Blog Archives

February 21 – March 5, 2024

Highlights this week:

Bratton…more throwback Greensite back next week… Steinbruner…Aptos Post Office bike jumps. Hayes… back next week… Patton…Santa Cruz Shapers… Matlock…double contribution… Eagan…Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover. Webmistress…pick of the week. Quotes….”Tap Dancing”

...

EARLY BIG CREEK POTTERY. (l to r.) Bruce McDougal, Marcia McDougal and yours truly May 18, 1970. The little goat’s name was Natoma and we had just created the Big Creek Chapter of the Natoma Street Tap Dancing Society (explanations later). The photo was taken by Candace Freeland , who is Jan Karon’s daughter. Jan wrote all the best selling Mitford Years and Father Tim novels. Candace is a photographer in Hawaii now.

[Webmistress adds: I feel it was serendipitous that I found this photo – posted last in 2011 – just before I grabbed Gary Patton’s blog post, where I saw the mention of Bruce and Marcia McDougal being profiled in “The Shapers”, Lookout’s series on the people who shaped Santa Cruz. Blew me away! 🙂]

photo credit: Candace Freeland Additional information always welcome: email bratton@cruzio.com

DATELINE February 14, 2024

More archive diving, looking forward to Bruce coming back soon!

//Gunilla//


DATELINE May 2011

TANNERY ARTISTS AS TOURIST DRAW…NOT!!! George Newell gave a talk about the Tannery at the April meeting of Lifelong Learners up at UCSC. I really and truly wish the tannery well now that it’s there. That said I can never figure why Santa Cruz with its high rents and supposed caring for humanity and the poor became so elitist and gave Tannery housing to so called “Artists” instead of teachers, nurses, homeless veterans, and people struggling to make a living who don’t pose as “Artists”. Newell works hard to justify the expense of the Tannery to the city. One of his biggest “moments du merde” (aka. bullshit) was when he said, and you’ve heard it dozens of times, with all the artists living in the Tannery it’ll become a tourist attraction. People will come here from all over to see the amazing atmosphere and creations on display at the Tannery. STOP RIGHT HERE…now think about that…and be very, very honest….how many of you actually think that tourists would rather come here to see the Tannery instead of Carmel and Monterey?? We have next to nothing to draw money-spending over-night tourists, not now, not never. The Boardwalk sure, but those tourists only come here for the rides, they never go downtown, never shop. So to repeat…lets see a show of hands of how many of you would ever say to your visitor friends or relatives…”oh, don’t go to Monterey and the Aquarium, and the Cannery OR don’t go to Carmel and walk the Gallery walk go to the Santa Cruz Tannery”. Poor choice Santa Cruz, about that Tannery, and Newell never once mentioned that they built it on the San Lorenzo flood plain. And on opening weekend they had to sandbag the street level parking spaces because the river overflowed. More later. Naturally.

DANCING IN THE STREETS HUGE SUCCESS.Whoever was responsible for that Dance celebration a week ago that took place all over Downtown deserves some kind of medal. Great crowds, wonderful community feeling, genuine Santa Cruz spirit, and some fine dancing from where I sat. We need more of that stuff. More parades, more celebrations, more community…that’s what’ll bring tourists here. Have you ever gone traveling and lucked upon some local celebration by accident? It automatically becomes one of most treasured memories of all time.

DE-SAL ON THE BALLOT? WHO’LL WRITE IT AND WHY!!! It begins to look like the City Council might put the construction of a de-sal plant on the ballot. They really don’t want to, but just maybe. The next question and we’ve seen this too many times that our ever conniving city staff will figure out a way to write and word the issue so that no one will be able to easily figure out how to vote. Like a yes means no De-sal or a no means build the plant. Watch for this and be very, very afraid.

[BACK TO THE CURRENT TIMELINE]

Bruce will be back with movie reviews as soon as he’s had a chance to write more!

...

Gillian is taking a break this week.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org    Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...

THE DIRT BEHIND OPPOSITION TO MEASURE M
Notice that the same developers that are giving tons of money to No on M are also giving money to this new “Santa Cruz for a Healthy City” which acts like Santa Cruz Together to funnel multiple contributions.   Clever too that “Santa Cruz” Beach Hotel Partners is actually based in Long Beach, So Cal.

“Santa Cruzans for a Healthy City, received two substantial donations of $12,500 from Long Beach-based corporations La Bahia Holdco and S.C. Beach Hotel Partners for a total contribution of $25,000.

Here is the article: Sales tax increase campaign boosted by corporations – Santa Cruz Sentinel

MORE DIRT BEHIND OPPOSITION TO MEASURE K, AND MORE DIRTY STUFF LINING UP FOR MONEY GRABS IN NOVEMBER
Santa Cruz County is already the most expensive place in which to live….so how can elected officials ever think it is reasonable to keep piling on regressive sales tax measures to pay for their mismanagement of revenue the County already has?

Many thanks to my friend Bruce Holloway for sending this heads-up recently:
“In October Sen. Laird got an exception in state law to the 2% local sales tax limit for the Metro.  In other words, expect a countywide half-cent sales tax on the November ballot for the Metro (which already has a half-cent sales tax).”
Hmmmm……..

“Current law authorizes cities, counties, and specified special districts to increase the sales and use tax applicable in their jurisdiction, also referred to as a transaction and use tax, to fund local priorities including transportation projects and services. Current law also generally caps the total of all transaction and use taxes in a county (or combined tax rate) at 2%. This cap applies countywide, generally meaning that if one locality or special district imposes a transaction and use tax, it limits the ability of another locality or special district that shares the jurisdiction to do so under the remaining portion of the 2% limit. Unfortunately, two localities in the County of Santa Cruz have hit the 2% combined tax rate limit, which will prevent METRO from pursuing a new measure absent new legislation to exempt METRO from the 2% limit.”

Governor Newsom Signs Legislation to Support the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District

This smelled like yet another “gut and amend” action, a sneaky way to get things quickly passed in the legislature.  Lawmakers defend the process, claiming it is necessary for emergency actions and funding.  I think it  is abused and this is a case in point.

Senator Laird introduced SB 862 last year on February 17, in the window of time that all new bills must be presented for processing in the coming year.  It was a bill related to agriculture and was introduced to the Agriculture Committee on March 1, 2023, and again on April 18 and May 18. On June 12, it was approved “with author’s amendments” after the second reading.  Three days later, on June 15, it was referred to the Revenue & Taxation Committee….THERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF SENATOR LAIRD’S GUT AND AMEND ACTION.
 
On July 11, the Taxation & Revenue Committee approved it with a 6:3 vote,  The Assembly approved the gut-and-amend bill  on August 14, and it went to the Senate the next day.  Two days later, the Senate Rules Committee heard the new version of the bill (that started off as something related to agriculture) as required by Senate Rule 29.10(d)  which identified SB 862 as something “new or rewritten” :

“(d) If the analysis, prepared in accordance with subdivision (a) of Rule 29.8, of a bill, other than the Budget Bill, that is returned to the Senate for a vote on concurrence discloses that the Assembly amendments create a new bill or rewrite the bill as passed by the Senate, the bill shall be referred to the Committee on Rules. The Committee on Rules by a vote of a majority of its membership may either (1) refer the bill to an appropriate standing committee, (2) recommend that the bill be taken up for consideration of the Assembly amendments, or (3) hold the bill”

Legiscan: California Senate Bill 862

The Rules Committee approved  the gut-and-amend version of SB 862 on August 24, the Senate approved it on August 30 and sent it to the Governor’s desk on September 11, where it was signed into law on September 30.  Voila!!!

So, what was the “emergency” that Senator Laird felt he had to address?

 By taking drastic actions to convert an agricultural bill that had passed through the  pertinent Agriculture Committee, he suddenly swapped out the language and action of the bill to become an exemption to law for Santa Cruz County Metro to exceed the 2% limitation on combined rate of all taxes under the Transactions and Use Tax Law, and completely avoid normal lengthy reviews by the Appropriation Committee, Fiscal Committee or Local Program Committee.

Not only that, but any county or city can seemingly now impose unlimited sales tax increases because Senator Laird’s gut-and-amend actions changed the Public Utilities Tax Code 98290 in general, while providing the special findings needed for Santa Cruz County.
California Public Utilities Code 98290 – (a) A retail transactions and use tax ordinance may be adopted … » LawServer

Expect to see yet another half-cent sales tax on your ballot sometime between this November and for the next 10 years (the Metro Board has until January, 2035 to raid your wallet).

I suppose the good news is that the proposed new tax will require a 2/3 approval of the voters….unless there is another gut-and-amend bill coming down the pike, reducing the approval necessary to a simple majority.

PLEASE VOTE NO ON MEASURE K…HERE IS WHY
If you know you are in debt, would you go buy a new expensive car?  Most reasonable people would not, but that is exactly what the County’s leadership has done, slamming the County finances into an historic $85 MILLION deficit.  The fix is to grab more money out of everyone’s wallets with a regressive sales tax that will strain everyone’s already-stressed personal  family budgets.

Oddly, 100% of the voters in Santa Cruz County are being allowed to vote on whether or not a 1/2 cent sales tax gets imposed on businesses only in the unincorporated areas.  The County Office of Administration, led by Carlos Palacios, CAO, has steered the County into an historic $85 million deficit, with the complicit nod of approval by the Board of Supervisors.

The rationale for Measure K, placed on the ballot by vote of the Supervisors on December 5, 2023 was that FEMA is too slow to pay the reimbursements for Covid-related actions, the 2020 CZU Fire, and last year’s flooding in Santa Cruz County (keep in mind that the Pajaro floods were in Monterey County).  FEMA is known to be slow in payment, so why did the CAO Palacios push the Board to buy the West Marine commercial complex in Watsonville as an expensive new South County Government Center, a new 38-acre park that is remote and without bus service, and continue to spend lavishly on consultants to put together a curious word-salad “Equity Statement” that resulted in allowing 14-year-olds to serve on Commissions and get paid $75/meeting?

Please read the excellent Guest Comment in the 2/23/23 Sentinel by Mr. Michael Funari, a long-time Santa Cruz resident who served on the 2021-2022 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury:

“…Only seven of California’s 52 counties have a higher sales tax rate than the current rate in Santa Cruz.

Perhaps Santa Cruz’s difficulty in providing for the public good is an issue more of spending than revenue.

Please consider reviewing the  excellent Grand Jury investigative report finding from 2021-2022 that the County deceived voters with the Measure G 1/2 cent sales tax initiative, placed on the ballot in 2018 by the Board of Supervisors.

Yet, Measure K ballot language touts virtually the same laundry list of what will benefit as what the Supervisors said Measure G would benefit…but  failed to do so.  County Fire Department received ZERO dollars from the Measure G sales tax increase, so what would make anyone want to trust the same empty promise again that Measure K promises?

Where did “Citizens for a Safe and Strong Santa Cruz County” Measure K proponents get $13,525, as reported to the Secretary of State (FPPC #1464510)?

The group seems to have partnered with the City of Santa Cruz Measure L sales tax effort, Santa Cruzans for a Healthy City-Yes on City Sales Tax Measure March 2024 (FPPC #1465088),  which has failed to file any reports on the Secretary of State website.

SUPER HIGH BUILDINGS POSSIBLE WITH DOUBLE DENSITY
Many thanks to my friend, Al, for sending me this information.  Could this become Santa Cruz?  Please Vote YES on Measure M.

Developer wants to ‘supersize’ S.F. project under new state housing law — while it’s being built.

And to add to that…

With the Governor signing AB 1287, a new law  has been created to “amend the state’s Density Bonus law, which exempts builders from parking and density requirements if projects have a specified amount of units for low-income residents.  The new law expands this to include incentives to build housing for middle income residents, allowing more units and higher buildings.”
GOVERNOR SIGNS AB 1287, CREATING DENSITY BONUSES FOR MIDDLE-INCOME APARTMENTS AND CONDOS | East County Magazine

SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT BOARD IGNORED PUBLIC PROTEST AND RUBBERSTAMPED PUNITIVE RATE CHANGES
Last Tuesday, two Capitola City Police Officers and nearly 40 people came to the Soquel Creek Water District Board meeting to attend the Public Hearing on Rate Changes.  Oddly, the Board agenda had NOTHING listed for Item #2 PUBLIC HEARING.

Instead, the District had shoved the Rate Change Public Hearing to the penultimate item on the Administrative Business, and would have required people to sit though nearly the entire meeting to participate.

Was this intentional, hoping that people would not stay?

The two Police Officers had been summoned in advance of the meeting by District staff…to intimidate rate protesters?  The City of Capitola residents paid for them to be there, not the District.

The crowd was not at all unruly, and waited patiently for Board President Bruce Jaffe to scramble the agenda’s order of items that left everyone quite confused…I think even he was not sure what to do next.

Unfortunately, everyone had to sit though a dog-and-pony show presentation about how wonderful the District’s plan to inject treated sewage water into the pristine aquifer will be…but little information about the true cost of doing so.  After nearly 40 minutes of this dribble, along with a vague explanation of the rate changes by the Raftelis Consultants, public hearing began.

Two ratepayers who have successfully sued the District for illegal rate setting matters spoke:  Michael Boyd and Jon Cole.  Both pointed out that the District cannot charge customers for the Basin benefit they insist the PureWater Soquel Project treated sewage water will provide because the Project won’t be online until later this year (maybe) and the benefit of the Project has not been proven.

Prop 218 mandates that the District cannot charge customers for a service or benefit that does not exist.

Luckily, Community TV posts the video recordings right away (the District takes weeks to post them on their website), so take a look.

People were allowed to speak for only two minutes.

Listen to Michael Boyd at Minute 43:50  and Jon Cole at Minute 46:30,  with many other good speakers following.  Only two people supported the rate changes, and both of them had been bobbleheads on the hand-picked Water Rate Advisory Committee, and brainwashed by District staff.

In the end, the District Counsel announced that 569 written protests had been received, but had not been verified.  Although it likely was the highest level of protest the District has ever received, it was not near the 7,127 needed to achieve a 50% + 1 level to stop the rate change action.

The Board did have the ability to vote to “Take No Action” and in effect approve a continuance of the rate consideration, but apologetic and pretending to care, they merely thumbed their noses at the many rate payers who will now suffer very significant increases in their monthly water bills.

The customers left in disgust and anger…”We’re going to vote you OUT!” one shouted while exiting.

 I sure hope so.

Director Tom LaHue (who admitted publicly he just doesn’t understand numbers in financial reports) and the new Director Jennifer Balboni (who insisted the District raise fixed service fees by 60% rather than 40% to force those who conserve to pay their fair share) will both be up for election this November.

Do you know a few good candidates to run?  I sure hope so.

PROTEST AT&T APPLICATION TO DROP COPPER WIRE LANDLINE SERVICE
Two weeks ago, the County Board of Supervisors held an interesting discussion with two AT&T representatives when the Consent Agenda item to send a Board letter to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) protesting AT&T’s application to pull the plug on copper wire landline telephone service.

See item 6.1
Ultimately, the Board approved sending their protest letter to the CPUC on behalf of the rural residents in particular who depend on this service in disasters and power outages.

Word has it that AT&T plans to hand off the copper wired landline service to Frontier, which is of great concern.

In 2016, Frontier purchased this segment of telephone service from Verizon, and has failed to maintain the lines.  A CPUC investigative report in April 2019 determined AT&T and Frontier had neglected to maintain the lines necessary for the copper landlines, especially in low-income areas.  AT&T and Frontier kept that analysis secret, claiming it to be “confidential”, while raising the rates up to 153% over a decade.  In December, 2020, the CPUC issued a ruling that the two telecomm companies must provide a redacted form of the report by mid January, 2021.

That report made it publicly known that:

  1. Service Quality has deteriorated: Both carriers exhibited a higher relative number of outages and longer time required to restore service for outages lasting more than 24 hours.
  2. Demonstrated lack of resiliency: AT&T and Frontier are not maintaining networks to withstand environmental and weather-related conditions. Networks are not robust, both Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) have cut back on preventative maintenance expenditures.
  3. Disinvestment in Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS): AT&T and Frontier are putting very little investment into infrastructure that supports only Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) service. Both ILECs are relying on price increases and customer inertia to maintain revenue stream.
  4. Increased investment in broadband improves POTS service quality: AT&T and Frontier areas with higher broadband investment have a higher level of POTS service quality and better performance on all [service] metrics.
  5. AT&T is focusing on higher income communities: AT&T wire centers serving areas with the lowest household incomes exhibit higher trouble report rates and longer out-of-service durations than areas in higher income communities.
  6. Direct relationship between amount of competition and service quality results: Areas with limited or no competition experience lower service quality results. Both AT&T and Frontier put more investment and attention in areas with higher rates of competitive offerings.

Furthermore, the CPUC determined that:

AT&T and Frontier both repeatedly failed to meet the state’s minimum standard to “repair 90 percent of all out-of-service trouble reports within 24 hours.”

“The requirement to clear a minimum 90 percent of out-of-service (OOS) reports within 24 hours has never been met by AT&T since 2010. Verizon/Frontier met the OOS standard in only two of the 96 months covered by this study,” the report said.

“AT&T has the financial resources to maintain and upgrade its wireline network in California, but has yet to do so,” the report also said. “Frontier has a strong interest in pursuing such upgrades, but lacks the financial capacity to make the necessary investments.” Frontier filed for bankruptcy in April 2020 while admitting that its financial problems were caused largely by a “significant under-investment in fiber deployment.”

AT&T raised phone prices 153% over a decade as service got steadily worse.

I tried to telephone the CPUC Public Advocate but only got a recording, and the message box was “full”.

As of this writing, the Board is set to receive a more formal presentation on February 27 meeting, but likely will not revoke the protest letter (which has not been made publicly available to date).

If you  or someone you know depends on copper landline telephones for emergency communication in disasters and power outages, please submit written comment to the CPUC:
AT&T application to withdraw Eligible Telecommunication Carrier designation 
AT&T application requesting relief from Carrier of Last Resort Obligations

Participate in the remote hearings on March 19, 2pm and 6pm
Toll Free 1-800-857-1917
Code 6032788#

Keeping these copper landlines maintained and available is a matter of life and death public health and safety, which the California Constitutuion states is to be the first responsibility of our public officials:

 CA Constitution art XIII § 35
SEC. 35.(a) The people of the State of California find and declare all of the following:

(1) Public safety services are critically important to the security and well-being of the State’s citizens and to the growth and revitalization of the State’s economic base.

(2) The protection of the public safety is the first responsibility of local government and local officials have an obligation to give priority to the provision of adequate public safety services.

Contact your County Supervisor and/or City Council to urge them to stand steady on this matter to protect the rural residents and preserve copper landline telephone service.

COULD THE OUTCOME HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT?
Every year at this  time, I wake up from nightmares of what happened at the Aptos Village Project when Swenson  bulldozed the world-famous Aptos Post Office Bike Jumps.  I can still hear the screams of the kids trying to ride one more time before the dozer smashed the jumps, and Aptos Village was wiped off the map as a special place for local kids and internationally-known bike jumpers to come and defy gravity at the Aptos Post Office jumps.

Could it have been different had I not buckled under the intensity of the moment before the bulldozer as Swenson foreman Jessie Nichol was swearing obscene language and the sheriff sirens were blaring on approach, all making my head spin?

That terrible, terrible morning blazed it’s impact on me in a way that haunts me every year on the anniversary of the destruction of Aptos Village, ripping away something that had been really wonderful for our community, for the sake of County development and tax revenues.

I read last week’s Bratton Online post by Gillian Greensite, and pondered at her: “Communities can grow without destroying the things that people love. Edward T. McMahon, UrbanLand April 4, 2012.”

Take a look at what people loved, but that Swenson and the County, under County District Supervisors Ellen Pirie and Zach Friend, ripped away.

Could it have been different?   Who knows, but the outcome haunts me still.

Can it be rebuilt?  That is my quest, and maybe yours.

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  VOTE.  VOTE.  VOTE.
MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY DOING JUST ONE THING.

Cheers,

Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...

More from Grey next week

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

#60 / Shapers

I was delighted to have been recently profiled by Wallace Baine, in a column that appeared on the online news platform, Lookout. Click the following link if you’d like to read the column, which reviews the local, Santa Cruz County history in which I was involved during the twenty-year period I served as an elected member of the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors.

Baine’s column provides an “evaluative” retrospective of what happened and what I had to do with it. The fact that the column describes my “legacy” as a “long shadow” gives the reader an indication that both the “pluses” and the “minuses” of my tenure on the Board are discussed. I do like to think that my involvement was more “plus” than “minus,” more “sunshine” than “shadow,” but that isn’t everyone’s evaluation!

Lookout photographer Kevin Painchaud contributed a very nice picture to accompany the column, the picture having been taken in late February 2024, showing me out at Lighthouse Field, where my involvement with local politics began, back in the early 1970’s:

I was not the first person that Lookout decided to profile as one of the “Shapers” who have affected Santa Cruz County history, and I surely won’t be the last. Here is how Lookout has defined its “Shapers” series:

In many fundamental respects, Santa Cruz County is what it is today, for better or worse, because of the efforts and decisions of a few highly influential and consequential people. We here at Lookout are attempting to do something audacious and take the measure of those foundational people in our new series of profiles called “The Shapers.”

Who are the Shapers? They are people who have left a lasting mark on how many of the rest of us live and work today in Santa Cruz County. Obviously, some are elected officials, but others are government employees, businesspeople, nonprofit/arts leaders, entrepreneurs, academics/teachers, community activists, artists/writers and philanthropists. Many of those significant people are now retired from public life and are perhaps due for a reappraisal from the current generation. Others are still active and exerting influence in the realms of culture, business, the arts, development and public policy.

Other “Shapers” whom Lookout has identified include, Ciel CirilloBruce and Marcia McDougalTim Jackson, and Rowland Rebele. I think my profile comes fifth in the series. More to come!

As I read the column – and reviewed its evaluation of the role I have played in Santa Cruz County history – it struck me that I should probably comment about the whole idea of seeing history as having been “shaped” by “highly influential and consequential” individuals. There is no doubt that individuals, and what they do, have an important impact on what happens – and thus on the history of the times in which they lived. However, and maybe this can be seen particularly in the case of elected officials, our history is a “group project.” We shouldn’t ever forget that.

If we begin to think that what counts most is what “consequential” individuals do, we can underestimate, and actually “undermine,” our own role in “making history.” I want to say that when I look back on the history in which I have been involved (and I’m still “kicking”), I want to be remembered most for my role as an elected “representative,” and I want to be remembered as a “good” representative, of course. I think the “Shapers” review of my tenure on the Board of Supervisors should be counted as giving me a pretty good “grade.”

Our elected officials are not selected because they, individually, are supposed to figure out what to do, and then do it. Our system of “self-government” is a system of “representative” government, in which we (the people) decide what to do, and then elect people who “represent” the voters who put them into office, and who will work (we hope successfully) to achieve what the majority of the community wants to accomplish.

The way I look back on the history in which I have been involved (and it’s highlighted very well, I think, in Wallace Baine’s Lookout column), my job was to try to achieve what the people who elected me wanted to accomplish. How well I did at that, how well I was able to help the community achieve what the majority wanted to happen, is how my personal contributions should be evaluated. “Saving Lighthouse Field,” establishing a comprehensive system of “growth management,” saving farmland, setting up a system that required developers to set aside at least a small share of new residential development as “price-restricted,” so that it would always be “affordable” to a person with an average or below average income, providing resourcess for community based social programs, stopping offshore oil drilling and protecting our marine environment were not my projects. Those were community projects.

Bottom line? Who shapes our history? WE do. We do it together – at least that’s what happens if our politics is working right. It doesn’t always work right, of course, and it certainly won’t work right if we elect people who make statements like this one: “I am your justice. I am your retribution.” The person who said that doesn’t understand the first thing about democratic and representative self-government, and never should have been elected to “represent” the people, because that person doesn’t “get” the whole idea. He thinks it’s all about him!

I am very proud to have been recognized as an effective and “consequential” representative of the people of Santa Cruz County, but just remember this: When we want to think about who “shapes” our history, the answer is that WE do! We’re in this together!

So, let me end with my much-repeated admonition: If we want to accomplish anything – if we want “self-government” – we need to get involved ourselves.

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

Dateline February 26

GRAB ‘EM BY THE PROPERTY!

The Democrats, and President Biden, are growing increasingly frustrated with his portrayal in the media with their concerns about the 81-year-old’s age and his ability to execute another four years in the Oval Office. During the 2020 presidential election run-up, Donald Trump was unrelenting in his criticism that Biden was “too old” yet is unconcerned that he himself has reached that same “old” age. Reporters are quick to fixate on Biden’s verbal slips, while soft-pedaling Trump’s slips, outright lies, and non-sensical ramblings, while waiting for the rabbit to pop out of a hat. It’s show-time! Democratic strategist, Jon Reinish, says, “The more this campaign and the more this White House takes the gloves off and gets aggressive, the better off they are. There have been many instances on many tough issues where they’ve been behind the ball and have not been nearly as sharp, nearly as persuasive or nearly as aggressive as they could have been.” In light of Biden’s poor approval ratings and concerns about his ability to serve, a dramatic pushback from the president’s team against the negativity might help build up a sense of Biden’s strength, Reinish said, adding that he hopes “it’s not too late” to start such maneuvers.

In the DOJ’s investigation of Biden’s purloined classified documents case, Special Counsel Robert Hur released a tedious and lengthy summation that concluded the President would face no charges for the mishandled items from his senatorial and vice-presidential years. But Hur felt that he had to color outside the lines, devoting what he thought important by covering Biden’s struggle to remember during his questioning, which the White House immediately took issue with, especially since there were no charges. Senior adviser for the Biden campaign, TJ Ducklo, criticized the media for “gratuitous and sensationalist attacks on the President’s age” after Trump suggested he’d be fine with Russian invasions of NATO countries who failed to contribute their share to cover defense obligations. Americans deserve “a press corps who cover his candidacy, his comments, and his policy positions with the seriousness and ferocity this moment requires,” Ducklo responded.

The President held a press conference following Robert Hur’s stinging judgement that Biden was a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” to defend his age and ability at recall. He fired back with, “I’m well-meaning, and I’m an elderly man, and I know what the hell I’m doing.” But he then went on to confuse the Egyptian President as the “president of Mexico,” which let some air out of his balloon, with the verbal slip drawing even more scrutiny. Todd Belt, director of George Washington University’s graduate political management program says, “I think the president overestimates his ability to handle the press at times.” Biden’s news conferences stand at an average of 11 per year, while Trump’s averaged 22, during which he confronted and harangued reporters about releasing “fake news.” The current administration has attempted to build a press relationship, avoiding aggressive criticism of the coverage. As a side note, President Obama averaged about 20 press outings per year during his terms in office.

Esquire’s Charlie Pierce confesses that he has been willing to grant Attorney General Merrick Garland a bit of latitude, but the Robert Hur hatchet job on the president was the final straw, and he must go, he concludes. Talk radio, Fox News, and any MAGA monster will rant about Biden’s politicization of the Department of Justice, how it’s prosecuting/persecuting honest, God-fearing citizens, and making a complete mockery of the Constitution; but, the AG in his timidity and determination to be “apolitical” has failed to do the very thing he was appointed to do – pursue justice and accountability charges The Nation magazine. The former president should have been prosecuted years ago, right out of the gate following the swearing-in ceremonies in 2021, but hesitation has brought us to the current dilemmas.

Pierce believes Special Counsel Jack Smith shouldn’t have been a solution, that the Attorney General and the FBI should have been on the case the minute Garland walked into his office…a crisis is a terrible thing to waste. Pierce asks us to imagine quick actions and investigations which would have found many in DC the objects of 14th Amendment prosecution. He compares this laxity to the rapid response of the Republican administration after 9/11 to absolve George W. Bush and his lackeys of blame for ignoring the attack warnings they had received, blindly forcing the country to get behind the war footing because ‘terrorists‘ were on the loose. Charlie calls out Democrats for being “the adults in the room” while allowing Republicans to act like privileged children. “They need to express genuine outrage when the situation merits it, in contrast to the staged hissy fits Republicans do by reflex,” he contends. Further, he thinks, “It is long past time to stop giving the GOP the benefit of the doubt on anything. Don’t appeal to their better nature – they may not have one.”

As for Garland, if he steps down now, imagine the circus that would be initiated in the halls of government, with Republicans shouting “lawfare!” to amplify accusations of weaponization of the DOJ, their term for warring against political opponents using the law. Of course, the GOP would launch their own campaign to preemptively neutralize any nominee, with the press corps meekly calling any move to hold Republicans to account as ‘divisive.’ Pierce goes on, “Bending over backwards to be seen as reasonable when dealing with unreasonable people is not an effective strategy. We need to do better. A DEMOCRATIC attorney general prepared to take some heat from the press at the risk of being seen as partisan would be a nice change – and can we find someone besides a Republican to head up the FBI while we are at it?”

Marjorie Taylor Greene would gladly head up any ‘neutralization campaign,’ which she would designate as ‘eradication’ no doubt. Steve Schmidt on his ‘The Warning’ blog calls her out for using the term in her menacing statement about candidate Nikki Haley“Not only do [Republicans] support President Trump, we support his policies. And any Republican that isn’t willing to adapt these policies, we’re completely eradicating from the party. So, it’s up to Nikki Haley what she does.” Steve says, “Eradication is a word typically applied to vermin, like rats or an infestation of termites or bedbugs. Certainly, it doesn’t seem particularly tolerant of different points of view. Does it seem strange that Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to shrink the party into a smaller, purer instrument of loyalty to Donald Trump for Trump in the name of Trump? Shouldn’t there be a question asked about intention to the people who have become completely hostile to freedom of conscience, speech and expression what they might do with power? Might they seek to stifle speech and intimidate? Might they threaten retribution? Might they act in the threat? How would they act? These question is matter a great deal in this moment. Americans have a great deal of time to ponder our way of life, which is deeply attached to several core precepts. Among them, that ‘we the people’ pick our leaders, and not the other way around. Eradication. It’s an unusual choice. It seems ominous.” A quote from H.L. Mencken is certainly ominous – “As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their hearts’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

Jimmy Kimmel, on one of his shows last fall says of Trump and his gang, “The Chicken McNuggets are coming home to roost, aren’t they? The rats are jumping off the Spray-tanic. The big beautiful walls are closing in – somewhere up there, I have to believe John McCain is smiling. You know. he likes people who don’t get caught.” Kimmel couldn’t hold back after Trump’s recent $355M civil fraud ruling, saying, “It will be a refreshing to see a woman grabbing his assets for a change. I’ll tell you something. When you’re attorney general they let you do it. You don’t even ask. You just seize. You grab ’em by the property.” Immediately, Trump having nothing better to do, attacked Kimmel as a “loser.” On Truth Social he posted, “They could get a far more talented person, who would also get better ratings, for 5% of what they are paying this Loser.” Kimmel then expressed his delight that he had “caught the attention of America’s most famous tangerine. I got to say that is a hell of a way to find out you’re not going to be somebody’s running mate. He has no idea how delighted I am by something like this. I’m going to try to enjoy it, because he probably won’t be able to do this when they take away his phone in prison, so I’m going to really, like, soak it in.”

Trump and his two fraud-prince sons are appealing Judge Arthur Engoron’s decision in the New York civil fraud case, which fined the three heavily and barred them from leadership roles, with independent officials monitoring their companies. Alina Habba, the Trump attorney in the case, issued a statement, “We trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious fine and take the necessary steps to restore the public faith in New York’s legal system.” The appeal is headed for the First Judicial Department Appellate Division, where the Trump Crime Family hopes to see their sins justified, after Judge Engoron declined to delay enforcement of his decision. “You have failed to explain, much less justify, any basis for a stay. I am confident that the Appellate Division will protect your appellate rights,” Engoron responded. The Don is responsible for paying additional interest on the fine if it is upheld, and New York attorney, Letitia James, updates the amount each day on Xwitter. Ka-ching, ka-ching!

Bad news from Trump’s hometown newspaper, The Palm Beach Post…they endorsed Joe Biden in a recent editorial. They expressed to readers their grave concern about the prospect of a second Trump term, asserting that the “nation would have much to fear,” urging undecided voters to reassess events involving Trump with a fresh perspective, as they cited Newsweek’s reporting on Friday, February 23. Highlighted were the two New York cases: the civil fraud suit, and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case. The P.B. Post’s Biden endorsement brings to the fore, the extent to which the ex-president’s standing has eroded in his own Mara-Lago neighborhood…time to vacate for E. Jean Carroll’s occupancy?

Jackie Calmes in her LA Times column, pinpoints her observations of changes in Trump’s rallies, where once they consisted of “brash rowdiness” but have now dissolved into self-pity. “These aren’t rallies anymore. They’re pity-parties.” she maintains. Poor, poor, pitiful Trump. Lord, have mercy! Calmes says where once spectators showed up to hear about “a better future,” now there’s only a gaggle of Trumpers who emit “constant catcalls, boos, and their own favorite profanities.” Trump is trolling for pity, and dollars, as he spreads his gloom and doom, as he “saps the crowd’s energy.” His ramblings and verbal garbage are hard to follow, and he has become a constant embarrassment to the larger audiences he once attracted, yet the GOP holds his banner high! Pity!

If you vote for a man who said windmills cause cancer, used a Sharpie to change the track of a hurricane, asked to nuke hurricanes, autographed Bibles, saluted a North Korean general, stared at the sun twice, believed there were airplanes in the Revolutionary War, and suggested that bleach was a COVID cure, your opinion of Joe Biden’s sanity is laughably irrelevant. And remember, the same people who think Obama is a Muslim, think Trump is a Christian!

Dateline February 19

SNITCHING SWIFTIES SELLOUT SNEAKERS

The Washington Post’s Rick Reilly writes, “Are you bummed you weren’t around when the Stasi ruled? Do you wish you could’ve been one of Mao Zedong’s millions of neighborhood snitches? Maybe watch the Red Guards drag off your least favorite aunt? Not to worry, the bad old days are back – thanks to Nextdoor.com.” Rick says all you gotta do is sign up, log in and start profiling everyone on your block…Black guy on the corner with a backpack…call the cops! Girl going door-to-door selling cookies to raise money for a high school trip? Alert the snitches! Fiftyish White man driving a luxury car, doesn’t go to work? Call the IRS…and stay vigilant! Trifling Halloween candy hand-outs? Alert, alert, alert! Rick reports reading of a vegan couple complaining about the smell of their neighbor’s barbecue invading their “meat-free radius,” and asks, “Is there a kale-free radius?” He says there’s no butting-out, only butting-in, as he tells of a post about a “slow moving vehicle following the school bus every morning.” Only a newspaper carrier following the same route…can never be certain that the carrier won’t bounce the daily off of some kid’s head, but with sparsity of pages in today’s tabloids who would notice? Rick concludes that entertainment ends and lunacy begins if we don’t take notice that we live in a country with more guns than people, and pulling into the wrong driveway can put a bullet through a windshield, and the person to fear is not the guy in the hoodie but the person behind the keyboard of a computer or tablet. Douglas Adams wrote in ‘The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy,’ “In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” Now is the time to cheer up those individuals!

“Your Honor, in an effort to insure a fair trial, we move for a change of venue to the defendant’s imagination,” said Trump’s attorneys and most of the GOP. Needless to say, that hasn’t worked in any of the former president’s cases, so last week he got another shot across the bow in Judge Arthur Engoron’s 92-page decision dealing a blow to the Trump Crime Family’s business operation. New York Attorney General Letitia James brought the suit against Trump in 2022 for falsely altering his net worth on key financial statements for tax and insurance advantages. The fraudulent documents were used in securing loans and making deals, and the final decision was Engoron’s since there was no jury involved. The $354M in penalties was below what the AG had initially sought, but both Trump sons were also fined over $4M each, and former CFO Allen Weisellberg was dinged for a mil. Donald Trump will owe over a half-billion big ones with interest added to the fine, and the meter is still running at the rate of one million per week…try to change venue on that one, Donny-boy! The meter is still running on the E. Jean Carroll case with no appeal being filed, so somebody needs to start making some decisions on disposition of properties on this runaway train.

Stories abound of the cavalry coming to the rescue with a crowdfunding setup, but the reality is that Trump’s MAGA base throughout the election cycle has not pitched in an amount that would pay off more than just a fraction of these gigantic court penalties, just barely staying above the bills for payouts to those legal teams who are getting some payment. Liar Trump, being deeply in debt, likely never had the $400M in cash that he once claimed, at least for any length of time, since the money comes in and goes right out the door at month’s end. Some have speculated that he might borrow against his properties to avoid asset forfeiture, but he has no equity in them, so what bank is going to sink more money into Trump’s empire, especially in light of his current status? With no money, he can’t write checks to cover his debts; consequently, he won’t be able to put money in escrow accounts to appeal the court decisions, so seizure of assets seems to be on the table. Besides, meals in prison are pretty inexpensive, along with the free room. After the fraud verdict was out, the MAGA base actually started a GoFundMe account to bail their Golden Boy out of trouble, which led to questions of whether the GFM terms of service would permit such an endeavor. Putting that concern aside, the loyalists managed to raise $84K within 24 hours…about .01% of Trump’s court debts to date, and only 6,547+ more days to make it all go away.

But, wait! Trump probably thinks he has an ace in the hole with this one…becoming a Sneakerhead! He showed up at Philadelphia’s Sneaker Con to hawk a pair of gold, custom, Trump-branded, limited edition high-top sneakers for only $399 a pair, and it’s reported that an autographed pair went to a winning bidder for only $9000. The high-top, branded as the “Never Surrender High Top Sneaker” is part of the line which includes the white and gold athletic fit, “POTUS 45” for $199, and the red athletic “T-Red Wave,” also for $199. The Gettrumpsneakers.com website announced early on that the 1,000 pairs of “Never Surrender” kicks were sold out, with “at least 10” bearing the former prez’s autograph. A licensing agreement with 45Footwear/CIC Ventures gives the company the right to use his name, image, and likeness, with no money going to his presidential campaign. Alas, we’re probably too late to own a pair since the site claimed they were to be available for only three days with a limit to buyers of three pairs. But, they may still have 45Footwear’s Trump branded fragrances – ‘Victory 47 Cologne’ and ‘Victory 47 Perfume’, with a price tag of $99.

Trump was mostly oblivious to the boos amid the mixed and emotional reactions from the attendees when he came on stage, saying, “Wow, lot of emotion. There’s a lot of emotion in this room.” Speaking for about ten minutes, he said, “They have lines going all around the block. They’ve never seen anything like this one.” Yeah, probably in the entire history of the planet…you could check Wikipedia! Chants of “USA, USA, USA” could be heard by a small group, and Sneaker Con later faced a lot of backlash for giving the candidate a venue for his remarks. The organization addressed the controversy with a post on social media saying, “Sneaker Con’s mission is to support and promote sneaker culture through our worldwide live events and digital platforms. We are thankful and appreciative of the sneaker community, and recognize individuals who generate awareness and authentic sneaker related engagement toward our community.” And they will never find a sneakier sneakerhead than Donald J. Trump. It should be noted that CIC Ventures is the same company that made the Trump NFT trading cards, but we all know with certainty that his only successful business is selling hats to morons.

Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, raises a red flag in light of his former boss’ growing debts, saying he’s “for sale,” in his need to raise loads of cash over a short period of time. The cash-strapped ex-president would be willing to sell sensitive government information to which he had access, both before and after his term was over, according to Cohen. “He doesn’t care about America, and I say this not to be hyperbolic. I say this as fact, knowing him for as long as I’ve known him. He will sell that information to anyone, because he doesn’t care about anyone or anything other than himself,” Cohen explains. Trump’s onetime national security advisor, John Bolton, believes foreign autocrats could take advantage of him in this situation, which demonstrates “why he is not fit for office.

Trucker, Chicago Ray, is organizing his fellow-trucking buddies to start refusing loads destined for New York City in a protest over the court’s ruling handed down last week in Trump’s fraud case. He claims to have “at least” ten drivers who will join him in this action, and Trump is raising a fist toward their efforts. “Such an honor to have so many Great Patriots on the side of FREEDOM!” was posted to Truth Social media platform, along with Trump’s whine, “Joe Biden’s Unfair and Dangerous Weaponization of Law Enforcement is a serious threat to Democracy. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” Canadian truckers in 2022 organized a “People’s Convoy” when they converged on Washington, DC to voice opposition to COVID-19 mandates, but that turned out to be a bust. Early in February“God’s Army Truck Convoy/The Take Our Border Back Convoy,” began its drive though the southern states to rally in several border cities, but it was a slow starter, failing to pick up any significant numbers on the journey. The organizers claimed at least 700,000 people would attend, after the publicity on Tucker Carlson’s podcast and Alex Jone’s InfoWars, however, it was reported only about fifty cars, trucks, and RVs arrived at destination Dripping Springs, Texas. The group did manage to raise $157,000 online, with no explanation or plan for distribution. The orange-hued blonde in the back is waving his hand energetically, if you hadn’t noticed!

Trump attorney, Alina Habba, is no longer involved in the E. Jean Carroll case, having been a total disaster for her client who will bring on a new legal team to appeal his $83.3M defeat. Morning Joe Scarborough and co-host, Mika Brzesinski, discussed this change on their show, with Joe in quasi-seriousness asking, “Wonder why?” which brought forth laughter from Mika and the crew. Mika cautioned, “Try to keep a straight face,” with Joe’s counter, “No, I mean, she’s very angry. They took away her coloring books! There was a color-by-number thing on how to be a lawyer when you grow up, and the judge took them away!” The panel wondered why she was ever on the case, since Trump historically had bad lawyers who at least knew their way around a courtroom; ironically, she is still in the employ of Trump, being a voice for his reelection. She was simply a cut-out in the courtroom where The Donald basically was his own defense, proving the old adage that one who represents himself has a fool for a client.

Aldous J. Pennyfarthing says, “If you ever find yourself in legal peril, you might want to consider hiring Alina Habba as your attorney, but only if you’re on trial for dropping a house on a witch, otherwise you will be in for a rude awakening. With Trump facing loads of legal peril, Habba’s job was to go on TV to convince millions of people who are already sure he’s innocent, and the heap of criminal and civil accusations against him were all meticulously curated by a sitting president who’s nothing but a listless amalgam of advanced dementia symptoms. If somehow she had managed to score him a hard-bristled toothbrush for his weekly prison urinal cleanings, that would have been gravy.” Aldous J. adds, “Trump has exhausted every listing in the ‘law’ section of the Yellow Pages and was forced to move on to the ‘lawn and garden’ section. Hey, if anyone still uses the Yellow Pages, it’s Trump.”

On HBO’s ‘Real Time,’ host Bill Maher joked, “Taylor Swift won the Super Bowl. Swift drives MAGA Nation crazy because one thing they cannot stand is a blonde billionaire with a cult following. Trump is running around the country trying to balance his busy schedule with all the primaries and four trials going…today he had to do his makeup in the car.” Referencing the upcoming trial involving hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels, Maher quipped, “Only Trump could pay hush money to someone who was too embarrassed to talk about it to begin with.” The Don’s efforts to stall and delay his court appearances, according to Maher, is the same tactic Melania uses in the bedroom, and he criticizes Trump for sending her a valentine message in a fundraising letter to his supporters. Maher deplores this election cycle with, “This is going to be a long and grueling and mostly pointless campaign since everyone knows which of the two elderly candidates they prefer to barely tolerate…the one who can’t walk upstairs, or the one who can’t walk down ramps. That’s where we are. Can we please not make it even more tedious than it already is? I don’t want to hear any more about how somehow Joe Biden has the energy to completely destroy America, even though the can’t open a package of nuts with his teeth.”

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com
 

...

EAGAN’S SUBCONSCIOUS COMICS. View classic inner-view ideas and thoughts with Subconscious Comics a few flips down. 

EAGAN’S DEEP COVER. See Eagan’s “Deep Cover” down a few pages. As always, at TimEagan.com you will find his most recent  Deep Cover, the latest installment from the archives of Subconscious Comics, and the ever entertaining Eaganblog.

“Tap Dancing”

“When I first saw tap dancing, I immediately got it: the righteousness of being able to make so much noise with your feet!”
~Shalom Harlow

“Once you’re on stage you can’t go back, even when things go wrong people expect you to stay there and entertain them. When all else fails, you’ve got to try tap dancing.”
~Angus Young

“You’re just jealous of me because I’m a tap-dancing ballerina fairy princess veterinarian!”
~Daniel Handler

“Tap dancing all started with the old clog waltz.”
~Sammy Davis, Jr.

...

Dolphins are freaking awesome!


COLUMN COMMUNICATIONS. Subscriptions: Subscribe to the Bulletin! You’ll get a weekly email notice the instant the column goes online. (Anywhere from Monday afternoon through Thursday or sometimes as late as Friday!), and the occasional scoop. Always free and confidential. Even I don’t know who subscribes!!
Snail Mail: Bratton Online
82 Blackburn Street, Suite 216
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Direct email: Bratton@Cruzio.com
Direct phone: 831 423-2468
Cell phone: 831 212-3273
All Technical & Web details: Gunilla Leavitt @ godmoma@gmail.com
...


Posted in Weekly Articles | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *