BEACHES. This was back about 1940 or so, before the Dream Inn, before dirty beaches, The Ideal Fish Restaurant building was there. Check it out and think about how all the development this area has received, and just how much better is it now???

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.
Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

Dateline: September 18, 2024

MORE ABOUT MARCIA McDOUGAL. We mixed deadlines for BrattonOnline last week and I didn’t get a chance to add so many newer accomplishments, victories, and memories. Thanks to you readers who asked. Yes, Marcia and Bruce McDougal started Big Creek Pottery as a three way partnership with Al Johnsen who taught pottery and art at UCSC. They fought like crazy and Al was forced out of the ownership. Marcia and Bruce created The Davenport Cash Store and re-created the Whaler Bar into the Whale City Bar and Grill. More than all of that was the re-developing of the Cash Store into the Davenport Roadhouse Bar and Restaurant Inn which became very popular. Marcia moved into Santa Cruz a few years ago following Bruce’s death and the ferocious fire that burned their house to the ground. As previously mentioned Marcia died Friday, September 6 at 12:45 p.m.

ENCOMPASS, MONICA MARTINEZ, MORE FROM BECKY STEINBRUNER. Becky Steinbruner replies to last week’s issues….

I received this information from a reader as well.  What I reported was all based on the Court records.  Community Foundation sought resolution for nearly three years before agreeing to dismiss the case, “Without Prejudice”, which I understand means it can be re-opened or amended in the future.

This was not an attempted smear campaign or in favor of anyone.  I was very troubled when I read the documents in Case 19CV01804 because it seemed clear that something went awry, and that the trouble began concurrently with Encompass being permitted access to Community Foundation bank accounts.  Monica Martinez is running for a public service job that would give her great access to approve financial matters for Encompass and other non-profit organizations, and to represent the needs of her constituents and others countywide.

I have to think that Community Foundation would not have spent nearly three years in court battling, which translates to a lot of money for attorney fees if Encompass would have been transparent and accountable early-on.

Why did the Attorney General get involved? I think there is more to this than what Mr. Gelblum’s response presents.

I also received many comments from readers, all of whom were thankful for providing information on a matter regarding ethics that would have otherwise been unknown and not discussed.

The reason I added Tony Crane in the report was because he truly did run for D2 Supervisor because he knew there would be possible public forums for him to get his troubling research on Monica Martinez related to the Second Story Encompass facility in his neighborhood.  He had begged for the Supervisor Zach Friend to help, but got no response.

Take care,
Becky

BREATHLESS.  Net series. (6.3 IMDB) ***This Spanish production centers and details the business side of running a hospital. It deals with, and carefully exploits the union angles of labor managing, it revolves around the constant conflict between medicine and money. There doesn’t seem to be much difference between Mexican and United States in hospital operations

KAOS. Netflix series. (7.5 IMDB). * Even after viewing this one I’m not sure if it’s supposed to be a comedy or a semi serious religious Greek drama. Jeff Goldblum and David Thewlis play their darndest at being Zeus and Hades stomping around Olympus trying to influence any survivors who’ll listen to them. Read a good book instead.

SLOW HORSES. Apple series. (8.2 IMDB) *** There’s been five seasons or series of Slow Horses so far and I never watched any of them. Slow Horses is British slang for “slough house”. And Slough House is where the wild, clever talking M15 British agents who have made professional mistakes hang out between cases. Gary Oldman is the lead and he’s a perfect fit as are Kristin Scott Thomas and Jonathan Price. Set aside some down time and watch this one. It’s been nominated for 9 Emmy awards.

MONSIEUR SPADE. Netflix series. (6.9 IMDB) * Clive Owen is either paying off a bet or simply forgot how to act…he plays at being the Dashiell Hammett character Sam Spade in this political drama set in France in 1963. He lives in the south of France and is supposed to be 60. A priest, an investigator, a mess of a cast all looking for a young girl named Teresa, don’t even think about this one!

HORIZON: AN AMERICAN SAGA. HBO series (6.8 IMDB) ** Kevin Costner (who must have had some lifting of face) not only directed this saga but is one of many featured costars along with Sienna Miller, and Luke Wilson. There is a murder in Montana during our civil war and the movie features a large focus on “Native Americans” being careful to respect them as important humans in a rare drama.

THE WATCHERS. Max movie.(5.7 IMDB) *** An incredibly puzzling movie set in Ireland with Dakota Fanning delivering a parrot to a more than unbelievable and invisible bunch of humans hiding out in an impossible part of a forest. Full of legends, myths, and puzzles, it’s worth your time.

AMERICAN MURDER: Laci Peterson. Netflix series.  (7.0 IMDB) **** It’s a documentary about a murder that happened in 2002. Laci Peterson was murdered and her husband Scott was convicted, and more than 20 years later he and his family are still working to disprove his involvement. It takes place in Berkeley and Modesto and gives us some concept of how big a role the media plays. There’s more documentaries being produced on the Peterson case and we are advised to wait for a better version.

GYEONGSEONG CREATURE. Netflix series. (7.3 IMDB). *** This Korean horror flick reminded me of some of the films we studied in Earl Jackson’s film classes at UCSC. It’s a deeply detailed and bloody story of military lives, husbands, wives all being chased and threatened by this creature. It’s mostly fun and preposterous. Sit back and enjoy it.

THE UNION. Netflix movie. (5.5 IMDB) * A very unfunny attempt at a comedy that stars Mark Wahlberg, Halle Berry and J.K. Simmons. There’s not a laugh in it, and the actors behave like they’re paying off some debts. The photography is dutiful as are the various locations. Do remember that there are songs interspersed and that makes it more weird and hard to remember that it’s a story about some Americans acting as tourists.

LADY IN THE LAKE. Apple series (5.9IMDB). *** Natalie Portman (who is now 43 years old) plays a Jewish author in the 1960’s Baltimore. There’s some black politics thrown in and the plot gets lost after some extreme editing. The entire plot is reversed and not as well thought out as they figured. Don’t give up anything important to watch this.

...

A Red-Letter Day at City Council

Tuesday September 10, 2024, was a red-letter day at City Council. Spearheaded by a motion from council member Sandy Brown, seconded by council member Sonja Brunner and supported with a unanimous council vote, the staff-generated response to the Civil Grand Jury was rejected by council. Instead, a request for a month’s time extension will be sent to the Grand Jury, an ad hoc committee of council members formed, and a new response brought before council prior to that deadline, assuming the presiding judge approves the requested time extension.

I rarely leave the council chambers with a broad grin as I did on September 10. It felt appropriate given the circumstances. Members of the 2023-24 Grand Jury worked exhaustively to produce effective, quality reports. As a juror for that year, I joined an amazing group and worked very hard. Not one statement in a report can be written without citations and evidence for accuracy. On this wealth of investigation are based the Findings and Recommendations for each report. The aim is to improve efficiency and transparency in local government. Issues are chosen from formal complaints and chosen by a super majority vote of jurors. There is no enforcement mechanism for the Recommendations. It is up to the press to spread the word, the public to become involved and the local governments to respond with integrity. If they disagree with a Recommendation the expectation is that there is a valid explanation supported with documentation.

The two Grand Jury reports sent to the Santa Cruz City Council in mid-June for a September 16 response deadline were: Housing for Whom? An Investigation into Inclusionary Housing plus Preventing Rape and Domestic Violence: Where’s the Priority? Without repeating all the details, the focus of the Housing for Whom? report was that the city has no data on whether Inclusionary Housing is going to (income-qualified) residents and local workers who have preference under the Municipal Code. Nor is there data on the percentage of the city’s affordable housing occupied by (income qualified) UCSC students. The focus of the Preventing Rape and Domestic Violence report was on the city’s neglect of its Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women (CPVAW); inadequacies in their required annual reports; errors in SCPD statistics on rape; abandonment of tracking of rapes by strangers (Santa Cruz has historically had a disproportionate percentage of rapes committed by strangers); the ending of in-person self-defense classes in the High schools and much more. (Full disclosure, I was one of the founders of CPVAW in 1981.)

Suffice it to say that the staff response to both reports was defensive, dismissive and in many instances, inaccurate. I submitted detailed rebuttals which are in the agenda packet under postproduction public correspondence. The full Grand Jury reports were not included in the agenda packet for council. So, if they or the public were interested in checking the basis for the Findings and Recommendations, they had to hunt around on other websites to find them. Not even a link to the reports was included in the agenda packet. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda, adding insult to injury. Thankfully, council member Brown pulled it off for further discussion.

Ann Simonton, a current CPVAW commissioner expressed it best when she spoke to the city’s Grand Jury response: “I’m shocked that the city has chosen to disagree with so much of this important information that we could use to become more effective. It’s offered as a gift, and I think we should see it as a gift.”

If you care to view this short segment, with council member Brown’s eloquent words and a united city council holding its senior staff accountable, it is at 1:24:30 in the time bar at this link.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.
...

WHO WAS THE ANONYMOUS BENEFACTOR?

Who was the anonymous donor that bailed out Encompass’s financially-troubled Second Story facility in October, 2018?  Many people had testified before the Board of Supervisors on August 28, 2018 and again on September 18, 2018 about their concerns the facility would be closed due to financial problems.

Then, the Santa Cruz Sentinel reported October 4, 2018 that an “Anonymous Donor” had made a donation to meet the required $1 million needed to keep Encompass’s Second Story facility open, and that the donation came through the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County.

“Private donors preferred anonymity, Martinez said. The gift was made through the Community Foundation of Santa Cruz County.

The money, received last week, paid off a state loan on the residential property, “ensuring that Encompass fully owns the home and can continue the program’s operation into the future,” Martinez said.

“It will give us the time that we need to come up with a long-term sustainability plan with Encompass and the county,” Martinez said.”
Aptos rehabilitation house 2nd Story survives with donation

Hmmm…

This happened at about the same time as alleged unauthorized checks were written for a sum total of $1 million by Encompass CEO Monica Martinez, transferring funds (without prior approval) from the Community Foundation bank accounts to those of Encompass, and compelled  the Community Foundation to file legal action on April 4, 2019 against Encompass (Case 19CV01804).

Last week’s information about the Community Foundation and Encompass legal battle that involved Ms Monica Martinez, CEO of Encompass at the time, and now running for 5th District County Supervisor, brought forth many interesting comments.

The court records for Santa Cruz County Superior Court case 19CV01984  do not show that Community Foundation pressed any further charges, despite Judge Volkmann’s  determination that  “A triable issue of material fact exists as to whether Encompass misappropriated these funds.” (see page 4 of the January 7, 2021 Order After Hearing).  Instead, Community Foundation filed to dismiss the matter on March 11, 2021 (their attorney signed it February 27, 2021).  Request for Entry of Dismissal

What one has to wonder is: what changed?  Why did Community Foundation spend so much money on legal fees over nearly two years if the matter could not be resolved sooner and without exhaustive court legal expenses?

Why did the California State Attorney General become involved in the legal action?  Was it related to the action filed by Encompass to attempt to discredit Community Foundation’s actions as a non-profit?

Some commenters last week wondered why I included Mr. Tony Crane in the information?  He had been speaking publicly about the problems with the Encompass Second Story facility in his Aptos neighborhood for months. (January 9, 2018 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKER SHEET, Board of Supervisors Meeting).  He filed Public Records Act requests to understand what had  happened.  As a person of great integrity, he was troubled by what he learned Monica Martinez, CEO of Encompass, had done.

He ran for County Supervisor in order to have a different public forum to share the information he had gathered about CEO Monica Martinez’s  concerning actions.  Knowledge is golden, especially when one takes action to share it.

CANDIDATE FORUMS TO HELP YOU MEET COUNTY SUPERVISOR CANDIDATES
This week, Lookout Santa Cruz will host a candidate forum for the two running for Fifth District Supervisor: Ms. Monica Martinez and Mr. Christopher Bradford.
The Wednesday, Sept. 18 evening event will be in Felton: Lookout Election Forum – District 5 County Supervisor

Next week, Lookout will host a similar forum for the two running for Second District County Supervisor:  Event Calendar

This Monday, September 23 evening event will be at Cabrillo College in the Horticulture Building.

Sign up to reserve your seat now.   LookOut will hopefully post the recordings of both forums on their website soon after the events.

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS SOIL AND CREEK BANK PROBLEMS CONTINUE
The Santa Cruz County Fair Board has scheduled a second Special Meeting for September 24 to continue discussion of potential litigation regarding problems related to the mountain of soil trucked in from the Highway One Capitola Overpass project and dumped in the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds parking lot next to the creek.

The Fair Board held a Special Meeting on September 3 to authorize up to $400,000 to the State Construction Authority (CCA) to determine the possible contamination level and structural stability of the area and to determine what mitigations are necessary.

The Fairgrounds is owned by the State of California, and therefore, all improvements must be reviewed and approved by that agency.  The Fairgrounds CEO Zeke Fraser did not notify CCA before seemingly signing an agreement with Granite Construction, the Highway One contractor with CalTrans, to dump the soil, compact it, and add subsurface drainage pipe leading into the adjacent creek.  Was itsomeone’s idea to expand the parking lot?  Was it a plan to help create a bridge access to the new South County Park just across the creek (181 Whiting Road) and thereby move the County’s idea to use the park use and access as possible expanded evacuation?  Or was it another unauthorized project the Fairgrounds Foundation organized without Board review, such as the hiring of the unlicensed paving contractor a few weeks ago?

Whatever the plan, it went awry.

However, there may be some good news regarding the soil’s contamination, and hence threat of adverse impact to the stream and College Lake project, at least if Granite Construction did thorough soil sampling and adequate analysis.  Here is information from the CalTrans project staff:

“The excavated material at Retaining Wall 2/Capitola Ave has been tested and reclassified as unregulated for ADL. This means that the material has lead concentrations below 80 mg/kg of total lead (TTLC) and below 5 mg/L soluble lead (STLC) – NOTE that only samples over 50 mg/kg trigger the need for the STLC test.

The latest test results, dated 6/21/2024, show a maximum concentration of 15.8 mg/kg, well below the 80 mg/kg threshold. Therefore,  the material can be reused and is not considered hazardous.

The project unregulated material is hauled off the project to the following locations:

-#240 San Miguel Canyon Rd. (Capuro Vineyard)
-#2601 East Lake Ave, Watsonville, CA 95076 (14th District Agricultural Association)

Granite has provided a copy of the agreements with the property owners as required per the standard specification.

Per the agreement, Granite and the owners are required to follow any environmental restrictions, and permit requirements associated with the transporting and final placement of the material.

Additionally, Granite has informed us that they have stopped transporting the material to #2601 East Lake Ave, Watsonville.

MIDCOUNTY GROUNDWATER AGENCY FIVE-YEAR REPORT ON SUSTAINABILITY
Every year, the MidCounty Groundwater Agency, (MGA) comprised of representatives from Central Water District, Santa Cruz City, Soquel Creek Water District, and the County’s private well owners, are required to provide the State Dept. of Water Resources (DWR) with an update on the Plan to meet sustainability goals by 2040.  This year’s Draft Periodic Evaluation Report is open for public review and comment, but the deadline is September 19, 2024.

“In March 2024, the MGA Board determined that there is no compelling new information at this time to amend the 2020 Basin GSP and directed the continued preparation of the PE for submission to DWR by the required deadline.

Comments on the Draft Periodic Evaluation are due by September 19, 2024. Written comments may be submitted via email to comment@midcountygroundwater.org or sent via mail or hand delivery: MGA Board of Directors, c/o Administrator, 5180 Soquel Drive, Soquel, CA 95073. Oral comments can be provided at the MGA Board meeting on Thursday, September 19, 2024, which begins at 6:00 PM at the Capitola Branch Library at 2005 Wharf Road, Capitola.”

Here is the GOOD news:

“Water use in general, and especially groundwater extraction, continues to decrease in response to effective water conservation programs. Water Year 2023 had the lowest total municipal water use since tracking began in 1984, despite increasing population over that period.”
(page 14, ES-5)

Here is the link to that draft Report

“Coastal chloride concentrations are generally stable or decreasing over the evaluation cycle. The exception is in the southeastern portion of the Basin at Seascape where increasing chloride concentrations occurred at depths shallower than historically observed despite the protective groundwater elevation being met in the area’s Purisima F unit representative monitoring well.” (page 12, ES-3)

“Basin-wide change in storage is relatively stable,” (page 13, ES-4)

PureWaterSoquel (PWS) is currently being constructed to produce and directly recharge the Purisima A and BC aquifer units with up to 1,500 acre-feet per year (AFY) of purified water. PWS project start up is expected in 2025.

Santa Cruz Water Dept. is evaluating an Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) project as part of its effort to develop additional water supplies for use during extended drought periods while contributing to improved conditions in the Basin. The project will divert available flows from the San Lorenzo River, beyond what is needed to meet system demands, and inject and store the treated potable water in the aquifer through conversion of existing and installation of new municipal wells. Permitting of the initial well conversion is expected to be completed in 2026″ (pgs. 13-14, ES-3-4)

Based on the information evaluated and presented in this Periodic Evaluation, the Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) is still a viable Plan for achieving sustainability. Since the GSP does not need to be changed, a Plan Amendment is not necessary. The MGA will continue to implement the GSP as adopted by the MGA with the understanding that there is potential for some elements of the Plan to require an update in the future based on additional analysis of increasing chloride in the Seascape area and results from the Optimization Study.

So, does this mean that things are looking up for groundwater conditions, and Soquel Creek Water District may not need to inject treated sewage water into the aquifer?

Ask this question in your comments to the MidCounty Groundwater Agency and in letters to the editor.  Wouldn’t it be better to inject potable water rather than treated sewage water with unknown levels of contaminants, and that the Regional Water Quality Control Board has admitted will degrade the high-quality groundwater of the MidCounty Basin???

Just to see how your taxpayer dollars were wasted by the State Water agency’s helicopter flight in 2022 to determine groundwater quality conditions compared to those in 2017 when the Midcounty Groundwater Agency did such studies, take a look at the map on page 21  comparing the flight paths of the two.

“Because the 2017 and 2022 flight lines were not flown over the exact same locations, comparison of changes over time are difficult to interpret.” (page 23, 2-5)

Please write the MGA and Senator John Laird about this, and request that the flights be re-done before the PureWater Soquel Project comes online, following the same flight pattern as the 2017 helicopter AEM Study in order to have accurate information on the groundwater sustainability for our area and to consider using the PureWater Soquel Project treated sewage water for irrigation of golf courses and landscapes.

Contact Senator John Laird
comment@midcountygroundwater.org

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  ATTEND A CANDIDATE FORUM AND ASK QUESTIONS THAT MATTER TO YOU AND YOUR COMMUNITY.

MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE BY JUST DOING ONE THING THIS WEEK.

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com
...

Whence SCruz Enviros?
I continue to ask myself this question: where has the environmental movement gone in Santa Cruz? I have several hypotheses. This is not to deny the tireless work of various individuals who have helped on many fronts, but I sense a loss of momentum, of any organized movement of the type of conservationists that have been so crucial in the past in providing the Santa Cruz area with much of which it is now proud: Lighthouse Field, the City’s Greenbelt, Wilder Ranch, and Gray Whale Ranch come to mind, is there any kind of movement now that could achieve such success?

Questionable Rationality
One of the age-old issues with working with coalitions is the rationality factor, and the environmental conservation movement has had its share of associates who defy the laws of rational discourse. There is strength in numbers, but as those numbers grow the community will include people who are vocal about some pretty wild, unsubstantiated things. Those people sometimes have a fairly strident way of expressing themselves. Whether it is a tactic, or perhaps they believe it, the opposition to conservationists will say ‘look at that lunatic fringe group!’ They lump perfectly rational people in with the less-than-rational minority. The less-than-rational folks will also say ‘Look! I have credibility! I am associated with these rational people!’ That fringe element has driven more than a few of my colleagues away from advocating for conservation.

Oppositional Idiocy
Problems with rationality aren’t just internal to conservationists: there are many irrational people to face in the opposition. There is increased reliance on very poor methods of discourse: tu quoque, black-and-white and straw man arguments are very common, and conservationists aren’t always prepared to rebut such vacuous methods of dialogue. We often don’t even recognize them as such. As I wrote recently, add those types of arguments to a long list of unsubstantiated ‘facts’ and you have the gish gallop making it impossible to address any particular thing.

Conflict Avoidance
Poor discourse and barely rational coalition members may have contributed to the next reason I hypothesize for the demise of the local conservation movement: conflict avoidance. One thing that seems on the upswing with the younger generations is conflict avoidance, but this issue has long been a problem to conservationists. Politicians and other would-be mediators of environmental conflict have often tried problem solving by attempting solutions through compromise. That is, they see two sides – conservation versus development – and say “we can find a middle ground.” The problem with that is that often the conservation issues associated with the proposed development aren’t addressed by this middle ground: biology doesn’t work that neatly. This concept has oozed its way into the general populace where many want to solve things by reaching an imaginary happy spot – ‘half way’ between what is portrayed as two divergent points of view. Even that half-way point is difficult for most to imagine negotiating.

Those who are proponents of nature destruction are well seasoned negotiators, new public conservation advocates not so much. New recruits into conservation often balk at the need to negotiate with often well-paid consultants who are so good at their game. These new conservationists also often feel shy about hiring professionals, especially lawyers to help with the conflict: for some reason many feel like seeking that method of solution is ‘too much.’ And, then again, lawyers are expensive.

Legal Defense, Legal Bills
If somehow a group of conservationists can come to the conclusion that a lawyer would help, raising money for legal defense funds for conservation around Santa Cruz is not easy. Lawyers are expensive and their work takes time. Can you remember the last time a local conservation group asked for funding for legal defense? It has been a long time.

And yet, legal defense has often been essential to resolving many important environmental conflicts, everywhere. Especially here in California, the laws protecting the environment are strong and broad ranging. Those proposing to destroy nature fear enforcement of those laws. With my conservation advocacy, I often cite legal language and so have been called ‘litigious’ by a handful of nefarious truth-stretchers: I have never retained legal counsel to sue anyone. It is very important for conservationists to understand laws and regulations and to cite those as well as case law whenever making their point. And yet, fewer and fewer locals are forming coalitions to retain legal assistance to protect nature.

Legal Reprisals
Some conservationists have avoided the milieu of conflict because they fear that the often well-funded anti-nature crowd might sick their lawyers on them. There are Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) where the pro-development types intimidate conservation advocates by suing them…often for libel but for lots of other things. Also, some conservation advocates have been named in lawsuits by nature destroyers. For instance, our ‘friends’ at the Trust for Public Land sued local conservationists to recover expenses the group said they used to defend themselves in court actions aimed at better protecting the Cotoni Coast Dairies property.

No Peace, No Justice
The last issue hobbling local conservationists is their inability to adequately form coalitions with environmental justice movements, which have perhaps gained more wide support and recognition. This piece well summarizes the issue, and rests with the ‘no brainer’ intersection of the two movements: climate change. In this regard, Santa Cruz might be doing okay, but we are leaving behind other conservation issues of the highest importance: conservation land management, endangered species conservation, clean water and wetlands protections, and natural areas visitor management. Each of those issues has meaning for environmental justice proponents, but conservationists have done little to make that bridge.

What Can You Do?
I urge more people to become actively involved with local conservation groups. And, when you do, help those groups to become better through your mentorship and skill. We need to train one another to be good at conservation before the next big issue threatens species, habitats, or the relationship between humans and nature in our region.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.netEmail Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com
...

#258 / The Golden Buzzzer

AGT stands for “America’s Got Talent.” You may well have heard of this show, which airs on NBC, apparently twice a week. I watch hardly any television, and while I had heard of AGT, I knew virtually nothing about the show – just that it was some kind of “talent show.” Then, I got an unsolicited message sent to me by way of my Facebook profile page. What I got in that message was just a quick snippet of…. something. I wasn’t quite sure what.

I tracked it down, though, and it turns out that one of my Facebook Friends was moved by an AGT episode featuring Richard Goodall. My friend had sent me that snippet. I am sending off to you, by way of this blog posting, what I found when I tracked down that snippet sent to me by my Facebook Friend. He was moved. And I was moved. And I think you might be moved, too.

The following video invitation is for a ten-minute trip to the AGT stage, and unless you already know about Richard Goodall and his “Golden Buzzer” (and if you’re an AGT fan you probably do), I am betting that you, like me, might be brought to tears – or pretty close – by the following video excerpt, which certainly demonstrates that “America’s got talent,” and which can also be seen – and I think very importantly seen – as an intimation of how truly glorious and full of promise all of our lives really are.

Here’s a piece of advice, to go along with the video, and to follow up on my statement that we should realize how truly glorious and full of promise all of our lives really are. When you have that thought…

Don’t stop believing*


Image Credit:nbc.com/americas-got-talent
*Click right here for the lyrics of “Don’t Stop Believing,” by Journey

 

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.netEmail Gary at gapatton@mac.com
...

FACT CHECKS, GROUNDHOG DÉJÀ VU, TO THE LIFEBOAT!

What a couple of weeks! If NetflixAmazon Prime, or Hulu aren’t already working on scripts to cover these events they are missing a bet. It would be a perfect opportunity for the old early 60s show, ‘That Was The Week That Was,’ the BBC satirical tv show that was Americanized and hosted by David Frost…for those of us who remember. Charges and accusations are still flying about the Harris-Trump debate held on TuesdaySeptember 10. Consensus is that Kamala cleaned Trump’s plow, setting him back on his heels for ninety minutes as she taunted him, causing him to completely lose his cool, coming up with his spur of the moment lies and defenses that held no water. His attacks on immigrants…all being criminally, mentally deranged druggies who have crossed the ‘open’ border to plague our country. Picking up on the fabrication of Haitians in SpringfieldOH eating their neighbors’ pets or capturing water fowl from the city parks, he proceeded to look like the complete fool that he is. In a letter to the Fresno BeeFred Oakes wrote, “After listening to the guy who used to have the nuclear codes talk about Haitian immigrants eating our cats and dogs, two things occurred to me: First, I couldn’t stop laughing. And second, our three cats and one small dog who were all previously on the fence about who to vote for all immediately decided to vote for Kamala Harris.”

By now, we’ve all seen the cover page of the conservative Drudge Report which is headlined “THE END” below an AI photo of passenger Donald Trump sitting in a plane with a cat on his lap and a planeload of cats, ducks, and geese situated behind him. Founder Matt Drudge, promoted Trump in 2016 but has since backed away, and to emphasize “Trump’s worst performance of his career,” he points to other websites and their coverage, such as MediaiteDeadline, and NBC news, which ran a story entitled, ‘The Night Trump Lost It All.’ A pro-Trumper, Scott Jennings, wrote to the LA Times with: “He’s actually in a better position to win at this point than he was in 2016 and 2020. Trump is Trump. We know him. We love him. We hate him. There’s nary a person in this country who doesn’t have an immediate and often visceral opinion of him. So a debate is unlikely to change his image.” The Times letter editor, Paul Thornton, writes that columnist Jackie Calmes says it’s time for the former Trump heavyweights, such as John KellyDan Coats, and HR McMaster to come forward to tell voters that Trump is unfit to be president again.

Conservative Geraldo Rivera said, “He was childish, he was creepy, he was cringy,” and some Fox News talking heads said Harris made Trump “go down a few dog and cat holes,” biting into all the bait the VP threw out. Trump continues to ignore that he got his butt kicked by a woman, lying that he won the debate despite talk throughout his party that he performed poorly. He was warned by his coaching team that Kamala would bait him, but without self-control he just couldn’t help himself…and what about those nuclear codes he wants to ‘control?’ He couldn’t even keep his story straight on the first assassination attempt he endured, saying he got “shot in the head,” so look in the mirror again dummy; and by the way, nobody sees any external ear disfigurement, so maybe your head DID suffer damage? It’s a given that his brain was scrambled when Harris chased him down to shake his hand as they walked onto the debate stage, obvious that he meant to ignore her completely as he scowled his way to his station behind the podium…a “concept” plan, possibly? From that moment Harris knew where to aim and what his bullying backlash would be, resulting in his aged, haunted look as he exited the stage at the end. Harris had to remind her opponent at one point that she was his opponent, not Joe Biden, as she parried in a study in offense instead of being defensive of the president and the administration. Kamala’s barbs about world leaders “laughing” at him and US military leaders calling him a “disgrace” rattled him, but her coup de grâce was mocking his bored rally attendees leaving early when he started his spiels on Hannibal Lecter, sharks vs electric boats, and cancer-causing windmills.

The Vice President threw Trump off his game, avoiding vulnerabilities such as the US retreat from Afghanistan and the economy, while she pounded him on the volatile issue of abortion rights, where she is attempting to win over undecided women, despite Trump’s claim that “everybody wanted Roe overturned.” Many MAGAites throughout the day had downplayed Harris’s debating credentials, with Marco Rubio saying she would be lost without a Teleprompter. Post-debate critics claimed she wore earrings with radio capabilities to receive off-site coaching, or that she had viewed the moderator’s questions beforehand, or that ABC had skewed the debate with an unfair fix…such as doing fact-checking on Trump. It should have been apparent to all that Harris was well prepared with her rapid-fire performance of setting Trump’s hair ablaze. Jon Stewart on ‘The Daily Show’ said, “This is like one of those ‘Groundhog Day’ movies where you get to go back and fix the bad way something happened earlier to the good way.” Stewart also poked at Trump’s repetitious claim that Nancy Pelosi was responsible for the J6 Insurrection because “she didn’t do her job,” as he claims that he was simply “showing up for a requested speech,” on that fateful day. Jon reminded him, and us, that he spent two months riling up his base about a stolen election that was thrown out of every court that his MAGA team approached for a resolution in his favor. “Join me on January 6, it will be wild,” was shoved right back at him. Trump’s usual excuse, “I didn’t know anything about it,” disqualifies him from any office says Stewart…“he will always be the first one on the lifeboat as the ship goes down.”

Senator Lindsey Graham called Trump’s debate performance a “disaster,” and said his debate team should be fired, in an interview with Tim Miller on the Bulwark PodcastFox News host Jesse Watters felt that Trump had some chaotic moments, but “had some great knockouts, and so this race just got tighter,” with Laura Ingraham commenting that the former president “missed a few opportunities, even with ABC helping Harris.” Trump flag waver Sean Hannity determined ABC to be “the biggest loser in the debate” since they didn’t hit back at Harris on her past policies, whereby he learned nothing new to clarify who she really is with ABC-Disney giving her a pass…”an injustice to the American audience.” Right-wing podcaster Matt Walsh had to present a hard dose of reality to one of his responders who felt that Trump “rambled too much,” by asking, “Do you need me to lie to you and tell you this was a brilliant performance by Trump?” Podcaster Megyn Kelly and Arizona Senate candidate, Kari Lake, heaped blame on moderators Muir and Davis by accusing them of “running cover” for Harris, and making “bogus” corrections for Trump “after he makes a point,” – make that after he ‘tells a provable lie.’ Radio host Hugh Hewitt wrote on X“It is laughable how ABC choreographed this to help VP Harris but it isn’t working because it is so obvious.” Muir and Davis were consistent in fact-checking the GOP candidate, once for belching out that parents in some states are allowed to kill a newborn, with a quick reminder that murder is not legal in any state. Brit Hume on Fox had to admit “she was not the complete dunderhead so many of us thought she was. She was composed, she was prepared, she kept her cool. She saw advantages, she took them. She baited him successfully, which is the story of the debate.”

Guest Dr. John Kruse, MD, PhD, who is a psychiatrist based in San Francisco, appeared on the ‘David Pakman Show’ on YouTube to offer his synopsis of Trump’s debate performance, saying that the former president was obviously on stimulants. In his thirty-year career, he has seen patients with preexisting conditions struggle with cohesiveness, instability, and rambling…as Trump did when he saw that time was left on the debate timer. Kruse speculates that The Don has ADHD and must take powerful stimulants, offering no specifics on what he uses, to control his behavior of body twitching, being unable to stay on track, and a lack of emotional regulation. The doctor believes Trump’s constant movement with 40-50 hand gestures per minute, and constant head movement saved his life in the Pennsylvania assassination attempt. His probable unwillingness to do sustained debate prep with his team was made evident in his meeting with Harris. Political consultant Philippe Reines, former State Department adviser to Hillary Clinton, studied seven previous debates in which Trump took part, and noted that in those Trump tried to drown out the other participants. Making the analogy of two people attempting to hold a conversation, while a third starts up a chainsaw, is how a chainsaw wielding Trump could win by blocking out any reasonable argument or discussion. His malfunction in the debate was giving Kamala space to talk as she wished, reminding people about the guy with a criminal record. Reines adds, “You’d never know it listening to him that he served for four years, and this whatever you want to call it, this amnesia that people are somehow having pleasant memories of his term is odd.” Observing Trump’s performances for almost a decade, Reines says The Don’s mental and physical fitness were clearly diminished, pointing out: “There is something going on with his language. He always digressed,” at earlier events. Talking about China tariffs, then talking about a Chinese bank ensconced in Trump Tower in the past, he now talks in staccato fashion, stopping short, not using proper nouns as much, and he is a different person. As reported by Raw Story, Reines says Trump looks generally the same, and he’s equally loud, and somehow being louder and tanner has been equated to health, and it’s just not there…what the former president did is “very unnerving.”

The Bulwark Podcast’s Tim Miller wrote: “The impotent Trump was too intimidated to even look Kamala’s direction…and now wusses out of the rematch. Cannot recall a more dramatic demonstration of beta weakness in a campaign setting.” Over 500 people assembled in Tucson, Arizona to hear Trump insist he had scored a “monumental victory” against Harris, he referred to Minnesota governor Tim Walz as the vice president, all while slurring his speech, with difficulty reading from the Teleprompter. Psychiatrist Richard A. Friedman writes in The Atlantic that the former president is displaying signs of cognitive decline, his tangents and inability to get to a point suggesting “a fundamental problem with an underlying cognitive process. If a patient presented to me with the verbal incoherence, tangential thinking, and repetitive speech demonstrated by Trump regularly, I would almost certainly refer them for a rigorous neuropsychiatric evaluation to rule out a cognitive illness.” Trump continues his attempt at domination in refusing to back off his outlandish assertions, doubling down on lies about immigrants eating pets and teachers giving students sex change operations to the consternation of unsuspecting parents. Clearly confused, he calls Kamala a “Marxist communist fascist socialist” as he strings words together that might have given him more mileage in a different era.

Wife Melania has been missing in action during the campaign, with Trump now linking up with right-wing provocateur and twice-failed congressional candidate, Laura Loomer, who has complete loyalty to him and has been seen with him on many of his latest appearances. Loomer is an advocate of any loose cannon conspiracies floating around, prompting many Trump supporters to urge him to keep her at arm’s length, one being Senator Lindsey Graham and, surprisingly, a jealous Marjorie Taylor Greene. Loomer has struck back at Graham, questioning his sexual identity, and referring to Greene as a “trailer trash Harpy,” a “miserable lying bitch,” and a “hooker” as she calls attention to her extramarital affair. John Marshall in a Talking Points Memo notes that the GOP is running two presidential campaigns…one being headed by Trump, based on his personal grievances and stories shared at his rallies that have little to do with reality, the campaign faltering as the unhinged Trump drifts away from fact to fiction. The other campaign, run by Chris LaCivita and Susie Weiss, who recognize Trump’s decline, yet attempt to run with a more conventional strategy, as they urge The Don to discuss the economy or immigration, while dialing back on the craziness to retain voters who are now doubting his stability.

Laura Loomer, an “invited guest” she claims, seems to still be in the picture, and as long as she strokes Trump’s ego and encourages his basest political instincts, she is likely to remain, spouting her 9/11 conspiracy theories, her Islamophobia, her pro-white nationalism, and outright racism. As a guest in Trump’s private box at the LIV Golf Tournament last year, Trump can be heard in the video she posted on X, telling her she is “very special.” And earlier this year, Trump pointed her out in a crowd at Mar-a-Lago, calling her a “woman with courage.” She compounded the cats and dogs story in saying, “Haitian immigrants aren’t just eating cats and dogs. They eat HUMANS. Remember their leader? Known as ‘Barbecue?’ Only Hannibal Lecter himself would want to bring more of them to the United States! Don’t let the media say that concerns about illegal immigration are ‘conspiracy theories.’ These aren’t rumors. It’s a FACT. When you import the third world, you become the third world, and we won’t allow it here in America. Donald Trump will stop our country from further becoming a third world nation. The media is obsessing over the Haitian migrants because even the most liberal voters are horrified over the animal abuse committed by so many of Kamala’s invaders.” A few day earlier, Trump claimed at one of his rallies that, “Dr. Hannibal Lecter is a representative of the people who are coming into this country.”

Republican US Senator Thom Tillis of critical swing state, North Carolina, decries Loomer as “a crazy conspiracy theorist who regularly utters disgusting garbage intended to divide Republicans. A (Democratic) plant couldn’t do a better job than she is doing to hurt President Trump’s chances of winning re-election.” “Enough,” he writes on XBill O’Reilly says Loomer doesn’t matter: “Does it matter to the American people that Laura Loomer exists? No, it doesn’t,” he told Leland Vittert on NewsNation’s ‘On Balance’ show. “I have no idea why Donald Trump does what he does,” was his response to Vittert’s suggestion that Loomer’s presence is “horribly detrimental to his campaign.” O’Reilly conceded that Loomer is “a bad look…it doesn’t matter to me as a voter. And I think a lot of voters feel the same way.” Miami New Times reporter, Naomi Feinstein wrote an article entitled, ‘Loomer and Trump Sitting in Tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G,’  as she notes that Melania was nowhere to be found at the debate, or at her husband’s side during the 9/11 ceremonies in New York and PennsylvaniaThe Drudge Report ran a photo of Loomer and Trump with the headline, ‘Loomer MAGA Love,’ with the question, “Has Trump found his soulmate?” A co-host of MSNBC’s ‘The Weekend’ suggested it’s time for Melania to step up and get more involved before her husband’s campaign is completely derailed by his new far-right, gadfly companion. Former RNC chair Michael Steele thinks this interaction is not only hurting his fellow Republicans, but it is fueling rumors of an affair at a critical time following Trump’s washout at the debate. Jimmy Kimmel says watching the debate “was like a half nightmare, half hospice.”

And where is JD Vance? Spearheading the cats and dogs stories campaign, of course! Seth Meyers on Late Night says, “Maybe I’m being too hard on JD. I bet he’d be fun to have a beer with…let’s let him explain why,” as he runs a clip of Vance at a campaign stop. Asked by a reporter, “Why would the people in Wisconsin want to have a beer with you?” JD answers, “Well, I guess they’d want to have a beer with me because I actually do like to drink beer.” Meyers lowers the boom, joking, “Well, it’s official. JD Vance has done the impossible. He’s made Mike Pence the fun one! Vance answers simple questions like he’s in an episode of ‘Frasier’ where Niles accidentally joins a biker gang.” Jimmy Kimmel on his Live! show on ABC said, “There are a lot of things Trump isn’t good at…one being the picking of running mates. He made a huge mistake with JD Vance, who can’t stop stepping in it. For a guy who wears more eyeliner than Liza Minnelli, you’d think he’d have a better understanding of women.” Kimmel noted that DJT, Jr. reportedly pushed Vance’s selection, now one of the most unpopular VP picks in modern times. He speculates that if Trump loses the election, Papa Trump will sue his son to take the ‘junior’ off his name. On Vance’s veep opponent, Tim Walz, Kimmel says he doesn’t know where he’s been hiding all along, but, “His blood type is Corn Dog Batter…and he belongs to several Pickle of the Month clubs.” Mike Pence, make a note of this!

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down.

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

Second hand

“I wear a lot of second hand clothes unless I have a concert and then I wear beaded and sequined second hand clothes. No stylist dresses me although I do have a woman that assists me with the buttons.”
~Chris Isaak

“I get highs, to be totally honest, in second-hand shops. My hunting instinct, I expect, really kicks in.”
~Björk

“In religion and politics people’s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.”
~Mark Twain

“If the book is second-hand, I leave all its markings intact, the spoor of previous readers, fellow-travellers who have recorded their passage by means of scribbled comments, a name on the fly-leaf, a bus ticket to mark a certain page.”
~Alberto Manguel

“I’m really interested in fashion but at the same time I find it quite competitive. Second-hand stuff leaves you more open to whatever your own personal style is rather than feeling dictated to by shops.”
~Sophie Ellis Bextor

...

This is a very interesting deep dive on the history of second hand clothing. Sellers used to wash and fix up the clothes they were selling, but today (just in case you didn’t know) donations do not get washed before being put out on the floor. I *love* a good thriftstore find, and I donate a fair amount of stuff as well. I have learned that thriftstores are bursting at the seams, and a lot of donations just get tossed nowadays, so if you are trying to lighten your load and/or your conscience by donating instead of throwing away, check out local “buy nothing” groups and the likes on facebook, post on craigslist, get together with friends…

COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
84 Blackburn Street, Apt 102
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Cell phone: (831) 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *